HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuck Plan for Identification of New Discharges Sept 30 2014
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
Plan for Identification of New
Discharges
NPDES Permit NC0004774
September 30, 2014
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
REPORT VERIFICATION
i
Report Verification
PROJECT: GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
BUCK COMBINED CYCLE STATION
ASH BASIN
NPDES PERMIT NC0004774
TITLE: PLAN FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES
This document has been reviewed for accuracy and quality commensurate with the intended
application.
Prepared by:______ ________________ Date:_____________ ______
Checked by:______ ________________ Date:_____________ ______
Approved by:_____ _________________ Date:___________________
Project Manager: Brooke Ahrens, PE
Professional Engineer Seal:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
440 South Church St., Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
North Carolina Engineering Firm Number F-0116
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
Table of Contents
Page
Report Verification ......................................................................................................................... i
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... ii
List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. iii
Section 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1
Section 2 - Site Description ........................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Plant Description ................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Ash Basin Description ........................................................................................... 3
Section 3 - Site Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................. 5
3.1 Site Geologic/Soil Framework ............................................................................... 5
3.2 Site Hydrogeologic Framework ............................................................................. 5
Section 4 - Identification of New Discharges ................................................................................ 7
4.1 Purpose of Inspection ............................................................................................ 7
4.2 Seepage ................................................................................................................ 7
4.3 Area To Be Inspected for New Discharges ........................................................... 7
4.4 Inspection Procedure ............................................................................................ 7
Section 5 - References ................................................................................................................. 8
Appendices
A – Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin – Inspection for Identification of New Discharges
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
LIST OF FIGURES
iii
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – Areas To Be Inspected For Seeps
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
1
Section 1 - Introduction
The purpose of this document is to address the requirements of North Carolina General Statute
(GS)130A-309.210 (d) Identification and assessment of discharges; correction of unpermitted
discharges, as modified by North Carolina Senate Bill 729, for the Buck Combined Cycle Station
(BCCS) ash basin operated under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0004774.
The following requirements are contained in General statue 130A-309.210:
d) Identification of New Discharges. – No later than October 1, 2014, the owner of a coal
combustion residuals surface impoundment shall submit a proposed Plan for the
Identification of New Discharges to the Department for its review and approval as provided in
this subsection.
(1) The proposed Plan for the Identification of New Discharges shall include, at a
minimum, all of the following:
a. A procedure for routine inspection of the coal combustion residuals
surface impoundment to identify indicators of potential new discharges, including
toe drain outfalls, seeps, and weeps.
b. A procedure for determining whether a new discharge is actually present.
c. A procedure for notifying the Department when a new discharge is
confirmed.
d. Any other information related to the identification of new discharges required
by the Department.
(2) The Department shall approve the Plan for the Identification of New
Discharges if it determines that the Plan complies with the requirements of this
subsection and will be sufficient to protect public health, safety, and welfare; the
environment; and natural resources.
(3) No later than 30 days from the approval of the Plan for the Identification of New
Discharges, the owner shall begin implementation of the Plan in accordance with the
Plan.
The North Carolina Senate Bill 729 establishes the submittal date of this Plan for Identification
of New Discharges no later than October 1, 2014.
This bill also modified GS 130A to establish the following submittals that are related to this Plan.
GS130A-309.210(a) was modified to require:
(2) No later than December 31, 2014, the owner of a coal combustion residuals surface
impoundment shall submit a topographic map that identifies the location of all (i) outfalls
from engineered channels designed or improved for the purpose of collecting water from the
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
2
toe of the impoundment and (ii) seeps and weeps discharging from the impoundment that are
not captured by engineered channels designed or improved for the purpose of collecting
water from the toe of the impoundment to the Department. The topographic map shall comply
with all of the following:
a. Be at a scale as required by the Department.
b. Specify the latitude and longitude of each toe drain outfall, seep, and
weep.
c. Specify whether the discharge from each toe drain outfall, seep, and
weep is continuous or intermittent.
d. Provide an average flow measurement of the discharge from each toe
drain outfall, seep, and weep including a description of the method used to
measure average flow.
e. Specify whether the discharge from each toe drain outfall, seep, and
weep identified reaches the surface waters of the State. If the discharge from a
toe drain outfall, seep, or weep reaches the surface waters of the State, the map
shall specify the latitude and longitude of where the discharge reaches the
surface waters of the State.
f. Include any other information related to the topographic map required by
the Department.
The inspection procedures presented in this plan, developed to satisfy the requirements of
GS130A-309.210(d), will be used as the basis for developing the topographic map required by
GS130A-309.210(a)(2).
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 2 - SITE DESCRIPTION
3
Section 2 - Site Description
2.1 Plant Description
Duke Energy formerly operated Buck Steam Station (BSS), a coal-fired electricity generating
facility with a capacity of 256 megawatts located in Rowan County, North Carolina near the town
of Salisbury. The BCCS has been co-located with the former BSS facility, and, as of April 2013,
all of the coal-fired units at BSS have been retired. The Buck site is located northwest of
Leonard Road and is situated between several residential properties and the Yadkin River.
Leonard Road generally runs from southwest to northeast in the vicinity of the site, and is
located along a topographic divide. The topography at the site generally slopes downward from
that divide toward the Yadkin River. The entire Buck site is approximately 640 acres in area.
2.2 Ash Basin Description
The ash basin system at the Buck site was used to retain and settle ash generated from coal
combustion at the retired coal-fired units. The ash basin system consists of three cells, the
associated earthen dikes, discharge structures, and two canals. The cells are designated as
Cell 1 Additional Primary Pond (Cell 1), Cell 2 Primary Pond (Cell 2), and Cell 3 Secondary
Pond (Cell 3). The ash basin is located to the south (Cell 1) and southeast (Cells 2 and 3) of
the retired BSS Units 1 through 6 and the BCCS Plant. The original ash pond at the Buck site
began operation in 1957 and was formed by constructing a dam across a tributary of the Yadkin
River. The footprint of the original ash pond was the approximate current footprint of Cells 2
and 3. As the ash pond capacity diminished over time, the original pond was eventually divided
into two ash ponds (Cells 2 and 3) by construction of a separate dike. In 1982, additional
storage was created by construction of Cell 1, separate from the other cells, by building a new
dike upgradient from Cell 2.
Until Cell 1 was constructed, ash generated from the coal combustion process was sluiced (via
ash discharge lines) to Cell 2. Following construction of Cell 1, sluiced ash was re-routed from
Cell 2 to Cell 1. Flow from Cell 1 enters Cell 2 via the Primary Cell Discharge Tower. Flow from
Cell 2 enters Cell 3 via the Old Primary Cell Discharge Structure. Flow from Cell 3 discharges
to the Yadkin River through the Secondary Cell Discharge Tower.
The approximate pond elevations for the three ash basin cells are: Cell 1 – pond elevation 705
feet; Cell 2 – pond elevation 682 feet; Cell 3 – pond elevation 674 feet. The elevation of the
Yadkin River near the site is approximately 624 feet.
The area contained within the waste boundary for Cell 1 encompasses approximately 90 acres.
For purposes of delineating the waste boundary, Cells 2 and 3 are considered a single unit, with
the area contained within this portion of the waste boundary encompassing approximately 80.7
acres. Cell 3 was developed by increasing the elevation of the earthen dike along the Yadkin
River and constructing an intermediate dike across the ash placed in Cell 2.
The ash basin system is operated as an integral part of the site’s wastewater treatment system.
During operation of the coal-fired units, the ash basin received variable inflows from the ash
removal system and other permitted discharges. Currently, the ash basin receives variable
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 2 - SITE DESCRIPTION
4
inflows from the Buck site yard drain sump and stormwater flows, wastewater from the retired
BSS coal-fired units, and BCCS wastewater.
Effluent from the ash basin is discharged through the discharge tower, into a concrete-lined
channel, to the Yadkin River. The water surface elevation in the ash basin is controlled by the
use of stop logs.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 3 - SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
5
Section 3 - Site Geology and Hydrogeology
3.1 Site Geologic/Soil Framework
The Buck site ash basin system is located in the Charlotte terrane of the Piedmont
physiographic province (Piedmont). The following generalizations on the site hydrogeology are
taken from A Master Conceptual Model for Hydrogeological Site Characterization in the
Piedmont and Mountain Region of North Carolina (LeGrand 2004).
Piedmont bedrock primarily consists of igneous and metamorphic bedrock. The fractured
bedrock is overlain by a mantle of unconsolidated material known as regolith. The regolith
includes, where present, the soil zone, a zone of weathered, decomposed bedrock known as
saprolite, and where present, alluvium. Saprolite, the product of chemical and mechanical
weathering of the underlying bedrock, is typically composed of clay and coarser granular
material up to boulder size and may reflect the texture of the rock from which it was formed.
The weathering product of granitic rocks may be quartz-rich and sandy-textured, whereas rocks
poor in quartz and rich in feldspar and other soluble minerals form a more clayey saprolite. The
regolith serves as the principal storage reservoir for the underlying bedrock (LeGrand 2004).
3.2 Site Hydrogeologic Framework
Piedmont topography is characterized by gently rounded sloped hills and valleys. Recharge
typically occurs on upland areas and slopes while groundwater discharge is concentrated in
surface water bodies and lowland areas. LeGrand’s (1988, 2004) conceptual model of the
groundwater setting in the Piedmont incorporates the above two medium systems into an entity
that is useful for the description of groundwater conditions. That entity is the surface drainage
basin that contains a perennial stream or river (LeGrand 1988). Each basin is similar to
adjacent basins and the conditions are generally repetitive from basin to basin. Within a basin,
movement of groundwater is generally restricted to the area extending from the drainage divides
to a perennial stream or river (Slope-Aquifer System; LeGrand 1988, 2004). Rarely does
groundwater move beneath a perennial stream or river to another more distant stream (LeGrand
2004).
Therefore, in most cases in the Piedmont, the groundwater system is a two-medium system
(LeGrand 1988) restricted to the local drainage basin. The groundwater occurs in a system
composed of two interconnected layers: residuum/saprolite and weathered rock overlying
fractured crystalline rock separated by the transition zone. Typically, the residuum/saprolite is
partly saturated and the water table fluctuates within it. Water movement is generally through
the fractured bedrock. The near-surface fractured crystalline rocks can form extensive aquifers.
The character of such aquifers results from the combined effects of the rock type, fracture
system, topography, and weathering. Topography exerts an influence on both weathering and
the opening of fractures while the weathering of the crystalline rock modifies both transmissive
and storage characteristics.
The aquifer system in the Piedmont typically exists in an unconfined or semi-confined condition
in the bedrock zone. Under natural conditions, the general direction of groundwater flow can be
approximated from the surface topography. Groundwater moves both vertically down through
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 3 - SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
6
the regolith and parallel to the bedrock surface to areas where groundwater discharges as
seepage into streams, lakes, or other surface water bodies.
The Buck site is located on the north side of Leonard Road (Figure 2). This road runs generally
southwest to northeast and is located along a local topographic divide. The topography at the
site generally slopes downward from that divide northward to the Yadkin River. Based on the
slope-aquifer system, groundwater at the site is expected to flow downward from this
topographic divide, to the ash basins, and discharge into the Yadkin River.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 4 - IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES
7
Section 4 - Identification of New Discharges
4.1 Purpose of Inspection
The purpose of the inspection is to identify new discharges and indicators of potential new
discharges, including toe drain outfalls, seeps, and weeps associated with the coal combustion
residuals surface impoundment (ash basin).
4.2 Seepage
Seepage is considered to be the movement of wastewater from the ash basin through the ash
basin embankment, the embankment foundation, the embankment abutments, or through
residual material in areas adjacent to the ash basin. A seep is defined in this document as an
expression of seepage at the ground surface. A weep is understood to have the same meaning
as a seep.
Indicators of seepage include areas where water is observed on the ground surface and/or
where vegetation suggests the presence of seepage. Seepage can emerge anywhere on the
downstream face, beyond the toe, or on the downstream abutments at elevations below normal
pool. Seepage may vary in appearance from a "soft," wet area to a flowing "spring." Seepage
may show up first as only an area where the vegetation is lusher and darker green than
surrounding vegetation. Cattails, reeds, mosses, and other marsh vegetation often become
established in a seepage area.1 However, in many instances, indicators of seeps do not
necessarily indicate the presence of seeps.
4.3 Area To Be Inspected for New Discharges
The areas to be inspected for new discharges and indicators of potential new discharges are the
areas of the site where water contained in the ash basin might infiltrate into the underlying
residual material and be expressed as seepage. This would include the earthen embankment
which impounds the ash basin and certain adjacent areas.
The extent of the areas to be inspected was determined based on the generalized LeGrand
conceptual model the concept of the slope-aquifer system, and the site topography. In this
generalization, flow of water from the ash basin would be expected to be located within the
slope-aquifer compartment and to be below the full pond elevation of the ash basin. The areas
to be inspected are shown on Figure 2.
4.4 Inspection Procedure
The inspection procedure for identification of new discharges and indicators of potential new
discharges associated with the Buck ash basin system is provided in Appendix A. In addition to
the specific requirements for the inspection, Appendix A also provides the general requirements,
the frequency of inspections, documentation requirements, and provides a decision flow chart
for determining if the potential new discharge is associated with the ash basin.
1 Dam Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection Manual, North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Division, 1985 (Revised 2007).
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | Plan for Identification of New Discharges
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
SECTION 5 - REFERENCES
8
Section 5 - References
LaGrand, H.E. 1988. Region 21, Piedmont and Blue Ridge, p.201-208, in Black, W.,
Rosenhein, J.S., and Seaber, P.R., eds., Hydrogeology: Geological Society of America,
The Geology of North America, v. O-2, Boulder, Colorado, 524p.
LeGrand, Harry, Sr. 2004. A Master Conceptual Model for Hydrogeological Site
Characterization in the Piedmont and Mountain Region of North Carolina, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Figures
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
A
BUCK COMBINED
CYCLE STATION ASH
BASIN INSPECTION
FOR IDENTIFICATION
OF NEW DISCHARGES
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
INSPECTION FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES
1
1. Purpose of Inspection
The purpose of the inspection is to identify new discharges and indicators of potential new discharges,
including toe drain outfalls, seeps, and weeps that arise after the initial submittal of maps required by
North Carolina General Statute 130A‐309.210(a)(2)(ii). Seepage is considered to be the movement of
wastewater from the ash basin through the ash basin embankment, the embankment foundation, the
embankment abutments, or through residual material in areas adjacent to the ash basin. Therefore, a
seep is defined in this document as an expression of seepage at the ground surface. A weep is
understood to have the same meaning as a seep. If new discharges or indicators of potential new
discharges are identified, the decision flow chart (see Figure A‐1) will be used to determine if the
potential new discharge is from the ash basin and if notification to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR) is required.
2. General Inspection Requirements
2.1. Inspections are to be performed on areas that are below the ash basin full pond elevation and
within the area shown on Figure A‐2. The purpose of the inspection is to identify new
discharges and indicators of potential new discharges, including toe drain outfalls, seeps, and
weeps associated with the coal combustion residuals surface impoundment (ash basin).
2.2. If required, a larger scale figure showing the locations of outfalls from engineered channels will
be developed. If a separate figure showing outfalls from engineered channels is not developed,
Figure A‐2 will be revised to show these features.
2.3. Inspections of areas on or adjacent to the ash basin embankments should be performed within
two months after mowing, if possible.
2.4. Inspections should not be performed if the following precipitation amounts have occurred in
the respective time period preceding the planned inspection:
2.4.1. Precipitation of 0.1 inches or greater within 72 hours or
2.4.2. Precipitation of 0.5 inches or greater within 96 hours
2.5. Record the most recent ash basin water surface elevation.
2.6. Review previous Inspection for Identification of New Discharge report(s) prior to performing
inspection.
2.7. Review the most recent previous dam inspections.
2.8. Conduct an interview with the Site Environmental Coordinator prior to performing inspection
to inquire about possible changes to site conditions, such as pond elevations, operations,
additions or removal of wastewater discharges to the ash basin, changes to site surface water
drainage, etc.
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
INSPECTION FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES
2
3. Frequency of Inspections
Inspections will be performed on a semi‐annual basis during the following months: April to May and
October to November.
4. Qualifications
The inspections shall be performed under the direction of a qualified Professional Engineer or
Professional Geologist.
5. Documentation of Inspection
The inspection shall be documented by the individual performing the inspection. The report should
contain observations and descriptions of the seeps observed, changes in observations compared to
previous inspections, estimates of flows quantities, and photographs of seeps and outfalls of engineered
channels designed or improved for collecting water from the impoundment. Photographs are to be
numbered and captioned.
6. Initial Inspection
An initial inspection should be performed to identify features and document baseline conditions
including location, extent (i.e., dimensions of affected area), and flow. Seep locations should be
recorded using a Global Positioning System (GPS) device. Photographs should be taken from vantage
points that can be replicated during subsequent semi‐annual inspections.
7. Inspection For New Seeps at Outfalls From Engineered Channels
Inspect the outfalls from engineered channels designed and/or improved (such as through the
placement of rip‐rap) associated with the ash basin dikes to identify new seeps or indicators of new
seeps.
7.1. Inspect all outfalls from engineered channels designed and/or improved (such as through the
placement of rip‐rap)
7.2. Document the condition of the outfall of the engineered channel with photographs.
Photographs are to be taken from similar direction and scale as photographs taken during the
initial inspection.
7.3. Observe outfall for seepage and for indicators of seeps.
7.4. Compare current seepage location, extent, and flow to seepage photographs and descriptions
from previous inspections.
7.5. Record flow rate if measureable.
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
INSPECTION FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES
3
9. Inspection For New Seeps Not Captured by Engineered Channels
Inspect areas below the ash basin full pond elevation and within the slope‐aquifer system shown on
Figure A‐2 to identify new seeps or indicators of new seeps. Inspect topographic drainage features that
potentially could contain new seeps that potentially discharge from the ash basin.
9.1. Previously Identified Seeps
a) Inspect previously identified seep locations. Document the condition of the seeps with a
photograph. Photographs are to be taken from similar direction and at a similar scale as the
photograph documenting original photograph of seep. Describe the approximate
dimensions and flow conditions of the seep.
b) If flow measurement device is installed at the outfall, record flow.
c) Observe seep to determine if changes to location, extent, or flows are present. Document
changes to location, extent, and/or flow amount or pattern.
9.2. New Seep or Indicators of Seep
a) Mark the location of new seep or indicators of seep using a GPS device.
b) Document the condition of the seeps or indicators of seeps with a photograph.
c) Describe the approximate dimensions and flow conditions of the seep.
d) Map the location of new seep or indicator of seep using GPS coordinate points collected
during the site visit.
e) If seep or indicator of seep was not caused by changes in surface water drainage and if the
location is below the ash basin pond elevation, utilize the decision flow chart to determine if
the seep represents a discharge from the ash basin and if notification to DWR is required.
10. Update Maps Identifying Seeps
If new seeps are identified during the inspection, Figure A‐2 shall be updated to show the location of the
new seeps. All seeps located below the ash basin full pond elevation and within the slope‐aquifer
system shown are to be shown on Figure A‐2.
11. Decision Flow Chart
The decision flow chart developed to determine whether a new seep discharges from the ash basin is
found on Figure A‐1.
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin
INSPECTION FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES
4
12. Procedure for Notifying NCDENR DWR If New Discharge Is Confirmed
If it is determined that a newly identified seep is present, Duke Energy will notify the DWR Regional
Office by mail within 14 days after the determination.
Buck Combined Cycle Station Ash Basin INSPECTION FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DISCHARGES 5 Notes: 1. If no new seeps are identified, inspection will be documented however no notification to NCDENR DWR is required. 2. If new seeps are identified that do not represent discharge from the ash basin during the same inspection that identifies new seeps that do represent a discharge from the ash basin, a single report will be submitted to NCDENR DWR.