20180558 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization_20180419

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B.0233 (8)(b),.0243 (8)(b),.0250 (11)(b),.0259 (8)(b),.0267 (11)(c),.0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Project Information
1a. Name of project:
City of Washington - Cherry Run Pump Station Bank Stabilization Project
1b. County:
Beaufort
1c. Nearest municipality:
City of Washington
1d. Subdivision name:
N/A
1e. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties?
If yes, answer 1f below.
® Yes ❑ No
1f. Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Owner Information
2a. Name on Recorded Deed:
City of Washington
2b. Deed Book and Page No.
DB 0813 P 00673
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the
recorded map that indicates
when the lot was create
2d. Responsible Party(;
for Corporations):
2e. Street address:
102 E. Second Street
2f. City, state, zip:
Washington, NC 27889
'CU 18
2g. Telephone no.:
252-975-9302
2h. Fax no.:
Ar .
2i. Email address:
[e-mail]
/N'G
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Consultant
3b. Name:
Brian T. O'Kane, P.E.
3c. Business name
if applicable):
Ark Consulting Group, PLLC
3d. Street address:
2755-B Charles Blvd.
3e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27858
3f. Telephone no.:
252-565-1026
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
4.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Bryan C. Fagundus, P.E.
4b. Business name
if applicable):
Ark Consulting Group, PLLC
4c. Street address:
2755-B Charles Blvd.
4d. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27858
4e. Telephone no.:
252-565-1024
4f. Fax no.:
4g. Email address:
[e-mail]
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 4

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 5676-08-7058
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.570428 Longitude: -77.080477
1 c. Property size: 0.14 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Cherry Run
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw, NSW
2c. River basin: Tar -Pamlico
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
The site is currentIV utilized as a CitV of Washington Pump Station.
3b. Attach an 8 Y2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location
of the site
3c. Attach an 8 Y x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site
3d. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
87 feet
3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project includes installing rip rap shoreline stabilization between the existing City of
Washington Pump Station and Cherry Run along the existing embankment.
3f. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project includes installing rip rap shoreline stabilization between the existing City of
Washington Pump Station and Cherry Run along the existing embankment. Silt fence will be installed along
the toe of the existing slope to protect the stream from sedimentation. Hydraulic excavators will be used to
install the rip rap stabilization and will be limited in movement to the area within the proposed limits of
disturbance. All disturbed areas within the riparian buffer will be stabilized prior to the removal of erosion
control measures.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
Comments:
property/ project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/ Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach
documentation.
5.
Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
for this promect(including all priorphases) in thepast?
5b. If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 4

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1. Buffer Impacts
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques. The limits of disturbance are identified to confine the impacts to those required to stabilize the
embankment.
2. Buffer Mitigation
1a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ® Tar -Pamlico
❑ Randleman ❑ Jordan
❑ Catawba
❑ Goose Creek
1 b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
Reason for
impact
Type of impact
(exempt, allowable,
allowable w/
mitigation)
Stream name
Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1
impact
(sq ft)
Zone 2
impact
(sq ft)
B1 ® P ❑ T
Slope
Allowable
Cherry rY Run
❑Yes ®No
928
345
B2 ❑P El
El Yes No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B6 El ❑T
El Yes El No
Total buffer impacts
1c. Comments: Buffer impacts within 15 feet of normal water level included with CAMA General Permit for
shoreline stabilization. (Refer to attached document 2018-02-27 - CAMA General Permit)
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The limits of disturbance are identified to confine the impacts to those required to stabilize the
embankment.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques. The limits of disturbance are identified to confine the impacts to those required to stabilize the
embankment.
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet (square feet
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC DMS ❑ Yes ❑ No
proposed?
2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC DMS.
2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
2f. Comments:
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 3 of 4

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
❑ Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act NEPA/SEPA ?
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public federal/state land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act NEPA/SEPA ?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ❑ No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated
❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Bryan C. Faeundus, P.E. 04/18/18
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name 'ApI(Jcant/Agenh Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent by
First Class Mail via the US Postal Service:
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail via
the US Postal Service
For government transportation projects sent by
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by delivery service
(UPS, FedEx, etc.):
Karen Higgins Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch OR NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 4 of 4

• 1
s w 813PAGE6M
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
THIS DEED. Made as of the J7 day of 1982, from Mason
Lumber Company, Incorporated, a North Carolina corpo ation, hereinafter designated
SELLER, to City of Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina,
hereinafter designated BUYER;
WITNESSETH:
That in consideration of the properties being conveyed to SELLER from BUYER,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SELLER has sold and does hereby convey
unto BUYER certain tracts or parcels of land and a certain right -of -waxy located in
"Beaufort County, North Carolina, and more.particularly described as follows:
FIRST TRACT: BEGINNING at a point which may be located as follows:
gee n_a —fie point where the easterly edge of Tranters Creek inter-
sects the northerly edge of the right-of-way of Clark's Neck Road
(State Road 1403) and run thence with the northerly edge of the
right-of-way of Clark's Neck Road S 810 57' E 60.28 feet to an iron
ppipe, the point of beginning. running thence from said point of
beginnin?, so located, with the northerly edge of the right-of-way
of Clark s Neck Road S 64" 10' E 26 feet; thence with the line of the
land being retained by SELLER N 0" 27' W 49.79 feet; thence with the
line of BUYER S 30" 521 W 44.85 feet to the point of beginning.
SECOND TRACT: BEGINNING at an iron pipe where the westerly edge of
to rig o1r-way.of U. S. Highway 264 intersects the southerly edge
of Cherry's Run and running thence with the westerly edge of the right-
of-way of U. S. Highway 264 S 27" 46' 00" E 67.66 feet to an iron pipe;
thence S 62° 14' 00" W 55 feet to an iron pipe; thence N 27" 46' 00" W
95.43 feet to an iron pipe in the southerly edggee of Cherry's Run; thence
�- with the southerly edge of Cherry's Run N 770 21' 09" E-28.49 feet`and
S 810 161 43" E 34.20 feet to the point of beginning.
RIGHT-OF-WAY: BEGINNING at a point which may be located as follows:
n a an iron pipe where the westerly edge of the right-of-way of
U. S. Highway 264 intersects the southerly edge of Cherry's Run and
running thence with the westerly edge of the right-of-way of U. S.
Highway 264 S 27" 46' 00' E 67.66 feet to an iron pipe, running thence
S 620 14' 00" W 8.18 feet to the point of beginning; running thence
from said beginning point, so located, S 27" 46' 00" E 12.40 feet;
thence S 50" 16' 00" E 21.38 feet to the westerly edge of the right-of-
way of U. S. Highway 264; thence with the westerly edge of the right-
of-way of U. S. Highway 264 S 27" 46' 00" E 129.47 feet; thence S 62"
141 00" W 20 feet; thence N 270 461 00" N 97.50 feet; thence N 500 16'
00' W 47.50 feet; thence N 27" 46' 00" W 20.24 feet to the southerly
line of the above4ciscribed Second Tract; thence with the southerly .
line of the said Second Tract N 62" 14' 00" E 30 feet to the point of
beginning.
"The above-described right-of-way is granted to BUYER in order that BUYER
may use the same for the construction, operation and maintenance of water
and sewer facilities. SELLER may use the land upon which the right-of-
way is granted but its uses must not be inconsistent with the uses of,-
BUYER and the right of BUYER to immediate access to the above-described
right-of-way at all times.
e srnT1 of Real, Estate =
�> �0R W Tax
PREPARED BY McMULLAN 8 KNOTT

UNITED STATES WASHINGTON QUADRANGLE
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NORTH CAROLINA 10,
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) �
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SE/4 CHGCGWINn'Y IT QUADRANGLE
ayer
Ch .• •. .> -� —
�`• \\vim/ � \ �// • o - •
o
© � M .l�I /... -.R'L ` • � \ . 140 • O ��\• • . / `
Ydµ- - ••. G +.'= itlt<._ .�. •\� \ V •
IGN
WASHINGTON, N. C.
L, 0 500 1000 2000
1412 MTl3 1.12'
SE/4 CHOCOWINITY 15' QUADRANGLE
21 MILS i =1Feet 35077 -E3 -TF -024
1:12000
1951
PHOTOREVISED 1983
UTM GRID AND1983 MAGNETIC NORTH DMA 5555 11 SE -SERIES V842
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
Project Mgr.: BTO Project No.: 17038 ARK NC License: P-1199 SITE LOCATION PLAN EXHIBIT
�
Drawn By: KLG Scale: /SBCity of Washington
901( 2017 Drainage Improvements & Bank Stabilization A 1
Checked By: BTO Date: 01-23-18 Engineers & Planners Cherry Run Pump Station
2755-B Charles Blvd. I Greenville, NC 27858 Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina

USDA United States
Department of
_ Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Beaufort County,
North Carolina
November 29, 2017

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
In
Preface.................................................................................................................... 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Beaufort County, North Carolina.....................................................................13
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes...............................13
Me—Muckalee loam, frequently flooded.....................................................14
Sb—Seabrook loamy sand..........................................................................15
StA—State sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes............................................16
References............................................................................................................18
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
2

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

ar ar
`9
z z
Y
E
7) NC W
393820o 3M M0 393KM 33= Mm 333B" lr a
k y
77°f5TW

Custom Soil Resource Report
10
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOQ
jo
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
L 1
Area of Interest (AOI)
�
Ston Spot
y
124,000.
Bolls
Soil Map Unit Polygons
t
Very Stony Spot
Warning: P may in Soil Ma not be valid at this scale.
Y
ter
Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Soil Map Unit Points
p,
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
9 PP 9 Y
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Special
Point Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
V
Blowout
Water Features
scale.
Streams and Canals
®
Borrow Pit
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
X
clay Spot
+44
Rails
measurements.
C
Closed Depression
eu
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
1/
r!h
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
Landfill
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow
Background
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Marsh or swamp
.
Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Mine or Quarry
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
®
Miscellaneous Water
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
®
Perennial Water
of the version date(s) listed below.
Qg
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Beaufort County, North Carolina
.+.
Saline Spot
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 26, 2017
Sandy Spot
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
g.
Severely Eroded Spot
1:50,000 or larger.
®
Sinkhole
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 13, 2015 --Feb 1,
Slide or Slip
2017
Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
11
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
4.4
23.5%
Me
Muckalee loam, frequently
flooded
8.7
46.5%
Sb
Seabrook loamy sand
5.2
27.8%
StA
State sandy loam, 0 to 3
percent slopes
0.4
2.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
18.7
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Beaufort County, North Carolina
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r20
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period. 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Altavista and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altavista
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
BE - 12 to 15 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 15 to 35 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 35 to 42 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 42 to 80 inches: coarse sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Tomotley, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, flats on marine terraces
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Me—Muckalee loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r3j
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Mucka/ee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Muckalee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 24 inches: loam
Cg - 24 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Sb—Seabrook loamy sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r45
Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period. 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Seabrook and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Seabrook
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
C - 8 to 81 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dragston, drained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: No
Nimmo, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Leon
Percent of map unit. 1 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
StA—State sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r47
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period. 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
State and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of State
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 18 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 18 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 44 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
W.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
17

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres l 42p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres 142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/deta il/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2 054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres,usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_052290.pdf
19

'CAMA ! O DREDGE � FILL
No 70673
EN 0 PERMIT Previous permit # A QB nC °
ew Modification OComplete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC Q7 j I o O
GZRulas attadrod.
Applicant Name Tl/E��kjhM" A ,� Project Location: County 13PAA.1/ cA,'(- Cp -
AddressT 0 &j x 1 Q 4%% _ Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) p � ut 9 4 Jw1_2Vi
City &� 4 cJ State } 1 L ZIP � G �Z�'a ' z to 1J ^'t r t511--
Phone # [phone]b E -Mail Subdivision
Authorized Agent
Affected O CW O EW X1�7
A ❑ ES 11PTS
AEC(S): O OEA O HHF ❑ IH ❑ UIRA O N/A
O PWS:
ORW: yes rn-o--D PNA yes
City ZIP -2-)a4%!7
Phone # ( ) River Bast n_J'j42 t'APA -% 4O
Adj. Wtr. Sod yy ) man. /.ung)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body &kAen
Type of Project/ Activi } �ec SZ--t,r_7
' AXX 01 L.%zr°c'T7_Cyt-3ll f
(Scale:
Pier (dodo) length
Fix
Fi
Gro
Bul
Basi
Boat
Odle
S
SAV:
Mo
P
W'
edPhtform(s)
Fkladrlg Platform
nger
Grob
kh
Basin
Boathouse/
Beach
horeline
ratorium:
hotas
arver
'^
TI
!— � - � �'.
s
()
pler(s)
t✓
! } !
.-1 _ I. i t �'i n
1
I
i
length
number
ftiRi ��{en�th f
avg distance offshore
I ;
I NIL
+—;-- - — — �.
.i
max distance offshore s
I
_
cubic yards_
ramp
I
I i -'
j
- ' I
i
i
r i
Boadit
i
�-
f
L
I_ I l
i
Bulldozing
I
Length
of su s no
n/a yes ®
yes no
Attached: Yes(- no
_
L I
! -� -� — I
-4-
-
1
A building permit maybe required by: (fIT''1 Ofi I�VA�rj�--o�l ASee note on back regarding River Basin rules.
( Note Local Planning jurisdiction) 1
Notes/ Special ConditionstitJ/ Sibx �✓` 'Q Na y 'i'l�1_{ t. '> > 1�} 2 ))p fl -V
t%t !awl fA tJ'1
/;gent or Alicante
Signature 'r* Please read compliance statement on back of permit "
00
Application Fee(s) Check #
� �.� 2�►� -- Ju �t Zit$
Issuing Date Expiration Date

X- 1
Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s).
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify thatthis project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Resources. Contact the Division of Water Resources at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the
Wilmington Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on howto comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ I -888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone] .
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -
North of New River Inlet- and Pamlico
Counties)
Elizabeth Cid District
401 S. Griffin St.
Ste. 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
httpV/portal.ncdenr.org/web/Cm/dcm-home
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-W I
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow - South of New River Inlet -
and Pender Counties)
Revised 7/06/17

a�
AC 6�.32.68
US HWY 264
100' PUBLIC R/W — 69' B/F
• °f /
e e °
• d
'e ��° ... °, a • ° e • d e deo` n�P
•. • e.° _ - b - ° .'`9' •° VISIBZE EWE OF CONCRE
•
'.d d °. A. a .� .. ' °
e a EXACT LOCATIONe X�bT lyETER
A .d •
OWED' • /
4.
• ;O. ° '.d a .• e ° ° — d •.e..•---
_ ° d 4. e • , ° d .. ° e e ®0.93 a ° d. ®4.20 's0
e e °. '° °. dd _ °CANE; WA(•K° • _ e °, • :d. 'Od .. °, : • 1.89 / 8 d
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS
PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACT (ZONE 1) B1 - 928 S.F.
(SLOPE STABILIZATION)
PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACT (ZONE 2) � B1 - 345 S.F.
(SLOPE STABILIZATION)
—----�---- e — •° •--ems—--d--a ----- • n .e �— SIGN i
— — —'T_ —� t �- 7 — - •.80®10.50
ccwc. CUT/REMOVE NATIVE MATERIAL AS e 'r. •a ° /-- ti I f
Lr ---
EOG I
WATER REQUIRED TO INSTALL RIP -RAP SUCH THAT /. - \ for WASHNGTOIV
TOP OF RIP -RAP ELEVATION IS ESTABLISHED 397 4 . CONI. '� BENCHMARK CITY NMIT
BELOW NATURAL GROUND ELEVATION ) / 9 COTTON SPINDLE
PROTECT EXISTING 0.29 INSIDE PUMP STATION SITE FENCE. IN PIP
UTILITY(S) (TYPICAL)_/ EL. = 10.51 %
R/W , S 27' 46' C70" E 67.69 s.ac '� s
—COMM— — — —COMM— —
— —COMM 1COMM— —
—COMM
O/H FIBER OPTIC LINE)
�J
�o
- CLASS II RIP -RAP
36" DEEP WITH
UNDERLINER (TYP.)
SF
210L GUY W/RE �-
FO
L010.25
DEEP WITH1,l1 ��e�e�/�OIII, �.08.16
• X91 �!�®I'I.II'rI�E
• �� A��iG0v�2G
I������li•19!!1!��0�9�I11
(3001 co,
01 MONOMM�
•
-• 457;95:.. ...
-- -- GRADE / COMPACT CORNER TO LINK t�ivcE.
GRVL SUBGRADE ELEVATION PRIOR GRVL
7.30 TO REINSTALLATION OF FENCE 8_U, ��° S 27' 46' 00" t'
INSTALL 4' DEPTH WASHED #57 O
STONEWM41N FENCEp.LIMITS 10' GRAVEL OR(l/E
\ AFTER BANKSTABILIZATI.ON-
x WORK HAS,BEEN PERFORMED
U- �— 796:` - /-
2p,N- — — — -99 / x�
46 q.Ft $:
O I BRICK I IB. d7 Ac. 7. 9
V �O oI BUILDING 4 ®8 ted p
���
1 :. CONC.7 7. 46; Q01' W
sem s.r5 20. ¢
11.4'
Idi7,so J7.70".14- - - - - 01 '. (° I•,
I�
GENERA MR I
k . /I-FRAM1- — — �— 9.14 13
ELECT. �Y
GRVL ;A I OEMI PAN
PLATFORM
_ J jl.NK
78 — — —X-
07.6 5. — —
GRVL
®6.47 8.0 07.0
;F SF —r/ SF --T7aT— SF SF
EIP
0.95 N 27' 46' 00- W 95.43"
LIMITS OF
L" DISTURBANCE
(0.16 ACRES) -
/
07.04 )
�\
•4����M�u���U
[�•� •�� • I�t•Iiti��ii�'ri1i
UTILIZE EXISTING GRAVEL
�.�t.t'ilii�i�i• !� t ..•.�rl
DRIVE
AS CONSTRUCTION
S/S
MIH
Q
10' 0 5' 10'
SCALE 1 inch= 10 ft
'IlAD NSULTING Green Charles Blvd
GR UP, LLC
Greenville, NC 27858
ENGINEERS B PLANNERS 252.558.0888
www.arkconsuItinggroup.com NC License: P-1199
BUFFER IMPACT EXHIBIT
CHERRY RUN PUMP STATION
BANK STABILIZATION
HIGHWAY 264
CITY OF WASHINGTON, BEAUFORT COUNTY, NC
SCALEDATE SHEET
1" = 10' 04-18-2018 1 of 1

Energy. Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
City of Washington
Attn: Mr. Bobby E. Roberson
102 East Second Street
Washington, NC 27889
Dear Mr. Roberson:
ROY COOPER
Go vernor
MICHAEL REGAN
Secreian
TOBY VINSON
lnierim 1)lrejuar
March 7, 2018
Subject: Stormwater Permit Exemption
Stormwater Project No. SW7180202
2017 Drainage Improvements
Beaufort County
On February 2, 2018, the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and
Land Resources received a copy of your SECP for the subject project. The proposed project involves
Drainage Improvements and Bank Stabilization near Hodges Road and the Cherry Run Pump Station In
the City of Washington, NC. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project,
as proposed, consists of activities that will not pose surface water quallty threats from stormwater
runoff. The Director has determined that projects that are reviewed and approved by the Division as
not posing water quality threats from stormwater runoff should not be subject to the stormwater.
management permitting requirements of 15A NCAC 21-1.1000. For this reason, we are informing you by
way of this letter that the current project will not require a State Stormwater management permit.
The stormwater rules require the Division to permit the common plan of development,
therefore, any future development on the property, regardless of whether a SEC plan or CAMA Major
permit is also required, will require a Stormwater Management Permit application and permit issuance
from the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources prior to any construction. Any construction on
the subject site, prior to receipt of the required permit, will constitute a violation of 15A NCAC 21-1.1000
and may result in appropriate enforcement actions by this Office.
Please keep in mind that this determination does not affect your legal obligation to obtain other
permits and approvals, which may be required by Federal, State, or local government agencies, rule or
law. If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact
this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Bill Moore
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
cc: 'Ark Consulting Group, PLLC, 2755-B, Charles Blvd, Greenville, NC 27858
Washington Regional Office
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Lend Resources
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27999
Phone: [phone] / Fa)c 252-946-3716