20130893 Ver 2_401 Application_20180318

ATk
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins DATE:
NCDWQ - 401 Wetlands Unit REF:
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
March 2 20 PA
ID,A G Lee Oil Company - 17
Water Quality Certification
(401 Wetlands Permit - NCDWQ)
Five (5) copies of the following: Wetlands Pre -Construction Notification Form, Wetlands Impact Narrative,
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank- Payment Credit Receipt dated 9/15/16; Wetlands Impact Maps
(Sheets 1 & 2 of 2)
DELIVERY VIA:
0 Regular Mail ❑ Hand
❑ UPS Overnight ❑ UPS Ground
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
0 For Approval ❑ As Requested
❑ For Your Use ❑ For Bids Due
❑ Other
COMMENTS:
❑ Federal Express
❑ Other
❑ For Review and Comment
Karen, we are repermitting the wetlands impact as directed by Rachel Capito with the USACE. The impact mitigation
has been paid for and our client is waiting for his tenant's lease to expire before constructing the drainage and impacts.
Jonathan L. McDaniel, P.E.
Vice President
Copies To: Rachel Capito - USACE (email LOT only)
JLM/jhs CF (P), LAM, AGM
(if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once)
Secretary.0.JLM. LOT. Higgins. AGLeeOi1. WaterQual ityCert.3.2.18
306 New Bridge Street I P.O. Box 976 I Jacksonville, NC 28541-0976 I [phone] I Fax [phone]
Firm License Number F-0108 I www.parkerengineeringandsurveying.com

\0
r6t WA ZT
AT C19
1 1 > y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes Q No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes Q No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
Yes ❑ No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Q No
2.
Project Information Cl
2a.
Name of project:
N/A
2b.
County:
Onslow
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information qR
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
A. G. Lee Oil Company, Inc. p
Deed Book 813, Page 226 F S
Albert G. Lee, President
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
110 Roxy Dr.
3e.
City, state, zip:
Selma, NC 27576
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jonathan L. McDaniel, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Parker & Associates, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
306 New Bridge Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Jacksonville, NC 28540
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Tax ID's 345-1.2 and 345-1.7
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.786501 Longitude: -77.378636
1 c.
Property size:
1.48 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Northeast Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
White Oak
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is developed with an existing gas station, and adjacent to other commercial properties.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.24
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 206
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See Wetlands Impact Narrative
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Wetlands Impact Narrative
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary 0 Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Corey Novak
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: Land Management Group, Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
1/25/10, Action ID: SAW -2009-02255, Jurisdiction Determination Attached (Map also signed 1/25/10)
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A portion of the wetlands are impacted in Permit No. 2005-9988695 by the NCDOT for the Piney Green Rd Expansion (see Sites 9 & 10)
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The impacts by the NCDOT and the property owner are separate.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWO (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.09
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.09
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Northeast Creek
INT
Corps
6
167
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
_
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
_
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
167
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary T
01 - Choose one Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments.-
omments:5h.
5h.Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
[] Neuse 0 Tar -Pamlico Catawba ❑ Randleman 0 Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Wetlands Impact Narrative
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The 0.09 AC fill area for parking areas will utilize appropriate erosion control measures and be scheduled accordingly to provide minimal impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ Q Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
0 Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Riparian wetland
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 0.09 acres
Quantity: 167 LF
Quantity:
SeeWetlands ImpactNarrative
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes Q No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the
A City of Jacksonville stormwater permit will be required at the time of future expansion.
plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑X Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
0 Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs applyORW
(check all that apply):
HSession Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the project will be collected in the gravity sewer system that is ultimately treated at the treatment facility owned by the City of
Jacksonville.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes Q No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS endangered species in Onslow County, NC
NC Natural Heritage Program - Heritage Data, Database Search and Virtual Workroom
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA South Atlantic Management Council's Internet Map Server
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office GIS Mapping Application
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA CPN 370178 4388J (City of Jacksonville)
Albert G. Lee
r
�`?—/b
AppliAqV�VS'geture
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid onlydfan authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

A. G. LEE OIL COMPANY, INC.
Wetlands Impact Narrative
Project Description (B. 3d and 3e)
Wetlands and stream impacts are proposed at the southwest corner of Piney Green Road and US
Highway 17 in Jacksonville. This corner consists of two parcels owned by the A.G. Lee Oil Company
with an existing BP Service Station (Kangaroo Express). There are two wetland areas located between
the existing gas station site and US Highway 17, and already have permitted impacts by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT), see permit No. SAW -2005-9988695. The DOT proposes
to fill one of the areas completely, and excavate approximately half of the other area to accommodate
their road drainage from the Piney Green Road Expansion Project.
The property owner is planning to redevelop the site, and will need to fill/impact the remaining
section of wetlands. The project will include piping the existing ditch (RPW) by extending 30" RCP
from the end of the DOT's pipe towards the back of the property. The pipe will outlet in the existing
centerline of the RPW ditch and have a rip rap apron to slow outlet velocities. The remaining area over
the pipe will be filled with select material and paved over for redevelopment of the site. Another existing
ditch that combines with the DOT's drainage will be routed around the future development (outside
parking), and tie into the proposed rip rap apron at the back of the property. Typical grading and
excavation equipment will be used to complete the construction of this project.
Justification (D. la)
This need is caused only and totally by the North Carolina Department of Transportation taking
of additional land for widening the right-of-way of Piney Green Road.
While the widening of Piney Green Road has long been deemed a great public need, the
additional space required for the additional traffic lanes has required the Department of Transportation to
acquire large areas of private property along the corridor. In some instances this taking has resulted in
significant adverse effect on the residual properties. Such is the case at this location.
The owner believes that the movement of the street right-of-way toward his existing service
station, coupled with the new control of access will have negative impacts on business operations. The
owner believes future customers will avoid the use of this business, resulting in such loss of revenues that
the business will not be able to survive. Similar convenience facilities located to the Southeast along
Piney Green Road have already closed, reportedly as a result of similar impacts and a lack of land area
which would otherwise have allowed for reconstruction or relocation of the business on the tract.
Further, the change in right-of-way will render the site as a zoning non -conformity with regard to
City of Jacksonville Land Use and Zoning Setbacks. In such instances major damage to the structure
caused by fire or catastrophic environmental events would prevent reconstruction, without relocation,
unless special variances were requested and granted.

Accordingly, the owner believes that for the business to reasonably survive and compete, the site
must be redeveloped. Unlike the businesses mentioned above, the subject property does have additional
land area in the back, but in order to reasonably and effectively utilize the land area, the drainage ditch
(identified as a wetland and RPW), on the Northwestern side will need to be closed and paved over to
provide for parking and vehicular circulation. While there is some possibility that a redevelopment of the
site may be accomplished without wetlands impacts, the resulting business would be undersized and non-
competitive with the current industry standard. Please see the enclosed "Layout 1.0" showing the existing
service station with overlay of the future site including the new right-of-way and DOT curb island.
Additionally, it has been determined that the carwash currently on the existing site can not likely be
reconstructed during a redevelopment due to the lack of vehicle circulation space.
To be competitive with the current industry standard it is important that the new facility be
comparable in size and usage to the newer convenience store facilities proposed or being constructed in
the area. This generally requires fueling positions numbering between 16 and 24, a convenience store
layout model developed by the marketing professionals, and co -locating of a fast food facility. These uses
are believed by the property owner to be necessary to remain competitive at this current location.
A Wilco -Hess facility was recently submitted to the City of Jacksonville for approval, located just
0.7 miles North of this site on US 17 at its intersection with Wolf Swamp Road. That site is proposed
with 24 fueling stations, a convenience store and fast food facility, but also will have additional space for
large truck fueling. It is important to the subject tract owner to be as competitive with this proposed
facility as is reasonably possible. The collective uses require a circulation pattern that not only functions
and be customer friendly, but also be in conformance with the local planning and zoning ordinances
which specify drive aisle, parking spacing, loading and unloading, refuse collection and other site related
criteria. Meeting these criteria requires utilization of almost all of the property available, and therefore
requires closing the existing ditch and impacting the remaining wetlands.
Mitigation (D. 3c)
To compensate for the permanent impacts proposed, a lump sum payment will be made by the
owner into the Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank. The owner has reserved to purchase credits (see
attached letter) for 167 LF of stream and 0.09 acres of riparian wetlands for a total of $69,308.20. These
credits are proposed at a ]:I ratio based on the poor quality of the wetlands and RPW being impacted.
The wetlands in this location are at the uppermost reach of an unnamed tributary that drains to
Northeast Creek. The two wetlands areas were disconnected from each other over a hundred years ago
for a railroad that used to be in this location, and the berm which supported the tracks and separates the
areas is still visible. Since that time, the Highway 17 corridor through Jacksonville has been heavily
commercialized and expanded, and this particular intersection with Piney Green Road is one of the
busiest in the city. The combination of commercial development and drainage improvements for
stormwater runoff has drastically altered the hydraulic connectivity these wetlands once had. Because of
these current conditions, a 1:1 mitigation fee is fare compensation for the proposed permanent impacts.
This fee is on top of the many other expenses the owner will face in order to do the construction
associated with a complete redevelopment of the site.
c3.JWP. PineyGreenRd.Narrative.8.15.13

BACHELORS DELIGHT MITIGATION BANK
c/o Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
MITIGATION CREDIT INVOICE
DATE: September 1, 2016
TO: A.G. Lee Oil Company, Inc.
Attn. Mr. Albert Lee
P.O. Box 237
Smithfield, NC 27577
PERMIT AGENT: Parker & Associates, Inc.
306 New Bridge Street
Jacksonville, NC 28540 ` O
PROJECT NAME: A.G. Lee Oil Company — y 17/ iney Gk6en Road Jacksonville NC
• •1
CORPS ACTION ID: SAW -2009-0255`
BDMB NO. 2016-001 •�
INVOICE NO. 2016- 1
e)
Credit Type, s _F Fee per Unit Total
Stream 167 $391.00
_ $65,297.00 ,
-f
Non -Riparian Wetland* 0.0 $51,422.00 $0.00
I
rian Wetland* 0.1 $71,273.00_ $7,127.30
FFa
F— � Tota/ 8a/ante Due � $72,424,30 (
Notes: *Wetland credits sold in 0.10 -unit increments ___
Terms:
(1) Payment due upon receipt of invoice. All credit reservations expire 45 days from date of invoice.
(2) Credit transfer to be completed upon receipt of payment in full.
(3) Payment must be made with certified funds.
(4) All checks should be made payable to "Bachelors Delight Escrow Account"

U. S. ARMY CORPS 4F ENGINEERS �
W41Mkoon Di trtct
ComDOUSAWm.Nft1fation ftNj9M &jJjt►►Tr�orrm
Parmittee. A.G. tee oil Contp"V, hoc. Action W. SAW 200902255
Project Nantes A.G. I" Oil Company gas Mian expansion County: Onslow
Imstnrctlons to Permittees The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), who will then sign the for to verify the
trarmwfer of tate mitigation responsibility. once the Sponsor. has slgned this form, it is the Permfttee's
ensure that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engbuws (USACE) project Manager Identified on respof a Sig to
ropy of this lover before conductingpage two to M receipt of a signed
authorized imp c% unless Otherwise specified below. if mare than one mitigation
Sponsor will be used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or If the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur
in more than one "40t Hydrologk: Unit Code, (HUC), multiple forma will be attached to the
permit OW the
for each Sponsor and/or H UC must be provided to thea separate forms
ppropriate mitigation Sponsors.
in"Vrns to Sponsor. The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements shown below are available at the
identitled site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the Identified
bion,
whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. once the form is signed, the t Update
of
S
app>ate kdger and provide a copy of the signed form to the Permittee and to the USACE ponsor eruct update the
prop
Manager. The Sponsor must also oorrtply with all reporting requirements established in their suthorWng instrumeI"ev Fee ntm
ra
Pennhted Impacts and Cvnrpaitaatory Mitlgetion Requiremerft
Warm Cool Cold Riparian filpartan Non•Riparian Coastal
itiWAM Non -ie. Ane
267 0.09
more than onemitigation sponsor will be used for the Perritt only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Warm cool Cold Riparian fgparlan
Rhodne Non-rhwine Non-Nparian Coastal
167 049
Teton Site �bited:
(list the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the
a
aamptance letter identities specific site. For NCEEP, NCEEP. if the NCEEP
specific site, also ('rat the specific site to be debited}.
Seeffan to be cam~AY the liNt*otion sponsor
Slaftment of Mitigation liability Amor: 1, the undersigned, verity that I am authorized to
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and 1 approve Mitigation certify that the Sponsor agree; to aOCe¢i AA resp©rrsibfNty for
providing the mitigation Identified in this document (see the table above), aw*dated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I .also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCEEP), as approved by the USACE, are
curtently available at the mitigation site Identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor falls to provide the
required compensatory nmklgatlon, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may
ens in evmplianoa associated with the mitigation requirements. Y pursue mneasures against the ,Sponsor to
Affitknim Sponsor Names !d%� i% �r%?, L(i3•f l2 j(%
RO" qWs Authorized
of
Page 1 of 2
Date of
Form Updated 2 October, 2022

USACE Wilmington Distrkt
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form, Page 2
Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
• Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is In receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee Is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified In this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
Constructlon within ill ftuctionai arhorned by the hermit identified on qac one of this form can beain only
jam the USACE is in rece,ot of a conn of this documenf sl�npri ►,+. ►ko r
"�ongr, confirming that the Sponsor has
accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized Impacts conducted by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon
permit issuance: however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of
permit issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming
that the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
Signed copies of this document must be retained by 'the Permittee, Mitigation sponsor, and in the USACE
administrative records for both the permit and the Sank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that the USACE Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
if changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -rase approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRTj. If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District
guidance and a new version of this form must be completed and Included in the USACE administrative records for both
the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/Additional Conditions:
This form Is not valid unless signed by the mitigation Sponsor and USACE Project Manager. For questions regarding this
form or any of the conditions of the permit authorization, contact the Project Manager at the address below.
USACE Project Manager:
USACE Field Office:
Email:
David Salley
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
USACE Project Manager Signature
September 13 7013
Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, Including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://riblO.usace.grmy.mil.
mil.
Page 2 of 2
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure We continue to do so,
Customer satisfaction Survey located at our website at htto:ll►e_Pulatmxwesurvey.com/tocompiate the survey online. ploase complete the

U
/
A,
Wetlands Line
(TYP•)
Existing Permitted Impacts by NCDOT
Permit No. SAW -2005-9988695 ---A
End DOT Pipe
Begin new ditch
ex. 48" CMP
(Remove) A!
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=60'
0 30 60 120
I
\P
.L \
End DOT Pipe
Begin New 30" RC
End DOT Impacts
Begin Owner Impacts
Riparian Wetlands I New DOT
Imoact 0.09 Ac. Curb Island
\V
/ iRPW Impact 167 LF
V
cl .
�r
/
/
��`•�`PLI%A CARO
SEAL
37928
Legend:
Ac. - Acreage
DOT - Department of Transportation
ex. - Existing
rcp - Reinforced Concrete Pipe
R/W - Right-of-way
Typ. - Typical
Existing Ditch
••• - Proposed Ditch
— -- Wetlands Line
,l Pumpkin
1 Center
o�A\\fie o•
01ocw �l (I �
/C N
00 000 0, goC
nnn
VICINITY SKE
NOT TO SCALE
Notes:
1. Wetland Impacts: initial disturbance of these areas shall be limited to only that area
minimally needed to allow passage of construction equipment to prepare for the
installation of the crossing and to execute upland construction on the opposing
side of the crossing. Grubbing or land disturbance of the subject area shall
not be performed until the culverts, backfill material, erosion and sediment control
materials or devices sufficient to substantially complete the construction and stabilization
of the crossing are staged or stockpiled at the location. Due consideration shall be given to
impending inclement weather conditions that may adversely affect the completion of the impact
in the shortest time practicable.
2. No construction of the impact shall commence in the wetlands until all materials needed for the
impact are staged on site.
3. When possible, work in the wetlands shall be done during periods of dry weather.
4. Work in the wetlands shall be completed in the minimum time necessary.
5. Install silt fence at impact.
6. Construct impact. Finish grade area.
7. Install permanent ground cover (sod) on slopes.
8. Maintain silt fence at toe of slope and as needed to prevent erosion.
Overall Wetlands Impact Map - Sheet 1 of 2
Project:
Owners:
Rev. 03/01/18 JLM - for renewal date
PARKER &ASSOCIATES, INC.
Nationwide Permit 39
A.G. Lee Oil Com an Inc.
l� Y�
Date: 08/15/13
scale: 1"=60'
Consulting Engineers - Land Surveyors - land Planners
Parcel ID 031111 & 056031
110 North 9th Stree
Field book: N/A
Jacksonville, North Carolina
ATk
09
Smithfield, NC 27577
File Name: AG Lee - wet impact.dwg
P.O. Box 976 - 28541-0976 306 New Bridge Street - 28540
Jacksonville Twp., Onslow Co., North Carolina
[phone]
Disk Name: ACAD 2470
Phone [phone] - Fax [phone]
Drawn: JJL
Firm License Number: F-0108

Existing Permitted Impacts by NCDOT-
Permit No. SAW -2005-9988695
ex. design
48" RCP
\,/ I
on /
Wetlands Line l
(TYP•) \
lll___ XT!__. -
5=11- 11-40'
Structure ID
LoE
FL Inv.
C8#1
40.2
39.7 36.7
DI#1
39.9
- 36.3
CB#1
40.5
40.0 37.0
/rte
ex. design
/ 30" RCP
End DOT Pipe
Begin New 30" RCP
r SEAL
C'
'0%
.
37928
%29j�
Legend:
Ac. - Acreage
BOC - Back of Curb
DOT - Department of Transportation
ex. - Existing
FF - Finished Floor
FL - Flow Line (Gutter)
Inv. - Invert
L.F. - Linear Feet
RCP - Reinforced Concrete Pipe
Typ. - Typical
- Existing Ditch
-Proposed Ditch
-Wetlands Line
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
Section "A"
Horz. 1"=40'
Vert. 1"=4'
Proposed NWP 39 Impacts
167 L.F. of RPW (Stream)
0.09 Ac. of Riparian (Wetlands)
See Permit No. SAW -2005-9988695 for adjoining NCOOT Impacts
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=40'
0 20 40 80
Wetlands Impact Map - Sheet 2 of 2
Project; Owners:
Rev. 03/01/18 JLM - for renewal date PARKER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Nationwide Permit 39 A.G. Lee Oil Company Date: 08/15/13 Consulting Engineers - Land Surveyors - Land Planners
Scale: As Noted Jacksonville, North Carolina
Parcel ID 031111 & 056031
110 North 9th Stree Field book: N/A
Smithfield, NC 27577 File Name: AG Lee - wet impact.dwg P.O. Box 976-28541-0976 306 New Bridge Street - 28540 2TJL1
Jacksonville Twp., Onslow Co., North Carolina [phone] Disk Name: ACAD 2470 Phone [phone] - Fax [phone]
Drawn: JJL Firm License Number: F-0108 09 1