20180195 Ver 1_More Info Received_20180307

I would also like to schedule a time that we can discuss the masterplan, sanitary sewer construction documents, est regards,B our conference call.In the meantime, please let me know
if you have any questions, concerns, or need any additional information prior to work for you this week?Is there a time that would lication/permit so that I can clarify any issues
you may have.stream/wetlands report, and app
Johnson, Alan
From:Messina, Erik <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday, March 07, 2018 4:26 PM
To:Johnson, Alan; [e-mail]
Cc:Walters, Shad; Lowry, Ben; Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Subject:RE: \[External\] RE: Park 1764 project, DWR 18-0195
Attachments:Park 1764 - USACE PCN Form (Executed).pdf; Park 1764 Masterplan - Site Plan.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

Alan,

Thank you for meeting with us over the phone a couple of weeks ago to walk through the Park 1764 Off-Site Sewer
Permitting. Per our discussions, attached is the Masterplan of the proposed Park 1764 Business/Industrial Park and the
updated the PCN Application to indicate the Nationwide Permit Number 39. Please also see my responses to your
comments below in BLUE.

Erik P. Messina, P.E. / Assistant Project Manager
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1900 Center Park Drive · Suite A · Charlotte, NC 28217
Direct: [phone] · Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone] · http://www.cecinc.com
Senior Leadership · Integrated Services · Personal Business Relationships

From: Johnson, Alan \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 8:35 AM
To: Walters, Shad <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC,
PWS <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: \[External\] RE: Park 1764 project, DWR 18-0195

Ok, your plans are still not clear. Figure #6 (8 ½ X 11) and sheet C500 of the plan sheets. Figure 6 does not show the
stream at the very bottom of the project area (the Margaret Lutz Heirs property). Does the new sewer line cross this
stream? C500 states existing line and existing wetland and then shows the sewer line crossing this stream. Yes, the
proposed sewer line does cross this stream. Figure 6 does not show this stream as it was outside of the Margaret Lutz
Heirs property, which was the extent of the scope for the ECS Report. It was also understood that this was an existing
stream and did not need to be reverified/remapped.

1

Sheet C500 (plan view) shows the sewer line running on the east side of the main channel (SA) and crossing stream SE,
SD, SA (the bottom channel as noted above is not shown). Based on Figure 6, there are only 3 crossing. Figure 6 does
not show this stream as it was outside of the Margaret Lutz Heirs property, which was the extent of the scope for the
ECS Report.

Sheets C501 et al, calls out the impacts as #1 through #4. The plan sheet (C500) should indicate the corresponding
nomenclature/identification. This goes for the wetland areas as well. Is the wetland at the bottom of the C500 also
being impacted? No, the wetland at the bottom of C500 is not being impacted.

Be reminded of the emails submitted yesterday.

My guess is that stream impact #1 is at the bottom Yes – Stream “F” ,impact #3 is sewer line B Correct, and #4 is stream
SD Stream “E” and #2 is SE Stream “D” (but there are two SEs, not the SE1)

Thanks

From: Walters, Shad \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 3:08 PM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; Kevin Greer <[e-mail]>; Scott Millar
<[e-mail]>; Lowry, Ben <[e-mail]>; Messina, Erik <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] RE: Park 1764 project, DWR 18-0195

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

Alan
See below for responses to your comments in red.

I have also attached an updated PCN reflecting the revisions, a narrative describing he impacts, the wetland/stream
delineation report prepared by ECS, and an update plan set highlighting the streams/impact areas, etc.

Please review and let us know if you need any additional information.

Shad W. Walters, P.E. / Principal
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1900 Center Park Drive · Suite A · Charlotte, NC 28217
Toll-Free: [phone] · Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone] · http://www.cecinc.com
Senior Leadership · Integrated Services · Personal Business Relationships

This electronic communication and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including copyright law. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are prohibited from disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Please
promptly notify the sender by reply electronic communication and immediately delete this message from your system.

From: Johnson, Alan \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 10:53 AM
To: [e-mail]; Walters, Shad <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Park 1764 project, DWR 18-0195

2

The purpose of the project is the Park 1764 business development. This should be part of the application. We noted
that the sewer line extension would serve the Park 1764 in Section 3E. Please clarify if you would like that notation
made in other sections.

Wetland impacts are permanent and temporary. That area that remains within the maintained easement is consider a
permanent impact. Area outside the permanent will be considered temporary and should be restored. Restoration
information should be clarified The PCN has been revised to note the temporary and the permanent impacts as
noted above. The plans have been noted to reflect this also. (See attached)

Stream impacts are confusing. The line runs parallel to the stream (that I can tell), except for one crossing. Please
clarify. See attached pdf set with the streams/wetlands highlighted. We have also attached the delineation report
for your reference of the overall area. The sewer line construction area should be 10 ft or greater from top of
bank. Typically the limits of disturbance is a minimum of 25’ from top of creek bank where it parallels the main
stream. If general bank stabilization is proposed (rather than stream crossing), this should be clarified on the plan view
and length of stream bank. I am sure you are not excavating 40 ft of stream. The open cut to install the sewer line
under the stream bed would be no wider than 5’ - we have accounted for the temporary pipe crossing to get
equipment across the stream and the pump around area – allowing 40 total lf of temp impact for each crossing. The
open cut and the area of pump around should be separated or clarified within the application

Thanks

Alan D Johnson – Senior Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

3