FINAL HOR Attachments C5 thru F partial-Northampton Compressor Station

Attachment C.5
Form Letters Received via Email Supporting the Northampton Compressor Station
Of the 12 written comments received that expressed support for the air quality permit for the Northampton
Compressor Station, nine of these comments were submitted using one of two form letters as the basis for their
comments. Form Letter No. 3 was submitted by four commenters and is presented in Figure C.5-1. Form Letter
No. 4 was submitted by two commenters, and is presented in Figure C.5-2. Three commenters submitted emails
that were a combination of Form Letter Nos. 3 and 4. All nine commenters are presented in Table C.5-1,
organized by the form letter submitted.

Figure C.5-1. Form Letter No. 3
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the Northampton Compressor
Station. The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor or small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each
criteria pollutant, but the Station will emit significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions are
significantly lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year and Volatile Organic Compound
emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.
Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and fugitive emission. These
measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.
Thank you for diligence in protecting the environment. I have no doubts regarding the air quality for this project. I urge you to
approve the permit.
Thank you,
XXXX

Figure C.5-2. Form Letter No. 4
Dear Sirs:

I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the Northampton Compressor Station.

The compressor station will use a turbine design that includes the state-of-the-art SoLoNOx technology to minimize Nitrogen
Oxide emissions. Also, Selective Catalytic Reduction pollution controls will be used to further reduce Nitrogen Oxide emissions.
The Nitrogen Oxide emission rate represents the lowest permitted level for turbines in currently compression service. In
addition, Oxidation Catalysts will be installed to reduce emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, including any hazardous air
pollutants by approximately 50 percent and emissions of Carbon Monoxide by approximately 80 percent. These two add-on
control technologies are not required by regulation and are not in general use on compressor stations in the industry.

Again, I urge NCDEQ to issue this minor air permit. There is no regulatory or environmental rationale to justify denying this
permit and denial could set a precedent that would cripple economic development in North Carolina.

Thank you,
XXXX

Page C.5-2

Table C.5-1. Commenters that Submitted Form Letters Nos. 3 and 4
in Support of the Northampton Compressor Station

From Subject Received Page
Comments Submitted Using Form Letter No. 3a
Clayton Ruff ACP/DAQ 11/20/2017 C.5-3
Diane ACP/DAQ 11/16/2017 C.5-4
Susan Mills ACP/DAQ 11/2/2017 C.5-5
emesel100 ACP/DAQ 11/14/2017 C.5-6
Comments Submitted Using Form Letter No. 4b
Charles Hellwig ACP/DAQ 11/14/2017 C.5-7
David Guy ACP/DAQ 11/1/2017 C.5-8
Comments Submitted Using Text from Form Letter Nos. 3 and 4a,b
Bob&Diane Cook ACP/DAQ 11/16/2017 C.5-10
Garry Terry ACP/DAQ 10/31/2017 C.5-11
Dr. Phillip Stephens ACP/DAQ 10/31/2017 C.5-12
aSee Figure C.5-1 for text of Form Letter No. 3
bSee Figure C.5-2 for text of Form Letter No. 4

From:Clayton Ruff
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Monday, November 20, 2017 10:14:11 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear Sirs:

I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the Northampton Compressor Station.
The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor or small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each
criteria pollutant, but the Station will emit significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions
are significantly lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year and Volatile Organic
Compound emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.

Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and fugitive emission. These
measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.

Thank you for diligence in protecting the environment. I have no doubts regarding the air quality for this project. I urge you
to approve the permit.

Thank you,

Clay Ruff
Page C.5-3
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:Diane
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:08:27 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the Northampton Compressor Station.
The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor or small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each
criteria pollutant, but the Station will emit significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions
are significantly lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year and Volatile Organic
Compound emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.
Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and fugitive emission. These
measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.
Thank you for diligence in protecting the environment. I have no doubts regarding the air quality for this project. I urge you
to approve the permit.
Thank you,
Diane Cook
--
Diane McClary Cook
------------------------------------------------------------------
Connect: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/diane-mcclary/12/81a/658
------------------------------------------------------------------
Family: http://www.christbaptist.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Truth: http://biblia.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
News: http://viewthestory.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Listen: www.desiringgod.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Read: http://thegospelcoalition.org/
"Far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world
has been crucified to me, and I to the world."
-Galatians 6:14
Page C.5-4
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:Susan Mills
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Cc:[e-mail]
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Thursday, November 02, 2017 12:37:21 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear Sirs:

I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the
Northampton Compressor Station. The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor or
small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each criteria pollutant, but the Station will emit
significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions are significantly
lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year and Volatile Organic
Compound emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.

Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and
fugitive emission. These measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.

Thank you for diligence in protecting the environment. I have no doubts regarding the air quality for
this project. I urge you to approve the permit.

Thank you,

Susan Mills
4158 Bent Grass Drive
Fayetteville, NC 28312
Page C.5-5
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:emesel100
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Tuesday, November 14, 2017 9:24:58 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the
Northampton Compressor Station. The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor
or small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each criteria pollutant, but the Station
will emit significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions are
significantly lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year
and Volatile Organic Compound emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.
Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust
emission and fugitive emission. These measures are above and beyond regulatory
requirements.
Thank you for diligence in protecting the environment. I have no doubts regarding the air
quality for this project. I urge you to approve the permit.
Thank you,
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Page C.5-6
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:Charles Hellwig
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:28:00 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the Northampton
Compressor Station.
The compressor station will use a turbine design that includes the state-of-the-art SoLoNOx technology to minimize
Nitrogen Oxide emissions. Also, Selective Catalytic Reduction pollution controls will be used to further reduce
Nitrogen Oxide emissions. The Nitrogen Oxide emission rate represents the lowest permitted level for turbines in
currently compression service. In addition, Oxidation Catalysts will be installed to reduce emissions of Volatile
Organic Compounds, including any hazardous air pollutants by approximately 50 percent and emissions of Carbon
Monoxide by approximately 80 percent. These two add-on control technologies are not required by regulation and
are not in general use on compressor stations in the industry.
Again, I urge NCDEQ to issue this minor air permit. There is no regulatory or environmental rationale to justify
denying this permit and denial could set a precedent that would cripple economic development in North Carolina.
Thank you,
Charles Hellwig
Raleigh, NC
Page C.5-7
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:David Guy
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Wednesday, November 01, 2017 11:00:47 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the
Northampton Compressor Station.

The compressor station will use a turbine design that includes the state-of-the-art SoLoNOx
technology to minimize Nitrogen Oxide emissions. Also, Selective Catalytic Reduction
pollution controls will be used to further reduce Nitrogen Oxide emissions. The Nitrogen
Oxide emission rate represents the lowest permitted level for turbines in currently compression
service. In addition, Oxidation Catalysts will be installed to reduce emissions of Volatile
Organic Compounds, including any hazardous air pollutants by approximately 50 percent and
emissions of Carbon Monoxide by approximately 80 percent. These two add-on control
technologies are not required by regulation and are not in general use on compressor stations
in the industry.

Again, I urge NCDEQ to issue this minor air permit. There is no regulatory or environmental
rationale to justify denying this permit and denial could set a precedent that would cripple
economic development in North Carolina.

Thank you,
--
David Guy
Membership Director
Greater Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce
159 Maxwell Street
Fayetteville, NC 28301
910-433-6767(O)
910-850-8004(C)
[e-mail]
Page C.5-8
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
[e-mail]
Page C.5-9
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:Bob&Diane Cook
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:09:10 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the Northampton Compressor Station.
The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor or small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each
criteria pollutant, but the Station will emit significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions
are significantly lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year and Volatile Organic
Compound emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.
Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and fugitive emission. These
measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.
The compressor station will use a turbine design that includes the state-of-the-art SoLoNOx technology to minimize Nitrogen
Oxide emissions. Also, Selective Catalytic Reduction pollution controls will be used to further reduce Nitrogen Oxide
emissions. The Nitrogen Oxide emission rate represents the lowest permitted level for turbines in currently compression
service. In addition, Oxidation Catalysts will be installed to reduce emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, including any
hazardous air pollutants by approximately 50 percent and emissions of Carbon Monoxide by approximately 80 percent. These
two add-on control technologies are not required by regulation and are not in general use on compressor stations in the
industry.
Best in Class measures will also include equipment and procedures to significantly reduce the amount of methane (greenhouse
gas) released into the atmosphere. ACP is installing equipment that can recompress gas and it put back in the pipeline. ACP
is also installing valves as close to compressor buildings as practical to minimize the amount of gas that may need to be
vented during maintenance. In addition, ACP will install fittings that allow for capping of the gas during system testing.
Again, I urge NCDEQ to issue this minor air permit. There is no regulatory or environmental rationale to justify denying this
permit and denial could set a precedent that would cripple economic development in North Carolina.
Thank you,
Robert Cook
Page C.5-10
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:Garry Terry
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:57:50 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Good morning,

I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the
Northampton Compressor Station.

ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and fugitive
emission. These measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.
The compressor station will use a turbine design that includes the state-of-the-art SoLoNOx
technology to minimize Nitrogen Oxide emissions. Also, Selective Catalytic Reduction pollution
controls will be used to further reduce Nitrogen Oxide emissions. The Nitrogen Oxide emission rate
represents the lowest permitted level for turbines in current compression service. In addition,
Oxidation Catalysts will be installed to reduce emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, including
any hazardous air pollutants by approximately 50 percent and emissions of Carbon Monoxide by
approximately 80 percent. These two add-on control technologies are not required by regulation
and are not in general use on compressor stations in the industry.

Best in Class measures will also include equipment and procedures to significantly reduce the
amount of methane (greenhouse gas) released into the atmosphere. ACP is installing equipment
that can recompress gas and it put back in the pipeline. ACP is also installing valves as close to
compressor buildings as practical to minimize the amount of gas that may need to be vented during
maintenance. In addition, ACP will install fittings that allow for capping of the gas during system
testing.

Thank you for diligence in protecting the environment.
I have no doubts regarding the air quality for this project and I urge you to approve the permit.

Thank you,

Garry Terry
3144 US Hwy 13 N
Ahoskie, NC 27910

Page C.5-11
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4
From:Dr. Phillip Stephens
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ
Date:Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:16:51 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
I am writing in support of the draft minor source permit, Air Permit No. 10466R00, for the
Northampton Compressor Station. The Northampton Compressor Station is not only a minor or
small source by definition, less than 100 ton/year for each criteria pollutant, but the Station will emit
significantly less than 100 tons for any pollutant. Maximum potential emissions are significantly
lower, for example, Sulfur Dioxide emissions are at a little over 3 tons per year and Volatile Organic
Compound emissions are at a little over 22 tons per year.
Further, ACP has committed to several Best in Class measures to reduce both exhaust emission and
fugitive emission. These measures are above and beyond regulatory requirements.
The compressor station will use a turbine design that includes the state-of-the-art SoLoNOx
technology to minimize Nitrogen Oxide emissions. Also, Selective Catalytic Reduction pollution
controls will be used to further reduce Nitrogen Oxide emissions. The Nitrogen Oxide emission rate
represents the lowest permitted level for turbines in currently compression service. In addition,
Oxidation Catalysts will be installed to reduce emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, including
any hazardous air pollutants by approximately 50 percent and emissions of Carbon Monoxide by
approximately 80 percent. These two add-on control technologies are not required by regulation
and are not in general use on compressor stations in the industry.

Best in Class measures will also include equipment and procedures to significantly reduce the
amount of methane (greenhouse gas) released into the atmosphere. ACP is installing equipment
that can recompress gas and it put back in the pipeline. ACP is also installing valves as close to
compressor buildings as practical to minimize the amount of gas that may need to be vented during
maintenance. In addition, ACP will install fittings that allow for capping of the gas during system
testing.

Again, I urge NCDEQ to issue this minor air permit. There is no regulatory or environmental rationale
to justify denying this permit and denial could set a precedent that would cripple economic
development in North Carolina.
Phillip Stephens
Page C.5-12
Attachment C.5: Comments Supporting Northampton Compressor Station Submitted using Forms Letter Nos. 3 and 4

Attachment C.6
General Comments Received via Email Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
There were 606 written comments received that expressed general opposition to the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Project. Of these, 580 of these comments were submitted using a form letter as the basis for their comments.
Form Letter No. 5 was submitted by 580 commenters and is presented in Figure C.6-1. The commenters that
submitted Form Letter No. 5 are identified in Table C.6-1. The remaining 26 commenters are identified in Table
C.6-2 and copies of the comments are included in this section.

Page C.6-2

Figure C.6-1. Form Letter No. 5
Dear Secretary Michael Regan,

The proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline pathway through North Carolina puts communities and natural resources at
great risk. I appreciate your agency’s insistence on collecting more information and asking tough questions of
Duke Energy and Dominion Energy. However, the very notion of this project undermines the clean energy
economy future for North Carolina. There is no plan B for our environment and natural resources. Our state and
people cannot afford the costs this pipeline brings. North Carolina claims to be a leader on climate change, but
allowing the potent greenhouse gas methane to be released will only exacerbate our warming world and bring
irreversible damage to our land and water.

I urge NCDEQ to stand with the already-impacted communities where this pipeline would cross and deny any
and all permits. If we’re going to be a leader in the Southeast for solar, wind, and other forms of renewable
energy and energy-efficiency, and if we’re going to remain a destination for people to live, work, and play, then
we must do all we can to keep fossil fuel development from happening. Your agency and Governor Cooper’s
administration has the power to protect our people, environment, and quality of life, and I’m asking you to do that
today.

Thank you,
Sincerely,
XXXX

Page C.6-3

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Aaron LaVallee Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Aaron Newlander Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Abbygale Huffman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ada Khoury Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Adam Levine Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Adam Matar Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Akila Mosier Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Alan Katzer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Alex Blaine Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Alice Loyd Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Alice Poffinberger Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Allison Delavan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Alysia Tacinelli Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Alyson Winters Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Amanda Brewer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Andrea Snyder Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Angela Giordano Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ann Campbell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ann Eastabrooks Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ann Marie Dunn Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ann Mazzullo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ann Wood Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Anne Cassebaum Protect NC by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Anne Connolly Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Anne Hummel Deny the permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
April Hardee Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Arielle Schechter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Arlene Thomas Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Page C.6-4

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Arnold Gordon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Audrey Tillinghast Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
B Lipson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Babette Bruton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Barbara Benson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Barbara Biddle Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Barbara Gabriel Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Barbra Roberman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Barry Auman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Barry Goldfarb Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Barry Smith Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Becky Fields The Atlantic Coast Pipeline could destroy my home! 11/10/2017
Becky Sims Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Beth Stanberry Deny permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Betsey Granda Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Betsy Webster Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Betty Beaver Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Bob Rosen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Brandon Michaels Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Brandylyn Lemen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Brenda Starr Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Bretton Little Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Brian Grasso Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Brian Habenicht Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Bronwyn Lane Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Bruce Miller Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
C L Milko Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cama Merritt Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-5

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Camie Rodgers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Camie Rodgers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carie Hudson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carl Gipson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carla Tevelow Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carol Ashcraft Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carol Boersema Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carol Gold Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carol Macilroy Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/20/2017
Carol Moldoveanu Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carol Swing Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carol Young Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carolyn Cooper Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Carolyn Massey Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Carolyn Smith Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Catherine Covington-East Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Celeste Winterberger Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Chanda Farley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Charles Froelich Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Charles Keeling Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Charlie Burns Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Charlotte Sprawls Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cherie Connick Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cheryl McGraw Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Chris Logan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Christi Dillon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Christie Driscoll Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Christina Hugenschmidt Lifelong North Carolinian Adamantly Against the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Page C.6-6

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Christine Bloomfeld Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Christine Drea Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Christine Reed Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Christopher Baxter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Chuck Itzkovitz Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cindy Jensen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Claudia Thuring Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Clyde Smith Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cody Hulme Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Coleen Brock Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Constance Mitchell Criss crossing our continent with toxic oil pipelines won't help an economy of cadavers. Our
future is in CLEAN energy. Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic
Coast Pipeline
11/11/2017
Cordale Brown Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Craig Fedor Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cynthia Bernett Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Cynthia Chilton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Cynthia Mastro Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
D E Corum Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
D Garratt Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dale Buxton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Dale Mendoza Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dale Rio Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dane Bowen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Daniel Gay Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Danna Mclintock Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dave McLintock Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dave Palumbo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dave Sniffin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-7

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
David Fletcher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
David Flora Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
David Reynolds Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Debbie Baucom Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Debbie Hatcher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Deborah Dobson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Deborah Milkowski Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Deborah Steiner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dee Foster Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dee Foster Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Delia Alonso Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dennis Raines Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Destinee Means Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Devon Seltzer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Diane Clark Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Diane Wynne Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Donald Barker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Donald Harland Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Donna Ehresmann Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Donna Wagoner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dot Sulock Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Doug Wingeier Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dr. Dan Graham Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dustin Jones Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Dwayne Dvoracek Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
E Cook Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Edward Hester Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Edward Wolfsohn Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-8

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Eileen McCorry Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Eleanor Schilder Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Elena Carleo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Eli Celli Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Elizabeth Andrews Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Elizabeth Bonzo-Savage Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Elizabeth Forsythe Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ella McRae Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ellen Fallon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Eloise Grathwohl Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Emily O'Hare Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ercel Dotson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Eric Zimdars Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Erica Burns Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Erik Schreiner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Erin Parker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Erin Parker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Evan Krichevsky Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Felicia Williams Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Ferrell F Adkison Sr Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Fidel Arbolaez Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Fielding Wilson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Frances Kelly Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Frances Melott Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Frank Lewis Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Frank Moore Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Fred Martin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Frederick Ehrgott Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-9

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Gale Rullmann Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gary Andrew Please deny the permit for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gary Brown Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gary Drescher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gary Feimster Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Gayle Ruedi Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gene Fox Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gene Hanson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
George Czerw Please protect NC resources and communities by denying the permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
George Phillips Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Gihon Glenn Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gloria Shen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Greg Hall Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gregg Stave Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Gwendolyn Coote Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Hallie Barnes Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Harold Watson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Harriette Frank Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Harvey Sellner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Hatty Miller Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Helen Voris Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Henrietta Jenrette Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Herman Schiller Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Hillary Ostrow Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Holly Mills Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Holly Potthoff Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Hope Nicholls Deny the Permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Howard Harper Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-10

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Howard Lepzelter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
I. Engle Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ian O'Hagan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Inge Whitaker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Isaiah Rock Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
J Angell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
J S Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
J. A. Perry Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
J. Jewell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jackie Campbell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Jacqueline Abell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jacquelyn Kennedy Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jaiden Rhinehart Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Carroll Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
James Cooke Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James De Grave Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Klein Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Marsh Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Sakolosky Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
James Schall Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Stone Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Wheeler Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
James Zelbacher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jan Zollars Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jane Ann Hughes Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Jane Church Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Janet Deaver Molyneaux Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Janet Deaver Molyneaux Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Page C.6-11

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Janet Deaver Molyneaux Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Janet Pecci Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Janet Schlaufman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Janet Tice Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Janine Tokarczyk Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Jason Gaylor Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Jason Husby Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Javier Rivera Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jay Marlow Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Jay Pfeil Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jay Street Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jaya Ishaya Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/16/2017
Jean Ann Wheelock Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jean Burnett Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jean F. Molinari Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jean Hopkins Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jeanne OBryan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jeanne OBryan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jeanne O'Bryan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jeff Botz Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jeff Kulp Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Jeffrey Deal Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jennifer Brandon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jennifer Dimarco Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jennifer Harris Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jennifer Henley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jennifer Ivey Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jennifer Kain Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-12

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Jenny Garvin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Jerrold Gunter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jess Smith Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jesse Boeckermann Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jessica Boyle Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jim Robinson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jin Adams Parker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joan Hoeborn Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joan Parker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joan Parks Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Joanne Heckel Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joanne McGrath Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Jody Schuld Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joel Johnson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
John Bastian Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Comella Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Curran Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Freeze Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Godcfrey Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Hinnant Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
John Reuter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Schaechter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Thomas Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
John Wiles Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Johnny Mayall Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jon Powell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joseph Louis Mazzitelli Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joseph Shulman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-13

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Josephine Girardin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joshua Myles Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Joyce Harvey Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Jude Maglione Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Judith Barton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Judith Dewar Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Judith Foster Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Judith Tyler Pigossi Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Judith Tyler Pigossi Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Judy McClung Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Judy Palmieri Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Judy Williams Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Julie Finn Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
K Liddle Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kate Capehart Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kate Lamar Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Katherina Underhill Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Katherine Meyer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Katherine Williams Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kathleen McQuaid Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kathleen McQuaid Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kathryn Armstrong Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kathy Bradley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kathy Dowd Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kathy Hart Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Katie Todd Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Katie Todd Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Katrina Emanuel Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-14

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Kay M Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kay Reinfried Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Keith Swisher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ken Bosch Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kenneth Anderson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kenneth Wallston Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kerstin Sindemark Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Kevin Sprouls Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kim Adams Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kim Brower Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kim Preish Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kimberly Hart Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/17/2017
Kimberly Hurtt Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kimberly Lewis Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kirk Dougherty Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kirk Pappan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kristina Heiks Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kyle Bracken Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Kyle Cory Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Larry Hannon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Laura Probst Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Laurice Ferris Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lesley O'Connor Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Leslie Cassidy Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Leslie Stewart Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Leslie Wickham Jr Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Letha Abeln Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lidia Lucaciu Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-15

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Linda Ashman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linda Camp Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linda Griffin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linda Kane Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linda M Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linda Ricks Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linda Sue Barnes Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Linsi Deyo Deny permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lisa Greer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lisa Rademacher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Liz Dyer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Liz Erpelding-Garratt Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Logan Paul Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Loretta Holland Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lorri Drozdyk Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Louise Alt Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lynn B. Spees Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lynn Wright Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lynne C. Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Lynne Kohn Deny permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
M A Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
M.Garvey Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mae Basye Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mandy Lane Kinney Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Margaret Gjertsen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Margaret Hatton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Margaret Silvers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marguerite Moss Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-16

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Mariann Regan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marilyn Collins Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marilyn Delafield Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marion Edrington Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marjorie Andrews Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mark Bodenheimer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Mark Hurmence Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mark Koritz Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mark Taylor Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marla West Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Marna Napoleon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Martha Chambers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Martha Spencer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Martin Feinstein Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Bushur Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Mary Combs Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Goodkind Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Jackson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Mary Jane Moore Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Nolan Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Price Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Rand Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Rogers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mary Stone Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Mary Votta Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Matt Brzezinski Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Meg Miles Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Melinda Thomas Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Page C.6-17

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Melinda Trevorrow Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Melissa Bloom Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Melissa Howell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Melissa Sheppard Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Melvin Hoot Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michael Adams Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michael Bryant Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michael Connolly Protect NC people and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michael Lewandowski Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michael McConney Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Michael Minnick Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michael Sileno Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michelle McAlpin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Michelle Rivers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Miguel Liriano Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mike Breiner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mike Stimpson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Miles Varner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Millard Locklear Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Miriam Angress Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Mitchell Ward Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Monika W Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Myra Lighthart Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Nancy Acopine Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Nancy LaPlaca Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Naomi Avissar Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Nathan Peterson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Nathaniel Grubbs Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-18

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Nick Hood Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Nikki Schipman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Pamala Gianpicolo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Pamela Binzen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Pamela Taylor Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Pat Pavlak Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Patricia Cabarga Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Patricia Hyde Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Patricia Kelley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Patricia Rister Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Paul Mazzola Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Paul Osmer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Paul Root Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Paula Stober Please protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Peter Lourekas Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Peter Townsend Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Phebe Watson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Philip Blumenthal Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Philip Huffsmith Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Querido Galdo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
R.Terry Lyon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Rachel Cash Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Randy Harrison Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Rebecca Burmester My State Matters 11/10/2017
Rebecca Koo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Rebecca Laprade Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Rebecca Reid Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Rebecca Showalter Deny permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline - Protect North Carolina Communities 11/10/2017
Page C.6-19

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Reevyn Aronson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Rex Miller Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ricardo Arevalo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/19/2017
Richard Ashton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard Fullerton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard Han Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard Honeycutt Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard McHenry Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard Partridge Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard Strowd Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Richard Ziegler Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Riley Maness Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Rob Myers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Robert Belknap Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robert Hayward Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robert Libbey Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robert Love Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robert MacArthur Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robert Smith Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robert Swett Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Robert Voelker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Roberto Penaherrera Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Roberto Romo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Robin Briggs Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robyn Barnes Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Robyn Swierszcz Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Roger Townley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ronald Fisher Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-20

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Ronald Lewis Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Rosemary Carton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ruchir Vora Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Russell Fowler Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ruth Bauer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ruth Talley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ryan McCrea Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Ryland Bowman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Sam Todd Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Samuel Brewer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Samuel Durkin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sandra Clark Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Sandra Clark Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Sandra Resner Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sara Felsen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Sara Loeppert Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sara Ryals Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Sara Smithe Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sarah McNeal Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sarah Rubin No permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sarah Weil Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Scott Cottrill Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Sean Hartung Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Sebastian George Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Shannon Simpson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Shelly Simmons Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Shelton Jenkins Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sherman Hoover Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-21

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Sherman Poultney Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sherry Neuhaus Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Shirlee Miller Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Shirley Ware-Gully Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Shoshana Serxner-
Merchant
Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
SIDNEY JONES DENY permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline -- no more harm! 11/9/2017
Simmons Isler Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Simmons Isler Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Sreenath Sharma Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Stacy Grossman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Stacy Ward Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Stephen Boletchek Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Stephen Melott Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Stephen Orzell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Stephen Weissman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Steve Copulsky Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Steve Reznick Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Steve S Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Steven Dean PLEASE deny permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Steven Linden Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Steven McCraw Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Steven Stobbe Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Steven Tracy Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Sue Perry Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Summer Savin Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Allen Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Brown Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Susan Craver Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-22

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Susan Dameron Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Susan Davis Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Edelstein Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Galante Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Morris Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Saucedo Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Susan Williams Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tamara Sanders Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tammy Dickens Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tasha Pate Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Teresa Bratton Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Terri Flam-Goldberg Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tess Fraad Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Therese Schluchter Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Thomas Antoon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Thomas Naftzger Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Thomas Struhsaker Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tia Pearson Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Tika Bordelon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tim Hubbard Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017
Tim Linerud Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Time Shurtleff Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Timothy Moore Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tina Whitted Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tish Wilson Please use common sense and protect what we have left! 11/9/2017
Tish Yarborough Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017
Tom Dillon Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Tondra Bowers Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Page C.6-23

Table C.6-1. Commenters that Submitted General Comments Opposing the Atlatnic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letter No. 5a
aSee Figure C.6-1 for Form Letter No. 5
From Subject Date
Tracy Feldman Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Valarie Snell Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/12/2017
Valeria Gist Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Valerie Whitfield Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Vera Crumley Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Vic Fahrer Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Victor Lowell PLEASE PLEASE Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast
Pipeline
11/9/2017
Virginia Liddle Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Vivian Fish Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Walker Rayburn Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Walter Kross Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Walter Wood Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Wanda Temple Stephens Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
Wendy Stevens Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/16/2017
Wes Weaver Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/10/2017
William Blaine Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
William George Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
William Holcomb Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
William Welkowitz Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Yeymi Serrano Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017
Z. Vijay Director Protect NC resources and communities by denying permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/9/2017

Page C.6-24

Table C.6-2. List of Commenters that Submitted Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

From Subject Received Page
[e-mail] No Subject 11/18/2017 C.6-25
NRDC - Rhea Suh Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (12 Letters) 11/18/2017
11/17/2017
11/14/2017
11/12/2017
11/9/2017
11/7/2017
11/6/2017
11/5/2017
11/4/2017
11/4/2017
11/2/2017
10/31/2017
C.6-26
[e-mail] ACP 11/20/2017 C.6-27
Larry Hutcherson ACP 11/20/2017 C.6-28
Loretta Valenski ACP 11/20/2017 C.6-29
Venus ACP/DAQ Public comments 10/11/2017 C.6-30
Sydney Champion ACP/DEQ 11/13/2017 C.6-31
Jasmine Gregory ACP/DEQ 11/13/2017 C.6-32
Hengfeng Gu Denial to Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/13/2017 C.6-33
Lisa Thurman Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/20/2017 C.6-34
Gloria G. Wolk Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/17/2017 C.6-35
Rex Young Atlantic Coast Pipeline comments 11/20/2017 C.6-36
[e-mail] Coastal Pipeline for North Carolina 10/31/2017 C.6-37
George Burazer Oppose Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/19/2017 C.6-38
Mary Stascak-Berkant Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/11/2017 C.6-39

From:[e-mail]
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External]
Date:Saturday, November 18, 2017 6:47:33 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Sent from my mobile.
_____________________________________________________________
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/11/200000-gallons-of-oil-spill-from-the-keystone-pipeline/546158/
Look at what happened to Keystone. Say no!
Page C.6-25
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Saturday, November 18, 2017 3:02:35 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
6
1 day
2,839
2,839
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-26
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Friday, November 17, 2017 6:51:52 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
5
1 day
2,830
2,830
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-27
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Tuesday, November 14, 2017 8:44:51 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
7
1 day
2,817
2,817
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-28
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Sunday, November 12, 2017 6:24:37 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
10
1 day
2,805
2,805
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-29
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Thursday, November 09, 2017 12:06:08 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
10
1 day
2,788
2,788
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-30
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Tuesday, November 07, 2017 4:47:26 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
8
1 day
2,776
2,776
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-31
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Monday, November 06, 2017 3:09:08 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
9
1 day
2,768
2,768
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-32
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Sunday, November 05, 2017 11:16:49 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
13
1 day
2,757
2,757
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-33
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Saturday, November 04, 2017 7:32:58 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
13
1 day
2,741
2,741
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-34
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Saturday, November 04, 2017 7:32:58 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
13
1 day
2,741
2,741
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-35
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Thursday, November 02, 2017 4:06:36 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
7
1 day
2,719
2,719
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-36
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:NRDC - Rhea Suh
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] [ACP] Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:35:59 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
13
1 day
2,699
2,699
Dear Secretary Regan:
Please do not certify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in North Carolina. This fracked gas pipeline
would threaten hundreds of rivers, creeks and wetlands, local farms and communities and the
safety of families like mine.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive environmental review has not yet been done — which
means that we have no way of knowing the impacts of this pipeline on our water supply or
how our water could be adequately protected.
In addition, this dangerous pipeline would keep us shackled to the dirty fuels of the past and
generate greenhouse gas pollution when there is no documented need for the pipeline. Clean
energy alternatives, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, are readily available
and increasingly affordable, yet the pipeline puts consumers at risk of higher energy bills
while Duke Energy will make guaranteed profits.
FERC has failed to account for the pipeline’s full hazards to our environment, clean water,
health and climate — now it’s up to North Carolina to act to protect our rivers, streams,
wetlands and groundwater. Please protect North Carolina and its residents like me from the
dangers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Thank you.
Page C.6-37
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:[e-mail]
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP
Date:Monday, November 20, 2017 8:15:57 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Hello, my name is Ashton Burnette. I work here in the Triangle in the field of Advanced Manufacturing and
Robotics.
Water is the most valuable resource, and natural gas production wastes water.
People live all along the path of the pipeline, and they have rights.
There is a reason that we call it “Clean Energy”, and Natural Gas is not clean. The transition to Clean Energy is
unavoidable.
One is clean, the other is not. It is simple.
I oppose the construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. We can simply do better.
-Ashton Burnette
Sent from my iPhone
Page C.6-38
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:larry hutcherson
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Cc:larry hutcherson
Subject:[External] ACP
Date:Monday, November 20, 2017 4:50:24 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
I’ve been living in NC my entire life and in Nash County for the last 20 years. The Atlantic
Coast Pipeline, is unnecessary, an environmental hazard, endangers most of the Neuse River
Basin, and affects fragile parts of coastal NC. It does not really offer any advantages to our
part of the state, and the promise of economic development is a false one. The project is
simply one more method for the energy monopolies in our part of the world to make profits at
the expense of the health of our environment, wildlife, and human population.
We already have the coal ash debacle, courtesy of Duke Energy. We certainly do not need a
second. Who is going to pay when the pipeline ruptures? Who is going to restore safe
drinking water for the folks in West Virginia after it is contaminated by fracking?
Who is going to pay for the dead wildlife and damaged ecosystems that result in
contamination of our precious sounds?
Duke has a monopoly, or almost, on electricity in NC. THIS is criminal, as is the pipeline
itself.
Please deny the permits. We have too much to deal with already in our part of the state. We
have a large proportion of the state’s poor and indigenous people. The pipeline will not help
us.
I totally agree with this N&O article. Please deny this very bad project!
http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article185428273.html
Sincerely,
Larry Hutcherson
Middlesex NC
Page C.6-39
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Loretta Valenski
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP
Date:Monday, November 20, 2017 2:32:03 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
I have lived in NC my entire life and in Nash County for the last 20 years. The Atlantic Coast
Pipeline, based on all information I can assimilate, represents an environmental hazard,
especially to my part of the state, endangering most of the Neuse River Basin, which also
affects fragile parts of coastal NC. It does not really offer any advantages to our part of the
state, and the promise of economic development is a false one. The project is simply one
more method for the energy monopolies in our part of the world to make profits at the expense
of the health of our environment, wildlife, and human population.
We already have the coal ash debacle, courtesy of Duke Energy. We certainly do not need a
second. Who is going to pay when the pipeline ruptures? Who is going to restore safe
drinking water for the folks in West Virginia after it is contaminated by fracking?
Who is going to pay for the dead wildlife and damaged ecosystems that result in
contamination of our precious sounds?
If you ask Duke energy, it is we, the rate payers! We have no choice, as Duke has a
monopoly, or almost, on electricity in NC.
Please deny the permits. We have too much to deal with already in our part of the state. We
have a large proportion of the state’s poor and indigenous people. The pipeline will not help
us.
I totally agree with this N&O article. Please deny this very bad project!
http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article185428273.html
Sincerely,
Loretta Valenski
Middlesex NC

Page C.6-40
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Venus .
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DAQ Public comments
Date:Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:29:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
verify that the attachment and content are safe. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [e-mail].
Absolutely no. A RESOUNDING no from my entire family. So that's 9 no's. This is the same
company that dumped coal ash and wants us to pay to clean up their mistakes. To allow this
pipeline to be laid out is an insult to the entire state, which has been trampled over by Duke
Energy for far too long. Stop supporting fossil fuels, it's an out of date technology that is only
still around because of the sheer volume of people under the forcible control of incredibly
irresponsible companies like this.
Page C.6-41
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Sydney Champion
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DEQ
Date:Monday, November 13, 2017 7:03:12 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Hello,
My name is Sydney Champion and I am a resident in Raleigh, North Carolina. I would like the
NC department of Environmental Quality to deny the permit to build the Atlantic Coast
Pipeline through the state of North Carolina. The pipeline and the natural gas that will be
pumped through it, pose a safety and health threat to all of the citizens of North Carolina as
well as its valuable ecosystems.
Thank you for your time,
Sydney Champion
Page C.6-42
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:jasmine gregory
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] ACP/DEQ
Date:Monday, November 13, 2017 7:02:30 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Hi my name is Jasmine, I am a resident in Raleigh, North Carolina
I would like the NC Department of Environmental Quality to deny the permit to build the
Atlantic Coast Pipeline through the state of North Carolina. The pipeline and the natural gas
that will be pumped through it pose a safety and health threat to all of the citizens of North
Carolina as well as its valuable ecosystems.
Thank You!
Page C.6-43
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Hengfeng Gu
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] Denial to Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Monday, November 13, 2017 8:26:17 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Hi my name is Hengfeng Gu, I am a resident in Raleigh, North Carolina
I would like the NC Department of Environmental Quality to deny the permit to build the
Atlantic Coast Pipeline through the state of North Carolina. The pipeline and the natural gas
that will be pumped through it pose a safety and health threat to all of the citizens of North
Carolina as well as its valuable ecosystems.
Thank you!
--
Hengfeng Gu
Center for Additive Manufacturing and Logistics (CAMAL),
Edward P. Fitts Dept. of Industrial & Systems Engineering,
North Carolina State University
Page C.6-44
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Lisa Thurman
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Monday, November 20, 2017 10:56:09 AM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Dear NCDENR:
I am against the Atlantic Coast Pipeline for several reasons. First, I am against
fracking. Fracking pollutes water, well water and air. The pollutants that go in the
water is kept secret, which is wrong.
Second, pipelines are known to bust. There is a long history of this in
documentation.
Third, the fracked gas will either come from Pennsylvania or North Carolina.
People in Pennsylvania have be reporting the contamination of their water for
several years now.
Forth, blasting is very loud and disturbs the local community.
Fifth, leaks from natural gas regular maintenance and accidents contributes to air
pollution/green house gases/ climate disaster as much as petroleum.
Sixth, investments should be going to renewable such as solar and wind.
Sincerely,
Lisa Thurman
1702 Lenora Cirlce
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Page C.6-45
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Gloria G. Wolk
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Friday, November 17, 2017 9:41:07 PM
Importance:Low
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
I am vehemently opposed.
The terrible cost to our state and the people are not worth the
relatively small benefits.
Gloria G. Wolk, MSW
Consuumer advocate, author, consultant
Member of IRE.org and NAPD.org
www.Viatical-Expert.net - fighting fraud
www.AccidentalFelon.net - fighting wrongful convictions
Raleigh, NC 888-798-Book
Page C.6-46
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Rex Young
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] Atlantic Coast Pipeline comments
Date:Monday, November 20, 2017 1:13:07 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
My name is Rex Young, a North Carolina resident who lives near and recreates in the surface
waters in the state of North Carolina. I am concerned about the impact of the Atlantic Coast
Pipeline as proposed by Duke and Dominion. As evidenced by the recent Keystone Pipeline
spill, such pipelines are not as safe as they are publicized to be by their sponsors. Pipeline oil
spills threaten the quality of our groundwater drinking supplies and the fragile ecosystems of
our surface waters that many here enjoy for food and recreation. Moreover, they increase the
emissions from the burning of fossil fuels which impacts respiratory health and increases
climate change. These emissions do not respect state boundaries. Once in the air, currents will
transport and deposit these emissions in the State of North Carolina and poison our citizens
regardless of where the fuels are burned. I implore DEQ to reject this pipeline or, if it is
approved, to place the most stringent air and water quality protections in its permit. Finally, I
implore DEQ to undertake individual site-specific evaluations as envisioned in the Clean
Water Act rather than merely grant a blanket, general permit that absolves DEQ of its
responsibility to protect human health and the environment.
Sincerely,
Rex Young
Page C.6-47
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:[e-mail]
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] Coastal Pipeline for North Carolina
Date:Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:22:49 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
I oppose any natural gas pipeline planned for construction through North Carolina, particularly if the
pipeline is for corporate convenience in supporting sales into states south of North Carolina.
1. There is risk of fire and explosion with natural gas pipelines, and many accidents have occurred with
such pipelines in the past. Some of these accidents have involved property damage and/or loss of life.
2. Pipelines crossing rivers, particularly those routed over rivers on piers or suspended by wires, are
vulnerable to vandalism or sabotage that can result in fire or explosion.
3. Undetected leaks from natural gas pipelines can result in fire, explosion, or prolonged atmospheric
pollution.
Sincerely,
Peter Latham
8 Peachtree Lane, Pinehurst,. N.C. 28374
Ph. 910-420-1121
Page C.6-48
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:George Burazer
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] oppose Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Sunday, November 19, 2017 10:50:12 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
For your consideration:
Just two days ago, there was a rupture of the Keystone Pipeline
in South Dakota. Dirty tar sands oil, 210,000 gallons have polluted
the ground. It is the nature of pipes that they leak. Why spoil the
environment of W. Va., Va. and mostly importantly my our state of
North Carolina with the potential problems of leaks if this pipeline
is given the go-ahead.
The federal government thinks climate change is a hoax. Trump is
content in opening the floodgates to energy sources which only hurt
our nation's battle against global warming.
I urge DENR to oppose the building of the ACP through N.C.
Sincerely,
George Burazer
8300 Meadow Lakes Dr.
Charlotte, NC 28210
Page C.6-49
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
From:Mary Stascak-Berkant
To:SVC_DENR.publiccomments
Subject:[External] Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Date:Saturday, November 11, 2017 11:00:28 PM
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
Hello! I am in opposition to the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Please do
everything possible to oppose the pipeline. NC's natural resources are in
peril. Thank you for your continuing work to insure that NC's citizens'
health and natural resources are protected.
Mary Stascak-Berkant
7412 Heartland Dr.
Wake Forest NC 27587-9714
Page C.6-50
Attachment C.6: Unique General Comments Opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Attachment C.7
General Comments Received via Email Supporting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
There were 785 written comments received that expressed general support for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Project. The comments were submitted using 6 different form letters:
1. Form Letter No. 6 – 3 comments
2. Form Letter No. 7 – 30 comments
3. Form Letter No. 8 – 6 comments
4. Form Letter No. 9 - 697 comments
5. Form Letter No. 10 – 28 comments
6. Form Letter No. 11 – 21 comments
The text from the Form Letters are presented in Figures C.7-1 through C.7-6. The commenters that submitted
these Form Letters are identified in Table C.7-1, organized by form letter.
Figure C.7-1. General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 6
Re: ACP; NC Supports Stable, Diverse Energy Infrastructure

Dear Secretary Regan,

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality RE: Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) 401 Permit Application The Atlantic Coast
Pipeline will be good for our communities, our economy, and our environment. Moving to more environmentally friendly sources of
energy is vital for North Carolina, our region and our country. And the best way to do that is by approving the ACP. The ACP will
transport natural gas, which is already a much cleaner form of energy than older forms North Carolina has used for decades. And
natural gas is an important partner fuel to renewables such as solar and wind. It is a natural complement for when the sun isn’t shining
or the wind is not blowing. The gas transported by the ACP will be used to generate cleaner electricity to heat homes and power new
industries creating Americans jobs. I urge you to approve the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. A copy of this letter will be sent to my local,
state and federal elected officials.

Sincerely,
XXXX

Figure C.7-2. General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 7

Re: DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe.

Dear Secretary Regan,

I am writing in support of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and to urge that North Carolina DEQ approve the project’s application for an air
quality permit for the compressor station in Northampton County. This is an urgently needed infrastructure project that will bring
lower-cost energy supplies and new economic development to one of the most underserved and economically distressed regions in
our state. Without this infrastructure, eastern North Carolina will not be able to attract manufacturing or the other industries it needs
to grow the economy, create jobs and support the local tax base. The project has been more thoroughly reviewed by state and federal
agencies than any other infrastructure project in our state’s history—from construction practices and environmental protection to
public safety and air quality. Compressor stations are an integral part of our nation’s natural gas pipeline system. The ACP project has
demonstrated that the Northampton compressor station will meet or exceed all regulatory requirements for public safety, noise and
air quality. After months of careful review the Northampton Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a local permit for the
station. The effects of the station will be minimal compared to the huge benefit it will provide to all North Carolinians. I believe North
Carolina truly needs this historic project, and I believe in the careful review the project is undergoing. I ask that you approve the ACP
for North Carolina.

Sincerely,
XXXX
Page C.7-2

Figure C.7-3. General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 8
Re: Help North Carolina Prosper

Dear Secretary Regan,

Dear Governor Cooper, As North Carolina continues to grow, we need new, dependable energy that will help us succeed. New energy
will enable us to more affordably heat our homes, power our businesses, grow our industries and build our communities. It will be the
doorway to new jobs, thanks to increased industry opportunity. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline will safely provide that American energy to
Eastern North Carolina by connecting us to the nation’s largest supply of clean, reliable natural gas. This new energy is vital to our
economic future and is what we need to prosper. Please join me in supporting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline for the good and growth of
North Carolina.

Sincerely,
XXXX

Figure C.7-4. General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 9
Re: Support the ACP

Dear Secretary Regan,

Dear Governor Cooper: The Atlantic Coast Pipeline is a once-in-a-generation infrastructure project that will unleash the economic
potential for Eastern North Carolina and the state as a whole. Its approval is vital to North Carolina’s future. This infrastructure is
critical for meeting the state’s growing energy needs, giving us the ability to attract new businesses that will create thousands of
permanent, good-paying jobs while delivering more affordable energy for our families and businesses. Construction alone will
stimulate almost $700 million in economic activity and create more than 4,000 jobs across Eastern North Carolina. With only one
major natural gas pipeline in the state, North Carolina can’t grow without the ACP. The clean and affordable energy it will bring to our
state will allow us to compete nationally for new business and new jobs, while enhancing energy security. Over the past three years,
ACP partners have worked with state and federal agencies and maintained open communication with the public, holding countless
meetings with communities and property owners. ACP partners have also taken steps to protect the environment, making hundreds of
route adjustments to safeguard water sources and wildlife habitats. As a native of Eastern North Carolina, you know firsthand how
difficult it has been to attract industry and business to this part of the state. If you support North Carolina jobs and workers, I hope
you will join me in supporting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Your leadership on this important issue will benefit North Carolinians for
generations to come.

Sincerely,
XXXX

Page C.7-3

Figure C.7-5. General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 10
Re: The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide

Dear Secretary Regan,

Dear Governor Cooper, When you ran for governor, you promised to support a ‘North Carolina that works for everyone,’ including an
economy that works for everyone. With the approval of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP), we have the opportunity to bridge the
growing rural-urban divide in our state that is leaving so many Eastern North Carolina communities behind. We’ve all witnessed the
economic decline in Eastern North Carolina over the past years. That’s why the location of the pipeline in the eastern part of the state
is so vital to the economic comeback of this region. Economic viability and quality of life in our rural communities depends on robust
infrastructure. Just as roads, rail, water and broadband are essential to prosperity, so too is energy infrastructure. The critical energy
infrastructure provided by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline will help meet the state’s growing energy needs, giving us the ability to attract
new businesses that will create thousands of permanent, good-paying jobs while delivering more affordable energy for our families
and businesses. Construction alone will stimulate almost $700 million in economic activity and create thousands of jobs across Eastern
North Carolina. Over the first two decades of operation, the pipeline is expected to stimulate $1.2 billion in capital investment in the
state, specifically in struggling rural communities. This means millions of dollars in annual property tax revenues to help revenue-
starved counties along its route fund schools, hospitals, emergency responders and other essential community services. This project
represents the largest capital investment in the economic future of this region in many decades. I hope you will join me in supporting
the Atlantic Coast Pipeline to help secure a bright future for our entire state.

Sincerely,
XXXX

Figure C.7-6. General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 11
Re: We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Dear Secretary Regan,
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality RE: Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) 401 Permit Application The safety of our
environment—our water, air, plants and animals—is of utmost importance. But we must balance it with infrastructure that allows our
communities to survive and thrive. That is what the Atlantic Coast Pipeline will do. The ACP will bring cleaner, affordable American
energy to North Carolina, which will mean lower bills for consumers, opportunities for business growth, and economic stabilization in
much of our state—and we are eager for it. But that doesn’t mean the ACP isn’t taking every precaution when it comes to
environmental safety. The ACP’s stream and wetland crossing techniques and pipeline construction methods meet state and federal
requirements designed to protect water quality. In addition, the ACP project team has reviewed each stream crossing to ensure the
chosen construction method is appropriate given the site-specific characteristics of that stream. Horizontal directional drilling (HDD) is
being proposed in many locations to avoid impacts to major waterbodies. Please do not delay the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. North
Carolina needs it. A copy of this letter will be sent to my local, state and federal elected officials.
Sincerely,
XXXX

Page C.7-4

Table C.7-1. Commenters Providing General Support for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Using Form Letters
From Subject Received
General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 6
Terry Goodwin ACP; NC Supports Stable, Diverse Energy Infrastructure 10/31/2017
Gloria Rastadt ACP; NC Supports Stable, Diverse Energy Infrastructure 10/31/2017
Susan Leach ACP; NC Supports Stable, Diverse Energy Infrastructure 10/29/2017
General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 7
Brent Fleury DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/19/2017
Don Williams DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/19/2017
Vickie Rufty DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/19/2017
David Bowden DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/18/2017
Michael Mason DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/18/2017
Mike Geremia DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/18/2017
Janet Gaye McKeithan DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/18/2017
Charlie Gallman DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/18/2017
George Cowles DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Wanda Hurley DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Al Bateman DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Freda Johnson DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Michael Roberts DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Darline Aman DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Ailanna calvelage DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Linda Smith DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Rebecca Autry DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Andrew Munday DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Brenda Brown DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Lina Linthicum DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Judith Johnson DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Eunice Forsley DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Ed Baggett DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Rick Cremasco DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/17/2017
Everett Austin DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/16/2017
Kenneth Johnson DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/16/2017
Grace Tucker DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/15/2017
Wayne Woodall DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/14/2017
Robert Current DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/14/2017
Susan Ingram DEQ: I believe the ACP is necessary and safe. 11/14/2017
General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 8
Deborah Woodring Help North Carolina Prosper 11/20/2017
Sherie Rumfelt Help North Carolina Prosper 11/20/2017
James Barry Help North Carolina Prosper 11/19/2017
Dawn Spencer Help North Carolina Prosper 11/17/2017
Libby Parnell Help North Carolina Prosper 11/17/2017
Joyce Plummer Help North Carolina Prosper 11/16/2017
General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 9
George Ensley Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Racine Younger Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Page C.7-5

From Subject Received
Sharon Harmon Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Jean Miklosko Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Charles Hayes Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Chris Byerly Support the ACP 10/31/2017
M L Thorpe Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Dontario Hardy Support the ACP 10/31/2017
Barbara Nichold Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Donnell Sedgwick Sr. Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Kim Hall Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Joseph Waite Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Greg Parlier Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Leslie Jenks Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Charles Hyslop Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Judy Burris Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Cynthia Kirkmanò Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Michael Gloidic Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Robert DiNanno Support the ACP 10/30/2017
William Stewart Support the ACP 10/30/2017
Brunilda Jarvis Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Hazel wolford Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Scarlett Rumburg Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Stephen Rumburg Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Dennis Price Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Terry Dixon Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Gaylena Bunch Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Christopher Lynn Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Harry Chamblee Support the ACP 10/29/2017
Deborah Williams Support the ACP 10/27/2017
Mary Kimbro Support the ACP 10/27/2017
John Walls Support the ACP 10/27/2017
Lloyd Conner Support the ACP 10/27/2017
Ralph Bassett Support the ACP 10/27/2017
Joyce Menius Support the ACP 10/27/2017
Jackie Esgrow Support the ACP — Letter NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Mike Vernon Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Jere Neal Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Melodie Parrish Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Nina Bickle Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Rhonda Brittain Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Russell Imboden Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Ralph Eckley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
John Leon Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Bill Bowden Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Robert Dorman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Tamera Robertson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Louella Slaughter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Maisha Miller Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Page C.7-6

From Subject Received
Candace Nicholson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Libby Davis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Carol Jennette Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Ricky Mason Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Billy Payne Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Richard Mack Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Karl Thoma Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Bill Quillin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Scott Tomlinson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Gilbert Sarvis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
David Fry Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Robert Reid Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Sharon Bowles Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
James Meadows Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Robert Geyer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Robart Houston Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Wanda Davis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Donna Day Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Barbara Maines Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Kaye Mischler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Gary Medlin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Russell Wing Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Shawn Higgins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Kevin Pyles Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Scott’s Petitfils Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Sue Carr Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Joni McFatter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Paul Swoboda Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Robert Mann Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Cynthia Benton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
David Prater Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Sherie Rumfelt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Barnett Blair Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
YOU FOR CK Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/20/2017
Colesta Jackson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Bernadette York Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Daniel Currie Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Janet Gryder Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Carol Bruce Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Mary Ellen Blankenship Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
James Barry Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Wayne Stamper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Charles Jacobi Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Alisha Reyes Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Gina Livengood Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Christine Atkinson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Bruce Malpass Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Page C.7-7

From Subject Received
Tami Wishon Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Anne Stamper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Johnny Laughinghouse Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Jean Heath Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Bill Roberts Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Warren Rose Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
James Ward Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Elaine Campbell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Erin Leonard Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Mrs. Dan White Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Barbara Preston Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Marsha Tillery Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Randy Snodgrass Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Efrain Barnet Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Margie Hall Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
William Routh Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Susan LJones Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Robbie Lomax Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Gail Notestine Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Belinda Boehlke Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Rosiliana Wilder Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Pamela Parrish Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Mathias Reidenbach Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Rock Cremasco Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Steve Bibb Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Wanda Cash Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Donna Matthews Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Eleanor Seguin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Teresa Fulford Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Ignacia Robertson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Angela Reynolds Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Doretha Johnson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Karen Bauguess Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Stephanie Cronland Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Billy Sly Iloebo Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Ryan Decker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Joann Estle Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Talmadge Page Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Albert Cobb Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Julia Monroe Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
James Day Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/19/2017
Judith Syrett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Edwin Martinez Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Darrell Voncannon Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Michelle Taylor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Bonnie Pennell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
George Cowles Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Page C.7-8

From Subject Received
Michael Barbee Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Wendy Queen Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Abner Garcia Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Larry Hill Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Mark Larrabee Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Teresa Bailey Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Awalt Alati Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Dorothy Black Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Betty Dunn Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Stephen Streit Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Mary Valade Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Frances Clafllin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Millisa Davis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Dallas Salter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Monette K. Harms Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Walter Roth Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Janice Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Sharonann Mack Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Paul MacDonald Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Betty Kimel Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Gerald Ward Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Michael Pearce Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Rodney Taylor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
David Cook Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Lisa Kilfeather Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Clyde Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Joseph Pedrosa Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Mark Houle Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Jeramy Nelson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Joe Brumbles Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Monica Legere Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Fred Whitaker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Christine McPhee Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Elaine Brodeur Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Diane Alter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Pelzer Doar Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Angela Connor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Elizabeth Wilson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Heather Wheeler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Toby Stamper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Julia Wright Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
John Ritchie Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Alberto Solana Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Maria Johnson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Leah Usher Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Trent Aiken Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Donna Linck Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Page C.7-9

From Subject Received
Thomas West Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Yovonne Cooper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Jimmy Trivett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/18/2017
Geneva Hunt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Barbara Dowell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Donald Steigel Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Lloyd Moore Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Richard Morgan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
John Black Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Robert Head Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Tom Jordan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Annette Riwe Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Jean Parries Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Libby Parnell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Charles Laws Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
John Kosinski Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Keith Dodson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Gail Grant Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Susan Parker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Tammy Washington Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Sharon Wilson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Rufus Snyder Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Joanne Stevens Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Stanley Quimby Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
James Pfaff Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Venessa Jenkins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Kathy Vance Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Shari Nelson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Larry Burkett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Lucille Morris Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Patricia Lotti Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Lisa Kiser Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
David Mills Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Kelley Taylor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Shirley McNeill Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Jim Gibson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Jean Yilling Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Juanita Wagoner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Nelda Simmons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/17/2017
Albert Iosue Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jane Raper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Janet Schimenek Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jerry Crotts Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jason Briggs Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Arlice Baker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Keith Turner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jane Rice Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Page C.7-10

From Subject Received
Rita Martin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Barbara Lassiter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Tempie Almstead Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jo5 Starling Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Gaynell Anderson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Johnny Michaux Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Janice Burton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Barbara Eveland Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Carrie Daniels Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
William Murphy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jesus Rojas Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Faye Strang Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Greg Oliver Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
William Rose Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Ronald Camp Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Roger Long Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Paula McElroy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Barry Helms Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Deborah Pryor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Becky Icard Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Karen Stinson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Joyce Plummer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
John & Ann Stasny Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Yvonne Thompson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/16/2017
Jay Tarasaria Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Mary Bridgewater Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
G. Michael Guy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Caroll Taylor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Donna Yeager Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Robert Parker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Carmen Wyant Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
K L Kania Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Johnny Miller Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Brent Fleury Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Vickie Moote Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Thomas Willoughby Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Monica Kilpatrick Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Sandra Matthews Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Jerry Harris Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
Eve Gelfand Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/15/2017
George Crackpot Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Brian Woomer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Donna Sheppard Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Robert Leake Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Albert Cleef Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Brian Broomfield Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Virgle Davis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Page C.7-11

From Subject Received
William Brampton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Bruce Layne Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Clellan Howell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Richard Wittekind Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Melisa Wilkins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Robin Walter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Stephen Ryan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
William Leatherwood Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Kathy Miller Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Nancy Jensen Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Margaret Faulk Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Cynthia Hall Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Jimmy Carter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
William Finch Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Dennis Willoughby Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Vicki Hamill Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Marla Hyatt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Rick Bellomy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Joseph Caserma Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Leila Church Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Bobbie Nix Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Harold Townley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Lina Vasquez Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Paul Shea Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
William Bullard Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Bill OBryan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Nancy Lefevers Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Lillian Lupo Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Audrey Clontz Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Dorothy Craft Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Lewis Hallford Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Ike Williams Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Larry Loftin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Nancy Mahala Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Judy Hamlett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Dan Owen Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Marilyn Bateman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Mickey Farr Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Donna Marley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Donna Wright Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Marylin Lane Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Pennie Gregory Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Dianna Bloking Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
J Larae Phelps Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Janet Lantieri Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Christine Anderson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Geraldine Barksdale Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Page C.7-12

From Subject Received
Mike Joiner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Michael Longson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Janet Greene Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/14/2017
Beverly Nichols Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Joel Yates Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Lawrence Callihan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Mary Vernon Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Stephen Ward Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Jackson Hoffman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Marie Gantt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Emma Cornelius Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Wilson Mitchell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Bernard Bode Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Maureen Occhiuto Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Cheryl Westmoreland Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Frank Green Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Thomas Sawyer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Millie Whitley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Verrol Spencer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Rhonda Kirchner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Scott Tomlinson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Barbara Keister Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Richard Hickerson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Jim Michael Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Jenny Mayo Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Donna Proffitt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Peggy Colton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Jimmy Baker, Jr. Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Lois Cutler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Roger Charles Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Sharon Burnette Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Della Brown Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Susan Thompson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Kazimierz Kowalewski Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Nathan Knox Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Karen Bartlett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
J Keith Motley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Denise Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Tony Wilcox Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Michael Arcidiacono Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Nan Walker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Elizabeth Simmons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Paul Willhide Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Joe Simpkins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
John Franklin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Claudia Gaskin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Mary Carter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Page C.7-13

From Subject Received
Sally A Beach Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
William Sadler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Brenda Lett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Nellie Wheless Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Michael Hogan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Phyllis Bennettmanaphyllis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Danny Respess Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/13/2017
Richard Cherry Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Lynda Roberts Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Jerry Cowell Sr Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
William Bowens Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Mike Snyder Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Rhonda Torres Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Dave Roseman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Donna Puckett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Carol Terryberry Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Linda Prezioso Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Stephen Maness Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Shane Creasy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Glendon Legette Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Isabelle Andrews Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
T B Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Jean Scroggs Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Nancy Marshall Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Kim Elkins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Betty Vitty Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Nicholas Steele Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Alvin Drye Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Rita Sipple Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Kevin Ipock Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Nancy Cooper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Michael Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Donald Burchette Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Janice Parys Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Carolyn Stearns Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Bobby Ray Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Mary Ray Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Jimmie Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
John Torpey Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Susan Finney Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Jeter Griffith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Elaine Simmons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Betty McLawhorn Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Vicki Rice Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Phyllis Mills Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Victor Gregory Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Debbie Poarch Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Page C.7-14

From Subject Received
Edward Robertson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Roger Hunsucker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
George Dakun Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Ruby Jane Bennett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
John Bennett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Mary Self Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Mary Sechler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Kathy Wheeler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Cindy Viehnan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Keith Megilligan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Gus Shelton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Jeff Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Roger Singletary Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Stephen Leary Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Eddie Streetman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Teresa Hill Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Celia Black Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Harold Dawkins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Gayle Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Joseph Sides Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Brenda Dobbins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Betty Galati Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Letha James Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Karen Ham Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Judyth Nolan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
John Church Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/12/2017
Kenneth Ipock Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Kathy Mabe Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Duard May Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Marie Bennett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Beverlie Brewer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Gene Nobles Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Donna Proffitt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Marie Nelson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Janice Simmons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Robert Hadley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Dean Shemenski Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Ginger Ward Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Jessie Conner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Tracy Holifield Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Kenneth Cook Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Lessie Brindle Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Michael Campbell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Nellie Parsons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Michael Condon Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Jeff Tilghman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Rick Trujillo Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Page C.7-15

From Subject Received
Robert Grudzinski Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Gladys Fretcher Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Mary Harrison Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Joan Porto Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Jeanie Queen Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Robert Cook Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Doug Wells Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Katie Lefever Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
William Brown Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Mark Hemphill Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Myra Courtney Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Allen Packer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Carmella Simmons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
June Parris Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Frank Hendricks Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Janet Carithers Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Stanley Williams Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Barbara Lee Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Linda Gunter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Jackie Hunt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Mark Davis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Zenna Brown Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Howard Hepler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Michelle Conner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Clifton Noe Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Donald Medlin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Kent Earp Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Rachel Maloney Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
John Brewer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Mirian Deans Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Carolyn Church Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Marianne Roberts Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Talmadge Dickerson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Barbara Mitchell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Cynthia Benton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Ethel Casey Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Brian Puliafico Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Edith Deltgen Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Kathryn Johnson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
J D Grasty Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/11/2017
Lori Newcomb Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Brian Raby Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Lorraine Giardino Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Shirley Meader Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Giles Stroud Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Marsha Ray Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Emma Linton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Page C.7-16

From Subject Received
Kathy Jennings Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Carol Staley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Jacquie Stroupe Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
William Taylor Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Evelyn Radford Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Paula Prissy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Jay DeMuth Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Grady Stephens Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Jerry Johnson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Janice Keck Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Vickie Gilliland Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Lorraine Walters Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Barbara Spell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Fred Curley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
David Ballard Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Stephen Kitterman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Rodney Barnes Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Velma Snell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Bruce Mathis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
George Wynne Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Richard Sooy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
James Schoenberger Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Van Wilson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Norma Joyce Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Peg Stinnett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Mark Nunn Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Jacob Albrecht Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Kathy Hayden Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Marie Mingus Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/10/2017
Joseph Cook Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Richard Gaines Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Harold Presley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Collin Lindhardt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Frances Prince Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Rex Owens Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Martha Webb Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Angelita Blackstock Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Gary Williamson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
William Hartig Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Kristin Boyd Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
David Neal Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Anthony Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Wiley Jones Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Sue Lilly Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
John Heitman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Vernon Turner Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Cynthia Coffey Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Page C.7-17

From Subject Received
Debbie Greene Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Pat Wilkes Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Samuel Cunningham Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Virginia Painter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Doyle Buchanan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Mary Melville Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Robert Weber Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Matthew Miller Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Harold Robertson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Anthony Hudnall Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Walter Harris Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Evie Glodic Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Terrance Schrader Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Suzyette Moore Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Tony L Curtis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
David Butcher Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Joseph Rauzi Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
John Benedict Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Anita Linton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Joe Rogers Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
James Clark Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Elola Moore Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Michale Frank Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Nita Helton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Jack Walton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/9/2017
Paila Maybrey Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Eric Hoke Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Lloyd Kay Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Manuel Perez Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Catherine Hurd Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Richard Swiger Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Tammy Kauffman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Alice Angell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Larry Pierce Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Randy Knight Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Reid Tyler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Joel Scott Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Michael Shaw Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Marianne Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Lester McLaney Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Patricia Van Doren Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/8/2017
Horace Hugee Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/7/2017
Elizabeth Allison Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/7/2017
Timothy Weavil Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/7/2017
Howard Hutchison Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/7/2017
Jarvis Belch Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/7/2017
Larry Horowitz Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/7/2017
Page C.7-18

From Subject Received
Ernest Krist Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/6/2017
Jean McAllister Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/6/2017
Alix Caban Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/6/2017
Francesca Heflin Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/6/2017
Tammy Leggett Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/6/2017
Donald Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/6/2017
Sandra Kerley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Chris O'Connell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Lee Smith Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Hander DeSouza Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Edith Byrd Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Andy Honeycutt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Douglas Tetrick Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
William Faircloth Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Richard Worsinger Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Charmaine Santont Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/5/2017
Vanessa Arthur Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Shirley Shepherd Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Tammy Combs Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Susan Scott Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Patricia Phillips Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Althea Scheid Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
John Stein Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Terry Culbreth Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Patrick Teague Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Shedrick Willians Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Carol Adams Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Billie Woody Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Doxie Casper Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
William Alderman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Jean Veilleux Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Iwona Tauer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Linda Jenkins Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Susan Glover Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Donna Kovacs Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/4/2017
Melissa Mcnally Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Jackie Lushene-Edwards Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Deb Dornton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Charles Laspino Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Paul Zimmerman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Samuel Peace lll Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Paul Letendre Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Lynne Gabby Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Amy Ziolkowski Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Sue Allen Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Karen Palmer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Deborah Ensign Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Page C.7-19

From Subject Received
Teresa Presnell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Mr. & Mrs. C Mike & Linda
B Cox, Sr.
Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Jeff Holt Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/3/2017
Bonnie Todd Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Lisa Francia Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Shinetta Fields Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Edward Reilly Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Charles K Harnage Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Alice Tegan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Ginger Huerter Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Rev. Shernece Stephens Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Kimberly Beyer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Greg Futrell Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Cynthia Heaton Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Mary Bergman Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Philip Huffstetler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Byron Brady Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/2/2017
Helen Cline Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
Lynda Vaughan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
April Mace Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
Patrick Tighe Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
Shamus Nilan Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
C. B. Coker Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
Jeffery Mullis Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 11/1/2017
Rhonda Messer Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Derrick Propst Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Joanne Heckel Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Josephine Ramo Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Tina Johnson Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Joseph Ferone Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Susan Pearcy Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Judy Justice Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Mary McGrath Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Neil Ayrons Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Peter Burkott Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Peggy Chandler Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
Frieda Utley Support the ACP — Letter to NC Leaders and DAQ 10/31/2017
General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 10
David Fry The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/20/2017
Patty McIver The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/20/2017
Furman Williams The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/20/2017
Sherie Rumfelt The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/20/2017
Barnett Blair The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/20/2017
Diane Rankin The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Shirley Livengood The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Joe Hunsinger The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Page C.7-20

From Subject Received
James Barry The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
David Mize The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Carma Gibson The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Lou J Apa The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Randall Loflin The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Brian Puliafico The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/19/2017
Oscar Batchelor Jr The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/18/2017
Suzanne Nelson The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/18/2017
Nathan Knox The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/18/2017
Frances Patterson The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/18/2017
Melissa Werner The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/18/2017
Katherine Connor McKee The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/17/2017
Dawn Spencer The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/17/2017
Richard Bellomy The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/17/2017
Libby Parnell The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/17/2017
Libby Parnell The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/17/2017
James Schoenberger The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/17/2017
Barbara VanSchaick The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/16/2017
Robert Terry The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/16/2017
Joyce Plummer The ACP: Helping to Bridge the Rural-Urban Divide 11/16/2017
General Atlantic Coast Pipeline Support - Form Letter No. 11
Don Edwards We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/8/2017
Sondra King We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/8/2017
Patricia Adams We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/8/2017
Richard Sweeney We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 11/8/2017
Robert Pacitto We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Thomas Freeman We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Carol Coring We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Steven Maclellan We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Reid M. Saunders We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Eddie Vause Jr. We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
James Clark We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Michael Sloope We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/30/2017
Lee Balazs We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
James Williams We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
April Royal We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
David Costa We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
Robert Ferris We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
John Morgan We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
Rafael Mojica We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/29/2017
James Queen We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/27/2017
Teresa Austin We Need the Atlantic Coast Pipeline 10/27/2017

Attachment D – Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for
Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit

Page D-2
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, PublicHearing For Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form(Please Print Legibly!)
Date No\,1 .
(j)
\ 6 ;;i.o I J) Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
rr L / Name'Q)(U CAYO\ V)(U M
'Title ij(j i1 e SI d 0J �
L:_�lp.-Employer/Representinbg--=__.)=--"'L,-=-----1�,-------------------------
Mailing Address _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Date // /Jsb 71 l Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name l), Jt/arUJa t)/J15-ftJ, ,Tr. Title 11)1,-\l/l:1 c:kJ fa414f-'??! }ner
Employer/Representin.o-g-��-'"""/£_· _________________________ _
Mailing Address !; 'ti) So;ruly ( 'cos:.s /2.J
City and State ,Nasboi/Je J N C.Zip Code ,?-7 � S 6
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-3
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Date /$b5 j77
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name.__.._?1--=-"--�)_,__�---=-· �r��WJ\.. _____ _
Employer/Representing � Cin,� Ce:iht-kM�J �u�\.
Mailing Address PlD � ?1 LafS , 1 &�, ·uc,t c2
City and State <2 � . 1'.J(:__ 7J J Zip Code ______ /1�1-=Ff/&___._____..f/,�5' __ _
Yes No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin,c-------------------Date, ____________ _
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code. __________ _
Yes D No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registratio_n form.
Page D-4
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin �------------------Date -------------
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name�IYJ (fa r: k Title f'.la ./, IS: l. 0 I 7
Employer/Representin,;,-----------------------------­
Mailing Address '-I� 4 .3 Go fds b0re � �
City and State�( ;.)�<1:-'1......,__.,_e _ ___.!A��-c__..-=--------Zip Code J. 83 ? �
Yes No D
Hearing=:QA{y-14-uP
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Date_l f .__// ":::,__.� /�fr--=----
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
� f) Name /t..\Aj De TTS: Title _________ _
AA_ I Employer/Representing ��Ill.,.:.l!f-_;?
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City andState /<.ed<_'( fV/ f Zip Code._l-"""-'--------
No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-5
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Hearing ·1:f)� -f9c,p
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form(Ple ase Print Legibly!)
Date I 1/!5/f 7
@)
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your nameand affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name __ l::2�)h.!....!...A_L___·�,_S --=es-=--=s___;o=-------Title ____________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
o.o �\c½ ,..1 --r· City and State_���·--,--'-" ..... -�--------Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-----g �DA�&--�--f __ Date__.__//'-+-/-'---'/.S:-=--+--'//-+-7 __ _I I I Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your nameand affiliation will be correcJ,ly entered in the hearing record.
Name & �£, b o,f & llJJ/ls.} 1� re,L Title _______ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes
ITZJ
No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-6
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date-------------
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name-::D<5!:::) f-(,.,J Je._5 Title _________ _
Employer/Representin0-------------------------------
Mailing Address . _______________________________ _
City and State. ________________ _ Zip Code. __________ _
NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
to
Hearino..-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name 1li (,,/L /f-(A wtJ Title f:J&velUk.f1NP'...Ac77Jt!-L,cA. L'
Employer/Representin15-____________________________ _
Mailing Address _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-7
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!) ' t
Hearino--------------------Date--'/�. /--,c..�/,__._,,_�_----+--/r--2 __
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name� Dr{JlqqjL. Title _______ _
Employer/Re/e�ent in0-g_0.._J_=--�--<........;;=--=---------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!) [ 2-
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliatio ill be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title ____________ _
Employer/Repre sentin o-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes D No Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-8
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!) /3
Hearino--------------------Date_/_/_ .. f_S-:_.-;Jt,_-_/_1 __ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name -:i/em/1v9 �--["ey So�7 Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address 2 0 d-d-0 /J I d5 f< J.
City and State f/J; L ' 1 f"";q X ,,iV C Zip Code �zg 3 2
Yes No D D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
1+
Hearino-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name Sandra Clark. Title ____________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-9
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearing/l! Pc:,[J'o'J fl. f+tj Date_/ f-+-(--+-/_:i.t9_t '7 ___ _1 7
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your nameand affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name L/6 f/U-fdt£v Title ____________ _I
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
l(o
Hearin o-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your nameand affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name E&w--c� *'{!_� Title ____________ _
Employer/Representine------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-10
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form(Please Print Legibly!) I 1-
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your nameand affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name C.41<..7 ·7c, &&A A/ t Title ________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!) @
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _ Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your nameand affiliation will be corr�ctly entered in the hearing record.
Name \A)-e nd e fl 1lr Y �/ r t Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
·1City and State {ya..., ,7 sh1.,r5
I Yes No D
Zip Code -Z 7 75 � f I
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of yourstatement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-11
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date_/ f_/_{_5°_/_1�7 __ t I Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title_�_h_-14-___,f,____/4_ ___ :.__, ,u=-----/)4-, .. ,L
Employer/Representino-------------------------------­
Mail ing Address f/ D /3o �
City and State �kS to ,,JIl Zip Code &---7 'f S z__
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin 0--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested be low and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name ,-i')/\\/C � O qve . v Tit le -------------
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State _________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registrati on form.
Page D-12
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin.0-------------------Date. ___________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
NameCC\t\i\:fY'\ o-e. 6 l ove_·y-Title H-R \), re e,_,,+o·r
Employer/Representing 6' ov .e._ I{" Con� ,-r u c+' 0" (;o. I \ nc.
Mailing Address \Y Lo� �C\r\\Jt McAr K.£± Rood
City and State SPo bccvd I N (Zip Code.__,_,Q"'\-J---'-=-RJ___.___...,lt, ___ _
Yes No 0 D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin.t>--------------------Date. ___________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly e1:tered in the hearing record.
Name C,hrt?PJ 81-h(fc½,e: Title. _____ _
Employer/Representin.0----------------------------­
Mailing Address .Q.lO I O LJh.tUrL 'J f<._n,( ,
City and State N ltS h Vl l l-e AJ L
Yes No
Zip Code ,:J, 1 't-J�
D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-13
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
@)
Hearino--------------------Date ___________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name e4w/4 �/�4.J� Title. ____________ _
Employer/Representine------------------------------
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes D
Hearing T) A cp
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!) @
No Lo Cr, ro .o. s+a +-: o,,Date l I J J 5 / .:lo I 7 ' I I
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name-�e re..,.se_ V; cJ;=::-Title. _________ _ B , De_t;;:_;e n.s.e. L�Gt.1 v\J� Employer/Representing I U f' '2__ • Q s :€ /:::::_ f\ U I rn Y\ yY\ f O + a \
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code. __________ _
Yes No Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-14
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------D ate ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
N ame __ _.,D,_,,_.i..:;(A..._,J_l--=·��----'-'""-/-*'-a-=6:...=· .._( -------Title. ____________ _
Employer/Representin e------------------------------
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearinc,_ _________________ _ Date � /4J U J'/ 7 I
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affili.ati'on will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name W/J'1/P1�' (} /_,:/71//; ��', Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Ad dr ess _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes D No Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-15
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!) ' � I r· 11·-=i_Hearino-------------------Date ;1 /1 � T
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name (\�,VD\_;� �f\-!t e_.\.,.Title O \--C\ CU\.A 6, 1 \....I -Employer/Representin o...-_"-...;::�=---'L-=,. :..,.\_-\_-..:....(I\....:.·· _ ___,.,---'-......._-b,L-------------------
Mailing Address \ tY:� \\J tv\_O\..\Y\ �\-­
City and State 'b vf\�\I\. \ 1 �\..lC,, .r......., r' � Zip Code d: f'"it.,, � >
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
�·---. ..... .
Hearino-------------------Date. ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name �--/,II lJ�--� t1.� i··· Title. __________ _
Employer/Representin5-____________________________ _
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State f', flsfuro ) (V C ZipCode 27 > I?
Yes No 0 D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registratio� form.
Page D-16
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin.0--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name -�� -g t:-6< rc/&11 Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Addre ss ________________________________
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin o--------------------Date _____________
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
' �
Name �l�\C€n, \1,forc\f\f\ Title-------------
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-17
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality @
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date __ /--1-/ /---=-JS-____,/'---· l..:...._1 __ _I
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title ____________ _
Employer/Representine------------------------------
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State. ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D
_,/
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
@ Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
1\11/Reo.
(_··:.,;-,_...., "11 • •J)I �_,./
1/.
.,J---· /\'! , , n r' e ?. C:u e J 1.fl_/ Hearino-__,,__.__v_l ______________ _ Date I I / I 5 / I 7I ,
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name ___________________ _ Title ___________ _
Employer/RepresentinE>-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code. __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-18
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino---------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliatioywm be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name W,' I //0\ vY\ Q,-een<?_Title -------------
Employer/Representin o-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name [A.JO� \ \.} Ct{l.r--\?<L
Employer/Representing, ____ ffi_·:")=, _··_\ _______________________ _
Mailing Address 7-S \. � • \ \,-(.3,S'jv::,( � .• ,
City and State i'·I\ ..._\ \J<if�'"' ? I�
Yes No
)
J:\�, l ,-J ':,'•·/, lr.,_o
Zip �ode_/_9'--S�S-_:r--__ _
D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-19
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ___________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
�/
Hearin..,_ __________________ _ Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Employer/Representino--__ A_c_._P _________________________ _
Mailing Address ______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ �pCode _________ _
Yes D No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-20
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!) Hearin __________________ _ Date ____________ _ Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record. Name L G: v r--(.� c·e lc Jcvt '<.Title ____________ _ Employer /Representino--..... A_· _c__? _________________________ Mailing Address _______________________________ _ City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registratiO!]. form.
Hearin
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
0--------------------Date_// ---r-1 l_s ____ / 1 __7 __ Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record. N�l ,ado ::-,bcjnn Titl C,nCQ/2n C,f;l-eh Employer/Representin .,.,g _______ ----:;:,a--....... ----:-------------------Mailing Address 1 S() G, a 1 cd) �M, (1 ,<-� l. City and State ::D,, %5 J A / . c.Zip Code zq g � \
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-21
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Employer/Representin 0-_____________ ....;.._ ______________ _
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin .a---------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name __ --1r-lf2:_r-�" ,.......:..k__,,___--=�:.........;;..:e,,_A.=-:J_· ______ _ y Title ___________ _
Employer/Representing.___,_A_,"t:1"'-'..--.'---'--!�--=------=-J::....,· ""-"' -:;__ ______________________ _
Mailing Address _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes D No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-22
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
®
Hearine--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard dunng this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name�1Ctr t/r\. F .,R c le../ Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearine-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation .w_ill be correctly entered in the hearing record.
. . � ;-, • ("1 s ,.,.-r· · C
Name ½ S Of .,__)l or �Title ,..]f)I.A,v1tt, l1, U )•
t.) ( J> lJ JI.,,, Employer/Representin D----'-'--+--"'-�· _1.____,1--------=---'-'...IL--7,,f_"·'--, _____________ _
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code. __________ _
Yes D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-23
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin 0-------------------Date, ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name J(,�havJ2.. \t-/4,{51� 3 e Y'
Employer/Representing (! ,-t;r � E,dJ::.7 /Vbu.n-r
Mailing Address � 31 s .En1111/J,... s-t:
City and State 112.oc,4 Mtfu., � T NC.. Zip Code 2 7 '3tJ'L ·
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
®
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name Luc..; f\da Cook Title ____________ _
Employer/Representin0------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
YesD No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-24
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name {a II ,!) Hk C ,,Z l"t}JI Title ____________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearint:>--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name /& /.,,,, <f L /(, Title ____________ _
Employer/Rep resentin.0-'------------------------------
Mailing Address �i:S-C; 7 23 ;s T· , /I w r f/4,e.. /?..oc,f
City and State '/ IH �a._,� \ \)\ \ Vi X I Zip Code '2 J $ lP Cc.?
Yes NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-25
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin .0---------------------Date. ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliatiol) will be correctly entered in the hearing record.d #7 . , /' /
Name �� � ,{la u«2'¢l Title. ___________ _) 7
Employer/Representin 0-------------------------------
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes NoD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-------------------Date, ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title. ____________ _
Employer/Representin0-------------------------------
Mailing Address. ______________________________ _
City and State. ________________ _ Zip Code. __________ _
YesD No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-26
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin0-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record. OA.:z:,. \-s
i� ' ( LR> ?--, ""\..-\ /A ,, 2--
l C O (JPS f't._�l}<Z.lEZ__ Name G'---L \ (/'-'\ ""'":> Title ------------<_-0· c2v\ � (/\ � A f ' Employer/Representino-g __ .> ______ ----4--+---L-vu___:::.-->=--------------
Mailing Address. _______________________________ _
City and State. ________________ _ Zip Code. _________ _
Yes D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Date I/ !ts-/17 ,
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name!Sr-'"-q )'\r) ,�c.-1 Title. __________ _
Employer/Rep resentino------------------------------
Mailing Address _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code. _________ _
Yes D No G Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-27
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
HearinD--------------------Date--=-/{--_____.___,,_/ �-� I 1-----Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation wi · be correctly entere in the hearing record.
Name__,,_ljL._�::....,,,,.,.__,.__.,_�-4-1..l.4....,.:..Jl,,Jt-LJL.�1--,-___.:i,4-:..__ __
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name 7ft /l'111J /'< JlAQ_�p � ¾c,; Title ___________ _
Employer/Representin.0------------------------------
Mailing Address _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes D No Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-28
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date. ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record. Name � N'fA--bf /t N S Title. ____________ _
Employer/Representin.z:,_ ____________________________ _
Mailing Address, _______________________________ _
City and State. ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin o--------------------Date. ____________ _ Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record. Name Ge HA/\ J1 Lt( D6 uI \ I Title. ____________ _ Employer/Representino-------------------------------Mailing Address·------,---------------------------City and State_-+-;��) [\-��}1'-'-t . ....,_i/\�l_l e__ .. _�/_J_(__. __
Yes No D
Zip Code __________ _
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-29
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin0--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affil�o/,ion will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name v1�� WJ/y.,L Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mai ling Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name ,'11L f vr' 11 L < !? JC)-�5-e/7 r � I Title ____________ _
Employer/Representino-------------------------------
Mai ling Address _______________________________ .
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
YesD No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-30
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be c rrectly entered in he hearing record.
Name _1iJ-.:---'-"'--++''----'>o,=-.X......,,.:O::....-=C4--===:..:�'--!lrt4:.,__:__·---J1--------Title ___________ _
Employer/Representin o------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin o--------------------D ate ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title ____________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code� 7 � 3 /
Yes D No
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-31
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearint>-------------------
Yes No D D
_..
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!). . .
Hearin o-------------------·,. Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name _ _.(; ...... ? l.._,'.p.._¼=l/ ...... b.:...,.._ ...... 1-:-,.__.lo'---"/'-W11L.1-1-,15u_1 ,..:.J!L<'.4,,.,_________ Title. __________ _
Employer/Representino-g--'B_a-'--'C,LJ,=1A.;;_
1
-"?-'-L-_ __._�-¥-'"'l-·h,¼f\l'i.L.'7!f-------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes D No
�
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-32
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin o--------------------Date ___________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino...-----------------------------
Mailing Address \ L\, (, 6 t>eo.ol!± \Y\nf kt w\
City and State '6e,a \CD°'-f c!
Yes No B D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a co py of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin 0--------------------Date _ ___,_/.,_/ ·--=-/_S_, ,__)7_.__ __ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name ,S < \ �� �t., i+l-5--l-or-i Title ------------
Employer/Repre sentin0----------------------------­
Mailing Address lt sq Le.-bor;'br-. a, ':1 .r,A K.c0 )
City and State_-=G"'--;.4.,_·--=-\At--Si..:...b"-'1,;_r___,tc,-' __ ,-'1'-c=--=---------\ J' Zip Code �J ��3 1
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-33
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-------------------D ate ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
==�o� in the hearing record.
Title ____________ _
Employ�0--�-----------------------------
Mailing Addr ess _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D [2f Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearin 0-------------------D ate ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Namef'ti'1 fhuNcJ B,#t?/IIF Title ________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-34
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!) ··-
Hearinc--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
---r - { Name .... _,.1. · y,._j'I/.,.__ --r--t---<--Title ____________ _
Employer/Representinc-------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration fonn.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name <c,y:\ C �-a ful\(Ll O-ib Title ____________ _
Employer/Representing (\-e.a.b\fYZlk rfor (\) C
Mail ing Addres s _____________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code _________ _
Yes tJ No D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration fonn.
Page D-35
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affilia��� � b� corr� entered in th: hearing record.
Name ..... ,Z•le,� T-::>>< �/(/4 G-Title . ____________ _ r IP'
Employer/Representin!:>-------------------------------
Mailing Address 'f 7 SI Ai L--I f' tt-
City and State � AA-Z fir JI/;;:
Yes No
Zip Code._....::r:9-'----'7'-tf _.5_1 ___ _
D Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form (Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino-------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name //f'J/.J-rr G / 6 J e:_r Title ____________ _
Employer/Representino-g __ G_-_1_· o_\J_e...r___c,_ __ c_;l..'.):..__rl__:_:S=--+_· _,__r....,.u"--..::c=-· ...:..h_, --==·C'.>::::....:....•'l�...:..C:::...........:o:....-+-2..l-.....:/7:........:....._;:c:;_: .::....· -­/
Mailing Address P -0 . [3 (J X: 4 D
City and State_{J_/_;;::e::...._t;=· �::...._4....L.!o:......<.....:i=-------..:.A...L..½_< _l__,l,..___N..:........:::c�
Yes No
Zip Code '-.;:) 7 f �C°
Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-36
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit
Division of Air Quality
Public Hearing Registration Form
(Please Print Legibly!)
Hearino--------------------Date ____________ _
Please furnish the information requested below and indicate whether you wish to be heard during this public
hearing. This information is necessary in order that you be given an opportunity to speak and so that your name
and affiliation will be correctly entered in the hearing record.
Name�b.--1 , ..... ft_j�!\_d_tl __ C,_,e;�, _c,_k_ ___________ _ Title ___________ _
Employer/Representino------------------------------
Mailing Address _______________________________ _
City and State ________________ _ Zip Code __________ _
Yes l'foD Do you wish to speak at the hearing? Please submit a copy of your
statement to the hearing clerk along with this registration form.
Page D-37
Attachment D. Pictures and Registration Forms from November 15, 2017, Public Hearing for Northampton Compressor Station Air Quality Permit

Attachment E – Supplemental Information Received from Applicant
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Mceachern, Charles
Sands, Heather
FW: [External] FW: Additional Information Request
Mondy, December 11, 2017 9:28:04 AM
image001.png
image002.png
TK-2 Drawing.pdf
TK-3 Drawing.pdf
TK-1 Drawing.pdf
image004.png
FYI
Charles M. McEachern, III, P.E.
Environmental Engineer / Permits Coordinator
Division of Air Quality - Raleigh Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919 791 4276 office
919 881 2261 fax
[e-mail]
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
www.ncair.org
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Laurence A Labrie [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:25 PM
To: Mceachern, Charles <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] FW: Additional Information Request
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail].
TK-1 (Pipeline Liquids Storage Tank aka Hydrocarbon Tank) will receive and store pipeline liquids
captured by the station’s separators and filter-separators. The emissions associated with the
operation of this Hydrocarbon storage tank are estimated using E&P Tanks to ensure capture of any
flash emissions (which the EPA TANKS program cannot estimate).  We conservatively estimated that
this storage tank will complete five (5) turnovers per year. The tank normal vent is vertical.
TK-2 (Accumulator Tank) receives liquids from the compressor building and auxiliary building floor
drains. The emissions associated with the operation of this Accumulator waste tank were calculated
using EPA’s TANKS program. The tank normal vent is vertical.
Page E-2
Attachment E. Supplemental Information Received from Applicant
TK-3 (Aqueous Ammonia Storage Tank) will have no emissions during normal operation. 
Larry Labrie
Phone: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
From: Mceachern, Charles [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:34 PM
To: Laurence A Labrie (Services - 6)
Subject: [External] Additional Information Request
Hello Larry, I need some information about the three insignificant tanks, TK-1, 2, and 3.  For each of
them I need a description of the exhaust stack/pressure relief valve, or whatever vent they are
equipped with.  Also, for TK-3 I need an estimate of the actual ammonia emissions.  Maybe the
consultant can run the TANKS program for this tank as well?  I need this information as fast as you
can get it to me.  Please call me if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Charles M. McEachern, III, P.E.
Environmental Engineer / Permits Coordinator
Division of Air Quality - Raleigh Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919 791 4276 office
[e-mail]
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
www.ncair.org
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may
be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY
COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional
Page E-3
Attachment E. Supplemental Information Received from Applicant
express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the
individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the
message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
Page E-4
Attachment E. Supplemental Information Received from Applicant
6'-0'0AW.
J'-11" lYP.
comAm SNT-1·-''-4+{ 01,e
AC CESSORY NOTES: 8,0,M. FDR HT-118980-Tl·D TANK 1D INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SHIPPED LOOSE FOR AELD INSTALtATlON BY OTHERS: ITEM BASE TY ITEM TY TOTAL TY STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION ONE (1) -MORRISON B18F-0400AG, 2" CLOCK GAUGE. (ITTM 'E'} ONE (1) •MORRISON 1419-0700-lT 2" X 6'-0" LONG ALUMINUM DROP TUBE. (ITEM 'E') ONE (1) • MORRISON 179 HCl-2100 IC, 2� THREADED All CAP. (ITEM 'K') � ONE (1) -PROTECTOSEAL MODEL 854'1H 4" FLANGED CONSERVATION VENT ,,J.,/ � 1/2 OZ VACWM, 1/2 OZ PRESSURE, ,5 OZ/IN SQUARED. (ITEM 'P) ,,1.. \,, If• ! ONE (1) • SHAND & XJRS 91210-H-01-00, EMERGENCY VENT, SET 1.5 OZ/SQ. IN, (ITEM 'A') V 10'-0M HEATED X 3'-0M COLO END W/ 4• X 3• X 150t c.s. RANGED HEATER WELL W/ 3• SCH."10-JO'l·SS PIPE WELL, EP TERMINAL ENCLOSURE, CONTROLS BY OTHERS. (ITEM 'C) NH>l•fl-SElffl>IIH!rAOWITii l!M"WIR<,(ITl:,..,_1 ONE (I.}• ROSEMOUNT 3144P TEMPERATURE TRANSMITTER MODEL llll+lPDWE5Ks.xA. (ITEM 'P') ONE (1) • ROSEMOUNT 214C TEMPERAlURE SENSOR MODEL •�H.Q:t'.11SMBID3E016�1. (ITEM 'P')
4 s 'o"'J\;
']
NE (1) • 3" 11kW/480V/3PH OPEN COIL ELEMENT 13'-0'' OAL
11'-S 3/4" 0,A.L TAt.lK.-----------------� £g�� rn: ��i:���6 ��;���';;°����D�� ���������B1SC027BQ8SXW. (ITEM 'P')
t----------------9'·10" ST.Sll!'l.L---------------9 7/e· O,A.H, HEAO
10
11
12
ll " 26.J7SII-.
A •
C D
G
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC
c/o DOMINION TRANSMISSION INC
NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION
1,000 GALLON HYDROCARBON TANK
P.O. #4500299048
ArB:iii;:;i,;,,;:--;:;--::-:::--::--:-��----J::MPAIIY AJlANIJC COAST PIPELINE. LLC clo DOM, TRANS:' QUIPMEI/T NAMF D5 9 HYDROCARBON TANK (WFOOl) QUIPMEIIT NO. DWG #HT-118980·Tl-D s NO. PO:'1500299048 / SO-l189B0 AllK SIZE DIA 4'-Q" I FlljT\I 9'-10"
26,375 in
TS<S-.2S 4" PLATE STEEL SEE W.D, FOR MATERIALS HD-CS·ASME-F0�.3125 4'-0" 00 X 5/16• ASME FlANGEO & DISHED HEAD, SA-516-70, .]125" NOM, ,25" MIN THK, 1.5" SF, NO CENTER HOLE, SINGLE BEVEL INSIDE SOL-CS-UL-122 X 12 X 48 4'-0" DIA. IA. STYLE X 12" ELEVAT ION X 122 DEGREE SADDLE FOR TANKS 12'--0" LONG ANO SHORTE 4• THK. TANKS IN DIKE ONLY LBR-10� X 8 X 3 8" X 8" X 3" 10 GAUGE LABEL BRACKET LL<:S·T0-.75·5 X 12 5" X 12" X 3/4" TEAR DROP LIFTING LUG U!4·5TIUXER..PLTw-1'5 4" TH.K.X2'•5" LG X s·w STRlK.ER.PLATE SUVl·STRIXER.-PLT-&-«S 1J4" THK. X 3•.9• LG XS" W STRIKER PLATE DROP-TS-.25 11'1" PLATE DROP MATERIAL MANWAY COLLAR) MWY·DOM-GUARD-CHILD-24 2' X 1/4" STAINLESS STEEL RAT BAR CHILD GUARD FOR 24" MANWAY DIKE<:S-1000-186X72X24 15'-6"L X 6'-0'W X 2'-0"H SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DIKE FOR 1,000 GALLON HORlZONTAL TANK RRS·HLF-186X72·1000·12 15'-6'' L X 6'-0" W 12 GAUGE ALUMINUM REMOVABLE HALF RAINSHIELD FOR A
WIYNN•tlR-QLY•l5XlS-2·!."S LAD·STR-6R-134-NS STR-CS-ANG-2 X 2 X .375
5a DE"r,tJl SEE DETAIL SEE DETAIL 5a:DE"r"1l SEE DETAIL SEE DETAIL
SEE DET"IL SEE DETAIL
4'-0" OlA X 9'·10" LG 1,000 GALLON HORIZONTAL TANK 2'·1" W X 12'�" LG, GALYANJZED WAlXWAY W/ HANDRAILS LADDE GALV STRAIGHT WI 8 RUNGS 2" X 2" X 3/8" ANGLE IRON ROOF MANWAY l<I" 0.lAJAPI/ROOF} DRAIN (2• DIAJ150#/Rf/SCH. 80) HEATER (4" OIA,/150#/RF/SCH. 40) INlfl IV/ Dll'RJSER (6" DIA./1$0•/RF,SO,. IO) U ID LEVEL GAUGE 4" DIAJ1S01/RF/SOI. 80 NORMAL VENT 4• OIA./1SO#/Rf!SCH. 80 OVERA.QV,,I (2" OlA./NPT/SCH. 40/tt-3000) AA0AA t.£Va.GAl.lGE (4" DIAJ150#/RFJSCH, eo SPARE W/ BLIND 4" OJA,/1SO#/RF/SOI. 80) 1 SEE DETAIL THEIF HATCH ('1' DIA./150#/RF/SCH, 80)
2 SEE oET•IL
oeu;reo sa oETAJL SEE DETAIL SEE DETAIL
1. MATERIAL: RIGHT HEAD: LEFf HEAD: SHELL: NOZ ZLES: COUPLINGS: STRUCTURAL: MANWAY GASKET: BOLTING:
DJKE DRAlN WJ PLUG Cl" OlAJ3000#/HALF COUPLING) THERMOSTAT 1" DlAJNPT/SCH. 80/lt3000JSS TRU:K CONNECTIONIORAIN (2" OIA./1SO#/RF/SCH. 80) TEM.PERAlURE TllANSMJTTE.R (314" DLAJ3000#JNPT/SS)
=DESIGN DATA= TYPE SA-S16-70 SA-S16-70 SME f&D H.R. CARBON STEEL PLATE SA-106-B-SML S N/A SEE· SA-105-CS N/A SEE· SA-36 1/8" THK, GARLOCK BLUE-GAURD 3000# ZINC PLATED
2. VESSEL TO Ill: BUil. T & LABELED ACCORDING TO ASME CODE SECTION VITI, DIVISION I CURRENT EDITTDN : YES: NO: x .
THK, 0,3125 0,3125 0.250 B,0,M, B,Q,M,
(u) l'-r--.;i:.,_----------6'-l:----------o1--------4·.u·---------MK CAPACITY 1 000 GAL, DESIGN PRESSURE: ATMOSPHERIC CODE STAMP: NONE DESIGN TEMP.: ·20° TO 200°F CORR, ALLOWANCE: NONE
�-+------------------1r--ro.A.L\'lA�'IAY---1------------------i BUILT HAMIL TON TANKS EXT. PRESSURE: N/A X·RAY REQ'D: NONE ..
&&PLAN VIEW
1-------------------lr•S3/4"0.A.L TANJ<-----------------"'
t---------------9'·U7"ST.51'5.L---------------9 7/8" O.A.H. 9 7/8" O,A.H, HEAO
�----------------------15'�"0,A.L.CONTAINMENT-DT�ll-----------------------"'
.&.&.FRONT VIEW
*NOTE: LADDER & WALKWAY NOT SHOWN.
6" TYP,
2017 COLUMBUS, OHIO
STAINLESS STEEL
NAME PLATE
0
Er\1s, INC. ®LISTED A80VEGR01JND TANK FOR FLAMMABLE LTQUrDS �O. _OATE.0:;.,3 1 UL-142 LABELING
THIS TANK REQUIRES EMERGENCY RELlEF VENTING, CAPACITY NOT LESS THAN n±:.8.QQ_ CUBIC PEET PER HOUR
UL-142 VENTING
FOR APPROVAL
APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION.
-CUSTOMER HAS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS.-CONSTRUCTION WILL BE SCHEDULED WHEN
SIGNED APPROVED DRAWING IS RECEIVED.
D APPROVED AS DRAWN.
D REVISE & RESUBMIT W/ NOTED CHANGES.
SIGNATURE: _________ _
DATE:
3 UPD 2 I ' REV
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPER1Y OF HAMILTON TANKS, LLC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE WffilOLJT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF HAMILTON TANKS, LLC IS PROHIBITED.
TEST PRESSURE: 30 PSIG JOINT EFF,: 0.70
M.D.M,T.: N/A HEAT TREAT: NONE OTHER: 3. INTERIOR: TANK: SEAL WELD All INTERNALS. REMOVE All WELO SlAG AND VAO.IUM, (SHIP CLEAN ANO ORV). SAND BLAST TO 'NEAR WHITE' PER SSPC•SP10 ANO APPLY THE FOLLOWING 1ST COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS PHENICON HS Fl.AKE ALLEO@ 5,0 TO 6.0 OFT. 2ND COAT: SHERWIN W1LUAMS PHENICON HS FlAKE RU.ED@ 5.0 TO 6.0 OFT.
CONTAINMENT DIKE ANO RAJNSHIELO: SANO Bl.AST TO 'NEAR WHITE' PER SSPC-SP10 ANO APPLY THE FOLLOWING ,&,.15T COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B69VZ12/869VZ1S/869011 ZINC CLAD II PLUS@ 2,0 TO 4.,0 OFT. 2ND COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B67/867VS RECOATA8LE EPOXY@ '1,0 TO 6.0 OFT. ]RO COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #865300/860V30 HI-SOLID POLYURETHANE@ 3.0 TO 4.0 OFT. •t,l,lt,; 10 4. EXTcR!OR: Tilt.'); (QNTAlffl1{RT DUl: MD y.tr§HJElQ: SAUD OlASTTO 'NEAR WHITE' PER SSPC•.$9-JI) AND APPLY THE FOLLOWING _&1sr COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B69VZ12/S69V215/869D11 ZINC CLAD II PLUS@ 2.0 TO -l,0 OFT, 2ND COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B67/B67VS RECOATABLE EPOXY@ -l,0 TO 6,0 OFT. 3RD COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #BG5300/860V30 HI-SOLID POLYURETHANE@ l,0 TO 4.0 DFT. COLOR: MUNSELL 10B/7/1
Sa. All bolt hake< to strad<lle natural ccnter1lne or non>es. Vessel not designed for existing piping, All fittings to be protected For shipment. Tolerances: Shell Diameter (Out of Roundness): ±1 %. Ron cll!vcll ¼1%. Sb. Customer has the responsfbil,ty to verify all dimensions on this drawing, 6, NOMINAL CAPAC ITY: 1.000 GAU.CNS EST. wr. EMPTY: 6,600# NET 7. NOTES: TAAi:: 2,,00., A. QUANTITY: ONE (1) TANK REQUIRED. DIKE: �SO-B, TANK TO BEAR MANUFACTURERS AND Ul LABELS ONLY. RAINSHIELD: 3001 C. FOR TANK ENO VIEWS, SEE OWG. IIHT-118980-Tl-D2. WJ,1.--,.W�Y.9S01 0, FOR NOZZLE DETAILS, SEE OWG. #HT-118980•Tl-D3, LADDER: 100, E. FOR CONTAINMENT DIKE DETAILS, SEE OWG. #HT-118980-Tl-04. F. FOR HALF RAINSHIELO DETAILS, SEE OWG, #HT-118980-Tl·OS. G, FOR LADDER & WAL'tN-JAY OETAil5, SEE DWG, #HT·118980-T1-D6,
)08; NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION (TAG: WFOOI)&
,_
t-800·627-8265
DfSC!IIPTION: 1,000 GALLON HORIZONTAL UL-142 SINGLEWALL STORAGE TANK W/ CONTAINMENT DIKE & REMOVABLE HALF RAINSHIELD (HYDROCARBON TANK DS,9)
CUSTON� J & ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC c/o DOMINION TRANSMISSION, INC. D'hG.• REV, HT·l1B9BO·Tl·D1 S
4500299048 DAT£ SCALE: DAA.Vm SY: 6/6/2016 N.T.S S, 1-'0RRISDN
so, 11B980 o,roa:o av: J. KINDIG
Page E-5
Attachment E. Supplemental Information Received from Applicant
s--o� w.
,·.a-
mrfUINMENT-000:
6·
1•-11,r
2'-4" O.A.H. CONTAINMENT Dr 61/4"
-r--t--
ACCESSORY NOTES: TANK TO !NO.UDE THE FOLLOWING SHIPPED LOOSE FOR FIELD INSTALLATION BY OTHERS: ONE (1) • MORRISON 818F-0400AG, 2" QOCK GAUGE, (ITEM 'P) ONE (1) -MORRISON #419-0700-lT 2" X 6'-0" LONG ALUMINUM DROP lUBE. (ITEM 'P) ONE (1) -MORRISON 354-0200-AV, 2" UPDRAFT VENT. (ITEM 'G') ONE (1) -MORRISON 179 MCI-2100 re, 2" THREADED Fill. CAP. (ITEM 'K') ONE (1) -MORRISON 2440F-0050-AV, 6• FLANGED EMERGENCY VENT, 8 OZ. (ITEM 'C) ONE (1) -PROCESS HEATING 3" 15,Sk.W/480V/3PH OPEN COIL ELEMENT 17-0" DAL. 1<1'-0" HEATED X 3'-0'' COLD END W/ 4" X 3" X 150# C,S. R.ANGED HEATER WELL W/ 3" SCH,40-304-SS PIPE WEU., EP TERMINAL ENCLOSURE, CONTROLS BY OTHERS, (ITEM 'D') � .. ��� i ONE (I)• ROSEMOUNT 3144P TEMl'EAA.m.RElRAH'5Jo11fflR MODEL IJ14'4PDtAU.5M5XA. (ITEM 'P') ONE (1) -ROSEMOUNT 214C TEMPERATURE SENSOR MODEL f21<K:RWSMB103E0627SL£5XAX\AI. (ITEM 'P') ONE (1) • ROSEMOUNT 114C THERMOWELL MODEL #114CE0600TAB1SC027BQ85XW, (ITEM 'P') ONE (1) -GALVANIZED LADDER AND WALKWAY W/ HANDRAILING.
6"
ITEM BASE ITEM TY TOTAL TY
1.
10 ll 12 13 30.875 in 30,875 in ...
B.O.M, FOR HT·H8982·Tl·D
STOCK NUMBER
SDL-CS-UL-120 X 12 X 64
u ... cs--ro-.1s-sx 11 BURN-STRIKER-PL T-A-NS BURN-STRIKER-PL T-8-NS DIKE-CS-2500-240X96X28
RRS-HLF-240X96-2500-12
DESCRIPTION 1 4� ,UTE S'T£R. SEE VII). FOR MATEAIAL5 5'-4" DIA.1/4• STOCK FLAT A.ND FL.Af.l.GED HEAD S'-4" DIA, UL STYLE X 12" ELEVATION X 120 DEGREE SADDLE FOR 1/4• THK. SINGLE WALL TANKS 24'-0• LG. AND SHORTER INSIDE DIKE ONLY
S-X 11" l<l/4' TfAA, DROP UffitlC Ll.<l
1/4" THK. X 2'-10" LG X 5" W STRIKER PLATE 20'-0" L X 8'-0" W X 2'-4" H SEOJNDARY CONTAINMENT DIKE FOR 2,500 GALLON f10R.IZONrAL TANK .2.0'-0" L X 8--0" W 12 GAUGE ALUMINUM REMOVABLE HAlf RAINSHIELO FOR A 5'-4" DIA X 15'-0" LG 2,500 GALLON HORIZONTAL TANK
M'NY-OOM-GUARD-CHIL0-24 2' X 1./4" STAINLESS STEEL FLAT BAR CHILD GUARD FOR 24" MAtfWAY
SEE DETAIL
S£E DETAI!.. SEE DETAIL U ID LEVEL GAUGE (4• DIA,/150#/RF/SCH. 80) SEE DETAIL NORMAL VENT 4" OIA_/150#/RF/SCH. 80)
511:f Dl:T/1,ll, QIIT<Ef (1' 01/VISO•IRF/SOl.80) SEE DETAIL OVERFLOW (2" DIA,/NPT/SCH, 40/#3000J SEE DETAIL RADAR LEVEL GAUGE (4'' DIA./15011-"/RF/SCH. 80) TtiElf HA.Tei (oil"' OIA./ ISOt'/.Af/SCH. 8Q) DELETED SEE DETAIL THERMOSTAT 1• DIA.JNPl:tSCH. 80/#3000/55)
.. ... , lAN O.D.
6" TYP,
S'-4' TANIC 0.0.
) l :,_ I I REV
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC c/o
DOMINION TRANSMISSION, INC.
NORTiiAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION
2,500 GALLON ACCUMULATOR TANK
P.O. #4500299048
o CO�PAIIVATu\NTIC CQASI PIPELINE, LLC clo DON, }RANS? EQUIPMENT NAME D5.8 ACQJMULATOR TANK rDFOOlJ EQUIPMENT NO. DWG #HT-118982-Tl-D
0
JOB NO. pp:45002990:38 I SQ-116962 TANK 512E DIA 5'-4" IOOff.�l-�'�·P-" ___ TANK CAPACITY 2 500 GAL
BUILT HAMILTON TANKS 2017 COLUMBUS, OHIO
STAINLESS STEEL
NAME PLATE
©usrrn ABOVEGROUND TANK FOR Fl.AM MABLE LIQUIDS NO. UL-142 LABELING
THlS TANK REQUIRES EMERGENCY RELlEF VENTING, CAPACIT Y NOT LESS THAN 224 BOO CUBIC FEET PER HOUR
UL-142 VENTING
FOR APPROVAL
APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION.
0
-CUSTOMER HAS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS.
-CONSTRUCTION WILL BE SCHEDULED WHEN
SIGNED APPROVED DRAWING IS RECEIVED.
0 APPROVED AS DRAWN.
0 REVISE & RESUBMIT W/ NOTED CHANGES.
SIGNATURE: _________ _
DATE:
SEE DETAIL 01� ORAUI WJ JI\UG rz· DIA./30001/HAlf COUPLING SfE DETAIL TJUJCK CONNECTIOPI 11,• DIA,Jl5Q•IR.Flsot. li0) TEMPERATURE TRANSMITTER 3 4" DIAJ3000#JNPTJSS
=DESIGN DATA=
1. MATERIAL:
RIGHT HEAD: H.R. CARBON STEEL
LEFT HEAD: H.R. CARBON STEEL N/A
SHELL: H.R. CARBON STEEL N/A
NOZZLES: SA-106-8-SMLS N/A
COUPLINGS: SA-105-CS N/A
STRUCTURAL: SA-36
MANWAY GASKET: 1/8" THK. GARLOCK BLUE-GAURD 3000#
BOLTING: ZINC PLATED
1YPE F& F F& F
PLATE
SEE·
SEE·
Z. VESSEL 10 BE BUILT&. LABl:LED ACCORDING TO ASI-IE CODE SECTION VIII, Diil!S!ON 1 CURRENT EOITTON : YES: NO! Jl ,
DESIGN PRESSURE:ATMOSPHERIC CODE STAMP: NONE
DESIGN TEMP.: ·20° TO 200°F CORR. ALLOWANCE: NONE
EXT. PRESSURE: N/A X-RAY REQ'D: NONE
TEST PRESSURE: N/A JOINT EFF.: 0.70
M.D.M.T,: N/A HEAT TREAT: NONE
OTHER:
3. INTERIOR:
THK.
0.250
0.250
0.250
B.O.M.
B.0.M.
TANK: SEAL WELD ALL INTERNALS. REMOVE ALL WELD SLAG AND VAQJUM, (SHIP CLEAN AND DRY). SAND BLAST TO 'NEAR WHITE' PER SSPC-SP10 AND APPLY THE FOLLOWING 1ST COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS PHENICON HS FLAKE ALLED@ 5.0 TO 6,0 DFT. 2ND COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS PHENICON HS FLAKE AllED@ 5,0 TO 6,0 DFT. CONTAINMENT DIKE AND RAINSHIELD: SAND BLAST TO 'NEAR WHITE' PER SSPC-SP10 AND APPLY THE FOLLOWING _&1ST COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B69VZ12/869VZ15/B69011 ZINC CLAD II PLUS@ 2,0 TO 4,0 OFT, 2ND COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS IIB67/B67V5 RECOATABLE EPOXY@ 4,0 TO 6.0 DFT. 3RD COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS ltB65300/860V30 HI-SOLID POLYURETHANE@ 3.0 TO 4,0 DFT. CO R: MUS 4, EXTERIOR: TAffF CO:ff!A)NMHfT PfM �o S!U@:ltru): SAM> 8tA$T TO ·ne.u Wf·UTe Pat SSK•Stl'lO "'--.ro APPLY THE FOLLOWING &_tST COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B69VZ12/869VZ1S/B69D11 ZINC CLAD II PLUS@ 2,0 TO 4,0 OFT, 21.0 COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS .¢867/867V5 RECOATABLE EPOXY@ 4,0 TO 6,0 DFT, 3RD COAT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #B65300/860V30 HI-SOLID POLYURETHANE@ 3,0 TO '1,0 OFT, COLOR: MUSELL 108/7/1
5;,, All bolt holes to straddle ""t\Jral ccnte�lnc or "'" Vessel not designed for existing piping. All nttings to be protected ror shipment. Tolerances: Shell Diameter (Out of Roundness): ±1 %. Fl e·Lettl: ±1%. Sb, Customer has the respons bill\' to ve,ily all dimensions on lhis drawing,
6. NOMINAL CAPACITT: 2,500 GALLONS EST. Wf. EMPTY: 9,650# NET 7. NOTES: TANK: '1,400# A. QUANTITY: ONE (1) TANK REQUIRED. DIKE: 3,4501 8, TANK TO BEAR MANUFACTURERS AND UL LABELS ONLY, RA[NSH(ELD: 375# C: FOR TANK END VIEWS, SEE 01/VG, #HT-11B9B2-Tl-D2. WAL'l<Y-JAY: 1,3251 D. FOR NOZZLE DETAILS, SEE DWG. #HT-118982-Tl-03. LADDER: 100/t E. FOR CONTAINMENT DIKE DETAILS, SEE DWG. #HT-118982-Tl-04. F. FOR HALF RAJNSHIELD DETAILS, SEE DWG . #HT-1189B2-Tl-DS. G. FOR WAL�AY & LADDER DETAILS, SEE D\NG, ltHT-11B982-T1-D6,
JOB: NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSO R STATION (TAG: DFOOl)
� 1-800-627-8265 OCSCRlPTION:
2,500 GALLON HORIZONTAL UL-142 SINGLEWALL STORAGE TANK W/ CONTAINMENT DIKE & REMOVABLE HALF RAINSHIELD (ACCUMULATOR TANK DS.8) cu�OMER:
,-.--------------9'.i·---------------i---------------g·,i·---------------PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL I & ATIANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC r./O DOMINION TRANSMISSION, INC.
!:============================,· OWG., REif. J------------------------------20'-0"0.A.LCOlfTAINHEUTDUCE-----------------------------,
&FRONT VIEW
*NOTE: LADDER & WALKWAY NOT SHOWN.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF HAMILTON TANKS, LLC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE WffiiOLJT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF HAMILTON TANKS, LLC IS PROHIBITED.
HT·118982·Tl·D1 4 p0#
4500299048 OATE: r;c:AtE: CRAWN B"f: 5/27/2016 N.T.S S.MORRISON
SO> 118982 CHECKED BY: J. KINDIG
Page E-6
Attachment E. Supplemental Information Received from Applicant
D
C
----
B
A
8 7 6
20'-8" L<O 2 1/2'' V
� 2 1/2" '-.
r') 2 1/2" 2 1 /2" Nl CXJ y X
I
SLIDING I� FIXED I I SADDLE SADDLE� I I: � CXJ : -'-.IO>
� '®lfl CL LO I �-st-
---
CXJ -1 \ 'i----I I I I
( 4) 1-1 /2"¢HOLES
�� .I I. (4)1-1/2"x1-3/4"
1 '-0 11 SLOTS
(TYP) ANCHOR BOLT PLAN
L N1 -LN5N2 N4N9 X z N7 z XN6 N3NS .. �·-
� ��
lt"lll"r' J -
I I 111 F /F -N1 ,__ \ I
I I
� � ----s s---� ( N I '-. �
r') I
L() ® N1 I 6 • 0 0 -I --
5 ...
N2 N9 N6 NS N3 N5 N4
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
=�i, � 4 ----E� ,�... '
PLAN
32'-10 3/4"
APPROX.
2s'-o"
SEAM TO SEAM
-�PI LIT 51 51 @ :11 :
' i ·= \ =
I�� 1;:::;i
--� ,, __ , -)· _, )
4' -o" 1 '-4" 1 '-4" 1 '-4" 1'-4" 1 '-4" 1'-4"
N2 N9 N6 NS N3 N5 N4
----
-
/�II �
�
'!Jj
� -
-
3' -4"
-
<N7 l\.
I
I .....,,,,
7Fl
I
•
-
. .
� l
N7
4 3
I
�-----@ --I,.
.. s 51
F/F
• CXJ '-. n
0 8' -1" I
LO
---
0, <@>AQUEOUS AMMONIA LI 51 -
MARK SIZE N1 24" N2 3• N3 2" N4 2" N5 2" N6 2" N7 2" NS 2" N9 2" N10A 2"N10B 2" N 11 2" N12 2" N13 2"
I
I
I
� I
I J t----
_,..,,,,, / i'::::,.__
'-'
�'I>
180'
g' -11 5/16"
ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE
TIE-IN SCHEDULE RATING FACE SERVICE 150# RF MANWAY 150# RF LEVEL TRANSMITTER 150# RF PIT/Pl 150# RF LIQUID FILL 150# RF VAPOR RETURN 150# RF PUMP RETURN 150# RF RELIEF 150# RF VACUUM BREAKER 150# RF SPARE W/BLIND 150# RF LEVEL GAUGE 150# RF LEVEL GAUGE 150# RF Tl 150# RF DRAIN W/BLIND 150# RF AMMONIA TO PUMP
8
---s s---�
' �
""--GROUNDING LUGS (ONE PER END) N1
2'-1 3/8" 20'-8"
F/F SLIDING SADDLE SADDLE PLACEMENT
ELEVATION FRONT PLATFORM NOT SHOWN CIVIL INFORMATION: FOR CLARITY DEAD WEIGHT Fy = -120,000# SEISMIC SHEAR Fz = Fx ±21,800# WIND SHEAR Fz = ±5,500# SNOW LOADS F z = ± 10,500# Fy = 6,860#
NOTES:
1.STORAGE TANK SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION 1, SECTION VIII OFTHE ASME BOILER CODE AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE. 2.DESIGN PRESSURE: 50 PSIG/ 1/2 OZ/IN2 VACUUM.DESIGN TEMPERATURE: -20'F TO 150'F 3.ALL CARBON STEEL SURFACES TO BE FINISHED PER PEERLESS DOCUMENT AENV-SCR-23.4.SHIPPING PREPARATION: ALL NOZZLES TO BE PROPERLY SEALED TO PREVENT MOISTURE INTRUSION DURING SHIPMENT5.TANK TO BE LIFTED UTILIZING BOTH LIFTING LUGS.6.WALL THICKNESS 5/16" MIN. PLATE SA-240-304L7.DRY WEIGHT 18,100 LBS VESSEL.8.OPERATING WEIGHT: 119,500 LBS.8.ONE (1) TANK REQUIRED PER SITE.
7 6 5
·_-----@JTl 517
� z:•
14' -1" 1'-6" •
I N1 n i PUMPS ON ------
3' -8" PUMP SKID
FIXED SADDLE
0 0
SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION SYSTEM
EQUIP. NO.I STORAGE TANK I SERIAL NO.I I TYPE I AQUEOUS I FAB. DATE I-/-/-IPROJECT I SEE PROJECT LIST IPEERLESS MFG. co.
SCR SYSTEMS DIV.
14651 NORTH DALLAS PARKWAY
DALLAS, TX 75254 214-357-61810 0
3 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 REVISED TAGS & ADDED SECTION A-A 1 MOVED LADDER, ADDED CIVIL INFO, CAGE AND PSV SUPPORT PER CLIENT COMMENTS. 0 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL REV REVISION DESCRIPTION f 4 3
"CXJ '-. n
0 � I -:..-
·c:o I
LO
0I -:..i-
8/11/16 CRC 7/5/16 CRC 5/16/16 GW
4/12/16 GW DATE BY
2 1
I
I
I
7 /8" I 7 /8" 1 .I 1 '-4" : CXJ co '-. • '-.� �
� �
3/8"0 (TYP.)-SECTION A-A LADDER BASE -
-11 I Ill I �I� TOP OF GRATING I
BG BG BG
CK CK
I I I I I
I I--
TI 517
N11 ,I-. -I"� '-../ I
�
,M, I
A A ELEVATION ILEFT SIDE •,.
"
CERTIFIED
CUSTOMER ATLANTIC COAST PIPEIJNE-DOMINION PO#: 70302319
PROJECT: ACP-NORTHAMPTON LOCATION: NORTHAMPTON CO., N.C.
CONFIDENTIAL FAB-IS0_,4 & PEERLESS 8/30/10
THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE Mfg. Co. PROPER TY OF PEERLESS MFG. COMP ANY AND SH ALL NOT BE RE PRODUCE D, COPIED, LOANED AL TERED, 14651 N. DALLAS PARKWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS 7 5254
NOR USED FOR ANY [phone], WWW.PEERLESSMFG.COMPURPOSE OTHER TH AN TH AT MAKING ENERGY SAFE,
FOR WHICH IT IS FURNISHED EFFICIENT, AND CLEAN
EXCE PT WI TH THE WRI TTEN TITLE: 13,000 AQUEOUS AMMONIA STORAGE TANK (TNK-600) PERMISSION OF PEERLESS MFG. COMP ANY.
SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0"
ORN BY: GW
DOC NO: D2060201
UNITS: FT/IN DATE:
CHK'D: BG APPVD:
SIZE:
2
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 3/31/16
BG
D
JOB NO:700167
ENG. CONTACT: BG
SHEET: 1 OF: 2 IREV. 3
1
D
C
._
A
Page E-7
Attachment E. Supplemental Information Received from Applicant

Attachment F – Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents

Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Ms. Leslie Hartz
VP Pipeline Construction
Northampton Compressor Station
707 E. Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
Subject: DRAFT Air Permit No. 10466R00
Northampton Compressor Station
DRAFT
Pleasant Hill, Northampton County, North Carolina
Permit Class: Small
Facility ID# 6600169
Dear Ms. Hartz:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
MICHAEL A. ABRACZINSK.AS
Director
In accordance with your completed application received January 13, 2016, we are
forwarding herewith Permit No. 10466ROO to Northampton Compressor Station, Pleasant Hill,
Northampton County, North Carolina for the construction and operation of air emissions sources or
air cleaning devices and appurtenances. Additionally, any emissions activities determined from your
air permit application as meeting the exemption requirements contained in 15A NCAC 2Q .0102
have been listed for information purposes as an "ATTACHMENT" to the enclosed air permit.
Please note the records retention requirements are contained in General Condition 2 of the General
Conditions and Limitations.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request a formal adjudicatory hearing within 30 days following receipt of this
permit, identifying the specific issues to be contested. Such a request will stay the effectiveness of
the entire permit. This hearing request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to G.S.
150B-23 of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. The form for requesting a formal
adjudicatory hearing may be obtained upon request from the Office of Administrative Hearings.
Unless a request for a hearing is made pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, this air permit shall be final and
binding.
You may request modification of your air permit through informal means pursuant to G.S.
150B-22. This request must be submitted in writing to the Director and must identify the specific
provisions or issues for which the modification is sought. Please note that the permit will become
final and binding regardless of a request for informal modification unless a request for a hearing is
also made under G.S. 150B-23.
Unless exempted by a condition of this permit or the regulations, construction of new
air pollution sources or air cleaning devices, or modifications to the sources or air cleaning
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality I Air Quality Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh. NC 27609
919 791 4200 T I 919 88-226 F
Page F-2
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Leslie Hartz
November 7, 2017
Page2
devices described in this permit must be covered under a permit issued by the Division of Air
Quality prior to construction. Failure to do so is a violation of G.S. 143-215.108 and may
subject the Permittee to civil or criminal penalties as described in G.S. 143-215.114A and 143-
215.114B.
This permit shall be effective from DRAFT until DRAFT, is nontransferable to future
owners and operators, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
For PSD increment tracking purposes, PM 10 emissions from this modification are increased
by 4.18 pounds per hour.
Changes have been made to the permit stipulations. The Permittee is responsible for
carefully reading the entire permit and evaluating the requirements of each permit
stipulation. The Permittee shall comply with all terms, conditions, requirements, limitations
and restrictions set forth in this permit. Noncompliance with any permit condition is grounds
for enforcement action, for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification, or
for denial of a permit renewal application. Should you have any questions concerning this matter,
please contact Charles McEachern at 919-791-4200.
cmm
Enclosures
c: Raleigh Regional Office
Connie Horne, Cover letter only
Sincerely,
Patrick Butler, P.E., Regional Supervisor
Division of Air Quality, NC DEQ
Page F-3
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
I
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Issue Date: DRAFT
Expiration Date: DRAFT
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
DRAFT AIR PERMIT NO. 10466R00
Effective Date: DRAFT
Replaces Permit: (new)
To construct and operate air emission source(s) and /or air cleaning device(s), and for the
discharge of the associated air contaminants into the atmosphere in accordance with the provisions
of Article 21B of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina (NCGS) as amended, and other
applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
Northampton Compressor Station
718 Forest Road
Pleasant Hill, Northampton County, North Carolina
Permit Class: Small
Facility ID# 6600169
(the Permittee) is hereby authorized to construct and operate the air emissions sources and/or air
cleaning devices and appurtenances described below:
Emission Emission Source Control Control System System Source ID Description Description ID
1CT-01 (NSPS)natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Taurus 70-CT-01-SCR, selective catalyst reduction in
j 10802S, 96.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 11, I 07 ICT-01-OC series with an oxidation catalyst
horsepower ISO output)
CT-02 (NSPS)natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 50-CT-02-SCR, selective catalyst reduction in
6200LS, 60.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 6,276 CT-02-OC series with an oxidation catalyst
horsepower ISO output)
ICT-03 (NSPS)natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 40-CT-03-SCR, selective catalyst reduction in
14700S, 51.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 4,427 CT-03-OC series with an oxidation catalyst
horsepower ISO output)
EG-01 natural gas-fired emergency generator (14.9 million Btu
(NSPS,NESHAP) per hour heat input, 1,818 horsepower output, 1,300 NIA NIA
kilowatts electric)
in accordance with the completed application 6600169.lSA received January 13, 2016 including
any plans, specifications, previous applications, and other supporting data, all of which are filed
with the Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (DAQ) and are incorporated
as part of this permit.
Page F-4
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 2
This permit is subject to the following specified conditions and limitations including any
TESTING. REPORTING. OR MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
A.SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMIT A TIO�
1.Any air emission sources or control devices authorized to construct and operate above must
be operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions contained herein. The
Permittee shall comply with applicable Environmental Management Commission
Regulations, including Title l SA North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter
2D .0202, 2D .0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 (40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ, Subpart KKKK), 2D
.0535, 2D .0540, 2D .0611, 2D .1111 (40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ), 2D .1806, 2Q .0102 and
2Q .0309.
2.PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT -The Permittee,
at least 90 days prior to the expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal by
letter in accordance with ISA NCAC 2Q .0304(d) and (f). Pursuant to ISA NCAC 2Q
.0203(i), no permit application fee is required for renewal of an existing air permit (without
a modification request). The renewal request (with AA application form) should be
submitted to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ. Also, at least 90 days prior to the expiration
date of this permit, the Permittee shall submit the air pollution emission inventory report
(with Certification Sheet) in accordance with ISA NCAC 2D .0202, pursuant to N.C.
General Statute 143 215.65. The report shall be submitted to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ
and shall document air pollutants emitted for the 2024 calendar year.
3.SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTROL REQUIREMENT -As required by ISA NCAC 2D .0516
"Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Combustion Sources," sulfur dioxide emissions from the
combustion sources shall not exceed 2.3 pounds per million Btu heat input.
4.VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT -As required by ISA NCAC 2D
.0521 "Control of Visible Emissions," visible emissions from the emission sources,
manufactured after July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged
over a six-minute period, except that six-minute periods averaging not more than 87 percent
opacity may occur not more than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour
period. However, sources which must comply with ISA NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source
Performance Standards" or .1110 "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants" must comply with applicable visible emissions requirements contained therein.
5.ISA NCAC 2D .0524 "NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS" -For the
following equipment, the Permittee shall comply with all applicable provisions, including
the notification, testing, reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring requirements contained in
Environmental Management Commission Standard ISA NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source
Performance Standards" (NSPS) as promulgated in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart indicated
below, and including Subpart A "General Provisions."
Page F-5
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466R00
Page 3
Emission Source(s) Regulation
Subpart JJJJ
Standards of
natural gas-fired emergency generator (14.9 million Btu per hour heat Performance for
input, 1,818 horsepower output, 1,300 kilowatts electric) (ID No. EG-01) Stationary Spark
Ignition Combustion
Engines (SI ICE)
a.Monitoring Requirements -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the following
monitoring requirements shall apply:
1.If the emergency stationary SI ICE that is greater than or equal to 500 HP that
was built on or after July 1, 2010, does not meet the standards applicable to
non-emergency engines, the Permittee shall install a non-resettable hour
meter. [60.4237(a)]
b.Compliance Requirements -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the following
compliance requirements shall apply:
1.The Permittee shall operate and maintain stationary SI ICE that achieve the
emission standards as required in 40 CFR 60.4233 over the entire life of the
engine. [60.4234]
11.Owners and operators of stationary SI ICE who conduct performance tests
shall follow the procedures in 40 CFR 60.4244. [60.4244]
111.If the stationary SI ICE must comply with the emission standards specified in
40 CFR 60.4233(d) or (e), the Permittee shall demonstrate compliance
according to one of the methods specified in paragraphs A and B of this
section. [60.4243(b)]
A.Purchasing an engine certified according to procedures specified in
this subpart, for the same model year and demonstrating compliance
according to one of the methods specified in paragraph I and II of this
section. [60.4243(b)(l)]
I.If the certified stationary SI ICE and control device are
operated and maintained according to the manufacturer's
emission-related written instructions, the Permittee shall keep
records of conducted maintenance to demonstrate compliance,
but no performance testing is required. The Permittee shall
also meet the requirements as specified in 40 CFR Part 1068,
Subparts A through D, as they apply to the engine. If engine
settings are adjusted according to and consistent with the
manufacturer's instructions, the stationary SI ICE will not be
considered out of compliance. [60.4243(a)(l)]
Page F-6
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 4
II.If the certified stationary SI ICE and control device are not
operated and maintained according to the manufacturer's
emission-related written instructions, the engine will be
considered a non-certified engine, and the Permittee shall
demonstrate compliance according to the following, as
appropriate. [60.4243(a)(2)]
(a)If the stationary SI ICE is less than 100 HP, the
Permittee shall keep a maintenance plan and records of
conducted maintenance to demonstrate compliance and shall,
to the extent practicable, maintain and operate the engine in a
manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for
minimizing emissions, but no performance testing is required.
[60.4243(a)(2)(i)]
(b)If the stationary SI ICE is greater than or equal to 100
HP and less than or equal to 500 HP, the Permittee shall keep
a maintenance plan and records of conducted maintenance and
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate the
engine in a manner consistent with good air pollution control
practice for minimizing emissions. In addition, the Permittee
shall conduct an initial performance test within 1 year of
engine startup to demonstrate compliance. [60.4243(a)(2)(ii)]
(c)If the stationary SI ICE is greater than 500 HP, the
Permittee shall keep a maintenance plan and records of
conducted maintenance and shall, to the extent practicable,
maintain and operate the engine in a manner consistent with
good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions.
In addition, the Permittee shall conduct an initial performance
test within 1 year of engine startup and conduct subsequent
performance testing every 8,760 hours or 3 years, whichever
comes first, thereafter to demonstrate compliance.
[ 60.4243( a)(2)(iii)]
B.Purchasing a non-certified engine and demonstrating compliance with
the emission standards specified in 40 CFR 60.4233(d) or (e) and
according to the requirements specified in 40 CFR 60.4244, as
applicable, and according to the following: [60.4243(b)(2)]
I.If the stationary SI ICE is greater than 500 HP, the Permittee
shall keep a maintenance plan and records of conducted
maintenance and shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and
operate the engine in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. In
addition, the Permittee shall conduct an initial performance
test and conduct subsequent performance testing every 8,760
Page F-7
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466R00
Page 5
hours or 3 years, whichever comes first, thereafter to
demonstrate compliance. [60.4243(b)(2)(ii)]
iv.For an emergency stationary ICE, the Permittee shall operate the emergency
stationary ICE according to the requirements in paragraphs A through C of
this section. In order for the engine to be considered an emergency stationary
ICE under this subpart, any operation other than emergency operation,
maintenance and testing, and operation in non-emergency situations for 50
hours per year, as described in paragraphs A through C of this section, is
prohibited. If the Permittee does not operate the engine according to the
requirements in paragraphs A through C of this section, the engine will not be
considered an emergency engine under this subpart and shall meet all
requirements for non-emergency engines. [60.4243(d)]
A.There is no time limit on the use of emergency stationary ICE in
emergency situations. [60.4243(d)(l)]
B.The Permittee may operate the emergency stationary ICE for any
combination of the purposes specified in paragraph I of this section
for a maximum of 100 hours per calendar year. Any operation for
non-emergency situations as allowed by paragraph C of this section
counts as part of the 100 hours per calendar year allowed by this
paragraph B. [60.4243(d)(2)]
I.Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for maintenance
checks and readiness testing, provided that the tests are
recommended by federal, state or local government, the
manufacturer, the vendor, the regional transmission
organization or equivalent balancing authority and
transmission operator, or the insurance company associated
with the engine. The Permittee may petition the Administrator
for approval of additional hours to be used for maintenance
checks and readiness testing, but a petition is not required if
the Permittee maintains records indicating that federal, state,
or local standards require maintenance and testing of
emergency ICE beyond 100 hours per calendar year.
[ 60.4243( d)(2)(i)]
C.Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for up to 50 hours per
calendar year in non-emergency situations. The 50 hours of operation
in non-emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per
calendar year for maintenance and testing provided in paragraph B.
Except as provided in paragraph I of this section, the 50 hours per
year for non-emergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or
to generate income for a facility to an electric grid or otherwise
supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity.
[60.4243(d)(3)]
Page F-8
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466R00
Page 6
I.The 50 hours per year for non-emergency situations can be
used to supply power as part of a financial arrangement with
another entity if all of the following conditions are met:
[60.4243(d)(3)(i)]
(a)The engine is dispatched by the local balancing
authority or local transmission and distribution system
operator; [ 60.4243 ( d)(3 )(i)(A)]
(b)The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission
and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage
collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of
power supply in a local area or region; [60.4243(d)(3)(i)(B)]
(c)The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or
similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state,
public utility commission or local standards of guidelines;
[ 60.4243( d)(3)(i)(C)]
(d)The power is provided only to the facility itself or to
support the local transmission and distribution system
[60.4243(d)(3)(i)(D)]; and
(e)The Permittee identifies and records the entity that
dispatches the engine and the specific NERC, regional, state,
public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that
are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local
balancing authority or local transmission and distribution
system operator may keep these records on behalf of the
Permittee. [60.4243(d)(3)(i)(E)]
v.For a stationary SI ICE that is natural gas fired, the Permittee may operate
this engine using propane for a maximum of 100 hours per year as an
alternative fuel solely during emergency operations, but shall keep records of
such use. If propane is used for more than I 00 hours per year in an engine
that is not certified to the emission standards when using propane, the
Permittee is required to conduct a performance test to demonstrate
compliance with the emission standards of 40 CFR 60.4233. [60.4243(e)]
c.Recordkeeping Requirements -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the following
recordkeeping requirements shall apply:
1. The Permittee shall keep records as follows: [60.4245]
A.All notifications submitted to comply with this subpart and all
documentation supporting any notification; [60.4245(a)(l)]
B.Maintenance conducted on the engine; [60.4245(a)(2)]
Page F-9
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page?
C.If the stationary SI ICE is a certified engine, documentation from the
manufacturer that the engine is certified to meet the emission
standards and information as required in 40 CFR parts 90, 1048,
1054, and 1060, as applicable [60.4245(a)(3)]; and
D.If the stationary SI ICE is not a certified engine or is a certified engine
operating in a non-certified manner and subject to 40 CFR
60.4243(a)(2), documentation that the engine meets the emission
standards. [60.4245(a)(4)]
11.For non-certified engines greater than 25 HP, a copy of the maintenance plan
and conducted maintenance. [60.4243(a)(l)]
111.Copies of any performance testing required under this Subpart. [60.4245(d)]
1v. All records required under this section shall be maintained for a period of two
years following the date of such record. All records shall be kept on-site and
made available to DAQ personnel upon request. The Permittee shall be
deemed in noncompliance with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 if recordkeeping
requirements are not maintained. [40 CFR 60.7(t)]
d.Reporting Requirements -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the following
reporting requirements shall apply:
1.If the SI ICE is subject to performance testing, the testing shall be conducted
according to the requirements of 40 CFR 60.4244, and the Permittee shall
submit a copy of each performance test within 60 days after the test has been
completed. [60.4243(a)(2), (b)(2), (e), and (t)]
11.For stationary SI ICE greater than or equal to 500 HP that have not been
certified by an engine manufacturer to meet the emission standards in 40
CFR 60.4231, the Permittee shall submit an initial notification as required in
40 CFR 60.7(a)(l). The notification shall include the information in
paragraphs (A) through (E) of this section. [60.4245(c)]
A.Name and address of the owner or operator; [60.4245(c)(l)]
B.The address of the affected source; [60.4245(c)(2)]
C.Engine information including make, model, engine family, serial
number, model year, maximum engine power, and engine
displacement; [60.4245(c)(3)]
D.Emission control equipment; [60.4245(c)(4)] and
E.Fuel used. [60.4245(c)(5)]
111.For an emergency stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power more
than 100 HP that operates for non-emergency situations as described above,
Page F-10
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 8
the Permittee shall submit an annual report according to the requirements in
paragraphs A through C of this section. [60.4245(e)]
A.The report shall contain the following information:
I.Company name and address where the engine is located.
II.Date of the report and beginning and ending dates of the
reporting period.
III. Engine site rating and model year.
IV.Latitude and longitude of the engine in decimal degrees
reported to the firth decimal place.
V.Hours spent for operation for non-emergency situations as
described above, including the date, start time, and end time
for engine operation for these non-emergency situations. The
report shall also identify the entity that dispatched the engine
and the situation that necessitated the dispatch of the engine.
B.The first annual report shall cover the calendar year 2015 and shall be
submitted no later than March 31, 2016. Subsequent annual reports
for each calendar year shall be submitted no later than March 31 of
the following calendar year.
C.The annual report shall be submitted electronically using the subpart
specific reporting form in the Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through EPA's Central
Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). However, if the reporting
form specific to this subpart is not available in CEDRI at the time that
the report is due, the written report shall be submitted to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in 40 CFR 60.4.
6.15A NCAC 2D .0524 "NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS" -For the
following equipment, the Permittee shall comply with all applicable provisions, including
the notification, testing, reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring requirements contained in
Environmental Management Commission Standard 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source
Performance Standards" (NSPS) as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart indicated below,
and including Subpart A "General Provisions."
Page F-11
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page9
I
I
Emission Source(s) I Regulation
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Taurus 70-10802S, 96.0 million
Btu per hour heat input, 11,107 horsepower ISO output) (CT-01) Subpart KKKK --
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 50-6200LS, 60.0 million Standards of Performance
Btu per hour heat input, 6,276 horsepower ISO output) (CT-02) for Stationary
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 40-4 700S, 51.0 million Combustion Turbines
Btu per hour heat input, 4,427 horsepower ISO output) (CT-03)
a.NSPS Reporting Requirements -In addition to any other notification requirements to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Permittee is required to NOTIFY
the Regional Supervisor, DAQ, in WRITING, of the following:
1.The actual date of initial start-up of an affected source, postmarked within 15
days after such date;
b.NSPS Emissions Limitations -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the following
permit limits shall not be exceeded:
Affected Source(s) I Pollutant I Emission Limit
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Taurus
70-10802S, 96.0 million Btu per hour heat
input, 11,107 horsepower ISO output) (CT-01)NOx 25 ppm at 15% 02
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur
50-6200LS, 60.0 million Btu per hour heat
input, 6,276 horsepower ISO output) (CT-02)natural gas used shall have less than
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 20 grains of sulfur per 100 standard
SO2 cubic feet and have potential 40-4 700S, 51.0 million Btu per hour heat input,emission less than 0.060 pounds 4,427 horsepower ISO output) (CT-03)SO2 per million Btu heat input
c.NSPS Recordkeeping -The Permittee shall maintain records of the fuel quality
characteristics in a current, valid purchase contract, tariff sheet or transportation
contract for the fuel, specifying that the maximum total sulfur content of the natural
gas used is 20 grains of sulfur or less per 100 standard cubic feet and has potential
sulfur emissions of less than 0.060 pounds SO2 per million Btu heat input.
d.NSPS Performance Testing -As required by 15A NCAC 20 .0524, the following
performance tests shall be conducted:
Page F-12
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
I
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 10
Affected Source(s) Pollutant I Test Method Test
Frequency
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Taurus 70-10802S,
[Methods 7E or 20
96.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 11,107 horsepower ISO
output) (CT-01) NOx Annual
natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 50-6200LS,
60.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 6,276 horsepower ISO
output) (CT-02)
Fuel supplier Per fuel natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 40-4700S, SO2 certification shipment 51.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 4,427 horsepower ISO
output) (CT-03)
1.All performance tests shall be conducted in accordance with EPA Reference
Methods, contained in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A.
11.The EPA Administrator retains the exclusive right to approve equivalent and
alternative test methods, continuous monitoring procedures, and reporting
requirements.
m.Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the
equipment will be operated, but not later than 180 days after the initial start­
up of the equipment, the Permittee shall conduct the required performance
test(s) and submit two copies of a written report of the test(s) to the Regional
Supervisor, DAQ.
1v. After the initial performance test, subsequent NOx performance tests shall be
conducted on an annual basis (no more than 14 calendar months following
the previous performance test).
A.If the NOx emission result from the performance test is less than or
equal to 75 percent of the NOx emission limit for the turbine, you may
reduce the frequency of subsequent performance tests to once every 2
years (no more than 26 calendar months following the previous
performance test).
B.If the results of any subsequent performance test exceed 75 percent of
the NOx emission limit for the turbine, you must resume annual
performance tests.
v.The Permittee shall be responsible for ensuring, within the limits of
practicality, that the equipment or process being tested is operated at or near
its maximum normal production rate or at a lesser rate if specified by the
Director or his delegate.
vi.All associated testing costs are the responsibility of the Permittee.
Page F-13
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 11
vu. At least 45 days prior to performing any required emissions testing, the
Permittee must submit two copies of a testing protocol to the Regional
Supervisor, DAQ for review and approval. All testing protocols must be
approved by the DAQ prior to performing tests.
vm. To afford the Regional Supervisor, DAQ, the opportunity to have an observer
present, the Permittee shall PROVIDE the Regional Office, in WRITING, at
least 15 days notice of any required performance test(s).
7.NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT-As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of
a source of excess emissions that last for more than four hours and that results from a
malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal
conditions, shall:
a.Notify the Director or his designee of any such occurrence by 9:00 a.m. Eastern time
of the Division's next business day of becoming aware of the occurrence and
describe:
1.the name and location of the facility,
11.the nature and cause of the malfunction or breakdown,
111.the time when the malfunction or breakdown is first observed,
1v. the expected duration, and
v.an estimated rate of emissions.
b.Notify the Director or his designee immediately when the corrective measures have
been accomplished.
This reporting requirement does not allow the operation of the facility in excess of
Environmental Management Commission Regulations.
8.FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540
"Particulates from Fugitive Dust Emission Sources," the Permittee shall not cause or allow
fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible
emissions beyond the property boundary. If substantive complaints are received or excessive
fugitive dust emissions from the facility are observed beyond the property boundaries for six
minutes in any one hour (using Reference Method 22 in 40 CFR, Appendix A), the owner or
operator may be required to submit a fugitive dust plan as described in 2D .0540(t).
"Fugitive dust emissions" means particulate matter that does not pass through a process
stack or vent and that is generated within plant property boundaries from activities such as:
unloading and loading areas, process areas stockpiles, stock pile working, plant parking lots,
and plant roads (including access roads and haul roads).
Page F-14
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 12
9.Selective Catalytic Reduction and Oxidation Catalyst REQUIREMENTS -As required by
15A NCAC 2D .0611, NOx, CO, and VOC emissions shall be controlled as described in the
permitted equipment list.
a.Inspection and Maintenance Requirements -To comply with the provision of this
permit and ensure that emissions do not exceed the regulatory limits, the Permittee
shall perform periodic inspections and maintenance (l&M) as recommended by the
manufacturer. In addition, the Permittee shall perform an annual inspection of the
pollution control device.
b.Recordkeeping Requirements -The results of all inspections and any variance from
manufacturer's recommendations or from those given in this permit (when
applicable) shall be investigated with corrections made and dates of actions recorded
in a logbook. Records of all maintenance activities shall be recorded in the logbook.
The logbook (in written or electronic format) shall be kept on-site and made
available to DAQ personnel upon request.
10.15A NCAC 2D .1111 "MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY"-For the
natural gas-fired emergency generator (14.9 million Btu per hour heat input, 1,818
horsepower output, 1,300 kilowatts electric) (ID No. EG-01), classified as new stationary
RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions, the Permittee shall comply with all
applicable provisions, including the notification, testing, reporting, recordkeeping, and
monitoring requirements contained in Environmental Management Commission Standard
15A NCAC 2D .1111, as promulgated in 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ -"National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines," including Subpart A "General Provisions."
a.In accordance with 40 CFR §63.6590(c)(l), this source(s) shall meet the
requirements of 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ and Subpart A by meeting the
requirements of 40 CFR 60 Subpart 1111 for compression ignition engines or 40 CFR
60 Subpart JJJJ for spark ignition engines. No further requirements apply for such
engines under 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ or Subpart A.
11.CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS -As required by 15A
NCAC 2D .1806 "Control and Prohibition of Odorous Emissions" the Permittee shall not
operate the facility without implementing management practices or installing and operating
odor control equipment sufficient to prevent odorous emissions from the facility from
causing or contributing to objectionable odors beyond the facility's boundary.
Page F-15
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466R00
Page 13
12.Federal and State Rules Applicable to Sources Exempted from Air Permitting Requirements
-Your facility is subject to the following federal and state rules:
40 CFR 60 -NSPS --Subpart JJJJ --Standards of Performance for Stationary
Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines
40 CFR 63 -NESHAP/MACT --Subpart ZZZZ --Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines
40 CFR 60 -NSPS --Subpart OOOOa --Standards of Performance for Crude
Oil and Natural Gas Facilities for Which Construction, Modification or
Reconstruction Commenced After September 18, 2015
which are applicable to some of the emission sources at your facility listed on the
"Insignificant/Exempt Activities" list attached to this permit. The purpose of this permit
condition is to inform you of your compliance obligations to these applicable rules as they
are enforceable.
13.NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT -In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0309, this permit
may be revoked unless natural gas-fired compressor turbine (Taurus 70-10802S, 96.0
million Btu per hour heat input, 11,107 horsepower ISO output) (ID No. CT-01 ), natural
gas-fired compressor turbine (Centaur 50-6200LS, 60.0 million Btu per hour heat input,
6,276 horsepower ISO output) (ID No. CT-02), natural gas-fired compressor turbine
(Centaur 40-4700S, 51.0 million Btu per hour heat input, 4,427 horsepower ISO output) (ID
No. CT-03) and natural gas-fired emergency generator (14.9 million Btu per hour heat input,
1,818 horsepower output, 1,300 kilowatts electric) (ID No. EG-01) and appurtenances are
constructed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and other supporting data.
Within 15 days after start-up of the new or modified facilities, the Permittee shall provide
written notice of the start-up to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
Any existing equipment being replaced is permitted to operate in compliance until the
replacement equipment is operational.
Page F-16
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO
Page 14
B.GENERAL CONDITIONS AND LIMIT A TIO NS
1.In accordance with G.S. 143-215.108(c)(l), TWO COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS,
REPORTS, TEST DATA. MONITORING DATA. NOTIFICATIONS, REQUESTS FOR
RENEW AL, AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THIS PERMIT shall
be submitted to the:
Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Air Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-791-4200
For identification purposes, each submittal should include the facility name as listed on the
permit, the facility identification number, and the permit number.
2.RECORDS RETENTION REQUIREMENT -In accordance with 15A NCAC 2D .0605,
any records required by the conditions of this permit shall be kept on site and made available
to DAQ personnel for inspection upon request. These records shall be maintained in a form
suitable and readily available for expeditious inspection and review. These records must be
kept on site for a minimum of 2 years, unless another time period is otherwise specified.
3.ANNUAL FEE PAYMENT-Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(a), the Permittee shall pay
the annual permit fee within 30 days of being billed by the DAQ. Failure to pay the fee in a
timely manner will cause the DAQ to initiate action to revoke the permit.
4.EQUIPMENT RELOCATION -In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0301, a new air permit
shall be obtained by the Permittee prior to establishing, building, erecting, using, or
operating the emission sources or air cleaning equipment at a site or location not specified in
this permit.
5.REPORTING REQUIREMENT-In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0309, any of the
following that would result in previously unpermitted, new, or increased emissions must be
reported to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ:
a.changes in the information submitted in the application regarding facility emissions;
b.changes that modify equipment or processes of existing permitted facilities; or
c.changes in the quantity or quality of materials processed.
If appropriate, modifications to the permit may then be made by the DAQ to reflect any
necessary changes in the permit conditions. In no case are any new or increased emissions
allowed that will cause a violation of the emission limitations specified herein.
6.In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0309, this permit is subject to revocation or
modification by the DAQ upon a determination that information contained in the application
or presented in the support thereof is incorrect, conditions under which this permit was
Page F-17
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466R00
Page 15
granted have changed, or violations of conditions contained in this permit have occurred. In
accordance with G.S. 143-215.108(c)(l), the facility shall be properly operated and
maintained at all times in a manner that will effect an overall reduction in air pollution.
Unless otherwise specified by this permit, no emission source may be operated without the
concurrent operation of its associated air cleaning device(s) and appurtenances.
7.In accordance with G.S. 143-215.108(c)(l), this permit is nontransferable by the Permittee.
Future owners and operators must obtain a new air permit from the DAQ.
8.In accordance with G.S. 143-215.108(c)(l), this issuance of this permit in no way absolves
the Permittee ofliability for any potential civil penalties which may be assessed for
violations of State law which have occurred prior to the effective date of this permit.
9.In accordance with G.S. 143-215.108(c)(l), this permit does not relieve the Permittee of the
responsibility of complying with all applicable requirements of any Federal, State, or Local
water quality or land quality control authority.
10.In accordance with 15A NCAC 2D .0605, reports on the operation and maintenance of the
facility shall be submitted by the Permittee to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ at such
intervals and in such form and detail as may be required by the DAQ. Information required
in such reports may include, but is not limited to, process weight rates, firing rates, hours of
operation, and preventive maintenance schedules.
11.A violation of any term or condition of this permit shall subject the Permittee to enforcement
pursuant to G.S. 143-215. l 14A, 143-215.114B, and 143-215. l 14C, including assessment of
civil and/or criminal penalties.
12.Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(2), no person shall refuse entry or
access to any authorized representative of the DAQ who requests entry or access for
purposes of inspection, and who presents appropriate credentials, nor shall any person
obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any such representative while in the process of carrying
out his official duties. Refusal of entry or access may constitute grounds for permit
revocation and assessment of civil penalties.
13.In accordance with G.S. 143-215.108(c)(l), this permit does not relieve the Permittee of the
responsibility of complying with any applicable Federal, State, or Local requirements
governing the handling, disposal, or incineration of hazardous, solid, or medical wastes,
including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) administered by the
Division of Waste Management.
14.PERMIT RETENTION REQUIREMENT -In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0110, the
Permittee shall retain a current copy of the air permit at the site. The Permittee must make
available to personnel of the DAQ, upon request, the current copy of the air permit for the
site.
15.CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112{r) REQUIREMENTS -Pursuant to 15A NCAC 20 .2100
"Risk Management Program," if the Permittee is required to develop and register a risk
management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act, then the
Page F-18
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
DRAFT Permit No. 10466R00
Page 16
Permittee is required to register this plan with the USEPA in accordance with 40 CFR Part
68.
16.PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL RELEASES -GENERAL DUTY -Pursuant to Title I
Part A Section 112(r)(l) of the Clean Air Act "Hazardous Air Pollutants -Prevention of
Accidental Releases -Purpose and General Duty," although a risk management plan may not
be required, if the Permittee produces, processes, handles, or stores any amount of a listed
hazardous substance, the Permittee has a general duty to take such steps as are necessary to
prevent the accidental release of such substance and to minimize the consequences of any
release. This condition is federally-enforceable only.
17.GENERAL EMISSIONS TESTING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS -If emissions
testing is required by this permit, or the DAQ, or if the Permittee submits emissions testing
to the DAQ in support of a permit application or to demonstrate compliance, the Permittee
shall perform such testing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2D .2600 and follow all DAQ
procedures including protocol approval, regional notification, report submittal, and test
results approval.
Permit issued this the DRAFT.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Patrick Butler, P .E.
Regional Supervisor
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
DRAFT Air Permit No. 10466R00
Page F-19
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
ATTACHMENT to DRAFT Permit No. 10466ROO, DRAFT
Insignificant/ Exempt Activities
Source
11-TK-l -pipeline liquids storage tank (1,000gallon capacity) jI-TK-2 -hydrocarbon waste storage tanki(2,500 gallon capacity) l�-TK-3 -ammonia tank (13,400 galloncapacity) I-WH-01 -natural gas-fired boiler (5.25million Btu per hour heat input)
I-Fug-01 -blowdown and purge emissions
I-Fug-02 -piping leaks (NSPS OOOOa)I-EG-02 -natural gas-fired emergency generator (148.9 horsepower, 100 kilowatts !electric, NSPS JJJJ, NESHAPS ZZZZ)
1�-TK-4 -odorant storage tank (6,000 galloncapacity)
Exemption
Regulation
12Q .0102 (g)(4)
2Q .0102 (g)(4)
2Q .0102 (g)(4)
2Q .0102(h)(l )(B)
12Q .0102 (g)(l 4)(B)2Q .0102 (h)(S)
2Q .0102 (h)(S)
2Q .0102 (g)(l 4)(B)
Source of Source of Title V
TAPs? Pollutants?
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes Yes I No Yes
No Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
1.Because an activity is exempted from being required to have a permit or permit modificationdoes not mean that the activity is exempted from an applicable requirement or that the owneror operator of the source is exempted from demonstrating compliance with any applicable requirement.
2.When applicable, emissions from stationary source activities identified above shall be included in determining compliance with the permit requirements for toxic air pollutants under 15A NCAC 20 .1100 "Control of Toxic Air Pollutants" or 2Q .0711 "Emission RatesRequiring a Permit."
3.Sample permit conditions showing the regulatory requirements for exempt sources subject toNESHAP, NSPS, and NCAC rules may be found here: http://www.ncair.org/permits/insig/
Page F-20
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Page F-21
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Air Permit Review
Permit Issue Date:
Facility Data
Region: Raleigh Regional Office
County: Northampton
NC Facility ID: 6600169
Inspector's Name:
Date of Last Inspection:
Compliance Code:
Applicant (Facility's Name): Northampton Compressor Station
Facility Address:
Permit Applicability (this application only)
SIP:
NSPS:
NESHAP:
Northampton Compressor Station PSD:
uncertain
Pleasant Hill, NC 27707
PSD Avoidance:
NC Toxics:
112(r):
SIC: 4922 I Natural Gas Transmission Other:
NAICS: 48621 I Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
Facility Classification: Before: NIA After: small
Fee Classification: Before: NI A After: small
Facility Contact
Contact Data
Authorized Contact
Leslie Hartz
VP Pipeline Construction
[phone]
707 E. Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
Review Engineer: Charles McEachern
Review Engineer's Signature: Date:
1.Purpose of Application:
Technical Contact
Bill Scarpinato
Environmental
Consultant
[phone]
5000 Dominion Road
Glen Allen, VA 23060
Application Data
Application Number: 6600169.15A
Date Received: 09/17/2015
Application Type: Greenfield Facility
Application Schedule: State
Existing Permit Data
Existing Permit Number: NIA
Existing Permit Issue Date: NIA
Existing Permit Expiration Date: NIA
Comments I Recommendations:
Issue: 10466ROO
Permit Issue Date:
Permit Expiration Date:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (ACP) is constructing a natural gas pipeline running from
West Virginia through North Carolina. They have submitted an air permit application for
the Northampton Compressor Station (NCS), which will consist of natural gas-fired
compressor turbines, emergency generator, storage tanks, and associated equipment.
2.Application Chronology:09/17/2015 Application, including $50, and authorized signature is received by the
RRO.
09/22/2015
10/08/2015
Acknowledgement letter is sent requesting a zoning consistency
determination, PE Seal, and a site address. The permit processing clock
has not begun.
Preliminary Assessment of Air Permit Application letter is sent to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) noting the deficiencies
with the application.
Page F-22
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
10/21/2015 P .E. Seal on appropriate portions of the application is received.
10/26/2015 Zoning consistency determination is received.
11/20/2015 Therese Vick, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League (BREDL),
reviews the application.
12/31/2015 E-mail sent to William Scarpinato, Permit/Technical Contact, with the
following questions:
•Need the fuel certification specs (for the fuel contracted to be
transported in this pipeline) to demonstrate less than 0.060 lb
SO2/MMBtu heat input emission potential.
•Do any of the turbines use water or steam injection?
•Is there a manufacturer's certification for the engine's compliance
with JJJJ?
01/06 /2016 Left message for William Scarpinato
01/07/2016 E-mail from 12/31/2015 is resent to William Scarpinato and Leslie Hartz,
VP Pipeline Construction (Authorized Contact), as a request for additional
information. The permit processing clock stops on this day.
01/11/2016 Telephone call to Robert Sawyer, ERM (consultant) with the above
questions (left message).
01/13/2016 E-mail received from Lawrence Labrie (position unidentified) in response
to my additional information request. He states:
•The current draft tariff limits sulfur in the natural gas to the NSPS
KKKK limits.
•None of the turbines use steam or water injection.
•The emergency generator will be a non-certified engine.
I responded by e-mail acknowledging receipt of the information and noting
that the final tariff showing the gas specifications will be required as the
initial performance test.
01/19/2016 Telephone conversation with Bill Scarpinato during which I requested a
site address and facility contact name. Bill requested that I send a draft to
him and Lawrence Labrie for review. On this day I sent an e-mail with the
draft permit and requested comments as an additional information request.
The permit processing clock stops on this day.
02/16/2016 Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie about the permitting process.
He states there may be some minor changes to boiler and generator sizes as
the project becomes more finalized. The facility plans to test for all criteria
pollutants, irrespective of any testing required by the permit, and therefore
requiring a CO test is acceptable. The company is still reviewing the draft
permit and will submit comments soon.
Page F-23
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
10/17/2016 Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie who states construction is
scheduled to start at the end of 2017, that the facility is still seeking a 911
address, and that he would like to meet in my office on Nov. 1 at 10 am.
11/01/2016 Meeting at RRO with Larry Labrie to discuss the application. It appears
most of the equipment on the original application will change, so a revised
application will be submitted.
11/27/2016 Telephone conversation with Dara Aloosky, Sierra Club, about application
status.
01/05/2017 E-mail received from Therese Vick, BREDL, about application status. I
reply that there has not been a change.
02/22/2017 E-mail received from Therese Vick, BREDL, about application status. I
reply that there has not been a change.
04/21 /2017 E-mail received from Therese Vick, BREDL, about application status. I
reply that there has not been a change.
05/08/2017 E-mail received from Therese Vick, BREDL, about application status. I
reply that there has not been a change.
05/11/2017 Telephone conversation with Goodwin Thompson, SELC, about
application status.
06/02/2017 Telephone conversation with Dara Aloosky, Sierra Club, about application
status.
06 /12/2017 Telephone conversation with Jennifer Berra, attorney, about application
status.
06/30/2017 E-mail received from Therese Vick, BREDL, about application status. I
reply that there has not been a change.
07/20/2017 Larry Labrie leaves a message that the revised application will be delivered
soon.
07/21/2017 A revised application is received. The revised application includes the
following:
•Revision to how turbine power is expressed.
•Revise EG-01 from 1,416 hp to 1,818 hp
•Add a natural gas-fired emergency generator (148.9 hp, 100 kw)
•Revise the insignificant tanks (l-TK-1, 2, and 3) to 1000, 2500, and
13,400 gallons, respectively.
•Recalculate fugitive emission estimates.
Page F-24
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
07/22/2017 Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie to discuss the revised
application. Mr. Labrie stated the company still plans to submit comments
on the draft permit, but will withhold them until a revised draft is sent to
them. The permit processing clock remains off.
07/24/2017 E-mail sent to Therese Vick, BREDL, about receipt of updated application.
07/26/2017 Telephone conversation with Hope Taylor, Green Water NC, about the
application status.
07/28 /2017 Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie to discuss the recalculated
fugitive emissions. The calculations used the EPA emission factors as
lb/hr/source when they are actually kg/hr/source. Additionally,
compressor emissions need an explanation as to why the "Other
equipment" category is appropriate.
07 /3l/2017 Telephone conversation with Dara Aloosky, Sierra Club, about the
application and permitting process.
08/01/2017 Therese Vick, BREDL, visits the office to discuss the application and get a
copy of the most updated version.
08/02/2017 E-mail received from Larry Labrie with updated calculations for the
fugitive emission sources.
08/03/2017
08/03/2017
08/03/2017
08/04/2017
08/07/2017
08/10/2017
I responded by e-mail on this day with a request for an updated NSPS
OOOOa analysis.
E-mail to Larry Labrie requesting specifics on how the turbine particulate
emissions are calculated.
Telephone conversation with Keili Wood who requests a public hearing. I
advised she follow up with a letter.
Telephone conversation with Marti Girolami who requests a public
hearing. I advised she follow up with a letter.
Telephone conversations with Rob Sawyer, ERM ( consultant who
prepared application) about the calculation methodology used to estimate
emissions. I requested a copy of the spreadsheet, and that the emergency
equipment be recalculated at 500 hours per year rather than 100 hours per
year.
E-mails received from Larry Labrie explaining the PM calculations for the
turbines and discussing NSPS CCCCa applicability.
Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie about the application status.
Page F-25
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
08/15/2017
08/16/2017
08/18/2017
08/22/2017
08/28/2017
08/31/2017
Larry Labrie sends an e-mail with maps of the facility and surrounding
area. I replied with a question about the turbine stack orientations,
Larry Labrie sends an e-mail with equipment drawing showing the turbine
stacks are 60' feet high and vertically oriented.
Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie about the application status.
Later on this day I e-mailed him the current draft permit for review.
Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie about the application status.
E-mail sent to Larry Labrie stating DEQ upper management has decided
to submit the draft permit to public notice for comment on or about
9/19/2017, and will also hold a public hearing around mid-October.
Telephone conversation with Larry Labrie about the public hearing.
3.New Equipment/Change in Emission and Regulatory Review:
The Northampton Compressor Station will provide compression to support a pipeline
capacity of 1.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. Equipment described by the
application is as follows:
A.Three natural gas-fired compressor turbines (11,107 hp ISO, 6,276 hp ISO, and
4,427 hp ISO capacity, ID Nos. CT-01, 02, and 03), each controlled by selective
catalytic reduction (ID Nos. CT-01, 02, and 03-SCR) in series with an oxidation
catalyst (ID Nos. CT-01, 02, and 03-OC)
Turbine Model # Heat Input Power Output
(mmBtu/hr) (horsepower ISO*)
Solar Taurus 70 (ID No. CT-01) 96.0 11,107
Solar Centaur 50L (ID No. CT-02) 60.0 6,276
Solar Centaur 40 (ID No. CT-03) 51.0 4,427
*Turbine power is expressed as "horsepower ISO," meaning a standard developed by
the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) which specifies turbine power
referenced to standard atmospheric conditions of l 5°C, 60% relative humidity, and
ambient pressure at sea level.
Emissions from the turbines are based on EPA's AP-42 document for SO2 and air
toxics, and on manufacturer's data for all other criteria pollutants along with ammonia
and formaldehyde. The manufacturer's data differentiates between normal full load
operation, low load operation, and low temperature operation. The turbines normally
operate in so called "SoLoNOx mode" with additional control coming from SCR and a
catalytic oxidizer. At low loads (i.e. startup and shutdown) and temperatures below 0
°F and down to -20 °F, the turbines emit much higher NOx (-13x higher), CO (-6x
higher), and VOC (-2x higher) since the control devices do not work until specific
temperatures are achieved.
Page F-26
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Title V and Permit Potential Emission estimates assume 8,677 hours of normal
operation for each turbine, 100 start-up and shut-down events per year per turbine,
with each event lasting 10 minutes (33.3 hours/year total, per turbine), and 50 hours of
operation per turbine in subzero temperatures. During these abnormal operations the
turbines are not expected to operate in SoLoNOx mode, and the control devices are
assumed to have 0% efficiency, even though some control will likely be achieved.
The Title V emissions assume no control efficiency from any pollution control
devices. Emissions are calculated by the applicant's spreadsheet with emission
factors, calculation assumptions, and results shown in tables C-2, C-3, and C-4 of the
application. These emission calculations have been reviewed by me (Charles
McEachem) and found to be accurate. Emissions are estimated as follows:
Pollutant Title V Emissions Permit
(no add-on control, Potential/Expected
8760 hr/yr) from Actual Emissions
all 3 turbines, from all 3 turbines,
combined (tpy) combined (tpy)
TSP 18.1 18.1
PM-10 18.1 18.1
PM-2.5 18.1 18.1
SO2 3.08 3.08
NOx 47.3 18.0 voe 2.90 1.65
co 64.2 28.6
The Permit Potential emissions above include emissions reduction due to pollution
control devices installed on each turbine as follows:
Control Device Type NOx% CO% VOC%
reduction reduction reduction
Selective Catalytic Reduction (Centaur 40, CT-03) 80% ----
Selective Catalytic Reduction (all others) 44% -- --
Oxidation catalyst (Centaur 40, CT-03) --90% 50%
Oxidation catalyst (all others) --80% 50%
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is used to control NOx emissions by the injection
of ammonia into the exhaust stream in the presence of a catalyst, resulting in the
conversion ofNOx into molecular nitrogen (N2) and water vapor. The emissions
reductions listed above are guaranteed by the manufacturer for ambient temperatures
greater than or equal to O °F.
Following the SCR system is an oxidation catalyst for control of CO and VOC.
Page F-27
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Applicable regulations include:
2D .0516, which limits sulfur dioxide emissions to 2.3 lb/mmBtu heat input.
Compliance is demonstrated through the use of natural gas which has an inherently
low enough sulfur content to always comply with this rule.
2D .0521, which limits visible emission to 20% opacity. Compliance is expected
based on observations of similar units and will be verified during inspections.
2D .0524, NSPS Subpart KKKK, applies to each of these turbines since they are
installed after February 18, 2005 and each has a heat input greater than 10 mmBtu/hr.
This rule regulates SO2 and NOx emissions as follows:
Turbine Model # Heat Input NOx [ref. 60.4320 SO2 [ref. 60.4330(a)(l)]
(mmBtu/hr) and Table 1]
Solar Taurus 70 (ID No. CT-01) 96.0 natural gas shall not contain
Solar Centaur 50L (ID No. CT-02) 60.0 25 ppm at 15% 02 in excess of 20 grains of
Solar Centaur 40 (ID No. CT-03) 51.0 sulfur per 100 cubic feet and
shall have potential sulfur
emission of no more than
0.060 lb SO2/MMBtu heat
input
These turbines do not use water or steam injection, so 60.4340 requires demonstration
of compliance with the NOx standard through either stack testing or by use of a
continuous emission monitor (CEM). The applicant requests to use annual stack
testing as their compliance method.
60.4340(a) states that if the NOx emission result from the performance test is less than
75% of the emission standard that the testing frequency may be reduced to once every
2 years (no more than 26 calendar months following the previous performance test). If
any subsequent performance test show in excess of 75% of the standard then the
testing frequency returns to annual.
60.4360 requires monitoring of the fuel sulfur content unless exempted under 60.4365,
which exempts the fuel monitoring requirement if the fuel used is either tested as or
certified as having less than 20 grains of sulfur per 100 cubic feet and not exceeding
the potential SO2 emission rate of 0.060 lb/MMBtu heat input. A copy of the fuel
specification from the draft tariff document was supplied showing compliance with the
NSPS standard, and a finalized version will be required for the initial performance test.
Additionally, 60.4333(a) states, "You must operate and maintain your stationary
combustion turbine, air pollution control equipment, and monitoring equipment in a
manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions
at all times including during startup, shutdown, and malfunction."
60.4375(b) requires submittal of the NOx performance test results (written) within 60
days of test completion.
Page F-28
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
60.4400(a) describes the testing requirements and requires an initial performance test,
as described in 60.8 (within 60 days of achieving maximum production and no more
than 180 days after startup), followed up with annual testing to occur no more than 14
months after the previous test. 60.4400(b) requires three 20 minute runs within 25%
of 100% peak load.
The NSPS Subpart A provisions apply to these new turbines and include the
following:
•60.7(a)(3) notice of initial startup of an affected facility within 15 days after
such date (written or electronic)
•60.7(b) requires maintenance ofrecords of the occurrence and duration of
startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions
•60.7(f) requires retention of all records, including test reports, for at least 2
years
Compliance with NSPS Subpart KKKK is expected based on statements by the
applicant, and will be verified through receipt of required notifications, stack testing,
and on-site inspections.
B.natural gas-fired emergency generator (ID No. EG-01, 14.9 mmBtu/hr heat input,
1,818 brake horsepower output, and 1,300 kilowatts, electric)
Emissions ofNOx, VOC, and CO are estimated by using manufacturer's data, and
PM/PM-1 0/PM-2.5 and SO2 by using AP-42, for 500 hours per year as shown below:
Pollutant Title V Emissions
(tpy)
TSP 0.160
PM-10 0.160
PM-2.5 0.160
SO2 9.70E-5
NOx 0.50 voe 0.54
co 2.50
Applicable regulations include:
2D .0516, which limits sulfur dioxide emissions to 2.3 lb/mmBtu heat input.
Compliance is demonstrated through the use of natural gas which has an inherently
low enough sulfur content to always comply with this rule.
2D .0521, which limits visible emission to 20% opacity. Compliance is expected
based on observations of similar units and will be verified during inspections.
Page F-29
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
2D .0524, NSPS Subpart JJJJ, which has the following requirements:
60.4233( e) requires owners and operators of engines larger than 100 hp meet the
emission standards in Table 1 to the Subpart, which limits NOx to 2.0 g/HP-hr, CO
to 4.0 g/HP-hr, and voe to 1.0 g/HP-hr, for the life of the engine (60.4236).
60.4237(a) requires installation of a non-resettable hour meter if greater than 500
hp, emergency engine built after 7/1/2010 does not meet the standards applicable
to non-emergency engines. For this 1,818 hp engine the emergency emission
standards from Table 1 are the same as the non-emergency standards.
60.4243(b) requires either (I) purchase of a certified engine and operation
according to manufacturer's specifications, or (2) purchase of a non-certified
engine and demonstrate compliance with the emission standards through an initial
performance test followed up by additional performance tests every 8,760 hours of
operation or 3 years, whichever comes first.
60.4243(d) specifies the amount of non-emergency operation allowed to still be
considered an "emergency" engine.
60.4243(e) allows up to 100 hours per year when firing propane in emergency
situations.
60.4244 specifies test methods.
60.4245(a) requires records be maintained of all notifications, maintenance on the
engine, and either certification documentation or stack tests, as applicable.
60.4245( c) requires owners of non-certified engines to submit of a notice of the
date of construction (note that 60.7(a)(l) waives this requirement if the item is
mass produced and delivered in its completed form) and include the information
listed in paragraphs ( c )( 1) through ( c )( 5).
60.4245(d) requires submittal of performance tests within 60 days of testing.
60.4245(e) requires submittal of an annual report if the engine is contractually
obligated to be available for more than 15 hours of emergency demand response.
60.4246 refers to Table 3 for Subpart A provisions (most are applicable)
Compliance is expected based on the applicant's statements, and will be verified
through testing and inspections.
2D .1111, NESHAP Subpart ZZZZ, applies to this engine, but has no requirements
so long as compliance with the NSPS JJJJ standard is maintained.
Page F-30
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
C.Fugitive Emissions from blowdowns (ID No. I-Fug-01) and piping leaks (ID No. I­
Fug-02)
EPA document no. 600/R-96-080g, "Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas
Industry, Volume 7: Blow and Purge Activities" was consulted for the following
information: "Blowdowns" are an operating condition where pressure is relieved in the
gas line or other equipment by venting the natural gas to the atmosphere. This is
usually done in order to conduct maintenance on the line or turbines (when the
flammable gas must be removed first), and is later followed by a "purge" using natural
gas in order to remove any oxygen in the line from the maintenance activity (air is
removed to prevent a flammable mixture of gas and oxygen). Other emergency or
upset conditions (such as pipe rupture, gas detected in compressor buildings, etc.) may
occur that require a similar blowdown and purge. Emissions are calculated on a mass
balance basis by the applicant assuming one full site-wide blowdown per year. It is
noted that blowdowns of this type generally occur about every 5 years.
Pipeline leaks (I-Fug-02) are self explanatory, occurring at the various flanges, valves,
compressors and monitoring equipment in all parts of the facility. The applicant used
EPA Protocol for Equipment Leaks (EPA-453/R-95-017), Table 2-4, to calculate
fugitive emissions from piping leaks.
Emissions from both of these sources are as follows:
Pollutant Blowdowns (ID No. Piping leaks (ID No.
I-Fug-01) Title V I-Fug-02) Title V
Emissions (tpy)Emissions (tpy)
voe 18.8 0.776
Total HAP 1.06 0.044
(hexane)
The blowdowns (I-FUG-01) are exempt from permitting requirements under 2Q
.0102(g)(l4)(B) based on having no applicable requirements.
The piping leaks (I-FUG-02) are exempt from permitting requirements under 2Q
.0102(h)(5) since their potential is less than 5 tons for each criteria pollutant. 40 CFR
60, Subpart OOOOa applies to the piping leaks, I-FUG-02, and is discussed in Section
4 of this review.
Since the turbines are subject to NSPS, the fugitive emissions are counted toward the
facility-wide emissions for TV and PSD purposes.
D.Insignificant Activities
•Pipeline liquids storage tank (1000 gallon capacity, ID No. I-TK-1)
This horizontal storage tank is used to store pipeline liquids captured by the
compressor station separators and filter-separators.
Emissions are estimated by the applicant using "E&P TANKS" as being up to
o.145 tpy of voe.
Page F-31
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
This tank is exempt from air permitting requirements under 2Q .0102(g)(4) by
virtue of its being a storage tank.
•hydrocarbon waste storage tank (2,500 gallon capacity, ID No. I-TK-2)
This horizontal oil storage tank will store waste oils from the compressor building
and auxiliary building floor drains.
Emissions are estimated by the applicant using EPA's TANKS program as being
up to 2. l 9E-05 tpy VOC.
This tank is exempt from air permitting requirements under 2Q .0102(g)(4) by
virtue of its being a storage tank.
•ammonia tank (13,400 gallon capacity, ID No. I-TK-3)
This tank stores an aqueous ammonia solution for use in the SCRs.
This tank is exempt from air permitting requirements under 2Q .0102(g)(4) by
virtue of its being a storage tank.
•odorant storage tank (6,000 gallons, ID No. I-TK-4)
This tanks stores methyl mercaptan for odorizing the natural gas. There are no
regulations applicable to this tank, thus it is exempt from air permitting under 2Q
.0102(g)(l 4)(B).
•natural gas-fired boiler (5.25 mmBtu/hr heat input, ID No. I-WH-01) used for
building heat
This boiler will be used for human comfort heat. Emissions are estimated using the
DAQ spreadsheet for natural gas combustion as follows:
Pollutant Title V Emissions
(tpy)
TSP 0.171
PM-10 0.171
PM-2.5 0.171
SO2 0.014
NOx 1.13
voe 0.124
co 1.89
Since this boiler is only fueled by natural gas it is exempt from air permitting
requirements under 2Q .0102(h)(l)(B).
•natural gas-fired emergency generator (148.9 horsepower, 100 kw, I-EG-02)
This generator will provide backup power to the operations center. Emissions are
calculated using AP-42 for TSP/PM-1 0/PM-2.5 and SO2, and manufacturer's data
for NOx, VOC, and CO at 500 hours of operation per year as follows:
Page F-32
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Pollutant Title V Emissions
(tpy) TSP 0.015
PM-10 0.015
PM-2.5 0.015
SO2 0.00025
NOx 0.00025
voe 0.015
co 0.005
This engine is subject to NSPS Subpart JJJJ and NESHAPS Subpart ZZZZ. It is
exempt from air permitting requirements under 2Q .0102(h)(5) since each
pollutant's emission potential is less than 5 tons per year.
4.NSPS, NESHAPS, PSD, and Attainment Status:
NSPS Subpart KKKK applies to the turbines and Subpart JJJJ applies to the
emergency generator as discussed above.
NSPS Subpart 0000 applies to natural gas compressor operations from the wellhead to
the point of custody transfer (defined as post processing and treatment of the gas) of the
marketable gas, and storage vessels with greater than 6 tpy voe emissions. This
compressor station is located after custody transfer, and no tanks will emit over 6 tpy
voe, therefore, this facility is not subject to this rule. On August 18, 2015 the EPA
proposed revisions to this rule called NSPS Subpart OOOOa, which regulate methane
and voe emissions not currently covered by Subpart 0000. On August 2, 2016, this
rule became effective and applies to equipment constructed after September 18, 2015.
NSPS Subpart OOOOa applicability to the proposed facility is described in 60.5365a as
follows:
•each well affected facility [60.5365a(a)] -there are no wells associated with this
compressor station.
•each centrifugal compressor using wet seals [60.5365a(b)] -all 3 centrifugal
compressors will use dry seals so they are not subject to this rule.
•each reciprocating compressor [60.5365a(c)] -none of the compressors are
reci pro ca ting.
•each pneumatic controller affected facility which is a single continuous bleed
natural gas-driven pneumatic controller. [60.5365a(d)] -the facility states there
will not be any pneumatic controllers.
•each storage vessel with potential voe emissions in excess of 6 tpy [60.5365(e)] -
each storage vessel has potential voe emissions less than this threshold, thus they
are not subject to this rule.
Page F-33
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
•all equipment within a "process unit" [60.5365a(f)] -this applies to equipment
used to remove natural gas liquids from field gas, which the facility states will not
be done at this site.
•each sweetening unit [60.5365a(g)] -no sweetening (i.e. removal of H2S or CO2)
occurs at this facility.
•each pneumatic pump [60.5365a(h)] -this facility does not use pneumatic pumps.
•The collection of fugitive emission sources at a well [60.5365a(i)] -there is no
well associated with this facility.
•the collection of fugitive emissions components at compressor stations is an
affected facility [60.5365a(j)] -this is a "compressor station," as defined in
60.5430a, and the fugitive emissions are subject to this rule. These are the only
sources at the facility with requirements under this rule. The sources are estimated
to be 646 valves, 340 flanges, 1 connector, and the 3 turbines.
60.5370a requires compliance be achieved upon startup[60.5370a(a)], and at all times
(including startup, shutdown, and malfunction -note that the provisions of 40 CFR
60.8(c) do not apply[60.5370a(b)]) the owners and operators shall maintain and operate
the facility in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing
emissions [60.5370a(b)].
60.5397a describes fugitive emission standards at a compressor station for the reduction of
GHG (as methane) and VOC as follows:
•60.5397a(a) defines fugitive emissions as: Any visible emission from a fugitive
emissions component observed using optical gas imaging or an instrument reading
of 500 ppm or greater using Method 21.
•60.5397a(b) requires development of an air emissions monitoring plan
•60.5397a(c) specifies the 8 elements of a fugitive emissions monitoring plan
•60.5397a(d) specifies the 4 more elements of a fugitive emissions monitoring plan
•60.5397a(e) requires each monitoring survey observe each fugitive emissions
component for fugitive emissions.
•60.5397a(f)(2) requires an initial monitoring survey be conducted within 60 days
of startup of a compressor station.
•60.5397a(g)(2) requires a monitoring survey of the collection of fugitive emissions
at a compressor station be conducted at least quarterly after the initial survey.
Consecutive quarterly surveys must be conducted at least 60 days apart.
60.5397a(g)(3) and (4) describe how to handle "difficult-to-monitor" and "unsafe­
to-monitor" emissions, respectively.
•60.5397a(h)(l) requires each identified source of fugitive emissions be repaired or
replaced no later than 30 days after discovery unless the repair qualifies under
60.5397a(h)(2) as either technically infeasible, would require a vent blowdown or
compressor station shutdown, or would be unsafe to repair during operation of the
unit. In these cases the repair must be made during the next compressor station
shutdown or within 2 years, whichever is earlier. 60.5397a(h)(3) requires each
repaired component be resurveyed for fugitive emissions within 30 days after
being repaired. Subparagraphs (i) through (iii) require a resurvey within 30 days
of discovery of the fugitive emission using either Method 21 or optical gas
Page F-34
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
imaging, and digital documentation of any fugitive emission that can't be repaired
during the monitoring survey when discovered.
•60.5397a(i) requires records of each monitoring survey be maintained as specified
in 60.5420a(c)(l 5).
•60.5397a(j) requires an annual report to include information specified in
60.5420a(b )(7).
60.5398a describes procedures to allow for alternative means of emission limitation as
approved by the Administrator.
60.541 0a(j) describes the procedures for demonstrating initial compliance with this rule.
60.5415a(h) describes the requirements to demonstrate continuous compliance.
60.5420a describes the notification, reporting and recordkeeping requirements. It also
states that 60.7(a)(l), (2), and (3) do not apply.
NESHAPS subpart ZZZZ is applicable to the emergency generator as discussed above.
This facility is a PSD minor source since no criteria pollutant potential emissions exceed
250 tons per year. PMIO and SO2 were triggered for increment tracking in Person County
by Cogentrix of NC on 12/30/1985. For increment tracking purposes the facility-wide
PMl 0 increase is 4.18 pounds per hour, and the SO2 increase is 0. 7 pounds per hour.
Person County is in attainment with all ambient air quality standards.
S.Facility Wide Air Toxics:
All of the air toxic emissions from the permitted sources emanate from natural gas
combustion sources of varying type. Rule 15A NCAC 2Q .0702(a)(25) exempts natural
gas combustion sources with an aggregate heat input less than 450 mmBtu/hr from toxics
requirements if they are the only source of benzene. This exemption rule was developed
by DAQ and takes into account all air toxic emissions from natural gas combustion, and
mentions benzene specifically since that pollutant is the one most likely to affect
compliance with the 2D .1100 AAL. The facility-wide heat input is 225.8 mmBtu/hr, thus
this facility is exempt from triggering an air toxics evaluation.
Although the facility does not trigger an evaluation, under SL 2012-91 (also referred to as
HB 952) DAQ is required to demonstrate there are "no adverse health affects" expected
from this facility's air toxic emissions. DAQ interprets this to be a demonstration that the
facility complies with the 2D .1100 acceptable ambient level (AAL) for all air toxic
pollutants. The exemption from air toxics based on the natural gas heat input rate of 450
mmBtu/hr was developed by DAQ following a study of combustion related air toxics from
natural gas combustion (internal and external combustion source types). Operating
combustion sources below this threshold is not expected to result in any acceptable
ambient level (AAL) exceedances.
Page F-35
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Additionally, ammonia is a toxic air pollutant associated with turbines using ammonia
injection for NOx control. The combined emissions from the three turbines could be as
high as 2.83 lb/hr. The turbines exhaust through 60 foot high stacks which are vertically
oriented, thus the 2Q .071 l(b) table is used for the evaluation. The 2Q .071 l(b) toxic air
pollutant permitting emission rate for ammonia is 2.84 lb/hr, thus demonstrating
compliance with this pollutant's 2D .1100 AAL.
6.Compliance Status:
This is a greenfield facility with no compliance history.
7.Facility Emissions Review:
The emissions summary in the table below is based on all of the emission estimates
discussed above.
Facility Emissions Summary
Pollutant Title V Emissions Permit
(tpy) Potential/Expected
Actual Emissions
TSP 18.3
PM-10 18.3
PM-2.5 18.3
SO2 3.10
NOx 47.8 voe 22.1
co 68.6
This facility is a "small" for fee purposes.
8.Summary of Permit Changes:
NIA
18.3
18.3
18.3
3.10
19.6
22.1
33.0
9.Conclusions, Comments, and Recommendations:
(tpy)
Recommend issuance of revised air permit No. 10466ROO.
Permit Coordinator: Date: --------------------· Charles McEachern, PE
Regional Supervisor: ____________________ Date:
Patrick Butler, P.E.
Page F-36
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Page F-37
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060
Web Address: www.dom.com
�; (tjf,i Dominion
September 16, 2015
BY: OVERNIGHT MAIL
Patrick Butler SEP 1 /
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
NCDENR Division of Air Quality
Suite 101
NC DENR Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Northampton Compressor Station
New Source Permit
Dear Mr. Butler:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC proposes to construct and operate the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, an
approximately 556-mile-long interstate natural gas transmission pipeline system designed to meet growing
energy needs in Virginia and North Carolina. Enclosed is an application for a new natural gas compressor
station to be located in Northampton County, North Carolina. The Northampton Compressor Station will
include the following equipment:
•Solar Taurus 70 combustion turbine;
•Solar Centaur SOL combustion turbine;
•Solar Centaur 40 combustion turbine;
•Caterpillar G3516 emergency generator;
•Boiler rated at 6.3 MMBtu/hr;
•Accumulator tank with a capacity of 2,500 gallons;
•Hydrocarbon waste tank with a capacity of 1,500 gallons;
•Aqueous ammonia storage tank with a capacity of 8,000 gallons;
The application also includes various operational natural gas releases associated with station components
and piping fugitive emissions related to equipment proposed at the Northampton Compressor Station.
Enclosed with this permit application is the fee in the amount of $50.
Should you have any questions or need additional in the formation, please feel free to contact William
Scarpinato at [phone] or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely, Q��iV1.t�
Robert M. Bisha
Project Director, Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Dominion Environmental Services
Page F-38
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
Prepared For:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, ..
The world's leading sustainability consultancy
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project
Permit Application
Northampton Compressor Station
Northampton County, North Carolina
September 2015
Environmental Resources Management
75 Valley Stream Parlavay, Suite 200
Malvern, PA 19355
www.erm.com
i,, + .,. --ll-rt--
ERM
Page F-39
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
INTRODUCTION 1
1
1
3
3
6
7
7
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.2 APPLICATION OVERVIEW
FACILITY AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION
2.2 AGGREGATION DETERMINATION
PROJECT EMISSIONS INFORMATION
3.1 COMBUSTION TURBINES
3.2 EMERGENCY GENERATOR
3.3 BOILER
3.4 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
3.5 STORAGE TANKS
3.6 PROJECT EMISSIONS
FEDERAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
11
11
12
13
14
16
4.1 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS) 16
4.1.1 40 CFR 60 Subpart De -Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-
Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units 16
4.1.2 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb -Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid
Storage Vessels 16
4.1.3 40 CFR 60 Subpart Jiff -Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark
Ignition Internal Combustion Engines 16
4.1.4 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK -Standards of Performance for Stationary
Combustion Turbines 16
4.1.5 40 CFR 60 Subparts 0000 and 0000a -Standards of Performance for Crude
Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission and Distribution 17
4.2 NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
(NESHAP) 18
ERM i ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-40
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
•
4.2.1 40 CFR 63 Subpart HHH -National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants from Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities 19
4.2.2 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD -National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
And Process Heaters 19
4.2.3 40 CFR 63 Subpart JJJJJJ -National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources 19
4.2.4 40 CFR 63 Subpart YYYY -National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Stationary Combustion Turbines 19
4.2.5 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ -National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 19
4.3 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AND NON-
ATTAINMENT NEW SO URCE REVIEW 19
4.4 TITLE VOPERATING PERMIT 20
4.5 MAINTENANCE EMISSIONS AND FEDERAL ROUTINE MAINTENANCE,
REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT PROVISIONS (RMRR) 20
4.6 CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS (RMP)
4.7 ACIDRAINREGULATIONS
4.8 STRA TOSPHERIC OZONE PROTECTION REGULATIONS
4.9 GREENHOUSE GAS REPORTING
5.0 STATE REGULATORY APPLICABILITY
6.0 PROPOSED COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATIONS
20
21
21
21
22
26
ERM ii ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR ST A TJON
Page F-41
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
•
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE2.1
FIGURE2.2
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE3.1
TABLE 3.2
TABLE3.3
TABLE 3.4
TABLE 3.5
TABLE 3.6
TABLE 3.7
TABLE3.8
TABLE 3.9
TABLES.1
NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION LOCATION MAP
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
PRE-CONTROL TURBINE LOW TEMPERATURE EMISSION RATES
(< oo F AND> -2 0° F)
TURBINE CONTROLLED SHORT-TERM EMISSION RATES
TURBINE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS DURING START-UP EVENTS
TURBINE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS DURING SHUTDOWN EVENTS
TURBINE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
EMERGENCY GENERATOR POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
BOILER POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
FUGITIVE COMPONENT POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
FACILITY-WIDE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (TPY)
STATE REGULATORY APPLICABILITY
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIXA
APPENDIXB
APPENDIXC
APPENDIXD
APPENDIXE
ERM
NC DENR PERMIT APPLICATION FORMS
FACILITY PLOT PLAN
POTENTIAL TO EMIT CALCULATIONS
VENDOR SPECIFICATIONS
SECRETARY OF STATE REGISTRATION
iii ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR ST A TION
Page F-42
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
1.0
1.1
1.2
•
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (ACP, LLC) proposes to construct and operate the
Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP), an approximately 556-mile-long interstate natural
gas transmission pipeline system designed to meet growing energy needs in
Virginia and North Carolina. The proposed project has the capacity to deliver
1.5 billion standard cubic feet of natural gas per day (bscf / d) from Pennsylvania
and West Virginia to power generation facilities and other end-users.
In support of the ACP, Dominion Transmission Inc. (DTI), a subsidiary of
Dominion, proposes to construct and operate the Northampton Compressor
Station in Northampton County, North Carolina to provide compression to
support the transmission of natural gas.
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
ACP, LLC submits this construction/ operating permit application to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR) for
the authority to construct and operate the Northampton Compressor Station in
Northampton County, North Carolina. This permit application narrative is
provided to add clarification and/ or further detail to the information in the
permit application forms provided by NC DENR.
Concurrent with the submittal of this air quality application, other required
environmental permits and approvals are being pursued with the appropriate
regulatory agencies.
This section (Section 1) contains introductory information. Section 2 presents a
description of the Northampton Compressor Station and its associated
equipment. The estimated emissions of regulated pollutants from the
equipment and operating scenarios are presented in Section 3. Section 4
addresses federal regulatory requirements applicable to project sources and
Section 5 provides a review of State regulatory requirements. Section 6 provides
ACP, LLC's proposed compliance demonstration methods.
ERM 1 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-43
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
•
•
This application also contains:
ERM
•Appendix A -NC DENR Permit Application Forms;
•Appendix B -Facility Plot Plan;
•Appendix C -Potential to Emit Calculations;
•Appendix D-Vendor Specifications; and
•Appendix E -Secre tary of State Registration .
2 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-44
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
2.0 FACILI1Y AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION
The Northampton Compressor Station will be located in Northampton County,
North Carolina to provide compression to support the transport of natural gas.
The proposed project will require the construction of a new facility subject to the
requirements of 15A NCAC 02Q.0300-Construction and Operation Permits.
ACP, LLC seeks authorization for the construction and operation of:
•One (1) Solar Taurus 70 Combustion Turbine (CT-01);
•One (1) Solar Centaur SOL Combustion Turbine (CT-02);
•One (1) Solar Centaur 40 Combustion Turbine (CT-03);
•One (1) Caterpillar G3516 Emergency Generator (EG-01) rated at 1,416 hp;
•One (1) Boiler (WH-01) rated at 6.3 Million British Thermal Units per
hour (MMBtu/hr);
•One (1) Accumulator Tank (TK-1) with a capacity of 2,500 gallons;
•One (1) Hydrocarbon Waste Tank (TK-2) with a capacity of 1,500 gallons;
•One (1) Aqueous Ammonia Storage Tank (TK-3) with a capacity of 8,000
gallons;and
•Various operational natural gas releases associated with station fugitive
components (Fug-01) and piping fugitive emissions (Fug-02) related to
the equipment proposed at the Northampton Compressor Station.
A map displaying the location of the Northampton Compressor Station is
provided as Figure 2.1. A process flow diagram (PFD) for the Northampton
Compressor Station is provided as Figure 2.2.
ERM 3 ACP, LLC. NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-45
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
FIGURE 2.1 NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION LOCATION MAP
A�I Pipeline
"·-"--
fllF.. M:Clenb0.f_'OOU\5RPPI Art_fil__S'llescutl! A,
ERM
•,. �:.aSIIXSI
[) liASll:IClt
<@>1.1tl'IChffandlorR�
� Y.IMSIIII
Nattwfront5lsan�
Ka1CNl,.,.Slnlc:e
u.srnt1&wamosswe
NIIDIMGUaG
4
DtVl'5£D: CMIU11etS. SCH C: 1:1,1 aJO
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Appendix 1B
Aerial Route Maps
GreensviUe Co., Virginia
ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A 11ON
Paga BO ol 153 e ... , •.-.O•r"f•·
DR_!WN UY: CtS
Page F-46
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
-�O O �
FIGURE 2.2 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
�
� 8
Ammonia
Tank TI<-3
Gas Suction Une {Low Pressure Gas)
ERM
!
Accumulator
Tank TI<-1 e
Hydrocarbon
{Waste OIIJ
Tank TI<-2 e
5
I -Air I .... -.
Taurus 70 Turbine CT-01
1-Air,.._
Centaur 60L Turbine CT-112
I -... .... I ,.,_,
Centa .. 4-0 Turbine CT-03 8
1 .......,,...,,
Jo,� i
Emergency
Generator EG-1 8 l!n-­+ -.... �
Gu Discharge Line (High Pressure G3!I
�Point
o.s Flow
Pipeline Fluid Flow
v.ntSn ... --0 -------
ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf ATION
Page F-47
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
2.2
•
•
AGGREGATION DETERMINATION
The Northampton Compressor Station will be operated by DTI. Stationary
sources of air pollutants may require aggregation of total emission levels if these
sources share the same industrial grouping, are operating under common
control, and are classified as contiguous or adjacent properties. Other than the
interstate pipeline, which is specifically exempt from the requirement to
aggregate as stated in the preamble to the 1980 PSD regulations, there are no
facilities that would be considered adjacent to the Northampton Compressor
Station and thus no other sources must be aggregated with the Northampton
Compressor Station .
ERM 6 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR ST A TION
Page F-48
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
3.0
3.1
PROJECT EMISSIONS INFORMATION
As discussed in Section 2.1 of this application, ACP, LLC seeks the authority to
construct and operate new emission sources. This section provides a description
of the basis for the estimation of emissions from these sources.
COMBUSTION TURBINES
The proposed natural gas-fired turbines to be installed at the Northampton
Compressor Station will be equipped with Solar' s SoLoNOx dry low NOx
combustor technology as well as add-on emission controls including selective
catalytic reduction (SCR) for NOx and oxidation catalyst for CO and VOC.
Emissions for the Solar Turbines assume that the units will operate up to 8,760
hours per year and up to 100% rated output. Pre-control (SCR and oxidation
catalyst) emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile
organic compounds (VOC) are based on emission rates provided by Solar. VOC
emissions are conservatively estimated as 10% of uncombusted hydrocarbon
(UHC). Solar also provided emission estimates for UHC, carbon dioxide (CO2),
formaldehyde, and total hazardous air pollutants.
The pre-control emission rates for normal operating conditions are as follows
(all emissions rates are in terms of parts per million dry volume (ppmvd)@ 15%
02):
•9 ppmvd NOx for the Centaur SOL and Taurus 70;
•25 ppvd NOx for the Centaur 40;
•25 ppmvd CO for the Centaur SOL and Taurus 70;
•50 ppmvd CO for the Centaur 40;
•25 ppmvd UHC; and
•2.5 ppmvd voe.
The proposed SCR will further reduce the NOx emission rate for each of the
proposed turbines to 5 ppmvd at 15% 02.
Per vendor estimates, the oxidation catalyst will provide additional control for
CO, to achieve 5 ppmvd CO@ 15% 02. The catalyst will also control organic
compound emissions and will provide an estimated 50% control for VOC and
formaldehyde.
Vendor estimates for SCR and oxidation catalyst performance are provided in
AppendixD.
At very low load and cold temperature extremes, the turbine system must be
controlled differently in order to assure stable operation. The required
adjustments to the turbine controls at these conditions cause emissions of NOx,
ERM 7 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-49
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
TABLE3.1
•
CO and voe to increase (emission rates of other pollutants are unchanged).
The only times when low-load operation (non-normal SoLoNOx operation) is
expected to occur are during periods of startup and shutdown. Solar has
provided emissions estimates during start-up and shutdown (see Solar Product
Information Letter (PIL) 170, included as part of the vendor attachments to this
application for more detail).
Similarly, Solar has provided emissions estimates for low temperature operation
(inlet combustion air temperature less than 0° F and greater than -20° F). Table
3.1 provides estimated pre-control emissions from the turbines at low
temperature conditions.
PRE-CONTROL TURBINE LOW TEMPERATURE EMISSION RATES (< 0° F AND > -
20° F)1
Solar Applicable NOx, co, UHC,
Model Load ppm ppm ppm
Taurus 70 50-100% load 120 150 50 Centaur50L
Centaur40 80-100% load 120 150 50
1.Emissions Estimates from Table 2 of Solar PlL 167.
2 Centaur SOL emissions based on Centaur 50 Emissions Rates
AeP, LLe reviewed historic meteorological data from the previous five years for
the region to estimate the worst case number of hours per year under sub-zero
(less than 0° F but greater than -20° F) conditions. The annual hours of operation
during sub-zero conditions were conservatively assumed to be not more than 50
hours per year.
A summary of the potential emissions of NOx, CO, and voe during normal
operations and low temperature scenarios is provided in Table 3.2.
ERM 8 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-50
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
TABLE3.2 TURBINE CONTROLLED SHORT-TERM EMISSION RATES
CT-01 CT-02 CT-03
Pollutant Operating Solar Taurus Solar Centaur SOL Solar Centaur 40
Scenario Turbine Turbine 70Turbine
lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
NO, Normal 1.77 1.10 0.94
Low Temp. 23.6 14.7 12.5
co Normal 1.06 0.66 0.57
Low Temp. 6.36 3.96 3.42
voe Normal 0.155 0.095 0.08
Low Temp. 0.310 0.19 0.16
The emission rates presented in Table 3.2 are estimates based on the emissions
factors provided by Solar multiplied by the control efficiency expected from the
installation of the SCR (approximately 80% NOx control for the Solar Centaur 40
Turbine and 44 % NOx control for the Solar Taurus 70 and Centaur SOL Turbines)
and oxidation catalyst (approximately SO% VOC control for all turbines, 90% CO
control for the Solar Centaur 40 Turbine, and 80% CO control for the Solar
Taurus 70 and Centaur SOL Turbines).
Potential turbine emissions also include conservatively assumed uncontrolled
potential emissions from start-up and shutdown events calculated using
emission data provided by Solar. Although these emissions are provided as
uncontrolled for the purposes of potential to emit estimations, ACP, LLC expects
that some control may be achieved by the combustion turbine control devices
during the start-up and shutdown events. Ton per year potential emission
estimates are based on an assumed count of 100 start-up and 100 shutdown
events per year. The duration of each start-up and shutdown is expected to be
approximately 10 minutes per event. Thus, it is assumed that there will be
approximately 33.3 hours of start-up and shutdown event time when the unit
may not be operating in SoLoNOx mode. Table 3 of Solar PIL 170 was used as
basis for emissions during these events.
A summary of the potential emissions during start-up and shutdown events is
presented in Tables 3.3 and 3.4.
To practically track these events and associated emissions, ACP, LLC proposes
to keep track of the total number of hours of non-SoLoNOx mode (a parameter
monitored by the turbine control logic) and utilize an average start-up /
shutdown emission rate (equivalent lb/hr based on 10 minutes per event). The
proposed compliance demonstration is provided in Section 6 of this application.
ERM 9 ACP, LLC - NORTHAMPTON COMPRE5.SOR Sf A TION
Page F-51
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
TABLE 3.3
TABLE3.4
TABLE3.5
TURBINE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS DURING START-UP EVENTS
CT-01 CT-02 CT-03
Pollutant Solar Taurus 70 Turbine Solar Centaur SOL Turbine Solar Centaur 40
Turbine
lb/event tpy lb/event tpy lb/event Tpy
NOx 0.800 0.0400 0.800 0.0400 0.700 0.0350 co 73.1 3.66 69.1 3.46 64.4 3.22 voe 0.840 0.0420 0.800 0.0400 0.740 0.0370
CO2 519 26.0 469 23.5 392 19.6
CI-Li 3.36 0.168 3.20 0.160 2.96 0.148
CO2e 603 30.2 549 27.5 466 23.3
TURBINE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS DURING SHU1DOWN EVENTS
CT-01 CT-02 CT-03
Pollutant Solar Taurus 70 Turbine Solar Centaur SOL Turbine Solar Centaur 40
Turbine
lb/event tpy lb/event tpy lb/event tpy
NOx 1.10 0.0550 0.400 0.0200 0.300 0.0150 co 93.4 4.67 35.4 1.77 30.2 1.51 voe 1.06 0.0530 0.400 0.0200 0.340 0.0170
CO2 575 28.8 217 10.9 181 9.05
C.Hi 4.24 0.212 1.60 0.0800 1.36 0.0680
CO2e 681 34.1 257 12.9 215 10.8
Table 3.5 includes the facility's potential emissions for the combustion turbines
including normal continuous operation controlled by SoLoNOx mode, SCR, and
oxidation catalyst, low temperature operation controlled by the SCR and
oxidation catalyst as well, as the uncontrolled emissions associated with start-up
and shutdown events.
TURBINE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
CT-01 CT-02 CT-03
Solar Solar Solar
Pollutant Taurus 70 Centaur Centaur40
Turbine SOL Turbine Turbine
tpy tpy tpy
NOx 8.35 5.20 4.44
co 13.1 8.19 7.29 voe 0.775 0.477 0.405
S02 1.43 0.894 0.760
ERM 10 ACP, LLC-NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR STATION
Page F-52
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
3.2
• TABLE3.6
3.3
PMFilt 2.42 1.51 1.29
PM10-Filt 2.42 1.51 1.29
PM2.S-Fdt 2.42 1.51 1.29
PM-cond 5.99 3.74 3.18
CO2 50,035 31,329 26,747
CI-Li 4.00 2.50 2.14
N2O 1.26 0.788 0.671
CO2e 50,511 31,627 27,000
NH3 5.77 3.58 3.02
Total HAP 0.525 0.352 0.286
Formaldehyde 0.496 0.332 0.271
EMERGENCY GENERATOR
Emissions for the natural gas fired emergency generator assume up to 100 hours
of operation per year and are calculated using EPA's AP-42 emission factors.
A summary of the emissions associated with the emergency generator are
provided in Table 3.6 .
EMERGENCY GENERATOR POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
EG-01
Pollutant Caterpillar
3516
tpy
NO, 0.312 co 0.295 voe 0.0375
SO2 0.0003
PMFm 0.0214
PM11J-Filt 0.0214
PM2.s-Filt 0.0214
PM-cond 0.006
CO2 77.9
CI-Li 0.290
CO2e 85.1
Total HAP 0.0143
Formaldehyde 0.0099
BOILER
The proposed natural gas boiler will be used to provide building heat (space
heating) only, and will have a maximum heat input capacity of 6.3 MMBtu/hr.
ERM 11 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR ST A TION
Page F-53
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
The boiler will use Low NOx Burners (LNB). Emissions for the proposed
natural gas-fired Boiler are calculated using EPA' s AP-42 emission factors for
Natural Gas Combustion (Section 1.4) conservatively assuming 8,760 hours per
year. 15A NCAC 02Q.0102(c)(2)(B)(iv) provides an exemption from the
requirement to obtain an air permit for fuel combustion equipment with a heat
input rating less than 10 MMBtu/hr that is used solely for space heating. As
such, the proposed boiler is exempt from permitting requirements.
The potential emissions from the boiler are provided in Table 3.7.
TABLE 3.7 PROPOSED BOILER POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
3.4
WH-01
Pollutant Boiler
tpy
NOx 1.35
co 2.27
voe 0.149
SO2 0.0162
PM.Fill 0.0514
PM10.Fm 0.0514
PM2.s.F,1t 0.0514
PM.cond 0.154
CO2 3,246
CH.t 0.0622
N2O 0.0595
CO2e 3,266
Total 0.0511 HAP
Hexane 0.0487
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
The proposed project will include fugitive components including valves,
flanges, pumps, etc. Emission factors for fugitive components were based on
EPA's report on equipment leaks for oil and gas production facilities'. It is
expected that this facility will comply with recently proposed New Source
Performance Standard Subpart OOOOa which incorporates leak detection
i USEPA, 1995. "Emission factors from Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates," EPA-453/R-95-
017 Table 2.4, Oil and Gas Production Operations Average Emission Factors.
ERM 12 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR ST A TION
Page F-54
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
•
3.5
monitoring. However, no credit for any reduced emissions has been taken in
the numbers below.
Additionally, ACP, LLC has estimated emissions from blowdown events. ACP,
LLC will minimize these events whenever possible, but blowdown of the
machines and piping will sometimes occur for safety reasons and to ensure
protection of equipment. ACP, LLC has also conservatively included estimated
emissions from one site-wide blowdown event in these emission calculations.
Such events are not routine, but typically occur once every five years.
The total fugitive emissions are summarized in Table 3.8.
TABLE3.8 PROPOSED FUGITIVE COMPONENT POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
FUG-01 FUG-02
Fugitive Fugitive
Pollutant Leaks-Leaks-
Blowdowns Piping
tpy tpy
voe 18.8 20.0
CO2 19.5 20.7
CHi 643 683
CO2e 16,092 17,106
Total 1.06 1.13 HAP
STORAGE TANKS
The Northampton Compressor Station will operate three (3) aboveground
storage tanks (ASTs). TK-1 (Accumulator Storage Tank) will have a capacity of
2,500 gallons and will receive and store pipeline liquids captured by the station's
separators and filter-separators. The emissions associated with the operation of
this accumulator storage tank are estimated using E&P Tanks to ensure capture
of any flash emissions (which the EPA TANKS program cannot estimate). ACP,
LLC has estimated that this storage tank will complete five (5) turnovers per
year.
TK-2 (Hydrocarbon Waste Tank) will have a capacity of 1,500 gallons and will
receive liquids from the compressor building and auxiliary building floor
drains. The emissions associated with the operation of this hydrocarbon waste
tank were calculated using EPA's TANKS program. ACP, LLC has estimated
that this storage tank will complete five (5) turnovers per year.
ERM 13 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-55
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
3.6
•
The potential VOC emissions associated with the proposed new storage tanks,
TK-1 and TK-2, are 0.35 tpy (0.08 lb/hr). Detailed emission calculations are
provided in Appendix C of this document.
TK-3 (Aqueous Ammonia Storage Tank) will have a capacity of 8,000 gallons
and will be used to supply aqueous ammonia to SCRs. 15A NCAC
02Q.0102(c)(l)(D)(iii) provides an exemption from the requirement to obtain an
air permit for storage tanks used solely to store inorganic liquids. As such,
Ammonia Storage Tank TK-3 is exempt from air permitting requirements.
PROJECT EMISSIONS
The potential emissions associated with the proposed new equipment at
Northampton Compressor Station are summarized in Table 3.9 in tons per year.
Detailed emission calculations are provided in Appendix C of this document.
ERM 14 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf A TION
Page F-56
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents
.,.
TABLE3.9 FACILITY-WIDE POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (TPY)
Criteria Pollutants Greenhouse Gases Ammonia Total
Unit ID NOx co voe SO2 PM-ru, PM10-F11t PM:z.s-rut PM-cond C O2 CH.t NlD c� NIIJ HAP
CT-01 8.35 13.0 0.775 1.43 2.42 2.42 2.42 5.99 50,035 4.00 1.26 50,511 5.77 0.525
CT-02 5.20 8.19 0.477 0.894 1.51 1.51 1.51 3.74 31,329 2.50 0.788 31,627 3.58 0.352
CT-03 4.44 7.29 D.405 0.760 1.29 1.29 1.29 3.18 26,747 2.14 0.671 27,000 3.02 0.286
EG-01 0.312 0.295 0.0375 0.0003 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.006 77.9 0.290 0 85.1 0 0.0143
WH-01 1.35 2.27 0.149 0.0162 0.0514 0.0514 0.0514 0.154 3,246 0.0622 0.0595 3,266 0 0.0511
FUG-01 18.8 19.5 643 16,092 1.06
FUG-02 20.0 20.7 683 -17,106 1.13
TK-1 0.350
TK-2 1.32E-05
Total 19.7 31.1 41.1 3.10 5.29 5.29 5.29 13.1 111,475 1,335 2.78 145,686 12.4 3.42
ERM 15 ACP, LLC -NORTHAMPTON COMPRESSOR Sf ATION
Page F-57
Attachment F. Air Quality Permit Application Review Documents