20081271 Ver 2_Application_20090224

BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
b ,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Mr William Wescott
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Dear Sirs
February 17, 2009
*44 1?01 ?09
0,9
EUGENE A WNU, JK
SECRETARY
Mr Stephen Lane
N C Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557 0!
Subject Nationwide Permit 14 Application and CAMA Major Development Permit Minor
Modification Request for the intersection improvements to SR 1303 at US 264, part of
the detour associated with the replacement of Bndge No 103 on NC 32 over Runyon
Creek in Beaufort County Federal Aid Project No BRSTP-0032(7), State Project No
8 1151501, TIP No B-4019 Debit $240 for Water Quality Certification from WBS
333863 1
References Nationwide Perrmts 23, 33, and 12 issued September 18, 2008, USACE Action ID -
2008-02697
Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Tar-Pamlico River Buffer Authonzation
issued October 13, 2008, DWQ Project No 20081271
CAMA Mayor Development Permit issued October 27, 2008, Permit Number 172-08
Please see the enclosed USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, Approved Junsdictional
Determination Form, Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN), and permit drawings for the above
referenced project The aforementioned 404/401 permits address only the bndge replacement NCDOT
is requesting a Nationwide Permit 14 for the intersection improvements on the off-site detour only In
addition we are requesting a minor modification to the referenced CAMA permit A recent change in the
design for this project includes the addition of a turn lane along the eastern terminus of the off-site detour,
at the intersection of US 264 and SR 1303 (Beck Kiln Rd ), to account for increased traffic in that area
once the existing bndge is closed to traffic There will be an additional 0 14 acre of permanent wetland
impacts due to roadway fill from these intersection improvements
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description The project is located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin (HUC 03020104) No surface
waters are located in the project area of the intersection improvements Neither High Quality Waters
(HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1 undeveloped watersheds or WS-II predominately undeveloped
watersheds), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1 0 mi of the project area of the
intersection improvements
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
WEBSITE
WWW DOH DOT STATE NC US
LOCATION
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
U, Z
4
l'
.0
z Permanent Impacts 'Riparian wetlands will be impacted by the proposed intersection improvements
;Construction of the proposed project will result in a permanent impact of 0 14 ac to riparian wetlands
from roadway fill (see permit drawings)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules
This project is located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, therefore, the regulations pertaining to the buffer
rules apply No impacts to riparian buffers will result from construction of this project
Federal Protected Species
As of January 31, 2008 the USFWS lists six federally protected species for Beaufort County (see Table
1)
Table 1. Federally protected species of Beaufort County.
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Habitat Biological
Conclusion
Lepidochelys kempu Kem 's ndley sea turtle E No No Effect
Trichechus manatus West Indian Manatee E No No Effect
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E No No Effect
Canis rufus Red wolf E(XN) No N/A
Lysimachia asperulae oha Rough-leaved loosestrife E No No Effect
Aeschynomene virginica Sensitive jointvetch T No No Effect
Bald Eagle
The bald eagle (Hahaeetus leucocephalus) was delisted from the Endangered Species Act as of August 8,
2007 However, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act Suitable habitat in
the form of nesting-size trees does not exist within 660 ft of the project area of the intersection
improvements
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters of the
United States" Due to the presence of wetlands within the project area of the intersection improvements,
avoidance of all impacts is not possible The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and
practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts Minimization measures were
incorporated as part of the project design these included use of 3 1 fill slopes inj unsdictional areas
Mitigation
NCDOT has transfered credits from EEP and the Grnmesland site will be debited one acre of riparian
creation to mitigate for the impacts associated with the improvements to the intersection The Gnmesland
site is located near the community of Gnmesland in Pitt County and lies within the Middle Atlantic
Coastal Plain Level III ecoregion, HU 03020103, of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin NCDOT began
constructing the site in 1999 in two separate phases and hydrologic and vegetative monitoring began in
2001 The site was transferred to EEP in 2004 and monitoring was successfully completed in 2007
Project Schedule
The review date for this project is March 31, 2009 and the Let Date is May 19, 2009
2
Regulatory Approvals
CAMA It is anticipated that the additional permanent impacts relating to roadway fill in wetlands will be
authorized under Coastal Area Management Act Mayor Development Permit We are, therefore,
requesting a mmnor modification of the Coastal Area Management Act Mayor Development Pemmrt issued
October 27, 2008
Section 404 Permit At the request of the USACE, NCDOT anticipates that the additional permanent
impacts relating to roadway fill in wetland associated with the offsmte detour will be authorized under
Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 (Linear Transportation Projects) propose to proceed under a
Nationwide Perrmt 14 (72 CFR, 11092-11198, March 12, 2007)
Section 401 Certification We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3704 will apply to this project
In compliance with Section 143-215 313(e) of the NCAC, we will provide $240 to act as payment for
processing the Section 401 certification application (debit WBS element 33386 3 1) We are providing
five copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality for their approval
Thank you for your assistance with this project If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Tyler Stanton at tstanton@ncdot gov or [phone]
Sincerely,
4C - Gregory J Thorpe, Ph D , Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc
W/attachment
Mr Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Mr Steve Sollod, NCDCM
W/o attachment
Dr David Chang, P E, Hydraulics
Mr Greg Perfettm, P E , Structure Design
Mr Victor Barbour, P E , Project Services Unit
Mr Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr C E Lassiter, P E, Div 2 Engineer
Mr Jay Johnson, Div 2 Environmental Officer
Mr Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms Anne Deaton, NCDMF
Mr Jay Bennett, P E , Roadway Design
Mr Mated Alghandour, P E, Programming and TIP
Mr Art McMillan, P E, Highway Design
Ms Beth Smyre, P E, PDEA
Ms LemLam Paugh, NEU
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" )
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2 Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested NWP 14
3 If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here ?
4 If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here ?
5 If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here
II. Applicant Information
1 Owner/Applicant Information
Name Gregory J Thorpe, Ph D , Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number _(919) 733-3141 Fax Number [phone]
E-mail Address
2 Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant )
Name
Company Affiliation
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
Fax Number
Pagel of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format,
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided
1 Name of project Improvements at the intersection of US 264 and SR 1303 (Buck Kiln Rd)
2 T I P Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only) B-4019
3 Property Identification Number (Tax PIN) N/A
4 Location
County Beaufort Nearest Town Washington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number) N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc ) Take US 264 to US 175,
turn left onto NC 32E You will come to Bridge No 103 after approximately 15 miles
5 Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody )
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum) 3554470 ON -77 0239 °W
6 Property size (acres) N/A
7 Name of nearest receiving body of water Runyon Creek [29-3-(2), SC,NSW1
8 River Basin Tar-Pamlico
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated mayor river basins The
River Basin map is available at http //h2o enr state nc us/admm/maps/ )
9 Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application The protect is located near an urban/residential area of
Beaufort County Land around the site is mostly forested with light residential development
10 Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
Page 2 of 8
The addition of a turn lane alone the eastern terminus of the off-site detour, at the
intersection of US 264 and SR 1303 (Brick Kiln Rd) to account for increased traffic in that
area once the existing bridge is closed to traffic Standard NCDOT construction equipment
will be used
11 Explain the purpose of the proposed work The purpose of the protect is to enhance service
and improve safety due to the increased traffic on the off-site detour
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable) If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T I P project, along with
construction schedules Nationwide Permits 23, 33, and 12 issued September 18, 2008, USACE_
Action ID -2008-02697 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Tar-Pamlico River
Buffer Authorization issued October 13, 2008, DWQ Project No 20081271
The review date for this project is March 31, 2009 and the Let Date is May 19, 2009
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e g, culvert installation should be listed separately from
nprap dissipater pads) Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet
1 Provide a written description of the proposed impacts Construction of the posed
protect will result in permanent impacts of 0 14 acre to riparian wetlands due to fill material
Page 3 of 8
2 Individually list wetland impacts Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of

Site Number
Type of Impact
(e g , forested, marsh, -year
100 Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc ) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
2A Permanent Fill forested yes adjacent 0 12
213 Permanent Fill forested yes adjacent 0 02
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0 14
3 List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property 1 0 acre
4 Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts Be sure to identify temporary
impacts Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e g , cement walls, np-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc ), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included To calculate acreage, multivly length X width. then divide by 43 560
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Impact (linear f et) (acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5 Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U S ) Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads. etc
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody - Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc
(acres)
N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 00
6 List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U S resulting from the nrn,ect

Stream Impact (acres) J
00
Wetland Impact (acres) 0 14
Open Water Impact (acres) 00
Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres) 00
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) - -00
Page 4 of 8
7 Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet) Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE
8 Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application
Pond to be created in (check all that apply) ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e g, dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc) N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e g, livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc ) N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond N/A Expected pond surface area N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site
layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible Also discuss how impacts were
minimized once the desired site plan was developed If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be
followed during construction to reduce impacts The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all
reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts Minimization
measures mcomorated as part of the project design included fill slopes in jurisdictional areas will be at a
3 1 ratio
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to reducing the size of the project, establishing and maintaining wetland
Page 5 of 8
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams, and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http //h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands/strmgide html
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to site location (attach directions
and/or map, if off ite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e g , deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc ), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed
NCDOT will transfer credits from EEP and the Gnmesland site will be debited 0 14 acres of
riparian creation to mitigate for the impacts associated with the improvements to the
intersection The Gnmesland site is located near the community of Gnmesland in Pitt
County and lies within the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Level III ecoregion HU 03020103,
of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. NCDOT began constructing the site in 1999 in two separate
phases and hydrologic and vegetative monitoring began in 2001 The site was transferred to
EEP in 2004 and monitoring was successfully completed in 2007
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
websrte at http-//h2o enr state nc us/wrp/index htm If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet) N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet) N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres) N/A
Amount of Non-ripanan wetland mitigation requested (acres) N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres) N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
Page 6 of 8
2 If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation
Yes ® No ?
3 If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion
1 Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B 0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B 0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B 0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B 0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Tar-Pamlico )? Yes ? No
2 If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multwhers
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 00 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 00 15 0
Total 00 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel, Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1
3 If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund) Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B 0242 or 0244, or 0260 N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 7 of 8
the property If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality9 Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http //h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands If no, please provide a short narrative description
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e g , draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control)
N/A

re b r(
Applicant/Ageit's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided )
Page 8 of 8
(mod DATA FORM
VP ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site 84019 Int of 264 & Brick Kiln Rd Date: 12/15/08
Applicant / Owner. NCDOT County: Beaufort
Investigator, Jay Johnson State N C.
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID-
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.Quercus alba Ov 10% FACU 9.
2.Fagus grandifolia Ov 10% FACU 10.
3.1-igustrum vulgare S/S 40% FAC 11
4.Magnolia virginiana S/S 20% FACW 12
5.1-onicera wonica V 20% FAC 13
6 Vitus rotundifolia V 10% FAC 14.
7 Smilax Alauca V 10% FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-) > 50%
Remarks: Wetland vegetation is present
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
°•) _
Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12" (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology is not present

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mapped as craven clay loam Drainage Class
Taxonomy (Subgroup). Aquic hnludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
-No X
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc
0-7 10YR5/3 fine sandy loam
7-14 10YR6/4 clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators.
Soils
_ Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
- Concretions
`High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy
_ Sulfidic Odor
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
_ Reducing Conditions
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks: Wetland soils are not present
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed On Local Hydric Soils-List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x Within a Wetland? Yes_ No x
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No x
Remarks: Non wetland = all parameters are not present
L o? DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site 84019 Int of 264 & Bnck Kiln Rd Date, 12/15/08
Applicant/ Owner: NCDOT County: Beaufort
Investigator Jay Johnson State N.C.
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID.
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 Taxodium dishchum Ov 40% OBL 9.
2.Magnolia virginlana S/S 20% FACW 10.
3.Smilax glauca V 25% FAC 11
4.1-onicera iaponica V 25% FAC 12.
5 13.
6 14.
7 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). >50%
Remarks:
Wetland vegetation is present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks). Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators.
_ Other Inundated
xSaturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations. x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: n/a (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves

_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks.
Wetland hydrology is present
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mapped as craven clay loam Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Agmc hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No x
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon IMunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc
0-12 10YR2/1 loam
Hydnc Soil Indicators
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon x High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy
Soils
_Sulfidic Odor X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks. Wetland soils are present
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Wetland = All parameters are present
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes x No

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) 12115108
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER
PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough. Beaufort City Washington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 544690 N, Long 77 02394°
Universal Transverse Mercator 18 31316531E 3935334
Name of nearest waterbody Runyon Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows Pamlico River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Tar/Pam
Check if map/dtagram of review area and/orpotential junsdictional areas islare available upon request
Check if other sites (e g , offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Office (Desk) Determination. Date
Field Determination. Date(s) 12/15/08
SECTION II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
Therec.' - "navigable waters of die US" within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
S Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
fil Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain.
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There f "waters of the US " within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1 Waters of the U S
a. Indicate presence of waters of U S. in review area (check all that apply)
CM TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters-2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or rndtrectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or mdirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of junsdrehonal waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non-wetland waters linear feet width (fl) and/or acres
Wetlands 18 acres
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on. ?al?is'
Elevation of established OHWM (if known) Field Delineation
Non-regulated waterstwetlands (check if applicable) '
J3 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g., typically 3 months)
Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F
SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWL If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IMA-1 and Section IMD 1 only, if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections Il1A.1 and 2
and Section IILD 1, otherwise, see Section IRB below
1 TNW
Identify TNW Runyon creek
Summarize rationale supporting determination
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent" Meets 87 manual criteria, contiguous to Pamlico river
R CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanashave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional Uthe aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(pereumal) flow, slop to Section DID 2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
slap to Section DID 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody` is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HLRI for
the tributary, Section HLR2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IILB 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III. C below
Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
() General Area Conditions
Watershed size I;'
Drainage area 'c J-5 t
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
® Tributary flows directly into TNW
? Tributary flows through "_ tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 1 or , river miles from TNW
Project waters are
VJ(st river miles from RPW
IM
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are ' ` - aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNWs
Tributary stream order, if known
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West
s Flow route can be described by identifying, a g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply
Tributary is ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made) Explain
? Manipulated (man-altered) Explain
Tnbutary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 10 feet
Average depth 3 feet
Average side slopes ?;
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
® Silts ® Sands
? Cobbles ? Gravel
? Bedrock ® Vegetation Type/% cover 50
? Other Explain
? Concrete
® Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e g , highly eroding, sloughing banks] Explain stabil
Presence of runhiIDe/pool complexes Explain
Tributary ckMPA
g try a...?
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) 01 %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for asatt2q
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year- JV1( rgirea#
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Pver flee Characteristics
Subsurface flow FAUJI&M Explain findings
? Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
® OHWlv16 (check all indicators that apply)
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition ?
? water staining El
? other (list)
? Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain.
If factors other than the OHWM were used to deterni
JU High Tide Line indicated by EJ
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/charactenstics
? tidal gauges
? other (list)
(m) Chemical Charactenstics
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ire lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
? survey to available datum,
? physical markings,
? vegetation Imes/changes in vegetation types
Characterize tributary (e g , water color is clear, discolored, oily film, water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily severjurisdiction (e g, where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
7Ibid
(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
? Riparian comdor Characteristics (type, average width)
? Wetland fringe Characteristics
? Habitat for
? Federally Listed species Explain findings
? Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
? Other environmentally-sensitive species Explain findings
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationshp with Non-TNW
Flow is gclt Mast Explain.
Surface flow is PRIME-
Characteristics
Subsurface flow 150L Explain findings
? Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW
? Directly abuttmg
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
? Ecological connection Explain
? Separated by berm/barner Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are nver miles from TNW
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from i
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the M floodplam.
(h) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g , water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed
characteristics, etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
(w) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
? Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width)
? Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
? Habitat for
? Federally Listed species Explain findings
? Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
? Other environmentally-sensitive species Explam findings
? Aquatic/wildhfe diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis
For each wetland, specify the following
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to deternune if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with an of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not linited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW} Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland hes within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of sigmficant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapmms Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include, for example
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself; then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWL Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tnbutary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs lmear feet width (ft), Or, acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs 1 Sacres
RPWs that flow directly or mdimctly into TNW&
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are junsdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e g , typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally
Provide estimates for junsdicttonal waters in the review area (check all that apply)
E9 Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non-wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWL
21 Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indu dy into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
nON is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non-wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
fM Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are junsdictional as adjacent wetlands
J Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section I LLB and rationale in Section III D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
01 Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW arejurisddictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW&
IS Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdichonal wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S ," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMMRCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)."
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial proposes by industries in interstate commerce
Interstate isolated waters Explain
Other factors Explain.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Nee Footnote # 3
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts win elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Manorwidwn Regardrag CWA Acs Jcerv&caon Following Rapanm
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non-wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands acres
F NON4MMICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Ja If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR)
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explam.
Other (explain, if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non-lunsdichonal waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of junsdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory buds, presence of endangered species, use of water for ungated agriculture), usin g best professional
judgment (check all that apply)
" Non-wetland waters (i e, rivers, streams) Imear feet width (ft)
Lakes/ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Sigmficant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Non-wetland waters (i e, rivers, streams) linear feet, width (ft)
Lakes/ponds acres
Other non-wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the apphcant/consultant
Data sheets prepared/subrinded by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
? Office concurs with data sheets/dehneation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/dehneation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps
Corps navigable waters' study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
? USGS NHD data
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 124000 Washington Quad.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Beaufort County Plate 46
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100-year Floodpiain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ? Aerial (Name & Date)
or ? Other (Name & Date)
Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
Applicable/supporting case law
Applicable/supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify) Site visit on 12/15/08
R ADDMONAL COMAENTS TO SUPPORT JD

cc ? c
M m

o 00
z °

:3 o

° a

75 U) r m
r

z
z
CQY C)
F x U

U p U M

F
S
¢ Q 7
a p
Q 0.
U
z
F
W
W
5
Cl)

W

CL O
c co
m ca

LL 'D
CL N==

oc)

LU :k U)
> cc

Cs c
(D ti 3 Cl

a) c
C c
ca ca
0

IL
CD

w C)

co
cZ LL
0) co

L i L L i L i J i ?
0

z
a

m m »= o
zoo °
? o_
?c o
F m
w
? f0 d E.
o
?~ °
a w V

C
C
C
U
?
d
?
c0
Q
U ? (D
w
d
LL ? ? (U6 U °O

Q

? N ?. O N °
to E U) E o
U a

Q ? rn
? (
F- D
_
o

W m 0)?

m w m m

m
>
W >
J
H
W rn
E-2? o

c u?

Elm
m ?

J Q.
? N

O
O iO ?
E C+7 N

O ?

?
p
Q
C11 J
?
_
? Z N N
o ] m
H
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
i
i
yy / /
.00/
/
/ C
/
vo °=? A V N ? / ? I
i-??OO ' N
WD Z A A Q D?? '/ i//
Q O Q C in L^ .''
o ;,
G7 00 z V m m T a I I \ 1
il -S{ (?I Z Z / ? O
m
O / ,.?aoa
Z w 1 C?
o o I 6? y cn
-0- Pr skis
1 ?~
-r,- A,r S& 4,,,e
8 -12- For sftv,.
b" t=4
o N
%
r For sma„,,
w
4 ? SO
tly b
N O
P P
VVV ? e ? ?
r ,? , f a
•
? f v a
e
.04
b x ?
00
hi''1 F
a
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
t
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
;-
I
1
I
1
1
i
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
i
I
1
1
1
1
11
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
MVWONS
C-2008 16.00 64W.-L.-SR-130 I\BC-US-264-SR-1303-1 dgn
8/17/99
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?
I\BC-US-2.4-SR-1303-2 dg, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I

; ,lot

;

;
-Yl- PT StG. 16+44.25
;
;

;
;
I LI

;

;

20

-Yl- POT Sto. 20+44.25
;

; ;
;

;

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
I I
303\BC-US-264-SR-1303-TYP dgn
N
(f _
W
N Z
00
W
C.)
W
SO
O
1 !? I
f
1
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
n II
II
II
N
rn I
0 I
Z II
11
Z II
0 Ii
I
W
II
II
II
II
II
I
/
/
/
/
/
r
I
\
I

a
Ct

W
W
Z
-'I
00
N
N
W
W
OD
N
I
f
I P
\? s
I
\
\
\
I
I
I
11
II
II
I
II
II c
II ? ?
II
II
II
N II
II
O
Z
II
Z II
0 II
0
N II
II q
II
I
II
II
II
II
I
s ?
/
/
/
r
I
J
I
- Al

CA
rn
9
O
z
z
0
I
O
CA
W
O Z
69
W
W
O
N
I?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I °
I s
I
I
I
I W
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Q 4
I If
V))
s
R

_US_264_SR_1303_TYP dgn 5/14/99
p
c w ?
Op op Op
a U1
? I
a ? ?? I
0? a o°,
0 o c
1
I
I
I I I '
at
I I ?? I
I I I
I I I ?
I I I
I ? I
I
ri i i ;
II ?? II ,
C I I_ I I r
N I m II m II
rn I
?i -------? 9 ?i-------?
I Q II
i ? I Z I I
Z I Z I) II ?
Z I Z II t Q II ?? '
of I ?I A II
I ? II II
I ?? II
I ? I
I i I
I.J j II ? II ? '
I I I
I I I '
I
it
I l 1
1 I I
I
I ,
I
- _ I
1
I
i
ffill
1
I
r_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
i
I
I r