HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081541 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20090212rI
L
Og-ISy 1
"Howard Farm Property"
Buffer Restoration Project
Greene County, NC
Neuse River Basin
(Cataloging Unit #03020203)
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
(Task 9)
•
•
Prepared For:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
? qIJ
F?? ? c1 Lij(j?a
flFNR WATEI: R,.
r?
L osystem
. - -N.
December 2008
RECEI?FED
DEC 1 0 2038
N- I.
ENHAN
CEMENT EM
PROGRAM'
NC EEP Contract #D05020-1
0
Prepared By:
Land Management Group, Inc.
PO Box 2522
r]
Wilmington, NC 28403
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
Phone. 910-452-0001
Fax. 910-452-0060
Project Manager:
Christian A. Preziosi
Office. 910-452-0001
Cell. 910-471-0515
Email. c reziosi(&lmgroup.net
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1
0
•
•
1. PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................ 2
1. Location and Setting ....................................................................................................... 2
2. Mitigation Type and Objectives ...................................................................................... 2
3. Project History and Background ..................................................................................... 2
4. Monitoring Plan View ..................................................................................................... 2
II. PROJECT CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 3
1. Pre-Construction Conditions .......................................................................................... 3
2. Soils ................................................................................................................................ 3
3. Restoration Activities ..................................................................................................... 3
4. Adaptive Management ................................................................................................... 4
III. METHODOLOGY AND SUCCESS CRITERIA ...........................................................4
IV. MONITORING ..................................................................................................................5
V. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................5
TABLES
1. REPORTING AND MILESTONE HISTORY
2. PLANTED SPECIES LIST
3. ANNUAL MONITORING DATA (YEAR 3) - CUMULATIVE
SPREADSHEET
FIGURES
1. SITE LOCATION MAP
2. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE
3. NRCS SOIL SURVEY
4. BUFFER PLANTING OVERVIEW
APPENDICES
A. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
B. VEGETATION SURVEY DATA BY PLOT
C. SURVEY WITH MONITORING PLOT LOCATIONS
i
0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Prior to project implementation, the Howard Farm Property was farmed for soybean and cotton
production. The site consisted entirely of open agricultural fields with no existing riparian buffer
(i.e. trees and shrubs are absent within 200 ft of existing surface waters). Under contract with the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG)
implemented the restoration of 26.3 acres of riparian buffer habitat along Mussel Run (a tributary
of Contentnea Creek) and contiguous surface-waters (i.e. field ditches) in Greene County, NC.
0
The entire 26.3-ac project area has been planted with characteristic tree and shrub species on an
average density of 900 stems/ac. Planting was completed in February 2006. Thirteen (13)
permanent 0.10-ac monitoring plots (equivalent to 5% of the restoration area) were established
subsequent to planting. Annual monitoring will be conducted near the end of each growing
season for a period of five years beginning in October 2006. Vegetative planting will be deemed
successful if survivorship of plantings and volunteers of desirable species meets or exceeds a
target stem density of 320 stems/acre.
A total of 1,638 stems (planted and volunteer shrubs/trees) were observed within the thirteen
0.10-acre plots during Year 3 monitoring. Of the total observed, 906 stems (total excluding red
maple and sweet gum) were counted toward the success criteria (corresponding to an average of
791 stems/acre). Given the average stem density observed, the site is progressing well toward the
targeted stem density.
0 Monitoring reports are being submitted annually to the EEP (by January 1 of each year). These
reports include results of vegetative monitoring and photographic documentation of site
conditions. Monitoring reports also identify any contingency measures that may need to be
employed to remedy any site deficiencies.
The following monitoring report summarizes the restoration project and includes more specific
information related to project implementation, `as-built' conditions, and site progress through
Year 3.
Howard Farm Buffer Restoration
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
Land Management Group, Inc.
December 2008
Contract No. D05020-1
S
L PROJECT BACKGROUND
1. Location and Setting
As approved by the EEP, LMG implemented the restoration of 26.3 acres of farmland located
adjacent to Mussel Run (a tributary of the Neuse River) and a series of contiguous surface waters
(i.e. field ditches). The project area is part of the "Howard Farm", located approximately 2.5
miles northeast of Hookerton in Greene County, NC (refer to Figure 1). The project includes the
establishment of characteristic tree and shrub species adjacent to open field ditches on the east
and west side of Churchill Road (SR #1404) as well as Mussel Run (refer to Figure 2). The
i property is situated within NEU-7 of the lower Neuse River Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit
03020203) and within sub-basin 03-04-07.
2. Mitigation ype and Objectives
The proposed restoration project is intended to provide suitable, high-quality riparian buffer
restoration as compensatory mitigation for riparian buffer impacts authorized through the EEP.
The objective of the project is to restore riparian buffer vegetation and diffuse flow conditions to
help reduce non-point source discharge of contaminants into adjacent water bodies. The primary
function of the riparian buffer project detailed in this document is to restore the nitrogen (N)
removal capacity of those areas situated adjacent to surface waters. In addition, the project will
provide ancillary benefits to aquatic and wildlife habitat via enhanced niche habitat, microclimate
modification and shade, and increased food-web support.
3. Project History and Background
Table 1 provides information regarding the reporting and milestone history for the Howard Farm
0 Buffer Restoration project.
4. Monitoring Plan View
Locations of vegetation monitoring plots for the Howard Farm Buffer Restoration are depicted in
Appendix C.
Howard Farm Buffer Restoration 2
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
Land Management Group, Inc.
December 2008
Contract No. D05020-1
IL PROJECT CONDITIONS
1. Pre-Construction Conditions
The 26.3-acre riparian buffer restoration area represents a portion of a larger 145-acre tract
("Howard Farm") formerly farmed for the production of soybean and cotton. Land use practices
(including herbicide, pesticide, and fertilizer application) served as potential contributors to
decreased water quality of adjacent surface waters (i.e. ditches and `blue-line' streams).
Application of nitrogen-rich fertilizer represented the most significant non-point source of
nitrogen within the immediate project area. Woody vegetation along ditches was either absent or
sparse (less than 100 stems per acre that are > 5 inches diameter at breast height). As a result,
nutrient-laden runoff was discharged from agricultural fields directly into surface waters with
little or no nutrient filtration/transformation.
2. Soils
The site consists predominantly of Johns sandy loam (refer to Figure 4) - a somewhat poorly
drained to moderately well drained soil occurring along stream terraces. Infiltration is moderate
and surface runoff is slow in these areas. The seasonal high water table occurs between 1.5 ft and
3.0 ft below the soil surface. The remaining portion of the buffer area consists of Lumbee sandy
loam - a poorly drained soil characteristic of broader flats of stream terraces. Lumbee soils
exhibit moderate infiltration with a seasonal high water table occurring at or near the soil surface.
3. Restoration Activities
The restoration project included the planting of characteristic tree and shrub seedlings adjacent to
open ditches and blue-line streams on the 26.3-ac restoration site (refer to Figure 3). No federal
or state permits were necessary to conduct the restoration activities. The riparian buffer was
planted with various species including river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), water oak (Quercus nigra), willow oak
(Quercus phellos), and red bay (Persea borbonia). The outer 50 feet of the buffer area was
planted with characteristic shrub species including wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), American
beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and sweet pepperbush
(Clethra alnifolia). All species selected for the restoration project naturally occur on the site
within undisturbed riparian buffer areas. These species are considered to be well suited for site-
specific conditions (including soil characteristics and moisture regimes). In addition, each of
Howard Farm Buffer Restoration
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
Land Management Group, Inc.
December 2008
Contract No. D05020-1
these species is listed within NCDENR's "Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration" as
appropriate species for use in riparian buffer restoration projects. Approximately 20,000 trees
and shrubs were planted throughout the project footprint. Bare-root seedlings were planted at a
density of 600 trees per acre. Shrubs were planted at densities of 1,000 to 1,200 plants per acre.
On-site planting was completed in February 2006.
Refer to Table 2 for a list of species planted (with corresponding quantities) within the buffer
restoration area.
4. Adaptive Management
Infestation of common morning glory Qpomoea purpurea) was prevalent during the early stages
of site development. Physical removal of the vines was conducted prior to Year 1 and Year 2
monitoring events. In addition to the removal activities a supplemental planting was conducted in
February 2007. A total of 12,000 river birch, green ash, and wax myrtle were planted in areas
that experienced reduced survivorship and/or suppressed growth. In addition, the herbicide
OustTM was applied in select areas of the tract to limit its potential adverse affect on planted
species.
LMG identified the continued prevalence of morning glory during site inspections conducted in
February 2008. As a result, an additional application of OustTM (at a rate of 1,500 liters per
hectare) was performed. This work was coordinated through, and conducted by a licensed
applicator. Physical removal of vines was also conducted during this year of monitoring.
Though the morning glory was present across the site, survivorship of planted trees and shrubs
remained high during Year 3 monitoring. It appears as though most plantings now have a
• competitive height advantage over the morning glory vines, and as a result, no future remedial
actions are planned at this time.
in. METHODOLOGY & SUCCESS CRITERIA
Annual monitoring is being conducted near the end of each growing season for a period of five
years. Vegetative monitoring has included the establishment of thirteen (13) 0.10-acre permanent
plots corresponding to a total of 1.3 acres (equivalent to 5% of the restoration area). The
Howard Farm Buffer Restoration 4
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
Land Management Group, Inc.
December 2008
Contract No. D05020-1
locations of the monitoring plots are depicted in Figure 3. Vegetative planting will be deemed
successful if survivorship of plantings and volunteers of desirable species' meets or exceeds a
target stem density of 320 stems/acre.
Monitoring reports are being submitted annually to the EEP (by January 1 of each year). These
reports include results of vegetative monitoring and photographic documentation of site
conditions. Monitoring reports will also identify any contingency measures that may need to be
employed to remedy any site deficiencies. For instance, deer browse tubes and fencing may need
to be used if evidence of significant herbivory or deer browse is observed. In addition,
supplemental planting may be necessary in areas of reduced survivorship.
IV. MONITORING
A total of 1,638 stems (planted and volunteer shrubs/trees) were observed within the thirteen
0.10-acre plots. Of the total observed, 906 stems (total excluding red maple and sweet gum) were
counted toward the success criteria (corresponding to an average of 798 stems/acre). Of the
species planted, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and American beautyberry were the most abundant
shrubs observed within the thirteen monitoring plots. The most abundant of the planted tree
species were American sycamore and river birch. These trees demonstrate successful growth as
evidenced by a majority exceeding fifteen (15) feet in height. Please refer to Appendix A for site
photographs of Year 3 conditions.
Refer to Table 3 for a summary of results related to species abundance and target stem densities
In addition, individual plot data sheets are provided in Appendix B.
V. CONCLUSION
LMG has completed the third year monitoring for the 26.3 acres of riparian buffer restoration
located in NEU-7 of the lower Neuse Basin. Stem densities within all thirteen plots well exceed
the 320 stems/acre target density for restored buffer habitats. The total observed density (791
stems/acre) indicates that the site is progressing well toward the target maturity density. The
'Desirable species are considered as noninvasive species characteristic of riparian habitats of the Coastal Plain.
Howard Farm Buffer Restoration
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
Land Management Group, Inc.
December 2008
Contract No. D05020-1
Table 1. Reporting and Milestone History
Project Milestone Completion COMMENTS
Date
1 Feasibility Study, CE Document, and September, 2005 Complete
Public Meeting
2 Record a Conservation Easement on January 2006 Conveyed to SPO
the Site
3 Restoration Plan Approved by EEP
4 Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed January 2006
5 Mitigation Site Planting and February 15, Complete
Installation of Monitoring Devices 2006
6 Submittal of Mitigation Plan (including June 2006 Complete
as-built drawings)
7 Submittal of Monitoring Report#1 to December 31, Approved by NCEEP
EEP 2006
8 Submittal of Monitoring Report #2 to December 31, Approved by NCEEP
EEP 2007
9 Submittal of Monitoring Report #3 to December 31,
EEP 2008
10 Submittal of Monitoring Report #4 to December 31,
EEP 2009
11 Submittal of Monitoring Report #5 to December 31,
EEP 2010
0
Table 2. Howard Farm Plant List
Species (trees) Quantity
River Birch (Betula nigra) 2,000
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) 2,000
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 1,000
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos) 1,000
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata) 1,000
Water Oak (Quercus nigra) 2,000
Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica) 1,000
Red Bay (Persea borbonia) 2,000
Species (shrubs)
Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera) 2,000
Sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia) 2,000
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) 2,000
American Beautyberry (Callicarpa americana) 1,000
Possumhaw (Viburnum nudum) 1,000
Supplemental Planting (February 2007)
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 4,000
River Birch (Betula nigra) 4,000
Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera) 4,000
TOTAL 32,000
0
H
O
F?
;:.
z
0
0-4
F
W
L7
W
M
yW
C..
N
WW
V1 ~
H ?
d W
A w
w
O
O
W
O
z
w
r?
a
N x
J
~ 1? M N m M O O ?- M ao co M M d N O ? ? ti
Q T 0
1
M
T
O N M N O N t!7 co m
a
N
T
O Cl) O O N
N to ?. co
T
OD
T
1?
J 1.-
a
T
T
p
o
N
n co
co cc
co
o
J w
a
0
T
~O ° v ao rn co
co co
co 40
J o
a
T
Q M O N M Op Goo G O
J co
a
co
1--
Q
.mod.
M
m
co
to
to 00
a
F-
OM C)
N
N _
tl'
N
N
V
N
M o
N
T
CL
0 M tb N co ° U-) O N N N
O? N
J
CL T 67
0
O N O O
M N ti O M ?' O M r M
T
J r T
a
0 N N ,. ?R 2 Go
C co
co
J 1 [
1 t co co
IL [
M
H
p
1--
N
CO
N
co
~
r
CO
T
Cl)
N
LO
?
Ln
a
N
Q o ° a, ° co Lo to C-4
c
IL
T
0
CO
U')
O
lO
M
J M M. M
IL
7E Z,
CO R R
U)
N
E
C_
N
N
L
C
0
Y -lc
co
Y
O
Q
l1J °
m
c7
d
co y
Q -r-
E
a`)
o o
O
-
s
n
m
a
U E
_ t
C m
Y m
E a
7 E m m
U
a m Q a? a>
"' V '
ui m U O U o U
U U x `
a) U D
m -` N .U. U O Y
m s U - (D
N
O
O
C V
KJ
a
U)
cn
w
cn
0 m >
m
;
a
o
w
m
?
o
v
m
a
L
a
E
a
D
7S
m
Ir F"
m
c
o
E
Q
=
cn
c
d
ca
FIGURES
Map Source: DeLorme: North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer., 1997 p. 46.
SCALE 1" = 2.0 miles
NC EEP
Howard Farm LMG Figure 1.
Buffer Restoration Project LA ND MANAGEMENT GROUP-. Site Location Map
Greene County - Environmental Consultants
I•
0
r1 ,
Cem
ast Greene \East ••._-`..,
Sch i Cem' i
205
?e'
m
Cemi :ems
Old, -Cem ? i
!` t
BM f t5.o ?4DS i
73.7Cem
SITE
C `•?.? New Zion
Ch
1231 ?.
i Cem
BM Cem1404 J(J
12.2 Antioch
Fourway ' -: -
\ I7 5 ,
.. 1400)
ff l
13.5
i
yLL -? -? /
Boundaries are approximate
and not meant to be absolute.
ap Source: 1982, USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle. Hookerton Quadrangle SCALE 1" = 2000'
NC EEP Figure 2.
Howard Farm LMG
Buffer Restoration Project LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP-. 1982 Topographic Quad
Environmental Consultants
Greene County
I•
I•
0
Boundaries are approximate
and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Soil Survey of Greene County, 1977.
- Omni
SCALE 1" = 2000'
NC EEP
LMG Figure 3.
Howard Farm Generalized Soil Malt
Buffer Restoration Project LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP iuc.
Environmental Consulfonts Greene Count, NC
Greene County Y
I•
0
0
0
y r r d i.
sq,
Tn `??l% i ' `Jh f
•? i fit' /? 'S Z ?''f ? f??:+}? Wis... y ? ?,
R A Y i[:
s ro!
:s n
At,
200' Buffer Planting Area (26.3 acres)
Boundaries are approximate
and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Soil Survey of Greene County, 1977. SCALE 1" = 500'
NC EEP Figure 4.
Howard Farm LMG Buffer Planting Overview
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP we
Buffer Restoration Project Environmental Consultants
Greene County
EMENNEEN
APPENDIX A. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS (SEPTEMBER 2008)
I•
1) View of maturing River Birch and Sycamore in Plot 11.
1•
2) View of edge of Plot 12.
Howard Farm
Buffer Restoration Project
Greene County, NC
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP-.
Environmental Consultants
Site Photographs
September 2008
(Annual Monitoring Year 3 of 5)
I•
3) View of maturing Green Ash at Plot 7.
4) View of seedlings at Plot 13
Howard Farm
Buffer Restoration Project
Greene County, NC
A?LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP -
Environmental Consultants
Site Photographs
September 2008
(Annual Monitoring Year 3 of 5)
5) View of maturing American Beauty Berry at Plot 2.
Howard Farm
Buffer Restoration Project
Greene County, NC
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP iHc
Environmental Consultants
Site Photographs
September 2008
(Annual Monitoring Year 3 of 5)
6) View of maturing Sycamore Plot 1.
0
APPENDIX B. INDIVIDUAL PLOT DATA SHEETS
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
American Beautyberry SH 7 2ft Planted 7
American Beautyberry SH 7 3 ft Planted 7
American Beautyberry SH 2 4 ft Planted 2
American Beautyberry SH 2 5 ft Planted 2
Persimmon SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 2 4 ft Planted 2
American Sycamore SA 1 9 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 1 loft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 1 13 ft Planted 1
Green Ash SA 1 2ft Planted 1
Green Ash SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Green Ash SA 2 4 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 1 2ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 1 4ft. Planted 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 2ft Planted 1
Baccharis SH 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Baccharis SH 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
TOTAL SHRUBS
24 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
39
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
15 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
390
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES 0
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 39
r
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
11
PLOT NUMBER 2
SPECIES STRATUM
SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 4 ft Planted 1
Amer. Beautyberry SH 13 5 ft Planted 13
Amer. Beautyberry SH 5 6 ft Planted 5
Amer. Beautyberry SH 5 7 ft Planted 5
Amer. Beautyberry SH 4 8 ft Planted 4
Amer. Beautyberry SH 2 loft Planted 2
Sweet pepperbush SH 1 5 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 2 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 3 4 ft Planted 3
River Birch SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 8 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 1 12 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 2 15 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 2 3 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 2 4 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 3 5 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 2 7 ft Planted 2
Baccharis SH 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 3 5 ft Volunteer 3
Baccharis SH 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 2 7 ft Volunteer 2
Baccharis SH 1 8 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 1 9 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 1 lift Volunteer 1
Sweet Gum SA 150 6 ft Volunteer 0
Sweet Gum SA 150 8 ft Volunteer 0
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 46 (PER PLOT) 62
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 16 (PER ACRE) 620
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES 300
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 362
9
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Amer. Beautyberry SH 2 1 ft Planted 2
Amer. Beautyberry SH 4 2 ft Planted 4
Amer. Beautyberry SH 4 3 ft Planted 4
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 4 ft Planted 1
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 5 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 6 3 ft Planted 6
Elderberry SH 7 4 ft Planted 7
Elderberry SH 3 5 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 1 6 ft Planted 1
Possumhaw SH 2 I ft Planted 2
Possumhaw SH 1 2 ft Planted 1
Sweet pepperbush SH 1 1 ft Planted 1
Sweet pepperbush SH 1 2 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Green Ash SA 3 2 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Red Bay SA 1 1 ft Planted 1
Water Oak SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 3 4 ft Planted 3
Overcup Oak SA 2 5 ft Planted 2
Persimmon SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 3 4 ft Planted 3
Persimmon SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
River Birtch SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
River Birtch SA 4 3 ft Planted 4
Baccharis SH 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 5 4 ft Volunteer 5
Baccharis SH 3 5 ft Volunteer 3
Baccharis SH 2 6 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Planted 2
TOTAL SHRUBS
48 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
75
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
27 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
750
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
0
I TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 75
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Willow Oak SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 5 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 8 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 4 3 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 4 4 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 2 5 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 2 6 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 4 5 ft Planted 4
Overcup Oak SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore T 1 loft Planted 1
Green Ash SA 4 2 ft Planted 4
Green Ash SA 2 3 ft Planted 2
Red Bay SA 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay SA 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Wax Myrtle SH 3 I ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 9 2 ft Planted 9
Wax Myrtle SH 4 3 ft Planted 4
Wax Myrtle SH 1 4 ft Planted 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 5ft Planted 1
Baccharis SH 6 5 ft Volunteer 6
Baccharis SH 5 6 ft Volunteer 5
Baccharis SH 1 7 ft Volunteer 1
Sweet Gum SA 8 2 ft Volunteer 0
Red Maple SA 4 4 ft Volunteer 0
0
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 30 (PER PLOT) 68
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 33 (PER ACRE) 680
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES 17
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 80
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Elderberry SH 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
River Birch SA 2 4 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 4 5 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 5 6 ft Planted 5
River Birch SA 1 8 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 3 2 ft Planted 3
Overcup Oak SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
Overcup Oak SA 4 4 ft Planted 4
Overcup Oak SA 4 5 ft Planted 4
Overcup Oak SA 4 6 ft Planted 4
Green Ash SA 4 2 ft Planted 4
Green Ash SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 3 4 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 2 5 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 2 6 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore T 3 loft Planted 3
American Sycamore T 4 12 ft Planted 4
Red Bay SA 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay SA 3 2 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay SA 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay SA 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Baccharis SH 5 4 ft Volunteer 5
Baccharis SH 19 5 ft Volunteer 19
r?
u
Baccharis SH 3 6 ft Volunteer 3
Wax Myrtle SH 3 1 It Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 4 2 ft Planted 4
Wax Myrtle SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Wax Myrtle SH 3 4 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 1 5 ft Planted 1
Blueberry SH 3 2 it Volunteer 3
Blueberry SH 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Pine SA 6 2 ft Volunteer 6
Sweet Gum SA 12 2 ft Volunteer 0
TOTAL SHRUBS
47 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
112
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
60 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
1120
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
24
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 131
u
n
u
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Amer. Beautyberry SH 2 4 ft Planted 2
Amer. Beautyberry SH 7 5 ft Planted 7
Sweet Pepperbush SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 4 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 3 5 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 3 6 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 4 7 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 3 loft Planted 3
River Birch T 2 12 It Planted 2
Green Ash SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Green Ash SA 5 4 ft Planted 5
Green Ash SA 2 5 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 2 3 ft Planted 2
Willow Oak SA 1 5 ft Planted 1
Willow Oak SA 2 6 ft Planted 2
Red Cedar SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Red Cedar SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Red Cedar SA 4 5 ft Planted 4
Red Cedar SA 2 6 ft Planted 2
Red Cedar SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
Overcup Oak SA 2 5 ft Planted 2
Overcup Oak SA 2 7 ft Planted 2
Baccharis SH 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
0
0
Baccharis SH 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 4 7 ft Volunteer 4
Baccharis SH 1 8 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Planted 1
Wax Myrtle SH 3 2 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 4 3 ft Planted 4
Wax Myrtle SH 7 4 ft Planted 7
Wax Myrtle SH 3 5 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 2 6 ft Planted 2
Wax Myrtle SH 3 7 ft Planted 3
Tulip Poplar SA 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Tulip Poplar SA 1 8 ft Volunteeer 1
Sweet Gum SA 30 6 ft Volunteer 0
TOTAL SHRUBS
51 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
92
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
39 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
920
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
32
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 122
r?
J
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Number of Individuals
Species Counted toward
Success Criteria
T SA or SH
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 2 ft Planted 1
Amer. Beautyberry SH 4 3 ft Planted 4
Amer. Beautyberry SH 7 4 ft Planted 7
Amer. Beautyberry SH 5 5 ft Planted 5
Amer. Beautyberry SH 6 6 ft Planted 6
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 7 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 2 4 ft Planted 2
Elderberry SH 3 5 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 4 6 ft Planted 4
Elderberry SH 1 7 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 8 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 2 ft 1
Planted
River Birch SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 8 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 2 2 ft 2
Planted
Green Ash SA 14 3 ft 14
Planted
Green Ash SA 3 4 ft 3
Planted
Green Ash SA 5 5 ft 5
Planted
Green Ash SA 4 6 ft 4
Planted
Green Ash SA 1 8 ft 1
Planted
Red Cedar SA 2 4 ft 2
Planted
Red Cedar SA 1 6 ft 1
Planted
Red Cedar SA 1 7 ft 1
Planted
Tulip Poplar SA 2 6 ft 2
Volunteer
Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft 2
Planted
Wax Myrtle SH 1 3 ft 1
Planted
Wax Myrtle SH 4 4 ft 4
Planted
Wax Myrtle SH 2 5 ft 2
Planted
Wax Myrtle SH 5 6 ft Planted 5
Wax Myrtle SH 6 7 ft Planted 6
Wax Myrtle SH 10 8 ft Planted 10
Wax Myrtle T 11 loft Planted 11
Baccharis SH 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 3 8 ft Volunteer 3
Baccharis SH 1 loft Volunteer 1
Sweet Gum SA 200 8 ft Volunteer 0
Red Maple SA 30 4 ft Volunteer 0
TOTAL SHRUBS
71 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
121
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
39 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
1210
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
241
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 351
0
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Elderberry SH 4 4 ft Planted 4
Elderberry SH 1 5 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 4 6 ft Planted 4
Highbush Blueberry SH 1 4 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 6 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 1 8 ft Planted 1
Black Willow SA 2 4 ft Planted 2
Black Willow SA 1 5 ft Planted 1
Black Willow SA 4 6 ft Planted 4
Black Willow SA 1 8 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 2 8 ft Planted 2
American Sycamore T 4 loft Planted 4
American Sycamore T 8 12 ft Planted 8
American Sycamore T 4 14 ft Planted 4
American Sycamore T 20 16 ft Planted 20
American Sycamore T 6 20 ft Planted 6
Baccharis SH 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 9 6 ft Volunteer 9
Baccharis SH 1 8 ft Volunteer 1
TOTAL SHRUBS
21 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
76
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
55 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
760
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
0
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 76
u
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
T, SA, or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
American Sycamore T 1 loft Planted 1
American Sycamore T 6 16 ft Planted 6
American Sycamore T 1 18 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore T 9 20 ft Planted 9
American Sycamore T 18 + 20 ft Planted 18
Black willow SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Black willow T 1 loft Planted 1
Black willow T 1 12 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 6 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 3 8 ft Planted 3
River Birch T 1 loft Planted 1
River Birch T 2 14 ft Planted 2
River Birch T 4 16 ft Planted 4
River Birch T 1 18 ft Planted 1
Highbush Blueberry SH 5 4 ft Planted 5
Highbush Blueberry SH 3 8 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 1 2 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 6 4 ft Planted 6
Elderberry SH 5 6 ft Planted 5
Baccharis SH 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 5 6 ft Volunteer 5
Baccharis SH 3 8 ft Volunteer 3
TOTAL SHRUBS
29 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
80
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
51 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
800
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
0
n
u
n
u
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 10
SPECIES STRATUM Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Number of Individuals
Species Counted toward
Success Criteria
T SA or SH
Highbush Blueberry SH 10 4 ft 10
Planted
Highbush Blueberry SH 4 6 ft 4
Planted
Highbush Blueberry SH 2 8 ft 2
Planted
Elderberry SH 2 2 ft Planted 2
Elderberry SH 12 4 ft Planted 12
Elderberry SH 3 6 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 3 2 ft 3
Planted
Wax Myrtle SH 9 4 ft 9
Planted
Wax Myrtle SH 2 6 ft 2
Planted
Amer. Beautyberry SH 6 2 ft 6
Planted
Amer. Beautyberry SH 3 3 ft 3
Planted
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 4 ft 1
Planted
River Birch SA 3 4 ft 3
Planted
River Birch SA 1 6 ft 1
Planted
River Birch SA 2 8 ft 2
Planted
River Birch T 2 loft 2
Planted
Black Willow SA 4 4 ft Planted 4
Black Willow SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
Black Willow SA 2 8 ft Planted 2
Baccharis SH 6 4 ft Volunteer 6
Baccharis SH 3 5 ft Volunteer 3
Baccharis SH 6 6 ft Volunteer 6
Baccharis SH 1 8 ft Volunteer 1
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 73 (PER PLOT) 88
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 15 (PER ACRE) 880
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES 0
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 88
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 11
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
River Birch SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 3 4 ft Planted 3
River Birch SA 1 5 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 8 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 1 9 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 1 loft Planted 1
River Birch T 9 12 ft Planted 9
River Birch T 4 14 ft Planted 4
River Birch T 1 15 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 2 16 ft Planted 2
Black Gum SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
Black Gum SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
American Sycamore T 4 loft Planted 4
American Sycamore T 19 12 ft Planted 19
American Sycamore T 3 14 ft Planted 3
American Sycamore T 16 15 ft Planted 16
American Sycamore T 5 16 ft Planted 5
American Sycamore T 1 18 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore T 6 20 ft Planted 6
TOTAL SHRUBS
0 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
86
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
86 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
860
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES
0
0
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 1 86
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 12
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Amer. Beautyberry SH 5 2 ft Planted 5
Amer. Beautyberry SH 7 3 ft Planted 7
Amer. Beautyberry SH 2 4 ft Planted 2
Amer. Beautyberry SH 1 5 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 3 6 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 2 1 ft Planted 2
Wax Myrtle SH 6 2 ft Planted 6
Wax Myrtle SH 3 3 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 7 4 ft Planted 7
Wax Myrtle SH 3 5 ft Planted 3
Wax Myrtle SH 1 6 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore T 2 15 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 3 2 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
Green Ash SA 2 4 ft Planted 2
Red Cedar SA 3 4 ft Planted 3
Red Cedar SA 5 5 ft Planted 5
Baccharis SH 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Baccharis SH 3 5 ft Volunteer 3
Baccharis SH 2 6 ft Volunteer 2
Baccharis SH 1 7 ft Volunteer 1
Baccharis SH 2 8 ft Volunteer 2
Loblolly Pine SA 10 3 ft Volunteer 10
TOTAL SHRUBS
52 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
71
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
19 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
710
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES 10
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 81
HOWARD FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 13
SPECIES STRATUM
T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Wax Myrtle SH 4 2 ft Volunteer 4
Wax Myrtle SH 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Wax Myrtle SH 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Elderberry SH 1 3 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 4 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 1 5 ft Planted 1
Persimmon SH 3 3 ft Volunteer 0
Persimmon SH 2 4 ft Volunteer 0
River Birch SA 2 3 ft Planted 2
River Birch SA 4 4 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 4 5 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 5 6 ft Planted 5
River Birch SA 4 7 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 3 8 ft Planted 3
River Birch SA 1 loft Planted 1
River Birch SA 2 lift Planted 2
River Birch SA 1 12 it Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 1 7 ft Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 7 loft Planted 7
American Sycamore SA 1 lift Planted 1
American Sycamore SA 8 12 ft Planted 8
American Sycamore SA 2 14 ft Planted 2
American Sycamore SA 1 15 it Planted 1
Baccharis SA 1 4 ft Volunteer 0
Baccharis SA 1 loft Volunteer 0
Sweetgum SA 3 5 ft Volunteer 0
TOTAL SHRUBS
17 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
59
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 47 (PER ACRE) 590
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEER SPECIES 5
1 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 69
J
APPENDIX C. CONSERVATION EASEMENT PLAT
(INCLUDING MONITORING PLOTS)
LO n M
Iq M N I- LO 04 LnOO 000- Ol `O (Y) 04
=
O
10 OD
LO N
O O0
r
00 d
N
O
MN M00 0q Or Mr rr nO
00 LO O> I- O '0 r m0 00 LO Lr) 00 ^ I:T
1-M I-00 OWN UM NN N^ ?O
O 00 M N 00 O d' O. ,* r 0 4 '0 O
0 ? O In 00
U 0
0 10 M O d «
CV o0 '0 ??
I' r- 10.0 10 n ^^ `DLO 0, 0, 00 LO
O UU 010, 1010 010. 0, O ce) 00 UU
M 00 M 00 O? O- M m0 M 00 I? r M 00
a ^ r I? r c7 00 I? r I? r I? r
? r
L
0 O ?- N CO
4 o I? 00 C.,
c
Cy') LO
r- r
r'0
(Y) LO Ln
CO LO
c0 10
LO U
O-0 0 ? Os
O p
N 00
10
d' Ln
IZT %0
E
'
U)
"*
0
- - 04 u-) 0 L
n
?\O
D -0 0
0 MO - d d
O L.
0 U r
- 10 O n OO O 0,
10 10
CL N 00 LO? -0
N
V N USO 00N CO
00 L LO
O U O U 0,0
C:) 0, U O, O)U O? U
00 ? ? ^? nM
^ ^ ^
r- N c? d' ?p
CL
CL
P_j
O
z
k ?
?O Z i N Vi -?
In ?yQ 'o ,aw mN a ->w
0 l'1 p o
?YNNF-d C lj G ?`.
4 Q t,_
xr-??aTw .-?, ?? oa
>1AQn ?4-wp?? ryW
wW a'^`1?0 ??0[a O
Laiay°?1w zo ?lal ?°c wo
? U~ m G 6?? Y 2 ? O`
UIQ V1w ?3 NOW tn? R•oVi
n.o awj4 aai--F ??i3o
O?Ri1 a ¢->?NLioF
wal
pp,, O..m .-,w ?.•.KO
?VILU NO MQQ C?N?tU
`t G
W Z
a z
aaa
w W w
Z w W f 11
\ ? S a N 02 29 59" W
Fvo \??,.\ ? J 3 Sl,tt.Z
0bvo?j-dJ NJ? \ \ \
&0?l?8 d
Nll
\ O
S
F-
(1
? O \
\ ? C
u. /
\ ¢n
\ Nm
\
u
z \ \
n o '\
waM? \\
[n?MM \\
m \
C V ?
1 ? 1
/?w a
s +
N
J
r
O O F
O K
W
!n F
Ld Q
W A
2 W
Q
LL,
.?'.'aJ?•+. W Q
of
i U
LLJ
Z
- 3
mtj
wj ~
F lal,
O?
0
iJa-acs
¢mN
m m
80
w?
-w
JG
u
c
l
12 m
le;
m =' ?
ty
s
v
c
u
• N
O O 1
O 1
O 2w
4. c O
a o Q
0 2 m Z
o _ n a
V d <
D D ?
N
} O
m ? o
O ct
W N ? S
-H
Q'
?
N
iV
O L..J
LL.I
5
U
w
1 ? W ? O V
M _bZ.Sh.£0 S a in Q
Q c:
LEI J N U
nv o° ?ti2t
o m >O(D
Q O ?S
m
µo[.' p
/ n:: w rma V) UQ.,
Ly? WO
t- r
c_
I
': =gym Z ~ Z (-o
V>
/? ?:
U
m
L
L,xED ?
r-
m
29? c
G O V
/ U Q
W LL- z LL-
n'
OQ
LLI Z LL L
Q LL] Q
< ME 0 CL
/ >
N
LLJ
N
W O:D
iy
Y /
a 3
a Ory 0 Uc? K
=a N •!0'0, N UJ Z
m
p £ ?f) ?rl b
'` ?H,ZIN L,
:2 LLI
;.?
w
/ a ?N J .8 yl ySU `?,,,
N
Ni R ?+ CL a-,
0 CD
T a a ?
?m
m ? cm? 2?
w
C?
G.
N
L.
Gi
lY
aal `ag 3
H19 b-
is
e? al o k s a? F?
st=d
Hi z???g? ??G W=?
0 0 0 W o
r
cl
a
u
- /
54?.W e
Ilo?b?l f? ?`??
gV,
a ?}
Igo , w??
'moo
3rl [
HO
€
x. al 2!r'i 0a, ?? ? z3
.? y4
'YO,. J
0