20171379 Ver 1_401 Application_20171027

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
October 27, 2017
Mrs. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
Suite 102 F 919.859.5663
Raleigh, NC 27607 www.timmons.com
RE: Pre -Construction Notification — General Certification (GC) 4088
Ranchland Solar
Currituck County, North Carolina
Project #: 39089.007
Dear Mrs. Higgins:
On behalf of the Ranchland Solar LLC, Timmons Group is submitting a Preconstruction Notification (PCN)
for General Certification (GC) 4088 associated with proposed construction of two road crossings within the
existing Ranchland Solar project that is located at the intersection of Ranchland Drive and Ferrell Mill Road
in the Town of Moyock, North Carolina within Currituck County. The purpose of the two road crossings are
to connect the Ranchland Solar site to the Summit Farms Solar site and to obtain access to the southern
section of the Ranchland Solar site from the northern section of the Ranchland Solar site. To accomplish
the goals of the proposed project, removal of an existing culvert and replacing it with a smaller culvert is
proposed at one location and the installation of a new culvert is proposed at another location. Please find
enclosed for your review the following items:
Appendix A
- Pre -Construction Notification Form
- Signed Agent Authorization
Appendix B
- Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
- Figure 2 — Hydrologic Inventory Map
- Figure 3 — Environmental Inventory Map
- Figure 4 — Parcel Map
- Figure 5 — NRCS Soil Survey Map
- Figure 6 — Aerial Map
Appendix C
- Approved Jurisdictional Determination (USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-02311; November 21,
2016)
- Ranchland Wetland Map; dated October 17, 2016
- No Permit Required (USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-02311; November 21, 2016)
- No Further Action Letter (NC State Environmental Review Clearinghouse; SCH File # 15-E-
4600-0578; May 28, 2015)
- Threatened and Endangered Species Review (Angler Environmental; dated June 8, 2017)
Appendix D
- Road Crossing Exhibit— Lateral A— Plan View
- Road Crossing Exhibit — Lateral A — Profile and Cross Sections
- Road Crossing Exhibit — Lateral B — Plan View
- Road Crossing Exhibit — Lateral B — Profile and Cross Sections
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE j CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

PROJECT HISTORY & EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is relatively flat; however, there is some topographic relief across the site. Located within the
northern section of site is the Summit Farms Solar site that is +/- 709.18 acres in size. Located within the
central and southern sections of the site is the Ranchland Solar site that is +/- 886.76 acres in size. There
are two canals (Lateral A Canal and Lateral B Canal) that are aligned east to west and eventually merge
and flow north near the northeast corner of the site. Lateral A Canal separates the Summit Farms Solar site
from the Ranchland Solar site. Lateral B Canal separates the northern section of the Ranchland Solar site
from the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site. There are also three canals that border the east,
west, and northern sides of the site, which flow north and east, respectively. There are few highpoints with
most of the area flowing into existing ditches, which flow north into each of the canals. There is a smaller
area towards the northeastern border of the site, which contains existing ditches that flow west into the
canal. There are existing wooded areas that will remain undisturbed. One wooded area exists toward the
northeastern portion of the site, located to the west of the canal that flows north. Another wooded area
exists towards the center of the site, which has an existing farm path that runs vertically through the middle,
as well as horizontally to the north and south. Another wooded area exists towards the southern portion of
the entire site that will be undisturbed.
A stream and wetland delineation was conducted by the Energy Renewal Partners, LLC. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination on November 21, 2016 (see attached;
USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-02311). Based on the delineation there are approximately 0.09 acres of
wetland and approximately 29,808 linear feet waters of the U.S. located within the project site. Angler
Environmental conducted a Threatened and Endangered Species Review (see attached letter dated June
8, 2017). Angler concluded that the proposed project may affect northern long -ear bat (Myotis
septentrionalis), but within the permissible scope as defined by the 4(d) rule. In addition, Angler concluded
that the project will not affect any of the other federally listed Threatened and Endangered Species. An
environmental document was prepared and submitted to the NC State Environmental Review
Clearinghouse for review. The NC State Environmental Review Clearinghouse determined that no further
action is required in a letter dated May 28, 2015 (see attached; SCH File # 15-E-4600-0578).
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The Ranchland Solar project is an existing solar panel farm located on a former +/- 886.76 acre agricultural
farm located south of Ranchland Drive at the intersection of Ranchland Drive and Ferrell Mill Road in the
Town of Moyock, North Carolina within Currituck County. There are existing paths (former farm paths)
present along the edges of the project site and against the canals. The project proposes two road crossings
to connect the Ranchland Solar site to the Summit Farms Solar site and to obtain access to the southern
section of the Ranchland Solar site from the northern section of the Ranchland Solar site. The two proposed
road crossings are required to connect the Ranchland Solar site to the Summit Farms Solar site and to
obtain access to the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site from the northern section of the
Ranchland Solar site. Separating the Ranchland Solar site from the Summit Farms Solar site is Lateral A
Canal. Lateral A Canal is in the northcentral section of the project site and aligned in an east to west
direction. Separating the northern section of Ranchland Solar site from the southern section is Lateral B
Canal. Lateral B Canal is in the southcentral section of the project site and is also aligned in an east to west
direction. The locations of each proposed road crossing are labeled as Lateral A (Culver Improvements)
and Lateral B (New Crossing) and are shown on Figure 6: Aerial Map.
Lateral A (Culvert Improvements): The road crossing at Lateral A Canal is located along an existing road
crossing designed to allow access to the Summit Farms Solar site. The existing road crossing contains an
existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure that is in a degraded condition. The proposed activity at this
location involves removal of the existing culvert structure and replacing it with two 72 inch reinforced
concrete pipe (RCP) culverts that are 42 linear feet. A rip -rap dissipator pad will be installed flush with the
existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage. In addition, an existing ditch is proposed

to be relocated at this location that will contain a RCP tied to the existing grade of the stream and contain
a rip -rap dissipator pad installed flush to allow for aquatic life passage.
Lateral B (New Crossing]: The road crossing at Lateral B Canal is a new proposed road crossing designed
to allow access to the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site. The proposed activity involves the
placement of new 60 inch RCP culvert that is 42 linear feet. A rip -rap dissipator pad will be installed flush
with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage.
Stream Impact Table
Impact Number
Type of Impact
Stream
Width feet
Impact
Length feet
S1 - Lateral A Canal
Permanent— Fill — Dissipator Pad
22.5
66
S2 - Lateral A Canal
Temporary — Fill — Coffer Dam & Diversion
Channel
22.5
10
S3 - Lateral A Canal
Permanent — Fill — Dissi ator Pad
6
16
S4 - Lateral B Canal
Permanent — Culvert
15
42
S5 - Lateral B Canal
Permanent — Fill — Dissi ator Pad
15
15
50
10
S6 - Lateral B Canal
Temporary — Fill — Coffer Dam & Diversion
Channel
Total stream
impact
194
The total stream impacts associated with Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) are 92 linear feet. The total
stream impacts associated with Lateral B (New Crossing) are 102 linear feet.
It should be noted that Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) is located along an existing road crossing within
the north central section of the project to allow access to the northern section. The existing road crossing
contains an existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure that is in a degraded condition. The proposed activity
at this location involves removal of the existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure and replacing it with two
42 linear feet reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts at the same location.
Of the total 194 linear feet of stream impacts, 132 linear feet will be associated with rip -rap dissipator pads,
which will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage
(Stream Impacts S1, S3, and S5). In addition, there will be another 20 linear feet of temporary stream
impact associated with the construction of coffer dams and diversion channels for both road crossings
(Stream Impacts S2 and S6).
Therefore, there will be a total of 42 linear feet of permanent stream impact (Stream Impact S4)
associated with one new culvert installation located at Lateral B (New Crossing).
Stormwater Management
Inverter pads and a gravel drive are located on the site and include 23.71 acres impervious, which is 1.79%
of the site. Since the percentage is below 24%, has been permitted as a Low Density project and does not
require a stormwater management plan. In addition, grass has been planted throughout the site and
maintained. Existing drainages patterns have been maintained, and the sheet flow from storm water is
directed across the grassed areas to swales and ditches surrounding the site.
AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION:
Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable
by incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the
layout to avoid and minimize impacts. Avoidance and minimization measures were also accomplished
during the design of the proposed road crossings.

The Applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to the greatest extent practicable given the project's
purpose and need. The overall project avoids the +/- 0.09 acres of wetlands located in northeastern portion
of site. Avoidance and minimization efforts include locating a crossing over Lateral A along an existing road
crossing. Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) road crossing is located along an existing road crossing that
contains an existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure in a degraded condition. The proposed activity at
this location involves removal of the existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure and replacing it with two 42
linear foot reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts at the same location. Therefore, the overall culvert
length has decreased by 14 linear feet at Lateral A (Culvert Improvements). Minimization efforts were
utilized to the maximum extent practicable in designing the road crossing over Lateral B (New Crossing) by
crossing Lateral B as close to 90 degrees as possible and confining the culvert impacts to as minimally as
possible.
Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other pollutants from entering the adjacent
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill will be placed and
contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent waters of the
U.S. Stockpiling of excavated material within waters of the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the
construction of this project. Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all
phases of construction and installation. The contractor shall install silt fence only as necessary to install
devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following
every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made
immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report will be kept by the
owner's representative. Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted
areas. The project will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered
Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through the State Stormwater Rules
MITIGATION:
The total stream impacts associated with Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) are 92 linear feet. The total
stream impacts associated with Lateral B (New Crossing) are 102 linear feet. Most of the stream impacts
are associated with temporary construction impacts and rip -rap dissipator pads, which will be installed flush
with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage and. There will be a total of 42
linear feet of permanent stream impact (Stream Impact S4) associated with one new culvert installation
located at Lateral B (New Crossing). Therefore at this time, the applicant does not propose compensatory
mitigation.
SUMMARY:
The Ranchland Solar site proposes two road crossings to connect the Ranchland Solar site to the Summit
Farms Solar site and to obtain access to the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site from the northern
section of the Ranchland Solar site. To accomplish the goals of the proposed project, removal of an existing
culvert and replacing it with a smaller culvert is proposed at one location and the installation of a new culvert
is proposed at another location.
Separating the northern section of Ranchland Solar site from the southern section is Lateral B Canal.
Lateral B Canal is in the southcentral section of the project site and is also aligned in an east to west
direction. The locations of each proposed road crossing are labeled as Lateral A (Culver Improvements)
and Lateral B (New Crossing) and are shown on Figure 6: Aerial Map. As a result, the total stream impacts
associated with Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) are 92 linear feet; while the total stream impacts
associated with Lateral B (New Crossing) are 102 linear feet. Of the total 194 linear feet of stream impacts,
132 linear feet will be associated with rip -rap dissipator pads, which will be installed flush with the existing
grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage. In addition, there will be another 20 linear feet of
temporary stream impact associated with the construction of coffer dams and diversion channels for both

road crossings. Therefore, there will be a total of 42 linear feet of permanent stream impact associated
with one new culvert installation located at Lateral B (New Crossing).
Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable
by incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the
layout to avoid and minimize impacts. Avoidance and minimization measures were also accomplished
during the design of the proposed road crossings. Since there will be a total of 42 linear feet of permanent
stream impact (Stream Impact S4) associated with one new culvert installation located at Lateral B (New
Crossing) the applicant does not propose compensatory mitigation at this time.
Therefore, we are requesting confirmation that the proposed project qualifies under the conditions GC 4088.
Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you should have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
George Buchholz, REM, PWS
Senior Environmental Project Manager
Attachments: listed above

APPEDIX A

F_ -lt4A r6,0.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Hage 1 of 9t]
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 4088
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? DWQ 401 Certification:
X No X Yes
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank X No
or in -lieu fee program.
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer X No
1 h below.
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project:
(Ranchland Solar
2b
County:
:,urrituck
2c
Nearest municipality/ town:
Town of Moyock
2d
Subdivision name:
2e
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
(Price Solar LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
IDB: 1367; PG: 392
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d
Street address:
192 Raceway Drive
3e
City, state, zip:
(Mooresville, NC 28117
3f
Telephone no,'
3g
Fax no..
3h
Email address:
Hage 1 of 9t]
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

T. /'9FJ FJII{i GSI I L 1111UN I I IQLIVI 1,11 UI I ION
GIIL II VI11 VYYIIG11
Ranchland Solar, LLC
(Kelly Hoyt
!;SunEnergy1
4a Applicant is:
4b Name:
4c Business name
(if applicable):
4d Street address:
192 Raceway Drive,
4e City, state, zip:
(Mooresville, NC 28117
4f Telephone no.:
{704)662-0375 ext. 380
4g Fax no.:
4h Email address:
[e-mail]
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
George Buchholz, Senior Environmental
5a Name: Consultant/Project Manager
5b Business name Timmons Group
(if applicable):
5c Street address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
5d City, state, zip:
(Raleigh, NC 27607
5e Telephone no:;
984.255.2361
5f Fax no.:
919.859.5663
5g Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
)016000002A0000; 001600000260000
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.476238 Longitude: -76.150690
1c
Property size: !Ranchland Area +/- 886.76
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Guinea Mill Run Canal
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, Sw
2c
River basin:
IPasquotank River Basin 030102051106; Roland Creek
watershed
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The site is relatively flat; however, there is some topographic relief across the site. Located within the
northern section of site is the Summit Farms Solar site that is +/- 709.18 acres in size. Located within the central and
southern sections of the site is the Ranchland Solar site that is +/- 886.76 acres in size. There are two canals (Lateral A
Canal and Lateral B Canal) that are aligned east to west and eventually merge and flow north near the northeast corner
of the site. Lateral A Canal separates the Summit Farms Solar site from the Ranchland Solar site. Lateral B Canal
separates the northern section of the Ranchland Solar site from the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site. There
are also three canals that border the east, west, and northern sides of the site, which flow north and east, respectively.
There are few highpoints with most of the area flowing into existing ditches, which flow north into each of the canals.
There is a smaller area towards the northeastern border of the site, which contains existing ditches that flow west into the
canal. There are existing wooded areas that will remain undisturbed. One wooded area exists toward the northeastern
nnrfinn of +hc ei+c Inco+cA +n +hc ­­+ of +hc rnnoI +h o+ fl...eic. nr. rfh Anr,+hcr .einnA A or vic.+c +r..ao rA +ho ..c..+or of +ho !
site, which has an existing farm path that runs vertically through the middle, as well as horizontally to the north and south.
Another wooded area exists towards the southern portion of the entire site that will be undisturbed. Adjoining properties
to the west and east of the site consist of mostly vacant parcels. The adjoining property to the south is an area that is
mostly wooded. The properties north of the site across Ranchland Drive and Ferrell Mill Rd consists of some developed
subdivision homes that front Caratoke Highway.
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 0.09 acres located in northeastern portion of site
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: +/- 29,808 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The Ranchland Solar project is an existing solar panel farm located on a
former +/- 886.76 acre agricultural farm located south of Ranchland Drive at the intersection of Ranchland Drive and
Ferrell Mill Road in the Town of Moyock, North Carolina within Currituck County. There are existing paths (former farm
paths) present along the edges of the project site and against the canals. The project proposes two road crossings to
connect the Ranchland Solar site to the Summit Farms Solar site and to obtain access to the southern section of the
_ Ranchland Solar site from the northern section of the Ranchland Solar site.
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Two proposed road crossings are required to connect the Ranchland Solar site to the Summit Farms Solar site and to
obtain access to the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site from the northern section of the Ranchland Solar site.
Lateral A Canal is in the northcentral section of the project site and aligned in an east to west direction. Lateral B Canal
is in the southcentral section of the project site and is also aligned in an east to west direction. The locations of each
proposed road crossing are labeled as Lateral A (Culver Improvements) and Lateral B (New Crossing) and are shown on
Figure 6: Aerial Map. Traditional equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving
equipment, graders, and earth movers to construct the proposed road crossings.
Lateral A (Culvert Improvements): The road crossing at Lateral A is located along an existing road crossing designed to
allow access to the Summit Farms Solar site. The existing road crossing contains an existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert
structure that is in a degraded condition. The proposed activity at this location involves removal of the existing culvert
structure and replacing it with two 72 inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts that are 42 linear feet. A rip -rap
dissipator pad will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage. In
addition, an existing ditch is proposed to be relocated at this location that will contain a RCP tied to the existing grade of
the stream and contain a rip -rap dissipator pad installed flush to allow for aquatic life passage.
Lateral 8 (.New Crossing): The road crossing at Lateral B is a new proposed road crossing designed to allow access to
the southern section of the Ranchland Solar site. The proposed activity involves the placement of new 60 inch RCP
culvert that is 42 linear feet. A rip -rap dissipator pad will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to
allow for aquatic life passage.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the X Yes Comments: Approved JD
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?

4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what X Final
type of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional Agency/Consultant Company:
areas? Name (if known): Jesse Degnan, Other: Energy Renewal
James McRacken Partners, LLC
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
- USACE issued an Approved JD on November 21, 2016 (see attached; USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-02311).
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained X Yes
for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. {
- USACE issued on November 21, 2016 (see attached; USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-02311) a No Permit Required for
activities associated with the installation of solar panel in what was agricultural farm field for solar energy production.
- The NC State Environmental Review Clearinghouse determined that no further action is required in a letter dated May
28, 2015 (see attached; SCH File # 15-E-4600-0578).
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
6b If yes, explain.
X No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply).
Wetlands X Streams — tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1
Wetland Impacts:
2g. Total
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. j 3e. 3f. 39.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
_
S1 (P) (Fill - Dissipator Pad Lateral A PER {{Corps 22.5 136
S2 (T)
(Fill — Coffer Dam &
Lateral A
PER
{Corps
22.5
10
Diversion Channel
S3 (P)
Fill - Dissipator Pad
Culvert
Lateral A
PER
+Corps
13
16
S4 (P)
Lateral B
PER
Corps
15
42
S5 (P)
(Fill - Dissipator Pad
(Lateral B
iPER
Corps
'15
50
(Fill — Coffer Dam & (Lateral B
PER
Corps
'15
'10
S6 (T)
Diversion Channel
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts '194
3i. Comments:
The total stream impacts associated with Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) are 92 linear feet. The total stream impact
associated with Lateral B (New Crossing) are 102 linear feet. It should be noted that Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) is
located along an existing road crossing within the north central section of the project to allow access to the northern section,
The existing road crossing contains an existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure that is in a degraded condition. The proposed
activity at this location involves removal of the existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure and replacing it with two 42 linear fee
reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts at the same location.
Of the total 194 linear feet of stream impacts, 132 linear feet will be associated with rip -rap dissipator pads, which will be
installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage (Stream Impacts S1, S3, and S5). In
addition, there will be another 20 linear feet of temporary stream impact associated with the construction of coffer dams and
diversion channels for both road crossings (Stream Impacts S2 and S6). Therefore, there will be a total of 42 linear feet of
permanent stream impact (Stream Impact S4) associated with one new culvert installation located at Lateral B (New
Crossing).
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water
of the U.S. then individualll
....... -............ --
- list all open water impacts
below.
4a.
4b-
4c. j 4d.
...--...... .....
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable
Type of impact Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary (T)
01
02
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below -
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID number
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
purpose of pond
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated
Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5gComments:
5hls a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
_impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a Project is in which
protected basin?
6c.
Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Randleman
6d. 6e.
Other:
6b.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact
Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number -
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet
131
B2
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating
resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout to avoid and minimize
impacts. Avoidance and minimization measures were also accomplished during the design of the proposed road crossings.
The Applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to the greatest extent practicable given the project's purpose and need.
The overall project avoids the +/- 0.09 acres of wetlands located in northeastern portion of site. Avoidance and minimization
efforts include locating a crossing over Lateral A along an existing road crossing. Lateral A (Culvert Improvements) road
crossing is located along an existing road crossing that contains an existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure in a degraded
condition. The proposed activity at this location involves removal of the existing +/- 56 linear foot culvert structure and
replacing it with two 42 linear foot reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts at the same location. Therefore, the overall
culvert length has decreased by 14 linear feet at Lateral A (Culvert Improvements). Minimization efforts were utilized to the
maximum extent practicable in designing the road crossing over Lateral B (New Crossing) by crossing Lateral B as close to
90 degrees as possible and confining the culvert impacts to as minimally as possible.
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional waters of
the U.S. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and
permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent waters of the U.S. Stockpiling of excavated material within waters of
the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. Proper sedimentation and erosion control
methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation. The contractor shall install silt fence only as
necessary to install devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following
every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to
maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report will be kept by the owner's representative.
Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will meet all relative
requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through the State
Stormwater Rules.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2blf yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for
this project?
lete if Using_a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
3c Comments.
4. Complete if Makina a Pavment to In -lieu Fee Proaram
X No
DWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
..............
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:

4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
X No
requires buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c
6d
6e
Zone Reason for impact
Total impact Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6f �E
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation
bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
X No
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 1.79%
2b Does this project re uire a Stormwater Management Plan? X No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Inverter pads and a gravel drive are
located on the site and include 23.71 acres impervious, which is 1.79% of the site. Since the percentage is below 24%, has
been permitted as a Low Density project and does not require a stormwater management plan. In addition, grass has been
planted throughout the site and maintained. Existing drainages patterns have been maintained, and the sheet flow from storm
water is directed across the grassed areas to swales and ditches surrounding the site.
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the
plan:
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is this project?
__..
Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
No
been attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
HQW
4a
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs
ORW
apply (check all that apply):
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
been attached?
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X Yes
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
X Yes
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or
the use of public (federal/state) land?
X Yes
1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of
an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or X Yes
State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by
the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final
approval letter.)
X Yes
Comments: The NC State Environmental Review Clearinghouse determined that no
further action is required in a letter dated May 28, 2015 (see attached; SCH File # 15-E-
4600-0578).
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland X No
Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2bls this an after -the -fact permit application? !
X No
2c if you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result X No
in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The entire project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use control and erosion and sedimentation
measures in place for specific areas which require them.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated
from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Any waste water generated from the site is directed into an existing treatment facility operated by Currituck County.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species X Yes
or habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species X Yes
Act impacts?
5clf yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh Field Office
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat?
Angler Environmental conducted a Threatened and Endangered Species Review (see attached letter dated June
8, 2017). In summary, Angler concluded that the proposed project may affect northern long -ear bat (Myotis
septentrionalis), but within the permissible scope as defined by the 4(d) rule. In addition, Angler concluded that
the project will not affect any of the other federally listed Threatened and Endangered Species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The interactive map located at http://ocean.floridamarine.orge_coral/ims/viewer.htm was utilized to determine if
the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat and it was determined that it would not.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant
in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
During a review by the NC State Environmental Review Clearinghouse (see attached; SCH File # 15-E-4600-0578;
dated May 28, 2015), the Depart of Cultural Resources had no comment regarding the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
X Yes
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency
Management Risk Management reviewed the proposed project during a review by the NC State Environmental Review
Clearinghouse (see attached; SCH File # 15-E-4600-0578; dated May 28, 2015). It is anticipated that any proposed
encroachments would not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge and the
requirements will be met that are set forth by the Currituck County's Floodplain regulations.
8c What source(s) did you use to
Revised December 16, 2005).
C- 1-16 'kkb 1a
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
mas
Applicant/Agent's gnature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the aoolicant is orovided 1
Page 10 of 10
804000J (Map
11)1.2-7190
Date

APPENDIX B

Path: R:\805\39089.007 -Ranchland Solar Farm\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\39089-VIC.mxd
c` 0
Site limits are approximate. I ` tnp r
Topographic imagery from USGS. 5 I J
C�
0 6,400 12,800 19,20025,600 'y
Feet i
RANCHLAND SOLAR TIMMONS GROUP
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. �
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 39089.007 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): LAMBS CORNER
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 1598 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.473525°N WATERSHED(S): ALBEMARLE
LONGITUDE: -76.151614°W HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03010205
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction. biddina. and/or construction staking without the exoress written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

03010201"03010201
4
Auryr'esLoro m mdhltprorPtnandrarSlate
03010204
kk rrin
:� sa
Ahoskie 03010203
a:r
03010107
, ", Roanoke F.li
Fliver National
;'iillottlMon Wlildlde ReNg4
.a ;13 rf
Legend
Site Marker
a
■ ■ Albemarle (03010205)
Hydrologic Unit Code
0 4 8 16
Miles
Great Dismal
swamp National
Wddhfe Refuge •..•IF';' ,il'I1-
Dismal il:f:ili nf:':LII1+s
9n• amp
state Park
i
r'•
rr4
c�
H ertford
m
� C
x
� N
Eden) on
03020104
Belhaven
fi t.;31 k1
Elizabeth
City
39 R
Pettgrew �l
St*@ Park
ftcosln Lakes
N�onalge
Widlife Refu
4aw
Lake tv,w
03010205
M attamu Sime t
National
VNrldlde Refuge
AKgakor RNer
Natio n at
w0dide %tugs
Dare County
Bombing R�
:iKill D �.II
�lR Hlil�
03020105
N
DATE
ryo
.d
inn
10/27/2017
a
E
`
E4a�
W<` —
o
���
.
F u3
W
3
awC
S
r< LL
'101
T
D
ww=n
1 Q y
o
CZ
o
eo
L O
i�x�
m a
n
itU
y a
f jN
N
i W
w<
O
Z
Z
J z
m°�
o
1:7
�-
L
Q
of
>
W
Z
H
V �
Z
a
OJ
DATE
.d
inn
10/27/2017
DRAWN BY
A. WILSON
i
DESIGNED BY
A. WILSON
CHECKED BY
G.BUCHHOLZ
.
SCALE
1"=SMILES
L
ill
D
a
w
0
0
w<
O
J z
1:7
�-
Q
z
Z
H
V �
Z
OJ
�
J_
i
U
�
�♦
ZZ�
tea/
N
LL U
W
0
LL
-
JOB NUMBER
9.007
3908ETNO.
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1

Legend
Project Study Limits - 1598 Acres
—•— —• NHD Streams
All hydric
Not hydric
Partially hydric
A: 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
NOTES:
Project Limits are approximate.
NWI from US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Soils data from SSURGO.
National Hydrography Dataset from USGS.
Aerial imagery from NC One Map.
N
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Albemarle Soils
Ma
Mapunit Name
Ro
Roanoke fine sandy loam
Po
Ponzer muck
Ca
Cape Fear loam
Ws
Wasda muck
Do
Dorovan mucky peat
No
Nimmo loamy sand
Pt
Portsmouth fine sandy loam
Legend
Project Study Limits - 1598 Acres
—•— —• NHD Streams
All hydric
Not hydric
Partially hydric
A: 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
NOTES:
Project Limits are approximate.
NWI from US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Soils data from SSURGO.
National Hydrography Dataset from USGS.
Aerial imagery from NC One Map.
N
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
�� IT �• .,,A J1
^'
FOM
r,r
e � .
e�
Lateral A
Culvert Improvements
n
At
Lo
N
2 a OL
Q
W wuiU
W
u_ z
wLu oM� C
QLo p
oco o t a
co
U)
<0 �LL w
o
�L
L0 Z
`° O
Z3 cv
N
m-'t
N w
LIJ
O J �
ORO
Y �
� N
F
� w
a� ~
= E d
Z C
o Z
5 > DATE
10/27/2017
co
DRAWN BY
A. WILSON
DESIGNED BY
A. WILSON
to AMR. CHECKED BY
* G. BUCHHOLZ
16 SCALE
+l 1 " = 500'
?Y4• �sf ,{,Y
�� IT �• .,,A J1
^'
FOM
r,r
e � .
e�
Lateral A
Culvert Improvements
n
At
Lo
N
2 a OL
Q
W wuiU
W
u_ z
wLu oM� C
QLo p
oco o t a
co
U)
<0 �LL w
o
�L
L0 Z
`° O
Z3 cv
N
m-'t
N w
LIJ
O J �
ORO
Y �
� N
F
� w
a� ~
= E d
Z C
o Z
5 > DATE
10/27/2017
co
DRAWN BY
A. WILSON
DESIGNED BY
A. WILSON
to AMR. CHECKED BY
* G. BUCHHOLZ
16 SCALE
+l 1 " = 500'

Path: R:\805\39089.007-Ranchland Solar Farm\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\39089- Parcel. mxd

Path: R:\805\39089.007 -Ranchland Solar Farm\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\39089-NRCS.mxd
Th
Ra
VS
�
..... d R ❑ rn <
r�
US'
Ca
V'r%
Ca
Ws
Wa
tt U
At
Ro
ft4
J
LLegend-6
� Pt
Project Study Limits - 1598 Acres
1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400 ,
r1Q:ns s ee! $j
Feet
RANCHLAND SOLAR TIMMONS GROUP
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 5: NRCS MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVFD THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 39089.007 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): LAMBS CORNER
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 1598 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.473525°N WATERSHED(S): ALBEMARLE
LONGITUDE: -76.151614°W I HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03010205
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

{s
.r?g,kv ► a =" t_F_y=
i� ��p' "�`k " wv,. '+� a. ry ;.,-� 't�'',• - r :•e=�`-':- �� ,r,;� r - � }1 - �".�r=F.+� "r � , g �. � +„p V -
ll � 'i .ir' _ r15•t. �p `-3 is „;+r .:- �J.i .�*-`+� • >. ►C ^'' ;r'?�"' '•�
t• �rY.
f
� Jir 4
T rtie
i.'
h !•' , �'�+}' S r
if
•,�, .•_- r� a,, _W r,. _ - 1R. � j�. r34 ..44 _ -,rir s,. - yy� � . .! � r •
' i'�' - - .- Y"..�ySrC•- ',•�y ' - � "r� ,1T .'.� • �l.l! _ •}• - � •: R.'[r' y ,� � { �, • = r.
44
ilk
- ••ii - `r�' tf-y -
Or
'a y
• V �_ Q �i�C'�'°':r? Y tY' ii n' '� rye fl• .f ' K-. �'N � ,.:i r
?r / o CCJ� - -•� Y . �^ 1. •.ti. `.� lL ss■�S '�.r f� ]F..:
i
• n �a r x r.r
�" a u� CY/ �r , i F jail . I ��•+ M1 + r `sem a.
. T - • (� O • ..L� �, ti - - _.y�, _ { .!�: JFK : - �� ••t f L r. 7 Y . _ ` - `�- r�,i�- . r -';y �4 �F.
o O is f (
° o 0�°'t"
__ .r .. 7 : • .;� ` ,.r: �4f O ;' ° � o '�.. , .. � J't 4� s° fir ,� # !' _ .I 5. � •��,j� ..�3 ` -
.. . �y'�v}O o � � � � + '° �,��,� o ` � ' .� •, � a 'rte ,. C �•' ` � � r• *�t t. � � x t . ` � •
p is
� � _ - / �� p " � ° o°Q 0 0 .�� • � g f° /r --- '`:J �' F :.i!+I r ��• r .H � � Vii,
r ♦ , a oo ° O � O P ❑ o !i } Jn/ � b • ,. O ,. d o r r Q P �r : � (�' - L v. - ! � •[' s� � �°-� •'� '
D %� .' j j � o '� ' • _ f � ems" O .� [ 0 �sU// � .ki: 1 j. sem_ .7.�^• .� ,�
,s W ` U ° +r`r' L +•_ ♦
o is tiV _ {� 1VIRW
, [ n
/� �%• 0 ° p 0 y /;��rT-�,'O - 0 +.r. ,._ Y i�Vie{ ]•`"'Mi,nr=sy •�;' Y
° , .
O o ° � f O(f • a o ; r' ,. � , I tiT/(/Q �. - . _ ..moi . ^-r, •t [fit A�; �
• a° ° O �.r [� ° U ° f.+ ��� aJ,J F k •Qr ,� '~ � b �! •� ��� � ��'I�,y,• �
0 ° Q -• r'.'. c� n O O O- a � _y[ i � n . r ji
VM
ON V
dr
lip
Aft
AN
y�yf� o n Q r.r aftlY „ r.o o�7i :,�7• 0 f ;.[� }� ®-
"CY' },. U O ° �/ _ -_ '' . ' 'F : ti `,,jf�� Q '� - '� ,r•\ o ° O "� f . ;
J J.C>R i "• .c y N O WW p YY k•i%%UU u
r ° °Q 0 �r f y: �:• y o `` ep O ti''� a f o' 0 " �:;:�
o U y..
o h.
Culvert Improvement'
•;4' .0 _ n - n- _ °• ;q illi' ' .� ,�._ -[ - o ,�A , . - - +
Lateral A
�Y,1 r." . vfJ �' -S 1.^ • �3�rr s J ^r ' Oa � , '
Gil
() .1 . IV .. 0 1
, " . .
I . �_o. . . i . : . . : . . I
w.�'
� ' : O � • d*+ ' Q "� � �' i ��A• 1'' U s i � � � � _ � .,�; • � � � J^%i E�' '� o �F`? o - ., tl °'�� o � �Z'�`'�r� � ��b 0
CD
° � ❑ � V y5 � -t� r + i o i — � �R
(�O o V � S O ° �j • ��U ` I `j\-��� k: ti , � 4 _ Y� � '.s ° r r O� , r � i r��" . �., l�. ' . _—�' �v. `♦ ��:
` O '� 0 r. -J J � V .L'i� � ^�_. [ 'k,�, }r / • �- tri � � — - �
Q
0;tA1
D fl P } Q C� o o
o
PO nr-
- `' g v ice'
o
°
Li
• ���.
o&I I -
AkV
lowr r - w. - r ' •. +�P is rz�rr. t; -
New Cr(
"! �°'7 oef� `..3 � .. .� `• ,4 ' -~ ' • �,_ •. `s.�-' >k�-�.'�. -�+ ,'� - ; f 'old'• ,
411
*'.� �T- +•v M R ,� � -„ • ..r ` �•F r A !SIF - - . - ..
7. ,�},�;t♦�:i. �)�.. •.. ,'r .�� ••{.` •-rl .,i'*� Iys !'/R►'�"� ..�� T..f., '•�. :.y^ - •-.�-_ •- r!•• •i r. - - - ' o �y
r
r.�
3 y S .' ❑
s. r ' 6i 3: i . ,• .� rf • _ !�' r/
•.. :rs - .
A.i /
o � �
WWI
• n �a r x r.r
�" a u� CY/ �r , i F jail . I ��•+ M1 + r `sem a.
. T - • (� O • ..L� �, ti - - _.y�, _ { .!�: JFK : - �� ••t f L r. 7 Y . _ ` - `�- r�,i�- . r -';y �4 �F.
o O is f (
° o 0�°'t"
__ .r .. 7 : • .;� ` ,.r: �4f O ;' ° � o '�.. , .. � J't 4� s° fir ,� # !' _ .I 5. � •��,j� ..�3 ` -
.. . �y'�v}O o � � � � + '° �,��,� o ` � ' .� •, � a 'rte ,. C �•' ` � � r• *�t t. � � x t . ` � •
p is
� � _ - / �� p " � ° o°Q 0 0 .�� • � g f° /r --- '`:J �' F :.i!+I r ��• r .H � � Vii,
r ♦ , a oo ° O � O P ❑ o !i } Jn/ � b • ,. O ,. d o r r Q P �r : � (�' - L v. - ! � •[' s� � �°-� •'� '
D %� .' j j � o '� ' • _ f � ems" O .� [ 0 �sU// � .ki: 1 j. sem_ .7.�^• .� ,�
,s W ` U ° +r`r' L +•_ ♦
o is tiV _ {� 1VIRW
, [ n
/� �%• 0 ° p 0 y /;��rT-�,'O - 0 +.r. ,._ Y i�Vie{ ]•`"'Mi,nr=sy •�;' Y
° , .
O o ° � f O(f • a o ; r' ,. � , I tiT/(/Q �. - . _ ..moi . ^-r, •t [fit A�; �
• a° ° O �.r [� ° U ° f.+ ��� aJ,J F k •Qr ,� '~ � b �! •� ��� � ��'I�,y,• �
0 ° Q -• r'.'. c� n O O O- a � _y[ i � n . r ji
VM
ON V
dr
lip
Aft
AN
y�yf� o n Q r.r aftlY „ r.o o�7i :,�7• 0 f ;.[� }� ®-
"CY' },. U O ° �/ _ -_ '' . ' 'F : ti `,,jf�� Q '� - '� ,r•\ o ° O "� f . ;
J J.C>R i "• .c y N O WW p YY k•i%%UU u
r ° °Q 0 �r f y: �:• y o `` ep O ti''� a f o' 0 " �:;:�
o U y..
o h.
Culvert Improvement'
•;4' .0 _ n - n- _ °• ;q illi' ' .� ,�._ -[ - o ,�A , . - - +
Lateral A
�Y,1 r." . vfJ �' -S 1.^ • �3�rr s J ^r ' Oa � , '
Gil
() .1 . IV .. 0 1
, " . .
I . �_o. . . i . : . . : . . I
w.�'
� ' : O � • d*+ ' Q "� � �' i ��A• 1'' U s i � � � � _ � .,�; • � � � J^%i E�' '� o �F`? o - ., tl °'�� o � �Z'�`'�r� � ��b 0
CD
° � ❑ � V y5 � -t� r + i o i — � �R
(�O o V � S O ° �j • ��U ` I `j\-��� k: ti , � 4 _ Y� � '.s ° r r O� , r � i r��" . �., l�. ' . _—�' �v. `♦ ��:
` O '� 0 r. -J J � V .L'i� � ^�_. [ 'k,�, }r / • �- tri � � — - �
Q
0;tA1
D fl P } Q C� o o
o
PO nr-
- `' g v ice'
o
°
Li
• ���.
o&I I -
AkV
lowr r - w. - r ' •. +�P is rz�rr. t; -
New Cr(
"! �°'7 oef� `..3 � .. .� `• ,4 ' -~ ' • �,_ •. `s.�-' >k�-�.'�. -�+ ,'� - ; f 'old'• ,
411
*'.� �T- +•v M R ,� � -„ • ..r ` �•F r A !SIF - - . - ..
7. ,�},�;t♦�:i. �)�.. •.. ,'r .�� ••{.` •-rl .,i'*� Iys !'/R►'�"� ..�� T..f., '•�. :.y^ - •-.�-_ •- r!•• •i r. - - - ' o �y
r
r.�
3 y S .' ❑
s. r ' 6i 3: i . ,• .� rf • _ !�' r/
•.. :rs - .
A.i /
o � �

APPENDIX C

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-02311 County: Currituck U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -LAMBS CORNER
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Sun Energy 1
Eric Schudt
6750 NC Highway 30 East
Bethel, NC, 27812
[phone]
Size (acres) 886.76 Nearest Town Movock
Nearest Waterway Tull Creek/Guinea Mill Run Canal River Basin Albemarle -Chowan
USGS HUC 03010205 Coordinates Latitude: 36.469314
Longitude: -76.146407
Location description: Property is approximately 886.94 acres and is southwest of the Caratoke Highway at Ferrell Mill
Road in Movock, Currituck County, North Carolina. Property is adiacent to Guinea Mill Run Canal and Lateral Canal
A both tributaries to Tull Creek.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
Page 1 of 2

SAW -2016-02311
X The waters of the U.S. on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.
If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified,
this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka Stygar at
910-251-4619 or Krystynka.B.Stygar(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits an Ordinary High Water Mark as indicated by changes in soil
character and absence of terrestrial vegetation and is hydrologically connected to Guinea Mill Run Canal a tributary to
Tull Creek, a tributary to the North Landing Rivera TNW.
D. Remarks: Project are is referenced on map titled " Ranchland Solar" and is dated October 17, 2016 provided by
SUnEnergyl. Please see attached for further review.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by January 20, 2017.

SAW -2016-02311
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: November 21, 2016 Expiration Date: November 21, 2021
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http:Hcorl2smgpu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.

SAW -2016-02311
JL
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Eric Schudt
Sun Energy 1
File Number: SAW -2016-02311
Date: November 21, 2016
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
®
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usaee.gM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ug latoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW -2016-02311
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
2407 West 51' Street
CESAD-PDO
Washington, NC 27889
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Attn: Krystynka Stygar
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Krystynka Stygar, 2407 West 5' Street, Washington, NC 27889
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

N. C. HWY. 168 RIDGES
PAVED ( 100' R/W )
�o
?,I, ► ► �\ � � \ x
/ olI I I►►► I t,,, x X x\ °tom
zl I xLAND DR• ��- L I ► — — ro\r \ X X I *K&
RANC X rte, X
X x k x WETLANDS ��
I I \ X X X x x\ x x\ x X X x x �- X x
_ x \ X x X \x x\ \ \ X °� I
_ GUINEA MILL RUN�� ` x \ �(\ x �C� x X X
X X L- WOODS
_ \\
I I II I X X x x X\ X X X\ x X\ .. X X ><\ x X >(\ X WETLANDS \ II X x \\\
I I I x\ X x x \x �`\ \ X X x x\ X x 1 \\ X An°N x—
I I I \ x X\ X x \X X SUMMIT FARMS SOLAR \ x \X X X X x x
I I I X X x X 709.18 +/ ACRES X X x\ \ \ x X X
II I I I X X \ x\ x x\ \ X x a X X x\ x\ x x x x X X x X X
i
I I I x x x X X x x x \ \ x\ x\ X X x A x \ '`\fix X �,\--
II I I I \ X X X\x \ x x> \ x X x x X x� x\ X\ x X \x x x X X\ X x x-
---- I�-==J== ►� x x\ x X x x x X x X \X \ '�-' x x x x x \ \x X x \ X X —___-
-f x \ \ x \x x X x\x X x X x x
---- S.R. 1389 I—r I X X x\ �( X X x \ X \X x\ X X \ X
OXFORD RD. I I I \x X X �`\ X \ X x\ X x X � X\ X x \) X X
I I I x x \ x \x x\ '`\ x x x x x x '� x� \x x x --� X x IX x x
II I I I x x x x x x x x x� x \ x x\ x x— —_ X — x x � x� Ix
I x X \ X X V< \ X _ CA I X X,
I I I X x\ \ X X - TOP BAN X xI
X X _ — --- x
I I I II X x x X x--- T - I— x -- x- X x X X x X X, �.� X I --
I I I x- , T T0� OF BANK X It
II X X I I I �C � �� x I x
_ ,—I \ '` V, ' -- _ I I xl �I I I I x X x x kl o )< x
X ,� \ `II ► I x I xI XI X Tx X
I I X I \ LATERAL A CANAL I I I IX x X X/ I
I I ^I X X (JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.) ' I i t I I I I I X XI k I xC C
I I i><\ LENGTH = 10158+/- FT. \ I I ii RANCHLAND SOLAR I I I X I I I X 1 X xl I
I I I \ \ WOODS II I I I 886.76 +/- ACRES h I x1 X --
II \ \ X CLEARED \ x \ I
IT FARMS TRAIL I , X \ I I I I I X I x1 X I I x I x X I X I —_
SUMMIT \ n\ X i x i I I I I X X X
><I X x\ X \X X X x ,\ X x II�- �� I I X I x I x I X I IX IXI
I I xI. x X x X\ \ \x X \x x I I I I I I I �` X x X X x x
I I I x x \ x x X III x x i I
I X> \x x\ x \ I I� x X IX l x
I X Ix x X I I , I I I x
I I I X x\ \ X )( I x I I I ,_ �-L C NAL �- X X
X X I I X 7
I X\ II - I X X
I X \ X _ X X X I
I I x x\ \ ---_-------_ ----- — X I �x x x x x x x x ,� ,I X I X I
X= -
I ._ X x --- _-�--�- x I x x I x1 '� �� ,�LEA� ED I x I x I x X x I
-----_ 1 — LATERAL B CANAL I I I X I I x x x X I X I I X
(JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.) EIA x I I I I xI x x X X
LENGTH = 19650 +/- FT. ��\\ I I I X I x ►X X X I X X I
v WOODS \` I I �\ —- X
I
I
\ I
\ I
J�
NOTES: \
TOTAL SITE AREA = 1595.94 +/— ACRES
RANCHLAND TOTAL AREA = 886.76 +/— ACRES
RANCHLAND TOTAL AREA OF WETLANDS = 0 ACRES
RANCHLAND TOTAL LENGTH OF CANALS (JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.)= 29808 +/— FT.
WOODS
287.59 +/- AC.

SAW -2016-02311
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2016-02311 County: Currituck
NO DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED
Property Owner: Sun Energy 1. C/O Eric Schudt
Address: 6750 NC Highway 30 East
Bethel, NC, 27812
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc.): Property is approximately
886.94 acres and is southwest of the Caratoke Highway at Ferrell Mill Road in Moyock, Currituck
County, North Carolina. Property is adiacent to Guinea Mill Run Canal and Lateral Canal A both
tributaries to Tull Creek.
Description of Activity: Applicant proposes to install solar panels in what was agricultural farm
field for solar energy production.
Your work as proposed does not require Department of the Army authorization for the following
reason(s):
_ There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands within the boundaries of the property.
X The proposed project does not impact jurisdictional waters or wetlands.
_ The proposed project is exempt from Department of the Army regulation.
Specify: There are jurisdictional waters present within the project area boundary but will not
be affected for energy production. Please see attached map labeled "Ranchland
Solar Wetland Map".
This Department of the Army determination does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain
any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact
appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work, you must contact the N.C.
Division of Coastal Management in Washington, North Carolina, at [phone] to discuss any
required State authorization.
Any changes in the above described work must be coordinated with the Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact Krystynka Stygar at telephone number 910-251-4619 or [e-mail].
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date: November 21, 2016

SAW -2016-02311
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
hgp:Hcop2smapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0.

Pat McCrory, Governor
r
Ms. Gail fount
North Carolina Department of Commerce
Utilities Commission
4325 Dail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4325
Bill Daughtridge, Jr., Secretary
Re. SCH File # 15-E-4600-0578; Amended Application of Wildwood Solar, LLC for Certificate
to construct a jEy MW Solar Photovoltaic
Docket Sub 0
Dear Nis. Mount:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made in the review of this document. Because of the nature of the
comments, it has been determined that no further State Clearinghouse review action on your part is
needed for compliance With the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. The attached comments
should be takers into consideration in project development.
Sincerely,
CrystaPBest
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region R
Maidang Address: Telephone: [phone] Location Address:
1301 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1301 State Courier 451-01-00 Raleigh, North Carolina
[e-mail]
An Equal Opportunity/AffrmativeAction Employer

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Rat McCrory
Governor
�r_►Elr�i � t
TO: Crystal Best
State Clearinghouse
r
FROM: Lyn Hardison U r
Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
Permit Assistance & Project Review Coordinator
Donald R. vary der Vaart
becreiary
FRE: 15-0578 (IS-05SI)
Environmental Review —Amended Application of Wildwood Solar, LLC for Certificate to
construct a 40 MW Solar photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility
Currituck County
Late: May 26, 2015
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has completed its review of the proposal for the
referenced project. Based on the information provided, several of our agencies have identified permits
that may be required. The agencies have offered some valuable guidance to be perforated prior to
application submittals and ground disturbance which will help reduce any impacts to the natural
resources within the project area. The comments are attached for the applicant's review.
It is suggested to the applicant to contact IAC Wildlife Resources Commission if the site attracts large
numbers of migratory bird or observes fatalities or injured bird.
if the applicant has any questions pertaining to NCDENR permitting processes, please ask them to
contact Lyn Hardison, Permit Assistance Coordinator, in the Department's Washington Regional Office,
[phone]. The proposed project is located within his geographic working territory.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachment
1639 flail Service Raleigh, PIoffh Carolina 27699.1639
Customer Service'ldf Free 1-977,623-67,18' Internet: w�awr.nodetir,aav
pin Egc.�a! {1N,^,al ri y 1. A. 1n.""vivc Adicr. i mr4oye .. MAC- {-, U'nI '%Y s GyCiFC u"

North Carolina ildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDENR Division of Environmental Assistance and Outreach (DEAO)
FROM: Maria T. Dunn, Northeast Coastal Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: May 22, 2015
,SUBJECT: Wildwood Solar, LLC 40 MW Solar Facility - AMENDED, SP -5310 Sub 0, Currituck
County, North Carolina.
OLIA No. 115-0578
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject
document and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 1 13-131 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to construct a 40 MW photovoltaic solar facility located at 1374 Caratoke. Highway in
Meyoek, NC. Several calls were fielded by staff from citizens concerned with the project's development and
impact to wildlife resources.
We would like to state concern regarding the location and size of this project in relation to foraging habitats
for migratory waterfowl. Agricultural lands in eastern North Carolina ofien provide foraging opportunities for
migratory waterfowl, especially in areas near natural waterbodies, such as the Currituck Sound. The
photovoltaic panels may reflect sunlight and resemble a water surface, potentially drawing waterfowl in to
land_ We request that if this facility is constructed, any fatalities or injured birds be reported to the NCWRC.
It should also be noted that as agricultural lands are transformed into solar facilities, winter foraging habitats
for migratory waterfowl are lost. The cumulative loss of land will likely become a significant concern.
In addition to the concerns above, the following statements should be observed:
Maintain or establish a minimum 1004001 undisturbed, native forested buffer along each side of
perennial streams and 50 -foot undisturbed, native forested buffer along each side of intermittent
streams and wetlands. Forested riparian buffers provide habitat areas for aquatic and terrestrial
Mailing Address: Division of inland Fisheries . 1721 Mail Service Center e Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Wildwood Solar, LLC AMENDED Page 2 May 22, 2015
CLIA Na. 15.0578
wildlife species and travel corridors for terrestrial wildlife. In addition, forested riparian buffers
protect water quality by stabilizing stream banks and filtering stormwater runoff
2. Avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands during construction. In addition to providing wildlife
habitat, wetland areas perform important functions of flood control and water quality protection.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits and N.C. Division of Water Resources
Section 401 Certifications are needed for any impacts to jurisdictional strealns or wetlands.
Temporarily disturbed wetland areas should be returned to original soils and contours, and
reseeded with annual small grains appropriate for the season (e.g. oats, millet, lye, wheat, or rye
grass) and should be allowed to revert to natural wetland vegetation.
3. If additional overhead transmission lines will be installed, then measures to minimize impacts to
birds should be implemented. These can include increasing line visibility, insulating wires to
cover exposed connections, and increasing the distance between wires so no contact with ground
or other energized wire can be made. For more information see
hito:// yw�v.f\vs. ov/birds/docunsLnts/norverlilies,ncll;
4. If site and/or transmission line maintenance is needed, avoid snowing between April I and
October I to minimize impacts to nesting wildlife. We suggest a maintenance schedule that
incorporates a portion of the area (e.g., one-third of the area) each year. Pesticides, fertilizers,
and other chemicals should not be used in wetland areas or near streams.
5. If pesticides or, chemicals will be used for site maintenance, then stormwater runoff frorn the site
should be directed to bio -retention areas prior to discharge to streams or wetlands to provide
additional protection for water quality and aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitats.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained. Excessive
silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including
destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species.
7. Measures to mitigate secondary and Cumulative impacts can be found in NCWRC's Guidance
Memorandum to Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and
Terrestrial Wildlife Resources and Water Qualio; (August 2002;
httl�.:r/���v_��Wncv�ildlifeWc7r<, l'nIWt 15fi3!C'nnsei�in !locus c�}ts12f}Ov(iuidal}ceNfesnoralidtilrtforSeco
solarvas}clCrEl}}ulaisveln}nactsl�d4).
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If our agency can be of further assistance,
please contact me at [phone] or at€naria.dunn(ia-nqwildlife.org.

Mate of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Office: Washington
Project Numberl5-0578Due Date: 5/22/2015
CountyCurrituek
Alter review of this project it has been detennined that the ENR pennit(s) and/or approvals indicated inay need to be obtained in order For this project to comply with
North Carolina law, Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the Foran. All applications, information
and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process'Urne
PERMITS
_-
SPECIAL APPLICA'T'ION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
(statutory time Limit)
Permit to construct & operdte wastewater treatment facilities,
Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction
30 days
®
server system extensions & sewer systems not discharging
into state surface waters.
contracts. On-site inspection. Post -application technical conference usual.
(90 days)
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or
Application 140 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. Pre -
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities
application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct
90.120 days
discharging into state surface waters.
wastewater treatment facility -granted after NPD1~S, Reply time, 30 days otter
(N/A)
receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit -whichever is later,
®
Water Use Permit
Pre -application technical conference usually necessary
30 days
(MA}
❑
Well Construction Permit
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the
7 days
installation of a we]1.
{ 15 (iays)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner,
E]
Dredge and Fill Permit
On-site inspection. Pre -application conference usual, filling may require
55 days
Easerneru 10 fill from N.C. Depanmeni of Administration and
(90 days)
Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement
Application must be submitted and permit received prior to
®
and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC
construction and operation or the source. If a permit is required in an
90 days
(2Qrac. 10
(2Q.0100 �hru ?Q.0300}
area without local zoning, then there are additional requirements and
timelines (2Q.0 113).
F,
Permit to construct & operate Transportation Facility as
15 A NCAC 2Q.0601)
Application must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction or
90 days
per (2D.0800,
modification of the source.
Any open burning associated with subject proposal must be
in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
Demur ition or renovations of structures containing asbestos
®material
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 20.1 t 10
60 days
(a) (I ) which requires notification and removal prior to
N/A
{90 days)
demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group 919.707-5950,
E]
Complee Stlnrie Permit required under 15 A NCAC
217.4£0{1
Thr Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &: sedimentation
control plan will be rcquircd if one or more acres to be disturbed, Plan f ilcd with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Section) At least 30
20 days
days before beginning activity. A fee of $65 for the first acre or any part of an acre. An express review option isavailable with additional
(70 days)
fees.
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOT's approved program. Particular attention should be given
430 days)
ro design and instalialion of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable storrnwater conveyances and outlets.
Ort -site inspection usual, Surety bond tiled with ENR Bond amount varies
❑
Mining Permit
with type mine and number of acres of affected land, Any are mined greater
30 days
than one acre must he permitted. The appropriate bond mus be received
(60 days)
before the permit can be issued.
On-site inspection by N,C, Division Forest Resources ifpermii exceeds 4
1 day
El
North Carolina Burning permit
days
(N/A)
Special Ground Clearance Suring Permit - 22
On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if more than
five acres of clearing activities are involved. Inspections be
I day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils
ground should
(NIA)
requested at least ten days before actual bunt is planned"
Q
Oil {refining Facilities
N!A
90-120 days
(NIA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant
must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans, inspect construction.
certify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require
Damm Safcty Permit
permit under mosquito control program. And a 404 permit from Corps of
30 days
Engineers. An inspection of ske is necessary to verify Hr7ard Classification,
(60 days)
A minimum ree orS200.00 must accompany the application. An additional
processing fee based on a percentage or the total project cost will be required
]u
to 16, 2014
upon completion,

Project Number: 15-057SDue Date: 5/22/2015
Initials
No
comment
Normal Process `I ime
Date
Review
DAQ
(statutory time limit)
PERMITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
5/$/15
5112/15
DWR-WQROS
Aquifer & Surface}
RLS
File surety bond of $5,000 with ENR running to State of NC conditional that any well
10 days
❑
Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well
opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged according in ENR rules
N/A
DEMLR (LQ & SW)
Geophysical Exploration Permit
and regulations.
❑
Application filed with ENR at least 10 days prior to issue of pemit. Application b}
10 days
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
letter. No standard application form.
N/A
®
State Lakes Construction Permit
Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include descriptions &
15-20 days
drawings of structure & proci fofownership of riparianproperty.
NIA
❑
401 Water Quality Certification.
N/A
60 days
(130 days)
❑
CAMA Permit for MAJOR development
S250,00 fee must accompany application
l 5 days
(150 days)
®
CAMA Permit for 1vilNOR development
550-M fee must accompany application
'-2 days
(Z5 days)
Several geodetic monuments arc located in or near the project area. If any monument needs to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
❑
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611
©
Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title f 5A. Subchapter 200100.
❑
Notification of the prover regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (UST5) are discovered during any excavation operation..
®
l Stormwater Rules) is required.
Compliance with f 5A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal
45 days
(N3 A)
®
Tar Pamlico of Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules required.
Plans and specifications lbr the construction, expansion, or alteration of a public water system must be approved by the Division of Water
❑Resources/Public
Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction as per I SA NCAC 18C.0300 et. seq. Plans and
30 days
specifications should be submitted to 1634 Mail Service Centcr, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634. All public water supply systems must comply
with state and federal drinking water monitoring requirements. For more information, contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
If exisling mater lines will be relocated during the construction, plans for the water line relocation must be submitted to the Division of Water
[E]
Resources/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 77699-1634. For more information, contact the Public
30 days
Water Supply Section, [phone].
Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority)
Division
Initials
No
comment
Comments
Date
Review
DAQ
RMB
SEE CHECKED BOXES
Site consists of Cape Fear, Roanoke and Wasda Muck Series soils that are
poorly drained to very poorly drained soils, recommend on site wetland
determination.
5/$/15
5112/15
DWR-WQROS
Aquifer & Surface}
RLS
F1
❑
DWR-PWS
NA
❑
NA
DEMLR (LQ & SW)
PHM
❑
5/20/15
DWM - UST
JSB
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
5/6/15
119 1110"143ZR.10712Tt7
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
❑Asheville regional Office ❑Mooresville Regional Office ❑WiliningtonRegional Office
2090 US highway 70 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Mooresville, NC 28115 Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone] [phone] [phone]
❑Fayetteville Regional Office
225 North Greets Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
[phone]
June 16, 2014
❑Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh; NC 27609
[phone]
NWashington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
(252) 946-x,481
❑Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N(,'27107
[phone]

ALI VA
INT WA
"MA
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
TO: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Coordinator
FROM: Scott Bullock, Regional UST Supervisor j.
COPY: Robert Davies, Corrective Action Branch Head
COPY: Kathleen Lance, Administrative Secretary
BATE. May 6, 2015
Donald R, vary der Vaart
Secretary
RE: Environmental Review — Project Number 15-4578— Amended Application of Wildwood Solar, LLC for
Certificate to construct a 40 MW Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Currituck County
located at 1374 Caratoke Highway in Moyock, NC.
I searched the Petroleum Underground Storage Tank (UST) and Non -UST Databases and those databases did not indicate
any reported petroleum releases in the proposed project area. I reviewed the above proposal and determined that this
project should not have any adverse impact upon groundwater. The following comments are pertinent to my review:
I . The Washington Regional Office (WaRO) UST Section recommends removal of any abandoned or out -of -use
petroleum USTs or petroleum above ground storage tanks (ASTS) within the project area. The UST Section should be
contacted regarding use of any proposed or on-site petroleum USTs or ASTS. We may be reached at [phone].
2. Any petroleum USTs or ASTs must be installed and maintained in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal
regulations. For additional information on petroleum ASTs it is advisable that the North Carolina Department of
Insurance at [phone] ext. 239, USEPA [phone], local fire department, and Local Building Inspectors
be contacted.
3. Any petroleum spills must be contained and the area of impact must be properly restored. Petroleum spills of
significant quantity must be reported to the North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources —
Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank Section in the Washington Regional Office at (252) 946-
6481.
4. Any soils excavated during demolition or construction that show evidence of petroleum contamination, such as
stained soil, odors, or free product must be reported immediately to the local Fire Marshall to determine whether
explosive or inhalation hazards exist. Also, notify the UST Section of the Washington Regional Office at (252) 946-
6481. Petroleum contaminated soils must be handled in accordance with all applicable regulations.
S. Any questions or concerns regarding spills from petroleum USTs, ASTS, or vehicles should be directed to the UST
Section at [phone],
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 252-948-3906.
943 Washington Sq. Ball, Washington, NC 27889
Phon052-946-64811 Internet; httplJportal.Rcdonr.org/webtwm
An Equal Op{ orality t AfrPrative Actlon Ernplbg, - 50% Pryded i I A Post Consumer Paper

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY- CURRITUCK Ell. -ENERGY RELATED
.FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES
CLEARINGHOUSE COORD REGION R
ALBEMAR.LE REG PLANNING COMM
P.O. BOX 646
HERTFORD NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
ALBEMARLE REG PLANNING COMM
CC&PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Commerce
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Review
STATE NUMBER: 15-E-4600-0578
DATE RECEIVED: 04/27/2015
AGENCY RESPONSE: 05/22/2015
REVIEW CLOSED: 05/27/2015
DESC: Amended Application of Wildwood Solar, LLC for Certificate to construct a 40 MW
Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Currituck Co. Docket #SP -5310
Sub 0. - View document at
http://Starwl.ncuc.net/NCUC/portal/ncuc/page/Dockets/portal.aspx, Type SP -5310
Sub 0 in the Docket Number search line.
Located between Ferrell Mill Road to the east, Oxford Road to the west and
Ranchland Drive to the north, Moyock, NC
Amended due to addition of parcel
CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER: 15-E-4600-0551
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-10 1.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this offfce at (919)807--2425.
NO COMMENT ❑ COMMENTS ATTACHED
DATE: f

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE U®�
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: CURRITUCK HII: ENERGY RELATED
FACILITIES/AC'T'IVITIES
MS CARRIE ATKINSON
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE PLANNING - MSC 41554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
ALBEMARLE REG PLANNING COMM
CC&PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Commerce
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Review
STATE NUMBER: 15-E-4600-0578
DATE RECEIVED: 04/27/2015
AGENCY RESPONSE: 05/22/2015
REVIEW CLOSED: 05/27/2015
DESC: Amended Application of Wildwood Solar, LLC for Certificate to construct a 40 MW
Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Currituck Co. Docket 4SP-5310
Sub 0. - View document at
http://starwi.ncuc.net/NCUC/portal/ncuc/page/Dockets/portal.aspx, Type SP -5310
Sub 0 in the Docket Number search line.
Located between Ferrell. Mill Road to the east, Oxford Road to the west and
Ranchland Drive to the north, Moyock, NC
Amended due to addition of parcel
CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER: 15-E-4600-0551
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail, Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (919)807,72425.
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: DA'Z'E:
Leo C Q ot, �ct:Lkr-v t c-* r�, so 9' 4' �5A

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINIS'T'RATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY* CURRITUCK H11: ENERGY RELATED
FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
ALBEMARLE REG PLANNING COMM
CC&PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROTECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Commerce
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Review
STATE DUMBER: 15-E-4600-0578
DATE RECEIVED: 04/27/2015
AGENCY RESPONSE: 05/22/2015
REVIEW CLOSED: 05/27/2015
DESC: Amended Application of Wildwood Solar, LLC for Certificate to construct a 40 MW
Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Currituck Co. Docket 4SP-5310
Sub 0. - View document at
http://starwi.ncuc.net/NCUC/portal/ncuc/page/Dockets/portal.aspx, Type SP -5310
Sub 0 in the Docket Number search line.
Located between Ferrell Mill Road to the east, Oxford Road to the west and
Ranchland Drive to the north, Moyock, NC
Amended due to addat�i3�ae
CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER.: 15-E-4600-0551
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:NO COMMENT 1:1COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: KPdQ
DATE
6-`6 - IG-

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVER:NMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: CURRITUCK RI,I,: ENERGY RELATED
FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES
MS CAROLYN PENNY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
CC&PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
MSC # 4719
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
ALBEMARLE REG PLANNING COMM
CC&PS DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Commerce
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Review
STATE NC7MSER.: 15--E-4600-0578
DATE RECEIVED: 04/27/2015
AGENCY RESPONSE- 05/22/2015
REVIEW CLOSED: 05/27/2015
DESC: Amended Application of wildwood Solar, LLC for Certificate to construct a 40 MW
Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Currituck Co. Docket 4SP-5310
Sub 0. - View document at
http://starwl.ncuc.net/NCUC/portal/ncuc/page/Dockets/portal.aspx, Type SP -5310
Sub 0 in the Docket Number search line.
Located between Ferrell Mill Road to the east, Oxford Road to the west and
Ranchland Drive to the north, Moyock, NC
Amended due to addition of parcel.
CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER: 15-E-4600-0551
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental: review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING# IS SUBMITTED: ❑ NO COMMENT 01
COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: Co- kAJ--A--- DATE: 00

North Carolina • ,` ,
ManagementB093Emergency
Pat McCrory, Governor
Frank L. Perry, Secretary
May 8, 2015
State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Administration
1.301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North. Carolina 27699-1301
Subject: Intergovernmental Review State Number: 15-E-4600-0578
Wildwood Solar, LLC; Currituck County
Michael A. Sprayberry, Director
As requested by the North Carolina State Clearinghouse, the .North Carolina Department of
Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Risk Management reviewed the proposed
project listed. above and offers the following comments:
1) The project site is located in Currituck County, Currituck County participates in the
National Flood Insurance Program and enforces a Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
that requires a Floodplain Development Permit be issued for all development located in
the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) within its jurisdiction. Please ensure Currituck
County's Floodplain Administrator reviews and issues permits for each part of the
Wildwood Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility within a SFHA.
2) The site outlined in the application encroaches on the coastal SFHA. Please see Flood
Insurance Rate Map Panels 8030 and 8040. Any grading, fill or placement of equipment
or materials in the SFHA will require a floodplain development permit issued by
Currituck County.
3) All structures and utilities should be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation
as described in Currituck County's ordinance and 44 CFR 60.3.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the
above comments, please contact me at [phone], by email at [e-mail] or
at the address shown on the footer of this document.
MAILING ADDRESS:
4218 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-4218
www.ncdps_gov
www.nefloodmaps.com
Sincerely,
John D. Brubaker, P.E., CFM
NFIP Engineer
Risk Management
An Equal Opportunity Employer
G'I'M OFFICE LOCATION:
4105 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Pax: [phone]

State Clearinghouse Page 2 of 2 May S, 2015
15-E-4600-057$
cc: John Dorman, Program Director
John Gerber, NF1P State Coordinator
Jason Litteral, Planner, Currituck County
File

.2. ANGLER
Kathy Matthews, Project Review
Raleigh Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Re: Ranchland Solar Site, Currituck County, North Carolina
Threatened and Endangered Species Review
Dear Ms. Matthews:
On behalf of SunEnergyl , Angler Environmental, a RES Company (Angler), would like to submit
a review of threatened, endangered, significantly rare, or special concern species associated with
the Ranchland Solar Site. Angler has conducted a project review in keeping with the protocol
outlined for Online Project Reviews for the Piedmont and Coastal Plain Regions of North Carolina
on the USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Angler conducted a review of known
federally -listed threatened and endangered species likely or documented to occur, or having
habitat within, the project impact area, and to assess any potential impacts of the proposed work
on these resources. For this project, Angler queried the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
IPaC database, the USFWS North Carolina county database, and the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) April 2017 database to gather information. The database findings of
these queries are included as attachments with this letter.
Fifteen federally -listed species were identified by these databases as potentially occurring or
being affected by this project (Table 1); however, according to the NCNHP there were no
documented occurrences of any federally threatened, endangered, or other ranked species
occurring within the project area or in the immediate vicinity.
Table 1. Federally -listed species identified by USFWS databases for the project area.
Species/Resource Name
Federal
Habitat
Database
Status
Present
Atlantic sturgeon
E
No
IPaC
(Acipenser oxyrinchus)
Shortnose sturgeon
E
No
IPaC
(Acipenser brevirostrum)
West Indian Manatee
E
No
Raleigh FWS —
(Trichechus manatus)
Currituck County, IPaC
Green sea turtle
T
No
Raleigh FWS -
(Chelonia mydas)
Currituck County
Hawksbill sea turtle
E
No
Raleigh FWS -
(Eretmochelys imbricate)
Currituck County
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle
E
No
Raleigh FWS -
(Lepidochelys kempii)
Currituck County, IPaC
Leatherback sea turtle
E
No
Raleigh FWS —
(Dermochelys coriacea)
Currituck County, IPaC
Loggerhead sea turtle
T
No
Raleigh FWS —
(Caretta caretta)
Currituck County, IPaC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 I P: 703-393-4844
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

SunEnergyl
Ranchland Solar
Threatened and Endangered Species Review
June 8, 2017
Page 2 of 6
Red -cockaded woodpecker
E
Yes
Raleigh FWS —
Picoides borealis
Currituck, IPaC
Red knot
T
No
Raleigh FWS —
Calidris canutus rufa
Currituck County, IPaC
Piping plover
T
No
Raleigh FWS -
Charadrius melodus
Currituck County, IPaC
Bald eagle
BGPA
No
Raleigh FWS —
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Currituck Count
Northern long-eared bat
T
Yes
Raleigh FWS —
M otis septentrionalis
Currituck County, IPaC
Indiana bat
E
No
IPaC
M otis sodalist
Seabeach amaranth
T
No
Raleigh FWS —
Amaranthus pumilus
Currituck County, IPaC
T= federally -threatened E= federally -endangered
BGPA= Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The proposed project consists of an approximately 918 -acre site on Ferrell Mill Road in Currituck
County that is being evaluated for development as a solar energy -generating site. Development
will include the installation of ground -mounted solar panels across the parcel. The north portion
of the site is accessed by Ferrell Mill Road which turns into an unnamed road that bisects the
project area. The current site conditions are majority agricultural land, with peripheral forested
areas to the south; 80 acres will be cleared for this project with no impact. Please refer to figures
attached with this letter for more information on the site location and use.
One species reported by IPaC, the federally -endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalist), was
identified to be a reporting error on IPaC during a phone conversation with Kathy Matthews of the
USFWS — Raleigh office on June 5, 2018. As a result of this conversation, Angler has documented
that this species would not occur within the project limits and is mistakenly listed.
Eight of the fifteen -listed species identified by our database search, the Atlantic sturgeon,
shortnose sturgeon, green sea turtle, Hawksbill sea turtle, Kemp's ridley sea turtle, leatherback
sea turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, and West Indian manatee are all aquatic animals which do not
have potential habitat within the project limits.
The federally -endangered Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxycrinchus) was identified on a county -
level review. The Atlantic sturgeon is a large fish that occurs in major river systems in moderately
flowing, deep water along the eastern seaboard of the United States. It is an anadromous species
that migrates to moderately -moving freshwater areas to spawn in the spring; in some southern
rivers, a fall spawning migration may also occur. Spawning occurs in moderately flowing water in
deep parts of large rivers, usually on hard surfaces (e.g., cobble). Juveniles usually reside in
estuarine waters. Subadults and adults live in coastal waters and estuaries when not spawning,
generally in shallow nearshore areas dominated by gravel and sand substrates. Nearby river
systems include Guiena Mill Run Canal, New Bridge Creek, Roland Creek, and Tull Creek, but
these systems are miles from the project site; additionally, the proper use of erosion and sediment
control devices for any ground disturbance occurring as a function of this project will prevent
sediment pollution from leaving the project site. Atlantic sturgeon will not be affected by this
project.
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 I P: 703-393-4844
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

SunEnergyl
Ranchland Solar
Threatened and Endangered Species Review
June 8, 2017
Page 3 of 6
The federally -endangered shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) was identified on a
county -level review. Shortnose sturgeon also occur in most major river systems along the eastern
seaboard of the United States. The species prefers the near shore marine, estuarine, and riverine
habitat of large river systems. It is an anadromous species that migrates to faster -moving
freshwater areas to spawn in the spring, but spends most of its life within proximity of the river's
mouth. Large freshwater rivers that are unobstructed by dams or pollutants are imperative to
successful reproduction. Distribution information by river/waterbody is lacking for the rivers of
North Carolina; however, records are known from most coastal counties. Due to the lack of major
river systems in the project area, and the planned use of proper erosion and sediment control
devices for any ground disturbance, shortnose sturgeon will not be affected by this project.
The federally -endangered West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) was identified on a county -
level review, but not by the IPaC database; however, Manatees have been observed in all the
North Carolina coastal counties. Manatees are found in canals, sluggish rivers, estuarine habitats,
salt water bays, and as far off -shore as 3.7 miles. They utilize both freshwater and marine habitats
at shallow depths of five (5) to 20 feet. In the winter, between October and April, manatees
concentrate in areas with warm water; during other times of the year, habitats are more widely
ranging and include those with sufficient water depth, an adequate food supply, and a proximity
to fresh water. Manatees require a source of fresh water to drink and are primarily herbivorous,
feeding on any aquatic vegetation present; they may also occasionally feed on fish. Due to the
lack of habitat in the project area, and the planned use of proper erosion and sediment control
devices for any ground disturbance, the West Indian manatee will not be affected by this project.
Green turtles (Chelonia mydas) was identified on IPaC as federally -threatened. They are
generally found in shallow waters (except when migrating) inside reefs, bays, and inlets. The
turtles are attracted to lagoons and shoals with an abundance of marine grass and algae. Open
beaches with a sloping platform and minimal disturbance are required for nesting. Green turtles
have a strong nesting site fidelity and often make long distance migrations between feeding
grounds and nesting beaches. Hatchlings have been observed to seek refuge and food in
Sargassum rafts. Due to the lack of habitat for this species within the project area, and the
distance from the coast this species will not be affected by this project.
Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate) are listed as federally -endangered on IPaC. These
turtles use different habitats at different stages of their life cycle, but are most commonly
associated with healthy coral reefs. Hawksbills are also found around rocky outcrops and high
energy shoals, which are also optimum sites for sponge growth. They are also known to inhabit
mangrove -fringed bays and estuaries, particularly along the eastern shore of continents where
coral reefs are absent. Due to the lack of habitat for this species within the project area, and the
distance from the coast this species will not be affected by this project.
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempiil) is listed as federally -endangered on both IPaC
and by the county. It is the smallest of the sea turtles that visit North Carolina's coast, and has
been sighted in most coastal counties. While most this sea turtle's nesting occurs in Mexico, the
species is known to nest on North Carolina beaches infrequently. Sightings of the species exist
for most coastal counties. Kemp's ridley sea turtle can lay eggs as many as three times during
the April to June breeding season. Kemp's ridley sea turtles prefer beach sections that are backed
up by extensive swamps or large bodies of open water having seasonal narrow ocean
connections and a well-defined elevated dune area. The species prefers neritic areas with sandy
or muddy bottoms. The males spend their entire lives in the water while the female comes ashore
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 I P: 703-393-4844
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

SunEnergyl
Ranchland Solar
Threatened and Endangered Species Review
June 8, 2017
Page 4 of 6
only to lay eggs. Due to the lack of habitat for this species within the project area, and the distance
from the coast, this species will not be affected by this project.
Leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) is listed as federally -endangered on both IPaC
and the county. It is the largest, deepest diving, and most migratory and wide ranging of all sea
turtles. They are pelagic, but also forage in coastal waters with Atlantic Canada supporting one
of the largest seasonal foraging populations. The most significant nesting in the United States
primarily includes the Caribbean in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands, and Southeast Florida,
but the largest nesting population are present in the western Atlantic in French Guiana. Due to
the lack of habitat for this species within the project area, and the distance from the coast, this
species will not be affected by this project.
Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) is listed as federally -threatened in IPaC and the county.
Loggerheads nest on ocean beaches, generally preferring high energy, relatively narrow, steeply
sloped, coarse-grained beaches. The predominate foraging areas for western North Atlantic adult
loggerheads are found throughout the relatively shallow continental shelf waters of the United
States, Bahamas, Cuba, and the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Migration routes from foraging
habitats to nesting beaches for a portion of the population are restricted to the continental shelf,
while other routes involve crossing oceanic waters to and from the Bahamas, Cuba, and the
Yucatan Peninsula. Seasonal migrations of adult loggerheads along the mid- and southeast U.S.
coasts have also been documented. Due to the lack of habitat for this species within the project
area, and the distance from the coast this species will not be affected by this project.
Four bird species were also identified by our database review on both IPaC and the county; Red -
cockaded woodpecker, red knot, piping plover, and bald eagle. Angler reviewed an additional
public resource to determine possible occurrence of this species within the project area or vicinity.
The Cornell Lab of Ornithology eBird website allows public users to record and track sightings of
birds by species and date, and maintains records for viewers. The data are only supplemental in
nature, as they depend on private citizen use and are unverifiable in accuracy of identification;
however, they can be a useful contribution to a species review. The scope of this project does
include tree clearing to occur as needed within approximately 93 acres; most work will be done
within cleared agricultural land.
Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis, RCW) is listed as potentially occurring in the
county. The red -cockaded woodpecker excavates nesting cavities in mature living southern pine
species, especially longleaf pine (Pinus palustris). For nesting, the bird typically requires at least
sixty -year-old trees, and prefers forest stands with a regular fire regime. For foraging, the
understory must be clear, and the presence of a hardwood understory signifies that there is not
suitable foraging habitat for this species. The trees onsite are mixed planted pine and
interspersed hardwoods, and are approximately 30 years old. The understory was marginal for
foraging habitat. The nearest recorded sightings of the red -cockaded woodpecker on eBird are
located over 30 miles from the project site, and additional information shared by USFWS
regarding known populations suggest RCW are unlikely to be on-site. Based on these findings,
this species will not likely be adversely affected by this work.
The red knot (Calidris canutus rufa) is a federally -threatened shorebird found primarily on
seacoasts on tidal flats and beaches, but also occurring less frequently in marshes and flooded
fields. The rufa red knot is one of the six recognized subspecies of red knots, and is the only
subspecies that routinely travels along the Atlantic coast of the United States during spring and
fall migrations. It is known to winter in North Carolina and to stop over during migration. Habitats
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 I P: 703-393-4844
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

SunEnergyl
Ranchland Solar
Threatened and Endangered Species Review
June 8, 2017
Page 5 of 6
used by red knots in migration and wintering areas are similar in character: coastal marine and
estuarine habitats with large areas of exposed intertidal sediments. In North America, red knots
are commonly found along sandy, gravel, or cobble beaches, tidal mudflats, salt marshes, shallow
coastal impoundments and lagoons, and peat banks. Ephemeral features such as sand spits,
islets, shoals, and sandbars, often associated with inlets can be important habitat for roosting.
Ebird sighting on May 12, 2017 more than 30 away in Currituck National Wildlife Refuge. Due to
the lack of habitat for this species within the project area, this species will not be affected by this
project.
The piping plover (Charadrius melodus) is federally -threatened and is primarily found on sand
and/or mud flats with no or very sparse emergent vegetation. Areas adjacent with unvegetated or
sparsely vegetated sand, mud, or algal flats above high tide are also essential, especially for
roosting piping plovers. North Carolina is uniquely positioned in the species' range to where they
are present year-round. These birds are primarily coastal during the winter, preferring areas with
expansive sand or mudflats (feeding) in close proximity to a sandy beach (roosting). The nearest
recorded sightings of the piping plover on eBird are located over 30 miles from the project site.
Due to the lack of habitat for this species within the project area, this species will not be affected
by this project.
Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is a federally -protected raptor requiring open water for
nesting habitat. Bald eagles were identified as occurring within Currituck County. Habitat for the
bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water for
foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water.
A desktop -GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.13 -mile radius
(1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on June 7, 2017 using aerial
photography on Google Earth. No water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered
potential feeding sources were identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review
area, a survey of the project study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not
conducted. Angler also consulted eBird for this species. The nearest sighting of bald eagles
recorded on eBird with respect to the project site is located approximately about 23 miles east of
the project site on Knotts Island. Due to the distance of the project site to open water, this project
will not affect bald eagles.
During summer, northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) roost singly or in colonies
underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees and may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. This bat seems opportunistic in selecting roosts, using tree species
based on suitability to retain bark or provide cavities or crevices. It has also been found, rarely,
roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in
caves and mines, called hibernacula. They typically use large caves or mines with large passages
and entrances; constant temperatures; and high humidity with no air currents. Within hibernacula,
surveyors find them in small crevices or cracks, often with only the nose and ears visible. This
project is not located within a watershed where a known roost is located; however, approximately
93 acres of trees are subject to clearing which may affect NLEB habitat. Therefore, SunEnergyl
and Angler are relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill
our project -specific section 7 responsibilities. This species may be affected by this work.
Seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus) is a federally -threatened, annual plant found barrier
island beaches, where its primary habitat consists of overwash flats at accreting ends of islands
and lower foredunes and upper strands of non -eroding beaches. It occasionally establishes small
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 I P: 703-393-4844
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

SunEnergyl
Ranchland Solar
Threatened and Endangered Species Review
June 8, 2017
Page 6 of 6
temporary populations in other habitats, including sound -side beaches, blowouts in foredunes,
and sand and shell material placed as beach replenishment or dredge spoil. Seabeach amaranth
appears to be intolerant of competition and does not occur on well -vegetated sites. The species
appears to need extensive areas of barrier island beaches and inlets, functioning in a relatively
natural and dynamic manner. These characteristics allow it to move around in the landscape as
a fugitive species, occupying suitable habitat as it becomes available. Due to the lack of habitat
for this species within the project area, this species will not be affected by this project.
In summary, Angler has reviewed available database resources for possible effects to federally -
listed threatened and endangered species within the project area, and we have determined that
the proposed installation of solar panels on this approximately 918 -acre project site may affect
northern long-eared bat, but within the permissible scope as defined by the 4(d) rule. This project
will not affect any of the other federally -listed threatened or endangered species identified during
database review.
Sincerely,
V'&'
vp�"
Kathleen Webber
Environmental Specialist
Attachments
Brad Breslow
Project Manager
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 I P: 703-393-4844
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

Ranchland Solar Site Legend
A
Threatened and Endangered Species Review Project Limits
Approximate Limits Subject to Clearing
r
f . _ "

6/5/2017 Currituck County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Currituck County, North Carolina
Note:Marine Threatened and Endangered Species information can be found at the National Marine Fiseries
Service (NMFS) Endangered and Threatened Species website
Updated: 11-30-2015
Critical Habitat Designations:
Loggerhead Sea Turtle - Caretta caretta - See the Federal Register for a description of the primary constituent
elements essential for the conservation of nesting Loggerhead sea turtles within the designated units. This
document also contains a map and a description of each designated unit.
Federal Register Reference: July10, 2014, Federal Register, 79:51264-51266
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Current
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Black rail
Laterallus jamaicensis
FSC
Current
Green sea turtle
Chelonia mydas
T
Current
Hawksbill (=Carey) sea turtle
Eretmochelys imbricata
E
Historic
Kemp=Atlantic, ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys kempii
E
Current
Leatherback sea turtle
Dermochelys coriacea
E
Current
Loggerhead sea turtle
Caretta caretta
T
Current
Northern long-eared bat
Myotis septentrionalis
T
Current
Piping plover
Charadrius melodus
T
Current
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
Red knot
Calidris canutus rufa
T
Current
West Indian manatee
Trichechus manatus
E
Current
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisttcurrituck.htmi
1/3

6/5/2017 Currituck County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Invertebrate:
Vascular Plant:
Grassleaf arrowhead
Sagittaria weatherbiana
FSC
Historic
Seabeach amaranth
Amaranthus pumilus
T
Current
Virginia least trillium
Trillium pusillum var. virginianum
FSC
Current
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to
support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species
Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of
conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support
listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and other
selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage
Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fws. og v/mi rg atorybirds/baldea lg e.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance T(S/A&
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisttcurrituck.htmi 213

C41i Off` :.x
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0588
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Project Name: Ranchland Solar
June 04, 2017
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the

06/04/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502 2
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www.fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
http://www.fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

06/04/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List

06/04/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/04/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0588
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Project Name: Ranchland Solar
Project Type: ** OTHER **
Project Description: Solar power generation site. Solar panels will be installed across the site.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/36.47042378129367N76.14864633716786W
Club4t E&916
v sae k
Counties: Currituck, NC
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 12 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species
on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area. Please contact the
designated FWS office if you have questions.
2

06/04/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Mammals
NAME
Indiana Bat (Myotic sodalis)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htWs:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5949
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hiips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
STATUS
Endangered
Threatened
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) Threatened
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is outside the designated
critical habitat.
Species profile: ht42s:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Birds
NAME
STATUS
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) Threatened
Population: except Great Lakes watershed
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is outside the designated
critical habitat.
Species profile: hM2s:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot (Calidris canutus Tufa) Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hiips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: haps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Q

06/04/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01502
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htWs:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Endangered
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is outside the designated
critical habitat.
Species profile: ht42s:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is outside the designated
critical habitat.
Species profile: h!Ws:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) Endangered
Population: Carolina DPS
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: btips:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3252
Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hiips:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6635
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus) Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hUps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
4

6/5/2017 Currituck County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/currituck.htmi 313

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Ranchland Solar Site
Date: June 7, 2017
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Determination
Indiana bat
Indiana Bat is included in the IPaC; however, it was verified to be a reporting error on
(Myotis sodalis)
Reporting Error on IPaC
No effect
6/5/17 during a phone conversation with Kathy Matthews of the USFWS — Raleigh
office.
Approximately 93 acres of trees are subject to clearing on this parcel. Relying upon
Northern long-eared bat
Suitable habitat present
May affect
the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on
(Myotis septentrionalis)
the Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill
our project -specific section 7 responsibilities.
Green sea turtle
No habitat present
No effect
Attracted to lagoons, reefs, bays, mangrove swamps and inlets. This habitat does not
(Chelonia mydas)
exist within the project area.
Hawksbill sea turtle
No habitat present
No effect
Found in coastal waters, around coral reefs, rocky outcrops, shoals, mangrove bays,
(Eretmochelys imbricate)
and estuaries. This habitat does not exist within the project area.
Kemp's ridley sea turtle
Prefer beach sections backed by extensive swamps or large bodies of open water
(Lepidochelys kempii)
No habitat present
No effect
and neritic areas with sandy or muddy bottoms. This habitat does not exist within the
project area.
Leatherback sea turtle
No habitat present
No effect
Generally open ocean species, but needs sandy, steeped sloped beaches for
(Dermochelys coriacea)
nesting. This habitat does not exist within the project area.
Loggerhead sea turtle
No habitat present
No effect
Found in open ocean, neritic areas, or on coastal beaches. Location is outside the
Caretta caretta
designated habitat.
Bald eagles
No Eagle Act permit
Nearest sighting of bald eagles recorded on eBird with respect to the project site is
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
No habitat present
required
located approximately about 23 miles east of the project site. No large water bodies
are located within a mile of the project site.
Piping plover
Primary constituent elements of habitat include sand and/or mud flats with no or very
(Charadrius melodus)
No habitat present
No effect
sparse emergent vegetation. They nest along sandy beaches including beach berms.
This habitat does not exist within the project area.
Red knot
Habitats used in migration and wintering include coastal marine and estuarine with
(Calidris canutus rufa)
No habitat present
No effect
large areas of exposed intertidal sediments. This habitat does not exist within the
project area.
Potential habitat present
Habitat occupies open, mature stands of southern pines, for foraging and
Red -cockaded woodpecker
and ncurrent survey
Not likely to adversely affect
nesting/roosting. A mixed planted pine stand with marginal foraging habitat exists
(Picoides borealis)
c
conducted
onsite that will be cleared during development but the latest eBird sighting is 30 miles
from the project area.

Shortnose sturgeon
Prefers near shore marine, estuarine, and riverine habitat of large river systems.
(Acipenser brevirostrum)
No habitat present
No effect
There is no habitat present within the project area; there is also no proposed in -
stream work.
Atlantic sturgeon
Occur in major river systems, spawn in deep, moderately flowing water, and live in
(Acipenser oxyrinchus)
No habitat present
No effect
coastal waters and estuaries. There is no habitat present within the project area;
there is also no proposed in -stream work.
West Indian manatee
Habitat is aquatic, and are found in canals, sluggish rivers, estuaries, and salt water
(Trichechus manatus)
No habitat present
No effect
bays. There is no habitat present within the project area; there is also no proposed
in -stream work.
Seabeach amaranth
No habitat present
No effect
Grows in overwash flats at accreting ends of islands. This habitat does not exist
(Amaranthus pumilus)
within the project area.

S�eNT OF its
QpP HFA E7rf[ H 'Lm""
United States Department of the Interior
.9 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
SACH 3. t9 ,
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 6/8/2017
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Ranchland Solar
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑✓ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑✓ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

APPENDIX D

LATERAL A CROSSING
E
0
ry E
v E
~ t 3
Q w 3
p � p A h ., p p • � � _ w U K ry
_1-11 71
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING w a o M
_,� - - _ _ ^ 1 - 1 a • ate___ EXISTING ROAD CROSSING Z W
-- - - PROPOSED CAST IN PLACE ENDWALL ' r- ' es-ps n� ` o ' b a' p "X
� . n � _ 3:1 SLOPE � o ��
(DESIGNED BY OTHERS) - - Y
PROPOSED (2) 42 LF OF 72" RCP ��10'-� .. " • '- - of ar - r nr
UPHILL INVERTS: 0.75' =~ --= (D�v
ti r
DOWNHILL INVERTS: 0.25' -- �� - r.� L !_ -'' M1 Q TIAFG GR
�. 3 A VES
-_ �� �` d _ _ �. _ RIVE
1 [� n
_O*qo -
_ 30
0
nJ r7 -�� 1 r v r 10/12/17
— _' J — — DRAWN BY
— _ - , _ "•. r _ t J. DOOLEY
APPROX. 56 L�OF XISTING CULVERT DESIGNED BY
P STRUCTURE REMOVED J. DOOLEY
PROPOSED 6'W X 16'L X 26"D - _ _ - - 2 - i� x p-, CHECKED BY
=� �z - _ CLASS 1 RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION 4 3 _q`ti fII 1 p� ❑ 1�)\\\ R BAKER
^�� = _ It carn //1 I / h 2 p [� • SCALE
_ PROPOSED 68 LF OF 24" RCP liep ❑ �j' AS SHOWN
UPHILL INVERT: 4.75 - - - --9- - ! / r I ❑ •
:1
IS / I 7 87 1. �� I I ❑ ��
` Ek+Arf �. DOWNHILL INVERT: 2.00 _ _ _ 1} _ e9 l 4 ❑ 1
DRI Vj
Lu
.p ,pay •.p• -.f •Y i. AV -t YY •S •'-➢ pf _ � -�`.. a � ' � t -
r•\�-
A A d h 4 o � 0 � t A A , •� `e- u�' � 1 \. � r � z gg
w r r r Q f L
z 0-
r N �
s RIO', 0' ., 1^ /// L a, 0
v
^ - - - \ • ' ` nJ �r. PROPOSED 22.5'W X 75'L X 36"D = Q ;
-_ • o A ��
CLASS 2 RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION ///
� o 0 0 4 if
FES #1 a' ` ter:"�+✓� _ -.� r , F :'.:-� PROPOSED CAST IN PLACE END WALL - _ _ r� �S
y~ (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) -� v/ V �uii ° g
_ a
2:1 SLOPE - ~ �
le
,� Is � t ,. a � . STABILIZE BOTH THE WESTERN AND EASTERN � � � z J � m t
SLOPES OF THE ROAD CROSSING WITH NORTH �o = Y x g
/ 1 -� AMERICAN GREEN S75 MATTING ` - Q U " w V:
1 _
/ / / Y' �i ~ REMOVE EXISTING 18" CPP e - u z 0 al
RELOCATE EXISTING DITCH r y A q=� m:,Qo Z
1 / a 4 � -� _ - •- �• n U
EXISTING 1.5:1 SLOPE 111111 r/ rlll 41
SCALE 1"=20'
a De N
ei.° 1' 1 r1 11
/ 11 1'1 1 1 / J 11 � 1 _ .� �.:� . I ► •1 1 I 1 � 37401 �
l 1 [ 1 9 1 1 11 1 0 20' 40, i
I.II,II�7r ! 1 rr1,11 '. •.r o� rc.1, 1,1 1 1 1 EX1.0 €S
It _`

E
B
LATERAL B CROSSING
uE
E
v
i Z .,
~ L 3
w 3
LL
QNi M
'-
a a a o a
1
zLL
zo
an
°
a •r a o � a a a _
~�
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
J; f
1
�
�
u
w
z
I
w
w
3:1 SLOPE
pilv
A L N
PROPOSED 42 LF OF 60" RCP
N N t 6 a c.
�.
—� UPHILL INVERT: 2.00'
y~a b h 6
a
• 1 DOWNHILL INVERT: 1.50' �_ �_
0
_ . _
PROPOSED 15'W X 50'L X 36"p
o
10/12/17
TPO
CLASS 2 RIP RAP OUTLERTECTION
DRAWN BY
1
��
J. DOOLEY
DESIffED er
1. DOOLEY
PROPOSED CAST IN PLACE ENDWALL � � _ `S `r� � : ;
z–\�
(DESIGNED BY OTHERS) =
,
_ g �_ _��__ r F - D s D
� .— 1 A S
~A` :. h L. L Cv `
CHEO�D BY
_.
�
^�
-._ - - �. • a •- ^ Y
•
R. BAKER
`
AS SHOWN
• s
•�
n
ca
1 7 ° n a ", ',
°s °9 n �, . ➢• , o '' .1.-.
zz-
�-_� `
51 -' �� `-°-� .i ..; ,a a a , o
zz
cbw
+_
.50
\
ak
w
fV
d
co
Y a
h
PROPOSED CAST IN PLACE ENDWALL -
ouiz
g
g
(DESIGNED BY OTHERS) \
v
z "
'
Y
X
\
STABILIZE BOTH THE WESTERN
D "_r 7 f ' o ' r ." '.R . • ' S. -- —
Q
o
w
1
AND EASTERN SLOPES OF THE
v� ti a a ` —���
Z
cc
z
ROAD CROSSING WITH NORTH
' ' '' , D : �-
a n $ h h a a G h
Q, a a n
°
z
ui
1
AMERICAN GREEN S75 MATTING
/ '� �r
--, r ' , . •rrI 11 - - r
z
o
H
N
o
� 1 s a' r''' 6• "
V
1I!
1hf a
1
JIlI'1lII
1
J J �I III SCALE 1"=20' o
37401
�1
JII II
S"EE 19D
��J I JI 0 20' \ 40'
IJ
EX2 .0

15
10
5
0
-5
N
LATERAL B CROSSING
PROPOSED
30ACC =SS
ROA) SHOULDER/TOP OF WALL
ELEVATION = 11.00'
FINISHED GRADE
(2) PROPOS i3CAST-IN-
'LACE END (ALLS
.DESIGNED I Y OTHERS)
�I.
LATERAL B
CANAL.........- -
42 LFOF 60u
RCP @ 1 20% EXISTING GRADE
SLOPE
— — g �O
z
~ t 3
ti y 3
wSTREAM INV
PURIED INV. :=
= 3.00'
2.00' >v
o
15
BURIED INV. =
1.50'
OFF
T-EMP40RARY COFFER--DAM—
R-0AAND
LL
6 0 ti m
ANDDIVERSION CHANNEL
CROSS SECTION
15'1111 X 501 X 36"D
.,LASS 1 RfP"fZ
0
€
OUTLET PROTECTION
'O BE INSTA
_LED
z
---F[_USH lTVITH
=XISTING G
1AD
O K..
TEMPO
:ZARY COFFE
R DAM
CHANNEL
AND DIVERSION
o
rn
N
M
�
rn
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
-5 -5
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+25
.1C
0+00 0+30
UPSTREAM INVERT
CROSS SECTION
r
PROPOSED SHOULDEI
TOP OF WALL
:TIM- l"
FINISHED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED UPHILL
INVERT = 2.00'
E
u
0
� z
�
m
-
Oz
o �
^ E
E
Lu
0+00 0+30
z
~ t 3
ti y 3
15
DOWNSTREAM INVERT
LL
6 0 ti m
CROSS SECTION
x m
0
€
Q Q
z
sI
O K..
, I
VERTICAL 1"=3'
p
om
o
PROPOSED SHOULDER/
roe rvo.
o
f
TOP OF WALL
37401
2
0 30' 60
a
ui
0
0
-- 10
EX2.1
6
F
0
u
Q
z
0
m
Q
p
10112/17
DRAWN BY
7 DOOLEY
DESIGNED BY
5
]. DOOLEY
60" RCP
�•
CHEMDBY
R BAKER
•
scn�
FINISHED GRADE
s
AS SHOWN
Ln
•
•
o
PROPOSED DOWNHILL
p
w
INVERT= 1.50'
cn
0
En
RIP RAP OUTLET
Q
v
£�
PROTECTION TO BEN
INSTALLED FLUSH WITH
EXISTING GRADE
cv
�
i
-
o�Z0
z
Lu
U) Z
a
'19
�Lu
W
z
0 u
co
U
Y
uQ
J
E
Q"
Lu
-5a
z
J uLu
o
="�
<
u
=<0
X
co
O
0
� z
�
m
-
Oz
ox
Lu
0+00 0+30
DOWNSTREAM INVERT
CROSS SECTION
0
€
U
sI
al
, I
VERTICAL 1"=3'
p
HORIZONTAL 1"=30'
roe rvo.
f
f
37401
0 30' 60
a
SHEET Na
EX2.1
6