20171222 Ver 1_401 Application_20171114

4700 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27609
m o f f a t t & n i c h o l [phone] Fax [phone]
www.moffattnichol.com
November 14, 2017
Ms. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
(hand delivered)
RE: Additional payment for the 401 Certification Fee for Richland Creek Greenway Stream
Repair, Wake Forest, NC
DWR # 17-1222
Dear Ms. Higgins:
In response to your letter of September 28, 2017, please find enclosed an additional check
(#168448) for the application fee of $330.00 from the Town of Wake Forest as requested. Let
us know if we can provide any additional information to assist in the issuance of this
Certification and Buffer approval.
I can be reached at 919-522-6364 or via email at [e-mail] if you have any
additional questions.
ely,
rATTney
NICHOL
Cc: Holly Miller, Town of Wake Forest
Jason Doll, Moffatt & Nichol

September 28, 2017
Moffatt & Nichol
Attn: Jason Doll
4700 Falls of Neuse, Ste 300
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Richland Creek Greenway Stream Repair
Dear Mr. Doll:
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
0o
DWR # 17-1222
Wake County
On September 27, 2017, the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application
requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification / Buffer Authorization from the Division for the
subject project. The Division has determined that your application is incomplete and cannot be
processed. The application is on -hold until all of the following information is received:
Need More Fee
A review of the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form indicates this application is for
_160_ linear feet of stream impacts. Pursuant to 143-215.3D (e), a $570 permitting fee
is required to process this application. Check # 168053 was applied; however, the
remaining balance to remit is $330. Please remit a check to DEQ-DWR, 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H .0502(e) / 15A NCAC 02B [Neuse] .0233 the applicant shall
furnish all of the above requested information for the proper consideration of the application. If
all of the requested information is not received in writing at the address below within 30
calendar days of receipt of this letter, the Division will be unable to process the application and it
will be returned. The return of this project will necessitate reapplication to the Division for
approval, including a complete application package and the appropriate fee.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act / the
Buffer Rules for this activity and any work done within waters of the state may be a violation of
North Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Page 2 of 2
Please contact Sheri Montalvo at 919-807-6303 or [e-mail] if you have any
questions or concerns.
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWR RRO 401 files
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Filename: 171222 Rich landCreekGreenwayStreamRepair(Wake)_HOLD

4700 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 300, Raleigh,
NC 27609
[phone] Fax [phone]
t-: NavvN 7
MEMORANDUM
To: Jennifer Burdette, NC Division of Water Resources
James Lastinger, US Army Corps of Engineers — Raleigh Field Office
From: John Dori� T
Date: September 22, 2017
Subject: Application for NWP 13 and corresponding Neuse Riparian Buffer
Richland Creek Greenway Stream Repair— Wake Forest
Dear Ms. Burdette and Mr. Lastinger:
al D
FP 2 i 2017
Attached please find a PCN for a project in Wake Forest, NC which proposes to stabilize 160
linear feet of streambank along a severely eroding section of Richland Creek along the Richland Creek
Greenway near the intersection of Harris Road and Barnford Mill Road. The streambank in this location
has been severely eroded and has resulted in the closure of the greenway for safety reasons. As
described in the attached application, we plan to install various streambank stabilization and in -channel
devices along 160 feet of Richland Creek to address erosion issues. Planned measures include bankfull
bench enhancement, single arm vanes, geolifts, stone toe protection, bank sloping and rock
stabilization. There will be about 2,000 square feet of unavoidable impact to Zone 1 of the stream buffer
to conduct this activity. Once the site is stabilized, we plan to replant this area in native woody species
in the next appropriate season.
If you have any questions about this project or would like to conduct a site visit, please feel free
to call me at 919-522-6364 or contact me via email at [e-mail]. Thank you in
advance for your careful consideration of this request.
Cc: Holly Miller, P.E., Town of Wake Forest, Assistant Town Engineer
Jason Doll, Moffatt & Nichol - Raleigh
M&N Job No.: 9756

O�O� WA TF9QG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
7Nyes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express N Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only
❑ Yes
for Corps Permit:
N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
N No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Richland Creek Greenway Stream Repair — Wake Forest
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Wake Forest
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Town of Wake Forest
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 7271, pg. 398; DB 7271, pg. 398
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Holly Miller, P.E., Town of Wake Forest, Assistant Town Engineer
3d.
Street address:
301 S. Brooks St.
3e. City, state, zip:
Wake Forest, NC 27587
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-435-9443
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jason Doll
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Moffatt &Nichol
5c.
Street address:
4700 Falls of Neuse, Suite 300
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e. Telephone no.:
919-781-4626 (o), 919-264-1337 (m)
5f.
Fax no.:
n/a
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 16

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1841-48-7387 and 1841-48-7076
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.997406 Longitude: - 78.510425
1 c.
Property size:
0.48 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Richland Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c.
River basin: map is available at
Neuse
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Greenway is located along creek. Wooded buffer between greenway itself and top of bank of creek. This section of the
creek has experienced severe erosion and trees are basically falling into the creek itself.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
270 feet
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Stabilize the eroding streambank and protect the existing greenway to allow greenway to be available to the public again.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Install various streambank stabilization and in -channel devices along 160 feet of Richland Creek in order to address
erosion issues. Planned measures include bankfull bench enhancement, single arm vanes, geolifts, stone toe protection,
bank sloping and rock stabilization (see attached site plan, cross sections, and representative photographs).
Page 3 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: There is no question that Richland Creek is a
jurisdictional stream.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what
Preliminary ❑Final
type of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Town of Wake Forest is considering development of a Watershed Plan for Richland Creek which will include a plan
to address streambank stability along this entire corridor where issues have developed. That will be a multi-year effort
while this particular project addresses the most critical streambank erosion issue in the corridor that has resulted in
closure of this section of the greenway.
Page 4 of 16

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
or Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact length
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
(linear feet)
Permanent (P)
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
or Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
160 feet
S1 ® P ❑ T
Streambank
stabilization
Richland Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
25
(mainly
bioengineered
measures)
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑P❑T
❑PER
❑Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
160 feet
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 16

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary (T).
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
04 ❑P❑T
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 16

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation,
then you MUST fill out Section
D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse
❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ❑ P ®T
Streambank
stabilization
Richland Creek
❑ Yes
® No
2000
0
B2 ❑P
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
2000
0
6i. Comments: All buffer impacts are temporary since the site will be replanted during the proper season with native woody
species once the work has been completed and the site is stabilized.
Page 7 of 16

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed project is the Least Damaging Practical Alternative that will stabilize the eroding streambank and allow the
greenway to reopen. Two other alternatives were considered that resulted in more channel and streambank impact and
would move the channel further away from the greenway but both were rejected since their stream and buffer impacts
were greater and costs were higher.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Work has been designed to have a minimal impact on the streambank in terms of grading and installation of structures in
the stream channel itself and still accomplish the goal of stabilizing the streambank. Construction will be done from the
greenway where possible to minimize impacts on the channel.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
Page 8 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 16

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: No new impervious surface will be added to the buffer other than the
❑ Yes ® No
stone toe protection needed along the channel itself.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
< 10 % (mostly existing)
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Again, no new impervious surface will be
added to the buffer.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
City of Wake Forest municipal sewer serves the area.
Page 11 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website with Wake County link. Field verified that habitat does not exist on this site for any listed species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO website — mapping function. No historic sites shown in vicinity of project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: FEMA policy with respect to streambank stabilization is that if the
work is done within 12 months and is basically designed to restore the site to its pre-existing condition, then there is no
issue with FEMA requirements. All these provisions are met with this project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Search FEMA website for ncfloodmaps.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applic gent's Signature
(Agent's sonature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 16

u
I

Site Plan — please see attached 11" by 17" site plan
Sheet 1 — Cover
Sheet 2 — Notes
Sheet 3 — Existing Conditions
Sheet 4 — Schematic and Planting Plan
Sheet 5 — Grading
Sheet 6 - Details
Page 14 of 16

s -4��v ��

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. NA PARCEL ID (PIN): 1841-48-7387 & 1841-48-7076
STREET ADDRESS: 0 Harris Road
Wake Forest NC 27587
Latitude: 35.997406 Longitude: -78.510425
Please print:
Property Owner: Town of Wake Forest
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jason C. Doll of Moffatt & Nichol
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Holly Miller. P.E.
Assistant Town Engineer, Town of Wake Forest
301 South Brooks Street
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.
L. YG• {K C�----
Au orize Signature Authorized Signature
I
Date: Z �f�� 7 Date: C/Z4� �
Page 16 of 16

Town of Wake Forest
Richlands Creek
Stream Restoration and Bank Stabilization
Vicinity Map
�9
NO
linos u
Notes
Sheet 3:
Existing Conditions
Sheet 4:
Schematic and Planting
Sheet 5:
Grading
Sheet 6:
Jye !r
wnt-.aICGE
£
i
s
v -
�WWA
a
IRWAI NLLAS 'OWnisl(ue3�
� 9
FrOIBCt SHO D
sg
AS AT*AYESTICAM
..1
Wp]L �u E1Atu
£ hn
O yb e
>aww+oMEs
6
P
'T nt:v.^sM1Rf
4HC--ipLLCTN
K'(:
dr
�. _
UC!IL14C1 A:
�y r
Project Manager:
Town of Wake Forest
Holly Miller
919-435-9443
Project Engineer:
Moffatt and Nichol
Ryan Smith
919-781-4626
Project Summary:
Length: 160 If
Temporary Zone 1 Buffer Impacts: 2,000 sf
Restoration Plan
Single arm vanes: 3
Vegetated geolift: 50 If
Bank stabilization: 2,000 sf
Project Schematic
Sheet 1:
Cover
Sheet 2:
Notes
Sheet 3:
Existing Conditions
Sheet 4:
Schematic and Planting
Sheet 5:
Grading
Sheet 6:
Details

PROJECT NARRATIVE
This project envoi the mislorotion of 160 linear feet of perennial stream. The site is located in Wake
Forest. NC neor The primary purpose 4 to repair and protect a fading stmaimbank that is threatening an
exisfirsg greenway. The work involves tree removal, grading, installation of in -stream structures. erosion
control, and plonting. A small section of gree -way trail may need repair. All work shall be subject to the
direction and inspection of the Project Engineer.
ENGINEERS NOTES:
The location and alignment of all improvements shown are approximate. The final location and
alignment shall be defermined during construction using best professional judgment and approved
by the Project Engineer.
Materials fists are provided as on approximation only. Contractor shall Independently verify the
number and amount of stone. backfill. or other items necessary to properly complete the lob.
The latest version of the Following standards applies to these specifications:
A.NCDOT "Standard Specifications For Roads and Structures" dated July 2006
S. NCDENR "Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Monuol. 2006"
The Contractor sholl Call the "Call Before you Dig" toll free number to make sure that all utlilies are
located and marked. Any damage to existing utilities a the responsibility of the Contractor.
Any damage resulting from actions of the Contractor to structures or grounds on site will be repaired
or replaced at the expense of the Contractor. to a quality meeting or exceeding the, previous
standards.
The Contractor is to ensure public safety during all phases of construction.
The Contractor is responsible for Clearing and disposing of any man -mode materials, debris greater
I han 2 inches in diameter or 2 feet in length. or other items that lie within the construction limits, as
requested by the Project Engineer.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
I. All slopes shall be seeded and stabil d with a dense coverage o! gross. Any exposed or bare
slopes shall be re -seeded or protected with erosion control matting. Erosion control matting shall
meet the requirements of Rolonko Co, Mol 70 and include openings of no more than 0.5 inches.
3. All backfill shall be suitable for plant growth and generally free of debris or other materiol
greater than 2inches in sae.
4. All elevahom and Channel dimensions shall be mel within a talerpnce of 0.'
5. Stabilization measures shall be implemented as soon as possible following completed areas of
construction. Specific seeding requirements are provided in the Planting Plan.
6. Provide temporary or permoneni groundcover on all exposed areas within 7 calendar days
following completion of any phase of grading. Provide o permanent groundcover for all
disturbed areas within 14 working days or within 90 calendar days twin chever is shorted following
completion of construction or development.
7. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be inspected every seven (7) days or after each
rainfall occurrence that exceeds one-half ( 1 /21 inch. Damaged or ineffective devices shalt be
repaired or replaced, as necessary.
8. All erosion control devices shall be properly maintained during all phases of the construction
until the Completion of all construction activities and all disturbed areas have been stabilized.
Additional control devices may be required during construction in order to control erosion
and/or off-site sedimentation. Alt temporary control devices shall be removed once Construction
is complete and the site is stabilized.
9. The contractor must take necessary action to minimae the tracking of mud all site areas. The
contractor shall daily remove mud/soil from pavement, as may be required.
MAP LEGEND
—
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
HYDROGRAPNY
BANKFULL BENCH ENHANCEMENT
®
PROPOSED BANK STABILIZATION
BANK GRADING W(TH BANKPULL BENCH
VEGETATE) GEOUFr
STONE TOE PROIECiION
MATERIALS ESTIMATES
Demolition:
Tree Removal: Up to TO Items of various sizes.
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration = 160 linear feet
General excavolion = 400 CY
tri -Stream Structures:
Single AM Vone = 3
Vegetated Geol"Irt = 50 1f x S layers
Temporary Seeding and Amendments = 2.000 sf
Permanent Seeding: 2.000 sf
Live Slakes. 200
Live Cuttings: 50 7 x 3 geolN layers
Trees = 60
TASK LIST/CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING
1) Set-up all erosion control.
2) Install temporary safety fence around limits of disturbance.
3) Locate and setup access and temporary stockpile area.
4) Complete Ime removal activities.
4) Begin stream restoration activities.
5) Structure and Geolfl installation to be coordinated with the Project Engineer
6) Compbte bank stabilization. seeding. and malting.
71 Complete all planting and begin mointernonce activities.
8) Apply temporary and permanent seed and straw to any remaining disturbed areas.
9) Remove temporary erosion control measures.
drea
Any disturbed athat remains denuded for re 14 days or momust be
temporary ee
sded "poll of on-going stabilization during construction.
101 Thoroughly clean all sediment from roadways or other areas outside project orad.
11) Request a final inspection from the Project Engineer.

NAD '83/20'1

\
BanNutl bench
Pull Uack riprop /
as possible to reduce
ALL STREAMBANKS TO RECEIVE:
enhancement
flow astriction Stone toe with
I
HEIGHT
B. LIVES WITHIN 3' OF STREAMBED
Single Arm Vpne 2 vegetated 9eoGNs
C. TREES ABOVE AT 8 FTSPACING.
15 RIVER BIRCH (BETULA NIGRA)
/ Single Arm Vona 3
10'-20'
VEGETATED GEOLIFT
s
F
To BE PLANTED PER DETAIL WITH UVE
15'-30'
Stone Ipe protection
PLANTING TABLE
25 or as possible
STREAMBANK AND BANKFULL BENCH
Bwe Root
�i
/
X36 i
A. TEMP AND PRM SEED MIX.
B. LIVESTAKES BELOW BANKFULL BENCH
15 BLACKGUM (NYSSA SYLVATICA)
no
20'-30'
BANKFULL BENCH
BANKFULL BENCH TO RECEIVE:
50'-100'
A. TEMP AND PERM SEED MIX.
Bore Root
B. TREES AT 8 FT SPACING.
Is
MATURE
MATURE
� '\�\�
u,
Rap
_�— ✓
PA+� Safety fence
WIDTH
TYPE
Y
\\
so�
LIVE STAKE PER
m
�\ \\ \•.yv
10'-12"
12"-15'
\\\\\\� Pas �.. =� ✓
Stone to
bank sloping
-
nk sloping and
stabilization as nee �o manta" lh. \>e�
Installs wid. hon Ilisen.h
jLIVE
Single arm Vane
10'-15'
STAKE PER
SPECIFICATION
TY GEOUFT PLANTINGS
- Cr_ m'
Safety fence
Potential access to
I
Re-usestone to restore inner berm and
Center thalweg _`
wall if.
LIVE
u,23
SILKY WILLOW (SAUX SERICFA)
10'-12'
12'-15
GENERAL PLANTING NOTES:
1. ALL INVASIVE SPECIES TO BE REMOVED FROM ALL ZONES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH
PLANTINGS.
2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION. PLANTING LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
3. AREAS TO BE PLANTED ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF UTIUTIES ARE ENCOUNTERED, PLANTS
MAY BE REPOSITIONED SLIGHTLY TO AVOID IMPACT.
4. PLANTS AND PLANTING SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS OF ANSI Z60.1 AND ANSI A 300 AND
BE COMPLETED ACCORDING TO PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS..
5. ALL PLANTS, SPECIES. QUANTITIES, AND PROVIDERS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR APPROVAL BY
THE PROJECT ENGINEER *ALL TREES SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION FOR HEALTH
AND QUALITY PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE SITE. ALL PLANTS ARE SUBJECT TO REFUSAL
BASED ON INSPECTION OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
6. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE DONE IN A SUITABLE SEASONAL TIMEFRAME FOR EACH SPECIES:
6.1. WETLAND SEEDING, PLUGS, AND SHRUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SPRING PRIOR TO
JUNE 1 OR IN THE FALL PRIOR TO OCTOBER 31.
6.2. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN THEIR DORMANT SEASON AND PRIOR TO MARCH 1.
7. TREES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE AND HEALTH TO BE STABLE WITHOUT STAKING. STAKING
MAY BE ALLOWED IF CONDITIONS REQUIRE AND NTH APPROVAL AND INSPECTION OF THE
PROJECT ENGINEER.
8. SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.
SEEDING AND STREAMBANK NOTES:
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING ACCORDING TO
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. STREAMBANKS SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY SEEDING AND AMENDMENTS AT THE COMPLETION OF
ANY STREAM SECTION OF 100FT OR ANY IN–STREAM STRUCTURE.
3. SEEDING SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY FESCUE GRASSES. PLACE SEEDING AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN
(UNDER THE COIR MATTING).
4. SPREAD SEED UNIFORMLY UNDER COR FIBER MATTING. APPLY AMENDMENTS AND MULCH PRIOR
TO COIR MATTING INSTALLATION.
5. STREAMBANK AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR 805 SURVIVAL AT ONE–YEAR.
IF 205 OR MORE ARE DEAD OR DEAD LIKE CONDITION, RE–PLANTING OF SUFFICIENT STOCK TO
COMPLY A AN 805 SURVIVAL RATE SHALL BE PERFORMED.
6. SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS,
TEMPORARY SEEDING AND AMENDMENTS:
Apply 10-10-10 fertilim at 1,000 lbs/ocre, 1'enest— at 1.5 tonsloos.
and wheat stras at 1.5 tons/oars,
Seed: Apply the followMg vegetation at the listed rotes.
FWI, Winter. Spring Seeding (August 15–May 1):
Rte groin 1 Ib per 1,000 eq It or 45 lbs per acre
Summer Seeding (May 1–August 15):
Browntop Millet 0.3 It, per 1,000 sq H or 15 lbs par ooe
Apply Permanent Seed Mix at 25 lbs/acre
Species Common N— Percent
ymus 1191 Virginia wild rye 5
ropogon geror , luestem
—,--,,u- scop LIltle bluestem
a.cup a
Con,.l � �oe
ido
Desmodi., c npdense w ti
�d
ers o-to.a
"LANTiNG � ST
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
MATURE MATURE
ALL STREAMBANKS TO RECEIVE:
A. TEMP AND PERM SEED MIX.
HEIGHT
B. LIVES WITHIN 3' OF STREAMBED
C. TREES ABOVE AT 8 FTSPACING.
15 RIVER BIRCH (BETULA NIGRA)
NOTE: NO TREES WITHIN 5 FT OF GREENWAY
10'-20'
VEGETATED GEOLIFT
s
F
To BE PLANTED PER DETAIL WITH UVE
15'-30'
CUTTINGS. SEE GEOUFT SPECIES IN
PLANTING TABLE
STREAMBANK AND BANKFULL BENCH
Bwe Root
�i
ALL STREAMBANKS TO RECEIVE:
A. TEMP AND PRM SEED MIX.
B. LIVESTAKES BELOW BANKFULL BENCH
15 BLACKGUM (NYSSA SYLVATICA)
C. TREES ABOVE AT 8 FT SPACING.
20'-30'
BANKFULL BENCH
BANKFULL BENCH TO RECEIVE:
50'-100'
A. TEMP AND PERM SEED MIX.
Bore Root
B. TREES AT 8 FT SPACING.
"LANTiNG � ST
OTY TREE PLANTING
MATURE MATURE
SIZE
HEIGHT
WIDTH
15 RIVER BIRCH (BETULA NIGRA)
10'-20'
10'-20'
Bare Root
s
F
15 SYCAMORE (PLATINUS OCCIDENTALIS)
15'-30'
10'-20'
w
Bwe Root
�i
a
15 BLACKGUM (NYSSA SYLVATICA)
40'-70'
20'-30'
Bore Root
15 WILLOW OAK (QUERCUS PHELLOS)
50'-100'
20'-30'
Bore Root
MATURE
MATURE
u,
0 LIVE STAKES
HEIGHT
WIDTH
TYPE
Y
LIVE STAKE PER
m
100 SILKY WILLOW (SALIx SERICEA)
10'-12"
12"-15'
SPECIFICATION
jLIVE
100 SILKY DOGWOOD CORNUS AMOMUM
10'-15'
6'-12'
STAKE PER
SPECIFICATION
TY GEOUFT PLANTINGS
LIVE
u,23
SILKY WILLOW (SAUX SERICFA)
10'-12'
12'-15
PER DETAILG
Z
25 SILKY DOGWOOD (CORNUS AMOMUM)
10'-15'
6'-12'
LIVE CUTTING
pR DETAIL
25 R
TAG ALDER (ALNUS SRULA)
10'-12'
12'-15'
LIVE CUTTING
PER DETAIL
LIVE CUTTING
25X NINEBARK (PHYSOCARPUS OPUUFOLIUS)
10'-15'
6'-12'
PER DETAIL

Grading Plan
Profile View
0+oo
280-
27
1+00
2+02+05
I
i
I
I
Bankfull Item Single arm vane Single arm vane
Elevafio Sil gle arm vane
Proposed
Profile
10 1
I
I
Pool POOI
0+00
280
Cross Sections
o+szos
(Boseflow Channel)
(Pool)

ram,rwnc e�a.eirm.i�— ewna4
SINGLE ARM VANE
r
Er!h�''firiiat�!
VEGETATED GEDLIE
BARE ROOT PLANTINGS
_ N. T. S.
�a I. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
1. Dig hole with dibble, shovel, or other appropriate device.
2. Dig hole of sufficient size to fit entire root mass without bending or breaking.
3. Place ammendments in the hole as specified.
4. Lower bare root plant into the hole.
5. Heel in or close hole firmly. Ensure that plant is secure.
WGround Surface
LVE SrAKE
xaf ro SCriE
Bare Root Planting