20081155 Ver 4_Staff Comments_20170810

Homewood, Sue
From:Johnson, Alan
Sent:Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:53 PM
To:Homewood, Sue; Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc:Paul Petitgout
Subject:Kellswater Project DWR# 08-1155 (?)....potential IP or waiver
I looked at the proposed three impact sites for the current application. Two are on the same channel. They are intermittent (on
the low end of the score). But nothing special. The channel with impacts 1 and 3 ceases once you hit the flood plain. I am not
sure that impact #3, would actually cross the stream. (I think they just “projected” that it continued to the main channel). I don’t
think a waiver for an IP should be an issue.

Paul, fyi, the apartment complex was part of the original submitted application for Kellswater in 2008.

Below is a shot of the “original” project. In blue is where the impacts were approved back in 2008. (0.06 ac wetland, 524 lf of
intermittent, and 178 lf of perennial (mitigation required). There WAS NO APPROVAL issued for any other impact. Unless
under a DIFFERENT DWR# was issued. However, nothing shows up in BIMS. Paul do you have a copy of an approval other
than the one issued in August 2008? That being the case it WILL have to be included in the application. WHAT IS THE
IMPACT FOR THE PROPOSED CROSSING FOR THE STREAM BETWEEN THE EXISTING PROJECT AND THIS NEW
SECTION. THAT MAY REQUIRE AN IP REGARDLESS.

Proposed project boundary in relation to existing
1

Paul, fyi, the apartment complex was part of the original submitted application for Kellswater in 2008.

Alan D Johnson – Senior Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

2

>! .._ . .
, „ �,t� :
.> . . � , . , y:
_ ��2\� � - �l« L�wtl.
� .. ,. �: . y� < .:
«�.+�«�.\�\\�3, w
a> \ .mow
� ©� � ©�_
~ y.� >yz:5 . ©� �:. � � : »§ �
� 2� : . . .. <�\� � �
� m2/ 2�
6\.�{2�� � ° 2\ � »�z,�\
,yam,. . »� »»��»�. . \ ,
- �+ : _
� � \`�� - \�\ « `^� � \ % a
\\\ \ ` � \\ � y � � /\ \� >�
. � � ��x � � v � `�
��/ � :����� y<\® �..
� . y .«?� �
- x<
�� � � ,2� w�w>y « �
: �«w© � - d
\� � � � \}/� �

IN REO IS WHAT "
WAS ORIGINALLY
APPROVED,