NC0020338_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20171011

,. ROY COOPER
" Governor
MICHAEL S. RE, GAN
Secret(AN
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Environmental Quality Director
October 11, 2017
Mr. Grant Trivette RECEIVEDINCDEWWR
Town of Yadkinville
P.O. Drawer 816 0 C T 16 2017
Yadkmville, NC 27055 Water QuaNY
Permitting Section
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI)
Town of Yadkinvllle
NPDES# NCO020338
Yadkin County
Dear Mr Trivette:
On September 27, 2017 a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) was performed by Jim
Gonsiewski. Mr Grant Trivette was present for the Inspection The purpose of this inspection
was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program, which includes reviewing
the files, POTW plant performance, Industry monitoring data, and adherence to the enforcement
response plan (ERP)
Background
This is a 2.5 MGD permitted facility The City has four (4) Significant Industrial Users and one (1)
Categorical Industrial User categorically regulated per CFR 433
POTW Interview
There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and there are no NPDES permit limit
or monitoring violations recorded from January 2017 through August 2017 Additionally, the
facility is well operated
Pretreatment Program Elements Review
The Headworks Analysis (HWA) renewal was submitted on August 18, 2017 The submittal is
currently under review.
The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was approved on April 7, 2017 The next IWS is due on
January 31, 2022
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on January 2, 2012.
The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was approved on January 19, 2010.
Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) was approved on March 16, 2016.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
450 W Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 3001 Winston Salem, North Carolina 27105-7400
336-776-9800

STMP File Review
The Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) is being conducted at the proper locations and
frequencies �l
Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review
A review of the file for Unifi (#0002) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and
compliant.
A review of the file for B&G Bakery (#0004) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized,
and compliant
A review of the file for The Austin /Company (#0006) revealed that the monitoring data was well
organized, and compliant. /
The slug control plans for Unifi (#0002), B&G Bakery (#0004) and The Austin Company (#0006)
were in good order.
r
Action Items
One exceedance of nickel was noted at Unifi on May 31, 2017 The next sample collected on
August 5, 2017 was compli Grit.
One exceedance of Oil and Grease was noted at B&G Bakery on July 13, 2017 Three samples
collected after the July 13%'sample were compliant.
No other action items were noted.
The pretreatment program is considered satisfactory Mr. Trivette implements the pretreatment
program in an excellent manner. If you have any questions please contact Jim Gonsiewski or me
at [phone]
i
Sincerely,
,l
1c" Sherri V Knight,/ I P E
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO
CC' PERCS Unit — Monti Hassan
Central Files
WSRO Files

'S NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
ydarerRescTun is
IA -AM., AM., A£, a4fA.., EY
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: I O uy m I 0 `i rx al NA. m J j 14r-
2. Control Authority Representative(s). ci + t f' 1 V C-
3. Title(s): � coo r 1 rc:
4. Last Inspection Date: Zt -, Inspection Type (Check One): [�! PCI [I Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspectiioon and Program Info Sheet(s)? EK YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES'N NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters:
ICIS CODING
Main Program Permit Number
I N I Q 1 0 10 1A,101�L2o x,91P'll 1311 '1
MM/DD/YY
Are Milestone Dates Being Met9 ❑ YES ❑ NO
7. Current Number Of Sign.Mcant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
8. Number of SlUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP9
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
1
10. Number of SlUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
D
11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
()
12 Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods9
01
13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
14. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
( i
15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
16 Number of CIUs in SNC?
POTW INTERVIEW
17 Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18 Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed
19 Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Public Notice9(May refer to PAR if Excessive SlUs in SNC) Not Pu
20 Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division
21 Are Any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication If Yes, Which
Ones?
F] YES NO
El YES � NO
Lamts
Reporting bil bpi
blished• �-
00
❑ YES P�NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ZLYES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitorings N YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equ>valent9 14 YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate _V YES ❑ NO
25 All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report` YES ❑ NO Division Inspector, please verify yourself
26. IfNO to 23 - 26, list violations
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info -
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file If Applicable
Headworks Analysis A
(S l-,:) ® Yes ❑ No
1 a -I 1
©"Yes ❑ No
Industrial Waste Survey S
Ej Yes ❑ No'
[a Yes ❑ I
Yes ❑ No
Sewer Use Ordinance UO)
t. Yes ❑ No
a
©Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
I t 3 N Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
' j �, R Yes ❑ No
3 1,�
[] Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29, User Name1
2. N�
3 , (AS
30. IUP Number u
t (D 1' �l' 116
o 0 ")- I
o r"6 (.,s
31. Does File Contain Current Permits I
NJ Yes ❑ No
[a Yes ❑ I
J&-] Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date IS
3-&a
`I ] B c
14 (1 C
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
%1114
;
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
IfYes ❑ No
`,❑ Yes ❑ No
`] Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35 Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Years I
O Yes ❑ No 11
ayes ❑ No7j
® Yes ❑ No
36. a Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a lues ❑No
a. EVes []No
a. Xes [INo
b. IfNo, is One Needed9 (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes []No
b. []Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes No
37 For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
0Yes❑No19N/A0YesNq
W/A
Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ❑Yes []No
lb
a. ❑Yes ❑No
a. []Yes []No
b. All Issues Resolved
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
®Yes ❑ NoYes
❑ No
F Yes [INo
its Sampling as Required by 1UP, including flew?
40 Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
��i'es 11 No
I N Yes El No
Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
QYes❑No❑N/A
1 Yes❑No❑N/A
11
fPqYes❑No❑N/A
1
Sam lin as Required b IUP, includingflow
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Perio3, Did SIU submit all reports
1EIYes❑No❑N/A
CRYes❑No❑N/A
Yes❑No❑N/A
on time
42a. For categorical JUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NdKN/A
❑Yes❑No'jaN/A
[7Ye"N/A
file include rocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP9
42b For categorical I[Js with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑MPN/A
❑Yes❑No�IN/A
❑Yes❑N RN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes 91 No
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sam lin 9
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
1Yes❑No❑N/A
, Yes❑No❑N/A
0Yes0No71A
All Re ortinNon-Com fiance from SIU Sam lin 9
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SILT Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
ai7Yes❑No❑N/A
aW. Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑NoQN/A
Monitoring Violations?
b Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b tesNo❑N/A
b Yes❑No❑N/A
b ❑Yes❑N/A
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
a Yes❑N4N/A
es❑No !/A
c.❑Yes❑No /A
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC9
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
I ❑ Yes No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑Na[)N/A
❑Yes❑No[kN/A
❑Yes❑No .jN/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)9
48 Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No N/A
[1Yes0NoEk1A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of ?enalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No N/A
❑Yes❑No N/A
❑Yes❑No N/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑Nq N/A
Fb
a.❑Yes❑Mo kN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoK7N/A
b. Is SJU in Compliance with Orders
❑Yes❑NocW/A
b ❑Yes❑No N/A
b ❑Yes❑No®N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes E& No
❑ Yes [R No
El YesNo
11
Requested Information For Your
11
j

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: u 311 ` C� j o i I V �ck-e-I Q,�-Ce:o-o k
N eK+- -!�01 yy-,Tki 5 n) Ce
F � 0� -a O t ll- 4A rne- z,1c.t`e.Q-C,l ct >n Cz NI v t I �ec�S �? ►��� !" �J ,n �]; d3
C,1ra,�' i<& 3 4; m(s a�Pft, r '7/ l � cc 1( cr av`F � tq yt-�-- l
LNDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING:
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
1. Islustry Inspected:
2. Incustry Address:
3. Typo of Industry/Product:
4 Industry Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
5. Does tie POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments.
A Initial Interview
❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour
❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour
❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review
❑ YES ❑ NO
E. -Exit Interview
❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments.
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments.
Requirements:
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES ❑ No
NOV: ❑ YES ❑ NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ❑ No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory Marginal UnSatisfactory
DATE:
PCI COMPLETED BY: