20140957 Ver 2_ACP Partial Response Recd Digitally 09-22-2017_20170926

Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, VA 23060
DominlonEnergy.com
September 22, 2017
ELECTRONIC MAIL
Jeffrey O. Poupart
Water Quality Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
JeffpoupartAa ncdenngov
Re: Atlantic Coast Pipeline - DWR Project #14-0957 v2
Response to Request for Additional Information
401 Water Quality Certification Review
Dear Mr. Poupart:
Dominion
;;Wo Energy®
oa/ 4e
Vd-
A
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (Atlantic) is providing the enclosed responses to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality's September 14, 2017, request for additional information on
Atlantic's Water Quality Certification application. The enclosed response addresses all but two of
your requests. Responses to information request item numbers Lb.i and 6.c will be provided to your
office by September 29, 2017.
Atlantic respectfully requests that NCDEQ continue to process its application. Please contact
Spencer Trichell at [phone] or Spencer.TrichelllcAdominionenergy.com, if you have questions
regarding this submittal.
Please direct written responses to:
Richard B. Gangle
Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Sina&angle'7
Richard
Environmental Manager, Atlantic Coast Pipeline
cc: Spencer Trichell (Dominion Energy)
Jennifer Burdette (NCDEQ)
Enclosure - Response Materials and Appendices
F�FPk-k2 6�2017'
0 D

Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Alen, VA 23060
DominionEnergy.com
September 22, 2017
t1►I u:l
Jeffrey O. Poupart
Water Quality Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Jeffpoupartna ncdenr.gov
Re: Atlantic Coast Pipeline - DWR Project #14-0957 v2
Response to Request for Additional Information
401 Water Quality Certification Review
Dear Mr. Poupart:
Dominion
FWW war
Energy®
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (Atlantic) is providing the enclosed responses to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality's September 14, 2017, request for additional information on
Atlantic's Water Quality Certification application. The enclosed response addresses all but two of
your requests. Responses to information request item numbers Lb.i and 6.c will be provided to your
office by September 29, 2017.
Atlantic respectfully requests that NCDEQ continue to process its application. Please contact
Spencer Tricll at k 273-3472 orSpencer.Trichellna.dominionenergy.com, if you have questions
regarding this submittal.
Please direct written responses to:
Richard B. Gan
gle
Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Richard B.�angle
Environmental Manager, Atlantic Coast Pipeline
cc: Spencer Trichell (Dominion Energy)
Jennifer Burdette (NCDEQ)
Enclosure -Response Materials and Appendices
1

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
September 22, 2017
Response to NCDEQ Request for Additional Information dated September 14, 2017:
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water
Resources (Division), sent a "Request for Additional Information" to Atlantic Coast Pipeline,
LLC (Atlantic), dated September 14, 2017, to address public comments from a public comment
period held by the Division between June 16 and August 19, 2017, and to address public
comments from public hearings held on July 18 and 20, 2017. Consistent with a previous
request for information submitted to Atlantic dated June 28, 2017, the Division stated that
Atlantic's response to the September 14 request was necessary to process Atlantic's application
requesting an Individual Water Quality Certification/Buffer Authorization for the Atlantic Coast
Pipeline Project (ACP or Project). Atlantic has reviewed the NCDEQ request for additional
information and is providing the following responses and attached information according to the
NCDEQ request.
Each of the requests for information, as numbered in the NCDEQ request, is provided below,
followed by Atlantic's response in italics:
1. The project involves numerous stream crossings that have the potential to affect
downstream water quality both temporarily during construction and permanently.
Your application and responses to the Division provide thorough general
descriptions of the plans for the project, however more site-specific detail is
necessary to ensure that downstream water quality is protected. Provide the
additional justification requested below:
a. Add a column to the Wetland and Waterbody Crossing table (appendix C-1)
for each waterbody more than 30 feet in width that provides site specific
reasons why each crossing could not be completed using the HDD method
or a conventional bore to avoid impacts to the stream channel.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic reviewed waterbodies that are not already proposed to be crossed via the
HDD method or the conventional bore method that have an ordinary high water
mark width of greater than 30 feet based on field studies completed for the

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
Project and identified two crossings that met this criteria. Beaverdam Swamp at
MP 23.1 with a width of 45 feet and Raft Swamp at MP 174.0 with a width of 40
feet are proposed open cut crossings. Since there are only two crossings at issue,
Atlantic respectfully presents its justification below.
Beaverdam Swamp -
Justification for no HDD:
Assuming minimal elevation change between the HDD endpoints, a 36" HDD
installation will need to be approximately 1600 feet in length. This length will
require an endpoint near Richneck Road, which, in turn, will require the road to
be closed during pullback of the pipeline after the HDD is complete, resulting in a
local traffic detour for 12-24 hours. In addition, the residences adjacent to the
HDD site will be subjected to noise levels that are much higher and of longer
duration than those associated with conventional pipeline construction. Finally,
the horizontal alignment along this route is not horizontally "straight".
Curvature within the HDD path is designed to minimize longitudinal stresses
imposed upon the pipe. Redesigning the alignment within this section to achieve
acceptable curve radii would likely cause the pipeline to deviate from the
negotiated easement boundaries.
Justification for no Conventional Bore:
In order to minimize the impacts to the waterbody, sufficient depth of cover will
be needed. In order to achieve sufficient depth of cover, the installation will need
to be deep (e.g., deeper than I5 feet), resulting in deep bore pits. Since the bore
pits will need to be built in saturated and/or flooded wetlands, significant
geostatic/hydrostatic pressures will be encountered. Bore pits designed to
withstand these types of pressures typically require driven sheet piling and
significant bracing and concrete floors. Construction of these types of bore pits
will be time consuming and will result in additional disturbances and impacts to
the local residences, especially when compared to the much faster, linear "cut
and cover" construction.
Raft Swamp -
Justification for no HDD:
An HDD to avoid this water body would need to be approximately 4200 feet in
length. The anticipated soil conditions could present a high hydraulic fracture
risk. Additionally, due to the pipeline alignment, either Shannon Road will need
to be closed during pullback (24-48 hours) or additional workspace to layout the
pipeline will be needed at the point of inflection (PI) at approximate MP 174.6 to
2

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
provide a staging area for the pullback section. If the pullback section is
fabricated on the west side, then either Snipes Road will need to be closed during
pullback (48-96 hours) or several pullback strings and multiple mid -welds will be
required, thus increasing risk of rejected welds that would require repair to
unacceptable levels. Finally, there are residences adjacent to where the HDD
equipment would be setup, which would be subjected to noise levels that are much
higher and of longer duration than those associated with conventional pipeline
construction.
Justification for no Conventional Bore:
In order to minimize the impacts to the waterbody, sufficient depth of cover will
be needed. In order to achieve sufficient depth of cover, the installation will need
to be deep (e.g., greater than 1 S feet), resulting in deep bore pits. Since the bore
pits will need to be built in saturated and/or flooded wetlands, significant
geostatic/hydrostatic pressures will be encountered. Bore pits designed to
withstand these types of pressures typically require driven sheet piling and
significant bracing and concrete floors. Construction of these types of bore pits
will be time consuming and will result in additional disturbances and impacts to
the local residences especially when compared to the much faster, linear "cut and
cover" construction.
b. Many crossings are proposed to be installed using the open cut method that
do not make accommodations for the work to be completed in the dry or
without exposure to flowing water.
i. Provide a site-specific justification for not working in the dry and a
crossing plan for each open cut crossings proposed. These plans
should include turbidity curtain locations, and upstream/downstream
water quality sampling locations for turbidity and total dissolved
solids (sampling for total dissolved solids is only required within
Water Supply Watershed areas).
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic is working to make modifications to the erosion and sediment
control drawings at proposed open cut locations and will provide updated
drawings and a response by September 29, 2017.

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
ii. Your July 12, 2017 response to the Division indicated that the open
cut method was proposed for several crossings due to the presence of
inundated wetlands. Many of these wetlands do not appear to be
inundated based on aerial photography and identification of a discrete
channel by the field survey. Provide documentation that the adjacent
wetlands are inundated beyond the discrete channel for each of these
crossings.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic reviewed wetlands adjacent to the 27 waterbody crossings that were
listed in Table 4 of the July 12, 2017 response document as crossings that noted:
"This is an inundated wetland with a waterbody channel contained within the
wetland and will therefore be treated as a wetland crossing during construction
following the FERC Procedures. " Sixteen of these crossings included adjacent
wetlands with hydrology indicators that demonstrate inundation during the
growing season or where photos indicate that standing water was present at the
time of the field study. Datasheets for the 16 wetlands are included in Appendix A.
Datasheets for the remaining 11 waterbodies identified in Table 4 of the July 12,
2017 response document as waterbodies with adjacent inundated wetlands where
reviewed by Atlantic, and field conditions documented at the time of field studies
were not in inundated. Thus, datasheets for these areas not included.
Furthermore, Atlantic has conducted further review of these 11 waterbodies and
determined that the construction method to cross can be changed from the
previously proposed open cut to a dry crossing where perceptible flow exists
using either a dam and pump or flume crossing method for these crossings.
Waterbodies changing from open cut to dam and pump or flume include:
• shlh008—
MP 20.1
• swio001—MP
67.7
• swio002—
MP 67.8
• swio005—
MP 69.3
• swio013—
MP 70.9
• swio011—MP
71.0
• swio012—
MP 71.0
• sjop001—MP 84.6
• sjoo003— MP 85.9
• sjob003— MP 103.9
4

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017 September 22, 2017
• ssao001— MP 116.9
iii. Your July 12, 2017 response to the Division also stated that utilizing
a dry method for several stream crossings would result in more
impact for a longer duration. Provide an explanation of the additional
impact and duration of the impact compared to using a dry method,
including specific plans showing the additional impact.
Atlantic's Response:
The waterbodies in the July 12, 2017 response where Atlantic noted that a dry
crossing would result in more impact for a longer duration are intermittent
streams that are 3 to 9 feet wide. In accordance with the FERC Procedures, in -
stream construction activities at each of these crossing will be limited to 24
hours. The equipment used to excavate the trench will be operated from one or
both banks of the waterbody and will not operate in the stream
itself. Temporary sidecast material excavated from the trench will be placed on
the bank above the high water mark (at least 10 feet from the edge of the
water). Use of a dry crossing method at these locations would require
additional time and stream bed/bank impacts to accommodate the installation
and removal of the materials needed to isolate the flow of the stream (e.g.,
flumes, sandbags). Due to the size of these crossings, it was determined that
the open -cut crossing method would have the least impact on the streams and
use of a dry crossing method would not reduce overall environmental impacts.
iv. Both dam and pump and flume method are listed for many stream
crossings. Provide the criteria for selecting one method over the
other, including who will make the decision and when the decision
will be made.
Atlantic's Response:
The crossing method is dependent on the stream conditions at the time of
crossing. The dam and pump method will be used at streams with a lower
flow rate at the time of crossing where pumps can be effectively used to
transfer the water around the workspace and provide uninterrupted flow.
The flume method will be used at streams with larger flow rates at the time
of crossing or where pumps cannot be staged on the banks. The
environmental inspectors working with the site construction supervisor will
make the determination on the appropriate method to employ. Because

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
discharge rates cannot accurately be predicted at this time, the decision will
be made at the time of crossing.
v. The typical diagrams for each stream crossing method indicate that a
temporary bridge will be installed "if needed". Provide the criteria to
determine if a temporary bridge will be needed. If a temporary
bridge isn't needed, explain how equipment will operate without
crossing back and forth within the stream channel.
Atlantic's Response:
Temporary bridges are used at a majority of the stream crossings to allow
equipment and crews to move along the right of way in a logical manner.
Atlantic will install temporary bridges at all streams that can accommodate
a single span or simple in -stream support(s).
Stream crossings where the banks are deeply incised and narrow would be
an example where a temporary bridge would not be used. In this case the
excavation equipment would perform the work from the banks by reaching
into the waterbody.
vi. Provide construction drawings, including construction sequencing for
the Neuse River crossing.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic will utilize the HDD method to cross the Neuse River.
c. Provide a restoration plan for all stream crossings. This can be accomplished by
providing a site-specific plan for each crossing, or by providing a typical
restoration plan for each different type of restoration (e.g., restoration of
preconstruction contours, laying back banks on incised streams, or placement of
riprap to ensure streambank stability where the conditions at the crossing warrant
this protection) and assigning which restoration plan will be used at each stream
crossing.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic has provided typical details depicting standard waterbody crossing
restoration and restoration of waterbodies with riprap stabilization
(Appendix B). The type of restoration to be performed at each waterbody
0

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
crossing in North Carolina is anticipated to be Type I for all waterbodies.
Type I restoration will involve standard restoration and stabilization of
stream banks. Type 2 restoration, as depicted in the typical drawing, would
only be used if stabilization of a waterbody was unsuccessful and required
use of riprap or geogrid material along the banks. Rock riprap or geogrid
materials would not be placed below the plane of the ordinary high
watermark.
d. Provide a plan to monitor all stream and wetland restoration through two growing
seasons once vegetation is established. Explain your method for determining
whether the success criteria provided in your application are met.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic will monitor wetland restoration for three years after construction, which
is required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) Wetland and
Waterbody Construction and Mitigation Procedures, Section VI.D.4-6, which
state:
"Wetland revegetation shall be considered successful if all of the following
criteria are satisfied:
a. the affected wetland satisfies the current federal definition for a
wetland (i.e., soils, hydrology, and vegetation);
b. vegetation is at least 80 percent of either the cover documented for the
wetland prior to construction, or at least 80 percent of the cover in
adjacent wetland areas that were not disturbed by construction;
c. if natural rather than active revegetation was used, the plant species
composition is consistent with early successional wetland plant
communities in the affected ecoregion; and
d. invasive species and noxious weeds are absent, unless they are
abundant in adjacent areas that were not disturbed by construction.
Within 3 years after construction, file a report with the Secretary identifying the
status of the wetland revegetation efforts and documenting success as defined in
section VI.D.S, above. The requirement to file wetland restoration reports with
the Secretary does not apply to projects constructed under the automatic
authorization, prior notice, or advance notice provisions in the FERC's
regulations.
7

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
For any wetland where revegetation is not successful at the end of 3 years after
construction, develop and implement (in consultation with a professional wetland
ecologist) a remedial revegetation plan to actively revegetate wetlands. Continue
revegetation efforts and file a report annually documenting progress in these
wetlands until wetland revegetation is successful. "
In addition, waterbody bank restoration will be monitored according to the FERC
Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan (FERC Plan),
Section VII.A.1 and VII.A.4, which requires that Atlantic:
1. Conduct follow-up inspections of all disturbed areas, as necessary, to
determine the success of revegetation and address landowner concerns.
At a minimum, conduct inspections after the first and second growing
seasons.
2. Revegetation in non-agricultural areas shall be considered successful if
upon visual survey the density and cover of non -nuisance vegetation are
similar in density and cover to adjacent undisturbed lands. In
agricultural areas, revegetation shall be considered successful when
upon visual survey, crop growth and vigor are similar to adjacent
undisturbed portions of the same field, unless the easement agreement
specifies otherwise. Continue revegetation efforts until revegetation is
successful.
3. (This item is not applicable to waterbody bank restoration)
4. Restoration shall be considered successful if the right-of-way surface
condition is similar to adjacent undisturbed lands, construction debris is
removed (unless otherwise approved by the landowner or land managing
agency per section V.A. 6), revegetation is successful, and proper
drainage has been restored.
2. There are numerous places throughout the application where qualifiers are used when
citing methods to protect water quality (e.g., may, as appropriate, as near as practical,
where feasible, when needed, etc.). Propose a standard method and provide justification
for each variation from the standard for each waterbody crossing not using the standard
method.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic can provide the following clarification as to the use of standard methods
and when deviations may be necessary.

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
The supplemental information to the application states that "bridges `may'
include clean rock fill over culverts, timber mats supported by flumes, railcar
flatbeds, flexi float apparatuses, or other types of spans. " For clarification,
Atlantic will use clean rock over culverts for access across the majority of
streams crossed by the pipeline that are otherwise too wide to be crossed by a
single timber mat bridge. Timber mats supported by flumes will be used for
access across streams crossed by the pipeline that have too much flow for use of
clean rock over culverts. Railcar beds will be used for access across streams
crossed by the pipeline that are greater than 40 feet wide and cannot
accommodate a center support. Timber mats will be used for access across
smaller streams crossed by the pipeline where a single mat can span the width of
the stream. Flexifloat apparatuses are not proposed. No other types of spans are
proposed.
The supplemental information to the application states that "water pumps for
withdrawing hydrostatic test water, `may' need to be operated continuously on
the banks of waterbodies and `may' require refueling in place. " Atlantic has
identified the need to operate water pumps continuously, thereby requiring that
refueling occur within 100 feet of waterbodies. Pumps would be refueled in
secondary containment structures and fuel would not be stored within 100 feet of
the edge of the waterbody or adjacent wetlands.
The supplemental information to the application states that "stream banks will
then be restored `as near as practical' to preconstruction conditions and
stabilized. " Atlantic used the qualifier `as near as practical' to reflect the fact
that some streambanks cannot, or should not, be put back to preconstruction
contours. In instances where streambanks are incised prior to construction,
Atlantic would grade the banks to a stable slope and taper the new contours into
the adjacent, undisturbed conditions outside of the right-of-way as part of
restoration of streambanks.
The supplemental information to the application states that "Stabilization
measures will include seeding, installation of erosion control blankets, or
installation of riprap materials, `as appropriate'. " Atlantic plans to utilize
standard restoration measures with erosion control blankets. If waterbody flow
forces require greater stabilization, Atlantic would use riprap or a geogrid type
material, as outlined in response to item Lc, above.
0

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
The supplemental information to the application states that "a limited amount of
stump removal and grading `may' be conducted in other areas if required by
safety related issues. " At wetlands crossings where the landscape is not level or
conditions exist that prevent the level application of timber mats over wetlands
soils, some stump removal may be necessary in order to produce a level and safe
travel corridor and prevent equipment from sliding off of timber mats. The
removal of stumps would occur on an as needed basis to support safe
construction and not as a standard practice. Conditions will be assessed during
construction to determine where stump removal is required.
3. Provide a list of the drinking water well testing parameters.
Atlantic's Response:
Water wells within 150 ft of the limit of disturbance (LOD) are sampled and
tested for pH, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, conductivity,
alkalinity, acidity, sulfates, oil/grease, phenolic, iron, manganese,
aluminum, fecal coliform, copper, lead, nickel, silver, thallium, zinc,
chromium, arsenic, mercury, selenium, cyanide, calcium magnesium,
hardness, chlorides, antimony, cadmium, and beryllium.
4. Provide the locations and rate of discharge of hydrostatic test water.
Atlantic's Response:
The table below provides the milepost location, rate of discharge, and type
of hydrostatic test that will generate the discharge water (mainline or HDD
drill segment).
Table 1
Hydrostatic Test Discharge Locations by Milepost, Rate of Discharge and
Source of Hydrostatic Test water in North Carolina
Discharge Location
Rate o Discharze
H drostatic Test T e
Milepost
allons er minute
AP -2
0.00
5000 gynn
Mainline H drotest
8.27
5000 gpm
Mainline H drotest
9.90
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
12.89
5000 gpm
Mainline H drotest
13.96
5000 gynn
Mainline H drotest
27.68
5000 gpm
Mainline H drotest
34.40
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
10

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
Table I
Hydrostatic Test Discharge Locations by Milepost, Rate of Discharge and
Source of Hydrostatic Test water in North Carolina
Discharge Location
Rate of Discharge
Hdrostatic Test T e
Mile ost
fgallonsper minute
40.36
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
41.00
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
53.75
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
56.66
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
59.90
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
62.12
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
74.32
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
75.70
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
78.82
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
83.15
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
83.35
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
88.68
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
88.94
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
93.80
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
102.81
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
113.43
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
121.10
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
126.51
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
128.18
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
142.34
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
144.32
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
156.90
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
157.28
1500 gpm
HDD Pretest
167.33
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
170.52
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
170.85
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
181.13
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
186.33
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
AP -3
0.00
5000 gpm
Mainline Hydrotest
September 22, 2017
5. The Division received numerous comments expressing concerns over potential
sedimentation and turbidity from the construction of the pipeline. The Division
understands from the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) that
the proposed pipeline has submitted two Sediment & Erosion Control Plans for review
11

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
(one for Northampton, Halifax, Nash, Wilson, and Johnston Counties, on for Sampson,
Cumberland, and Robeson Counties), but there may be an exemption from NPDES
Stormwater permitting.
a. Provide all Sediment & Erosion Control plans for the project using the following
link: haps://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Supplemental-Information-Form.
Atlantic's Response:
Sediment and Erosion Control plans were uploaded for the ACP in North
Carolina to the web -link provided, on September 20, 2017. The uploaded
files include the application materials that were submitted to the NCDEQ
DEMLR Raleigh and Fayetteville regional offices on 13 March 2017 (rev 1)
and revised application materials that were submitted to the Raleigh and
Fayetteville regional offices on 28 August 2017 (rev 2).
b. Provide an overview of the sediment and erosion control measures you plan to
implement as part of you Sediment & Erosion Control Plan, including if there are
any measures or steps you plan to voluntarily take above the minimum
requirements (e.g., implementing the requirements in Section II.B of the
NCGO10000 Construction Stormwater General Permit, etc.).
Atlantic's Response:
The erosion and sediment control measures identified for use on the Project
were selected in accordance with the requirements in the FERC Plan and
Procedures, and the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual. The baseline erosion and sediment control
measures include temporary and permanent waterbars, trench plugs, belted
silt retention fences and coir logs.
In addition to the baseline erosion and sediment control measures, Atlantic
has committed to implementing enhanced erosion and sediment control
measures at 89 waterbody/wetland crossings identified as sensitive by the
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Specifically, compost filter sock
will be utilized at these waterbody crossings instead of the baseline erosion
and sediment control measure (i.e., belted silt retention fence). Compost
filter sock is generally recognized as having superior suspended solids
filtering and removal efficiency as compared to most sediment barrier
technologies and is often used for protection of exceptional/high quality
environmental resources. The waterbody/wetland crossings to receive
12

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017 September 22, 2017
enhanced erosion and sediment control measures are identified in the table
below.
Table 2
Waterbody/Wetland Locations Where Enhanced Erosion and Sediment Control Measures are
Planned in North Carolina
Project Segment/
County
Milepost
Waterbod /Wetland Name"
Unique ID
AP -2
Northampton
8.3
UNT to Trouble Field Creek
snrh010
Northampton
8.5
UNT to Trouble Field Creek
snrh009
Northampton
8.5
UNT to Trouble Field Creek
snr 002
Northampton
8.8
UNT to Trouble Field Creek
snrg003
Northampton
9.4
None crossed
None
Northampton
9.6
UNT to Roanoke River
snrh004
Northampton
9.9
Roanoke River
shlh001
Halifax
10.1
UNT to Roanoke River
whlh002
Halifax
10.2
None crossed
None
Halifax
10.9
None crossed
None
Halifax
23.1
Beaverdam Swamp
sh1h017
Halifax
27.4
Jacket Swamp
sh1h011
Halifax
30.6
UNT to Rocky Swamp
shlh015
Halifax
31.0
UNT to Rocky Swamp
shlh020
Halifax
31.2
UNT to Rocky Swamp
shlo001
Halifax
31.2
UNT to Rocky Swamp
shlo002
Halifax
32.0
Rocky Swamp
whlh023e
Halifax
32.7
UNT to Rocky Swamp
shlh013
Halifax
32.8
UNT to Rocky Swamp
shlh014
Halifax
33.0
None crossed
None
Halifax
33.4
None crossed
None
Halifax
33.7
UNT to Fishing Creek
shl 011
Halifax
33.9
Fishing Creek
sna 001
Nash
34.1
None crossed
None
Nash
34.7
None crossed
None
Nash
34.8
UNT to Fishing Creek
sna 003
Nash
34.8
UNT to Fishing Creek
sna 002
Nash
35.1
UNT to Fishing Creek
sna 004
Nash
39.7
UNT to Swift Creek
snab100
Nash
39.7
UNT to Swift Creek
snab100
Nash
39.8
UNT to Swift Creek
snah001
Nash
40.3
UNT to Swift Creek
snah002
Nash
40.6
Swift Creek
snah003
Nash
40.9
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snah006
Nash
41.6
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snah005
Nash
41.7
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snah004
Nash
42.0
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snah029
Nash
42.1
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snah025
Nash
42.1
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snah026
Nash
42.8
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snab103
Nash
43.8
None crossed
None
Nash
44.0
UNT to Flat Rock Branch
snabl04
Nash
44.4
Flat Rock Branch
snac001
Nash
44.8
Flat Rock Branch
sna 012
Nash
1 54.0
Little Sapony Creek
wnah028
13

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
Table 2
Waterbody/Wetland Locations Where Enhanced Erosion and Sediment Control Measures are
Planned in North Carolina
Project Segment/
County
Milepost
Waterbod /Wetland Name'
Unique ID
Nash
56.3
Sapony Creek
snah024
Nash
58.8
UNT to Tar River
snap004
Nash
59.1
UNT to Tar River
snap003
Nash
59.1
UNT to Tar River
sna 002
Nash
59.4
Tar River
snao011
Wilson
60.4
UNT to Tar River
snao009
Wilson
68.3
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio003
Wilson
69.1
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio004
Wilson
69.3
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio005
Wilson
69.5
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio006
Wilson
69.7
Marsh Swamp
swio007
Wilson
70.4
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio009
Wilson
70.5
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio008
Wilson
70.9
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio013
Wilson
71.0
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swi0011
Wilson
71.0
UNT to Marsh Swamp
swio012
Wilson
72.2
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swi 001
Wilson
72.3
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swic001
Wilson
72.5
UNT to Contentnea Creek
dwic001
Wilson
73.1
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swib100
Wilson
73.3
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swib100
Wilson
73.4
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swib100
Wilson
73.6
Contentnea Creek
swic002
Wilson
73.9
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swi 008
Wilson
74.1
UNT to Contentnea Creek
swi 006
Wilson
74.4
UNT to Buckhorn Branch
swio017
Wilson
75.8
UNT to Buckhorn Branch
swi 017
Johnston
75.8
UNT to Buckhorn Branch
swi 009
Johnston
81.0
UNT to Little River
s o 013
Johnston
82.0
UNT to Little River
s o 003
Johnston
82.5
UNT to Little River
sjoe001
Johnston
82.5
Little River
s'oe002
Johnston
82.6
UNT to Little River
s'oe004
Johnston
82.8
None crossed
None
Johnston
83.4
UNT to Buffalo Creek
s'oe005
Johnston
83.5
UNT to Buffalo Creek
sjoe006
Johnston
84.5
UNT to Big Branch
s "oo014
Johnston
84.6
Big Branch
s'o 001
Johnston
84.5
UNT to Big Branch
s'o 002
Johnston
85.9
UNT to Little Creek
s'oo003
Johnston
86.5
Little Creek
sjoo004
Johnston
98.5
Neuse River
sjob105
Johnston
110.6
Parker Pond Swamp/John K
Swam
-jop029f
Cumberland
154.2
Cape Fear River
scm026
a Waterbody Name listed as "None crossed" represent locations along the pipeline right-of-
way where enhanced erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented to protect
off right-of-way water resources.
14

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017 September 22, 2017
6. The Division requires additional information regarding cumulative impacts. It is
important to note that an analysis of cumulative impact is required regardless of whether
these projects are separate from the ACP, not within ACP's purview or undertaken by
entities other than ACP.
a. Provide a map of the proposed pipeline showing all existing transmission
pipelines and their associated distribution points in North Carolina.
Atlantic's Response:
A map depicting existing transmission pipelines (based on GIS data from a
commercial vendor, REATAG) and the proposed ACP in North Carolina is
provided as Appendix C. Distribution points along the existing systems, other
than metering and regulating stations along the existing Transcontinental Gas
Company system in western North Carolina, which are included on the figure,
are not readily available.
b. Provide the shapefiles for the proposed pipeline route.
Atlantic's Response:
A shapefile of the proposed pipeline route with mileposts in North Carolina has
been provided to NCDEQ as a ZIP -file attachment to an email sent to Ms.
Jennifer Burdette on September 20, 2017.
c. The application indicates Metering and Regulation stations will be constructed in
Johnston, Cumberland, and Robeson Counties. Provide a qualitative cumulative
impacts analysis for these counties. Refer to the Division's Cumulative Impact
Policy for 401 and Isolated Wetland Permitting Program (Ver 2. 1, dated April 10,
2004) for guidance, available online:
httDs:Hfiles.nc. izov/ncdea/Water%20Oauality/Surface%20Water%20Protection/40
I/Policies Guides Manuals/CumulativeImpactPolicy_.pdf
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic is working to complete a qualitative cumulative impacts analysis for
the counties with Metering and Regulation stations, and will provide the
updated analysis by September 29, 2017.
d. Based on the Division's review, the proposed pipeline will cross Moccasin Creek
[27-53-(0.5)] in Johnston County, which is a 303d stream impaired for benthos.
15

Atlantic Coast Pipeline
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Response to Information Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Dated September 14, 2017
September 22, 2017
The proposed pipeline will also cross just upstream of the following 303d
streams:
i. Stony Creek [28-68b] in Nash County, which is impaired for benthos and
dissolved oxygen;
ii. Tar River [28-(36)b] in Nash County, which is impaired for dissolved
oxygen; and
iii. Mill Creek [27-52-(1)b] in Johnston County, which is impaired for
dissolved oxygen.
Based on past concurrent construction projects, provide a quantitative cumulative
impact analysis from construction activities for the 4 watersheds listed above.
Alternatively, provide a commitment to implement the requirements in Section
H.B. of the NCGO10000 permit, or other similar additional best management
practices, in these 4 watersheds.
Atlantic's Response:
Atlantic commits to implementing the requirements in Section H..B of the
NCGO10000 permit (or similar additional best management practices) in these 4
watersheds.
Atlantic has provided these responses and will provide the remaining responses by September
29, 2017, within 30 days from September 14, 2017, per NCDEQ's request for additional
information.
16

Appendix A
Wetland Datasheets for Inundated Wetlands

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic andulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ���� 1 ,Go ---- City/County Sampling Date: -7 — IL
Applicant/Owner: State: C Sampling Point: 'q�y
Investigator(s): � Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): � t �'c iL Local relief (concave convex, none): C_A. 'Lti-ch� —E' . Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat a a� • aG Long: 7 C l-3 i � i . �V/.( Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ° C3 NWI classification: Fr �.3
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes >(/— No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �X__ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features. etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetiand? Yes No
Remarks:
HYUKOLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
1❑T
Q High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
tI—iI
Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
717�
l��IJ Water Marks (131) t❑f Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (02)
8_
Sediment Deposits (132) lJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
,Saturation
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (85) Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
,Water -Stained Leaves (89)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes NoDepth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes Y No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
7.
8.
l%
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
% Cower
S ecie ? Status
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2D
u
1
Species Across All Strata:
y�/L
Percent of Dominant Species
F
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Ramnlinn Pninf• VV
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
u
1
Species Across All Strata:
I (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: SZ) 20% of total cover: 2-6) FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: —_) FAC species x 3 =
1. G. �jp — �.a� FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
3. Gt4vt v (A( Column Totals: (A)
M
17 IJ
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8 Q 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover t/ LIQ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: q_ 20% of total cover: ' l0 -
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 2 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5. height.
6. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7• than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
=Total Cover �y}
50% of total cover: 2� 20% of total cover: `
Wood ine Stratum(Plot si e: )
3. A1 cc�v►S �4t _
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover i �`� Vegetation
50% of total cover: _1 20% of total cover: t l/ Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:�/�4-440 G
Profile De ti
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
W
scup on. (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
inches Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Texture Remarks
Color moistL_ % Type Loc
T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑
Histosol (Al)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Polyvaiue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
fid
Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
tJ
Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
H5
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)71❑
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
L] 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�] Marl (F10) (LRR U)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
7�
D Other
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al
( )
I—t
1_t
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ,❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
present,
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
D Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
unless disturbed or problematic.
D Sandy Redox (S5)
n Stripped
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
H
Matrix (S6)
n Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
M/
Hydric Sol[ Present? Yes J 1 No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
W

�q� � r � S � � ��' I /5' � Y irk �� • '� �w'�^•�eI �� I ' d'
I I •',• • � �w ' ,• • r �r iy, I I ' II � t.
.„
�l
t
-14
ly
• ti.
� A.,
g': -:1i -� '� `�, ..� -
410
ams . • _ -]• ..,.
�j�ttj�r v s
i Jry.• � i7<
_'�• t .. ��.'. �-�. % .I` ,, ::off

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
-�� I,
Pro'ect/Site• � c� � �
j
City/County: _ �'1 t i Sampling Date: ' —IS
App( V, L Ln�
State: � Sampling Point:j/JI%4Q-}C)) 4 F .�/
Investigator(s):
Investigator(s): _�
r(s):
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ��YV�,�y�'
, _
Local relief (concave, convex, none)-.(— { ` C ta-�_ Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Lat: /.2 r .7 1 71,
q%fDatum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
NWI classification: P— t— �)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical
for this time of year? Yes ')",_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes >11 No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
YesNo
Yes 4- No
Yes ><1 No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
% � 1 Cin../., � �`V"U i'L�t � i�-��I S- t i'l t � z' y,'t. ►-�� `1 �-' � � 4�'� � Cg
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q❑
•EHigh Water Table (A2)
t❑ -i
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Saturation (A3)
tiJr
�t—_IT Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
tJ Water Marks (131)
L ! Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits
iQ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
(133)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation
Thin Muck SurfaceC7
( )
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No .>�
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes % No Depth (inches):
i�
Yes No Depth
X
includes capillary frin e
(inches): �— Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
'
PW—r `'1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
I
7.
8.
7.
8.
Sampling Point:
S ecie ilt lt Mulu usr
uommance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Multiply by:
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
�—
f
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (g)
Percent of Dominant Species j
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ( (A/g)
Total Cover
50% of total cover:�,20-%/. f total cover:
S ✓L
�%flf
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 2 % of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Piot size: )
2.
3. I `YY��' l � 1
4. Lk
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.-
10.
11.
12.
– Total Cover /
50% of total cover: 2S 00X of total cover: V
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot si e: )
2.
3. CL C> 7f SSE/
4.
5.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (g)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
a2 - Dominance Test is >50%
F1 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover:_ 20% of total cover: Present?
(if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Yes X_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

SOIL
irlf:" ��Liio ((p
oampung ro
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
inches Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration,, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
unless otherwise noted. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosoi (Al) ❑Polyvaiue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
H Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
D Loamy Mucky
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Stratified Layers (A5)
HOrganic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
T� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
H
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Ell 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Depressions (F8)
F1 Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D Other
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
r] Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_] Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P,
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
present,
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
H
(S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

�� '� - ♦ �1�' • SCJ'_ l��

(WWET(LAND JDEITERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantiic and If Coastal Plain Region /
Project/Site:�i jl� \ +r r 4 i Cn City/County: t t Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: �t >� v� c3� State: Sampling Point: VJ t4LO 0 o
Investigator(s): �� C� _ Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): f' j 1 v �\/_ Local relief (concave, convex, none): %L � v'' 2 Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or M–LR--A):'` y �3 r.
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
: �?� C 0 21: S ( NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X_' No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes i No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Q Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
IIIPrimary
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
7ui Mari Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Moss Trim Lines (B16)
pQp�
l=1
Water Marks (B1)
tUt
Li Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
H Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
iQ—r
I_1 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
M-6eomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
L2'�,FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
phagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover
Dominant Indicator
S ecie . Status
Multiply by:
OBL species
2.
3.
A
FAC species
4. a L
a
5.
6.
7.
8.
- Total Cover
50% of total cover:20% of total cover: -t--L
Sa�/lin Sh b Stratum (Plo izie: )
1. ( ty r k� 1, it
rAL
3LZrL-
.
4.
5.
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: ( (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
hyoropnync vegetation Indicators:
7
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
�-J--
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover j
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 1
Herb
1.!
tratum (Plot size: ) / ,
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2•
�tr ��
' _�C(� t)
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4'
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
6'
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
11.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: b 20% of total cover: 2 -
Wood
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
�
4.
5.
LE� = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover: �.�20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
( 1 0 J k
0 t_v� bzo�--_ 01
Sampling Point:
th needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvge Loc Texture Remarks
5&;,K
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
trictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
j—j Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gieyed
-❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Matrix (172)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
Depleted Dark
El
(MLRA 153B)
Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
ID
Red Parent Material (TF2)
(178)
F] Mari (F10) (LRR U)
D
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other
n Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(Explain in Remarks)
El iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Ej Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes L_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Versioh 2.0

� t -All
'S
�►°'S�' s'i`x
a
�
F.0114
tel/
V J
SII
/
F.0114
tel/

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County:l IT1 Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: ti14(9r State: 14IC- Sampling Point: INir/���3`�i� �✓
Investigator(s): fi Section, Township, Range: 1AZA.
d
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): OnE p #Ar J Local relief (concave, convex, none): GO.Vej" Slope (%):
w 8
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T Lat:3c �? r e)l ey3 Long: 7'7 � fz �i• �(Zg Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: �A1cdZ*1k NWI classification: _/lb&5f
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �Y No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 4 No within a Wetland? Yes A_ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ::Ts-: No
Remarks: /J
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
I� High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
_x
Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Iron
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (85) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Yes No
Depth (inches).
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): _
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes 772�— No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

vGrGTeTlr)M iFmir stratat - use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? �rSStt//atus..
2.,!,Ze4ka '
3. i 7Z,&
4. Ekc
5.
6.-
7.-
8.
.7.8.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: Lfc 20% of total cover:
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
2.SL y C
rr
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
L O =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: b ) " L
M 1
r `(
1. W �,n
2. tiw. A Z- G,,it)
4.
r -7_ =r
5. �r, G7L ter.'11 %L Y Z-
6.
7.-
8.-
9.
.8.9.
10.
11.
12.
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: b 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum _(Plypt size: 26 ) y r,
of
2.�Oxr[o �NOI^�41 rGVIt.Qh� j�L�
3.
4.-
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover. 2- 20% of total cover: D • g
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Sampling Point: ylvA e�ytIW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Z (A)
Total Number of Dominant ' (B)
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_A-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiyht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Vf
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

soil
Sampling Point: W N1my7g10 W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvoe'Lo�c — Texture Remarks
o� 3— 1 t.W'
A"
D Y4 S% o 7• -YP y/nCi
o
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_r Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S; T, U)
_
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
I
(A�•f
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

aO
dL
1
i
I
yrs
r.Re

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 3/11/2015
Applicant/Owner: DOMINION State: NC Sampling Point: wnac005f_w
Investigator(s): Team C Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 36.03017516 Long: -77.8779865 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes '� No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes '� No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Hardwood floodplain forest associated with Flat Rock Branch. Recent clear-cut activities have taken place in the southeastern section outside of the
wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
'/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:wnac005f_w
5•
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraclflua
10
No
FAC
7
Total Number of Dominant
3 Pinus taeda
5
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
15 20% of total cover:
Multiply by:
8
5 )
OBL species 0
x 1
= 0
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4.
85.71428571 (A/B)
6.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
30 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
15 20% of total cover:
Multiply by:
8
5 )
OBL species 0
x 1
= 0
50 Yes
55
2 Lonicera japonica
= Total Cover
13
3 Athyrium asplenioides
26
10 No
27.5
11
FACW species
x 2
=
50% of total cover:
20%
of total cover:
135
6.
405
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
7.
FAC species
x 3
=
1 Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes FAC
FACU species 15
x 4
= 60
2 Acer rubrum
10
Yes FAC
UPL species 0
x 5
= 0
Magnolia viminiana
10
Yes FACW
Column Totals: 163
(A)
491 (B)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5 )
1 Microstegium vimineum
50 Yes
FAC
2 Lonicera japonica
15 Yes
FACU
3 Athyrium asplenioides
10 No
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
37.5 20% of total cover:
15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
1 Vitis riparia
3 Yes
FACW
2 Vitis riparia
3 Yes
FACW
3.
4.
5.
3 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
1.5 20% of total cover:
0.6
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes '� No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:wnac005f—w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-16 10 YR 3/1 95 10 YR 3/6 5 C PL
SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No
Remarks:
Hydric soil present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

"; '�'--- ms's'- - _'•++� 'ti_ '`,'' �
fTT � �+.� _J �J�•ti y. 7

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 3/10/2015
Applicant/Owner: DOMINION State: NC Sampling Point: wnac005s_w
Investigator(s): Team C Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 36.03090618 Long: -77.87693315 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes '� No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes '� No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Wetland depression that recieves water inputs from a stream
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) ✓
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
'/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:wnac005s_w
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1 Acer rubrum
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
3 Quercus nigra
4.
5•
6.
Absolute
% Cover
15
5
5
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FAC
Yes FAC
Yes FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
height.
25
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
= Total Cover
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
35 70
g,
12'5
10.
5
FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
40 120
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FAC species x 3 =
1
Alnus serrulata
20
Yes
FACW
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
2
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 190
(A) (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
'� 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
30
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Arundinaria gigantea
15 Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Present? Yes '� No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:wnac005s_w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-16 10 YR 3/1 100
SL Mucky modifier
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No
Remarks:
Hydric soil present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Photo 1
Wetland data point wnac005s_w facing east
Photo 2
Wetland data point wnac005s_w facing south

•6y� h x'
-ti
Photo 3
Wetland data point wnac005s_w facing west

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: AC /— City/County: IJ06 4A Sampling Date: 8-,-2 1 — ( r
Applicant/Owner: b Stater Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): bQJP_rZr Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): oa LlAti 0 Local relief (concave, convex,, none): CCS tP.�2 Slope (%)):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l Lat: 2-(0 Long: [ / O 5( Z Datum:w i+s
Soil Map Unit Name: 43 6k NWI classification: 1OF40
tu40
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _X_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indica rs minimum of two re uired
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uired check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
' Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation
1--f Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (610)
(A3)
Water
lII Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
L( Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (132)
LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Dry-Season
Q Presence Reduced
Water Table (C2)
iCrayfish
Drift Deposits
of Iron (C4)
Q
Burrows (C8)
(63)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position
Q Iron Deposits (65)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
(D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes X No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes Z No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
14 C �
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree S ratum (Plot size: JU ) %Cover Species? Status
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: c (C7 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.T a
2
3. oruvx ?f .1.)-
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10 0= Total Cover
50% of total cover: Q 20% of total cover: �-
Herb Str tum (PI size: )
1. /
2.
3 4-
. Dl.. C �,
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Z2 = Total Cover
50% of tot i cover: 3yS__ 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
Samnlinn Pninf-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 19
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant LSpecies Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species Cq
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Four Vegetation
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
�
Hydrophytic
7i.L = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _� Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Yes ll No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of in
Sampling Point:
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
10 R 1i c%u1 454113 4 MM
,�o /
ypc. — ,wicemraaon u=uepienon KM=Keduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosoi (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
trictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LI2R S, T, U)
Thin
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, TI U)
B
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR
-❑
Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Depleted Matrix
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
(173)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
Depleted
❑
(MLRA 1536)
Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151,)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (1713) (LRR P, T, Q)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) '
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

w
77
• - � Fes_ _ -
-
tix;,�;p •,-IL
,
rH ��Y'�

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Pouf:" 1,40
Investigator(s): c -
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): 1 G /) C Local relief (concave, convex, none): _tGTh�-i�i2 �T Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat• .5 S 3 522,, 3 ( ?l ng: , 7 52 / �lv � 7 t Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/_ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑YSparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑—r Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (613)
p1 High Water Table (A2)
LJ Saturation (A3)
1L -J -J Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) �Y
t�_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
]-Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (81)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
F] Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
ff�❑ ediment Deposits (62)
TL�if
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
tl-J-t
tJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
aGeomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(67) ]2�i=AC-Neutral
Test (D5)
J21 -Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
M

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
Absolute Domino t Indicator
) % Cover S eci ? Status
1.
c c to
2. t35_
7�
-
3. L
7-D /
jam`
4.
_
5.
UPL species
6.
Column Totals:
7.
8.
C _ = Total Cover7�
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
sag- lin /Shr�Strat­�-(Plot size:
) `
1.
2.
JI
3. J,. G�2i
/ F/A-C.
4.
���
5.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2-6 20% of total cover:
D�--°
t ('
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
12
I IN
V FA((A
(4 <,
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) /
1. cam%" rl5 L lZ - �./
2.
3.
4.
5.
f= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
(If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
w /u /4 P s
Samolina Point-
Absolute
oint
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Dominance Test is >50%
F] 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
EJ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tail.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tail.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
ption: (Describe to the
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
th needed to document the indicator or confirr,
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Type: C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosoi (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Active Layer (if observed):
/U H H � _2_� Tc
Sampling Point:
absence of indicato
TextureRemarks
cTr'-"
2Location: PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) z 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
tLJ
LJ
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Ll
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark
❑—
(MLRA 153B)
Surface (F7)T1
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
IJ
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
liedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
4nomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? YesLL No
,narks:
1 Y�It
i C-7-5-
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

wnoh025f w
V
Wetland data point wnah025f—w facing east
Wetland data point wnah025f—w facing south

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: TI VI
Applicant/Omer: DO 'v`1 n.t0✓1
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: 1'Lo1o'Vl"'n
Subregi LRR)brMLRA)): r Let:
Soil Map Unit Name: P110(AM
City/County: UX [SOY\ CO. Sampling Date:
State: Sampling Point: VJWi0 1DQ(of-W
Section, Township, Range: NW
Local relief (concave, convex, none): COrCC• '!e Slope (%):
Long: �,6, 0 7 ` q Datum: WbS
NWI classification: I v Fo
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -Z,
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology _ naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes )< No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired� check all that aooly)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑1 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
�_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Er
Saturation (A3)
t0
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Q
Water Marks (B1)
tl-J-r
1L�If Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) j��Ij
DrySeason Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
1L-Jf
t"f Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
® Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
I�
y1
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
LJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
n�
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
n
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
n❑n
Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Not-
-2-1
.L_
Water Table Present? Yes L No_ Depth (inches): to
Saturation Present? Yes X
No _ Depth (inches): l a
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WWf 00(%6 F_V1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: K )
1. Q 5.54 5 y! va(1Y4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
50 MAO
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
ThatAre OBL, FACW, or FAC: S (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: C)hz (AIB)
2. Jln
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
Prevalence index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply low
8
OBL species x1=
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(UV = Total Cover
500/6 of total cover: 5v 20% of total cover: ZO
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: IS x Is )
1. LiGr�S' °^rr S1nB+SSP 15 'L
2 �_��� CJ`G Ca 40 'V VAL
3.
4.
8.
Hydro is Vegetation Indicators:
- Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7.
8.yn1
S2- (05 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: S2- .� 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 X )
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
3'
4.
5
6.
7,
8.
g,
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: I % X f �
1. V�}15 Y0'FU�L(i'N1iA
-Total Cover '' '
20% of total cover: 1_
)
=�%Q 1 C�
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
2.
3.
4.
5.
Z
-- Total Cover
V 20 /o of total cover:
50% of total cover: °
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WUf10 00(o f W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) °k Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
0-(0 (ovrz W1
SL
Co - I_� (n Y2 4/1 pro IoYp
LS
17-21( 2.5-Y
0 (r' -S/, 2 C M
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (A1)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑---III 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
y 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft) (LRR O)
IrL.�ll Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
L] Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) 1�.'�I
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) JJ
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) {I'.'.II
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface 2)
(A8) (LRR JJ
L] 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
(F8)
F1 Marl (F10) (LRR U)
(TF1
'�I
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
rl Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
0 Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
[] Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
r❑r--11
LI Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) ,L�
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Version 2.0

.. - W.,
To
• r r
- - -1 rt• 4
��' 1 '+

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ! C` City/County: ` Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: 4v^ r v -r s Q n State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): r LL - Section, Township, Range: N
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.)::1 6kVal Mack[' Local relief
(concave, convex, none): C.t [. � llt, Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): x..1`-1`— P Lat: �~ ta17 ! Long: —25 -lis 0 Datum: By
Sol] Map Unit Name: -._, �� 5,exe, HU x �X -wry NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typicAr this time of year? Yes --Z Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes v- No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesy No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
Within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum_ of two required
❑, Surface Soil Cracks (%)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply)
❑-r Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
I—1 High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1810)
'Q Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
II Water Marks (Bi)
LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)II
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
II Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
S Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
�❑r
LJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
El Geomorphic Position (D2)
QIron Deposits (185)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ElShallow Aquitard (D3)
!__I. Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
j[-fAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Q Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No V/ Depth J`
Water Table Present? Yes
(inches):
No 7: Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): 1>
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
x 1 =
FACW species
2.
FAC species
3.
FACU species
4.
UPL species
5.
Column Totals:
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50°% of total ccovverr:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3O X -Ao )
1. P I VA U S
Y 1�L
..._....
2.li.
3. t. % pr'G 1 d-►Mt(i V`t' }C!1 C d�111 l(j r�
c
p J
t
4.
•5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20°% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2..vi &AI.
3. r3'�!1 Iirl1, : rri
57
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
.�� Total Cover
..�
50% of total cover: �S 20% of Total cover:. 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: '3C? XSo )
1.
2.
3.
Sampling Point: w't`• t uov-w,
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _% (AIB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
X3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
L /1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2l0020- Dominance Test is >50%
II 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
1__L Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine- All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height,
4.
5 Hydrophytic
�- =Total Cover Vegetation
- Present? Yes Y No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WWI 4U� F_V11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) _ Color(moisl}-- %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0_10 "I,< 3 jov
<_� SL
r 11 7SIX qJj k cp
SL
%�/�
a-zo, .s i vii yup
54�,
-'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
-0,Histosol
(Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1:11 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
HHistic
Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
u 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
E
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S. T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
H
IJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
1❑t Red Parent Material (f F2)
(AS) (LRR
(F8)
Ll Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
D
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
II Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
II
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochre (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR d, S)
0 Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 1530, 153D)
II
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

t� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: AcnCity/County: SAOS'ol� Sampling Date: 7/2-2/I If-
ApplicanUOwner: �Pmlrliovl State: /J C- Sampling Point: wId
oW
Investigator(s): n -DY-) Section, Township, Range: ytA
r
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): •r�°OdP `t✓1 Local relief (concave, convex, none): (011ca„'CC Slope (%): �� Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: •S6 r) Z3 rV Long: 7 S' 2H b 12 W Datum: ` bS -�'+8�l
Soil Map Unit Name: C61u15 Snnc),..r to it NWA classification: I r� FL7
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No—
Are
o_Are Vegetation Soil -or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes n No— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X' No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Primary
Hydrology Indicators:
Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
I❑'I Moss Trim Lines (B16)
yet Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
S Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Lnt Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Position (D2)
II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Qf
E
WWII
_
Surface Water (Al) L1 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2) t1 ----If Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) 1L ---If Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Water Marks (131)❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2) t0 Presence. of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3)❑ Recent IronReduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) LJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)Geomorphic
Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
n1..L
Q
Lt
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137),III--I
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
t1 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
Water Table Present? Yes _
Saturation Present? Yes iX
includes capillary fringe)
No X Depth (inches): N
No X Depth (inches): % 2-0 r
No_ Depth (inches): ) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present. Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W�0001(0q-W
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3b X�� )
1. Tl G`=r ry �r'J,vt
Absolute
%Cover
%
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
of FAC-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �, (A)
Totales Acro s Dominant II//
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: too (AIB)
2. p,; s 4°e 6 IS f FAC
Oy2rW n� r-\ l5
3. S `� � EAC
4. Lq..tdtrn 6raT $-tyro GF(✓ti ZO y /kC,
T
6.
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
OBL species x1=
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �� 20% of total cover: 1' _
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 X (S )
1. Ao)" ignq FAC),,/
2. ViY o0hc, (o -1 _FA-(-
3, &gr"v rvnn (0 �_ FAiC,
r
4.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
�-t 3 -Prevalence Index is <<-3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb LSt�ratum (Plot size: s X5' )
1. ✓<tVryry,S C.Qrnoui to 05L
2.
A W
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of sae, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
3. .. ,
4.
5
6.
7,
8.
g,
10.
11.
12.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:11S 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )4 30 )
Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
2. Tox�c�auldrav, r�5 5 v Fm
3.
4.
5.
l = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: Z
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W 11000110 P -%,i
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
foo
$-2o Z.sy 4/y 90
Z.Sy 1.14 to MS tk
lo. Sn,.
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matdx.
Hydric
❑
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
unless otherwise noted.)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
TTT❑111 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (AS)
'�
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D
D
rl
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
j] Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
n Redox Depressions (F8)
fMarl (F10) (LRR U)
(MLRA 1538)
l❑'I Red Parent Material (rF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
itnn Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
L]
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
L] Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
0
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HSandy
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox (SS)
,n❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
IL—II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TM`s �i,. ,:�..,�
''
',.� �`+ _�
,'ai ;'>• _
�;ti ,..* .**
,�L`1►P'
V
� �
' if i
. � _
_ — _ .� y4 I
1. +e -

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plaln Region
Projectl5ite: CitylCourny, Sampling ❑ate: b
Applicant/Owner:_-•_ _ Sampling
�Z I Yl t C�Y� State: Samlin Point:
Investlgator(s): i -o De.fr . C4 0,Y .. Section, Township, Range: —n D V"1f_,,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): I lt+ Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yl f) r'1 C- slope (%) U Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L O R P Lat: SE) . LI 93 U 2_ Long: ' � S , 3 l !� �1 I � Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: tea ,I "s }_0. 11 �. ` �` `'d l o 0- rn z NWI classification: ]?F -D
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes NO
(If needed, explain any answers In Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydic Soil Present? Yes --No
.�/ within a Wetiand7 Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
NC,we l, +o,c,�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two re2uirQd)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ parsaiy Vegetated Concave Surface (g8)
Primary In 'r rs (minimum of oneis reouiredLCheck all 11hat apuly)❑
Surface Water (At) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
EJ
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patfems (B14)
Q Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (916)
Water Marks (B1)
1I -J -f
I --I Oxidized Rhixospheres along Living Roots (C 3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
I❑ -f
❑ Recent iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (CB)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (85)
Cather (Explain in Remarks)
a'5haIlowAquitard (D3)
❑ jnundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
l[Ir�FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
I/
Surface Wafer Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
1%epth
Water Table Present? Yes
No (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No: Depth (inches): Z�
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes Ho
includes ca pilia ry frInge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
w,}}oau3O�'a
Sampling Poo
r
"} aft
Absolute Dominant Indicator
°%
Dominance Test worksheet:
013L species
Tree Stratum {Plot size: A }
1. LCv'- f U %>^ u Y--
Cover
i 5
Snecies7 Status
� L
cies
That Are 013L, FACW, or of Dominant r FAC:
7i (A)
2. �� i ��:�� �� ��� iia• J r0L�
...�-
.I a y., i
3. ; c c (L
1 [� _
�
A
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant cies
(B)
7,.
a-
5•
That Are OBL FACW, or FRC
(AB)
6.
7.
8 -
Li 0 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: ZL 20°% of total cover: 4S
SaplingfShrub Stratum (Plot size: 30�+ % D
1. r r
2.
3.
4.
5.
8:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20°% of total cover:
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: _j0� --A '�Df4 }
1. C li`i u, 51 iA [ % vz } ¢n . 01'y"+ l 1�,x V — Ll Z) '1 f
3.
4.
5.
6
7.
8.
S.
10,
11.
12 -
5 D = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: �--5 20% of total cover: t �
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 Df � X 361P)
2-
3.
4,
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total ° Cover of:
Multiply by: _
013L species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = 131A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
b12 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetatlon
2 - Dominance Test is 750%
El 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast helght (D BH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.2B ft (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants fess than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.2B It In
height.
5 Hydrophytic
i = Total Cover Vegetation
50°/o of total cover: 20°% of total cover:. w'• Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Yes �II No
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Verslon 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth malirix
finches] Color{m{oisti �°�
Redox Features
Color(gyistl _ % Tyne lot`
Texture Remarks
�? 2,5, L'jz 7S
10' s zS G
CL
j1-ZD lay 4L UQ
10� A LfD C.
'Type: C=Concentralion, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosol (A1)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (Se) (LRR S. T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
0
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Tiffin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral ❑)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
E Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,5)
❑
Black Hist[c (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
(F1) (LRR
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
-❑ P[edmont Fioodplaln Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (AS)
T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1`20)
(MLRA 1536)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P,
(176)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Redox Depressions
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
Lj
❑
Ntuck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
(FS)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
F1
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
!]
Thick €]ark Surface (At 2)
L] Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
Ij
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
j] Delta Ochrc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
[]
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
HSandy
Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
13
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sail Present? Yes fVo
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

-
M
s • '� � `-f .ilk, +^".,,;.:
,r
_FLS- •. : �~ v-�T ''�'i 'l
look
RL Ir.
�s
X11 ij .:1, 1 • 1 • yn + I
�1,� � •.�. it . �#' L.�. `:S' 1.r
1'
Abr
c •;
til

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: SERP City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 7/25/2014
Applicant/Owner: DOMINION State: NC Sampling Point: WJOA008f_W
Investigator(s): GB, TP, LE Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this Area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): SWALE Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.3842118 Long: -78.37642493Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes '� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Data point for a PFO wetland located in a wet swale intersection, stream SJOB004 flows through feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
'f Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes '� No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes✓ No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes '� No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
7.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
2 Quercus laurifolia
20
Yes
FACW
3 Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
4 Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
7.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
70
= Total Cover
FACW species 42
50% of total cover:
35 20%
of total cover:
14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
x 4 =
60
1 Morella cerifera
15
Yes
FAC
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
3. Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
4 Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
5. Aronia arbutifolia
5
No
FACW
C, Vaccinium corymbosum
5
No
FACW
7.
8.
9.
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1 Microstegium vimineum
2 Arundinaria gigantea
3 Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
4 Boehmeria cylindrica
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 17.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1 Lonicera japonica
2 Smilax rotundifolia
50% of total cover: 4
rs here or on a separate
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACW
Sampling Point: WJOA008f-W
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
11 (A)
12 (B)
91.66666666 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
FACW species 42
x 2 =
84
FAC species 111
x 3 =
333
FACU species 15
x 4 =
60
UPL species 0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 168
(A)
477 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.83
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
8 Yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 No FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
35 = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 7
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5 Yes FAC
3 Yes FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
8 = Total Cover Present? Yes '� No
20% of total cover: 1.6
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WJOA008f-w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 98 7.5YR4/6 2 C PL SCL
4-18 10YR 4/1 92 7.5YR 4/6 8 C PL/M SC
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
CLAY
Depth (inches): 4
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '( No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

......
:
. fix. � r - • • �_. � � � ���. w -�'�
r� • � - f 5 ; l

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Sile: P C A-) City/County: Skr'l i7JD rl ,� Sampling Date: 5 2 0 i5-
Applicanf/Owner: 'Do YYt I iN 1 vC O n State: i C_ Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): ESS�t20f r"TV+ry)IDU��� Section, Township, Range: hby)e�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 6 C 0.) n 6H9 P. Local relief (concave, convex, none): GO h LUV e. Slope
nn
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L 1` F r Lat: 3 5. 27L0l `� — 1 Long: — -7S • S S 3`I I Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: g i lbio so't IS Vl� Opti NN classification: I 0
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for his time of year? Yes \/ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes----����---- No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes v No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
u Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
check all that aooly)
❑
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
. h Water Table (A2)
iEl
Q Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (810)
_
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
rQ
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (03)
I❑'I
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑_
Sediment Deposits (132)
1Q
LJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
n❑
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
f ] ,Shallow Aquitard (D3)
QZundation
Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
ater-Stained Leaves (Bg)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
/ �i
N \4
Surface Water Present?
Yes _ No J Depth (inches):
74
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): i 2D
✓
Saturation Present?
Yes No _ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes v--�No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Z,) -t( -4P SS e (�
j r -«A

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: JS&-fObZ vJ
('�
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
3o('}x30
Tree Stratum (Plot size: i T )
/ Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. =t'e-Xv �CO�
1S
y G�1 n
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
2. '�N w✓- 5'I-yYMbi�Iva, FJ}G
3, Ny SSa�. S y VO -i-1 (,A to r
�
4.
Percent of Dominant Species �'v�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (AIB)
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
S5
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
1715 20% of total cover: _�
FACW species x2=
p 1
SaolinplShrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 X30 I
)
FAC species x3=
1
y_ I.(
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
2. 5) ry pl'Q A.S -i-tNV�'pYiO� s FpL
3 t"
4,
5.
Vegetation Indicators:
6.
IHyyldrophytic
II 1 -- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
Dominance Test is >50%
8.2
Qr-� 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
= Total Cover
50% of cover:
17- 6 20% of
total cover:
dotal
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 f X Soft)
`/ Facw
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Li�-FhYa. AInlf0Ila
IC)
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
5.
6.
7,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
8.
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
10.
11.
height.
12.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: Jr' 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: .3 DTf )C-6Dt� )
1. V1 DY1 P�
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
2.
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover Cover
50% of total cover:
20%
of total cover:
Present? Yes -
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).

SOIL
Sampling Point-J54"p 7 -PW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' Loci
0 -10 ( ate
la - ox z z _T57qy 51 -5- C, CA
Texture Remarks
s L nv ut, - -F(.x-Fvre,
�s
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
j] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
[� Stratified Layers (A5)
Wrganic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)}F-
,[] Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
,[] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
ID Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (173)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
H Redox Depressions (F8)Very
F] Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
-0 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
EIReduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
T]Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
D Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 1538)
❑ Red Parent Material (T172)
Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) -0 Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
L] Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) -0 Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) weliand hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) L] Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
L Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No
Remarks:

k � • rs � �� a y -� a � r, Vii- � ... � � - - _ �E" ,
l ;.'� .. h��,- "_� r ,- ._. L .�,• •1i .. s:� � _F�` " �_ ,_..moi. i
i �j,-:_�: �s� i" S F � ���;.�: �_'•; .. �„fib= � - .. -
mid
ir
i�
Av.
.. Z; -�•
lic

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
'�� City/County: Curv)�p Ev (AIKA Sampling Date:
Project/Site: ��--
Applicant/Owner. Y AWN i. IVC State: J V ` Sampling Point:wcrne 00$; W
Investigator(s): L9V Section, Township, Range: , X"$1``.4V
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):1 C
Subregion (LRR or ML1RA'): L \ (L
Soil Map Unit Name: W"ro. vh
Local relief
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeaR Yes
Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology naturally problematic?
we, convex, none): E i4�C11 4e., Slope (%): 0-4
_
Long: -119 1TO-7—ma,?,PQ Dja�ttu'--rm:: �I
NWI classification: T, V
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes %1-11�' No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes V No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ,
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
check all that aooly)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ �Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
O'Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
IIIIA� Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Iy1 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Q?Sa' ation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_' Water Marks (81) 1❑f Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (132) 1L--Jf Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_n Drift Deposits (133) lL'J� Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
QIron Deposits (B5)
LE lIn�undation Visible on Aerial Imagery
Ll Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
(137)
❑�Shallow Aquitard (D3)
&'I?AC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes —No
Water Table Present? Yes _
Saturation Present? Yes _
includes capillary fringe)
✓ Depth (inches): J� r
No Depth (inches): 7Zfl
No ✓ Depth (inches): 7
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes IV/ No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: wrc r^F OOMW
30 3f) ff•
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
x
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. L%r LAj Gt LI w&AV 5� roc I R l L A
s
��'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
Total Number of Dominant � 1
2.
3.
Species Across All Strata: '1 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �L_Jb (AIB)
5.
6.
7 -
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bw
B.
OBL species x1=
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: -7r 20% of total cover:_
FACW species x2=
Sacling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3 0 X 30
FAC species x3=
1. �-1G\)r,i711't FYyS�i�
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3.
4.
5.
Vegetation Indicators:
6.
IHyyldrophytic
,y --,,t 11-- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
J0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
n 3 -Prevalence Index is 93.0'
u Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
= Total Cover !
50% of total cover:
� 20%of total cover: (o
Herb (Plot size: 3 0-,K 3 0, �,)
'Indicators
1Stratum
Atk.
L
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. y V ppAwnr&6Q oxe-p'p
1
0-
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3.
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
5.
6.
7.
8.
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
11.
height.
12.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plotsize: 30 x30.F4-)
1. 4 , (ax rn�t.y,.l; ,61-17s
10
L
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20%
of total cover: Z
Present? Yes -Z No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WcmVo U Og¢_y,)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
v -z Icy L(i two
�L
2: Zo- (uy L'L7_
0\%"°l4 Zu G 6
SL -
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matdx.
Hydric
0
HHistic
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
Histosol (Al)
Epipedon (A2)
LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
T Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
'E] Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
J�( Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Lj Redox Depressions (F8)
0 Marl (1710) (LRR U)
(MLRA 1538)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
EI TVery Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
y Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
0 Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
L]
❑
❑
HSandy
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) E]] Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR O, S) 0 Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) r r Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
L]
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wemp008_w facing southeast.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1) C -P City/County: %" " 'q m W1 ° "1 Sampling Date: 7/16 /1 5
Applicant/Owner: (D® M "r) ( Cin State:NC Sampling Point:'Virl r10 Uo1aF-W
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: NFA
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): T-2 f ras C e Local relief (concave, convex, none): (Ck V'e''C Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L -R it P Lair. S�U(�7 Long: -77'4000'- Datum: W6S `ef-t
Soil Map Unit Name: Nloo;Ulk (arr" S+ c( NWI classification: PFQ
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No_ (If no, explain in Remarks.) �.
Are Vegetation _, Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ No
Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ' No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V;� No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (613)ySp�sely
_ Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Moss Trim Lines (13116)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)aturation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
V Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
2_ Jnundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water•Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
l}
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No
Depth (inches): Iv
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No_
Depth (inches): (t'�"
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: IN vlrp V AaP_vj
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree
1,
yF+ k?jJ�
Stratum (Plot size: "�
�., 1'(rJ[�2n(1 Cyr\ kU(iP(FL�fO�
%Cover
Species? Status
F PrLrf
Number ODominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _� (A)
2.niW55
10 =� PAC3.
�5•-t• �
�i
S
C
Total Number of Dominant
cJ�rntfD9� (fTG uC,
/.J FK
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species G/ �
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: r�� �o (Ats)
5
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
8.
5
= Total Cover
OBL species . x 1 =
50% of total cover:
oJ 20% of
total cover: 4
FACW species x2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species x3=
1.
S Cd(JI1 G\n lA
��
y t=AC
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
2,t- �✓• i �Pkh�pR`� SYr-Il'UG !; QG p �kC-
3, VO.id co, rj �) FAL
4. Tloe oPaCa to FAC
5'
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6'
_1�Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7'
2 - Dominance Testis >50%
B.
_ 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�O =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Iv
C)!Smcrr)ctA C4Ab7 S
^' UC�L-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrdogy must
1.
; p
.�7
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
A dfn n A ] n y Y i B 2Y i A 041 tai
I0
FAGS
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AJI herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
3.L4Vk Um aSPle�$�ide5 10 Y. V-kC
q, y� 0 O�IrIo.Yeol d�q s O
5. SOP LI YUY(AS C.2.rl\(^c4 S N GBL-
6.
7,
8.
9,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
�0
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
5M i^X Yi11-(An(1 • F0k, 0�,
b
FAG
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
2.
3.
4.
5'
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5 20% of total cover. (
Present? Yes_ No_
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling PcintNnfpOn-W J
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) -A
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
U-� Io-1tza/ I, Ivi)
MacvLi L
4 - 5 toy R 5/-z too
5L_
3 -j— T
Ic cc�l� }�y�
SL
$-L IUciR$/2 45
IogAS 4 5 V\
SL.
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Metrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)Tl
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
✓Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Lgamy
Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Praide Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrologymust be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes No—
o_Remarks:
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plein Region -Version 2.0

14r
Iqk f. ,-0
AS?�', y' t"� •
IV
. •x• a ^' r�•�� I •tib S ��
• � Yui _ ��zs">i e� .. ,_�.5:• , . - w
�'• _;, _ = �� - we �•

Appendix B
Typical Drawings for Waterbody Restoration

NOTES:
1. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON THE BANKS OF
FLOWING STREAMS WHERE VEGETATION HAS BEEN REMOVED OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
2. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
3. STAPLES SHALL BE MADE OF AT LEAST 11 GAUGE WIRE, U -SHAPED
WITH 6" LEGS AND A 1" CROWN. STAPLES SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE
GROUND FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE STAPLE LEGS. ALTERNATELY,
1" DIA. WOODEN PEGS 6" LONG AND BEVELED MAY BE USED TO
SECURE MATTING.
4. MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER
SPECIFICATIONS OR AS STATED BELOW:
STAKE TO SLOPE
WITH STAPLES
DOUBLE (TWO) STAPLES
mi
END TO END
OVERLAP (6" MIN.)
V
• EXTEND TOP OF BLANKET 2 FEET PAST THE UPPER EDGE OF
THE HIGH WATER MARK. IF A SLOPE BREAKER IS PRESENT ON
THE APPROACH SLOPE, BEGIN THE BLANKET ON THE UPHILL
SIDE OF THE SLOPE BREAKER.
• INSTALL BLANKET(S) ACROSS THE SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF
THE WATER FLOW.
• ANCHOR ("KEY") THE UPSTREAM EDGE OF THE BLANKET(S) INTO
THE SLOPE USING A 6" DEEP TRENCH. DOUBLE STAPLE EVERY 11
12" BEFORE BACKFILLING AND COMPACTING TRENCH.
• OVERLAP THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS A MINIMUM OF 6".
PLACE THE UPPER BLANKET OVER THE LOWER BLANKETTYpY
(SHINGLE STYLE) cql
AND STAPLE EVERY 12" ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE EDGE. F�0 rR -
• WHEN BLANKET ENDS ARE ADJOINED, PLACE THE UPSTREAM
BLANKET OVER THE DOWNSTREAM BLANKET (SHINGLE STYLE)
AND STAPLE EVERY 12" ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE EDGE.
• STAPLE DOWN THE CENTER OF THE BLANKET(S), THREE
STAPLES IN EVERY SQUARE YARD.
5. IN LIVESTOCK AREAS WHERE EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS
APPLIED TO THE STREAMBANKS, FENCING WILL BE USED IF
NECESSARY TO EXCLUDE LIVESTOCK, WITH PERMISSION OF THE
LANDOWNER.
6. MONITOR WASHOUTS, STAPLE INTEGRITY OR MAT MOVEMENT.
REPLACE OR REPAIR AS NECESSARY.
7. INSTALLATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR AT SEVERELY SLOPING ROAD BANKS,
BUT MAY ONLY BE INSTALLED TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE BLANKET WIDTH.
�v V
SLOPE BREAKERS
' EROSION CONTROL
FABRIC
EDGE TO EDGE
OVERLAP (6" MIN.)
51
TYPE 1 -STREAM BANK RESTORATION, NC
NOT TO SCALE

90'/1
WORK CO
NOTES:
1. RIP -RAP WILL NOT EXCEED AN AVERAGE OF ONE
CUBIC YARD PER RUNNING FOOT BELOW THE OHWM.
2. RIP -RAP INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE
WITH ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS.
3. RIP -RAP MUST BE CLEAN AND FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS.
4. RIP -RAP SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN A MANNER THAT
IMPAIRS SURFACE WATER FLOW.
5. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE INSTALLED BELOW RIP -RAP.
(OHWM) ORDINARY HIGH WATERMARK
L�
L�
of
0w
�
w
3: wF-
wF- 3:
O o3
03 O
* w
w „
PLAN
1' AVERAGE DEPTH RIP—RAP
*OHWM
PROFILE
PIPELINE
TYPE 2 -STREAM BANK RESTORATION, NC
NOT TO SCALE
'OSED PIPELINE
)ISTURBANCE

Appendix C
Natural Gas Infrastructure Map — North Carolina

! 1
rF�✓
�• f
F.I, I .I•lll..I I .
O
our, twin
200
250
d
11�/ Danvill . K.. 3000
'0
North Carolina
H alix
SapnnI
Sdise.
1lnstan- lem
en o
50 F rkj F;l llnl
Hig oint
ileiah
;IIIA 7154 ff -
5, rk,ury
Asheboro
oresville 1178 ff
94611. _949 ft 1it'I'I 100
:ddsboro
Ukharie
National
Fo to st
rl tt NORTH
Fort Bragg • CAROU
Ili
14
hlililary
Reaervatlr- I ttevlll
Rockingham 150 4
I s.'
IL
►--i � tea=,
'myrtle Beach
i or,C Bal
This information is for an vironmental review purposes only.
O
Mileposts
Existing Natural Gas Pipelines N
0
Proposed ACPM&R Site
IV Proposed ACP Pipeline Route
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
A.
Proposed ACP Compressor Station
Atlanticl
Natural Gas Infrastructure
•
O
Existing Meter Stations
Existing Compressor Stations
0 1:2,225,000 50
Coast
Pipeline
North Carolina
Miles
=M
ERM
M:\Clients\D-F,DOM\SRPP\_ArcGIS\2017\09\19_NC_Maps _for _PaN_ DOMING _Nat _Gas_Infrastwcture.rrxd I REVISED: 09/19/2017 1 SCALE: 1:2,200,000
DRAWN BY: JML