20081788 Ver 1_401 Application_20081208

r
oB-1-1$8
H.T ANGLE
ENIGINEERING, P.C.
212 Princess Street - Wilmington, North Carolina 28407 - Tel. [phone] - Fax [phone] - email: [e-mail]
LETTER OF nA-NSWTTAL
DAM / 14n8
TO adlyROIBCT Ni0:
RE:
ATTENTION:
TRANSMITTAL. NO: PAGE OF
WE ARE SENDING: D orieur,& Ei Prints ? shon Drawings Q Samples
0 Specifics ons fl Calculations © Other
DEC 5 2008
DENR. WATER QUALITY
ORW4',IATER BRANC4
Issue Status Code: A. Preliminary B. Fabrication Only C. Far Wormation D. Bid
E. Construction F. For Review & Comments G. For Approval H. See Remarks
Action Status Code: 1. Approved As Submitted 2. Make Corrections Noted 3. Other
4. Amend & Resubmit 5. Rejectul - See Remarks
REMARKS
Szgiaed
QUANTTL Y DRAWING NO. REV. DESCRIPTION STATUS
""?RIGHT ANGLE
ENGINEERING, PC
212 Princess Street
December 3, 2008
Wilmington, NC 28401 Tel. [phone] Fax [phone]
To: Jefferson M. Ryscavage
Colonel, U.S. Army
District Commander
US Army Corps of Engineers
Re: SAW-2003-572
Dear Col. Ryscavage,
Please reference your letter (enclosed) to Mr. Franky Thomas dated November 17, 2008 regarding the
matter referenced above:
No additional work has or will be done on the site until this issue is resolved, or if directed by USACE or
DWQ.
Attached is a completed PCN form for placement of the culvert pipe as well as additional supporting
documentation. Mr. Thomas would like to leave the pipe in place and compensate by preserving additional
wetlands and buffer area on the tract (approximately 2.5 acres).
Measurements taken in the field on November 25, 2008 indicate that the actual impact area is 0.02 acres as
shown on the attached sketch. Forty linear feet of stream was impacted by placement of the 36" pipe.
Additional information attached:
• Agent authorization letter signed by Mr. Thomas
• Sketch from field measurements
• Site photographs
• Brunswick County GIS mapping
• Old survey survey from 1984 showing the old culvert pipe
• Google mapping showing Thomas Garst Lane connecting to Riverview Drive, though no
connection is presently passable.
• Letter from attorney of adjacent landowner, Ronald Saucier, expressing his intention to the Town
of Leland to donate land to reopen Thomas Garst Lane.
Please let me know what additional information you need.
Sincerely,
Jim Vithalani,
President
M
±?SEC 5 208
P --p Qk "0
V?"E . L!',yD? A>?D gT 'dl?!ATE 8R??1Cti
Cc: Mr. Franky Thomas
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Regulatory Division
Action ID. SAW-2008-2579
Mr. Franklin Thomas
Post Office Box 40
Leland, North Carolina 28451
Dear Mr. Thomas:
November 17, 2008
This letter is in reference to the response received from your agent, Mr. Jim Vithalani of
Right Angle Engineering, dated October 15, 2008, in response to the Cease and Desist letter sent
by this office and received by you on September 23, 2008 regarding an unauthorized discharge
of fill material into Section 404 jurisdictional waters and wetlands adjacent to the Brunswick
River, located on parcel number 038BCO19 across from 102 Riverview Drive also owned by you
in Leland, Brunswick County, North Carolina. This project has been assigned Department of the
Army number SAW-2008-2579. Please reference this number in all future correspondence.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office (Corps), reviewed
the Nationwide Permit (NWP) 26 authorization issued to you on May 17, 1991 for the discharge
of fill material into waters of the United States for the construction of a road at the subject site.
Your permit has expired and NWP 26 is no longer valid.
The October 15, 2008 letter indicates that you were recently performing maintenance on an
existing structure. As your road crossing is a previously authorized activity, the recent
maintenance activity may have qualified for NWP 3; however, in order to be eligible to utilize
this NWP, the previously permitted structure must be "currently serviceable". Part E. of the
2007 Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 12, 2007, defines
currently serviceable as "useable as is or with some maintenance, but not so degraded as to
essentially require reconstruction". Based upon all available data and Ms. Garvey's site visit
observations, the Corps does not believe that your structure, while formerly authorized, qualified
for NWP 3 verification. As such, your recent activities conducted in waters of the United States,
including wetlands, is a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311).
To resolve this violation, you must either restore the impacted wetlands and waters to pre-
construction condition or obtain after-the-fact DA authorization. As we stated in our September
23, 2008 letter, if you should apply for DA authorization you will be required to demonstrate
purpose and need of the project, avoid and minimize your impacts to jurisdictional waters to the
C7 77r 7- 1 E7 D !TRAIL
? F;L(?LLPT RCOU"'STED
-2-
maximum extent practicable, and provide compensatory mitigation for lost wetland and waters
function. Keep in mind that you will be required to remove all discharged fill and provide
restoration to the satisfaction of this office for those areas of impacted wetlands that you do not
receive after-the-fact authorization.
Failure to submit either a restoration plan or an after-the-fact authorization request, in the
form of a Preconstruction Notification application (copy enclosed), within two (2) weeks of
receipt of this notice may result in a referral to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency with a recommendation for civil action.
If you have any questions regarding developing a restoration plan or applying for
authorization, please contact Ms. Kimberly Garvey, at [phone] or Ms. Jennifer Frye at
[phone], both of the Regulatory Division.
Sincerely,
reJefferson M. Ryscavage
Colonel, U. S. Army
District Commander
Enclosure
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Jim Vithalani
Right Angle Engineering, P.C.
212 Princess Street
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401
Office of the United States Attorney
Eastern District of North Carolina
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 800
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Section-Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Chad Coburn
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1461 Division of Water Quality
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
-3-
Mr. John Hennessey
Division of Water Quality
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Ms. Melody Jennings
Leland Town Hall
102 Town Hall Drive
Leland, North Carolina 28451
I- ?t
O?' OG T Office Use Only:
)MYT 77
C 2008 Corps action ID no.
1 1
1 l o 1 DWQ project no.
UENk _ u rrF. QUA01r Form Version 1.0 November 2008
ir1ETlN.;'1D? AND STJR"?+?^'?+TE? 98ANCH
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d . Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
? Yes
? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Franky Thomas Property
2b. County: Brunswick County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Leland
2d. Subdivision name: Belvedere Heights
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: Cyril Franky Thomas
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 847 @ 511
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Cyrill Franky Thomas
3d. Street address: 102 Riverview Drive / PO Box 40
3e. City, state, zip: Leland, NC 28451
3f. Telephone no.: 910-520-5931
3g. Fax no.: 910-371-3170
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jim Vithalani, P.E./Shane Lippard, P.E./Nancy Card
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Right Angle Engineering, PC
5c. Street address: 212 Princess Street
5d. City, state, zip: Wilmington, NC 28401
5e. Telephone no.: 910-251-8544
5f. Fax no.: 910-251-2208
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 038BC019
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 34.23416`N - 77.99042`W
1 c. Property size: 6.73 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Belvedere Branch, Brunswick River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: SC - Brunswick River
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located in a residential subdivision, but bordered on the south by US 17. A powerline runs along the
highway right-of-way. The culvert is located within a former roadbed, Thomas Garst Lane.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.8 ac (assuming the branch runs the length of the property - 1950ft X average 40ft wide wetland)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1950
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The culvert is necessary to restore the use of Thomas Garst Lane. The owner and adjacent owner to the west would like
to reopen the road and deed the property to the Town of Leland. The added access would be a safety feature for the
residents of Belvedere Heights as it would open another access to the community and emergency vehicles.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replace an old RCP with a larger CPP to restore access. Equipment - track hoe
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
? Yes ® No ? Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
? Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ? No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NW 26 ISSUED IN 1991
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ? T fill ? Yes ® No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.02 ac
W2 ? PEI T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact
number - impact intermittent (INT)? length
Permanent (P) or (linear feet)
Temporary (T)
S1 ® P ? T culvert Belvedere Branch ® PER ? INT 6- 40
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S4 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 40
3h. Comments:
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (if
(P) or applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
131 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The culvert was placed in the narrowest part of the stream where the previous RCP was located. Minimal fill was used to
enable safe crossing of the branch.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A trackhoe was used enabling work to be accomplished as far as possible from the stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h.. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Belvedere Branch runs the length of the 6.34 acre tract. The owner would like to legally preserve the branch, wetlands
and a buffer area, approximately 2.5 acres in exchange for placement of the culvert pipe and fill.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes ® No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ? Yes ® No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ® Coastal counties
management programs (check all that apply)? ? HQW
? ORW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Town of Leland
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ® Yes ? No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy No post-construction permit
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved program is established yet
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved). in Leland.
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? 0
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per ? Yes ® No
General Certifications 3704 and 3705?
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted ? Yes ? No
for each stormwater BMP?
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The owner
believed he was acting legally under an expired permit when he replaced a broken RCP in order to provide alternative access
and reopen an old roadway - Thomas Garst Lane. His intention is to deed the road to the Town of Leland. The adjacent
landowner is in agreement with this plan and is prepared to deed access across his land as well. See attached letter from
adjacent owner, Ronald Saucier's attorney.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E] Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
www.fws.gov
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
www.safmc.net
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
www. national register of historic places.com/nc/Brunswick/state.html
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http://gis.brunsco/net and www.FEMA.gov
J a h1aY) Vt.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Appli ant/Age s Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an aut ' tion letter from the applicant Date
is rovided.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
November 24, 2008
US Army Corps of Engineers
NCDENR - DWQ
RE: SAW-2008-2579
As owner of the following parcels of land in the Town of Leland, North Carolina,
designated here by Brunswick County Parcel Numbers: 038BD032, 038BD033,
038BD034, and 038BC019; I authorize representatives of Right Angle Engineering, PC,
(Jim Vithalani, P.E., Shane Lippard, P.E. and Nancy Card) to act on my behalf regarding
work in wetlands associated with Belvedere Branch.
I further authorize these individuals as well as representatives of the US Army Corps of
Engineers and NCDENR - DWQ to enter my property as necessary for completion and
resolution of SAW-2008-2579.
Franklin Thomas, sign date: - • D

?Z
i
36 CP
24,
AREA OF WETLAND DISTURBANCE: 907 SQ FT = 0.02 ACRES
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
11/25/2008
FRANKY THOMAS PROPERTY
SAW-2008-2579
RIGHT ANGLE
ENCi1NEEPIN0, P.C.
212 PRINCESS STREET
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
[phone] FAX [phone]
aE `SIR-�➢'°.- r'i3• � '_ r ,4
a.
~
w
3
r�AF�
Y
Tf i.aVW

R
4xl
I
Aai a.

Print Preview
Page 1 of 2
Parcel Number 038BC019 Plat Date
Account Number 12480210 Land Value $670
PIN 310706484073 Building Value $0
Owner THOMAS CYRILL FRANKLIN Other Value
_ $0
Owner Address 1 j Deferred Value $0
Owner Address 2 P O BOX 40 I Total Taxable Value $670
City LELAND Heated Sq Ft
State NC Year Built -
Zip 28451 Bedrooms
Legal Description 6.73 AC PLAT 1/127 Full Baths i
Parcel Street Number Stories -
Parcel Street Ext. Wall 1
Street Type Ext. Wall 2
Street Dir Neighborhood 1006
Subdivision Municipality LELAND
Deed Book ' 0847 Fire Tax District LELAND
Deed Page 0511 Township NORTHWEST
Deed Date 6/27/1991 Acreage 6.73
Plat Book 0001 Sale Price $2,000
http://gis.brunsco.netJprintPreview.aspx?PrintOptData--Brunswickolo20County,%2ONC IOIOltruelfalseltr... 11/25/2008
Brunswick County, NC
II ,
3
d
o
I
I
1'
O m /
(J?-- 69
E
o ? ? •?r5?. oe?, Q?Q
W
O
N
Q
W ?
W
3
W
2 H
W U
O 2
:y \ N h
b
4i O o
0
1 i °1=
wl
o ?

H
Q
W
2
2 O
>t o
m 2
? W
I i
I ?
' b W
U
r
N W
a `
t
o ?
u
d
? I
j
J ?.
I
? w
.G
VIES / y L

ktih °
^ ] C
L.f
o n ` I a
v °

i
f ? ? ° L a
"
° ? Io ^ W
?
c N : m
• L u o
° z
4 : o

?
O ° O a>
- i? ? I O? ??

? i
i i•m
- ?
v
i?
o ?°. I
o m I
ii I y•t =
?
?L

rj ?°Ny
a[a[
_ ;d?WOy ?i?
? y
\y ^ t
? i u
? ;
O ^
,^??Q ?M i w
• ., i
o ?p

O v °'

O ? Q

tZ,
Q
3 ?

o Z
?
v
h
e3
.9
1 i

O ? k
. i

?
i
•
0
? t k

^

L w e o ? N

U
V/)
Ld
V i
O
N
V)
Q
W
Z <
o
O
f
JW
liJ F-
0
i
u) L
?- w o
F- f
U
L
Q? f
CO J
U)
111
i1 w
1'a
I ?
n
G 12
? I
N a (?
W ?
l1
I , wW
x ,
I r
O
I ?
II
o
3 I
??I j

102 riverview drive leland nc - Google Maps
Page 1 of 1
http://maps.google.comlmaps?f q&hl=en&geocode=&q=102+riverview+drive+leland+nc&sll=37.062... 11/25/2008
Address 102 Riverview Dr Get Google Maps on your phone
Leland Text the word "GMAPS" to 46645 3
C+ fie-,
Maps , NC 28451 V,?:7
ALLEN, MACDONALD and DAMS, PLLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1508 Mititary Cutoff Ruud. Suite 102
01.Ej=N ALLEN (Itedm4l WILMMNOTON. NORTH CAROUNA28403
JAMES A. MACDONALD TSLEPHIONE 910.2-S&G558
=AX P. OAVIS VAX 910.2S64b538 X-16 U ALL19NMA
[e-mail]'i'}t.HV
January 23, 2006
Town of Leland Code Enforcement Office
Attn: Cameron Moore
102 Town Hall Dr.
Leland, NC 28451
rte: Ronald Saucier, Zoning Compliance Pcrmi4111 Thomas Ga rst Lane, Leland, NC, Parcel. #'s
03SBC025, 0M, (P.7,028, and 029
Fear Mr. Moore,
Ron Saucier and I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and John Wcssell
regordin9 Mr. Saucic es proposed project for a new SPEC kmdon on Thomas Garret Lane. As
Ron indicated in our conversation with you he proposes the following:
1. Regarding the 30 foot access casement across the southern boundary of Mr.
Saucicr's property.
W. Saucier proposes to grant a 30 foot wide easement to the 'T'own of Leland along the
southern boundary of the tract for a distance of 555 29 Peek.
In exchange for grattting tttis eaftmadk the town of Lclwd 9a11 pay Mr. Saucier
$48,000.00, an amount representing the pace per square foot +Alkh Mr. Saudcr racily Pid for
this property.
Mr. Saucier would then donate the sumo of $400000 back to the Town of Leland to
cover the cost of paving an a== road firm the current aid of pavement cm Thomas C st Lane
for a dbumce cxtcnftg to a point 150 fax east of Mr. Saucict's western property tine within the
30 foot easement This road would provide accew from Mr. Sa=ces property to Thomas Cn=
Lane. Auer paving, any remaining funds after Mr. Saud ees donation would go towards
be autificxdion, improveuneats, and mai mmanae of Thmw Gwa Lane or as &c town may &=t.

P. UU3/003
This contribution of t wd would also be conditioned upon the t
further condilians on Mr. Saucier for overt im osin
other mauls as a condition ofhis pmj upg'ading any nthcr P aces of Thomas Ic no Carat
Lahr or
We hope this IrOPusal would be accepted as a win-win proposal for Thank You for your considemtjon in this mWer both parties.
TS ly,
MacDonald
&
CC: John Well