The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090858 Ver 3_Ivey Ferguson MY6 2017 Monitoring Report_20170822.. � ,, tie �,.r ,� s..✓ �' ' � 1 `'� °� l f. ��', Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location and Description................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Methodology.........................................................................................................................................2 3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots.......................................................................................................... 2 3.3 Photo Stations................................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 References........................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Monitoring Location Exhibit Figure 3: MY6 Mowing and Supplemental Planting Areas Appendix B: Veuetation Assessment Data Table 1: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 2: Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Table 3: Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot Table 4: Planted Stem Average Height by Vegetation Plot Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets Appendix E: Photo Stations 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Location and Description Located near the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road (SR 1005) in Orange County, North Carolina (Appendix A. Figure 1 — Site Location Map) is the nutrient mitigation bank known as the Ivey -Ferguson Bank Site (Site). The Bank Site is located on 3 parcels of land (PIN Numbers: 9758022055, 9758034637, and 9758337836), which are located near the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. The first parcel of land (PIN Number: 9758022055) is located on the north side of Old Greensboro Road, approximately 450 feet west of the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. The second parcel (PIN Number: 9758034637) is located on the west and east side of Carl Durham Road and is located approximately 1,200 feet north of the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. The third parcel of land (PIN Number: 9758337836) is located on the north side of Old Greensboro Road, approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. Overall, the 3 parcels of land containing the Bank Site total approximately 218 acres. The purpose of this Bank Site is to improve water quality within the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed by providing off-site mitigation for development (both existing and proposed) requiring nutrient offsets. The Bank Site is located within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed, inside of 14 -digit USGS HUC 03030002060070. Stormwater runoff from this site drains into an unnamed tributary of Phils Creek (Stream Index #16-41-2-2-(0.3), which drains into University Lake approximately 3.4 miles downstream. According to the Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS), Phils Creek is classified as WS -II; HQW, NSW in this location (Appendix A. Figure 2 — Monitoring Year 6 Exhibit). This Bank Site has been established under the terms and conditions of the Cape Fear Basin Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Mitigation Umbrella Bank (Bank), signed on February 3, 2011, made and entered into by EBX-EM, LLC (EBX-EM), acting as the Bank Sponsor, and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The Division of Water Quality is now hereby referred to as Division of Water Resources (DWR). 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to: To improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributary of Phils Creek by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by agricultural influences. To improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement. To provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary of Phils Creek and associated riparian and upland buffers These goals will be met through the following objectives: By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site. By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through chemical methods. By establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site. By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an accredited or approved land trust or stewardship program. 2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data. Final stem count criteria are 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring (Ivey Ferguson Bank Parcel - Bank Parcel Development Package, 2010). The Year 5 Monitoring Report was submitted to DWR in the fall of 2016. After reviewing the report DWR requested additional (Year 6) monitoring due to the low average height of the planted stems on site. As of Monitoring Year 6, the Bank Parcel has 9 plots encompassing 0.2224 acres, containing 164 planted and volunteer stems, which yielded a density of 737 stems per acre including planted and volunteer species. Vegetation survival threshold was met for each of the plots. Summary tables of the data collected are provided in Appendix B. All success criteria have been met and the Ivey -Ferguson Bank Parcel is ready to be closed out. In May 2017, RES performed release mowing and supplemental planting of 200 one -gallon trees across 60% of the easement area (Figure 3). During Monitoring Year 6 field investigations, inspection of the fencing was conducted to determine the condition and structural integrity of the fencing. It was determined that the fencing was in good condition and remedial actions to the fencing were not warranted. 3.0 Methodolo 3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by NC DMS (EEP, 2006; EEP, 2009). All nine (9) vegetation plots installed by McAdams were located in Monitoring Year 6. Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance to CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Table 1 (Appendix B) provides a success summary for each vegetation monitoring plot which the target density is a minimum of 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period. Table 2 (Appendix B) provides a stem count total and planted stem total by each individual vegetation plot. Table 3 (Appendix B) provides a summary of only planted stem counts as compared to planted stem counts of the As - Built. Table 4 (Appendix B) shows the average planted stem height in the plots. Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix C. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix D. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a respective vegetation monitoring plot. 3.2 Photo Stations Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success of the Bank Parcel. Photos provide a visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. All fourteen (14) photo stations installed by McAdams were located in Monitoring Year 6. Photographs were taken at high resolution using a Nikon CoolPix S33 13.2 megapixel digital camera. The locations of the photo stations are depicted in the Monitoring Location Exhibit (Appendix A. Figure 2 — Monitoring Year 6 Exhibit). Photographs for the photo stations are located in Appendix E. 2 4.0 References EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. December 29, 2010. Ivey -Ferguson Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — Bank Parcel Development Package. EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. August 2012. Ivey Ferguson Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — As -Built Report. Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2 North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. Available at internet site: http://www.ncepp.net/news/roorts/buffers.pdf. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) January 15, 2010. Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoringeports. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation. Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina. APPENDIX A Site Maps w� y ( d \ 1 f .. �-.,.,wA � / � � � � • 1.,�+... ��+ t' `�•' Cy �" is � s' i,A� ....� � + % r � -. or 4. f .ti 550 : e a �� ' �� :_.._.w � � lir• � 'j�,�`f • r Terre Its • e .�= ! Ch Trail 11, s r , BANK PARCEL AREAS 0,. USGS 7.5 MINUTE "WHITE CROSS, NC" QUADRANGLE, 1968 (PHOTOREVISED 1981); 35.8994915°N, 79.1662239•W PROSECT NO. MAM-09020 • -/ H i _FERGUSON 1 v ■ '/ i BANK PARCEL THE COMPANY, INC. Meridian Parkway y FILENAME: MAM09020.DWG SCALE:Durham, 1" = 1,000, C7 4 FIGURE 1. SITE LOCATION MAP ham, North Carolina 2771$ No.: �»Ca.com DATE: «) 09-09-13 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA IMCADAMSI 4 NOW OR FORMERLY JENNIFER NEWTON BARBER PB 107, PG 10 DB 4953, PG 364 / PIN: 9748734645 NOW OR FORMERLY VIRGINIA I. FERGUSON DB 945, PG 227 PIN: 9748929813 CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ARE INCLUSIVE OF THE AREAS NOTED AS BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1 .. ...............................................273,427 BUFFER SQ. FT. - 6.28 ACRES BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 1 ..................................................135,108 EASEMENT SQ. FT. - 3.10 ACRES CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1 AREA REMAINING.........................138,319 PB 98, PG 184 r SQ. FT. - 3.18 ACRES CONSERVATION EASEMENT 2., 138,922 SQ. FT. - 3.19 ACRES BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 2 ..................................................127,797 2ao o ma 200 .wo SQ. FT. - 2.93 ACRES CONSERVATION EASEMENT 2 AREA REMAINING............................11,125 SQ. FT. - 0.25 ACRES CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 3 EASEMENT........ 2,730 SQ. FT. - 0.06 ACRES CONSERVATION EASEMENT 4.......................................................71,344 SQ. FT. - 1.64 ACRES BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 4 ....................................................66,055 SQ. FT. - 1.52 ACRES CONSERVATION EASEMENT 4 AREA REMAINING ........................... 5,289 SQ. FT. - 0.12 ACRES CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 5 EASEMENT...... 31,600 SQ. FT. - 0.73 ACRES CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 6 EASEMENT...... 19,251 SQ. FT. - 0.44 ACRES CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 7 EASEMENT...... 35,922 SQ. FT. - 0.82 ACRES CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 8 EASEMENT...... 34,594 SQ. FT. - 0.79 ACRES CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 9 EASEMENT...... 24,784 SQ. FT. - 0.57 ACRES TOTAL AREA CONSERVATION EASEMENT...................................597,980 SQ. FT. - 13.73 ACRES TOTAL AREA BUFFER RESTORATION EASEMENT ........................443,247 SQ. FT. - 10.18 ACRES ADDITIONAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT NOT USED ..................... 34,594 SQ. FT. - 0.79 ACRES NOW OR FORMERLY PAUL M. & SEDELIA D. CAMPBELL PB 54, PG 43 DB 830, PG 4834 PIN: 9758055071 r i r r r r i r r r r ELEZABETH M. IVEY & VIRGINIA L FURGUSON DB 965, PG 21 PIN: 9758034637 CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 5 -- EASEMENT PS -5 PS 4 PS -2 NOW OR FORMERLY MAS D. & SUSAN D. PRITCHARD PB 92, PG 133 DB 3224, PG 34 CONSERVATION/ PIN: 9748826600 BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 7 EASEMENT VP -2 r CONSERVATION/ S BUFFER RESTORATION I A AREA 9 EASEMENT w m� VIRGINIA I. FURGUSON g� vm PB 77, PG 159 o Q a a m DB 1513, PG 228 4 N ro PIN: 9758022055 Nrnr VP -1 io oai CONSERVATION/ g ; BUFFER RESTORATION AREA P S — 1 EASEMENT (NOT USED) NOW OR FORMERLY TERRELLS CREEK BAPTIST VIRGINIA I. FURGUSON CHURCH PB 77, PG 159 D8 277, PG 1155 OB 1513, P, 228 PIN: 9748919740 PIN: 9758027026 PS -3 ELEZABETH M. IVEY & VIRGINIA I. FURGUSON DB 965, PG 21 PIN: 9758034637 VP -5 r PS -7i/ ;f NOW OR FORMERLY BERNARD K. DURHAM JR. & HILDA 0. DURHAM PB 94, PG 158 DB 1172, PG 275 PIN: 9758146972 / CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 3 EASEMENT PS -6 BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 4 EASEMENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT SVP -4 CONSERVATION/ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA 6 EASEMENT JP -3 LEGEND 0 PHOTO STATION (PS -X) O VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT (VP -X) NOW OR FORMERLY REDCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PB 90, PG 131 DB 3220, PG 328 PIN: 9758243026 NOW OR FORMERLY BERNARD K. DURHAM JR. & HILDA 0. DURHAM PB 94, PG 158 DB 1172, PG 275 PIN: 9758251993 CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1 VP -6 r BUFFER AESTORATIO AREA 1 I EASEMENT PS -9 PS -8 NOW OR FORMERLY BRUCE R. PADEN PB 90, PG 131 DB 4914, PG 518 PIN: 9758227658 ,` y�IOW OR FORMERLY ---------------- , ' 7?VEtS COTTON 83, P i PB 83, P I / DB 1963, PG 50 i PIN: 9758367142 9 `?O C G'OT04lFi'Kl S� Jjs -VP-7 ELEZABETH M.IVEY DB 3918, PG 4 PIN: 9758337836 PS -10 S-11 PS -13 VP -8 PS -12 BUFFER C CONSERVATION RESTORATION 0 EASEMENT AREA 2 --2LD GREM�.. - 2 AS NOW OR FORMERLY SYNERGY HOLDING CORPORATION PIN: 9758457724 NOW OR FORMERLY BARTON LLOYD, JR. DB 254, PG 637 PIN: 9758453458 NOW 0 FORMER DANIEL & THELMA - LIAMS PB 3, PG 35 D833, PG 56 / NOW OR FORMERLY VIF LLC PB 98, PG 184 D8 3924, PG 193 PIN: 9758446961 r i NOW OR FORMERLY VIF LLC PB 98, PG 184 DB 3924, PG 193 PIN: 9758446556 r NOW OR FORMERLY i VIF LLC PB 98, PG 184 i r DB 3924, PG 19.3 i PIN: 9758446288 \ j I 1 r i r r r r r r ( r 1 I r NOW OR FORMERLY I r JEFFERY W. & KAREN R, i FUCHS PB 98, PG 184 DB 4520, PG 20 PIN: 9758436158 I I r I r 9 r r r 1 NOW OR FORMERLY CHARLES & ALLISON R. JACOBSON PB 98, PG 184 r DB 4619, PG 434 PIN: 9758426771 S-14 r I ----------------- GRAPHIC SCALE N 2ao o ma 200 .wo 1 inch = 200 ft. V R b Z o 5 �a CW.7 zm C 0 U w X� z �N" m QzN Dim z 6� W a a z� w � a z" W 0 w oZO yla9 Zig 0 �a � a0 ~a Ww� U NO MAM-09020 .wF, MAM09020-F1 RTF RTF NTS 09-09-2013 ®MCADAMS Vegetation Assessment Data Table 1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Ivey -Ferguson Bank Parcel; Orange County, NC Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 Vegetation Plot ID Conservation Easement Area Vegetation Threshold Met?* Tract Mean 1 9 Yes 2 7 Yes 3 6 Yes 4 4 Yes 5 5 Yes 100% 6 1 Yes 7 1 Yes 8 2 Yes 9 2 Yes * Target density is a minimum of 320 shrubs and desirable trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period according to the "Ivey -Ferguson Bank Parcel Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area, Bank Parcel Development Package"; approved by DWQ on December 29, 2010. Table 2. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Ivey -Ferguson Bank Parcel; Orange County, NC Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 CURRENT MONITORING YEAR ANNUAL MEANS Scientific Name Common Name Species Type2017) PL VP -1 NT PL VP -2 NT PL VP -3 NT PL VP -4 NT PL VP -5 NT PL VP -6 NT PLT VP -7 PL VP -8 NT PL VP -9 NT MY -6 (Aug MY -5 (Sept 2016) MY -4 (Sept 2015) MY -3 (Oct 2014) MY -2 (Sept 2013) MY -1 (Oct 2012) AS BUILT (June 2012) Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 2 3 7 1 4 3 1 1 2 25 21 25 2 2 3 9 Carya tomentosa shagbark hickory Tree 1 1 Cornus florida flowering dogwood Small Tree 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 7 3 11 Diospyros virginiana persimmon Tree 1 1 1 1 4 11 23 2 2 11 16 Fraxinus peonsylvanica green ash Tree 8 5 3 5 7 2 30 31 30 29 29 28 31 Liquidamber styraciflua* sweet gum Tree 3 4 3 1 8 5 5 19 Liriodendron tulipifera tulip poplar Tree 2 1 1 3 3 1 5 2 1 1 20 20 21 13 16 15 27 Pinus taeda* loblolly pine Tree 2 1 Platanus occidentalis sycamore Tree 4 7 11 7 8 8 8 8 10 Pyrus calleryana* callery pear Tree 2 1 Quercus alba white oak Tree 2 2 Quercus falcate southern red oak Tree 1 1 Quercus launfolia laurel oak Tree 3 1 1 1 2 8 9 15 11 10 11 15 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 3 1 2 6 6 6 5 7 5 10 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 3 8 3 2 1 3 5 1 1 5 1 2 37 31 41 24 23 23 27 Quercus pagoda cherry bark oak Tree 3 3 Ulmus americana American elm Tree 5 1 3 9 25 45 37 48 Nyssa sylvatica black gum Tree 2 5 9 7 2 2 Prunus serotina black cherry Small Tree 1 1 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 1 1 1 1 Planted Stem Count Total 9 17 15 18 21 11 13 15 9 128 121 129 95 103 106 156 Volunteer Natural Stem Count Total 7 3 5 2 0 6 5 4 4 36 53 102 45 52 3 0 Size of Vegetation Plot (Acres) 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.2224 0.2224 0.2224 0.2224 0.2224 0.2224 0.0224 Number of Different Species (Planted & Volunteer Nature[) 5 4 7 8 8 10 10 8 7 21 55 51 36 44 37 42 Planted & Volunteer Stems Per Acre 648 810 810 810 850 688 729 769 526 738 782 1039 630 697 490 701 PL— Planted Species NT=Natural/Volunteer Species *Liquidambar stryraciflua, Pinus taeda, and Pyrus calleryana were observed in plot; however, are not listed as a species to be planted according to the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (EEP, 2004). Therefore these species are not quantified. Table 3. Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot Ivey -Ferguson Bank Parcel; Orange County, NC Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 V11-1 VP -2 VP -3 VP -4 VP -5 VP -6 VP -7 VP -8 VP -9 Monitoring Year 6 Planted Stem Count Total 9 17 15 18 21 11 13 15 9 As Built Planted Stem Count Total 21 17 19 13 14 17 19 19 19 Planted Stem Difference from As Built -12 0 -4 5 7 -6 -6 -4 -10 Survivability Rate (%) per Monitoring Plot 43% 100% j 79% j 138% j 150% j 65% j 68% j 79% j 47% Note: The difference between planted stems from the As Built and Monitoring Year 6 is due to species which were deemed "missing' or "dead" at the time of monitoring. One possible explanation for "missing' species is due to thick herbaceous growth obscuring the species from identification during Monitoring Year 6. Therefore, it is possible "missing' species could grow larger than the herbaceous layer and allow for their identification and measurement in subsequent monitoring years. In addition, species which were deemed "dead" could survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species are surviving below ground. Therefore, in subsequent years the species could grow under more favorable conditions. In addition, re -planting as recommended in previous monitoring years, could have increased stem counts above the As -built stem counts Table 4. Planted Stem Average Height by Vegetation Plot Ivey -Ferguson Bank Parcel; Orange County, NC Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 Monitoring Year 6: August 1, 2017 VP -1 VP -2 VP -3 VP -4 VP -5 VP -6 VP -7 VP -8 VP -9 Total Planted Stems in Plot 9 17 15 18 21 11 13 15 9 Average Tree Height (All Trees, cm) 370 534 119 139 114 97 118 302 214 Average Tree Height (8 Tallest, cm)* 386 761 167 192 169 113 156 345 231 Supplemental Planting No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes *The tallest 8 trees were chosen to be averaged because this is the number of trees needed to reach 320 stems per acre. APPENDIX C Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix C. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 3: View Facing 140°SE Vegetation Plot 4: View Facing 3320NW Appendix C. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 5: View Facing 222°SW Vegetation Plot 6: View Facing 130°SE Appendix C. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 7: View Facing 276°W Vegetation Plot 8: View Facing 192°S Appendix C. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 9: View Facing 232°SW APPENDIX D Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets Site: Ivey Ferguson Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 9 Veg Plot No.: 1 X-axis: 4°N MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MY5 (September 2 X Y I ddh I Height I DBH ddh I Height DBH B=bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 1 50.100' >100 Platanus occidentalis 4 Quercus phellos 3 aPlatenus occidentalis B=bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 1 50.100' >100 Platanus occidentalis 4 Quercus phellos 3 Site: Ivey Ferguson Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 9 Veg Plot No.: I X-axis: 4*N U. U 0.5 X-AXIS mnnituring. Stem shGuld ba searched forat k3-aabnn during subsequent Mnnitcwing Yaars bacausa the stem may grow zbnva hadiaceousL@yar. Denutes-Deac-. Stem should stffi be seanch 71 fwatk3catnn during subsequent MDnituring Yearsbecause the roots the stem may survive and therefore m-spiuutinsubsequentNbnftcwin-gYears. WON MCA U. U 0.5 X-AXIS mnnituring. Stem shGuld ba searched forat k3-aabnn during subsequent Mnnitcwing Yaars bacausa the stem may grow zbnva hadiaceousL@yar. Denutes-Deac-. Stem should stffi be seanch 71 fwatk3catnn during subsequent MDnituring Yearsbecause the roots the stem may survive and therefore m-spiuutinsubsequentNbnftcwin-gYears. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 7 Veg Plot No.: 2 X-axis: 194°14 MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MY5 (September 2016) X Y I ddh I Heigh[ I DBH I ddh I Heigh[ I DBH B= bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50, 50-100, >100 Liquidambar styraciflua 3 Betula nigra 3 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 7 Veg Plot No.: 2 X-axis: 194°N 1 0.5 Gj. 0.5 1 2 3 c 5 fl 7 a 9 13 X-AXIS na es Ung may a musing ecause o m a aceous yer.9n ere are n visa a e c, (4 +}' nitoring. Stem should he searched for at location during subsequent Lbn itaring Years because the stun may gmw 'k! hove herba�aeaus Beyer. no s a m should sW tie searched r at locatim dunng subsequent n mrg Years because the Fucts 238° a stem may survire and dherefore re -sprout in subsequent LIDnitaring Years. r. �mmmmmm 1 2 3 c 5 fl 7 a 9 13 X-AXIS na es Ung may a musing ecause o m a aceous yer.9n ere are n visa a e c, (4 +}' nitoring. Stem should he searched for at location during subsequent Lbn itaring Years because the stun may gmw 'k! hove herba�aeaus Beyer. no s a m should sW tie searched r at locatim dunng subsequent n mrg Years because the Fucts 238° a stem may survire and dherefore re -sprout in subsequent LIDnitaring Years. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 6 Veg Plot No.: 3 X-axis: 188°S MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MYS (September 207 X Y tltlh Height DBH tltlh Height DBH B= bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 50-100' >100 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 2 Betula nigra 3 Quercus phellos 1 Liriodendron tulipifera 1 0 v 0Fraxinus pennsylvanica v - aFraxinus pennsylvanica vLinodendmn tulipifera ® B= bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 50-100' >100 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 2 Betula nigra 3 Quercus phellos 1 Liriodendron tulipifera 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 811/2017 Area: 6 Veg Plot No.: 3 X-axis: 188'S 14 e 78 16 a2O 7 12 14 13 5 4 I 7 C I 3 2 6.5 2 3 4 5 a 7 a !D X-AXIS Denotes"Hissing". Stem may be missing because cfthick hedbaceous"rand therefomirictVsible at the time of yonitoring. Stem should he sea rc:hed for at location during subsequent Wnitoffing Years beon LL -7,2 the stem may gmw 31bove herbaceous layer. Denotes"Dead". ms av d still be -=ea rothed foratlDcatiDn during subsequent Lbnrtonng Yes r. be-.susa the roDt-= Df tie stem may surVpAe end the refs re re—sprout in subsequent Wnitcring Years. 78 2 3 4 5 a 7 a !D X-AXIS Denotes"Hissing". Stem may be missing because cfthick hedbaceous"rand therefomirictVsible at the time of yonitoring. Stem should he sea rc:hed for at location during subsequent Wnitoffing Years beon LL -7,2 the stem may gmw 31bove herbaceous layer. Denotes"Dead". ms av d still be -=ea rothed foratlDcatiDn during subsequent Lbnrtonng Yes r. be-.susa the roDt-= Df tie stem may surVpAe end the refs re re—sprout in subsequent Wnitcring Years. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 4 Vag Plot No.: 4 X-axis: WN MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MY5 (September 2016) X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Map ID Scientific Name Source meter meter 1 1 1 C. C. Vigor mm cm cm Notes 1 Diospyros virginiana B 4.3 1.5 M Missing 2 Comus flodda B 6.2 1.8 M Missing 3 Cornus florida B 8.5 2.3 M Missing 4 Cornus florida B 8.2 5.5 M Missing 5 Comus florida B 5.9 4.4 M Missing 6 Cornus florida B 3.8 3.9 M Missing 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 0.9 2.8 290 1.9 3 186 0.903 8 Cornus florida B 0.7 5.4 M Missing 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 3.3 6.4 12 102 3 12.32 95 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 5.7 7.1 10 91 3 10.28 83 11 Cornus florida B 8 8.2 M Missing 12 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 2.8 8.8 13 95 3 13.7 76 13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 0.4 8.2 23 125 3 24.84 102 14 Betula nigra B 2.5 3 240 1.2 3 189 0.372 planted 2015 15 Betula nigra B 8.6 3.5 201 0.4 3 171 0.225 planted 2015 16 Betula nigra B 9.6 3.6 138 0.1 3 16.74 109 planted 2015 17 Quercus phellos B 8.5 6.8 13 110 2 13.58 127 planted 2015 18 Betula nigra B 7.8 5.4 10 102 3 6.04 73 planted 2015 19 Taxodium distichum C 1.6 7.2 235 1.6 3 9.11 115 planted 2015 20 Betula nigra B 0.5 5.9 10 93 3 7.22 84 planted 2015 22 Quercus phellos C 6 6.5 12 77 3 planted 2017 23 Betula nigra C 6 5 10 111 3 planted 2017 24 Quercus falcata C 7 3 10 99 3 planted 2017 25 Betula nigra C 6.5 3.5 5 1 80 3 planted 2017 26 Diospyros virginiana C 5 4 190 1 0.7 3 planted 2017 27 Quercus phellos C 9 1 20 1 115 1 3 planted 2017 B= bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 50-100' >100 Liquidambar styraciflua 1 1 1 Betula nigra 1 Carya tomentosa 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 4 Veg Plot No.: 4 X-axis: WN 110 L.5 D,j LE 6 X-AXIS notes '�zsjng".Stemmey bemissing becauseo a aceous layeran therefore not visible at e tirreotrrlonnonng. Stem sho u id be searched forst locatio n d u ring subsequent h4onitoriig Years hexa use the stem may grow a bove he rb a Deous ever. na s s m ou still esearo a ors res ion urngsubsequenton onng earsbecause eroo o e >tem may survive and therefo re re-sp rout in su bseq ue nt k4an itorirg Years. 1.3 LO L.5 D,j LE 6 X-AXIS notes '�zsjng".Stemmey bemissing becauseo a aceous layeran therefore not visible at e tirreotrrlonnonng. Stem sho u id be searched forst locatio n d u ring subsequent h4onitoriig Years hexa use the stem may grow a bove he rb a Deous ever. na s s m ou still esearo a ors res ion urngsubsequenton onng earsbecause eroo o e >tem may survive and therefo re re-sp rout in su bseq ue nt k4an itorirg Years. 1.3 Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 5 Veg Plot No.: 5 X-axis: 274°W MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MYS (September 2016) X V ddh Heiaht DBH ddh Height DBH B= bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 50-100' 11100 Liquidambar styraciflua 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 5 Vag Plot No.: 5 X-axis: 274°W 70 8 F F I 1 0.5 0,j 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 @ 7 8 g 1D X-AXIS =--notes "hissing". Stem maybe mussing because of thick herbaomus layer and theiefare not viseble at the tine of Dnitarng. Stem should be seamed forst looetim during subsequent Wri taring Years bemuse the stem maygrow cove herbaoeaus layer. -notes "Dead". Stern should still e searched ra location during subsequent n onng Years became the mots. 0 e stem may survNe and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years. �-MEWMW --O---Lg-v� ��---WIMMMM� LO"K, MMMIM 1 0.5 0,j 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 @ 7 8 g 1D X-AXIS =--notes "hissing". Stem maybe mussing because of thick herbaomus layer and theiefare not viseble at the tine of Dnitarng. Stem should be seamed forst looetim during subsequent Wri taring Years bemuse the stem maygrow cove herbaoeaus layer. -notes "Dead". Stern should still e searched ra location during subsequent n onng Years became the mots. 0 e stem may survNe and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 1 Veg Plot No.: 6 X-axis: 176°N MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MYS (September 2016) X Y I ddh I Height I DBH I ddh I Height DBH B= bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50, 50-100, >100 Betula nigra 2 1 Liriodendron tulipifera 1 Pinus taeda 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 8 Quercus laurifolia 1 Cornus florida 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 811/2017 Area: 1 Veg Plot No.: 6 X-axis: 176'N 1 2 3 4 5 13 7 a 9 10 X-AXIS Denotes' Missing". Stam maybe missing because of thick haffbaceous"T and therefore not visible at the time of monitoring. Stem should be searched forat llacatiDn during subsequent Monitoring Yearsbacause the stam may grow above harbaceouslayar. Denates'Dead'. Stem should still be searched for at kw-atiDn during subsaqua nt Won Rofing Years because the FuGts of thastem maysurms and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years. Mm� mm� 1 2 3 4 5 13 7 a 9 10 X-AXIS Denotes' Missing". Stam maybe missing because of thick haffbaceous"T and therefore not visible at the time of monitoring. Stem should be searched forat llacatiDn during subsequent Monitoring Yearsbacause the stam may grow above harbaceouslayar. Denates'Dead'. Stem should still be searched for at kw-atiDn during subsaqua nt Won Rofing Years because the FuGts of thastem maysurms and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 1 Veg Plot No.: 7 X-axis: 316°N MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA MY5 (September 2016) X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Map ID Scientific Name Source meter meter mm cm cm Vigor mm cm cm Notes 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 2.3 0.7 15 129 3 13.76 106 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 7.4 1.4 8 85 3 7.75 72 3 Liriodendron tulipifera B 8.9 1.1 175 0.4 3 145 1.756 4 Liriodendron tulipifera B 6.7 2.6 9 44 2 8.13 43 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 4.6 1.8 12 1120 3 12.4 91 6 Quercus phellos B 2 2.3 157 0.2 3 8.8 123 7 Liriodendron tulipifera B 1.9 4 10 60 2 11.95 59 8 Liriodendron tulipifera B 4.1 4.7 M Missing 9 Liriodendron tulipifera B 3.3 5.1 M Missing 10 Cornus florida B 4.9 4.6 M Missing 11 Cornus florida B 7.5 4.3 13 1 120 3 13.1 93 Deer 12 Liriodendron tulipifera B 5.8 9.7 M Missing 13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 7.5 9.7 M Missing 14 Betula nigra B 9.8 9.5 M Missing 15 Liriodendron tulipifera B 7.4 T9 145 0.5 3 9.56 75 16 Diospyros virginiana B 6.5 7.5 320 2.4 3 240 1.754 17 Liriodendron tulipifera B 4.5 7.7 7 41 3 14.33 27 18 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 34 T7 8 84 3 8.81 70 19 Fraxinus pennsylvanica B 0.1 8.5 7 55 3 7.26 42 Res prout B=bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50, 50-100, >100 Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Ulmus americana 3 1 1 Pinus taeda 1 Betula nigra 1 Pyrus calleryana 1 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 1 Veg Plot No.: 7 X-axis: 316'N 0 2761 QIII/ 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 fd 10 X-AXIS Denotes' Missing -. Stem may be missing because of thick herbaosaus "r a rid therefore not vistAs at the time of mnnrtonng. Stem should be searched forat location during subsequent Mon daring Years because the stem may grow have herb aceous layer. Danotas'Dead'. Stem should still! be searched for atlocatian during subsequent Monitoring Years because the Fouts -of thustem maysurv" and thefufam re-spmut in subsequent MGnKarinq Years. S 12 12 14 p LI -1 1 1 1 0 2761 QIII/ 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 fd 10 X-AXIS Denotes' Missing -. Stem may be missing because of thick herbaosaus "r a rid therefore not vistAs at the time of mnnrtonng. Stem should be searched forat location during subsequent Mon daring Years because the stem may grow have herb aceous layer. Danotas'Dead'. Stem should still! be searched for atlocatian during subsequent Monitoring Years because the Fouts -of thustem maysurv" and thefufam re-spmut in subsequent MGnKarinq Years. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 2 Veg Plot No.: 8 X-axis: 236°N MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA I MY5 September 2016) X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH ®rScientific HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 50-100' >100 Liquidambarstyraciflua 3 2 Quercus phellos 1 Pyrus calleryana 1 Quercus laurifolia 1 Ulmus americana 1 Fwi— Betula nigra 1 B=bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50' 50-100' >100 Liquidambarstyraciflua 3 2 Quercus phellos 1 Pyrus calleryana 1 Quercus laurifolia 1 Ulmus americana 1 Betula nigra 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 811/2017 Area: 2 Veg Plot No.: 8 X-axis: 236'N 0,2 0.,5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X-AXIS 0 3EncbEs "Klissing". Stem may be massing because of thick herbaceous layer and thffefam not visible at the torne of Tjonito&U. SbErn should he searched forst location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow RBove herbaceous layer. Denotes "Dead". Stem should still be searched tor at ca ion d uiing subsequent Wriftoring Years beosuse, the mots ot 192 t1:5- 0 te stem may su rvive and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Yeas. MINE! INIMENEENE ENE MIEEIMIEEI EMEMININ ANN MINIMENEENE MIM INNEEMINIONEENE 0,2 0.,5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X-AXIS 0 3EncbEs "Klissing". Stem may be massing because of thick herbaceous layer and thffefam not visible at the torne of Tjonito&U. SbErn should he searched forst location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow RBove herbaceous layer. Denotes "Dead". Stem should still be searched tor at ca ion d uiing subsequent Wriftoring Years beosuse, the mots ot 192 t1:5- 0 te stem may su rvive and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Yeas. Page: 1 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 2 Veg Plot No.: 9 X-axis: 270°N MONITORING YEAR 6 DATA I MYS (September 2016) ��] X Y I ddh I Height I DBH I ddh I Height I DBH B=bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50, 50-100, >100 Ulmus americana 3 Liquidambar styraciflua 4 10 5 Liriodendron tulipifera 1 069X 1111 Nil 111.1mm Quercus phellos ® B=bare root M= missing D= dead Vigor: 3= good condition, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1= almost surviving and not likely to survive next year CURRENT MONITORING YEAR VOLUNTEER DATA HEIGHT CLASSES (cm) Scientific Name 10-50, 50-100, >100 Ulmus americana 3 Liquidambar styraciflua 4 10 5 Liriodendron tulipifera 1 Page: 2 Monitoring Year: MY6 Date: 8/1/2017 Area: 2 Veg Plot No.: 9 X-axis: 270'N 0.5 0j� 0.5 f 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 X-AXIS Denotes' Missing'. Stem may be missing haoause of th ick herhaoeousleyerand therefore not visible at the time of mon toeing. Stem should ha searched forat location during subsequent Mon hoeing Years hecause the stem meygrcw Bova herhaceouslayer. Denotes'Dsad'. Stem should still be searched foratloratlon during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots of he stem maysurvore and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years. mm MOMMOMM 0.5 0j� 0.5 f 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 X-AXIS Denotes' Missing'. Stem may be missing haoause of th ick herhaoeousleyerand therefore not visible at the time of mon toeing. Stem should ha searched forat location during subsequent Mon hoeing Years hecause the stem meygrcw Bova herhaceouslayer. Denotes'Dsad'. Stem should still be searched foratloratlon during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots of he stem maysurvore and therefore re -sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years. APPENDIX E Photo Stations W rs *1 -F jsT + �.••1 i 1_... IX M W ho,. mow- S Appendix E. Photo Stations Photo Station 3: View Facing 34°N Photo Station 4: View Facing 28°N W'dIF 'w ' . � 79,y ip �.1►f . r ti �s : '� 1r,