20031625 Ver 4_Monitoring Report Year 2-1_20081105

CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC
November 3, 2008
Ms. Liz Hair
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Ave, Rm 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Ste 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Monitoring Year 2/1 Report
Bright's Creek Golf Club
Polk County, NC
USACE Action ID: 200430264
NCDWQ Project No.: 03-1625
Dear Ms. Hair and Ms. Karoly,
r_--I /?Z n
P l-, [?
NQV 5 ;q 08
LANDS ATF?RVk`41 F`1
Bright's Creek Golf Club is a residential golf course community located in Polk County, North
Carolina. Bright's Creek Golf Club received a US Army Corps of Engineers Permit (USACE
Action ID No. 200430264) on June 13, 2005 and a NCDWQ (Project No. 03-1625) 401 Water
Quality Certification on May 26, 2005 authorizing permanent impacts to 110 linear feet of
unnamed tributaries to Harm's Creek and 180 feet of relocation on an unnamed tributary to
Bright's Creek. The enclosed Monitoring Year 2/1 Report indicates compensatory mitigation
performed to-date to offset impacts as authorized.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (828)
698-9800 if you have any questions.
Respectfully,
Chris Gro(s? R. Clement Riddle
P.W.S.
Project Manager Principal
Cc: David Gillespie, Bright's Creek Golf Club
718 Oakland Street
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28791
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.cwenv.com
Monitoring Year 2/1
Report for Compensatory
Mitigation Performed at
. ,
G0LF qCLV6
October 2008
Prepared By:
Clearwater
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland St
Hendersonville, NC 28791
Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT ABSTRACT ..................................................................... 4
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .............................................................4
2.1. Project Location .................................................................................................. 4
2.2. Project Goals and Objectives .............................................................................. 4
2.3. Restoration Approach ......................................................................................... 5
2.3.1. Design ......................................................................................................... 5
2.3.2. Implementation: .......................................................................................... 5
2.4. Project History and Background ......................................................................... 6
3.0 VEGETATION MONITORING .......................................................7
3.1. Vegetation Monitoring Protocol ......................................................................... 7
3.2. Vegetation Success Criteria ................................................................................ 7
3.3. Vegetation Monitoring Results ........................................................................... 7
4.0 STREAM MONITORING .................................................................8
4.1. Stream Monitoring Protocol ............................................................................... 8
4.1.1. Cross-Sections .............................................................................................8
4.1.2. Longitudinal Profile .................................................................................. .. 8
4.1.3. Reference Photos ...................................................................................... .. 8
4.2. Stream Success Criteria .................................................................................... .. 9
4.2.1. Cross-Sections .............................................................................................9
4.2.2. Longitudinal Profile .................................................................................. .. 9
4.2.3. Reference Photos ........................................................................................ 9
4.3. Stream Monitoring Results ................................................................................. 9
4.3.1. Cross-Sections ........................................................................................... ..9
4.3.2. Longitudinal Profiles ................................................................................ 10
4.3.3. Reference Photos ...................................................................................... 11
4.3.4. Qualitative Observations ........................................................................... 11
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... 12
5.1. Vegetation Monitoring ...................................................................................... 12
5.2. Stream Monitoring ............................................................................................ 12
List of Tables
Table 1: Project Activity and History
Table 2: Project Contacts
Table 3: Tree and Shrub Species Composition
Table 4: Vegetation Monitoring Results
Table 5: Summary of Profile Data
Table 6: Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Index
2
List of Figures
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: Proposed Culvert Drawing
Figures S 1-S2: Locations of Culvert Removal Areas from mitigation plan
Figures C 1-C7: Details of Culvert Removal Areas from mitigation plan
Appendices
Appendix A: Morphological Data
Appendix B: Reference Photos
3
1.0 PROJECT ABSTRACT
Bright's Creek Golf Club is a residential golf course community located in Polk County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). Bright's Creek received a US Army Corps of Engineers
Permit (USACE Action ID No. 200430264) on June 13, 2005 and a NCDWQ (Project
No. 03-1625) 401 Water Quality Certification on May 26, 2005 authorizing permanent
impacts to 110 linear feet of unnamed tributaries to Harm's Creek and 180 feet of
relocation on an unnamed tributary to Bright's Creek.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
Bright's Creek removed six (6) existing culverts on-site in 2006 and 2007 and restored
stream beds and banks within these areas. This mitigation activity restored
approximately 200 linear feet of stream. Restoration of the culvert sites involved the
removal of the culvert structures and adjacent road embankments and excavation of new
channels that connected the upstream and downstream reaches.
2.1. Project Location
The project site is in Polk County, North Carolina and is located in the Broad River
Basin, the US Geological Survey (USGS) 03050105 hydrologic unit, and the NCDWQ
sub-basin 03-08-03. It is approximately 7.6 miles northwest of the City of Columbus,
NC. The latitude and longitude for the project area are 35.3392667°N and
82.2699474°W. From Asheville, take Interstate-26 east. Turn east onto Highway 74.
Turn left onto Highway 108 to the north. Turn left onto Highway 9 to the west. Turn left
onto Silver Creek Road. After crossing Lake Adger, turn left onto Palmer Road. Palmer
Road will end at the entrance to Bright's Creek Golf Club. A USGS topographic map is
included as Figure 2.
2.2. Project Goals and Objectives
The objectives of the project were to:
1. Remove existing culverts
2. Re-connect aquatic habitats;
3. Establish native vegetation through a forested riparian buffer; and
4. Improve the natural aesthetics of the stream corridors.
The culvert removals and stream restorations involved the following steps:
1. Remove culverts and excavate new channels through the road embankments
with disposal of roadbed gravel (if any) outside the limits of the restoration
areas;
2. Construct grade control structures;
3. Apply temporary seed and erosion control matting to the banks; and,
4. Plant native herbaceous and woody vegetation on the banks and at the top of
both banks to establish a vegetative buffer.
4
2.3. Restoration Approach
2.3.1. Design
The restoration approach was similar for all of the culverts. The culvert and road
embankment were to be removed, a new channel section excavated, and the new banks
seeded, matted and planted with native vegetation. The cross-sectional area for the new
channel section was matched to the cross-sectional area of a stable adjacent section.
Slope was to be controlled by constructing step-pool structures to establish grade control
and protect new banks within the culvert removal areas.
Step-pool structure designs were based upon data gathered in the existing conditions
survey. During the existing conditions survey, the exact length and slope of the restored
channel was determined. The number of structures required at each location was
calculated so that the fall across each structure was as close to 1 foot as possible.
Due to the small size of the stream channels and the existing topography and vegetative
conditions, the most appropriate bank stabilization and planting methods were chosen.
Erosion control matting, seeding, live staking, and containerized tree-shrub planting were
all designed for both rapid and long-term bank stabilization and vegetation survival.
2.3.2. Implementation:
Bright's Creek removed five (5) existing culverts on-site in 2006 and restored stream
beds and banks within these areas. The original mitigation plan included seven (7)
culvert removal and\or restoration sites. Repairs were made to Crossings 1 thru 5 in June
2008. A total of 65 trees were planted at Crossings 1 thru 5 in June 2008 also.
Culvert 6 is not included in this mitigation report because the Crossing 6 site involved the
removal of twin 12" CMP and replacement with a bottomless culvert to maintain lower
impact quantities on the project. This crossing was included in the mitigation plan under
planned bank stabilization following installation of the bottomless culverts. At present,
the bottomless culverts have been installed and the surrounding stream banks stabilized.
Mitigation work on Crossing 7 was performed in December 2007. The stream was
reconstructed with step-pools and the banks stabilized with coir matting. Trees/shrub
plantings and live stakes were installed in March 2008. It should be noted that the work
performed at Crossing 7 is in the vicinity of but is not the exact same location as
indicated in the original mitigation plan. The stream location originally proposed has
been utilized as a utility line right-of-way and cannot be manipulated with heavy
equipment. The current location involved the removal of a 30-foot 12-inch CMP. A total
of 42 linear feet of stream was restored (30 linear feet were proposed in the original
mitigation plan).
Erosion control matting was placed to the top of bank. Outside of the erosion control
matting, riparian trees and shrubs were planted on 10 to 12-foot centers in agreement
5
with the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program's "Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration" in order to obtain a 320 tree/acre density at maturity. Existing vegetation
limited somewhat the number of woody plantings necessary as the riparian corridor had
not been eliminated along the whole restoration length.
2.4. Project History and Background
Table 1: Project Activity and Histor
Activity Planned or Actual Date
USACE 404/NCDWQ 401 approval May/June 2005
Construction of Crossings 1-5 July 2006
As-built Survey of Crossings 1-5 August 2006
Year 1 Monitoring (MY-1) of Crossings 1-5 August 2007
Construction on Crossing 7 December 2007
As-built Survey on Crossing 7 December 2007
MY-1/As-built Report Submittal
MY-1 on Crossings 1-5
As-built on Crossing 7 December 2007
Planting on Crossing 7 March 2008
Repairs/Plantings on Crossings 1-5 June 2008
Year 2/1 Monitoring (MY-2/1) and Report Submittal
MY-2 on Crossings 1-5
MY-1 on Crossing 7 September/October 2008
Year 3/2 (MY-3/2) Monitoring and Report Submittal September 2009
Year 4/3 (MY-4/3) Monitoring and Report Submittal September 2010
Year 5/4 (MY-5/4) Monitoring and Report Submittal September 2011
Year 5 (MY-5) Monitoring and Report Submittal at Crossing 7 September 2012
Table 2: Proiect Contacts
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland St
Designer Hendersonville, NC 28791
[phone]
Attn: Clement Riddle
Southern Excavation
Construction and Planting Contractor 165 Chestnut Cove Rd
Brevard, NC 28712
Crossings 1-5 [phone]
Attn: John Rogers
Streamline Restoration, Inc.
Construction and Planting Contractor 250 Thompson Rd
Saluda, NC 28773
Crossing 7 [phone]
Attn: Grant Fulbri ht
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland St
Monitoring Hendersonville, NC 28791
[phone]
Attn: Clement Riddle
6
3.0 VEGETATION MONITORING
The success of woody vegetation plantings will be evaluated for 5 years. Table 3
contains a list of species planted at the mitigation sites.
Table 3: Tree and Shrub Snecies Cmmnnsitinn

Scientific Name
Common Name Planted Stems
i12007 Planted Stems
in 2008
Quercus falcata southern red oak 7
Ilex labra inkber 2
Platanus occidentalis sycamore 8 20
Corpus amomum silk dogwood 16 18
Betula nigra river birch 11
Euon mus americanus strawberry bush 2
Vaccinum co mbosum hi hbush blueberry 1
Acer rubrum red maple 9
Dios ros vir iniana persimmon 4
Liriodendron tulipifera tuli tree 5
Oxydendrum arboreum sourwood 2 6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 1
Hamamelis vir iniana American witch hazel 6
Viburnum nudum Possumhaw 6
Amelanchierarborea Common serviceber 6
Quercus alba White oak 21
3.1. Vegetation Monitoring Protocol
Survival of planted vegetation will be evaluated using survival counts and all rooted
vegetation will be flagged and evaluated for at least 5 years to determine survival. The
complete planted buffer at each crossing will be assessed due to the small areas planted.
3.2. Vegetation Success Criteria
The total number of surviving stems within the project boundary is used to determine a
density in trees/acre. Per recent conversations with NCDWQ personnel, success is
defined as a density of 320 trees/acre after 5 years; or greater tree-shrub density due to
the establishment of native volunteer species.
3.3. Vegetation Monitoring Results
Table 4: Veuetntinn Mnnitnrina Rvenltc
Crossing Target
Stem Stem Count Current
D
it
Number
Count
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3 MY-4
MY-5 ens
y
(trees/ac.)
1 24 11 25 378
2 16 6 22 »-; 499
3 8 6 40 1815
4 10 6 16__% 581
5 10 6 13 472
7 17 24 z}':

?
M

.

498
Total 85 59 116 ;.
7
As indicated in Table 4, all crossings met the success criteria for the 2008 monitoring
year. Several locations had growth of volunteer species. Representative photos are
contained in Appendix B and show the general health of the planted buffer areas.
Qualitative observations of the planted vegetation indicate that the planted trees appear to
be stressed, most likely as a result of a long period of below average rainfall. Herbaceous
vegetation consists of primarily Lespedeza cuneata (Chinese lespedeza). Much of
Bright's Creek Golf Glub was stabilized with Lespedeza cuneata during earth-moving
activities. The combination of an extensive seed bank and recently disturbed soils has
allowed the Lespedeza cuneata to become dominant in the vicinity of the stream
crossings. Removal of Lespedeza cuneata with damaging planted vegetation would be
difficult and is not planned at this time.
4.0 STREAM MONITORING
Environmental components monitored in this project are those that allow an evaluation of
channel and bank stability. Specifically, the success of channel modification and bank
stabilization will be evaluated for 5 years.
4.1. Stream Monitoring Protocol
4.1.1. Cross-Sections
Permanent cross-sections were established at every crossing. The cross-sections were
marked on both banks with permanent pins to establish the exact transects used. The
annual cross-section surveys will include points measured at breaks in slope and any
identifiable features (bankfull, inner berm, etc.).
4.1.2. Longitudinal Profile
A longitudinal profile will be completed annually at each crossing for a total of 5 years.
Survey points will include thalweg and water surface. Each of these points will be taken
at the head of each feature, e.g. riffle, run, pool, and glide where possible, and the max
pool depth. Average water surface will be used to calculate slope for the project reach.
4.1.3. Reference Photos
Photographs used to evaluate restored sites will be made with a digital camera.
Reference sites will be photographed once per year for at least 5 years following
construction. The stream will be photographed longitudinally at the upstream end of the
restoration site looking downstream and at the downstream end of the site looking
upstream. Photographs will be taken of both banks at the cross-sections. The water's
edge or channel's edge will be located in the lower edge of the frame and as much of the
bank as possible included in each photo.
8
4.2. Stream Success Criteria
4.2.1. Cross-Sections
There should be little or no change in the as-built cross-sections. If changes in the cross-
sections occur, then they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement
toward a more unstable condition (down-cutting, erosion) or are minor changes that
represent an increase in stability (settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks,
decrease in width/depth ratio).
4.2.2. Longitudinal Profile
The as-built longitudinal profile should show that the bedform features are remaining
stable, e.g. they are not aggrading or degrading. The pools should remain deep with flat
water surface slopes and the steps/riffles should remain steeper and shallower. The
overall slope of the reach, based on average water surface slope, should remain stable.
4.2.3. Reference Photos
Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation,
bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Longitudinal photos should indicate the absences of developing bars within the
channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate
excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the bank over time. A series of photos
over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation. Vegetative
succession should include initial herbaceous growth, followed by increasing densities of
woody vegetation and then ultimately a mature overstory with herbaceous understory.
4.3. Stream Monitoring Results
4.3.1. Cross-Sections
Comparisons of MY-2 cross-sections with previous cross-sections are provided in
Appendix A.
Crossing No.l
Cross-sections taken for MY-2 show little to no change in dimension.
Crossing No. 2
Cross-sections taken for MY-2 show little to no change in dimension when
compared to MY-1. The cross-section pins were lost between the time of the as-
built survey and the MY-1 survey, resulting in variation between the as-built
survey and subsequent years.
Crossing No. 3
The step feature at Cross Section 1 show little to no change in dimension. The
pool surveyed in Cross Section 2 appears to have aggraded since MY-1. The step
structure controlling the pool appears stable. Sediment accumulation in Cross
Section 2 is likely due to sediment inputs upstream of the project area and long
periods of exceptionally low flows.
9
Crossing No. 4
The right bank on Crossing 4 received erosional damage from an adjacent
stormwater feature. The outlet of the stormwater feature was rerouted away from
the project area and the bank repaired in July 2008. Cross-Section 1 shows the
erosional feature in MY-1 but not subsequent to the bank repair work in MY-2.
The channel shows little to no change in dimension in Cross-Section 1. Cross-
Section 2 demonstrates some aggradation in the channel that can be attributed to
extra sediment input from the stormwater-caused bank erosion. Repairs
completed in July 2008 should prevent further aggradation and allow the pool to
scour.
Crossing 5
The cross-section pins were lost between MY-1 and MY-2, resulting in variation
between the between MY-1 and MY-2 events. The cross-section pins were
replaced during the 2008 monitoring event. Field observations indicate that there
is little to no change in the cross-sections at this site. Both the banks and the bed
appear stable.
Comparisons of MY-1 cross-sections with previous cross-sections are provided in
Appendix A.
Crossing 7
Crossing 7 only contained one cross-section. The cross-section shows some
minor aggradation and is likely due to long periods of extremely low flows. At
the time of the 2008 monitoring event, no surface water was present in the
channel.
4.3.2. Longitudinal Profiles
Table 5 presents a summary of profile data gathered at each of the crossings.
t anle n: Nummarv of rronte uata
Culvert As-built (2007) MY-1 (2007) MY-2 (2008) MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
No. Slope P-P
Spacing Slope P-P
S acin Slope P-P
Spacing Slope S Pa-cP in Slope P-P Slope P-P
Spacing Spacing
1 0.032 19.0 0.007 10.60 0.010* --- x -,
2 0.038 15.4 0.036 14.4 0.056 12.9
3 0.035 17.5 0.045 14.64 0.038 11.1
4 0.041 11.5 0.046 11.5 0.051 28.5
5 0.049 16.2 0.051 19.9 0.053 20.6
r
7 0.096 12.3 0.097 16.2 t ' _
*Based on stream bed due to lack of surface water
Crossing 1
No surface water was observed in Crossing 1. Average slope was based on bed
features rather than the average water surface slope. The slope for the reach has
decreased since the as-built survey from sediment accumulation. Sediment
accumulation is likely due to sediment inputs upstream of the project area and
long periods of exceptionally low flows.
10
Crossing 2
The slope at Crossing 2 has increased since MY-1. A visual assessment of the
site indicates that all structures, and therefore the reach profile, are functioning
and stable.
Crossing 3
The slope at Crossing 3 has changed very little. Pool-to-pool spacing has
decreased slightly as an adjustment to upstream sediment inputs and long periods
of exceptionally low flows.
Crossing 4
Both the slope and the pool-to-pool spacing have increased since MY-l. The
most probable cause is increased sediment input from bank erosion due to an
adjacent stormwater feature and long periods of exceptionally low flows. Pools
are generally filled in with gravels and cobbles.
Crossing 5
Crossing 5 shows little to no change in the profile since MY-1.
Crossing 7
The overall slope at Crossing 7 shows little to no change while pool-to-pool
spacing has increased. There was no surface water observed at Crossing 7.
4.3.3. Reference Photos
Photos from each of the crossings are contained in Appendix B.
4.3.4. Qualitative Observations
Qualitative observations were noted at each site to document conditions which may not
have appeared in the cross-section data, profile data, or reference photos. In general, the
restoration sites appear stable with developing buffers.
Tnhle 6_ C nte4nrienl Ctrenm Fentnrt, Vicnnl Ctnhility lnrlAY

Feature Initial
2008
MY-01
MY-02-
MY-03 MY-4
MY-5
Riffle 100% 80% 80% I A.
Pool 100% 80% 70%
Thalweg 100% 80% 75% i
Bed General 100% 80% 80% 1Fo ?y
Bank Conditions 100% 95% 95%
Ste Structure 100% 90% 95%r °-
rsaseu on assessment wan no surrace water on Crossing l and 7
11
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Bright's Creek Golf Club is a residential golf course community located in Polk County,
North Carolina. Bright's Creek received a US Army Corps of Engineers Permit (USACE
Action ID No. 200430264) on June 13, 2005 and a NCDWQ (Project No. 03-1625) 401
Water Quality Certification on May 26, 2005 authorizing permanent impacts to 110
linear feet of unnamed tributaries to Harm's Creek and 180 feet of relocation on an
unnamed tributary to Bright's Creek.
Bright's Creek removed six (6) existing culverts on-site in 2006 and 2007 and restored
stream beds and banks within these areas. This mitigation activity restored
approximately 200 linear feet of stream. Restoration of the culvert sites involved the
removal of the culvert structures and adjacent road embankments and excavation of new
channels that connected the upstream and downstream reaches.
5.1. Vegetation Monitoring
During the 2008 monitoring event, all sites met the target density of 320 trees per acre
based on planted and volunteer species. Herbaceous vegetation consists of primarily
Lespedeza cuneata (Chinese lespedeza). Much of Bright's Creek golf club was stabilized
with Lespedeza cuneata during earth-moving activities. The combination of an extensive
seed bank and recently disturbed soils has allowed the Lespedeza cuneata to become
dominant in the vicinity of the stream crossings. No further action is recommended at
this time.
5.2. Stream Monitoring
Most of the daylighted stream channels and banks appear stable in cross-section and
profile with most problems resulting from occurrences outside of the control of the
mitigation plan, i.e. long periods of low flows due to drought rainfall levels. All step
structures appear stable and functional. Crossings 1 and 7 contained no surface flow and
as such had more limited profile and qualitative assessments. No further action is
recommended at this time.
12

l
BI Rdg For
/ est
t Y \
Mftehouse
airview

s -
r 74
Bat Cal
D 5 Lh N hlrflfl V R LY 'w r l J{
,.
F 4 t5 :
3 '? _
?'e
,5 ? r r _
?.k,
L 4 /
Lure t .}
Y F t
,

Project Site

T v N s x ,I

191 "Dam

T ?_-? Her derson ville t ?, t
Bar kerHei
ht

r
G rtl. ,k g
s

t

?

•
,
?`. H d rs nvill
o
pq 1 ? _J
? _
- r '
'
.•
t211 y Hill f, \ r ^i t ??a , (

t oy

fff 5 ty '?
- t i io ?_
- -
? FLG. r:rt ,.'dil e
Y.
-•
\ ?.

4
East Flat no cN`?
?
., .? .r 5
.
T r r n , Fl at Rock ; --
` ` 's 'te
r
1 7q, Coi

Saluda
Lyn r,
708 .
Tryon
?Q \
t f j1rr r??? ,1 ?;` -
r ?t S -
e 4 ??
:D TapoQrads CaPTed ty 1999 Dli-r Parw"Ah ME 010%
Bright's Creek Golf Club
Polk County, NC
CLEARWATER
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland St
Hendersonville, NC 28791
Vicinity Map
Figure 1

l+?Y ! I Y yr ..: ?° 1 ? ?.,a Y r" p? 1 '1 ?y` ?•??' ? r ? r ?E J 4 3ry, Fr/ 'r!) t ? y la (11`
?I}IE'•r t ???O I`f?ti tlf l?? r? R' ,?iJllr'•1? Jy-?7

"` I!I I1 7 ' I II ,\ ?s 1 ? f?71 ? I ? IIr I 1?F? Sc ?'.
(I
r 4"•
"l
II`

I I

Ir?•1
7
of r s11'?' ??? rl '1 '1?`,°•+ ??4,. r,-,E?.J? ??) f ;fir"'..:-s I?? ?<t???r, ? ,
e `Ca •
J r 1 !?? / r .cam J? - I ? i 111 t' a ?J ? t ?*?1j ? 1 ,J '?y , Ir f ?1 ip ? r ? ?
'??i
r J •
1r / ?J..?4
I X15' ?
+' (,l
-
1' Y?? l71 i
??1 ?lyr /I .
r -
,?`\; _.
,•?

"`

I
?I
I
?
.
.
.I
+ r( „/
c ? r? 1 I I ,I tl v li? I rr ' J r' - , I? V {
f- -: / 1 Ir f , J r Ci r I -
^?rJr mss- '`I I f?rJf) Ilp ifS`? / jsF r'
r
K
r
11 J
ll j I 7
1 11
?'I s
?r [ 1 - rv['
'
J
?
I ,??
¢
, r /
,
I )7
I =_
.
J? 1 1 F J Y r! I 1 % I J, ? "FF ?7 P ,r^-? F. Z Y "? ! I \ 1
r p l t r H 1.It S i
III
1,1 L.1 J rI I _,ll? ',, ,71f 1 ?, 1 i 1 ,; •-, ..?„ f•P t ~,I
'??
?, I 1 /mss / _ ? r? 1 I 'T(
?
? ?,

-
,r r .il
(j / q J 1 ((f r r rl \ I I 4J
1 >
1? 11 I / E 7 I-l\ ?' !'Ir4+ I`? /? ?.r_ r _4 i(, i1?
`
? /? e ? I? /.? I LI v c5i I
,
•? I
? J ?I
1
?l? r d
1
1
-
/-
_
?
?
71 NN
` r
?
j..
l
I I I
i
I
I
I
r l
\
1
I
v
r J _i / `-"?
?I I t
?\ 1
y S` rl_
aft S ,.?,(.
r
r ?
?
WV ' 7 A= I IA.??..
?i r!1 J J I r ?. J` 11 ) r ?}V 1 0 ? ?#gg I 1 ,1 _ 446 t f)) J kt ,'•
,?,1
/j rl /: ? :i/' -... J?>? J? C, 1 {'ylt ` .1 f l C 5 1 ?? ?' _? / ' ,? ? "-i Y IA ? ;, (
{
' `
l ? ` '•
,`

-" `, ,' 1 ,? r..
1
. ,_ I ,rl '; `I7 '? } a ?1J.-
..-IN ) /lf.??p, ?. -_` .'.•
?Il
((till fV ,E `?'.
4 171 j 4 1 J J a (- Iljr SITE ?`?r11, ((lt / ,
17
i; fll ?i?.y v 7, r; ,v
[, ,??t f I , 1 r)I ' r ? 1 ; ? 7n ;{Js r , ? ??? o r l ^ ) ;4 ?
?'a
'

? ,
/
-
- t?

[I ?•``1 ! I tI?JJF.. 1, 'O' d
k
7 `? 1.1 r}'(} r ?? S I .C
Y) Il?tr ?y(t? l ?'I IfJ? ?I ,r
I_zz
?
1
te
l
i ?x
711" . ,C 1 qry
r 1: 1,-1
If. :_ - ' \ '; `i t'I ?'. `r
.y ?u f _ r sAl
'y
?ti J 71 `%. ! 1 ' 11 h. l\ l Ifi +.II y J ?1 + f
1j, r•
f 51( Q? ?? ?
,
r rS3
?? --- ? . ? f ?
JI I
• ?
?
-
,
L
'
.
? 1
?I
.
?
?
y?
? ?
, I
-^
I -: l
?
r
./ I t I,I /..r • r ) nL .1
70

[ Z r:,,?? ',.??=
1 f (h 1 7 I y f?) f+t 1 - l j +D ??? '-/`' ?i 1 /.??. r ! l ,? .
•T
r
Y
? 1' \ ? •
\-::.. `,`, ... -1.? ?qp ?... ? 1 \ v I
/ J I ??
r.? f
1. ? J
/! {.at-1.e.,,.
i ,
?? l i?l ?? I r ? r,S' fb+- , /1? r? , I? /? r ? ?„??) ?h--:_J I ja $ ?'?-•r 's,?i ?'I? I ?f a`
Ni !, r ? !r 1 ? Y 1 t
? _ -~.i

?1 '•

? _ ?
i
'Pe
i

46
,. ?f?
1
•'
.- ?, a
?_ ? %? ??' ?,
J I ?fi ?J
RN
f
-
4
/
r
\
C : `ill ?l f r ``I I?Id p,. ?v4? I \ J _?.? .,;C\J(? ` I!+ Op 1 17 1
I41II' 4
°+ti '7?W' 1 C z?r N
l '\. '?.
l
".
1 / .? II I,;U l t' ! r f I \ '. \} rC?? JI : I ` i r ?S ?- y
L
,1
l
= r 11
`
'
'`\
?
? t'7 I:
\
?
f
l
Ike
,
III. 1
3 qqqqc tC?
,' ;? x
, ?
7 f
1¢ Y q r Nary 1 ? ?r ?. 5'--?J ! c ?y 1-'. ? I , I f 1..? ? c? .
ip''I? III ryl ? ?
? ?_ , `•?sJ _ )ty
?,r ,?- /.?'
\
. t x 1\ J?' J i'•
) ? •.1 ' -
?
.
,
r
1: L.b
U Iopo(arads Capyri?t C9 1Q991k1 arme Yaimord>S ME 04096 SUM Data USGS 600 ft Seale: l : A300 Detail 13-3 Id m WGS59
CLEARWATER

Brights Creek Golf Club USGS To o ra hlc Ma
p g p p
Environmental Consultants, Inc. Cliffield Mountain Quad
Phase 1 718 Oakland St
Polk County, NC l lendersonville- NC 28791 Figure 2
828-698-9800

CULVERT tt7
22LF OF

STREAM
Y,.._-. AND BUFFER
(TYP) ? ? \' ? ?tl., ? ?•' ? ? /// .
l? \ \\ A.
46.. t
_ l
LmdDe6M BRIGHT'S CREEK
DATE, 02/2WO5
scALE, r - 700•
sir i of 2 S
G: \ 6003050 \ ad Civil \ Special Plots 5 - L MENT.dwg Feb 5 - 9..15AM rodnevd
I'LL
Aw.
\ CULVERT tt6
47LF OF /
TWIN 12' CMP ?'"' ; F•' ;?; /?
CULVERT tt5 /
I r" 30LF OF STREAM
TWIN 18" CMP // AND BUFFER
v ?/ ?i (TYP)
n J/ O
1 O,1 - i
?Df O e CULVERT tt2 \
30LF OF
CULVERT #4 12" CMP
/e CULVERT ttl
24LF OF 50LF OF
24" PDPE 12" IRON ` ?.

If
CULVERT tt3 i
30LF OF /
1 \" J J 1 12' CMP
• 1
1 !
f ,
L?dDe?gn BRIGHT'S CREEK
DATE, 02/23105
scAm, r - 7oo•
2 OF 2 S2
. Q1MI.IM F N]11.IM
G: \ 6003050 \ Cod \ Civil \ Special Plots \ 3050-CLEMENT.dwci Feb 23, 2005 - 09118AM rodnevd

REMOVE EXISTING
GRAVEL TO MATC
ADJACENT GROUND
ELEVATION. REPLANT
AS PER BARE ROOT
\ DETAIL. SEE SHEET D2
REMOVE
EXISTING 1
IRON CULVER?7"-?
0
oP '?
? r
1
1
EXCAVATE NEIN----?
CHANNEL THROUGH
\ ROAD EMBANKMENT
l ,- CONSTRUCT Sj P -?/-'
' POOLS 17 IL D1
j R E M 0-VE--€X?STI N G-------
GRAVEL TO MATCH __----
ADJACENT GROUND ?-
i ELEVATION. REPLANT AS
+ %1 ! PER BARE ROOT DETAIL-
---SSE--SHEET D2
• BRIGHT'S CREEK 6003050
. S18LI.IM F. O6LI.IH9
CULVERT 1 DATE: 3/1/5
SCALE: 1"=20' Cl
1
t
i
REMOVE
EXISTING 12"
CMP CULVER
REMOVE EXISTIN
GRAVEL TO MATCH
ADJACENT GROU D
ELEVATION. REPL NT AS
PER BARE ROOT ETAIL.
SEE SHEET D2 ,
f
0
Q
I ?
r Z ?
? I
c? ?o I
I
.I
I
LmdDesign. BRIGHT'S CREEK
v t11LLIM F. ®tLLIM9
CULVERT 2

REMOVE EXISTING
GRAVEL TO MATCH
ADJACENT GROUND
?tEVATION. REPLANT
AS PER BARE ROOT
DETAIL. SE SHEET D2

EXCAVATE NEW \
CHANNEL THROUGH
ROAD EMBANKMENT
CONSTRUCT STEP
OOLS PER DETAIL D1

6003050
DATE: 3/1/5
;CASE: 1"=20'
? I
REMOVE
EXISTIN 12"
CMP CUL FART
RE OVE EXISTING
GRAVEL TO TCH
ADJA ENT GR UND
ELEVATION. RE ANT
AS PE BARE RbOT
REMOVE EXI ING
GRAVEL TO =CH
DJACENT GROUND
EL NATION. REPLAN T
AS PER BARE R00
\ DETAIL. SSE SHEET 2 \
EX VATE EW
CHA NEL TH OUGH
ROA EMBAN ANT
?CONST CT STEP
POOLS DER DETAIL 1

DETAIL. EE SHEET 2
O ?
\ O
Z
/ OZ
i
• BRIGHT'S CREEK 6003050
CULVERT 3 DATE: 3/1/5
SCALE: 1°=20' C3
1 \
I
EXCAVATE NEW
' CHANNEL THROUGH
REMOVE TWO 1 ROAD EMBANKMENT
CONSTRUCT STEP
EXISTING 18" POOLS PER DETAIL 1
CMP CULVERTS
- EXISTGgG DRIVEWAY TO OLD
HOUSE TO BE ABANDONED.
I \
I
RE OVE EXISTING
,\ EVE
TO MATCH \
ADJACENT GROUND
ELEVATION. REPLANT REM VE EXISTING
AS PER BARE ROOT GRAVEL TOM CH
DETAIL. EE SHEET D2 ADJ CENT GRO D
' ELEV TION. REPL NT
/ I AS P R BARE ROOT
DETAI SEE SHEET D,2
1
1
,I
L B R I G H T' S CREEK 6003050
mCULVERT 4 DATE: 3/1/5
SCALE: 1"=20' C4
i i
EMOVE EXI ING
GRAVEL TO TCH , 1 -- _
ADJACENT R UND
ELEVATION./RE LANT
1 ,\
AS PER BARE OOT
DETAIL. SEES ET
D2
REMOVE TWO/ E
/ \?`EAVATE NEW ?
EXISTING 1,4„ CHANN THROUGH
CMP CULVERTS ROAD EM NKMENT
\ \\ CONSTRUCT TEP
OLS PER DETAIL-D1
?o
o Z
A y0 1
REMOVE EXISTING w f
GRAVEL TO MATCH ;Soo
ADJACENT GROUND
ELEVATION. REPLANT 3-1Z
AS PER BARE ROOT za
DETAIL. SEE SHEET D2 0
v
LmdDesign • B R I G H T' S CREEK 6003050
•????"""" CULVERT 5 DATE: 3/1/5
SCALE: 1"=20' C5
R MOVE TWO-
E ISTING 12"
CMP CULVERTS
AND REPLACE
WI TH A
BOTTOMLESS
CULVERT.

Lmd 1.
M 6l6]I I.IM F. RtLi.IM
BRIGHT'S CREEK
CULVERT 6

6003050
DATE: 3/l/5
SCALE: 1"=20' C6
i ? zl'
REMOVE EXISTING
GRAVEL TO MATCH
ADJACENT GROUND
ELEVATION. REPLANT
AS PER BARE ROOT
DETAIL. SEE SHEET D2
i
__;?Z
EMOVE
/EXISTING 8"
' HDPE CULVI

i

i
/EXCAVA?NEW
HANNEL THROUGH
ROADJEBANK9 NT
CON TS RUCT STEP
POOLS PER DETAIL D1
-? l
00
90
REMOVE EXISTING \
GRAVEL TO MATCH
ADJACENT GROUND
ELEVATI P N. REPLANT AS
`. PER BARE ROOT DETA14. !. `
SEE SHEET D2
1
LmdDesip • B R I G H T' S CREEK 6003050
DATE: 3/1/5
e naxiaw a mv.iso SCALE: 1"=20' C7
CULVERT 7
APPENDIX A
Morphological Data
Crossing No. 1
Crossing 1
Cross-Section 1
96
95 !
94
93
0
>y 92
w
91
90
89
0
Cross-Section 2
96 -
95 --- r
94 - - - --
?.
o i \
R
92 -
---
w
90
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station (ft)
--W-As-built , MY-1 MY-2
5 10 15 20 25 30
Station (ft)
--M-As-built MY-1 MY-2
o
0
m
r
d
fA =
fA o
O a
U
0
0
v
L
O
y
m
M
O
N
O
O
O m
m m m
(U) UO!IBA013
Crossing No. 2
Crossing 2
Cross-Section 1
100
99
98
c
97
eo
_d
w 96 -
95
94
0
Cross-Section 2
100
99
98
97
96
ca
°-' 95
w
94
93
92
-?-As-Built ?t MY-1 MY-2-
0 5 10 15 20 25
Station (ft)
30
n 1 u Station (ft) 15 20 25
C)

?l
T
O
(D
3 0
LO
0
0
N
N
N
O
L
U

O
O C
O O
M :;a-
m
4.0
CO
O
L
a
O
0
N
O
O
ill a O
O
to CO to 0 to ? 0 m 0 N to
O O O O O
O O 0') O O O
(4) UOIIBA013
Crossing No. 3
Crossing 3
Cross-Section 1
100 --
99
c
= 98
R
w
97 -- -- - - - - - - - -- - - --
96 L
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Station (ft) 0 As-Built -w--MY-1 MY-2
Cross-Section 2
100
99
98
c
0
m' 97
w
96
95
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Station (ft) 0 As-Built MY-1 MY-2

T ?ll
c?
?
C)
?

a' I
tL
M
C d
.N w
O ?
L a
u
LO
Cl)
O
M
LO
N
C
O
ca
0
N
LO
T
T
LO
O
O L
O O O
(4) UIIBna13
Crossing No. 4
103
102
101
c
100
ca
m
w 99
98
97
Crossing 4
Cross-Section 1
0 5 10 15
Station (ft)
Cross-Section 2
103
102
101
c
100
eo
d
w 99
98
97
20 25 30
-?-As-built -- MY-1 MY-2
- A..
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station (ft) 0 As-built - MY-1 MY-2
0
0
v cn
?j
T
C)
c }
,
co
O
O
Cl)
O
LO
N
I*
C
.N
0
L
U
d
O
a`
F
O C
O O
N
CO)
O
LO
0
0
O
Lr)
c9
O
O
0
LO 7 M
O O O
(4) UOIjBAa13
Crossing No. 5
Crossing 5
97 1
96
95
c
94
m
w 93
92
91
0
100
99
98
97
c 96
> 95
m
U' 94
93
92
91
0
Cross-Section 1
5 10 15
Station (ft)
Cross-Section 2
20 25
- 0 As-built MY-1
5 10 15 20 25
Station (ft) 0 As-built MY-1
30
MY-2
30
MY-2
>I*
I
1
I Cl)
U)
? O
C
y O
p a`
L
U
r- o L
rn rn W m
(4) UOi;enal3
LO
N
O
N
w
C
O
r
LO
0
LO
0
Crossing No. 7
Crossing 7
Cross-Section
101.5
101
100.5
100
99.5
99
m 98.5
w 98
97.5
97
96.5

0
5
10 15
Station (ft)
- 4 As-built t -MY-1
20 25
0
v 3:
H
Itl
I-
C
N O
N L
o a
L
U
LO
Cl)
O
co
LO
N
E
O C
N C
cn

0

0
rn rn m rn rn rn co
(41) UOIIBAal3
APPENDIX B
Reference Photos
Crossing No. 1

+7?? ?" y7?
E
1f: i
;.1 ?x1 v
w

e
A;F t ?5. ,y
L1 t. F:s1? i?.• °1 YF !?Yii t •\N?S :. ??..
' t
ti
!
Crossing 1, Photo Point 1: Looking downstream from the upstream end of reach
Crossing 1, Photo Point 2: Looking at right bank from left pin of Cross-Section 1
Crossing 1, Photo Point 3: Looking at left bank from right pin of Cross-Section I
Crossingl, Photo Point 4: Looking at right bank from left pin of Cross-Section 2

l
Jy.¢ A
Crossing], Photo Point 6: Looking upstream from the downstream end of the reach
Crossing No. 2

Crossing 2, Photo Point 2: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross-Section I
Crossing 2, Photo Point 1: Looking downstream from the upstream end of the reach
rolt',, 15 .d,A
,Y l
M
,JIM„ r
f
t
,;??c?, ?,<kltt
r? °t
Crossing 2, Photo Point 3: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross-Section I
Crossing 2, Photo Point 5: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross-Section 2
Crossing 2, Photo Point 6: Looking upstream from the downstream end of the reach
Crossing No. 3
d
Crossing 3, Photo Point 2: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross-Section 1
L,rossmg s, rhoto Yoint 3: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross-Section 1
Crossing 3, Photo Point 4: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross-Section 2
Crossing 3, Photo Point 5: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross-Section 2
Crossing 3, Photo Point 6: Looking upstream from the downstream end of the reach
Crossing No. 4
Crossing 4, Photo Point l: Looking downstream from the upstream end of the reach
Crossing 4, Photo Point 2: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross-Section 1
Crossing 4, Photo Point 3: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross-Section I
Crossing 4, Photo Point 4: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross-Section 2
Crossing 4, Photo Point 5: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross-Section 2
Crossing 4, Photo Point 6: Looking upstream from downstream end of reach
Crossing No. 5

Crossing 5, Photo Point 1: Looking downstream from the upstream end of reach
Crossing 5, Photo Point 2: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross -Section 1

Crossing 5, Photo Point 3: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross -Section I
Crossing 5, Photo Point 4: Looking at right bank from left pin at Cross -Section 2

Crossing 5, Photo Point 5: Looking at left bank from right pin at Cross -Section 2
Lrossing 5, Photo Point 6: Looking upstream from the downstream end of reach

Crossing No. 7

Crossing 7, Photo Point 1: Looking downstream from upstream end of reach
Crossing i, Photo Point 2: Looking at right bank from left pin at cross-section

Crossing 7, Photo Point 3: Looking at left bank from right pin at cross-section
t-rossmg i, rnoto romt 4: Looking upstream from downstream end of reach