20070113 Ver 2_401 Application_20081008

L? STEARNS & WHELERa" LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
GIIVIIUIIIIIC112LI GnyllnmCla OL OLlC11LIJIJ
3128 Highwoods Boulevard • Suite 140
Ralei
NC 27604
h
Date: 10/8/08
File No.: 71121.5
g
,
Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.stearnswheler.com
Attn: Amy Chapman/Ian McMillan
To: Division of Water Quality Re: PCN Application for City of Raleigh
401 Wetlands Unit Southeast Beaverdam Creek Interceptor
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 1)1 - 0113 V 2
We are sending you the following items: ? Attached ? Under separate cover via ?
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
7 PCN Application and Supporting Documents
1 $200 Fee
These are transmitted:
0 For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit copies for approval
? For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit copies for distribution
? As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return corrected prints
? For review and comment ? Forbids due ? For review and remittance
REMARKS: Please copy us on any requests for additional information. Thank you.
cc: Ron Horton, City of Raleigh
Signed:
K. Marie Doklovic, P.E.
S&W Form 1 (0707)
P: 6003430`.Petmits`PCN Letter of Transmittal.doc
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
1 1.08
O C-1
Dl-'J'? fir: t UP.UTV '
wErLAivDS Af:? ?TORWATER 6RAtd
. a rt
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No, 01-0113 02,
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit 7 Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
FN? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 3699/3689
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: FRI
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details),, h r , .
II. Applicant Information
0 ^7 200V
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Ron Horton, Construction Projects Administrator
Mailing Address: City of Raleigh '
Po Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
Telephone Number: 919-857-4543 Fax Number: 919-857-4545
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: K. Marie Doklovic, PE
Company Affiliation: Stearns & Wheler PLLC
Mailing Address:
3128 Highwoods Blvd
Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone Number: 919-790-6770 Fax Number: 919-790-9227
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I I by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
I . Name of project: Southeast Beaverdam Creek Interceptor Rehabilitation/Replacement Project
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
Property Identification Number (fax PIN ): Work is within existing easements but PINS noted on drawing set
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
Site is along SE Beaverdam Creek between Wade Avenue and slightly south of Glenwood Avenue - See attached site map
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): See attachment IN See attachment oil
6. Property size (acres): N/A - linear project
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Southeast prong - Beaverdam Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing sewer interceptor (approximately 50 - 75 years old) in an existing built-out
residential area. Many homes and maintained yards are only feet away from the creek. Some have foot bridges across the creek.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Rehabilitation and replacement of an aged sewer interceptor using excavation equipment (dig and replace) and cured-in-place
pipe lining (trenchless technology) which utilizes a box truck and trailer mounted stand.
1 1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Repair or replace an aged and deteriorated sewer interceptor.
In some locations, the interceptor is going to be realigned out from under structures. Reference attached drawing set.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe pen-nits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A portion of this project received a prior riparian buffer authorization certificate under DWQ Project No. 07-0113 on February 13,2007.
We have not accounted for this portion of the project in this application.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Only permanent impacts include stream stabilization in two areas. Stabilization method is gabion mattress. There are three stream
crossings. However, timber mats will be utilized over the stream thus no impacts are anticipated. No wetlands or open waters
are located along the project corridor. Sewers crossing streams are bored underneath or aerial crossings with piers outside the banks.
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact "Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
No wetlands - see attached letter
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiDly length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 (also Sheet C-07) SE Beaverdam Permanent - Gabion intermittent 12 18 .005
2 (also Sheet C-06) SE Beaverdam Permanent - Gabion perennial 15 12 .004
A (also Sheet C-02) SE Beaverdam Permanent - Rip Rap perennial 25 25 .014
B (also Sheet C-02) SE Beaverdam Permanent - Rip Rap perennial 28 28 .018
C (also Sheet C-06) SE Beaverdam Permanent - Rip Rap intermittent 22 22 .011

l'otal Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 105 .052
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation. dredging. flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name
(if of Wat e)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): .052
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .052
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 105
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes FEW No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of' a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Trenchless technology was utilized where
possible on this project. Three remaining aerial crossings will have encasement and piers located outside the top of bank. The
stream bed needs permanent stabilization where existing sewers will be removed or have been exposed due to erosion and where
new sewer crossings occur (rip-rap).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://l12o.enr.state,nc.us/ncwetlaiids/strmgide.hti-fl1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
None needed - no wetlands on site and less than 150 feet of perennial stream impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.iic,us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A - no change
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No 0
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is an established old neighborhood near downtown Raleigh. Little redevelopment should occur. There are few
vacant lots along the project corridor. The sewers are not being upsized to accommodate any future growth.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
2-2-1619
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
coslvstem
? ee?I
PROGRAM
Ron Horton
City of Raleigh
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
May 16, 2008
Expiration of Acceptance: November 16, 2008
Project: Southeast Beaverdam Interceptor Rehabilitation & Replacement County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/LAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
ULI the juquiied mitigatin in thar perinit and payment must be made prior to conducting the au orize work. e amoun o e n
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts Neuse 03020201 0 0 105 0 0 0 11259 0
Credits Neuse 03020201 0 0 210 0 0 0 33,777 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely,
WilIia Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, NCDWQ-Raleigh
Marie Doklovic, agent
File
RestoYrit?... ... Prot-" our fta&
,&VA
QUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
Y •f
01
P
fal -
cl

C
0
,n

;r
r :LI
pa p6ob
5
}
/1 -.15.
4
N Tarboro Rd

C.
a
?G
Q
avi Dixie TH
o

na
' r
tl
_
tea'
? i ?
t
#

L
Alb,
i
1 a r
a4
to t?
?]F
r
Q
.Sc

try _ '°
0. 3b.
L
O
U
LC

(1) O
U
L L
?
c ?
c
?- a)

F U
Of E
I.L

4--
O ?
L
-0
4.0 > CU
U o
m 2

c
CU

VJ
co
w 1
} Me Ce62 ?
B
Ce 2
cn z Q j CeC2 CeC2
O ' -n YO
O
W G NT CeC2 v 7
CeD >- n
ir N O C I O ApD
?
W LS 2 z
Ce MCMULLA U
o - CeB
u L W
1
1
-
LSH
c Co
E SFO Ce62
_cai
BER Y A R ING O
CeC
gpp?i
Q" ,
?
?
,
s
c z
-?...® M TTL R Q? ' _ I L < CeC2
a

CeD
<<?AMs U
N -
® p$N? SONORA CeF
C
F
e
MP.?I\ W z CeD'-®
ROS DAL i w w CeC2 Co

Y
Co
z g o a 71 Ma
ANDY E O Q a OVZ? D N\E S ?2 -- Me C,

?pr?`
D ORD URNE SU WkE
OO
G?
s?
R BERTS m C:
1 inch equals 1,000 feet T City of Raleigh, North Carolina
L:,
STEARNS & WHELER
NC DWQ PCN Application
Environmental Engineers and Scientists
Job No.. 60034 Date: 6/25/2008 FIGURE 1 - SOUS Map
. y ti
City of Raleigh
Southeast Beaverdam Creek Interceptor
Rehabilitation and Replacement Project
Map Unit: CeB2-Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained soils are on uplands. They formed in
residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate and shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is
below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CeC2-Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained soils are on uplands. They formed in
residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is
below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CeD-Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained soils are on uplands. They formed in
residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is
below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CmA-Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
These nearly level, very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils are on flood plains. They
formed in loamy alluvial deposits. They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil.
Permeability is moderate and shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is
within a depth of 0.5 to 1.5 feet. These soils are subject to frequent flooding.
Map Unit: CoA-Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
These nearly level, very deep, well drained to moderately well drained soils are on flood
plains. They formed in loamy alluvial deposits. They have a loamy surface layer and
subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water
table is within a depth of 2.5 to 4.0 feet. These soils are subject to occasional flooding.
Map Unit: MeA-Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
These nearly level, very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils are on flood plains. They
formed in loamy alluvial deposits. They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil.
Permeability is moderate and shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is
within a depth of 0.5 to 1.5 feet. These soils are subject to flooding.
Map Unit: WkE-Wake-Wateree complex, 10 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky
This map unit consists of moderately steep Wake and Wateree soils on uplands. They
formed in residuum from felsic rocks. Wake soils are shallow and excessively drained.
They have a sandy surface layer and sandy underlying material. A significant amount of
gravel is present throughout these soils. Occasional areas of bedrock are exposed at the
surface. Hard bedrock is within a depth of 10 to 20 inches. Permeability is rapid and
shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet. Wateree soils
are deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil. Occasional
,,° W .
areas of bedrock are exposed at the surface. Permeability is moderately rapid and
shrink-swell potential is low. Soft bedrock is within a depth of 20 to 40 inches. Seasonal
high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: WmE-Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
These moderately steep, very deep, well drained soils are on uplands. They formed in
residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is
below 6.0 feet.
4

IXQO 34 S)l
City of Raleigh Public Utilities

Southeast Beaverdam Creek Interceptor
Rehabilitation and Replac::;arnent Project J
2 ?
---?? 340 `v 240
3 60

s o ZgO??o
m
n
g`L 0
0 340 0 40 (3)
N 3
70
0
0
l
o
J 320

/ 380
J
?
w
f
?J o Q?
0

o
V
,cp
Ib
380 ? \a 3S'?,
?
o
_ co
ct CO
A a o
? 3
3,
360

.
O"'
CO
3g0
0 380
320
0
'L
i
(
I
)0 i 20/
D? 2 0___)

1 inch equals 1,000 feet T City of Raleigh, North Carolina
?
,
STEARNS & WHELER '., NC DWQ PCN Application
Environmental Engineer s and Scientists
Job No.: 60034 Date: 3/2/2008 FIGURE 2 - Topographic Map

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
UTM 17 711061E 3965261N (NAD83/WGS84) Magnetic and geographic declination from UTM grid for this topo map.
USGS Raleigh West (NC) Quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?lat=35.80881 &lon=-78.66403&size=l&u=4&layei=D... 1/30/2008
v 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km
46

105 Braxton Village Way
Holly Springs, NC 27540
Phone: [phone]
www.wazengineering.com
Ms. K. Marie Doklovic
Stearns and Wheler, PLLC
3128 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27604
July 12, 2007
RE: Results of Wetland Delineation
Southeast Beaverdam Creek Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement
City of Raleigh, NC
WAZ Project No. 07004:01
Dear Ms. Doklovic,
This letter serves to summarize the results of the wetland delineation by WAZ Engineering, PC (WAZ) for the
above referenced project. Specifically, the project study area included a fifty (50) foot wide corridor
surrounding the proposed sanitary sewer line as depicted in Figures 1 through 4 dated January 2007 provided
by Stearns and Wheler, PLLC. Delineations were performed in accordance with guidelines set forth in the "Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual" published in January 1987. Initial investigation of the project
corridor was performed by Emilio Ancaya and Amy Wazenegger, PE, and final wetland delineation was
performed by Emilio Ancaya and T. Eric Black.
Initial field investigations were performed on February 15, 2007, and three (3) areas, as shown on the attached
maps, were identified for more thorough investigation due to the presence of some wetland indicator plant
species. Upon return to these areas on July 2, 2007, we have concluded that there are no jurisdictional
wetlands present within the boundary of the project corridor defined above. Therefore, a jurisdictional
determination meeting with a representative of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is unnecessary.
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. If you have any questions, or require further
information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
WAZ Engineering, PC
Amy J. Wazenegger, PE
President
C
i
JUL 1 u ?COl
r
r r

ta

i u
4 .S li
'
U Q
\ \ ?

Y K
\ W
W

,
\\\ \? -- S Q Z N

w

?- w -
I ,

r

r
Q

{

i

r
eW ' w
i
r

4
\

\ J

_ w
1
? S

h

VFRU
F.1
?
` S J
.NESt
t cj Y
J
t \
Q
" / + O 2 ?
k W \
o l \
:
ITZ

-

? ,
i
\

I

°�
8

1 ? I Q U ?

CJ ?
I T
?
I

I I.?

1 _ -
i
I I
?
?
Y
?
w I r G

O

I.. L Ulm

mUw ?-

? ?

w .. W
I
'- I
U tD W
?
I

a; i mo i

a? it ? >?
M
I> , I r, N, Q
1m ?! I _, I
?
11 ??
S z
_ I i 1

I _
I a I I ?q°
?n
g o
i I
i r II ? ? w o
t
L

I
i

? 0e011 7IIHON/i

i
I

I

' I
I i
I r

I r

I
/m
_ vl
8
I:
J
/
I

? r
/ eo

w
u

d, ? T

/