199101620 Ver 1_Complete File_19910830

IMPORTANT
To- kjy-?
Date v li Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M 9
of
Phone ql q ? 1J 0 ? c?
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message E ? q Q Q ) lf??
\ 5 )
J
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
?v v? Printed on Recycled Paper
.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • h, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor 1,\cb,?g2?William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
?N ?: u
tei?ep, m 19
o•
Dr. G. Wayne Wright 3
Corps of Engineers P. 9 ?'??'?
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Dear Dr. Wright:
In keeping with your request, this office has circulated to interested
state review agencies U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice Action ID.
199101620 dated April 25, 1991 which describes a project proposal by the City
of Winston-Salem. The project, involving wetland and open water fill to
facilitate construction of a new parkway known as the Historic Bethabara
Parkway, is located in waters and contigous wetlands of Mill Creek, in Winston
Salem in Forsyth County.
Mitigation of the 1.2 acres of dirctly impacted wetlands is the primary
recommendation by two key agencies. Both the Wildlife Resources Commission
and the Division of Water Resources interpose this recommendation. Bridges to
replace culverts, in order to provide for wildlife travel corridors, is also
recommended by the Wildlife Resources Commission. Loss of the wooded riparian
zone along Mill Creek is of considerable concern to the Commission. No
alternatives, however, were suggested.
The writer supports the mitigation recommendation which would seem the
very best that might be provided to offset the impacts, primary and secondary,
from this new corridor.
Additionally, and as brought out by the Wildlife Commission, we assume
an EA has been prepared as it would seem contrary to state law if that is not
the case.
For the record, the Division of Environmental Management issued Section
401 Water Quality Certification No. 26-27 for this project on August 30, 1991.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
0
Dr. °`ayne Wright
Page
Sept*ber 11, 1991
Should you require additional input from the state on this matter, do not
hesitate to contact this office or the responding agencies.
Very sincerely,
?C?C-tom .
Jo n R. Parker, Jr.
Inland '404 Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
cc: Division of Wildlife Resources Commission
Division ow Water Resources
Division of Environmental Management
t.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary August 30, 1991 Director
Mr. Samuel B. Wehrenberg
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern, Inc.
Wrightsville Building, Suite 110
2300 W. Meadowview Road
Greensboro, N.C. 27407
Dear Mr. Wehernberg;
Subject: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal
Clean Water Act,
Historic Bethabara Parkway
Project # 199101620
Forsyth County
Attached hereto is a•copy of Certification No. 2627 issued
to City of Winston-Salem dated August 30 1991.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
eo ge T. Everett
Attachments
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regional Office
Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker
Central Files
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/9466481 919/395-3900 919/761-2351
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
} - 1 lb
NORTH IAROLINA
Forsyth Count
N
CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued
of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500
and subject to the North Carolina
Management Regulations in 15 NCAC
Winston-Salem pursuant to an appl
April, 1991 to construct Historic
Rd. too Bethania Station Rd.
in conformity with the requirements
and 95-217 of the United States
Division of Environmental
2H, Section .0500 to City of
ication filed on the 26 day of
Bethabara Parkway from REynolda
The Application provides adequate assurance that the
discharge of fill material into the waters of Mill Creek in
conjunction with the proposed Bethabara Parkway in Forsyth--
County will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality
Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North
Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate Sections
301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted
in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set
forth. .
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to
prevent significant increase in turbidity outside the area
of construction or construction related discharge (increases
such that the turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less
are not considered significant).
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in
revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit.
This the 30 day of August, 1991.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
l/?
Ge rge T. Everett, rector
WQC# 2627
-, f2
` .«-
e ?,. 5rnn o
4AW
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor May 3, 1991 Willian w. Cdbey, Jr., Secret,
'91 'N
Dr. George T. Everett Cl)
Division of Environmental Management ItY
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Cl
moo,
Dear Dr.. Ev.-erett :
The attached U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. 1620 dated
April 25, 1991 describing a project proposed by City of WinsTon=Salem
is being circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable
Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed
project and return this form by 5/25/91
Very sincerely,
John R. Parker, Jr.
404 Coordinator
REPLY
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office supports the project proposal.
---_No comment.
Signet
Date
Agency
JRP:jr/aw
P.O. Box 27687. Ralcigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Tclenhone 919-733-49R4
Wrightsville B.ildin Suit'i10
2307 W. Me.d.A w oad
Gree ,U with CarolvA 407
. (919)85 422
Greensboro, NC
Roanoke, VA
Rockville, MD
Virginia Beach, VA
Mobile, AL
Raleigh, NC
Hayes, Seay, IVMattern & Mattern, Inc.
ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
June 28, 1991
ce?
Mr. John R. Dorney
Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
RE: Historic Bethabara Parkway
City of Winston-Salem, N.C.
A/E Comm. No.: 2884
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is written in response to your letter of May 30,
1991 concerning the issuance of the 401 Certification. The two
items that needed to be resolved before the 401 Certification
could be issued are as follows:
1. A sewer line is present at site 3. What plans have been
made to deal with this sewer line?
The existing sanitary sewer manhole will not be relocated
or adjusted due to construction of the parkway project.
Any permits required by sewer line reconstruction will be
handled individually by the City of Winston-Salem.
2. At site 4, a Gulf gas pump is present. What is the
status of the underground storage tank at this location?

Mr. John R. Dorney
June 28, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Current deed and tax records show Stallion Properties to
be the owner of the property where the underground
storage tank is located. The City of Winston-Salem, N.C.
will not be purchasing the property covering the
underground tank for permanent or temporary right-of-way.
However, the soil and groundwater around the tank were
tested and no petroleum contaminants were found.
Should you have any questions or require further information
concerning these items, please do not hesitate to call.
Respectfully,
? ??
Samuel B. Wehrenberg, P.E.
ZO-L-Vice-President
cc: Eric Galamb Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Don Smith City of Winston-Salem
(with copy of original letter)
Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc.
AN 1111 F "1'S • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
.fir.'.
? e ? SiATf
4P ?o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor May 30, 1991
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Samuel B. Wehrenberg
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern, Inc.
Wrightsville Building, Suite 110
2300 W. Meadowview Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Dear Mr. Wehrenberg:
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
The Division of Environmental Management has completed its
field investigations for our 401 Certification for the Historic
Bethabara Parkway Project in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County. We
only have two outstanding questions which you will need to
address before the 401 Certification can be issued. First, a
sewer line is present on site 3. What plans have been made to
deal with this sewer line? Second, at site 4 a Gulf gas pump is
present. What is the status of the underground storage tank at
this location?
If you have any =questions about these concerns, please
contact me at 919-733-5083, extension 575.
Sincerely yours,
C4'(2?>Or
Jo An R. Dorney
JRD/lj
Wehrenbe.ltr/D-4
cc: Eric Galamb
John Parker
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/761-2351
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
A
nit
Tti
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor May 30, 1991 George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mr. Samuel B. Wehrenberg
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern, Inc.
Wrightsville Building, Suite 110
2300 W. Meadowview Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Dear Mr. Wehrenberg:
The Division of Environmental Management has completed its
field investigations for our 401 Certification for the Historic
Bethabara Parkway Project in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County. We
only have two outstanding questions which you will need to
address before the 401 Certification can be issued. First, a
sewer line is present on site 3. What plans have been made to
deal with this sewer line? Second, at site 4 a Gulf gas pump is
present. What is the status of the underground storage tank at
this location?
If you have any questions about these concerns, please
contact me at 919-733-5083, extension 575.
Sincerely yours,
T: ?:)'Y
r-
John R. Dorney
JRD/lj
Wehrenbe.ltr/D-4
cc: Eric Galamb
John Parker
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/761-2351
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 23, 1991
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: John Dorney
THROUGH: M. Steven Mauney `/ '"
l
FROM: Eric Galamb l
L
SUBJECT: 401 Certification
Historic Bethabara Parkway
Forsyth County
A site inspection of the subject project was made on
May 21, 1991. All five sites were evaluated and ranked on
one rating sheet. For site 3, what will happen to the sewer
line running through this area? At site 4, a Gulf gas pump
was observed. What is the status of the UST? If these two
questions can be answered satisfactory, then the WSRO
recommends that a 401 be issued for the subject project.
EEG/vm
Attachment
cc: WSRO
!?9
A?,
K_/A M •
WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORKSHEET
Project No. or description Air, 6, ;Di?G{, 2 , "r®w(zV,
' Location ? /? 6w,t
43
River basin and nearest permane t stream C'A"Cr_C'
Evaluator 6? LAIV?3
Agency and address
Date and time evaluated 14 41y 211011 .,
Major Wetland Type
Approximate size of wetland system
Approximate extent of wetlands in area
within miles
acres
acres
Three most dominant plant species (in order) :
Soil Series (if known)
Hydrologic indicators
Direct hydrologic connection?
Existing Conditions
Drainage 700,
Disturbance
Restoration -oo
(circle one) YES/ NO
5 .e. _f
S 4r r3 0
entia
. Does site provide habitat for endangered or threatened
species? If yes, then score equals 100%. State reasons for
exceptional status.
Item No.
I. Location/Landscape
1 Natural area buffer
2 Sensitive watershed
II. Ecological Values
3 Special ecological attributes
4 Dispersal corridor system
5 Wildlife
6 Aquatic life
7 Water storage
8 Streambank stabilization
9 Removal sediment/toxicant
10 Removal/transform nutrients
11 Groundwater recharge/discharge
III. Human Values
12 Outdoor recreation/education
13 Commercial value
Score (circle one)
5
5 Cb
1
(DI
5 5 L /
5 3 l 0
5
5 3
3 0
0
5
5
5 3 (T) 0
0

5
3 1 0
0
5
5 3
3 1
1
Total score"
Percent score 0p
(out of a tota?l? of 65 points)
Site description and notes: 1 ltd,ie
' Jfe ? ?i? t Girt ? ?C RI LL" ??/•l ??r ?l
dl 2?t .? 4?'U?' • ?t i1 t t,.ti n h ? ? 1??ro? ? ? is ?'?? , , • ? r ", ? r/ , r 6 4W
05- 5?-Uwk. cro!S( 5{a,,fW ,g ok C???? 5 - ', fe 5 ?
f P/? ? m G

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 23, 1991 M E M O R A N D U M
- - - - - - - - - - MAY1991
C\j Jp.
TO: John Dorney jl ?, 1NgTER t cs7
THROUGH : M. Steven Mauney l Pfon?r a"aIrl) Q\'
FROM: Eric Galamb ?f?`??£l Zll?O?`?
SUBJECT: 401 Certification
Historic Bethabara Parkway
Forsyth County
A site inspection of the subject project was made on
May 21, 1991. All five sites were evaluated and ranked on
one rating sheet. For site 3, what will happen to the sewer
line running through this area? At site 4, a Gulf gas pump
was observed. What is the status of the UST? If these two
questions can be answered satisfactory, then the WSRO
recommends that a 401 be issued for the subject project.
EEG/vm
Attachment
cc: WSRO
. 1
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
May 1, 1991
S: July 1, 1991
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199101620
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
is
V
Enclosed is the application of the City of Winston-Salem requesting
Department of the Army permit authorization and a State Water Quality
Certification to place fill material within Mill Creek, Winston-Salem, Forsyth
County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance
of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii)
of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorization of the proposed activity pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and have determined that a water quality
certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same
law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the
certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt
of a request for certification is considered a reasonable time for State
action. Therefore, if your office has not acted on the request by July 1,
1991, the District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be
addressed to Mr. John Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, telephone (919)
846-0648.
Sincerely,
nClhie, e Wrig
Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
J

Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
And Community Development
8025 North Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
-2-
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
ig, Suite I10
iwview Road
rolina 27407
9) 855-8422
W.?
J
April 1, 1991
Hayes, Seay, MaOrn7& Mattern, Inc.
ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
RE: Historic Bethabara Parkway
City of Winston-Salem, N.C.
A & E Commission No.: 2884D
Dear Mr. Winefordner:
) 99) 6) -6 20

Enclosed please find one copy of the "Application for Permit"
under section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the referenced
project. Please distribute as required for review and issuance
of the permit. A copy of this application is also being
forwarded to Mr. John Thomas, Corps of Engineers, Raleigh, N.C.
as requested.
Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
HAYES, SEAY, MATTERN AND MATTERN, INC.
Samuel B. Wehrenberg, P.E.
Vice-President
Enclosures as noted
Greensboro, NC
Roanoke, VA cc: Don Smith
Rockville, MD City of Winston-Salem
Virginia Beach, VA
Mobile, AL
Raleigh, NC
Mr. Clifford Winefordner
Department of The Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, N.C. 28402-1890
l e t Me or print. Carefully describe all an , : • .;
ticipaced development activities, including consif°uc-
tion, excavation, filling, paving, land clearing, and-,
stormy ntrol. If the requested information?is '
not >!uiewnt- o your project, write N/A (not ap-.
plicable). Items 1.4 and 8-9 must be completed` for°
all projects.
•? ?_? _......._.
1--APPLICANT
a. Name City of Winston-Salem. N.C.
Address P.O. Box 2511
City Winston-Salem State N. Q.
in 27102 JDay phone [phone]
X Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any Hi stori c
Bethabara Parkway
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give
the owner's name and address.
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. Street address or secondary road number
Proposed Rdwy, Reynolda Rd to Univ. Pkv
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Winston-Salem. N.C.
c. County, Forsyth
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Mill Creek
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED,
USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose
(for example, building a home, motel, marina,
bulkhead, or pier).
Const. of 5 lane & 4 lane divided
Rdwy with associated storm drainage,
culverts, bridge and erosion control
devices.
If you plan to build a marina, also complete
and attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an ex-
isting project, new work, or both? New
Construction
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
This will be a public highway for
community use.
-?--d: Describe the planned use of the project.
Transportation
LAND AND WATER
--- CIHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 1R Mi1P Roadway
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or Na-
tional Geodetic Vertical Datum 770-920
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract Varies
e. Vegetation on tract Vari es
f. Man-made features now on tract N /A
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classifica-
tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.) . N/A
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government? Varies-
Residential Commercial. Multi-Family
i. How are adjacent waters classified?N o n -high Qua l it
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? Yes
If so, by whom? Wake Forest University
Archaeology Lab
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT"w . ':?]
Complete this section if the project includes any
upland development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed N/A
b. Number of lots or parcels N/A
c. Density (Give the number of residential units
and the units per acre.) N/A
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed 2.18 m i l es
1ong, approximately 40 acres
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than
one acre of land, the Division of Land
Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan at least 30 days before land
disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
Yes. approved 12-12-90
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet
of mean high water to be covered by im-
pcrmeabie surfaces, such as pavement,
buildings, or rooftops. N/A
-. ek
List the materials, such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete, to be used for paved
Paved surfaces will be
sa?' concrete
If applicable, has a stormwater management
plan been submitted to the Division of En-
vironmental Management? N/A
Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities. N/A
9-
h.
i.
b. Amount of material to be excavated from
below water level in cubic yards -0-
c. Type of material N/A
d. Does the area to be excavated include marsh-
land, swamps, or other wetlands? N/0
.?
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards 167,0
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area N/A
g. Locaugn of spoil disposal area Excavated
material to be used in fill areas
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? _N 1.9
Have these facilities received state or local
j If not, attach a letter granting permission from
.
approval? N/A
cribe existing treatment facilities.
D
k
i. the owner.
Will a disposal area be available for future
es
.
N/A maintenance? N/A_
If so, where? -
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
Describe location and type of discharges to
1 swampland.'or water areas? N/A
.
waters of the state (for examplersurface runoff, k. Will the fill material be placed below mean
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
or "wash down"). Surface runoff
effluent
1. high water? No
Amount of fill in cubic yards See figure 16
, m. Type of fill material Native soil
n. Source of fill materialExcavated Mat' l & Borrow
Water supply source N/A
m o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
.
n. If the project is oceanfront development, wetlands? Yes
ions of the wetland to be filled Varies
Di
describe the steps that will be taken to main- p. mens
How will excavated or fill material be kept on
tain established public beach accessways or pro-
N/A q. site and erosion controlled? In accordance
vide new access. with approved erosion control plans
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will r. What type of construction equipment will be
be the elevation above mean sea level of the used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or
first habitable floor? NSA hydraulic dredge)? Backhoe, dozer,
compacting equipment
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equip-
INFORMATION ment to the project site? No If yes, explain
the steps that will be taken to lessen en.
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excava. vironmental impacts.
tion or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, N/A
which are covered in Section 7).
Length Width Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Upland fill
areas
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N1/A
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water
or normal water level N/A
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months,
in feet N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed
below mean high water N/A
f. Type of fill material N/A
?- s
wB ADDITIDNA ELI NEORMATION
In ad#.t4h to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for.
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and
cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on 8 V2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will 'be accepted. Blue-line
prints or ocher larger plats are acceptable only if 16
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard-
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or
location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per-
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and. complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com-
ments on the proposed project to the Division of
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen-
ding a copy of the permit application to them by
registered or certified mail. This notification is re-
quired by G.S. 113-229(d).
Name SPP fj_gur 17
Address
Name
Address
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
N/A
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the
project involves the expenditure of public funds, at-
tach a statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
(N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERK IIS
SION TO ENTER ON LAND';
Any permit issued in response to this application
will allow only the development described in the
application. The project will be subject to condi-
tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
state and federal review agencies to enter on the
aforementioned lands in connection with
evaluating information related to this permit ap-
plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
This is the Z day of March
191-.
Landowner or Authorized agent
City of Winston-Salem, N.C.
Send the completed application materials to the
Division of Coastal Management Office nearest you
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
DCM office and addresses and phone number.
s
w8ADDITI0NAL'INFORMAT'ION
In ad&?ft to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and
cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on 8 V2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 1J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will 'be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard-
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or
location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per-
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and. complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com-
ments on the proposed project to the Division of
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen-
ding a copy of the permit application to them by
registered or certified mail. This notification is re-
quired by G.S. 113-229(d).
Name SPP figure 17
Address
Name
Address
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
N/A
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the
project involves the expenditure of public funds, at-
tach a statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
(N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMIS
SION TO ENTER ON LAND';
Any permit issued in response to this application
will allow only the development described in the
application. The project will be subject to condi-
tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
state and federal review agencies to enter on the
aforementioned lands in connection with
evaluating information related to this permit ap-
plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
This is the 7 day of March
19 91
Landowner or Authorized agent
City of Winston-Salem, N.C.
Send the completed application materials to the
Division of Coastal Management Cfffice nearest you
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
DCM office and addresses and phone number.
4*-

APPENDIX TO 404 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
HISTORIC BETHABARA PARKWAY
Alternatives Analysis (Avoidance) - Alignments
The development of the Roadway project known as the Historic Bethabara
Parkway started in the late 1960's to be included as part of the City of
Winston-Salem's outer loop and also coordinated with the effort to restore
the Historic Bethabara Park area. The outer loop has since moved farther
out but an increasing traffic demand through the Historic District was
having a detrimental effect on restoration efforts. This led the city in
1988 to employ Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern (HSMM) to determine the
feasibility of constructing a parkway from Reynolda Road to University
Parkway (See figure 1). This study among other things included
environmental, archeological, historical and alignment investigations and
concluded with a feasibility study report dated December 1988. During the
development of the study several field environmental meetings were held
with appropriate agencies in attendance to determine the wetland'
boundaries, wetland quality and proposed project impacts. Below is a
short description of the studied alternates and impacts to wetland areas.
Alternate 1 (Fig. 2) consists of Segment 1-A & 1-B.
Segment 1-A begins at the Reynolda Road - Speas Road intersection and runs
along existing Speas Road, across Woodcreek Road cul-de-sac, and ends just
west of Bethabara Road.
Segment 1-B begins at the end of Segment 1-A and continues with an at-
grade intersection at Bethabara Road, runs north of Mill Creek through the
abandoned golf course, utilizes a single bridge to span Mill Creek,
Bethania Station Road, and the Southern Railway, and ties in with existing
Home Road. A spur road is utilized to connect Bethania Station to the
bypass. An additional structure would be required on realigned Old Town
Drive and the spur over Mill Creek.
This alternate alignment has very little impact on jurisdictional wetlands
through segment 1-A, however, the Spur Road to connect Bethania Station
Road would require substantial amounts of fill to be placed in the
wetlands area east of the Southern Railway. The alignment also requires
the acquisition and removal of five additional houses along Speas Road.
Alternate 2 (Fig. 3) consists of segment 2-A & 2-B
The proposed alignment that was developed prior to HSMM beginning the
feasibility study was presented as segment 2-A & 2-B. Segment 2-A begins
at the intersection of Yadkinville Road and Reynolda Road and runs
northeasterly approximately parallel to Mill Creek towards the bend in
Speas Rd., across the Woodcreek Road cul-de-sac and ends just west of
-1-

Bethabara Rd.. Segment 2-B then continues across Bethabara Road, spans
Mill Creek with a bridge, ties in with Bethania Station Road, continues
under the Southern Railway and connects to existing Home Rd. This
alignment had a significant impact on the wetlands area adjacent to Mill
Creek in segment 2-A.
Alternate 3 (Fig. 4) consists of Segments 3-A & 3-B.
Segment 3-A begins at the Reynolda Road - Speas Road intersection and runs
south of existing Speas Road, across Woodcreek Road cul-de-sac, and ends-
just west of Bethabara Road.
Segment 3-B begins at the end of Segment 3-A and continues with an at-
grade intersection at Bethabara Road; runs north of Mill Creek through the
abandoned golf course; utilizes a single bridge to span Mill Creek,
Bethania Station Road, and the Southern Railway; and ties in with existing
Home Road. An additional structure would be required over Mill Creek on
realigned Bethania Station Road.
This alternate has a minor impact on the wetlands in western portion of
the project since the alignment is shifted to the south side of Speas
Road. However, the single bridge spanning Mill Creek, Bethania Station
Road and the Southern Railway, as well as the additional bridge on the
realigned Bethania Station Road greatly increases the cost of the project.
Alternate 3 also requires the purchase of two additional businesses on
Bethania Station road.
Alternate 4 (Fig. 5) consists of Segments 4-A & 4-B.
Segment 4-A begins at the Reynolda Road - Speas Road intersection and
utilizes the existing Speas Road alignment, continues across Woodcreek
Road cul-de-sac, and ends just west of Bethabara Road.
Segment 4-B begins at the end of Segment 4-A and continues with an at-
grade intersection at Bethabara Road, and continues north of Mill Creek
through the abandoned golf course, utilizes a bridge to span Mill Creek,
and crosses Bethania Station Road on 16 feet of fill, continues with an
at-grade intersection with the Southern Railway and ties in with existing
Home Road. A spur road is utilized to connect Bethania Station to the
bypass and would require an at-grade intersection with the railway. An
additional structure would be required on realigned Old Town Drive and at
the spur over Mill Creek.
While the western portion of Alternate 4 has only a minor impact on the
wetlands, construction of the Spur Road to connect Bethania Station Road
with the bypass requires the placement of a large quantity of fill
material across the wetlands and floodplain east of the Southern Railway.
-2-
K.
Selected Alternate (Fig. 6)
After reviewing the alternates for the construction alignment a
recommended alternate was selected. The recommended alternate is a
revision of Alternate 4. Alternate 4 revised consists of Segment 4-A and
Segment 4-B revised.
Segment 4-A begins at the Reynolda Road - Speas Road intersection and
utilizes the existing Speas Road alignment, continues across Woodcreek
Road cul-de-sac and ends just west of Bethabara Road. A five lane section
would be used along part of the Speas Road alignment and then switch to a
four lane divided roadway for the remainder of the segment. Direct
driveway entrances from the Bypass would be used for the five homes on
Speas Road.
Segment 4-B revised begins at the end of segment 4-A and continues with an
at-grade intersection at Bethabara Road, and continues north of Mill Creek
through the abandoned golf course, utilizes a bridge to span Mill Creek,
and ties-in with Bethania Station Road on approximately 16 feet of fill,
continues with an at-grade intersection with the Southern Railway and ties
in with existing Home Road. A signal and gate would be needed at the
railroad intersection.
While the recommended alternate does not completely avoid construction in
the wetlands areas it does minimize the impact on the wetlands and on the
surrounding residential properties. The connection of Bethania Station
Road to the bypass is accomplished by a four-way intersection immediately
west of the railroad. Due to the high traffic volumes projected for
Bethania Station Road, the close proximity to the railroad crossing raised
questions of the safety and functionability of the intersection.
Therefore, Bethania Station Road was realigned along the north side of
Mill Creek and across the golf course. The chosen alignment for Bethania
Station Road creates some encroachment on the wetlands in the golf course.
However, the impacts are substantially less than would be caused by the
construction of the Spur Road previously considered for the connection.
The selected alignment has the advantages of being the least construction
cost, smallest impact on existing residential and commercial areas, and
provides the least impact on the wetlands areas. The selected alignment
is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative and
therefore is the avoidance alternative.
Minimization of Wetland Impacts - Encroachment Areas
The following areas along the project corridor have been identified as
jurisdictional wetlands from HSMM field investigations and field meetings
with representatives of the Corps of Engineers (See Figure 7):
1. The previously disturbed area near the Reynolda Road Bridge.
(Location 1)
-3-

2. The floodplain community bordering Mill Creek parallel to Speas
Road. (No encroachment)
3. The culverted streams passing beneath Speas Road (Sta. 21+05 and
Sta. 23+50). (Location 2)
4. The banks and watercourse of Bethabara Branch. (Location 3)
5. The perimeter ditch and ponds on the golf course. (Location 4)
6. The banks and watercourse of Mill Creek. (Location 5)
7. The existing stormwater management basin near the end of Home Road.
The actual boundaries of the wetlands in areas 1, 2 & 3 were delineated in
accordance with the methods prescribed in the federal wetlands manual.
These boundaries are shown on sketches included with this application.
The wetlands boundaries of the other areas were found to be limited to the
top of the banks of the area being considered.
The wetland impacts are broken up as permanent and temporary. Permanent
impacts are defined as being filled in by construction. Temporary impacts
are defined as areas between the fill slope and temporary construction
easement that could potentially be disturbed during construction but not
filled in.
All affected wetland areas have been minimized by the use of 2:1 fill
slopes and minimal roadway shoulders.
Encroachment Location 1. (Fig. 8 & 8A)
Area 1 - Previously disturbed area near the Reynolda Road Bridge
Construction in this area will result in a small encroachment left of Sta.
21+00. The encroachment is reduced by use of 2:1 side slopes for the
embankment material. The construction permanently impacts approximately
56 S.F. and temporarily impacts approx. 350 S. F. of jurisdictional
wetlands. A temporary sediment trap will be constructed at the outfall of
the proposed storm drainage system along Reynolda Road to reduce sediment
from upstream construction being deposited in the wetlands. All
construction of the sediment trap will be outside the delineated wetlands
boundary.
Area 2 - Floodplain Community bordering Mill Creek parallel to Speas Road
There will be no encroachment on the wetlands in this area due to
construction. Embankment side slopes of 2:1 have been used to reduce the
construction limits.
-4-
W
AL
(Fig. 9, 9A, 10 & 10A)
The delineated wetlands boundaries for these streams are limited to the
area downstream of the existing culverts. The wetlands area impacted by
construction of these culverts will be only the area covered by the
culvert and tail ditches. Approximate permanent area of the affected
wetlands will be 450 S.F. (@ Sta. 21+05) and 675 S. F. (@ Sta. 23+50) and
temporarily impacts 1500 SF & 1375 SF respectively.
The original design of the erosion control measures required the
construction of sedimentation basins at the outlet of the culverts.
Because of the high storm water discharges the sizes of the basins were
approximately 300' x 300'. In order to reduce the wetlands impact the
design concept was changed to allow sequencing of construction such that
storm water from disturbed areas of construction would not flow through
the culvert. The size of the sediment traps was reduced to detain only
storm water from the drainage systems and temporary pipes installed to
divert the water to the sediment traps. The reduction in the size of the'
temporary sediment traps allows them to be constructed completely outside
the wetlands boundary.
The total permanent and temporary wetlands area impacted at this location
is 1125 S.F. and 2875 S.F. respectively.
Encroachment Location 3 (Fig. 11 & 11A)
Area 4 - Banks and watercourse of Bethabara Branch
The jurisdictional wetlands at this location are between the top of banks
on each side of the stream. Therefore, the area of wetlands impacted will
be that portion of the existing creek being disturbed by the construction
of the reinforced concrete box culvert. The area impacted has been
minimized by the use of 2:1 side slopes on the embankments which allows
for the shortest culvert possible.
The permanent and temporary wetlands area impacted at this location is
approximately 1100 S.F. and 655 S.F., respectively).
Encroachment Location 4 (Fig. 12, 12A, 13, 13A, 14 & 14A)
Area 5, Perimeter ditch and ponds on the golf course.
The proposed alignment crosses the perimeter ditch at -L- Sta. 54+99 and
the proposed Bethania Station Road alignment crosses the ponds at -Y4-
Si:a. 46+75 & Sta. 49+00. At each of the locations the wetlands boundary
is limited to the top of the banks.
At -L- `Sta. 54+00 the wetlands encroachment will be the area of the
perimeter ditch filled by the roadway embankment. This area has been
minimized by the use of 2:1 embankment side slopes.
-5-
W
Wetlands encroachment along the -Y4- alignment will be the pond area
` filled by the roadway embankments. A rock embankment will be utilized in
the lower sections of the embankment along with 2:1 side slopes to ensure
the minimum impact possible. The rock embankment avoids having to place
fill material in the ponds.
The total permanent and temporary wetlands area affected is approximately
5650 S.F. and 2335 S.F. respectively.
Encroachment Location 5 (Fig. 15A - F)
Area 6 - Banks and watercourse of Mill Creek
Mill Creek will be spanned by a bridge which will not cause an
encroachment upon the wetlands area. However, channel work which is
required for the accommodation of the 100-year flood will be done in the
main channel of Mill Creek. This will involve approximately 1000 L.F. of
the creek channel. The banks and channel bottom will be lined with Rip
Rap as erosion control measures.
The wetlands area affected at this location will be approximately one
acre.
Area 7 - Existing storm water management basin near the end of Home Road
There will be no encroachment on the wetlands in this area due to
construction.
Erosion Control
All of the erosion control measures addressed in this appendix are a part
of the erosion control plans for this project. These erosion control
plans. have been reviewed and approved by the North Carolina State Division
of.Environmental Management. The Geotechnical report for this project
states that all embankment fill slopes constructed in accordance with
NCDOT standards will be stable at a slope ratio of 2:1 (H:V). These
slopes will be vegetated to reduce the potential for erosion both during
and after construction.
Mitigation
A concerted effort was made throughout the feasibility study and the
design process to avoid wetlands where practicable and minimize the
-6-

unavoidable impacts while still maintaining the projects objectives. To
accomplish these goals numerous on-site environmental meetings attended by
appropriate environmental agencies were held throughout the planning and
design phases of the project to determine the wetland boundaries, wetland
quality and proposed project impacts. The result of these efforts was the
selection of an alternative that met the project goals while at the same
time produced the least negative impact to the environment. This
philosophy was continued in the project design phase by minimization of
the unavoidable wetland impacts. These efforts are documented in this
permit application.
The resulting wetland impacts caused by the project are small, not high
quality and are scattered throughout the project. For these reasons and
due to the nature of a roadway project being kept to as minimum a width as
possible there is no practicable location for on-site or off-site
compensatory mitigation. A project special provision will be included in
the construction documents that requires the contractor to grade the
wetland areas temporarily disturbed during construction between the fill
slope and the temporary construction easements to their original,
elevations after construction is complete.
-7-

PROPERTY OWNERS
PARCEL NO.
4
10
12-15
27
30
32
33
34
OWNER
W. D. Poindexter, HRS
S & K Investments
City of Winston-Salem
Sam C. Ogburn, Jr. & Sr.
Stallion Properties
Nesbert & Vermell Salmons
AVL Industries, Inc.
Hubert E. & Rose Henson
35 Air Cooled Eng. & Parts
Dist., Inc.
36 H. Stephen Russell
37
James M. Logan &
Roy C. Hayes
39
Grundorf, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS
3890 Old Vineyard Rd.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27104
P. 0. Box 102
Goldenrod, FL 32733
P. 0. Box 2511
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27102
P. 0. Box 2799
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27102
3801 Heathrow Dr.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27117
2180 Independence Rd.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106
5717 Country Club Rd.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27104
4569 Havencrest Rd.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106
3800 Bethania Station Rd.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106
5555 Indiana Avenue
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106
3880 Bethania Station Rd.
Winston-Salem,. N.C. 27106
540 N. Trade St.
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27101
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 17
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 3/6/91

C4 O
O ? d.d
LON
Q r.? w
L
,? cC O ^: ? C ?, ? W
a C f3. z 0? 0 eC ?. ca
Q OWN
64 w
4? V L'
`? O r
O O ? ?' ? O L
L `-' O L v
C°+Rp??9 V V .O ^ O
?T C r. ? ? C O? .c
?A f c?^C y O cci
z
.,..f c?
F
._
c'y CC L z ? ? •? L
v O M .? v V a' c
low
p
? O O O J
O +S ,? " y LWO p
Opm
?"¦, L. c..
P-M
O . O L •? •n"
L 0 wo r.
Q P
PROPOSED HISTORIC BETHABARA BYPASS
DATE: 3- 6-91
VICINITY MAP
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHASARA PARKWAY
FIGURE i CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

r`
I 1 /
' SEGMENT I-A SEGMENT 1-8 l l / LEAK?_- '
Now RO•
0

ND , ` i \?\\ '1b
/ APPRO7fMATE LOCATION OF i BETNABARA f'^ ?...
1 ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE 1 PARK
-•---ALTERNATE 1-A
ALTERNATE 1-8 A \ 1
A-F INTERSECTION LOS
(A-FI CT YYEEAAR' 2005 4DT \ LEI J
ALTERNATE NO. 1
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 2 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
N
15.000 i .?
1 SEGMENT 2-A SEGMENT 2-9 LEAK
• 38,000
12 ?pMl RQ
J
?n IBp00 2 21.'x00 \ 0
AIL 6 / Q 56.000
• RA . r C Y C
?6 9 q 11 4
B r4
? 1
Y LE` RD. C u I.• ?i
86p0 I ' t 3000
X ST R^ \? S?p(/7/EAN RIKWitl'
Q APPROXINATE LOCATION OF } ` r pggpa /? •.. ! ,
/ ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE ` I PARK /
..?.? ALTERNATE 2-Aq ,` I II01tAgL'AS_?
ALTERNATE 2-6 \ ?.. \
21,500 YEAR 2005 AOT 1
A-F INTERSECTION LOS
IA-F) SECTION LOS
ALTERNATE NO.2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 3 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE:3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
ALTERNATE NO.3
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 4 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
ALTERNATE N0.4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 5 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

15,000
SEGMENT 4-A SEGMENT 4-8
`LEAK 38.000
(Cl t 24 000 MOW RD• I
l9) ( /` 9 (_ ?? 56000
pIL I8 ; T J
2 5 MDC 3.000 -?.. t
6? ?'SrEAS RR - - A Y
8 b 11 4
r4
\ O D?C ( ~? 4 `\\ qp MWANA Aw
(E o I BETHADARA?
i Q I HIS IC \ RAyYIY
Z
•
APPRO MATELOC TON OF 9 ARA e
ARCHEOLOGICAL. SITE I PARK f
ALTERNATE 4-A i ?-?? SS
ALTERNATE 4-8
YEAR 2005 AOT
INTERSECTION LOS !
(A-F) SECTION LOS
ALTERNATE NO. 4 REVISED
RECOMMENDED ALTERNATE
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 6 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
ENCROACHN
LOCATION
ENCROACHMENT
?I
.I.E/1K
II
LEGENDo
0 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF '?,
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE
D APPROXIMATE 100 YEAR FLOOD
BOUNDARY
® APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WETLANDS
i BETHABARA
PARK
?? I tel.
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 3
APROXIMATE LIMITS OF
100 YEAR FLOOD AND WETLANDS
AND WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
LOCATIONS

PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 7 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

3foe10? Q
O
D. I NDEXTER, HRS
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
I
11- E
PE STAKE;`
48046 19 E
T
i R" -+?
13=1
G
21+00
R
C
v
16?? WATER,
\ Nl 11
O
CLASS I RIPRAP
5-
+63
52'
22+OCI
BRIDGE
SEE FIG. 8A FOR
CROSS SECTION
30 CONC C 5
?Ji H 1 1
S
1O CS 11
-7 c^
940E GRASS t t iU,_
? L
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 8 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION I
M
TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 8
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 8
FOR PLAN '
01
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
I I I - ----------- -------
?I
J
O
to
STA 21+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 8A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION I
O
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 3-6-91
4k M,
JOW
BARBARA J.'
+ `MONDAY
BLOCK NO. 3578 T: NO. 68,7
f I .. r-
+75
TEMP. COST. EASE ?5 ; CONC. + '`'•.
E E ,
P;ro ui net'... - - 6iA , E
15" t
rr-
QI. 1f -
GP,.A55 +
- --- =- C1 uM A . J
2. qS WATER
$vr
a ADJUST Er SS
? TO GRA E
' R/ w
WETLANDS +77
ENCROACHMENT
_ - I TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP
? ? C;. 55' x 85' x 2' DEEP
_E
7;:6 8 5 +57
93' I 90
Li
+T
132' E ?-
SEE FIG 9A FOR
C.B. / 15'
W iI
-,
1 1•

SMITH
B LO Cff-f40_&5
L 0 T Wf ._Z
+ C C _..
r
BASE DIT
` /CLASS I
+5
V +
DITCH
?• IJ
P
'e. 7
18' =?
N IP
o rn - 1
C? I p ZXST.?LUr-
---_ L` i 22xt 0.0
SS,----A
cv ,.
.w
40' SLOPE STAKE LINE_
PERM. DRAIN. EASE.
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
TEMP ENST
EASE,
27
CLASS I PIP qp
AND FILTE FABRI C
CROSS SECTION WETLANDS BOXJNDARY
0 10 20 30 40 80
DATE: 3- 6 -91
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 9
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
i•? +QO.t
92,
% 00 1
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
!S7? 11 VARIES - SEE FIG. 9
FOR PLAN
VARIES-SEE FIG.9 FOR
--- -- --- -- ' -"'_ -- PLAN
FLOW LINE ---
? f-
QI
of oI
in -
STA 21 +00
0 10 20 40
DATE: 3-6-91
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 9A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
.- .
PERM. DMAN
EASEMENT
+C
s
8 0'
?V?DIT:.H
+52 6 BASE DITCH LINED Q
o
125' W/CLASS 1 RIPRAP
E AND FllS FABRIC
+20
TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP w 125
40 x 40 x 2' DEEP 2' BASE DITCH LINED
W/CLASS I RIPRAP
w I + - E
cn ! o n '"- - +02 E.W.

F
'
•7 41.7
= 2 C.B.
H {
Z
rn

{afo??i /%. i „i

IN
n
Ln
O F
F
O
I
I TEMP.
T50
96'
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
E-
L„w:tea-...?..-------? -
+52 SLOPE STAKE LINE
42.5' PROP. R/W
PROP. 2--5 CONC. C &G (TYP)
v?? I
E
C.B. q?? \+00
60: I TAPER o 45'
N- EXtS?
p EEf. DETAIL
0 -L- t6f
?spz-.zS RD ? 18j BS ER = ,? N
w.- - M.H. o a)
60:1 TAPER
CAT- I C.B. ADJ U S T TO
MH 0 0303 S 0pE STAKE LINEjTING R
i - W• r TEMP. CONST. EASE. E
S p +37 E
-? 45' +50
b
6 0
>'''` 6!,B-SE DITCH LINED
C? ±W/CLASS I RIPRAP
R- t AND FILTER FABRIC ?.
. ..: ; ::v..... " TEMPORARY
ENCROACHMENT u r
+00 16;3000
© +48 p 130' ' ?`I 878500
WETLANDS 130'
ENCROACHMENT
Ln PERM. DRAIN. SEE FIG. IOA FOR
/ EASEMENT [CROSS SECTION
Ile ;t
`?r G 0l?'C
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
?ME SCALE IN FT BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
Fl G. 10 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3- 6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 2
OP. R/W
+27
4 '
;EDIMENT TRAP
x 2 DEEP
4
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 10
FOR PLAN
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. 1,0
FOR PLAN

H ?
r?,
-X
O O
O
STA 23 + 5 0
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. IOA
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTF,, COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
0 0.
? TEMPORARY
?•qO% CD AENCROACHMENT f
011 y q°o
Aj (Z>
G \f4{? i?
? o a
+/O x?D dip x T
on
s " J•\ r
p ? ti x?p \ a Ss,
p c • ?,8 \ t7
I ti ?ti ©
Opp
0 O,Q <
?eFc \s?,%y ?'o `' WETLANDS
<•S!tic \qf? B NCROACHMENT
T
\ r
`,82
S, \LJL
? Spy .? •co ? -: ? x I,o
/19
177
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY N-
x1 0 C?
9T \ p`F
p c t ` * TEMP, SEE FIG. I I A FOR
ENCROACHMENT U CROSS SECTION
O 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
SCALE IN E BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 11 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 3
• 4
•
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 11
FOR PLAN /
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. II
FOR PLAN
c.?ll
J
O
n
r-- -
J J

O O
O
O
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG. I I
FOR PLAN

TEMP.
ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. II
FOR PLAN

ll?

O

l O

O
Lo
-
O
STA 38 +50
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 30 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. I l A
EN CROACHMEENT
LOCATION 3
80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
T BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

-Y h" e- .024

`` ?' *37
- 13 5
+80

?-L- POC STA. 51 +80.50
I
= E 129
-Y3-POT STA. IO+OO.n TEMPORARY

CROACHMENT
EN
+07

CONST. EASE. E
85' TEMP. 102' +37
97 ? E --?
`.>1(
Z
E
-- -
E ?-
_ -- - - SLO P
-' - - E STAKE LINE
WETLANDS
F? [BOUNDARY -
PERM. DRAIN. EASE.
, v f
©
+96 +27
45' ' 45' 45' r"
CA T-1 L> ? t f 1 r, n 15" t,
+ 3p 0 g WETLANDS
0 om t;D o f ENCROACHMENT
t, 5;

w 52057'23"E
- L-
=,'A+n n •_ 54 s n
C.B.
29
0O CD
I O m
T
•'
??.
'

+ C> +79
0
SLO
45 - ? -
+09
45
P PERM.-t6IN ASS
TFMP F? ?
YY
EASF ?NF? ?-
JP CONST
? _ - - - -
_--
E
,
- - -
.
- ,. 15
1- E
.
E
. N0.3457
NO. log
+69
?

?
i??
?: ?•' ? A ? " ; ??.,? ' i
SEAN = ?'
-• r ??
S U/G F 103'
UEL TANK

y
SEE FIG. 12-A FOR
71 : CROSS SECTION
r,ch
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 12 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 4

TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 12
FOR PLAN c?
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG. IL I-UN rLHiv
J( ?
o ° o
0

WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. 12 WETLANDS
FOR PLAN BOUNDARY

O
O
STA 54+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 12A
ENCR0ACHI\4 ENT
LOCATION 4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 3-6-91
6
1 *LO- 0

lTy ?? - i L_F1I v u.,7
+50 BOUNDARY
0 1
?r
STALL l O N lS _
? PK??LINE, F
SLOT ? /
0
k0
SEE FIG. 13A FOR
CROSS SECTION
GRASS

f
?O
2' BASE DITCH

DATE: 3-6-91

0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 13 FORSYTH COUNTY
ENCROACHMENT NORTH CIAROLI NA
LOCATION 4
r ?
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 13
FOR PLAN
cJ11
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
VARIED - SE_ FIG. 13
FOR PLAN

-o
Lo
DATE: 3-6-91

0

-Y4- STA 45+50
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 13A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHA BABA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
w
h •
f
I
G
WETLANDS
F94PST ENCROACHMENT
F4SF
s L.7
\o? F?

AROA ?? .
1
1 r
i
GREEN
i.
i f
i -Y - CURVE DATA
P1=53+13. 7
0=75' 13'06!'
D=11' 15'00"
c T=392.34
c>'`
L=668.61' ,R=509.30'
e =.06
Q' TEMPORARY
\0)
PERM. DRAIN.
EASE.
' +85i
55
Y?
Q` v \ k ..+20
h? 55
EEN ?•? "? 0 \8 ' +50
+20 )l. 46'
?O
T SEE FIG.14A FOR ?t 1
\N? ?? CROSS SECTION -w
?'9 n l r ? ? T ri t
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 14 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 4
s •
TEMP.
ENCROACHMENT -
VARIES -SEE FIG. 14
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT-
VARIES-SEE FIG.14
FOR PLAN
-Y4- STA 49+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 14A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 3-6-91
l I
66oo
9500
GAG Ge?G
?? Qaoe 2
o -1400
o`.
o?
a
?vO
0
L ej #Sa ,.fir
fl??
4
r
?G I
DATE: 3-6-91
/ cF?cti
? B
o,

5x
L ?NOV ?
TLANDS
UNDARY
DS
KENCROACHME
NT
~v q?
4 r MA
NS J' S
G??,A?G?'`r S // ? x'8)8 c',?•
0 10 20 30 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 15A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
S SEE FIG. 15D FOR
CROSS SECTION
80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

fl
pP
Nt,
j EAR/
C
34
i ° Sgt

t? ?2

' WETLANDS
' BOUNDARY
2

WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT .otK

0

o.
r
Ar

CB ,00 to

Q ` © <D y r R
/
y
C? Q

0 Dp °CESb
? O (r r

? ? PERM

• C EASE.

o
Opel d
T O ?
s
eti ? • ? 8:
SEE FIG. 15E FOR
CROSS SECTION \
'

0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15 B FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5

vj 14%
d ? 1
)

ce) 1J'?
Q?? N y 1 44F i o
Q
/yP cn ?Q v'
*SD C.i/AZQ? d p? I ?+
?,'" ?4 fl o WETLANDS ?.
BOUNDARY J
pays
n `
tayAj? crfl ?l/? ??/ W l 1
ul)
"' 00 ` tci tio.
r p Lj ?D?, ,
Q ap ? .t ?Pb = ? ?
d JD\\ S o °
WETLANDS 9 Ko
ENCROACHMENT
© 03 N
.? cu
SF ?'y Lj cu N , gam ,•,
F ?/ / ? ? 1 Q
SEE FIG. 15F FOR
CROSS SECTION ` mop
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15C FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
J, . . .
s t ' v
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 15A
LAN
I FOR WETLANDS BOUNDAI

0
to
DATE: 3-6-91
-T S TA 1 1; 0 0
0 IO 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 15 D
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION' 5
BOUNDARY
0
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY Or WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG. 15B
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS BOUNC

J
O
DATE: 3-6-91
-T STA 15+00
0 10 20 . 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 15 E
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
? ,
A { M Jr
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
AREA 1 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 1
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 56 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 4 C.Y.
AREA 3 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 2
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1125 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 40 C.Y.
AREA 4 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 3
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1100 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 410 C.Y.
AREA 5 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 4
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 5650 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 630 C.Y.
AREA 6 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 5
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1.0 AC.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 2420 C.Y.
TOTALS
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1.2 AC
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 3504 C.Y.
DATE: 3/6/91
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 16
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

0, s 0, f
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY

WETLANDS WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT BOUNDARY

0
r
DATE: 3-6-91
-Y4- STA 52+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 15 F
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
f-
0
0
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
2
2223
0,9
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers a .i
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 l!®
Action ID. 199101620 April 25, 1991
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Post Office Box 2511, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
27102, has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL
MATERIAL IN THE WATERS AND CONTIGUOUS WETLANDS OF MILL CREEK FOR THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION OF HISTORIC BETHABARA PARKWAY FROM REYNOLDA ROAD (N.C. HIGHWAY
67) TO BETHANIA STATION ROAD IN WINSTON-SALEM, Forsyth County, North Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by representatives
of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project is basically separated into
five distinct sites. Plans submitted with the application show that Site
No. 1 is located on a previously disturbed area near the Reynolda Road Bridge
adjacent to Mill Creek. It consists of 56 square feet of wetland impacts
(4 cubic yards of fill below the plane of ordinary high water). This site
will provide access to Reynolda Road. Vegetation includes common rush,
cattail, and alder.
Site No. 2 will involve the extension of two culverts presently under
Speas Road .(18-inch and 54-inch diameter). The work will result in
1125 square feet of wetland impacts (40 cubic yards of fill below the plane of
ordinary high water). Vegetation includes a wooded area vegetated primarily
by red maple and sweet gum.
Site No. 3 is located adjacent to the banks and watercourse of Bethabara
Branch. It will result in the placement of.fill material into approximately
1100 square feet of wooded wetlands (410 cubic yards of fill below the plane
of ordinary high water). Vegetation is similar to that found at Site No. 2.
Site No. 4 will involve the placement of approximately 630 cubic yards of
fill material below the ordinary high water contour of a perimeter canal and
two ponds associated with a par 3 golf course located off Bethabara Road
adjacent to Mill Creek. It consists of 5650 square feet of wetland fill
(total), with the canal edge being vegetated primarily by river birch and
black willow. The ponds are characterized as having high ground basically to
the waters' edge, with only a narrow fringe of common rush.
Site No. 5 is located off Bethania Station Road adjacent to the banks and
watercourse of Mill Creek. The work will result in the placement of
2420 cubic yards of fill material below the plane of ordinary high water to
effect construction of a bridge over the creek. Approximately 43,500 square
feet of wetlands and waters (total) will be filled for construction of the
bridge as well as for channel work on Mill Creek required for accommodation of
the 100-year flood. The banks and channel bottom will be lined with rip-rap
for erosion control. This section of Mill Creek has been heavily impacted in
the past by channelization and relocation, and wetland vegetation now present
includes black willow, river birch, red maple, and sweet gum.

4b4k
-2-
The proposed project consists of a total of 51,431
of wetland.-impacts to.-.include. 3504.•cubic yards-.of -fill
ordinary high water. The purpose of the proposed work
road access for the public. Plans showing the work are
public notice.
0
square feet (1.2 acres)
below.the plane of
is to provide improved
included with this
.The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No
DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal
has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued
until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) has
determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by
PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within
the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein. The
work may impact the Bethabara Historic District, listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. A decision as to the effect of the project on
the listed property will be made based on consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO). Presently, unknown archeological, scientific,
prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work'under the
requested permit.
The District Engineer has determined, based on a review of data furnished
by the applicant and onsite observations, that the activity will not affect
species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and

r t
-3-
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs,..safety,...food .and fiber._production,..mineral needs,-considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of
the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be
authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection
Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any
other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the
District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes, and other interested
parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed
activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers
to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are
used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or Environmental Impact
Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are
also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made
until the DEM issues, denies, or waives State certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit
serves as application to the DEM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale
Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will-be furnished
to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take
final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act Certification on or after-
May 20, 1991.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before May 13, 1991, Attention: Mr. John
Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. John Thomas, until 4:15 p.m., May
27, 1991, or telephone [phone].
t
PROPOSED HISTORIC BETH w B w B w BYPASS
VICINITY MAP
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE I CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
,7- WERNIITE 1-6
A-F INTERSECTION U
(o-F) SECTION LOS
® YEAR 2005 AOT
ALTERNATE NO. 1
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 2 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
E
k
GM
ALTERNATE 2-9
21,900 YEAR 2005 AOT
A-i INTERSECTION LOS
14-11 SECTION LOS
ALTERNATE NO.2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 3 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
ALTERNATE NO.3
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 4 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

IV
ALTERNATE NO.4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 5 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

SEGMENT 4-A SEGMENT 4-8 15 00
` '` LEAK 2B O00
4
2400 NOW
Rp. I
C
?SI?SLS IfR • A ?/ !'/ ??
r
D r4 6
?o?`?D ? \.?\s??'+ ? Narwi .nom
t -4 HISTORIC
/?? LE6END`?J 2.0? 1
Q APPMXNATE LOCATION OF , ` ?T1Y1S?ItA
AROIEOLOpCAt SITE PARK 1 _,IA?Y.,fCK -
ALTERNAT TE E 4-8 Q. I
YEAR 2005 ADT .?
NJTERSECTION LOS
?A-F) SECTION LOS ; : J I
ALTERNATE NO. 4 REVISED
RECOMMENDED ALTERNATE
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 6 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

APROXIMATE LIMITS OF
100 YEAR FLOOD AND WETLANDS
AND WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
LOCATIONS
DATE: 3-6-91
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 7 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
® APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WETLANDS
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
I VARIES - SEE FIG. 9
FOR PLAN
-_-_ _---- ?. VARIES-SEE FIG.9 FOR
PLAN
FLOW LINE
? F-
cI
40 - I
STA 21 + 00
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 40
CALE IN FT
S_
FI G. 9A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
r
0
ID."'*I, I NDEXTER, HRS
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
TLANDS
7?IENC
ACHM
RO
E
T0, TEMPORARY
ENCROACHMI
J
cr
w
a
a
0
z
w
a
v

?qa? i y„ T G J
SLOPE STAKE 55'
:.:..,.:::...H:1?...? `.
48-46'19" E E ?r
„ \ 1
13 = I TAPER ?L ? H,
c
21+00
c
GRAS'
TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP
15'x 16 x 2.5' DEEP
CLASS_ I RIPRAP
5=_
+63
52'

22+OCI
BRIDGE
wy 16 WATER SEE FIG. 8A FOR
?--? - - ?----, CROSS SECTION
G
30" CONC C B G
SS
9 40 E GRASS
-- -
lilt
., L
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN ET CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 8 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION
TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG.8
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 8
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
c__)j

E- "
J
p O
to
STA 21{00
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
I= I BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 8A FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION I

w
B?ARBARA J.
' ?. o
+ MONDAY
c I : BLOCK NO. 3578 T N0. 68, 7
I. `
TEMP. CO(i1ST EASE -- ?i CONC. + 92'
E E E i -
E T5'
PERM naa'u, r-? ?•;Id E
15 V r r
< Dd. I l:
/- GRASS +
WM F c- ?--
-?c?- REh?io_ v
--- WM `?
2 , AS $ D.I. WATER C.B. i 15s
21-
_ / K N ADJUST
15 ii TO GRA , i
R/W C_B
WETLANDS +T?
ENCROACHMENT '-?
TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP
?? I r 55'x 85' x 2' DEEP
64 8,830 ? +7
E
+
I
93 w 90
+TI E
132' ?-
SEE FIG. 9A FOR
CROSS SECTION
DATE: 3-6 -91
TEMP CoNST. EASE.
27
CLASS I pip Ap AND FILTE FABRIC
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 9
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

SMITH
B LO C"4.-3&?
LOT
+_..
r
/-3' BASE DIT
?r' h?CLASS I I
%r +??,pQ,? L '1
68
V DITCH +
F. Ww
hip
J
`
`` IP
22)t cLC)
4 17:
w 40' SLOPE STAKE LINE
-4 PERM. DRAIN. EASE.

TEMP. ENCROACHMENT

P RM. DRAIN. J p
EASEMENT ( 6' BASE DITCH LINED
+0 / +S , W/CLASS I RIPRAP
125' 125 E ea° Fit T FABRIC
+20
MP SEDIMENT TRAP w 125 0
f
'
DEEP 2' BASE DITCH LINED
40' x 40' x 2
+0 I W/CLASS i RIPRAP
{ 6 5
80' E E -
E w ?Q
cx All
' V'pITLH
44 Riiii;
_ + 52 SLOPE STAKE LI N E "-
F +02 E.W. 42.5' PROP. R/W
`
77 41.T - 6 CONC. C 6G (TYP)
PROP. Z
= 2 C.B. 11
C.B. 'n +O
6o, I TAPER 10 -I
45'
3

f ro
CD
,
EXIS9
m ©nfl} No O j gE DETAIL A Otl"-
O?fl .
+ cc---
Qtpt0? 014
7
5
^^ 2

7
1
o -L-
+ r
} a O tP'SPrAS RD ? ER
18' 8S +

R ro

SS M.H. 0 CC
N 2 G .
i ni5??. 7A C.B. 60: 1 TAPER

Lrl .
EMS
CAT-1 C.B.--"""' -
1 ?"'-?--- ADJ UST TO
0 PROP. R/W MH f % +00 E STAKE LNEr -"--= --mac
r
P CtST

O
F ------
7 _
p O
ING R/.
W. 43?3? TEMP. CONST. EASE. _
MI +3T E E
I 4 ,
'
45
+50
TEMP. SEDIMENT . TRAP D 66'
30'x85'x2D EP 'C'C?Cj:CI

E 6; B» E DITCH LINED
4,W/CLASS I RIPRAP
950 :f u t AND FILTER FABRIC ?.
96' `TEMPORARY '; ,
o' ENCROACHMENT '
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY o +oo -.1- ?:, 6 i 3000
© +48 p 1301 N 878500
.. 130' •?
1 ENCROACHMENT PERM. DRAIN. SEE FIG. IOA FOR
0
pEASEMENT CROSS SECTION
0 } Q gy
C3}O
rC
T
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 10 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 2
i
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 10
FOR PLAN
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. 10
FOR PLAN

1 l
o o
STA 23+50
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. IOA FORSYTH, COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 2

?E' ac TEMPORARY
Qs\ 3?8x0?'?1 !?i , ENCROACHMEN
0 T ??o =
y ? oo.
910
& S?
?o Y.
x \ s, "S r
/ S
O C9 /? ?l. x\ fit` ? e<
A ?ell GT
AS?O?
x0,
Kp
WETLANDS /4,
<?s?,C \-9\ B L ROACHMENT F.pgT F
/ ?.
lop< 0'.
2 4L
xs C? .'f' ,? ? ro
?oc?3•-
WETLANDS Vs-\.,
e<pr 'QF,y/??s,\
BOUNDARY
?T?F F?'l1, cD ? T \ ?F '• G X r
F t
TEMP.
SEE FIG. I I A FOR
?X i ENCROACHMENT u \ELEC. CROSS SECTION
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. II FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 3. 1

f
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG. I I
FOR PLAN /
C--,j
J J J
O 0
L
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. II F TEMP.
FOR PLAN ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 11
I FOR PLAN

t? O
O O
In
O
STA 38 +50
DATE: 3-6-91
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. II
FOR PLAN
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
FIG. I I A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 3
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

-Y3- CAAAZ e= .024
V
137 •
+80
E '
-L- POC STA. 51+80.b
` s
=
-Y3- POT STA. 10+00b TEMPORARY
w ENCROACHMENT

r
+50 '
M CONST. EASE. E 0' +37

971 E
TE ... i
E _ _ '' _SLOP_E STAKE LINE C
j
=
F WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
PERM. DRAIN. EASE. ?.` f
+5br? © +96 _ +27
ww? 45' r n 45' 45' r-
CAT-I L•?rr <? _
I VA - 15"
r
J 0 C.B.
rn 3
WETLANDS
O
}o 0 ENCROACHMENT
BCD
BCD I N t
?
52037' 23" E - ?-
+nn 54
-
29
I
m jN - `-? r
O O(pp

+ C> +79

-? . O
+09
^ :.
O
G V?
SLOPS '? 451
\
ST
4 .
c
45'
PER MAIN
F Y
TEMP. C
T.
ONS
EASE ?NF?
JR J :=-i - _ .-- -- .-

E
E
.
N0. 3457

;-? -
No. log
+69 ?.:
-
F3G 1

98
103'
U/G FUEL TANK
SEE FIG. 12A FOR
nJ'^h? I r-
CROSS SECTION
r1R .
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
Y
BETHABARA PARKWA
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 12 FORSYTH COUNTY"
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 4
4
VARIES-SEE FIG.IZ FOH PLAIN
JI
O
O
(Z?j
_?
O
,--I
U-)
O
STA 54;00
0 10 20 40
DATE: 3-6-91
TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG. 12
FOR PLAN c?
f WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
1
F-
I
J
O
O
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SE= FIG. 12
FOR PLAN
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 12A
ENCR0ACHIV., -NT
LOCATION 4
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
ELI
0
j4ps.or-,50 I II80UNDARYi
L 1 V. rli r V V 1•?/ STALLIO N IES
// EPKE/L? f _ f F ---
I

DATE:3-6-91
SEE FIG. 13A FOR
CROSS SECTION
GRASS

A_ Ir 1
CX XO
21 BASE DITCH A
i

0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 13 FORSYTH COUNTY
ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 4
`I
LT
F G
M

TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 13
FOR PLAN
C-0
VARIES (- SEE FIG. 13
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY-

-Y4- STA 45+50
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 13A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 3-6-91
0
I
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
WETLANDS
FoNSr ENCROACHMENT
F,q
sF `L
\P4 F r
\`T?F
??HF F
lay.
AROA ?? ? •
\ h,,
KEEN
a
•
tc,
'T
n l

CDJ
SEE FIG.14A FOR
CROSS SECTION
1
1
1
i
IL
0?/

o?
GREEN '
ALT
-Y CURVE DATA
P I'=53+ 13.77
0=75' 13'06"
D=1 I' 15'00"
T=392.34
L=668.61'
R=509.30
e = .06
TEMPORARY
ENCROACHMENT ?
PERM. DRAIN.
EASE. ti raj
k
+85 G >
55
C?
+20
x\85 p 8 55
O \ +20 > ED -u,+50
46'
E8_1
j r• o _?
4-
???h'oi ,:- . ?I
,,
0 10 20 30 40 80
DATE: 3-6-91
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 14
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

0
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT-
VARIES-SEE FIG.14
FOR PLAN
TEMP.
ENCROACHMENT -
VARIES -SEE FIG. 14
FOR PLAN
DATE: 3-6-91
i
v
-Y4- STA 49+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 14A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
ci
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSY i H COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

X6600
9500 GAG ?Kp1
a
D
0 5
Q,a
W
i
w fl
1#
Is,
k
n
dr . /.
k
?_ WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT

<o ONS s S
,?ec9oo??
GSEE FIG. 15D FOR
CROSS SECTION
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
SCALE IN FT BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15A FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
~ ©v
iA:
? I

O ?N?:
r
406
•
WETLANDS
' BOUNDARY
o ?
WETLANDS
co I
v ?o
a
CJ
CD Q
[_DATE: 3-6-91
n
???
o. . <:
o ?? c3 S c
;? 6-x..00 •-?. ;`?' `
O a+ r
t
OOACCESS
EASE. "
PERM• 0 ryo _
SEE FIG. 15E FOR
CROSS SECTION
0 10 20 30 40 e0 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15B FORSYTH COUNTY
ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
J?
4r
o? Doti
x ^0 ?fl
/ ono
o0
Q o
Q
? a o
k
Q- -
. ?S6
DATE: 3-6-91

W 'or
`

c%l
Cf$
Q
.
?
/ ~~Q N

4
? V
oa ?
0
WETLANDS
ENCROACHM
C*b

a ?
d
ti
1Dec 1 0
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY t
3 ' ? ? Gp??S G
ti
4 1 Pb?
QO ? s, 1
Ti
m,
X
-' tU 1 N
N4 My ,
cD N ` .ts2
Z or-
S SEE FIG. 15F FOR/ k
CROSS SECTION
0 10 203040 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 15 C FORSYTH COUNTY
ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
t
qo .
%A/CTI AAIMO
WETLANDS BOUNDAI
F-
J
O
In
BOUNDARY
?O
to
-T= STA 11+00
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
I= I BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY Or WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 15 D FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION' 5
ENCROACHMENT
:E FIG. 15A
LAN
Aw
r
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG.
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS BOUNDi

J
O
DATE: 3-6-91
-T STA 15+00
0 10 20 . 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 15E
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
AREA 1 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 1
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS 56 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS 4 C.Y.
AREA 3 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 2
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS 1125 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 40 C.Y.
AREA 4 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 3
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1100 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 410 C.Y.
AREA 5 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 4
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS 5650 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS 630 C.Y.
AREA 6 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 5
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1.0 AC.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 2420 C.Y.
TOTALS
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1.2 AC
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 3504 C.Y.
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 16
6/91 ENCROACHMENT
kL LOCATION
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
WETLANDS
BOUN DAR Y?

0
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT
-Y4•- STA 52 +- 00
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 15F
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
PROPOSI
BETHAB
CITY OF
FORSYTI
NORTH f
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY-

0
0
a ?. srn?t o
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor May 3, 1991 Wi]11an W. Ccbey, Jr., Secretary
Dr. George T. Everett
Division of Environmental Management
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Dr-. EyQrett :
The attached U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. 1620 dated
April 25, 1991 describing a project proposed by City of Wins on=Salem
is being circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable
Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed
project and return this form by 5/25/91
Very sincerely,
John R. Parker, Jr.
404 Coordinator
REPLY This office objects to the project as proposed.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office supports the project proposal.
No comment.
Signed
Date
Agency
JRP:jr/aw
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]

tr
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890 '
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID. 199101620
April 25, 1991
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Post Office Box 2511, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
27102, has applied for 'a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL
MATERIAL IN THE WATERS AND CONTIGUOUS WETLANDS OF MILL CREEK FOR THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION OF HISTORIC BETHABARA PARKWAY FROM REYNOLDA ROAD (N.C. HIGHWAY
67) TO BETHANIA STATION ROAD IN WINSTON-SALEM, Forsyth County, North Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by representatives
of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project is basically separated into
five distinct sites. Plans submitted with the application show that Site
No. 1 is located on a previously disturbed area near the Reynolda Road Bridge
adjacent to Mill Creek. It consists of 56 square feet of wetland impacts
(4 cubic yards of fill below the plane of ordinary high water). This site
will provide access to Reynolda Road. Vegetation includes common rush,
cattail, and alder.
Site No. 2 will involve the extension of two culverts presently under
Speas Road (18-inch and 54-inch diameter). The work will result in
1125 square feet of wetland impacts (40 cubic yards of fill below the plane of
ordinary high water). Vegetation includes a wooded area vegetated primarily
by red maple and sweet gum.
Site No. 3 is located adjacent to the banks and watercourse of Bethabara
Branch. It will result in the placement of fill material into approximately
1100 square feet of wooded wetlands (410 cubic yards of fill below the plane
of ordinary high water). Vegetation is similar to that found at Site No. 2.
Site No. 4 will involve the placement of approximately 630 cubic yards of
fill material below the ordinary high water contour of a perimeter canal and
two ponds associated with a par 3 golf course located off Bethabara Road
adjacent to Mill Creek. It consists of 5650 square feet of wetland fill
(total), with the canal edge being vegetated primarily by river birch and
black willow. The ponds are characterized as having high ground basically to
the waters' edge, with only a narrow fringe of common rush.
Site No. 5 is located off Bethania Station Road adjacent to the banks and
watercourse of Mill Creek. The work will result in the placement of
2420 cubic yards of fill material below the plane of ordinary high water to
effect construction of a bridge over the creek. Approximately 43,500 square
feet of wetlands and waters (total) will be filled for construction of the
bridge as well as for channel work on Mill Creek required for accommodation of
the 100-year flood. The banks and channel bottom will be lined with rip-rap
for erosion control. This section of Mill Creek has been heavily impacted in
the past by channelization and relocation, and wetland vegetation now present
includes black willow, river birch, red maple, and sweet gum.
1
-2-
The proposed project consists of a total of 51,431 square feet (1.2 acres)
of wetland.-impacts to.--include. 3504--cubic yards- of -fill below- the plane of
ordinary high water. The purpose of the proposed work is to provide improved
road access for the public. Plans showing the work are included with this
public notice.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No
DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal
has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit-be-issued
until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) has
determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by
PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within
the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein. The
work may impact the Bethabara Historic District, listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. A decision as to the effect of the project on
the listed property will be made based on consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO). Presently, unknown archeological, scientific,
prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the
requested permit.
The District Engineer has determined, based on a review of data furnished
by the applicant and onsite observations, that the activity will not affect
species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined'by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and

Y
-3-
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs,..safety., .food and fiber.-production,..mineral.needs,- considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of
the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be
authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection
Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any
other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the
District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes, and other interested
parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed
activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers
to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are
used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or Environmental Impact
Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are
also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made
until the DEM issues, denies, or waives State certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit
serves as application to the DEM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North
Carolina Division of.Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale
Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished
to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take
final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act Certification on or after
May 20, 1991.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North .
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before May 13, 1991, Attention: Mr. John
Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. John Thomas, until 4:15 p.m., May
27, 1991, or telephone [phone].
f i
w^A^^SED HISTORIC BETE! A B A B A BYPASS
VICINITY MAP
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE I CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
%
4 6 .4%
LEGEND
? +?` `??
??1 APPROXM ATE LOCATION OF
I o ARCHEOLOGICAL 9TE .
ALTERNATE 1-A
ALTERNATE 1-6
A-F INTERSECTION LOS
(A-F) SECTION LOS
rff.BM YEAR ZOOS AOT
ALTERNATE NO. 1
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 2 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
A.
M. , * ff

C) APPRW ATE LOCATION OF
ARCNEOLOMAL SITE
..M.? ALTERNATE 2-A
ALTERNATE 2-8
21,300 YEAR 2005 AOT
A-F INTERSECTION LOS
IA-n SECTON LOS
z

ALTERNATE NO.2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 3 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE:3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
0 0 ,,,,
. SEGMENT 3-A SEGMENT 3-0 ?...?
12 pow
Is. 2
IN
e 5,000
2 S D IS 000 `? t
1AVIANA
p
? J ? l NisTaac \\ wAacwAr ?
??/ ? ?GEND ? ~ }
Q AFFRCJiMATE LOCATION OF BETNABARA ?... ?
ARCHEOLOGICAL STE ti PARK
ALTERNATE 3-A
.?
ALTERNATE 2RNATE 005 3A-AM
' 1•-f- °\
-V INTERSECTION NOS I ° I
IA-F) SECTION LAS L.. - __ .l
ALTERNATE NO.3
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 4 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

-?-? ALTERNATE •-A
ALTERNATE 4-0
® YEAR 2005 AOT
A-f INTERSECTION LOS
IA-FI SECTION LOS
ALTERNATE N0.4
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 5 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA
0 • ,
. SE()MENT 4.A SEGMENT 4-9 15 00
"`? 1EAK 39,000
I 24 00 RO• 1
r i.
C
J (e) r 9 c_? 56000
2 5 3,000
G ° ?°?AS IKI F .. A • Y ?
- / 9 0 11
MAGNA
= t Nlp ` RAKWAY
A060f?AIAStTE N °E pA?,1
ALTERNATE 4-B Q? I "?
YEAR 2005 ADT
ATERSEC"m LOS
(A-M SECTION LOS \ i 1
ALTERNATE NO. 4 REVISED
RECOMMENDED ALTERNATE
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 6 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 NORTH CAROLINA

APROXIMATE LIMITS OF
100 YEAR FLOOD AND WETLANDS
AND WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
LOCATIONS
DATE: 3-6-91
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
FIGURE 7 CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
® APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WETLANDS
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
,,
___..m1 .
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. 9
FOR PLAN
-.---_ -_ ?. VARIES-SEE FIG.9 FOR
------.__ PLAN
FLOW LINE " ?' - '°-
F- ?
? I
o? of
STA 21 +00
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 9A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
r Ip
O
0. I NDEXTER, HRS Il:
WETLANDS -'
.. BOUNDARY w
WETLANDS a
ENCROACHMENT
+00 z
z
70' TEMPORARY W
E ENCROACHMENT on
+25 +
STAKE,
SLOPE h
o ?
18 -?-
.?.°? 13 I PER IGAS 0 0

21+00
v
16" WATER.
GRAS!
TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP
15'x16x2.5' DEEP
CL_ ? SI RIPRAP
55
. +63
52'
0
22+OC1
BRIDGE
SEE FIG. 8A FOR
CROSS SECTION
30'CONC C a G ?
S
S ,
tJl ? --1-?I , ;
9 40 E GRASS k
?L
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 8 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH, CAROLINA
LOCATION I
4 1 Ilk
TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 8
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 8
FOR PLAN
cmili
WETLANDS BOUNDARY

J
p O

STA 21;00
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. SA
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION I
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
0
--7 ?; BARBARA J.", 'MONDAY v ?.
I BLOCK NO. 3578 ^? T N0. 17 .•r J r,
+T5 ' cn I 1
?.. 1 J +
CONC. 92'
ETEMP. Coo-ST EAS E I % +
E `- -
E .. T5' E ?T
PERM, DRZN. EASE Y I +2O
r r GP,ASS +5
WM J V??
? L w ? r
ove
2.qs 8 D.I. WA7FR c
• 0l
_,?.;;?•
N ADJUST SS
TO GRA E C
F R/ w
WETLANDS +73/
ENCROACHMENT
TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP
_E RJD 55'x 85' x 2' DEEP
+-6-7
+64
93 90
' I
Li
+7
132I
3?til ?.
SEE FIG 9A FOR GG
2 i
SMITH
B LO C1r-N0.37,
LOT Md._-IT
D . .
+ _
r
i
BASE D 1 T
K'/CLASS I I
-c; •- , crx r
C%;t R
? 1
;;4E.
T, V DITCH +
IJ
u.1 (VI I PM
tt ? c.
?.8. J c°i M v f
+27
.W. 40' SLOPE STAKE LINE A0, I
CLASS i plp Ap
AND FILTE FABRIC
ICROSS SECTION WETLANDS BUNDARY
0 10 20 30 40 80
DATE: 3 - 6 - 91
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 9
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 2
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
PERM. DRAIN. EASE.
IP. ENCROACHMENT
IP CONST EASE
E
wo•?
•
PERM. ONAIN.
EASEMENT-
+02
65
80'
v'DV T-:.h1
+22
F
41.7'
= 2 C.B.
O
W/CLASS I RIPRAP
rx4d 6! BASE DITCH LINED
pd FABRIC
+20
ENT TRAP W 125
f DEEP 2BASE DITCH LINED
I W/CL ASS I RIPRAP
! E
+ 52 SLOPE STAKE LINE
42.5' PROP. R/W
PROP. 2 -6 EON C. C 8kG(TYP)
an: TAPER C.B.
fp{OfOtfltOtfl
Ia I do
I N) I 1 \,-'J --I,
L11
CD PROP. R/W
O i +27
`r
42-70
TEMP. SEDIMENT TRAP
E
,\ ?Zlv
96:
WETLANDS
gE DETAIL +0 ^?C3tf?t . t 00 tOt?
-L- 2
SPE-As RD + v ??rt
78' BST

E-1
10 \+oo
0 45'
EXIST
i r0+ N?
M.H. 0 C
60-I TAPER ----
{ _ CAT-1 C.B. ADJUST TO
MH f % +00
pE STAKE LINE ??S7
G
0
W C
1N
43.3?a TEMP
CONST. EASE.
E
'
»- 45
+50

<y `.» E;B4'SE DITCH LINED
$l
U W/CLASS I RIPRAP
0
$ f„ 1t
AND FILTER FABRIC
TEMPORARY
ENCROACHMENT ,

BOUNDARY ° +00 -1- ? 6:3000
C) +? 0 130' ` N 878500
.. 130,
?
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT © ol PERM. DRAIN. SEE FIG. IOA FOR
EASEMENT [CROSS SECTION
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 10 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE:3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 2 -mi
0
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 10
FOR PLAN
TEMP ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG.10
FOR PLAN

O O
O
.S TA 23 + 5 0
0 10 20 40 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. IOA FORSYTH, COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH, CAROLINA
LOCATION 2
i •
,
IF, ?E' TEMPORARY
/ \Q?%O Q? i ENCROACHMENT fQ
G FST O ?/{? If x \ e9y, t 9 / '
s?
ro°' O a0' t4X
11110
. o ? ? ? Aso ciTq,?? `??•°e i ti?? X ?' 0•?
0 0 0 o? /3 IF
<0 c
F 6 'P t
??? Un
WETLANDS
R0 CHMENT FF
T ?F
. ? sT G<L rex ?/Q?, \x - ? •y x4 \ c c? <pT
3?9 ?2p x? \ 9 o\ti? 4s 4 `?
eo.
WETLANDS 6 ?s-??, . ??E=• ?/
BOUNDARY < 'pF°s.\
4,6 Q
? ? AF S, ? p\ 8 AS - ,?A r /
a?, t I
"Ilk
tK, F
pc TEMP, SEE FIG. I I A FOR
?x ENCROACHMENT U \E EC. CROSS SECTION
x
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 11 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5

s
TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 11
FOR PLAN /
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. II
FOR PLAN
C-11
r? -------
J
O
t1')
J J

0 U)
O
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES- SEE FIG. II
FOR PLAN
(_oj
TEMP.
ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. II
FOR PLAN

•
O p
O O
Lo
O '-
STA 38+50
DATE: 3-6-91
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
FIG. II A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 3
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

`- X01.4 t •
-Y3- • CANA1 l; e= .024
V *37
+80
-L- POC STA. 51 +80.b = E
-Y3-POT STA. 10+00.n
TEMPORARY
ENCROACHMENT
?z

+50 EASE.
CONST• E
MP 02' +37 ?._._

E
,;:::. 9T
Z
.
T5 TE E
'
- •- - -- _SLOPE STAKE LINE
' WETLANDS
F BOUNDARY
PERM. DRAIN. EASE.
_ r •. v f
+5b f? +96
' +27 O
"
'
45' t n 45 r
45
CA T-1 - 15
+ 3. C B WETLANDS
0 0? ?N o + ENCROACHMENT

; 52° 57'-23" E - L-
+'1? 54
-
----
wmwmmm?

?
_ 29:..8.
?
T
-n i '
o m ?N = f ojCD

0 +79
SLOPE '? 0 45' +09 c: D: (D
45' 5?
STq? , PERM?AIN ASE?.
7'Ehlp CONST .. Y
J
`

R.
7. 151-
NO-3457 E.

r
NO. 109
+6 ss-
98
103' ?J
U/G FU EL TANK

i
SEE FIG. I2A FOR
' - CROSS SECTION

0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 12 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 4

TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -SEE FIG. 12
FOR PLAN c?
r- WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 12 FOR PLAN
F- ~ I
J J
OI L p
O
c:0

_O
O
STA 54;00
0 10 20 40
DATE: 3-6-91
-WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
\ VARIES- SEE FIG. 12
FOR PLAN
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 12A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

f
I(
•
L' p Q
Q p TEMPORARY
\ ENCROACHMENT
Q PERM. DRAIN
POND EASE.
+40 +65
1 WETLANDS 67
`r= +50 BOUNDARY
LT
STALLION I S _
F 32 -?? F
\ Fo
45+00 +73.8
f
LT
N? W
F
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT o
VDITCH

DATE: 3-6-91
SEE FIG. 13A FOR
CROSS SECTION
GRAS
0 10 20 30 40 80
SCALE IN FT
Fl G. 13
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
2' BASE DITCH-1

PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

TEMP. ENCROACHMENT
VARIES -.SEE FIG. 13
FOR PLAN
c?lj
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY-
VARIES - SE_ FIG. 13
FOR PLAN

-o
DATE: 3-6-91
0
-Y4- STA 45+50
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 13A
ENCROACHMEENT
LOCATION 4
0
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
rLANDSI
1NDARY
1
1
13
WETLANDS
FoNSr ENCROACHMENT
F4SF
OL
? \oQF F
S
- •?lqk
\ FEN \,\S
1
rt
0)
A-Z
co/

t
I
1
GREEN ,
/r .
• LT \
-Y - CURVE DATA
PI=53+13.77
,6=75'13'06"
D= 11' 15'00"
T=392.34
L=668.61
R=509.30'
e z.06 ? f
ENCROACHMENT
ti
PERM. DRAIN.
EASE.
k
4
..+20
v?
8 55
5 ?
u,+50
+20 ?. 46'
4 P
Ric
55
fl?
?O
SEE FIG.14A FOR
N:A r? CROSS NJ >'
C4
0
0 10 20 30 40 80
DATE: 3-6-91
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 14
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
G3 T. r.,
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
.
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT-
VARIES-SEE FIG.14
FOR PLAN

i
-Y4- STA 49+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 14A
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 4
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
C-4i
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
TEMP.
ENCROACHMENT -
VARIES -SEE FIG. 14
FOR PLAN
DATE: 3-6-91
X600
9500
G
, Gg
000
©a
a
0
o?
Ca `p

W
Q
c '•

'o?

WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT

sgoo.
.01
s/ D
SEE FIG. 15D FOR
S CROSS SECTION
?E
0 10 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15A FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT !NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
?a
,b ! .
- CbA
f
i ? ° BERG
cos
0

jlo?
E:.: I ?coo
0 (20
sF.
WETLANDS ?ENCROACHMENT h? ??1 0
P. CP.
c o \\ c3S c
to `? ? ?h '? •\ ?
in c
• D ,? ? 6X0 ?
C • Q rJ / ?/ }per
C? 6170
a, t 1
,a 00
ot. ACCESS
0
r EASE- ?p PERM. p ?o
?% \
Oe G , x . \
SEE FIG. 15E FOR
CROSS SECTION '
0 IO 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15 8 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
J?
q.
Sv
7
0
? xya ?
F
? o
o c? ,
O?
? o
d Q
p 4 /
4e % ? ?xo
W 1
N o
/Z
y4w
iQQ°
Q=
4
N
`b
D/
. - w 11
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT
co
N
171f

Q
1 1 Q
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY
,? t7
i a
m
SF Cy JG' D N
?-
SB S SEE FIG. 15F FOR , Z
CROSS SECTION ?-
0 10 20 3040 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FIG. 15C FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3-6-91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION 5
i
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES-SEE FIG. 15A
LAN
I FOR WETLANDS BOUNDAI

J
O
to
DATE: 3-6-91
-T STA 11+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FI G. 15 D
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
BOUNDARY
0
U-1
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY Or WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
WETLANDS ENCROACHMENT
VARIES - SEE FIG. 15B
FOR PLAN
WETLANDS BOUNC

J
O
DATE: 3-6-91,
-T STA 15+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 15E
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5

PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
AREA -1 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 1
AREA OF FILL "IN WETLANDS 56 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS 4 C.Y.
AREA 3 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 2
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1125 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS 40 C.Y.
AREA 4 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 3
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1100 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 410 C.Y.
AREA 5 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 4
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS 5650 S.F.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS 630 C.Y.
AREA 6 - ENCROACHMENT LOCATION 5
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS 1.0 AC.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 2420 C.Y.
TOTALS
AREA OF FILL IN WETLANDS = 1.2 AC
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 3504 C.Y.
0 IO 20 30 40 80 PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
SCALE IN FT CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FI G. 16 FORSYTH COUNTY
DATE: 3/6/91 ENCROACHMENT NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION

WETLANDS
BOUNDARY-
C-4
WETLANDS
ENCROACHMENT
WETLANDS
BOUNDARY.

0
DATE: 3-6-91
-Y4- STA 52+00
0 10 20 40
SCALE IN FT
FIG. 15 F
ENCROACHMENT
LOCATION 5
f-
0
0
PROPOSED HISTORIC
BETHABARA PARKWAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
.q
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199101620
April 11, 1991
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section ?-?
Division of Environmental Management cn
North Carolina Department of Environment, ? j
Health and Natural Resources r
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the application of the City of Winston-Salem, represented by
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern, Incorporated, for Department of the Army
(DA) authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to place fill
material in waters/wetlands of Mill Creek associated with construction of the
Historic Bethabara Parkway, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina.
Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for
certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative
regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same
law. A DA permit will not be granted until the certification has been
obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt
of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action.
Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by June 11, 1991, the District
Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. John Thomas, telephone (919)
846-0648.
Sincerely,
W ne Wrig
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure