20170911 Ver 1_401 Application_20170721

69
20170911
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Land Planning Permitting Environmental Consulting Construction Management • Expert Testimony
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date:
Name: Dalton Cook
Company Name: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
From
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
Attached
X Shop Drawings
Letters
X Reports
21 -Jul -17
RE: 201512081-2016
SEI #:
Under Separate Cover via
Specifications
Change Order
Computer Disk
Invoices
Reproducibles
Samples
COPIES
DATE
DESCRIPTION
4
7/21/2017
Four copies of the PCN application/notification form
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For Approval Approved as Submitted
X For Your Use Approved as Noted
As Requested Return for Corrections
For Review & Comment FOR BIDS DUE
Resubmit Copies for Approval
Submit Copies for Distribution
Return Corrected Prints
Other
JUL 9,12017
SIGNED: CC:
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 tel [phone] fax [phone]
1-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com

o�o��a �R4G COURTESY
COPY
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:X❑
Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
West Holly Springs Road Townhomes (Dumbarton)
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Holly Springs
2d.
Subdivision name:
West Holly Springs Road Townhomes
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
3a.
Owner Information
Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Dumbarton Ventures LLC.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 15406 Page: 815
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ted Gossett
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
PO BOX 1216 DEC -WATER RESOURCES
MC LEAN VA 22101-1216 1211 NE
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Owner of Project
4b. Name:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
4d. Street address:
909 Aviation Pkwy, Ste 700
4e. City, state, zip:
Morrisville, NC 27560
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jim Spangler
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
4338 Bland Rd
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e. Telephone no.:
919-875-4288
5f. Fax no.:
919-875-4287
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): --10649631999,0649633923,0649641134,0649641381
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.6575 Longitude: -78.8445
1c. Property size:
13 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Little Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The subject property is mainly wooded and undeveloped with residential structures. There is a sanitary sewer easement in the northern portion of the
property. The land use in the general vicinity is residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.087
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct a residential subdivision on the subject property as well as a sanitary sewer outfall
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project is a residential subdivision that will involve grading/earth moving and utility work by using grading and excavating equipment
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes Z No El Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Excavation
Unknown
Yes
Corps
0.013
W2
Choose one
Unknown
Yes/No
Corps
W3
Choose one
Unknown
Yes/No
Corps
W4 -
Choose one
Unknown
Yes/No
Corps
W5 -
Choose one
Unknown
Yes/No
Corps
W6 -
Choose one
Unknown
Yes/No
Corps
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.013
2h. Comments:
The temporary impacts are the result of a sanitary sewer line connection to existing manhole.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
Choose one
Pond
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Pi
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑x Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The current location of the existing off-site manhole requires that sanitary sewer line temporarily impact the wetland in order to make the connection.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented in order to control runoff and other discharges from activities to be conducted in the
excavation area of the wetland.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
e appropriate amount of credits will be purchased upon permit approva . see affa—cFed Statementof Availabilityletter)
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
21
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The
Stormwater Management Plan submitted to Town of Holly Springs for approval.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Holly Springs
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Town of Holly Springs
❑ Phase II
❑X NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
El Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered `yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer will service the subject property
Page 9of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ YesX❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program element occurrence dataset
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes MX No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
National Marine Fisheries Service essential fish habitat mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Natural Heritage Program;
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Wake County GIS Maps
James A. Spangler
7-21-17
' Agent's rinted Name
Date
ignature
(Aganf_s.-4hature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

LENNAIZ'
November 16, 201.6
To Whom It May Concern:
The letter serves to inform you that Lennar Carolinas, LLC, located at 909 Aviation Parkway,
Suite 1500, Morrisville, NC 27560, as the buyer of record and under contract with the project
owner, llumbarton Ventures, LLC, hereby authorizes Spangler Environmental, Inc, to act as our
technical agent for the purposes of environmental issues, including wetland and stream
identification, permitting, mitigation planning and regulatory agency coordination at the property
known as Dumbarton (aka Downton Square) located at 620 W Holly Springs Road in Holly
Springs, North Carolina which includes PTNs 0649644205, 0649549401, and 0649547627. All site
visits by regulatory personnel must be coordinated in advance with our agent, Spangler
Environmental, Inc. This letter supersedes all previous Agent -related correspondence.
The following contact should be copied on all correspondence:
Agent:
James A. Spangler, CEI, A.M.ASCE
Spangler Environmental, Inc
4338 Bland Road
Rqlcigh, NC 27609
[phone]
neerely,
Mitch Barr n
VP of Land Development
LENNAR
919-225-1078
909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 1500, Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

MUMU.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR APEX QUADRANGLE
iU U.S. OEOLOWGLSURVEY �`n. xnp..sar MORTM G�LMA.WMtE CO.
,d w ,, .OS Topo ov 7.3 -MINUTE SERIES »«
haGuaM b/�M Unka Sw«4wbEiral Surra
'
SCA.E 1:2400D
w ov
xaoa.ssinr rron
_e
we w. as w. ewe
T
- ..... •
sa
ram. o... . z
w,..4 ...ruw.�..a ......w. ' .7
• •`••••
w
m.,wr wnmi�e.e.
w.n�..rwu..muo.v.v as
.w
......
� w
�
dw
w..�e._......ws wwe ...".....r..m ..�.
.:.....,,,.,,,
. . ,....-....
auweeuwan r.
APEX. NC /•1
7016 ��I

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
July 21, 2017

35" 39'34' N
35° 39 22' N
Custom Soil Resource Report
3 Soil Map
l
934800 694890 69499D 895C20 695050 695100 695140
3 3
Map Scale: 1:1,720 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet
Meters
N o 25 50 100 150
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Caner wordrcwtes: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WC -1,84
9
35° 39'34'N
35° 39'22" N

Custom Soil Resource Report
10
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI(
;y spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOI)
d Stony Spot
1:15,800.
Solis
� Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Wet Spot
..
soil Map Unit Lines
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Z-11 Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
®
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
W
Blowout
Water Features
she.
Streams and Canals
Borrow Pit
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Gay Spot
++4 Rails
measurements.
(j
Closed Depression
~ Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Gravel Pit
R a US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravely spot
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
• ^
Major Roads
O
Landfill
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A.distance
Lava Flow
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Marsh or swamp
■ Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Mine or Quarry
®
Miscellaneous Water
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
®
Perennial Water
of the version date(s) listed below.
„r
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
.+
Saline Spm
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 19, 2016
Sandy spot
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
a
Severely Eroded Spm
1:50,000 or larger.
0
Sinkhole
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 14, 2011—Mar 3,
Slide or Slip
2011
Sodic Spm
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Wake County, North Carolina (NC183)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acnes In AOI Percent of AOI
HrC
Hemdon silt loam, 6 to 10
1.6
25.4%
percent slopes
—
HrD2
1 —
Hemdon silt loam, 10 to 15
—
1.2:
19.2%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
MgB2
Mayodan gravelly sandy loam,
2.4
38.3%1
2 to 6 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
VdyA
FWorsham sandy loam, 0 to 3
1.1
17.0%
percent slopes
~
Totals for Area of Interest
6.4
100.0%1
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
HrC—Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 4m10
Elevation: 300 to 700 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Hemdon and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Herndon
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 3 inches: silt loam
E - 3 to 9 inches: silt loam
Bt1 - 9 to 14 inches: silty clay loam
Bt2 - 14 to 34 inches: silty clay
BC - 34 to 48 inches: silty clay loam
C - 48 to 80 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Nanford
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
HrD2—Herndon silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 vfxw
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Hemdon, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Herndon, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: silt loam
Bt1 - 4 to 14 inches: silty clay loam
Bt2 - 14 to 34 inches: silty clay
BC - 34 to 48 inches: silty clay loam
C - 48 to 80 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
MgB2—Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 vfys
Elevation: 300 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Madison, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Madison, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bt - 6 to 37 inches: clay
BC - 37 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
WyA—Worsham sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1 vfx1
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Worsham, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Worsham, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Worsham, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Alluvium and/or colluvium over saprolite derived from granite and
gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
BA - 6 to 16 inches: clay loam
Bt - 16 to 45 inches: clay
BC - 45 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Worsham, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material. Alluvium and/or colluvium over saprolite derived from granite and
gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
BA - 6 to 16 inches: clay loam
Bt - 16 to 45 inches: clay
BC - 45 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
17

dt..5Ti1>f o,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
July 21, 2017
Dalton Cook
Spangler Environmental
4338 Bland Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Dumbarton
Dear Dalton Cook:
Secretary Susi H Hamilton
NCN H D E-3949
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS Telephone. [phone] LOCATION
1651 Melt Service Center www.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Ra"h, NC 27699-1651 Raleigh, NC 27803

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Dumbarton
July 21, 2017
NCNHDE-3949
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -Pre H? 5 -Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos:/tncnhde.natureserve.orptmntenVhelo. Data query generated on July 21, 2017; source: NCNHP, 02 April 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-3949: Dumbarton
July 21. 2017
❑ Project Boundary
Buffered Proj ct Boundary
0 Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
0 0.17E 0.06 07.
0 0.0 0,15 1.2 Mm
SbrsN Fry NFPF. pggmP. �+wmq mn�ra M CaP OFiCO. 4FOp.
rM 1R4 !IRVN. (iPPBPw.IGN MPYPWI fd OMnPnPP diWPY EM AMMP.
MET. EM C.Ms INdp Rugl. PrYfMP 1.kMNnM O OpM1FM11iW
RNipmtP. M PM OR 4Pr GOnmmb

as on t
,a
'IC Gypess 1 � ih B, s s �
r .= � �.��`� .C,� Arctic
�`s° '�'y Arbor Way Hiltz Swee z r 35 7 Ridge
t t 7 t VlOfst Drts3
i �.,oces� ,:�f�et Kno/I000 00 Ar Way
t{v wood Pl �$ PKW
i'.
o p;
o >� Trayeso
r
Dr
SS �
fir' rL
ois P Creek`o
t i
S Q`e �.,e Ont °JQ E
MoOre tiiti Way '.o� i �`�� .,, > 3S Q� Y r u Ctift<<�e�
a
tfO+ .j
e O .�
4�b C boll)" Springs t4ew _Hill R '� a 'G me s to
I C
�a a o--' ay n
�
'O
xs ti
t
a J
33
ohlw00ni;5?
E
f
Kitts
Lait
Third St ti Bluc'
cL ° Fin
Thomas Mill Rd n H way
= ai
On Sprl i
33 07 , 9's Rd 10 oily Springs Rd Red
_.
,_.
7 CA Hoii
Earp St
Q n
m r? Dutch ty Ln
fr L1, r r > !T O
i
Pkwy*,0 WZaile tiny St A
a
roan �?a
S t t o
%i C'' m a �a
N - V >�' - I
4 _
-t7 Ash ee St ` .� �hdl Collie
L �I aj s
_a 3� 35 / Ctr U
` � s� a i°'?r Turner =
Flagg
—�
t Rd
t '
oo I6t
Stinson Ave 810Q'�i �
_ C0(' �,e ea •� ate_
E M v8 Rd, ¢
d { F �c
NDisclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
A 0 850 1,700 3,400 ft the most current and accurate information possible.
i t t I I t t I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
1 inch — 1,600 feet and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

I Bu. T002 PC 1266
`s-__--__-____
I I ___
I I
DUMBAN F06 NT)URES 627 LLC
DB. 15406 PC. 850
BM. 2013 PG. 1011
ZONING: R -MF -OB CU
I� I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
WI
E n I TRACT 12
DUMBARTON VENTURES LLC
cl I PIN: 06495474"0
392 OB. 15406 PC. 853
BM. 2013 PG. 1011
JO' TYPE =I$ ZONING: R -MF -OB CU
WFFER
I I �
?E5 LLC
178 I i
650
101,
m CU
I I I
I I I
J
I I
T V 1C
G. 1150
101,
--OB CU
I I
I� I
I I I
•� TRACT 10 _L
DUMBARFON WMRES LLC
MN 161
/
0649593
If
ZONING, RRBm 2013 F
--08 CU /
II �
\ \ BM. 2001 PL 1166 ' "" "'
\ 1
y 588'41'007 203. IB' (TK) ..e„99997979
I I ZONIN
NEW F
1 1 ISZ.3Zl
1 I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I 1
I I
1 1
1 I
I 1
I 1
1 i
1 I
1 I
I �
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
� I
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
� 6.00'
�F
I�Q I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
\
\ /
1
I
1
I
I I
i I
____________
I
I
I
I I
I
I �
I 1
I 1
I I
I
raacT 7 I
DUUBARTON VENTURE$ LLCI
PIN 10619641
OB. 5406 PC a96
BN — PG. 1011
I I ZONIN
NEW F
1 1 ISZ.3Zl
1 I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I 1
I I
1 1
1 I
I 1
I 1
1 i
1 I
1 I
I �
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
� I
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
� 6.00'
�F
I�Q I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
\
\ /
1
I
\
\
I
1
�Ili fl��� 1 t�e�v
I I
DMI. EY D ne"
j PlJ 0
I R/Y I RteJ2
W. 5
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
i
I
I). IJ'
--7979—'°.
Mu. 1777 PG'. //Y I __ .-1979- .. m ,;.; �.
BM 1%9 PG. ))9 1 11 BM. 1996 PL. 185 �
__p 1a' euFFEa 1--
9B8'J9'39i`I6).gg 1999. PG 9 1 J_______________l /
"S]5” 20' UNOtST11RSED 589'01']17 115.69' , / - - - - -
'FR j BUFFER \1 11 1 ARELl,WO. RAMIRO
r - - - - - - - - - 1 _ 1 PIN: 0649646704
JO'T t"AO-
TRACT 6
OUMBARFON VENTURES LLL
MN: 0649641]81
OB. 15406 PG. 795
BN 2013 PG. 1011
ZONING: R -MF -08 CU
NEW RECOMBINED AREA
42,921 SF OR 0.%5J AC
FUTURE COMMERCML
1 \
iu
2 I TRACT 5
DUMBARTON VENTURES LLC
PIN: 0619641 IJ4
DB. .. 1016
INEW 316] 02 SF AREA \ \
0.]491 Ac /
TRACT 4
DUMBARTON VENTURES ILC �' i
PIN: 06496]1999 �
OB. 15406 PC. / I
W. PC. 10,0111
ZONING
,
ZONNG: OR 0 4 ,
INEW RECOED AREA / 11,466 SF OR 0.1010 AC %
52S01'31i1' / 1
I
W. I'll 7G
BM. 1996 F.
�Ili fl��� 1 t�e�v
I I
DMI. EY D ne"
j PlJ 0
I R/Y I RteJ2
W. 5
50
I
I ' ORN
19 6 EASEMENT
PC.
I /
I
I I
7979
�_1 - N63,RD., DAw,ll L I
I
s
BYP /1
EL -, TE.E
I
n
I
21]20
P/M 064 64]15]
DB. iJ100 PC.
JJ6
_ _
1
T
O'$RivlciF-`
n
ry
n
I I
�I OB.4765�P0
I BM. 1996 7. 1155 _ I
L BUPF6 -STS-.__
I
BN 1996
II33
I YAN ANDER, WAN
IJ4649PG256
G. 262
--------_
588•]8'167 172970'
19% PG 5
_ G _
�T
2D' UNDISTURBED
U.
I BMFFM
— —
1
_—
I i
Ta
1
=__r___
_
I
Ir l0' GRANT, NOREW
Tt
I
I
PI : 0619648161
BM. 199 TPG. 50
M
I
YT
1. ELMOSWA
TO
\
I PIN:
OB 1998
0649648166
3
�e
&
;gym
PC. 50474
w
1
1
• #
g
M II
I_i______
I
g
I I
~
I
I I
STEIG WAL S A
1 STEIC RWALD, ESA A
O8. I120IJ PG. 1291
BM 1998 PG. 504
--
1
J �
�
ie ,
q{
41
II­0ATEI
I
I I I
I
1
—
NCKOY, TI CEL LUMER
I PIN: 06 9618056
"1 BN 19% PC. 04
I I
>*• z9
M
�`(r\�,
�
p I
I J SERWCES LL NENT
_1 PIN: 0619648 0 I
UNDIMRBED 50]2
111��
111
111©
lip
P,
Ea
EB
D
o
tit 08. 1104J 534 I Z
503
V/��1FL � O xJ^ =O
I //L
,— —
I BOWLING, 061064 R E
ELIM,
1 PIN: 9 48 I 7 3
n I DB. 2552
� I BN. 19% a. SOJ
--- JL0L
0 MEADOWS, A11NEW1"� X J
IW PIN: 064 6]881] _-
OB. IJ52326 O_
19% PG. J I X
W O
'^
12_ V/ 3
LU 0
I ARSENFAU, TERM I
PhN' 064%3874
bI" %.15456 H:. 6
rl BM I99B J
1 I '
,� to
1
1 AMN 11-J
196 731
23,4
6
998 C
F T
503 SCALP IN FEET WU.
♦T o
—r- — o za Bo Tao ABo zao N V x
¢7979.
TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS PROJECT NO. XX -XX -XX

Legend
1 Impacted wetlands
Approximate Project Boundary
Approximate wetland location
Aid
rt r
+s
e
d. . q.:
N
L�
S
150 0 300 Fee
Dumbarton Due Diligence
W Holly Springs Road
Holly Springs, North Carolina
August, 2016
9-f W11
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
Wetland Impact
Location Map
map source:
nc one map orthoimagery &
BNK Prelim Site Plan -2 dated12-23-15

1Y w
BUFF'6F?
N
W E
S
:roil�i
[aTIPI y
t y i
1
I I t t A
I i
1
( f
1 \. �7
I 1 I i R
1 i
4,.
i"
125 62.5 0
Dumbarton Due Diligence
W Holly Springs Road
Holly Springs, North Carolina
August, 2016
1 I
1 I !I
I�
I 1 `� fT341
a ftTP IRT. Y°
1
s Si .
a�arpt/i
xros^Es- r ,m.ee' '
t
t
z
I
1
i
Legend
I
f ll An' Co Impacted wetlands - 0.013 acres (584.1 sq feet)
I I
' Approximate Project Boundary
125 Fee Approximate wetland location
��
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
Wetland Impact Map
map source:
nc one map orthoimagery &
BNK Prelim Site Plan -2 dated12-23-15
Im