20060507 Ver 2_Minor Variance_20080929

oto - 05 01 V 2
14
HesterHompany
REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS
September 29, 2008
Amy Chapman
NC Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: DWQ Variance #06-0507
2301 Oxford Road, Raleigh, NC
Dear Amy:
Please find enclosed with this letter three copies of a Variance Request Form requesting
modifications to the DWQ Variance identified above. The modification is seeking to add
110 square feet of impact to the Zone 1 Buffer for the construction of a wood slatted deck to
provide egress from the rear of the house, plus 25 square feet of impact to the Zone 2 Buffer
to allow for optimum placement of the front porch.
I have also enclosed three copies of the Site Plan, on which the property is identified as Lot
1, and three copies of the Ecosystem Enhancement System Acceptance Letter.
I hope this application is sufficient for your consideration of this modification request. If
you have any questions, or would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate
to call.
Enclosures
U-,i+
SEP 2 9 ?0n
??S1 RIB
? 1620 HILLSBOROUGH STREET, SUITE 200 1 PO BOX 12828 1 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27605
? OFFICE 9 19-821 -7222 ? FAX [phone]
c ,/
J. omas H :ter
? www.hesterco.com
OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received Request #
0LP - DSo 1 u a.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Variance Request Form
Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
? Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC .0233)
? Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC .0259)
NOTE: This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
Part 1: General Information
1. Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Mary Stewart Manasse (Landowner) or J.Thomas Hester (buyer)
2. Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the facility and its compliance)
Name: Mary Stewart Manasse
Title: Landowner
Street address: 2720 Montgomery Street
City, State, Zip: Durham, NC 27705
Telephone: [phone]
Fax:
3. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Lot 1, Recombination of Part of D.L. Johnson Subdivision (previously identified as Lot 24)
4. Location of Facility
Street address: 2301 Oxford Road
City, State, Zip: Raleigh, NC, 27608 p u V ?J
County: Wake
Latitude/longitude: Decimal Degrees 38.763439 / -49.353444 SEP 2 9 2008
5. Directions to facility from nearest major intersection (Also attach a map): DENR wS? pTERB&*W
From the intersection of Wake Forest Road and Whitaker Mill Road, travel west daN¢Y1?SMDWhitaker Mill Road. Turn right on Reaves Drive followed by a left on Oxford Road. Site is
less than 0.10 mile on right. Identified by white board fence.
6. Contact person who can answer questions about the facility:
Name: Jeff Rezeli, Architect, New City Design Group
Telephone: [phone] x112
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
7. Requested Environmental Management Commission Hearing Date:
Version 1: September 1998
Part 2: Demonstration of Need for a Variance
NOTE: The variance provision of the Neuse Riparian Area Rule allows the E_. Management
Environmental l Commission to grant a variance to an affected party when the following conditions apply on a given project:
(a) practical difficulties or hardships would result from strict application of the rule:
(b) such difficulties or hardships result from conditios which are peculiar to the property involved; and
(c) the general purpose and intent of the Rule would be preserved, water quality would be protected and
substantial justice would be done if the variance were granted.
This part of the application is to explain how the project meets criteria (a) and (b).
1. Attach a detailed description (2-3 pages) explaining the following:
• The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from strict application of the Rule.
• How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
• Why reconfiguring and/or reducing the built-upon area to preserve a greater portion of the
riparian area is not feasible on this project. If economic hardship is the major
consideration, then include a specific explanation of the economic hardship and the
proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Front porch is situated near center on front of house rather than on front corner of house, to
facilitate workable interior floor plan. Only 16 linear feet of front of house at front corner are
outside Riparian Buffer.
Moderately sized wood slatted deck situated on rear of house to provide rear access, with landing
and steps down from first floor elevation to ground elevation. Deck is less that 8' off the
ground. Entire rear and both sides of house are within Riparian Buffer.
Part 3: Water Quality Protection
NOTE; This part of the application is to explain how the project meets criterion (c): the general purpose and
intent of the Rule would be preserved, water quality would be protected and substantial justice would be done if
the variance were granted.
1. Briefly summarize how water quality will be protected on this project. Also attach a detailed
narrative (1-2 pages) describing the nonstructural and structural measures that will be used
for protecting water quality and reducing nitrogen inputs to surface water.
Same protections and best management practices as described in original variance request
(DWO #06-0507)
2. What is the total project area in acres? 0.27 acres (11,939 s.f.) (lot size)
3. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required for this project?
CAMA Major
Sediment/Erosion Control
401 Certification/404 Permit
None
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 1: September 1998
Part 3: Water Quality Protection, continued
4. Complete the following information for each drainage basin. If there are more than two
drainage basins in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each basin
provided in the same format as below.
Project Information Drainage Basin 1 Drainage Basin 2
Receiving stream name Oxford Branch
Receiving stream class' C-NSW
Drainage basin area (total2) 13,221 sq. ft.
Existing impervious area3 (total2) 0
Proposed impervious area3 (total) 2,836 s.f.
% Impervious area3 (on-site) 23.76%
% Impervious area3 (total2) 21.45%
Impervious area3 Drainage basin 1 Drainage basin 2
On-site buildings 1,865.18 s.f. proposed
0 existing
On-site streets 0
On-site parking 971.4 s.f. proposed
0 existing
On-site sidewalks 0
Other on-site 0
Total on-site 2,836.58 s.f,
Off-site 0
Total 2,836.58 s.f. proposed
0 existing,
The internet site for this information is http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslstrmclasslalpha/neu.html
2 Total means on-site plus off-site area that drains through the project.
3 Impervious area is defined as the built-upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
5. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived?
The lot is isolated from adjacent stormwater flows by a curb and gutter stormwater collection
system that serves the D.L. Johnson Subdivision. No off-site stormwater traverses this
property, according to data submitted with original variance request prepared by Robert J.
Goldstein and Associates, Inc.
6. What will be the annual nitrogen load contributed by this site after development in pounds per
acre per year without structural BMPs (stormwater pond, wetland, infiltration basin, etc)?
Attach a detailed plan for all proposed structural stormwater BMPs.
See original variance application.
Drainage Size of Post-development BMP nitrogen Final nitrogen Final nitrogen
basin drainage nitroge6n loading rate removal loading rate loading from
basin without BMPs° efficiencys (Ibs/ac/yr) drainage basin
(ac) Ibs/ac/ r (%) (Ibs)
1
2
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 1: September 1998
3
4
5
Totals ------ ------
Attacn calculations ana references.
e Attach calculations and references.
6 Phosphorus in the Tar-Pamlico Basin.
Variance Request Form, page 4
Version 1: September 1998
Part 3: Water Quality Protection, continued
7. The applicable supplemental form(s) listed below must be attached for each BMP specified:
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-105 Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SWU-106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SWU-107 Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-109 Innovative BMPs Supplement
See original variance application.
Part 4: Submittal Checklist
A complete appplication submittal consists of the following components. Incomplete submittals
will be returned to the applicant. The complete variance request submittal must be received 90
days prior to the EMC meeting at which you wish the request to be heard. Initial below to indicate
that the necessary information has been provided.
Applicant's Item
I /
• Original and two copies of the Variance Request Form and the attachments
listed below.
• A vicinity map of the project (see Part 1, Item 5)
• Narrative demonstration of the need for a variance (see Part 2)
• A detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management (see Part
3, Item 1)
• Calculations supporting nitrogen loading estimates (see Part 3, Item 6)
• Calculations and references supporting nitrogen removal from proposed BMPs
(see Part 3, Item 6)
• Location and details for all proposed structural stormwater BMPs (see Part 3,
Item 6)
• Three copies of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP and/or
narrative for each innovative BMP (see Part 3, Item 7)
• Three copies of plans and specifications, including:
Q Development/Project name
Q Engineer and firm
Q Legend and north arrow
Q Scale (1" = 100' or 1" = 50' is preferred)
Q Revision number & date
Q Mean high water line (if applicable)
Q Dimensioned property/project boundary
Q Location map with named streets or NC State Road numbers
Q Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor
elevations
Q Details of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter
Q Footprint of any proposed buildings or other structures
Q Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
Q Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff
calculations
Q Drainage basins delineated
Q Perennial and intermittent streams, ponds, lakes, rivers and estuaries
Q Location of forest vegetation along the streams, ponds, lakes, rivers and
estuaries
Variance Request Form, page 5
Version 1: September 1998
Part 5: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 7 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
See original variance application.
Part 6: Agent Authorization
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete t is section:
Designated agent (individual or firm):
Mailing address: P.Q. Box 12828 /
City, State, Zip: Raleigh, NC 27M5
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: 7282
Email: Whesterco.comn
Part 7: Applicant's Certification
1, (print or type name of person
listed in Part I, Item 2), certify that the information included on this permit application form is
correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the
deed restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
conditions.
Signature:
Date:
Title:

Fi6ster; Agent
Variance Request Form, page 6
Version 1: September 1998
r lsw-
-d?jj
,Fc0 stem
PROGRAM
September 16, 2008
Mary Stewart Manaste
2720 Montgomery St.
Durham, NC 27705 Expiration of Acceptance: June 16, 2009
Project: New Lot 1 (Previously Lot 24) County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/LAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer[[
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Neuse 03020201 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 25
Credits Neuse 03020201 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 37.5
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely, {{?? ?-}
William D. ilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, NCDWQ- Raleigh
J. Thomas Hester, agent
File
Rmtor6tg... E ... Prot" ow Stag
a YA
l?CDEM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
_ -
;i
I X
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS___ IS NOT___ LOCATED )LX _ LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS DESIGNATED ON FEDERAL
EMERGED NUMBER. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (F.E.M.A.) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER_37183C0341 E _~Y__ ZONES X _ ~ c~
n
k ~ ~ O ~
~Ma i ! RFO N ~ ~ ® _
R, A i'.
/ I HF a R, m U ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~
~ I ~ ae LUCINDA AYRES THRALL. ~ C9 ~ ~
r~' v PINS 170519604436 ~
0~~ G~~~ o . ~ ~ o
0~6 a 1s W SITE Q ~ m
i a ~ ~
o ~ ~o~~~~ ~ _
; ~ ~ ~ E V~ ~ ' it
.E'
a ~ 50 RIPARIAN BUFFER ~°Q y ~
PIN ( C ~ W W CHAPPEL O ~ r ~ ! , ~ ; PINS 170519605428 ~ JOSEPH M KEENER ~o~o~` ~ ' i~' r ~ ~ ,
VICINITY NIAP NOT TO S AI,E ~ . REFE
A S' REFERENCE DEED Elp P N~ 170519606580. p~'~ f' ~ = '~r
~r A BK1166 PG80 ~ ~ I ~ ' S B.O.M. 1984 756 ~w ~ k r ;
rti ~Fti
~s ~ 3 ~ 2 ~ J
~ S 96 ~p EI EI Q~ ~ ~
~ pA ~ ~ p~ Ati ~ F .7 . Q~~~ 26 June 2008
Z G~ ~ 0• EIP ~ ~ 0 . ~ .
~ ~ r W~
,c ,'F, o~ ~ ~ IP
cS U' ~ E j ~ a
~ ~ „ ~ o E ~ 1 I ~
o p ~ 4g 34 ~ La o ~ Ng0 > E P , 0~!ED...
w ~~o , ~ ~ 0 13.43 ,7o C ~ ~ PRINT. ~ Q EIP^
0 <v EIP WALL U ~ EIP. i ~ / ~ ~ ~
~ ti ~m ~o.
0 ~`L j ' I. ' J" 7 21 , ~ a<. ,a 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN-
GRAVEL ~ ~ ~ ® N EL 240.63
,p• NOTE. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ~ 3S 9 ~o; o"' e~~ TOTAL
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY PART O F ~ 0 5 DONE IN ~ y
u'o ~ ~ ~ ti ~ '9 . OF RALEIGH AND NCDOT STANDARDS 2 AND SPECIFICATIONS ~ A ,ti P ~ ~ . f q
2 Q ~ ~ 39, 745 SF
0 ~ ~ ~S •o, PO
, SLOTTED WOOD DECK T~ ~o, 0°91 AC ~I
,S ~ ` 'N ? PROGRESS PRINT ^0. ~ I
C SECOND FLOOR CANTILEVER ~ 1' 0
J 9 50 RIPARIAN BUFFER. DAVID M CONNOR ,EIP ? HEALTH DEPT. PIAN CHECK
2 n MARTHA W CONNOR ~c~ ~ PIN 170519604292 F~o~ 2 J'~` 06/26/08 ®BUILDING DEPT. PLAN giECK
~ HOUSE FOOTPRINT w s # 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN- ? BID sET
~ s,, ,u~ . 0 , B.O.M. 1992 PG, 1043. ~9 . ' ~ f
~ A P ~ o~ EL 241.15. ? coNSTRUCrION sir ~
F G ~ , ~ . , ~ PERMITTE BUIL ING. AREA BEFORE & AFTER e ~ . , , , , ' 6~~ NIP ? SUBMITTAL DOCUMENT ~ 2
2 Z ~ THE NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER REQS.: 1' STO WA , " ~ , FRONT PORCH (UNDER ROOF) ~S,
36,8 , ~ ,~o . 07/27/06 1 CITY COMMENTS
PEA GRAVEL OR PERVIOUS LEFT LOT: BEFORE - 7,572.10 S,F. I _
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AFTER 2,587.00 S.F, ~ro . 6.. o ' ~ ! 09/15/0$ 2 CITY COMMENTS
S'' - ~ ~ . MIDDLE LOT: BEFORE 8,496.80 S.F.
~ ~ 56 ~ ~ 4 3' o AFTER - 96.00 S.F. t~ 56 ~ i
~ Z
RIGHT LOT: BEFORE - 2,736.16 S.F. ~ . X00 ~ _ ~
~ o• AFTER 1,275.00 S.F. S. : ~ ~ D / - ~ J~O Q~'
`~prv..... N.: ~ G
a 20........ Z,I.. ~ ~ ~
~ 3°.... h NOTES: ~ k~o C ~ ~ R EK ~ ~ ~ o 100. YEA k~ ~ F ruf`f` P~1 ~ ~~O CURVE. DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC'LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH
• ~ ~ h . _ 1 BOUNDARY, EXISTING ONSITE 8c OFFSITE INFORMATION WAS TA ~ ~ -FLOOD PLAIN S ~ F 0~ ~ ~ ~o C1 15°18'05" 299,64' 80,02' S 34°06'04" W 79J8' ~ ~ O ~ ~ C2 01'38'56" 299.64' 40,00' S 45'34'34" W 39.97
. a 4°.' ~ . FROM SURVEY BY J.Y, PHELPS, JR. DATED 8-22-04. ~ • ~ EL 240.63 . '~j ~V ~ 1 C3 ~ 22°5701" 299.64' 120.02' S 37°55'32" W 119.22'
2 DWQ APPROVED FOOTPRINTS AS INDICATED BY CHANCE AND ASSOC ES a 0 ~ G
o". FROM SITE PLAN FOR MARY STUART MANASSE PROPERTY DATED 9 20 05. ti J ~ ~ ~t~0 THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER
0 SF 3) LOT 2 RECOMBINATION BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM PLAN TITLED 0 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE ARCHRECT FOR ~ ~8 ~ NIP ~
~~C °a N LOTS 24 25 2627 & A PORTION OF LOT 28 OF D,L. JOHNSON SUBDIVISION INTO M 9 P 9 2 lO(~. . . ...y . , - 9 .Y, PHELPS R. DATED 4-17-08, 2 ~Q~ THB PROJECT ARE INSTRUMENTS OF THE ARCHRECT'S EI P ~ SERVICE FOR USE SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THIS
, LOTS 1 &2 D.L, JOHNSON SUBDIVISION BY J J / ,w ~ ti~ . h 2 PROJECT AND UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED, THE
o° •0 4 ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NC DWQ VARIANCE APPROVALS. ~ P~ ) p~ 0 0 2~ 2' ti~~ ~OP~~ ~ GjO~I,~~ V'` 1 I 1 ~ I HESEE OCUMENTS ANDMSHALL RIE~TAINRALL ~ ~ J 0 N~ S 0 S U R D N I S I CJ I V COMMON TAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED
I .a. 5 .ZONING SCALED FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS 0 ~ ) ~ ~ RIGHTS, INCLUDING COP'~IGHT. TTY ARCNOECT'S
0 0 20 ~ ~ ~ a TUDY NA E: OX D OAD 6) FLOODS M FOR R g •~p, ~ p ^ ~ n DRAWINGS, SPEgFlCAl10NS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS 5~ B ° o ° M ° 19 3 5 P G 9 6 SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR
~ N ~ ~ ~ 3~,.... CITY OF RALEIGH FLOOD STUDY ID#: 598 ~J
~..2..4, 5 DATE APPROVED: 03 31 08 F ~ o GJ~~ s TO THISOPROJECT BY~OTHERSOEXCEPT BY OF 1 FIELD CLOSURE AGREEMENT IN WRrnNG BY THE ARCHITECT.
r. 7) THE WATERSHED AREA FOR THE STREAM IS ESTIMATED G~ LEGEND
AT APPROXIMATELY 0.35 SQUARE MILES 221,8 ACRES 0P o ( ) 0P ~f
~ ' PER "OXFORD ROAD FLOOD STUDY" MARCH 11 2008
YEAR PROJECT 10867.D1. PREPARED BY SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FL000 PL N- GRAPHIC SCALE EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE MH MANHOLE ~ NIP NEW IRON PIPE. PP POWER POLE MON MONUMENT R/W RIGHT OF VJAY
CONSULTANTS,PA:, OF RALEIGH N.C. EL 241.1 ~ ~~r ° PK PARKER KALON NAIL C/L CENTER LINE
8) ALL RECOMBINED PROPERTIES ARE SUBJECT TO PART 10 3 ~.l
SLOTTED WOOD DECK SFr ~ C P 9 T i Lr s : ~ aq ~ ITT E ~ ~ CB .CATCH BASIN ~ ' (.3
Ck 9) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL T I SECOND .FLOOR CANTILEVER (IId FEET Q
e~ .a.. N CITY OF RALEIGH AND NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS NT "M ~ 1 inch = ft.
HOUSE FOOTPRINT 1 ,O ~ ~
a'..d ~.I
FRONT PORCH UNDER ROOF) a N VARIANCE NOTES: ( ~ ' \ ' ; : ; ~ 1 MINOR VARIANCE 15 A NCAC 26.0233 DWQ 06-0508 ® O ~ ~
~ a , , 50 RIPAR N B FFER PEA GRAVEL OR PERVIOUS 2 ,MAJOR VARIANCE 15 A NCAC 28.0233 DWQ 06-0507
RETE DRIVEWAY ~ CONC ti , W 3 AREAS IDENTIFIED AS NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER SHALL I®
a ~ TOTAL ~ a BE MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY IN THEIR NATURAL OR MITIGATED a, Q
_ 39, 745 SF CONDITION. NO PERSON OR ENTITY SHALL FILL GRADE,EXCAVATE, a ~ 9
TO PERFORM ANY OTHER LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES; NOR CUT, NOTE: DRIVEWAY TO BE ~ ap.. 0.91 AC Ap A011 scALE: 1" = 30'
DICULAR TO REMOVE, OR HARM ANY VEGETATION; NOR CONSTRUCT ANY PERPEN s .a
CURB PROPERTY LINE, TYP, ~ STRUCTURES NOR ADD ANY ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, cSr g
~ E NOR .ALLOW ANIMAL GRAZING OR WATERING OR ANY OTHER ~ ~
- AGRICULTURAL USE ON SUCH PROTECTED AREAS WITHOUT WRITTEN NOTE: ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE e ~ u® ~
c~ AUTHORIZATION OF THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) OR DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY 'y Q ~ ~ { {
i HAND NCDOT STANDARDS ~ COMPLIANCE WITH THE RIPARIAN BUFFER PROTECTION RULES OF RALE G ,
AND SPECIFICATIONS ~ ~ ~ ~ (15 A NCAC 28.0233 OR.0259). THIS COVENANT IS TO RUN WITH
1 oP ~ THE LAND, .AND SHALL BE BINDING ON THE OWNER, AND .ALL 2 0~ JZ cA. r~~,, • o~
ti o 2 1 a,,, , ~ PARTIES CLAIMING UNDER IT. ~ ~ p' ~ Q ot,,~~so°~~~
URVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC IENOTH CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH t ' ~ C p
Ct .15'1805 299.64. 80,02 S 34'0804" W 79°78 ' ~ q ~ Cp ~ ~ 1! 1 r ~ DESIGNER : JCR
, ' Q ~ ~ ry~ J ~ e ~ e ti DRAWN : JCR
Q ~ Q7 o ~ !CHECKED : JCR
~ ,,1 Footprints Total Square Feet; 1650, SF 3022 SF (CONDITIONED) _ SCALE : AS SHOWN
Q Crawh 51a6a Basement.. H
1382 SF 268 SF (GARAGES N/A JOB NUMBER : 6773-1
AhearT HeigHts Stories SHEET TITLE
30'-6" 2 WALK-UP ATTIC
~ararla• SITE
ENLARGED PLAN 4,t.7 "7 ~ 1,544 St ~ ' Impe us Surface Area: PLANS
A011 SCALE: 1" = 20' ~r 5 SF (HOUSE), 929 SF (PERVIOUS DRIVEWAY) {
SHEET NUMBER
A01 1
I