19910022 Ver 2_Individual_20170614

Kimley>>> Dorn
Transmittal
Date: June 12, 2017
Project Name: Smithfield Foods Expansion — Tar Heel Site
To: Tom Charles/Eric Reush
421 Fayetteville, Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
Job Number: 011795033
Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 Telephone No. 910-251-4633
We are sending these by
❑ U.S. Mail ® FedEx ® Hand Delivery
❑ Other
We are sending you
® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints/Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Other
Cop%eS Date
No. Descriotion
the following items:
❑ Specifications ❑ Change Orders
1
6-12-17
-
Permit Application/Permit Support Document
1
6-12-17
11x17 Site Plan Drawings
These are transmitted as checked below:
® For your use ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Copies for approval
❑ As requested ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Copies for distribution
® For review and comment ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ❑ Corrected prints
Copy to: Jennifer Burdette Signed: ��

Transmittal Page 2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Form Approved -
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB No. 0710-0003
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Expires: 30 -SEPTEMBER -2015
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Corey Middle - Last - Ragole
First - Beth Middle - Last - Reed
Company - Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Company - Kimley-Horn
E-mail Address -
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 11500 N. Ambassador Drive
Address- 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
City - Kansas City State - NIO Zip - 64153 Country -USA
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip -27601 Country -USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
n/a 402-651-4482 n/a
n/a 919-677-2073 n/a
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Beth Reed to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
See attached Agent Authorization form 2017-06-12
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Smithfield Foods Expansion
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Goodman Swamp
Address 15855 NC Highway 87 W
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 34.749681 Longitude: -W 78.807055
City - Tar Heel State- NC Zip- 28392
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID 035600822686 Municipality unincorporated area of Bladen County
Section - n/a Township - n/a Range - n/a
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Raleigh, take I-40 East towards I-95 South for approximately 30 miles. Take Exit 328A for I-95 South. Stay on I-95 South for
approximately 35 miles, and then take Exit 46B -A for NC -87 South toward Elizabethtown. Stay on NC -87 South for approximately 18
miles. The Project Area will be on the right before reaching Tar Heel.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The project will consist of the construction of an approximately 495,175 square foot cold storage distribution center (providing
approximately 48,000 pallet positions) and 239 associated truck staging areas connected to the existing Smithfield Foods processing
facility. The new cold storage distribution center will employ approximately 200 additional people when it begins operations, scheduled for
2018. The proposed on-site cold storage distribution center would eliminate trucking the processed product off-site (an approximate 60
truck trip per day reduction) and eliminate the need for the multiple off-site storage/distribution centers. In addition, the proposed project
would construct two new truck access drives in effort to improve employee safety by separating truck traffic from employee traffic,
improve Smithfield Foods' compliance with Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) guidelines, and improve the safety of Smithfield
Foods' customers by further separating raw materials from finished goods.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
Smithfield Foods' purpose is to construct a finished goods cold storage distribution center at their existing food processing facility to
consolidate product distribution for the region. The project is necessary to increase product distribution efficiency, reduce truck trips/
traffic, improve employee safety, improve food safety, and further separate raw product from fmished goods during the material processing
operations as dictated by the Food Safety Modernization Act.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Development of the proposed project would require the placement of fill material into jurisdictional wetlands for the construction of the
trailer staging lots associated with the new cold storage distribution center. Additionally, fill would be placed in a jurisdictional ditch that
ties to one of the wetlands impacted by the trailer staging lots.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
Fill dirt, ABC stone, concrete - 1,753 cu. yd. Rip -rap - 642 cu. yd.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres See Table 4 in the attached Individual Permit Application and Supporting Documentation
or
Linear Feet No streams will be impacted as a result of the proposed project
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
In order to meet the project goals, the on-site alternatives must be designed such that the areal layout of the facility separates raw and
finished goods. As a result, the expansion needed to be located north in relation to the facility. Based on these constraints, wetland impacts
were avoided and minimized to the extent practical. Minimization measures included: reducing the number of trailer staging positions,
tightening the limits of disturbance, narrowing driveway isles in the lots, and realigning the proposed truck entrance drive. In addition,
through the design evolution, wetlands W2, W4, W5, and W6 were completely avoided.
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? QYes F—]No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
The initial two construction sequences are underway and will construct the new blast freezing rooms, palletizing areas, entry roads, new
employee parking lot, and office space. These construction areas are located entirely in uplands and will have no impacts to any
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The grading contractor already has approved erosion control permits for this portion of the work. Entry
roads into the property will be re -paved and utilities will either be relocated and/or installed as needed.
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- See the attached Adjacent Property Owners Map and associated table in Appendix E of the supporting document.
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
(See Permit Doc)
* Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
'P4 6/12/2017
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 Page 3 of 3

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Todd
Address: 11500 NW Ambassador Drive, Suite 500, Kansas City MO 64153
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Smithfield Site Tar Heel NC
Date: 2/14/17
The Department of the Army
U.S. Array Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Thomas Charles
Field Office: Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Smithfield Farmland Corp, hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and Isolated and Other Non -
404 Jurisdictional Waters permit, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revocation by the owner.
In addition, 1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 2nd day of February, 2017.
Todd Gerken da 1- 6ee-keti
Print Property Owner's Name
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
40I & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Property Owner's Signature

INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION AND
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
200 Commerce Street
Smithfield, VA 23430
Smithfield,
Prepared By:
Kimley-Horn
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
Kimley>))Horn
June 2017
©Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2017

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Executive Summary
This document is intended to provide supplementary information in support of the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers' (USACE) preparation of the Public Notice, Environmental Assessment, Finding of No
Significant Impact, Statement of Findings, and Review and Compliance Determination according to
the 404(b)(1) guidelines for the proposed cold storage distribution center expansion in Tar Heel,
Bladen County, North Carolina.
Applicant: Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Attn: Corey Ragole
11500 N. Ambassador Drive
Kansas City, Missouri 64153
Agent: Kimley-Horn
Beth Reed, Permit Project Manager
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
Date of Application: June 9 ,2017
Location: Smithfield Foods, Inc. is proposing to construct a cold storage distribution center
expansion connected to their current food processing facility located on NC Highway 87 in Tar Heel,
Bladen County, North Carolina. The facility is situated on an approximately 526 -acre parcel owned
by Smithfield Packing Realty Partnership, a subsidiary of Smithfield Foods, Inc. The property is
bounded by NC -87 to the east, Goodman Swamp to the west, farmland to the north, and forestland
to the south. The proposed expansion will adjoin the western side of the existing facility.
Applicant's Stated Purpose: Smithfield Foods' purpose is to construct a finished goods cold storage
distribution center at their existing food processing facility to consolidate product distribution for
the region. The project is necessary to increase product distribution efficiency, reduce truck
trips/traffic, improve employee safety, improve food safety, and further separate raw product from
finished goods during the material processing operations as dictated by the Food Safety
Modernization Act.
Project Description: The project will consist of the construction of an approximately 495,175
square foot cold storage distribution center (providing approximately 48,000 pallet positions) and
associated truck staging areas connected to the existing Smithfield Foods processing facility. The
new cold storage distribution center will employ approximately 200 additional people when it
begins operations, scheduled for 2018. Currently, pork product processed at the Smithfield facility
is loaded onto trucks and taken to multiple off-site distribution centers for storage prior to its
eventual shipment to clients. The proposed on-site cold storage distribution center would

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
eliminate trucking the processed product off-site (an approximate 60 truck trip per day reduction)
and eliminate the need for the multiple storage/distribution centers. In addition, the proposed
project would improve employee safety by separating truck traffic from employee traffic, improve
Smithfield Foods' compliance with Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) guidelines, and improve
the safety of Smithfield Foods' customers by further separating raw materials from finished goods.
As part of the cold storage distribution center construction, the following components would be
constructed:
• Separate entrance routes for truck/trailer access and automotive access;
• Rack storage and pallet areas for staging finished goods associated with each zone;
• Refrigerated product loading docks and loaded trailer staging areas for product
distribution;
• Stormwater swale and rip -rap level spreader
Existing Site Conditions: The approximately 77 -acre project area (proposed Limits of Disturbance)
is contained within the larger 154 -acre delineation study area, both of which are contained within
the 532 -acre property parcels owned by Smithfield Packing Realty Partnership, a subsidiary of
Smithfield Foods, Inc. The proposed project area is located 0.75 mile north of the Town of Tar Heel
on NC Highway 87 and is currently zoned as Industrial (1) by Bladen County. The proposed project
area is bounded to the east by NC Highway 87, farmland to the north and south, and by an electric
transmission line easement to the west. A large portion of the project area is an existing industrial
food processing facility with associated parking and infrastructure. The remainder of the project
area consists of undeveloped forestland.
The project area is located in the Lumber River Basin (USGS 8 -digit HUC: 03040203) and is situated
in the coastal plain physiographic region of North Carolina. Topography within the project vicinity is
mostly flat with several large Carolina Bays situated in and around the project area. Elevations in
the proposed project area range from 125 to 135 feet above sea level.
North Carolina Wetlands Assessment Method (NCWAM): Six wetlands were identified in the
delineation study area, covering three distinct wetland types using the NCWAM classification
system. Three wetlands (W2, W3, and W5) are headwater forest wetlands, wetlands W1 and W6
are basin wetlands, and wetland W4 is a pocosin wetland. The proposed project impacts only two
(W1 and W3) of the six wetlands that were identified within the delineation study area.
W1 was classified as a basin wetland and was found to have a "Medium" qualitative rating due to
the overall size, connectivity, and relatively minor disturbance to the wetland's interior. W3 was
classified as a headwater forest wetland and was found to have a "Low" overall wetland rating due
to the small size, lack of connectivity, and the influence of adjacent development on the wetland
system. The wetlands delineated within the delineation study area, but located outside of the
project area were not evaluated using NCWAM.
ii

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NCSAM): No streams are located within the project
study area.
CAMA Regulated Areas: The project is not located within a NCDCM regulated county.
Protected Species: As of July 21, 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists seven federally
threatened or endangered species protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) known to
occur in Bladen County, including American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), wood stork
(Mycteria Americana), American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), pondberry (Lindera
melissifolia), and rough -leaf loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia). Bald eagle is also known to
occur in Bladen County and is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA). A
review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database records (updated April
2017), indicates no known occurrences of any federally -listed species within a one -mile radius of
the project area. It has been determined that the proposed project will have no effect on any of the
federally listed threatened or endangered species known to occur in Bladen County.
Suitable habitat for northern long-eared bat, American chaffseed, pondberry, and rough -leaf
loosestrife is present within the project study area. Tree clearing activities will take place outside
of the NLEB summer pupping season (mid-June to end of July); therefore, the project will have no
effect on this species. Surveys were conducted in areas of suitable habitat for the plant species.
Due to the lack of individuals observed and the lack of known occurrences, it has been determined
that the proposed project will have no effect on American chaffseed, pondberry, or rough -leaf
loosestrife.
Cultural Resources: The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWeb GIS Service was
reviewed on May 1, 2017 to determine if any historic resources occurred in the vicinity of the
project. The review of the SHPO HPOWeb GIS Service revealed four historical resources listed as
occurring within 1.0 -mile of Smithfield Foods' property. Three of the historical resources identified
within 1.0 -mile of the property are listed as Surveyed Only (SO), and the fourth is listed as
Determined Eligible, Gone (DOE, Gone). No National Register (NR) or Study List (SL) historical sites
are listed as occurring in or within 1.0 -mile of the property. In addition, undeveloped land within
the property has been historically timbered and cleared for utility easements and a railroad right -of
way. Due to the size and function of the existing facility as well as historical disturbance, it is
anticipated that there will be no impacts to any historical or archaeological sites.
Proposed Impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands will be avoided and minimized to the extent
practical. However, the Preferred Alternative will result in 2.81 acres of permanent impacts to
wetland W1 and 0.015 acres of permanent impacts to wetland W3.
Development of the proposed project would require the placement of fill material into wetlands
for the construction of a proposed parking lot and staging area, the interior transportation
network, and the associated grading footprint.
iii

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Mitigation: Smithfield Foods will be responsible for mitigation associated with the construction of
the proposed project. Smithfield Foods proposes to mitigate for permanent impacts to wetlands by
purchasing both riparian and non -riparian wetland mitigation credits from the NC Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee (ILF) program.
Due to the relative wetland size and position within the watershed, a 2:1 mitigation ratio will be
applied to offset unavoidable impacts to all wetlands within the project area. With a 2:1 mitigation
ratio, the proposed project requires a total of 0.01 acre of riparian wetland mitigation credits and
5.62 acres of non -riparian wetland mitigation credits. However, the DMS calculates fees for
wetland mitigation credits in quarter -acre increments and there is a flat fee for each increment of
0.25 acres. Therefore, the total wetland mitigation credits that are proposed to be purchased for
the project through the ILF program is 0.25 acre of riparian wetland mitigation credits, and 5.75
acres of non -riparian wetland mitigation credits.
Smithfield Foods has requested an in -lieu fee payment from DMS due to the lack of private
mitigation banks located in the primary, secondary, or tertiary service areas, the anticipated credit
need for this project, and the expected timeline for permit review. DMS has accepted Smithfield's
request for in -lieu fee payment for up to 6.5 acres of non -riparian wetland mitigation credits and
0.25 acre of riparian wetland mitigation credits.
Other Required Authorizations: Other required authorizations will be obtained prior to
construction of the proposed work. These authorizations include:
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR),
A Stormwater Permit application and accompanying Stormwater Management Plan is not
required by Bladen County. A General Stormwater Permit with NC Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) is currently on file for the existing property, however this
project will be required to obtain a new General Stormwater Permit with NCDEQ.
• As part of the 401 General Certification requirements, a Sediment and Erosion Control
Plan/Land Disturbance Permit will be required by NCDEQ.
1V

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Contents
1.0 The Applicant/Project Overview, Location, Existing Site Conditions, Project Description ...... 1
1.1 The Applicant/ Project Overview..................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Location...............................................................................................................
1
1.3 Existing Site Conditions....................................................................................................
2
1.3.1 Land Use...............................................................................................................2
1.3.2 Topography..........................................................................................................3
1.3.3 Jurisdictional Features.........................................................................................
3
1.3.4 North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM)...................................
5
1.3.6 Soils......................................................................................................................
7
1.3.7 Vegetation............................................................................................................8
1.3.8 CAMA Regulated Areas....................................................................................................
9
1.3.9 Protected Species and Habitat.............................................................................
9
1.3.10 Historical and/or Archaeological Sites................................................................
11
1.3.11 Regulated Floodplain..........................................................................................
11
1.3.12 Zoning.................................................................................................................
11
2.0 Project Description.......................................................................................................................
12
2.1 Land Ownership.............................................................................................................
12
2.2 Construction Sequence.....................................................................................................
12
2.3 Proposed Impacts.............................................................................................................
13
2.4 Stormwater Quality Controls............................................................................................
14
3.0 The Public Need............................................................................................................................
15
4.0 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................
16
5.0 Scope of Analysis: ...................................................................................................................
16
6.0 Other Federal, State, and Local Authorizations Obtained or Required and Pending ............
16
6.1 State Water Quality (401) Certification.........................................................................
16
6.2 Stormwater Permit........................................................................................................
17
6.3 Sedimentation and Erosion Control Permit...................................................................
17
7.0 Project Alternatives/Alternatives Considered........................................................................
17
7.1 Avoidance (No action, uplands, and availability of other sites) ....................................
1.7
7.1.1 No -Action Alternative........................................................................................
18
7.1.2 Off -Site Alternatives...........................................................................................
18
7.2 Minimization (modified project designs, etc.)...............................................................
19
7.2.1 On -Site Alternatives..............................................................................................
19
7.2.2 Preferred Alternative............................................................................................
25
7.2.3 On -Site Minimization of Unavoidable Impacts .....................................................
26
7.3 Conclusion of Alternatives Analysis...............................................................................
26
8.0 Mitigation......................................................................................................................................
27
9.1 Factual determinations..................................................................................................
28
9.1.2 Water circulation, fluctuation, and salinity.......................................................
28
9.1.3 Suspended particulate/turbidity........................................................................
29
9.1.4 Contaminant availability....................................................................................
29
9.1.5 Aquatic ecosystem effects.................................................................................
29
u

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
9.1.6 Proposed disposal site.......................................................................................
29
9.1.7 Cumulative effects.............................................................................................
30
9.1.8 Secondary effects...............................................................................................
31
10.0 Public Interest Review............................................................................................................
32
10.1 Public Interest Factors...................................................................................................
32
10.1.1 Conservation......................................................................................................
32
10.1.2 Economics..........................................................................................................
32
10.1.3 General environmental concerns (33CFR320.4(p))...........................................
32
10.1.4 Wetlands(33CFR320.4(b)).................................................................................
32
10.1.5 Historic and cultural resources(33CFR320.4(e))...............................................
33
10.1.6 Fish and wildlife values (33CFR320.4(c))...........................................................
33
10.1.7 Flood hazards.....................................................................................................
35
10.1.8 Floodplain values (33CFR320.4(I)).....................................................................
35
10.1.9 Land use.............................................................................................................36
10.1.10 Navigation (33CFR320.4(o))...........................................................................
36
10.1.11 Shore erosion and accretion..........................................................................
36
10.1.12 Recreation......................................................................................................
36
10.1.13 Water supply(33CFR320.4(m))......................................................................
36
10.1.14 Water quality (also 33CFR320.4(d))...............................................................
36
10.1.15 Energy needs(33CFR320.4(n)).......................................................................
37
10.1.16 Safety..............................................................................................................37
10.1.17 Food and fiber production.............................................................................
37
10.1.18 Mineral needs................................................................................................
37
10.1.20 Considerations of property ownership..........................................................
37
11.0 Indirect and Cumulative Impacts............................................................................................
37
V1

Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Aerial Photograph (2014)
Figure 3: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4: NRCS Soils Map
Figure 5: Jurisdictional Features Map
Figure 6a -6b: Overall Site Plan
Appendices
Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Appendix A: On -Site Project Alternatives
Appendix B: Site Photographs
Appendix C: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix D: Permit Drawings
Appendix E: Adjacent Property Owners and Addresses
Appendix F: NCWAM Data Forms
Appendix G: Mitigation
Appendix H: NCNHP Letter
VII

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
1.0 The Applicant/Project Overview, Location, Existing Site
Conditions, Project Description
1.1 The Applicant/ Project Overview
This document is intended to provide supplementary information in support of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) preparation of the Public Notice, Environmental
Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, Statement of Findings, and Review and
Compliance Determination according to the 404(b)(1) guidelines for the proposed cold
storage distribution center expansion in Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina.
Smithfield Foods, Inc. (Smithfield Foods) is a global packaged meats company
headquartered in Smithfield, Virginia. The company operates farms, facilities, and
offices in the United States, Mexico, England, Poland, and Romania, where they employ
approximately 52,000 people.
As an environmentally conscious company, Smithfield Foods employs a Chief
Sustainability Officer who helps oversee the company's practices. Smithfield Foods
sustainability practice operates under the following six pillars: animal care, people,
environment, food safety and quality, helping communities, and value creation. Under
this operation, Smithfield Foods received 57 Environmental Recognition Awards from
the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) in 2016. These awards are bestowed upon
organizations that go beyond environmental compliance by designing and successfully
implementing plant upgrades or environmental programs. In addition, in 2013 the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality presented a Smithfield Foods facility with
its Environmental Excellence Silver Award. The Smithfield Foods' facility was granted
this award due to their environmental efforts in successfully reducing solid waste by
60%, water use by 17%, energy use by 13%, and greenhouse gas emissions by 20% from
2008 to 2012.
The company opened its existing food processing facility in Tar Heel, North Carolina in
1991. This existing facility is located immediately adjacent to the east side of the
proposed expansion area, west of NC 87. The facility specializes in fresh pork and case
ready fresh pork products and currently employees approximately 4,833 workers.
Smithfield's Tar Heel North Carolina plant is the largest hog harvesting facility in the
world.
1.2 Project Location
Smithfield is proposing the development of a cold storage distribution center located
adjacent to their existing food processing facility situated 1.8 miles north of the
intersection of NC Highway 87 and NC Highway 131 in Tar Heel, Bladen County, North
Carolina. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the project area location. The approximately 77 -
acre project area is contained within the larger 154 -acre delineation study area, both of

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
which are contained within the 532 -acre property parcels owned by Smithfield Packing
Realty Partnership, a subsidiary of Smithfield Foods, Inc. The property is bounded by NC
Highway 87 to the east, Goodman Swamp to the west, farmland to the north, and
forestland to the south.
A detailed delineation was conducted within the 154 -acre delineation study area to
identify stream and wetland areas that would need to be avoided or where impact
footprints would need to be minimized as part of the final project layout. Detailed
avoidance and minimization discussion is included in Section 7.
1.3 Existing Site Conditions
The 77 -acre project area is composed of roughly 23.7 acres of forested land crossed by
old farm roads and sanitary sewer and overhead powerline utility easements. The
existing processing facility occupies the remaining 53.3 acres of the project area. Figure
2 shows a 2013 aerial photograph of the project area. Within the project area, there are
a total of 2.83 acres of forested wetlands, which drain to Goodman Swamp located west
of the Smithfield Foods property. The project is located in the Lumber River Basin (USGS
8 -digit HUC: 03040203).
Based upon the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Methodology (NCWAM)
classification system, the centrally located wetland W1 is classified as a basin wetland
(approximately 22.6 acres in total size with 2.81 acres located within the project area). A
small wetland (W3) is located in the western portion of the project area and is classified
as a headwater forest using NCWAM. W3 totals 0.015 acre in size, and is located entirely
within the project area.
Additionally, one jurisdictional ditch (JD1) was identified within the project area. Feature
JD1 originates at a culvert under an existing driveway and drains the parking lot and
upland areas of the existing facility. JD1 becomes jurisdictional at a point just southeast
of wetland W1, where a distinctive change in vegetation occurs and soils become hydric.
There are multiple permanent structures located within the project area, grouped into
three main areas: the existing processing facility is located in the southeastern corner of
the project area, a guard house with a covered carport is centrally located along the
entranceway near the eastern boundary of the project area, and a tractor trailer scale
house and weigh station are located between the existing processing facility and the
existing guardhouse. Photographs of the project area are included in Appendix B.
1.3.1 Land Use
Land uses within the project area include an existing food processing facility with
associated loading bays and parking, trailer staging areas, and undeveloped
mixed -hardwood forested tracts. Land use in the vicinity of the project area
consists primarily of agricultural development and undeveloped forested land.
N

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
1.3.2 Topography
The project is located in the coastal plain physiographic region of North Carolina.
Topography in the project vicinity is primarily flat with moderate slopes down to
large river systems. The project area abuts the Lumber River and Cape Fear River
watershed divide, which runs along NC Highway 87 within the project vicinity.
Elevations in the project area range from 125 to 140 feet above mean sea level
(MSL) (Figure 3 — USGS Topographic Map).
1.3.3 Jurisdictional Features
Figure 5 shows the delineated jurisdictional features evaluated by Kimley-Horn
staff on January 26, 2017, April 6, 2017, and April 14, 2017. Wetlands W1
through W4 and Jurisdictional Ditch JD1 were reviewed by US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) representative Tom Charles and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) representatives Jennifer Burdette and Chad
Turlington on March 21, 2017. Wetlands W5 and W6, and Jurisdictional Ditch
JD2 were delineated at a later date and have not been reviewed by the USACE or
NCDWR. The jurisdictional delineation was conducted utilizing the USACE
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0). The project area is located in
the Lumber River Basin, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 03040203.
Kimley-Horn staff evaluated the larger 154 -acre delineation study area in the
initial stages of the project, and identified 6 wetland features (Wetlands W1 -W6)
and 2 jurisdictional ditches (JD1 and JD2). Wetlands W2, W4, W5, and W6, and
Jurisdictional Ditch JD2 were all avoided by the proposed project. A large pocosin
wetland system located west of the project area was also avoided by the project
layout. The proposed project area will only impact Wetlands W1 and W3, and
Jurisdictional Ditch JD1.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (Pre JD) request for the delineation
study area is included as part of this permit application. Based upon the NCWAM
classification system, Wetlands W2, W3, and W5 are headwater forest wetlands,
Wetlands W1 and W6 are basin wetlands, and Wetland W4 is a pocosin wetland.
The proposed project impacts only two (W1 and W3) of the six wetlands that
were identified within the delineation study area. USACE wetland determination
data forms were completed for each of the features identified within the project
area as appropriate and are included as part of the Pre JD request.
No stream features are mapped as occurring in the delineation study area on the
most recent Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for
Bladen County (Figure 4), or the most recent USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Map.

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
The delineation study area is located just east of the Lumber River and Cape Fear
watershed divide and all waters in the project area drain west toward Goodman
Swamp. Goodman Swamp is a tributary to a larger swamp system called Big
Swamp, which eventually flows into the Lumber River. Goodman Swamp is
classified by NCDWR as a "C, SW" water. Class C waters are protected for
secondary recreational uses, and SW is a supplemental classification for Swamp
Waters. There are no Outstanding Resource Waters or High Quality Waters
located within ten miles of the project area.
The following paragraphs describe the wetlands that were delineated within the
delineation study area and are displayed on the attached Figure 5: Jurisdictional
Features Map.
Wetland W1 is an approximately 22.6 -acre forested basin wetland partially
located in the northwest portion of the delineation study area. There are 10.3
acres of Wetland W1 located within the delineation study area, of which 2.81
acres are within the project area. W1 drains offsite to the west through a
manmade jurisdictional ditch into an offsite wetland, eventually discharging into
Goodman Swamp. Wetland W1 is an elliptical depression that is angled from the
northwest to the southeast, typical of wetland features known as Carolina Bays.
Wetland W1 is generally bowl -shaped, which concentrates surface hydrology to
the central region of the wetland. No standing water was observed in the
wetland fringe; however, water was ponded to depths of 12" in the center of
W1.
Hummocks, buttressed trees, and drainage patterns indicate water ponds
throughout the interior of the wetland following storm events. The dominant
trees/shrubs observed at the wetland data form location included loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), water oak (Quercus nigra), ti -ti (Cyrilla
racemiflora), and sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana). Little to no herbaceous
vegetation was present at the wetland data form location at the time of
delineation, however woody vine species such as laurel greenbrier (Smilax
laurifolia) and common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) were present throughout
W1.
Wetland W2 is a 0.02 -acre headwater wetland located along the western border
of the delineation study area. Wetland W2 drains southwest offsite towards
Goodman Swamp. Wetland W2 is bound topographically by a manmade berm to
the east and an easement fillslope to the west. The soils are saturated near the
surface. Hydrology in wetland W2 is likely sourced from groundwater interface
and runoff from the surrounding easement and development. The dominant
trees/shrubs observed at the wetland data form location included loblolly pine
and red maple. Little to no herbaceous vegetation was present at the wetland
data form location at the time of delineation. Laurel greenbrier and common
greenbrier were present throughout wetland W2.
M

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Wetland W3 is a small 0.015 -acre headwater wetland located in the western
portion of the delineation study area. Wetland W3 is completely within the
project area. Hydrology within W3 is supported by groundwater levels and
surface runoff from the adjacent uplands and industrial development. The
wetland was dry at the time of observation, but hydric soil indicators, water
stained leaves, and a sparsely vegetated concave surface indicate the wetland
pools water frequently. Vegetation observed in wetland W3 includes red maple,
sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), and various sedges (Carex spp.).
Wetland W4 is a 27.7 -acre pocosin wetland located in the northwestern portion
of the delineation study area. There are 3.0 acres of wetland W4 within the
delineation study area. Wetland W4 drains northwest offsite to a relatively
permanent water (RPW) which eventually discharges into Goodman Swamp. W4
has been historically altered by offsite agricultural ditches. Similar to the other
wetlands, W4 was dry at the time of observation. Hummocks and drainage
patterns were present throughout the wetland. The dominant trees/shrubs
observed in wetland W4 were loblolly pine, red maple, gallberry (Ilex glabra), ti -
ti, and fetterbush (Lyonia lucida). Herbaceous vegetation was sparse, and limited
to giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea) along the margins of wetland W4. Laurel
greenbrier and common greenbrier were present throughout W4.
Wetland W5 is a 1.49 -acre forested headwater wetland located in the southwest
portion of the delineation study area, south of wetland W2. Wetland W5 is
disconnected from W2 by a gravel drive, however the two wetlands likely share
subterranean hydrology. The dominant trees/shrubs observed in wetland W5
were red maple, loblolly pine, and sweetgum. Herbaceous vegetation in wetland
W5 was sparse, and limited to giant cane. Laurel greenbrier and common
greenbrier were present throughout W5.
Wetland W6 is a 0.12 -acre basin wetland located in the southeastern portion of
the delineation study area within an overhead electric utility corridor. Wetland
W6 is a linear wetland depression that receives stormwater from the adjacent
food processing plant. Standing water was observed to a depth of 4 inches
within Wetland W6. The standing water appeared to persist within Wetland W6
for extended periods of time as evidenced by depleted soils, algae, and distinct
hydrophytic vegetation. Wetland W6 has a surface water connection to
downstream jurisdictional waters through a ditch and culvert system that drains
south and offsite. Wetland W6 appears to be mowed and maintained frequently
and was dominated by herbaceous vegetation such as cattail (Typha latifolia),
soft rush (Juncus effusus), and water primrose (Ludwigia alternifolia).
1.3.4 North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM)
In order to evaluate the level of function for the wetland systems within the
project area, the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM)
5

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
(Version 5.0) was utilized. This assessment methodology evaluates the following
three major wetland functions and associated sub -functions: 1) hydrology
(surface storage and retention and sub -surface storage and retention), 2) water
quality (pathogen change, particulate change, soluble change, physical change,
and pollution change), and 3) habitat (physical structure, landscape patch
structure, and vegetation composition).
Functional ratings are applied to each wetland assessment area in comparison to
reference conditions of one of the sixteen North Carolina general wetland types.
Field evaluations of representative wetland assessment areas within each of the
two delineated wetlands were conducted on April 6, 2017 and April 14, 2017.
Data collected during these site evaluations, as well as the extensive data
collected during the wetland delineation efforts, was utilized as part of the
NCWAM evaluation.
The following table summarizes the results of the NCWAM analysis for the two
wetlands evaluated in the project area. NCWAM data forms are included in
Appendix F.
Table 1. Summary of NCWAM Results
Wetland
Community
NCWAM
Man-made
Function Rating
Overall
ID
Type
Reference
Alteration/
Summary
Wetland
Wetland
Disturbance
Rating
Type
Mixed
Hydrology — Med.
Basin
W1
Hardwood
Yes
Water Qual. — High
Medium
Wetland
Forest
Habitat — High
Hydrology — Med.
Mixed
Headwater
W3
Hardwood
Yes
Water Qual. — Low
Low
Forest
Forest
Habitat — Low
In summary, the two wetland types observed within the project area were basin
wetland (W1) and headwater forest (W3). The basin wetland was found to have
a "Medium" qualitative rating due to the overall size, connectivity, and relatively
minor disturbance to the wetland interior. The headwater forest wetland within
the project area has a "Low" overall wetland rating due to the small size, lack of
6

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
connectivity, and the influence of adjacent development on the wetland system.
The wetlands delineated within the study area, but located outside of the project
area were pocosin wetlands and headwater forest wetlands; however, offsite
wetlands were not evaluated using NCWAM.
1.3.6 Soils
Based on information obtained in the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for Bladen
County, the soils within the project area are composed of nine soil series. Table 2
summarizes the characteristics of each soil series in the project area.
Soils within the project area are well drained (Norfolk, Udorthents, and Wagram
soil series), moderately well drained (Goldsboro soil series), somewhat poorly
drained (Lynchburg and Ocilla soil series), poorly drained (Rains and Woodington
soil series), or very poorly drained mineral (Pantego soil series) soils.
Table 2. Soils within the project Site
*- soils which are primarily non -hydric, but which may contain hydric inclusions
The soils underlying the forested wetland systems in the project area are Rains
fine sandy loam and Wagram fine sand. The existing processing facility is
7
Map
Drainage
percentage
Hydric
Soil Series Name
Symbol
Class
of Site
Status
Goldsboro sandy loam (0-3% slopes)
GbA
Moderately well
1.8%
Hydric*
drained
Lynchburg fine sandy loam (0-2%
Somewhat poorly
slopes)
LnA
drained
o
2.4/o
Non -Hydric
Norfolk loamy fine sand (0-2% slopes)
NoA
Well drained
46.5%
Hydric*
Ocilla loamy sand
Oc
Somewhat poorly
o
2.0%
Hydric *
drained
Pantego loam
Pe
Very poorly drained
2.0%
Hydric
Rains fine sandy loam (0-2% slopes)
RaA
Poorly drained
9.8%
Hydric
Udorthents, loamy
Ud
Well drained
<1%
Non -hydric
Wagram fine sand
WaB
Well drained
28.4%
Hydric*
Woodington loamy sand
Wo
Poorly drained
7.0%
Hydric
*- soils which are primarily non -hydric, but which may contain hydric inclusions
The soils underlying the forested wetland systems in the project area are Rains
fine sandy loam and Wagram fine sand. The existing processing facility is
7

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
underlain primarily by Norfolk loamy fine sand with smaller pockets of Goldsboro
sandy loam, Rains fine sandy loam, and Ocilla loamy sand soil series.
1.3.7 Vegetation
The 77 -acre project area is dominated by existing industrial development, but
large areas of undeveloped forest lands are present in the northern and western
ends of the project area. The forested areas in the project area are a mix of basin
wetland areas, headwater forests, and upland pine -dominated forests. The
wetland systems in the project area comprise approximately 3.7% of the project
area.
Brief descriptions of the forested communities, as well as common species
observed in each community type, are provided below.
Basin Wetland
Wetland W1 in the project area is a basin wetland system. The dominant
trees/shrubs observed in the basin wetland on the project area include Loblolly
pine, red maple, water oak, sweetgum, bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), ti -ti,
and loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus). The dominant herbaceous plants and
vines include netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), laurel greenbrier, and
common greenbrier.
The shape, topography, and general orientation of W1 appear to be consistent
with a Carolina bay, and is surrounded by upland forests of varying widths. A
frequently maintained overhead electric utility corridor runs along the western
boundary of W1. A constructed ditch feature, located north of the study area
and project area but located within the Smithfield property, connects the
interior portion of W1 to the large pocosin wetland system located west of the
project area. The basin wetland on the Site is appears to be seasonally saturated
and intermittently to seasonally inundated with surface water following periods
of high rainfall or in conjunction with a seasonal high water table condition. The
interior depressional portions of the wetland was observed multiple times
inundated to depths of approximately 12 inches, and a high water table (within
12 inches of the surface) was typically observed throughout W1
Headwater Forest
Vegetation was sparse within the headwater forest community. The canopy and
understory species observed within this community consist of loblolly pine, red
maple, and sweetgum. The herbaceous and vine species include sedges (Carex
spp.), laurel greenbrier, and common greenbrier.
The headwater forest system receives hydrology primarily from groundwater,
precipitation events, and overland flows from adjacent uplands. The headwater
N.

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
forest areas in the project area is subject to ponding following significant
precipitation events.
Pine -Dominated Forest
The dominant trees/shrubs observed in the pine -dominated forest community
on the Site included loblolly pine, red maple, sweet gum, and tulip poplar. The
understory was dominated by various huckleberry species (Vaccinium spp.).
Areas of pine -dominated forest are present throughout the study area. These
areas are likely remnant pockets that were once managed for silviculture
production, but were allowed to revegetate naturally after a clear-cut harvest.
Canopy species observed included loblolly pine, red maple, sweetgum, and tulip
poplar. The understory consists of loblolly pine, sweetgum, red maple, tulip
poplar, eastern redcedar, and American holly. Herbaceous and vine species
observed were blackberry, grape vine, common greenbrier, and Japanese
honeysuckle.
1.3.8 CAMA Regulated Areas
The project is located in Bladen County and is therefore not subject to regulation
by the NC Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA).
1.3.9 Protected Species and Habitat
As of July 21, 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists seven federally
threatened or endangered species protected under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) known to occur in Bladen County, including American alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis), northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis), wood stork (Mycteria Americana), American
chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), pondberry (Lindera melissifolia), and rough -
leaf loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia). Bald eagle is also known to occur in
Bladen County and is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(BGPA). A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
database records (updated April 2017), indicates no known occurrences of any
federally -listed species within a one -mile radius of the project area. The formal
NCNHP database record search letter with findings is included in Appendix H.
The American alligator is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance,
and, therefore, does not require Section 7 consultation with USFWS. Suitable
habitat for American alligator is not present within the study area due to the lack
of perennial features present. In addition, a review of the NCNHP database
records (updated April 2017), indicates no known American alligator occurrences
within a 1.0 -mile radius of the proposed project.
M

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
During the agency scoping meeting held on April 11, 2017, Kathy Matthews of
the USFWS explained that surveys for northern long-eared bat (NLEB) have been
conducted on the opposite side of Bladen County. In addition, Kathy advised that
any tree clearing activities associated with the proposed project should take
place outside of the NLEB summer pupping season. Since no known roost trees
or occurrences of NLEB have been recorded in or within 1.0 mile of the project
area and all tree clearing activities will take place outside of summer pupping
season, it has been determined that the proposed project will have no effect on
this species.
Habitat evaluations were conducted within the forested portions of the property
for red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) nesting and foraging habitat in January and
April 2017. The dense understory found within the project area and the large
number of hardwoods precludes these areas from providing suitable nesting
habitat for the RCW. Potentially suitable foraging habitat is located in the
southwestern corner of the project area; however, based on historic aerials, this
area was cleared less than 30 years ago, and the area was found to contain a
dense understory. In addition, the NCNHP database (updated April 2017) has no
records, historical or current, of RCW individuals or cavity trees within one mile
of the proposed project. Based upon this information, it has been determined
that the proposed project will have no effect on the RCW.
Suitable habitat for wood stork is not present within the project area. For
nesting, feeding, and roosting, wood stork requires open freshwater or estuarine
wetlands that are seasonally flooded. The wetlands within the project area are
dense with vegetation and do not pool water long enough to provide an
adequate feeding habitat for wood stork. In addition, the NCNHP database
records (updated April 2017), indicate no known occurrences of wood stork in or
within a 1.0 -mile radius of the proposed project. Based on the lack of suitable
habitat and the lack of known occurrences, it is anticipated that the proposed
project will have no effect on the wood stork.
Suitable habitat for American chaffseed is present along the power line rights-of-
way and the maintained drives located within project area. Kimley-Horn
biologists conducted field surveys of the suitable habitat on May 16, 2017. No
individuals of American chaffseed were observed within the project area. In
addition, the NCNHP database (updated April 2017) has no records, historical or
current, of American chaffseed within 1.0 mile of the proposed project. Due to
the lack of individuals observed and the lack of known occurrences, it has been
determined that the proposed project will have no effect on American chaffseed.
Suitable habitat for pondberry is present within wetland W1 in the project area.
Kimley-Horn biologists conducted field surveys within the area of suitable
habitat on May 16, 2017 and no Lindera species were observed. Additionally, a
review of the NCNHP database records (updated April 2017), indicates no known
10

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
occurrences of pondberrry in or within a 1.0 -mile radius to the project area. Due
to the lack of individuals observed and the lack of known occurrences, it has
been determined that the proposed project will have no effect on pondberry.
Suitable habitat for rough -leaf loosestrife is present in the power line rights-of-
way, in the center of wetland W1, and within the ditches along the maintained
drives located within the project area. Kimley-Horn biologists conducted field
surveys within these areas of suitable habitat on May 16, 2017, and no
individuals were observed. In addition, the NCNHP database (updated April
2017) has no records, historical or current, of rough -leaf loosestrife within 1.0
mile of the proposed project. Due to the lack of individuals observed and the lack
of known occurrences, it has been determined that the proposed project will
have no effect on rough -leaf loosestrife.
1.3.10 Historical and/or Archaeological Sites
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWeb GIS Service was reviewed
on May 1, 2017 to determine if any historic resources occurred in the vicinity of
the project. As a result of the SHPO HPOWeb GIS Service review, four historical
resources were listed as occurring within 1.0 -mile of Smithfield Foods' property.
The Walter Robeson House (located approximately 5,000 feet north of the
property), the Robeson -Moore House & Kitchen (located approximately 1,300
feet northeast of the property), and the A. Hobson Singletary house (located
approximately 1,000 feet south of the property) are all listed as Surveyed Only
(SO). The Cape Fear River Bridge (Gone) 2005 which is located approximately
4,700 feet east of the property is listed as Determined Eligible, Gone (DOE,
Gone). No National Register (NR) or Study List (SL) historical sites are listed as
occurring in or within 1.0 -mile of the Property. In addition, undeveloped land
within the property has been historically timbered and cleared for utility
easements and a railroad right -of way. Due to the size and function of the
existing facility as well as historical disturbance, it is anticipated that there will be
no impacts to any historical or archaeological sites.
1.3.11 Regulated Floodplain
A search of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program's Flood Risk
Information System (accessed May 1, 2017) indicated that the project site is not
located within a 100 -year floodplain as designated by FEMA Flood Insurance
Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 3720034600K, effective January 5, 2007.
1.3.12 Zoning
The project area is situated on property parcels that are currently zoned as an
Industrial District by Bladen County. The proposed project is consistent with the
allowable uses for an Industrial District in accordance with the Bladen County's
Code of Ordinances.
11

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
2.0 Project Description
The proposed project will consist of the construction of an approximately 495,175 square foot
cold storage distribution center (providing approximately 48,000 pallet positions) and
associated truck staging areas connected to the existing Smithfield Foods processing facility.
The new cold storage distribution center will employ approximately 200 additional people
when it begins operations, scheduled for 2018. Currently, pork product processed at the
Smithfield facility is loaded onto trucks and taken to multiple off-site distribution centers for
storage prior to its eventual shipment to clients. The proposed on-site cold storage distribution
center would eliminate transporting the processed product off-site (reduction of approximately
60-80 truck trips per day) and eliminate the need for the multiple storage/distribution centers.
In addition, the proposed project would improve employee safety by separating truck traffic
from employee traffic, improve Smithfield Foods' compliance with Food Safety Modernization
Act (FSMA) guidelines, and improve the safety of Smithfield Foods' customers by further
separating raw materials from finished goods. As part of the cold storage distribution center
construction, the following components would be constructed:
• Separate entrance routes for truck/trailer access and automobile access;
• Rack storage and pallet areas for staging finished goods associated with each
zone;
• Refrigerated product loading docks and loaded trailer staging areas;
• Stormwater swale and rip -rap level spreader.
The project is scheduled to be constructed in three parts as shown on Figure 6a -6b, with
construction of the initial two sequences (located entirely in uplands) currently underway and
scheduled for completion in 2017. The third and final sequence would construct the cold
storage distribution center and associated trailer storage and staging, and is anticipated to
begin within the next year.
2.1 Land Ownership
The current project property parcel is owned by Smithfield Packing Realty Partnership, a
subsidiary of Smithfield Foods, Inc. The property is bounded by NC Highway 87 to the
east, Goodman Swamp to the west, farmland to the north, and forestland to the south.
The project property parcel has been operating as a processing plant since 1991.
The names and addresses of each adjacent property owner are included in Appendix E.
2.2 Construction Sequence
Smithfield Foods plans to construct new blast freezing rooms, palletizing areas, office
space, a new employee parking area, two new truck entry roads, a new cold storage
12

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
distribution center with trailer staging and storage lots, and all associated infrastructure
connected to their existing food processing plant.
The initial two construction sequences are underway and will construct the new blast
freezing rooms, palletizing areas, entry roads, new employee parking lot, and office
space. These construction areas are located entirely in uplands and will have no impacts
to any jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The grading contractor already has approved
erosion control permits for this portion of the work. Entry roads into the property will
be re -paved and utilities will either be relocated and/or installed as needed.
Following approval/issuance of the Section 404/401 permit, the work will expand to the
entire site layout. Clearing and grubbing will be followed by mass excavation and
preparations for full construction logistics setup. In this final sequence, the new
distribution center, trailer staging and storage, a new weigh station, a stormwater
detention pond, and all associated infrastructure will be constructed.
2018 will see an increase in site personnel as construction activities transition to the
third sequence of the project. Earthwork activities will begin to slow, but logistics
support, and erosion control maintenance will continue throughout the year. Power
consumption will increase during this year as well.
2.3 Proposed Impacts
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands will be avoided and minimized to the extent practical.
However, permanent impacts to jurisdictional areas will be unavoidable. These
unavoidable permanent impacts within the project area will be necessary for
construction of the project. Impacts necessary for the proposed project total 2.83 acres
of permanent wetland impacts and 0.01 acres of permanent impacts to jurisdictional
ditches. Each permanent impact area is depicted in the attached Permit Drawings
(Appendix D) and summarized in Table 3.
13

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Table 3. Wetland and Stream Impact Summary
Impact
Feature
Feature Type
Type of
Permanent
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Ratio
Site
ID
1
W1
Basin
Fill
2.81
2:1
Wetland
2
JD1
Jurisdictional
Fill
0.01
N/A
Ditch
3
W3
Headwater
Fill
0.015
2:1
Forest
Development of the project requires the placement of fill material into wetlands for the
construction of a cold storage distribution center and the corresponding parking lot and
loading bay. Fill would also be required for construction of internal access roads around
the new development connecting the distribution center to NC Highway 87. On-site
utility corridors (water, sewer, electricity) will be located within the limits of disturbance
as shown on Figure 6a -6b. No additional wetland impacts will occur as a result of utility
encroachments.
2.4 Stormwater Quality Controls
The Smithfield Foods facility is located on a 532 -acre parcel with approximately 128
acres of existing impervious which is 24.1% of the total site area. The proposed project
will add approximately 30 acres of impervious area resulting in a total impervious site
area of 29.7%.
Itemized stormwater management design considerations for the project include:
• The existing site is divided into 2 existing drainage areas discharging from
the site. The proposed linear basin contributes to a wetland feature
located on and off the site. The site primarily consists of tree covered
area and an existing industrial facility.
• The proposed project will consist of 1 building, new access roads, paved
trailer parking, and trailer weighing stations. A portion of the stormwater
runoff will be collected within an underground detention stormwater
system. This system will be drained via a stormwater pump that will
discharge into the existing wetland via a drainage channel. The
14

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
remaining stormwater will sheet flow across the proposed trailer parking
into the wetland. Stormwater post -construction discharge will be
reduced to non-erosive velocities utilizing rip -rap aprons/level spreader
or other best management practices deemed appropriate by the
engineer.
• During construction, the entire limits of disturbance will be enclosed with
silt fence. Land disturbance adjacent to existing wetlands will utilize a
minimum double silt fence.
The proposed level spreader will be required to be located along the northern side of
the proposed trailer parking area within wetland W1 due to the flat topography of the
site not allowing for gravity drainage outside of the existing wetland limits. This option
will allow non-erosive stormwater discharges into the wetland. The device will be
constructed within the limits of disturbance of the parking area and would not result in
additional wetland impacts. If the level spreader were to be located outside of the
wetland within an upland area, the parking lot would have to be extended
approximately 800 feet to achieve gravity drainage and would result in additional
impacts to W1.
3.0 The Public Need
Foodborne illness is a substantial burden on American citizens. The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) estimates about 48 million people (or 1 in 6 Americans) get sick from
foodborne illnesses in a given year. Of those 48 million, roughly 128,000 people are
hospitalized, and about 3,000 people die from the illness. In response to this burden, the FDA
proposed the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 (FSMA). FSMA works to reduce foodborne
illness through improvements in the food supply chain, including the implementation of new
transportation requirements. The Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food; Final
Rule (81 FR 20091), part of the FSMA, went into effect June 6, 2016. The ruling tasks food
production companies with necessary improvements to both their transportation vessels and
facilities.
The construction of a new cold storage distribution center connected to the existing food
processing facility will allow Smithfield to control the transportation, storage, and distribution
of their produce. Currently, Smithfield transports fresh and case ready pork products to various
storage and distribution centers throughout the region. Involved in this is the loading,
transportation, and unloading of food products — three areas that FSMA has targeted for
improved standards. The new cold storage and distribution center attached to the existing
plant will cut out unnecessary product handling and transporting. By reducing the amount of
transporting and handling, Smithfield will be able to better store and distribute food that is safe
for consumers and ahead of the FDA standards.
15

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
In addition to providing a better product to customers, constructing a new cold storage
distribution center attached to the existing processing facility will allow Smithfield Foods to
significantly reduce the amount of trucks leaving their largest and most productive facility. The
expansion will reduce outgoing trucks by an estimated 60-80 trucks per day. This reduction will
greatly reduce truck traffic on regional highways and interstates.
4.0 Project Purpose and Need
Smithfield Foods' purpose is to construct a finished goods cold storage distribution center tied
to their existing food processing facility to consolidate product distribution for the region. The
project is necessary to increase product distribution efficiency, reduce truck trips/traffic,
improve employee safety, improve food safety, and further separate raw product from finished
goods during the material processing operations as dictated by the Food Safety Modernization
Act.
5.0 Scope of Analysis:
The proposed work will benefit pork consumers across the United States, as well as in the State
of North Carolina, Bladen County, and the Town of Tar Heel by providing jobs and expanding
the local tax base. The primary financial beneficiary of the proposed project would be the
Applicant, Smithfield, a privately -owned corporation. The entirety of the project is anticipated
to be privately funded. In addition to the requirement to obtain a Section 404 permit, the only
other federal involvement in the proposed project is USFWS coordination. There are no
practicable alternatives to the proposed plan that would further avoid or minimize impacts to
waters of the U.S., and meet the Applicant's purpose and need, save the proposed impacts.
6.0 Other Federal, State, and Local Authorizations Obtained or
Required and Pending
Smithfield will obtain all permits and approvals required by federal, state, and local laws and
regulations prior to the construction and operation of the Facility.
6.1 State Water Quality (401) Certification
The NCDWR 401 certification application is submitted concurrent to this 404 permit
application.
16

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
6.2 Stormwater Permit
A Stormwater Permit application and accompanying Stormwater Management Plan is
not required by Bladen County. A General Stormwater Permit with NC Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) is currently on file for the existing property, however
this project will be required to obtain a new General Stormwater Permit with NCDEQ.
6.3 Sedimentation and Erosion Control Permit
As part of the 401 General Certification requirements, a Sediment and Erosion Control
Plan/Land Disturbance Permit will be required by NCDEQ.
7.0 Project Alternatives/Alternatives Considered
The purpose of the proposed development is to consolidate Smithfield Foods' finished goods
distribution through the construction of a new cold storage distribution center connected to
their largest existing food processing facility in Tar Heel, North Carolina. In addition to
consolidating regional distribution, the project is also intended to create a safer workplace for
the employees by separating truck and automobile traffic, and address items related to the
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) guidelines. As part of the development process,
numerous on-site alternatives were analyzed. Based on the factors considered below,
Smithfield Foods has demonstrated there are no practical off-site alternatives that achieve the
projects above stated purposes. Smithfield Foods has also demonstrated that they have
reviewed alternative on-site alignments as well as the environmental consequences of each
plan, and that the proposed alignment (Preferred Alternative) minimizes and avoids the most
impacts to aquatic resources while still meeting the projects purpose and goals.
7.1 Avoidance (No action, uplands, and availability of other sites)
As the largest pork production facility in the world, the processing facility accounts for a
significant amount of packaged pork products in the region. Currently, the products
generated from the facility are being transported to various third -party distribution
centers, and then transported again to Smithfield Foods' customers. The addition of a
cold storage distribution center tied to the existing processing facility will have a
significant impact on the regional truck traffic generated from this single facility. In
addition to consolidating transportation activities, the expansion will improve Smithfield
Foods' ability to comply with The Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food;
Final Rule (81 FR 20091), a part of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The ruling
tasks food production companies with necessary improvements to both their
transportation vessels and facilities. These guidelines will be more easily met by having
the distribution center tied to the existing facility to ensure minimal handling and
transportation of finished goods. The project also intends to improve worker and visitor
17

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
safety by dividing truck and automobile traffic, and ensure raw and finished good
separation.
7.1.1 No -Action Alternative
The No -Action Alternative means that Smithfield Foods' proposed project would
not be implemented, and the resulting environmental effects from taking no
action would serve as a baseline from which to compare the effects of permitting
the proposed project or an alternative to proceed.
Smithfield Foods is currently operating under the no action (i.e. no permit
required) alternative which would not result in temporary or permanent impacts
to jurisdictional waters and wetlands. While this would be the least
environmentally damaging alternative, it is not practicable, and does not support
the project purpose and need. Therefore, a no -action alternative is not a viable
option for Smithfield Foods.
7.1.2 Off -Site Alternatives
Smithfield Foods currently utilizes off-site cold storage centers for their
distribution. The product produced by the existing processing facility is loaded
and shipped to multiple regional storage vendors who then ship the product to
Smithfield Foods' customers. A main objective of this project is to consolidate
finished goods distribution into one distribution center connected directly to the
processing plant to reduce the amount of outbound trucks, reduce the inventory
footprint, and increase food safety by eliminating unnecessary product handling
and transport. Constructing a single off-site distribution center would not satisfy
these objectives.
Off-site/upland alternatives would not meet Smithfield Food's objective of
consolidation of regional product distribution by having a finished goods
Distribution Center located at their existing food processing facility. Loading and
trucking the finished product to an off-site distribution center for storage and
eventual shipment to clients would be the same process that is currently
implemented and would not support the projects purpose and need. This would
also include the property currently under the ownership of Smithfield Foods
located to the east of Hwy 87. Although this off-site alternative is in close
proximity to the existing Smithfield facility and may have less wetlands areas,
this alternative would still involve the loading, transportation, and unloading of
food product and would not improve Smithfield Food's compliance with the
Food Safety Modernization Act guidelines. In addition, while this off-site
alternative may have a slight reduction in the number of trucks required for
transporting the product, there would still be a significant amount of truck traffic
required to enter/exist Highway 87 to transport the product from the processing
facility to the storage/distribution facility. Therefore, off-site alternatives are not
a viable option for Smithfield Foods.
IN

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
7.2 Minimization (modified project designs, etc.)
Smithfield Foods has made an effort to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands on the
project site while still allowing the development to remain operationally functional and
efficient as well as financially feasible. Impacts to wetlands were minimized through
design by reducing the width of the driveway isles within the trailer staging areas
located north of the proposed distribution center, and by tightening the proposed limits
of disturbance of the project. The Preferred Alternative was rendered from Alternative 5
(C5.0); however, Smithfield Foods has modified the project design to reduce and
minimize total wetland impacts by approximately 1.3 acres.
7.2.1 On -Site Alternatives
The development of the site plan layout was an iterative process based upon
numerous variables, but also including purposeful avoidance and minimization of
impacts to jurisdictional areas to the maximum extent possible.
Site planning evolved quickly with consideration to preliminary discussions with the
regulatory and resource agencies to identify critical areas and design constraints.
Therefore, the site layout incorporated design criteria intended to avoid and
minimize environmental impacts early in the design process. The design criteria
included the following:
• A 495,175 -square foot finished goods cold storage distribution center
(providing approximately 48,000 pallet positions to account for the volume
of product produced at the facility)
The required size of the new distribution center was determined thru an
inventory needs assessment and product production analysis. There
were many aspects that influenced the final size. These are some of the
factors:
— Smithfield Foods currently averages 35,000-40,000 finished goods
pallets in outside storage locations;
— Smithfield Foods' annual volume increase will be 9.89% this year;
— The production plant produces 4,000 +/- pallets per day;
— The industry standard factor for warehouse efficiency is 85%,
meaning that warehouse inventory levels should be around 85%
at all times. A factor of 90% was used to size this warehouse
which results in a smaller footprint;
— Total Size: ([40,000 x.0989] + 40,000 = 43,956). 43,956/.90 =
48,840 pallet positions.
19

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
The proposed warehouse has been sized to hold 49,000 pallets.
Producing 4,000 pallets per day means that the proposed warehouse will
hold approximately 12 days of inventory (less than two weeks), which is
much lower than industry standards and resulted in a smaller warehouse
footprint. Furthermore, the final size of the proposed warehouse reduces
Smithfield Foods' overall inventory footprint in North Carolina as the
product will be consolidated from multiple outside storage locations into
one efficient distribution center.
• 329 truck staging and storage positions tied to the distribution center for the
delivery of finished products
The proposed trailer staging is essential to the function and operation of
the new distribution center. These positions will be used to "stage"
inbound and outbound loads providing a buffer for the loading dock and
allowing trucks more flexibility to pick up and drop off loads. The
reduction of outside storage locations and sourcing from manufacturing
plants will drive the utilization of this staging lot. Consolidating loads
from multiple distribution centers into this new facility will require this
staging lot to maintain on average 329 staging locations. The size of this
lot was determined by the following:
— The facility will ship an estimated 144 loads of product per
day;
— The facility will average an additional 66 loads of product
stored in trailers for either outbound or inbound truck
pickups;
— An additional 48 loads per day will be shuttled and staged in
this lot from other manufacturing sites;
— Packaging materials will be staged in trailers and will require
10 spots;
— A buffer of 30 staging locations will need to be maintained for
efficiency and to manage on-site traffic;
— The rest of the spaces are replacing the staging locations that
will be removed due to the building expansion.
CI

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Having this number of staging positions will assist in a reduction of trucks
on the road by an estimated 10% in North Carolina, reduce the delivery
distance to customers by approximately 10%, and enhance food safety as
the product will not leave the site until it is shipped directly to the
customer.
• 260 new automobile parking spaces for additional employees and visitors
The proposed automobile parking spaces will be required as part of this
expansion. The exact number of spaces necessary was calculated by
factoring in the additional jobs created with the expansion and the
anticipated rise in visitors.
• Restriping and reconfiguration of the existing trailer storage areas at the
processing facility
• A new truck entrance at the north end of the facility to provide safe
separation of trucks entering/exiting the distribution center from employee's
entrance
• A new truck entrance at the south end of the facility to provide a safe
separation of live product delivery for processing from finished product
leaving the distribution center
• Construction of blast freezers to allow on-site storage of finished products
• A stormwater management swale and rip -rap level spreader to catch and
collect stormwater generated from the site
In addition to the design criteria detailed above, the on-site layout has to meet
certain spatial constraints. The new distribution center must be tied to the northern
end of the existing processing facility to maintain production flow at the plant, allow
operations to continue during construction, and keep finished goods separated from
raw goods. Additionally, the layout could not overlay the existing utility easement
along the western edge of the study area, the truck staging positions located west of
the existing facility, or the C.R. England facility to the north.
The following table and discussion compares the jurisdictional impacts of the site
alternatives considered in the site design process. The site plan for each alternative,
including the Preferred Alternative, is shown in Appendix A.
21

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Table 4. On -Site Alternatives Considered
Alternative 1 (C1.0 Original Master Plan)
This alternative layout was the original master plan for the Smithfield Foods
expansion. The building expansion consisted of 495,175 square feet. The location
of the new distribution center was established by the existing plant operations
and processing flow. The plant's process begins with raw material at the south
end of the plant and the process flows to the north. Finished goods are palletized
at the north end of the plant making this the ideal location for the new finished
goods distribution center. The new truck docks were oriented to the north,
which is the best approach for food safety and truck/trailer logistics as this
clearly separates raw goods from finished goods. The entire new trailer staging
area was positioned north of the distribution center and contained 390 trailer
spaces. This layout minimized impacts to the existing plant and existing trailer
staging area which was ideal from a manufacturing standpoint as the plant will
need to remain operational during construction.
22
USACE Jurisdictional
Jurisdictional Water/Ditch
Alternative
Wetlands Impact (acres)
Impact (acres)
Preferred Alternative
2.83
0.01
Alternative 1
9.28
0.01
(C1.0 Original)
Alternative 2
5.38
0.01
(C2.0)
Alternative 3
6.30
0.01
(C3.0)
Alternative 4
4.60
0.01
(C4.0)
Alternative 5
4.12
0.01
(C5.0)
Alternative 1 (C1.0 Original Master Plan)
This alternative layout was the original master plan for the Smithfield Foods
expansion. The building expansion consisted of 495,175 square feet. The location
of the new distribution center was established by the existing plant operations
and processing flow. The plant's process begins with raw material at the south
end of the plant and the process flows to the north. Finished goods are palletized
at the north end of the plant making this the ideal location for the new finished
goods distribution center. The new truck docks were oriented to the north,
which is the best approach for food safety and truck/trailer logistics as this
clearly separates raw goods from finished goods. The entire new trailer staging
area was positioned north of the distribution center and contained 390 trailer
spaces. This layout minimized impacts to the existing plant and existing trailer
staging area which was ideal from a manufacturing standpoint as the plant will
need to remain operational during construction.
22

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
In this option, the northern truck access drive was located north of the existing
C.R. England facility. This location is preferred as it is on property that Smithfield
Foods currently owns and does not impact the existing adjacent businesses. This
alternative was the best solution from a manufacturing and logistic standpoint.
Food safety is addressed by clearly separating raw and finished goods, truck
traffic is rerouted to create a safer traffic flow and does not impact adjacent
businesses, and impacts to the existing facility are minimized. However, this
alternative would have created the greatest wetland impacts. Alternative 1
would have resulted in 8.54 acres of impacts to Wetland W1, 0.015 acre of
impacts to Wetland W3, 0.72 acre of impacts to Wetland W4, and 0.01 acre of
impacts to Jurisdictional Ditch JD1. The total wetland impacts associated with
Alternative 1 was 9.28 acres. Further wetland avoidance measures were
employed for the Preferred Alternative reducing the jurisdictional wetland
impacts by more than 6.0 acres.
Alternative 2
This alternative looked at the possibility of reorienting the layout so that the
dock and dock doors for the new distribution center would face to the south.
The building remained at 495,175 square feet. The proposed northern truck
access drive remains north of the existing C.R. England facility and impacts
Wetland W4. As a result of orienting the docks to the south, additional trailer
staging spots were added to the south side of the facility. This allowed for a
reduction of trailer staging spots on the north side of the building which helped
reduce impacts to Wetland W1. In addition, Smithfield Foods reevaluated the
required number of trailer staging positions proposed in Alternative 1, and
reduced the need to 329 positions. This further reduced the wetland impacts.
In Alternative 2, the new trailer staging lot resulted in 4.64 acres of impacts to
Wetlands W1 and W3, and the northern truck access drive resulted in 0.72 acre
of impacts to Wetland W4, for a total of 5.38 acres of wetland impacts. In
addition, Alternative 2 would result in 0.01 acre of impacts to Jurisdictional Ditch
JD1. While this alternative succeeds in reducing wetland impacts in comparison
to Alternative 1, there are major logistic and food safety issues that would be
created as a result of the layout. With the docks facing south, there is not a clear
separation of raw and finished goods. The raw and finished goods would be
received and shipped in the same area. In addition, raw and finished good
trailers would be intermingled creating an additional food safety hazard. One of
the major goals of this project was to increase food safety by clearly separating
raw and finished goods within the building and on site. Laying out the new
distribution center with the docks to the south does not accomplish this goal.
There are also logistic issues with this layout. With the new docks facing south,
all loading & unloading will be done in the same area. This would create major
traffic issues on the site as the facility will be handling approximately 400 trucks
per day. Because of these logistic and food safety issues, it was determined that
23

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
this alternative would not be a viable option. The Preferred Alternative
incorporates some of the wetland impact minimization efforts integrated within
this alternative while also meeting the project goals of a safer, more logistically
efficient site.
Alternative 3
This alternative was another attempt at orienting the proposed distribution
center differently on the site. In this alternative, the building was rotated 90
degrees with the new docks facing west. The building remained at 495,175
square feet. The proposed northern truck access drive remains located north of
the existing C.R. England facility and impacts Wetland W4. As a result of locating
the docks to the west, the additional trailer staging area was shifted to the west
side of the new distribution center instead of the north. As discussed in
Alternative 2, 329 trailer staging positions were used in the layout. The location
of the proposed distribution center remains to the north of the existing facility
for the reasons discussed in the design criteria and spatial constraints. This
option resulted in a reduction of wetland impacts when compared to Alternative
1, but more than Alternative 2. Furthermore, in this option, both the distribution
center and the trailer staging area create wetland impacts. Jurisdictional impacts
associated with the new trailer staging area and the distribution center
expansion resulted in 5.58 acres of wetland impacts and 0.01 acre of
jurisdictional ditch impacts. An additional 0.72 acres of wetland were impacted
by the northern truck access drive for a total of 6.30 acres of jurisdictional
wetland impacts. While this alternative is practical, it fails to reduce the wetland
impacts associated with Alternative 2, does not separate raw and finish goods as
well as Alternative 1, and traffic flow is not as functional. Because of these
factors, this alternative was not a reasonable solution compared to the Preferred
Alternative which further reduces impacts and better achieves the projects
goals.
Alternative 4
This alternative layout is similar to the layout in Alternative 1, but incorporates
some of the wetland impact reduction measures designed into Alternative 2. In
this alternative, the docks are oriented north with the trailer staging lot located
north of the docks. The building remained at the required 495,175 square feet.
The northern truck access drive remains located north of the existing C.R.
England facility and impacts Wetland W4. As discussed in Alternative 2, 329
trailer staging positions were used in the layout. After reassessing the truck flow
and staging, Smithfield Foods shifted approximately 103 of the 329 trailer
staging positions to the south of the distribution center, which helped minimize
wetland impacts. Staging spaces to the north were reduced to 171 spaces. The
rest of the staging positions, 55 in total, were located south of the new
distribution center in an open area adjacent to the water treatment plant. This
was an attempt to further reduce wetland impacts; however, through the
M

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
wetland delineation process, it was discovered that the areas around the water
treatment plant area also wetlands (Wetlands W2 and W5). Therefore, total
wetland impacts were not reduced. Jurisdictional impacts associated with the
new trailer staging lots around the distribution center resulted in 2.8 acres of
impacts to Wetlands W1 and W3, and 0.01 acre of impact to Jurisdictional Ditch
JD1. Impacts associated with the trailer positions near the water treatment plant
resulted in 1.26 acres of impacts to Wetland W5. An additional 0.72 acre of
wetlands were impacted by the northern truck access drive for a total of 4.60
acres of jurisdictional wetland impacts. Locating the trailer staging positions to
the south near the water treatment facility is problematic from a food
separation and logistics standpoint, and still resulted in wetland impacts,
therefore this alternative is not a practical alternative compared to the Preferred
Alternative, which further reduces wetland impacts and better achieves the
project goals.
Alternative 5
This alternative layout is similar to the layout in Alternative 4, but the trailer
staging positions located near the water treatment plant were moved back to
the northside of the facility. In this alternative, the docks are oriented north with
the trailer staging split on both the north (226 positions) and south (103
positions) side of the distribution center. The building remained at the required
495,175 square feet. After discussion with Smithfield Foods and C.R. England, the
northern access drive was shifted to the south of the existing C.R. England
facility, which avoided impacts to Wetland W4 entirely. All the jurisdictional
impacts in this layout are associated with the trailer staging lots. Approximately
4.10 acres of Wetland W1, 0.015 acre of Wetland W3, and 0.01 acre of
Jurisdictional Ditch JD1 would be impacted as a result of Alternative 5. In total,
Alternative 5 results in 4.12 acres of wetland impacts. This alternative succeeded
in achieving the project goals, design criteria, and spatial constraints detailed
above. In addition, compared to the other alternatives, Alternative 5 reduced the
total acres of wetland impacts. For these reasons, it was decided that this would
be the preferred orientation and layout of the proposed expansion. However, in
an effort to further reduce wetland impacts, Smithfield Foods agreed to tighten
some of the proposed alignments in order to generate the Preferred Alternative.
7.2.2 Preferred Alternative
The Preferred Alternative is the proposed Smithfield Food Expansion. The Preferred
Alternative was developed from Alternative 5 (C5.0). Like Alternative 5, the
Preferred Alternative reduces wetland impacts from other alternatives by relocating
the northern truck access drive to the south of the C.R. England facility, which avoids
impacts to Wetland W4 entirely (a 0.72 -acre reduction). The building expansion
remains at the required 495,175 square feet and the trailer staging/storage remains
at 329 trailer positions. Of the 329 trailer positions, 103 have been shifted south of
the new distribution center.
25

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
In order to further minimize wetland impacts in the Preferred Alternative, Smithfield
Foods reduced the width of the driveway isles within the trailer staging areas north
of the distribution center from 420 feet to 410 feet. This reduction in isle width does
put additional pressure on trailer maneuverability, but it successfully reduces
impacts to Wetland W1 by 0.92 acre. In addition, when finalizing the Preferred
Alternative design, the limits of disturbance was tightened to the extent practical
which further minimized impacts to Wetland W1 (0.37 -acre reduction).
Incorporating these measures into the Preferred Alternative results in a total of 2.81
acres of impact to Wetland W1 (Impact Site 1), 0.015 acre of impact to Wetland W3
(Impact Site 2), and 0.01 acre of jurisdictional ditch impacts (Impact Site 1). These
jurisdictional impacts can be viewed in detail on the Permit Drawings included in
Appendix D. The Preferred Alternative succeeds in reducing wetland impacts to the
extent practical while still achieving the project objectives. For this reason, the
Preferred Alternative is the proposed Smithfield Foods Expansion.
7.2.3 On -Site Minimization of Unavoidable Impacts
In addition to modifying the general layout of the site, Smithfield Foods has also
implemented the following measures to minimize unavoidable impacts:
• Reduced the number of required trailer positions from 390 to 329;
• Relocated the northern truck access drive from north of the existing C.R.
England facility to south of the facility avoiding impacts to Wetland W4 (a
0.72 -acre reduction of impact);
• Decreased the driveway isles width within the trailer staging areas north of
the distribution center from 420 feet to 410 (a 0.83 -acre reduction of
impact);
• Tightened the limits of disturbance to the extent practical (a 0.27 -acre
reduction of impact).
7.3 Conclusion of Alternatives Analysis
Smithfield Foods has provided information regarding the site selection process. This
analysis demonstrates that there are no off-site alternatives that would meet the
project purpose and need. Smithfield Foods has also addressed on-site alternatives for
the facility, including a discussion of the limitations to the site design process, such as
product distribution efficiency, employee safety, food safety, and site separation of raw
product from finished good as dictated by the Food Safety Modernization Act. The
evaluation has also addressed alternative site configurations and efforts made
Smithfield Foods to minimize impacts to wetlands. After reviewing the alternatives and
the efforts made to avoid and minimize impacts to the aquatic environment, the
proposed plan represents the least damaging practicable alternative.
we

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
8.0 Mitigation
Jurisdictional Wetlands
The proposed project will result in 2.81 acres of permanent impact to jurisdictional
basin wetlands and 0.015 acres of permanent impacts to forested headwater wetlands.
Permanent impacts will be associated with the parking lot and staging area, the interior
transportation network of the project, and the associated grading footprint.
Kimley-Horn staff conducted a field evaluation of the wetlands identified within the
project area using NCWAM to evaluate wetland functions and recommend appropriate
mitigation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands. The method utilizes a qualitative
assessment of departure from reference condition for the evaluated wetland complex.
In summary, the two wetland types observed within the project area were headwater
forest wetlands (W3) and a basin wetland (W1). The headwater forest wetland within
the project area has a "Low" overall wetland rating due to its small size, man-made
disturbance, and lack of hydrologic function. The basin wetland W1 has "Medium"
ratings due to its overall size and minimal disturbance to the wetland interior.
Due to the relative wetland size and position within the watershed, a 2:1 mitigation
ratio will be applied to offset unavoidable impacts to all wetlands within the project
area. With a 2:1 mitigation ratio, the proposed project requires a total of 0.01 acre of
riparian wetland mitigation credits and 5.62 acres of non -riparian wetland mitigation
credits. However, the DMS calculates fees for wetland mitigation credits in quarter -acre
increments and there is a flat fee for each increment of 0.25 acres. Therefore, the total
wetland mitigation credits that are proposed to be purchased for the project through
the ILF program is 0.25 acre of riparian wetland mitigation credits, and 5.75 acres of
non -riparian wetland mitigation credits.
Smithfield Foods has requested an in -lieu fee payment from DMS due to the lack of
private mitigation banks located in the primary, secondary, or tertiary service areas, the
anticipated credit need for this project, and the expected timeline for permit review.
DMS has accepted Smithfield Food's request for in -lieu fee payment for up to 6.5 acres
of non -riparian wetland mitigation credits and 0.25 acre of riparian wetland mitigation
credits.
27

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
9.0 Evaluation of the 404(b)(1) Guidelines:
9.1 Factual determinations
9.1.1 Physical substrate
The project area is composed primarily of mixed pine and hardwood forests
interspersed with utility easements and development. The majority of the
forested areas within the project boundaries are upland forests that have
historically been altered by activities on the property. Approximately 5.32 acres
of wetland would be filled to construct the proposed project. Impacts would be
primarily associated with the parking lot and building footprints and aprons. In
these areas, unsuitable substrates would be excavated prior to the placement of
clean fill capable of providing suitable compaction for the building and parking
lot foundations. In all areas where fill would be placed, the existing elevation
would be increased. Sedimentation and erosion control measures would be
utilized to limit the displacement of sediment downstream.
9.1.2 Water circulation, fluctuation, and salinity
The proposed project should have no appreciable effect on current, circulation,
or drainage patterns. Fill within wetland W3 will have a minor effect on the
water circulation and fluctuation of the small headwater system. Wetland W3
has historically been altered and mostly hydrologically disconnected from
downstream waters, and the proposed impacts would not greatly change the
function of the headwater system as a whole.
The project is situated along the Cape Fear and Lumber River watershed divide.
The wetland systems within the project area are upper headwater systems to
the Goodman Swamp. There are no upstream features present, so potential off-
site flooding upstream of the filled areas should not be a concern. The wetland
impact is not substantial given the size of the wetland systems present within
the project area. The loss of floodwater retention capacity of the wetlands would
be offset by the installation of stormwater detention basins, such that the
project would not result in a measurable decrease in overall floodwater
retention. In general, the discharge of stormwater from the project would be
regulated to prevent large spikes in volume following most rainfall events. Large
storms in excess of the 100 -year storm event may exceed the storage capacity of
the basins and result in increased flows downstream of the site. Water chemistry
may also be changed somewhat from existing levels. Additionally, the increase in
impermeable surfaces may result in increased temperatures in stormwater
runoff.
NN.

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
9.1.3 Suspended particulate/turbidity
The project -specific sedimentation and erosion control measures that will be
utilized during construction will minimize downstream sedimentation. The
majority of turbidity increases would likely result from the clearing and
construction of upland areas. Sediment loss would be minimized by the
implementation of sediment and erosion control measures. Once construction of
the project is complete, the soils would be stabilized, revegetated, and
stormwater runoff would be directed to detention and treatment basins.
Accordingly, the effects of turbidity resulting from the proposed undertaking are
expected to be temporary and minor.
9.1.4 Contaminant availability
Historically, the project area has supported agricultural uses, which likely
included the application of numerous herbicides and pesticides. Additionally, a
historic railroad ran along the existing power line easement on the western
boundary of the project area. In 1991, Smithfield converted the agricultural
fields to a food processing facility. The forests located to the west of the food
processing facility have been historically logged, but have remained mostly intact
over the last 50 years. Proposed uses for the project area would result in the
potential discharge of some pollutants typical of construction and maintenance
associated with paved lots. In general, the level of potential contaminant
introduction to the aquatic systems is low. Contaminants would leave the project
area in the initial runoff for up to a 100 -year storm event, where they would
wash to the stormwater detention basin. Additionally, only suitable earthen
material originating on-site, which should be free of toxic pollutants or
contaminants, would be used for construction of the permitted fills.
9.1.5 Aquatic ecosystem effects
The direct effects due to the placement of fill associated with the project would
be a total loss to the impacted aquatic ecosystem and its functions in the
footprint of the fill placement. Wetland W3 would be filled and would no longer
be able to provide nutrient filtration, sediment removal, or stormwater storage.
Any aquatic habitat present within the wetland area would be lost. Portions of
wetland W1 within the project area would be filled and the wetland may lose
some storage capacity. The secondary short-term effects expected downstream
would primarily be limited to temporary discharges of sediment during
construction. Even with proper construction and maintenance, sediment control
measures do not eliminate all turbidity in receiving waters, though these effects
should be limited to the duration of site construction and maintenance of
required sediment and erosion control measures.
9.1.6 Proposed disposal site
No disposal sites are required by the proposed plans.
we

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
9.1.7 Cumulative effects
For the purposes of assessing cumulative effects that the proposed action may
have to the aquatic environment, it is reasonable to evaluate the effects within
the project boundaries and downstream of the project as it could affect the
watershed. The direct impact of the proposed construction includes the loss of
0.015 acres of jurisdictional riparian wetland and 2.81 acres of jurisdictional non -
riparian wetlands. The impacts to these resources would result in a complete
loss of function, including water quality functions (nutrient sequestration,
sediment filtration, etc.), habitat for aquatic and terrestrial species, and
hydrology (flood water attenuation, groundwater recharge, etc.).
The proposed project is located in an area that is relatively rural, with a mix of
industrial development, low-density residential areas, and agricultural land uses.
The project area contains a portion of the headwater systems flowing to
Goodman Swamp at the top of the Lumber River watershed. Current stresses on
Goodman Swamp come from high sediment loads and nutrient inputs that come
from agricultural land use (resulting from the constant tilling of soils, and the
addition of pesticides and fertilizers), as well as development for commercial
industrial and residential uses. The potential cumulative effects on the aquatic
environment generated by the project would be both temporary and
permanent. The temporary effects would primarily be limited to the increased
sediment load that result from ground disturbance. High sediment loads can
cause changes to the channels capacity, potential destabilization of the stream
banks, and loss of aquatic habitat. The potential for sediment discharges would
last for the duration of project construction, though the effects of the sediment
may be long lasting. This effect can be moderated by the proper installation and
maintenance of erosion control measures.
Stormwater discharge from the proposed project would not affect downstream
properties or the natural environment. All stormwater falling on the construction
site will be collected within the stormwater system and conveyed to the
proposed stormwater basin within the project area, which is designed to hold
the 100 -year storm event post -construction. The final project conditions will
result in post -construction runoff rates below that of pre -construction
conditions. All velocities (ditch, swale and outlet) during construction and post -
construction will be non-erosive. Rip rap dissipater pads will be utilized at outlets
to promote diffuse flow and ensure non-erosive velocities.
The long-term cumulative effects could include the incremental loss of aquatic
function provided by the wetlands within the project area, including sediment
and nutrient filtration, stormwater retention, baseflow maintenance,
groundwater recharge, sediment transport, etc. The long-term effects would also
include increases in stormwater flowing off the site. Increased stormwater can
have a substantial effect on a stream system's stability and functional integrity
30

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
for miles downstream of a discharge. This effect can also manifest itself over
many years, and is often caused by numerous small changes within a watershed.
The proposed development plan includes the construction of a stormwater
detention basin, designed to capture up to the 100 -year storm event within the
contributing basin. These measures can substantially reduce the effect of
stormwater on downstream tributaries. As the watershed is still largely rural, the
cumulative effect of the proposed project and other similar projects is still
minimal. Proper implementation of sediment and erosion control measures and
stormwater management practices, as proposed by the current plans, is the best
way to minimize the cumulative impact of this type of development.
Overall, the anticipated effects of the proposed project would be minimal
relative to similar types of projects in the region, and taken alone, do not present
a significant or imminent threat to the stability and integrity of the aquatic
ecosystem within the watershed. The type of wetland system that would be
impacted is not a particularly unique or high quality resource. By implementing
proposed best management practices, such as the retention of stormwater and
the implementation of sediment and erosion control measures, the effects of the
project could be somewhat reduced. The loss of wetland function would also be
replaced by the proposed mitigation.
9.1.8 Secondary effects
The proposed project is designed to serve as a sustainable, practical means of
storing and staging Smithfield food products. The proposed project will reduce
the carbon footprint generated from running trucks back and forth between cold
storage facilities and the existing processing plant. The project is expected to
provide an economic boost to the local community, primarily in the form of tax
revenues and job creation. Based on the type and number of jobs created, the
economic benefit is expected to go toward meeting current job demand as well
as contributing to a moderate regional population growth.
Based on the factors discussed above, the cumulative effect of the proposed
undertaking does not pose a significant threat the integrity of the aquatic
environment. Additionally, the secondary impacts resulting from the proposed
plans are primarily limited to increased development pressure on neighboring,
undeveloped tracts of land. Based on this estimate, the overall secondary effects
on aquatic resources associated with this project are not more than minimal.
31

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
10.0 Public Interest Review
10.1 Public Interest Factors
10.1.1 Conservation
The proposed development does not include the permanent conservation of any
wetlands on site. The mitigation payment to the DMS would be used to restore
and preserve wetland areas elsewhere in the Lumber River Basin.
10.1.2 Economics
The proposed project will expand Smithfield's ability to produce and deliver pork
products.
• Reduced truck trip costs
• Meeting demand of pork products
• Reduced need of offsite warehouse
• 200 new jobs
• Private investment
10.1.3 General environmental concerns (33CFR320.4(p))
The overall impact to the environment as a result of the construction would be
minimal. Temporary increases in sediment, construction noise, traffic levels, etc.,
would be expected during construction of the project. Long-term impacts to
wetlands, streams, and fish and wildlife would primarily result from the loss of
existing aquatic and terrestrial habitat and by changes to the watershed, though
these effects would be somewhat offset by functions provided by the
stormwater facility and by the mitigation offered by the Applicant. Stormwater
generated by the increases in impervious surfaces would be retained on-site,
preventing potential negative impacts to persons living or owning land within the
floodplain downstream of the project. The property is currently owned by
Smithfield and the surrounding region is not occupied by any particular minority
or ethnic group, so the proposed activity should not lead to environmental
justice concerns.
10.1.4 Wetlands (33CFR320.4(b))
There is a total of 15.32 acres of jurisdictional wetlands within the delineation
study area. The proposed project would result in the loss of 2.81 acres of basin
wetland and 0.015 acre of headwater forest wetland, which currently provide
nutrient filtration, sediment removal, and aquatic habitat. Smithfield Foods
proposes to mitigate for permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands associated
32

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
with the cold storage distribution center by requesting an in -lieu fee payment of
0.25 acre of riparian wetland mitigation credits and 6.5 acres of non -riparian
wetland mitigation credits from the NC Department of Mitigation Services
(DMS). However, the proposed project is anticipated to only need 0.25 acres of
riparian wetland mitigation credits and 5.75 acres of non -riparian wetland
mitigation credits due to revisions to the proposed project area made after the
mitigation credits were requested from DMS.
Some of the lost wetlands functions, such as the nutrient and sediment filtering
capabilities, would also be replaced by construction of the on-site stormwater
treatment facility.
10.1.5 Historic and cultural resources (33CFR320.4(e))
Based on a review of the SHPO HPOWeb GIS Service, there are no known or
suspected historic or cultural resources located within the Property. In addition,
undeveloped land within the property has been historically timbered and cleared
for utility easements and a railroad right -of way. Due to the size and function of
the existing facility as well as historical disturbance, it is anticipated that there
will be no impacts to any historical or archaeological sites.
10.1.6 Fish and wildlife values (33CFR320.4(c))
The project would not be expected to result in more than minimal permanent
adverse effects to fish or wildlife values. During construction, it is likely that
some aquatic and terrestrial animals would be displaced, along with their
habitat. The types of habitats within the project area include headwater forest
wetlands, a basin wetland, forested upland areas, and maintained rights-of-way.
The proposed plans have relatively minimal impacts to a historically altered and
discontinuous wetland.
As of July 21, 2016, the USFWS lists seven federally threatened or endangered
species protected under the ESA known to occur in Bladen County, including
American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), wood stork
(Mycteria americana), American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), pondberry
(Lindera melissifolia), and rough -leaf loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia). Bald
eagle is also known to occur in Bladen County and is protected by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA). A review of the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) database records (updated April 2017) indicates
there are no known occurrences of any of the aforementioned species within a
one -mile radius of the project area.
The American alligator is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance,
and, therefore, does not require Section 7 consultation with USFWS. Suitable
habitat for American alligator is not present within the study area due to the lack
of perennial features present. In addition, a review of the NCNHP database
33

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
records (updated April 2017), indicates no known American alligator occurrences
within a 1.0 -mile radius of the proposed project.
During the agency scoping meeting held on April 11, 2017, Kathy Matthews of
the USFWS explained that surveys for northern long-eared bat (NLEB) have been
conducted on the opposite side of Bladen County. In addition, Kathy advised that
any tree clearing activities associated with the proposed project should take
place outside of the NLEB summer pupping season. Since no known roost trees
or occurrences of NLEB have been recorded in or within 1.0 mile of the project
area and all tree clearing activities will take place outside of summer pupping
season, it is unlikely that the proposed will have any effect on this species.
Habitat evaluations were conducted within the forested portions of the property
for red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) nesting and foraging habitat in January and
April 2017. The dense understory found within the project area and the large
number of hardwoods precludes these areas from providing suitable nesting
habitat for the RCW. Potentially suitable foraging habitat is located in the
southwestern corner of the project area; however, based on historic aerials, this
area was cleared less than 30 years ago, and the area was found to contain a
dense understory. In addition, the NCNHP database (updated April 2017) has no
records, historical or current, of RCW individuals or cavity trees within one mile
of the proposed project. Based upon this information, it has been determined
that the proposed project will have no effect on the RCW.
Suitable habitat for wood stork is not present within the project area. For
nesting, feeding, and roosting, wood stork requires open freshwater or estuarine
wetlands that are seasonally flooded. The wetlands within the project area are
dense with vegetation and do not pool water long enough to provide an
adequate feeding habitat for wood stork. In addition, the NCNHP database
records (updated April 2017), indicate no known occurrences of wood stork in or
within a 1.0 -mile radius of the proposed project. Based on the lack of suitable
habitat and the lack of known occurrences, it is anticipated that the proposed
project will have no effect on the wood stork.
Suitable habitat for American chaffseed is present along the power line rights-of-
way and the maintained drives located within project area. Kimley-Horn
biologists conducted field surveys of the suitable habitat on May 16, 2017. No
individuals of American chaffseed were observed. In addition, the NCNHP
database (updated April 2017) has no records, historical or current, of American
chaffseed within 1.0 mile of the proposed project. Due to the lack of individuals
observed and the lack of known occurrences, it has been determined that the
proposed project will have no effect on American chaffseed.
Suitable habitat for pondberry is present within wetland W1 in the project area.
Kimley-Horn biologists conducted field surveys within the area of suitable
34

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
habitat on May 16, 2017 and no individuals were observed. Additionally, a
review of the NCNHP database records (updated April 2017), indicates no known
occurrences of pondberrry in or within a 1.0 -mile radius to the project area. Due
to the lack of individuals observed and the lack of known occurrences, it has
been determined that the proposed project will have no effect on pondberry.
Suitable habitat for rough -leaf loosestrife is present in the power line rights-of-
way, in the center of wetland W1, and within the ditches along the maintained
drives located within the project area. Kimley-Horn biologists conducted field
surveys within these areas of suitable habitat on May 16, 2017, and no
individuals were observed. In addition, the NCNHP database (updated April
2017) has no records, historical or current, of rough -leaf loosestrife within 1.0
mile of the proposed project. Due to the lack of individuals observed and the lack
of known occurrences, it has been determined that the proposed project will
have no effect on rough -leaf loosestrife.
10.1.7 Flood hazards
The proposed project area is located in areas determined to be outside the 0.2%
annual chance flood hazard area (Zone X) according to the FEMA FIRM Panel
3720034600K effective January 5, 2007. The project would not be expected to
have an impact on the overall hazard of flooding downstream of the Property.
The proposed development would result in increases to impervious surface
within the watershed, but this increase would be offset by the retention of
stormwater originating on-site in the proposed stormwater detention basin.
Additionally, the project is located at the upper end of the watershed and
outside of any flood hazard zones mapped on the FIRM panels, so there is
minimal risk of causing flooding upstream of the proposed project site.
10.1.8 Floodplain values (33CFR320.4(I))
Pursuant to Executive Order 11988, consideration has been given to the effect of
the proposed project toward reducing the risk of flood loss, minimizing the
impact of floods on human safety, health and welfare, and restoring and
preserving the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. The proposed
project area is located outside of the 0.2% annual chance flood hazard area
(Zone X) according to the FEMA FIRM Panel 3720034600K effective January 5,
2007
The project would result in the conversion of a portion of the Study Area to
impervious surface. Stormwater generated by the project would be directed to a
detention basin, to be constructed in compliance with state guidelines for
stormwater management. Stormwater discharge will approximately maintain
natural drainage to the local watershed, limiting potential impacts to
downstream systems. Accordingly, the project should not result in measurable
impacts to the functions or value of these areas.
35

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
10.1.9 Land use
The proposed expansion would result in the conversion of some forested areas
to industrial development. While this would be a major shift in land use, the
project would remain consistent with the existing facility, local zoning
requirements. The project would be located immediately adjacent to the existing
Smithfield processing facility in a property parcel that is currently zoned as an
industrial district along the NC Highway 87 corridor.
10.1.10 Navigation (33CFR320.4(o))
The project is located on non -navigable waterways. Accordingly, consideration of
the project's effect on navigation is not applicable.
10.1.11 Shore erosion and accretion
No ponds, lakes, or other such features are located on the proposed project site.
Therefore, shore erosion and/or accretion would not occur as a result of the
project.
10.1.12 Recreation
The proposed site currently has limited use for recreation, and the proposed
facility would have limited access to the public due safety and security concerns
related to the nature of the facility. The proposed project would not be intended
to provide recreational activities to the surrounding community. Overall, the
proposed project is not anticipated to affect regional recreational opportunities.
10.1.13 Water supply (33CFR320.4(m))
The proposed expansion does not include any additional processing but rather
refrigeration storage/distribution. No new wells are proposed as a result of this
expansion and water withdrawal will be minimal. The storage/distribution
center will utilize approximately 90% recycled water with the only anticipated
additional new water usage associated with the eleven proposed employee
restrooms.
10.1.14 Water quality (also 33CFR320.4(d))
No major impacts to water quality are expected. Temporary increases in
turbidity during construction, loss of nutrient removal capacity of the filled
wetlands, and some discharge of pollutants and nutrients in the runoff could
result. It is anticipated that the proposed construction of stormwater treatment
facilities on site should offset long-term impacts by removing sediments,
nutrients, and other pollutants from treated stormwater, and by attenuating
peak flows downstream. The NCDWR will review the proposed plans as part of
the Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification prior to construction of the
project. The stormwater plan for the facility will also be reviewed and approved
by Bladen County prior to Site Plan approval.
36

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
10.1.15 Energy needs (33CFR320.4(n))
The proposed project would result increase demand from the local electrical
grid. For this reason, an electrical mini -substation would be constructed as part
of the proposed project to help alleviate demand through the existing
infrastructure in the area. In addition, Smithfield intends to reduce their energy
consumption by investing in an energy saving refrigeration system for the
distribution center.
10.1.16 Safety
The project has been designed to improve safety for both Smithfield employees
and the public. By constructing separate truck and automobile entrance ways,
Smithfield will greatly increase the traffic safety on site. Through the reduction of
handling and consolidation of storage, Smithfield Foods can also ensure a more
controlled product will be distributed to consumers. In addition, during
construction of the project, all applicable safety standards would be observed.
10.1.17 Food and fiber production
The project area currently exists as a mix between forestland and developed
land. The project would not remove any land from food or fiber production.
10.1.18 Mineral needs
The project has not historically been used to produce mineral products, so
consideration of mineral needs is not applicable.
10.1.20 Considerations of property ownership
Adjacent landowners may be affected as a result of project construction
activities. It is possible that adjacent landowners may experience increased noise
and temporary traffic patterns along NC Highway 87. However, the use of the
land would be consistent with the designated zoning, the existing industrial
facility, and the owner's right to reasonable, private use of their land.
11.0 Indirect and Cumulative Impacts
Population
The proposed project would employ approximately 200 employees. It is anticipated that most
employees will be hired from Tar Heel, Fayetteville, Elizabethtown and other surrounding
communities. It is anticipated that most of the employees would commute to work although a
portion of the employees may consider relation to the immediate vicinity of the proposed
project area. Because a majority of the employees will already be located within the project
region, there will be limited additional residential, recreational, institutional, and/or
commercial development in this area as a result of the proposed project.
37

Smithfield Foods Expansion Project
Tar Heel, Bladen County, North Carolina
Zoning and Land Use
The proposed expansion would result in the conversion of some forested areas to industrial
development. While this would be a major shift in land use in the direct project location, the
project would remain consistent with the existing facility and local zoning requirements. The
project would be located immediately adjacent to the existing Smithfield processing facility in a
property parcel that is currently zoned as an industrial district along the NC Highway 87
corridor. Because this project is an expansion of an existing industrial facility, it would not be
conducive to secondary developments that would have an indirect or cumulative effect on
zoning and land use in the region.
Traffic
The proposed project would employ approximately 200 employees at build out. The increase in
employees would result in a permanent increase to traffic loads on Highway 87. However, the
facility is in operation 24 hours/day and the additional employee traffic would be distributed
throughout three work shifts. There will also be a temporary increase in construction traffic
during the construction phase of the project. The only roadway improvements required as a
result of the project include turn lanes at the driveway entrances/exits at the facility and
median cuts on Hwy 87. No roadway widenings will be required. In addition, the proposed on-
site storage/distribution center will eliminate approximately 60-80 trucks/day on Highway 87
and other regional roads.
Jurisdictional Waters of the US
The proposed project directly impacts 2.81 acres of a larger 22.6 -acre wetland system. This
basin wetland is seasonally saturated and intermittently to seasonally inundated with surface
water following periods of high rainfall or in conjunction with a seasonal high water table
condition. Stormwater from the proposed facility will be detained and reduced to non-erosive
velocities prior to being released into the wetland; therefore, there will be no indirect impacts
to the hydrology of the remaining wetland. In addition, there will be no indirect impacts to
natural drainage to off-site wetlands systems as a result of the proposed project. While this
wetland system is hydrologically connected to waters of the US, the non-riparian/depressional
wetland is not directly discharging into any streams and therefore the proposed project would
not have indirect impacts to adjacent surface waters.

FIGURES

,Gro
Legend
Project Area
Tar Heel
Bladen County
0 2,000 4,000
Feet
Kentucky
Virginia
Tennessee
Bladen County
i n'a
CUMBERLAND
J
creek
SAMPSON
Project Location
BLADEN
I.
South
�YY
Carolina Atlantic Ocean
Georgia COLUMBUS
0 40 80 0 6 12
mmow:= Miles mmmm::= iles
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Kimley>>> Horn Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

w r tam x' t2 fryr`x� aesr av��
ci
N•iv � 4 tr aart..ak ,� 113a 2�^ •'� i},A4�`� �4,, '.
R1 �' s
'.F s.. '.Y f '► i � ?.fie }� t., � '* � u- e Y {t,,� i_t.
`t
..
' 9P j(�LF•�r_
41 j 11
i+N
tdn .
{ .✓ y v"' x 8 1, } 'Z+'' a 'a4*t
5
grt?er:,
t" R
�r �
MO
r ' /.: i f �'}°P• .F `Mii S -r'' 7 u 3 RX r`�
..: i (
too
y,gg
K 4�Y8, k
'lk. �t -, • y..�. la,,,..
ai
74 R
AtO
," � a, 111 ✓'� �.".'.
r
?
•
1 �
f,
,t Legend
Project Area
Kimley))>Horn
0 600 1,200
Feet
Figure 2: Aerial Map
(NC Orthoimagery Program, 2013)
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

w
r _
2X, y
'- . y ,l �.
_-.opt
Pik
£-_
\ NID 132
r
Ya
�32o
Legend
—- _ Project Area
0 1,000 2,000
F •�, — � - '� ``�, Feet
7j7 -
Figure 3: USGS Topographic Map
Kimley>>> Horn (Duart and Tar Heel Quads, 1986)
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

GbA •��
a � NooA
'l MB N
T.
GbA Q
17 n
`—_ - NoA NoA 3'
NoA Ln Lig
A
R a o
Ra A e87
Gb NoA
4r At
AaA'
.r Re � oyF �1
Y Ra C
Ra C
NoA WmB
G Ire A B a Ln c 00
J
R ry cry Q
o
"Wd'aBa 0P NoA
"T E)
WaB
w 7
BnB' a
Ln
Ly
AuA -
_ z
Hydric Soil Table
Map Unit Map Unit Name Status '
GbA Goldsboro sandy loam, O to 3 percent slopes Inclusions
LnA Lynchburg fine sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain Non -hydric Legend
NoA Norfolk loamy fine sand, Oto 2 percent slopes Inclusions
0
Oc Ocilla loamy sand Inclusions C Project Area
Pe Pantego loam Hydric y J
RaA Rains fine sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain Hydric
Ud Udorthents, loamy Non -hydric 0 0 1,000 2,000
WaB Wagram fine sand, Oto 6 percent slopes Inclusions Feet
Wo lWoodington loamy sand IHydric
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map
Kimley>>> Horn (Bladen County, 1990)
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

N
03 00 /
JD1 /
/ 0 11,51" 150
E51
�1 1
Legend
Jurisdictional Ditches
Wetlands
Study Area
Kimley»)Horn
0 650 1,300
Feet
Figure 5: Jurisdictional Features M
Smithfield Foods Expansioapn
Bladen County, NC

�Cx
\ °,•//.. I' • Imo_ v �
PROP TRUCK SCALE LOCATION
g / � n aiel ✓
SEE SHEET C4.1FOR
JIVj a a. v. v °. '�\a° . a I° .< '.°aa ° •° I.... I °a �.d VTV/ PLAN INT THIS AREA
I
I
I
I
fi
I
1 II
I I
I �
II
\11
I_
II
I
I
I
II
II
11
SMITHFIELD FOODS
EXISTING PLANT
FF:137.00
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
-X -X -X- PROPOSED CHAIN UNK FENCE
.""'Y"N . PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND ST%%NG TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEMCES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS. EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Figure 6a
~ O p Q Q m
w O O 0
S O [D w s
J
n
W
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
LIMITS BEYOND IMPACT SHOWN WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS
PAVEMENTLEGEND
III
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
V)
EXISTING ASPHALT
E%ISTNG CONCRETE
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
-X -X -X- PROPOSED CHAIN UNK FENCE
.""'Y"N . PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND ST%%NG TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEMCES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS. EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Figure 6a
~ O p Q Q m
w O O 0
S O [D w s
J
n
W
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
LIMITS BEYOND IMPACT SHOWN WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS
U
Z
INCLUDES STAGINGAND STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS.
Q
V)
�p'o
O LL
U) LL
J ' !r J
Know what's below.
W Q a LV
Call before you dig.
NORTH SURVEY NOTE
^ LU LL
LL A d
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
T X
r
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING ANDE�
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE).
. Z
I_ O
W
O 40 80 160
U
5co
` w
THE 517E WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES 117.1-2009 AND
(ANSI
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
A OQ
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
VJ
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF TINE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS "'COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRU/OR CTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPEOFICATIONS.
C4•�

a c • 9 $ • < /• � , 1���2yy.0�00' 50.00' 50.00'
Rd,
MATCHLINE_
. 8 SEE SHEET C4.0 FOR CONTINUATION
9
p 45 'g �•
$ ° • 12Y 50.00' 80.00'
$ e ° • TYP
$1. to �� � ��•ZT •1�.1�{ a�I �Ie a .:.:
I 220.58`
TE
7�1",
$ •REMOVE ASPHALT AILD REPLACE ° � �
V41H CONCREPAVEMENT
8J
It
•$a I °
°7: 440IM"
� e
4p�. •
NOTE: OUTLINES OF BUILDINGS DRAWN FROM
READILY AVAILABLE INFORMATION,
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SPACING PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF 173.03,
ANY DISCREPANCY
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
I
a P v "CIO
v /
� . VI V, !
PROP. EDGE OF PAVEMENT -(TYP d' /
D
v�
`.y\ LOT W REMAIN
9 �
3'.• -24.00'-•18.00' `+ iZ$gci
o�5 Un
PROP, 24" CURB AND GUTTER
PARKING FIELD STANDARD DUTY
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
�=
T
H PROP. EDGE OF PAVEMENT (TVP.)
\
EEL EDGE OF PAVEMENT, (TYP,)
----------------
II /
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
20
S
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY UNE
—x—x—K— PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE
.e e eY1. PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Figure 6b
~ O O Q Q 0
wo
o � u=i
D p p Q m
S [D W
Y O< a o U
U
' z
LI „
WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND V J
OMITS BEYOND IMPACT SNN1TH THIS PROJECT. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING ANDD S STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS. VJ
PAVEMENTLEGEND
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
15
EXISTING A-.—
SPHALT.]
EE]
EXISTING CONCRETE
STANDARD DUTY --E-
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY UNE
—x—x—K— PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE
.e e eY1. PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Figure 6b
~ O O Q Q 0
wo
o � u=i
D p p Q m
S [D W
Y O< a o U
U
' z
LI „
WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND V J
OMITS BEYOND IMPACT SNN1TH THIS PROJECT. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING ANDD S STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS. VJ
Z 0
�po
15
— O LL
//► LL
0
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^ W LL
SURVEY NOTE
LL LL
LL }
X
EATING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ON A BOUNDARY@TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
T
..1�
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
Z
LL �
W
r Q
THE SITE WILL FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
_ U
(�,
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITYCODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
S
CHARIER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND IN AREAS
LZj
U) oQ
SIM
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE
VJ
ONONEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SIZE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPEOFlCATIONS
��.,L

APPENDIX A
ON-SITE
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES

DITCH JD2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W2
WETLAND W5 0 ACRES OF IMPACT
0 ACRES OF IMPACT _ z�
I
l
\ \ I
WETLAND W6
\ ACRES OF IMPACT
II
_ II
.`A
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: N/A
WETLAND W1
2.81 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W4
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
DITCH JD1
0.01 ACRES OF IMPACT
Y
• rl
N
M
m
04
Z oD Z
I
Ho Zw
JZ Lf)_
U CL 0
L,w �r
n>
KQ
W Z
L, W
W H
J
LL Q
DM Bf. -
WE 00 -m -W
JOB W.
WFIL WSPAf
C0.0

DI T(, LJ inn
0 ACRE
WETLAND W5
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
G
0.015 ACRE
WETLAND W6
ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
®z PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: N/A
'ACT
COMMON;
0
PC
PE1
4)
r�r
P1
• �1
V`
cV
m
M
ONO
O
Z a0Z
_O U—
N zw
J Qcl-
¢X 0¢
L, L1 F-
E E
IV
pm BY:
011E 00-00-00
JOB NO.
CAO BIL. �o SCAIf
SHEET
C1.0

DITCH JD2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W3
0.015 ACRES OF IMPACT
m m m
ja-li
"
WETLAND W6 vx
ACRES OF IMPACT
........... ..
©z PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: N/A
WETLAND Wl
4.64 ACRES OF IMPACT
DITCH JD1
0.01 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W4
0.72 ACRES OF IMPACT
COMMON;
w
WAM BY:
WE 00-"
n NO.
W BIL. 60 smf
SHIF
C2.0

DITCH JD2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W5
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
E,?::��,
WETLAND W3
0.015 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W6
I �p ACRES OF IMPACT
Ye T�11 M�1 �a�i
7MY4l4ATiw1-
CENTER
II
®z PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: N/A
WETLAND W1
5.56 ACRES OF IMPACT
DITCH JD1
0.01 ACRES OF IMPACT
COMMON;
PC
PE1
M
PC
•mil
9
u N
m
M
ONO
O
00 Z
Z
_O U-
N Zw
J QCL
Q X �Q
L, LJ H
M
pm BY:
OAff 00-00-00
JOB NO.
CAO FlIE �o SCAIf
SHEET
C3.0
Zoo:
n
Q_o
U
�m
�'
LL
z a
LL
r
~
U o
��
U
0 � N
z z \
J
�
WETLAND W4
J �
0.72 ACRES OF IMPACT
O<
o a
PC
PE1
M
PC
•mil
9
u N
m
M
ONO
O
00 Z
Z
_O U-
N Zw
J QCL
Q X �Q
L, LJ H
M
pm BY:
OAff 00-00-00
JOB NO.
CAO FlIE �o SCAIf
SHEET
C3.0

DITCH JD2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W5
1.26 ACRES OF IM
WETLAND W6
00 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W2
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
©z PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: N/A
WETLAND W1
2.60 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W4
0.72 ACRES OF IMPACT
COMMON;
0
PC
pE1
4)
V`
cV
m
M
� ONO
0
L� n U
CO Z
Z
_O U—
N Zw
J QCL
Q X �Q
L, Lit r
a
w
F=
a
z
w
LJ
F -
Q
Z
O
Cn
pm E1:
DAM OD-"
n NO.
CAO FlIE �o SCNf
SHEET
C4.O

DITCH JD2
0 ACRE
WETLAND W2
WETLAND W5 0 ACRES OF IMPACT
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
P��-
WETLAND W3
0.015 ACRES OF IMPACT
4
14 -. � i m I
WETLAND W6
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
ASE II
IBUTIC
®z PROPOSED SITE PLAN
WETLAND W1
4.10 ACRES OF IMPACT
DITCH JD1
0.01 ACRES OF IMPACT
WETLAND W4
0 ACRES OF IMPACT
COMFICATM
PC
�1
V`
N
rn
M
04
0
0 Z
Z I
O_U-i
F N Zw
J Q �_
L, W r
WF -
W,
pm ft:
DAM TSH-"
n H0.
CAD FlIE �o smf
SHEET
C5.0

APPENDIX B
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

gMu
all
MW
hit
*',,' ; 11
RAI
J'A
�AA
Nviv
tKy
ow

Photo 3 — Photo of the soil profile taken at data point W 1 -WET.
Photo 4 — Interior view of Wetland W2.
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, North Carolina Page 2 of 7 foul oiti "

Photo 5 — View of the western boundary of Wetland W2 bounded by a utility easement.
Photo 6 — View of the northern boundary of Wetland W3. Note the lack of water stained leaves present
in the upland pine forest.
Smithfield Foods Expansion Page 3 of 7 KimleyOHorn
Bladen County, North Carolina

_ %h f •
r+�V+
J ✓ � 1} �' y'e.
+9 M4M

Photo I I — View looking across Wetland W5 to the water treatment plant.
Photo 12 — View of the linear Wetland W6.
Smithfield Foods Expansion Page 6 of 7 Kimley>»Horn
Bladen County, North Carolina

Photo 13 — View of Jurisdictional Ditch 1 (JD 1) looking out of Wetland W 1 towards the existing
facility.
Photo 14 — View of Jurisdictional Ditch 2 (JD2) looking south from the origin within the Study Area.
Smithfield Foods Expansion Page 7 of 7 Kimley»)Horn
Bladen County, North Carolina

APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

Jurisdictional Determination Request
,r
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (7D) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
RPcrmirr`PQ Cnnean7atinn CPm71!`P nrinr to etartincr Az7n1-lr
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 15855 NC Highway 87 W
City, State: Tar Heel, NC
County: Bladen
DirectiviiS: See Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 035600822686;035600816293
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Kimley-Horn; ATTN: Beth Reed
Mailing Address: 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Addressi: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Smithfield Packing Realty Partnership
Mailing Address: 2800 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 4200
Houston, TX 77056
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Addressi:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
W1I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

12
❑✓
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 154
W/1
G.
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
Project Coordinates: 34.749681
Latitude -78.807055
Maps (no larger than l lxl7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
W] Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.miI/Missions/CivilWorks/ReguIatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
htto://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/reaulatory/Dublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
n1nfe and rpfnrn therm -.ria p -mail fn flip rpnnpefnr
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved 7D must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WrAT Tc
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Kimley-Horn on behalf of:
Smithfield Foods, Inc. ATTN: Corey Ragole, 11500 N. Ambassador Dr., Kansas City, MO 64153
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Bladen
City: Tar Heel
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 34.749681 °N; Long. 78.807055
oW
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Goodman Swamp
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
433 linear feet: 5 width (ft) and/or acres.
COwardin Class: Riverine (Jurisdictional Ditches)
Stream Flow: N/A
Wetlands: 15.3 acres.
Cowardin Class: Palustrine
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non -Tidal: N/A

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Kimley-Horn on behalf of Smithfield Foods, Inc.
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 124k- ouart and Tar Heel Quads
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Bladen County - 1990
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): INC Statewide orthoimagery Project (2013) or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
N
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of aquatic
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic
resource
resource in
review area
Riverine
236.5 linear
JD1
34.751796
-78.806218
Ditch
feet
Non -section 10 — non -tidal
Riverine
197.5 linear
JD2
34.742634
-78.804211
Ditch
feet
Non -section 10 — non -tidal
W1
34.752839
-78.807184
Palustrine
10.25 acres
Non -section 10 — wetland
W2
34.747930
-78.808460
Palustrine
0.44 acre
Non -section 10 — wetland
W3
34.749145
-78.807893
Palustrine
0.015 acre
Non -section 10 — wetland
W4
34.756610
-78.807211
Palustrine
3.00 acres
Non -section 10 — wetland
W5
34.747392
-78.807738
Palustrine
1.49 acres
Non -section 10 — wetland
W6
34.745964
-78.802772
Palustrine
0.12 acre
Non -section 10 — wetland

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Todd
Address: 11500 NW Ambassador Drive, Suite 500, Kansas City MO 64153
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Smithfield Site Tar Heel NC
Date: 2/14/17
The Department of the Army
U.S. Array Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Thomas Charles
Field Office: Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Smithfield Farmland Corp, hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and Isolated and Other Non -
404 Jurisdictional Waters permit, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revocation by the owner.
In addition, 1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 2nd day of February, 2017.
Todd Gerken da 1- 6ee-keti
Print Property Owner's Name
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
40I & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Property Owner's Signature

,Gro
Legend
Delineation Study Area
Tar Heel
Bladen County
0 2,000 4,000
Feet
Kentucky
Virginia
Tennessee
Bladen County
i Fa
-
CUMBERLAND
J
creek
SAMPSON
Project Location
BLADEN
I.
South
�YY
Carolina Atlantic Ocean
Georgia COLUMBUS
0 40 80 0 6 12
mmow:= Miles mmmm::= iles
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Kimley>>> Horn Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

•
N -
1
1
_ 4 '
r°
—
'J11 rr
� alk V P � 1. � '° 1 � { �•� � - *a —
1112 �'
r
-Ago- g
v Le end
T.
a* #,S- �•- Delineation Study Area
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
- --
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Kimley>>> Horn (Duart and Tar Heel Quads, 1986)
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

Legend
Jurisdictional Ditches
Wetlands
Study Area
Kimley»)Horn
W4
/
JD1 /
/ 87
as
0 100 200
Feet
f:
4.
JD2
0 650 1,300
Feet
Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

bA
a � NoA
WmB � N
G bA Q
17
N o A No A 'r P
NoA Ln Ln
A
14 a Ca
Ra ' A
Gb oA
.� Pe A t A a A',-
� pyo
Y Ba
Ra ' C
NoA WmB
bA Ln Ra aUc ki►d"q
jo
~ �Ra
`5'r_ WaB 0 N A �
T
Wao
W tj8 l
Bn13 7 WaB
L
1.,
Ly
AuA -
C
Hydric Soil Table
Map Unit Map Unit Name Status
GbA Goldsboro sandy loam, O to 3 percent slopes Inclusions_
LnA Lynchburg fine sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain Non-hydric Legend
NoA Norfolk loamy fine sand, Oto 2 percent slopes Inclusions
Oc Ocilla loamy sand Inclusions
Pe Pantego loam Hydric Delineation Study Area
RaA Rains fine sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain Hydric
Ud Udorthents, loamy Non-hydric 0 1,000 2,000
0WaB Wagram fine sand, Oto 6 percent slopes Inclusions Feet
wo Woodington loamy sand Hydric
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map
Kimley>>> Horn (Bladen County, 1990)
Smithfield Foods Expansion
Bladen County, NC

WETLAND [DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: Smithfield Facility CltylCounty: Tar Heel/Bladen County sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Appilcantrowner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC Sampling Pant: W1 -UP
Investigators) B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none]: None slope (%) <10/o
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.752423 Long: -78.805802 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: WaB - Wagram fine sand NWl classification_ None
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoilRor
or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normat Circumstances" present? Yes m No❑.
Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No— _ V/✓
wWetland?ithin a Wetland? Yes D No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
Data point W1 -UP was taken approximately 20' from and 1' higher in elevation than W1 -WET.
The uplands surrounding wetland W1 were distinguishable by a change in the vegetation
community and a topographic break.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Surface Water (All) I
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (81)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑Iron Deposits (135)
HInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field observations:
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
QAC -Neutral Test (D$)
Sphagnum moss (D$) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? YesNo _ 4,Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): >20"
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): >20" Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No W.
(includes caoillary frinoe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed at W1 -UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1 -UP
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
6
1.
Pinus taeda
25%
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Quercus nigra
15%
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
6
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species 100%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
40%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
0
50 /o of total cover:
0 0
20 /0 20 /o of total cover:
8 o
/o
FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Pinus taeda
15%
Y
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Quercus nigra
15%
Y
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10%
Y
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prunus serotina
5%
N
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
45%
=Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
22.5% 20% of total cover: c) 0/,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5%
Y
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
✓ Ll
5.
50/o = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of total cover:
10/o
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1 -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc?
Texture Remarks
0-5" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
5-10" 10YR 3/2 100%
Sandy loam
10-16" 10YR 4/3 100%
Sandy loam
16-20" 10YR 6/1 100%
Sandy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
H
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No ❑✓
(inches):
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators were observed within the upper 20" of soil. No groundwater or saturation
was present within the upper 20"
of soil.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND [DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Smithfield Facility CltylCounty: Tar Heel/Bladen County sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Appilcant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC sampling Pant: W1 -WET
Investigators) B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section. Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Carolina bay Local reiief (concave, convex, none): Concave slope (%) <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.725399 Long: -78.806040 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Ra - Rains fine sandy loam NWl classification- PF04A
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ©No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSaior Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes m No❑.
Are VegetationHsoi�Ror Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes✓ No _ Is the Sampled Area n n
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes I� No J�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yesg-- No —ft
Remarks:
Wetland W1 is a Carolina bay wetland. W1 appears disconnected from downstream receiving
waters and hydrology is likely sourced from high groundwater and precipitation events. W1 is
bounded topographically and contains soils and vegetation typical of Carolina bays.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Surface Water (Al) I
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (131)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑Iron Deposits (B5)
HInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (Cea)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Moss Trim Lines (1318)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
QAC -Neutral Test (D$)
Sphagnum moss (D$) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? YesNo Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes..
es - No- Depth (inches): 7°
Saturation Present? Yes _ No _ Depth (inches): 4" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1i No Jam.
(includes caoillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
W1 appears to pond water up to 4" in the most depressional areas. Hydrology is likely sourced
from groundwater and precipitation events.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1 -WET
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
W1 is hummocky throughout the wetland.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
9
1.
Pinus taeda
30%
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Acer rubrum
15%
Y
FAC
Quercus nigra
15%
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
9
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species 100%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
60%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
0
50 /o of total cover:
0 0
30 /0 20 /o of total cover:
o
12 /o
FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Magnolia virginiana
15%
Y
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Cyrilla racemiflora
15%
Y FACW
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Quercus nigra
10%
Y
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Ilex opaca
5%
Y
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
45%
=Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
22.5% 20% of total cover: c) 0/,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5%
Y
FAC
2.
Smilax laurifolia
5%
Y
FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
✓ Ll
5.
10% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
50/0 20% of total cover:
2%
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
W1 is hummocky throughout the wetland.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1 -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc?
Texture Remarks
0-4" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
4-10" 10YR 5/1 100%
Loam
10-14" 10YR 5/1 100%
Clay loam
14-20" 10YR 6/1 100%
Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
H
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes iz— No ❑
(inches):
Remarks:
The water table was observed
at 7" and the soils were saturated at 4" deep.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiectlsite: Smithfield Facility city/county: Tar Heel/Bladen County Sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Applicant/Owner Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC sampling Point: W2/W5-UP
Investigator(s): B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Berm Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex slope (%) <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Let: 34.748369 Long: -78.808419 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Wo - Woodington loamy sand NWI classification- None
Are climatic ! hydrola is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoilRor
or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes m No❑.
Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No— ✓ ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
Data point W2/W5-UP was taken on a man-made berm adjacent to wetland W2 approximately
20' east of and 3' higher in elevation than W2/W5-WET.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al) ❑Aquatic Fauna (8 13)
High water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -season water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑Iron
Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (33)
R
undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
ater-Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface water Present? Yes
No _ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): >24"
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): >24"
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 1l Nom
includes capillary Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed at W2/W5-UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2/W5-UP
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda
25%
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
15%
Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
100%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
40%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% 20% of total cover: 9%
FACW species x 2 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1. Pinus taeda
5%
Y FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B!A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
5%
= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of
total cover: 1 °/n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5%
Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
Total Cover
Vegetation
✓
50% of total cover:
2.5%20% of total cover: 1%
Present? Yes No -L]
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the del
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-5" 10YR 3/1 100%
5-24" 10YR 5/4 100%
needed to document the indicator or confirm
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: W2/W5-UP
ce
Texture Remarks
Loam
Fill material
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) L_j 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) E] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No g✓
No water table or saturation was present within the top 24". The soils at W2/W5-UP are primarily
composed of fill material.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiect(Site: Smithfield Facility city/county: Tar Heel/Bladen County Sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Applicant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC Sampling Point: W2/W5-WET
Investigator(sy B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Topographic crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave slope ("/*) <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.748282 tong: -78.808452 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Wo - Woodington loamy sand NWt classification- None
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoior Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes m No❑.
Are VegetationRsci�Ror Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ NO -4 —
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Remarks:
Wetlands W2 and W5 are small, headwater drainages within the study area. W2 and W5 have
been historically altered and disconnected by the construction of the adjacent utility easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators;
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required]
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply;)
Surface Water (Al) nAquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Mass Trim Lines (81£)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CE)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑iron
Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
B
undation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
ater-Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
- No Depth (inches): 10°
Saturation Present? Yes
_ No Depth (inches): 6°
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 1i No J—.
includes capillaryjringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Both W2 and W5 appear
to receive hydrology from groundwater and runoff from the surrounding
uplands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2/W5-WET
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda
25%
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
5
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
100%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
25%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
12.5% 20% of total cover: 5°/n
FACW species x 2 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1. Acer rubrum
5%
Y FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2. Pinus taeda
5%
Y FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B!A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
10%
= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
5% 20% of
total cover: i°/n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5%
Y FAC
2. Smilax laurifolia
5%
Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10%
= Total Cover
Vegetation
✓
50% of total cover:
5%20% of total cover: 2%
Present? Yes No -L]
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2/W5-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-4" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
4-10" 10YR 5/1 100%
Loam
10-20" 10YR 5/2 100%
Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)Fj
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P,
T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Q
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
e
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes iz_ No=—
(inches):
ogRemDepth
arks:
Remarks:
The water table was observed
at 10" and the soils were saturated at 6" deep.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND [DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: Smithfield Facility CltylCounty: Tar Heel/Bladen County sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Appllcantlowner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC sampling Pant: W3 -UP
Investigators) B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section. Township, Ranger Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local reiief (concave, convex, none]: None slope (%) <10/o
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.749329 Long: -78.807845 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ra - Rains fine sandy loam NWl classification_ None
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoilRor
or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normat Circumstances" present? Yes m No❑.
Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No— _ V/✓
wWetland?ithin a Wetland? Yes D No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
Data point W3 -UP was taken in a pine dominated forest approximately 30' north of and V higher
in elevation than W3 -WET.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Surface Water(A1) I
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (81)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑Iron Deposits (135)
HInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (133)
Field observations:
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
QAC -Neutral Test (D$)
Sphagnum moss (D$) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? YesNo _ 4,Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): > 18"
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): >18" Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No W.
(includes caoillary frinoe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators were observed at W3 -UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: M -UP
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1.
Pinus taeda
40%
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Acer rubrum
5%
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
6
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species g3.3%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
o
50 /o of total cover:
° o
22./0 20 /o 5 of total cover:
o
9 /o
FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Juniperus virginiana
5%
Y
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5%
Y
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Pinus taeda
5%
Y
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
15%
= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
7.5% 20% of total cover: 3%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
10%
Y
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
z
5.
10% =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5% 20% of total cover:
2%
Present? Yes NoLl
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W3 -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc?
Texture Remarks
0-4" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
4-12" 10YR 4/2 100%
Loam
12-18" 10YR 5/2 100%
Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
H
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ❑✓
(inches):
_L1
Remarks:
No water table or saturated soils
were observed at W3 -UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND [DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: Smithfield Facility CltylCounty: Tar Heel/Bladen County sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Appllcant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC sampling Pant: W3 -WET
Investigators) B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Isolated depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%) <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.749175 Long: -78.807885 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Ra - Rains fine sandy loam NWl classification: None
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoilRor
or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes m No❑.
Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes✓ No _ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes Q No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes9__ No —4
Remarks:
Wetland W3 is a small, isolated depression influenced by surface water runoff from adjacent
development.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
✓
Surface Soil Cracks (€313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primaa Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (613)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
Mass Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (81)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
❑Iron
Deposits (135)
other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
RWInundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
V(
FAC -Neutral Test (D$)
ater-Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes-
No Depth (inches): 10°
Saturation Present? Yes_
No Depth (inches): 7"
Wetiand Hydrology
Present? Yeswi No Jam.
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
W3 has a variable water table, but typically present within upper
12". Hydrology in W3 is sourced
from groundwater and surface water runoff from adjacent parking lots.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: M -WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum 5% Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
3.
x 1 =
FACW species
4.
FAC species
x 3 =
5.
x 4 =
UPL species
6.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
7.
8.
5% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of total cover:
1%
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1. Acer rubrum
5% Y
FAC
2. Liguidambar styraciflua
5% Y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5% 20% of total cover: 20/n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Carex spp.
5% Y
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
5% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of total cover:
1%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5% Y
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
50/o = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of total cover:
10/o
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Wetland W3 is sparsely vegetated.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 (A)
5 (B)
100% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes IV] No Ll
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W3 -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc?
Texture Remarks
0-5" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
5-12" 10YR 6/1 100%
Sandy loam
12-16" 10YR 6/1 90% 10YR 5/8 10% C M
Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
H
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ] No ❑
(inches):
Remarks:
The water table was commonly present within the upper 12" and
soils were saturated typically
3-4" above the water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND [DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Smithfield Facility CltylCounty: Tar Heel/Bladen County sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Appllcant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC Sampling Pant: W4 -UP
Investigators) B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section. Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slight hillslope Local reiief (concave, convex, none]: None slope (-%) 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lal 34.754846 Long: -78.806786 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Wo - Woodington loamy sand NWl classification_ None
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoilRor
or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normat Circumstances" present? Yes m No❑.
Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No— _ V/✓
wWetland?ithin a Wetland? Yes D No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
Data point W4 -UP was taken bordering the southern edge of W4. The uplands surrounding
wetland W4 are distinguishable by a significant change in the vegetation community and a
topographic break.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Surface Water(A1) I
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (81)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑Iron Deposits (135)
HInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field observations:
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
QAC -Neutral Test (D$)
Sphagnum moss (D$) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? YesNo _ 4,Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): > 18��
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): >1811 Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No W.
(includes caoillary frinoe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed at W4 -UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W4 -UP
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Pinus taeda
25%
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Quercus nigra
15%
Y
FAC
3.
Acer rubrum
5%
N
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species 100%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
0
50 /o of total cover:
0 0
22./0 5 20 /o of total cover:
9 o
/o
FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Pinus taeda
15%
Y
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Quercus nigra
15%
Y
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
100/0
Y
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
40%
= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% 20% of total cover: Ao/n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1.
Smilax laurifolia
5%
Y
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
✓ Ll
5.
50/o = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of total cover:
10/o
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W4 -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc?
Texture Remarks
0-5" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
5-8" 10YR 3/2 100%
Sandy loam
8-14" 10YR 5/2 100%
Sandy loam
14-18" 10YR 6/2 100%
Sandy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
H
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No ❑✓
(inches):
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators were observed within the upper 20" of soil. No groundwater or saturation
was present within the upper 20"
of soil.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiect(Site: Smithfield Facility city/county: Tar Heel/Bladen County Sampling Date: 1/25/2017
Applicant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC Sampling Point: W4 -WET
Investigator(sy B. Reed & W. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater drain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 34.755538
Long: -78.806914
Slope (%) <1%
Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Wo - Woodington loamy sand NW) classification: PF04B
Are climatic I hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
©
No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
SoilF_:1
or HydrologyF:�
significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances° present?
Yes M No=.
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ NO -4 —
within a wetland? Yes � No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Remarks:
Wetland W4 is a large wetland draining to Goodman Swamp. Hydrology in W4 appears to be
sourced from groundwater and precipitation events. W4 is bounded by road fillslopes within the
project study area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators;
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required]
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al) nAquatic Fauna (B13)
High water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Mass Trim Lines (81£)
Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CE)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑iron
Deposits (135) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Bundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
V(
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
ater-Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface water Present? Yes No _ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes - No Depth (inches): 7"
Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): 4"
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 1i No Jam.
includes capillaryjringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
W4 likely receives hydrology from a high water table and groundwater recharge. No surface
water was observed within W4.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W4 -WET
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
W4 is densely vegetated with understory shrubs, typical of pocosin wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Pinus taeda
20%
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2.
Acer rubrum
20%
Y
FAC
3.
Persea borbonia
5%
Y
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
100%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45%
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
22.5% 20% of total cover:
9%
FACW species x 2 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Ilex glabra
30%
Y
FAM
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Cyrilla racemi_flora
30%
Y
FACW
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Lyonia lucida
10%
Y
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Ilex opaca
5%
N
FAC
Prevalence Index = B!A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
75%
= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
37.5% 20% of
total cover:
9°/n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
Arundinaria gigantea
5%
Y
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
5%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5% 20% of total cover:
11%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30'
)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
15%
Y
FAC
2.
Smilax laurifolia
5%
Y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
20%
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Ll
50% of total cover:
10% 20% of total cover:
4%
_/
Present? Yes ♦ No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
W4 is densely vegetated with understory shrubs, typical of pocosin wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W4 -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
04'
10YR 3/1
100%
Loam
4-10"
10YR 5/1
100%
Loam
10-18"
10YR 6/1
100%
Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
❑,
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑,
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Q
Stratified Layers (A5)✓❑
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
F-1
Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑,
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑,
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
r�
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic 150A, 15013)
LJ
HSandy
(S4)
Redox (S5)
[:]Piedmont
(F18) (MLRA
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes FY -11 No g
Remarks
The water table was observed at 7" and the soils were saturated at 4" deep.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiect(Site: Smithfield Facility city/county: Tar Heel/Bladen County Sampling Date 5/17/2017
Applicant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC Sampling Point: W6 -UP
Investigator(s): R. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%) <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.745839 tong: -78.802596 Daturn: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: NoA - Norfolk loamy fine sand NW1 classification- None
Are climatic I hydrola is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoior Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes m No❑.
Are VegetationRsci�Ror Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No— ✓ ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
Data point W&UP was taken in a maintained field 10' east and 1' higher in elevation than
W&WET.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required]
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is re€tuired: check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (BIG)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Mass Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CE)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑Iron
Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
R
undation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(87)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
ater-Stained Leaves (139)
El
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
_ No- 4,Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): >18"
Saturation Present? Yes
_ No ✓ Depth (inches): > 18"
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 1l Nom
includes ca ills Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators were observed at W&UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W&UP
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. None
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
1
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
L00%
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
FAC species x 3 =
1 None
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B!A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Festuca spp.
100% Y FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
100% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
500/o 20% of total cover: 20%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
✓
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
-L]
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W6 -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-4" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
4-12" 10YR 4/2 100%
Loam
12-18" 10YR 5/2 100%
Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)Fj
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 1536)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Q
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
e
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= Nog✓
(inches):
Remarks:
No water table or saturated soils
were observed at W&UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiectlsite: Smithfield Facility city/county: Tar Heel/Bladen County Sampling Date: 5/17/2017
Applicant/Owner: Smithfield Packing Realty Group state: NC sampling Point: W&WET
Investigator(s): R. Sullivan (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: Hollow
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%) <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.745897 Long: -78.802787 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Ra - Rains fine sandy loam NWI classification- None
Are climatic ! hydrola is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoilRor
or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes m No❑.
Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ — NO -4 — _/
within a Wetland? Yes ♦ No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Remarks:
Wetland W6 is a small, linear depression influenced by stormwater backup at a culvert. W6 is
connected to downstream receiving waters through a man-made ditch network.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑
✓
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is re€tuired: check all that apply)
Surface Water (At) ❑Aquatic Fauna (9 13)
High water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (8113)
Water Marks (61) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -season water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑iron
Deposits (135) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
R
undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
ater-Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface water Present? Yes ✓ No _ Depth (inches): 411
Water Table Present? YesNv Depth (inches): 5"
Saturation Present? Yes Na Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes IV]1� No Jam.
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
W6 is sourced from stormwater runoff from the surrounding uplands. The stormwater backs up at
a downstream culvert and causes W6 to pond water for long periods of time. Standing water was
observed up to 4" deep within W6.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W&WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. None That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
3.
x 1 =
FACW species
4.
FAC species
x 3 =
5.
x 4 =
UPL species
6.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Typha latifolia
100/0 Y
OBL
2. Juncus effusus
5% Y
OBL
3. Ludwigia alternifolia
5% Y
OBL
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
20% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10%
20% of total cover:
4%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Wetland W6 is maintained and sparsely vegetated.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 (A)
3 (B)
100% (A1B)
Nrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No _L1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: w6-wET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-5" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
5-12" 10YR 6/1 100%
Sandy loam
12-16" 10YR 6/1 90% 10YR 5/8 10% C M
Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)Fj
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 1536)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Q
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
e
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes F71 No g
Remarks:
The water table was present within the upper 12" and soils were saturated at the surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

APPENDIX D
PERMIT DRAWINGS

+ • s + • + f f s
i+ + • f • + f + + + • + + • + + • > f + + • + + + + + • f f + + + + f + f > + + • > + >• + + + f • + + > s + + + + + + + + + s • • + + + _
+ +•+++ f s • f+f>>+s+•+ f • ++s •++•+• s •� • f + • + + •++ > s+• +
+ + • • f + f > + + + + • • + • / '�+ + + + + + • s + • +
s +
> • +
+ s f
• + • •
• f s s •
f
s • —�+ s f
++ f > + • + • + • + + + + + > f + + • + + + • > + + •
f • /
+ • + •
V s + + s
f
+++•
•
Ki ley)))Horn
SITE 1
SITE 2
mi
00 ` I�
• i— i
i • �
f > + > + > +
s >++ +s +
+ +
SMITHFIELD FOODS EXPANSION
PERMIT DRAWINGS
DATE: 06/08/2017
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 250 500 1000
EXISTING WETLAND
0
WETLAND IMPACT
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBENCE
COUNTY: BLADEN THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS
WATERWAY: NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
RIVER BASIN: LUMBER AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY
DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
SHEET 1 OF 3

I�
I I I
II I
I
U II I PROPOSED GRADE LINES
1 III I
\ IIII II
\ I
II
Ki ley))) Horn
TRAILER PARKING
IMPACT SITE 1 DETAIL
DATE: 06/08/2017
COUNTY: BLADEN
WATERWAY:
RIVER BASIN: LUMBER
DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE:
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 50 100 200
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND IMPACT
Ln
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBENCE
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS
NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY
APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
SHEET 2 OF 3
g
WETLAND
IMPACT
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
IMPACT
WETLAND
W1
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
JD1
PERMANENT IMPACTS:
2.81
ACRES
PERMANENT IMPACT:
0.01
ACRES
�o
I�
I I I
II I
I
U II I PROPOSED GRADE LINES
1 III I
\ IIII II
\ I
II
Ki ley))) Horn
TRAILER PARKING
IMPACT SITE 1 DETAIL
DATE: 06/08/2017
COUNTY: BLADEN
WATERWAY:
RIVER BASIN: LUMBER
DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE:
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 50 100 200
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND IMPACT
Ln
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBENCE
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS
NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY
APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
SHEET 2 OF 3

1
WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND W3
PERMANENT IMPACT: 0.015 ACRES
Ki ley)))Horn
i
/ I
/
II
I I
TRAILER
PARKING
IMPACT SITE 2 DETAIL
DATE: 06/08/2017
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 50 100 200
0
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND IMPACT
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBENCE
COUNTY: BLADEN THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS
WATERWAY: NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
RIVER BASIN: LUMBER AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY
DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
SHEET 3 OF 3

APPENDIX E
ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS AND ADDRESSES

ilk -11 ml
MAPID
PIN
ZONING
-ES
•
1
35600779915
1
DUNN TOMMYLEE
335 OURWAY
LINDEN
NC
28356
2
35600727451
PA
FOURCOUNTYBECTRCCOW
PO BOX667 SUB STATION
BURGAW
NC
28425
3
35600812169
1
FOUR COUNTY ELBE ; R C M EM B8;S- II
POOR
PO BOX 667
BURG4W
NC
28425
4
35600887143
1
SMITHRELDPACKINGREALTY
PARTNEREHIF
2800 POST OAK BLVD SUITE4200
HOUSTON
TY
77056
5
35600957605
PA
WOODELL DIANE
16246 NC87 HWYW
TARHEEL
NC
28392
6
35600674219
1
C4NADY PATR CK M
PO BOX 11408
WILMINGTON
NC
28404-1408
7
35600945742
PA
TERWJDSEITEMARE
4101 UPLANDWAY
GAR -AND TEY
AE
75042
8
35600945398
RA
TERRYJOSETLEMARE
4101 UPLANDWAY
GARLAND TE)(
AE
75042
9
36600056883
PA
ACKSON MICHAEL &
ACKSON TIE ES8, R
7350 NC 131 HWY
BLADENBORC
NC
28320
10
36600058881
PA
GARNER ROBERT L &
GAM ER RTA E
15938 NC87 HWYW
TAR HEEL
NC
28392
11
36600134104
PA
EDGE MARY BETH &
STOUT VAN MARTIN
16224 NC53 HWYW
WHITEOAK
NC
28399
12
35600856419
1
CAROL) NA COLD STORAGE U M ITER
PART
4808 PADFORD AVE
RCHM OND
VA
23230
13
35600446116
PA
MARYSEDGETRJSTEEFORVAN Sr
OUT
16224 NC53 HWYW
WHITEOAK
NC
28399
14
35600950511
PA
WOODELLDIANE
16246 NC87 HWYW
TARHEB-
NC
28392
15
35600952334
PA
WOODELLMAW L
WOODELLgiANNON
16324 NCHWY87
TARHEEL
NC
28392
16
35600936607
PA
GARNER ROBERT L &
GARNER RTA E
15938 NC87 HWYW
TAR HEEL
NC
28392
17
35600935155
PA
GARNERRTA E
15938 NC87 HWYW
TARHEEL
NC
28392
18
35600816293
1
EMITHRELDPACKING REALTY
PARTNERSHIF
2800FOSTOAKBLVDSLJITE4200
HOUSTON
TY
77056
19
36600134104
PA
EDGEMARYBETH &
STOUT VAN MARTIN
16224 NC53 HWYW
WHITEOAK
NC
28399
20
NODATA
NODATA
NODATA
NODATA
NODATA
21
35500596274
PA
BENSON B ER PROPB:11 EE
PO BOX 1250
LUM BERTCN
NC
28359-1250
22
35500868934
RA
EDGE MARYS&
STOUT VAN (TRJSTHE)
16224 NC53 HWYW
WHITEOAK
NC
28399
23
1355006802441
RA
I DAVISMARGAREfM
3521 CEDARHILLDRVE
FAYEITEVILLE
NC
28312

APPENDIX F
NCWAM DATA FORMS

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland W1
Wetland Type Basin Wetland
Date January 26, 2017
Assessor Name/Organization B. Reed/Kimley Horn
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Rating Summa
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland W3
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Date January 26, 2017
Assessor Name/Organization B. Reed/Kimley Horn
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summa
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

APPENDIX G
MITIGATION

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May 26, 2017
Todd Gerken
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
11500 NW Ambassador Drive, Suite 500
Kansas City, MO 64153
Project: Smithfield Foods Expansion
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sc;
Expiration of Acceptance: November 26, 2017
County: Bladen
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
Impact
River
Basin
CU Location
[(8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Ri avian Coastal Marsh
Lumber
03040203
0 0 0 0.25 6.5 0 0
0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: William Sullivan, agent
Sincerely,
Jam s. Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

APPENDIX H
NCNHP LETTER

NorthCarolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
May 26, 2017
Jason Hartshorn
Kimley-Horn
421 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Smithfield Foods
Dear Jason Hartshorn:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-3593
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler o_ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone: [phone] LOCATION.
1651 MaII Service Center a *w.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 Raleigh, NC 276133

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Smithfield Foods
May 26, 2017
NCNHDE-3593
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element
Group Observation Occurrence
Date Rank
Dragonfly or 33737 Somatochlora georgiana Coppery Emerald 2004 -Pre H?
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33779 Stylurus ivae Shining Clubtail 2004 -Pre
Damselfly
Freshwater 4561 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2009-07-22
Bivalve
Freshwater 10453 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell 2006-07-20
Bivalve
Vascular Plant 23815 Eriogonum tomentosum Southern Wild -buckwheat 1890
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
X?
E
E
H
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Low
Rare
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G4
S2S3
Low
Rare
3 -Medium
Species of
Threatened
G3
S3
Concern
3 -Medium
5 -Very
Low
Significantly
Rare
Special
Concern
Historical
G4 S4
G4G5 SH
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on May 26, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-3593: Smithfield Foods
a
guck
hf
ki
871
;v1.6erTy Swarnp
�"ter
°Or
N Tar Heel
W+E
S
May 26, 2017
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Page 3 of 3
1:29,698
0 0.25 0.5 1 mi
0 0.4 0.8 1.6 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),—sstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community

PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
FOR
SMITHFIELD FOODS
DISTRIBUTION CENTER EXPANSION
15855 NC -87
TAR HEEL, BLADEN COUNTY, NC
PROJECT DESIGN TEAM
OWNER DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER SURVEYOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ENVIRONMENTAL
SMITHFIELD FOODS.INC.TPPMANN GROUP K MLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INCASSOCPSSOC AURNG 8 ENGINEERING IA$E)ECS SOUHEAST. LLP KIM EY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 COMMERCE STREET FOR WAYNE.TN 4 ROAD 421 EIGH NC 276 IST, STE 606 GR BOX SOR ]26 RAMSEY STREET, SUITE 3 421 RALEIGH.
N ILLE 27601ST. STEM
CON ACT.
TODD
GE0 CONTACT. A A 48825 RALCON ACT;
MA T A CON ACT- RO ERT RUSSELL CONTAFAYEITCT:
IN NOW E G RALEIGH. BETH Rt
CONTACT: TODD GERKEN CONTACT: ADAM TIPPMANN CONNECT: MATT ANDERSON, PE CONNECT: ROBERT RUSSELL CONTACT: W I I.MSS E COINS, PE CONTACT 91 BETH REED, PWS
EMAIL GERKEN@S PHONE: TIPPM.5488 PHONEMAIL ATT.AR,2020 PHONE: J36.J2J.3308 PHONE: GOIN1@E EMAIL.P ONE ETH.R]30]J
EMAIL. [e-mail] EMAIL [e-mail] EMAIL. [e-mail] EMAIL: WGOINS®ECSIJMNED.COM EMAIL: [e-mail]
GOVERNING AGENCIES CONTACTS:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BLADEN COUNTY BEA DEN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
213 SUNE A, AVIATION PARKWAY 272 SMITH CIRCLE S58 GILLEPIE ST
ELIZABETHTOWN. NC 23337 EL SETHTOWN, NC 26331 FAYETTEVILLE. NC 23301
PHONE. [phone] CONTACT -RANDY GARNER CONTACT. GREG BURNS. PE
EMAIL [e-mail] PHONE. [phone] PH ONE: 910AR8.1493
EMAIL [e-mail] EMAIL: [e-mail]
91
Sheet
List Table
Sheet Number Sheet Title
C0.0
COYER SHEET
C0.1
GENERAL NOTES
C1.0
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS
01.1
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
C1.2
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
C2,0
DEMOUTION PLAN
02.1
DEMOLITION PLAN
C&O
PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C3.1
PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C3.2
PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C3.3
PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C4.0
SITE PLAN
C4.1
SITE PLAN
C5.0
GRADING PLAN
C5.1
GRADING PLAN
06.0
DRAINAGE PLAN
C6.1
DRAINAGE PLAN
C7.0
UTILITY PLAN
C&0
SITE DETAILS
C9.0
STORM DETAILS
072.0
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C12.1
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PRELII1iINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
~ o p Q Q 0
w O O I
O O N N
Q C Q
S O oC,
w s
Y � U
W
W
V//2/�
J
LJ_
\W
O
U
U
U) z
o )
OZ O
LL. O o o
LL
Q U) LL
VJ .
JZ.9
LJJ Q a W
r >< LL
TIL Z
lLL 0
O
_ U
VJ Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
C0.0

GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, BUILDING
UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS,
DOWNSPOUTS, GRAVEL AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDING WALLS, UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND BOLLARDS
IN BUILDING SIDEWALKS. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND CIVIL PLANS SHALL BE
IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER.
2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS WITH A "VAN" MARKING SHALL HAVE ADDITIONAL SIGN MOUNTED BELOW THE
SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SIGN DENOTING VAN ACCESSIBILITY, REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.
3. REFER TCN CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR DETAILS OF ON-SITE SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND PAVEMENT
MARKING. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION.
4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS AND CODES
AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
5. EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY RECEIVED 03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING (ASE).
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL NECESSARY BARRICADES, SIGNS, FENCES, FLASHING
LIGHTS, TRAFFIC MEN, ETC. FOR MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC AS REWIRED BY THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT) AND BLADEN COUNTY INSPECTIONS.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MONUMENTS, IRON PINS, AND PROPERTY CORNERS DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE CURBS, SIDEWALK, PAVING, AND GUTTER AS
INDICATED ON PLANS AND AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, INCLUDING ANY
DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
9. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD
CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF-SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY
OWNERS AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS MAY BE REWIRED.
10. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE NCDOT AND BLADEN COUNTY.
11. COORDINATE ALL CURB AND STREET GRADES IN INTERSECTIONS WITH INSPECTOR.
12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN THE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR
TO PROCEEDING.
13. ALL SITE DIMENSIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE FACE OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE STRUCTURE.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT ALL INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS MANUAL (LATEST REVISIONS FOR
ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS).
15. SIGHT TRIANGLES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REWIRED.
18. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING CODE AND NORTH CAROUNA
ACCESSIBILITY COD= CHAPTER 11 AS WELL AS FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.
17. ADJACENT STREETS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES.
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
1. REFER TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (LATEST EDITION) FOR DETAILS OF
STANDARD TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND STANDARDS.
DRAINAGE:
1. STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED:
15" DIAMETER AND LARGER: RCP, CLASS III PER ASTM C-76, WITH FLEXIBLE PLASTIC BITUMEN
GASKETS AT JOINTS.
LESS THAN 15" DIAMETER: PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR HDPE - AASHTO DESIGNATION M252 TYPE S,
M294 TYPE S AND MP7-97 TYPE S, SMOOTH INTERIOR/AMMULAR EXTERIOR, ONLY PERMITTED WHEN
SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH PIPE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDWNES OR NCDOT SPECIFICATION,
MIC HEVIIR IS MORE STRINGENT. PIPE JOINTS AND FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M252 AND
M294.
2. ALL STORM DRAINAGE WITHIN THE PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CLASS III REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
UNLESS OTHERNSE SPECIFIED AS CLASS IV.
3. ALL PIPE LENGTHS AND SLOPES ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. ALL PIPES SHALL BE WD ON STRAIGHT ALIGNMENTS AND EVEN GRADES USING A PIPE LASER OR OTHER
ACCURATE METHOD.
5. ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE MAY RE REWIRED IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IF DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
6. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS IN
ADDITION TO OTHER APPLICABLE CRITERIA:
6.1. NO MORE THAN 500 LF OF TRENCH MAY BE OPENED AT ONE TIME.
6.2 EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES.
6.3. EFFLUENT FROM DEWATERING OPERATIONS SHALL BE FILTERED OR PASSED THROUGH AN APPROVED
SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE, OR BOTH, AND DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT ADVERSELY
AFFECT FLOWING STREAMS OR OFF-SITE PROPERTY.
6.4. MATERIAL USED FOR BACK-FIWNG TRENCHES SHALL BE PROPERLY COMPACTED IN ORDER TO
MINIMIZE EROSION AND PROMOTE STABILIZATION PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS.
6.5. DESTABILIZATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL REGULATIONS.
6.6. APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
7. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO
RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER.
8. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS
WATERTIGHT.
9. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT FROM INVERT IN TO
INVERT OUT.
10. PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, FRAMES,
GRATES, ETC. SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
11. THIS PLAN DETAILS PIPES UP TO 5FT FROM THE BUILDING FACE. REFER TO DRAWINGS BY OTHERS FOR
BUILDING CONNECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL PIPE ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY.
12 ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AND UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND
SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING @ COVERS. UDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER".
13. STRUCTURE RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE IN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AS
NECESSARY.
14. RIM ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES RIM ELEVATIONS
REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES, AND JUNCTION BOXES, AND THE GUTTER FLOW LINE
FOR CURB INLETS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
I�
UTILITY NOTES:
1. ALL RLL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE. AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES
2 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE BLADEN COUNTY UTILITY INSPECTORS 72 -HOURS BEFORE CONNECTING TO
ANY EXISTING LINE.
3. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
8"PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D 3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP
8" PVC
SDR26 PER ASTM D 3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP
6" PVC SCHEDULE 40
4" PVC SCHEDULE 40
DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 AND AWWA C151
4. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
3" AND LARGER - DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA 0150
SMALLER THAN 3" - TYPE K COPPER TUBE
5. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.
6. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS NTH THRUST BLOCKING AS CALLED OUT ON UTILITY
DETAILS
7. WATER AND SEWER MAINS SHALL BE KEPT TEN (10) APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL
CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE).
8, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 3.0' COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.
9. IN THE EVERT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATERLINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS
LINES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY UNE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE MTN MECHANICAL
JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF CROSSING, THE WATERLINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS
VATH APPROPRIATE THRUST BLOCKING MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA
C-151) (CLASS 50).
10. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFlWNG.
11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH OF 3000
P.S.I.
12. BLADEN COUNTY HAS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT ALL PRIVATE WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS.
13. DRAWINGS DO NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
14. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES.
15. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAMNOS FOR TE -IN LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALL UTILITIES.
16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE BLADEN COUNTY UTILITY
DEPARTMENT WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.
IF MUNICIPALITY DOES NOT REWIRE TESTING, CONTACT ENGINEER FOR APPROPRIATE UTILITY TESTING
CRITERIA-
17.
RITERIA17. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING
UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND
WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RWED ON AS
BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT
LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.
18. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES CHARTED OR
UNCHARTED WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
19. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS AND/OR TESTING REWIRED BY CODES AND/OR
UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE
FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICE.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE NTN ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
21. ALL UTILITY MAIN LENGTHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
22 ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
23. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WORK TO BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED UTILITY
CONTRACTOR.
24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AS REWIRED WITH FOUR COUNTIES FOR INSTALLATION OF PRIMARY
ELECTRIC SERVICE AND TELEPHONE SERVICE TO THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS.
25. WHEN A WATER MAIN CROSSES OVER A SEWER MAIN, THERE MUST BE EIGHTEEN INCHES OF VERTICAL
SEPARATION. IF THE WATER MAIN MUST GO UNDER THE SEWER MAIN, BOTH LINES MUST BE OF DUCTILE
IRON FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CROSSING WITH A TWELVE INCH VERTICAL
SEPARATION. THE CROSSING OF OTHER UNDERGROUND RIPE REWIRES A MINIMUM OF TWELVE INCHES OF
VERTICAL SEPARATION. ALL DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER TO OUTSIDE DIAMETER.
26. WHEN A WATER LINE PASSES OVER OR UNDER A STORM SEWER, VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES
SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNLESS WATER LINES ARE OF DUCTILE IRON OR ENCASED IN CONCRETE A MINIMUM
6" CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE POURED BETWEEN THE TWO. DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE
DIAMETER TO OUTSIDE DIAMETER.
27. A FIRE INSPECTOR SHALL INSPECT THE UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE PIPING FROM THE PIV TO THE BUILDING.
FOR YARD FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FOGS), THE UNDERGROUND FDC PIPING MUST BE INSPECTED
BEFORE IT IS COVERED UP.
28. GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING AND DETAILS ARE TO BE INCLUDED NTH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PLUMBING
PLANS
29. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE NTH OWNER AND OWNER'S CONSULTANT "SHAMBAUGH AND SON" FOR
ALL WATER SYSTEMS EXISTING AND PROPOSED ON THIS PROPERTY. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER
IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
BACKFLOW PREVENTION NOTES'.
1. THERE SHALL BE NO TAPS, PIPING BRANCHES, UNAPPROVED BYPASS PIPING, HYDRANTS, FIRE
DEPARTMENT CONNECTION POINTS OR OTHER WATER -USING APPURTENANCES CONNECTED TO THE SUPPLY
UNE BETWEEN ANY WATER METER AND ITS BLADEN COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REWIRED BACKFLOW
PREVENTER-
2 ALL REQUIRED BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLES ARE REWIRED TO BE TESTED BY AN APPROVED
CERTIFIED TESTER PRIOR TO PLACING THE WATER SYSTEM INTO SERVICE.
3. THE DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE BLADEN COUNTY REGULATIONS AT
THE PROPERTY LINE AND AS SHOWN IN THE LOCATION OF THE UTILITY PLAN.
4. THE FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE BLADEN
COUNTY REGULATIONS AT THE PROPERTY UNE AND AS SHOWN IN THE LOCATION OF THE UTILITY PLAN.
GRADING:
I. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY MTN ALL BLADEN COUNTY AND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONS AT CURB AND
GUTTER LOCATIONS ARE TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK, AND THIS MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO GROUND BREAKING-
4.
REAKING4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL
FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL
REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE
7. ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
8. UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN ARE BASED UPON THE APPROXIMATE WT AND FILL
SLOPE UNITS, OR OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
9. THE PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN IN DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS AND SIDEWALKS ARE FINISHED
ELEVATIONS INCLUDING ASPHALT. REFER TO PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT
SUBBASE OR AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SO THAT RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY FLOW ACROSS
NEW PAVEMENT AREAS TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE INLETS OR SHEET OVERLAND.
11. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN IS CONSIDERED A
VIOLATION OF THE GRAINING PERMIT AND SUBJECT TO A FINE.
12. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM THE SURVEY REFERENCED IN THIS PLAN SET.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS @ CONDITIONS AS OUTUNED IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.ES.
PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED PATH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND ALL TERMS AND
CONDITIONS IN THE NCDEO PERMIT ISSUED FOR THIS PROJECT.
IC ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE AND WATER DISTURBED AREAS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS
OBTAINED.
16. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL SHEETING, SHORING,
BRACING AND SPECIAL EXCAVATION MEASURES REWIRED TO MEET OSHA. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE WORK INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS THE
DESIGN ENGINEER ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN(S) TO INSTALL SAID ITEMS.
17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE ANY DEWATERING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT
THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AS AN ALTERNATE ALLOWANCE.
18. CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEWATERING AS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT AS
SHOWN ON THE PLANS. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DEWATERING
RECOMMENDATIONS.
19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, DOOR
LOCATIONS AND EXACT UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS.
20. ALL FILL MATERIALS, EXISTING BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, PAVEMENT AND UTILITY STRUCTURES, TOPSOIL AND
ANY OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE BEARING ZONE
BELOW THE STRUCTURE
21. ALL FOUNDATION AND UTILITY EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNIAL
REPRESENTATIVE TO DETERMINE WHETHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE REMOVED. ALL UNDESIRABLE
MATTER SHALL BE REMOVED, BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS REWIRED BY
THE GEOTECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
22. GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, THEY
MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS, OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS
REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE
GUTTER FLOW LINE FOR CURB INLETS.
23. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A
SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE.
24. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT I FOOT.
25. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY
EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR
ABANDONED AT MAIN AS REFERENCED IN THE PLANS.
26. ALL WT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR RATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
27. ALL AREAS NTH 2.1 SLOPE OR ERODABLE SLOPES SHALL BE COVERED NTH MONET MATTING OR
APPROVED EQUAL INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS
28. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING
UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND
WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS
BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT
LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.
29. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY NTH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE
SAME.
FINE GRADING NOTES:
1. SIDEWALKS TO HAVE A MAKNUM 2% CROSS SLOPE AND A MAXIMUM 5% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE
2. PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS TO HAVE MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE AND MAXIMUM 5% LONGITUDINAL
SLOPE WTHIN STRIPED AREA
3. ADA PARKING AREAS AND ACCESSIBLE AREAS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM 2% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS.
4. SIDEWALK INTERSECTIONS AND RAMP LANDINGS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM 2% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
I. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY DISPOSING OF EXCESS MATERIAL OFF-SITE
2 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ALL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE STANDARDS FROM THE NCDEQ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
REGULATIONS
3. GROUND COVER SHALL BE ESTABUSHED PER "SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES" PROVIDED IN
THE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GROUND COVER ON DESIGNATED AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER
THAN 3:1 WITHIN 7 DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING. CONTRACTOR
SHALL PROVIDE GROUND COVER IN 14 DAYS ON ALL OTHER AREAS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
ANY PHASE OF GRADING PERMANENT GROUND COVER FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITHIN 15 WOF49NG DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER) FOLLOWING
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
5. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, SOL STOCKPILES AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE
STABILIZED OR PROTECTED MTN SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL SOL
STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS BORROW AREAS AND SOL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM
THE PROJECT SITE.
6. SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER MEASURES
INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS FIRST STEP IN ANY
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND SHALL BE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLOPE LAND
DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE.
7. WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES INTERSECT PAVED OR PUBUC ROADS, PROVISIONS
SHALL BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT BY VEHICULAR TRACKING ONTO THE
PAVED SURFACE WHERE SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A PAVED OR PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE,
THE ROAD SURFACE SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT
SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND TRANSPORTED TO A
SEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA, STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT
IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER.
8. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS
AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED
AND APPROVAL HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE BLADEN COUNTY INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
TRAPPED SEDIMENT AND THE DISTURBED SOL AREAS RESULTING FROM THE DISPOSITION OF
TEMPORARY MEASURES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION.
9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NCDEQ
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE, AND U.S. SOIL
CONSERVATION SERVICE.
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES AND STRUCTURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLOSE
CONTACT NTH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS CAN BE
PERFORMED AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
11. A COPY OF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND PERMIT SHALL BE
MAINTAINED ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES.
12 STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT
OTHERWISE STABILIZED SHALL BE TOP SOILED AND SEEDED, TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NODEQ SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS. PERMANENT SEEDING AND
GRASS ESTABUSHMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE.
13. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF DOES NOT LEAVE SITE LIMITS OR ENTER
PROTECTED AREAS. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITED BEYOND DISTURBED AREA WITHIN SITE UNITS
SHALL BE REMOVED_
14. WEEN A CRUSHED STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HAS BEEN COVERED WITH SOL OR HAS BEEN
PUSHED INTO THE SOIL BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, IT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH A DEPTH OF
STONE EQUAL TO THAT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION.
15. ALL DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SILTATION. INEFFECTIVE PROTECTION DEVICES
SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPLACED AND THE INLET CLEANED. FLUSHING IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE
METHOD OF CLEANING.
16. DURING DEWATERING OPERATIONS, WATER SHALL BE PUMPED INTO AN APPROVED FILTERING
DEVICE PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO RECEIVING OUTLET.
17. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES AND
DIVERSIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION.
DEMOLITION NOTES'.
I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL REMOVAL EFFORTS NTH THE OWNER. COORDINATION ITEMS
ARE ANTICIPATED TO INCLUDE SITE ACCESS, TRAFFIC CONTROL, MAINTENANCE OF ACCESS AND UTILITIES
FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS TO REMAIN, AND EROSION CONTROL-
2.
ONTROL2. ALL FEATURES MARKED TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE SHALL REMAIN IN EXISTING CONDITION UNLESS
REMOVED THROUGH EFFORTS FOR OTHER FEATURES.
3. SPECIAL CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT AND MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING FEATURES NOT MARKED FOR
REMOVAL IN THE EVENT OF ANY IMPACT TO SUCH FEATURES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM
REPAIR AND/OR RESTORATION TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AS OF START OF WORK.
4. WHERE PAVEMENT REMOVAL AREAS ABUT OTHER PAVEMENT AREAS TO REMAIN, THE EXISTING PAVEMENT
SHALL BE SAW CUT TO PROVIDE A BOUNDARY WHICH IS STRAIGHT AND CLEAN IN APPEARANCE
5. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN FEATURES NLL GENERALLY BE PROTECTED IN PLACE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
MARKED FOR REMOVAL
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF ALL DEMOLITION DEBRIS OFF OF THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE.
OTHER NOTES:
I. CONTRACTORS MUST PROVIDE "REDUNE" DRAWINGS TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR (GC) AT COMPLETION OF
WORK AND WILL NEED WRITTEN DIRECTION TO DEVIATE FROM STAMPED PLAN.
~ o O Q Q m
w O O I
O O N N
d N N
a m Q
u!
W
0
Z
J
LLL
W
Z
fW
v
U
VJ
0 W
�O'o
-0 LLL
QW LL
VJ 1 Q
JZ�_j
wQaLL
W LL
r ><
Wz
0
I_ U
VJ Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
Co.1

EXISI7NG LEGEND
a
BURLEY CONTROL A o
BOLLARD '
STORM INLETS ®� 0
x
STORM MANHOLE
^ LIGHT POLE ^v
s \ UTILITY POLE
/\ SEWER MANHOLE OO
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
WATER VALVE N
Z
SIGN � O
TREELINE
\ \
\ \\ FENCE
\\ \ STORM DRAIN PIPE
_ \ \SAN
ITLINE SEWER PIPE
GAS
\ \ \\ \ \ POWER LINE-----�—
\ \
TELEPHONE LINE
4 -WIRE POWER LINE --- -�—
\ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
WATER LINE — — — — — — — z
PROPERTY LINE
EASTING ASPHALT
\\ \\ \ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION a
WETLAND c
TOTAL SITE AREA: 539.31 AC ¢
UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION: 31.8 AC
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND a o
UNITS BEYOND IMPACTS SHOWN WITH TBS PROJECT. THIS o
INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
\ \\ \ MARY SEDGE - TRUSTEE644FOR VAN ST / /// \ EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS. ^ ¢ >
PIN X69, PG
/
- �/ • \ \\ D.B. 269. PG 960
256.94 ACRES (PER BLADEN COUNTY CIS) / \ \ THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL z w z y
INSURANCE
RATE MAP
(FIRM /3720034600KOD ZONE PER FEMAEF EFLOFFECTIVE DATE JANUARY 52007. w w a 3
CANADY PATRICK M
PIN 0674219
D 0642, 0
.B. 0642, PG 0913
94.81 ACRES (PER BLADEN COUNTY GIS)
PROPERTY LINE
y \
\`\ WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT \`\\ /"/✓/ \
�Q—
\\ - WETLAND LIMITS
E \\\ / LIMITS
CONSTRUCTION �— — — — — — — — — — — — — —�
-------------------
\
\ r�
O
WETLAND LIMITS
o w
\\\ J � � T. •7 ^\ ` / r• r� r r r • r r r r r • r r r r r a r r r r • r r �� s r �_
\\ � r rrrrr rrr rrrr rrrrrr r.\�\r r z
�/'� \ I . 5 9 \`\\ r r k r r r r r r c a r r r r • r r r r r r • r r r ¢\ rr \ �' V!
w-
2 EDGE MARY BETH JUPoSDICTOPf_AL DITCH r • r r r r • r r r t r t r r r r\ r r ry �_
n PIN ,4035600134104 - \ \ JI O
D.B. 385, PC 734 v. v.
469.38 ACRES (PER BLADEN COUNTY GIS) - `\ '% r r r r r r r °' r r •. `' r r • r r r °' r r r/ \
.� \ SMITHFIELD FARMLAND CORP.
\\ PIN #035600822686 r r r r r r r r \ W
\ _ D.B. 0723, PG 0276 r r r r w•-� \
ACRES (PER BLADEN COUNTY GIS)
\ A G I I I ' IL I_ O
._ \ \ • �\ \ CAROLINA
OLD STORAGE
LP I ) w
\ \\\ D. B. 0662, PC 0675
16.9 ACRES C.R. AND COUNTY CIS) I I t I
PROPERTY LINE +/
o
N
Z 0
\ \\
\ SMITHFIELD FARMLAND CORP.
\\ PIN OD3560OW7143 O 0
O O LL
\ D.B. 0723, PG 0276 /A LL
\ \ 309.74 ACRES (PER BLADEN COUNTY GIS) Q V J Q Q
\`\ J Z L
wQaw
wLL
.\ Baa=
rx �zz w
\`\ 2 vJ
\`\ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET V) Q
\ 0 150 300 600 m
E \ SHEET NUMBER
C1.0

i
111�1 70
L I
EXISTING WETLAND__
%%/
� \ l
CoJL 1
I IljI\IIVIIlI II\V\III IIII I�ryv1II1°I IIlIOII\ Iu+I"aI 1 w II1\IIIIII)1 II�I III II I II I\II �1I 1I 1I JmI
V
��a . \v '`v�E(`%�C�III'OS� �NH,vSNV1 TIG _ R— II Urc1I�C/`—/ A/� _//—�/l� �_ l �I�✓\/la �i� \/'/`Il�\ 1/li,l\\ i'1vb\fi lI 1 /�V / .1i /'/mg'I v °/ . +/�\_� I (� `( / �l �/ . IV /—/ TT/ _,��� /. //� ��If, � �
e /^
I/ iaIi
�. Ia
%i/.u.1l,i
j/I.
/\
.//
/
.
/
.-
h.
DITCH ,
II/
�.
DITCHExlsec uRIwlcnGNAL
A.
pr, V
V
y
EXSTING CONCRETE ACCESS ROAD
(CONSTRUCTED MTN GFR PLANS) A
0 % EXISTING QFR BUILDING
fl
z
— 14'
T OFR/MR
n\/f
EXISTING WETLANDS EXISTING SMITHFIELD
PLANT BUILDING
)NCREIE ACCESS ROAD
TED NTN GFR PLAN) W
-
I I I�i vv 9bv/, MATCHLINEI'—
\ r
1§ff:�f�EETC4.FOR ONTINi�ATION.—.—�-�!'.
... ,ev ...... ;� \.. .
EXISTING LEGEND
z
SURVEY CONTROL
A
BOLLARD
0 U)
STORM INLETS
®� 0
STORM MANHOLE
� po
LIGHT POLE
O LL
UTILITY POLE
`O�
SEWER MANHOLE
OO
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
w_ a w
WATER VALVE
SIGN
^Q^
Df LL
LL
TREELINE
d
T X }
FENCE
LL W z
r 0
0
STORM DRAIN DRAIN PIPE
U
cn
SANITARY SEWER PIPE ------'-------GAS
(ANSI
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
LINE
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
OF
POWER LINE
-----�—
TELEPHONE LINE
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
4 -WIRE POWER LINE
-----y—
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
---�—
WATER LINE —
-----
PROPERTY LINE
— — —
EXISTING ASPHALT
W O
O � f=
/l
G D C, Q m
z
U
0 U)
� po
5Know
O LL
'^
VJ
JZLIV —j
what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
NORTHLL
SURVEY NOTE
^Q^
Df LL
LL
EXISTING BOVNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICINFORMATION SHOWN
d
T X }
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE).
LL W z
r 0
0
O 40 80 160
U
cn
THE 51TE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA AOCESSIBILITY CODES 117.1-2009 AND
(ANSI
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
Lz,N
�A oQ
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
OF
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
A . w

I�
EXISTING LEGEND
a
sUavEr caMTaa A
o
BOLLARD
STORM INLETS ®� 0
STORM MANHOLE
i
LIGHT POLE e�P
UTILITY POLE `O�
SEWER MANHOLE sO
NL
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
N
.I Ir Er '
WATER VALVE
SIGN
O
.'�.
.i,.a., I
TREELINE .rvvv�-vvvwvv�
// 3i.
FENCE —x—x—
./ .
i -(-
STORMIN PIPE -------
ASEWER
.
�y'�
SAN PIPE
GAS LINE
.I. . .... ./ .
,, MAT 14QNE
POWER LINE
— — — —
/:i�`/i/rl %�E SHEET G4.1 FAR CONTIN i�ATION - /. '
hWIREOPOWERELINE ----�—
�. l . I.
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
./. _ .I.�.
WATER LINE — — — — — — —
z
1.----
L,I
EXISTINNG ASPHALT
e4', .
I _ . �.
L�
I
ry
. . .
= a�
. . .
' . . .
#. .
132-_---.T—�'L
g
{
■
'/
. .
EXISTING ASPHALT. PARIONG AREA Yl .
TI . . . . . ,'
. '
Q.4,QV�
. . . .'_' . . . . .
I I ..... . ...
4
a
ns 9cs: 7. . . . . . . .
o
��°
a
`�W.I
yo
I..,
Z
Ij
l..J
.
......
a_
T \.
z (n
Z
U)
1—
W 0
Z
O
NORTH
U
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
v
0 40 80 160
'„ z
0 cn
�po
O LL
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^
LL � �
URVEY NOTE
AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
LL 0 }
T X
BASEDBOUNDARY
SED ON A BWNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC S SURVEY RECEIVED
AND
2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
IGINEERING(ASE).
..1� W Z
LL
r � 0
THE SITE WILL FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
_ U
(�,
S 111 AND
CAROLINA 1 OF THE
CODES (ANSI 1 EXCEPT
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND IN AREAS
IZj
U) oQ
SITE
WHERE AN AR STATEMENT FROM A SITE
VJ
AR I CONDITIONS
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES HYOF THAT SIZE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFlCATIONS.
w . /�
I L

I I IIIrT /\ II \\ 3F/// --� \ \ IIID . I j ll. ♦�♦ _
I\ ==1s � — �l
I II I I {— 7 \ \ / (, i° 1 _13a;t33.\�IIIjL
I lla I III
I 1 III III /� 1-1,
♦ J,/� ��.
131/ �� / \ V_" �\� �� //%' ✓/, .. .
II r \\ /
f.24
, DETAILED DEMOLITION
� EE SHEETC2.1 FOR / /. /
I l I II
/J i '^/ I
PLAN IN THIS AREA
11
//41 4e
I I I II I I NETLAN�YLIPACT LIMITS `
II I 1 ` APPROXIMATE AREA 2.81 AC
I\ I I III — — ) i\\N\\\\ ♦I ^ \� j I \\ �� �/� �\ �/ hl
\ II )I I TREE LINE TO BE TRIMMED BACK \�
I�. I III\� III \\/ —1 1{ �� ° ♦, 1 1 �1 I 4 I
N.
It I
X3r\r -i- II II I ° p °.I`a ° . > a ° ° ° / ° \\ — __—_�, _ - .\) t i
U.
\ -
\ I� I/
It I '/ \
\ = I a
0.
1� \ I I
IN. 11 II
I'I`I II �e I " -----133-------------- ,_---- (r / /
kI
Iz I I
I �.I
I �q yt11 na / F � . .
I R I I 1� II I / PLUS GFR BUILDIN
I V (qoN$y UGTED IN PHAS 2) \. .
135---- --
I ,f I'
I I
'NST
r 135- 135 x135— 135- 135 -135 / i j/ \ I F \
/ II I � �--^��--fr�+�•- �=-=+�a�. ==tee..— --� - L = / / � / 1 Ir \ \
�.� b1n^ j
\ \I I III a NK,
Ivy
`VP ✓v / ' I I I I EXISTING SMITHFIELD
PLANT BUILDING
EXISTING WEILAND.
I \ \ //� • CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT
Ir\ll\ //r/r ENCROACH INTO AETLAND
//// UNTIL PERMIT IS OBTAINED
---134—\
CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN
PLAn n M DRAIN
AND�ASSOCIATEDEXISTINGSSTRUCTURES PIPE
I I \I 1\
N.
\ \ \ / °a a°` (TYPICAL BENEATH EXISTING
CONTRACITOR "EIMOUSH ASPHALT PAVEMENT)
SIL \\ ` —\\ r��===1 AASPHALLREMTPwnQlTG
III I I �1IIL \\ \\\® _e'/f/%s AFTER NEW PARKING/j/ �Iv1ATCHLIN
I I I II I 71, SE[ SHCET C2.1, FOR CONTINUATION
I ,
I
91
NO NOR K SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
WITH THIS PROJECT UNTIL PERMIT IS APPROVED. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS.
UTILITY DEMOLITION SHALL OCCUR AFTER PROPOSED
RELOCATED UTILITIES ARE INSTALDI. CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE ALL UTILITY SHUT DOWNS WITH OWNER
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
UNITS OF DISTURBANCE: 31.8 AC
z
DEMOLITION LEGEND
GRAVEL, SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT AND CURB AND
CUTTER TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED
5
UTILITY TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, REFER TO
UTILITY PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION
a
UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION
Know what's below.
WETLAND TO BE IMPACTED
NO NOR K SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
WITH THIS PROJECT UNTIL PERMIT IS APPROVED. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS.
UTILITY DEMOLITION SHALL OCCUR AFTER PROPOSED
RELOCATED UTILITIES ARE INSTALDI. CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE ALL UTILITY SHUT DOWNS WITH OWNER
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
UNITS OF DISTURBANCE: 31.8 AC
z
(n
0 U)
� po
5
o LL
'' ^^
VJ
JZLIV —j
Know what's below.
Q^ a LV
Call before you dig.W
NORTH
SURVEY NOTE
LL W LL
LL
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
LL
T X
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE).
..1� Z
L W
II— O
O 40 80 180
U
cn
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA AOCESSIBILITY CODES 117.1-2009 AND
(ANSI
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
IZj
�A oQ
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE W1TIN BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NODOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
L
C"•�

II
#4
II
II
II
II
II
14
II
II
II
#II
I%
I
I
II
II
— -- —-
L BENEATH EXISTING
T PAVEMENT)
PLACE EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE
AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES
(TYPICAL BENEATH EXISTING
ASPHALT PAVEMENT)
I I
BD]E
CONTRACTOR 'SHALL NOT DEMOLISH EXISTING ASPHALT
J PAVEMENT CENTER HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED.
UR
PROPOSED PARKING NORTH OF
DISTRIBUTION
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
1 /
I
I /
I /
II
AN
Ilk
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO
Pp C, �� /j / / / BE RELOCATED BY
SHAMBAUGH AND SON
CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH AND/\
REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE
CON ACTOR TO DEMOUSH
AND REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
� 1
CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH AND
REMOVE EXISTING POWER POLE
o /
� \ \ CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMO /
TEMPORARY CONNECTION
\ ONCE OFR ACCESS ROAD IS
\ OPERATIONAL - xj
---------
VJ
\ \\\\\\
TO PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING
/ I STORMWATER
/ I/
\
NG STORMRAIN UNE
I POND
\
�po
I X111
O LL
U) LL
.
J z K J
Ems..
35
\\\
CONTRACTOR OQMAND
URVEY NOTE
BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
ST LIGHT
REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE
\`1\1
(ASE).
r � 0
_ U
(�,
w
\ 1111\
111 AND
CAROLINA ACCESS E NC CODES (ANSI 1 EXCEPT
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND AREAS
� ) oQ
SITE G
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES HYOF THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF TIME SITE IS EXTREME AND
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTON TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
�^.,L
L
CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH
AND REMOVE EXISTING
11111
(I
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
1111\
TFALL
7}5
�
_ ___ _____
— — — — — — CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH AND
REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE
CONTRACTIIR 70 PROTECT IN
PLACE EXISTING LIGHT POLE
GUARDRAIL --------------
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
20
s
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
O 20 40 80
DEMOLITION LEGEND
GRAVEL, SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT AND CURB AND
CUTTER TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED
UTILITY TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, REFER T
UTILITY PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION
a UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK
PILE AREAS. NO EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND
AREAS.
UTILITY DEMOLITION SHALL OCCUR AFTER PROPOSED
RELOCATED UTILITIES ARE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE ALL UTIUTY SHUT DOWNS WITH OWNER
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
UNITS OF DISTURBANCE: 31.8 AC
~ O p Q Q m
W O
00 � N
4 m Q
zo �� w
Y � U
z
Q
J
n
z
0
J
O
2i
LU
0
z
VJ
0 U)
�po
80
O LL
U) LL
.
J z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^
LL LL LY �
LL }
T X
URVEY NOTE
BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED
SED ON A BWNDARY @TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY R AND
2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
IGINEERING
..1� W Z
LL
(ASE).
r � 0
_ U
(�,
w
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
111 AND
CAROLINA ACCESS E NC CODES (ANSI 1 EXCEPT
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND AREAS
� ) oQ
SITE G
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES HYOF THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF TIME SITE IS EXTREME AND
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTON TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
�^.,L
L

a
0
Z
O
SILT FENCE OUTLET Me s s s
DOUBLE SILT FENCE 1 ('Yp) a EROSION CONTROL NOTES
ADJACENT TO wEnANo� A� \
I I 11 \ 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WTU NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFlCATONS. a
2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE z
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES. NO WARRANTY
I {' r i I _ I t / /' IS OVEN OR IMPUD AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOULD BE
J \ �/ r% ( SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR A / / 1 CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
ca`NSTrtUcnON STOCK \ � v � / / I ,� I EROSION CONTROL
PILE AREA SILT FENCE / \ P I I ' 3. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED WITHIN
/ I L III II \ II `\ \ `- _ TO BE MAINTAINED S MQN + \ y
'00/
b / I i PLAN IN THIS AREA / FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
I / I III II Ii I I \ FROM TOE OF SLOPE m i 1\ �/ I WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, ti o
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO O ?
I I i PI \ / I Tk ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS. ¢ s
CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA / I 1\ \ / / 'I 5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER a o H
I I \ WITHIN UNITS OF DISTURBANCE 1 -133 \ I "/ /I I EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY. G� o
CZTRUCTIWLEN-TRRINCE REFER TO EROSION _ \ \ I \. / / ' ,.I . /y. I 8. INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF. §
\\ II \ STRAW WADDLE CONTROL PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INPORMAnON
< \ I 7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL I�
/ ADJACENT lb PAVEMENT _ \\� I / / / BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
\ I I I II
(TYPICAL) __- _ cDNCRETEwASINWr II `\ 1 I /I
I l I STATOf! (EYP)l I 1 \ / & SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEO OR DISPOSED OF AT A w w w s
PERMITTED Lao LANDFILL
k 9. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOL FROM GETTING OFF SITE OR INTO a 3
I \ l7I a y v ` P 1 / f % EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SOL PILES AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN
AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM M DRAIN WATERCOURSE.
\� p\1 �,l III III I II a v I ea ° e a v 'a a^ ro a a • gTo ° q ` ° / ( \ III / 10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
EROSION CONTROL REGULATIONS.
\ / II lI Il -132 a--- r -� I. '1 I ■THET�
\ TRACKED FROM
10. I II II lI Il CONTRACTDR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION. ''� a I J/ \ \y .l `j3 / il. AREA40T0 PAVED ROADWAYS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOL/MUDTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO MINIMIZE MUDGFROM E PAVEMENT DNLYTIAS '
\ II I II TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE °a I. \ I' { OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
IZ lI II CONSTRVCTION UNITS. REFER TO EROSION \ \
I STRAW WADDLE CONTROL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION - I 12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT NCDEQ APPROVAL
I A I lI II ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT 47 I i
(TYPICAL) _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ i \ I I _ 13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
- 1
\\ I II / l IO• - -- -- - - - __ -- _ - \ _ AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF ``Np1W111A
- -133- -- - - - = / _ / \ \ _ _ _ , I CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOAN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS ;N �\% �A
1� \ III/ ll O - - --- - _ - _ - - r _ - NEEDED OUT SIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE N
I �.• °
CONSTRUCTION STOCK PILE AREA. \ REVIEWED AND PERMITTD. � �'QO�c • G
IDL I lU i CONCRETE WASHOUTZi4 �J
SILT FENCE TO BE MAINTAINED 3 � STATION (EYP) / EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCE
VIN FROM TOE OF SLOPE. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. - O •__
W I \ I I II • I \ / / 1. OBTAIN A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FROM NCDEQ AND POST ORIGINAL 15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 'r{T�c
y � CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA / PIT Ot! SITU• 16. PERMANENT OtWNDCOVIR WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR y O� •+•+'�`b\
11 llI WITHIN UNITS OF DISTURBANCE--� YC qQ
�I �lll II a • �\ � / 2. INSTALL ALL THREE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND SILT FENCE FOR THE NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3). .� pNNNT11A1`\O``�
UNITS OF DISTURBANCE AS INDICATED ON PLAN. 17. DUE TO THE PROJECT BEING UNEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE [\� 1
I I 1I ll Il ° (� J 3. CONTRACTOR TO SCHEDULE A LAND DISTURBANCE PRECONSTRUCTION END OF THE DAY.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. REFER TO EROSION / z Y Y
�lI I MEETING WITH NBEQ -EROS ON CONTROL DIVISION, CONTACT JOIN CONTROL DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . / \ / \ pgCE, 910-433-3300 r o � p ¢ =a 0]
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE wg _
a I 4. UPON APPROVAL BY NCDEQ, BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, AND DEMOLITION
OF SITE. MAINTAINING EROSION OONTI20L MEASURES AND NECESSARY. Q Q
I y �I II (MITS O' CONSTRUCTION ! I �� I IN GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED AND MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND E LO
1 TYPICAL i ! EXISTING QFR BUILDING 5. USE RIPE INLET PROTECTION ON ANY OPEN TRENCHES AT AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE PROJECT LIMITS a \ w
DAYS/WEEKENDS IN ORDER TO PREVENT OFFSITE SEDIMENTATION. SHALL BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CHECKED IN PARTICULAR: _ ID -
I Y o
a E
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL ROAD AND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE -
PRIOR TO DEMOLITION UNDER PROPOSED BUILDING AND TRUCK APRON.INSPo =
7. MOW/MULCH EXISTING VEGETATION AND STUBBLE. CUTTINGS TO BE LEFT WITHENEW GRAVEL CAS NTION REEDED. CHECK SEEDED AREAS
OADS AND PARKING AREAS P�RODIEROSON µCONDIMENTDTIORF�A� TOP DRESS
IN-PLACE TO PROVIDE MULCH ACROSS THE SITE EXCEPT WHERE ACCESS RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINS MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT
ROAD PROPOSED OR UNITED GRADING NECESSARY. PRODUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY. Z
/ / 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SILT FENCE-
EVERY
z
1 I i Y I II p _ l EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. z
/
DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS
IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME //�
\ I _ 9. CONTINUALLY STABILIZE SITE WITH VEGETATION, PAVING, ETC. ALL AREAS INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE \1 J
SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF CONSTRUCTION OR STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEM RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID J
NON -ACTIVITY OR PER NPDES STANDARDS, WHICHEVER IS MORE UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT 0
STRINGENT. DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
\ -----_ _
EROSIONIN PRIOR J
0. COORDINATEANY EROSION CONTROL MEASURE ALL
INSPECTOR
SHALL BE REPLENISHED INLET PROTECTION/SILT FENCE OUTLET: I I
X133- -135 135- 1-135- -135 -135 /\�� �2 1 AS NECESSARY AND FREE OF SEDIMENT. LU O
F r 1 - / / / / / INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS AFTER EACH RAIN AND MAKE REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
11. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, AND ALL AREAS HAVE BEEN REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. WHEN
--�_ - _ // /� STABILIZED COMPLETELY, CALL NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL DIVISION, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL MATERIALS AND ANY
--- -d _ L_
- - - - -7 - - / d� ` \ CONTACT NODI PACE, 910-43}3300, UNSTABLE SOL, AND EITHER SALVAGE . DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO PROPER
12. SEEDING AND MULCHING OF SITE SHALL TAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY AFTER OUTLEGRADT.
�D COMPACT IT. APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL BARE AREAS AROUND THE INLET OR LLI Z
CONTACTED
QFRIMR \\ AFTER THE OR DU No PSEDINOOST SAND MULCHING N6 FOR POST INSTALLPHASE. NCDEO SHALL ATION IS
COMPLETE FOR AN INSPECTION. Q O
v<v� Illllp • p 13. AFTER APPROVAL FROM NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR, REMOVE NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS I (�
ALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND STABILIZE ANY
\ ' I._ r� REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS PROMALDO NOT REMOVE ANV FROSNON CONTROL
TNCV i 1 D INSPECTOR -
s5 _ / EXISTING SMITHFIELD AND SELF INSP THE SITE IS
1- vAA 135 / PLANT BUILDING n n�rn RY NtnFa
CONTRA' "A TO PROMCE INLET PRO CTION,
TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE d 14. STABILIZE AREAS WHERE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WERE REMOVED.
CONSTRUCTION UMITS, REFER TO ON
.CONTROL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORM TON
THE SEGMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2008 TO
Z4. Y REWIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
\ /-_--
Awp 134-\ / ./, (/ INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE EN THE PROJECT TO MANE SURE
THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING
BECAME EFFECTIVE
DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS
OF
I ° • • I BECAME EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2010. TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF
d SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS AND NPDES SELF-MONITORING REPOR75, A
Ira \ �SFYDTHE�REMWIREEMENTS E SEDIMENTATIONAJLABLE. THE NEW FORM
POLLUTION DEVELOPED
To
CONTROL ACT
AND THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCO
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
UMIT DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING DITCHES TO AREA IMMEDIATELY SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE
SURROUNDING NEW CULVERTS AND AREAS WHERE DISTURBANCE IS LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
I I
7 DAYS
NONE
NECESSARY TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. WETLANDS ARE NOT
TO BE IMPACTED.
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:
L ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND ALL
\\ II 1 °
IF SLOPES ARE TV OR
I
I I
\
I
CONTROL
EROSION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY
OTHERCONSTRVCRON ACTIVITY AND MAINTAINED UNT1L PERMANENT
GROUND COVER IS ESTABUSHED.
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1) SMALL BE
PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABIUZATION WITH GROUND
COVER AS SOON PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY ENG WITHIN 7
•
I I I
II
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES
SLOPES 3:1 B FLATTER
\
I \
ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE
CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
FROM A
•
°
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND HOW
I
I I
I
ZONES.
INS W CONTROL MEASURES AND
INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND CONCURRENT
PRACTICES F'PoOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
2 ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
III♦I \
i °
1
\ A
1
I�
/
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL
PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS
PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE
•
\ lll) •
I
`
x�
I� I IIIEFFECTIVE
I I I
II Io II II
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
(TYPICAL)
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR
EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
-' CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT TIHE
SEDIMENT SOURCE.
LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY
SILT FENCE OUTLETS ARE TO BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL LOW POINTS OF SILT
II
��• 1
_ = -
/I/
`
FENCE AND AREAS WHERE RUNOFF MAY CONCENTRATE CAUSING DAMAGETO
SILT FENCE. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL OUTLETS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE
SILT FENCE IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF
\�
CONSTRUCTION.
a
0
Z
O
SILT FENCE OUTLET Me s s s
DOUBLE SILT FENCE 1 ('Yp) a EROSION CONTROL NOTES
ADJACENT TO wEnANo� A� \
I I 11 \ 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WTU NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFlCATONS. a
2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE z
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES. NO WARRANTY
I {' r i I _ I t / /' IS OVEN OR IMPUD AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOULD BE
J \ �/ r% ( SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR A / / 1 CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
ca`NSTrtUcnON STOCK \ � v � / / I ,� I EROSION CONTROL
PILE AREA SILT FENCE / \ P I I ' 3. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED WITHIN
/ I L III II \ II `\ \ `- _ TO BE MAINTAINED S MQN + \ y
'00/
b / I i PLAN IN THIS AREA / FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
I / I III II Ii I I \ FROM TOE OF SLOPE m i 1\ �/ I WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, ti o
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO O ?
I I i PI \ / I Tk ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS. ¢ s
CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA / I 1\ \ / / 'I 5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER a o H
I I \ WITHIN UNITS OF DISTURBANCE 1 -133 \ I "/ /I I EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY. G� o
CZTRUCTIWLEN-TRRINCE REFER TO EROSION _ \ \ I \. / / ' ,.I . /y. I 8. INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF. §
\\ II \ STRAW WADDLE CONTROL PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INPORMAnON
< \ I 7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL I�
/ ADJACENT lb PAVEMENT _ \\� I / / / BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
\ I I I II
(TYPICAL) __- _ cDNCRETEwASINWr II `\ 1 I /I
I l I STATOf! (EYP)l I 1 \ / & SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEO OR DISPOSED OF AT A w w w s
PERMITTED Lao LANDFILL
k 9. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOL FROM GETTING OFF SITE OR INTO a 3
I \ l7I a y v ` P 1 / f % EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SOL PILES AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN
AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM M DRAIN WATERCOURSE.
\� p\1 �,l III III I II a v I ea ° e a v 'a a^ ro a a • gTo ° q ` ° / ( \ III / 10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
EROSION CONTROL REGULATIONS.
\ / II lI Il -132 a--- r -� I. '1 I ■THET�
\ TRACKED FROM
10. I II II lI Il CONTRACTDR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION. ''� a I J/ \ \y .l `j3 / il. AREA40T0 PAVED ROADWAYS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOL/MUDTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO MINIMIZE MUDGFROM E PAVEMENT DNLYTIAS '
\ II I II TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE °a I. \ I' { OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
IZ lI II CONSTRVCTION UNITS. REFER TO EROSION \ \
I STRAW WADDLE CONTROL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION - I 12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT NCDEQ APPROVAL
I A I lI II ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT 47 I i
(TYPICAL) _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ i \ I I _ 13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
- 1
\\ I II / l IO• - -- -- - - - __ -- _ - \ _ AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF ``Np1W111A
- -133- -- - - - = / _ / \ \ _ _ _ , I CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOAN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS ;N �\% �A
1� \ III/ ll O - - --- - _ - _ - - r _ - NEEDED OUT SIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE N
I �.• °
CONSTRUCTION STOCK PILE AREA. \ REVIEWED AND PERMITTD. � �'QO�c • G
IDL I lU i CONCRETE WASHOUTZi4 �J
SILT FENCE TO BE MAINTAINED 3 � STATION (EYP) / EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCE
VIN FROM TOE OF SLOPE. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. - O •__
W I \ I I II • I \ / / 1. OBTAIN A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FROM NCDEQ AND POST ORIGINAL 15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 'r{T�c
y � CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA / PIT Ot! SITU• 16. PERMANENT OtWNDCOVIR WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR y O� •+•+'�`b\
11 llI WITHIN UNITS OF DISTURBANCE--� YC qQ
�I �lll II a • �\ � / 2. INSTALL ALL THREE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND SILT FENCE FOR THE NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3). .� pNNNT11A1`\O``�
UNITS OF DISTURBANCE AS INDICATED ON PLAN. 17. DUE TO THE PROJECT BEING UNEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE [\� 1
I I 1I ll Il ° (� J 3. CONTRACTOR TO SCHEDULE A LAND DISTURBANCE PRECONSTRUCTION END OF THE DAY.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. REFER TO EROSION / z Y Y
�lI I MEETING WITH NBEQ -EROS ON CONTROL DIVISION, CONTACT JOIN CONTROL DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . / \ / \ pgCE, 910-433-3300 r o � p ¢ =a 0]
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE wg _
a I 4. UPON APPROVAL BY NCDEQ, BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, AND DEMOLITION
OF SITE. MAINTAINING EROSION OONTI20L MEASURES AND NECESSARY. Q Q
I y �I II (MITS O' CONSTRUCTION ! I �� I IN GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED AND MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND E LO
1 TYPICAL i ! EXISTING QFR BUILDING 5. USE RIPE INLET PROTECTION ON ANY OPEN TRENCHES AT AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE PROJECT LIMITS a \ w
DAYS/WEEKENDS IN ORDER TO PREVENT OFFSITE SEDIMENTATION. SHALL BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CHECKED IN PARTICULAR: _ ID -
I Y o
a E
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL ROAD AND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE -
PRIOR TO DEMOLITION UNDER PROPOSED BUILDING AND TRUCK APRON.INSPo =
7. MOW/MULCH EXISTING VEGETATION AND STUBBLE. CUTTINGS TO BE LEFT WITHENEW GRAVEL CAS NTION REEDED. CHECK SEEDED AREAS
OADS AND PARKING AREAS P�RODIEROSON µCONDIMENTDTIORF�A� TOP DRESS
IN-PLACE TO PROVIDE MULCH ACROSS THE SITE EXCEPT WHERE ACCESS RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINS MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT
ROAD PROPOSED OR UNITED GRADING NECESSARY. PRODUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY. Z
/ / 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SILT FENCE-
EVERY
z
1 I i Y I II p _ l EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. z
/
DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS
IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME //�
\ I _ 9. CONTINUALLY STABILIZE SITE WITH VEGETATION, PAVING, ETC. ALL AREAS INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE \1 J
SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF CONSTRUCTION OR STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEM RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID J
NON -ACTIVITY OR PER NPDES STANDARDS, WHICHEVER IS MORE UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT 0
STRINGENT. DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
\ -----_ _
EROSIONIN PRIOR J
0. COORDINATEANY EROSION CONTROL MEASURE ALL
INSPECTOR
SHALL BE REPLENISHED INLET PROTECTION/SILT FENCE OUTLET: I I
X133- -135 135- 1-135- -135 -135 /\�� �2 1 AS NECESSARY AND FREE OF SEDIMENT. LU O
F r 1 - / / / / / INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS AFTER EACH RAIN AND MAKE REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
11. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, AND ALL AREAS HAVE BEEN REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. WHEN
--�_ - _ // /� STABILIZED COMPLETELY, CALL NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL DIVISION, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL MATERIALS AND ANY
--- -d _ L_
- - - - -7 - - / d� ` \ CONTACT NODI PACE, 910-43}3300, UNSTABLE SOL, AND EITHER SALVAGE . DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO PROPER
12. SEEDING AND MULCHING OF SITE SHALL TAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY AFTER OUTLEGRADT.
�D COMPACT IT. APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL BARE AREAS AROUND THE INLET OR LLI Z
CONTACTED
QFRIMR \\ AFTER THE OR DU No PSEDINOOST SAND MULCHING N6 FOR POST INSTALLPHASE. NCDEO SHALL ATION IS
COMPLETE FOR AN INSPECTION. Q O
v<v� Illllp • p 13. AFTER APPROVAL FROM NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR, REMOVE NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS I (�
ALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND STABILIZE ANY
\ ' I._ r� REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS PROMALDO NOT REMOVE ANV FROSNON CONTROL
TNCV i 1 D INSPECTOR -
s5 _ / EXISTING SMITHFIELD AND SELF INSP THE SITE IS
1- vAA 135 / PLANT BUILDING n n�rn RY NtnFa
CONTRA' "A TO PROMCE INLET PRO CTION,
TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE d 14. STABILIZE AREAS WHERE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WERE REMOVED.
CONSTRUCTION UMITS, REFER TO ON
.CONTROL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORM TON
THE SEGMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2008 TO
Z4. Y REWIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
\ /-_--
Awp 134-\ / ./, (/ INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE EN THE PROJECT TO MANE SURE
THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING
BECAME EFFECTIVE
DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS
OF
I ° • • I BECAME EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2010. TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF
d SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS AND NPDES SELF-MONITORING REPOR75, A
Ira \ �SFYDTHE�REMWIREEMENTS E SEDIMENTATIONAJLABLE. THE NEW FORM
POLLUTION DEVELOPED
To
CONTROL ACT
AND THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCO
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH OUAUTY WATER
7 DAYS
NONE
(HOW) ZONES
IF SLOPES ARE TV OR
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3.1
7 DAYS
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1.
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES
SLOPES 3:1 B FLATTER
14 DAYS
GREATER THAN 50• IN
LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND HOW
ZONES.
a_
VJ z
0 U)
OZ O
010000. BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2013, THE DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND
ERI• O O
, L �\ \ \ \\ ' - \ ,(/ _ illp /i Jl ./.i' , /I. LAND RESOURCES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTNG BOTH THE SPCA AND • Q '^ Q Q
' . THE THE NCOMBIND FORM SHOULD NMAKE IT RT EOASIER TO COMPLY WTH NCG 010000. V)
\ 'I - . .1. SELF -INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. THE COMBINED SELF-MONITORING FORM ISW J
J Z
d AVAILABLE AS A PDF AND WORD DOCUMENT FROM THE LAND QUALITY WEB Know what's below.
1. SITE, HTTP://PORTALNCDENR.ORG/YEB/LR/EROSION W d W
II I y4 _ _ _ _, MgTCHLINE _ _ _ _ _ Call before you dig. ^W LL
I I I /j I �aEESFIEET C3. I FOR CONTIN J�ATI N F YOU HANE QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE LAND VIAL TY BECTON AT NOF TH Ey
NIREaaNu OFFICE. SURVEY NOTE LLL LL
\ / 1 EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN T
I I I
BASON A BOUNDARY &TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECE VIEDZ F -
I03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND L W
d GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE). r_ 0 40 80 180 �/� L)
I I I II III eCYi. .1-2009 AND
THE SITE WILL
1LL
CAROLINAOCES FULLY COMPUANT WITH THE NORTH 5
// � Ty
CHAPTER 11 OF THEE N BCC)UNLESS AND ES (ANSI 7EXCEPT IN AREAS
WHERE ANAPPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER, V J Q
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS m
WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
PILE AREAS NO EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPUANCE ARE POSSIBLE. SHEET NUMBER
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 31.8 AC ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN C3.�
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS

�IWIATCHLINE
-S€I H.EET C3.0 FAR CONTINV T N
(
j��I�IV - - }{�-}F A.1L-.li d
t 1pMM. //. �' . . . . .
%
TI_ --
I
I _ - .
I
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION.
I I - TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE 'I%� d
I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. REFER TO EROSION'
RE ' 1 Z� o� CONTROL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION \/ /-
it1 — 24
i—�
.(
/ d
II /
I I --- .
#I/a
I LIMITS OF CON(TYPICAL)STRUCTION /
. . . . . . .
�p _—
�. . . . . . . . . .
T d
II ... .. Q.
II
II
II
II
TT��1I d
SILT FENCE OUTLET d
(TYPICAL)
fil
II �
T I\
II �
II
I$
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
I'
I
SILT FENCE
(TYPICAL) _
STRAW WADDLE
Q / / (TYPICAL)
J �
I
e / / LIMITS O' CONSTRUCTION �-
p "� `CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION. / J
TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE
J CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. REFER TO EROSION
I
//TYPICAL
DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION
CON C-11 / / ^ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE REFER TO
R LAYDOWN AREA WITHIN / /V/ /_ EROSION CONTROL DETAILS FOR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE // / ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Id
'�'�.
CONSTRUCTION
STOCK PILE AREA
SILT FENCE TO BE
MAINTAINED 3' MIN
FROM TOE OF SLOPE
/
.ALL NE
--
/
/�Q.
I/^� / =134_---- T
I I CONCRETE WASHOUT _
- - STATION. (TYPICAL)
a -
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOWN ARE
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES. NO WARRANTY
IS GIVEN OR IMPUED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
3. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED -THIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO
ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS.
5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER
EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
8. INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL
BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
& SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEO OR DISPOSED OF AT A
PERMITTED LCID LANDFILL
9. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FROM GETTING OFF SITE OR INTO
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SOL PILES AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN
AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM DRAIN OR WATERCOURSE.
10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
EROSION CONTROL REGULATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO MINIMIZE MUD BEING TRACKED FROM CONSTRUCTION
AREAS TO PAVED ROADWAYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOIL/MUD FROM THE PAVEMENT DAILY AS
OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT NCDEQ APPROVAL
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS
NEEDED OUT SIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE
REVIEWED AND PERMITTED.
14. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
16. PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR
NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3).
17. DUE TO THE PROJECT BEING LINEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE
END OF THE DAY.
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
828
PROPOSED CONTOUR
- -823-
— - EXISTING CONTOUR
a
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
SF
SILT FENCE
®
SILT FENCE OUTLET
COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 7
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
II
INLET PROTECTION
®
CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION
Know t'sbe belowore
STRAW WADDLE
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOWN ARE
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES. NO WARRANTY
IS GIVEN OR IMPUED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
3. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED -THIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO
ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS.
5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER
EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
8. INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL
BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
& SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEO OR DISPOSED OF AT A
PERMITTED LCID LANDFILL
9. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FROM GETTING OFF SITE OR INTO
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SOL PILES AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN
AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM DRAIN OR WATERCOURSE.
10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
EROSION CONTROL REGULATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO MINIMIZE MUD BEING TRACKED FROM CONSTRUCTION
AREAS TO PAVED ROADWAYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOIL/MUD FROM THE PAVEMENT DAILY AS
OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT NCDEQ APPROVAL
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS
NEEDED OUT SIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE
REVIEWED AND PERMITTED.
14. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
16. PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR
NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3).
17. DUE TO THE PROJECT BEING LINEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE
END OF THE DAY.
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT
GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE
INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND
PRACTICES PRIOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR
EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT THE
SEDIMENT SOURCE.
SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
IN GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED AND MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND
.per
5'
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE PROJECT UNITS
SHALL BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CHECKED IN PARTICULAR:
NONE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE-
INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ROADS AND PARKING AREAS PERIODICALLY FOR CONDITION OF SURFACE. TOP DRESS
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
WITH NEW GRAVEL AS NEEDED. CHECK SEEDED AREAS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AFTER
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINS MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT
020 40 80
PRODUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY.
SILT FENCE,
,.
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REWIRED REPAIRS
COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 7
IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3.1
INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEM RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID
Know t'sbe belowore
UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT
DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
2. ALL OTHER DISTURBED AN SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
BEEN PROPERLY STABIUZEO
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES
INLET PROTECTION/SILT FENCE OUTLET:
INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS AFTER EACH RAIN AND MAKE REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
14 DAYS
REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. WHEN
you
you
THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL MATERIALS AND ANY
LENGTH
UNSTABLE SOL, AND EITHER SALVAGE OR DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO PROPER
LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING DITCHES TO AREA IMMEDIATELY
GRADE, THEN SMOOTH AND COMPACT IT. APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL BARE AREAS AROUND THE INLET OR
OUTLET'
SURROUNDING NEW CULVERTS AND AREAS WHERE DISTURBANCE IS
NECESSARY TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. WETLANDS ARE NOT
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ONA BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RDUVID
TO BE IMPACTED.
NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AEND
OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT
GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE
INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND
PRACTICES PRIOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR
EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT THE
SEDIMENT SOURCE.
SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH DUALITY WATER
7 DAYS
NONE
(HOW) ZONES
,.
Q V J p Q
COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 7
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3.1
7 DAYS
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
Know t'sbe belowore
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1.
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
2. ALL OTHER DISTURBED AN SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
GREATER THAN 50' IN
you
you
^ W LL
LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND HOW
-DISTURBING
ZONES.
-2 Y 2
O p Q Q m
�o
Oh r� N
a Q
d 00 o O m
Z
Oa-
cj� J
LU 0
W
QO
^2 U
LL
VJ z
0 W
�po
I. ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND ALL
O LLL
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1) SHALL BE
//► LL
PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND
,.
Q V J p Q
COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 7
(Y J
CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE UST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
Know t'sbe belowore
2. ALL OTHER DISTURBED AN SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
Call before dig.
all
d LJJ
PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS
you
you
^ W LL
VEE
LPRACAST LCABLEAND- BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE
LAST LAND ACTIVITY.
SURVEY NOTE
LLL
LL
-DISTURBING
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ONA BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RDUVID
LL
T X
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AEND
Z
W
SILT FENCE OUTLETS ARE TO BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL LOW POINTS OF SILT
FENCE AND AREAS WHERE RUNOFF MAY CONCENTRATE CAW IVIG DAMAGE TO
ENGINEERING (ASE).
EL�
r O
SILT FENCE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL OUTLETS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE
`^ U
SILT FENCE IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF
CONSTRUCTION.
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
5 co
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
CHAPTER 11 OF THE HOBO) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
/A oQ
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
VJ
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
m
WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK
PILE AREAS NO EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 31.8 AC
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
w
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
��.

I I'
I
I I II Ir TI �
I
I III // I I IIIA I�I�
/ /�II➢ L III III Js'
II i \I� ^' ILII III/
I I 1 I I III 111
/� � I I IIII III
) II ISI
I i L d Iii
I �
I
II\ II II IIII d
I
II ( II II III VIII l
I ,P
I \\\I 1I IIIIIII
\ W
\\ 10 I I I III
�J12 I IIII
IIkg1.1\ II �I III
\ I II
I 1U II I wl
I
II II II II
I 1 I I
II � II II
I�
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
/ 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TGEXISTING UTILITIES SHORN ARE
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY QTI ABOVE GROUND FEATURES.NO WARRANTY
FOR IS GIVEN IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF RIFE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTILITIESLITIESSHOULD BE
/ / � CONSIDERED
APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
ROL /' J 3. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED WITHIN
ZEA FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
/ WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO
ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS.
/ I 5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER
/ \ /I - I EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
' / I 8. INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY 70 PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PPIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL
BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
& SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEQ OR DISPOSED OF AT A
I ) PERMITTED LCID LANDFILL.
9. PROM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FROM GETTING OFF SITE OR INTO
)/ EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SOIL PILES AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN
I AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM DRAIN OR WATERCOURSE.
10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
EROSION CONTROL REGULATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTON TO MINIMIZE MUD BEING TRACKED FROM CONSTRUCTION
AREAS TO PAVED ROADWAYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOL/MUD FROM THE PAVEMENT DAILY AS
\ I I I OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT NCDEQ APPROVAL
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS
NEEDED OUT SIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE
\ I REVIEWED AND PERMITTED.
\ I 14. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
I
I
15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
1S. PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR
NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3).
j( 17. WE TO THE PROJECT BEING UNEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE
END OF THE DAY.
i i\\ EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
/ I\
GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE ED AND MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE PROJECT LIMITS
\. SHALL BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CHECKED IN PARTICULAR:
CONSIRIUON ENIRANCE'
INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ROADS AND PARKING AREAS PERIODICALLY FOR CONDITION OF SURFACE. TOP DRESS
WITH NEW GRAVEL AS NEEDED. CHECK SEEDED AREAS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AFTER
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINS MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT
PRODUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY.
SILT FENCE-
- \ INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REWIRED REPAIRS
-/. IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME
INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID
�\ UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT
_ DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
I\ _I INLET PROIECTGJ/SILT FENCE OUTLET:
\ \ INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS AFTER EACH RAIN AND MAKE REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
\ REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. WHEN
I \\ \\ THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL MATERIALS AND ANY
\ \ \ UNSTABLE SOL, AND EITHER SALVAGE OR DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO PROPER
GRADE, THEN SMOOTH AND COMPACT IT. APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL BARE AREAS AROUND THE INLET OR
OUTLET.
NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
828
PROPOSED CONTOUR
— —823—
— EXISTING CONTOUR
M
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
NF
SILT FENCE
®
SILT FENCE OUTLET
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
13
INLET PROTECTION
0
CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION
STRAW WADDLE
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
/ 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TGEXISTING UTILITIES SHORN ARE
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY QTI ABOVE GROUND FEATURES.NO WARRANTY
FOR IS GIVEN IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF RIFE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTILITIESLITIESSHOULD BE
/ / � CONSIDERED
APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
ROL /' J 3. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED WITHIN
ZEA FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
/ WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO
ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS.
/ I 5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER
/ \ /I - I EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
' / I 8. INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY 70 PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PPIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL
BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
& SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEQ OR DISPOSED OF AT A
I ) PERMITTED LCID LANDFILL.
9. PROM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FROM GETTING OFF SITE OR INTO
)/ EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SOIL PILES AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN
I AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM DRAIN OR WATERCOURSE.
10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
EROSION CONTROL REGULATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTON TO MINIMIZE MUD BEING TRACKED FROM CONSTRUCTION
AREAS TO PAVED ROADWAYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOL/MUD FROM THE PAVEMENT DAILY AS
\ I I I OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT NCDEQ APPROVAL
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS
NEEDED OUT SIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE
\ I REVIEWED AND PERMITTED.
\ I 14. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
I
I
15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
1S. PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR
NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3).
j( 17. WE TO THE PROJECT BEING UNEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE
END OF THE DAY.
i i\\ EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
/ I\
GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE ED AND MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE PROJECT LIMITS
\. SHALL BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CHECKED IN PARTICULAR:
CONSIRIUON ENIRANCE'
INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ROADS AND PARKING AREAS PERIODICALLY FOR CONDITION OF SURFACE. TOP DRESS
WITH NEW GRAVEL AS NEEDED. CHECK SEEDED AREAS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AFTER
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINS MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT
PRODUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY.
SILT FENCE-
- \ INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REWIRED REPAIRS
-/. IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME
INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID
�\ UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT
_ DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
I\ _I INLET PROIECTGJ/SILT FENCE OUTLET:
\ \ INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS AFTER EACH RAIN AND MAKE REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
\ REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. WHEN
I \\ \\ THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL MATERIALS AND ANY
\ \ \ UNSTABLE SOL, AND EITHER SALVAGE OR DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO PROPER
GRADE, THEN SMOOTH AND COMPACT IT. APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL BARE AREAS AROUND THE INLET OR
OUTLET.
NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME IXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER
7 DAYS
NONE
(HOW) ZONES
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
LESS IN LENGTI AND ARE
NOT STEER THAN 2:1.
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
GREATER THAN 50' IN
LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
I ^�' \\
;�
MATCHLINE
\ \
I \\ \ �,✓ I �� � � % SEE SHEET C3.3 FOR CONTINUATION
I I I {LgyL II 9 L,
�\`I I RAC 50 40 80E IN FEE760
1 I \ I �.IIIIII II. ,
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
WITH THIS PROJECT THIS INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK
PILE AREAS. NO EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS.
NONE
PERIMETERS EXCEPT FOR AND HOW
�
ZONES
a
•
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
SURVEY NOTE
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ON A BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT MTH THE NORTH
CAROLINA AOOESSIBIUTY CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
WHERE ANAPPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXISTMERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
ALL CWSTRUCTW TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN�
COUNTY AND/OR NODOT STANDARDS AND SPEOMFICATONS.
~ O p Q Q m
w O
O � N
Iw
Z
0
O IZ
(Y J
LU
CV
Lu
QO
2 U
VJ z
0 U)
�po
O LL
Q U) LL
VJ .
JZLIV_j
I,jJQaW
r ><
LLJ z
LL� C �
G O
_ U
VJ w
Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
C3.2

X134 4
w9
I
as aw
sd I / a ° I
� L )
aEf.SHEET C3.2 FOR CONTIIIATfON — /
I ,
AlUl
-131�t
3 O
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTIOU.
TYPICAL AT ALL INLETS MI IN THE ( /
ICONSTRUCTION UNITS. REFER TO EROSION
CONTROL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATIONNyyI11}y}y
TRUCTON
p I (TYPICAL)
• . T� V°-
SILT FENCE
(TYPICAL)
\ r_- 9 __
\ I
�1
d
d
d
d
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
Q a
IARDRAIL -----
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
, EROSION CONTROL NOTES
�. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
\ 2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOWN ARE
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES. NO WARRANTY
IS GIVEN OR IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOULD BE
\\ \ CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
ICTON \\ \ 3_ STABIUZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED 111 -IN
\�\\ FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO
ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS.
5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER
EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
8,
INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL
d BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
( & SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEO OR DISPOSED OF AT A
PERMITTED LCID LANDFILL
\VIDE EROSIONTROL MEASURES ASTO PREVENT SOIL FROM GETTINGSTE OR
PRO
OFF(11 9 EXISTING DRAINAGESTSTRUCTUR S. SOIL PILESEAND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN INTO
(\(( AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM DRAIN OR WATERCOURSE.
d(((( 10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
)(i11 EROSION CONTROL REGULATONS.
I\I 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTON TO MINIMIZE MUD BEING TRACKED FROM CONSTRUCTION
((\ AREAS TO PAVED ROADWAYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOIL/MUD FROM THE PAVEMENT DAILY AS
\\ OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
k 12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT MOOED APPROVAL
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF
8 CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS
NEEDED OUT SIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE
REVIEWED AND PERMITTED.
-- 14. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
16. PERMANENT GROUNDOOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR
NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3).
17. DUE TO THE PROJECT BEING LINEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE
END OF THE Y
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
828
PROPOSED CONTOUR
— —823-
— - EXISTING CONTOUR
M—
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
>i
SILT FENCE
®
SILT FENCE OUTLET
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REWIRED REPAIRS
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
13
INLET PROTECTION
0
CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID
STRAW WADDLE
, EROSION CONTROL NOTES
�. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
\ 2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOWN ARE
FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS AND FROM A SURVEY OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES. NO WARRANTY
IS GIVEN OR IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOULD BE
\\ \ CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN LOCATION AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SITE
ICTON \\ \ 3_ STABIUZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION. DENUDED AREAS MUST BE SEEDED 111 -IN
\�\\ FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR PER NPDES STANDARDS
WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.
4. ALL ADJACENT ROADS TO THE SITE ARE TO BE SWEPT AND WASHED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY TO
ENSURE NO SEDIMENT COLLECTS ON THE ROADWAYS.
5. INSPECT AND PROPERLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER
EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
8,
INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT RUNOFF.
7. WHERE POSSIBLE, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL
d BE ADEQUATE TO MAINTAIN SEDIMENT ON SITE.
( & SPOIL OR BORROW SITES SHOULD BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY NCDEO OR DISPOSED OF AT A
PERMITTED LCID LANDFILL
\VIDE EROSIONTROL MEASURES ASTO PREVENT SOIL FROM GETTINGSTE OR
PRO
OFF(11 9 EXISTING DRAINAGESTSTRUCTUR S. SOIL PILESEAND CONTRACTOR STAGING AND MATERIALS LAY DOWN INTO
(\(( AREAS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 50' AWAY FROM ANY STORM DRAIN OR WATERCOURSE.
d(((( 10. ALL EROSION CONTROLS MEASURES AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL
)(i11 EROSION CONTROL REGULATONS.
I\I 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ACTON TO MINIMIZE MUD BEING TRACKED FROM CONSTRUCTION
((\ AREAS TO PAVED ROADWAYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOIL/MUD FROM THE PAVEMENT DAILY AS
\\ OFTEN AS MAY BE REWIRED.
k 12. NO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT MOOED APPROVAL
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
AREA. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE LIMITS OF
8 CONSTRUCTION SHOULD CONTAIN ANY ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREAS. IF ADDITIONAL LAYDOWN AREA IS
NEEDED OUT SIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION, A REVISED EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHOULD BE
REVIEWED AND PERMITTED.
-- 14. NO PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
15. NO CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN OR STAGING SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
16. PERMANENT GROUNDOOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR
NO MORE THAN 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). PER G. S. 113A-57 (3).
17. DUE TO THE PROJECT BEING LINEAR, CONTRACTOR TO DISTURB ONLY WHAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE
END OF THE Y
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK
PILE AREAS. NO EOUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS.
NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
IN GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED AND MAINTAINED WEEKLY AND
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALS,
DITCHES, SLOPES
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE PROJECT UMI TS
.per
5'
SHALL BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CHECKED IN PARTICULAR:
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE:
7 DAYS
INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ROADS AND PARKING AREAS PERIODICALLY FOR CONDITION OF SURFACE. TOP DRESS
WITH NEW GRAVEL AS NEEDED. CHECK SEEDED AREAS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AFTER
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEETRUNOFF-PRODUCING RAINS MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT
0 20 40
80 PRODUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY.
SRT FENCE.
LL LL
LL
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY REWIRED REPAIRS
IF SLOPS ARE 10' OR
IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME
7 DAYS
INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
r O
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID
NOT STEER THAN 2:1.
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT
DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS
w
BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
PROIECTDIJ/SILT FENCE OUTLET:
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
INLET
INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS AFTER EACH RAIN AND MAKE REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
GREATER THAN 50' IN
REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. WHEN
m
ANY
THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL MATERIALS AND ANY
ALL OTHER AREAS WITHNONE
SLOPS FLATTER THAN 4:1
UNSTABLE SOL, AND EITHER SALVAGE OR DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO
EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND HOW
GRADE, THEN SMOOTH AND COMPACT IT. APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL BARE AREAS AROUND THE INLET OR
OUTLET.
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING AND STOCK
PILE AREAS. NO EOUIPMENT ALLOWED IN WETLAND AREAS.
NPDES GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME IXCEPTONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALS,
DITCHES, SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH OUAUTY WATER
7 DAYS
NONE
(HOW) ZONES
^Q^ W LL
SURVEY NOTE
LL LL
LL
SHOWN
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SUSURVEY
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REDUVID
IF SLOPS ARE 10' OR
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
LESS IN LENGT1 AND ARE
r O
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
NOT STEER THAN 2:1.
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
w
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
GREATER THAN 50' IN
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE R
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITHNONE
SLOPS FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND HOW
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
��.�
ZONES
~ O p Q Q m
W O
O � N
Iw
d ¢ 01 Q >
� oo m
zo m w
Y
Z
0z
0 IZ
W J
CV
W
QO
2 U
VJ z
0 U)
�po
O LL
LL
0 W .
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^ W LL
SURVEY NOTE
LL LL
LL
SHOWN
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SUSURVEY
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REDUVID
T X }
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
Z
EL� W
ENGINEERING (ASE).
r O
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
_ U
(o
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
w
CHAPTER Il OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPTIN AREAS
U) oQ
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
VJ
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE R
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
��.�

�x
\ .,•//.. I' • Imo_ v �
PROP TRUCK SCALE LOCATION
/ � n aiel ✓
SEE SHEET C4.1FOR
J t • as v �\<e 9 O �e < '. .oQa •v I / a.}d VTV/ PLAN INTTHIS AREA
I
I
I
I
fi
I
1 11
I 1
I �
II
\11
I_
II
I
I
I
II
II
11
SMITHFIELD FOODS
EXISTING PLANT
FF:137.00
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
-X -X -X- PROPOSED CHAIN UNK FENCE
.1""Y"N . PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND STRI No TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEMCES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS. EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
~ O p Q Q m
w O O I
O O N N
Q C Q
SO O[D w s
J
n
W
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
LIMITS BEYOND IMPACT SHOWN WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS
PAVEMENTLEGEND
III
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
V)
EXISTING ASPHALT
E%ISTNG CONCRETE
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
-X -X -X- PROPOSED CHAIN UNK FENCE
.1""Y"N . PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND STRI No TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEMCES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS. EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
~ O p Q Q m
w O O I
O O N N
Q C Q
SO O[D w s
J
n
W
NO WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND
LIMITS BEYOND IMPACT SHOWN WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS
U
Z
INCLUDES STAGINGAND STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS.
Q
V)
�po
O LL
U) LL
J ' !r J
Know what's below.
W Q a LV
Call before you dig.
NORTH SURVEY NOTE
^ LU LL
LL A d
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
T X
r
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING ANDE�
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE).
. Z
I_ O
W
O 40 80 160
U
5co
` w
THE 511E WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES 117.1-2009 AND
(ANSI
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPTIN AREAS
UA OQ
WHERE AN APP OVED STATEMENT FROM A SITEENGINEER,
J
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NODOT STANDARDS AND SPEOFICATIONS.
C4•�

• c ° 9 g • ° /° .� ° 12.00' 50.00' 50.00'
Rd,
v
— �MATCHLIN£_.—.,——
. 8 SEE SHEET C4.0 FOR CONTINUATION
°9
8 � ,
1T� 50.00'80.00'
$ e ° ° TYP
21'f 0
° I 220.59' -
7�1", �
NTH CONCRETE PAVEMENT
-7
8.
9 J It
256.98'
91
85.45' IIj' 40N • -
NOTE: OUTLINES OF BUILDINGS DRAWN FROM
READILY AVAILABLE INFORMATION,
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SPACING PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF 73.03'
ANY DISCREPANCY
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
I
Popo /
v a .VI0 p /
v / ,
PROP. EDGE OF PAVEMENT-(TYP v' /
D l
v
/ 7
D
0
PAVEMENTLEGEND
/
0 3J
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
15
EXISTING ASP.—
SPHALT.]
.18.00,
24.00' 36.c
Tva
D /
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^ W LL
SURVEY NOTE
G
EATING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ON A BOUNDARY@TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
T
..1�
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
Z
LL �
W
r O
THE SITE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH 1-2 NORTH
_ U
(�,
AC S CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY
CHARIER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND IN AREAS
LZj
U) oQ
SIM
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE
VJ
CONDITIONS
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SIZE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
��.,L
9 �
tea$ qzq
Oqma Z
a�immw
OZmN .
�a01�
PROP. 24" CVRS AND GUTTER
PARKING FIELD STANDARD DUTY
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
n ` - EL EDGE OF PAVEMENT (TYA.)
p— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
20
S
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY UNE
—x—x—K— PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE
.Y1. PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
~ O p Q Q 0
w0
O O � N
d N N
4 m Q
S O O D w s
Y
U
' z
LI „
WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND V J
OMITS BEYOND IMPACT SNN1TH THIS PROJECT. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING ANDD S STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS. VJ
PAVEMENTLEGEND
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
15
EXISTING ASP.—
SPHALT.]
EE]
EXISTING CONCRETE
STANDARD DUTY --ETE
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY UNE
—x—x—K— PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE
.Y1. PROPOSED TREE LINE
SITE NOTES
1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING TO CONFORM TO THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D.) AND
NCDOT SUPPLEMENT.
2. ALL PAVING CUTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW CUTS EXISTING
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AND MATCHED.
3. REFER TO SITE DETAIL SHEET C7.0 FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS
~ O p Q Q 0
w0
O O � N
d N N
4 m Q
S O O D w s
Y
U
' z
LI „
WORK SHALL ENCROACH INTO ANY PART OF WETLAND V J
OMITS BEYOND IMPACT SNN1TH THIS PROJECT. THIS
INCLUDES STAGING ANDD S STOCK PILE AREAS. NO
EQUIPMENT ALLOWED IN REMAINING WETLAND AREAS. VJ
Z
0
�po
15
— O LL
//► LL
0
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^ W LL
SURVEY NOTE
LL LL
LL }
X
EATING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ON A BOUNDARY@TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
T
..1�
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
Z
LL �
W
r O
THE SITE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH 1-2 NORTH
_ U
(�,
AC S CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY
CHARIER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND IN AREAS
LZj
U) oQ
SIM
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE
VJ
CONDITIONS
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SIZE CONDITIONS
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
��.,L

s
I�
GRADING AND DRAINAGE LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
PROPOSED DROP INLET (DI)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (MH)
----
FLOW ARROW
a
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
S
SILT FENCE
828
PROP05E0 CONTOUR
t— .00
SPOT ELEVATION
— — —823— — —
EXISTING CONTOUR
40
PROPOSED RIP RAP
~ O p Q Q m
w O O I
O O N N
4 m Q
O
SO[C w
Y O u
U
r _ U z
�� _vim
133.79 13' /
�y\ 134.17
�1-4 �134.bIIII ------e--
, � ;O Z '^
� / � �/44 BNL
13379-113aOO
LOO /
O LL
Alli '^
J
I iI
IL
` \� f / Know whaPs b0low. J
j — �v1ATCHLINE \ _ _ — — — — Call before you dig. LIJ_ Q a W
��EE.SFiEETC5.1 FOR CONTIN�IATION \\ -f / NORTH SURVEY NOTE LL a d LU =
I I ^h I I EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN T X
1 BASED ON A BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED ..1� r
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND LL W
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE). r O
0 40 80 160
IT
THE v/�
E 517E WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH ` U
III I 4 4i1/ \ ANSI 11.1-2009D
CHAPTER 11 OF THECAROLINA AOCESSIB1 NY ) UNLCOES ESS AND7EXCEPT IN�AREAS �A , OQ
. ' WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE V) ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS m
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE. SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADE" C5.0
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
i 33---_ i .
Z� f
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
Js\
GRADING AND DRAINAGE LEGEND
VJ
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
0 U)
PROPOSED DROP INLET (DI)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (MH)
--
FLOW ARROW
a
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
S
SILT FENCE
828
PROPOSED CONTOUR
'L-826.00
SPOT ELEVATION
— —823— —
EXISTING CONTOUR
40
PROPOSED RIP RAP
yO
�T
ti
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
~ O p Q Q m
w O O I
O O N N
4 m Q
SO O[D w s
Y O
U
z
VJ
0 U)
�po
80
O LL
U) LL
.
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^a^
LL � �
SURVEY NOTE
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
LL LL }
T X
BASED ONA BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
..1� Z
LL
r O
_ U
(�,
THE SIZE WILL FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
S 111 AND
CAROLINA 1 OF THE
CODES (ANSI 1 EXCEPT IN AREAS
CHARIER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND
IZj
U) OQ
SITE
WHERE AN AR AR I STATEMENT FROM A SITE CONDITIONS
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES HYOF THAT SITE EXTREME
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NODOT STANDARDS AND SPECIMCA11ONS.
��. w

V /
I /
-J*1
I j I SEE SHEET C6.1 FOR T
I I I DETAILED DRAINAGE �e
i 33 PLAN IN THIS AREA
/
I134� I ��
� I I II ; ♦ � /
,o I I wjwjW3F1Jv1
la `w A3 Wj PI.' Nj Wj Ad \
I IO I I I I
I 'I
LL \
\
I SMITHFIELD FOODS
I I SMITHFIELD FOODS
DISTRIBUTION CENTER EXPANSION \
I I I EXISTING OFR BUILDING
I I 365,0151 SF I FF:137.00 FF:137.00
II
'I I I ,III
I I 1 1 11
I I-
I I EXISTING STORM DRAIN
DI -
I I lily
\\\ I II I II RIM18134.56 RIM: 134.57 RIM: 134.57 OM? 13207
\ I I I INV IN: 124.84 (DI -19) INV IN: 125.56 (DI -21) INV IN: 126.31 (01-23) INV Wlk 127.07 (01-23)
\ I I I INV WTI 124.74 (DET -IN -17) INV WTI 125.48 (DI -19) INV OUT: 128.21 (0-21) _ J
\ \ 104 LF W 100 LF OF 100 LF OF
4Y RCP O 0.27% 42• RCP O 0.27% 4V RCP O 0.27% yh W rl�
\\\ \\\ I (I 135 135 135 135 135 135 I I
\ I1 98 LF OF 146 OF
G awia�o
rj
42 RCP a o.z7% Too Lr of 36 a o.z7% t
1 Jf 1 _ q-21 42• RCP O 0.27% q_23
PoM19134.56 RIM: 134.57 RIM: 134.57
\ I CONTRACTOR TO INV IN: 125.22 (DI -20) INV IN: 125.95 (DI -22) INV IN: 126.68 (DI -24) I/ -
\ \ CONNECT INTO EXISTING INV WT: 125.85 (DI -20 INV OUT. 128.58 (q-22) •L
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM INV WT: 125.12 (DI -18)
I I I 3A
Wd� P &L SMITHFIELD FOODS
I IQ I 'hr j'S a e EXISTING PLANT
IO I I \\\ 133134,131-- FF:137.00
\\ _ MATCHLINE_
SEE SHEET C6.1 FOR CONTIN�IATION
� I
1
IT
�L
o o ¢ a 'm
wo
O � N
4 m Q m
zo �� w
Y o< a o U
z
DRAINAGE LEGEND
m
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
m
EXISTING STORM PIPE
®
PROPOSED DROP INLET (DI)
®❑
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (MH)
®
PROPOSED STORM RISER WITH
Know what's below.
GRATED INLET (RI)
Call before you dig.
FLOW ARROW
a
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
els
PROPOSED CONTOUR
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REWVID
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE).
- - EXISTING CONTOUR
O 40 80 160
WRB AND GUTTER
THE 51TE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES 117.1-2009 AND
SPILL CURB AND GUTTER
IZj
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
VJ
m
PROPOSED RIP -RAP
SHEET NUMBER
EXISTING WATER LINE
C6.�
EXISTING SEWER LINE
FM
EXISTING FORCE MAIN
o o ¢ a 'm
wo
O � N
4 m Q m
zo �� w
Y o< a o U
z
VJ
0 U)
Opp"o
8
0 LL
j
Z
Know what's below.
Q W
W Q
Call before you dig.
a _
NORTH SURVEY NOTE
^^ LD LL
LL LL d
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHONN
T X
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REWVID
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING (ASE).
..1� Z
LL W
r O
O 40 80 160
U
cn
THE 51TE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES 117.1-2009 AND
(ANSI
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
IZj
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
OF
EXIST WHERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
C6.�

p
t
130_728 /
1
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C6.0 FOR CONTIN 1gATION
1
1
t I L
—_—__L—__--_L—_--_1_----�
I
II' 1
jl
II
II
I�
II
L
TI o k°
II
II
I
I
I
II
II
II �
II ^
II
1"�'/ I ✓O_ yidET
Ly�y I L-1
I I —
II
I �
I
II
I I \I
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 160
----------------------
PARKING FIELD DETAIL
2O
�T
ti
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
~ O p Q Q m
W O
O � N
r �
zo ��
Ow _ �
Y < a o U
a
J
a_
LU
C�
Z
a
0
U
z
DRAINAGE LEGEND
m
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
EXISTING STORM PIPE
®
PROPOSED DROP INLET (0)
80
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED STORM RISER WITH
Know what's below.
GRATED INLET (Po)
-�'►
FLOW ARROW
a
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
526
PROPOSED CONTOUR
—823—
— EXISTING CONTOUR
CURB AND GUTTER
THE SITE FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
SPILL CURB AND GV TIER
IZj
U) oQ
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
r
PROPOSED RIP -RAP
SHEET NUMBER
EXISTING WATER LINE
C6.1
EXISTING SEVER LINE
FM
EXISTING FORCE MAIN
~ O p Q Q m
W O
O � N
r �
zo ��
Ow _ �
Y < a o U
a
J
a_
LU
C�
Z
a
0
U
z
VJ
0 U)
�po
80
O LL
U) LL
.
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^Q^ W LL
LL
SURVEY NOTEEXI
BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHONN
LL d }
T X
BASED ON A BWNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC S RVEYIN RECEIVED'
BASED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
..1� W Z
LL �
r Q
_ U
(�,
THE SITE FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 11 117.1-2009 AND
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND IN AREAS
IZj
U) oQ
SITE
WHERE AN AR AR I STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT WHVERIFIESOFOF THAT SIZE CONDITIONS
EXIST ERE THE TOPOGRAPHY THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
VJ
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
C6.1

I4 oP
NOTES
1. SEWER CONNECTIONS SHOWN 5' FROM BUILDINGS. REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR
CONNECTION TO BUILDINGS.
2. 4' PVC SANITARY SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE 2% MIN. SLOPE.
WATER
1. ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES AND FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE FUNCTIONALLY APPROVED
PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION.
2. FIRE UNE BEING DESIGNED AND BUILT B7 SHAMBAUGH AND SON.
SANITARY SEWER
1. GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE SDR -35 PVC PIPE AS SPECIFIED IN THESE
PLANS. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC.
2. CLEANOUT SYMBOLS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS REPRESENT LOCATION OF SURFACE
ACCESS POINT. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE WYE APPROPRIATELY BASED ON PIPE
DEPTH. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT 75' MAX SPACING.
3. ALL MANHOLES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS.
MANHOLE DIAMETER SHALL VARY DEPENDING ON PIPE DIAMETER AND DEPTH, PER
NCDEO STANDARDS
4. SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUTS LOCATED IN PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE HEAVY-DUTY
TRAFFIC BEARING CASTINGS
UTILITY LEGEND
F
PROPOSED FIRE LINE
W
PROPOSED WATER LINE
-N------ EXISTING WATER LINE
$
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE
ti
PROPOSED FORCE MAIN
------ss---
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
BUILDING CONNECTION
DOUBLE CHECK
m
BACKFLOW PREVENTOR
8• PVL O 2.00%
FIRE HYDRANT
•
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
V PVL O 2.00x
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
®
GREASE TRAP
NOTES
1. SEWER CONNECTIONS SHOWN 5' FROM BUILDINGS. REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR
CONNECTION TO BUILDINGS.
2. 4' PVC SANITARY SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE 2% MIN. SLOPE.
WATER
1. ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES AND FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE FUNCTIONALLY APPROVED
PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION.
2. FIRE UNE BEING DESIGNED AND BUILT B7 SHAMBAUGH AND SON.
SANITARY SEWER
1. GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE SDR -35 PVC PIPE AS SPECIFIED IN THESE
PLANS. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC.
2. CLEANOUT SYMBOLS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS REPRESENT LOCATION OF SURFACE
ACCESS POINT. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE WYE APPROPRIATELY BASED ON PIPE
DEPTH. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT 75' MAX SPACING.
3. ALL MANHOLES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDEQ STANDARDS.
MANHOLE DIAMETER SHALL VARY DEPENDING ON PIPE DIAMETER AND DEPTH, PER
NCDEO STANDARDS
4. SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUTS LOCATED IN PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE HEAVY-DUTY
TRAFFIC BEARING CASTINGS
DETAIL A
SCALE I'-20'
7v-
GRAPHIC
SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 180
Z Y Y i
r O ^ O Q Q 0]
w 0 w N =
a a p0 Q
Z O o m w
a a
14
RIM: 129.77
�'/„�
VJ Z
INV: 129.23
0 U)
�po
o LL
I �
�
BUILDING CONNECTION
Know what's below.
39 LF OF INV OUT: 130.00
Call before you dig.
8• PVL O 2.00%
SURVEY NOTE
19 LF OF
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
V PVL O 2.00x
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
CONNECT TO EX STUB
INV: 128.57
THE SIZE WILL FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
EX 8 LF OF
EY MH
8• PVL O 2.00%
RIM: 135.20
VJ J
INV IN: 112.80
INV IN: 128.41
DETAIL A
SCALE I'-20'
7v-
GRAPHIC
SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 180
Z Y Y i
r O ^ O Q Q 0]
w 0 w N =
a a p0 Q
Z O o m w
U
�'/„�
VJ Z
0 U)
�po
o LL
Q
U) LL
0 . Q
J Z K J
Know what's below.
w_ a w
Call before you dig.
^a^ LL
SURVEY NOTE
LL LL WW
X LL 2
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ON A BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
r
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
Z
EL� W ZD
r p
THE SIZE WILL FULLY COMPLIANT THE NORTH
'^ U
�/J Z
CAROLINA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 11 117.1-2009 AND
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND IN AREAS
C3
U) L]
SITE
AN AR STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
VJ J
SWHEREURVEYOR, AR I
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECTMEREHY OF OF THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
m
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
SHEET NUMBER
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLADEN
COUNTY AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIMCATIONS.
C7•�

CONCRETE (a000 Pep 4'COMPACTED ABCSTONE BASE
.e wwM 110 GK) Oo1cRETE SEAv.NT
-I _ �=JIT III -III=1� I�IP�ti ill IIII il-�
(PER GEOTECHNICAL REI—)
NOTE:
t EM—NlBONLY. FlNA-DLS—BEPROVIDEDL-EFNAL
CBRS ARE �vnB BLE ON OOMPACTED SOBEASE
z BENALLOR-N-
wiiH TIE xORTN LAROMNA
DEVARrMENroErRAxsvors`aiTON lNcoon svEcspAnoNa
a. PAVEMENT SELTTON Musr MEETTNE dBTErM GIVENNTHE SHE SOL REPORT.
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE SECTION
'CONCRETE (4.000 PSII -El ST -1 11L
DNCRETESEnlnrvr
NCRETEPAVEMENTSECTgN B+B NMTI (+O GA) O z
(SEE PAVEMENt DE -w o
E E
UN o
I I I� I I lib I I III I I I� I I—I I L I I III I I I� I I—I I KI I I III I I I� I I
o or
II�I� TIL=III Il�ll ll1 III—u` a 111,1ll IIlwIIL�ll UI o
NOTE: 9MBGRADE
N OTE: (PER GEOTECHNICAL R—P
t GESIGN To BE PRO-EDONCE RNALCER1
ARE AVPLABLE ON CpAPACTED S—ASE
S. c OLPOINTS FO PATO
EDESTNTANAREBEFORMEDNB%SPATTE
ARNABS— a 3
ON MESITE PIR
AN. SEE CONTROL JOINT DETAIL.- -
B LIGHT BROOM 1—BROOM —ES TO BE Iry THE DIRECTION AS III—ON THE eRE
PIAN
* AL tERIALAOCORCANC
SSHALLBEINE w11H THENOROLNA
THCAR4
DEPARrMErEarMOF-NSPOR-NON (N=n SPEClgcnnONS. - I
q I-ELENT SE—N MUST MEET THE CRRERIA— IN THE SRE SOIL REPORT. Y
CONCRETE -TO -ASPHALT DETAIL STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE SECTION
NOT TO SCALE NOT-
-O—RETE uRETHA.EJOM✓�ALN�G
BECTgN AIBGHTRAVCOLOR N U`g\i
81 e i
NOTE: s.—N -\��C ryn)illlT�T�aT
t.. IONTSPACINGTOBI— wr PRE EDTmp c
EXPANSION JOINTo o a a m
NOT TO SCALE o o o =
N
Ol Q
JD—EBAwED OR PRfAtOIDfD a O m
ED W
SrRfNOTN OCOrvCRETEE Y
o
- III III ILII -III III III III III III= =
I I S 1111ll1�1 I i �I I�I I i �ool p o i Iol Iolll I i �o�I I o I ISI Iolll I I'—�O�I I o I ISI I I
MOTE:---- ---- ---- - J
t. {'DE r Ull INGC NCRETEGROOVING—AT
THE MRST PASS O I—NNGGry a
3. CONS I. SHALL BE RE£STABLLSHED AFTER BROOM RNIBING
DPE CONTROL JOINT
NDTTD—LE W
LJJ
U)
U)
0 (1)
�O'o
—0 LL
Q U) LL
1
JZL�
LIJ Q a Lu
W LL
=X°�
Wz
0
_ U
A Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
C8.0

'D'N 'HDI3ltltl
$O WNDIH dD NO'SIAIO
^ n
_
'D'N 'HOI3ltl1
SAtlMHOIH d0 NOISIAIO
'ld3G
' O
$ O;
w
NOI1tl1tl0dSNtltl1 dO 1d3O
VNIIORVO H1tl0N
�0 31VIS
ydll0'.) 3dId
tlOd DNIMVtla 0uvoNV1S HSI
D
a
m
N0I1tl1SOdSNtltl1 d0
YNIIOSr3 H1tloN
d0 31tl1S
H3A09 ONV 3WVHd 310HNVW
HOA DNIMtltlO allVONViS HSIl0N3
v
m
a
b
x
a
I
I I
S - �r"1 WSRm
cn
w
a
-NI vi J I
o
II II
LJ
w �
U
g
moo �
=8 0
I _
a 3
!p. 4
IIII
WI rV1
!p-
JJIIII
€
7i6 9
\
V� '
3
"ted 4nod �€ �3g
.411
I
4
■ WOMEN ..
IL'4t
.4v 1�
STATE OF
DEFT. �ina�xsPORrAr[ox
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RALEIGH, N.C.
ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR
PIPE COLLAR
' N
' l:
n O
= m
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYSL
MLEIOH, N.C.
ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR
MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER
-p\\\\11111111//
=m
j
'� m-4-'4t4Q
`\'��\ yCA p�
. ��C
�J
a
,wV"p0 q=e
N 'HDI3ltltl
SAVWHDIH AD NOISIAIO
'013
' m
o
.1.N 'HOI31VU
SAVMHSIN d0 NOISIAIa
`= m
E_
NOI1tl1tl0dSNV81 dO 1d30
VNIIOWD H1U0x
LO 31tl15
9I'008 ONV bl'O48 S'DMa H1IM 3SN NOd
S31YH0 ONV 3WVHd 131NI dOHa
tlOd DNIMtltlD 0tltl0NV1S HSIlDN3
^ p
v
O
NOIIVIHOdSNrtl1 d0 Id3G
VNIIOtlVO HIUON
10 31YIS
3d Id „84 NuH1 „ZL
i
H313WtlI0 ,9 ONV ,S ,b 3lOHNVW 1SV93Hd
tl.l ON I.V.. (tltl0NVIS HSII.N3
- O
D Q
= m
.�� //I
p /Ulll111\\
Z
Y
<
Y
<
m
w� W
LL
O
OD
Q
_
m
w H a� m
i ion w
'Cu ,
w
T�= r_ III wW
LU
w
ow
„i 911 Zy941 1 c -�
Imp
1 j A Y
38�: 3
O
E Z
U)
E
s a R, "s3 sl
0 0
LLI
co
4 E4 A`Sd4 7@�@
49 A
Z
U)
0
3
IL' O O LL
o
% W
` Lu J
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR
DROP INLET FRAME AND GRATES
m
STATE OF
xoRrH CAROLINA
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR
PRECAST MANHOLE 4',5' AND S' DIAMETER
N
w Q d W
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1 LEIGH, N.C.
FOR USE WITH STD. DWG.S 840.14 AND 840.15
w O
'" m
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MLEIDR, N.C.
12" THRU 48" PIPE
W a
z m
^ w LL
LL
r
LWr Z
O
G �
A Q
m
E
SHEET NUMBER
C9.0

I�
STRAW WADDLE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILT CAPTURE PROTECTION ON EXISTING
PAVEMENT
1.0 DESCRIPTION
1.1 THIS WORK SHALL CONSIST OF FURNISHING, PLACING, MAINTAINING AND
REMOVING THE STRAW WADDLES SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER AND AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. THE STRAW WADDLES
SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM DISTRIBUTED BY THE BMP STORE.
2.0 MATERIALS
2.1 STRAW SWALES SHALL BE SYNTHETIC FILTER MANUFACTURED FROM RECYCLED
SYNTHETIC FIBERS.
2.1.1 STRAW SWALES WILL BE MANUFACTURED TO BE 9" IN DIAMETER AND ARE
AVAILABLE IN IV 6', S', 10', 17, 14' AND 16' LENGTHS AND A MINIMUM OF
TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES LONGER THAN THE CURB INLET OPENING. THIS WILL
ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO COVER THE INLET WITH TWELVE (12) INCHES
BEYOND THE INLET ON BOTH ENDS.
3.0 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
3.1 GENERAL SEOUENCE
3.1.1 INSTALL THE STRAW WADDLES ALONG THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR LIMITS
DEFINED ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN ON SHEET C3.0 AND C3.1.
3.1.2 THE STRAW WADDLES SHOULD BE CLEANED IF A VISUAL INSPECTION SNOWS
SILT AND DEBRIS BUILD UP AROUND THE STRAW WADDLES.
3.1.3 TO REMOVE THE STRAW WADDLES, UFT OUT OF THE OPENING.
3.1.4 THE STRAW WADDLES IS REUSABLE. ONCE THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IS
COMPLETE AND IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL, REMOVE, CLEAN
AND STORE OUT OF THE SUNLIGHT UNTIL NEEDED ON THE NEXT PROJECT.
3.1.5 PONDING IS LIKELY IF SEDIMENT IS NOT REMOVE) REGULARLY. INSPECTION
OF STRAW WADDLES SHOULD BE ON A REGULAR BASIS AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER
MAJOR RAIN EVENTS.
STRAW WADDLE SILT PROTECTION
N.T.S. REV. DATE: 3/13/17
STRUCTURE
D Full (cis) E (R.)
L (ftJ
P (ft )
D (in.)
STONE STONE
THICKNE DIA.
SS (in.) (in.)
STONE
CLASS
VEL.
(fps.)
FES -01
47.15 9.00
1804
0
21.00
36
22 6
B 1
6.67
SWALEA
3.57 4.50
6.0
7.50
WA
12 3
A3.24
SWALE B
2.97 4.50
6.0
7.50
WA
12 3
A
3.09
OTE: The lengths of the np-mp aprons Were determined by
8.06 of the NCDENR Erosion Control Manual.
using the NEW
York DOT
Dissipator Method as outlined in
Section
NOTE: Rip-mp aprons designed for full flow pipe capacity.
1USE A
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST NOO BY WEIGHE ITAILLP11 DR
HT OF
"NSTRLITIN LEE ITA
RE 1
FLAT
'ODLE FOR sEDPMENTUFENCFSNAR LB/LIN
STEEL *1 A INI'M LINITI IF ' FEET MAN' DIRI THAT ITFIL POSTS
TIME "I TONS TO FA'LTATI FAITERNO THE FAEI'
OR CARRIER
ETINIIII A- T,HCOFILTER TANDARD. sTRENCTH Ex TRA
ITRENITH 2 FIDUR, FLAT THEPIT
IT HE THE DIDIMINT FINII 1111 NIT 1-11 4
(HIS
RE.)
THE BARR E' TO 1111 JAN TO F 'HEN IINTI ARE NECESSARY,sE11RELVH F
FIRED ry INNICH
FIITINGwireaosLlNiW aL'n nc
SHE
HE TEND' STRIN FT
I PLACE 11 IN1111 IF THE FAIIII ALINI THE 1-1 IRE DUE IF THE
I 1111F ILL IF FRENCH I 1 MFAcLIONP IFC T. PRCUFnL II 11R THE Fs ORTILLIT. ALLL
STEEL FENCE POST
WIRE FENCE
HARDWARE CLOTH
US POST
F Qm
OWrtES
b SAIDE
EA LT S"NR 11
BAa G GATCH
emecT(a araexwem
SIDE VIEW 6CiEL
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE ('NCDEQ 6.62)
FILTER OF "" OP OF 51 "F
WASHED STONE\ A
\y ABOVE TSTf THEW THE TOP Or
HE WASHEDS ON[
9 FILTER FABRIC -
o^ ON GROUND
BURY WRE FENCE AND
HARDWARE CLOTH
SECTION VIEW
MAINTENANCE
SEE SILT FENCE THIS SHEET FOR MAINTENANCE INFORMATION.
SILT FENCE
BURY WIRE FENCE
II FILTER FABRIC.
__ II ANDNARBWARE
TM
-A�-� STEEL FENCE IN TRENCH
POST SET MAX
- 2'APANIT MIN. -
NOTES '. INTO SOLID GROUND
1. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN HALF OF STONE OUTLET IS COVERED.
2. REPLACE STONE AS NEEDED TO ENSURE DEWATERING.
SILT FENCE MIRETS ARE TO BE PROVIDED ALONG AI L LOW POINT50F
SILT FENCE AND AREAS WHERE RUNOFF MAY CONCENTRATE CAUSNG
MAGE TO SILT FENCE. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL OUTLETS AS
NECESSARY To ENSURE SILT FERCE IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL
THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION.
SILT FENCE OUTLET ('NCDEQ 6.62)
:;UB END ON OUTLET B
END SECTIONS.
SPIGOT END ON
INLET END SECTIONI
I�.I�.�y.1y.1•_
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
SUBTHE RE DE PREPARATION --PREPARE THE ON TH DE FOR RIPRAP AND Y FILL TO
THE REWIRED LINES AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. COMPACT ANY FILL
REWIRED IN THE SUBISTU R ED TOA DENSITY APPROXIMATING DEPRE THAT N RI
SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED MATERIAL OR ER OBJ DEPRESSIONS WITH RIPRAP.
REMOVE BGRA BRUSH, TREES, STUMPS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL CUT THE
AT THE E ATION OF T DEEP THAT THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE RIPRAP WILL TBE
E
AT THE ELEVATION LO THE SURROUNDING AREA CHANNELS SHOULD BE EXCAVATED
SUFFICIENTLY TO ALLOW PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP IN A MANNER SUCH THAT THE
FINISHED INSIDE DIMENSIONS AND GRADE OF THE RIPRAP MEET DESIGN
SPECIFICATIONS.
SAND AND GRAVEL FILTER BLANKET --PLACE THE FILTER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY
AFTER THE GROUND FOUNDATION IS PREPARED. FOR GRAVEL, SPREAD FILTER STONE
IN A UNIFORM LAYER TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH. WHERE MORE THAN ONE LAYER OF
FILTER MATERIAL IS USED, SPREAD THE LAYERS WITH MINIMAL MIXING.
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC --PLACE THE CLOTH FILTER DIRECTLY ON THE PREPARED
FOUNDATION. OVERLAP THE EDGES BY AT LEAST 12 INCHES, AND SPACE ANCHOR
PINS EVERY 3 FT ALONG THE OVERLAP. BURY THE UPSTREAM END OF THE CLOTH A
MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW GROUND AND WHERE NECESSARY, BURY THE LOWER
END OF THE CLOTH OR OVER LAP WITH THE NEXT SECTION AS REWIRED. SEE
FIGURE 6.14A PAGE 6.14.6.
TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE THE CLOTH MEN PLACING RIPRAP. IF DAMAGE OCCURS
REMOVE THE RIPRAP, AND REPAIR THE SHEET BY ADDING ANOTHER LAYER OF FILTER
MATERIAL WITH A MINIMUM OVERLAP OF 12 INCHES AROUND THE DAMAGED AREA IF
EXTENSIVE DAMAGE IS SUSPECTED, REMOVE AND REPLACE THE ENTIRE SHEET.
WHERE LARGE STONES ARE USED OR MACHINE PLACEMENT IS DIFFICULT, A 4 -INCH
LAYER OF FINE GRAVEL OR SAND MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT THE FILTER CLOTH.
STONE PLACEMENT --PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER
PLACEMENT OF THE FILTER. PLACE RIPRAP SO THAT IT FORMS A DENSE
WELL -GRADED MASS OF STONE WITH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS. THE DESIRED
DISTRIBUTION OF STONES THROUGHOUT THE MASS MAY BE OBTAINED BY SELECTIVE
LOADING AT THE QUARRY, AND CONTROLLED DUMPING DURING FINAL PLACEMENT.
PLACE RIPRAP TO ITS FULL THICKNESS IN ONE OPERATION. DO NOT PLACE RIPRAP
BY DUMPING THROUGH CHUTES OR OTHER METHODS THAT CAUSE SEGREGATION OF
STONE SIZES. TAKE CARE NOT TO DISLODGE THE UNDERLYING BASE OR FILTER WHEN
PLACING THE STONES
THE TOE OF THE RIPRAP SLOPE SHOULD BE KEYED TO A STABLE FOUNDATION AT
ITS BASE AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 6.158. THE TOE SHOULD BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH
ABOUT 1.5 TIMES THE DESIGN THICKNESS OF THE RIPRAP, AND SHOULD EXTEND
HORIZONTALLY FROM THE SLOPE
THE FINISHED SLOPE SHOULD BE FREE OF POCKETS OF SMALL STONE OR CLUSTERS
OF LARGE STORIES. HAND PLACING MAY BE NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE PROPER
DISTRIBUTION OF STONE SIZES TO PRODUCE A RELATIVELY SMOOTH, UNIFORM
SURFACE. THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD BLEND WITH THE
SURROUNDING AREA NO OVERFALL OR PROTRUSION OF RIPRAP SHOULD BE
APPARENT.
OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL
FLAn
NATURAL GRADE
22
�I
RIP RAP-\ I F
A 4" IAS WASHED STONE
PROFILE LAYER OF FILTER FAHRIC
NOTES
END OF THE PIPE OR CULVERT AT THE DISCHARGE OUTLET AT A
MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2:1 AND A HEIGHT NOT LESS THAN TWO THIRDS
THE PIPE DIAMETER OR CULVERT HEIGHT.
THERE SHALL BE NO OVERFLOW FROM THE END OF THE APRON TO THE
SURFACE OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL THE AREA TO BE PAVED OR
RIP -RAPPED SHALL BE UNDERCUT SO THAT THE INVERT OF THE APRON
SHALL BE AT THE SAME GRADE (FLUSH) WITH THE SURFACE OF THE
RECEIVING CHANNEL THE APRON SHALL HAVE A CUTOFF OR TOE WALL
AT THE DOWNSTREAM END.
THE WIDTH OF THE END OF THE APRON SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE
BOTTOM WIDTH OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL
MAXIMUM TAPER TO RECEIVING CHANNEL 5:1
ALL SVBGRADE STRUCTURE TO BE COMPACTED TO 95X OR GREATER.
THE PLACING OF FILL, EITHER LOOSE OR COMPACTED IN THE RECEIVING
CHANNEL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.
NO BENDS OR CURVES IN THE HORIZONTAL AUGNMENT OF THE APRON
WILL BE PERMITTED.
MAINTENANCE NOTES
GENERAL, ONCE A RIPRAP INSTILLATOR HAS BEEN PROPERLY
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED IT REQUIRES VERY LITTLE MAINTENANCE.
RIPRAP SHOULD BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY FOR SCOUR OR
DISLODGED STONES. CONTROL OF WEED AND BRUSH GROWTH MAY BE
NEEDED IN SOME LOCATIONS.
N01L5. APPLM!&E AT ALL SITE ,`
STASN2ED. FREGr0H1 CNECIL4 OF
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ('NCDEQ 6.06)
OPERMANENT SEEDING
DR ASSES SPECIFICATIONS LAND L10 (OBDOING HAND SPRIGGING PLAN)uv.Ws All
R MSELIN HAPIPING, 01 PLOIWNOG TO DEPIH OF
PRCH BT GERM NAn OND PLARTL P S, "ON FEE All A111ACE WH CH WOU.
OF 10-1 Cg10A p nUzere
IF IIL I1 LIC PER
us ED. RE INLEss SOIL 111PNL1,11111AI RIP 11 OFF ISS 11
71H IINIIGAI THAT A LOWER RATE
OF RS
PERMANENT SEEDING
I- DI EBER 1 - FEDRUARv se RATE rn/ACRE1
0
TEA (F
TE11R
RIVIERA BERMUDA (UNHULLEO) 11
WARM 11AIIN"IIIIH 1 - AUGUST 31 RA
SE FOR TAIL u
RIVIERA 11R111A (FILLED) 50
O
FASIDPARY sEEONc
LL
SEEDING Mlx 11 RATERYE AIN) 2
1 O/ACRE
SEEDING LATER
M.ICTAIND-All 11 - SIG IE
IIAI
SOL
FDLLDW E RECOMMENDATIONS OF SDIL TESTS OR AP 0 F/ACRE .GROUND.
MUNMR
LTLIMMESTONE AND 1. R/ACRE 1G -1a-10 FERnuzw.
LGH
A
HFAMULCHT A
'LA"'"TTNTHE MANUFACTURERS RE OM -'J ATIONSCOR A MULCH ANCHORING
O ED
LAN _INS
TER/EAR
sEEOINc MlxruRE RTE III/ADREI
RYE 1GRANN'YLAIN)Ec
PIEDMONT AND u TAL P1.
NGREAN IN NGUNTAIus)eG
ouNPIEDMONT 9 JA MAY 1i'. FED. 1 -MAT 1
SFA
TUAL
FIL AMENDMENT= IF OIL TEITY IF A11LI .DDR A/AYRE cRDDNO
LI
AIRIULTURAL MEATINE LESSAND '. IN/ACRE 1D 1 1D FF - nu
MULCH
APPLY RATE BE C NoI CAI1DN5 PERWso As IIGHT�wE T AT A
.A UTENANIE
MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWNG EROSION DR OTHER11FIRIL111 IF IRIWLT 11 NIT FITLY A-
RIIECD DAMAGER[T[RnuzE. AND.
OSu SEEOINc
RATE �1_/AIIEI
CFR IT, RDMONT AND MOUNTAINS, A -STEMMED BUDANCRASS MAY BE
I1TED AT A RATE OF sale/ASa
PIEDMONT MAY 1 C
All
IGIL
L�E;NIF/°E"-FFEERDDND
TMRAL D , Nl'SARD1GUGRTI'
MDLOH
APPLY
YARD
NC
H AN LOHLME'HT
IE IRE I
DGL S,TCHDAE� NICE AN' NEARLY ETRAIGHT� TTnnoNs '."A MULCH ANDHDRNG.
MULSHn IMMELFEELY FOLILONING LAOSIONO ORU OTHERRDAMAEEEGERFFFRnuzE. AND
I.
LB/ACR NECESSARY TO Ex
1R R sTAeIURE NON "ALL
D lE TED ON ANY AREA
IF
AE TE "ERE
r0A0 Ju R
CLUB/EO RE (hE IE GTEUI�BµNN AC LEDILEHA VE IEMPORARILT ERMAN NTLI CEASED ACCORDING
EARLY MARSH.) GRExoaEAriE(uouNralNs) LEs OEZA IN LA FEsauARv OR THE c s E
E' FRE GLICE' AND MCI
IEl
Ar I DIED LE
EVENT IN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM iTHEHLAST AIIANo-DISTURDING ACTIRVITIAITIIAYIT IN
ANY
ANENT
DID A AIT N
WTUNI 14STAGLEAnCALENDAR CN WT, CDAYS FROM NGUND ETHESFAST DLANDPDISNRBING ACTIVITY MAN EVENT
PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SEEDING ('NCDEQ 6.10 & 6.11)
NCDOT p57
WASHED STONE TANDARD METAL ��$57 WASHED
OSTS 2'-0' IN STONEPLACED TO I y HARDWARE CLOTH
ROUND A HEIGHT OF 16" 14' Ac
ooaoaooao MIN.
ABOVE BOOX MESH OPENINGS)
000000000 VADS T HARDWARE WIRE
DS TO THE TOP OF BOX
NINGS.I/4' MESH
2'
_ IN 2z�
rf(1�9_GAUGE,
MIN. rn _oRm
a'.pg Pea.-4�xo°9� 9 $B.U.e M6L I!i
X57 WASHED STONE PLACED TO A
HEIGHT OF 16' MIN. ABOVE TOP OF BOX
MAINTENANCE
INSPECT INLETS AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT
(% INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT. CLEAR THE MESH WIRE
bF ANY DEBRIS OR 05HER OBJECTS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FLOW
FOR SUBSEQUENT RAINS. TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE OR
UNDERCUT THE WIRE MESH WRING SEDIMENT REMOVAL REPLACE
STONE AS NEEDED.
DRAINAGE AREA MAY NOT
EXCEED I ACRE.
CDIRSTRUCTON SPECIFICATIONS V
1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW DEPRESSION APPROACHING THE INLET.
2. DRIVE 5 -FOOT STEEL POSTS 2 FEET INTO THE GROUND SURROUNDING THE INLET. SPACE
POSTS EVENLY AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET, A MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART.
3. SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE MESH HARDWARE CLOTH. SECURE THE WIRE MESH TO
THE STEEL POSTS AT THE TOP, MIDDLE, AND BOTTOM. PLACING A 2 -FOOT FLAP OF THE
WIRE MESH UNDER THE GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS RECOMMENDED.
4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NC DOT R5 OR /57 STONE) ON A 2.1 SLOPE WITH A HEIGHT OF
16 INCHES AROUND THE WIRE, AND SMOOTH TO AN EVEN GRADE
S. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED, REMOVE ACCUMULATED
SEDIMENT, AND ESTABLISH FINAL GRADING ELEVATIONS.
6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND STABILIZED IT WITH GROUNDOOVER.
YARD INLET PROTECTION
N.T.S. REV. DATE:03/21/17
O p Q Q BE
TH O O 2
O N
d ¢ O QmED
S O O 0 IS
Y U -
NJ
Z (n
O J
U <(
Z �-
LLJ
00
O
/'
I "L
L1J
VJ z
0 U)
�p'o
O LL
Z l
L1J Q a LU
W LL
= ><
LL�
ELI z
C 0
G O
_ U
VJ w
Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
C12.0

CRITICAL PgNTs NOTES:
A O—Inta and Seams 'Hatronlai slapk s o no siwdtl be
ILP,Pladed Wale, Line altered if necessary I plea to
C. Channel 6otbmiside Sbpe VeNces eacure Ne cnlral to.nk along Ina channel
A A �•
B C a C -•In hose dei wrdNana. the use d sNpk
slake lengths g,eale, Nen W(15an) may
be rleNs4ary o ProWdy secure Ne
ora g t To scale RECP's.
NORTH DI.IWmer:
AMERICAN Theirlbrmation rme,Nw hereinN aneral deal nirdarmation and .Fare Igca
GREEN I censitt an Independent prdessbnal for lorOler design guidance. y We 1eaN0f15,
V
IN 476(ynlM1iann Rd. I'II: PINI-P22-MOaI
+Ville, IT 11 xw+v nxvravnr m Dmwn on:N&11
MATTING DETAIL
HUB END ON OUTLET B7
END CTIONS.
SPIGO END ON
INLET END SECTIONS
�T •�.�•..�.�=
�.w�.w.. �• �i
-
STEEL BACK ROD
MIN, SEE PLAN
PLAN I
aT:w.'Y Lewy -
NATURAL GRADE
2 2
\ RIP RAP I F
Y
4' /5 WASHED STONE
PROFILE LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC
CHANNEL
INSTALLATION
DETAIL
m as Irebre bMalne rebel
convol Potluac IR — of
�tlmg anY nemseary aPpiminn IN
ime. rendna seal.
....a at
Na Fp d uw den,Id br
deep X 6115an1 wbe he M mN
apaoximae"y T(30an) INTI RECPe
acted beyond Me upebpa Ixanbn
cows bench Ike SlpreMex mat at Ne
rerculvea o ae wpee—tal
RE—row or depleseNkea
pmxnmlelYaIM(M—) apart In tl+e
hdmm a uw Dean. aecxrl any
cem�pad� treaty ala aNIMFP MIaY
se mmpance wl am fold nw
over Ne aced aMroconpackd �L
Secue REGIS ova mpaclal 1
a _1 1T -ppm xiapart — Na
dme RECPs
3.Rd mMer REGIS in tliredion d water
low.
beam or alaareL RECPs m1
Zi sofas, 4RECPa m
Lnily netened b sai audaw Dy
krddaoe esPwanMin Ne staph Ivtlem
(Sal d1en— of deples 01.0. Ace'
a,. ad 4' on moa N ansa
SFJ bnpN aW� m
a RECPs d by d nM
slapka5 ekes appm indeiTpaon1
oma call am mmpaa IM
afla _e'
6. Adj --- I a— mon be overlapped
e eentaly Ts t__)
nuenandin an RECPa ti
-. F hip &. doon.mPl®l— a
w m foo (9 t2m) Intervals tke a
tlouda d ebpks alaggaed
ovaodre ItlN dNe almond.
a�alMlorednmNna row d�dallkaldekes
a-(15an) alp X T(ISan) a+0e -h.
-11 aM pmpwl Na IreaM1 edm
n pv_
•
IoaMarcmapa so.Mp
• ,�r
•
pr�.Vq
f2AAa:hvs per92 kt)
sm�
o e,o
Lb• mm,
(m>
IlaSrsp�er
rT
" LI.A'11.1
•
41
• a
•
Bal srcM1ae Pa S0.y0.
(2T FrcM peraO. M.)
Shaol2otz.CI{,A NN EL
I NS'1 A I,., A'.L
EARTH ANCHOR (NEA)
DETAIL
`es
Awl Earth Anchor
Oetxil
NOTES:
Slope Cradicnl
D -el
The perramarlce dgourd andlomg dewces is highly
dependant on numerous enelprolea specific vanaaes. Kos the
sale tect mixerelbllity of the proengineer and/or contractor to
Woo the appro ruiia doctor type and loroh. Anchoring shall be
CRITICAL POINTS
adeded to hod tha mat in intimate coned with Ne soil subgrade
A. Ovedepa am Seams
antl resist W11- in aaadance w.N the pri ec design invent.
" Anclo, Pattern Guide can very based on eadh anchor and
E. Projected Water Una
C. Clene'd Sottoml6be Slope Vertices
blanket selection.
- If awned, the system can be so&fillaE and sodded after TRM
A A
R R
mstalation. Sod sW* be steplaVataked acoorcet, 0 plan
C C
STRUCTURE 0 Full (ds)
E (ft.)
Drawing Not To Scab
P (fl.)
- - NORTH
1Nadeimer:
(Ips.)
AMERICAN
Thamkrmahan preenatedormnle general desgnmlanotian ale. Fa specific application,
GREEN
wraull an independent
pronneibnl fo-Mm desgn guuance.
id01 SI. Vyendel-CynlM1ivnv Rd. PR: AdF'122-Zadd
P,mvvilk, IN 476,33 wxx.nvyraamwm
A
For—.- 0 T4
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
L PLACE STONE TO THE UNES AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN THE PLAN ON A
FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION.
2. KEEP THE CENTER STONE SECTION AT LEAST 9 INCHES BELOW NATURAL
GROUND LEVEL WHERE THE DAM ABUTS THE CHANNEL BANKS.
3. EXTEND STONE AT LEAST 1.5 FEET BEYOND BEYOND THE DITCH BANK
(FIGURE 6.838) TO KEEP WATER FROM CUTTING AROUND THE ENDS OF THE
CHECK DAM.
4. SETSPACING BETWEEN DAMS TO ASSURE THAT THE ELEVATION AT THE
TOP OF THE LOWER DAM IS THE SAME AS THE TOE ELEVATION OF THE
UPPER DAM.
5. PROTECT THE CHANNEL AFTER THE LOWEST CHECK DAM FROM HEAVY
FLOW THAT COULD CAUSE EROSION.
6. MAKE SURE THAT THE CHANNEL REACH ABOVE THE MOST UPSTREAM DAM
IS STABLE.
7. ENSURE THAT OTHER AREAS OF THE CHANNEL, SUCH AS CULVERT
ENTRANCES BELOW THE CHECK DAMS, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO DAMAGE OR
BLOCKAGE FROM DISPLACED STONES.
STAPLE DETAIL
1. Prepare sol —. Falel,g TRM,
.edfin. -, necamary aPpll-on of
It—,..—and aced.
2aep
at - alp of 1. dmn.d by
Ig In IRM In "d-
(15
deepm0
ep x 6' (I—) wide trench wM
apPmdwYe ei 11 ca an) of TRM
d ple .d ae Lse ShoM�Aepn r0on
danndkdvert wtla
supplan-1.l e r p,dedan xi
needed. And+or Ne TRM vaN a row at
�Pkrn, ndwrs�aplxim y 12-
tooda. the
,Ioe kd
on aM, -pin ANIPM'aad
mpsaad wH ad fdd Nene-a 12'
an) potion 1— bark owe—d
—aaded e.L aea,re TRM pre
sal w'M a row of eepkalad m
spa .Prodmalely 2 (30 )
Ne widN of Ne TR M.
':d oiler TRM F diredon of w
dew i bollen d cbannd, TRM w 1
u,vd lVdh amroprmle aloe agallml ew
.sal wdace. PI TRM must ba wwreN
wi wrfaca aY NaAig
s apba a app
X1.1
119u� sh
F the M__
smner
d. dace mncecvbve TRM a— -.doe style)_o_(1p cIn-15
rm) ovadap. Lee a dWile rax of
-ini s-a--1
ga fid'(N10c 1-1 and
F.
dllenpN ad0e d TRM a tap IN siM
.­a-
-P.OecIldore0 wm a rov d
e,d a—'e"aely 1T
(30 cm) aaeIts vn) asap and
mmlpea oe banmut beeam0l
& Ad]— T-daPoad
Ppmxi,releN 2' • 5' (5 cm • 125 and
(depeld.na on TRM 41) antl
aalellm.
I.In Nah Ipv chamW applUdodnw a
pk 0 ne a(9 is 12 .)
30 m 40 IoM (B m - e mf piprea
Ike a tl.dMa row e¢dropks slap0e,ea
d�(+ao )eroan 1 Dan)
IdN alma chenn t
& Ire kmll�nd anal d the TRM „mal be
er�Ich� . vnN a row pl &IMes en
6'(15 nal 12' (3o an1
apand in a 1115 an) deep x rr (15 nn)
ketch aeaRl and romped Ina
be,cn oder ampin .
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
INSPECT CHECK DAMS AND CHANNELS AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFIER EACH
SIGNIFICANT (1/2 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT AND REPAIR IMMEDIATELY.
CLEAN OUT SEDIMENT, STRAW, UMBS, OR OTHER DEBRIS THAT COULD CLOG THE
CHANNEL WHEN NEEDED.
ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE THE CHECK DAM AND
EROSION FROM HIGH FLOWS AROUND THE EDGES OF THE DAM. CORRECT ALL
DAMAGE IMMEDIATELY. IF SIGNIFICANT EROSION OCCURS BETWEEN DAMS,
ADDITIONAL MEASURES CAN BE TAKEN SUCH AS, INSTALLING A PROTECTIVE
RIPRAP LINER IN THAT PORTION OF THE CHANNEL
REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED TO PREVENT
DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGETATION, ALLOW THE CHANNEL TO DRAIN THROUGH THE
STONE CHECK DAM, AND PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FROM CARRYING SEDIMENT
OVER THE DAM. ADD STONES TO DAMS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN DESIGN
HEIGHT MID CROSS SECTION.
FLOW2' MIN AS WASHED STONE
I'1 /5 WASHED STONE W (SPILLWAY) MIN 2/3 J
V SPILLWAY CREST STREAM WIDTH W
RIP RAP
a FLOW _T?
m
RIP RAP
e PIAN gCTON R—B FILTER FABRIC
SECTION A—A
ROCK CHECK DAM
N.T.S. REV. DATE: 04/10/17
NOTES
END OF THE PIPE OR CULVERT AT THE DISCHARGE OUTLET AT A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2:1
AND A HEIGHT NOT LESS THAN TWO THIRDS THE PIPE DIAMETER OR CULVERT HEIGHT.
THERE SHALL BE NO OVERFLOW FROM THE END OF THE APRON TO THE SURFACE OF THE
RECEIVING CHANNEL THE AREA TO BE PAVED OR RIP—RAPPED SHALL BE UNDERCVT SO
THAT THE INVERT OF THE APRON SHALL BE AT THE SAME GRADE (FLUSH) WITH THE
SURFACE OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL THE APRON SHALL HAVE A CUTOFF OR TOE WALL
AT THE DOWNSTREAM END.
THE WIDTH OF THE END OF THE APRON SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE BOTTOM MDTH OF THE
RECEIVING CHANNEL
MAXIMUM TAPER TO RECEIVING CHANNEL 5:1
ALL SUBGRADE STRUCTURE TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OR GREATER.
THE PLACING OF FILL, EITHER LOOSE OR COMPACTED IN THE RECEIVING CHANNEL SHALL
NOT BE ALLOWED.
NO BENDS OR CURVES IN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF THE APRON WILL BE PERMITTED
SANO AND GRAVEL FILTER BLANKET --PLACE THE FILTER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE GROUND FOUNDATION IS PREPARED. FOR
GRAVEL, SPREAD FILTER STONE IN A UNIFORM LAYER TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH. WHERE MORE THAN ONE LAYER OF FILTER MATERIAL
IS USED, SPREAD THE LAYERS MTU MINIMAL MIXING -
SYN ETIC
IXING.SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC --PLACE THE CLOTH FILTER DIRECTLY ON THE PREPARED FOUNDATION. OVERLAP THE EDGES BY AT LEAST
12 INCHES, AND SPACE ANCHOR PINS EVERY 3 FT ALONG THE OVERLAP. BURY THE UPSTREAM END OF THE CLOTH A MINIMUM OF
12 INCHES BELOW GROUND AND MERE NECESSARY, BURY THE LOWER END OF THE CLOTH OR OVER LAP WITH THE NEXT SECTION
AS REQUIRED. SEE FIGURE 6.14A PAGE 6.14.6.
TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE THE CLOTH WHEN PLACING RIPRAP. IF DAMAGE OCCURS REMOVE THE RIPRAP, AND REPAIR THE SHEET
BY ADDING ANOTHER LAYER OF FILTER MATERIAL WITH A MINIMUM OVERLAP OF 12 INCHES AROUND THE DAMAGED AREA IF
EXTENSIVE DAMAGE IS SUSPECTED, REMOVE AND REPLACE THE ENTIRE SHEET.
MERE LARGE STONES ARE USED OR MACHINE PLACEMENT IS DIFFICULT, A hINCH LAYER OF FINE GRAVEL OR SAND MAY BE
NEEDED TO PROTECT THE FILTER CLOTH.
STONE PLACEMENT --PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE FILTER. PLACE RIPRAP SO
THAT IT FORMS A DENSE, WELL—GRADED MASS OF STONE NTH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS THE DESIRED DISTRIBUTION OF STONES
THROUGHOUT THE MASS MAY BE OBTAINED BY SELECTIVE LOADING AT THE QUARRY, AND CONTROLLED DUMPING DURING FINAL
PLACEMENT. PLACE RIPRAP TO ITS FULL THICKNESS IN ONE OPERATION. DO NOT PLACE RIPRAP BY DUMPING THROUGH CHUTES OR
OTHER METHODS THAT CAUSE SEGREGATION OF STONE SIZES TAKE CARE NOT TO DISLODGE THE UNDERLYING BASE OR FILTER
MEN PLACING THE STONES,
THE TOE OF THE RIPRAP SLOPE SHOULD BE KEYED TO A STABLE FOUNDATION AT ITS BASE AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 6.15B. THE TOE
SHOULD BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH ABOUT 1.5 TIMES THE DESIGN THICKNESS OF THE RIPRAP, AND SHOULD EXTEND HORIZONTALLY
FROM THE SLOPE.
MAINTENANCE NOTES THE FINISHED SLOPE SHOULD BE FREE OF POCKETS OF SMALL STONE OR CLUSTERS OF LARGE STONES. HAND PLACING MAY BE
IN GENERAL, ONCE A RIPRAP INSTALLATION HAS E. PROPERLY DESIGNED AND
INSTALLED IT FOR SC
NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF STONE SIZES TO PRODUCE A RELATIVELY SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE. THE
PERIODICY FOR SCS VERY LITTLE MAINTENANCE OUR OR DISLODGED STONES. CONTROL OF WEED AND BRUSH RIPRAP SHOULD BE INSPECTED FINISHED GRADE OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD BLEND WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. NO OVERFALL OR PROTRUSION OF RIPRAP SHOULD
ALL
GROWTHMAY BE NEEDED IN SOME LOCATIONS. BE APPARENT.
OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL
15
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
SURVEY NOTE
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ONA BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT NTHTHE NORTH
CAROJNA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
TALL CON STRl1CTI0N TO BE IN ACCORDANCE NTH BLADEN COUNN AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
~ O p Q Q m
w O
00 � N
d N M N
C o m Q m
� O
S O D w _ s
Y O a o U
J
0
0
Z
0
'
v )
0
0L_
W
J
Q
W
vJ
0
O
O O
LL
LU
J
a LV
W LL
r ~
z
2 0
O
I_ U
Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
C12.1
STONE STONE
THICKNE DIA.
STONE
VEL.
STRUCTURE 0 Full (ds)
E (ft.)
L (ft.)
P (fl.)
D (in.) SS (in.) (in.)
CLASS
(Ips.)
n
FES -0i 64.54
9.00
12.0
15.00
36 12 3
A
9.13
SUBGRADE PREPARATION PREPARE THE SU.ADE FOR RIPRAP AND FILTER TO THE REWIRED LINES AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE
PLANS. COMPACT ANY FILL REWIRED IN THE SUBGRADE TO A DENSITY APPROXIMATING THAT OF THE SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED
NOTE: The lengths of the rip -rap aprons were determined by
using the New York DOT Dissipater Method as outlined in
Section
MATERIAL OR OVERFILL DEPRESSIONS WITH RIPRAP. REMOVE BRUSH, TREES, STUMPS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL CUT
8.06 of the NCDENR Erosion Control Manual.
THE SUBGRADE SUFFICIENTLY DEEP THAT THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE RIPRAP WILL BE AT THE ELEVATION OF THE SURROUNDING
NOTE: Rip -rap aprons designed for full Pow pipe capacity.
AREA CHANNELS SHOULD BE EXCAVATED SUFFICIENTLY TO ALLOW PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP IN A MANNER SUCH THAT THE
FINISHED INSIDE DIMENSIONS AND GRADE OF THE RIPRAP MEET DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS.
NOTES
END OF THE PIPE OR CULVERT AT THE DISCHARGE OUTLET AT A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2:1
AND A HEIGHT NOT LESS THAN TWO THIRDS THE PIPE DIAMETER OR CULVERT HEIGHT.
THERE SHALL BE NO OVERFLOW FROM THE END OF THE APRON TO THE SURFACE OF THE
RECEIVING CHANNEL THE AREA TO BE PAVED OR RIP—RAPPED SHALL BE UNDERCVT SO
THAT THE INVERT OF THE APRON SHALL BE AT THE SAME GRADE (FLUSH) WITH THE
SURFACE OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL THE APRON SHALL HAVE A CUTOFF OR TOE WALL
AT THE DOWNSTREAM END.
THE WIDTH OF THE END OF THE APRON SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE BOTTOM MDTH OF THE
RECEIVING CHANNEL
MAXIMUM TAPER TO RECEIVING CHANNEL 5:1
ALL SUBGRADE STRUCTURE TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% OR GREATER.
THE PLACING OF FILL, EITHER LOOSE OR COMPACTED IN THE RECEIVING CHANNEL SHALL
NOT BE ALLOWED.
NO BENDS OR CURVES IN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF THE APRON WILL BE PERMITTED
SANO AND GRAVEL FILTER BLANKET --PLACE THE FILTER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE GROUND FOUNDATION IS PREPARED. FOR
GRAVEL, SPREAD FILTER STONE IN A UNIFORM LAYER TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH. WHERE MORE THAN ONE LAYER OF FILTER MATERIAL
IS USED, SPREAD THE LAYERS MTU MINIMAL MIXING -
SYN ETIC
IXING.SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC --PLACE THE CLOTH FILTER DIRECTLY ON THE PREPARED FOUNDATION. OVERLAP THE EDGES BY AT LEAST
12 INCHES, AND SPACE ANCHOR PINS EVERY 3 FT ALONG THE OVERLAP. BURY THE UPSTREAM END OF THE CLOTH A MINIMUM OF
12 INCHES BELOW GROUND AND MERE NECESSARY, BURY THE LOWER END OF THE CLOTH OR OVER LAP WITH THE NEXT SECTION
AS REQUIRED. SEE FIGURE 6.14A PAGE 6.14.6.
TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE THE CLOTH WHEN PLACING RIPRAP. IF DAMAGE OCCURS REMOVE THE RIPRAP, AND REPAIR THE SHEET
BY ADDING ANOTHER LAYER OF FILTER MATERIAL WITH A MINIMUM OVERLAP OF 12 INCHES AROUND THE DAMAGED AREA IF
EXTENSIVE DAMAGE IS SUSPECTED, REMOVE AND REPLACE THE ENTIRE SHEET.
MERE LARGE STONES ARE USED OR MACHINE PLACEMENT IS DIFFICULT, A hINCH LAYER OF FINE GRAVEL OR SAND MAY BE
NEEDED TO PROTECT THE FILTER CLOTH.
STONE PLACEMENT --PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE FILTER. PLACE RIPRAP SO
THAT IT FORMS A DENSE, WELL—GRADED MASS OF STONE NTH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS THE DESIRED DISTRIBUTION OF STONES
THROUGHOUT THE MASS MAY BE OBTAINED BY SELECTIVE LOADING AT THE QUARRY, AND CONTROLLED DUMPING DURING FINAL
PLACEMENT. PLACE RIPRAP TO ITS FULL THICKNESS IN ONE OPERATION. DO NOT PLACE RIPRAP BY DUMPING THROUGH CHUTES OR
OTHER METHODS THAT CAUSE SEGREGATION OF STONE SIZES TAKE CARE NOT TO DISLODGE THE UNDERLYING BASE OR FILTER
MEN PLACING THE STONES,
THE TOE OF THE RIPRAP SLOPE SHOULD BE KEYED TO A STABLE FOUNDATION AT ITS BASE AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 6.15B. THE TOE
SHOULD BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH ABOUT 1.5 TIMES THE DESIGN THICKNESS OF THE RIPRAP, AND SHOULD EXTEND HORIZONTALLY
FROM THE SLOPE.
MAINTENANCE NOTES THE FINISHED SLOPE SHOULD BE FREE OF POCKETS OF SMALL STONE OR CLUSTERS OF LARGE STONES. HAND PLACING MAY BE
IN GENERAL, ONCE A RIPRAP INSTALLATION HAS E. PROPERLY DESIGNED AND
INSTALLED IT FOR SC
NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF STONE SIZES TO PRODUCE A RELATIVELY SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE. THE
PERIODICY FOR SCS VERY LITTLE MAINTENANCE OUR OR DISLODGED STONES. CONTROL OF WEED AND BRUSH RIPRAP SHOULD BE INSPECTED FINISHED GRADE OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD BLEND WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. NO OVERFALL OR PROTRUSION OF RIPRAP SHOULD
ALL
GROWTHMAY BE NEEDED IN SOME LOCATIONS. BE APPARENT.
OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL
15
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
SURVEY NOTE
EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
BASED ONA BOUNDARY @ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RECEIVED
03/31/2017 PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING (ASE).
THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT NTHTHE NORTH
CAROJNA ACCESSIBILITY CODES (ANSI 117.1-2009 AND
CHAPTER 11 OF THE NCBC) UNLESS AND EXCEPT IN AREAS
WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS
EXIST MERE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND
ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
TALL CON STRl1CTI0N TO BE IN ACCORDANCE NTH BLADEN COUNN AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
~ O p Q Q m
w O
00 � N
d N M N
C o m Q m
� O
S O D w _ s
Y O a o U
J
0
0
Z
0
'
v )
0
0L_
W
J
Q
W
vJ
0
O
O O
LL
LU
J
a LV
W LL
r ~
z
2 0
O
I_ U
Q
m
SHEET NUMBER
C12.1