20160681 Ver 2_Corrected Application Recd Digitally_20170525

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: David Syster <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 12:02 PM
To: Burdette, Jennifer a; Steenhuis, Joanne
Cc: 'Greer, Emily C SAW'; 'Tammy Spivey'
Subject: RE: math
Attachments: Blake Farm IP RFAI Submittal 5-18-17 revised 5-25-17.pdf
0,
I've attached a full revised set (Narrative, Drawings, Appendices etc) with the revised information.
Let me know if you need any additional information.
Thank you,
David A. Syster
President
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
From: Burdette, Jennifer a[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:22 PM
To: David Syster; Steenhuis, Joanne
Cc: 'Greer, Emily C SAW'
Subject: Re: math
David,
Electronic copies will be fine.
Thanks,
Jennifer
Jennifer Burdette
401/Buffer Coordinator
DEQ - Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919-807-6364
(Physical Address: Archdale Building, 9th Floor, 512 N
Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604)
Emoil correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Low and
may be disclosed to third parties.
1

From: David Syster <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 5:12:25 PM
To: Steenhuis, Joanne
Cc: 'Greer, Emily C SAW', Burdette, Jennifer a
Subject: RE: math
Joanne,
I apologize and yes I will certainly edit and get back to you.
I will edit open water impacts locations:
1.) The permit application
2.) The table in the drawing
3.) Appropriate places in the narrative.
I will include wetland types in the table on the impact map and a summary in the narrative.
Do you need the entire submittal again? I can do that and e-mail electronically and copy Jennifer Jennifer do you need me
to mail a hardcopy?
Thank you,
David A. Syster
President
in
1 1M"'ammmm
5315 South College Road Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
From: Steenhuis, Joanne[mailto:joanne.steenhuispncdenr,c�ov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:23 PM
To: David Syster
Cc: Greer, Emily C SAW; Burdette, Jennifer a
Subject: math
David,
I was adding up your open water impacts and calculated it to be 0.53 acres not the 0.52 that you have. I even took the
numbers out to the 4t" place and still got 0.53. Can you please change that and email it to me.
I also need the wetland types for the wetland impacts in my data base and permit.
Thanks
Joanne Steenhuis
Environmental Senior Specialist
Transportation Permitting Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
(9 10) 796-7306 •
308-4021 •!
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405

Email corresponclence to and fi`om thlois address is sut-yect to tlhe
Alotill-I Carolina Public Records 'Law and may be disclosed to thloird patlies,

Attachment 1
Blake Farm
Supplemental Documentation to the Individual Permit Application
Requested By:
Pender Farm Development, LLC
Mr. Raiford Trask, III
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Prepared By:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
910.452.2711
Date:
18 May 2017
Revised 25 May 2017

Table of Contents
Section
Title
Page
I.
Purpose and Need..................................................................................
1
II.
Location and Existing Conditions..............................................................
1
III.
Project History......................................................................................
1
IV.
Project Description.................................................................................
I
V.
Avoidance and Minimization....................................................................
2
VI.
Alternatives Analysis..............................................................................
3
A.
Off -Site Alternatives.......................................................................
3
B.
On -Site Alternatives.........................................................................
4
C.
Alternatives Conclusion...................................................................
5
VII.
Compensatory Mitigation.........................................................................
5
VIII.
Additional Authorizations........................................................................
5
IX.
Summary.............................................................................................
5
Appendices
A.
Pender County Tax Information.................................................................
i
B.
Pender 1164 LLC & Pender Farm Development, LLC Sec. of State Corp Pages........
ii
C. Agent Authorization.............................................................................. iii
D. Adjacent Property Owner Information......................................................... iv
E. Vicinity Map........................................................................................ v
F. Proposed Site Plan & Wetland Impact Map ................................................... vi
G. Jurisdictional Wetland Determinations......................................................... vii
H. Natural Resource Information................................................................... viii
I. Alternative Analysis Map........................................................................ ix
J. Threatened and Endangered Species Study .................................................... x
K. Historic Properties & Archaeological Resources ............................................ xi
L. North East Cape Fear Mitigation Bank Credit Reservation Letter .........................
TOC -i

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information SEGi
I. Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to construct a 255 lot residential development with associated amenities in the Scott's
Hill area and provide access to NC 17 and I-140. The Wilmington to Hampstead corridor is a rapidly growing area
of southeastern North Carolina. With the construction of I-140 and completion of a local waste water treatment
facility, the Scott's Hill area has become a prime area for residential development. At this time few planned
residential neighborhoods with associated amenities are located within this area. The closest subdivisions to the
east are along Scott's Hill Loop Road but do not contain additional lots for development. Whitebridge is located
further north on the east side of Highway 17 but again, does not contain additional lots. The Applicant believes
there is a need for residential lots in this region to meet current demands.
II. Location and Existing Conditions
The project is located west of Highway 17 and north of Sidbury Road; Scott's Hill, Pender County, North Carolina
and is locally known as Blake Farm (See Appendix E).
The project area for the proposed subdivision is located on 1164 acres of timber land. Wetlands present within the
project area are primarily wetflats and pocosins. These wetlands have been timbered historically and the last cut
was completed in approximately 2011. Ditches which run through the project area connect the wetland pockets
and ultimately flow to a single discharge point along the eastern property line. From this point a large ditch
continues off the property to a tributary of Futch Creek. The wetland hydrology is primarily rainfall and
groundwater recharge. During summer months the ditch system is normally dry and only flows during periods of
heavy rainfall.
To access the site take NC 17 North from Wilmington. Turn left onto Sidbury Rd in Scott's Hill and travel 0.54
miles west to Huggins Rd/Hogans Trail (unmarked dirt road). Turn right on Huggins Rd and follow approximately
0.66 miles. The site will be directly north and east (See Appendix E).
III. Project History
A Department of the Army (DoA) wetland Jurisdicitonal Determination (JD) was issued for a portion of the project
area in November 2013 and the remaining area has been varified by Ms. Emily Hughes (See Appendix G for JD
Maps and Forms). Wetland impacts for the portion of Blake Farm Boulevard extending from the NC 17 to the SF
(Single Family 1), Phase IA area were covered under a separate Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14. This portion of
Blake Farm Boulevard was determined to be a single an complete project allowing development of SF1, Phase IA
and is shown on Sheet 2 in Appendix F. A JD was also completed for this parcel in November 2013. No other
DoA or DWR permits have been obtained. The project numbers, assigned by the regulatory agencies, include
those listed below:
Issuing Agency
Document
Project Number
Date Issued
Expiration Date
Authorized
Impacts (AC)
USACE
Signed Wetland Survey
2012-01624
11/19/13
11/19/18
N/A
USACE
Signed Wetland Survey*
2013-01397
04/28/14
04/28/19
N/A
DCM
CAMA Consistency
In Progess
TBD
Concurrent with 404
N/A
1 able 1. Project numbers associated with the project. *Adjacent Property JD for Blake harm Boulevard.
IV. Project Description
The Applicant anticipates permanently impacting 1.44 acres of Section 404 jurisdictional wetlands and
temporarily impacting 0.22 acres of Section 404 jurisdictional wetlands. Impacts to 6,521 if (0.53 acres) of
Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs) are also proposed. The proposed unavoidable impacts are necessary to
facilitate the development of roads, lots and associated infrastructure. Please refer to Appendix F — Proposed Site
1

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information SEGi
Plan and Impact Map, for details of the proposed impacts.
Heavy machinery, such as a bulldozers, graders, back hoes, and excavators, will be utilized during the construction
process. The machinery will be used to clear the land, establish grade, stabilize the soil and to transport and
deposit the fill material within the project boundaries. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed
prior to commencement of land disturbing activities.
Threatened and Endangered species and archaeological concerns were addressed by coordination with the
appropriate agencies and on site reconnaissance. Findings from these studies did not reveal any areas of concern
associated within the project limits. Please see Appendix J for Threatened and Endangered species information
and Appendix K for Historical Preservation information.
V. Avoidance and Minimization
It is the Applicant's desire to avoid and/or minimize impacts to wetlands to the greatest extent practicable. During
the design phase of the project the engineer and design team reviewed multiple layouts to accomplish the
Applicants purpose and need while limiting wetland impacts. Through this process it became apparent that Impact
Area H would contain the largest impact due to the NCDOT width and curve radius requirements for Blake Farm
Boulevard. For that reason the layout chosen contained only one wetland crossing along Blake Farm Boulevard
and avoided additional impacts to the larger, high functioning wetland systems. These wetland areas (Wetland "E"
and large system to the south) can be noted to the north and south of SF -1 on the design drawings (see Appendix F,
Sheet 3).
Avoidance of permanent impacts that would bisect larger contiguous wetlands was accomplished by a road design
that optimized upland areas within the project area. This process eliminated some desired connectivity but lead to
only minimal fringe impacts to these systems and lower overall project impacts. The road and lot design in the
Bent Oak Dr. and Tangmere Ct. area is an example of this effort. Earlier design phases proposed connectivity
through Wetland C to Atlantic Ave. Impacts to Wetland M were also avoided by re -designing proposed ditch P-7
to pass to the east of wetland M and tie into existing ditch X-3.
Minimization efforts are evident throughout the project in both direct and secondary impact forms. A number of
originally proposed impacts have been reduced during the design process. Minimization of Impact F was
accomplished by removal of the proposed median on Atlantic Avenue and reducing the overall road width in the
vicinity of Wetland F. Please see Appendix F, Sheet 8.
Secondary impacts have also been minimized by detailed design of the project's hydrological aspects. Attention
was given to areas in which drainage swales, roadside ditches or stormwater features may adversely impact
adjacent wetlands in the future. Secondary impacts to Wetland E have been minimized by raising the elevation of
Blake Farm Blvd and associated roadside swale to a similar elevation of the adjacent wetlands (Appendix F, Sheet
18). Similarly the proposed ditch P-7 and associated culverts under Tangmere Ct. have been raised in effort to
minimize any secondary impacts to Wetland C. In this area existing ditch X-7 within Wetland C has a bottom
elevation of 34.65 while the proposed ditch P-7 has an elevation of 35.00. This will ensure Wetland C will pond
during storm events and draw down slowly. Please see Appendix F, Sheet 17.
Secondary impacts were also taken into account during the design of the Constructed Wetland located at the east of
Wetland C. This is denoted as SCM 4 in Appendix F, Sheet 20. The proposed design has a normal pool elevation
of 36.00 which is similar to that of the surrounding wetland to the east and Wetland C which is surrounded by the
Constructed Wetland. Although there are a number of deeper retention areas within the Constructed Wetland, they
do no have contiguous flow (i.e. direct connection to the outfall) and are designed to hold water during periods of
heavy rain and draw down slowly. Wetland C and existing ditch X-6 are also higher in elevation at this north end
near the constructed wetland compared to the southern end near Bent Oak Dr. The current design of the
2

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information SEGi
Constructed Wetland will allow for the collected stormwater to migrate through the SCM and treated water
discharge into Wetland C at its highest point. Thus, maintaining the natural flow of water through the system.
In order to minimize secondary impacts to downstream water quality, the Applicant proposes to enhance existing
ditches within the site by creating an adjacent flood plain. This will increase storage volume and retention time
during periods of heavy rain. The increased contact time within the floodplain will allow the natural chemical and
biological processes to occur, that will protect downstream waters. Please see Proposed Ditch Detail in Appendix
F, Sheet 2.
VL Alternatives
The Applicant investigated other potential means of developing the subject parcel, and has been unable to find a
practicable alternative that would achieve the proposed goal and stated purpose. They are as follows:
Site Selection Criteria
Site selection criteria used for the project include: Sites with at least 130 acres of buildable area, reasonable
proximity to Highway 17 within a reasonable distance from I-140 in the Scott's Hill area, zoned for residential
development or have the potential to be re -zoned for residential development, and have access to public or private
sanitary sewer and water.
A. Off-site Alternative Analysis
A comprehensive off-site alternatives analysis has been conducted, as part of the Individual Permit
process. SEGi applied the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines by utilizing, current Pender County Zoning Maps,
Public or Private utility company service area information, historical aerial photography and available
current land use records, to best determine if any off-site alternatives existed which met site selection
criteria.
Considering the desired location being in close proximity to Scott's Hill and have access to Highway 17
corridor, multiple sites were reviewed in and around the proposed site. These sites were chosen for their
size, access from US Highway 17 and zoning. Once these criterion were met, their potential to
accommodate the project, with accompanying infrastructure (sewer and water) were reviewed. If the sites
did meet the infrastructure criterion then the degree of wetland impact associated with each remaining
alternative site was considered to determine which would provide the Least Environmentally Damaging
Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). The following table contains the properties that were evaluated as
alternative sites for the development:
Map
ID
County
Parcel ID
Property Owner
Size (AC)
1
Pender
3271-94-4437-0000
Blakes Of Scott's Hill LLC
469.89
2
Pender
3281-15-7192-0000
Corbett, Wilbur R
2921.99
3
New Hanover
R02100-001-001-002
Blake, HenryC. II
57.24
4
New Hanover
R02900-001-067-000
Skipper Family Properties, LLC
94.52
5
New Hanover
R02100-001-001-001
Seagrove, LLC
160.64
Table 2. Alternative Site Information.
These sites and their ability to meet the required site selection criteria are discussed below.
1. Alternative Site 1— Parcel ID: 3271-94-4437-0000
This site met the size, location and access to sewer and water criterion. So it was included in
further review for site practicability. However a cursory review of LIDAR and the Pender County

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
GIS Wetland Inventory Map reveals the need for wetland impacts, greater than what is currently
being proposed, in order to achieve the Applicant's stated goal. Therefore, Alternative Site 1 was
rejected.
2. Alternative Site 2 — Parcel ID: 3281-15-7192-0000
This site, similar to Alternative Site 1, meets site selection criteria and was included for further
review for site practicability. However, a review of LIDAR and the Pender County GIS Wetland
Inventory Map reveals the need for wetland impacts, greater than what is currently being
proposed, in order to achieve the Applicant's stated goal. Therefore, this site was rejected.
3. Alternative Site 3 & 4 — Parcel ID's: R02100-001-001-002 & R2900-001-067-00
In order to meet the necessary size requirement these two parcels will need to be combined to be
considered. Once combined these sites meet the size and location requirement within Scott's Hill.
However, it does not provide access to Highway 17, nor is sewer and water available at this time.
The lack of access, as well as sewer and water make this alternative impracticable. For these
reasons Alternative Site 3 and 4 was rejected.
4. Alternative Site 5 — Parcel IDs: R02100-001-001-001
This site, similar to Alternative Sites 3 and 4 does not have direct access to Highway 17, and does
not have sewer and water available. For these reasons this site is not practicable and was rejected.
5. Preferred Alternative — Proposed site
The proposed site does meet the site location, size, access to Highway 17 and available sewer and
water criterion. For these reasons the proposed site was reviewed in more detail and found to
present less environmental (wetland) impacts than Alternatives 1 and 2. For this reason the
Proposed Site was accepted as the Least Damaging Practicable Alternative.
B. On -Site Alternatives Analysis
During the design and permitting of the project, several on-site alternatives were considered.
1. Alternative 1— Current Proposed Design:
This alternative was designed to utilize as much of the uplands within the property as possible,
while impacting the least amount of wetlands. Alternative 1 was accepted as it was the least
environmentally damaging practicable alternative.
2. Alternative 2 — Re -alignment of Blake Farm Boulevard:
The option to reduce or eliminate Impact H was considered. However due to NCDOT's required
turning radius all attempts to reduce or eliminate Impact H resulted in a similar or larger impact
elsewhere. Therefore, Alternative 2 was rejected due to a similar or increased amount of wetland
impacts.
3. Alternative 3 — Elimination or Reduction of Impacts to Wetlands and RPW's:
This alternative was considered, but due to the size and location of both wetlands and RPWs
within the property, additional minimization was not practicable and this Alternative was rejected.
Consideration was given to reduce impacts on Lot 57 to that necessary for the house pad only.
During a review of this alternative it was apparent that due to the height (5) of fill material
necessary to grade this lot, construction of the pad would be prohibitive without the proposed
4

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information SEGi
impact. Additionally, as the remaining wetlands would be within the property of the future
homeowner they would be more susceptible to secondary impacts. For these reasons this
alternative was rejected. Please see Appendix F, Sheet 19.
4. Alternative 4 — No Action Alternative:
The No Action Alternative or the alterative that proposes no impacts would remove access to the
site from Blake Farm Boulevard and limit interconnectivity within the subdivision. Additionally,
due to the various lengths and placement of ditches within the tract the site could not be developed
with the no action alternative. For these reasons the No Action Alternative is not practicable and
was rejected.
C. Alternative Analysis Conclusion:
Based on the results of the on-site and off-site Alternative Analysis, it is apparent that on-site Alternative 1
is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative.
VII. Compensatory Mitigation
The Applicant has chosen to purchase 2.90 acres of wetland restoration credit, through the North East Cape Fear
Umbrella Mitigation Bank (NECFUMB). These credits will be used to replace the permanent loss of 1.44 acres of
wetlands proposed within this permit application. Please see Appendix J, NECFUB Credit Reservation.
In order off -set the proposed impacts to 6521 if (0.53 acres) of RPW's within the project area, the Applicant has
proposed to construct a new network of ditches totaling 3542 if in length. The design of these ditches will include
a large flood plain encompassing approximately 1.63 acres to better enhance on-site and downstream water quality.
VIII. Additional Authorizations
The proposed project will require the following environmental permits:
Type
Agency
Date Issued or Applied For
401 Water Quality Certification
NC DWR
Applying for concurrently with IP
CAMA Consistency
NC DCM
Applying for concurrently with IP
State Stormwater Permit
NC DWR
Issued
S&EC Permit
NC DLR
Issued
Table 3. Other state and local environmental authorizations
IX. Summary
The Applicant is proposing to permanently impact 1.44 acres of Section 404 wetlands, as well as the temporary
impact of 0.22 acres of wetlands, which are necessary to facilitate the construction of infrastructure, dwellings and
driveways, within the Blake Farm subdivision. The Applicant intends to offset the proposed permanent wetland
impacts in the form of payment to the North East Cape Fear Mitigation Bank, for 2.9 acres of wetland restoration
credit. The Applicant and SEGi believe the project, as proposed, is the least environmentally damaging,
practicable alternative.

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
Attachment A
Pender County Tax Information
SEGi

1:21,272
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
PIN: 3271-16-5288-0000
Owner: PENDER 1164 LLC
1202 EASTWOOD RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Deed Ref: 4286/008
Property SIDBURY RD
Address:
Description: TRA PB 56/87 PENDER 1164 LLC DIV
Subdivision:
Tax Codes: G01 F29 R40
Sale Price: $Null
Sale Date: 2013-07-09
Plat: 00560087
Account No: 959217
Township: TOPSAIL
N
1 inch = 1,773 feet
WE
June 30, 2016
S.
Acres: 461.09
Land Value: $654,748
Building Value: $0
Total value: $654,748
Deferred Value: $0
Exempt Amount:
PCL Class: R
Heated Sq Feet:

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
Attachment B
Pender 1164, LLC Secretary of State Corporate Page
Pender Farm Development, LLC Secretary of State Corporate Page
SEGi

Elaine F lk arshall
Secretary
Click Here To:
View Document Filings File an Annual Report
Print a Pre -Populated Annual Report form
Corporate Names
Legal: Pender 1164, LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
Sosld:
Status:
Annual Report Status:
Citizenship:
Date Formed:
Fiscal Month:
State of Incorporation
Registered Agent:
Corporate Addresses
North Carolina
EErT1E1T OFTHE
SE l ETA Y OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, N6 27626-0622 (919)80 7-2000 Account
Login
Register
Amend a Previous Annual Report
1279145
Current -Active
Current
Domestic
9/20/2012
December
NC
Trask Land Company, Inc.
Mailing:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Principal Office:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Reg Office:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Reg Mailing:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Company Officials
All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 57D-3-20.
Member: NDCO
511 North Tejon St., Suite 200
Colorado Springs CO 80903
Manager: Pender Farm Development, LLC
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington NC 28403-2012

Elaine F lk arshall
Secretary
Click Here To:
View Document Filings File an Annual Report
Print a Pre -Populated Annual Report form
Corporate Names
Legal: Pender Farm Development, LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
Sosl d :
1288496
Status:
Current -Active
Annual Report Status:
Current
Citizenship:
Domestic
Date Formed:
11/21/2012
Fiscal Month:
December
State of Incorporation:
NC
Registered Agent:
Trask, Raiford , III
Corporate Addresses
Mailing:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Principal Office:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Reg Office:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
Reg Mailing:
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403-2012
North Carolina
EErT1E1T OFTHE
SE l ETA Y OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, N6 27626-0622 (919)80 7-2000 Account
Login
Register
Amend a Previous Annual Report
Company Officials
All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 57D-3-20.
Managing Member: Raiford G Trask , III
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington NC 28403

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
Attachment C
Agent Authorization
SEGi

SEG
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TR A PB 56/87 PENDER 1164 LLC
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL I.D. 3271-16-5288-0000
STREET ADDRESS:_ Sidbury Road
Property Owner (please print): PENDER 1164 LLC c/o Raiford Trask
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property, does hereby authorize
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi) to act on their behalf in matters regarding areas of
environmental concern.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
PENDER 1164 LLC
1202 EASTWOOD RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above i ion submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.
Prop drty 0146 Autl orize i g n aA re SEGi Authorized Signature
Print Name
,5-/2 //U
Date
David Scibetta
Print Name
4/29/2016
Date

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment D
Adjacent Property Owner Information
iv

E
0
0 / Y O
0
J Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
❑ Parcels
0
0
0
0
x
0 205 410 820 1,230 1,640 2,050 Adjacent Property Owner Key Map
1 inch = 1,019 feet Feet Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
Scotts Hill, Pender Co., N.C.
Map Source: NCOneMap Parcel Data 4/27/2016 0$-1$9.01 � ��

Adj-,,t Property Owner W oT,,h—
PIN NAME
ADDS
CITY STATE
ZIP PROPERTY_ ADDRESS
PROPERTV_DESCRIPTON
LAST SALE_ LAND_V DEED_B DEED_P PLATF PLATE
DATE DATE PWT ACRES ALUE OOK AGE AGE OOK
1 3261-59-88240000 DUPEN WNDCCLLC
C/O JI M TEACHEY.1430
COMMONWEALTH DR SUITE 102
WILMINGTON NC
28403 SIDBURY RD OFF
PT TR FAR PB 53/508,51 RECCMB
10/12/2008 10/13/2008 530050 404.07 573779 3534 315 53 50
2 3262-72-59140000 PENDER 1164 LLC
1202 EASTW00D RD
WILMINGTON NC
2.03 ISLAND CREEK RD
439.5 AC PB 40176 JACK STOCKS DIV
1/15/2014 1/16/2014 400076 439.5 624090 4369 255 40 76
3 3271-085507-0000 BLAKE FARM POND LLC
1202 EASTW00D RD
WILMINGTON NC
28403 SIDBURY RD
TR CPB 56/87 PENDER 1164 LLC DIV
9/1/2015 9/2/2015 560087 10.14 23728 4606 1545 56 87
4 3271-17-16440000 PLURIS HAMPSTEAD LLC
2100 MCKINNEY AVE SUITE 1550
DALLAS TX
75201 SIDBURY RD
TR A PB56197 PENDER 1164 LLC DIV
1/7/2015 1/8/2015 560087 28.77 56965 4519 319 56 87
5 3271-236002-0000 ON DEVELOPMENT LLC
1202 EASTW00D RD
WILMINGTON NC
28403 US HWY 17 OFF
TRI PB 57/6 BLAKE FARM SUE
10/29/2014 10/30/2014 570008 13.03 28927 4488 56 57 8
6 3271-33-1156-0000 ON DEVELOPMENT LLC
1202 EASTW00D RD
WILMINGTON NC
28403 US HWY 17 OFF
TR2 PB 57/6 BLAKE FARM SUB
12/9/2014 12/10/2014 570006 14.64 31622 4506 18 57 6
7 327143-2166-0000 BLAKES OF SCOTTS HILL LLC
10565 US HIGHWAY 17
WILMINGTON NC
28411 SIDBURY RD
NIS US HWY 17 PT BLAKE LANDS
12/19/2007 12/20/2007 570006 108.7 291069 3375 179 57 6
8 3271-049793-0000 WHITETED LARRY
261 PANDYANN LANE
WILMINGTON NC
28411261 PAN DY ANN LIN
TRACTS HOWARD WHITETED DIVISION
OFF W/S HWY 17 PL29 PG61
11/15/1999 11/16/1999 290061 10.2 33228 1530 149 29 61
9 3271-544562-0000 SIMMONS WILLIAM HOWARD II
10191 SIDBURY RD
WILMINGTON NC
28411-7916216 PANDYANNW
TR6 PB 29/61 HOWARD WITITETEC
DD1012136
12/15/2005 12/16/2005 290061 2.24 39200 2844 214 29 61
10 3271-547425-0000 WHITETED LARRY GILBERT—I
261 PANDYANNW
WILMINGTON NC
2841117 US HWY
L2 PB37/69 HOWARD W HITETED
DIVISION
9/23/2014 9/24/2014 370069 0.9 22500 4472 165 37 69
11 3271-640682-0000 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC
150 FAYETTEVILLE ST B0X 1011
HICKORY NC
2860111329 US HWY 17
S/ HAMPSTEAD
5/28/2013 512912013 N0PLAT 8.191783782 4263 120
12 3271-644637-0000 PENDER EMS &FIRE INC
805 RIDGEW00D RD
BURGAW NC
28425 US HWY 17
ESMTAREA PB 56/79 PENDER EMS/FIRE
6/25/2014 6/26/2014 560079 0.33 14375 4434 203 56 79
CARLSON MARY BETH MORGAN
13 3271-6448590000 It
8139 MARKETST
WILMINGTON NC
28411 US HWY17
TR2-AR PB 56/79 PENDER EMS/FIRE
6/29/2014 6/30/2014 560079 6.41 149994 4437 161 56 79
14 3271-647810-0000 SIDBURY LAND HOLDINGS LLC
511 N0RTH TEJ0N STSUITE 200
COLORADO SPRINGS CO
80903 US HWY 17
2.40ACACCESS/UTILITY ESMTAREA
11/22/2009 11/23/2009 200007 2.4 104544 3709 176 20 7
CARLSON MARY BETH MORGAN
15 3271-649713-0000 It
8139 MARKETST
WILMINGTON NC
28411 US HWY17
TRI -AR PB 56/79 PENDER EMS/FIRE
6/29/2014 6/30/2014 560079 1.77 59578 4437 161 56 79
CARLSON MARY BETH MORGAN
16 3271-65-90540000 It
8139 MARKETST
WILMINGTON NC
2841111471 US HWY17
10.19 ACRES OFF N/W SIDE 17 BEHIND
ACLRS/HAMPS H73 P41892 V
5/2/2011 51312011 N0PLAT 10.19 47245 3920 157
17 3271-944437-0000 BLAKES OF SCOTTS HILL LLC
10565 US HIGHWAY17
WILMINGTON NC
28411 SIDBURY RD
NIS US HWY 17&SR 1572 BLAKES
12/19/2007 12/20/2007 570001 469.89 744492 3375 179 57 1
18 3281-15-7192-0000 CORBETTWILBURR
PO DRAWER 210
WILMINGTON NC
2840111630 US HWY17
ON AIS 17 TO S0UND US 1571 PB 26/113 112EV2005 1/29/2005 260113 2921.99 4915326 IA 6521 26 113

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
Attachment E
Vicinity Map
SEGi

eeM
SIN d
G�
IVa
Planlatfon Rd
I�LJ Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
0 7501,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500
Feet
1 inch = 3,958 feet
Map Source: ESRI Street Maps
C/
arr1SQn Gfeek Rd
c
Rd
� e
k
OjfO
pr r
u
,m
Vicinity Map
Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
Scotts Hill, Pender Co., N.C.
4/27/2016 05-159.01
17
Ht1mpstoad.
lory
4
r
Green Grp

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment F
Proposed Site Plan & Wetland Impact Maps
vi

z
H
Z
�s
BLAKE FARM
°
='C
A TRASK LAND COMPANY COMMUNITY
o
SF-1 SUBDIVISION
0-
VICINlrYMAP-NorrosCALE
PHASE 1A, 1B, 2 AND 3
z
0
A
Trask LandLO
WETLAND IMPACT DRAWINGS
o
m
Sheet List Table
1202 Eastwood Road:
Sheet Number Sheet Title
Sheet Description
Wilmington, NC 28403
,
V
c-aao
covra
<
[phone]
c-ooi
wrrLnNos IMancr Mna ovrRnLL
w
�
v�M�IQM&CREED
,a�
2
3
4
G-002
WI-100
WI—io1
WETLANDS IMPACT MAP OVERALL
WETLAND IMPACT MAP KEY
WETLAND H IMPACT
Y
g
s
�n-raz
wrrLnNo a AND dlMancr
m
243 North Front Street
T`:c.,
6
W1-1o3
WETLAND IMPACT
Wilmington, NC 28401
�a
�
wl-zoi
wrrLallo o AND r IMancr
Phone: [phone]
8
WI-202
WETLAND B. C. AND F IMPACT
Fax: [phone]
NC FIRM LICENSE F-1222
9
10
WI-301
WI-401
WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT
www.mckimcreed.com
12
13
WI-501
XS—"loo
XS-1o1
WETLAND IMPACT
SECTION VIEW KEY
X-1A rNROU GH X—SA SECrI�N VIEWS
14
%5-102
X—SB THROUGH %-7A SE CrION VIEWS
.,, ,
15
%5-103
X—BA THROUGH %-8D SE CrION VIEWS
O
...............
i LL
16
CU101
UTILITY MAP
O
VW
ca-i or
a-� wrrLnNo ceosslNc aLnN � aeorlLr
ti)
ie
ca-roz
wrrLnNo r ere aono ceoss srcnoN mew
re
ca-i os
Lot sr aLnN AND ❑aorlLr
20
CN-501
SCM 4 LAYOUT AND CROSS SECTION
O
`.BLAKE FARM
21
APPENDI% A
APPENDIX
LL
U
NOT TO SCALE
�
A

LEGEND
IMPACTED AREAS
— TEMPORARY —140 IMPACT
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
PROP.— DITCH
PROJECT OMITS
TREE & DITCH
S i ARSA
Sheet List Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
Sheet Description
1
G-001
WETLANDS IMPACT MAP OVERALL
2
G-002
WETLANDS IMPACT MAP OVERALL
3
w 10
WETLAND IMPACT MAP KEY
4
WI -101
WETLAND H IMPACT
5
W 10
WETLAND A AND J IMPACT
6
WI -103
WETLAND IMPACT
7
W 20
WETLAND D AND E IMPACT
8
WI -202
WETLAND B, G AND F IMPACT
9
WI -301
WETLAND IMPACT
10
WI -401
WETLAND IMPACT
11
WI -501
WETLAND IMPACT
12
XS -100
SECTION VIEW KEY
13
XS -101
X -1A THROUGH X -5A SECTION VIEWS
14
XS -102
X -5B THROUGH X -7A SECTION VIEWS
15
XS -103
X -8A THROUGH X -8D SECTION VIEWS
16
CU101
UTILITY MAP
17
CP -101
P-7 WETLAND CROSSING PLAN & PROFILE
18
CP 102
WETLAND E BFB ROAD CROSS SECTION VIEW
19
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
caosaiae FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT Q/
FSOIATEDWETLANDS
MAY FILLED AS A PORTION
DF BIAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDV.
DEVELOPMENT FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
SGM�5
�yM—'q, I EXISTING
I ' \� RP DITCH
NOTE:
CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED
DITCH TO MATCH THE
CENTERLINE GRADE OF THE
DUSTING DITCH.
PROPOSED DITCH DETAIL
\-
BFB -1
FUTURE
BFB -1 DITCH IMPACT
DEVELOPMENT
WL
scM�
1565 SF (0.036
6SFF(0.036 u)
i
-
I LEVEL SPREADER
I
FUTURE
BLAKE FARM BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT
y \
DIVIDED BOULEVARD WITH
GRASSED MEDIAN AND
��yyI����
PRo ED STORM
ROADSIDE SW ALES
DRAINAGE SVVVVVVSTEM(TYP.)
MOM.
•
PE11E1
OVERALLWETLANDS IMPACT MAP MEN
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.

��;
F _ =SLB
- _ARE FARiuI BLV6 - - - - - 1•-
I -----
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - l --
- - - - \
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 150 300 600
1 inch = 300 ft.
WI z02
(-
E4 7P9, I
STUB
s �a
5
Exis71NC DITCHI AMENITY AREA
I vy ? 3s
—
„WI -101
♦ BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION
Trask Land w
v�lvxxlM&c�D
oPe
PEN Eac ownsHw
o o ,v Noa,H CAaouNA 9 �,.
I: P-1
z e ri—a ao ja ... ,
WETLAND IMPACT MAP KEY N.TZs
I
I� STUB
r --;7I
ay
J
r
�I
L_
I
I
'X 111
BLAKE YARM BLVD
EXTENIJS TO HWY 17
I II II I II
I
I
j
—
I
ll
yl
—
—
_
— —n
0
wl-zoz . a
vi 01
fir- �Wi ,s <
WI z02
(-
E4 7P9, I
STUB
s �a
5
Exis71NC DITCHI AMENITY AREA
I vy ? 3s
—
„WI -101
♦ BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION
Trask Land w
v�lvxxlM&c�D
oPe
PEN Eac ownsHw
o o ,v Noa,H CAaouNA 9 �,.
I: P-1
z e ri—a ao ja ... ,
WETLAND IMPACT MAP KEY N.TZs
I
I� STUB
r --;7I
ay
J
r
�I
L_
I
I
'X 111
BLAKE YARM BLVD
EXTENIJS TO HWY 17

nnatchhne WI- Ol
C
C C
C
C 10WIDE TEMPORARYC
C C WETLAND AR EAH WETLAND H IMPACT '
C TOTAL=0 .92 ACRES o.TzACREs ry. / -
GRAPHIC SCALE
EXISTING DITCH. TOM _
REAUGNED IMO BED-
-PIPE / =-
i
1 inch = 100 Q
43 I 44 1 1 4
C C P-1 / / SAVE AND TREE
C .� -�. l \� SAVEAREA
LEGEND
MPACIED AREAS
JJR SD COONPL DITCH
42
E%SOND OTCH NUCKX CLEAN WE
REALIGN EXISTING ~
PROPOSEO DITCH
3561E TO BE HUED
DITOIES(1001T) \ �\
PROJECT UNITS
TEMPORARY MMAND IMPACT
TREE DTCH
P 40
L 34
F SAK AREA
OVP� 38,
� F39 35 0 0
V
LOT SETS I6
��• /RE MOVAI I I SAIT
STORM DRAINAGE 36 I SVS
225 LF �. SYSTEM (1P.)
_ X REMOVAL i
-' ROADSIDE DROi J 11 TO CONNECT
PIPE CROSS PIPES TO L
/CROSS
ROCK CHECK
/
Wetland -H
DAMS s o / '`�...
/
// —
Overall Area: 0.92 acres
Impact Area: 0.72 acres
2 _
SANUARVSwER
Temp Impact: 1,145 SF
SYSTEM(TYP.)
OOTIET BOX FOR / I I 5 6 7 I8
X' 1 uNEARPONDsysTEM //
Ditch P-1
Ditch will replace ditch X-1. This
ditch is 160 LF.
IRGEST NTO X I I'
-DISCHA-1J�
proposed approx.
Ditch X-1
Realign X-1 to meet the new culvert
(1
under Blake Farm Boulevard (-225
LF removal).
Realign ditches on upstream side of
Blake Farm Boulevard to provide
flow on the inlet end of the culvert
�J1�IQNI&CREED
s nay^ E^°
Trask band
��
'LAKE FARM SF 1 S.- IwsIGN
DEHso N YNo THCAHOLI
woo
In
211 N.111 I'l-I
r
BLAKEFAR�
ori�K and
"i9;8;
(-160 LF realign _ 140 LF removal).
WETLAND H IMPACT
...ass
NOT MR CONSTRUCTION

FUTURE PE DESTRIAN BRIDG4-"�"�`��~~~
OOO l CROSSING LINEAR POND
RO O OAMENITYAREA matchllne WI-201 i94 �� \ / 82 \
�matchline WI-102
33 Q`B-.` /
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
SAVE AREA'\ DITCH X 1 REMO L 936 LF I I
T E/��\
DITCH %3 REMOVA
a 8 \ 59 .�
inch =looIT,
F_ —1 F_ —1 —1 �\ P-6 DITCHRE-AEIGN RE-ALIGNMENT _
5 P 6 AT IT INALIGNM, NT
LEGEND
IMPACRBB u EAS
JJRSDC D OI
44 1 145 46 47 11 48 49 50 Y/ DITCH INTERSECTION -,..
DITCH X-3 REMOVAL 680 LF 11 V 3 o
/�
61 v
58 w
\ I i
nsnrvc Dora ae CLEAN OUT
E ITCH NU
\
m
PROPOSED DITCH
PROJECT UNITS
-
D wIDErEMo o
X32— ROANOKE DR 1 2O MPA (510 SF)
­141)PDRnav
ENPOR RT IMPACT
3 3 /
TREE k DITCH
22
31 19 _
STORM DRAINAGE U
P-6
S E AREA
SYSTEM (TVP. v
30 23 18 56
5WETLAND A IMPACT \
29 1 24 17 — — J 0.13 ACRES i
Wetland -A
Overall Area: 1.12 acres
SAITARY SEWER
6 I SYR—ITTY1.1 Ij
16 D 55 \ETIANDAREAA I
Impact Area: 0.13 acres
25 TOTAL- 1.12 ACRES
7 L 27 J 26 15 _ — —
Temp Impact: 510 SF
wetland-1
O 54
Overall Area: 0.02 acres
Impact Area: 0.02 acres
— —Ditch
m--�
X-1 AND X-2
WETIANOAREA I
CROATAN DR r� 53
REMAINS IN TREE SAVE AREA
I TOTAL =D.D2 ACRES
IMPACT AREA: 0.02 ACRES
REMOVE 938 LF OF X-1, 989 LF OF X-2
Ig 11 9 111 11 11 12 13 14 L = — J I
7 —
52
Ditch X-3
REMAINS IN TREE SAVE AREA
REMOVE 680 LF
J L� J L— J L— oTSETancRs J L— I J I
Farmhouse Dr Culvert
—
INV IN = 33.50
srua I
INV OUT= 33.00
OFFSITE
Ditch P-6
IN 5
WILL REPLACE X-3. 345 LF,
BEGINNING AT P-7/X-3
INTERSECTION.
t%IVIQIVIQD
n n'E'n� mal Goo, mo.
Trask LariCl �f
BLAKE FARM SF 1 sueolvlSION
T� AT AHOLINA
o o e. 9,0, , z <
o e ®
�zs,a�ssos
WETLAND A AND J IMPACT

78 DITCH 1-1 "MCI' - El LF
'I 75 Onatchline WI -202
STUB
\
1-103
X-6
v�v
v/ 7
80
72
���
cPAPHic scALL
PROPOSED STORM
\Y WETLAND N, \ "- DRAINGE(TVP.I
.RR AC IMPACF / CJ.
\
\
100 C 50 100 200
1 Inch = 100 IF,
pR 6
71 �v
1
LEGEND
P^=
-�
64 / // 67�-'� - I �"�
1
63 J PROPOSED SANITARY
� WETLAND O, SEWER SYSTEM (TVP.(
-
—
INPACIEO AREAS
� \ \
61w' 62 \\ �\ T 02 ACIMPACT K \ -_- ..
V
\ \ -
-\
JURISDICTIONAL01—
DITCH X-4 REMOVAL = 310 LF 8
70
/
ENsnrvc Dlra NucRe nrAN aur
- _ - J ✓ 69
�\ CONSTRUCTED
ETLAND(SCM-4(
W '
PRCPOEED DITCH
PROJECT UNITS
DITCH% -4 TO REMAIN=346 LF
(
O TREE & DITCH
SAT£ AREA
\� P DITCH CREATION
\ L. BEG IN SAT
WE�
WETLAND CENDSAT 1-3 404WETLAND
\�\ DITCH I NQ IMPACT
C e
R
I
4
LOT SETHACIC3
I
REMAIN M
DUKE ENER
GV I` I�
SOURCETO INTERSECTION� �
L WITHP-]AND P-6 DITCHES � � �
� POWER LINE AND
� � � EASEMENT < OFFSITE
Ditch X-3
REMAINS IN PLACE UPSTREAM OF
�
P-6 INTERSECTION.
FLASHBOARD RISER TO BE
\� "B00 LF UPSTREAM OF
4C4 TLANI
NO IMPACT
INSTALL FLASHBOARD RISER
P-6/Pa INTERSECTION
P
ll,
500 LF UPSTREAM P -6/P-7.
AFLASHBOARDRISER
Ditch X-4
WILL BE INSTALLED WITHIN P
\
P
I
REMOVE 370 LF DOWNSTREAM OF
THE BANK LIMITS OFX-3.
�\ RISER TOP ELEV TO EQUAL
4 P
P
P
P7
EXISTING TOP OF BANK.
I
e
I P
RETAIN —345 TO P-7.
_
Tangmere Court Culvert
INV IN = 35.50'
INVOUT =35.00'
F CDFSITF
Ditch P-7
as ask Land }r
�1v1CjQjyl��[� OF,ne,N ENN Baa zoNp INo I�
BLAKE EARM sE sueD1v1s1oN
ENDEHcouNT1N RTHHCAHo LIN
PWETLAND
�
WILL FLOW INTO X-3. 670 LF,
BEGINNING AT WETLAND C.
6E Wetlands K, L, M, N, O
IMPACT
Perm. Impact ot.12 AC; No
Temporary Impacts.

' j 14
/
ou
matchline wi301
EXISTING DITCH - 115
116
- matchline WI-201
117
118119120121
-
GRAPHIC SCALE
Sao o Eo iCo rzoo
FUTURE _ _ — — _
DEVELOPMENT/ /
(OFFSITE) 113 112 111 1110
\
12
1 ICrn = 100 n.
/ 109
1
LEGEND
SANRARV SEWER 108 .`' \ 1
STUBBED
FUTURE CONmV�
\I
107
/ O-106
I /
=�-:l/ 87
\ I
IMPACTED AREAS
DC
E'-'C Oa Nuae C—'
PROOED DITCH aur
---- PROJECT UNITS
96 97 99 100 101 102
��
ST M DRAT BE 103
v
v
N
S
aETU-141)/Q
TEMPORARY IMPACT
/„`4 NRARVS ER SVS EM (IVP.
� C/ —um( P.) 104
FREE h DITCH
SAYE AREA
G / 105
-
\o��
¢
E F ¢
/� : •�
LOT SETS I6
404 LAND I` WETLAND
E NgIMPACT TOTAL= 0.14 ACRES
E IM PACTAREA 0.14ACRES -"�-"�~ / YO \ /
TUBE-�Vd3F�C--j3,(iU��
NITY ARE .i
91 3
Wetland - D
Overall Area: 0.14 acres
Impact Area: 0.14 acres
(�(12�\��
ROADSIDEA / ~~`�� \ BLAKE FARM
/ CROSS PIP PUMP STAT
~ ~
93
Ditch X-1
Remove Ditch X-5 in its entirety
FUTURE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE - ^- ""”"
0� ROSINauNEARPOND��=== �' ���
—
i
(595 LF) from the source to
matchline WI- 01 0 -�. TOAMENITVAREA.� matchline WI 201 i94 V�
0 _
�/"� 82
intersect of Ditches X-1 and X-2.
matchline WI-102
zow mo.
an J
Trask Land
1 K L U. ��
BLAKE ENo RM uSF 1CS UBDICV ISION
s„cTow sB
'B=�
WETLAND D AND E IMPACT

39
matchline WI-3
1 -� -- 138
--
--
matchline WI 2
----_
1 -------------------------
o
-' P-1
-
13 P�Op M� \–� -_
. DRAINOAGEDsys17E,RI 11
\ �/ DIT7 P-11 NEW = 2 415 LF----------
/135// LDT StFB9CK5
GRAPHIC SCA oo zoo
4}
I
p
//134 DITCH x 8REMOVAL 2355LF�
12123 //
1 lnrn = 10D Tt.
LEGEND
:�9T� 13
132 // --- ---
-
-- --
IMPACTED RE S
//131
OUT
—TIN DITCH UCKA CLEAN C
125// ------
/ 87
126// \
ED D
PRDJECi UN TS
TEMPORARY NEILANO INPACT
E%
//// 127// '., - ING CULVERT I` L - -
O ReH OX
___ _--_-------------------
FREE SAYE AREAa
BE REMOVAL- 2355 LF
128/IVDTEM IT P)
m m TOTALIETLANDB \ [ {'f� _____
' TOTAL O,2 ACRES \ '/ 1D' WIDETEMPORARV
_
Wetland - B
/Y.O'i1tu2,�
Q `._ IM
V .., PACT 2 3,i355F) --
N IMPACT 0.12 A00S
N e
/� CT WETLAND CIMPACT /
\ C / 130/
_
-
_
_
Overall Area: 0.12 acres
Impact Area: 0'12 acres
ACRES 10. /
WIDETEMPORARV p, WETIAND
v \
B IMPACT(li(1,143 SF) F TOTAL 1.31
8 � –�
AREAF -
ACRES
Wetland -C
\
20 WIDE TEMPORARY T
IM
/ PA CT(2((3,1455Fi' F WETLANDFTOTIMPACT
L)
� 185 � olaACRES (roTAy
—
- �
Overall Area: 1.32 acres
Impact Area: 0.05 acres
ELE\'.-34.54
� \
,,I,�
--
Temp Impact (1) 1,143 SF
84 — �� < 86//
Temp Impact (2) 3,145 5F
Wetland -F
\..
187, � �=�
I
Overall Area: 1.31 acres
DITCHx6iX-8TOREMAIN
DITCH X 6 REMOVAL=140 \ �� 188 J �'��
"I
��
I 10'—E TEMPORARY
Impact Area: / 0.14 acres
Temp impact (1) 1,4455F
"//\ LF (1O LF TEMP.IMPACT)
4 ��
IMP4CT(1)(1,445 SF)
Temp Impact (2) 2,2255F
WETLANDAREAC /ON jQ
l ��
\� /77 Q
Ditch X-5
TOTAL=1i32 ACRES ETLAND(SC
�� 1
ai I
BFARMS l
I
Remove Ditch X-5 completely.
Ditch X-6
PUMP
HIM STATION
I
Remove 140 LF Ditch X-6. 10 LF of
DITCH P-? REMOVAL =RS LF
78—
l PI 75
R
X-6 is located in temporary impact
matchline WI-202 �� ',
area.
_ I mat 1-103-6 ��
X ��
X
Ditch X-7
Remove Ditch X-7 (89 LF) from its
source to Wetland C.
Ditch X-8
Remove Ditch X-8 (2355 LF) from its
t%Q D
O
E e
ask Land
�
BLARE FAM ssueD1v1s1oN
oTNRrH-L-
N
8
�mJl^Pn (9� a5z an
���
WETLANDBC AND F IMPACT
source to Wetland C. Ditch X-8 will
m
be replaced by proposed Ditch P-11.

-- 213 --
191
matchline WI-
178 ---1 'ate 212
— J
177
179 �,� r — —
DITCH P-11 NEW =2,415 LF
/ _�'�� 165
_=� I
J
164
DITCH X-8 REMOVAL =2,355 LF
0o GRAPHIC SCALE
.
1 [H,n = 100 Q
�18 80 176
__
_ ��
�
163
LEGEND
��[�
175
--
_ J L _
74
162
n
NP- AREAS
uRsolcnoNu DITCH
u IT
cxsn11111141-1c oEI
z �� _ _
183 168
_j 168
— _j
-7
PRI DIT
PRIECT Um
173�� �� 161
/ 184 v\ / ❑R I�4�E sysT -
IENPORARY N£lUNO INPACi
TREEeortcR
PPLO $€D 54NIT�{RV
WER4Y E�VP����� 169
J
AREA
� 172 i = �_ _ � � / �
149
�
� w
OT SET S
170\J
\\� ' - � - c
148
/ �� 159
47 / �\� „ 171
/ P-11
�Ta
a
o
/150 151152 158
0
%
_ � �
N
F�
Ditch X-8
X-8 will be removed from its source
44
143 J153 157
----
------------
to the intersection with Wetland C.
142w 154�. L
142
141 155 " r /
X-8
-
11 _
Ditch P-11
P-11 will replace existing ditch X-8.
140 ~ _ l \ /, 156 \/
�
This proposed ditch is approximately
2,415 LF, begins the NW
at property
line SF to Atlantic
39 /
matchline WI301 -� 138 ��
___
matchline W -3
of -1 and extends
Avenue 48" Cross -Pipe. The ditch
_
' matchline WI -201 -.. —73 - -
matchline WI 2 ----- ___
bottom elevations mimic those of
existing X-8.
♦
� WUM&CRaD
211 1.111
,oma
s na, E aI ,o P ho
Trask Land
BLAKE FARM SF 1 SUBDIVISION
oo Nr No ,sP q"o
a
9
e`�n,oisrNceFARM
-
w2ia of ase �e�es
WETLAND
IMPACT

I 224
—
I 201Al
1242
1243
��_—
mate ine WI -501 �G I
C 223 �� �=
— — 11f, 200 7
L
22—
2
II
o244
loo 50 MoD
c� PInOrnPPHR=iOP
24 5
_-0-3
199
no.
221
204 �
198 I
LEGEND
II
205
IMPACD AREAS
247
I
uRso cnONAL DITDH
—TING ora ae ncnN OUT
F248
22�
197
06
I I
wTSCALE
Nu
PROJECT DMITS
1219 ITS
196
TEMPORARY -ND IMPACT
AREATC
1249
�L
_ __j o Iqv �
/207
� 250 �
' � �
�
I
I — _
IX251 �I.
— — 208
217 �
195
Y_
-�1
LOT S TH EZ
LPROPOSED
STORM OR ��
/206 -,-
/ 209 ,-
194
Ditch X-8
X-8 will Be removed from its source
intersection Wetland C.
I L 252 216 DITCH z,4TSLF
/ �A
_ _ PROP 5EDSANITARY , 193 I
I r - I - - -5�
253 �
L
f 215 — /210
'-
DITCHX-RREMOVAL=z,s55LF
I
to the with
Ditch P-11
— _
I I F_ 254
L
I
L—=/
—I J
192
I
P-11 will replace existing ditch X-8.
This proposed ditch is approximately
= _
214 I 211
//�
2,415 LF, begins at the NW property
line SF Atlantic
255_
L — —
_ _j
L
213 '=�
of -1 and extends to
Avenue 48" Cross -Pipe. The ditch
bottom those
r — _
match line WI
N -91—I—
I
elevations mimic of
existing X-8.
vI�'D
nar�e��ro�mamal crop mo.
`f'l,as1 Land
Trask U.
anJ /� q
BLAKEENo RM"SF-1SUBDIVISION
e„c,owNeNP
La
IN10 .
-
i/
ce
wL(s�o �zs �a�ssoFf777.S
WETLAND IMPACTuN
.—T—TION

I
II
PLURIS WWTP PROPERTY \
I I
I 1
I I
GRAPHIC SCALE
EU ,00 400
, Inch = 100 ft.
\
I
LEGEND
IMPACTED ueEAs
.uRISDIcnaNAE DITCH
-TING DITCH MUO(k CLEAN OUT
PROPOSED DITCH
ISAYE
---- PROJECT UNITS
IMPACTED DITCH SECTIONS
1REE k DITCH
REA
229 I
{ II II II
I }� I II II II II II II II DITCHPIINEVJ-2,415
237 236 235 234 233 232 231
1 II II II II
I I IP�DPDEED�T
LOT SETHA
1240112391123811II
R DRAT GE
+ I SEWER ,TEM TYP J� SVSTEM11 P) DITCH X -B REMOVAL 2,355
11
LF
B
Ditch l
—
�fOY LT �J�1
E241] 225 I2261 I 227
202 I
X18 will Be removed from its source
to the intersection with Wetland C.
Ditch P 11
—
I J L J
—
P-11 will replace existing ditch X-8.
This proposed ditch is approximately
P P
' —
L 242 224 L —
—228
1
2,415 LF, begins at the NW property
marc ine WI -501
_ 1
I� 243
2
line of SF -1 and extends to Atlantic
Avenue 48" Cross -Pipe. The ditch
bottom elevations mimic those of
223 ��==--
L — _ 1 _
I I -
X200
Im I I
existing X-8.
--
t% -� BLAKE FARM SF 1 SUBDIVISION
v 1vxIQM&CREED • Trask Land DS" oosNTE'° R,s" q"o IN
he E �G,oUP"o
csol� ® WETLAND IMPACT
_ wn(s�o �zs �a�ss 03
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

r DITCH X-7 A
slue
.DITCH X-8 B
-� �DITCHXBD
- DITCHX8A
i �I��DITCH
_ _
DITCH X3 D a
DITCH
5.D3����i` n
ITCH X
a
r
e
STUB—
__DITCH X-3 B
o
n
DITCH X-1, X-2 C �z , a' = sJUB
DITCH X-3 A
� r 4
slue
EXIS7ING D17CH, 711, „` a' DITCH X-1, X-2 B x "• :-' _
BLAKE FARM AMENITY AREA
L�
DI
GRAPHIC SCALE I ' i DITCH X -1,X2 A
- d
TCH � Y
300 0 150 300 804 EXI671NG —
j[Y�' r 11
1 inch = 300 ft.
BLAKE FARM SF 1 SUBDIVISION DITCH X 1 B - DITCH X-1 A
� NFMM&CREED Trask Land
t% s na�nen� �a�C�ouPino �waM oEA�o1rtio;���o�ti 12...
211 1.111 I'l-I
E-1 o od BLAkIF FAUM BLVD
.� a�a,eE ti A
�s�o _ .
wis�oi�9s ass SECTION VIEW KEY EXTENDS rorlwvn

AVb. UtP I H = IU'
(OUTFALL CHANNEL)
.I LOT PAD .I
0
n
X-3 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
4"
(OUTFALL CHANNEL)
DITCH X-3 B
X-3 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
DITCH X-1, X-2 A
X-1 AVG. DEPTH = 3' X-2 AVG. DEPTH = 4'
+5 +5
40 40
%-3
i0 .50
X-3 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
41
41
n
DITCH X-1, X-2 B
X-1 AVG. DEPTH = 3' X-2 AVG. DEPTH = 4'
X-4 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
4" 3.)
LOT PAD
40 40
ON
i0
X-4 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
♦ BLAKE FARM SF 1 SUBDIVISION XS -101
VMS &CREED Trask Land o ma, p T 11 �r o T P -o
s na�nen� ��a��rouPino eu aM 13
E -1—d R1.111 Fl- —d - X -1A THROUGH X 5A SECTION
��ie,o ase-e�ss - VIEWS
LOT PAD
10 10
�0 X-1 xz 30
0 0 0
DITCH X-1, X-2 C
X-1 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
X-2 AVG. DEPTH = 4'
i ± It
DITCH X-5 A
X-5 AVG. DEPTH = 2'
iC
1-
XI
sc
AVb. UtP I H = IU'
(OUTFALL CHANNEL)
.I LOT PAD .I
0
n
X-3 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
4"
(OUTFALL CHANNEL)
DITCH X-3 B
X-3 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
DITCH X-1, X-2 A
X-1 AVG. DEPTH = 3' X-2 AVG. DEPTH = 4'
+5 +5
40 40
%-3
i0 .50
X-3 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
41
41
n
DITCH X-1, X-2 B
X-1 AVG. DEPTH = 3' X-2 AVG. DEPTH = 4'
X-4 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
4" 3.)
LOT PAD
40 40
ON
i0
X-4 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
♦ BLAKE FARM SF 1 SUBDIVISION XS -101
VMS &CREED Trask Land o ma, p T 11 �r o T P -o
s na�nen� ��a��rouPino eu aM 13
E -1—d R1.111 Fl- —d - X -1A THROUGH X 5A SECTION
��ie,o ase-e�ss - VIEWS
LOT PAD
10 10
�0 X-1 xz 30
0 0 0
DITCH X-1, X-2 C
X-1 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
X-2 AVG. DEPTH = 4'
i ± It
DITCH X-5 A
X-5 AVG. DEPTH = 2'

- +S 45 JJ
.. .. 31 30
LAMBOLL ST
BENT OAK DRv
L i0 4^
TEMP. IMPACT
WETLAND[ 30 4 -
TEMP. IMPACT
PERM. IMPACT
x-6 x-6
.)n -..
DITCH X-5 B DITCH X-6 A
DITCH X-6 B DITCH X-6 C
X-5 AVG. DEPTH = 2' X-6 AVG. DEPTH = 2'
X-6 AVG. DEPTH = 2' X-6 AVG. DEPTH = 2'
CONST.
CONST. WETLAND
-` WETLAND
x-]
x-6
_0CONST.
�� �_ -�
WET AND
+ o c
DITCH X-6 D
DITCH X-7 A
X-6 AVG. DEPTH = 2'
X-7 AVG. DEPTH = 2'
NMIM&CRED Trask Land
s ,a�En aouPino
BLAKERM Sry ORtiURBPDIVISION
GAROLINAqpol
�ou�ooa
Ea µood Road
—58 THROUGH X -7A SECTION VIE
I9,o� s9 -ass -NOT
MR CONSTRUCTION

45 4,
LOT PAD
LOT PAD
30 30
x-8 P-11
x-a
o � o
0 0
-
DITCH X-8 B
DITCH X-8 A
X-8 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
X-8 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
it
4, it -
WHALEBONE AVENUE
WSEL=33.88' WHALEBONEAVENUE
i"
40 4'-
x-a Hill
_ LINEAR POND
C v0
DITCH X-8 C
X-8 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
DITCH X-8 D
X-8 AVG. DEPTH = 3'
s ,a�n� Trask Land
nEo,o.m,a
BLAKE RM Sry SUBDIVISION
�IVISIONTrask
o
_� '1=5v
=o�P��o
BLAKE—M,�
1111 Ea,,µood Road
N� �a,oa
—SA THROUGH X-8D SECTION VIE n77AO
X9,01 s9-ass -

PLURIS HAMPSTEAD
WWTP
Sim
I IIII
am",�"
S7Ue --- --- F;
P-11
j
3CAKE FARM BE'VIDJ`,� i a°
- - _ is
1 FIRE HYDRANT (TVP,) �
LEGEND
SPNIiPRY SENOR
-.a -,a- WATER 11NE
�� Si0R1A IJNE
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 150 300 600
1 inch = 300 ft.
J
STUB
exis71Nc o17cH
BLAKE FARM AMENITY AREA
mak.
♦ BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION I
v
Trask Land
V
t�z.�°o.1nm3«,o<°eacouN.v�oA�Nc
UTILITY MAP s
EAl�6—_ B' STUB
I
FJ_ a_J
J �
°
L
r_J
--- 1, OUTLET BOX FOR
LINEAR POND
POND
- ; 'SYSTEM
x-1
BLAKE FARM BLVD
EXTENDS TO HWY 17
_
Ns
> = --
PROPOSED
'CONSTRUCTED
WETLAND
P-7 p_8
NEW
SANITARY
— s SEWER
L
PUMP
,STATION
P-7
STUB
exis71Nc o17cH
BLAKE FARM AMENITY AREA
mak.
♦ BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION I
v
Trask Land
V
t�z.�°o.1nm3«,o<°eacouN.v�oA�Nc
UTILITY MAP s
EAl�6—_ B' STUB
I
FJ_ a_J
J �
°
L
r_J
--- 1, OUTLET BOX FOR
LINEAR POND
POND
- ; 'SYSTEM
x-1
BLAKE FARM BLVD
EXTENDS TO HWY 17

30
10+00
D/
GS
GRAPHIC SCALE
HORIZONTAL
1 h =50 ft.
1 inch = 5 ft.
VERPCAL
WETLAND
o y� LIMITS OFA
DISTURBANCE
RAD
\ P
WE ARE RELOCATING THE OUTFALL
LOCATION OF DITCH X-5 AS SEEN ON SHEET
Q�
.q 8 TO PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AND
—
AROVI DE AN OUTLET FOR WETLAND"C'
ELEV,370 C
-TLA DS
BOTTOM
DF P 7 EL V.51, 00
\\
P-7 (SEE
2g
TEMPORARY DETAIL HEFT aN
IMPACT (
'01
18.4'
BeT
WW Ep/TLAN D C 16' 1 I %s c
ADW LL �_
III
- - - - - - ---- ----
BOTTOM F
1
30
10+00
D/
GS
GRAPHIC SCALE
HORIZONTAL
1 h =50 ft.
1 inch = 5 ft.
VERPCAL
PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED DITCH P-7
11+00 12+00 13+00
'ROPOSED
RADE
40
30
14+00 14+57
WETLAND C
/ /l
LOT 85 AND WETLAND "C' INSET
WETLAND "C" CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL PHASE 1 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND
SILT FENCE ALONG TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA BEGIN
CLEARING AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS, ROUGH GRADING
OF THE SITE AND INSTALLATION OF THE STORM WATER
COLLECTION SYSTEM.
2. ESTABLISH TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
OF WETLAND "C' FROM BENT OAK DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY.
3. COMPLETECONSTRUCTION OF BENT OAK DRIVE ROADWAY
COMPLETE AND LOT PAD GRADING OF LOT 85.
4. STABILIZE SIDE SLOPES TO CONSTRUCTED WETLAND. IF
RELEASED BY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
INSPECTOR, REMOVE WETLAND PROTECTION MEASURES
♦ - BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION �»,.<17v.
�Wa4&CFE® Trask Land p T°o_T°wsH o
�TION
EAR E ___1Z.0>�-� z e P-7 WETLAND CROSSING PLAN &
���s�o se Es PROFILE '�
ROP SED
RAD
EXN TING
STA T O
PR POSE DIT H P-7
—
TOP OF EANK
ELEV,370 C
-TLA DS
BOTTOM
DF P 7 EL V.51, 00
48" SPTO
OF B ANEE-
18.4'
BeT
)m
ADW LL �_
- - -
- - - - - - ---- ----
BOTTOM F
1
INV: 5.5 IN 35 0
11
DIT H EV L:
PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED DITCH P-7
11+00 12+00 13+00
'ROPOSED
RADE
40
30
14+00 14+57
WETLAND C
/ /l
LOT 85 AND WETLAND "C' INSET
WETLAND "C" CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL PHASE 1 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND
SILT FENCE ALONG TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA BEGIN
CLEARING AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS, ROUGH GRADING
OF THE SITE AND INSTALLATION OF THE STORM WATER
COLLECTION SYSTEM.
2. ESTABLISH TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
OF WETLAND "C' FROM BENT OAK DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY.
3. COMPLETECONSTRUCTION OF BENT OAK DRIVE ROADWAY
COMPLETE AND LOT PAD GRADING OF LOT 85.
4. STABILIZE SIDE SLOPES TO CONSTRUCTED WETLAND. IF
RELEASED BY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
INSPECTOR, REMOVE WETLAND PROTECTION MEASURES
♦ - BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION �»,.<17v.
�Wa4&CFE® Trask Land p T°o_T°wsH o
�TION
EAR E ___1Z.0>�-� z e P-7 WETLAND CROSSING PLAN &
���s�o se Es PROFILE '�

T T
WETLAND E EXISTING GRADE
+/- 37.0'.
PROP GRADE = 37'
ROADSIDE SWALE ON BFB ELEV
= 36'
/ EXISTING DITCH
WETLAND E - PLAN VIEW
PROPOSED BLAKE FARM BOULEVARD
ROADSIDE SWALE
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
17)n
17)n
0+00 11+00 12+00
SECTION E -E
WETLAND E - CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED BLAKE FARM BOULEVARD
ROADSIDE SWALE
♦ BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION IN»18z.
v 1vgKIM£�CT= TraskLand 6�xE, T0-1-1 w. P
��_. oEA�o�ti,1tioA,°��
��o
,a� ,zoz Ear,»ooa eoa � WETLAND E BFB ROAD CROSS
me�o�, me zaam SECTION VIEW """
----------
----------
----------
ii—�i�iii-
lINl�lll�Vii"��
1, till®ilii®
0+00 11+00 12+00
SECTION E -E
WETLAND E - CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED BLAKE FARM BOULEVARD
ROADSIDE SWALE
♦ BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDIVISION IN»18z.
v 1vgKIM£�CT= TraskLand 6�xE, T0-1-1 w. P
��_. oEA�o�ti,1tioA,°��
��o
,a� ,zoz Ear,»ooa eoa � WETLAND E BFB ROAD CROSS
me�o�, me zaam SECTION VIEW """

DRIVEW
SETBACK FRO
EXISTING GRA
PROPOSED GRADE
\YLIGHTTO WETLAND
(YARD
2MAN ENT I M PACT
'ORARY IMPACT
PROPOSED IMPACT, LOT 57
ROW
=ARMHOUSE DRIVE
40
40
PROPOSED GRADE
EXIST. GRADE
35 35
m O] ���
41 . N m m O N
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 w 60 120
.1� Trask 1 inch = 60 ft.
eA an
BLAKE PENo Rcous,v oa UB DIVISION
Vim' o owtis" P
i
N
'nom nr
PXOXF`"" 10R Eav`uao° 7 WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
m9i:ii
vilmin9an, nC PeW]
- (910) 799 -BASS -

IIIIIIIIIIIII
TOPSOIL SPECIFICATIONS II IIII
IEE oar I
GENERAL PLANTING NOTES
—E— IEEI 6L
_IED
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND V4
rix
EL
IE
E�
zum
ELEI 1-1
Z­
IN—
SEEDBED PREPARATION arm
CONSTRUCTED IVETIEAND ZONES
C
TT
T,
ur
�4
OR RATED WETILAN D #4 OUTLET STRU CTU RE
IEPII 11 11
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY SECTION
PLAN
1N$ µ OUTLET
Z
PROTECTION DETAIL
Trasd BLAKE FARM SF -1 SUBDISUBDIVISIONk Lanso
20
IWyyy 4 MM COUNTYNMH CAROLINA
(--A— SCM 4 LAYOUT AND CROSS
SECTION
(77;; FOR CONSTRUCTION

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment G
Jurisdictional Wetland Determination
vii

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
2017 Wetland Maps Verified By Ms. Emily Greer

\\\ Final Wetland Map Set Field
Verified by Emily Greer
,...mow ....,..
Fit
A.
\, e, as �e�. F•F.:
fin!
SITE
Reduced Cop;
Not to Scale
WETLAND DELINEATION SURVEY
EAST HAVEN"
—DER II. LLC
DEFA ROOK a2K PAGE 8 awu
nno SHN.EI'IOF}

��� mmmmm m g®®oo
mm®mm mmm m FROm��
o®gym® ��mmm o©Ntmm
mmmm mmmmm
mmmtsmm ommmm
mmm®m mmmmm
®m��®_ ®_ omm®_� Om®mo• •�
�i���'m o ®�m ®mmmm ommmoo
ommmm cotta®mm ®®mmm
m®otaam mm®mm mmtaratxmm .
mmmm m®t®tem mmmmm
mmom m®,comm o®tam©m
mmtxatmm mm®mm mmmom � � .
mmm®m mmtratmm mmtm®m
m®m©m mmmtmtm ��©o� m®®©m ��im�® mtttoty®m too©gym ott®m©m m®m®m
mmmom Emm o®mo� v®®gym mtmmt�m ®�c�®m om_m_mtm to®motor ®�imom
®omm m m_fm_m_m•���m_J
C� m�HE
mmrmt,mm ®� mmmom mttamtsaitm m®mtmtm to®ort©m tta�m�� ©m®m
mmmmm ® mmmmm ort®®m•m m®motor m®mt�m ®mo.m gttmmtm
m��©m m®m m®®© mmttttat�m m®m©m m®m�® ��o�m m®mmm
mmo®m g®m®�i mttt9®®m ort®mt�m om ®_®_®!sem®
m®0®® i�IRIN=� m®®vv �� ®m o®mmm® m®mtmtm 0-01
ommom mmomm sem. t�r���i
mmmom mm_m®_m_ tmmom mtmmtmtm to®ort©m o®mt�m ort®t®roam
®oo
©tma�tmaoar®mmrsmmmmmmm mmmEmm®©mm 90m®mmom©mm
m®tm©m©mmmm o©to®®®mm©®®m o ®®c�m�rscr0
NO ©�� mm cimmm®®®®©mmomtm�mmmm
ort® ,corm
v®moo oc� mm mm���� ��®v mmm �®mmv® m mtt®imam
����� � m©moor mtm�cum mmmmm ��mmm - ttamtmrm tta®®tsam
mm® tem m®m®m m®m®m m®mtmtm totttto.m©m t®mt�m ®®®® ort®t®tem
mmmmm m®® ommom m®®tem tm r��r�a to®mtaam m®mmm to®mom to®tmtaml®
mmmom tomtm®� omm®m m,®m®m to to®m©m m©mrmm mtta9mt�m o®tt�©®
mmmmm tv®mta>m ommom m©mot® ort®m to®ort m m®m®m ®MOM--
m
o©tos m
mmtaat�m mmmmm m®mom trsr®mt>am Pm m©m totmmtmtm mtta_m tot�mvm ottoatm®_©
menta m ommmm o®mtstm tt�ttto���
mmrm�m �� ® m® roam g��®m om®®m Pot�m�m HUM- o®®tmtm
mmmom a®�Emi
m®®tmm cotta m o© ©m to m t©®mtmm
omemmm
tt�ttmtttarmtm mm
m®menta m®rcpt.-am mho ©m to®m©m ®mmm tts:a®�m
m®otrom mmmmm to®mom ttta®®tm•m tca
m®,comm m®mmm ommmm ®®®tam ommmm ���tar� tottrm®tam �®m®m tttmtrotmt®
m®mmm m®�®m mm©om ttta®ort® tot®mt�m to®m®m to®�t�m m®mt�zam tt®tor®m
mm®mm mmmmm mmmm m®mmt� tot�mt�m m®mtmm om vm m®mtsam totttattaa®®
mmmt�m ® tmtmt�m m®®®m tottram tot®mtaam o®mm m mt�m mttm�ttm�
11 tec�
MEN
m m®®®© of®mho o®mmot��ti�©®®
mmmm m®® �r���m®ot �'am EN Em 0
mm m�m10mt�
Amo©m mo®��m 0� om o®mm_m m_m_t�m_ ®��otm_ m®m ®t®tm�m
mm®o_m mmtsaamm mmn�t®m ®m®� M®m®m ©m ©m mHE r ®®mmm
mmmmm ®�o�® ®®®� mtt®®rmm mttt>at � moor,®m
ON
0t®m®m mtmm totem®m gym ®®��
m®mmm m®gym ®®®m® tmmt�m
m���� mmm®� m®ort®m �t®mta'am
® mmmtJvum mta�ttm®® tt®mmm mttr�tsot�t�
m®_ m mmmmm mmmmm m®mtmtm
P��®m
m mmt3m m
© mmm m mm®mm o®mtstam
m®mom mmmmm mmmtaaam ®mtmtm
mmmm�®� omm®m
mmomm mmttsfm� ®mtm©cd ten©mo.
mmmmm ®mt.�tzam m®® mttmm�
mmomm mtdxa� o �®mom ��®om
mmrst�am
mmmmm ®�®om
ommmm mmmmmm mmmmm m��
om®om m®t�mm mmomm is
mmmom m® .mm_ om_m_om mmmmm -• - • • •
omm©m ta•®tela oOHMtaam mm tzm
t�®t�a�m m®tom • • • - ,
m ®®m m®tsmt�m
ommtsmm tatmmom mmmm®
mmmt�am m®®tem
om®mm
�®®® Po�mmm 11 •1' pal•

Reduced Copy
Not to Scale
M-1

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
2013 Jurisdictional Determination
ix

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2012-01624 County: Pender U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-SCOTTS HILL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
F. !r-' � >! M
Property Owner: W.S. Land Investments LLC -
Mike Cook -� 4'5' - -
Address: 511 North Teton Street, Suite 200 TI:5—
Colorado Springs, CO, 80903
Telephone Number: 719-632-1222
Size (acres) 100 Nearest Town Hampstead
Nearest Waterway Island Creek River Basin Northeast Cape Fear. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3030007 Coordinates Latitude: 34.3378458388564
Longitude: -77.7680515090703
Location description: The property is located approximately 0.6 miles northeast of the intersection of Hwy 17 and
Sid bur Road in Ham pstead, Pen der County Nort It Carolina PIN# 3271-25-1909. The p ro'ect review area is
a roximatel • 101 acres of land on the southern portion of the parKRL21rcel.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1). If you wish, you may request
an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also. you may provide
new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. includimg wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Cars Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there i s a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Crystal Amschler at 910-251-4170 or
Crystal.C.Amschler(d)usace.army. mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Determination was based on review of aerial photography, USGS sails and Lidar
maps and from observations made durin the site visits. Wetlands met criteria set forth in the Cors 1987
delineation manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Supolement. RPWs and stream channels
demonstrated an 011 M as identified in the field. Wetlands are ad'acent to RPWs that flow into an unnamed
tributary of Futch Creek which is a Section 10 Water.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 1/21/2014.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if of object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: November 19, 2013 Expiration Date: November 19, 2018

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http //perZ n� usace.army.mil/survey.htm/ to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
Southem Environmental Group. iris
WVb Ann: David Scibetta
-.j5315 South College Rd, Shite E
Wilmington. NC 28412

mm®mm ommmm e©m©©
mmmmm mmmmo v©mmm ,r'3' j
mm®mm ommmm ommmm
ommmm mmmmm �©mmm
mm®mm mmmmm ommmm
om®mm mmmmm ommmm
mm®mm mm000 ommmm ..
oma®mm omomm omm®m
o®mmm B®®©� omm®m
m®mmm Omm®m
o®m omm®m
ommmm �'
m®m ® omm©m
m ��® mo©oo mmmmm
mm®®m ©mmmm ©mmmm
mmmmm ©mmmm mmmmm
mm®mm mmm©m 0m®mm
mmmom mmoom om®mm .-
mmmmm mmmmm om®mm
mmm®m mmmmm mmmmm
mm®om mmmmm mmmmm
mmmmm ©mmmm
mm®©m ommmm ommmm
mm®mm ommmm ommmm
mm®®m m®mmm ommmm
m®®mm mm®mm ommmm
m®®mm mm®mm ©mmmm
mm®®m mm®mm o®®mm
m®®mm mm®mm o®omm
mm®mm mmmom omomm - .. ;..
mm®mm mm®mm ommmo ,
mm®mm mm®mm omomm
mm®mm mm®mm ommmm
mm®mom om®mm ommmm
mm®mm mm®mm ommmm .
mmmm mmmmm ommmm
mmm mm®_®m omomm
mmmm omomm ,
mmmmm
mmmmm ommmm .
mmmmm ommmm
mm®mm mmmmm omm®m , .
mmmmm ommmm
mmmmm ©mmom omm®m �' ��
mmmmm ommmm -
m®mmm-
mmm®m
mmmmm mmmmm om®mm
mmmmm mmmmm ommmm
mmmmm mmm®m om®mm � .
mmomo mmmmm ommmm .
ommmm mmmmm ommmm ��,.
mmmmm
mm©mm
mmmmm mm®®m Ommmm
mmmmm m®mmm ommmm , , :,
mm®mm mmmmm ommmm ..
mm®mm m®mmm omm©m
mm®mm mmmmm ommmm I�
mm®®m mm®mm ommmm ,, f
mm®mm mmmmm ©moom
mm®mm mmmmm ommmm A
Om®mm mmmmm ommmm
mm®mm mmmmm ommmm
mm®mm mm®mm omm©m �,
mmmmo mm®mm omomm -
mmmmm
mmmmm om®mm ommmm .... .
mm®mm ommmm ©mmmm -- .
mm®mm mmmmm
mmmmm mm®mm
m®®mm mm®mm
mmmmm mm®mm - ... •.. ' - �'-
mmmmm mm®®m -
mmmom
mm®mm om®mm ...
m®®mm om®mm
mm®mm om®®m
m®®mm om®mm mm®oo
mm®mm ommmm mm®mm
mmm®m ommmm ommmm :.
ommmm mmmmm ,
ommmm ® � mm®mm ,
mmmmo mmmmm mmmoo mmmmm ., .... ' ..,
ommmm mmmmm mmmmm ommmm , .. .
mm®mm mmmmm mmmmm ommmm ... _. , ..
om®®m mm®mm mmm®m mmmmm
ommmm mm®mm m®®mm mmmom
om®mm ommmm ommmo
ommmo om®mm om®mm ommmm �.
m®®®m om®mm ommmm
mmmmm om®mm � ommmm
mmmmo ommmm m©000 ommmm ..:.
mmmmm mmmmm mmmmm � � � ..-.
mmmom omomm mmmom 11 ., M' ���
@I�©�� ommmo mmmmm •- , - ,: ... ,".,,.
mmomm mmm��

om®©o ooze
ommmm omm
mommm omm
mmmmmm mmm
ommm m©�
mmmmm omQ
mmmmm m®ce
oomm mm
mmm© mm
mmmm mm
mmmm mm
mmmm m
ommm o
ommmm m
ommmm o
mmmmm o
ommmm o �
mmoom o
mmmom o c¢
om©om o �
mmoom o
mmmom o
mmomm omc
mm©oo mmc
mmmmm o®ec
mom©m omm
ommmm mmc¢
ommmm omm
mmmom o®c
ommmm
mo©oo mmc
omomm omc
ommmm omc
ommmm mmc
ommmm omc
ommmm
mmc mmc
omm®m
mmmmm mmc
ommmm omc
ommmm mmc
mm®mm mmc
mm®mm mmc
om®mm mmc
m®®mm mmc
m®omm
mmmmm
m®mmm m©c
m©mmm omc
000mm o®
mo®mm mmc
om®mm mmc
mmomm mmc
mm®mm mmc
ommmm m�c
ommmm m e
ommmm m c
ommmm mmc
ommmm mmc
Om®mm DDE
mmmmm mmc
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmomm
mmmmm
DOmO®
MINDDEED �K 42M, PAGE 8
IEAST H EN
m©
omo©m
o©omm
o©o©©

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
Adjacent Property / Blake Farm Blvd.
2014 Jurisdictional Determination
SEGi

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4F. 0 V7��
WILMINGTON DISTRICTF-1:5 ED
Action Id. SAW -2013-01397 County: Pender U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-SCOTTS HILL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Blakes of Scotts Hill
Attn: Mr. Chris Blake
Address: 10565 US Hwy 17
Wilmington, NC, 28411
Size (acres) 254 Nearest Town Hampstead
Nearest Waterway Island Creek River Basin Northeast Cape Fear. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3030007 Coordinates Latitude: 34.3325507986215
Longitude: -77.7742546793665
Location description: The site is located in the northeast guadrant of the intersection of Hwy 17 and Sidbury Road in
Hampstead, Pender County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request
an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide
new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area sub'ect to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC 4 1344. Unless there is a chap a in the law or
our published reeulations, this determination may be relied upon fora period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.,
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately de icted on the
plat signed by the Corps Reetilatory Official identified below on 4/28/2014. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published reeulations, this determination may be relied upon fora period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tyler Crumbley at 910-251-4170 or
Tyler.Crum blevAusace.army. m il.
C. Basis For Determination: Determination was based on review of aerial photography, USGS soils and Lidar
maps and from observations made during the site visit. Wetlands met criteria set forth in the Corps 1987
delineation manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Reiion Supplement and tributaries were determined
based on OHVVM as identified in the field. Wetlands are ad'acent to on-site tributaries that flow into an unnamed
tributary of Futch Creek, which is a tidal, Section 10 Navigable Water .
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 6/28/2014.
**It is not necessary to s it RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: Apri128, 2014 Ex ' ati Date: ril 28.2019
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at http://re ug latory.usacesurvey.com/.
Copy furnished:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc
Attn: David Scibetta
5315 South College Rd, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record. _
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Tyler Crumbley, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M IS
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided_ a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: I Telephone number:
of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Crystal Amschler, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights, to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections,. the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Applicant:
Blakes of Scotts Hill, Chris Blake File Number: SAW -2013-01397
Date: April 28, 2014
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
ZI
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
[—]I
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights, to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections,. the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

I
I I
uu�I
�I
Reduced CCP7� Cmm
Not to Scale wl
SITE
WETLAND DELINGEBATION SURVEY _
EAST HAVEN
81AKES OF PCOM HILL LLC
DEED BOOK 3375. PAGE 1]9 —
eExo xA tiFFTIOP3
m
J�
CA�Np��p�
.Op' E H'%
-_. sES �+EE,3oF3�oa ,1
L•483'1
9
Reduced CCP7� Cmm
Not to Scale wl
SITE
WETLAND DELINGEBATION SURVEY _
EAST HAVEN
81AKES OF PCOM HILL LLC
DEED BOOK 3375. PAGE 1]9 —
eExo xA tiFFTIOP3
m

T
L
4v
A -
.1K
4831
71
Reduced COP7
Not to scale
MCICM&CREM WETLAND DELINEATION SURVEY
oa
EAST HAVEN
BLAKE
OF — HILL HLO
V_ SWK —5, PAGE 179
M, "M_11n

LIVE
=MIA
mmssa®mm MEW
Mca —
mmaamomam
NO
Hco
—cME
—
--cc—mm m m---
mmmm
NOW moomm m=
MEOW HM m —M lcm
m
mm Hommommmomm

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment H
Natural Resource Information
Division of Water Resources Water Classification Map
USGS Topographic Map
Soils Map
Pender County GIS Flood Map
xi

t +.
D
O
' Q
SR -1657 uv
SR -1656
S -1571
SR -1662 ` r SR -1621 t i
SR -1648 1
SR -1620 1�
r
SR -1572
it
�- 4VO
S t
R-
t 3y-

i
A O
j
y
de
Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
0 200 400 800 1,200
1,600 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Map Source:USA Topo Maps,
7.5 -minute quad, 1:24k scale
21
Ip
USGS Topo Map
Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
Scotts Hill, Pender Co., N.C.
4/27/2016 05-159.01
•;

To
wo,
Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Map Source: NCOneMap Orthoinnagery,
Soil Servey of Pender Co.
Mu
To
Ra
Rol
&HA
AuB
GoA McC
MD &a
McC
r ^ C.flC3
ACJ
SBL G#�
Mew -
Soils Map .�
Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
Scotts Hill, Pender Co., N.C.
4/27/2016 05-159.01 g (in)

w l
,ry
}.r
�' SR$1
571��
SR -1661 t'
a, SR -1662
SR -1621-
o SR -1648
i
SR -1620
y
SR -1572 1
r �
-40 1
f
L C
SR -2259
d
d �F �

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment I
Alternative Analysis Map
Xii

Alternatives Analysis Key Map
Blake Farm SF -1 Project Area
Scotts Hill, Pender Co., N.C.
5/2/2016 05-159.01

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
Attachment J
Threatened and Endangered Species Study
SEGi

Blake Farm SF -1
Threatened and Endangered Species Report
USACOE Action ID#: 2012-01624
Prepared for:
Ms. Emily Greer
Project Manager, Regulatory Division
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Prepared By:
Mr. Raiford Trask III
Pender Farm Development LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
[phone]
May 2016

1.0 Introduction
This Endangered Species Report has been prepared as part of an Individual Permit (IP) application to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in order to determine whether protected species are located within the
subject site, herein referred to as Blake Farm SF -1.
2.0 Site Location
This Endangered Species Report is being prepared for one (1) Pender County parcel. The parcel ID
associated with Blake Farm SF -1 is 3271-16-5288-0000. The parcel is shown below and the project area
indicated by a red border:
Figure]: Aerial photo ofproject area
The 137 -acre project site is located west of NC7 in Scotts Hill, North Carolina. Entrance into the site can
be found off Hogan's Trail, which is off Sidbury Road, south of the site.
3.0 Site Description
The project are can be characterized as silvicultural land with areas intermingled with high pocosin and
hardwood flat wetlands, comprised of mixed hardwoods including comprised of hardwood tree species
including various oaks (examples: laurel oak [Quercus laurifolia], swamp chestnut oak [Quercus
michauxii]), swamp gum (Nyssa aquatica), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sweet gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera).and bay trees in the
genera Persea, Gordonia, and Magnolia, along with understory species including tall gallberry (Ilex
coriacea), titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), and fedder bush (Lyonia lucida).
2

4.0 Protected Species
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered Species website and data taken
from their IPaC Trust Resources Report (see attached), 17 protected species are known to occur in Pender
County', From review of the habitat requirements of the listed plants and animals from Pender County, it
was determined that there is the potential for occurrence of 5 of the listed species within the Blake Farm
SF -1. The listed species include: the red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis); American chaffseed
(Schwalbea americana); Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi); golden sedge (Carex lutea); and the
rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia).
5.0 Investigative Methods
We sent an information request to the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP), to get information on
the distribution of rare animals, rare plants, natural communities, Significant Natural Heritage Areas,
Dedicated State Nature Preserves, and Registered Heritage Areas, within and adjacent to the project area
(see attached)
Our firm has conducted extensive on-site field investigations for wetlands and protected species by
experienced biologists within all parts of the project area during all periods of the year.
6.0 Baseline Information on the Listed Species
6.1 Red -cockaded woodpecker
For nesting/roosting, this species needs open stands of pine containing trees 60 years old and
older. These birds need older, live pines, in which they excavate their cavities. Longleaf pines
are most commonly used, but other species of southern pine, such as pond pine (Pinus serotina)
are also acceptable. Dense stands (stands that are primarily hardwoods, or that have a dense
hardwood understory) are avoided. Generally, foraging habitat is found in pine and pine -
hardwood stands, with trees 30 years old and older, with foraging preferences for pine trees 6
inches or larger in DBH. In good, moderately stocked pine habitat, sufficient foraging substrate
can be found on 80 to 125 acres.
6.2 American chaffseed
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, American chaffseed occurs in sandy (sandy
peat, sandy loam), acidic, seasonally moist to dry soils. It is generally found in habitats described
as open, moist pine flatwoods, fire -maintained savannas, ecotonal areas between peaty wetlands
and xeric sandy soils, and other open grass -sedge systems. Chaffseed is dependent on factors
such as fire, mowing, or fluctuating water tables to maintain the crucial open to partly -open
conditions that it requires. Historically, the species existed on savannas and pinelands throughout
the coastal plain and on sandstone knobs and plains inland where frequent, naturally occurring
fires maintained these sub -climax communities. Under these conditions, herbaceous plants such
as Schwalbea were favored over trees and shrubs.
Most of the surviving populations, and all of the most vigorous populations, are in areas that are
still subject to frequent fire. These fire -maintained habitats include plantations where prescribed
fire is part of a management regime for quail and other game species, army base impact zones
that burn regularly because of artillery shelling, forest management areas that are burned to
maintain habitat for wildlife, including the endangered red -cockaded woodpecker, and various
other private lands that are burned to maintain open fields. Fire may be important to the species in
1 http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/pender.html

ways that are not yet understood, such as for germination of seed, or in the formation of the
connection to the host plant.
6.3 Cooley's meadowrue
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooley's meadowrue occurs in moist to wet
bogs and savannas. It grows along fire plow lines, roadside ditches, woodland clearings, and
power line rights-of-way, and needs some type of disturbance to maintain its open habitat. Plants
often found growing with the meadowrue include tulip poplar growing with cypress and/or
Atlantic white cedar (Leonard 1987).
6.4 Golden Sedge
Golden sedge grows in sandy soils overlying coquina limestone deposits, where the soil pH is
unusually high for this region, typically between 5.5 and 7.2. Soils supporting the species are
very wet to periodically shallowly inundated. The species prefers the ecotone (narrow transition
zone between two diverse ecological communities) between the pine savanna and adjacent wet
hardwood or hardwood/conifer forest. Most plants occur in the partially shaded savanna/swamp
where occasional to frequent fires favor an herbaceous ground layer and suppress shrub
dominance. Other species with which this sedge grows include tulip poplar (Ltriodendron
tulipifera), pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens), red maple (Acer rubrum), wax myrtle (Morella
cerifera), colic root (Aletris farinosa), and several species of beakrush (Rhynchospora spp.). At
most sites, golden sedge shares its habitat with Cooley's meadowrue and with Thorne's beakrush
(Rhynchospora thornei), a species of concern in N.C.
6.5 Rough -leaved loosestrife
This species generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between long leaf pine uplands and pond
pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty, poorly drained soil)
(Barry 1980), on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying
sand. Rough -leaved loosestrife has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub community of
large Carolina bays (shallow, elliptical, poorly drained depressions of unknown origin)
(Matthews et al., 1980). The grass -shrub ecotone, where rough -leaved loosestrife is found, is
fire -maintained, as are the adjacent plant communities (long leaf pine - scrub oak, savanna,
flatwoods, and pocosin). Suppression of naturally -occurring fire in these ecotones results in
shrubs increasing in density and height and expanding to eliminate the open edges required by
this plant.
7.0 Findings
7.1 Red -cockaded woodpecker
There is one NCNHP records of occurrence of red -cockaded woodpeckers within 1 mile of the
project limits. There are no cavity trees identified within the limits of the project. It is our opinion
that the proposed construction is not likely to adversely impact foraging resource or affect any of
the adjacent nest colonies of red -cockaded woodpeckers. No RCW nests, cavities, or starts were
observed on Blake Farm SF -1 or within 0.5 mile of the site. Thus, no impact to foraging resources
of the red -cockaded woodpeckers will occur, as a result of construction of Blake Farm SF -1.
7.2 American chaffseed
There are small sandy ridges interspersed throughout the tract. However, the dominant soil type
within the project area is a mineral based sandy loam. The site has remained overgrown, been
4

managed for timber for a very long period of time, and lacks the frequent fires needed by this
plant. There is a maintained power line R.O.W. within the tract, however, this is not ever
subjected to fire because of the danger of damage to the lines. There are several area of hardwood
flat wetlands, and are severely overgrown and shaded, making these areas unsuitable for this
plant. No American chaffseed was found during site surveys. Thus, it is anticipated that no impact
to the American chaffseed will occur, as a result of construction of Blake Farm SF -1.
7.3 Cooley's meadowrue
There majority of the project area, which has been managed for timber for many years, which in
this type of habitat, remained densely vegetated with waxy shrubs until harvest, and is rarely
burned. There is a maintained power line R.O.W. within the tract. This area has one small
wetland margin that is suitable for this plant, however, no plants were observed. The margins of
the on-site hardwood flat wetlands are generally overgrown, and have only recently been exposed
by timber and mowing activity. No Cooley's meadowrue was found during site surveys. Thus, no
impact to the Cooley's meadowrue will occur, as a result of construction of Blake Farm SF -1.
7.4 Golden Sedge
All of the wetland margins have been long overgrown, and lack the frequent fires needed to
maintain its preferred habitat. There is a maintained power line R.O.W. within the tract, however,
this is not ever subjected to fire because of the danger of damage to the lines. The soils in the
project area do not match the type that supports healthy local populations of golden sedge in
Pender County. No golden sedge was found during site surveys. Thus, impact to the golden sedge
is not anticipated to occur, as a result of construction of Blake Farm SF -1.
7.5 Rough -leaved loosestrife
There are small sandy ridges interspersed throughout the tract. The site has remained overgrown,
been managed for timber for a very long period of time, and lacks the frequent fires needed by
this plant. There is a maintained power line R.O.W. within the tract, however, this is not ever
subjected to fire because of the danger of damage to the lines. There are several area of hardwood
flat wetlands, and are severely overgrown and shaded, making these areas unsuitable for this
plant. No rough -leaved loosestrife was found during the site survey. No impact to the rough -
leaved loosestrife will occur as a result of construction of Blake Farm SF -1.
6.0 Summary
Blake Farm SF -1 was evaluated to determine the presence or absence of protected plant and animal
species, namely the red -cockaded woodpecker, American chaffseed, Cooley's meadowrue, golden sedge,
and the rough -leaved loosestrife. There were no red -cockaded woodpecker cavity trees or starts found
with the limits of Blake Farm SF -1, nor within 0.5 mile of its project boundaries. Thus, it is anticipated
that impact to woodpecker cavity trees, starts, or foraging resources will not occur as a result of
construction of Blake Farm SF -1. The site has remained overgrown, been managed for timber for a very
long period of time, and lacks the frequent fires needed by many of the listed plants. Therefore, the
preferred habitat of the listed plant species is not found within the limits of the project site. In addition,
none of the protected plants were found within Blake Farm SF -1 site. With that, it is anticipated that no
impact to American chaffseed, Cooley's meadowrue, golden sedge, or the rough -leaved loosestrife will
occur as a result of construction of Blake Farm SF -1.

Appendix A
USFWS and NCNHP Letters of Findings

Blake Farm SF=1 Project
IPaC Trust Resources Report
Generated May 02, 2016 01:42 PM MDT, IPaC v3.0.2
This report is for informational purposes only and should not be used for planning or
analyzing project level impacts. For project reviews that require U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service review or concurrence, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list from the Regulatory Documents page.
IPaC - Information for Planning and Conservation (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/): A project planning tool to help
streamline the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service environmental review process.

Table of Contents
IPaC Trust Resources Report .......................................................
1
Project Description..............................................................
1
Endangered Species............................................................
2
MigratoryBirds.................................................................
5
Refuges & Hatcheries...........................................................
9
Wetlands.....................................................................
10

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC Trust Resources Report
NAME
Blake Farm SF -1 Project
LOCATION
Pender County, North Carolina
IPAC LINK
https: //ecos.fws. gov/i pac/project/
5J5B1-X6GGJ-HYHGY-H2GS5-QXXNNI
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Contact Information
Trust resources in this location are managed by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Endangered Species
Endangered Species
Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species are managed by the
Endangered Species Program of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
This USFWS trust resource report is for informational purposes only and should
not be used for planning or analyzing project level impacts.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the
IPaC website and request an official species list from the Regulatory Documents
section.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may
be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency.
A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list either from the Regulatory
Documents section in IPaC or from the local field office directly.
The list of species below are those that may occur or could potentially be affected by
activities in this location:
Birds
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
CRITICAL HABITAT
There is final critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=B079
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BODM
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B04F
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 2

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Endangered Species
Fishes
Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=EOA7
Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=EOOB
Flowering Plants
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q214
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q231
Golden Sedge Carex lutea Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
There is final critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q3H D
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q2DF
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q2MZ
Mammals
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
There is final critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A007
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 3

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Endangered Species
Reptiles
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=C000
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
CRITICAL HABITAT
There is final critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=COOS
Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata
CRITICAL HABITAT
There is final critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=CODE
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=C00O
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
CRITICAL HABITAT
There is final critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=COOF
Similarity of Appearance (Threatened)
Threatened
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
CRITICAL HABITAT
There are both final and proposed critical habitat designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=C000
Critical Habitats
There are no critical habitats in this location
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 4

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Migratory Birds
Migratory Birds
Birds are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act.
Any activity that results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless
authorized by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.0] There are no provisions for allowing
the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in the take
of migratory birds is responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations and
implementing appropriate conservation measures.
1. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Year-round bird occurrence data
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
akn-histogram-tools.php
The following species of migratory birds could potentially be affected by activities in this
location:
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BOG8
American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BOF3
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=B07F
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 5

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Migratory Birds
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B008
Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B09A
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOEO
Black -throated Green Warbler Dendroica virens
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
Chuck -will's -widow Caprimulgus carolinensis
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
Gull -billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOJV
Henslow's Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B09D
Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis
Season: Breeding
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B092
Least Tern Sterna antillarum Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOMD
Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOFY
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOJL
Nelson's Sparrow Ammodramus nelsoni Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 6

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Migratory Birds
Painted Bunting Passerina ciris Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BOFU
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BODM
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
Saltmarsh Sparrow Ammodramus caudacutus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
Seaside Sparrow Ammodramus maritimus
Bird of conservation concern
Year-round
Sedge Wren Cistothorus platensis
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOJK
Short -eared Owl Asio flammeus Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BOH D
Swainson's Warbler Limnothlypis swainsonii Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BOJ N
Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 7

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Migratory Birds
Yellow Rail Coturnicops noveboracensis Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_pu blic/profile/speciesProfi le.action?spcode=BOJG
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 8

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Refuges & Hatcheries
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
There are no refuges or fish hatcheries in this location
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 9

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Wetlands
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers District.
DATA LIMITATIONS
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use
of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata
should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the
actual conditions on site.
DATA EXCLUSIONS
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
DATA PRECAUTIONS
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.
Wetland data is unavailable at this time.
5/2/2016 1:42 PM IPaC v3.0.2 Page 10

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment K
Historic Properties (SHPO) and Archaeological Resources
Xiv

STATE,,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susan Maltz Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
May 19, 2016
Raiford Trask III
Pender Farm Development, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Develop Blake Farm SF -1 Residential Subdivision, Off US 17, Scotts Hill, Pender County,
ER 16-0802
Dear Mr. Trask:
Thank you for your submission of May 5, 2016, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental. revi ewkncdcr. gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
C,�C� )4_ouLtaau�
60�(Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Blake Farm IP Supplemental Information
SEGi
Attachment L
North East Cape Fear Mitigation Bank Credit Reservation Letter
Xv

NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
Agent: Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Credit Reservation Letter
December 1, 2016
David Syster
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, INC 28412
Project: Blake Farm (Pender County, NC)
Dear David:
The Northeast Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) is providing preliminary acceptance to supply
mitigation credits for impacts to non -riparian wetlands associated with the Blake Farm Project located near
Scotts Hill in Pender County, North Carolina (conditional upon receipt of payment as outlined below).
Please refer to the table below depicting the type and quantity of credits requested and reserved for your
project.
fMitigation Type Credits Requested F Total Credits Reserved
Stream F 0 0
Non- Riparian Wetland 2.8 F 2.8
Riparian Wetland 0.0 F 0.0
The Bank will reserve the credits outlined above for a period of up to 90 days from the date of this letter.
Please contact us if you need a reservation to extend beyond the 90 -day period. Requests to reserve
credits beyond 90 days may require a deposit. Upon request for credit transfer, the Bank will issue an
invoice in the amount of $143,981.60. Upon receipt of payment, the Bank will provide an executed
Transfer of Credit Certificate for the total amount of credits invoiced and paid for.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at [phone] or
by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Northeast Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Christian Preziosi
Land Management Group, Inc. (agent)
Northeast Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
c/o Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
1