HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170493 Ver 1_B-4978 Wilkes April 21 2017_20170421STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
Apri121, 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN: Mr. Steven L. Kichefski
NCDOT Coordinator
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 for the Proposed Replacement of
Bridge 82 on SR 1154 over South Prong Lewis Fork in Wilkes County, Federal Aid
Project No. BRZ-1154(6); TIP B-4978, Division 11; WBS Element 39897.1.1.
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge number 82 on SR
1154 (Mount Pleasant Road) over South Prong Lewis Creek in Wilkes County with a single span, 105
feet long box beam bridge on the existing alignment. An offsite detour will be utilized during
construction. There will be 0.01 acres (341fl of temporary impacts to surface waters from two work pads
to construct the new bridge. There will be no permanent impacts to surface waters resulting from this
action; therefore, no mitigation will be acquired for this project.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Stormwater Management Plan,
Permit Drawings, and Roadway Plansheets. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed
in February 2016 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
This project is located in a trout county; therefore comments from the NCWRC will be required prior to
authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests
NCWRC Review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and
the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application.
This project calls for a letting date of November 21, 2017 and a review date of October 3, 2017.
MailingAddress: Telephone: (919)707-6000 Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: (919) 212-5785 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
NATu[tAL ENVIRONMENT SEC770N Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH NC 27610
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RA[.E[Gx NC 27699-1598 Website: www.ncdot.gov
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website
at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call Jeff Hemphill at (919) 707-6126.
Sincerely,
�i',��_
'/ .
,�or Philip S. Harris, P.E., Manager
�
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
�aF wArE9Q Office Use Only:
� � o c Corps action ID no.
��. , � � Y DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
� Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 82 over South Prong Lewis Fork Creek on SR 1154 (Mount
Pleasant Road)
2b. County: Wilkes
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Champion
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state B_4978
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6126
3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785
3h. Email address: jhemphill@ncdot.gov
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.15465 Longitude: - 81.32978
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 0.57 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to South Prong Lewis Fork Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Forested, rural residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
75 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a three span 91-foot timber deck & steel I beam bridge with a single span, 105-foot box
beam bridge on the existing alignment. An offsite detour will be utilized for this project. Standard road building
equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other: NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1❑ P� T Work pads South Prong � PER � Corps 34
Lewis Fork Creek ❑ INT � DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Olf Perm
341f temp
. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
01 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts Permanent
Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Stormwater Management Plan. Grass shoulders are used on each side instead of paved shoulders to maximize
vegetative conveyance and allow runoff to remain in a diffuse flow pattern to encourage passive stormwater treatment.
Deck drains have been placed only over land and none over body of water to route runoff to natural areas and minimize
direct discharge. Deck drain dissipator pads provided under deck drains and rip rap at pipe outlets provides energy
dissipation and encourages a diffuse flow pattern. Design maintains existing flow patterns to minimize impacts. New
bridge spans creek.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases of construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes � No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Wilkes
County. A bat survey report dated June 14, 2016 determined NCDOT is in compliance with the 4(d) rules for this project.
The report was sent via email to USFWS on October 5, 2016.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? � Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
hillip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. ��'z �" Zd�7
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
11
k 11�;11�� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation
SL[?1'llitYcl�P! �
Highway Stormwater Program �.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 39897.1.1 TIP No.: B-4978 County(ies): Wilkes Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 39897.1.1 TIP Number: B-4978 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 12/7/2016
NCDOT Contact: W illiam S. Zerman, PE Contractor I Designer:
Address: NC DOT Hydraulics Unit Address:
1590 Mail Service Center
Ralei h, NC 27699
Phone: 919-707-6755 Phone:
Email: bzerman ncdot. ov Email:
Cit ITown: Fer uson Count ies): Wilkes
River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA Count ? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? No
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.063 mi Surroundin Land Use: Rural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.24 ac. 0.20 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10 ft. lanes with 3 ft to 7 ft shoulders Two 9 ft lanes with grassed shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 309 Year: 2037 Existin : 218 Year: 2017
General Project Narrative: The purpose of this project is to replace the structurally deficient bridge #082 over South Prong Lewis Fork Creek on SR 1154 (Mt. Pleasant Rd.) in Wilkes County with a new
(Description of Minimization of Water bridge. Grass shoulders are used on each side instead of paved shoulders to maximize vegetative conveyance and allow runoff to remain in a diffuse flow pattern to encourage
Quality Impacts) passive stormwater treatment. Deck drains have been placed only over land and none over body of water to route runoff to natural areas and minimize direct discharge. Deck
drain dissipator pads provided under deck drains and rip rap at pipe outlets provides energy dissipation and encourages a diffuse flow pattern. Design maintains existing flow
patterns to minimize impacts.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): South Prong Lewis Fork Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 12-31-2-(6)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: None
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? no (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
�
�
• �
�
V
�
�
O
V
�
r
z
Ser �heet iA r rr Index of Sheeis
See Sheet 1 B For Conventlonal Symbols
����� �� ����� ��������
—L— JIA I I �-tS.i.bZ
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
A DESIGN EXCEPTION IS REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (15 MPH) AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE.
GRAPHIC SCALES
20 10 0 20 40
PLANS
50 25 0 50 700
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2017 = 218 ADT
ADT 2037 = 309 ADT
K = 10 %
D = 60 %
T = 5 % *
V = 15 MPH
* TTST =2% DUAL 3%
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.043 MI.
LENGTH OF STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.020 MI.
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.063 MI.
—L— JIA IL+t5tS.6Z
Prepared in the Off/ce of:
DIVIS7011i OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
20l2 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: GARY LOVERING, PE
NOVEMBER 18 2016 j'ROJECT ENGINEER
LETTING DATE: BRYAN KEY, PE
NOVEMBER 21. 2017 I'ROJECT DES/GN ENGINEER
iE STATE PROIECT REFeRENCe NO.
�� B-4978
STATE PRQ1.N0. .w.PROJ.NO.
39897.1.1 BRZ-1154 6
39897.2.1
�
D&9CRIpfION
P.E.
RM/. UTIL
HYDRAULICS ENGIIVEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGII�EER
P.E.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
z
�
DETAIL A
DECK ORAIN DISSIPATOR PAD
l�o��o s�ai�l
�
�ISSIPATOR P^u v w � R
PAD
'NOTE�. CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW OECI( DRAINS
�aouHo
p 60` � I
/�
GEOTf%TILf J �'��
L- 60' aa^ciirviFw
Type a(Liner- IS TONS CL B R'ip-Rop
Geo�exiile- 3a zy
FROM STA.11+85 TO STA.12120 RTiI.T.
0
CAROL 5. TRIPLETT
GRADE
TO DRAIN �
woo�s C I
C I
I
J'�
� /� � � \
���Ews.we airv � �i�J� L
� F �J` � � isos, �
�/ ���'' �/N /�F .
, Y
Tp OLD � \ � F �(�'1�
Y Q�I '/ i
HW � % r
i— F F
(li
�� -Y' PC Sf0. �+6/XI
iW
_ F+ ��'�(�'l -
-Y- PoT 5/0. /0
5 60' 57' .3�¢ E
12./142016
qtnguyen
R:\Hydraulics\CADD\PERMIT DRAWINGS\64978_Hyd_prm_wet.dgn
\
v i as
O
CAROL 5. TRIPLETT
w000s
L- PoT Sfo.lO+QDDO
O
CAROL 5. TR�LETT
-L- PC S�o.10+3366
CL B RIP RAP �
GEOTEXTILE
� 1
�� m
5� �
� c- Pcc <
� L- POC :
-Y- POT
/ � N
� PDE �
� I I �
� I�
� � I
� I
J �
� I �.
� �Z I �
�� �
1 � '�_
� ' � �,
� '
�f I (�
I 1
� I � L,
� � �
1
I �'
w000s ,� � RETAIN�
�� P�,
2 �
MARY LOlASE PARKER CHURCH� '1 � 1�
� 1 �
� � .
-�- � �o ,2.�+.�3 � � 4
8 '� � � i �
M I � 1�,
`� I � `
XCAVA ION ���CY �� � �
AVA E EO� I I
WORK PAD J �
E �
✓ATION 20 C \ � \
��^� _:�n .i. �;R;c �
��' -
�!�`��Il��°i!�����
PADS �T —
F oy./� o �
��WPDE—e�E � E �T
`?'I ;
'� 4l Y GRASS
w00D5 W
� I
I
BEGW SHOULDER BERM GUTTER -�� � I
STA.11+65 TO BEGIN BRIDGE RT�LT. � "
OMA7�Y LOUISE �PA�KER CMURCN� � WJ I
x I� �
1 TON CL RIP RA i
5 SY GE T�XTILE
�� �
� ��
J
� r
2///� �
� �
� ��
RM' SHEET NO.
DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
1[NC�A�ff�ILIE ]E ]PII.A\ZV�
DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQUISIT[ON
PERMIT JDRAWINGW
SHEET 2 OF 4
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
�! UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
�r
O/��f
8
J�b�
�� \ � ��� � .
\
w
� \ ���iNG kiW
/ `�� � �2
� ��i
' - RETAIN O
3p ,MF„ ,
� � " \
� �
� I �'� �
� I \�—_JS�
/ �
/ / � ,.�� �
� � `'` /�� ��._i�
/ / `.��
� �� JONNUW�pdAES.DvERw�E.
�� ti
o`� cRnss
/ /
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
S� ry\_
�
�
�
O
A. WA ND KdTE ELLER wIFE,
Woo�S
-L- PT S1o. /5+/5J5
K71TE ELLER
�_�ti, �-,�s�° L_��`�`' ��`�'�`'�—� `�_r�^�` r�
WOODS �r
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
GRAPHIC SCALE
TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE
0
�
RM' SHEET NO.
DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
1[NC�A�ff�ILIE ]E ]PII.A\ZV�
DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQUISIT[ON
ETAI L A i � / � � � .� � d �� � � � � � C� I � � �� � � �
/ DEC�IG D IA7 DISSIPATpR P I , �II � 1 I�i �
, -�°, � � � �� �;� �', !� � � �
,�o =o,a,
� , ,� ;,��� �� I I ������� �� , .,, _,��._ _ _
,
o�pir�6x vFw .� I � � � '.� � �� � , �� � I � i � � � � . I � ���
G
%�o,E� ��,�Pao'�o��E�,�� a��ow aE��� oaA��s ���,� �,I� � � I �� � �' � ��, � ��� P E RM I T D RAW I N G
GROUND� p .I� fib� � a� I � I I ���II . ' I I a I � Z � �
�, � I.�
� SHEET 3 OF 4
;:
/ � I I� I I �I �� ' I I ^ ' I j � , � ' �� DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
GEorexiiie � , I , . ��. I �� ,,, ; � � � UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
II� i
� !
�� �. ao� � � � . �� � , -J O�
TPe (L ..'15 N�CLBR' R�p / .. � I � � II �I � � �,
FROM STA.11+ 5 70-�STA.12+2qI RT,A.T � p�.��] � " I� �II
FROM STA.1'�2+ 7 TO/ STA`12�92�RTYLT. �, 1' R I Nc P,\ I� � I WOODS I �I ,�� �II ' � � � / �� � i}, O/��f�8
1
� � �' '� ,\� � �� � ' � 1'I; ��'' � \1 � � ' 7� J��eti
I � � \ �I � I� � -L- PoT Sfo. ro+o� '� � � I �� � � � � � s� �
��,� �,
... I � 1 T N CL B� RIP RAP ,� , � � ,� � RETAIN�.
I \ ` � i 4 . � GEOTEXTILE I� � woo05 I HpPE
i5
� � \, \� =:�1 . � �. II � ..� CAROL� LEYT �..����� II . I O . � _ � i� , � '`,`,1 \ � �, �`.,. \ . . . \ . .
I�. t�\ . � I I I 11 \�
1 s ` g� c �� w � �' I � \
OI � , \ I�I�� � �I� � � .��s �� � ,`I � ;� A�Y LOlASE PARKER�HURCH� � 1. . \ �\ �'\ �\ \ �
CAROL 5. TRI LETT �' ., �.: � � I I II ��� -L- f�C SlO.I0+3� , .�V '�' PCC S/ - .97 � . � . � � � �� I I I I ��� � � � � � � � � � � V '` � . �
R � � � � -�- Poc Sr �rot�.�s � l � � � �� � �. I '� ��� A � 1 � \ � � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ �. � � � � �
> GRADE �� � ��, `�� � -r- Por au � �i � 9 -c- Pc s�o.i2+s�.�3 � 4 \ � \ � A �
f TO DRAW I � �, I } ' � � i > i� \' I � � � � � � � � � � � �
/ c \ 1 � \ � 8 7 � � �� `� \' \ '
} .
'woo�s �' � \ � i � �� �. �n, .. � . M I � � � " '� � �' . ` \ � � � � � \ �''..
� � � � � � � � � � � , 1 -t - PCC S�o. i3+6555 � � . , �I '�.
i
� ; � � �� E'XGAVA ION CY � , � i � ; � � \ � \
� � / I �.. � �PDE AVA E TO =1139 5'�I . . ' - �� � '� ���g �p
J � E�— � , . � \ \ � ` . A. WARD R A . WiFE.
_ / � , � ., � oELB E - a � . � � ' � . , .. ' � N. K'ATE ELLER
, a � � TEl�'�P. WORK PAD > 9 ' � � � � �
/ � � �� '� �� F _I 6� �: ��I E � �� � � .
� � � � . ,�5 � , � � � ` � � �� - -� _ r � anvnrioN � zo c ,_ � � � -c.� � V �� _ A ' � � �� A �
� � / � C bi � ! \ �.. .. trre ni .._i. � E AVATE TO EL. 1 ��7.5' ���- �-_'-� . _ - - � \ ` � 1 � .. � � � �\ � � .. �. � .. \.. .
P -
�
_ , � �� A _
� � � i � ' /i �� ---- I-. ' � ._ — ca.4a�s�or�z _� _ rs��cMa �TAI �� . �����. wonos� � � � �.
p � �� �
— � � __
� � ui � �- � � � `� �
� � i �� a�� �e � � ' �
— � � �I7' 28l � � A �
� �..
-- J � 2 i i �i °� ,�-� . - -
- �
_. , _ ' ' � _
% � � / �� �� \ � �.� 3�0 -- �� - � � — � �� ��� �
� �*L PT 510. /5+/575
- -
- / � � - � ij � � / _ , ',. I � �.4 -- `� � `t-��^ \� -�
� � ��
� . .. i- % _ i _ .� II PADS TOR 1 . �,f,l I l 1�.; r ynr_� 1 . —'_ . Eri,ni�� k W . \ . . ..
� y- J. - Tl'PE III' '. �
sx�•m� aiw � ��.��� 3. ' °� _�„�� . C .�'I -(l-_. _ � �� � 5EE D TAIL 'A' �'" � I . F � ;� �V � � ,
i ( `� D �
� � ...��` �� � s isos' � RETAIsi-� � �(�`'_- � � , �,. � � i ti � � � �`` � _ _ a
__ R/ , J - CI o � QI � � � � ,
��., .� - / / R/ J � � - r,�PDE—C�E ..��-`—E � .� ��l �_..'� �� RETAIN � � � exi\� \ � �� �
D �
� � om' � E � � BOW � � � .
� Y �� �K�r � / p � , . —C I I � � � , � ��� � � ��t
�
� / �
� / � As
0 0� ��� � _ � �." j •
7 -. � � H� � � / � � - � �
W � �� F � � � ��� � � � �, � . , � S��
MF�
c � i� f � �
.
�
'� I / � � - � �� � $
�� p p � � � � �' '�� aea s � � � � �� V `��^F
. . , � % , ' � i � � � �� ��� ��
w � ��� � -Y- PC Sfa �+6UY1 w000s � �� r � I i � � � , � � I � / � � � �s � ` � � V ' � � \
� / i ,- �
�^��"q`�� � BEGW SHOULDER BERM GUTTER � � �
`r1� - � � � STA. 11 +65 TO BEGIN BRIDGE .RT�LT. � , ' I ,� � .- i ' � � � � / , / � � � � . � " _��� ...
� � ; � �� ; .
-� g��g
� H. K71TE HLL �
� � � O � 2 �E KgiTN Nup�N AN� wiFE �� f �� I I � �� / � � ���,�5 �I � � ARD R AF� MI��
� � � / � i
�
��� . O AIA�Y LOUIS PAFiKER CMURCN
i
� -Y- POT 510./O+OO.fb � CAROL S.TRIPLETT � � � I ��
- S GO�57'.3�4E �� 1 TON CL��� RIP RA � � I �� �� , • F',�/� JONN y� ��ER-AND W�E. �� �' � ,�-�
; ' . �/ / . DONN�,3.DrER�. �. `
� . 5 SY E,� XTILE $ � �� �� � � � Q . � ���� . .
� ��/�� � , / � ' / �RAs� �_
:� — _ � ,
_ � . � � , � �
, - �� — - _
� �i i� / _ � �
�� /�� i f-�i � i / � �. �
�� ,�, ,/ 7 i ��i � �� �
� \
� �� �� �
-
— , / __i f ; > " �' � �A �\ �� ,
� - i i � �
% �' � � � ��
. � ' �� � , � \6Sir — — .
�
� � �
� � � � ',.. , � r —_
c9 � ��I `/�^ .—�—_�_ �l
� �`
Hl �
�
�
�ti , rr�'�-- '�
� �` waoos � . �'
� � � 50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
�
� ��
� �
� <
z
�
�
� GRAPHIC SCALE
�
�
12./142016
qtnguyen TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE
R:\Hydraulics\CADD\PERMIT DRAWINGS\64978_Hyd_prm_wet.dgn
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
12+23 / 12+31 -L- TEMP. WORK PAD 0.01 34
12+57 / 12+62 -L-
TOTALS*: 0.01 0 34 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2013 10 24
• �
See Sheet � A For I ndex of Sheets � �i �I � � � � �i �i � � �i �i �
See Sheet � B For Conventi onal Symbols J�1 J 11 J� J� J�1 J I� J �1
VI C I N ITY MAP
BEGIN TIP PROJECT
-L- STA 10 +45.00
BEGI N
-Y- STA
CONST.
10 + 15.00
11/�� 1 ` • 1 � 1 �•� . . �`•�� 1 ��` 1 1 1 �� I,� 1 1 � � �\ ll ' �
LOCATI01�1: BRIDGE
TYPE
O VER SO UTH PR01�lG
LE WIS FORI� CREEI�
WORI�: GRADIII tG, DRAI11 tA GE, PA VI1�G
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
A DESIGN EXCEPTION IS REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (15 MPH) AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE.
STR UCTURES
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared In tl� Offlce of: HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11t DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH
= 218 ADT DI VISI01� OF HIGHWA YS
20 10 0 20 40 ADT 2017 — LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.043 MI. 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 � p� �►Oapyy Q
ADT 2 03 7 309 oADT 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ��?� g'�poQ
PLANS K= 10 �o LENGTH OF STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.020 MI. P.E. °� �
D = 6O % SIGNATURE: G-1v�i �
50 25 0 50 100 0 * q �
T= 5 /o RI HT F W Y D TE: GARY LOVERING, PE � o
V= 15 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4978 = 0.063 MI. NOVEMBER 18 2016 I'ROJECT ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIG11t � �
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =2% DUAL 3% � E11tGI11tEER ��p ooQ�Q
l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LETTI11lG DATE: BRYAN KEY, PE �� ��p���
N OVEM6 E R 21 , 2 O� 7 I'ROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER P�E�
SIGNAT URE:
BOU11lDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Line ----- -----
County Line --- ----
Township Line -- --
City Line - -
Reservation Line - -
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin �
Property Corner �
Property Monument 0
Parcel/Sequence Number �23
Existing Fence Line -X X X-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -W�B- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary W�B
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB
Known Contamination Area: Soil - �• •�
Potential Contamination Area: Soil - ,��. �
Known Contamination Area: Water - �' �'
Potential Contamination Area: Water � �
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential �' ?
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O
Sign �
Well °
w
Small Mine �'
Foundation 0
Area Outline
Cemetery fi
Building
School �
Church �
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water --- ---
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir �____�
Jurisdictional Stream �S —
Buffer Zone 1 Bz �
BufFer Zone 2 Bz 2
F I ow Arrow � --- ---
Disappearing Stream �--- ---
Spring �'��-�_.-.�
Wetland �
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
� FLOW
False Sump �
� " I' .,�� `I' I �:' (�)� I ���° .� (�) I'� " I' I'-I � �' . �� I'� (�) I ., I \ . ��. , II)� �i' I :�� I (�) \ (�) I .�" I'I � �� I'I ���i' . �� �'" �
� � ' � ' : �
�- � � �- � �� .„ ,
_
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
RIGHT OF WAY.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R1W Marker
Proposed Control of Access Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement -
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
CSX TRANSPORTATION
O
MILEPOST 35
0
SWITCH
����
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement —
Existing Curb —
�
0
.
W
.
W
.
��
� W
in� �
.. _. ��
�c�
�A,
E
E
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
O
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �---
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F---
Proposed Curb Ramp cR
Existing Metal Guardrail T T T
Proposed Guardrail T T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail n n �
Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n
Equality Symbol �
Pavement Removal
T�EGETATIDN.•
Single Tree
Single Shrub
�
�
Hedge
Woods Line � � � � � �
Orchard
Vi neya rd
EXISTI11lG STRUCTURES.•
MAJ O R:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS 6(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS 6(S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
� � � �
Vineyord
CONC
J CONC WW I
`
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water Line
TV:
coNc Hw TV Pedestal
TV Towe r
�--------� U/G TV Cable Hand Hole
��B U/G TV Cable LOS 6(S.U.E.*)
U/G TV Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
0 U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
s
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
•
•
O
►1
�
�
-O-
O
a
�
HH
GAS :
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. -
A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records -
End of Information
-W- -
W
A/G Water
- -T�- - -
TV
- - - -TV FO- - -
- -TV FO-
TV FO
0
�
— —�— —
— —G— —
—c—
a�c cas
�
O
55
A/G Sanitary Sewer
— — — —FSS— — — -
— — F55 — —
FSS
•
a
�
Os
- 7UTL -
0
UST
0
�
0
AATU R
E.O.I.
VI C I N ITY I��IAP
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4978
-L- STA 10 +45.00
N = 883393.9610
E = 1312179.3846
NCDOT GPS STATION
B�
S UR VEY C01�lTROL SHEET 8-4978
POINT
DESCo
NORTH
E�ST
E�EV�TION
� ST�TION
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
Location and Su
OFFSET
------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
B4�7g1 GPS B4�78-1 883�5307�7� 1312385081�6 11620�2 14+71052 1306� RT
B4�7g2 GPS B4�78 - 2 883335 0 2�56 1 3121 48 0 2752 1 151 0 56 1 1+�4 0 45 15 0 72 RT
B�3 B�-3 8836480 1842 13124480241� 114104� OUTSIDE PROJECT �IMITS
N = 883335.2056
E = 1312148.2752
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "b4978-2"
WITH NAD 83/NA 2011 STATE PLANE GR[D COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 883335.2056(ft) EASTING: 1312148.2752(ft)
ELEVATION: 1151.56(ft)
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
(GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.9999468806
THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND
LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM
"b4978-2" TO -L- STATION 10+45.00 IS
N 27°54'00" E 66.48'
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERT[CAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88
����������������������������������������
BM1 E�EV�TION = 11440�6
N g833�� E 1312��4
� ST�TION 11+150�� 78 RIGHT
g" SP I KE I N ROOT OF 2� " POP��R
���������***�����*����*���*�������*�����
64 9 7 8-2
�5R 13o N R�,,,,
��
KETT T-��� 21 �
H A � -- � NWY 4 __,-��
T � � �D ,_ ._
i�
i�
BEGIN CONST.
-Y- STA 10 � 5 0.00
N
E
= 883366.2323
= 1312055.7613
__
NO TE: DRAWING NO T T O SCALE
END TIP PROJECT B-4978
-L- STA 13 + 75.00
N = 883142.2432
E = 1312346.9487
MT P�Eq
\ 'S'��T
��
.�
NCDOT GPS STATION 64978-1
N = 883053.7970
�s,� E = 1312385.8196
\ � /�S�J
�
� � ,
, �
,
, �
JS� �-JS/... JS� O �� \ \ \
� �
y� � �
y � �
� ��
�2� � � �
� �
� �
, �.
�
�
�
..._�S\ � ,
,
\
NOTES: �s.
1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING
PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:
HTTPS.//CONNECT.NCDOT. GOU/RESO URCES/LOCATION/
THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
B4978 LS_CONTROL.TXT
SHEET NO.
� ���
SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER
INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
, INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL
BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.
SEE GPS CALIBRATION SHEET FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATE VALUES.
N
0
N
>
w
�
� i��
FROM STA. 11 + 85 TO STA. 12 + 20 RT.�1..T. ��' � � O/��
FROM STA.12+67 TO STA.12+92 RT.iLT. �R IN �� W00DS �, �
qo5' CONCo HW , � � � `�
`� ' i J'� 06-
BEGIN PROJECT B-4978 m, ; ,� SCALE
+00000
- L- P O C STA 10 + 4 5. O O j�' -L - POT Sto. �o foo.00
EXo R/W �
� I +33066 1 T N CL B RIP RAP ; RETAIN
� q 5 S GEOTEXTILE woo�s H �_
EXo R/W 15 �PE
_
+33066 `�'• �� 2 = = fi _ -�
� o � i 25000' DOUGLAS KEITH TRIPLETT � '
EXo R/W J ti � D B 6 1 4 P G 0 6 6 ��
C E C I L K E I T H C H U R C H A N D W I F E, � ,
q 3 1 0 0� � N � j D B 1 1 9 3 P G 2 5 6- 2 5 7 ,
I� I � � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
� � � � _y _ _� _ B -4978 4
Z � � � ^ R�W SHEET NO.
� a � � �, Y Pl Sto 11+03.50 Pl Sto 10+53.94 Pl Sto ll+ll.55 Pl Sto 13+25.08 Pl Sto 14+40.57 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
� �� , W p= 29 4/' 08.3" fLTI p= l5° 23' 5/.2" fLTJ 0= 68° 40' 46.2" fLT� �_ ll° 38' 02.9" fRTJ �_ l0° 42' Sl.l" fRTI ENGINEER ENGINEER
�� � � D= 35° 48' 35.5" p= 38° ll' 49.9" D= l04° l0' 26.9" D= l4° l9' 26.2" D= 7° 09' 43.1„
� �
��� � � L_ 82.90 , L= 40.3/' , L= 65.93', L_ 8/.22 , L= 149.60�
� , o T- 4 2. 4 0 T= 2 0. 2 8 T= 3 7. 5 7 T- 4 0. 7 5 T= 7 5. 0 2
� T R A N S I T I O N T O E X I S To 9 q,a 9 0 L T/ R T � � ; R= 1 6 0. 0 0' � 00' R= 4 0 0. 0 0' R= 8 0 0. 0 0'
� �� -L- STAa IO+q5o00 TO STAo 11+39090 � �� SE = EXIST R=_�50.00 R= 5 5.
, � � w o W SE SEE PLANS SE = SEE PLANS SE = SEE PLANS SE = EXIST
� � �' � V, = 25mph V, _ l5mph Vo = 35mph
�
�� o �
Q � � �
Q � � �, �
� � _
� I q o 5' T I E G U A R D R A I L � ^ DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
�� UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
� ;� CONCo TO EXISTo � l!
�
I
O
; %, �MP � � H W 6.
0' 2 5' 5 0'
0
DOUGLAS KEITH TRIPLETT
DB 614 PG 066
DB 1193 PG 256-257 G R A D E
TO D RAI N
, �, MARY LOUISE PARKER CHURCH , �
� � -L - PC Sta.10+33.66 -L - PCC St . l0+ 3.97 DB 716 PG 89 � '�
tn 1� �� 0 2 2� �
� +73097 - L- P O C S t 1 0+ 9 . 7 9 �� '� TRANSITION TO EXISTo 60000' LT/RT s�`'� ��' �
E � � 25000' -Y- POT o. ll+ l.11 -L- PC Sto. 12+84.33 �� �� - L- S T Ao 1 3+ 1 50 0 0 T O S T Ao 1 3+ 7 50 0 0 a2�� p
� E 5 F a +3 90 � w � � X�
/ �
C s � � 25e 0' +64000 � +84033 0 ', � ', � �
� �� ��o o , � , � ,
o �� � � � ��
w000s C� � z I �� pt� � LLAR� i N+OOa 0 25 00' 250
+13000 25 0' 39°00� +65a55 �� ', -L- PCC Sto.13+65.55 �� I
� o
� ,f, 30008' � 3900 ' EXCAVA ION 0 CY 25a00' �� '� � �s
� j� p3 � � E PDE E CAVA E TO L.=1139.5' +20000 � +85000 A. WARD ELLER AND WIFE,
� ��� � oELB W o404 o E 30a00' �
/ � � ,S, � __ � E ', ATE' _�_ 25000' �� DB 307 PGL567
C� R=55',. �` o�' � � � '�� F- - _ �" R R _X� , cAg�E EXoR/W
; �� �� � � � �-- -� PT .90 EX AVATION Zo cY w F W E �AgLE ; �, E N D PROJ ECT 6-49 78
�� % /�; 403 � TYpE-III EXCNVATE TO EL. =113 .5 F P ii -'_= T F� i66 2 0 �HORD
�� ; ' �y _ � ; � � , ,� �, -L- POC STA 13 + 75.00
_ _ � i � . \ -_ ___ _ _ ,
Y +92000 � � ; � �` o`ti I � ,� _ - - �s _ �� _�5�� cMP �RET � woo�s
, �
GPS B-4978-2 Exo R/W ,�'�;='� � .o � ^ . � � BR�ocE I I - 0315�7'i�� o, �� o -�\� \k
, . o o �
' � ��• o o c� 2 # 82 �, � S 4 3' 28.1" E � � � -_. X
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION �-% F� �� io o57i' � � � i o o M �' �� - � �-L- PT Sto. l5+15.15
-Y- STA 10 + 15.00 �%�,.�� � �' `� "' r�a,u 350 TL-2 - � o � M � �
%"".,U� v; + F� �`� �� -Y- T t l+ - - DISSIP TOR W�ll °P�E,qsq � EX,ST k 3
' ' , ,, : --,�, F I 5 , g�, • � r' � � R �%3 ' - - �N_ _ S o. ' 3. V N PADS � � AT-� , - _ _ �r Ro �SR "� R�w \k s Bw
E� ,Nc,_R ���' , , , � N � � �� �, � _Q � � � �' R -, SEE D TAI L A F R �� ��F IS � F � e ��54� � � �k
�
.o \ � F
k� � � '�i,o � W -r� y� � ST
r� F� ,� F��� i3o5%� RETAI.��'� %R E CHORD --� w � �'r 55 �/C �� \� `ti%�� k
� -� F - =o R �SR � - - � F owr o o � � 2 � �� � J , +
�, � , -� �, N �� , - ;� � � o � ��� , w 85000 � �� � �
\ , -j F8 Tow/ � � - E ELBOW � �' � E E � � +66a30 �HORp � E�
O � W , HP�KETT /� � ��j j PDE E E � S 56°I�'I�" E 24 92 � S 43°27' g�' T �� RETAIN EX R/W XS �� Ri�°� ��� _
� � �
Y O �/ �=� +2�0 040 S 50° 2'05 E 46e00' T,,' �, �
v oL� � � � N _ _ _ � �,;=- 0� 20028� 3�",CMP � , ; +65a55 \ ���i
m T0 o R` � - F ;- � � � � I , So
w HWY 42� o _ - - � ,,s` �=� _ 33088 � � ��2s3 , 25000 0 �S� , ,
z � --�' OLL � -Y +15000 +6qo00 +95000� N ; + � � sq ✓SS�O"E � �5g° E �' r �6�s� --
_ / F �� __ ,-- � � EXa R/W +30a00 25a00' 25000'. � �RAss 25e00 �i , �o�, s 52 2�� � o �,s y�./F
v �
� �-�,�TA 25000' woo�s 39a00' 39a00' � 36000 x,Gqr� I k �s 57vii� oo � � ygz�
� �,sM ; _ = 40 -y - PC Sta. l0 +6/.l0 � � � �, � � � �
,W �&T � �
z ; E���N� R' � R +39090 � � x 9, 9.,
,; -� , BEGIN SHOULDER BERM GUTTER � �, +84°33 , k � �� �X�X� � �
J 25000 � o , 25a00 '_ � x I
�u STA. 11 + 65 TO BEGIN BRIDGE RT./LT. � ��,\/ \X �
�
4 � ,' � � W N A. WA HD ALT ER AND WIFE,
2 CECIL KEITH CHURCH AND WIFE, W , � F�F � � . K E ELLER
DOUGLAS KEITH TRIPLETT MARY LOpg 716 PGK 89 CHURCH i � _ �� � ,' 3 �° \ � o �
`� � DB 307 PG 567
DB 614 PG 066 � � ' � N
� � " ' � JOHN V. DYER AND WIFE, � s 41°s6�o6�� E
DB ��93 PG 256-257 1 TON L RIP R� s , � �� ,' DONNA S. DYER � _�,,;�
� 5 SY GE�JT XTILE �� � ,' �,� DB 1145 PG 50 -f- � �
� °� a- o � � � ��
-Y- POT Sto.10+00.00
S 60° 57' 38.4" E
BEGIN APPR SLAB END APPR SLAB '� �� � ,°,� �RASS k S,�'�o,, � �
-L- STA 11 + 72.62 -L- STA 12 + 99.62 z � ,' ,�� �k 9�%„ ,,` °� �
� / F �9 S
� \
`i _ 350 � �'�s�
TYPE-III . TYPE III GRAU '
N TL-2 � �
, -I- s
. . . .
� � 0 � 4��41
� � � -�- O � i k 34 �
O � O � O � �,-,sM-��-,� � \
N
O� �� �' -�'� �,�,�
: �
GRAU 350 TYPE-III `� TYPE-III qT_1
TL-2 c�
BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE
NOT TO SCALE -�- STA 11 + 83.62 -L- STA 12 + 88.62
RELATIONSHIP OF BRIDGE TO ROADWAY
WOODS
JLL JI ILLI J 1 VI\ -L- /"�1`IV -1- 1 1\VI ILL
SEE SHEET S- TO S- FOR STRUCTURE PLAN
�������������
�t ��� ����������
�� �� ���������=
����������������������������������������
■■■��■r-----------------------------�■■■
■����■i i■■■
■■■■�■i � � - - . i■■■
■■■■■■i i■■■
■■■■■■L-----------------------------J■■■
����������������������������������������
����������������������������������������