20081364 Ver 1_Application_20080905

XJ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
'C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
?J MICHAEL F EASLEY P O Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611-5202
GOVERNOR PHONE [phone]
September 3, 2008
2
A
C ?Iqy ??? ?? 9T `? "'006
STD T??'4?/Jy
LYNDO TIPPE1'1X4*0y
SECRETARY
Mr Monte Matthews
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd, Suite 120 O Q 3 4:
Q - Raleigh, NC 27615 O '
(Zi
Subject Nationwide Permit #23
Bridge #104 on SR 1353
Wilkes County, North Carolina
TIP # B-4323
State Project Number: 8.2761401 (No DWQ Permit Fee Required)
Dear Mr Matthews
The NC Department of Transportation is scheduled to replace substandard Bridge #104 with a
new spanning structure over the North Prong of Lewis Fork Creek (Class C) in Wilkes County
The existing structure is a single span bridge with a timber deck on steel I-beams and stringers
with a superstructure composed of a low steel truss The proposed new bridge will be a three
span concrete structure. A temporary causeway will be needed during drilled shaft installation
which will result in 0 02 acres of temporary fill ( 01 acres on each side near the edge of the
stream)
In addition to the temporary impacts associated with the bridge replacement, we will be replacing
a 50'x 60" CMP at station 13+09 with a 70'x 60" CAP at the same location. Please note that
this pipe is perched 2-3 feet. We intend to bury this structure 1' into the streambed on a 4 3%
grade Should we be unable to bury this pipe due to bedrock, the pipe may remain perched If so,
a 10' energy dissipater pad will be placed in the streambed at the pipe outlet We also intend to
construct a concrete headwall on the inlet side of this pipe
The installation of the proposed pipe will require temporary dewaterinig. An impervious sandbag
dike will be constructed approximately 20 feet upstream of the proposed new pipe inlet to create
a small pool Clean water will temporarily be pumped around the construction area and will be
discharged approximately 110 feet downstream of the sandbag dike Any dirty water located
inside the construction area will be pumped into a silt bag if necessary. The dewatered area will
P O Box 250, N WILKEsBORO, NC 28659
PHoNE [phone] Fax [phone]
Mr Monte Matthews
Bridge #104 on SR 1353
Page 2
September 3, 2008
total approximately 0 005 acres Once the new structure is in place, the impervious dike will be
removed and preconstruction streambed elevations will be restored.
The wet pipe in question carries an unnamed tributary to the North Prong of Lewis Fork Creek
(Class C) This project will have no effect on any federally listed endangered plant or aTMmi nal___ v
species Historic compliance work is complete (see attachments)
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses Pipe sizes used will be the mnnnmum necessary to create a safe roadway All appropriate
BMPs will be used during construction
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, a marked county map, a marked
topography map, photographs and other supporting information We would like to begin
construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please let me know Your
early review and consideration will be appreciated
Sincerely,
Ar4
Heath Slaughter
Division Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc- Monte Matthews, US Army Corps of Engineers (1 additional copy)
Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality (2 copies)
Mike Pettyjohn, PE, Division Engineer
Heath Slaughter, Division Environmental Officer
Neil Trivette, Area Roadside Environmental Engineer
Ivan Dishman, Bridge Maintenance Engineer
Elizabeth Lusk, NEU
t

Office Use Only: Form Version Apnl 2001
208
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 1 3 6 4
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
- leaving the space blank
1. Processing
1 Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project-
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2 Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested NWP #23
3 If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here
4 If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here ?
II. Applicant Information
1 Owner/Applicant Information
Name North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address- P O Box 250, North Wilkesboro NC 28659
Telephone Number [phone] Fax Number [phone]
E-mail Address hslauughter@dot state nc us
2 Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant )
Name: Heath Slaughter. Division Environmental Officer
Company Affiliation North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address. P O Box 250, North Wilkesboro NC 28659
Telephone Number [phone] Fax Number _(336) 667-4,549
E-mail Address hsaaughter p,dot state nc us
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
-- - - ---- --and site-plan must include a-scale and-north arrow.- --The-specific-footprints-of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included If possible, the reaps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided
I Name of project Bridge #104 on SR 1353
2 T.I.P Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4323
3 Property Identification Number (Tax PIN) N/A
4 Location
County Wilkes Nearest Town. Millers Creek
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number). N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc )• See attached SR Map
5 Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long) DD 36 20162 N, 81 32799 W
(Note - If project is Imear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody )
6 Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application
Bridge
7. Property size (acres)- Approximately 0 9 acres
8 Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake) North Prong of Lewis Fork Creek
and one UT (Class )
9 River Basin Yadkin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins The
River Basin map is available at http //h2o enr state nc us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10 Describe the purpose of the proposed work Upgrade stream crossing and approach pipe
11 List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project. backhoe/trackhoe, motor
grader, dump trucks crane drill rig_
12 Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project Residential/Forest
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable) If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I P protect, along with
construction schedules
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan All wetlands and waters, and all streams (mternuttent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet
Page 5 of 12
I Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts impacts mciuae, Dui are HOL tuu,lcu Lv u1caaiajnU u
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding
** 100-Year floodpla,ns are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httv //www fema gov -
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
Total area of wetland unpact proposed: 0 acres
2 Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams

Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact*
Length of
Impact
(linear feet)

Stream Name** Average
Width of

Stream Impact Before perennial or

Intermittent?
(please specify)
13+09 Pipe replacement 20 NPLFC 1-2' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts Impacts include, but are not limited to culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include Imear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, np-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc), excavation, ditching/straightenmg, etc If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www uses Qov Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e g , www topozone com,
www mmuest com, etc )
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site. 20 In fl excluding rip=
Page 6 of 12
3 Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
)
Name Waterbody
(If applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc )
Bridge #104 Temporary Causeway 0 02 NPLFC Stream
13+09 Temporary Dewatermg 0 005 UT to NPLFC Stream
13+09 Rtprap 00005 UT to NPLFC Stream

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts Impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc
4 Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply) ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc )- N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g, livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc ).
Size of watershed draining to pond Expected pond surface area
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts
The existing bridge and approach pipe need to be replaced due to their condition. All
appropriate BNVs will be used during construction.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Mod cation of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project, establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams, and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the nutigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htta //h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands/strmgide html
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to* site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g , deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc ), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
EEP if necessar. No nutigation is anticipated
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http //h2o enr state nc us/wrp/mdex him If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet) To be determined by COE.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet) N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres) N/A
Amount of Non-nparian wetland mitigation requested (acres). N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres). N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note. If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document(review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to deternnme, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not unpacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B 0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B 0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B 0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify-Y?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information
Page 9 of 12
L
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 15
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near Manic oI cnannel, cone t exiengs an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i e , Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B 0242 or 0260
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property
Impervious surface area will increase bv_ 0 1 acres All appropriate best management practices
for sediment and erosion control will be implemented during construction
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) or any Buffer Rules
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application
Yes ? No 10
Page 10 of 12
6
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e g, draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control)
V1.1
Applicant/Agent's Signa Date
(Agent's signature is vah only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided )
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Berhe Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplm Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
IV
426 xf
EMA
? y _? r
1-4
? ,,,y x3 Iu
? pp w
i m
0-4 W a CD O
J m 4
® a? t A 4 W 7 J=
" C
1 4
7.2

i
r tai ?
_J

3
3
s s ? ? ? 1r
rl V Q? Q ?E ?4 ..?3i
146 CA?
I to
1?/Ifbb
4 i
r
A
a,
n
Q
O
.. 0 t cr) 0
4

M104000 w

m
m

Iw
V1
w
CO
? La i W
ti 't I O
W
J4
/ice
W JA 4'
al F
?I m r
I ?
.Z r
?I
1 J '
I /
?]. t.'I/??i?? f _! r????,r rL_.: `??~•`_r,t t M _ \? _,}? ,• 1i .i;\?
t.l? _ / B?f!}I`t}?r/, r S, ,.r fr/ If • _ ; /\ J r , \'\ r` t(r i `/=1.-Y =?A.! ,`ti ), lJ, , r - /, _ P` ?? ?t_.?.-at`` -.; !ir/ r__' ? S _ ..y tC4. r
.-
?(??. ( }' t tflf?r tC' r'(I '6:! -, roe If l ,{ l• ?r r MIT
',V
l?l Q'l+S i?'4 ` y? __ {??' ?• ?F'!It -?' . _'_ iJ lr %i t `, c,
`? ' t? t - ? a t f '' l ? ? , i \ I I \ _ 4 -. ,l 1??. _ + 1 \t i t©+ 4 t` r/+ , ry= jJ 1 7 \ :\- `
•\?' l? ? 1 \ , t ,t `!_ ` .a ,`i^ \ i \ '\r?? +i ?'=.i' -'-`-°,r r' _ -? r J' C \ ? ?. 'i -- .` 1Jt 7
`,
I(1 ? , ( f
-??'N IT-
ti
;?'
\V 5t ti r r, t 1 j y 1 / fi,`-_ ,?1-=? f i -_l i ?---^•\ 4 f `"?
!may' - L' t? `\. .. 4 , \° 1 r ! r j?, `•_/.. 'l- g/ ,`\ ,? t 1
`!1•r?:^? ? v ??" i ' ?' I r?`/ t? vA S ,r . ?, i 1 LCr
-} ll -? %
`?` ?? '??_-; ?\ `.` - s dtt ti _ } ?? ? Badge #104
Cb'
r'? s t• Z `
....i?:t4C/ /?
/' /rrYj?'1 (\ r` ti
` r \
rrr r, ... f ! . Jrf', 4 i ^r t f k \\?' r S 1? //7
If
1..'r, rr ? ? ? A . •'= _ FFr l /?` r C.? r 1 ' / ?? t ? ; rj? ; J y '!t\, t
f / `' ,I?,'?.\ 1}ti ?/S ?` ?'"/?(, ?`/ / ?r ....._._ {?, { ??_'?. 7• N • ? / `' 1 j r I ?,I } 1 t I` ` t \.
Cem ??' " ! i,I e + f
~ ??'` - 71` !r \ / _, Pipe
?i'00
\\ = - !tip }r?? ! -h?j
New Hope
r1262 t1
'}fi `` 7 it _) __ / {yl i / ??Q r`fr il`? `t i] ??? t ,% • r`t`O - ?'` _ , ,1 jl^1{,` rt\ if , ,? ' / ,_ _
7? fr t. a, , j ( ` s l 4,M1? v _ IN- !//'r ! J I v
-,{?rj? ,\!', k_-. i {!/' "``,`? ' _?, f ,- +- i? ,' Tom'%/• ?r f -5
1400 125it••
y
~
- l t ` ill \ ,a= ??.. `=1 !'r ?? ? .1 1? !%, a'? t "• ! ^` \_? _ `• -4 _?
y \ l , { ,. _ .\ • - -?.? ? .- i , it ' , L _ ?---cam ` t ,- { . l.r ?.. 1\ J' ? ? r „_
? , ?t } t ., ?I / _ ? , ? 4 r-?- ^, 4, It 1 J ? _r `? r;•r? ? ? , ? ? ?' { ? 1 ?? t ,t rlc \:/'/ 1 't y
?'
. _r_
BM
{,, ,<<,{ t 1{ ;` 6,-
'I,,
=(? yti } " t{t -`?vyr - r ) t Ott>>I) lr} ?-,- "? ` 1"??
lW l I k l \\, - , ''r _ / 1 /, ?r • 1 41 .J
9c9`.I'
280 ?J• -? M1 e?/
S
?,? -'?t -v v?v A'?l_ ?f ', l _ '? ;"?'=ice ?-?,?`,, '??? ?r? ? l i ' - ? , , ,• ?s // _?"""?
Name PURLEAR Location 036 2033261° N 0813256081' W
Date 9/3/2008
Scale 1 inch equals 2000 feet
2
1 Bridge #104 on SR 1353, Wilkes
2. Upstream view at station 13+09.
3 Outlet view of wet pipe at station 13+09
3.
s

77
(D
0
0
CD
0
a
-o
CD
Q
0
v
N
00
N
O
O
co
00
cn
w
D

N
D
z
v
ao
D
G7
N

0
O
z
n
m
m
m
D
v
D
r
r
I@
N
r
CD
D
C)
X 709
N
FA
En
w

n
CD
D -?
< O
m
D O
0 D X
m -r -i
m z
N X
m rm- o
D D z
N 0
N
m m
D
_ - N
° -n
z
• O
O C7 ?
m
4 C7
m
m

.::E
?o
1 T
o
0
0
V1 W m
m oo x
cn °
m n
m o z -?
n z o 0
? o
m o ?
(1) m sl? m C)
° m w
= o
i z m Q
G- Q
I ? g
n _ r
r r-
r
n I
TI
TI ?
n m
?
n
m
m
x
n m
co
m z
° o
m
0
n
0
o
?y 7
M w-
0 0 0
o
?r
r n m
m _<
`? ® ® <
-m rim
amp
n Op
? O V) x
e n m
xv ? cnx
n r
® m
N
X'
CD
0
CD
CD
CD
v
0
a
0
N
00
N
O
0
co
0

-- 33660 ICONSTI CENTER LINE
ROAD: SR 1353 STANTON LOOP ROAD PROPOSED RiW
COUNTY: W/LKES NEW EDGE PAVEMENT
- - - - EXISTING EDGE ROADWAY
TYPE: WET PIPE SURVEY STA 13+09
SCALE: 1' = 10' SHEET l OF I DATE: 7128108 ?1 NEW PIPE
J EXISTING PIPE
STREAM NAME. UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO NORTH PRONG LEWIS FORK CREEK r
RATING C
3' AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH
STA /3+09
--------------------------------------
--------------
4 Q
------ ----------------- ---------------------------------------
EXISTING PIPE SIZE. 50'x 60'
NEW PIPE SIZE- 70'x 60' W/ HEADWALL PIPE TO BE LAID °ON A 75 SKEW WITH 4.37 FALL
NOTE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES NOT SHOWN
SURVEY DATE: 7125108
CONDUCTED BY. RAID
DRAWN BY. ID
wetpipedetail dgn 07/28/2008 09 34 27 AM

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No B-4323
WBS No 33660.1.1
State Project No 8.2761401
Federal Project No BRZ-1353(2)
A. Proiect Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Wilkes County Bridge No 104 on
SR 1353, over North Prong Lewis Fork Creek The replacement structure will be a new
bridge of approximately 100 feet in length and 30 feet in width The bridge will have a 22
foot travelway accommodating two 11 foot lanes, and will have 4 foot offsets on each
side Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1)
The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately 8 feet above the existing
grade at this location
The approach roadway, extending approximately 398 feet from the north end of the
bridge and approximately 365 feet from the south end, will be widened to a 22 foot
pavement width providing two 11 foot lanes Five foot turf shoulders will be provided on
each side (eight foot shoulders where guardrail is included) The roadway will be
designed as a Rural Local facility with a 60 mile per hour design speed
B. Purpose and Need:
Bridge No 104 has a single-span superstructure composed of a low steel truss The
bridge has a timber deck on steel I-beams and stringers The substructure is composed of
two end bents of timber caps on timber posts and sills The bridge carves one lane
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 219 out
of a possible 100 for a new structure The bridge is considered structurally deficient and
functionally obsolete according to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines
Inspe6tion records show a structural appraisal rating of 2 out of 9 (structurally deficient)
The bridge is also functionally obsolete due to a deck geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9
The bridge is therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program
Steel truss bridges typically reach a stage where deterioration due to corrosion and
normal stresses cause the bridge to become impractical to maintain Past a certain degree
of deterioration, these bridges are programmed for replacement, as is the case for this
bridge The bridge is nearing the end of its useful life

i
3O Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings
a Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint) scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
d. Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4 Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities
5 Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas
6 Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of
right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts
7 Approvals for changes in access control
8 Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predommantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
velucle traffic
9 Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users
10 Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic
` 11 Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community
12 'Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
Studied Offsite Detour:
considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time traveled by then
average road user resulting from the offsite detour The studied offsite detour for this
project would include SR 1353 and SR 1300 The detour for the average road user would
result in one half minute additional travel time (0 4 miles additional travel) which falls
within the "Acceptable" category for the duration of construction expected on this
project After consideration of other factors, including emergency medical services
comments, school busses, the low volume of traffic, concurrence by Division 11, and
potential costs, it was decided to utilize the offsite detour
According to the Transportation Director for the Wilkes County School System, there are
two busses crossing the bridge twice each day The school system will not have a
problem functioning utilizing an offsite detour during construction
Emergency Management Services states that temporary closure of the road should not
create undue delays
Alternatives Discussion:
Only one "build" alternative was studied The "do-nothing" alternate is not practical,
requiring the eventual closing of the road as the existing bridge completely deteriorates
Rehabilitation of the existing bridge is neither practical nor economical
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions
ECOLOGICAL
YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource9 ? X
(2) Does the project involve any habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? ? X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish?
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of X
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X ?
(5) Will the project require use of U S Forest Service lands?
11 X
4
4
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered mmor9 X El
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control'? X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
-
and/or land use of adjacent property? F
1 _x
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness9 ? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/ or Transportation Improvement Program (and is, -
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990) X ?
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? 17 X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
-
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? F
1
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
d X ?
an
will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility?
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic and
environmental grounds concerning aspects of the action? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X El
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
l
bl
f
e
igi
e
or or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? F1 X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ? X
important to history or pre-history
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
- histonc sites or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
-
of the U S Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? 1 X
F
7
C. CE Approval
TIP Project No B-4323
WBS No 33660.1.1
State Project No 8.2761401
Federal Project No BRZ-1353(2)
Protect Description:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No 104 on SR 1353, over North Prong Lewis Fork Creek,
in Wilkes County Replacement will be at approximately the same location with a new
bridge of approximately 100 feet in length and 30 feet in width The bridge will have a
22 foot travelway and 4 foot offsets on each side Traffic will be detoured over existing
secondary roads dunng construction
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
X TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
Approved
C
?Uate Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
projectPlanni L
Date g n,it Head
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Date Project Planning Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only
Date
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS:
Wilkes County
Bridge No. 104 on SR 1353
over North Prong Lewis Fork Creek
Federal Aid Protect No. BRZ-1353(2)
State Project No. 8.2761401
WBS No. 33660.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4323
1. Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Project Development &
_ Environmental Analysis Branch (Permits), Resident Engineer:
Bridge Demolition:
The superstructure of Bridge No 104 consists of single-span low steel truss The bridge
has a timber deck on steel 1-beams and stringers The substructure is composed of two
_ end bents of timber caps on timber posts and sills The timber deck and steel structure
components can be removed without any falling debris The end bents are not in the
stream, and will be removed without dropping debris into the water Therefore, using
standard demolition techniques, the entire Bridge No 104 will be removed without
dropping components into Waters of the United States During construction, Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed
Moratorium on In-Water Construction:
A smallmouth bass construction moratorium has been requested by the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) The recommended moratorium runs from May I to
July 15 Since this moratorium is not a regulatory requirement, it will be honored if the
project schedule allows (Note that work activities outside of the stream are not affected
by this recommendation )
Greensheet, Programmatic Categoncal Exclusion, May 2005, Page 1 of 1
Studied Detour Route
41 0, "on c NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
WILKES COUNTI
REPLACE BRIDGE No 104 ON SR 1353
OVER NORTH PRONG LENTS FORT. CREEK
B-4323
Flsure l

o°
= r77
Mn
ll
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resou
State Historic Preservation Office
David L S Brook, Administrator
Michael F Easley, Governor
Lrsbeth C Evans, Secretary
Jef rey J Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Arcluves and History
October 28, 2003
- MEMORANDUM
TO Greg Thorpe, Ph D , Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
- FROM David Brooke
RFC,
a
? m
?2
95C`_Jys S 8RA1??N
Division of Historical Resources
SUBJECT Replacement of Bridge No 104 on SR 1353 over N Prong Lewis Fork Creek,
B-4323, Wilkes County, ER03-0911
On September 4, 2003, Sarah McBride, our preservation specialist for transportation projects,
met with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of
the minds concerning the above project We reported on our available information on historic
architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations DOT
provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting
Based on our review of the information discussed at the meeting, we offer our preliminary
comments regarding this project
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware that Bridge No 104 is a truss
bridge Please have an architectural historian evaluate this bridge and submit the
findufgs to us
There are no recorded archaeological sites within the proposed project area Based on our
present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be
eligible for hsting in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project
construction We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in
connection with this project
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments
www.hvo.dcrstate.nc.us
Locanon Moiling Addrw Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N Blount St Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699.4617 [phone] • 733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N Blount St Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] .715-4801
SURVEY d& Pts1NNINC 515 N Blount St Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] •715-4801
October 28, 2003
Page 2
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Fhstonc Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763 In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number
cc Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
i1i.STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F EASLEY
GOVERNOR
June 1 1, 2004
Mr David L S Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
-4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Dear Mr Brook
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECR-°TAPv
RE B-4323, Wilkes County, Replace Bridge No 104 on SR 1353 over North Prong
Lewis Fork Creek, State Project # 8 2761401, Federal Aid # BRZ-1353(2), ER
03-0911
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is conducting planmng
studies for the above-referenced project On October 28, 2003, your office sent a
memorandum to the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch of
NCDOT which requested that an architectural historian evaluate Bridge No 104 for
National Register eligibility
As you are aware, our office is currently administrating a statewide historic bridge survey
to determine eligibility for all bridges on the state highway system built before 1961 In
July 2002 Wilkes County Bridge No 104 (built circa 1925) was identified in the first
phase of the survey as warranting further research as an example of a Warren pony truss
bridge The bridge had been determined not eligible in the 1995 truss survey conducted
by NCDOT and your office The 2002 report stated that the bridge, based on its type and
age, merited further evaluation with similar truss bridges throughout the state
Since that time the architectural historians who are conducting the survey have
undertaken additional research, visited the site, and compared this bridge to its peers
across the state It is their conclusion that Bridge No 104 is not eligible for the National
Register because it is an undistinguished example of the once-common pony truss bridge
of the early twentieth century The survey identified seven Warren pony truss bridges in
the state, exclusive of a few that have been relocated and exist outside the state highway
system, and more than twenty Pratt pony truss bridges The technologically significant
examples of this type are earlier, longer, and uruquely or well-detailed examples, not
those that have common details and alterations, such as changes to connections like
MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE [phone] LOCATION
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH W ILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WESSITE WWW DOH DOT STATE NC US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Bridge No 104 Those that have documented dates of construction and known builders
are also more significant Wilkes County Bridge No 104 is an altered and undocumented
example of its type/design
I have attached the bridge survey form that provides details about the bridge and its
setting After reading this information, I concur that Wilkes County Bridge No 104 is
not eligible for the National Register, primarily due to its lack of integrity and
ubiquitously employed design
Thank you for your consideration and cooperation If you have any questions concerning
this letter please feel free to contact me at 715-1620
Sincerely,
1
Mary Pope urr
Historic Architecture Section
Attachment
Cc (wi attachment) Dennis Pipkm, P E, Project Engineer, PDEA
John Sullivan, P E , Federal Highway Admuustration

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HISTORIC BRIDGE INVENTORY REPORT LICHTENSTEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC
Bridge iD No: 960904 County: WILKES

Location: 1 MIS JC7 SR130CY
Bridge Name:
UTM: 17 470531 400635 Owner STATE
Facility Carried: SR 1353 (STANTON LOOP)
Camed/Featum Intersected: SR 1353 OVER NORTH PRONG LEWIS FORK CREEK
Type: PONY TRUSS
Material: STEEL
Railing Type PIPE RAILINGS
Date of Construction:1925CA
Div: 11 Crty-
Design: WARREN (BOLTED)
# Spans 1
Alteration: 1955,2002
Designer/Builder- BRIDGE MAINTENANCE UNIT (1955)
Length 77 Width: 11 6 # Lanes- 1
Source: NCDOT Bridge Maint Unit
Current National Register Status of Bridge: Not Previously Evaluated
Local, Determined Eligible, or NR Historic Distnct/Status
Name/Date:
Located in Potential Historic District/Historic Context? No
Adjacent to Identified or Potential Historic Properties)
No National Register, Study List, D O E , locally designated, or previously surveyed properties appear to be located
adjacent or close to the bridge
Inventory NR Recommendation: Not Eligible
Setting/Context-
The bridge tames a 1 lane road over a stream in a rural area of active farms with fields or woods at the adjacent
quadrants Beyond the NE quadrant is a period farmhouse Another period farmhouse with outbuildings is beyond the
SW quadrant- Well to the south on SR 1353 is a modem house
Physical Description:
The 1 span, 77' long and 11 U wade, steel Warren with verticals pony truss bridge is composed of all built-up members
The bndge is bolt connected and according to state records was relocated here in 1955 The torch bum, ire evident at
the gusset plates from when the original nvet connections were cut to disassemble the truss and move it here The
truss members are all riveted built-up members of standard steel sections, mostly of paired angles with lacing, battens,
or cover plate The bridge has roiled floorbeams, bolted to the verticals below the lower chords The floorbeams carry
rolled steel stnngers and a wood plank deck Earlier railings (ca 1955), which were state-standard 2 rail high wood
plank railings, Wert, replaced by 2 rail high welded pipe railings in 2002 The bridge has one unusual detail, angle
subties, connected to the upper chords and diagonals, in the next to last panels at each end of the bridge The angles
are connected to gusset plates with hex-head bolts, while all other bolts in the bridge are square-headed The best
available evidence is that this is a later alteration to the truss pattern intended to stiffen the diagonal
Summary of Significance:
The original date of construction, builder, and location of the traditionally composed met connected Warren pony truss
bridge are not documented by state records A date of ca 1925 for the truss is appropriate based on style The truss
is documented as having been moved to this location in 1955 by state forces The original riveted field connections
were cut off, as evidence of scamng from torches at the gusset plates, and the nvets were replaced by bolts when the
bridge was reassembled The bridge is not technologically significant because of the alterations affecting integrity of
design and matenals, as well as the lack of documentation for its original appearance, location, and fabricator
The Warren design is named after British engineer James Warren, who along with his partner Willoughby Monzani,
patented it in 1848 The design is distinguished by equal-size members and the ability of some of the diagonals to act
in both tension and compression Verticals can be added for increased stiffness Warren truss bridges did not gain
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HISTORIC BRIDGE INVENTORY REPORT LICHTENSTEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC
Bridge ID No 960104 County WILKES Div 11 City
popularity until after 1900, mainly because they were best suited to riveted field connections, not the pinned
connections preferred by American engineers in the 19th century American attitudes toward the Warren truss changed
due to the perfection of field riveting equipment and a growing realization that pinned connections were subject to
fatigue and contributed to undesirable stress reversals
The Warren pony truss type/design was very popular for highway spans of between 45' and 100' long in North Carolina,
as in most states, from about 1900 to 1930 In North Carolina, county governments purchased the trusses from bridge
companies for use on local roads The state highway department, established in 1916, preferred standard reinforced
concrete and stringer bridges, and made only limited use of truss technology After the state took over the
maintenance and ownership of all county roads and bridges in 1931, many county-built truss bridges were replaced
because they were considered too narrow or under capacity Replacement programs continued through the mid 20th
century, and many truss bridges were by-passed or relocated to more lightly traveled roads by the state's bridge
maintenance unit This bridge was relocated here in 1955
The historic bridge database currently lists seven Warren pony truss bridges, exclusive of a few additional examples
that have been relocated and survive off system, and more than 20 Pratt pony truss bridges (May 2003) The
technologically significant examples are the eadier, longer, and uniquely or well-detailed examples, not thole thdt have
common details and alterations, such as changes to connections Those that have documented dates of construction
and known builders are also more significant than those with undocumented dates and unknown builders This bridge
?s an altered and undocumented example of its type/design it is not historically distinguished by its technology or
setting/context
Bibliography
NCDOT Bndge Maintenance Unit File
NC Dept of Cultural Resources Survey & Planning Branch Records
Clay Gnffrth and Debra Kraybrll Bevin North Carolina's Metal Truss Highway Bndges FHWA, NCDOT, and NC
SHPO,1995
Condit, Carl American Budding Art The Nineteenth Century New York, 1960 pp 109-118
Comp, T Allan and Donald Jackson Bridge Truss Types A Guide to Dating and Identifying Nashville, TN American
Assoc for State & Local History, 1977
Boundary Description and Justification for Eligible Bridges
Plan Reel/Position /
Reviewed By/ Date JPH (6/03)
Notes

COUNTY:
a mz
N K.
N
ti
N
D
z
0
A
w
e
mm
z
°o

In
-?
D o

(n
-+
D n

N
-i
D v

In
-i
D o

N
--I
D 0
n
(A
?
D

W

co
T

CD
K:

Z

n

Q1

I

R7

r
w

O
_
T
+
0
o
n
Lo Ol
+ Zn
f

A
D

N
co N
+

co
co
N
A +

N

Ow +

0
A

N
L" a
W #
N u N A

0
O
D?

D
O LD
0
O
a)

O

A w

O
LP

W

tD

0
O
N

W 10
0
0

j,

A
tD
0
O

O

W tD
O
O

M
^I

W ID
O
O

Ul
-

N 0
tD
tp

W

J
O
O

'?
N

Ul tD
O
0

w
Ul

N co
tD
tD

cD
co

tD
Z
O

1
=
N
Ln
m -
Lo
A -
W O_
N N
61O F N N
d tp A
Ol A
N N
D
W
N
tD
O W
N LZ
tD
A W
Lj
N
co
Ln W
L4
N
A
O W
CA
N
W
O W
W
N W
W
tD
m W
O
tD
co W
L4
N
?!
A W
L4
N
tD
ID W
N
A
ID W
(il
w
A
D
Vl
-I

O
(T a
mOD O
w
OJ N
A-o Ln
a AD -J
w O
aD A
tD
A -1
U1
A
1 1 m
to
Ul
1 O
N
(,o O
N^I
r p? r r r r
Z
N
O m
N G? O
a7 o
UI ?1 0
N ?7 o
Ul v
O
-1 -1 Z '1 ? -1 ? D Z D ? Z
D v a D v D -n -i
z
0
F's
0 -o

Z o

.
Z ?,g

Z o
0
+
t
+ ++ +
- +
-- + Z
'
N m _
cn
m i i
A 1
CO 0
) m -q
C)
C)
0 n w
O O -I N A O W N N
#
co
O O
1 In
1 ? A Ul
lD tD tD tD tD tD

O O O O O O O
cn N d A W w :10

O N m O O L _
to W N A D] O
ul U1 W lD Ln A
O O nl A
FA w w w w w
N IW N N N N D
O
O
A -4
w m
LD m
N In
co N
0 O N O w
A W O N cn O

1
WBS 33660
Y
'E --at_
p k / PI NC l4151
9.
? ? to
'C w P01.
m
o AD?oO /+n o°/ SAa 70,
m a S a+ QO 00
O a 'O n (? I 70,00
.p m
m a
°
z 4F a
rn Z yyo
N Z
r
r H k O ?? 1
r4 mg
p
D
-i
r y
z Cc)
Sx
w
o f C
x 11,00
ES #104 W O O tP 01
C + O ^ a N O C. -^ F
(A O + O r• N O t"' N 00 o z O X to :' u fJ1 /
O ? a N r
O 'tr > y
ci
\?to2
k v x rh oD°? 12+004-
I °o So?S
r \
1 ?.
c
v° 'i PT Sto 12+3854 rt
xm ? 11 ? ? Los
O m Am 0O?
F n Eo
k> H c o l Lg ??d?,0
X O + `'
+ v I m o+, w>, C`
`Z I > 13+00 -L- '
N /
NBI Q'2 4'W
,? - - 39 05' O
O 0
o° ?o C
p \ / /
to I ; N p/ ;'n to Q
(-u ol rM 00 Z ?. ?/

? S6gy6
? CR\ >
52°
e z m
/38 83 N m d 14+00 -L-
X X-?
II Z I k
a
O
m
+
v
0
z
O
0
wd?
u 4
?N
G =
D o
:L1 C
H
m m ?
n
A

N

?
N ? p
T
V ?
\ J D z m
D u
n
m o
o

A ?
° O

n
v
c
G
D
a7 m
O Z

(A um O

<
m
?
K
Ql

H
1 v
Q
:z
_
I < x
In p <
r

t, m(AC) -,Q
tl J o m--10m
-

X DDCo
l
D
?
4 .m 5 -i -if
F

"
O ?
o Z W
O gNo
V4 -4

Ia I .) (-n
C) g fa (/1
Z
m LA
m ® C7 0
a d Z z Mo
P ®
?,®
!g .540 F-1
a = "M(D s X1 g C)
m (n70 L lD m ?
?
w
I
C )Z0 ® Z Ul r
X00 C:
? 29
C)
.
o
M7 DH o N o
•
m?
o 0
p ", _
W
29 p °m I D m m Na
M
to 'o ?! a PRONG
2D n
LEWIS C?
? [D ? r
m
?° m N m m 0 11
m I
\Cp \ O D\
\\ \ O 0
1
\ n m + u to c+ilrn W 15+00 -L-
o
\ \ O co
y? 1 \ a
D A _ \
%N?w
m to y vaw±m
o
?z I° m wo p
N d? 3: I PC Sto 15+448 r- '1 U. K)
D m
.1 tN_ C V)
na
CD m? ?? 7I DC QOV?
Zs 1?1 O]7 I inD + -?RZ
C) I
to o I oD ?Eo 16 100 -L-
cow _ f o \n
mQ' X it s Z ?r2
U3 v
CI bl m
th W + N O p00 -/ n :0 D 0-
0
?'0 O I O + O ?N T O„" O C
Z to ,w, to 0 < \
G?Z x+ I y ?o°otw„mn°+ m
0 0z;
N'o O H X a N
Z / \
FA rI
C!i G) fA -,yy -1 y?
a - mD
r mZ
I

o ?o
Q
N N f
I ?
(yMf?
V 1r
N
oz=L4
? n
O N n
u.v 0

N w;oz
4°?" 9.

m
m N
r mow
F G
I
r ! A

-?
0

0
-4
10
m co omZrn w
C
ns II a
''" o;-v o
no0Z C l
o ?3g-
D? Qmma .
n
rm-p A-dtn v
CD
_
d 0` C.n+ C

GnpC
D
A
C
m 70

mcn
-.
N+ V
cc (D
,
iI
t
o mw
w
yyz
c
i

?'M
?`
o
o
a
-
Z
ocn ()
CA
D?w C Co
r-W rm?
o
1b+8096 17aoa -L-
. =
Nm
1 ('?
? A
f-VJ
? N
Z; >1 Z fJ
Xf .," N W m
1 1. el ' R° t+.1 A ? .18 ?. QQ '1r
1 ..11 N
-DOD
A v
? w
a rn
n
204 >
?
Ia
rn
!t X CA
D 5
Q
CAD
n A
?, tpN 18+b 00
pal sic Nmo-
14 24??
1 q ? iivw
-1
IZN k
?ktI
120 o _1- 71°20-.W
12? ` 383 )IR?W
OUNTY** W1
a
z
Z
m
N
N
Z "? Ol to d W N ^
°n 2° yOm T ?HOm mr,om OTA zmm
HD Z? Zf m mSN? mx^- Ulr o"r
A D -0 m H
mH^m r m zt H , HZ '-m mHm
OyuO No p HTz yTZ Oo >Z°
P m?? W fZrlmSy mmpH Hm H
n m m OH ZDH
m °vom Om Z xOCm mOCm NN n°N
pSy?7 ym y m?Mm pAm mn n m
c H N N z mr Z mr n m ZD
Im r<r/n ZD Ni mV°n M- 0y n°-1
m° OH m ompA O°D m A
o n Inm r ToO1A omoN am ymz
Dm Am OC H m<ZH Hz <DH
O Z Z Z O Z y A
mH^y Hy n xr00 A?On =V1 OZZ
xz? N H C Z T Z H M-.- m m m y 2Z p 0
N;UI° <O Z pKK m?JAX? Uln^
mCON y^ n n-MM >-mm 'DD -ImZ
m m Z=° ZS °p 0 0 TFpN
Dyn mD
r Zr' mm O -im-Im31 'm=m N T?
myN O m
m H UlzC V/zA C xa m?
C 0-
ODHm mm m rZV1p rZNO 00 ('im
HH 1Z °Z° ° mH mH rm OH
pZj my f,.l DACZiO D?CZip ZH pZ
Z0=0 00 mx HSmD H=mA ZZ yO
rT'D mn nmm°o c?mr°x ° o
Tmpm pm V 2fr z? p NA
yHm Zm rn-i M. Oro - Om
y m? p? D m ?-0 T Z p 0
OO'+ O-i r m ly mnH yS
yH A
O N m H m A x N
O z z a Z D f d m p N m F
n
no, -Z
Imo KO V1 ryy rNy m O
CZ
N D x x O co m m H
Dn z z z O M
Zx Cl y Ty D O
O m
.? m
O1 ili d U N ^ O t0 m
_ ?A nmN uIOH O o" O yOZx OTm7m
Z LG Oft `_ PTO X 11 -' A C-°m NO
o Nm INNC HSH O ry O n12NOn mm0
H OH Oym V0m C y °y r AHjm.Cl
< Zr rMVf Mm m r mOT D
Z NN mmD lye m m0 O Ayn nZn
O yT Ozm HrH N m m O
m O m 0 AH CmH
H 2r, ZH ZO? DN RHl OC'H) 'DDA
m Nm x HZ ]] yD 9Zn
0 z rmc mH? '? mo N mr ..r omr
?n m rmcm
° ?Az x< n m m
°O m Ipyfo °pNm Z -zim m m.Tmlm mmm
z z zP, ym N in0 0 < NN< Z
y x -? zH on n
I z Noo mmm ov pmH °c n?
x ° m-min °C' nyz oz
A Q, -'0 -C, o z -? o o,.,T ZMT
m ??r mzo z oo H ?zo mxoAm
o z ?m o mmp "'?
y mmN Np0 O Oy A V1 Dfm*1 m-im
m y °yH mHZ Nm N Ony HOy
p <SZ n-N x til Cm TD
X n HZ K: nom N Z nmm°
zmn< ryy y --> z °m_0
C H ° mm 9 S r HA'"' y<N
z m A?- ° m x cn n
mm °mmm m m
m o mnm m'?m
?ovn HH n z rrr' om
ro m Nmmo y o< H m yZ<
0 0 H T N
y<
m rH Z'I m Vt mr~in C y
a O O H
00 D H p z m D O O F
+ o
c m mo z wiz
z z Z
mn z yrm m Ho...
H c? yo mom n MN zN
T Z n?°, -im
"
D NS AH D xm
O mm z n z_ m
H m m H Op H
I m
G H N ( T
r ?
r °
o T
o
O n
z O
O H
y 0
M O
O T
m °
o x
H j
m
n n
x :O
m o
? o 0
Z T D I
n c r
x m
o m
m n
"; -v
p y
n--
?e m
H?? O I
O ?l
tZ yp O
? ?r A N
m N
m
m, o
?x O N
?m N
H i
xy
ry_d

p°
n m
0f0+11m+1=O= f H
MOH, m HOm ?x
HZ y H <H
DHG7?ZC r0 rVt
-immltOZ MoD nN
-i mm Z %t1 r -1
m°nm?H HBO HC
Z
nmmmm< rmT OO-I
OHO°AO mZl Np
zp ax Hmx
om
nzz zvnA ^'NX ?x
m npH r,.., y n
r -? 3lnnm NON nN
00 Z CMx Ony mm
HHNmom xrZ mm
mm 31 yn yT mrn ;VZ
zz mmZ°HO l^zm Om
y H ]! ?m _Z:0 mN
00 mmmvAam zlm Nz
N? n mOH mD Z1mN n0
D DDM=iO °?D jH
N Z
Z°m?.yT .ODD N
Ol H Zir?Sm rniAm On
O D m
p? N ?T1DNr ll ZfTm1 .Tl
0 0
ov r n x
OOO 31A m H T Z
H?fmo 0
tzit ?Zif H m HZm °Z31 m
S N r Z ;
n Dnr H= lAAp E
F m r m n m O
ZNmOy DO 2
r o m p H O D m
r?Npc z n O
m O C y r m z
M y x m Z O m
mmo°c
D A H
m
° ? co
<
O A
cn n -v
? - ? 99 mom
-

OJ ;9 0 nco
z
i
D
4 ?
Z7 f
H
b
O C) O -?
H -?
a Zw m z
O OW? N Z
®
m m o
a m H r
s m o g m0 ?$
a
m m
m #P H
4 = HmO$ g c-) ?-.

o m ro
-i c-7 Z O ®®
Z +
Cn F-i
r-
m
C)
' C)
?u ? m
a
m o o

X E N a 7Z ® 0

'EKES #I04
O
T'l
H
F-
m
lz?
O
z
® b
z ?
T
z ?
D
O
M Z
<2
II? Ila
N d
O
D
117
N
CYI
O
O
+ T
O
O
1-`
+
O
O
N
+
O
O
w
+
O
O
O
O
(,1
O
O
+
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O 1
y9
O
?C
z
"O ? to
m
< 1
N 7JN
O ? p
m
mpn
nr
NE N
^ m H
Hr
H
vm
co
(i
N
O
I
m
n
D
O
m
o
O
R
S #33660
N N N W
co co O
O O O O

/ y O
D
/ n
N °
Z
+ N
O A
O C
/ ° n
/ O
Z
1 ?

Ra y v
m m H
m ? r r
y

D
n / ?

N a

+ D
m f
O
y I a
ti
of {
.1
? N H
rn ,
O ?O
N r r,_, m N w .D
m m T + " U1
ui / Z
n m z
n
I m m ? `^ x
y
/ v+ ^ D m
.o
+ H
+ Z
tm0 ~
?-

o N N
m

?
w
- - - - - - - - - - - --

r
^ y
N y
m
d n
'^ I O

IA m
N I
n ° m
a
D I
n v m
N
I
n
N m
N i
m
IF' vz
N O
y O
D Z
V1
tP y
y ?
c
UI n
O y
I ° M
O °
z

•
v
n°
m D

mz
1
°m
K CO G
N
0 G N D
p
W (/1 ? ti

W N

? n
z
0 0
>
A

w
N -A
m

n n ?-
o H
m
> o lam'.,)
? N
6 co
oe N
O Y
O
a
C
a
Q
0
c
C
CD n
i
F
F
O
N
_
(D
N
O
-1 I
m

a N

N ??
=? H
C
W Z N
e ?N
m D

i O N

p
Z
N v
o

; = m
oz n >
o m -? A
a =^ H ---- - -
o -
O mA 0
<
i mo

H?
z

m

v v?
'o
-T1 m
N oA
zDv o

a zC

?D (D
tim

K D
?m
D

r
N m? N
v
Z ?
?
? H
ON
N D T
TN
1
`m D o
O C)
?c
o z
a n
j N

J?

? w
o
N
D
<
N
hd"?

J J ? t

l
_ N
:ZE AO <
w s' m C m
M
I
i Z
- H I = i
- V) --i z -< A v m y U) A A m y
o m w m cn w cn -+ o m U) -> cn
X f
I I ° z -1. m N m = m mm
` O G7
z
c?
r O I N m m
--4
z A -<
° -<
v,

" m =N

u r
O
m
n
u
-4;0
:O H
?cnA
w D MIN o m K: r -
I O N

w r
I m
n
TI I A
A
NC7? O I I om
O ? o
=
» o ® W ---A O N --q m co n
D C 0 I H C f
N

)
i m D H Z L
O f--I --I m m
(/1 I ?
!7 m x> ?N U ?W ? nDH

z a
-4 O 0 n C I m
? N K
U)
mz --I 7u H?
b = D C g? -T, I I °
? O (7 L7 D

m» °o ? 9® O O Z i IN m m Z z a AZ M>--4
a N
C ® 51 C/ ._
O
N H
(7 s ?^J S
F>

co
D
v C
59 H H
b D M ®P cn ?" cn

F--I

m
' 5g

o

rm
mm -+ z r n
o co c)

m
m N o
(/)70
poC
Htnm
0
# # S A

O
O
N O
N
O
m m HfnC7A -iv r?n? ocn -o
x a =0070 -<A mmoA -nc?
H A D CO AO (nACO AO
H x °cno o chino pno
H
? m

o °
n ? °--?ma - p7v '- : -omn m
c?
< H m A
oo?H D v Hm
In A
Z M A A
'? m N D O AD m 0
m

z SAtT1W

F- nX

F-A O•- ?
r

? X
N
-1
H
i
- ?= Wm z? ?°
v,m p
-K:
? ° nn H-Ua? -<mD
°
o z?"
' mm =?n '?'
= m
A
O
D W = D d H A
=
? In
H
m N

m
m

m D H

oz
-
z i0
m?

v
m D
c?
D
om n = n?-,i?.v =, z

m A --I
m -o
° z
H D H ADD H =
o,z-co mn Hmm? xz?
r-mo z y ° O
H
n
z?o
? ? n
z zH
`-'
A
O m A
N
m ? ?
0
m ? Y? r -i
wm r
?
H
p O n Z
G)C')
AN?m ?' D
mm
z m
=zr-W
0° oo
n
m m
cn
° D
m
mnm
0
N c
n NO?
Nm
=
N -? A
°m
3. -W 29