20170479 Ver 1_W-5203I PCN application package_signed_20170420

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GovE[uvoR
April 19, 2017
Joanne Steenhuis, NCDOT Coardinator
Division of Water Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 401 Water Quality General Certification 4088 for proposed improvements
at the intersection of SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road) and SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Road) in Brunswick
County, TIP No. W-5203I, Federal Project No. HSIP — ll30(12), WBS No. 45333.1.9
Dear Ms. Steenhuis:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing improvements at the intersection of
SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road) and SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Road) in Brunswick County The existing curve on
SR 1130 at the intersection of SR 1125 poses a safety risk to the traveling public and has a history of vehicle
departures, wrecks, or other accidents. The project proposes to realign SR 1130 at the intersection with SR
1125 thereby creating a safer roadway for the traveling public.
Please iind enclosed the pre-construction notification application (PCN) and permit drawings for the above
referenced project. The project has no wetland impacts and has minimal tributary/intermittent stream impacts
at one crossing located at Sta. 37+88 —L-.
Section 404 Permit: We are planning on proceeding with the construction of this project under the latest
USACE Nationwide 14. There are no impacts to special aquatic sites in conjunction with this project,
therefore written approval from the USACE is not required. However, we are requesting e-mail confirmation
from the USACE that we may proceed in accordance with the conditions of Nationwide 14.
Section 401 Permit: We are requesting Section 401 Water Quality General Certification 4088 from
NCDWR. We are providing this application to NCDWR for their approval. Authorization to debit $240
Permit Application Fee from WBS Element 4533.1.9 is hereby given.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Digi[ally signed by Mason Herndon
� ��DN:m-MasonHerndon,o-NCDOT,
u=�ivislon 3,
mail=tmherndon@ncdotgov,r—US
Da[e: 301 ].0410 0]34:55 -04'00'
Mason Herndon
NCDOT Division 3
Environmental Program Supervisor
ec: Brad Shaver, US Army Corps of Engineers
Enclosures
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNISION OF HIGHWAYS
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Locarion:
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE AAYNE, NC 28429-5647

o`'�� W A r�RQG
� r
� � a �
� , , , � o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑ No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Rd.)/SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Rd.) Intersection Realignment
2b. County: Brunswick
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Holdens Beach
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state W_52031
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Karen E. Collette, P.E.
applicable):
3d. Street address: 5501 Barbados Blvd
3e. City, state, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: Division 3 Environmental Unit
4b. Name: Mason Herndon
4c. Business name North Carolina Department of Transportation
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 5501 Barbados Blvd
4e. City, state, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 33.962642 Longitude: - 78.306483
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 4.0 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Shallotte Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw HQW
2c. River basin: Lumber
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project area is currently paved secondary roads. General land use is agriculture, residence and forested areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.075
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
122
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The existing curve on SR 1130 at the intersection of SR 1125 poses a safety risk to the traveling public and has a history
of vehicle departures, wrecks, or other accidents. The project proposes to realign SR 1130 at the intersection with SR
1125 thereby creating a safer roadway for the traveling public. The project includes grading, drainage, widening, wedging
and resurfacing at the intersection.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and excavators will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: SAW 2014-00450
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: SEPI
Name (if known): Jason Hales/Chris Dustin Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
May 27, 2014
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes ❑ No � Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
� Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres)
Tem ora T
❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts X Permanent
X Temporary
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width
Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet)
DWQ —
non-404,
other)
Site 1� P❑ T pipe/fill UT to Shallotte Creek � PER ❑ Corps 4 �
� INT ❑ DWQ
Site 1❑ P� T dewater UT to Shallotte Creek � PER ❑ Corps 4 20
� INT ❑ DWQ
❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
� P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts X Perm
X Temp

3i. Comments: Intermittent stream at outlet of pipe at Site 1.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type
Tem ora T
Site 1� P❑ T N/A pipe/fill trib <0.01
Site 1❑ P� T N/A dewatering trib <0.01
❑P❑T
❑P❑T
❑P❑T
❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent
X Temporary
4g. Comments: Tributary at inlet of pipe at Site 1, 48 sf temp, 28 sf perm.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Flo
Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list ali buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
3:1 fill slopes where practicable. wetland impacts were avoided utilizing best fit widening.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Strict implementation of sediment and erosion control BMP's will be utilized to protect waters of the US
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: minimal ermanent stream im act ro osed
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: If required from 1a, see attached buffer permit drawings.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Vegetated swales or alternative design will be used to the maximum extent possible in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES
permit No. 000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes � No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this intersection improvement, this project will neither influence
nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
GIS/Field Survey
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Review (see attached letters)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Digitally signed by Mason Herndon
DN: rn=Mason Herndon, o=NCDOT,
Mason Herndon ��^— �� °u=Division 3,
email=[e-mail], c=US 4/ 19/ 17
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Date:2017.04.20073424-04'00'
Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
11

Project Tracki�eg No. (Internal Use)
14-03-0014
Revised
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND
LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
�- This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
ProjectNo: W-5203I County: BrunSwiCk
WBS No.: 45333.1.9 Document
Type:
Fed. Aid No: HSIP-1130(12) Funding: State X Federal
Federal X Yes No Permit NWP 14
Permit(s : Ty e(s):
ProiectDescrintion: Grading, draining, widening, wedging, and resurfacing, as well as
curve realignment and pavement markings and markers for SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road,
SW) at its intersection with SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Road, SW) (no off-site detour
lanned . Pro�ect area ex anded June 2014.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTIONOFREVIEWACTIVITIES. RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 14 April 2014
and 12 September 2014 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects
(APE). Brunswick County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated an APE
of cultivated fields and woodland, including a number of developed properties ranging in date from the
1910s to the early 2000s (viewed 14 April 2014 and 12 September 2014). Nine properties contain pre-
1965 resources. The gable-end form and general massing of a circa-1915 house (#1391 Mt. Pisgah Road,
SW, Parcel ID 1990012302) suggest an earlier use (church, school, etc.), but extensive renovations have
diminished its historical integrity. A circa-1930 house stands on a large parcel intersected by the APE,
approximately 730 feet west of the SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road, SW) centerline well beyond likely project
impact (#1709 H& H Road, Parcel ID 21500004). Two circa-1940 resources (#1679 Empire Road, SW
and #1631 Cedar Grove Road, SW, Parcel IDs 19900127 and 1990011802}, as well as five dating to the
1950s and early 1960s (#s 1188, 1200, 1412, and 1457 Mt. Pisgah Road, SW, Parcel IDs 19900097,
19900098, 19900120, and 1990012202 and #1624 Empire Road, SW, Parcel ID 1990006402) are
unexceptional examples of their types. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed the absence of critical
historic structures/landscapes in APE (viewed 14 April 2014 and 12 September 2014).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE A VAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABL Y PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THEPROJECTAREA: APE extends north along SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road, SW) from the SR 1125 (Cedar
Grove Road, SW) intersection to just north of the SR 1133 (Empire Road, SW) intersection; south to just
south of the Wood Duck Street, SW intersection; approximately 1400 feet east along SR 1125 (Cedar
Grove Road, SW) and 500 feet west along SR 1133 (Empire Road, SW). The APE also extends 200 feet
to either side of the Mt. Pisgah, Cedar Grove, and Empire centerlines to encompass proposed
construction activities. Comprehensive architectural survey of Brunswick County is recent, dating to
2009-2010, and records no properties in the APE. County GIS/tax materials and other visuals illustrate
the absence of significant architectural and landscape resources in the APE.
Should the design of the project change, including the addition of an off-site detour,
nlease notifv NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review mav be necessarv.
Historrc Archileci��re and Lanclrcape.r NO SURV/iY 2EOU1/ZIiD jorm for Minoi• Transpor(alion Projects as Oualrfred in rhe 2007 Pragrammarrc Agreement.

SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road, SW), Brunswick County
W-5203I, WBS No. 45333.1.9
Tracking No. 14-03-0014
Page 2
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
� 2�
Date
Hisioric Archileclure and /,andscapes NO SURVGY RGQUIRGD form for Minor Transporlalron Projecls as Qualifred in the 2007 Programmatic Agreemenl.

.;,,
� , � i ; /, � o�e�� �,�+Y � Q,y�a � �� ' � _ z � i
1 � � 5 y � � i n'� . e.. L. � ._
�� � �� h r,--� �� f i � �` <ornp�v- I� - r - i L.
;., , --Y a � ��S
� • , -� t � , �� , _�'
N ` �, -- �:i.
��,.
t�v+v v'/ � ) i
a9� �� �' . -., i 1 g h' y,�q ��•..
.Qo ro�, - � �. ; l� �..,�-:P Y`Vid
j � I . � f I i � .. �`o �
� �
� ' �I � .`rl . i,:t1 � : �
� ��� �. i�� � c%
ian .�:' ita r _r. : '' �f �.
"�Wj� , Shall��tte � �,, �rc.��o r,i �y 1`. `or;. ��3
3 �r.
% f, - ���y��iC} � /' , � 7 : ` . . . � . � . . ' � . . 1-�!
�n. ._ ' !1 S�t:�rl/r..� . �.f�L
'�''N I'� - ��i
J J �° a
� 4-
y ��L BRUNSWICK % `'
�,��`'a`.^� I:r,.�,.; G<i�,.� c, :
`,�,,,, s��u��ini,
,,y �`�;
, a
. . f�iler.:on�.l �� �r �� � n � ` v� �ednr (3roao�KJ �Y
. � �nll C..,nr;,;� M�;' ~ � p - . ��'`c: . . � ,
S '� /�' � ��.'
\
� S� '- y, .
�a � � � - . � ` � .. `s % ., .
r� i -- �` . � � � I .
nD .� ��o, . R�;`�� si;,M,u�y. � .
=c` . �.i.::,,. yr` , q' !2d SN! � _ �.
� ' ��,Itt . . `� - Vont �
� ����``�� Pro ject Area �
� . �df � � F � _ __ .
� " � �� .�.Y..PdS`N N��„atib�'!I
� � f I�.�.��.�-l_ Fs,-,�.n�.�,tic t`�aS S�.
r �
., �..i'h.11 - -- . , � � : ,. ' . . , . . .
I�r� ,.�3r, I�i��uN4idtiV�' . . �. .� �.11� r1 - . � i�� ��I . � ' .
yr.;}•.;li-orn f(cl CV.'
1 iy Holden
each
� �,._.�: ,,
. . . �.e.k �� `� ' ��
<;�.�„
W-52031 WBS No. 45333.1.9 Brunswick County
SR 1300 (Mt. Pisgah Road, SW)/SR1125 (Cedar Grove Road, SW)
Base map: HPOWeb, nts
NCDOT — Historic Architecture
April 2014
Tracking No. 14-03-0014

K� ., � � ����� � ����
� �a � �'�t t �
S t
1 ' A1 '
� ' � I 'f
, Qj,� �� �;�`fr"`a
�'y#�.w < _+�i..f�� �' ��}i1,. ����� .
Y w�,
• 1 ` �✓ , y r � � Y ����� p
E�r .. � ��.�` � art : � �` �-`� %'�?t� ..
� . ' Q - � } 3 r `
„�,. � ��i , r ,. s .;� �.� �,,`�: ,��
�� ��" ��C���'��. �, �i� a � il: ��Nt:t B;�i
.. �fy'�F�\F .. � �:� '?�� f 7�t.n:�ti �F , �
<
k SY. 1 0 ��������+
Y �'�y ; ��, ;�� �,F
7��. a i
r . ��� � � ;� f � 'r �:,
ir�: •�--. . �1�, . Y r�, i� �.� K:
1 ' ,Py.
. �� y � �t1 . � 1 h3 ..- .� Y
� �', :V�.:Y.a. �:....�
�-���e��
+�'`�� Y ?, � �. a �:
r�y`' �� � ' •'�,' ,µ,� � .
�
�} � i ..
Y � 1 � �, � 1
C,+ , "; iN;yt-�;�AY�``+l I f :� --��,,�;�..`
Mf�+ ;r_L C .�g.. .�
s: .
r ..5:-.� � : 'r ', r' �r. ��tP -r.%'�
f�f` ,�'t �F � �I; -.¢'��i
rt
� ' ��tl �w� ^.��' � � � � �� �, 4�,?s.�,✓� v:
'r y
. ,6 �;�+N� �. �� -,.. �.. y�'.i' r _,:
����;� 4�� �
� ! ,�� ' ��- � �
, {.�
;,� ..+ �,, ; , ���_.�.
,
r Y �;, ��� ,.;� �••..
i�
* ^ t, l
� i��
I,��
�� � I
. , .' _� i �����
�. �� . � j I�t� .. . � '
�'��� � �. ; ; �' ; �? '���� � ��. _. .
ATi !� I' ' . I� ` :l � �Ylf;'��,
i �, } � h I �.JY1' -c ��{ �% ' i�
# ; ,,�. �,1 �( ��
�� � � � � � � - t ', i. � : �«
"'� � �w 4�
� ���''�� � 1 { 1 _ � '��,�
J',.Z �� .� � � 1 y i::n :f..
l � �� � �: � i � e j �, . r .,
� Y t
h '1 ¢ '`�
� � �
�`,,�",�' �r¢,�'�� �`�.� �
� �, y,E �.�r-
�:�'" ,-���.�.�s-;.�`� �.�. reyr� "ti ^�!y✓�Y� 'E� ��' ��`� �� .i?� -
�� r
( � � tz� � r � i 'j ,,� - , . i Yc k.
�a d • � . .y�
.��;� � � ��,:�,��;,,�����t. � �' � i#�e , { -�� �F
y�� ..� �'� ti ��iR"�+ .��f, t � •�� , �`a��, ; �
^� � . ."l � ._ M1 '� �� .T .� , � 4. ,� - ; � � �• '� `.
.dy :�, .�1't��w.{ ik���� q� ! I �.•1. ..�,i. � k��sr,� �� sY, S� � '
�l F � . � Ril y� * � i l .-5 y�;::� • � � ��,' . .
� .
`t�,Ta�, i{iA����� �,,�� � � ��� . �' �.
7.��� T` � ����� `� � r � ����� � . � .
t •" +''�. � e i "54'F 1�:�. '� i+ R � _ �I � � f .
1�� � �[� �a u .1 . , y' ..� � � •.§°"� 'k�}"�
' 1
1��. k u •T_ F� _� a V x
,������ � �,, � � , ` '� ;: .�
�•'�y�"+� ��y��1� � " � , �''� f ; ' ti . �:" ^"�}�,.�,,f`�x: �F:
'� Rt. , '�!� � . "i ��' � ". . � l7 { ...I�i' � 'S <� pu�l
` } r . � � ' ' z �:i �' r �� , �
� �,� �� r. �", � � �, N+� �t'
'r;���;•1 � A e• 4 y��, `.� � l ��_ 'S �� w�i � J i 4 g.
'�� *^`a ' � � .. y + �(F �r: ��} �.[�. � ���i .
�.�. a . .f c .+� ;,��p �`� n,-� .�+,` r,� p.--'�s, � �i5�'�F,�yr�'�•�y �4 �i
. ,�� � � '��' '�.. l� • - � �` � ��'� r �;� � � � , a ��i� r' ' ' •.4
��, . ,,, , �! �s
i,�F,'��j � � �► ac ,ti . � 3+ ,�' I �f/� ����T1 r��� r � � �t���� r ��' !i � �
x� f'"~� ,� � r�. �r���� � �., �'� � �� ��,` r "•,,
�•, ��,: � :�. �r ' � ;.. j� �.,� � �.�',�.... k S � , ''�' � . �� ,� a ��, � � `
� c� ��, { �•(�� � 1f-' I � i 4 S'ry� I i �t� -' t� �i
� �-- 7G�*� y����vM t.1�:'ri�' 'i' �!` ttc^:.'� 1,���-.. �..... _1 �-rF {' �� I�I�� � ���4'���c - ��
P4�5 �� P �l^ l�, �G �'i�z;� �'rn ' t : � �' I� '�' � rL � � c� �, �� `�,�^`. '�� � 4 �f 1�+ �?'�'ri'�
� � F�, >.��r� r � rw a�i' h�C ��`g � 4y °''� ' ,�� �,�,��i'�
� �. E � v.� « '� ` , y ,
yR�i �` ` ti, �'� r � r�'� � � ':�
"�I�it•��.�c '��``v�i?� 7 : �• �Vt�. ,1}��i 3�'� �i w,�' `F '' * ��'4�,, y���y �
r`�� �i �,,.d�� � v� - �.� ;i � ,�,'� , ly�, }�..'� .',' i�' .r''4,•tA�i
k'�`r„�?'� �� frf. �,'i � r��` .` }I' �_J r tt �.s � I1�. . t�•` E�t '.
�,�� ,. �;� � �.���r� ��' ����t �� � � ', r,�""�'� .t�-�q'� �.;
y�� � M �e . � `�.� 4 .*.��
3, � , � � , , - 3 �,p �%. 4'��
� �/:,'1":` _ `.�i��'+��� .` Cit �. rl55_,t.ti�.l 3F."'`? . f .,AN f -;,�� I it���,) 1'� ....�`' ��� .__"
Area of Potential Effects (APE)
W-52031 WBS No. 45333.1.9 Brunswick County
Base map: current Brunswick County GIS, nts
NCDOT- Historic Architecture
September 2014
Tracking No. 14-03-0014
! :'I j
f �� ..I'-�-.

Project Tracking No.:
14-03-0014
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
o��� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ��
q�>�. -��... �
� PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM t� � �
��f p�;�;� �:
"¢-o.�"° '� This form onl ertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this ro'ect. It is not '��
�� Y P P J �:.'''• ••::.:.. ..�.
��-,�`.�"`-¢-� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the �.`��
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
WBS No
F.A. No.
Ci.i��►�Ikj I
45333.1.9
HSIP-1130(12)
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Brunswick
CE
Funding: ❑ State � Federal
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type.• NWP 14
Project Description: This project calls for a curve realignment and superelevation improvements of SR
1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road) at the intersection with SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Road) in Brunswick County. The
archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) far the project measures approximately 1,067,200 square
feet ar about 24.5 acres. This includes 0.82 mile (4,345 feet) along SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road), about
0.15 mile (800 feet) along SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Road), and about 0.09 mile (500 feet) along SR 133
(Empire Road). The Study Corridor width is approximately 200 feet (60.96 m) extending 100 feet (30.48
m) on either side of the road from its present center.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed
the subject project and determined:
� There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's
area of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
� Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
� All identiiied archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
� There are no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present
or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needec�
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 12

Project Tracking No.:
14-03-0014
Recommendation:
In September 2014, New South Associates completed an archaeological survey and evaluation of the
proposed improvements along SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road), from north of SR 1133 (Empire Road) to
south of Duck Haven Avenue. During the course of the survey, one archaeological site (31BW805**)
was located within the project APE. Site 31BW805** does not meet any of the criteria for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and is, therefore, recommended not eligible. Based on the
results presented, no further archaeological investigations are required for this project. A iinding of "No
Historic Properties" is considered appropriate in association with the proposed road improvements. I
concur with this recommendation since the road improvements will not impact significant archaeological
resources. Should the description of this project or design plans change prior to construction, then
additional consultation will be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info � Photos
Other: images of historic maps consulted
Signed:
�
� �
NCDOT ARCHAE OGIST
❑Correspondence
September 16, 2014
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2of12

Project Tracking No.:
14-03-0014
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The project's Area of Potential Effects (APE) along SR ll30 (Mt. Pisgah Road), SR 1125 (Cedar Grove
Road), and SR 1133 (Empire Road) in Brunswick County was subjected to an intensive archaeological
survey (Figure 1). In September 2014, New South Associates, Inc. completed shovel testing within the
project APE at 30-meter intervals to survey for potential archaeological resources. The purpose of the
fieldwork was to investigate the possibility of unknown archaeological resources that might be impacted
by the proposed undertaking. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project
measures approximately 1,067,200 square feet or about 24.5 acres. This includes 0.82 mile (4,345 feet)
along SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road), about 0.15 mile (800 feet) along SR 1125 (Cedar Grove Road), and
about 0.09 mile (500 feet) along SR 133 (Empire Road). The Study Corridor width is approximately 200
feet (60.96 m), extending 100 feet (30.48 m) on either side of the road from its present center. The APE
is characterized by lawn, forest, and agricultural fields. Figures 2 and 3 show the general landscape
within the project area. The USDA soil survey map shows six soil types within the APE (see Table 1)
(USDA Soil Survey 2014).
Table 1. Soils in APE
Soil T e Permeabili Locations
BaB Ba eade fine sand, 1-6 % slo es Well-drained Rid es and marine terraces
(GoA) Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0-2 % Well-drained Flats on marine terraces, broad inter-
slo es stream divides on marine terraces
(Lo) Leon fne sand Poorly- Flats on marine terraces
drained
(Ly) Lynchburg fine sandy loam Somewhat Flats on marine terraces, broad inter-
oorly-drained stream divides on marine terraces
(Ma) Mandarin fine sand Somewhat Flats on marine terraces
oorl -drained
(Ra) Rains fine sandy loam Poorly- Flats on marine terraces, Carolina
drained bays on marine terraces, broad inter-
stream divides on marine terraces
The examination of NRHP, State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE),
and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Off'ice (NC-HPO) website determined that no historic structural resources with potential
archaeological deposits were situated within the boundaries of the APE or proximal. Additionally,
historic maps of Brunswick County were reviewed for former structure locations, land use patterns, or
other confirmation of historic occupation within the APE vicinity. Archaeological and historical
reference materials were inspected as well. Overall, the historical review established that no NRHP listed
properties, archaeological sites, or cemeteries were contained within the APE. However, two
archaeological sites are recorded within one mile of the project area.
The intensive archaeological survey consisted of 110 shovel tests placed at 30-meter intervals (98.4 feet)
along nine transects. One transect was located on either side of the existing roads (Figure 4, 5, and 6).
One shovel test, 7-3, was not excavated because it was located within Empire Road. An additional nine
shovel tests were excavated during delineation of 31BW805**. One shovel test was not excavated
because it was located in the road. Transects ran approximately 15-meters from the road centerline. All
shovel tests measured at least 30 centimeters (12 inches) in diameter and were excavated to at least 10
centimeters (4 inches) into sterile subsoil. All excavated soils and sediments were screened through mesh
screen (0.64 centimeter, 0.25 inch) and all shovel tests were backfilled. A visual inspection of the surface
was also done in conjunction with subsurface testing.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER 6LIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3of12

Project Tracking No.:
14-03-0014
Soils varied greatly throughout the project area. In the southern portion soils seem to go deeper. At
Shovel Test 1-2, the soil profile consisted of gray (lOYR 5/1) sand ten centimeters thick (Stratum n
followed by dark yellowish-brown (lOYR 4/6) sand up to 35 cmbgs (Stratum II). Stratum III was brown
(lOYR 4/3) sand reaching to 80 cmbgs. The final stratum (IV) was very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2)
hydric sand. Typically, soil was shallower and consisted of two ar three strata. An example is the soil
profile at Shovel Test 5-4, which consisted of ten centimeters of grayish-brown (lOYR 5/2) sand (Stratum
I) followed by yellowish-brown (lOYR 5/8) sand reaching up to 20 cmbgs (Stratum II). Stratum III
consisted of brown (lOYR 5/3) sandy clay.
Site 31BW805** is a small twentieth century site consisting of an articulated chimney and a light scatter
of historic debris from two positive shovel tests. The site is located on a terrace approximately 105
meters northwest of an unnamed tributary of Shallotte Creek. Delineation shovel tests were excavated on
10 meter and 15 meter grids (Figure 7). One shovel test location (475N/SOOE) was not excavated due to
the presence of Empire Road. The brick chimney base dates to the twentieth century (Figure 8a).
Vegetation consists of a manicured lawn and a light understory surrounding the chimney base (Figure 8b).
Soils within the site are best represented by shovel test 490N/SOOE. Stratum I consisted of a very dark
gray (lOYR 3/1) sand up to 30 centimeters deep. This was followed by yellowish-brown (19YR 5/8)
sandy clay (Stratum II). A total of five artifacts was recovered from the two shovel tests and consists of
one wire nail, one fragment of clear container glass, one chimney glass fragment, and two pieces of non-
human bone.
Table 1. Artifact Summarv for Site 31BW805**
North East Vertical Location
500 500 Levell
500 500 Levell
500 500 Levell
490 500 Level 1, 0-20 cmbs, Stratum I
Count Weight Artifact
1 0.3 Chimne
1 0.8 Container Glass, Clear
2 4.1 Bone, Non-Human
1 5.5 Nail, Wire Common
Site 31BW805** is a small twentieth century site with a partial chimney and a small scatter of historic
artifacts. The assemblage is too small to permit meaningful analyses and features are not likely to exist.
The site has little to no potential to provide important information beyond that which has been
documented far the current project. Additional work here will not add to our understanding of the historic
settlement of Brunswick County. This site is recommended not eligible for the NRHP and no further
work is recommended here.
Archaeological investigation of the APE included both pedestrian walkover and systematic shovel testing.
Surface visibility was limited to a plowed feld on Transect 6. No artifacts were observed and all of the
shovel tests were negative.
No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the proposed road improvements to SR
1130. The proposed improvements will not impact any significant archaeological resources.
Tracy Martin
Archaeologist
New South Associates, Inc.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER 6LIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4of12

Project Trac%ing No.:
14-03-0014
Fi�ure 1. Tono�ranhic Mab Showin� Location of the Proiect Area.
.5'ntur�: L'SGS' 7opo5a �z���hic Oa.ruti %.7" Holde�rz L��e�uc6r� ;��C" ?f1l f7
NO N.ATlON.4L REGISTE2 EL/GlBLE OR L/STED .4RCILAGOLOGICaL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form, for� Mi�2or� Trara.rportarion Projects as Qual�ed i�a the 1007 P�rogran�imalic Aaa�eemerit.
Sofl2

Cefebmting 15 Years
�, � '� I February 18, 2016
E N G I N E E R I N G &
L O N S T R U L 7 I 0 N
To: Stonewall Mathis
NCDOT
Highway Division 3
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
From: Jason Hales
Environmental Project Manager
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Evaluation of Natural Communities and Threatened and Endangered
Species for NCDOT Realignment of SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road),
Brunswick County, NC
An evaluation of natural communities and threatened and endangered (T&E) species
for the NCDOT Realignment of SR 1130 (Mt. Pisgah Road) at SR 1125 (Cedar Grove
Road) east of Shallotte in Brunswick County included a GIS-based review of aerial
imagery, USDA soil survey mapping, USGS topographic mapping and LiDAR imagery;
a wetland and stream delineation; review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) web-based mapping tool; and a field survey by qualified
environmental scientists.
Fifteen federally threatened and endangered species are listed in Brunswick County
by the US Fish & Wildlife Service according to the county list, updated March 25,
2015. The species include: American alligator (T (S/A)), bald eagle (BGPA), green sea
turtle (T), hawksbill sea turtle (E), Kemp's Ridley sea turtle (E), leatherback sea turtle
(E), loggerhead sea turtle (T), piping plover (T), red-cockaded woodpecker (E), red
knot (T), West Indian manatee (E), wood stork (T), Cooley's meadowrue (E), rough-
leaved loosestrife (E), and seabeach amaranth (T).
Biological Conclusion:
No Effect
Review of GIS data and the NCNHP web-based mapping tool did indicate current
observances of the American alligator within one quarter mile of the project area. The
project crosses two water features which flow to Ox Pen Branch as well as Shallotte
Creek. The wetland habitat could support American Alligator. However, a field survey
of the project area was conducted on March 4, 2014 and no species were observed.
SEPI Engineering & Construction
]ason Hales
Environmental Scientist
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-633-6921
5030 IVew Centre Drive � Suite B � Wilmingtvn, NC � 28403 � Phone: [phone]I5 �
Fax: 9I Q.523.5716 � seprengineering. com � �[ SEPlengineers

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Aaion ]d. SAW-2014-0045U County: Brunswicl: U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-HOLDEN B�ACH
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Applicant: NCDOT — Division 3
Attn: Mr. Stonewal! Mathis
Address: 5501 Barbados Bivd
Castle Havne, NC 28429
AgcnL_ SEPI Entineerin2 and Construction
ath�: Mr. Jason Hales
5030 New Centrc Drive, Suite 6
Wilmineton, NC 28403
Size (miles) 0.53 Nearest Town Shallotte
Nearesl Waterway Pamlico Creek River Basin Carolina Coastal-Sampit. Nortli
Carolina, Soutl� Carolina.
USGS HUC 304Q207 Coordinates Latitude: 33.9626427786761
Longitude:-78.3064839085(82
Location desa-iption: This preliminarv JD is located at the intersectiou of NIt. Piseah Road and Cedar Grove Road
near Shallotte, Brunswick Countv.
Indicate Which of the Following Apn1Y:
A. Preliminar,y Determinntion
X Based on preliminary information, there may bc wetlands on the above described prope�Ty. We strongly suggest you fiave
this propziTy inspzctzd to determine lhe extent of Department oY the Army (DA)jw-isdiction. �['o be considered final, a
jw�isdictional determinatiun must be verified by the Corps. T'his prefiminary detertnination is not an appealable action
under the Reeidatory Pro�ram Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Parf 331). IFyou wish, you may rzquest
an approved JD (which may be appealed), hy contactii�g thz Corps district for hu-ther instruction. Also, you may provide
new inf�rmation tbr fur[her consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. Refer to the request pacica�e from SEl'1
dated April 8, 2014.
B. .4pproved Determination
_ There are NaviQable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the perniit requirements of
Section ( 0 of the Rivers and Harbors Act znd Section 404 of the Clean Water Ac[. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this deterriunatinn inay be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fi'om lhe date of Ihis
notification.
_ I7iere are waters oPthe U.S. including wetlands on the above described propetty subject to the pennit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Acl' (C WA)(33 USC $ 1344). U�less ihere is a chaoge in the Law or otir published
regulations, this determination ntay be relied upon for a period �ot to exceed 6ve years from tl�e dafe of this notifica[ion.
_ Wz strongly suggest you fiave the wetlands' on your property delineated. Due m the size of your properfy and/or our
presen[ workload, the C�aps may nor be able to accmnplish this weLland dzfineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
dzlinea[ion, you may wish to obtain a coi�sultant. To bc considzred final, any delii�eation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the LJ.S. including wetlands u� your project area have beei� delineated and the delineation has been
verified. by [he Corps. We strongly s�i�gest you have this delineation swveyed. Upon completiou; this survey should be
reviewed ai�d veriGed by the Corps. Once verified; this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWAjurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published re�ulations, may be
relied upon for a period no[ to excecd five years.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have Uezn dzlineated and sw�veyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by Yhe Corps Regulatory OfGcial identified balow o�� . Unless there is a change in Che law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a pzriod not [o exceed five years from the da[e oFthis notificaCion.
_ Tl�ere are no waters ofthe U.S., to include wetlni�ds, presenf on the above described project area which are subject to tlie
pern�it requirements of Seetion 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless [l�ere is a change in thc la�v or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to axceed five years from the date of this
notitication.
Page I of Z

_ T'he property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatoty program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611 or
Brad.E.Shaver(a�usace.armv. mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The subject areas exhibit eit6er an ordinary high water mark and or
exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1957 Corps Delineation Manual and flows ultimately toward
Shallotte Creek, a navigable water of the US.
D. RemaPks: There was one wetland and one tributary feature identified in the study area.
Corps Regulatory Official: ���
Date: Mav 27. 2014 Expiration Date: _
Copy Furnished (electronic):
NCDENR-DWR attn: Mr. Mason Hemdon
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
h�tt ://reeulatory.usacesurvev.com/.

..� -"'4 �.:y„^—..
����;���`�.
.�[yy �/-t y^y(j
S���y �! 1j%.= fiT� "oA
� �. c6 � ���t� . ��
l h '. ,!�.��1
� • p� ��. � � ^ i L yJo�"�l : .
1� %t' ��if'A� .
. . . (�:Vy{'�
M�!..
� - -.T'^'"'.1�lt-
� � � L. i
! ;... t Y
� 'I ,r'r � �\ � 1 ��r.i ti '
" �..,..�._.__ ' �
'', �"' ` '� "�4� � r� , ¢ .. '�o , � •
,�p cs . / r�'i r
r . . � � d;.,,.= �� ,,: � � : i. +,� �'�'� F,`�;�a T f� � 3S.F F ��'-,
- � ' � ,./,' �� i � 1.� �y � �. .$ �pa
Z 4 �M1 A ��c
�PiI ,� �" } P� � w w� �
. � _ .. �t� pI� � � M � �A '1�' ��
��y�j' � t
� �I "s �t,i,{� .���bn�. �. 4 Kh ,} q �� �.e�.
.%,����M�•.: �> J � y} .'i' �h,
' 4 �s'�'"�` �`�� , q��'� � �,
� ` K � � °p � ��` �{ i.�, �.,� ,�
" E �` x � �;
. l ~����'' R� � � . Y £
�Y a �,a a �+ .�, _ . � y � ; 'y'y
��i; ' NP} �a' 4 � � S `. A� � � � `.'
.e � � � ,. . ��� , �' L}� h�r `� t . �� .'�..
0. �•p�,I'
G �{1[� '�j i .�
7 � + � Y{j f� !�,i�.4" '1 ��'
, / , ' "� k' �/�y T� 4 Q
- ' 1 �{^� � ��f�i{�µ'�. y[�'
. . x`.,� � � : � M
� � 01 '
� Legend
� _ �� � � f;it Pisgah �rJ Pro�eci Area
��` �q` ,.,�
_ � .. . , �; � 7i � :1�:tlands
,�_ �; � , � 7ti� -�'- ' '� in[e�mitttent5ireamOrigin
�"- ''rj� . V 1•"�j.. at `: � Int�rmittent 3tream
�". i ��'•r'%.. � � ' �...�'",z�''��z .
_ � Seaeonal RP'�.4�
Figure 4. Mt. Pisgah Road Jurisdictional Features
7

�
�,
_
J,
�
�,
T
�
s,
M
�I
v�
C`�I
Si
/
��
�
J
�
v
L
C�
1
G
�
}
�
Q
J
:Y
��
O
O
�
Y
N
N
V
�
�
��
U
O
O
r
C
O
CT
�
C�
�
�
�
�;
,,
s
�I
Mi
0
�
�
�
Y
�
�
�
z
�
��
��
�
���
��w
��z
=a
o�w
�.����
�'�
���
���
��
=o�»
.,
�
V
W
O
QC
�
�
�
�
NOTE:
111OT TO SCALE METHOD lil CLEARING USED ON THIS PROJECT
IN�dD�I[�'L1L°Il'1C 1P]L.��TS
DO NOT lSE FOR RdW ACQUIS[TI01'
DOCUMENT NOT LONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ROADWAY DESIGN DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepored �n tne o��i�oE o�. ENGINEER STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
50 25 0 50 l00 qDT (2014) = 4300 sso� sa,baao� eo„�eva,a, casrre Havn� Nc zaaz9 �
MAP NO. I= 0.54 ML �o� �o� p�
_ _ ZOl2 ST9NDARD SPECIFZCATlONS ��y C�'��
PLANS V = 60 MPH �.E. �� °o
DAVID B. LEONARD, P.E. src,vazur�: < �
50 25 0 50 loo TOTAL = 0.54 ML RlGHT OF WAY DATE: ,� �
FUNC CLASS = RURAL AUGUST 2016 PROJECT DES7GN ENGINEER HYDRA(ILICS ENGINEER ��- g
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) COLLECTOR �� a�
5 z.s o 5 �o SUB—REGIONAL TIER LETTIHG DATE: CARLA M. SCHOONMAKER �� o� ��������
JUNE 2017 PROJECT DES/GN TECHMClAN
PROFILE (VERTICAL) r�'
srcxaruxs:

IMPACTS LEGEND
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER �
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE �
WATER
I�
l
ii�
i� i
C_____--;
__ - --- - /
_------� /
__------ TEMPORARY—IMPACTS �
— — — — Il�l SURFACE W ERS �
I
I
Permit Drawing
Sheet 2 of 2
�,
� �I
� �
� d ;� �
' �!� � �= '' .
I II
� , �I
' C ---- � ---------
� ' --------
, � _ _ 601 _____--����CE STING
�
� __
l\ _ _ — — — — — — —
\� _---- ----- _
— � � IMPAC�C�J�1�f�F�# TERS _ _� — — —
� ---
��--- -----— •
�� � � �
_� � `
� I � �
� I I"
� � � I L�
_ ��-, ���� iiC
_ -- � f� � ; ��, 3 g +00
����� ��
/� �_ � -
� � �_ /�� � � �� i — � __---
��-�-00 � �; � �, - _
� M � �, � � -- � i _
-� -- ----��--�4" RCP �
_ ---
------l1VIPACTSINSURFACEWATE ---------
.•
_
N
�
w
39 -f-00
� — — r'
_ -��-�'�- �� � /
-- --! — �- $=t�= � — — —
_ �— —�—
— — �� II
. �I �
i,�
TEMPORAf�
IN SURFA�I�
���➢� ��� = ��D' �]H[��� ���� �1����, ]1]L�]1�D
���➢� 7L°' = Il�9 Q1[�� a�ll➢ �n�� .��n���g ����4D
6ll �9 � ��9 �f�9
E: ,�
���
�
P CTS
� ERS
�
� BE1�C��€--o --
�� � _
, -------�--- --------
, , _ — — —
�_ �--
�----
, , r
- 2 TONS OF °
� 0602 C LASS ' 6' RI P RAP
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
4/19/17

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Bank
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stabilization
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (If) p� pfl
1 37+gg -L-RT pipe/dewatering 7 20
1 37+88 -L- LT pipe dewatering < 0.01 < 0.01
TOTALS*: < 0.01 < 0.01 7 20
NOTES:
Tributary at inlet of pipe at Site 1(RT), 48 sf temp, 28 sf perm.
�