20170440 Ver 1_401 Application_20170411

o`yQF w a rF�,o
2 0 1 7 0 4 4 0
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Colli truction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Irish Buffalo Creek Sewer Line
2b.
County:
Cabarrus
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Kannapolis
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
3.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
Owner Information
D
al I
LAPP I I M7
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
The proposed sewer line crosses portions of parcels t
owners, View Attachments.
at E re owned by mul iple
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Kannapolis
4b. Name:
Mr. Wilmer Melton
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Kannapolis
4d. Street address:
401 Laureate Way
4e. City, state, zip:
Kannapolis, NC 28081
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Michael T. Brame
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4620
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple Owners, View Attachments
Latitude: 35.477896 Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
80.666856
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
1.8 Linear Miles acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Irish Buffalo Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The sewer line corridor is predominately located in wooded areas. Scattered fields are located within the proposed
corridor. Structures are not located within the corridor. Adjacent properties contain scattered residences, a borrow pit,
ponds, wooded land and fields.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are approximately 0.3 acres of wetlands within the proposed corridor.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
There are approximaely 250 linear feet of stream located within the proposed corridor.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is provide sanitary sewer services to current and future occupants of properties in
the vicnity of Isenhour Road and other roads located in proximity to the site.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of installing sanitary sewer lines from a location north of Boy Scout Road to an existing sewer
line located east of Irish Buffalo Creek. Four streams and one wetland are located within the proposed sewer line
corridor. To facilitate installation of the sewer line and sewer line crossings, clearing and stumping/grubbing will be
necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during sewer line installation.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
EI Yes ®No El Unknown
ro ect (including all prior phases) in the past?
P 1 (� 9 P� P )�
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey/Michael Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is not part of a phased project. Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this appilication,
are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
PFO
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
®DWQ
0.012
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.012
2h. Comments: A small linear wetland is located within the top of a drainage swale. In order to install the sewer line and
maintenance access, it is necessary to bury the sewer line beneath the wetland and install a culvert and associated fill to
allow access to the easement for maintenance equipment to include tractors and mowing equipment. A 36 inch high-density
polyethylene pipe will be installed in the wetland crossing location to provide maintenance access to the sewer line. An end -
wall is being installed to minimize impacts to the wetland.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Excavation and
® PER
® Corps
S1 ❑ PET
Rip Rap/Pump
Irish Buffalo Creek
INT
®DWQ
25
15/25
Around
S2 ❑ P ® T
Excavation and
Rip Rap/Pump
UT to Irish Buffalo
® PER
® Corps
10
15/24
Around
Creek
❑INT
®DWQ
S3 ❑ P ® T
Excavation and
Rip Rap/Pump
UT to Irish Buffalo
❑ PER
® Corps
6
10
Around
Creek
❑INT
®DWQ
S4 ®P ❑ T
Sewer Line &
UT to Irish Buffalo
® PER
® Corps
6
34
Culvert/Endwalls
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 ❑ P ®T
Excavation and
Rip Rap/Pump
UT to Irish Buffalo
® PER
® Corps
7
15/10
Around
Creek
INT
®DWQ
S6 ®P [:1 T
Ford Crossing
UT to Irish Buffalo
El PER
❑ Corps
7
16
Creek
El INT
[-IDWQ
40 Ft.
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
Perm./114
Ft. Temp.
3i. Comments: Stream impact S1 is the location that the proposed sewer line will cross Irish Buffalo Creek. The stream will be
open -cut. A pump around will temporarily impact 25 linear feet of stream. Upon completion of installation, rip rap will be keyed
into the bed and bank of a 15 foot section of the stream to protect the sewer line and stream bed and banks that have been
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

open -cut.
Stream impact S2 is the location that the proposed sewer line will cross an unnamed tributary to Irish Buffalo Creek. The
stream will be open -cut. A pump around will temporarily impact 24 linear feet of stream channel. Upon completion of
installation, rip rap will be keyed into the bed and bank of a 15 foot section of the stream to protect the sewer line and
impacted stream bed and banks.
Stream impacts S3 and S4 are the location that the proposed sewer line will cross an unnamed tributary to Irish Buffalo Creek.
Impacts included in S3 include 10 linear feet of temporary impact associated with the excavation and pump around. Rip rap
will be keyed into the 10 feet section of the bed and bank of the stream at this location to protect the stream bed and banks
that have been open -cut. In order to maintain the sewer line easement, it is necessary to install a road crossing at the
location. Impacts included in S4 include the installation of 24 linear feet of 54 inch high-density polyethylene pipe that will
impact 34 linear feet of stream channel is being installed to provide maintenance access to the sewer line at this location.
Head -walls and end -walls are being installed to minimize impacts to the stream.
Stream impacts S5 and S6 are the location that the proposed sewer line will cross an unnamed tributary to Irish Buffalo Creek.
Impacts incuded in S5 include 10 feet of temporary impact associated with the pump around. Rip rap will be keyed into a 15
feet section of the bed and bank of the stream at this location to protect the stream bed and banks in the area that has been
open -cut. In order to maintain the sewer line easement, it is necessary to install a ford crossing. Impacts included in S6
include the construction of a ford crossing. The ford crossing includes the installation of a rip rap pad above the bed of the
stream that will enable maintenance vehicles to cross the stream.
At each of the areas of impact, the coffer dams and pump arounds will be removed following installation of the sewer lines and
crossings. Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments: Construction of ponds/lakes are not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Yadkin
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 [:]PMT
EI Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
EI Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The site is located within the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. Impacts to state protected buffers are not
proposed.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The initial design impacted an additional stream and and a relatively large wetland pocket. The propsed sewer line was
redesigned to avoid these two areas. The sewer line crossings have been designed in areas that are relatively straight and
with little meanders. The two areas where permanent impacts are proposed are located in areas where the sewer line
easement is otherwise inaccessible. Headwalls and endwalls have been designed in the location of the proposed culvert to
minimize the stream impacts. A ford crossing is being installed at the other location so that the stream will remain day -lighted
and aquatic life can easily migrate through the location. The delineation and survey was used to design the sewer line in a
manner that avooided and minimized impacts to the jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. Temporary coffer dams will be installed upgradient of the
proposed crossing locations. During excavation/backfill, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate
stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction. All excavated materials will be immediately
removed from the stream crossing area and temporarily stock -piled in upland areas to be used for back fill. The top one foot
of stream bed excavation will be stockpiled seperately and used as the top one foot of stream bed backfill. Upon completion of
the sewer line installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will be removed and flow will be restored. Following
construction, disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions, matted and seeded/live staked.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
E] Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
[Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Impervious surfaces are not being
created by the proposed project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will not be generated by the proposed project.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
PEI consulted the USFWS Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species List for Cabarrus County. The following
species have been identified in Cabarrus County.
Northern long-eared bat is identified as a federally listed threatened species. Hibernacula is not located with one quarter
mile of the project area. Additionally, the project area is not known to occur within 150 feet of known summer roosting
trees. Trees that afford suitable summer roosting habitiat are located within the proposed project area. The applicant will
rely on the 4(d) rule for tree removal activites assoicated with the NLEB.
Carolina heelsplitter is identified as a federally listed endangered species. The Carolina heelsplitter requires cool, clean,
well-oxygenated water. Stable, silt-free stream bottoms appear to be critical to the species. Typically stable areas occur
where the stream banks are well-vegetated with trees and shrubs. Silt was observed on the stream bottoms in the vicinity
of the crossings. Based on our observations and the proposed impacts, it its our opinion that the project will not adversely
effect this species.
Schweinitz's sunflower is identified as a federally listed endangered species. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in areas with
full to partial sun and is found in areas with poor soils, such as thin clays that vary from wet to dry. It is believed that this
species once occurred in natural forest openings or grasslands. Many of the remaining populations occur along
roadsides. Suitable habitat for this species was not identified on the site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down-gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
PEI consulted the NCSHPO historic properties website to determine if protected cultural resources are located within the
proposed project area (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/). The map does not depict eligible for listing cultural recourse within
200 feet of the project area.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
-To8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
Yes M No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The southeastern portion of the proposed sewer line corridor is
within the 100 year floodplain (View FEMA Firmette, Attached). Manholes located withi the 100 year floodplain will be
located above the 100 year flood elevations.
8c, What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? 3710560300J, effective 11/05/2008
Michael T. Bratne 1 4/06/17
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agents Signature Date
(AgenCs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided I
Page l]mf13
PCN Fonn—\A*nsion 1.3December 1D.2UO8Version

BRAN�N
is
i
I
I
I
ev f
Ile
o�
Q
44
h r
0VERC4SH BRANCH
PROP. SEWER LINE
WETLAND DELINEATION
TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
PERM. UTILITY R/W
EXIST. SEWER EASE.
FEMA STREAM CENTERLINE
FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK
BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
NOTES
LEGEND
—TB—TB—TB—TB—TB—TQ—
ee—ee—ee—ee-88
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY OTHERS. SEE CONSTRUCTION PLANS PREPARED BY DAVIS &
FLOYD TITLED "IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE", DATED 12-05-2016, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE INC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA. CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD 83 (2011). ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88.
7. CULVERTS SHALL BE BURIED A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
8. HDPE CULVERTS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE FLEXIBLE PIPE REQUIREMENTS OF NCDOT STD. 300.01.
9. THE HEADWALLS FOR THE 54" HDPE CULVERT ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FOR A 72" PIPE WITH AN OPENING FOR A 54" DUAL
WALL HDPE PIPE.
10. THE HEADWALLS FOR THE 36" HDPE CULVERT ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO NCDOT STD. 838.01 SPECIFICATIONS.
11. CULVERTS ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN A FEMA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ACCORDING TO FIRM MAP NUMBER 3710560300J,
EFFECTIVE DATE NOVEMBER 5, 2008.
w KUULKS LAKE RD y 11111111
N •nO�GSS/0 ��
Z C
Z�Q I
� RaCERs LAKE RD e %L SEAL
�z 0. = 16883
GN
Z \ ..
SCALE: V = 1000'
LOCATION MAP 1000 0 1000 2000
alley, williams, carmen, do king, Inc. PROPOSED CULVERTS FOR "`I OCSC egeft-mH 03 ATE �C = 1-13-" is5o1
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 Revised le end 3-03-17 RCC t• r 1000' I RCC
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE � COVER SHEET / NOTES ""° 1
fIRY LICENSE No. F-0203 � GWW
120 SOUTH WUN STREET P.O. BOX 1248Ll CITY O F K A N N A P O L I S
ru
KANNAPOUS. NC 28082 704/938-1515 - O1': 3

.694
VFW 4n' wnF Thum 1RAR1
CONSTRUCTION R/W 696, 1 6
STA.56+42.8 - STA.58+75.8
.� 98awe
98 _
69
i INV: 688.7
_ 72" HEADWALL
WITH 36" OPENING `
696 \
- ----- 696 t
rGRNDE
H - (30)
2.81 `
4140
.5104
698.09
C .'
LC}---
' 696
24 LF ofl54"
j 1QPE @I 2.50%
57+00
697---_
696
allay, williams, carmen, & king, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
MM UCO SE Ns. F-0203
120 SOUTH MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1248
KANWOUS, NC 28082 704/938-1313
[.1
71C
r-697 \ 690
_ 696
--695
6
72" HEADWALL (�
WITH 36" OPENING
INj( 689.3
-L L Lam ' ---LD Lam ---LD
670
N
v loj
\
NEW 30' WIDE PERMANENT
\
UTILITY R/W
S
STA.56+42.8 - STA.58+75.8
rn M
dam' 0� CO
+OLial F'o
I (o2 U-) p Z
�¢ za > >
V1�_ECW
00
rd� _
NC �R�Q /
\
N
ey Nq q0 8
�.
�S R
q0NO�0,��
\
670
N
v loj
O to
0
rn M
dam' 0� CO
+OLial F'o
I (o2 U-) p Z
�¢ za > >
V1�_ECW
TnIno_0o z z
PROP. GRADE
EXIST. GROUND
_----
---
_
1.00%
'-
,
i
PROP. 5
" DUAL WALL HDPE
WITH SOIL
-TIGHT JOINTS
STA.
57+12.90
PVC ® 2.76%
233.06' - 1
60LF - 12"
DIP ENCASED
IN CONCR
TE W/QIP TO
PVC COUPLINGS
PROPOSED CULVERTS FOR
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
56+50
Revised disturbed limb lineM* 1 3-03-17
57+00
SCALE1-13-17
1.1 = 20' w.r sr. RCC
1"=217 GWW
57+50
710
700
690
570
16501
54" HDPE CULVERT I $1E MEL 2
or. 3

NC
Nq0 J f \ \
V9y s R 8e
NEW 40' WIDE PERMANENT
` -UTILITY R/VG/ i ! i ` I I•' / / i I sex%
STA. 70+26.5 - 76+16.5 �Q/ �Sl•'
60' WIDE TEMPORARY ^�
/
CONSTRUCTION NEW SSMH - (39)
STA.73+18.89
i y, 635083.6201
7 I 36" HEADWALL E1502593.8226
L I I J 1734 i (NCDOT STD. 838.01) GRND L. 743-36
INV: 731.0 -I --:I,.
/ 28 LF of 36" /! i
HDPE @ 3.57%7�
p\jc
1\ J
735---,
734 —J733--
732•
731
76C
75C
735
74C
--11. I I I `• /
34
733CA
0�
73
INV: 730.0 � 11� r � � �\ \�� \ \ `\ \ �•i I � \
73C
!36" HEADWALL
i / i' i • 1 - 1 II i II(NCDOT STD. 838.01)
� r� i i• I I; III i � I \
� t III I
I I \ \
i—ee—ee-�as ~
rte---,
- - - - - - - - WETLANDS - `\ `-
\�'
EEss o CAR���2�:
SEAL
16883
720
GINE
FSLE`( �.``\
'///tft1111111```
3
a-1 7
72+00
72+50
73+00
760
750
740
7301
720
73+50
alley, williams, carmen, do king, Inc. PROPOSED CULVERTS FOR �'D'' Daavna+ DATE "VA` SCALE '-13-17 Aa Ma 16501
1 W%d dWwimd limns 8 kelype 3-03-17 RCC 1" = 29 p
CONSULTING ENGINEERS RCC
"muCmNo. F-om IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE PROf*E . WWW 36" HDPE CULVERT p"`"° 3
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS ' P.
120 S" MM SPISM P.O. BOX 1248 rL
KANNAPOLIS. NC 28082 704/958-1815 1" = 5' a: 3
Ni
(fl
rn
—00 00 � a
�en to
C CIS
v+6JN F
W
XD ..
= O f- O
�a zn.
(n P 0: W
t/1 1n d: 0 0 Z
EXIST.
GROUND
PROP.GRADE
5%
83 /
/ PROP. 3
" DUAL WALL HDPE
WITH SOIL
-TIGHT JOINTS
STA.04
72+38.07
P 0 4.501
VC
11
2g2'
140LF - 12" DIP
STA. 71+60 -
STA. 73+00
(PROVIDE AND INSTALL
DIP
TO PVC COUPLI
GS)
PIP
COLLAR
—
72+00
72+50
73+00
760
750
740
7301
720
73+50
alley, williams, carmen, do king, Inc. PROPOSED CULVERTS FOR �'D'' Daavna+ DATE "VA` SCALE '-13-17 Aa Ma 16501
1 W%d dWwimd limns 8 kelype 3-03-17 RCC 1" = 29 p
CONSULTING ENGINEERS RCC
"muCmNo. F-om IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE PROf*E . WWW 36" HDPE CULVERT p"`"° 3
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS ' P.
120 S" MM SPISM P.O. BOX 1248 rL
KANNAPOLIS. NC 28082 704/958-1815 1" = 5' a: 3

I 1
1
EASEMENT (E\) \ \ \
\ i
1 \
�eB--_ea__------- NEW 35' WIDE PERMANENT
Ba 5B UTILITY R/W
(STA. 0+00.0 — 10+79.00)
T2_ TB\ re
s
\ TOP OF \ `
STREAM BANK �
m\ NEv
`�{ h\ SSMH-!A
NEW
\ SSMH-1
STREAM BANK' \ \ \
PROTECTION
\ 50' WIDE TEMPORARY i \ BOTTOM OF
CONSTRUCTION R/W aSTREAM BANK
1 `
I
FEMA \
FLOOD LINE \
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT No, S1:
40 LF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
FOR RIPRAP BANK STABILIZATION,
DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING
(AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 25 FT)
LATITUDE 35.475236 I
\ LONGITUDE -80.655486 }
EX. WSACC \\ \ \ \ \\
MH -011263 \ \ \
S EX. SS MH
\ RIM ELEV. = 654.5 \`
\ INV. 641.69
APPROXIMATE s
\ FLOODWAY LOCATION
sa
N \ I
N \
NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVD 88
BY GPS READING
NOTES
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD.
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA, CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
LEGEND
PROP. SEWER LINE
WETLAND DELINEATION —w,_e wLB wL6 wLe—
TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT _
PERM. UTILITY R/W _
EXIST. SEWER EASE.
FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK —TB—TB—TB—TB-TB—TB—
BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK ee—ee—BB—ee—ee
TEMP. SILT FENCE — Et~— 0E>r--
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE L0 LD -LD LO
TEMP. COMPOST SOCK
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE
SCALE: 1' = 50'
I 50 0 50 100
BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE """ °ES"�M 03 _RC � RCC I REVISED IMPACTS 3-03-17 RCC 1' = SO' ° RCC
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS PROF"-` ^� GwW
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
�N CARO
SEAL
16883 -
%� ��tiG I NEF'����;•
SL E Y .
' !1 1
3r3��7�
16501
STREAM IMPACT No. S1 '`E'W. 1
or: 5
\APPROXIMATE r0
FLOODWAY LOCATION
\
1
/ l
100
YEAR FEMA FLOOD LINE
it
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAT
%
APPROXIMATE 'LOCATIO
PER EFFECTIVE I\I.R.M.
MAP # 371056030�J
alley, williams, carmen,
do king, Inc.
IRISH
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
FIRM UCENSE No. F-0203
120 SOUTH NAW STREET
KANNAPOUS. NC 28082
P.O. BOX 1248
704/938-1515
1 `
I
FEMA \
FLOOD LINE \
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT No, S1:
40 LF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
FOR RIPRAP BANK STABILIZATION,
DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING
(AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 25 FT)
LATITUDE 35.475236 I
\ LONGITUDE -80.655486 }
EX. WSACC \\ \ \ \ \\
MH -011263 \ \ \
S EX. SS MH
\ RIM ELEV. = 654.5 \`
\ INV. 641.69
APPROXIMATE s
\ FLOODWAY LOCATION
sa
N \ I
N \
NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVD 88
BY GPS READING
NOTES
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD.
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA, CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
LEGEND
PROP. SEWER LINE
WETLAND DELINEATION —w,_e wLB wL6 wLe—
TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT _
PERM. UTILITY R/W _
EXIST. SEWER EASE.
FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK —TB—TB—TB—TB-TB—TB—
BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK ee—ee—BB—ee—ee
TEMP. SILT FENCE — Et~— 0E>r--
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE L0 LD -LD LO
TEMP. COMPOST SOCK
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE
SCALE: 1' = 50'
I 50 0 50 100
BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE """ °ES"�M 03 _RC � RCC I REVISED IMPACTS 3-03-17 RCC 1' = SO' ° RCC
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS PROF"-` ^� GwW
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
�N CARO
SEAL
16883 -
%� ��tiG I NEF'����;•
SL E Y .
' !1 1
3r3��7�
16501
STREAM IMPACT No. S1 '`E'W. 1
or: 5
NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVD 88
BY GPS READING
NOTES
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD.
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA, CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
LEGEND
PROP. SEWER LINE
WETLAND DELINEATION —w,_e wLB wL6 wLe—
TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT _
PERM. UTILITY R/W _
EXIST. SEWER EASE.
FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK —TB—TB—TB—TB-TB—TB—
BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK ee—ee—BB—ee—ee
TEMP. SILT FENCE — Et~— 0E>r--
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE L0 LD -LD LO
TEMP. COMPOST SOCK
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE
SCALE: 1' = 50'
I 50 0 50 100
BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE """ °ES"�M 03 _RC � RCC I REVISED IMPACTS 3-03-17 RCC 1' = SO' ° RCC
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS PROF"-` ^� GwW
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
�N CARO
SEAL
16883 -
%� ��tiG I NEF'����;•
SL E Y .
' !1 1
3r3��7�
16501
STREAM IMPACT No. S1 '`E'W. 1
or: 5

-- -- 662
I \\
)
1 �
e
STREAM BANK 1
— PROTECTION / I
\ \ I I
D
50' WIDE TEMPO AR !
CONSTRUCTION /W��
NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVD 88
BY GPS READING
NOTES
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD.
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2—FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA. CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1—FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM,
STREAM BANK /
\ / LEGEND
�,i0% PROP. SEWER LINE
w
4 WETLAND DELINEATI❑N
BOTTOM OF
yr �ss� STREAM BANK
NEW / TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
O IC e9 NEW 25' SSMH-
'' sa, _W�ID PERMANENT
UTILTY R/W S / PERM. UTILITY R/W
j $ �,� IO l I / 9 • �,yEXIST. SEWER EASE.
'w° ,10 FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
f I \ \ FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
`) V ) I )/ j \ I �_• FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK —TB—TB—TB—T8—TB—TB—
If i I ) �•' \ \ ` BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK 66-ee—ee—ee—ee
\ \ \ qO• TEMP. SILT FENCE p— t)-- t— -- t)— _ to — ti_�� \\\t�tt�iiiiiiiriii
�"
CA
_.
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE _ �;__ �;__�_,,,... -____ ����, • °•��EX 19" WATFR I INE��
/ c
j \ TEMP. COMPOST SOCK = ' °�� SEAL 9<••° -
/ <
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE 16883
o
66 hes�+Oqf SCALE: 1' = 50' J( ���''�SL E
ro,
Ie __ . -_ 50 0 50 100
REV. no. OESCWnON DATE oamu, SCALE 3-01-17
alley, williams, carmen, & king, Inc. IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE tssot
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 REVISED IMPACTS 3-03-17 RCC 1' = 50' °" RCC
RNMUCENSENo. F-0203 STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS _SLE GWW STREAM IMPACT No. S2 '"° 2
to APOU MAIN STREET 704 9BOX38 1245 CITY OF KANNAPOLIS "" a: 5
KANNAPOUS, NC 28082 704/938-1515 -

NEW 60' WIDE TEMPORARY
\\ CONSTRUCTION R/W
\��S \\ STA.58+75.8 - STA.60+56.2
NEW 40' WIDE PERMANENT
UTILITY R/W
STA.58+75.8 - STA.60+56.2 _ - NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVID 88
BY GPS READING
UT TO IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
T'. / / PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT No. S3:
10 LF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
FOR DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING
(AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 6 FT)
\ NEW LATITUDE 35.480134
SSHH-318 / / LONGITUDE -80.667615 \ NOTES:
\ \ 0 1 1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
/' ? \ 2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD,
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
/ /91 e o \ 5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA. CONTOURS
/ / I \ SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
��_ _ 698 9, \ 6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
�'�P
oo \
�I
LEGEND
STA.56+42.8_ — STA.58+75.8 I�,1 i I'! / PROP. SEWER LINEIt
NFw ---------•a--`;�--- --
- � TOP OF ---
% WETLAND DELINEATION --- t.e �;_t---wLe-----wt8
STA.56+42.8 — STA.58+75.8 I y I ` STf7EAM BANK
BO/1 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
TOM OF:
UT TO IRISH BUFFALO CREEK yg8 / I\696" SREAM BANK PERM. UTILITY R/W
PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT No. S4: (f `9r\�m \� V: 689.3/ --
i
34 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT 24 LF of 54" \ EXIST. SEWER EASE.
I FOR NEW CULVERT AND HEADWALLS` 1 HDPE @ 2.50%� FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
(AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 6 FT) / @� 1 , FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
t , LATITUDE 35.480134 / f INV: 688.7 I STREAM 'S8' ` FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
LONGITUDE -80.667615
TOP OF STREAM BANK —Te—Te—Te—Te—Te-Te-
BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK 09-88-9e—se—ee—
s
i I WIDE NEW TEMP. SILT FENCE — Er— E3
ET— Et— Er-- — `\���"IllllilR,,,,i
CONSTRUCTION R/W _ `(/ ` S I /� /' ----`�\�\N'°Cq'• 0//
\ i f LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LOLD LO --1.0--- ��O FESS/.
•
r —ILEI Q�O,y9 •',y ,'
PERMANENT UTILITY TEMP. COMPOST SOCK _ Q A
1 \ \ \
R/W� 16883
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE
SCALE: V = 50'
I /
50 0 50 100
9 IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE
M. "° SED IM" 03 SCALE 3-ot-"
alley, willioms, carmen, & kin inc. JOB 16501
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 REVISED IMPACTS 3-03-i7 RCC 1' = 50' RCC STREAM IMPACT NO. Smw No.
FlRMUCENSENo. F-0203 STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS °"°"" °^ GWW S3 and S4 3
120 SOUTH MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1248 CITY O F K A N N A P O L I S
KANNOWS, NC 28082 704/938-1515 "' or rj

91
I I I NE Wrj / ,,
NIP
�SSMH-36 S I ' �' cryo ��h ` I UT TO IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT No. S5: \ \
NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVD 88
BY GPS READING
NOTES:
\ I I I I 25 LF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT \ \`
I I I 1 1 FOR DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING \ 1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
1 (AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 7 FT) 2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD.
LATITUDE 35.482510 \ \ 4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
\ 1 LONGITUDE -80.670001 \ \ 5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA. CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
PERMANENT FORD STREAM CROSSING...
GRADE BANKS TO A MAX. SLOPE OF '
15% FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS 1 LEGEND
I
PROP. SEWER LINE gg
NEW\
SSMH-37 i . \\ as \ \ I WETLAND DELINEATION ---4a�--_+�e--- m5-----wte--
50' WIDE TEMPORARY I TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
NEw\ CONSTRUCTION R/W , '
f N I I \ SSM 3 PERM. UTILITY R/W
NEW 25' WIDE PERMANENT _
^rye /^ \ \ UTILITY R/W I EXIST. SEWER EASE.
ell
^� UT TO IRISH BUFFALO CREEK ' I\'` Y ' i \ \\\\ \ \ \ II FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
,p \�� \ \� I ` \ \ FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
1 PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT No. S6 l I \
I \�\ \\�j \ I� FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY -
16 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT / 4A,\\ � \ \ \ \ ` 1
FOR FORD STREAM CROSSING / / \ ` v_ 1 \ 1 ' I TOP OF STREAM BANK —Te—TB—TB—Te—Te—Te—
(AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 7 FT) / % / ^tea \�
\1 \ � \ 1 1 1 � '� 1 I BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK ee—ee—ee—ee—ee—
LATITUDE 35.482510 /
LONGITUDE -80.670001 / ti \ r \ \�\ `\ ` I Il 1 I TEMP. SILT FENCE E}— EI— 1)— E3-- 0----
LIMIT
---_LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE L0 ---L0 LD LD—
NE
D----I fly\ 1 1 1 1
\§SAH- l ( ^ 1 ' TEMP. COMPOST SOCK
_ SEAL
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE ® = 16883
50 0 50 100 3-63-17
alley, Williams, carmen, & king, Inc. IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE "" o m DA "n"` s 3-01-" 16501
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I REVISED IMPACTS 3-03-17 RCC V = 50' °° RCC STREAM IMPACT NO.E„�.
F0T4 LICENSE No. F-0203 STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS `eontc GWW S5 and S6 4
120 soulN STREET P.O. eox 1 CITY O F K A N N A P O L I S
xu+►uPOL�s. NC 28082 704/938-1515515 s�s - OF: 5

14
I \ 28 LF of 36"
JJ J \ HDPE @ 3.57%�
` 1
N\
INV: 731.0
i
r 29
I
� t
73 �� 1
IMPACT
LIMITS \ 1
SCALE: 1' = 20'
IMPACT DETAIL
20 0 20 40
IE
SS
SS 39
ry
WETLAND IMPACT No. W1:
0.012 AC PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
iQ% I FOR NEW CULVERT, HEADWALLS AND FILL
LATITUDE 35.483320
LONGITUDE -80.670774
—7 30
WETLAND
BOUNDARY 128
\ III WETLANDS 'WC'
= SEE BLOW-UP ABOVE FOR DETAILS ) /' & STREAM 'SC'
\ j \ ► I Brie
Q
l
NC GRID / NAD 83(2011)
NAVD 88
BY GPS READING
NOTES
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
2. TOP AND BOTTOM OF STREAM BANKS WERE FIELD SURVEYED BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
3. SEWER LINE DESIGN AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BY DAVIS & FLOYD.
4. CULVERT DESIGN ONLY BY ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
5. CONTOURS SHOWN WITH 2 -FOOT INTERVALS ARE FROM THE NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM LIDAR DATA. CONTOURS
SHOWN WITH 1 -FOOT INTERVALS WERE PROVIDED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY BY MEL G. THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES.
6. HDPE PIPES ARE TO HAVE BURY DEPTHS OF 1 FOOT BELOW STREAM BOTTOM.
LEGEND
PROP. SEWER LINE SS
WETLAND DELINEATION —wte wL8—WLe wLe—
TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
PERM. UTILITY R/W —
EXIST. SEWER EASE.
FEMA 1% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY
FEMA FLOODWAY BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK—Ta—Te—Te—Te—TB—TB—
BOTTOM OF STREAM BANK ee—ee-88-ee—ee—
TEMP. SILT FENCE E}-- Et~— E)—E}--
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE_LD --Lp----LD- Lp
TEMP. COMPOST SOCK
TEMP. BY-PASS PUMPING DIKE
SCALE: 1' = 50'
I I I I I II I J
I I I I I SSM -3a S ( ,�,yo 1�b I 50 0 50 100
i I I S
s IRISH BUFFALO CREEK TRIBUTARY SEWER TRUNK LINE REV. aEVISEo IMPACTS 3-03E17 Rcc ASCALE
s OWN
E:n,,c2,
ley, Williams, carmen, & kin inc.
ONSULTING ENGINEERS STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS
4 LICENSE No. F-0203 aROFAE
0 APOU PAIN STREET P.O. 9BOX38 1548CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
NNAPOUS, NC 28082 704/938-1515
\11111III1,,,,,
=O� OFESs;o
SEAL 9<.
16883 -
SLEY
3-634
3-01-17 JOB NO. 16501
RCC WETLAND IMPACT No. W1 5
on GWW
a: 5

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes PEI to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: u4 lig W rt�H- e) -C- LL)g-V
Owner/Applicant Information:
Name: CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
Address: 401 LAUREATE WAY
KANNAPOLIS, NC 28081
Telephone Number: 704-920-4231(office) / 704-791-0480 (cell)
Fax Number: 704-920-4335
E-mail Address: wmeltonCu)kannapolisnc.aov
Signature: „6,A �� - / Date: February 28, 2017

F y
t
,4 4NKAni.
�
vr'�tiroe�
` l iA }ih� q
�•.,Q
r
tt
4` ,"P .514 %`d>i.. 4 p� � � `� •'"..,
9 3 t� EE
♦ � 5 4
n i
,
a � „
s
,
L
LEGEND
Sewer Line Alignment
,
Drawine 1
USGS Topographic Map
Enochville & Kannapolis,
NC Quadrangle
VM Scale: 1" = 2,000'
N USGS Topographic Map
Irish Buffalo Creek Sewer Line
Isenhour Road
Kannapolis, Rowan County, NC
PEI Project 1754
,4 4NKAni.
�
vr'�tiroe�
` l iA }ih� q
�•.,Q
r
tt
4` ,"P .514 %`d>i.. 4 p� � � `� •'"..,
9 3 t� EE
♦ � 5 4
n i
,
a � „
s
,
L
LEGEND
Sewer Line Alignment
,
Drawine 1
USGS Topographic Map
Enochville & Kannapolis,
NC Quadrangle
VM Scale: 1" = 2,000'
N USGS Topographic Map
Irish Buffalo Creek Sewer Line
Isenhour Road
Kannapolis, Rowan County, NC
PEI Project 1754

ChA
ti MeE

LEGEND
mom a
Sewer Line Alignment M
'k-1XV Awlf6 (.Oqk%) uwrt lo olowst pwrtow Wks ((W4,
POLVdAl KA W. MA 1". 4144MV 1"AWK I'LLAP rVt.W
OW.0 X— 404, A9, ", 0+ V, -1 OR F,-.- Os It —+n.4"w.a.rtanN
14 WA.*" 0.
was AA %0— t— —13 ft— ftRrV�YPtl IN 4%
fi-1 t', - @xW rYa 066 A --6x
"— 4" &s re..ak 1
"of 4" k -A w R'N.4 ftpo --------
Ink. Cil.aaM. 4—-j 0. —1
It
nano hwft
ir"M I'LIXIO ANA
rl' Oftw PIWO ftwo, rl"" ftw AM51 too
% Nil S
Drawing 4
FEMA FIRM Panel Nos.
3710560300)
Effective 11.05.08
Not to Scale
'oe
FEMA Firm
Irish Buffalo Creek Sewer Line
Isenhour Road
Kannapolis, Rowan County, NC
PEI Project 1754