Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081257 Ver 1_Application_20080819~1 N ~~~ ~ ~~:~. ~~~.~~ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ~ DEPAR'TIVIENT OF 'T`RANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY ~ August 12, 2008 /'~ Q~ U. S. Army Corps of Engineers ~ ,--, Regulatory Field Office Post Office Box 1000 O Washington, NC 27889-1000 ~ 81 ~ ~ 7 ~` ~~ ~ ~ ~ 20~~ ;a ~~ . b~„i ~~ ~L~.~,rr ATTN: Mr. William J. Biddlecome v~~~ri~,~~,~~,~R~~l ST~t+~~1',~TER ~w>~~~ I NCDOT Coordinator I ~'" Dear Sir: Subject: Nationwide Permit 23 Application for the Replacement of Bridge No. 45 on U SR 1100 (Grabtown Rd.) over Choowatic Creek in Bertie County. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1100(10), TIP No. B-4026, WBS Element 33393.1.1. /~ Please find enclosed permit drawings and half-size plan sheets for the above referenced project. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed for this project on October 13, 2006, and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. The NCDOT `" proposes to replace existing Bridge No. 45 on SR 1100 over Choowatic Creek in Beaufort County. The project involves replacement of the existing 35 ft. structure with an 80-ft., 2- span, prestressed concrete cored slab bridge at approximately the same location, and a slightly higher roadway elevation, using top-down construction. Bridge substructure will consist of steel piles. Permanent impacts will consist of 0.1 ac. to riparian wetlands in the Choowatic Creek floodplain. Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction. Impacts to Waters of the United States General Description: The project is located in the Roanoke River Basin (HUC 03010107). A best usage classification of "C SW" has been assigned to Choowatic Creek [DWQ Index # 24-2-7-2]. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mi. of the project study area. Choowatic Creek is not designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a National Wild and Scenic River. Additionally, Choowatic Creek is not listed on the Final 2006 303(d) list of impaired waters due to sedimentation for the Roanoke River Basin, nor does it drain into any Section 303(d) waters within 1.0 mi. of the project study area. MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH NC ~~ y Permanent Impacts: Riparian wetlands adjacent to Choowatic Creek will be impacted by the proposed project. Construction of the proposed project will result in a permanent impact of 0.1 ac. from roadway fill and excavation of existing bridge approach slope (see permit drawings). Temporary Impacts: In addition to permanent impacts, this project will also result in 0.06 ac. of temporary fill in riparian wetlands in the Hand Clearing areas for the installation of erosion control measures, including some or all of the following: Temporary Silt Fence, Special Sediment Control Fence, and/or Temporary Rock Silt Checks. Hand Clearing: Hand clearing of 0.25 ac. in riparian wetlands will be necessary for project construction outside of the new fill slope. Utility Impacts: No impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to relocation of utilities in the project area. Wetland and stream impacts due to the relocation of telephone, power, and water lines in the project area will be avoided by using directional bore techniques, with bore pits located outside of jurisdictional resources. Bridge Demolition The existing bridge consists of a timber caps on timber piles substructure supporting a concrete floor on timber joists. Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed to prevent any temporary fill from entering Waters of the United States. Federal Protected Species As of January 31, 2008 the USFWS lists two federally protected species for Bertie County (Table 1). Table 1. Federally protected cneciec of Bertie County Scientific Name Common Name Federal Habitat Biological Status Conclusion Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker E No No Effect Aci enser brevirostrum Shortnose stur eon E No No Effect Bald Eagle The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was delisted from the Endangered Species Act as of August 8, 2007. However, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No suitable nesting or foraging habitat exists within 660 feet of the project limits. In-Stream Work Moratorium The CE Project Commitments note an in-stream construction moratorium from February 15 to June 30, as requested by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF). However, per NCDOT T!P B-4026 Page 2 of 4 ti ~~ the attached email dated February 19, 2008, NCDMF has deferred to the February 15 to June 15 in-stream work moratorium as requested by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) for anadromous fish. NCDOT will adhere to this in- stream work moratorium and implement Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage as applicable. Avoidance and Minimization Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters of the United States". Due to the presence of surface waters and wetlands within the project study area, avoidance of all impacts is not possible. The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts. Minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design, these included: • Use of an off-site detour during construction, • Construction of a 45-ft. longer bridge, • Use of 3:1 fill slopes in jurisdictional areas, • Portions of the existing bridge approach slope will be graded down to existing wetland elevation, • Use of aPre-formed Scour Hole. Mitigation Due to the limited amount of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, NCDOT is not proposing mitigation for this project. Project Schedule The review date for this project is March 3, 2009 and the Let Date is April 21, 2009. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that a Nationwide Permit 23 authorize these activities (72 CFR; 11092- 11198, March 12, 2007). Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3701 will apply to this project. NCDOT will adhere to all conditions of this General Water Quality Certification. NCDOT is providing two copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review. CAMA: Due to the absence of any Areas of Environmental Concern (see attached email dated May 28, 2002), this project will not require a CAMA permit as confirmed by North NCDOT TIP B-4026 page j of 4 i v Carolina Division of Coastal Management staff. As previously stated the project will require a Nationwide permit, which has been determined to be consistent with the State's coastal program. A copy of this application will be posted on the NCDOT website at: htts://www.doh.dot.state.nc.us/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit html Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Mr. David E. Bailey at debailey(a~ncdot.gov or (919) 715-7257 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ~- Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director, PDEA cc: W/attachment Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (2 Copies) W/o attachment (see website for attachments) Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS Ms. Anne Deaton, NCDMF Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit Mr. Anthony Roper, P.E., Division 1 Engineer Mr. Clay Willis, Division 1 Environmental Officer Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design Mr. Tracy Walter, PDEA NCDOT T/P B-4026 Page 4 of 4 ~~ l~ Bailey, David E From: Sara Winslow (sara.winslow@ncmail.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:27 AM To: Chris Rivenbark Cc: Ron Sechler; Wilson, Travis W.; Gary Jordan; David E. Bailey Subject: Re: B-4026 Moratorium Dates Chris NCDMF moratorium time period of February 15 - June 30 is the standard anadromous time period for these inland systems. The time period through June 30 ensures that the environmental integrity of the area is protected if the spawning season should occur late. Since the jurisdiction is WRC, we would defer to their time period. Sara Chris Rivenbark wrote: > B-4026 Bridge No. 45 on SR 1100 over Choowatic Creek, Bertie County. > Ron, > To summarize our phone conversation last week, we have received three > different moratorium dates from four resource agencies for B-4026. > The requested in-water work moratorium dates are as follows: > NMFS in-water work restricted to October 1-March 1 (no in-water work > March 2 - September 30) USFWS February 15- June 15 NCWRC February 15- > June 15 NCDMF February 15- June 30 > To simplify the requests, you mentioned that you would differ to > NCWRC's requested moratorium do to the project's location in Inland > Waters. If this is accurate, please reply with a confirmation email. > Travis, Sara, and Gary, would you mind replying as well? > Thank you all for your help. Sara E. Winslow Northern District Manager NC Division of Marine Fisheries Elizabeth City, NC 27909 Phone: 252-264-3911 1 [ ~ 1~ Subject: Bride Replacement Projects CFY 200 Date: Tue, ? 8 Nlay 2002 I ~ :05:27 -000 Frorn: Bill Arrington <Bi11.~~rrinoconC.ncmail.net> Organizatiun: NC DE~(R DCi~1 To: "William T. Goodwin" <bgoodwinnu,.dot.State.nc.us> CC: Cathy Brittingham <Cathy.Brittingham~ncmail.net> Mr. Goodwin, RECEI~'E® FEB 13 2001 DIYISIOPJ OF HIGHVV~YS PDEA•OFFICE OF NAI~URAI ENVIRONMENT I have visited each of the 14 bridge replacement sites included in your March 1, 2002 letter, located in the 20 Coastal counties under the jurisdiction of the Division of Coastal Management. General comments regarding bridge replacement projects would include: 1. Existing access to coastal waters and Land adjacent to coastal waters should be preserved. This would include trails, driveways, roads, boat ramps, clear channels, vertical c l.earance under bridges, parking spaces, etc. 2. The design of storm water diversion should add treatment prior to discharging. No storm water should be discharged to .t he .waters and wetlands in coastal areas. Dec:c drains discharging to waters or wetlands should be eliminated from bridge replacements. Storm water collected from bridges and approaches should be disposed of by infiltration} as far from the waters and wetlands as possible. The planning and design of these replacements is crucial to protecting the surrounding water quality. Bridges within one half mile of SA waters. or OEtW waters will need special attention dedicated to ,storm water collection, treatment and disposal. 3. Without specific proposals including accurate details of the proposed bridge replacement structures and associated impacts, comments included herein are general in nature and give no assurance of the ability to permit any bridge replacement proP.osal in these locations. Specific comments-below are based on the assumption that the hridge .replacements would be of the same general width, length and on-the current alignment with no on site detour. Bridge replacements that vary =nom this. would usually cause greater environmental impacts and require additional coordination with the resource agencies. 4. Any structure required to be built in wetlands or over the water to facilitate the construction of the bridge replacement or a detour around construction should be a temporary bridge. Specific comments on the above referenced projects would include: 1. B-3611 in Beaufort County - RED LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the project area include CW, CS, .PTW, and PTS. The potential for significant environmental impacts exists. Any project in this area will require a high level of coordination with all resource agencies. The existing bridge and causeway impacted the AEC's significantly and the r potential for mitigation involving restoration and enhancement credits is great. ( including the abandoned roadbed to the west of the existing road) 2. 8-4024 in Beaufort County - GREEDi LIGHT PROJECT - P_EC's in the project area include PTw and PTS. This project has the potential for minimal impacts. 3. B-4026_in 8ertie County - OCM has no jurisdiction ~~ 4.E-4.031 in Brunswick County - RED LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the project area Lnciude C'rl, CS and PTW. CORSCrI!Ct10n o. the ~astinq br_dC]°_ has signiricantly im_oacted r_he AEC't. ReSLOrdCiOn and enhancement mitigation potential is as g~~at as the potential to ad~rersely effect the AEC's. " 5. E-408a in Craven County - GREEN LIGHT PROJECT - P.EC's in the project area include PTw and PTS. Parking area as in the northwest corner should be maintained. 6. 6-4150 in Hertrord County - YELLOW LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the project area include PTW and PTS. Parking and access to the road along the creek should be preserved. 7. 8-4154 in Hyde County - OCM has no jurisdiction. 8. 8-4214 in Onslow County - YELLOW LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the oroject area include PTW, PTS, Cw, E5, EW. Wetlands surrounding this bridge should be protected as much as possible. Tidal wetlands in the no rtheast quadrant and wetlands in the Coastal Shoreline Suffer have the greatest significance. There e:<ists a moderate potential for mitigation. 9. 8-4215 in Onslow County - GREEN LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the project area include PTw and PTS. P. moderate potential for mitigation may be possible with the lengthening of the bridge. 10. 8-4.219 in Pamlico County - RED LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in project area include CW, CS, PTW, PTS and EW. The existing bridge has impacted the surrounding .waters and wetlands. The inlet for this creek has closed in and only has water exchange at high tide. The bridge needs to'be extended and the fill causeway removed. Great mitigation potential. Should preserve parking spaces for public access. !6.~ ~. ~`, _ » lI. B-4221 in Pamlico County - GREEN LIGHT PROJECT= AEC's in project area include PTS and PTw. Access to farm roads in NW and 5E quadrants should be preserved. A moderate potential for mitigation may exist with lengthening the bridge and removing causeway. i2. 8-4223 in Fender County - YELLOW LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the project area include PTW and PTS. Any realignment or expansion of fill slopes should move to the south to avoid impacts. to the access and business and residence on the north side of the bridge. I3. 8-4227 in Perquimans County - GREEN LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in the project area include PTW and PTS. Access adjacent to the bridge should be maintained. 14. B-4314 in Washington County- GREEN LIGHT PROJECT - AEC's in project area include PTW and PTS. Thank you for providing DCM with the opportunity to comment on these projects in advance .of their planning. Advance notification of environmental concerns should allow the design and permitting process to work more smoothly. Thank you, ~ Bill -, - Si~O/0? I I:~: Ail I7-JUN-2008 13:55 i :\hydraulics\permits_environmental\drawings\b40L6_rdy_tsh.dgn pshepord AT HY239419 C011tTRACT: C202091 ~ ~+ z ~ N 0 o .~ o T m o ~ 0 D w o z y 0 ~ ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' Z o m -i `" ~ O ~ N Z 0 m 3 _ ~ n • g g z -~ z ~ ~ -,-~ b ~ ~ -i v No c Q1 -~ ,l u n u• n n n ~ O C o w O A p 0 ~i -< ~ m rrn ~ O Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ m Z ~ ~ O ~o D i ~ v N ~ ~ O ~ m b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ O y rn n ~ ,- m b ~ ~' x q~ qq~~ a o. a II II II O O O J Q ~ V ~ N 33; ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ r ~o r ~ b " ~ ,, ~ ~ o` ° ca ok m~ } a, \ 8 'O b ~ D M ~ ~ ~ =G~~, ~ D C m m ~ N ~~ o ~° m m ~ o ~ ~ k ~ y --cs I ~ o~ x m II_ I~ ti b ~ ~ .~ 8~ ~~ '~ 'DO • x j ~ s~ ~w a ~ ~ C ti ~ s yyy~ ~~ ,. ~~ t1 M~ ~.~ ~~ ~ ti ~ Z ~ ti i. TIP PROJECT: B-4026 ~ 00 rn I r G1 I II o ~ Z N l G1 D ~ m pl ~ ~ + ~ ~ Z ' ~ Z to C 0 ~ ~ D ~,_ ~ _ . o. z ~ o ~ + I ~~ i O O N a r ,~ z a = no + v ~a ~ o . t~ m n - ~ o . :~%~ ~ ~ i ~~~ ~/ .. ~j..--- -...,,, ~: .., ~..I ~ .., --~- ~ ~v ~ ~ ~~ ~ n +~ rn ~w 0 0 I Ii ii Z ~ II r V! -p II a~ o ~ ~ o0 ~ I~ I + m -' o ~^ I~ I 0 101 ~" I I ~ __ ___ o 0~ ~° I I - -- N _ -- z O a rn v O c O S ~ -' a ~~~\ ~ O V nb ~~ ~~ r~ r~ C „h m D o~ rn~ ~~ ~~ \~ MO W D ^z 'l~^J V I ~o~~ m ~~_ ~ ~ rnZ,~~ R~n ,~ ~ ~ ~ r .~ "18~ I ~ ~~ k~,~ ~~ !' I, r~ ~ r_ kn ~ l~, 11 oz `m ~ ~.. O ~ c7 ~ ~ ~ ~~ O `~ x ~~ y ~® ~ ®~ ~ ~~ O o Q ~~ ~ C ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ O ~ J 1---a y^^ ~a n ~ n 4 ,~ ( 1 M a •/ a ~~ O ~ p. S I~ 9 . ., .u~ ' ~"s e°~ ~\~ =1 \~ ~s v~~ ti Ol s V d r v tr rr V 3 ti v V Q ~~ d ti V C ti y V v ~ O ~4 .a c fi o r C d ~r I '~ V 4 N w ~ d ~ 0 3 w ~ 'w [~ V h ti ~ ~ ~ o j C ~ 3 ~ b N ~ i ~ ~ ~ y ~+ \ ~ ~ Oi ~ O ~ • ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ _~ n o U O C L •~ N O a ~ - O N U :~ (!~ ~ N O . Y ~ C ~ O ~ a N C7 :°_ o N m J C O N a~ a 0 N a N C _O1 m (7 m w 0 °'~E3m m m ~ ~ c =_ ~ ~C70uf0. rn n N z z `o a a~ v rn m C7 v 0 U E .~ U U ~ C - l0 l0 N 03 -O N = C Y U '~ 2 z z ._ o J O ~ ~ (4 O ~ N ~ C 7 N ` ~ O ~ N f0 ~ = m 3 ~~a ~~ ~ ~ 0 d Q c 0 N 0 ti d r M ~ ~n s+~.ac= ~_ t~__. (6 ~ ~ ~ O N ~ Z ~~ '~' M ?r,~ ~ ~ (R3p.. In O F- u~ N d ~ ~ ~ ~ U xL EF- ~ Qd W U - ~ p ~ c ~ O p W ai rna~ a~ ~ z ~rn W .tn N a~~ w O ~ M ~ wU Ea ~ Q W w Q ~ ~' °- U U A z v ~~ ~ ~ ~ Z i ~ w Q ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ m ~ co ~ N E~ ~.,, U ~- a ~_ ~ ~ C .-. ~ N ~ O ~A O M O O O ~ f0 ~~ " O N ~ 2U ~ 0 0 0 0 0 W a ~ ~, ~ ~ 'N C (0 L N ~ N ~U~... W U ~ 3 a n ~ ~, - ~ o C l0 U c0 0 M O cr O N O N H ~ 0 R C N ~p O 0 O 0 O 0 O O ~ g X 3 0 o W W ~ ° U C ~ d ro C O _ U - ~ O ~ LL. Nv N Q c ~° C U N ~ N r N ~ p ~ y c ~ a~ ° a ~ = ( O - N O O O O O N O c a ii ~ o 0 0 0 ~ c m a y o U ~ c ~ m m S ~ a m` 5 ~~ U Q C ~~-. N ~ ~ Z N fq (~) ~ 7 ~ ~ > C > C _ LL LL c 0 O~ ~ W O J O J O ~ O J O ~ ~ ~. (0 ~ ~ J ~ J ~ J O t0 J O N "'~ ~ N ~ d N O ~v t ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ a ~ ~ n `r N ~ J ~n H ° o t ~ ~ t p ~ t C° .- 00 t r ~, O r ~ '} U N t1 ~ N O ~ ~ O ~p O O V O "d (/~ N J fn Z ~ N M sr p (O ~ 0 ~ I - ¢ z a ~~ ~~-o . 17-JUN-2008 13:53 r:\hydr aul~cs\pe ~r onmental\dr aw3ngs \I~4026_hyd_pr m_Ne t.dgn /E T a~ 5 n y r V) NW I ~ ~ c~ a II^ ; a_ ~ ~s ao ~ N~ ? b o i4 r~r N r ~ O ~ I -r+ r T m N aQ1 d•4~ qG~y g ~ 3 a ~ ~ ~~ se >' ~+ v 0 a r "s m H N y rn vz ~~?As ~?~m ~~n° A~NO C9 ~{n; D ! O m n ~ N Z G a ~ 01aKy ~ 1l~ m N N K O ' N `~ ~ 1 ~ ~1 1 1 1 T >r 1 ~~ Y ~~ eR ~~ O =.s R~ ~~ ~~ ~ ?~ . °~ r" sI 3 a~ ~~ O ~® O M 1F Q ~.?'' ~ a~ O O mm mm m=m __ (-7^i• -i 1 O ~~ ~ $. T r 7o O ~~ Crn c ~rn° a /71~D2AD ~ ~NZgnm aAm~Z~ 'nc~mm~ Ste. A _n ~~zz~~ n~~O~m J ~ r A ~ ~ .nj• Z~~ 11 n u ~\ 1c\ ~~ ~I C ~ ~ ~~ ~ i 1\ \ ~ 1` ~ 1 ` 7 1 \ N 1`1 I 1, •1 1~ II II II 1 I Il ~1 ~1 I ~ I I I ~ i~ ~ ~ I i ~„ ~ m I ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ' i ~ N I Nm O@ O W ~ Z I L ~. N s ~ it ~ m I ~ o i ~ ~ fA r~ ~ I 9F ~ ~ O8 ~ ~ 'A H I I v' j. r ~ E m . m c m I ~ ~ 1r m r I ~ .-2 a tF ~,~ 1~ ~ h r ~ ~ \'~ I ~ h hF N : i 1 ~ g g~~ "" i - ~ '~ \ 1 'Uga _ ~ ~ ~ ~. Q .~ '~ ~. ~.::n.~:.~ E?r ~i t ~ fi ~ ~ E ~ l x~ ~ ~ ~ z ee ! y ~[m ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1r I i ~ ~ I b ~ amm ~~ ~ I I ~ p ~ ~ II I ~ ~~ I I~ C P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ I ~ h ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ TI 1 I h I ~ I I ~` I II sO~~i ~ ~.~ ~ ~I ~z OHO ~ II r~p ~ h ~ I or~ 1 I -w ~N$r• 1 ' 1 1~J0 ~ o+~~ °_$ 1 tE a ,~t ~ II 1 ~~ ~I $; O ~~ ~~ $~ ~ ~~ O z °' ~ n ~ pz ~~ + c~ ~o Z h '. ~' ~ ~ h ~,~~ ~ ~ • ~.4 ~ z ~~._ N m ~ ~~ ~ '~~~ D h ~~ h £ .I ~ ~ I fi ~I _~/~ ''o I / 1~ o x o ~~ P ~1~ /~ ~ . © ~ 8 ©. Q ~ '~ 4 ~ J to ~ S a' 1 ~~ .~ ~ aa_i3~"~ Imo/ . ~._ {~ / m Z -yi ~m a° • m ~~ w ~o 00 N \\ ~ .. F Y ~l~1 fl Q ,~ S N N egg ~~ ~8g f X~~L~ Q P ~~ ti~ I rn r v ~ D~ N O rn O O ~O o~r.~a 8 ti '~ N 8 ~ O~ ~~ s _~ ~ ~ ~ + n ~ _ ~ n m l ~ m H -H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ D `o 3 `' `'~ N m 3 _ ~ n n' ~ O m ~ v c o m ~ ~ y ~. v m H ~o D V m ~ D D ~ ` V v 2 {' "~" _ _ [l l5 ~ A S r n o N n m ~ r r~ ~~ m ^~ r ~a or 0 i 0 20 ~~ 6 7 K ~ 8~ ~~ ~ sr ~~~~' C ~ 2 ~Z ~ ~ s ~, o Z ~E ~ro ~ xz ~~ '~ l 1 ~ ~` 1 1 ~ ~~~ --- 1 ---; -------------------------- - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17-JUIJ-2008 13:53 T r\hydr aul:cs\per,mas_.env:r onmenta]\dr e.n ngs\ 4Q~5~F~yyi_Q~yp,Y„~fgry__________„~~~ ~~ _~ __~______ ~ g~ ~~~ ~ 3 t ~]~ ~ d '~ s ;~ , ~ I $8 { q as o ~~ i n 2 ~ ~ s _ ~a _~ Tr ti N ~ ~~?AD T A ; m r~ N ~~~~° A A N O~ F~Ny D ! O Oo i~ N Z C N ~a~~ ~ \ N ~ N N K C • N T ~ ~g a r lJ N NW ~ ~ ., * o ~- ~ a o ~, - NN ~ 0~ ~O c N ~ `g c Q. ~ ~r y m H NQn s¢4~ O ~ ~_ ~® ~~ ~o ~ =e Y ~R sQ gig' 3a C~ ~~ Tg Q a 00 m m N t/l mm Z2 m ~Z O = cn ae ~ c ~ y I ~, r T I '7- ~ ~ / O ; ~ ~ r Cm C ~ p fn Q s ~ i ~ r ~_ ~ ~~ \ z H ~ n P ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ m ~0 ~~ m ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ to ~ 1 ~'~ O~ Z I~ o V O ~ , m ~ O O Z ~ I n y ~. 3 w ~ N " ~ m0 m m ~ 1' P N W ('~ rt ~ ~ ~ ~ VI ~npp ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~p ~ R1 ia~ ~ ~ ~ wQ ~ ~ O Q ~ o ~~ II ~ ~ ~ j m 170 ~ z~~ ~ ~ V - - ~ ~ O ICI ~~`~s • ~ m ~ ~ V V = to ~ ~ m H ~ ~, ~ os ° __ ti z ,i~c~ ODD=AD Na NNZ A D O Z'E ('fm m N n~NpmD ~~26 °~, I/ ~`z ZTO~ ~~ zoo-cm L~ '~ m. Of' .E ut ~~ ZOw ii m ~ s 00 ~ ~ (.nl O '~ 2 ~ T~ ~ n ~ ~ .• I ~ D O Z r O 2 ~ ,~ ~ ~ ,~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ 1 ~ .~ ~ 2 ~_ o ~~ .n •'~ ° n ,~ o ~ , -V N E ~ ~ \ 1r 1E ~ ~F h II E ~.: ~ ~ ,~ : ,~ . ~ a z~ ~ .~ •. ~ ~ . fi: ~ ~~~ ~p ~b ~ ~~ ~ ~? ~~ Q ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' D ~ ~~ g ~~ ~ a '~ $ QQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ * .~ o /^ v ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ * LO ~~O ~ - „gg / ~ I ~ ~aR~~ ~ ~ ti ~~ I ~~~ ~ sO~~ ~ I ~~ ~Z lr ~1~ py.'0 'k r~p N yOrN V a°~8 y9 ~'~~ ~br I m ~N ~ i ~ Z on- pOm ~ r; 62 ~' D 3 D ~~ ~' ~ m Q ~ s ma p ~ ~ ~. ~ s o m ~ % 7 °~~, o. P H w ~~ N R~ o, w ~ x ~ Q s ^ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~K i ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~. w / a ~~Q® / 7y ° ~ ~ NdS~\d'i pi~St ~ ~ 3 a. a~ i3Md3- ' •' .. tia~ o~ ~'b 4 a e ~ -. ~ - ~ \ 4 ~y ~~ •A z O ~ _ / cn ~, 0 O~ ~J Q f.(~~ m N~ ~ W ~ Z ~. a ~' ~ ~N~~ ~ z_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i H ~- ~ ~ ~g1M ~ ~- _ . ', \ . a u . ~ 0 za O~J ~- ''J- J ac~~ N wx' A23 N~~ 29 ~?5 ~5, 2g~~ / i o~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ yy u nc •. w ~ J a/- ~ . ~-' ~ ~ Q~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ a~ o . m ~- O y W ~ "~' ~ ~ uQ W N ~ O ~I~ ~ I ~II O o I~ ~I ~ Q .~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ IJ II N 1 Q ~~ v W F h y- ~' `~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~D ~ ~ ® U m Si Q U M Q C, N Gs, M u ~- ~ ~ z H N coo O ~ 9 w W ooQ ~ ~ c a F ~J- W "~ Ir ~ I ~ ._ ~~ N ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~T~ - I GH _ ~ ,i ~ I~ ~ W ~- = 1 ~~ 1 y~ ~ ~ X11 u~ \~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -~~ ~ ~~0 ~.I ~ 4 W.~ ~ ~. N C~ ~ mJ N ZO ~_~ V,JL~T m Q F- ~ N ~i sneer _ 6 I( _ ~.- 16-JUN-2008 10:57 R:\Roadwayy\ProJ\b4026_rdy_tsh.dgn 3$ggUSERNAME$ffi~~ ~~ C011 tTRA CT: 0 T m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ° ° ~w ~ ~ m ~ ~ = ~ S N N Q o O y r V o o ~ n ~„ ^ ~ y z o m _ y ~ Q ^' ~ N z 0 m O v O T g g z z ~ b ~ ~, n ~ o _ ° ° <~v<o ° y ~= o . ~ Z li II 11 II II II II x p v o ~'' o A W o as D -ZC r r ~ C ~ ~ ~~a~~~~ a ~ 0 0 = ~ v C ,~ ~ v Z O ^' ^' Y ~ ~ D °° r = = C ~ -+ O D = C O m ~ ~ O t/~ m ~ b ~ -p (~ ~ O ° p [`1j y ` ~ ~ m ~ ~~~ ~ c~ O ~ ~ N a II II II O O O ~ O J V ~ N 3~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o b A ~ o N~J p ww~y ~ N ~ p o ~y ~ Aq `a 'i-GGy 2$S b ~ ~ m ~ ~-i G) Y ~ C m N ° r~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~~ ~ x ti c~ z ~ y+ ~ *1~ ~ Q O O ~ ~' H 4 , * ~ m s e ~~ s F.I 8 i ~ W F ~`1 e9j o-~ ~~ Brio . rh~~ 2 "~ ~ b ~ y ~ ~ C202091 TIP PROJECT: B-4026 ~ ao j ~ ~ i~ ~ I ~ NZ ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~I I ~ _ 1 OI ° O "' Z ~- ~N-1 1 I I ~ ~ z w ~ ~ on c~ D.~ ~^ I Z + ~ I o~ !~lif' i a,:;i 1'~:I ; ~ ~ ~ ji lli ~ ; ~ j71~a"It. h.~ '^rac~ i+~ ~~~p. ~~rli! N ~ :~. I ~~lj~~j Nu4a:ri. I+ II'tW 1.111 ~'~ L:~i~61~i uj~jrl rr r~~ ~~ i ! ~a•~ i"It~~~i ~ ' ' ' ~ ,;; a'+ m n ~~ ~ ~,~! I'„"~I; ~Ij'~i~jhi > z _ O ''..rl° I i ! r;ia~l ~ ~ o` 7o -~- ~O m ~ m / / I ~~i~ j ~ ~ / .I ! a! O . // r ~ .. // liij; / '.. ' ~~li~ I jh~~; ! 1 ~/ ~ l~~ .-~ ~: ~j!1 'j i~ill;l,, ,...;I ' l ~ n i Q ~a ; ~I! I'll ~ ~ I ~- rn m ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~I ~ ~ p m ~ j!. '~ v v 2 7 ,.~ ~ rn !~ w ~~ ~ I, `: O ~ I.~ ~i~' ~ti 'i I I. LI: 4`~` Il!!!i! ;,!I~!! n I~.n ~i1~ ; d'~~!. u~ pil~~~~. `I' illi9 I II II m ~ II ~ -~ o ~ ~ o0 I~ I z I~ I I O "~ v ~ to°°~__ ` , I\ ~ -- -- °o ~ ~' ~O I I - ~ _ --- ~ -- N I ' ~' o~ O ~ I Q ~ m m- ~, n z_ ~ r ~ .~ R ~8 ~~ ~ ,( ~ ~ C s tiI b ` ~ -~ r o ''l x ° ~ ~] b ~1 V J~1'f O ~i c~ o O ~~ ~ ~ ~ C ~~ ~ ~ O y ~ n C „h °o 09/08/99 ~~ , ~ ~ ~~ CGS I~ al (~ I~ f"T B a y • ~- O ~ Q. s~ 5 T '9 ffi ° °. N 0 ~ c a a 3 s v a O 2 T n p •n m m C N ~ ~ ~ ~ fi. 0 3 o ~ o o ~-'~- ~ 'b ~' ~ o o ~ ° ° ® c o m ^^p N 70 N J y ' ~ ~J S ~ O °, '~ 3 c o -. o° s T c ~ ~ 0 3 o m c RrI ~' ~' ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n_ c c H Q! ~' o' o O n~ c o' n '" o fi o fi~~~~ m ~ ~ s~ C ~ pO A ~ O- `~ ~ 7 ; ~ O ~ 7 O C ~ a ~ O < 7 ~ ° C ~ 4S7 -o ~ ~ ~ o T 7 3 x- 0 $° ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ o m ° b o a~ ~ ~ ~ b t~ X I II! -III. ~ ~.il ~' ~ ~ •p ~~ ~ "a E x ~ 2~ ee"O I u ~~~~ ~ ~ ~i it ~l eT~~,j >~ R ~ ~~~l O ~ = H N g ;. $ m m m p O 4. ° O 4 a. ~ ~ T y o ~ ~ ~ ~ ,;, o (Q C> 4~o~'a~'=aaoa~'~'~ o ~' fi m fi m n fi fi fi fi m m O ~ n S ~~~ g N N c ~ 3 0 °~ o c°~ 3~ o o a- o g w O a 0 ~ o°_ °o_ ~~ ~' ° C O. a ° O S S p ~ < o• ~ ~ ~ 3 o - $ o o T n ° 3 3 - n ~ v o [1 C 3 n ~ v .. [~ I I I I qq 1~ O ~fi fi fi~ fi~ ~fi~fi °om O. d O. Om d ni °- .o d ~ O v 'v -i -~ n~ 4 Z° 7 Zo Z° c o n 3 3 3 ~ .'« m ° m o' 2. ~ ~ Rf 0 0 '$ v v~ 3 o T a S T °. °. A O a a ~ G + ~ ~ ~' O' ` ~ 'O ° a ~ C O p n o~ ps~ v~ S~ ~. 3 a. a ; r 3C r ~ o ~' o o ~ 04 °a m ~ s 3 D p 3 ' S S M 3 3 3 "' 0 o ~ °A s 3 IIII III I I R 3 '° ~ ~° ~ o 0 0 o a ~I', o ~ o 0 0 0 0 .. ~_ o a. ~ o c o s o 0 0 0~ m ~ ~i o v_ v a s > > > > ~ Z a a a =, s o 0 0~ A m CS ~ SC ~ CS ~ ~ o w S° 3 ° v° 4' 47 47 O _ a O 7 '0 S X71 0 O A ~~ 7' O C ~ ~ ° ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ G o ° ° 'OO ~ ° ~ ° _ ' O 0 -00 ~ u n u o~ o ~ ~ o n~ a ° ~ ~- ~o~~~-moo -o m m y fA y C C C T m m ', '~ '~ ~ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I ~ I I I i~~ ~~I D• o tf ~ ~ o o v ~. v i m ~ a. ° v ~ ~ ~, ID 4°, n 70 0 0 3 0~ c $, ~ rt a s a ~ o a s' ~ ~ a ~ ~ ° n ~ ~ c ~ ' ° -o a ~ v s o 0 O O ° O p ° r a o r u s o m o ~~ I I ' I ®~ ®o ~-~o-.- I I 70 70 7° 70 N 7Y ~. 70 N 7 a 10 p ' , o ~ a oa °a o c O f a t~ ga~° 1 ~ I `~ ~. ~. o a ~ ° ~ = Z W ~ a o~ A a P °o w~ (~j ~~ p°~ o~ a ~ c ^~ C O ~ d ~ q •J n ~ ~ O C ~ O 1~ ° ' T C = m ~'9 ° m C n a ~ n o ~ ~ o ~ ~. a 0° m a O I ~ I I u ol^ $ ~~ I a o ~ ~ ~ C ~ C C C n ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ Z ~ ~ ~ o o ~ O ~ O ~i° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~i° ~ ~ ~ ~ j ° ~ -I -~ ~ ~ ~' ~ 'Z ~ ~ ~ o. g o' o' y o m' ° a ~ o' ~ o• ~ -+ v N < o• c m o o' o m ~` 0 0 0 o C ~ r v ~ ~' ~ ~ a. 3 ° ~ o_ ~ o_ °a ° o ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ p T qi S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O A m Q N ° T O O rtS N~ O Q°+ o O °' p d o ~ ~ ~ p CS ~ O O O O ~ N ~ ~ C N -n d ~ ~ ~ O- cS ~ cS~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ 47 a Q ~ C m rn p a O ~ ~ ~„ ~ p ~~ T w r ~ O ~ n d s ` o' o v O O e x ~~~ o~° o~ u p i e ~= c° O 7 p o ,p n ~ O 7 C A C ~ 7 O O O 7 C ~ ^N n t7 0 `~ ~ o -+ C c c C H ~p O T ~_ O m C C y ~ O • T ~ C N ~ ~' m C i ~ * ''~' I m I III °II IIII I I ~ i - I ~ ~ p ~ I l i l I i I l l R I ! I I I I (~ Z rn Z --~ O z D r 5 z rn rn -I N r N II :~ O C `0 ~' ~- 1--~1 ®~ I ~'j /®~ g ~ _ m ~ x'~ rn~ ~ IO f ~m ~ ~ "' _ °N OZ z ~ ~ ~ ° ai~yrn.t~g ~° ~ v Om ~ ~ n~ n~ o o~h~2~~~~= C to ~Z ~. to ~ ~ i \ Cil N~m~~~o°m~~~rn ~ ~Z ~y Z f.' ~~ , 6 ~ ~ ~ p i`n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 U b~ x y No -.rn'~ iooo~~-.c~ o~ N b r-- 'C `cxg~ oC row p ~ v~=i ~xAi ~ _ ~ o g 0 ~ ~ , ~' ~ U' H HV~j O~ I ~ ' m n m O I ~ N ~z ~ r b' ~a ,'~ ,: v 1 A e~ Z A ~ ~ to q~~ D~ o ~~~ -~ ~N 0 0 ~ ~~~ w~ ~W~ ; W Op '~ -A W N z~ ~_ ~ o .~ r ~ ~ rn ~ ~ s~ I ~ y g ~ b ~ b ~ ~, N ~ ~ i! ~ ~ 'bro ~ ~'' N ~ i o [~ ~ , ~v '! ~° ~' ~ ~ ~ +l A m m N ~~ ~y il~~ m `I g r ~ m A ~' N f ggO o~ sn ~ , i y ~ (1 mmco z '~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ = CO 0~ J ~ 17 lll^~~~~ OJ N Q~ ~ -_~ Cn ~~ O ~Q `rw~ rn ~ 40 ~ J J UI O to rt+ Y / .11 J> N W ~ '_I ~/ m m w y ~ ~..i/ ~`\ O .~ ~; . ° ~ ~ N N N ~.. ~~~ ~ m i/; N N N ~ D q ,~C ~ ~ A , ~ 'y O ~....~/ ^... W N UI ~ .~ 4q ~ ~1 y i m n i op b~ D v, h ~ ~~ a ~m ~x ~~ ~ , V ~-- J ,D ~~ 0~ f ~~~~~~~=oo ~~ y~~ N~~~ ~Q h y ~ ~ ~ i8 b r ~"w i; , ~ ago m ~ ~ • S "' N ~ ~ ~ n ~ 'ti ~V .tyq ~ • I I 7 ~ ,'y+ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ I I ~ A b ' ~ A w cn y b ~~ ~ ~ C ~ i I N~ ~ .H.I ~ ~~uo'i '~ ~~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ NO ~~~ , ~ 4 ~ ~., ~ ~ q ~ C IVl I ~ ~ ~ ~ wm r z m3 mw r z m ^ ,~, ~ b O Q ~ ICI 1 ~ y ~ ~~~DDAO--- mD~ ( D ~m 3 O N 0 Cq ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ( ~ G7 Z 17 Z RR~~ {] ~rr w m m m i 6 ~ a ~7 ~n ~ amD • cnm ~ b by :Z b ',~ b wNH ENV . 4 O ~ 0 ~ yO ~~ y ~~o mmo M S J ~ . -I (31 ~ ~-. W~ ~~ ~ N N J pJ b v,r ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ e~ Qy x R ~ ~ ~~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ c °r ~~~ 18-JUN-d700f~ 10:58 r:\roa oy pr of\b4026_rdy_sum.dgn 11/bEi /10/ i ~s ~~ ~~ ~~ < ~ C ~ ~ ~g _ ~ C~ /~1 ,~ z~ z gg ~~ ° ®~ ~ ~ ~~I ~ w O V/l z 'b P ~r $~ ~ a rn ~~ ~ ~ ~ % ~t : ~~ ~ ~ ~ i D z 0 + + ~" 9 ~ X ~ ~ ~ Q ~ g Z ~ .~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } s P ~ pp ~I g g Z ~ 0 - ~ o - e ~ ~ ~~ P N ~ 4 ~ s 3 ~M Y. N ~ m e ~ ~ ~ s s E ~ F 19 _ _ I REVISIONS ~& 0@6:d~,p pisk,4Riggn N ~ N N MO.. O C j j ONA ; O O ~v m . x~ n ~ D R00 O~ 9 D O -t9 m O 7N K '~~ ~O > ~l rao ~ i3 mo ~ v !' 7 O ° ~ m aD ..m o ~ A O y~ y ~ ~ = >~ 3 0 ~ V ~p ~ ~ ~ i ~ t 7 p ~ T N ~ ° 00 = O r= O T' U y .Z7 r T° o = • ~ r ~n N O * Z Oy ~QINS *N O 7~ +~ALm a ~ ° ~p ~ o ~ ~~° ~m z AANO m f+~inn at 't~ ~m C7 o 0 N ~^ K ti a O a a in 0 ~ ~ ~ m t4i 1n H C ~' W -(_ ~~ ~ N P J ~' N ~ m \\\\ \` \` \`1 `11 `1 11 1~ ,1~ 1 ~ 11 0 1 i I~I I I I II II I II II O n II ~~I8 ~® = i O xx ~~c~ i N Z ~ ~ ~mnnA $ ,,,+> nc~mm~ _'-9~gPgk" « W• 77 D ~445~ ~'~ ,5~ ODZr~ Zmp~~ Q u+ 7J 77 -rim 1=ClgQ~gpg~ a_r ~~< ~R4o Z~bii W rf 1 ~~ (L h ~h i ~G ~ f` fr \ Q {fr~~g / h ~ ~~ .~A .. ~~ t33d~ ~W L~ /~ .. rl m h Y:fr ~ ~~ h ~ iF ~~s ~ ~ ,F ~~$s~ r n1 ~ + ~ 2 ~ ~~~ a ~~ h ~~$ 8 ~ ~ " 8 h Q ~ ~ ~ Q Q ha i A s r vols.. " W N W ~ ~ p~ o~ma pt; ~m~~r x o + ~m ap pO nn my ;m ~ Z Z Q ~ ~ mm N !/f m m Vl VI m m ~~ (~ Z ~~ _ ~ ~ T yC O I ~ T ~ O N ~ r C r^ .'v m 0 m~ A on ~~ ~° Z ~o ~~ ~~\ fi h~ ,~ ~~ o ~ _ ~ _ ~ n _ S L a ~' m ° j j o m + ~ + 0 ~~ o. V wm V C V O O O ~ CN N A ~ -~. I ~ ~ ~ . I a N s~ O W ° I 4 v O Q• 7 o rn ~Z D I m ~ m -~Q ~Z° ° u D ~ v n ~ p m + = A /5 ~o v w h ~~~o * I m t= p~ Q ~ ~ ~ o *~~$ ~ QQ ~ ~h A~~ ~m ~ ,.h "'~ +~ s ~'r ° ~ x F ~ 'OO m ~ ~ fr _ 44]] ~ ~ fi N {C=~ z~ ~ ~ d. m m ~ I AN mo I g ~mmA~ 20 y xl + °~ '\ J ~~~ moo ~m O wvfx N ~~~p0 A D ~pp~D !) m c ci ~• -a s D A 0 a ' o° v N D I 8 ©~ ~ ti.z K N ~ .~ z ~ ~ ~Qo ~z ~ / o z I ~ do Mpi,d~~ ~~occ z -E -~ da?3Ade~~ ~ ro yy ~ i z ~ A ~ Z 0 I 18-JUN-2008 10:59 R:\Roodwo \Xsc\64026_rdy_xp]_Ldgn $SESUSERIVAMESSSS .. . :. : I ~ I I i 1: fi i. I I i ' . , i i _ p , I ,. i ~ ~ I ~ . ~:,~ , ', f I i ~ .. ~ I . ~ {I _ _ I :.I { ' I ! a i i . _ I i { , '. I : .. .i ~ . I I _. ! ~ _~ i i a - , __ ~ ~ ~ - - - .I i f ~ ~ I ,I , : i ; , ~ f i ~ I t ~ i" -1. i O I , I f i I _ ~. I I, .t . ~ I I ~ - I ._~_;. i 1_.. L ; . ~ I I I - rl ~ _ ~ I I . , ~ I I 1 - i G- i; _.. : C : ~ I I ~ _ _ _ I .. 1 I I I ~~ I I I I ~ . r .. ' . . .. .. .., i '... I . . - 1 ~ ~" . i ,_ :©,' r .. ~ I . t i - ~ - r i - 'a ~' - ~' - - - I I . I -- .. i< ~ -.' .. _ : : . , ~. _ . - ~ _. I , ~ -I ~ } . I ._ _ la I f I ., 1 .. J i ![ i :. - " : f ;. .. V :. ~ . . . : . - . " -. "" ~ . _. f .:. ..:_ .. .. 4 I I 1 1~ -- +.: - i .a .. - ~ ' , . , . -_ I t - __". . ., ,-~ r I _._ _ _ 1 _.. _.-. _.... ~. ~ f ~,- , _ ~ ~ ~ :_ ~- ~ - 1 ~:; - ,, ~ . _ - ~- .. I _ , _ . - . . . , - i_ ` f ~- ~ ~ ~ .. .. f ~' I ~ " I, I ,. ,. _ . :I -, +{ - f 1 ~~. - - - . . , o .. _ ~, . .. f . - ~, L - .. I _ , f - - - . I I ~ ~ ~ f „ I I ~, ,' . , ;+ . ., . . ' ' _ ~ - f - I ;. : ' :. 1 } ., , , .t .. .".. .. , , , i . ~. I + ~ { .. . ' . . " -... . , ^t + "_" _ _ _ __ ~ I _ + - • +' - -f _ _ _ _ _ ___ i j - ' l~_ ~ ,, ~ ~~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f - l = ~ ~: ~ ~ - .. I . I ~ ~ r ~.. t ,. ~ - .. f ~ .. ,. ;. F: ~ , f. ~ V i- '1 _ ~ F ~ f 4 ~+ . f ~ ~ I . I f~~- ", ~ :, _ ' - ~ 1 ~ ;j '! ~ - , ~ r . .. ' _ I . { , , ; I _ _~ - _ - ~+ 1 ~ f ~ I ,~ l : ~ ~ I a ~ j I ~ I .. .. f f . I - -+ 1 ~ ~; .. , „ .. ~ . ~ . , ~ ~ . I a ~~. ~ ~ ~ - I ,~ . ~, . ., I I . . ; ~ I I I I . ~~ ~ :, ,, .- , _ ~ 'f I ~ ~ ~ - . . - . . -- ,; F --- ~ - - , - . , L I F ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~i; .IT - I. . ~ ~ , I . ; !, ' !, . f ~ „~ ~ ~ I ~ ; o .. .. - - ' ,I I ~ ' I ;.. f f _ ~ .... fi f I . f f O ~ .. I ~ r 1 I ~ j i i f I f j I i ' I I I . . _... '. __ ii_ I __ I .. I i I I O O I I I I . _ _ .. I i I ~~. ~.p. , ~ . _. - - - ~ v d . L. I ~' ~, .. G ..i ~ 4i ,. _ . . . i ,_. I _ ,: o , : _ i i ~ Z , . , , I ., .. . . .. _ I i i , , - ~, f ~ ; I i ' I ~. t ,. t x ~ I ~ f I t ~ . ~ + . " - ~ . . . - _ ~ . . I i r .~ I __ . I _ ~ . 1 ., _ 1, ..' _ ~ , ~ f , I , i.. . . ~ 18-~u1a-20 08 10;59 pp ~$¢gg026_rdy_xpl_l.dgn ~ SS S USEHI AM t 1 . -; - _ - - ~' 'I ~ ~ - I ': - - . ~ C i , - - i - I - ~ '~ ~~ i i I ' I a I t. ' , i ' _ ~ ' i ~ :. _ ' _ ~ ' ''j r -:- i i I I I ; . .. - !, ' 1 o _ _ _. 1 . . , ~ r + a o _ . _. ' ~ Q I !~ ` , , I ~. i ° - ~ _, ~ ~ ' I I ! q ! .~ v '! -' ~~ ' ~ I - , ~ ._ ~ ! i i ~ _ ~ _ _ r - _ - _ ,, _ + ~ : : " ~, . _ - i I i 1 ~ i r o , ! , " j ' - ,I r ;; ~~ . :. i , ! i i ~ '- . . - L; i 1 i ~ o ~ ~ ~ r , . 1~ 1 ~ .. ~ r I , +, I 4 I --- t t_ . I ~ ~ - i i - - _I _ ' I C I I I . 1 .y. f •.. ~~ ~ ,i , t ' , t ' I I .. ~ __ ___ - I l - I - ~ - _ ~ ~- I . 1 ~ I I I I .. I ~ + __... l I I ..I_ .. _ _:._.. .. ___._i . . ._ ..~.:. _ ' ~ ~ I .... i I i :: t' . I ~ ' ', i - ~ - '.. ' . . I I,.. I i , _ ~ ~ I -+ , I , ~ ~ ~ i '~ I rs t i ,., 1 - ~ . , r I _ ~ ~ .. i I F I ~ 4 7 . _ ..~ ~ . .. _ .. I _ .. ... _ . __ .-.. ~ .. .. ... I ...... . ~ :. .. :_ _ F .~ _ .. ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~ . I _ _ - - - I - 4.._ _ + ~ I . I I I i ~ ~ I 4 1--_h:. . . - ~ -- r _ ._. _._ . - i ' 4 f ~ _, _ ~ .. ~ ~ .. , ` I + ~ . . - i -1 t __ +V _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ .1 _. 4 L. 4 ~r t I ~ ~ ~ '. • I F I ;. I . I W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ,. 'I _- ~ ~ _- 1 I ~ I~ ~ t J - ~ _ ~ _ ~ i '-l I .- ~ _~ I I _ i I I 4 i I r- ] 1 N _'. .. I i. ~ .. i 1 -T I I G Al I I + ~ t ~ ~ CJI I + - r i_ # I I { I I ; - I 1 f r .; ~ i- -. I + 1 ~ -_ t Yt + . , ~ i =.. 1 + ~_ t$.I {_: I I ~ 4 I t ~ ; 11 ~ r t r _,. ~ . .. _ } I, .. I I I i I F r I . I I ~ ~ .I ~' '~ . ~ . ~ _ ~ . 1 ,- ~ a ~ ~ .. I I .. ~ ti ~ ,. _. i! t . w ~ .._ - - ~ ., .- ~, ~ r - ~ '-• i , . .„1 .. l .. _ ... ~. ., I ~ . t ~ : - ~ ` ~ ,~ ~ . ,t, ~ ~ ~ , ; 1 ~+ ... . .. ' . . . 1 I ~; 1 1 ~+ I - ~. ~ ~ ~I~ ~~ ~~ , I • ~, ~, . :_ ._; . i ~ ~ t - . ~ I I ~ ~ F I i _ , I ~ . _ , . _ + ; . ., , ~-,- ,. ~i . i ' i I ;- _.. _, <- - ++ ,; I . ,, _ ,. i I ' ~[ I i t i I I, 1 I i t i I i i I I _. I 4 I .. - ~ -~ ~ I , .. . F - ~ f I - ~~ - I 1 ~ ', I I I I ~ _ ~ y 41 . I ~ l . ~ .. .. .~ r ' ~ I I r ,O ~ i, .. ~ '. :. ~ . . .. ~ 1~ ~ I I I 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~~ I I ` ~ I ~ I~ I I ~ I I ~ 4 ~ 4 I I I {: 1.._ I - ~ Lf I I + ~ ~ I I I I 0 ~ f ~ + i ± Lt _ I 1 .. ~ . I~ ~ Q I I ~ v 7y - - - i i (I ~. G ~ m ~ .I - ~ .. 1 i 7. . ~ I t a: - - ... •-1 . ~ . - 1 + - . - i - . I - . ~ I ~ .. ~ ~' ~.. -. ~ . _ r_ _ .: + .. .F .-. ~ JL ~ - t I 1_ ; - r ~~ ~I i I ~ I~ ,~ ~ 8 ,1 X I r ~ I - I . ... t i ~ . t ~i r r - - i i I ~ 1 o- Ll : ~. I ~ i ~ ~ I I . ~ I , ~~ - i , { +, ~7 ~ . 18-JUN-2008 II:00 R:\RoodNO~yy\Xsc SSRSUSERNAhIE8 \64026_rdy_xpl_l.dgn 8$S _ ~ ~ ~ + ,, ; . I ,,, {. .r o 'I ~ ' i ; I + I i I I I I i I i Q i - r _ I ~ _~ . .. I I ~ I I I 0 . . o I_ + I „. + ~ ; . .. j ,, - - ~ _ i o ~~ r, _ .. I,. _, ., 'r t+ - o + - - ~ ~ ~ I I • I l ' o + I ~ + I I .. A , ~ I .. - _. i ,, .. .. ~ i ,. . . + : ~ ' i . tt -- r1 j ' . ,: + - ;. ~ , ,-:- I -t , . i_ .. I _ , . ~ _ .. ~ . I ~ ~: - . . . .: i - - O ... . ~ I ~ - ~ , I i p I I -. ~ I ~ j .~-l + ~ ~ I I i + 7 -.- ... I _.- . . I ... - -.. I i _ :.- I -.- .. .. I .. - ~ - ~ ~~. .. ~ . ' - - - j { ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,.. 1 - ~I t I + I _-- + .- ' I' i , I ~ . -..- . . + I:.. I } I + I .1: I ..- , - I , - . .. , + ~. . 1 •' I . I r : +~1 , + ~ I I I I ' .. ~ _ - t ~ ~ ~ ~ , I .+ I _ ~ .. L I I I ~ i - .. ; ~ I I i l , f . , , I ~ .I . ~ ,, { .: ,. ., ::. :+ . :I rt_ ~~ ~ I '~ I ~ ~ 1 ~t ~ 1 + 1 ~~. I + ~- - , r ~ . r , I . 1 - i . , I -.- - I -... + . . ,. ~ .. ~ i I , i F +~+- + J . - ~ . ~ _ . t i + . 1 .~ + 4j ' ` i ~ I l ~ I + , , i - ... ... I ... -...f .. .. .~ _, _._ _, ' ~ ~ I i , .. . ~ .. .. f I ~I .. .. ~ + i I . ~ I .-+ ,. , - ~ ~ '. ~ + I ~- I 1 :. .. ; I ~ ` l .: ~ I ~ . ~ ; ~ ~ { ,. _ , . :. ,. { l {I I I : I ~ F - ~ + . _~ } - ~ .r ,. f -. . ,. ,... ~ ' + .. 1- I ., ~ ~.. y . , ~ - ' . ~ f -., - - .. ~.. -. L ~ . -~- - - - , .. ;. I j '. j i i .. r 1 r I ~ ~- ~ 1 ~+ ~ ~ _ , , ~ J ~ r ~ ' ~. .. , , ;I _, . I , ., I 1 ~ 14 ~~ ~. '. i i F .._ t l t + .. ~ ~ f~ i ~ I + I + ~+ + .fi iFF I i{ .+ _ + I F I i l rl I i I - . ~ -r ~ i ~; - t: .. .. ... ~ - ~ , ~ ~ I ~ , . + - ~ ~ . . ~ , ' ~ - I + . - 1 I } I. . ! ~ :. ~ :: - ~ ~ - - I ~ ~ .~i - _ - I. I I_j + ~ ~ i -_ - - _ - 1 I .- + I I I i I I I ~ - . I _- .. i I ,.. -i , . i ~- - - I i ..I .-I , I . I I I I I ' .., ,.. i .. ; , i I I j ' ., ~ I .. : I i.'.- ..'. _- f ~ .I '. .. .._ _. ~ l . -- .. ;! I I I . ~ I ~ - . I - + I I + ~ . i. - ~ ~ . + , + .,. '. I ~. . , .. .. - _ .- ... I , + I ,..I I ~. ~ ~ ~ - I ' , . ~ I _ ~ ~ 1 ~ I I + I I , - I I I ~-r ; '. I + '+ I {. I + - I + - , - - . - _ . . I - r __ - -- - - I I .: '. I :. ~ - ~ .. . ! i i , F i ~ . .. ~ _ ... _ , - ~ 'I ~ , , .. .. I i I ~. I I + ~ ~ I I I I ,_. ..~ .-. , Q1 ~ I 1 I I _ - - I _ . - - q .. .. I i i ~ }. ~. - i, _. .. ~ ' + I i ~+ - I + I t + ~ I ~ I 1 . 4 I . - I I I r - - - ~ t - 1 - F -- - - 1 - I I - I O .. ~ I I I 4 k O I 4 ~ ' 1 -- + p; , - y. i .. ~ . ~~ - -- I ~ - _ rnn . z I - a I . -. . . I . I i I _, ,. 1 I . - ,, -. I I + ~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ _ ,_ , I - -- ~ ., __ ., .. .. i - ,a i ; r SR 1100 Bridge No. 45 over Choowatic Creek Bertie County Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1100(10) WBS No. 33393.1.1 State Project~No. 8.2010401 T.I.P. No. B-4026 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION UNITID STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS APPROVED: ~ ~l ~u ~iJ'v~/ DATB 'Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., E ironmental Management Director Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT DATE ~tzJohn F. Sullivan, III, PE ~` Division Administrator, FHWA • ~ ~ Bertie County Bridge No. 45 on SR 1100 Over Choowatic Creek Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1100(10) WBS No. 33393.1.1 State Project No. 8.2010401 T.I.P. No. B-4026 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION October 2006 Document Prepared by: Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. a~e~aae~aaea V ~~, sr, ~.~ N CA~?~ '••, Date e ~ . FESS~/p ~y o y 9~ 9 ag SEAL c t 030049 = ~C G For the North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch Bryan D. Kluchaz, P.E. Project Engineer Bridge Project Development Unit Tra alter Planning Engineer Bridge Project Development Unit ''~~~~~~~ d~~~ PROJECT COMMITMENTS Bertie County Bridge No. 45 on SR 1100 Over Choowatic Creek Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1100(10) WBS No. 33393.1.1 State Project No. 8.2010401 T.I.P. No. B-4026 In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit No. 23 Conditions, the General Nationwide Permit Conditions, Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, General Certification Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of Certification, the following special commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT: Division Engineer: The following measures will be carried out for the replacement of Bridge No. 45: 1. An in-stream construction moratorium will be implemented from February 1 to June 30 to protect anadromous fish during spawning. NCDOT Resident Engineer should notify local EMS and Bertie County schools a. minimum of 30 days prior to road closure. Hydraulics Unit and Roadside Environ-nental: 1. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet will remain on each side of the stream underneath the bridge. Hydraulics Unit a~:d Structure Design Unit: 1. Bridge deck drains will not be allowed to discharge directly into the stream. Hydraulics Unit: 1. A state ston-nwater permit will be obtained. 8-4026 Categorical Exclusion Green Sheet August 2006 Page 1 of 1 Berne County Bridge No. 45 on SR 1100 Over Choowatic Creek Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1100(10) WBS No. 33393.1.1 State Project No. 8.2010401 T.I.P. No. B-4026 INTRODUCTION: The replacement of Bridge No. 45 is included in the 2006-2012 North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program. The location is shown in Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion." I. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicated the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 26.8 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. Based on a structural appraisal of 2 of 9, the bridge is considered functionally obsolete and structurally deficient. The replacement of an inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient traffic operations. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS SR 1100 (Grabtown Road) is classified as a rural minor collector. Land use in the area is rural, consisting primarily of agricultural properties. There is a cluster of mobile homes north of the bridge. Bridge No. 45 was constructed in 1952. The existing structure is 35 feet in length, and consists of two spans with the maximum span at approximately 17.5'. The clear roadway width on the bridge is 22.2 feet, providing two nine-foot travel lanes. The superstructure consists of a reinforced concrete floor on timber joists with an asphalt wearing surface. The end bents and interior bents consist of timber caps on timber piles. The bed to crown height is eight feet. The normal depth of flow is six feet. The posted weight limit is 11 tons for single vehicles (SV) and 17 tons for truck-tractors semi-trailers (TTST). The existing bridge and approaches on SR 1100 are tangent. The approach roadway on SR 1100 consists of two nine-foot lanes with four-foot grass shoulders. The estimated 2006 average daily traffic volume is 900 vehicles per day (vpd). The projected traffic volume by the design year 2030 is 1300 vpd. The volumes include 1 _ percent TTST and 2 percent dual tired vehicles. The posted speed limit on SR 1100 in the vicinity of the bridge is 55 mph. SR 1100 is not part of a designated bicycle route and there are no indications that an unusual number of bicyclists are using this route. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 1 There are aerial power lines running on the west side of SR 1100 that cross Choowatic Creek. There are underground telephone cables on the east side of SR 1100 that become aerial at the bridge and return underground just past the bridge. Utility impacts are anticipated to be low. There were no accidents reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 45 for a recent three-year period. A total of six school buses cross over Bridge No. 4~ daily. III.. ALTERNATIVES A. Project Description The proposed approach roadway will consist of a 22-foot travelway providing for two 11- foot travel lanes with five-foot grass shoulders. The proposed structure will provide a 28- foot minimum travel way, consisting of two 11-foot travel lanes with three-foot shoulders. The proposed right-of--way width varies 60 feet to 100 feet. The design speed will be 60 mph. Based on a preliminary hydraulic analysis, Bridge No. 45 will be replaced with a structure approximately 60 feet in length. The structure provides two 11-foot lanes and three-foot shoulders on each side. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing grade at this location. The length of the proposed structure may increase or decrease as necessary to accommodate peak flows as determined from a more detailed hydraulic analysis to be performed during the final design phase of the project. B. Build Alternatives Three (3) build alternatives studied for replacing the existing bridge are described below. Alternate A (Preferred) replaces the bridge at the existing location with a new structure. The length of the approach roadway will be approximately 250 feet to the south of the proposed bridge and 330 feet to the north of the proposed bridge. During construction traffic will be maintained by an off-site detour along SR 1106 (St. Francis Road) and US 17/13 that is approximately 10.9 miles (17.5 kilometers) in length. (See Figure 1) NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Brid a Re lacement Pro'ects considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite detour for this project - would include SR 1106 and US 17/13. The majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road user would result in 20 minutes additional travel time (10.9 miles additional travel). Up to a 10-month duration of construction is expected on this project. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion _ Page 2 Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that on the basis of delay alone the detour is acceptable. Bertie County Emergency Services has indicated that the detour is acceptable. NCDOT Division 1 has indicated the condition of all roads, bridges and intersections on the offsite detour are acceptable without improvement and concurs with the use of the detour. Alternate B replaces the bridge at the existing location with a new structure. The length of the approach roadway will be approximately 250 feet to the south of the proposed bridge and 330 feet to the north of the proposed bridge. During construction, traffic will be maintained by an on-site one-lane temporary detour structure that is approximately 73 feet in length located east of the existing bridge. Traffic will be maintained in a one-lane pattern through the use of portable traffic signals. Alternate B was not selected as the preferred alternate because it has a greater construction cost, greater environmental impacts, and longer construction duration due to the construction of both a temporary and permanent structure. C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study Alternate C replaces the bridge approximately 13.7 feet to the east of the existing bridge location with a new structure to be stage-constructed. The length of the approach roadway will be approximately 668 feet to the south of the proposed bridge and 1074 feet to the north of the proposed bridge. During construction, traffic will be shifted to the west side of the existing structure in a one-lane pattern while constructing Stage I of the proposed structure. Traffic will then be shifted to the new alignment in a one-lane pattern while Stage II construction of the proposed structure is being completed. Traffic will be maintained in a one-lane pattern through the use of portable traffic signals. This alternate was eliminated from the reasonable and feasible alternatives due the difficulty of construction and additional environmental impacts. To stage construct the proposed bridge, removal of a portion of the existing bridge may not be possible due to the existing girder spacing. The "Do-Nothing" Alternative will eventually necessitate removal of the bridge. This is not desirable due to the traffic service provided by SR 1100. "Rehabilitation" of the existing structure is not feasible due to its age and deteriorated condition. Rehabilitation of a timber structure is generally practical only when a few members are damaged or prematurely deteriorated. Timber components have deteriorated to a point making rehabilitation impractical. D. Preferred Alternative Alternate A, replacing the bridge at the existing location with a new structure, is the preferred alternate. Alternate A was selected because of its comparatively lower construction cost, lower environmental impacts, and lesser construction time. The B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 3 currently proposed 60-foot bridge is based on minimum information. The actual proposed bridge lengths, type, and materials will be deternlined during the design stage, when more detailed information is available. The Division Engineer concurs ~~ith Alternate A as the preferred alternate. IV. ESTIMATED COST The estimated costs, based on 2005 prices, are as follows: Alternate A (Preferred) Alternate B Structure Removal (existin) $ 6,904 $ 6,904 Structure ( ro osed) $ 134,400 $ 134,400 Detour Structure and A roaches -0- $ 155,894 Roadway A roaches $ 164,417 $ 221,236 Miscellaneous and Mobilization $ 94,279 $ 171,566 En ineerin and Contingencies $ 75,000 $ l 10,000 ROW/Const. Easements/Utilities: $ 45.800 $ 75,800 TOTAL $ 520,800 -------------- $ 875,800 V. NATURAL RESOURCES The information contained in this section is based on the Natural Resources Technical Report (May 2005) prepared by Ecoscience Corporation. A. Physiography and Soils Based on soil mapping for Bertie County (NRCS 1990), the project study area is underlain by five soil series: Augusta fine sandy loam (Aeric Endoaquults), Bibb (Typic Fluvaquents) and Johnston loams (Cumulic Humaquepts), Roanoke fine sandy loam (Tvpic Endoaquults), Wahee sandy loam (Aeric Endoaquults), and Wickham fine sandy loam (Tvpic Hapludults). The Bibb, Johnston, and Roanoke series are considered to be hydric in Bertie County; and the Augusta, Wahee, and Wickham series are considered to have hydric inclusions in Bertie County by the NRCS (1991). B. Water Resources 1. Waters Impacted The project study area is located within sub-basin 03-02-10 of the Roanoke River Basin (NCDWQ 2001). This area is part of USGS Hydrologic Unit 03010107 (Seaber et al. 1987) of the Mid-Atlantic/Gulf Region. The structure targeted for replacement spans Choowatic Creek. The portion of Choowatic Creek that lies B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 4 within the project study area has been assigned Stream Index Number 24-2-7-2 by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) (NCDWQ 2001). 2. Water Resource Characteristics Choowatic Creek enters the project study area as afirst-order, perennial stream with moderate flow over a sand substrate. At Bridge No. 45, Choowatic Creek is approximately 30 feet wide. The banks of Choowatic Creek range up to 1 foot high and are gently sloping. During field investigations, the water level appeared normal and water clarity was fair. Classifications are assigned to waters of the State of North Carolina based on the existing or contemplated best usage of various steams or segments of streams in the basin. The classification of Choowatic Creek in the project study area is C Sw (NCDWQ 2001). Class C water denotes freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and survival, and other uses. The Sw classification is a supplemental water classification denoting swamp waters that have a naturally occurring low pH, low dissolved oxygen, and low velocities. No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply I (WS-I), or Water Supply II (WS-II) waters occur within 1 mile of the project study area (NCDWQ 2001). 3. Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal Choowatic Creek flows into Roquist Creek approximately 1 mile east of the project study area. This direct connection and perennial flows enable Choowatic Creek to possibly support a passage for migratory fish. Therefore, this project can be classified by NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal as Case 2, where in-stream work will be avoided during moratorium periods associated with fish migration, spawning, and fish nursery areas. This conclusion is based upon the classification of the waters within the project study area, as well as comments received from NCWRC. Design and scheduling of bridge replacement should avoid the necessity of in-stream activities during the spring migration period for anadromous fish species (February 1 to June 30) within Choowatic Creek. NCDOT will coordinate with the various resource agencies during project planning to ensure that all concerns regarding bridge demolition are resolved. Potential downstream impacts to aquatic habitat are anticipated to be avoided by bridging the stream system to maintain regular flow and stream integrity. Short-term impacts associated with turbidity and suspended sediments may affect benthic _ _ populations. Temporary impacts to downstream habitat from increased sediment during construction will be minimized by the implementation of stringent erosion control measures. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page S C. Biotic Resources 1. Plant Communities and Associated Wildlife Five distinct plant communities were identified within the project study area: disturbed/maintained land, agriculture, Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Brownwater Subtype), mixed hardwood/pine forest, and pine plantation. These communities are described below. Faunal species detected in or near the project study area during field investigations are designated with an asterisk (*). 2. Aquatic Communities One aquatic community, Choowatic Creek, is located within the project study area. Physical characteristics of a water body and the condition of the water resource influence faunal composition of aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water resource also greatly influence aquatic communities. Duckweed (Lemma sp.) is present within Choowatic Creek throughout the project study area. Vegetation along the bank of the creek is typical of the Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest including bald cypress, swamp black gum (Nvssa biflora), sweet- gum, and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). 3. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities Permanent and temporary impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Permanent impacts are considered to be those impacts that occur within proposed cut- fill limits. Temporary impacts are considered to be those impacts which occur within the cut-fill footprint associated with the temporary detour of Alternate 1. Plant communities within the project study area were delineated to determine the approximate area and location of each. A summary of plant community areas and the potential impacts to each is presented in Table 1. Table 1. Area of Plant Communities within Cut-Fill Lines Plant Community Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Permanent Permanent Temporary Total Disturbed/Maintained Land 0.6 0.6 0.4 1.0 Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 Agriculture --- --- 0.2 0.2 Mixed Pine/Hardwood Forest <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Total 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.5 - areas are given m acres. 8-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 6 D. Special Topics 1. "Waters of the United States": Jurisdictional Issues Surface waters within the embankments of Choowatic Creek are subject to jurisdictional consideration under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as waters of the United States (33 CFR section 328.3). NWI mapping (Quitsna, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle [1981]) indicates that Choowatic Creek exhibits characteristics of a palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded system consisting of a mixture of broad- leaved and needle-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1/2C; Cowardin et al. 1979). This classification typically describes acypress-gum swamp and is common along major streams within the Coastal Plain. Field investigations confirm this classification. Approximately 210 linear feet of Choowatic Creek lies within the project study area. Wetlands adjacent to Choowatic Creek are subject to jurisdictional consideration under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as waters of the United States (33 CFR section 328.3). These areas are defined by the presence of three primary criteria: hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and evidence of hydrology at or near the surface for a portion (12.5 percent) of the growing season (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Field investigations indicate that two types of wetlands occur within the project study area. Wetlands 1, 2, and 3 (see Figure 2) exhibit characteristics of a palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded wetland consisting of a mixture of broad-leaved and needle-leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1/2C) (Cowardin et al. 1979). Wetland 4 (see Figure 2) exhibits characteristics of a palustrine, scrub/shrub, seasonally flooded wetland, consisting of broad-leaved deciduous vegetation (PSS 1 C) (Cowardin et al. 1979). All four wetlands are expected to be impacted by the proposed project. Impacts will result from a widening of the fill slope and are expected to be minimal. Impacts to jurisdictional areas are shown in Table 2. Jurisdictional areas within the project study area were delineated to determine the approximate area and location of each. For purposes of quantification in this report, areas of jurisdictional open water are considered to be Choowatic Creek. Permanent and temporary impacts are considered to be areas of vegetated wetlands and linear distances of open water occumng within the proposed cut-fill limits. Table 2. Proiected Impacts t~ _Turicdictinnal Areac Jurisdictional Areas Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Permanent Permanent Tem orary Total Wetland 1 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.24 Wetland 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 0.05 Wetland 3 0.02 0.02 -- 0.02 Wetland 4 0.05 0.05 -- 0.05 Total 0.12 0.12 0.24 0.36 tucaJ [l1G ~1VCi1 lIl dGiCS. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 7 Alternate 1 has the lesser amount of anticipated impacts to jurisdictional areas within the project study area. Alternate 2 results in three times the wetland impacts of Alternate 1, although two-thirds of the impacts associated with Alternate 2 are considered "temporary." 2. Permits Impacts to jurisdictional areas are anticipated from the proposed project. As a result, construction activities will require permits and certifications from various regulatory agencies in charge of protecting the water quality of public water resources. This project may be processed as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. The USACE has made available Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 23 (67 FR 2020, 2082; January 15, 2002) for CE's due to expected minimal impact. NCDWQ has made available a General 401 Water Quality Certification for NWP No. 23 (GC 3403}. If temporary structures are necessary for construction activities, access fills, or dewatering of the site, then a NWP No. 33 (67 FR 2020, 2087; January 15, 2002) permit and associated General 401 Water Quality Certification (GC 3366) will be required. In the event that NWP No. 23 or 33 will not suffice, minor impacts attributed to bridging and associated approach improvements are expected to qualify under General Bridge Permit No. 031 and its associated General 401 Water Quality Certification (GC 3404). Notification to the Wilmington USACE District office is required if this general permit is utilized. The proposed project will occur in one (Bertie) of the 20 counties covered by the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) within these counties are under the jurisdiction of the N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM). Because the project study area contains navigable waters and is located within inland fishing waters, Public Trust Areas (CAMA AECs) are expected to potentially be affected by the proposed project. Public Trust Areas are defined in 15A NCAC 07H .0207. Consideration should be given to avoiding disturbances within these areas whenever practicable. Because the project study area contains open water within a CAMA county, a DCM representative will need to verify the presence or absence of Public Trust Waters AECs. If the project study area contains Public Trust Waters AECs and replacement of the bridge avoids impacts to AECs, the DCM will review the permit application for CAMA consistency. If an AEC is proposed to be impacted, a CAMA Major Permit or General Permit for bridge replacement (15A NCAC 07H.2300) may be applicable. The U.S. Coast Guard will potentially consider this reach of Choowatic Creek navigable for bridge administration purposes; however, this reach of Choowatic - Creek may meet criteria for advance approval waterways as outlined in Title 33 CFR Section 115.70. Advance approval waterways are those that are navigable in law, but are not actually navigated by other than small boats. The Commandmant of the Coast Guard has given advance approval to the construction or repair of bridges across such waterways; therefore, a Section 10 permit (Title 33 CFR Section 115.70) for 8-4026 Categorical Exclusion page 8 structures and/or work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States may not be required for this project. A state stormwater permit will be required. 3. 1\Zitigation The USACE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of waters of the United States, and specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over- time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially. NCDOT will propose compensatory mitigation for cumulative impacts exceeding 0.1 acre. However, utilization of BMPs is recommended in an effort to minimize impacts. A final determination regarding wetlands or stream mitigation for impacts to waters of the United States rests with DCM, with input from USACE and NCDWQ. E. Rare and Protected Species 1. Federally Protected Species Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T [S/A]), or officially Proposed (P) for such listing are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The term' "Endangered Species" is defined as "any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range," and the term "Threatened Species" is defined as "any species which is likely to become an Endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range" (16 U.S.C. 1532). The term "Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance" is defined as a species which is not "Endangered" or "Threatened," but "closely resembles an Endangered or Threatened species" (16 U.S.C. 1532). Three federally protected species are listed for Bertie County (April 27, 2006 [USFWS 2006]): Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and Shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirosh-um), which have a designated status of Endangered, and the Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which has a designated status of Threatened. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 9 ~ ~ z Picoides borealis (Red-cockaded Woodpecker) Endangered BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT The habitat that is critical for the red cockaded woodpecker is not present. There is a pine plantation within the project study area; however, the stand is not mature enough, and the understory is too thick. The NHP database was reviewed on June 12, 2001, and again in June 2004, and no records of existing red-cockaded woodpecker occurrences were found within 1 mile of the project study area. Thus, no impacts to the red-cockaded woodpecker will result from project construction. Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Bald Eagle) Threatened BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT On August 29, 2006, NCDOT biologists surveyed for bald eagles and their potential habitat within cone-mile radius of the project site. Suitable habitat, in the form of open water for foraging, is not present within the project vicinity. In a one-mile radius of the project site, approximately 39 percent of the landscape is forested, primarily (26 percent) encompassed by the Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Brownwater Subtype) in the floodplain of Choowatic Creek. There are mature trees in the area; however, large dominant trees suitable for supporting bald eagle nests are not present. During the survey, no bald eagles or nests were observed. Further, no bald eagles were found on a visual survey along SR 1100 to the Roanoke River (2.8 miles south). Therefore, since suitable nesting and foraging habitat does not occur within one-mile of the project site, no net loss of habitat is expected to occur from replacement of Bridge No. 45. Acipenser brevirostrunt (Shortnose Sturgeon) Endangered BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT Correspondence via email (8/21/06) with North Carolina Marine Fisheries scientist Fritz Rohde concerning the suitability of habitat for the shortnose sturgeon within the project vicinity revealed that "there is no evidence that they have ever occurred there"; therefore, the Biological Conclusion for the shortnose sturgeon is "No Effect". 2. Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species The February 5, 2003 USFWS list (USFWS 2003) includes a category of species designated as "Federal Species of Concern" (FSC) (Table 3). A species with this designation is one that may or may not be listed in the future (formerly C2 candidate species or species under consideration for listing for which there is insufficient B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 10 information to support listing). The FSC designation provides no federal protection under the ESA for the species listed. To date, the NCNHP database has no documented occurrences of FSC species within 1 mile of the project study area. Table 3. Federal Species of Concern Scientific Name Common Name State Status* Potential Habitat Caynorhinus rafinesguii Rafinesque's big-eared bat SC No .4nirnodramus henslox~ii Henslow's sparrow SR Yes Dendroica ce~ulea Cerulean warbler SR Yes Orcatectes virginiensis Chowanoke crayfish SR Yes Anguilla rosn-ata American eel SC Yes Mt~otis austroripa~-ius Southeastern myotis SC Yes Orconectes virginiensis Chowanoke crayfish SC Yes °~tate ~tarus ~oaes - sL: ~peciai Loncern; 1: threatened; 5K: 5~gmticantly Rare (Amoroso 2002, LeGrand and Hall 2001) VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES A. Compliance Guidelines This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historical Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings (federally funded, licensed, or permitted projects) on properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment. B. Historic Architecture A field survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) was conducted on June 6, 2002 and again on October 1, 2002. All structures within the APE were photographed, and later reviewed by the Architectural Historians at NCDOT and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO). In a concurrence form dated February 18, 2003, and a memorandum dated March 10, 2003, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concurred that there are no historic architectural resources either listed in or eligible for - - listing on the National Register of Historic Places within the APE. A copy of the concurrence form and the memorandum are included in the Appendix. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 11 C. Archaeology The SHPO, in a memorandum dated March 10, 2003 recommended that "no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project." There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area and it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for conclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project. A copy of the memorandum is included in the Appendix. VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate bridge will result in safer traffic operations. The project is a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of significant environmental consequences. The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications. The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No significant change in land use is expected to result from construction of the project. No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right of way acquisition will be limited. No relocations of residents or businesses are expected with implementation of the proposed alternative. No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated. The project is not expected to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area. There are no publicly owned recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl refuges of national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project. No North Carolina Geodetic Survey control monuments will be impacted during construction of this project. The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the potential impact to prime farmland of all land acquisition and construction projects. All construction will take place along existing alignment. Although there are some soils classified as prime or having state or local importance in the vicinity of the project, the project will not involve the direct conversion of farmland acreage within these classifications. This project is located in Bertie County, which has been determined to be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Part 51 is not applicable, 8-4026 Categorical Exclusion page 12 because the proposed project is located in an attainment area. This project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area. The traffic volumes will not increase or decrease because of this project. There are no receptors located in the immediate project area. The project's impact on noise and air quality will not be significant. Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D:0520: This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and for air quality (1990 CAA and NEPA) and no additional reports are required. In the GeoEnvironmental Impact Evaluation memorandum dated February 26, 2003, it was stated that a field survey and a file search of appropriate environmental agencies was conducted to identify any known problem sites along the proposed project alignment. Based on the field survey, no anticipated UST impacts were discovered. The Geographical Information Service (GIS) was consulted for the project corridor and research shows that no regulated or unregulated landfills or dumpsites occur within the project limits. Based on the GIS search and the field reconnaissance, no superfund sites were identified in the vicinity of the project. However, if unregulated USTs, dumpsites or landfills are identified by Right-of--Way, a further investigation should be performed prior to right-of--way acquisition to determine the extent of any contamination. Bertie County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. This site on Choowatic Creek is located in a 100-year flood hazard zone where no detailed F.E.M.A. flood study has been performed. The structure requirements may be adjusted during the final hydrologic study and hydraulic design as determined appropriate to accommodate design flows. The proposed alternatives will not modify flow characteristics and will have minimal impact on floodplains due to roadway encroachment. The existing drainage patterns and groundwater will not be affected. The project will not have a disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effect on any minority orlow-income population. VIII. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Efforts were undertaken early in the planning process to contact local officials to involve them in the project development with scoping letters. B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 13 IX. AGENCY COMMENTS The following are comments received during the scoping process: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMF) Comment: In order to protect anadromous fishery resources that may utilize the project areas as spawning or nursery habitat, work in the waters of the creek shall be restricted to the period October 1 and March 1 of any year unless prior approval is granted by the Corps of Engineers following consultation with the NMFS. Response: An in-stream construction moratorium will be in effect from February 1 to June 30 (see Project Commitments). United States Department of the Interior -Fish and Wildlife Service Comment: In waterways that may serve as travel corridors for fish, in-water work should be avoided during moratorium periods associated with migration, spawning, and sensitive pre-adult life stages. The general moratorium period for anadromous fish is February 15 -June 15. Response: An in-stream construction moratorium will be in effect from February 1 to June 30 (see Project Commitments). NCDENR -Division of Water Quality Comment: Prefer bridge to be replaced with new bridge. However, if the bridge must be replaced by a culvert and ISO linear feet or more of stream is impacted, a stream mitigation plan will be needed prior to the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. Response: Bridge will be replaced with new bridge. NCDENR-Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) Comment: Since the area is a spawning area for anadromous fish, the Division requests a moratorium from February 15 through June 30. The moratorium would apply to any in-water work and the adjacent wetlands. Response: An in-stream construction moratorium will be in effect from February 1 to June 30 (see Project Commitments). North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRCI Comment: Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish B-4026 Categorical Exclusion Page 14 Passage". This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to June 15. Response: An in-stream construction moratorium will be in effect from February 1 to June 30 (see Project Commitments). Bertie County Schools Comment: Rerouting the six buses that currently cross Bridge No. 45 will place Bertie County Schools well over our transportation budget if the rerouting takes place over a long period of time. To reroute the current six buses to go to and from student stop assignments for eight months will cost an additional $47,105.28 (as of 2000-2001 school year charge amounts) which includes all school transportation cost involved. There is an alternative route that our school buses could travel; however, we do not allow our Public School Buses to travel on roads that are a danger to our children's lives. The alternative route is considered a very unsafe route for our Bertie County Public School Buses. Response: Closing the road and detouring traffic is the preferred alternate because of its comparatively lower construction cost, lower environmental impacts, and lesser construction time. The structure should be designed to allow the quickest construction time possible in order to limit the amount of time traffic is on the offsite detour. This may be accomplished primarily in the summer months. B-026 Categorical Exclusion Page 1 S i \ i ~ ~~ ' 1100 BYP (/ ~ 13 1104 i~ Bridge No. 45 ,~'~ WINDSOR ~-" , ~ 1100 ~' ~~ ~' -- ~ - r __ ~ ----~C`oo~a~' ~,~ ' 1103 r- - - - ~ eek~c r-- -~ ~--- t _ _ - -1 - -_~-- 1108 1100 ~~~ ~1 ~` `~ ~1 ~` ~\ ~ `. _ ---~~- ~ N \~ l ,\ N ~1 `1 1 O .\ `~'~~ 1102 `~ 1 ~_~-`\` _ \,` ,\ ~'.R 94ist 1105 ```~~ 1106 1107 0 ~~ _~ j w~ PERGUI- BERTIE '~, ~ N ~ MANS r ~ ~ l ~\ ~~_- i \ ~_ ---~'~i- ~., ~ I i ~ ~ ~`~WASHINGTON j ~~ _~ ~~ i \~ f ~ ~1 B ~ 17 ~~ ~~ 1545 17 13 532 ---Greek ~ _~ ~__i"- Millers Store ~- ~ _% ~ 1548 1523 ~'~~ .\ '-~ ~'~_ LEGEND 15~ `~ _~,~ STUDIED DETOUR ROUTE North Carolina -Department of Transportation Division of Highways Project Development and Environmental Analysis Bran FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NUMBER 45 ON SR 1100 OVER CHOOWATIC CREEK BERTIE COUNTY TIP NO. B-4026 0 1 MILES `~ gz g~ -°3® or 4Ci~ r~ A `-I A 8\'/ 2'~ O ~ G ar ~r ~~o zz ~z ~ O_ U7 ~ ~ ~ va3a • eT ~n} ~ F ~ ~ : TTON •VM~, ~ Op m~ ~vz °~`~~ ~ y. ~ ~o ~m ~o ~ Z m °°o O~ ~ ° ~~ ~ v ~ Om m j ~~ n ~,N~ o ~ D p O a ~ . ="x(17 C m ~ ~ ~' N C7 O Z o. rn nZ -I ~ ~ T ~~ ~ _ y G7 m ~ ~ o ~ ~~ o m o N ~ ~'~ D W v ,~ ~. -Z o. g / \ / i ~ ~~e/ ~ . ~~ ~~ ' 1~ I. ~o . ~ I ` , --N -- o ~~ ~~ ~~ : ~ ; o . ~ '~ l c,, rn ~ ~ I j ~ i ~ ~ , ~ G ~ y f o I~. r ,. 1 ~ i ~ ', o ~ ~ ~; ~ p4. ~ `~ i. ~ f ~ II -- ~ -~. ~ ' . r ~: i.. i I; i i , " i ~ ~ ~ ; i ~ ~ ~ ~ . m ~ ~ ` o ~ m ~. w m y ~' ~ ; 2 ~ V ~,. ~ cn '~ , ~ .~ o I~ ~ E ~ ~M ~ . ,. I I ° i ~ J i ~ i ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~; .. .. i ' ~ -: -,, ~~ E ; J /~ r D C7 m ~z ~~ =DD o~~ r~ m Ill v ' moZ D m z --I ~Zrn o c~ ~ c~ ~ 0 D p m y2~ 90 C,9 ~,~ o AAnr.,, . ~ ~ °07, °o~ -~°~® or My~y y~ A \-, A ~~ 7~ E C~7 °z wC c~ ~~ oz zz Z ~, ~ O O ~ o ~ /~ ~ va3a •eq ~ ~ rAON •VN~~ OQ ~vz ~ ~~~ m0 . n y. S o ~m ..° -~ nZ m °°o ~ =c ~ " _~. O~ ~ ~~d Z O Om m ~~ o ~ ~y~ o ~ D ~ o a 3 _ ~ i ~U C m ~ = .. N n Z ` ° rn O C7 Z ~ ~ ° i ~ ~ ~ ~ rn G7 m ~ ~ o c m -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s m o N ~ N~ ~ W d _ ,~ ~~ -Z 0 o~ _. o g MATCy L/NE TH/S SHEET ~~ f i. I~ ., i` i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:: A rn -'i ;'' -,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ + i ~ ~ I m ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i m •--. \ JI ,: ~~ 2 ..~ OD Z ~ m m D- Z Z ~ m r OD Z C7 ~ cn m m ~~ m~ ~ oo Z D ~ z I °z m ~O ~ O~ ZO mm DD ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ Q m yyn 90 oq ~„~ o ., w _F~,~m..z-9.,~ m .. _. ~m * .~ ~~ t .F i a ~~W~; t ~. ~` . '~ .° ~ ~~ .. 'x ..w ~.. ~_ .. ~'~3 W. _. 1 '~ ~, . ~ sv y,~": 8 ~ r ` +. 7 S ~~ 3x Q f '~ `h'~ SS~ K i ~~ i 3 a ' 3 7 3 fl ~ ~ ~. y, a :~: ~ :i. < ~ _ ~; a' ~ ~ ~. d Z a ~"-~a`~c R ram„' ~ . ~..,....e.. . ~~ ~~: . i ~ e~ o- R ~[ ' ~ : a. f .~ ~ ~ . ~ ~" T~~ L. L., ~ fl.. 1 1 yy , 3%t ~''.i V ~Y `. Y f~ ~ r4: _ _ ... ,, v j r4V - ~ ,;. Pli~ GOT PDE:~ _ ' ±~:~18~~ • ~p''~l'CS1 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ r safe n n ~r_=~ ' '"~ \~~ ~Alce oF;~a~r `~ ~ ~ c 2QQ~ Nort3t fat-olina Department a~ cultural R~~ol;trces ~~~"~ ~~rn - State Historic Preservation Clffire ~ ~~ ~~ ,DA~tid L. 9. Brook. Admininl~ator ~r~(~F~OI'?M1~'~sg5 AH~lY3ti5 Iu:hsalF. Ea61oy, C-o„arnor Div?sicn oiEiiamncall~So a~t}~th C. Evaad, 5~~etary Dsvid J. Olsa~ Director a~'y J..Cc~w, Depnry Saoretarp March 10, 2003 ;v~i~0 RANDtTI~I TO: Crreg.Thcrpe,.Nlanage= Project I7evelopniz~t and Esvirotzhacut~l Analysis ljrsnch NCDOT ]Division of Highways FRQltii: Iaavid Brook ~~~i(~ ~~ SUBJECT: 1Zeplacetnent Bridge No. 45 over Choowatic Creek on SR 1100 (Grabtow~ Road, B-4026, Seine County, FR03-036Q T~nariZ you fer youz letter oz Jan~ry 23, 2003, concerning the above project. Because the Department of Trsasgortation is ili the process of surveying and evatua~g the National Register eligibility of all of its concrete bridges we sze tulable to comment on~ the National Rzgister eligibility of the subject bridge. Pleas~c coni:aJct 1~lary Pape Fuir, in #1'ie Architectural History Sectioq to determine if further study of the bridge is needed. Thcrc a:ie no known archaeological sites within the pmpose~d project area. Based on our knnwlEr3gz of the area, iris unliki:lp that any archaeological resaurcE9. that map be zligil~le for cc~nclwion m the National Register of Historic Places vrill be affrcted by the project ~(fe, therefoae, rzcommead that no archaeologi~l inQestigatiotl 6e conduetedin connection with this project The above comments are msde pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act :Wd tua ndvisorp Council on Historic Preservation'3 Regulations for Compliance wids ~.eetio^ 106 codified sit 36 CFR Part BaC. . Thscnk you For pout.cooptration and coasideratioa.. Sfyou have questions concerning the move comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Esrle~, environtnmral review coordiatitor, at 919/733~F763. In at] future cotn.munication concerning this project, Pl~e trite the above iCfxrenced tracking nuiabez. cc: Mary Pepe Ftur . Matt wilkersan wvf~v. hna.dcr.statc.ac.ua Location bfn11in5 Addreae Tolep4anerFAx tDMTPCW'1'>;gTTt7N 701N. BWunc St.,'RJeigh i`IC 4017 Moil Servict Canter, Ralttigh NC 37fi99-ib17 (9t4) X33-3?b; • 73-865] !>rSTO.RiT10N 315 N, Blount St., Ralciglt , IC ' 4b13 h.Ltil Swyiwi C;cuia,ltnleigh NC 3?S49-db13 (919) 733-0.737 ^ 7T5-t3o I iLAV EY ~ PLAMV~IC 515 N. Bl~mtt St., Ralaigtt NC 4ti13 Mail Six Centtr, ~ftleigh NC 27699-1618 (919) 731-65.15 .715-+1SO i 1 tr L 1f ;~ ~5~ ~=t~G~~ 12 : Sri Pb~ Gt]T PDE=+ ~ '~,JJIUJ~J Fe~!erul.~d ~ 13RZ-1110(10} 77P ~ D-aQ2b Ccunry: 0e:tie CONCURAE.NCE ~'aHNI FOR PROPERTIES NaT E.L1GT~~.E FOii T.HE NATiQNAL REGTSTZ'JR OE HISTORIC PL,~iCES Project ~e:crrp+ion: Replxe 5cid0.e No. ~5 on SR 11? 0 ever Choolva;ic tree;; On 0211 o/ZtI63, rrpr~entat~ves of thz . Notch Carolina beparu_rant of l: ranspcrtarion (NC:DOT) ' Federal Highway .4tlrninisn-ation (FHWA) ~Norh Caroline State Historic F're9srvation Q~ca (.HPO} ^ Oti~r Ravielved the subject project at hi0.~~i~t D~J2 ~ (,l..Y lC4 ^ 5coping rnaeting ~ Hin-taric archirecniral resourccs photo, ap11 review sessiontconsulttean Other :SiI parties pr-.sent agreed ^ ZZiere are no prc~ins over fifty years old witiriri ~e project's eras of patontial er7ecu. There arc no proparrius tens than fifty yeah old which arz considered to meet Criteria Consideration G wirhin.rhe project's area of potznrial z$ects ' [~ 'Che:e arc properties oyet'fil~ty years-old within the project's Ares ef.Potenrial F_tioct3 (,APE), but teased on the hiswrical infdrmadon available and the photog~phs of zgch propercf, the praperry identified as ~+ ' ~+ Z ~ `~ ~ is considered not eligible fnc the National /ReSisLer an na zunhar :valuation of it is necessary. ' Q/ T"nere are ao Nati.anal Iteg?stet-tisLed or Study Li3ted properties within the project's area ufpnteniiat atT'acts. [~ rtll properties o eater than SA years of age locatod in tht APE haul beer! considered at this consultation, ~arsd bored upoo the above concurrence, all compliance far hisiocit architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic Prrservaaon Act and G5 .121-~t2(a} has beett c4mpiztod far this project.. [There are na histor.c propefias aflacted by this projext_ (4ttach any norer or docnrrnenu cu needer~ Sio ed: ~.~. ~ ~ i~. ~.vv3 Repres.cat:~tivt, CD - Data ~ ?12~1e~ FHWA, for the Dil+ision A inia'tratnr, or other Federal Agency ~~ 1• ' ~~! '~ ~s/o 3 State Historic Prestrvatian pt'ficer ~ p~ ]f a survey report is prepm-td, n final copy of this form and the attached list will be included. itiJ~li'=%~lJ.:; 1.~:bJ~ ~'1!_ [~l~'I FrJt}-I - `iy~1C.J~~.:r ~r~ r, ~Iurp.Ey~c ico~6crr=sc~aG_com 'V~rntre ~4-turp~z,J . ~, - rrf~7~.~'p(,7'..~C{,?7t ~~p;frnL~iZ?' ~~CS.Cc~uran~~.ur/%.onw ~rutzng S~'caCz,rt ~P. Q ~ ]U ~?F.mrc ("3521 i 94-5!}46 Jc~vo.A 10'~n~ (; ou~1 ~Yu6fu ~c(uk+it TD: iti~. Davis Nioorz, Tune 19, ?OD ~ Project Development and Erni_ron~~ntai :1.a31ysia Hrarch FRfliYi: t~rLr. John F, Smith; .Sr., 5uperiuteriden . tilr, Nick Shook, assistant 5uper'rntea ent .:..~('S~ Ntr. Phil Bragg, Tcanspor"tatioa Director lilrs. Vernice Murphy, TLs/lS Coordinator/Zone Ranting Special SUBJEf:T: Bridge No. dS an HigllYVaY ~R 1100, over Choowatie Cree?t, $ertie Ca.unt7 T.LP Project No. B-d~y6 .4f~er csrefullv e.~amining our Public. SchoalBus~RQUtes that cross Bridge Na. 45 oti Grabtawn ~Raad, we r~ould~ like to •affer suggestions towards the alternative methods of replacing the aridge. ~o~t~a x~r.?~R: Gr~tY C7E~GN CI?aU:i2A,ii4 :8~1VN Fuw.'sa xon,«o :ate ''YPS'R.:Y 8p~'X:i BCN.U.a RCB~..:rN L~~' At the present time,. we have a total of si-c buses crossing Bridge No. ~5 daily. Due •to tl?e Iacatioa of the bridge, rerouting those.buses tivi11 place Berde CQUnty Schools well over our transportatioa budget if the rerouting takes plate over a long period of time. Ta reroute the current siY buses to as to.and from Student stop assi~ments for.eight rroaths urzl.cost an additional 3#7,10528 (as of2000-?.001 school }ear charge araoclgts). r~+hicll- . includes all school transportation cost .involved. T>lis will put Bertie County Schools Transportation Departmznt in.a.troublesome ~nsncial strain while trying to meet a!1 transportation needs throughout the school year. As you are aware, therz is an alternative route that our school buses could travel; however, wg dr, not log, ou_* public School Buses to travel on roads that are a danger to our children lives. The altemative route is considered a very unsafe route far our Bertie County Public Schools Buses. P. 0. JAa41PS l0 V+'II~ID~GR. YaKi d ~.;.~Ci.M~ ='.'9~i7 PilO~ (?J2) 794-3ti3 Ee~.Y: ('',SZJ751y7^_7 P;IJ . i~5~1 0}~'~ a f ~: I• ~~,~" t ~ ti~ . ` cam We are very appreciative you value our opinion oa this project and hope that you ;~dI consider other aitemati:ves that require less than the eight to tweh~e months bridge closure dis~wsed in your letter sent to us.