20081176 Ver 1_Application_20080731

4

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS MICHAEL F. EASLEY P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611-5202 LYNDO TIPPETT "'4

GOVERNOR PHONE: [phone] SECRETARY

July 28, 2008

Mr. Monte Matthews
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 081176
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587

Subject: Nationwide Permit #14
SR 1401 (Alex Woodruff Road)
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Project Number: 11C.003058 (DWQ Permit Fee: $240)

Dear Mr. Matthews:

The NC Department of Transportation is scheduled to grade, drain, base and pave SR 1401, Alex
Woodruff Road in Alleghany County. Total project length is approximately 0.97 miles. The
improved section will be widened from 16 feet to 20 feet with impervious surface area increasing
by 0.47 acres. This project will require the replacement of two wet pipes as shown below:

Stream Impacts:

Station Number Existing Pipe Proposed Pipe Riprap Total Impacts at

Size Size Impacts feet this Station ft.
13+08 32'x 48" 40'x 48" 10 18
29+61 25'x 18" 40'x 24" 10 25

Total Stream Impacts = 43 feet

The replacement of the two wet pipes will require temporary dewatering. An impervious sandbag
dike will be constructed upstream of the existing culverts to create a small pool. Clean water will
temporarily be pumped around the construction areas and will be discharged downstream. Any
dirty water located inside of the construction areas will be pumped into a silt bag if necessary.
Total dewatered area for all wet pipe replacements will be approximately 0.008 acres. Once the
new pipes are in place, the impervious dikes will be removed and preconstruction streambed
elevations will be restored.
P. O. Box 250, N. WILKEsDoRo, NC 28659
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

Mr. Monte Matthews
SR 1401 (Alex Woodruff Road)
Page 2
July 28, 2008
The wet pipes in question carry different unnamed tributaries to the New River (Class: C, ORW).
This project was reviewed for the presence of threatened and endangered species on July 7, 2008.
This project will have no effect on any federally listed endangered plant or animal species. Historic
compliance work will be scheduled and concurrence with the State Historic Preservation Office
will be obtained if required.

This project will also require 0.049 acres of wetland fill at station 30+00 left (see attached plan
sheet, data form and photographs).

The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes used will be the minimum necessary to create a safe roadway. By utilizing the
erosion control measures outlined in the attachments to this application, downstream water

quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction.

Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets with proposed erosion control
measures, a marked county map, a marked topography map and photographs.

By copy of this letter, it is requested that Mr. Ron Linville, Mountain Region Coordinator, with
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission comment directly to you concerning the 404
Nationwide Permit application with a copy sent to me.

By copy of this letter, I am forwarding five (5) copies of this application package to Brian Wrenn,
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, 401 /Wetlands Unit, for his review. It is requested that any
comments related to the 401 certification be forwarded directly to me with a copy sent to the US
Army Corps of Engineers.

We would like to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please
let me know. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated.

Sincerely,

Heath Slaughter
Division Environmental Officer

Enclosures

cc: Monte Matthews, US Army Corps of Engineers (I additional copy)
Ron Linville, Western Piedmont Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality (5 copies)
Amy Euliss, Division of Water Quality

Mike Pettyjohn, PE, Division Engineer
Brandon Whitaker, PE, District Engineer

Mr. Monte Matthews
SR 1401 (Alex Woodruff Road)
Page 3
July 28, 2008
Scott Gallman, County Maintenance Engineer
Heath Slaughter, Division Environmental Officer
Scott Pipes, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Technician

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001

USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 8 1 1 7 6

If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.

1. Processing

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules

2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP #14

3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?

4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?

II. Applicant Information

1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 250, North Wilkesboro NC 28659

Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number, [phone]
E-mail Address: hslau hg ter(a dot.state.nc.us

2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Heath Slaughter, Division Environmental Officer
Company Affiliation: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 250, North Wilkesboro, NC 28659

Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (336) 6674549
E-mail Address: hslau hg [e-mail]

Page 3 of 12

III. Project Information

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.

1. Name ofproject: SR 1401, Alex Woodruff Road

2. Project Number (NCDOT Only): 11 C.003058

3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A

4. Location
County: Alleghany Nearest Town: Sparta
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached SR map.

Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 13+08 DD: 36.56283 N 81.11784 W
29+61 DD: 36.56786N 81.11230 W

(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)

5. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Secondary Road

6. Property size (acres): Approximately 5.9 acres.

7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UTs to New River (Class: C,
ORM.

8. River Basin: New
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)

Page 4 of 12

a

9. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Grade, drain, base and pave SR 1401.

10. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Trackhoe/backhoe, motor
grader and dump trucks.

11. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential/Farm

IV. Prior Project History

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A

V. Future Project Plans

Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: N/A

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream

Page 5 of 12

mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts

Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) (acres) (es/no (linear feet)
30+00 (Lt.) Fill 0.049 NO 0 Riparian

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at lp://www.fema.gov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: > 0.5
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.049
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams

Stream Impact Length of Average Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** Width of Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Stream Before (please specify)
Impact
Station No. 13+08 Pipe replacement 8 feet UT#1 to New River 2 feet Perennial
Station No. 29+61 Pipe replacement 15 feet UT#2 to New River 2 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 23 In. ft. excluding riprap.

Page 6 of 12

3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.

Open Water Impact Area of Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
Wet Pipes Temporary Dewatering 0.008 UTs to New River Streams

Wet Pipes Riprap 0.0009 UTs to New River Streams

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.

4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A

Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):

Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.

By utilizing the erosion control measures as shown in the attached drawings, adverse impacts to
streams in the area will be minimized. Since this is an existing roadway, the stream impacts
cannot be avoided. However, the replacement pipe lengths will be the minimum needed to
safely construct the paved roadway. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction.
Water quality should be improved as a result of our on-site improvements.

Page 7 of 12

VIII. Mitigation

DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable

mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.

If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.

EEP if necessary

Page 8 of 12

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp//index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): To be determined by COE
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A

IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)

Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?

If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No

If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.

Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify,
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:

Page 9 of 12

Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.

Zone* Impact Multiplier Required (square feet) Mitigation
1 3

2 1.5 -
Total
* Zone l extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.

N/A

XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)

Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious surface area will increase by approximately 0.47 acres. All appropriate best
management practices for sediment and erosion control will be implemented during construction.

XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.

N/A

XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No

Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No

Page 10 of 12

XW. Other Circumstances (Optional):

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

249/
8
Applicant/Agent's Signat Date
(Agent's signature is va ' my if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee lredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland

Page 11 of 12

~I~VV v
221 0
OD
Q- 140 7

140 2
q 14 111-
1~ . 01 1408 a .5
1347 1403 1401
0
0 3 1343 h? -r -t-.._ 14 7 1410
i 1.3 Pleasant
.1 M ~ 1407 Home
1345 ~ 1 ?3 x1409
New River i apt.
R~vE 1406 1412
- o
Bopt. 141
345 1348 1.3 1405 BALD KNOB ~ 1412 ~ 141
1404 1417

DOUGHTON R a
MTN.
r
White'
1415 m
r ~ a ~ Plains 1416 1436 .s
1347 Bapt. New 1403 ~ Edwards
, N- Haven Ch. 1418 .s
2 Cross Rds
1405 ~ 5

6 Shiloh Ch. 1 ? B±;
i 165 1_
Twin Oaks 21 \ , _ 11 Zion'
z21 Baptist
SPARTA Cb 1426
1_
1163 ; \ r7 Chestnut
1 5 a \ 1424 Grove Baptist
1427
.

a

O a

4 ;.k 4

a aq t
r;Cern
u - 'i

O

'Cem
l/
1 i
A_Y3QN _GRAYSON CO
u v"iAHY
oP, \ , I LEGH _ '
t`
RETAIN 1
.I: PIPE
29+61
G o \
. a \
25&0 13+08 \
s%` o7S SR 1401 >
~ I
i
i
o C~

t '

x*wR KCh'.. `F. ~~:.''C9T 8y p
s _ a t 18+20 u
(Gapped) 'wa
• ' a
_ bohM n n _ :sat
z s" A6
_N\ Name: SPARTA EAST Location: 036.5642419' N 081.1155554° W
Date: 7/2/2008
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet

Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.

~t
1. 2.

3. 4.

III

. t.

F t. .
r" sir ~ 5. 6.

1. Upstream view at station 13+08 on SR 1401, Alleghany.
2. Downstream view at station 13+08.
3. Downstream view at station 29+61 along with associated wetlands.
4. Upstream view at station 29+61.
5-6. This is the inlet and outlet of a double barreled culvert that we are retaining at station 11+30.
Fencing material and logs are directing base flow into what should be the stormwater barrel. In lieu
of providing mitigation for the 23 feet of piping impacts at station 13+08 & 29+61, we are proposing
to construct floodpla.ins, remove the obstructions and direct flow into the correct barrel of this piping
system. This should reduce bank scour at the outlet as well as lowering the risk of clogging in the
future.

PODRU eH$@K~ No. W ;z
11C.003013 2

Q SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"

GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP

lb ALLEGHANY~COUNTY
EXISTING 16 GRAVEL
PROPOSED 20' PAVED
x POT Sta.10+00.00 , ~ BASIN'S EQU R
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
Z BEGIN PROJECT 1 i BASIN'S LESS T' AN 1V
REQUIRE _ X BLOCK BUILDING ~ -
PC Sta. 10+09.45 GEORGE R. CROUSE
DB213PG 19
5 - 18• WATTLES SPACED
PT Sta. 10+98.38 1140 65! 15+30
W
END I
NTSLIM TSB ' Go~GFti o X9o x
CONTROL NAIL
N-9850.6547 PROPOSED 15' CMP X l
E-10171.8021 10+49
10+42 RT
PI Sta 10+5526 Rr~~ c' ,
12'x4'x3'
p = 33' 58' 11.6' (LT) G Q
D = 38 ll~ 49.9' ~ Q N
L = 8893 +
12'x4'x3'
O
T = 45.82'
R = 150A0' INT OF INTERSECn a O Asp
TO
12'x4'x3' \ * 12+11.12 EQUAL
Pl Sta 12+6520 + t~~ Y 10+0° 12'x 4'x p = %
52' 39' 252' (LT)
D = 38' ll' 49.9' PROPOSED
,wxiw
X '
L = 137.86' Slur TRw '
12'x4'x3'
T = 7423' TELEPHONE PEDESTAL i - - - _ _ - - -
11
R = 150.00' 185 RT
" N5-W HAVEN KOAD"
~ ROPOS3 D; 5• CM
6K 19-05
Y- LINE E.O.P. 3 PROPOSED48'CMP -,-A 12~x4'x3c 12' SOIL
11-00 13+08 12'x4 xDRIVE
HORIZONAL SCALE P= 50'

PROJECr R UMa NO. &EE6 NO.
YATCHUNE SEE SHEET •4 -11QQ341 _ 3_

ti 30 tn.
1 (5) /
GEORGE R. CROUSE
DB 213 PG 19
~ 12'x4'x3

ALL BASIN'S 1 0'-2U
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
- 2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
~ic°~ BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
REQUIRE ONLY 1
vsp-(
16+36

GEORGE R. CROUSE ao~
DB213PG 19

P1 Sta 16+46.66 SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"
0 = 3/' 58' 19.4" (LT) GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP
D = 28 38 52.4" ALLEGHANY COUNTY
L = ///.60' EXISTING 16' GRAVEL
T = 57.30' PROPOSED 20' PAVED
R = 200.00'
HORIZONAL SCALE P= 50'

PEojEcf tuimma No. sir ?a.
_1tGa~2,34L3_

SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROADVI
GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP
J
ALLEGHANY COUNTY CONTROL NAIL
EXISTING 16' GRAVEL 1 N-10721.2784
j E-10719.7012 a
PROPOSED 20' PAVED 22+00 _56 LT
GEORGE R. CROUSE
DB 213 PG 19 12,)(4'X3'
v X

/ 9,)(3')(3' 49 49
vWi
/ U
v
PROPOSE 18" CMP y
' 21+75
ALL BASIN'S 10'-21Y
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES. fp / / Jc /`j
BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
REQUIRE ONLY 1
/ x
•s~ 1,, a
GEORGE R. CROUSE
j DB213PG 19 c
ROPOSED
9+028- CMP
)D/ Sfo 2/+38.46
0 = 62• 17' 53.8" (RT )
A9 ' D = 28',38,52.4,
A6P L = 2/7.46'
T = 120.88'
R = 200.00'
YATCHUNE SEE SHEET 03
HORIzONAL SCALE r= 50'

rRO~ Ho. snffr r,o.
_11G..~63Il13_ _5_

SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"
GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP

ALLEGHANY COUNTY
EXISTING 16' GRAVEL
PROPOSED 20' PAVED

JONATHAN NESTER
? \ DB316PG 1251 W
rib 12'x 4'x 3' m
cn J cn
m

PROPOSED 18 CMP "ab
25+25 12'x4'x3' ,
i
0 JONATHAN NESTER IN LENGTH BAS'S 10!- 2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
DB 316 PG 1251 BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
REQUIRE ONLY 1

A9 (1X \ ` ~ ~
G ^ _V

P1 Sta 24+11.45
p = 16' 43 09.3p (RT)
D = 5° 43' 46.5"
L = 291.81'
T = 146.95'
R = 1,000.00'
HORIZONAL SCALE r= 50

mw rr uFamm mm gm wo
11C.003013 6

27-1W WATTLES SPACED SR 14 ALEX WO OAD"

,30 X51 ° GAP IVIL TOWNSHIP
+60
ALL HANY COUNTY
RAVEL
EXI LNG 16 G
ti PR POSED 20 PAVED
MEA OF IMPACT 2 -18' WATTLES SPACED ?g
2133A1 SQ FT _ 13EGIN @ 8' END o, y
3 Os
t
21
X ~
\ 12•x4'x3' Cy~ JONATHAN NESTER ~ CON Lw~L ~
B316PG1251 N- M
WETLAND AREA 1634.7471
ALL BASIN'S 10-20' 1+9811.20 LT
` IN LENGTH REQUIRE M W
Cf 2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES. y
BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
REQUIRE ONLY 1 (f :Wit
ti
12'x4'x3'
X
X X X X-
PROPOSEDISCMP t\
29+09
tit 12'x4'x3' (,V - -r- - - -
~ t ` Cl3
t 12'x4'x3' c99
~ 7[11
I~r ~ N t
m
15" CMP
O PROPOS 18' CMP D O30+56
x 29+61 t<
m PI Sto 30+51.64 "
A = 46' 52' 39S (LT) ~
L
= l6' 22' 12.8" JONATHAN NESTER
L = 286.36' DB 316 PG 1251
T = 151.74'
R = 350.00'
HORIZONAL SCALE t= 50'

PROJECT K9804a NO. 9W NO.

SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROA
\
GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP 3,
ALLEGHANY COUNTY o JONATHAN 8v COLETTE
EXISTING 16' GRAVEL NESTER
PROPOSED 20' PAVED DB 247 PG 870 ry~~
X CONTROL NAIL O
N-11295.4631
E-11853.8401
R 35+35 7.22 LT
JONATHAN NESTER
DB 316 PG 1251

- - - - - - - - - - - -

LLJ
/

1 1
/ - ' PROPOSED 18" CMP
C7 35+50
ALL BASIN'S 10'-20'
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
0 2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
vL BASIN'S LESS THAN 10' O
W REQUIRE ONLY 1 r - -
PROPOSED 25' CMP 4r-
(D

DAVID NESTER
DB 316 PG 1257 P1 Sto 34+89.3/
0 = 32" 21' 55.6 (RT)
D = 19° 05-54-9m
L = 169.47'
T = 87.06'
= 300.04'
HORIZONAL SCALE P= 50'

PROJECT R NO. SHM NO.

SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD PT Sta. 38+60.06 .
GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP _
ALLEGHANY COUNTY
3,
EXISTING 16' GRAVEL
PROPOSED 20' PAVED '
JONATHAN 86 COLETTE o 2)
PC Sta. 37+32.23 NESTER p
DB 247 PG 870
CONTROL NAIL m
N-11503.2594 ,
E-12218.1767
39+56 10.49 LT n
~TSn\ 12'x4'x3'
Z _ _ Mf~ORgF2Y SILT FENCE i P~~V LLJ
X ~O, G~ ~12'x4'x3' a-
H _ _ - - - - - - - - / W
lit-
- - - - - - - - - - W
m - - - - - - _ _ _ u6~^iSn~_tsp H
N E- LL-1
m _ \
-1 - - - - - - - - -
ALL BASIN'S 10'-20' - ` - ' -
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES. , -
BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
REQUIRE ONLY 1
,2.
DAVID NESTER n
DB 316 PG 1257
0
80 P1 Sta 37+96.49 P1 Sta 4/+28.02
A = 14° 38' 56.3" (LT) 0 = 3645" 24.7" (RT)
D = 11 ° 27' 33.0" !v D = 8' 48 53.0"
L = 127.84' ° L = 416.99'
T = 6427' T = 215.95'
R = 500.00' R = 650.00'
HORIZONAL SCALE P= 50'

PROJECr R6 NO. SM&r NO.

•

- _'s20 - 18" WATTLES SPACED
i BEGIN 51' END c, +80
2+05 42+80 ~p ALL BASIN'S 10'-20'
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
JUDY EDENFIELD et al BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
DB 316 PG 1254 REQUIRE ONLY 1
CONTROL NAIL CONTROL NAIL
N-11576.4355 N-11613.9214
E-12391.2534 E-12604.1191
41+427.23 LT 12'x4'x3' 12'x4',3' 43+5616.61 LT
X---X X- - - - X X -x
- -
X o
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - -
x3' 9',3'x3'
i
a PROPOSED 18" CMP 25
y 42+68
~2~
s
JUDY EDENFIELD et al
DB 316 PG 1254
0

SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"
N GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP
ALLEGHANY COUNTY

EXISTING 16' GRAVEL
PROPOSED 20' PAVED
HORIZONAL SCALE P= 50'

PROJECT KF004a NO. stiffr No.
_11~.~3413 _l(L

Pl Sta 46+70.33
A = 5 SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"
5'3836.2" (RT) GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP
L 337'/5..6371 3 63' 46f ALLEGHANY COUNTY
L =
T 171.5/' EXISTING 16' GRAVEL
=
R = 325.00' PROPOSED 20' PAVED

ALL BASIN'S 10'-20'
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
REQUIRE ONLY 1
t al
' - - JUDY 3D16 PG 1254
12'x4'x3' CONTROL NAIL N
N-11581.3237
n x4'x3' E-12877.2490
12'
46+29 7.25 LT
C
x 4b
rn
cn `
C
Q PROPOSED 18' CMP
46+18 9'x3'x3' ` `
CONTROL NAIL
N-11506.9464
\ E-13000.1081
47+73 16.04 LT
JUDY EDENFIELD et al \
\
DB 316 PG 1254
PT Sta. 48+14.45 \
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET •f/ HORIZONAL SCALE P= 50'

PROLWO I rMZ NO. 9M NO.
110.003013 __1?

SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD" 18" WATTLES SPACED BEGIN " W 00' SPACEND
2+GSI 59' END 51+70 53+70
GAP C IVL TOWNSH I P ~14
ALLEGHANY COUNTY °
sooz
EXISTING 16' GRAVEL o ~O N
PROPOSED 20' PAVED
,
JUDY EDENFIELD et al
DB 316 PG 1254

y t`o/ , ' ' N
,
C '
f2i7 _ , ' ~ W
rrn ALL BASIN'S 10'-20' w
= IN LENGTH REQUIRE
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
BASIN'S LESS THAN 10'
o REQUIRE ONLY 1
,
L
CONTROL NAIL
N-11427.4459
E-13055.5521
48+68 12.49 LT~~ vp
,
~L

PROPOS 18" CMP '
50+20 J Pl Sta 53-161.27
- ~ JUDY EDENFIELD et al A = 39' 4/' 59.9" (LT)
DB 316 PG 12 54 p = 19° 05' 54.9"
L = 207.87'
T = 108ZCT
PROPOS 18' CMP R = 300.09
48+97
HORIZONAL SCALE r= 50'

KoSCr kffmD x mo. mmT No.
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET 013 11C _OQ3013 _j2

49
2)
49 ,
JUDY EDENFIELD et al/
DB316PG 1254 / NOTE
THE ALIGNMENT HAS BEEN
REVISED AND A STATION
ca 49
N J / , EQUALITY HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
i ca 2 -18" WATTLES SPACED
BEGIN @ 6Y
END
49
L6
(10 C) 156+00 57+80
49 i 0
Lr) /
49
W ( ' ALL BASIN'S 10'-20'
IN LENGTH REQUIRE
2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
BASIN'S LESS THAN 10' s00Z OVNr
J c REQUIRE ONLY 1
V) ROPOSED 18' CMP
55+33
- / ~ JAS
WATTLES SPACED 2
` / BEGIN 03115' END
53+70 56+oo JUDY EDENFIELD et al
4p DB 316 PG 1254
SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"
GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP
ALLEGHANY COUNTY
EXISTING 16' GRAVEL
PROPOS D 18" CMP I ~01 -oPROPOSED 20' PAVED
53+76 -
HORIZONAL SCALE C= 50'

mace Rum4a NO. RW NO.
110.003013 13

-
5K 11-07
' ~ ~ - -
g00Z 6 - 18 WATTLES SPACED
9+30 7.0% 60+70 12'x4'x3
9vqy BEGIN 7. LT END -
JUDY EDENFIELD et al ' 7 - - 9'X3'X3' D
DB 316 PG 1254 ~~N I L E K O A
CONTROL NAIL
5K H07
N-10870.6298
E-13884.4115 i 0
59+24 18.06 LT / i
6 - 18" WATTLES SPACED •m
BEGIN @ 30' RT END O
i
59+30 5.0% 61+40
i
2 - 18" WATTLES SPACED C:)
BEGIN 050- END
7+80 59+30 i
/ POT Sta. 61+41.75
X 0 ° IN EBASIN'S RE END PROJECT
2.5% 2 COIR FIBER BAFFLES.
BASIN'S REQUIRE NLY1 10'
12'x4'x3' s8x PI Sta 59+75.54
~~52 A = 50' 32' 3/.0" (RT)
' - D = 22' 55' 05.9n
IZ'x4'x3'0 1, 2 % L = 220.531
i
e 9'X3'X3' - T = 118.02
J JUDY EDENFIELD et al R = 250.00'
DB 316 PG 1254
9'X3'X3' SR 1401 ALEX WOODRUFF ROAD"
GAP CIVIL TOWNSHIP
PROPOSED 18" CMP ALLEGHANY COUNTY
57+82 EXISTING 16'GRAVEL
PROPOSED 20' PAVED rno
M,VCHUNE SEE SHEET '12 HORIZONAL SCALE P= -W

• PRO `CTJfG~0.0~G13~ cE'NrERt.MF-
E;CAD: aR i40' E . LE)( WOODRUFF R
Mi3 VW
CIOU4`iTf :ALLEGHAt`'
MD OF PAVIiIi~z
TYP WET PIP 1 R ,LE Y PROP EDGE
ING EDGE OF ROADWAY
PLAN SALE; ~ 6U'' ~ ~xSr
SHEE O I wow
PWE
DAI E ~ UNE 23. 20 0
ST
R_Ai NAME: UNNAMED TRIBUTARY sxrsT PEE ,
E
TO NEW RAVER
i 'RATING:
CIL
!.5` AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH
s If
l
f
I
F{{ y~
Iwo,
00 lop
1 I w~ d i
1 13106 E

i EXISTING PIPE SIZE: 48' X 32' CMP
NEW PIPE SIZE': 4€ ' X 40` CMP (BCCS}*MAIN* PIPI^ TO BE LAID ~ ON 90° Sr(-w f
WITH 3.0/ FALL
~
11007 I k
I Y 1.005

t

11000
i
I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Teimporcry erosion c1n+, of PROPOSED :3.0% SLOPE
devices are riot shown but
will be installed as needed
wp-fpipe_ :emplate.dgn 07/11/2008 02:22.07 PM

r

PROJECT:IIC.003013 CENTERLINE
ROAD: SR 1401 " ALEX WOODRUFF RD."
COUNTY: ALLEGHANY PROPOSED Riw
TYPE: WET PIPE SURVEY PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT -
PLAN SCALE: I" = 60' _ EXISTING EDGE OF ROADWAY • - - - - - -
SHEET I OF I
2' NEW PIPE
DATE: JUNE 23. 2008 -
STREAM NAME: UNNAMED TRIBUTARY JONATHAN NESTER EXISTING PIPE -
TO NEW RIVER DB 316 PG 1251
RATING:
1.0' AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH

ao '
N

a - 2

JONATHAN NESTER
P1 St0 30f51f64 DB 316 PG 1251
4652,39e (LT)

~ _ ~ 3z6~12Z
EXISTING PIPE SIZE: 18" X 25' RCP T = 151.74'
NEW PIPE SIZE: 24" X 40' CMP (BCCS)*MAIN* R = 350.W
PIPE TO BE LAID ON A 69 SKEW
WITH 3.0% FALL
1007

1005

1000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35, 40 45
Temporary erosion control PROPOSED 3.0% SLOPE
devices ore not shown, but
will be installed as needed
wetpipe_template. dgn 06/23/2008 11:11:39 AM

r
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)

Project / Site: SR 1401, Alex Woodruff Road Date: 7/7/08
Applicant / Owner: NCDOT County: Alleghanv
Investigator: Heath Slaughter State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes x No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No x Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No x Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)

VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

1- Cat tails Herb OBL 9.
2. Juncus effusus Herb FACW + 10.
3. Carex Sp. Herb 11.
4. Aster Sp. Herb 12.
S. Cornus Amomum Tree FACW + 13.
6. 14.
.
7. Is.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
This is a riparian wetland running through a horse pasture. There is no canopy.

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other X Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: o (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Mast) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 A 10YR 3/1 2.5 YR 4/8 Abundant Muck

Hydric Soil Indicators:

- Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy
Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils list
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Within a Wetland? Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks: