Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081185 Ver 1_Application_20080801KCI TECHNOLOGIES Transmittal Letter ENGINEERS ? SURVEYORS ? SCIENTISTS ? CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS LANDMARK CENTER II, SUITE 220 ? 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ? RALEIGH, NC 27609 ? 919-783-9214 ? (FAX) 919-783-9266 Date: July 31, 2008 P A I 08 1 1 8 5 Company: North Carolina DENR Project: Dog Bite Site D L ( O V Division of Water Quality Stream Restoration M P AUG 1 _ 2008 Contact: Eric Kulz Subject: 401 Permit WATER euAUTv WETLANDS AND STORNIWATER BRANCH Number of Items Description 1 401 Fee (Check for $570) 1 EEP Approval Letter 5 PCN 5 Restoration Plan ? In accordance with your request ? For your review ® For processing ? Plans reviewed and accepted ? Plans reviewed and accepted as noted ? For revision by you ? For your use/files ? Please call when ready ? Please return to this office ? Approval requested ? Conference requested at your convenience Comments: Please see the enclosed PCN and restoration plan for the Dog Bite Site Stream Restoration, a full-delivery stream restoration project developed for the EEP. Please contact me with any questions. Thanks, Adam cc: File 44 vt_ a Adam Spiller Environmental dentist KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. www.kci.com Employee-Owned Since 1988 1r- c% STU11 July 16, 2008 PROGRAM Gary Mryncza Project Manager KCI Technologies, Inc. 4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220 Raleigh, NC 27609 Subject: Restoration Plan for Dog Bite Creek Stream Restoration Project French Broad River Basin - CU# 06010108 Mitchell County, North Carolina Contract No. D06056-A Dear Mr. Mryncza: On July 11, 2008, KCI Technologies (KCI) submitted the Dog Bite Creels Stream Restoration Plan to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for review and comment. The plan proposes to restore 3,718 existing linear feet (lf) of tributaries to White Oak Creek. Natural channel design approach will be employed using reference reach and regional curve data for developing design parameters. An onsite meeting with KCI and EEP was held July 1, 2008. The EEP has completed its review of the restoration plan and has no additional comments at this time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or certifications and complete the implementation of the earthwork. portion of the mitigation project (Task 4). A copy of this letter should be included with your 401/404 permit applications. For the purpose of obtaining approval of the erosion and sedimentation control plan for this project, I have also attached a memorandum confirming that KCI is the Owner and Financially Responsible Party, and has full operational control for all matters pertaining to construction of this project. Please sign and attach this memorandum to the Financial Responsibility/Ownership form of the erosion and sedimentation control plan application. Failure to do so may delay approval of the plan. Sincerely, Guy C. ce EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor cc: File ZT2 MCDENR North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 flail Service Center, Raleigh, N( 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net Office Use Only: Form Version March 05 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 08 1 1 8 5 kir any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".) I. Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 27 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check here: ? 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check ?a nn U II. Applicant Information AU G 2008 1. Owner/Applicant Information D j4K - Sj , MWATER gRWCH Name: KCI Technologies Inc. WE Mailing Address: 4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220 Raleigh NC 27609 Attn: Adam Spiller Telephone Number: (919) 783-9214 Fax Number: (919) 783-9266 E-mail Address: aspiller(apkci.com 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Company Affiliation: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: E-mail Address: Fax Number: Updated 11/1/2005 Page 5 of 13 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Dog Bite Stream Restoration Site 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0873-00-61-3570 4. Location County: Mitchell Nearest Town: Bakersville Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): To reach the site from Raleigh, proceed west on I-40 for approximately 200 miles Then take exit 86 for NC 226 towards Shelby/Marion. Take a right onto NC-226 traveling north Follow NC-226 through Marion and Spruce Pine. Just before reaching Bakersville make a right onto White Oak Rd Follow White Oak Rd for approximately 1.5 mile and then make a left onto Wilson Dairy Rd The road will dead end end at the Wilson property and the Dog Bite Site is on the left 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9952 °N -82.1206 °W 6. Property size (acres): 7.3 acres 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cane Creek 8. River Basin:_ French Broad (06010108) (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.) 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: This site is made u of three headwater streams on a former Updated 11/1/2005 Page 6 of 13 dairy. Most of the property has been cleared for cattle razing for over 60 years Over the past twenty years one pond was built adjacent to the stream which will not be affected by the restoration, and one dairy holding pond was built adjacent to the stream The dairy holding pond was closed on 5-16-08 per NRCS standards. The dairy is no longer in operation but livestock still have access to portions of the project streams and some of the pasture lands on the property have been converted to Christmas tree production As a result of this land use history, the proiect streams have become incised with eroding banks in some areas, portions of the stream have been channelized, and most of the stream lacks a diverse bed form The surrounding land use is characterized by pasture Christmas tree plantations forest and rural home sites. 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This project will entail stream restoration and enhancement activities. In restoration areas the channel will be relocated in areas where it is appropriate. In other restoration sections the existing channel will have its bed and banks improved. Enhancement reaches will have the bed and/or banks reshaped. Grade control and habitat structures will be installed to provide additional stability and variability to the streams. This type of work involves equipment such as bulldozers, track hoes, track trucks, and dump trucks 11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This project is a full-delivery project (FDP) performed for the Ecosystem Enhancement Program _(EEP) The stream restoration and enhancement activities are designed to provide stream mitigation credits for impacts in the French Broad Subbasin 06010108. IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. No. This is the extent of the easement for this EEP project Updated 11/1/2005 Page 7 of 13 VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: This project proposes to restore and enhance 3,736 linear feet stream that have been impacted by livestock and anthropogenic alterations This type of work involves rehabilitating existing streams so that they have the appropriate patternprofile and dimension Specifically, this project will incorporate the following actions: relocating certain sections of channel; working within existing channels to reform the banks and/or bed; installing grade control and habitat structures such as step pools and cross vanes-, stabilizing incoming seeps and drainages; installing livestock exclusion fencing; and replanting riparian buffers 2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, senarately list imnactc rlne to hnth Ctr17ehm- and flnnr1;nrr Wetland Impact Site Number (indicate on map) Type of Impact Type of Wetland (e.g., forested, marsh, herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within 100-year Floodplain es/no) Distance to Nearest Stream feet Area of Impact (acres) Total Wetland Impact (acres) 3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre 4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, Updated 11/1/2005 Page 8 of 13 plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X width- then divide by 41560 Stream Impact Number indicate on ma Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent Perennial t ? Average Stream Width Before Impact Impact Length linear feet Area of Impact acres 1 White Oak Creek Enh./Restoration Perennial 12.0 3,068 0.845 2 Tributary I Enh./Restoration Perennial 10.4 431 0.103 3 Tributary 2 Restoration Perennial 6.6 219 0.033 Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 3,718 0.981 5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. Open Water Impact Site Number (indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Impact Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc.) Area of Impact (acres) Total Open Water Impact (acres) 6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect- Stream Im act (acres): 0.981 Wetland Impact (acres): 0 Open Water Impact (acres): 0 Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.981 Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 3,718 7. Isolated Waters Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE. 8. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.); Proposed use or purpose of pond local stormwater requirement, etc.) (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, Updated 11/1/2005 Page 9 of 13 Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. This project will provide stream mitigation credits for impacts elsewhere within this 8-digit HUC. The site offers an ideal opportune to improve a series of headwater streams VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current version.). 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a Updated 11/1/2005 Page 10 of 13 description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. Please see the attached Doa Bite Site Stream Restoration Plan. A mitigation plan is not needed for this exempt activity. 2. Mitigation may, also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsi l'-,ility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): none Amount_ of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) 1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ? 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ? No 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. Updated 11 /1 /2005 Page 11 of 13 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )? Yes ? No 2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. Zone* Impact Multiplier Required 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. 3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ? No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No Updated 11/1/2005 Page 12 of 13 XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). i"_ C. 7_? 08 App icant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Updated 11/1/2005 Page 13 of 13 C V z 0 a S AVERY COUNTY MITCHELL YANCEY' 80 COUNTY , COUNTY ?t s ti jV 226 e t a \ rth Toe ,Q r e/ 4 MITCHELL AVERY r YANCEY ` 4 ` ADISO BURKE [ ? ?( r MCDOWE Dog Bite Site - Vicinity Map Project Site Location T K C Major Roads ? 1 KC I Other Roads Major Rivers 1:126,720 1 inch equals 2 m iles TECH NOLOG I F:S Cities and Towns 2 l 0 2 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES Mlles AND CONSIRUCDON. INC Mitchell County, North Carolina Dog Bite Site - Topographic Map I Project Easement Boundary A W? pF S 1.12,000 KCI „} h m TECHNOLOGIES (,.SOS7'opagraphlc Quadraugles? 1,200 BaArr:n illy (1978), Carvers Gap (1960), .77ic"irillr (1978). and Spruce Pine (1978) 1 inch equals 1,000 feet boo 0 1,200 Feet owi ENNRONMEN1AL TECNNOIOCKS AND CONSTRUCflON INC . r %*t AL