20180634_17BP 3 R 56 Onslow 11 - updated 20170215_20170216

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT NO.:
17BP.3.R.56
DIVISION: 3
FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET
Let Date: 4/2018 (availability date end of mid-end June 2018)
FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: January 31, 201710:00 a.m.
LOCATION: Onslow 11
COLJNTY: Onslow
ROUTE (US / NC / SR): SR 1434
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace Bridge 11 over Starkys Creek
TIER:
MPO / RPO AREA:
MUNICIPALITY:
BRIDGE NO.: 11
ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE NO E-MAIL ATTENDED
DIVISION BRIDGE Kevin Bowen 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
PROJECT MANAGER/ A1 Edgerton 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
RESIDENT ENGINEER
ASST. PROJECT MANAGER Caitlin Marks 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
DIVISION UTILITY Steve Davis 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
COORDINATOR
DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL Mason Herndon 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
OFFICER
ENVIRONMENTAL Anneliese 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
SPECIALIST Westphal
DIVISION DESIGN David Leonard 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
CONSTRUCT
REPRESENTATIVE
HYDRAULICS Jon Moore 919-707-6738 [e-mail] �/
REPRESENTATIVE
HYDRAULICS Chris Lewis 919-707-6714 [e-mail] �/
REPRESENTATIVE
STRUCTURE DESIGN Greg Dickey 919-707-6469 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCATION AND SURVEYS Rick Neal 910-341-0550 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCATION AND SURVEYS CJ Sawyer 910-341-0550 [e-mail] �/
REPRESENTATIVE
STRUCTURE DESIGN Korey Newton 919-707-6539 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
COiJNTY MAINTENANCE Brady Fisher 910-455-3777 [e-mail] �/
ENGINEER (retired) (retired)
COUNTY MAINTENANCE Lydia McKeel 910-455-3777 [e-mail]
ENGINEER
1

DIVISION OF WATER Joanne Steenhuis 910-796-7306 joanne.steenhuis@ncden �/
RESOURCES r.gov
US ARMY CORPS OF Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 [e-mail]
ENGINEERS my.mil
WILDLIFE RESOURCES Travis Wilson 919-707-0370 Travis.Wilson@ncwildli Comments
COMMISSION fe.org submitted
US FISH & WILDLIFE Gary Jordan 919-856-4520, gary�[e-mail]
SERVICES ext. 32
DIVISION BRIDGE Ron Van Cleef 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
MAINTENANCE ENGiNEER
DIVISION OF COASTAL Gregg Bodnar 252-808-2808 Gregg.Bodnar@ncdenr.
MANAGEMENT - FISHERIES gov
DIVISION OF COASTAL Stephen Lane 252-208-2808 Stephen.Lane@ncdenr.g �/
MANAGEMENT ov
GEOTECHNICAL iJNIT Dean 252-355-9054 [e-mail] �/
Argenbright v
PROJECT MANAGER — RS&H Richard 919-926-4105 Richard.Bollinger@rsan �/
Bollinger dh.com
ROADWAY — RS&H CJ Young Charles.young@rsandh. �/
com
ENVIRONMENTAL Phil May phil.may@carolinaeco.c �/
CONSULTANT om
DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER)
EXISTING FEATi.JRES
FEATURE BRIDGED: Starkys Creek
(BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 70'
WATER DEPTH: 9"
DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT) 30.25'
HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: 9.5'
PRIOR SURVEY DATE: POSTED: SV N/A TTST: N/A
STRUCTURE TYPE: 2 span cored slab, PPC CAPS/H-Pile in concrete cylinders, asphalt overlay
SPAN TYPE: 2@ 35'; ll cored slabs
HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL ):
-L- BASE YEAR: 2013 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3300 % TRUCKS/DUALS: 7%
SLJFFICIENCY RATING: 9.98
POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: (MPH / STATUTORY SSMPH) 50 mph
DETOUR: OFF-SITE: Y ON-SITE: N STAGE CONSTRUCTION: N
IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: L on SR 1438; L on SR 1439; L on US 17; L
on SR 1436; L on SR 1428; L of SR 1434
APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 8.9 miles
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? Waiting to hear back from Lydia (Brady Retired) COMMENTS:
None
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? Waiting to hear back from Lydia (Brady Retired)
ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? N/A COMMENTS:
ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? Major Concerns COMMENTS: House stops for
school on this rd servicing more than one school August — June; Also have summer school programs; contact Mike
Henderson (910) -455-5037 Director of OCS Transportation or Jeri Blick [phone] Asst. Director of OCS

Transportation
ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? NO COMMENTS: N/A
WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? NO
SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? NO
REASONS:
EXISTING R/W WIDTH:
IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES:
POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: Duke AERIAL/UG/BOTH: OH IN CONFLICT: Yes — it is approlcimately 30' from
ledge of bridge; no backfeeding; relocating will take appro�mately 6-8 months with PUE
TELEPHONE: Century Link AERIAL/UG/BOTH: UG IN CONFLICT: Yes — it is approximately 30' from ledge of
bridge; no backfeeding; relocating will take appro�mately 3-4 months with PUE
CABLE TV: TW AERIAL/UGBOTH: OH IN CONFLICT: --------
FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: --------
WATER: ONWASA IN CONFLICT: Above Ground; may need moved
SEWER: Contact: Matt Pageant IN CONFLICT: --------
NATURAL GAS: IN CONFLICT: --------
OTHER: IN CONFLICT: --------
BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED TO
COMPLETE LTTILITY ADJiJSTMENTS 6-8 months with PLTE
WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQUIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION?
WHAT TYPE PERMIT? Utility permit drawings showing aerial; maintain low coordinate of bridge; Show where bore
locations will be (keep out of CAMA buffers)
WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION? RS&H (SoDeep); dry utilities should be moved
at the latest 1 month prior to let date; wet utilities will be moved as part of the construction contract
IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA?
IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED?
EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED?
HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER AFTER THE FSM)
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? Yes
IS THERE LJNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? No IS PROTECTION NEEDED? Standard
ARE BANKS STABLE? Yes IS PROTECTION NEEDED? Standard
DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOLJNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? Moderate
WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? Yes COMMENTS:
BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? No COMMENTS:
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT? N/A
HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE
ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT?
NE QUADRANT: DIs and Pipe Outlet with 30' buffer for all necessary quadrants
SE QUADRANT: DIs and Pipe Outlet with 30' buffer for all necessary quadrants
SW QUADRANT: DIs and Pipe Outlet with 30' buffer for all necessary quadrants
NW QUADRANT: DIs and Pipe Outlet with 30' buffer for all necessary quadrants
3

GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (Co�LE�v BY GEOTECHIviC�, t�T P�ox To T� FSM) *NCDOT Geotech will
handle the design*
EXISTING FOUNDATION REPORTS? No IF SO, ATTACH.
KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN: Limestone
ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE? No CONIMENTS:
ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY? No COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE
PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE? No COMMENTS:
DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED? Unknown (FT.)
ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS? No COMMENTS: Our boreholes
will be sealed
POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: Pile — Recommend bents be placed a minimum of 5 feet away from e�sting bents.
ENVIRONMENTAL �co�LE�D BY DEo sTaFF P�ox To T� FSM�
WETLANDS AT SITE? likely COMMENTS: National Wetlands Inventory Classified as PFOl/2Cd (Freshwater
Forrested/Shrub Wetland) adjacent to site
KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? TBD COMMENTS: N/A
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS? None
CAMA COUNTY: Yes PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: No DCM CLAIMING: Yes
MORATORIA: No IF YES-DURATION: N/A
COMMENTS: No moratoria per Travis Wilson, WRC
IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCE1vIC RIVER? No COMMENTS: None
WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: C STREAM ID# 20-10
WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? No COMMENTS: None required
IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
NATIONAL FOREST: No
WILDLIFE REFUGE: No
STATE, COLJNTY, OR LOCAL PARK: No
AIRPORT: No
A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION: No
WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR: No
NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS: No
PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP: No
CEMETARIES: No
WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGiTLATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQiJIRED? No
IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES? TBD
(NCSHPO)
KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES 1N THE AREA? TBD (NCSHPO)
IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC? TBD (NCSHPO)
WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY? No
4

IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROUTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROLTTE? No
ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: None
CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS �DiscussED aT T� FSM BY nlvisloN B�D�E MaNaGEx�
METHOD OF ACCESS: Road Closure will provide room for all of the following:
TOP-DOWN: Yes
MATERIAL AND EQLTIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: Yes
TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS: Yes BARGE ACCESS: Yes HEAVI' EQUIPMENT ACCESS: Yes
POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES 1N VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS? TBD
ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE? Yes
ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED? No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER AT THE FSM)
ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL: Good — tangent across bridge, curve in alignment on South End appears far
enough away to put NC on bridge
EXISTING VERTICAL: Fair — Keep low point off bridge
POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS: sub-reginal tier
POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED: 55
POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: Yes COMMENTS: Design exception(s) may be utilized if necessary to limit extent of
roadway work to that suitable for a bridge replacement project
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: 600' NUMBER AND WIDTH OF LANES: 2@ 11'
SHOiJLD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOiJLDER APPROACHES? Shoulder
COMMENTS: N/A
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH: 6' PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH: 2'
CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE: 27'-10"
WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED? NO
COMMENTS: N/A
ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED
FOR CONSTRUCTION? YES COMMENTS: Potential modifications or additions to utility easements
ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Biggest concern is proa�imity of curve on south end of bridge
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES
ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OFF-SITE DETOUR � ON-SITE DETOUR ❑ NEW LOCATION ❑
CHECK ONE
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE)
LIBR ATT G� PEF to prepare the environmental package; will also need NPl&NP5 since DCM has claimed this project;
5

Mason will review and turn in
PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) ❑
MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST ❑
THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: April 19, 2018 (Date of Availability after School gets out - late June
2018)
SURVEY LIMITS: �-400' on the side of the bridge where the road is straight; �650' on the opposite side though the horizontal
curve; 100' upstream and downstream
POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: 21" Cored Slabs (potentially 18" cored slabs)
TYPE: Cored Slab
NUMBER OF SPANS: 2
LENGTH OF SPANS: 1@ 45'; 1@ 35'
TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: 80'
TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: 33' Out to Out with 11' lane; potentially may need 36'
BRIDGE SKEW: Maintain eausting (60 degree max); use standard skew
ROW BY: January 2018
PERMITS: February 2018 (LIBR Manual suggestions January 2018)
METHOD OF CLEARING: Modified Method III
SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS: No => potentially to Marine Fisheries but asphalt would have to be removed completely
(NCDCM will determine if NCDMF can use)
REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABUTMENTS / PIERS: Remove all piles and abutments completely
DECK OVERLAY TYPE Asphalt Overlay (from standards)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: No Deck Drains on Bridge; all plans should be done using a scale of 50;
APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICiJLAR: Either TBD; if skew use standard skew
SHOiJLD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL: Yes; ref Fig. 12-30 of the SMU design manual, and Chapter 12 of the
design manual per Greg Dickey
C�

� .U'"��+o�k�i,��t,•�,w�rr��fi� i�'�
� ?��', �ai� rr,iP+�,a� .;yi;m�na€rv �3�a=� �
M+��fiS ��B�L �ei
�i� 1 .'�.�Rf: ti�r'7: Mr.lf.`fi'.::�zt� o?,":
� d �. IM�i 6.P7Rt� ,�j4R•--H'AG� � is�
� ���rr, �r.�r� r,.rn� �� �o P $
�y "P'.E#a�l �Cdl1a C�s� NtS��a'p� .�iSS F�I
� � '; •:�� �� �� �� � �dt
� �_� �����
r'
�Ai��� }:� I. ' u ., 5. i�' �..� 2 n°f .��e�5�i�:J M iF+�y ''�� 6"�,� p' _•-
ET.� i�.Q�•�
�
�'
nu��
.�
':
d'� �'
� 'IFlM�.!'��'9i11�l�L�+7._