19960233 Ver 1_Complete File_19980105

sTn7Z o

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
January 5, 1998

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890

ATTN: Mr. Mike Smith
Assistant Chief

SUBJECT: Wake County, Aviation Parkway, Raleigh-Durham International Airport
connector to Northern Wake Expressway, T.I.P. Project No. R-2634, State
Project No. 8.2402302, Federal Aid Project No. RS-9219(2), COE Action
ID 199402640.

Dear Sir:

The Corps of Engineers (COE) issued a Section 404 General Permit 31 for the
subject project on August 07, 1996. This permit will expire on December 31, 1997. The
new connector is not scheduled to be complete until June 1999. Consequently, the
Department of Transportation (DOT) needs to renew authorization for this work.

Information regarding the project description has not changed since the
distribution of the application package in a letter dated March 08, 1996. The project
consists of constructing a full control of access, four-lane divided facility on 250 feet of
right-of-way. The facility will be on new location and will link Aviation Parkway with
Northern Wake Expressway. The cross section is two 12-foot travel lanes in each
direction with a 56-foot wide median. This project is currently under construction.

Additionally, there have been no changes in the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

list of Threatened and Endangered Species for Wake County.

The DOT requests that the COE reauthorize this project in Wake County under a
Section 404 General Permit 31. Reissuance of 401 Water Quality Certification by the
Division of Water Quality is also requested.

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr.
Lindsey Riddick at [phone], Extension 315.

Sincerel ,

H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch

HFV/rfm

cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, COE, Raleigh
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. William Rogers, P. E., Structure Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P. E., Program Development
Mr. R. L. Hill, P. E., State Highway Engineer - Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. D. A. Allsbrook, P. E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources MIIWA
•
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E F-= H N F~
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director

April 2, 1996
Wake County
DEM Project # 960233
TIP# R-2634
State Project No. 8.2402302
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Franklin Vick
N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval to place fill material in 8.169 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose
of constructing the Aviation Parkway, RDU connector to Northern Wake Expressway, as you
described in your application dated 8 March 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided
that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 2735. This certification allows
you to use General Permit Number 031 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. In
addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section
401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-
1786.
Sin erely,
R.stjonHow d, Jr. P. .
Attachment

cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
960233.1tr
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

„a 5fnipo

~ Z

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARREiT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
April 18, 1996

Mr. Mike Smith
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

Dear Mr. Smith:

SUBJECT: Wake County, Aviation Parkway, RDUI Airport connector to Northern
Wake Expressway, T.I.P. Project No. R-2634, State Project No.
8.2402302, Federal Aid Project No. RS-9219(2).

On March 8, 1996, the N.C. Department of Transportation applied to the Corps of
Engineers for Section 404 authorization to construct the proposed Aviation Parkway
connector to the Northern Wake Expressway. The Corps of Engineers advised the
NCDOT by letter dated March 25, 1995 that several items of additional information
needed to be provided to complete the application. The Corps' comments and the
NCDOT responses are given below:

Comment: "How much shoreline will be created by the proposed project, in linear feet,
including all proposed excavation and fill?"

Response: Approximately 1700 linear feet of shoreline will be created by the proposed
proiect. Since the project will destroy 1300 linear feet of shoreline, there will be a net
gain.

Comment: "What are the proposed bank slopes/elevations being created along the
shoreline? (Compare the proposal to the existing slopes/elevations of the impacted
wetland areas.)"

Response: A proposed bank elevation of 93.7 meters is being created along the shoreline.
The excavation for flood storage will begin 1 foot above normal pool elevation. This will
leave a strip adjacent to the normal pool where the slope and elevation remain unchanged.

a
s.. n

Comment: "How many acres of vegetated wetlands will be created by the proposed
project, if the existing reservoir conditions remain the same?"

Response: The excavation could potentially create 5.64 hectares (13.93 acres) of fringe
wetlands. This estimate is based on the typical cross section of the proposed excavation.
It must be stated that the NCDOT cannot commit to creating a specific amount of wetland
adjacent to the reservoir. The fringe wetlands which develop will be sustained
hydrologically by the normal pool elevation. This elevation could be changed in the
future, and is outside of NCDOT's control.

Comment: "...please provide Mr. Alsmeyer all pertinent information concerning the
design alternatives that were considered to avoid or minimize wetland impacts.
Specifically, could not the proposed corridor be shifted to the east, thereby avoiding and
minimizing impacts to the "fringe" wetlands located between Stations 19+00 and 23+00?
Also, could not the proposed areas to be excavated be relocated to avoid adverse impacts
to the large wetland area that appears on Sheet Nos. 19 and 20 of your permit package?"

Response: This project is designed to provide a connector from the Northern Wake
Expressway to the proposed Aviation Parkway interchange at Airport Boulevard, a
distance of approximately one mile. Consequently, the project has fixed termini which are
fairly close together. The proposed alignment crosses Brier Creek at its narrowest point
as compared to other reasonable crossing locations.

The design of this project was extensively coordinated with the Raleigh-Durham Airport
Authority. It was determined that the alignment proposed in the Environmental
Assessment needed to be shifted farther westward away from the airport to prevent
encroachment on the airport's future runway safety zones. The NCDOT reviewed several
possible alternatives and their associated impacts, and determined that the alignment
should be shifted 45 meters (150 feet) westward toward the lake. This shift of roadway
alignment resulted in impacts to the "fringe" wetlands located between Stations 19+00 and
23+00 which had previously been avoided. Other alignments would also increase the
project cost.

The proposed fill into Brier Creek has been minimized by maintaining a minimum height
for the proposed roadway crossing based on the 100 year floodplain and floodway in the

vicinity of the crossing. The slopes of the fill areas in the Brier Creek Reservoir were
steepened to minimize the displacement of water storage volume.

The proposed excavation adjacent to wetland site HC is designed to create a hydrologic
connection with the reservoir. Not excavating adjacent to wetland site HC would isolate
the wetland and a piece of the reservoir. This would require the construction of another
.fculvert and would increase project cost.

i

The NCDOT requests that the Corps of Engineers continue to review this project for
authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The N.C. Division of
Environmental Management has authorized this project under General Water Quality
Certification Number 2735 by letter dated April 2, 1996: If you need any additional
information, please call Mr. Gordon Cashin at [phone] extension 278.

Sincer ly

H. ranklin Vick, P.E., Manager
; L&
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/tp

cc: Mr. John Dorney, DEM
Mr. A.L. Hankins, Hydraulics
Mr. N. L. Graf, FHWA, attn: Mr. Roy Shelton
Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Program Development Branch
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., State Highway Engineer-Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. D.A. Allsbrook, Jr., PE., Division 5 Engineer

a+ •
eva ~~d
a~
F ~

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
March 8, 1996

RECEIVED
Mr. Mike Smith BAR 0 8 1996
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 6 Q ra EryVIROIV*WA`SCIEry
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 9
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh; North Carolina 27615

Dear Mr. Smith:

SUBJECT: Wake County, Aviation Parkway, Raleigh-Durham International Airport
connector to Northern Wake Expressway, T.I.P. Project No. R-2634, State

Project No. 8.2402302, Federal Aid Project No. RS-9219(2).

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a
multi-lane highway on new location between the Raleigh-Durham International (RDUI)
Airport and the Research Triangle Park west of the City of kaleigh. The proposed
new road will connect the proposed Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) interchange (TIP
No. R-2030) and the proposed Northern Wake Expressway (TIP No. R-2000), a distance
of approximately 1.0 mile.

The project consists of constructing a four-lane divided facility on 250 feet of right of
way. The proposed cross section will provide for two 12-foot wide lanes in each direction
with a 56-foot wide median. Full control of access will be maintained along the proposed
project. The environmental impacts of this project were evaluated in an Environmental
Assessment document and a Finding of No Significant Impact document approved by the
Federal Highway Administration on February 25, 1994 and April 28, 1995, respectively.
As currently scheduled, the project will be let to contract in September 1996, and will be
completed within 3 years.

To construct this project, a roadway embankment will be built across the Briar Creek
Reservoir. This reservoir is the only aquatic community found in the study area. It is a
man-made flood control water body and is fed by Briar Creek and Little Briar Creek.
Outflow from the reservoir continues to the south as Briar Creek. Potential impacts to
Briar Creek Reservoir include loss of lake area and increased sedimentation from
construction related erosion. The NCDOT has examined a number of alternatives to avoid
and minimize adverse impacts to the reservoir.

2

Based on the termini points of this project and the relatively short distance between the
two, any other alternative designed to avoid Briar Creek would be too costly as compared
to the recommended alternative location. The NCDOT also examined the possibility of
bridging the reservoir to avoid constructing the proposed. embankment. This alternative
would increase the estimated project cost by $6,095,000, and consequently is not
considered practicable.

The construction of the embankment is expected to increase the potential for
sedimentation from construction related erosion. The NCDOT, in coordination with the
Soil Conservation Service and Wake County, has developed a plan which consists of
rigorous requirements to minimize erosion and sedimentation. In addition to standard
erosion and sedimentation control practices, special measures shall be taken which shall
include, but not limited to the following

• The lake water level will be lowered to an appropriate level prior to construction.
• The natural channel will convey normal runoff through the reservoir during
construction. During construction, this channel will pass through the roadway

embankment through a 1200 mm reinforced concrete pipe.
• A standard stilling basin and silt screens for sediment removal shall be provided
downstream of the pipe outlet.
• Both sides of the proposed roadway embankment will be protected from erosion with
rock plating up to the 100 year pool elevation.
• The slopes of the fill areas in the Briar Creek Reservoir were steepened to minimize
the displacement of water storage volume.
• A two barrel 3 meter by 4.3 meter reinforced concrete box culvert will be constructed
in the roadway embankment to connect the sections of the reservoir divided by the
project. The box culvert bottom invert will be set above the estimated sediment level
to prevent sediment accumulation in the culvert.

jectI Z771ectares (6.84 acres) ofs~rfape,water- This will involve the
placement of 27,653 cubic meters (36,225 cubic yards) of fill placed below ordinary high
water in the reservoir. The placement of this fill would reduce the amount of flood
storage provided by the reservoir. Consequently, the loss of storage volume due to the
proposed roadway embankment will be mitigated by providing equal volume through
excavation adjacent to the existing reservoir. This excavation will allow normal water
pool and flood capacity in the reservoir to be maintained. A total of 30,700 cubic meters
(40,217 cubic yards) of material will be excavated from below ordinary high water to
replace flood storage volume.

'rpj~t wit r. ~ithpacts to a total of 0.538 hectares (1.329 acres) of wetlands.
anion +ill o it fl.364 hectares (0.899 acres) an filkvill be placed: in,,0.174
J es-(0.430 acres) The wetlands impacted by this project consist of thin marshy
fringes which have developed along the edge of the reservoir. These fringes are
dominated by soft rush (Juncos effusus), Ludwigia aiternifolia, broom sedge (Adropogon
Virg idcus), sedges (Carex sp.) and yellow jessamine (Gelsimium sempet-virens).

t. ~
3

These wetland communities developed in response to the creation of the Briar Creek
reservoir, and their location is determined by the normal lake level. It is anticipated that a
similar wetland fringe will develop at the edge of the areas which will be excavated to
mitigate for flood storage. Consequently, the flood storage excavation will create the
same type of wetlands to be impacted by the project. Since this constitutes on-site, in-
kind replacement, the NCDOT does not propose any additional wetland mitigation for this
project.

The NCDOT requests that this project be reviewed for authorization and ""di'al'
Permit 31. By copy of this transmittal, the NCDOT also requests that the N.C. Division
of Environmental Management review the proposed work. Attached you will find an
application form and plan sheets depicting the proposed impacts. If you need any
additional information, please call Mr. Gordon Cashin at [phone], Extension 315.

Sinter ,

H. Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch

HFV/plr

cc: Mr. John Dorney, DEM
Mr. A. L. Hankins, Hydraulics
Mr. N. L. Graf, FHWA, Attn: Mr. Roy Shelton '
Mr. Kelly Barger, PE, Program Development Branch
Mr. Don Morton, PE, State Highway Engineer-Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, PE, State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. D. A. Allsbrook, Jr., PE, Division 5 Engineer

i .r APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT ~n OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) _q s ng ^ Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
mments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of InformationOperations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22203-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC
205C3. Please 00 NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws•require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged .
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed ectivity rnust be attached to this
application (sae sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction ovgr the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
ITEMS I THRU 4 T BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE /an agent is not required!
H. Franklin• Vick, PE, Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Planning and knvironmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh NC 27611
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business (919) 733-3141 b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION'
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE

NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (sae instructions)
Aviation Parkway, Raleigh Durham International Airport connector to Northern Wake Expressway
- (T.I.P. No. R-2634, State.Project, 8.2402302) _

13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN llrappikab/el 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS luapocebw
Briar Creek Reservoir
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT .
Wake North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,. IF KNOWN, rseeinstructionsl

New connector road between SR 1002 and the.proposed Northern Wake Expressway.
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Project begins at Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) west of Raleiqh-Durham International-Airport
and runs north across Briar Creek Reservoir and Nelson Road (SR 1642) to the interchange
with the Northern Wake Expressway.

ENG FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: ChUW-UH)

1 8. Nature of Activity (Deschprian of project, include all features)
Roadway construction on new location. Construction of.an embankment across Briar Creek
Reservoir. Excavation for flood storaqe. See attached cover letter for details.

19. Project Purpose mascribe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions/

Public roadway.

USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of roadway embankment.

21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Suitable fill material. A total of 36,225 cubic yards (27,653 cubic meters) of fill will bE
placed below-ordinary hiqh water in Briar Creek reservoir.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled is" instructions)

0.536 hectares (1.329 acres) of wetlands will be filled.
2.77 hectares (6.84 acres) of surface water will be filled.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No XX IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK

24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
County of Wake Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Community Development Services P.O. Box 8001
P.O. Box 550 RDU Airport, NC 27623
Raleigh, NC 27602

25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED

k 'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
i 26. Application is hereby mad for a permit or Pe its 20 authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application ' omplete rata. I rtr certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
i du a h z agent t appli
1//41/74f
SIGNATURE OF APPLI NT TE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly,..: T.
` authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
,l fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
:E fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
• U.SGPO:1994.520.478182018

1
_ f,.r„ s sAr?. STATE 017- NORTH CAROLINA
"MOW 8 *low
w DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
QI

WAKE COUNTY
LOCATION: Aviation Parkway -Between. 4irport
} 13oukvard _ shed . Nortliern_ make xy
'
TYPE OF- iVORX- Grading, Drainage,.l'aving,,.5 5;Lu~,Culvcrt . ;

` v .,rr YA- are snug r mccl ai•rt)o2 _ . _ _ _ _
D£GIN cuLVERr •L- r
.15-17-L- REV.
Srt2*JJ194 -L• RMEND S
• - ~ ~ SrA2IJJA9 •L• REY.END P, .
• ,r
• WN R( r~ ; . ~
N, .
da Is &W
©
owl. ra
O F ~ - no u.sn.c.o.
N STA 1pWM 1-BEGIN STATE PMLN0.
• ' STAIaA L• BEGuY f.APAQ~LSTPa2/Sr2J END cuLvERr -L- ./•.G
END BRoGg -c- sr k
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
°""`°"""ro"ws"""' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
v am w~ DESIGN DATA rx0jEcr L&VG a WAKE CO.
[r1 APT I"9 . .600
APT I01e PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654
~y . $0 so zoo
D 10%
*m lOm IOw 0 53 !6 IMDYN WADMAY /AMORR 51r-n1IM . LA" M PROPOSED
. 13
-L• LINE v . 100% r'"' AIRPORT PRIiWY TO N. WAKE
- Y- LINEV., ao-km EXPRESSWAY
• Y DEIOtM V 63 km
ADT »or - 27.200
. APPROX.1.6 KIM
',Y` Aarr zois . 12sao
SHEET 1 OF 25.

V I C I N I T Y MAP
w Qi J W
) r :Irct Red Oak e,ultb«o 3,
~ -'S- T. it ;u bu o &7 • 't V"1 y 1' r 7961 ti Mad ilt / 1 ~ ~i~
c•cO i I ti i 3(c'3.'1
r mt ~tQ1) t +1 i r, to I t o«I ruT~'} i .
J 1 f 1 .,`1, Youn{tnllt ]91d to 1: 'uCkj Mount t1~a 1: r ORA _E I S.w Qu r
N- -A- S. 1
*J S 7_ it~ N N. 3,1. .1a}IJ~rt'3~,• •`1New Mopt Sprre MomtYt't U • •9.l t1 1
1 t . t . Bun [ a ED . Ale-.v' : '
a i + 3 boat t ,
+ 1 S 6. Grore afhvsllt t ~ ' t
1 A t 1~ • t,•) S ` ..rv.. t 1. b • ,g rf t
LA AAN ' 1• If Mal ill I s • 1 u '1\e t• K~ x~. it t S 1 98 It I ~2G / at I 1~, °3 „ ra 4
dbo, C % rr s Nrlt I f,
lv"
t u tU0t0: l S . lT M.. t Pe reu s t , gk 1 (e ~o
,Oaba as IO euse < to Role[nlle 1 3 t i ~ / 9 J j F,-; r.1 Yy
! 1 V JDa•,P ~s k01 P+101 t 'Y
Lis Intl n+«~ I M l- L t 1:/ 6
Lie:= 3izy I '•y I x C lows .nT «l •t~r A~ m+ S t LL. • t 1 ~1 61 1 ~~.~I 1_..%• Irarasbur tl 1~tboi 1 ^
Snow Camis it Nelso `o <
1 •r...~~.~ tf WaAlliep l t ! 3 SUntwp! / r 1 :''r: , ~
° 501 Jµ , an"br lizard + 1 3 l fw++r 3 t t~ •i l.~ ;i
let
, ~ ~ ~ • n.rrr ClmCstY I Pmelrws
U pr+7r 1 1 ~ AdIU1 h.li . , ; t Town r1 t ~
I 6 7 Y+k to
CrulebLeld X•rdt „rrln{to ~ t rebut , 5~ t~ ~ SA CrteA or
fi•t++•++
{ .p Yilla{t mmp + s + 17 N.! Eagle 6tli as Brae it t t Y J7 t x•,t a ts'•
y +la Hoot f I f RacA 1 as er 3 Y r/WJban3s Jt tt Yea '
IS ld. rt ni{hld,l! f 3 1 , k t1 + d• sifn-r
to f ~"rH / ' , + Wm dl J. ~u H I Maulea
RotA field r,r
m • f a tl hi~ 11 1 ell 5. + [ • / r 1, ~C~~ r*1 i t die ~SO(l + 10
~ ••r•
~SZD t~ ~ It 1~r{i6niR Lek, , 6arne ~ s Ir ~?bora t t lo,: 1 t \ y,
de 3 rosltroa 3 1 3 _ ~t ;51
SII Clly Prt130 + Ai~Y' I / 1 `Auburr~ « .^"1''" LoMichel
T r t y h} -Y
* [ to + Mil 55 ,1 1' I l1 (S O I a t k r"t.
1 J ucama S~ralo a st.•t.+.
A A t 1 ~ ~ tli C to ~ I } {
non S rn[i 11 5 a a 'a / is
ASCCNItr • tiraf t ~1 1 I of 39 { t t ~1 .•s,~4S,oe rio*a Tack Ctte12~ 3~7 y 3 I ~6[
9 Bled I .y' ~1 'w is 1 . 5 'al i0mton 5 • .,"c Stantonsbw Ns v
Cttt Sp<+nes 0 H 1V 5 T 0 N `rt ..1-~ x-- - 813lonbur[ fumy)
to t - wlrlo.
"•rVum.=' LiFl inn BatltYi 5 r•
v' V J
T• se 40 / G SIN P~OJ. G .
END P_k1.
',~r `'RESEA C . .
l z .4 vi \ ~ 4 ~ ~ 7 Z N t I 1
-57
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPOR'T'ATION
HIGHWAYS
" ' •t `""`I" v - I DIVISION OF
a: r-•
• \ ) - / n r5: 'riff ''*a t 4 y ' ii Ra1.f9MC'n1wn1 y~ p': ~1
Aye WAKE CO.
+ < Yo
fov tYyi 1 . r
PROJECT 8.2402302 R-2634
t..< x ?aPROPOSED
AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
/ ~ :W i~•s rr y •r"k. -'~at~ 5 ~ r ~ ~ ~ EXPRESSWAY
~y„ , ~s +c! : ~•.:p..~FS UMSTE/ D 1 e2 . 1 st
&f ~ APPRIU:1'.1.6 liM
,
SHEET OF -25-

I I- -
WETLAND SITE _ _ - - -I- - ~ HW y

I

FDP

s~yc9j0 ~-FDP ; OOm

\ - EV

0

~'y ~S • I ~ ~ r

Now+

2m v 2GI DP
N. C. DI:PT.OF TRANSPORTATION
MELT PLAN DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS
K' COUNTY
PL11~ 1 a1 VIE U r \ F _ WAKE
\ PROJECT 8.2402302 R-2634
/
lOm O 20m PROPOSED
; DLNOTES FILL BELOW
SURFACE WATER AIRPORT P1t1iK`1' TO N. WAKE
1;xPRESSwAY
EM DENOTES FILL IN
WETLANDS 1.6 link
SCALE SHEET 3 Or _25

HW - _ -WETLAND SITE
HB
Io
ollm
-I_ /TT /T T T T T T T 0

2 3.0 4.3 CBC 16

120 r

Lij
AS 41000S

Q
.z

s. •y:....•~ai:ay +'i': !•ir'••ir'•:1 ~~~.+...l.i',y,"•tiyi±! ,riij. ~yy~~~•+`;

1 I
DP 3.0 I FDP ~S-F
FDP
~F
HW / - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION

~V][]E~ST DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1VAIiE COUNTY
/o/ ~ / O 20M DENOTES FILL BELOW PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654
SURFACE WATER PROPOSED
AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
BN M'- DENOTES FILL IN I?.l'PRE5SWAY
WETLAND
S- CA 1r 11, 3(~ ~ APPROX. I.v KIM
SI-IEE7• of

F B WETLAND SITE
11000s `
HB

w

L-R
lYaoos

FDF N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
_ " - - - - DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
B WAKE COUNTY
/om 0 20! PLAN VIE PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654

I PROPOSED
i, MNOTGS FILL BELOW AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
SURFACE WATER EXPRI;SSWA1'
DENOTES FILL IN APPIWX.1.6 KAI
SCALE WETLANDS
SHEET 5 OF 25

r

r,

WETLAND SITE WETLAND SITE

7.~t7t DP L E F ID
~T T I T T T T T T T T T T T T 7 T T/ T T
T T T T

VC0 °0p5 l8 2cl z
71, / 45G /ML F W DF AIN
7z
Ln
co

Y
3. FDP L P

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
.L DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
F
IOI 0 WAKE COUNTY
20m PLAN VIEW PROJECT 8.2402002 R-2634
I DENOTES FILL BELOW PROPOSED
SURFACE WATER > > t
AIRPORT ' I 1;Ii~Vy' TO N. WAKE
DENOTES FILL IN I:Xljlk :S5WAY
SCALE WETLANDS APPROX. 1.6 KM
SHEET fi OF 25

r-ft A Sig
i
..r .w err w w.• m s a W mw vai Wr fYw sM W~ w...r su cr t m~a ~i ~'KA wf~ CQYi Ark 4`.w ivM W! •d~+ ICri ' v O A l a .sa r 1 0
FDP WETLAND SITE FDP (3RasS
HD
T T

LAKE
750mm

z l9 - -REV '
J
u

2

LA'
1
T'

LAKE F ID FDP
P

- - - - - - N. C. llL'PT.01- TRANSPORTATION
F DIVISION OI-' HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNT]'
m PLAN VIEW
/om 0 20m !t PIkOJLCT 8.2402302 R-2634
f -'1 DENOTES FILL BELOW 1-wIZd1)OSLU
SURFACE WATER AIRPORT PIkIi1 Y TO N. WAKE
DENOTES FILL IN EXPRESSWAY
WETLANDS APPROS.1.6 KNl
S" CA LE SHEET 7 {3I. °5

.i a v w.~ tr •M +ti amm M ft %M tlw %wa bm aebw4*
i9q 1ift Mu ftrh yeq as m+
FDP FDP
. MELT
L T

GRASS GRASS

750mm
J

U
WETLAND SITE Q
HD

/ FDP
- _ / p

LAKE LAKE N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

/o/ / / nom PLA i~~' VIEW WAKE COUNTY
G I ~ I 1~ PROJECT 8.2402302 8-2534
DI:NOTes TILL nl:i.oW
PROPOSED
SURFACE WATER AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE ~
DENOTES FILL IN EXPRESSWAY !
SCALE WETLANDS APPROX.1.6 KINI
SHEET 8 01 '~Ci

.w

4

F 22

w

+-V
1.2m 22
w 2GI
z
s I0° 3' 38.76 E
u WETLAND SITE u i
<c HD 375 MM c0
11.2m
N
Jfa~¦~ r, I ~
FDP _ FDP FDP

- -

LAKE
N. C. DLPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
LAKE
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
/011 ! 0 20M WAKE COUNTY
V 1 i ~ J)~T PROJECT 8.2402302 I1-2034
1 11 Ll PLAN
' DENOTES FILL BELOW PROPOSED
D SURFACE WATER AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
SCALE DENOTES FILL IN EXPRESSWAY
WETLANDS APPROX. 1.6 KINI
SHEET V OF 2.5

0 A111.4,7-10

G ~ -
4mm

1 _

22 ' 9 qq ~1 ~
~ -L-REV
1 FS 35 C~ CpRj
WETLAND SITE ' - -
o~ HD -

cv ( 1050 MM

FDP FDP

LAKE - - • - LAKE

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH - DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY DIVISION 017 HIGHWAYS
l0m 0 20m WAKE COUNTY

k13 Im PLAN VIEW PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654
1-1 IJ
DENOTES FILL BELOW PROPOSED
SURFACE WATER AIRPORT PlkKWY TO N. WAKE
EXPRESSWAY
SCALE ~ DENOTES FILL IN APPROX.
WETLANDS 1.G KM
SHE; ET 10 OF 25

15+2004-3

•
100YR POOL EL. o,.7.07M ~Q

~1i cam?
CLASS `B' RIP RAP
ARMOR TO
NORMAL POOL EL. 97.37,

EL. 93.42M
92
LAKE BED _ L

{ I I I I _ I I ( I
40Th 20m 40m

REV

~IC ~C~C~[~~1 n_~ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
1L: JL 1'~t f ^1 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE CO.
/om 0 20m PROJECT 8.2402002 R-2604
HORIZONTAL SCALE PROPOSED
DENOTES FILL BELOW AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
/m 0 2m SURFACE WATER EXPRESSWAY
Lw-~ VERTICAL SCALE
r'1PPR0:5:.1.6 KM
SHEE

r

6 _~_60628

100 YR POOL
EL. 97.07M

c6
96
GLASS B' RIP RAP
z "ARMOR TO EL. 97.
NG NORMAL POOL 9~

4-1 /

9L

r OP. LAKE LAKE BED-'
BED
I I I I l I I I I I I
410M 20,, - L 20M 40M

REV
~~,!li ` `l.~~lr~~-1 f _ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
JL DIV15ION O}: HIGHWAYS
WAKE CO.
/om 0 20m PROJECT 8.2402302 8-2634
HORIZONTAL SCALE PROPOSED
DENOTES FILL BELOW:
Im 0 2m ® SURFACE WATER AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
EXPRESSWAY
-m-2- VERTICAL SCALE DENOTES EXCAVATION TO APPROX.I.6 KINI
REPLACE STORAGE VOLUME SHEET ~2 O}' 2-5-

100 YR POOL EL. 9Z 07,

..___sz_
NG

r
z

NORMAL FOOL / 94
L.93.42 nQH.

92
PROP. LAKE 13ED

I
I I I I I I ~ I I
I
140r 120m loom Coln 60.x,

SECTION CJ- B N. C. DEPT. ION
N
V ION OF HIGHWAYS
Jl 1~ WAKE CO.
1011 0 20M PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654
HORIZONTAL SCALE / DENOTES rILL BELOW PROPOSED
l/17 21n SURFACE. WATER AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
VERTICAL SCALE DENOTES EXCAVATION TO EXPRESSWAY
REPLACE STORAGE VOLUME' APPROI.I.G KNl
SHEET L3- OF
2~

w
t , 00
w t
P,LAN VIEW
It` ' H. 1

w 1

•90 1
w
65n7
213.25'
LA I u')
HB

.75 / I w00

01.2 3'
/ wo

/ to

MA CH L S .4
• ~ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY

/om 0 20m DENOTES PROJECT 8.2402302 8-2634
IMbLACL STORSTORAGE EXCAVATION
VOLUME PROPOSED
tL•'I~LA
AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN EXPRESSWAY
SSWA'Y
~
WETLANDS
APPROX. LiG KM
SCALE SHEET 14 OF 25

w I

I
I TCIH NE PLAN VIEW

CU
L l _
I

z
w I w o0
I
I Q
_ w I

1 W AND T
- B
LAKE I 1
w l I

1 ~
w

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
/Om O 20m PROJECT 8.2402302 R-2034
J DENOTES IiXCAVATION To
REPLACE STORAGE VOLUME 1:)Ik( )POSI - D
L 93 m AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE'
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN EXPRES5WAY
SCALE WETLANDS APPROX. 1.6 KM
SHEIIJ 15 01. ti

t

i

` JJ \SQ S
er a ~S iv
9S ~ z
E E E E E E E
•95 LU •50 F
15m l 0m \
54/.34' _ ~

w° s

j TC SH 5 F

,,\Nl L NE -1.18
1 U_J~
;21 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
PLAN VIEW AN DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
/Om
I_-I I 1\/\/Xl O 20m DENOTES EXCAVATION TO PROJECT 8.2402502 R•2654 REPLACE STORAGE VOLUME PROPOSED
J2 0 AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
EXPRESSWAY APPROX. 1.6 KIM
C~'~L1L;. SHEH'T 16 OF 25

a"

Tl j SH.

V) LEIG - R A AI OR
ORI
W

~ Z
Q
y w OJ i
ET D IT
H _
,0 2

40m
A /

CH INE SH.
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION

Trn rT~ DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS
PLAN VIEW-L- ' WAKE COUNTY
l of i ! PROJECT 8.2402302 R-2034
DENOTES EXCAVATION TO PROPOSED
REPLACE STORAGE VOLUME AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE

KMDENOTES EXCAVATION IN EXPRESSWAY
C ~C ~ 1( L 1T.` E 20M WETLANDS APPRO~I:.I.O KM
S' SHI'ET 17 OF-25

i

H

KT V s~- 6 ~F

\ F .20
\ \ 135m _ E
F 442.91 Ems- E

~J
J
2
r

A H- R A PO AU RI Y

wo os

T LIN

N. C. DEPT. OF R-TA IM
PLAN VIEW DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
l0m 0 20m PROJECT 8.2902302 R-2634
DENOTES EXCAVATION TO PROPOSED
RLPLACL STOItAGL VOLURE
' AIRPORT IDRIitiYl' TO N. WAKE
EXPRESSWAY
SCALE APPROX. 1.6.Kb,-l
SHHI3I:T 18 OF 25

M

E SH.20 1
PLAN VIEW
1 GRAS
1 11

woooS 11

I1
,11 GRASS

r- 11

_ 11
LAKE \

-c WETLAND SITE 1;11 ~-n
HC 11
- \11 -60
/W
!93 _
131.23\ 18 _L C N. C. DLPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
A DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS
/ 0 WAKE COUNTY
20m PItOJLCT 8.2402502 R-2654
jc I'ItOPOSLll

lx\/\/lIMbLACL 'S VAT(ON TO
STORAGE voLVrtc AIRPORT PRIiWY TO N. 11'AIiL'
1 1~; , DNOTls XCAVATION IN LXPRESSWAY
SCALE WE'TLAN'DS' APPROX. 1.6 K161
5 HHET I) OI. 25

PLAN VIE W
~ F\

ZZ ~ 5 5m -.30

E i
.60 L 5I
0 HC
4 l5' I r-n
S - - I
w y ADS J
z f > m

~ I

k I

' N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
? WAKE COUNTY

~Dlll D PROJECT 8.2402502 8-2634
MATCH Ll/VF l1. PROPOSED
DLNOTLS LXCAVATION TO AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE
RLI'LACL STORAGE VOLUME EXPRESSWAY
DL•'NOTI:S LXCAVATION IN APPROX. 1.6 I;1N2
1(~ WLTLANDS SHEl"T 20 OF 2:>

w

PLAN SKEET

LAYOUT GUIDE SH.16

° r I O
SH.20

4
i S H. 18
I , p O
~ p
.p I
SH. 151 O
I 1° i SH. 19
SH. 17

1. SH.14

SH.5 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION

SH.4 I _ - ` DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
N WAKE COUNTY
ti\ ~ I PROJECT 8.2402302 8-2654
PROPOSED
AIRPORT PRl;WY TO N. WAKE

EETS ,2 i EXPIIE55WAY
of `'sEE So
fog POOLE A.PPROX.IN KAI
i Slii?I:T 21 OF 25

PLAN SHEET

LAYOUT GUIDE

SH. 19

- ~ n s srarsE •e•em'
20

SH: 7 _SH. 8 -
SH. 6 - - _
_ _ _ - - - N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1VAKE ; COUNTY
PROJECT 8.24102302 8-2634
PROPOSED
AIRPORT PR1 tiVY TO N. WAKE
EXPRESSWAY
APPROX.1.6 KM
SHI.I's'f' 22 OF' 25.

SUMMARY REPORT

SITE STATION EXCAVATION TO REPLACE
STORAGE VOLUME BELOW
O.H.W.

.1 15+90 TO 309700 M 3

18+50 -L-
REV LT

TOTAL EXCAVATION TO REPLACE 309700 M 3
STORAGE VOLUME BELOW O.H.W.

N. C. DEPT. OF_ TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS.
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.290230R-2634
PROPOSED
AIRPORT.: PRKWY TO N. WAKE

EXPRESSWAY
APPROX. 1.6 h`I
SHEET 23 0 F 2S

1.SUMM
ARY
REP
ART

SITE STATION FILL IN FILL IN
WETLANDS SURFACE WATERS
(HA.) '(HA.)

14+30 TO
22+78 -L-
REV 2.77

14+35 -L-
HA REV LT 0.011

15+82 TO
HB 17+10 -L REV 0.043

HC 17+80 -L- REV 0.01

18+50 TO
HD 22+85 --L- REV 0.11

TOTALS 0.174 2.77

N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS'
WAKE`- COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654
PROPOSED
AIRPORT, PRhWY. TO N. WAKE
EXPRESSWAY
APPROX. 1.6 E.ti1

SHEET 24 OF 25

-SUMMARY REPORT

SITE STATION EXCAVATION IN
WETLANDS (HA.)
x

14+35 -L-
HA REV LT 0

15+82 TO
HB 17+10 -L REV 0.034

17+80 TO

HC 18+30 -L- REV 0.33

18+50 TO '

HD 22+85 -L- REV 0

TOTALS 0.364

N. C. DEPT. OF. TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF, HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2402502 R-2654
PROPOSED
AIRPORT PRKWY TO N. WAKE

EXPRESSWAY
APPROX. 1.6 KIM
HEET 25 OF 25

0,4

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
} P.O. BOX 1890
• WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
March 25, 1995
IN REPLY REFER TO
~02
Regulatory Branch
, 996
Action ID. 199402640 X~ ~*I

Mr. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201

Dear Mr. Vick:

Please reference the March 6, 1996, Department of the Army permit application submitted
to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of my regulatory staff by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) for regional general permit authorization to discharge dredged or fill material into
jurisdictional waters and wetlands of the United States associated with the proposed construction
of approximately one mile of multi-lane highway. The proposed highway will be located between
the Raleigh-Durham International Airport and Research Triangle Park and will connect Aviation
Parkway to the Northern Wake Expressway, west of Raleigh, in Wake County, North Carolina
(T.I.P..R-2634).

Mr. Alsmeyer advised Mr. Gordin Cashin of your staff, during a March 21, 1996,
telephone conversation, that additional information is required to adequately evaluate your
proposal. This information will allow Mr. Alsmeyer to make an informed decision regarding
whether or not the proposal has minimal effects on the aquatic environment. You are requested
to provide answers to the following questions regarding the proposed compensatory mitigation
for the adverse effects of the proposed work:

(a.) How much shoreline will be created by the proposed project, in linear feet, including
all proposed excavation and fill?

(b.) What are the proposed bank slopes/elevations being created along the shoreline?
(Compare the proposal to the existing slopes/elevations of the impacted wetland areas.)

(c.) How may acres of vegetated wetland area will be created by the proposed project, if
the existing reservoir conditions remain the same?

-2-

In addition to the above, please provide Mr. Alsmeyer all pertinent information concerning
the design alternatives that were considered to avoid or minimize wetland impacts. Specifically,
could not the proposed corridor be shifted to the east, thereby avoiding and minimizing impacts to
the "fringe" wetlands located between Stations 19+00 and 23+00? Also, could not the proposed
areas to be excavated be relocated to avoid adverse impacts to the large wetland area that appears
on Sheet Nos. 19 and 20 of your permit package?

Please forward the requested information to this office by April 10, 1996, to ensure a
timely decision on your application. If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Alsmeyer at telephone [phone], extension No.27.

Sincerely,

aD. Smith
Chief, North Section
Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished:

John Dorney Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Section - Region IV
" Water Quality Section Wetlands Regulatory
Division of Environmental Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
North Carolina Department of 345 Courtland Street
Environment, Health and Atlanta; Georgia 30365
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535 Mr. Larry Hardy
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 National Marine Fisheries
Service, NOAA
Ms. Cherry Green Pivers Island
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726

231f .5

J

- -ipO~S~i uo r r

~-W L

- - -

- - -

- - -

- - -

i~

i~

I

EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION PARKWAY CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
State Project No. 8.2402301
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(1)
TIP No. R-2634

1. Descriotion of Action

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposed to construct a multi-
lane highway on new location between the Raleigh-Durham International (RDUI) Airport and the
Research Triangle Park (RTP) west of the City of Raleigh. The proposed new road will connect
the proposed Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) interchange (TIP No. R-2030) and the proposed
Northern Wake Expressway (TIP No. R-2000), a distance of approximately 1.0 mile. The project
consists of constructing a four-lane divided facility on 250 feet of right of way. The proposed
cross-section will provide for two 12-foot wide lanes in each direction with a 56-foot wide
median. Full control of access will be maintained along the proposed project. The intersection
of Nelson Road (SR 1642) and the proposed project will be grade separated. A new bridge for
Nelson Road will be constructed over the proposed project
This project is included in the NCDOTs Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 1995-
2001. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1995 and construction is
scheduled to start in fiscal year 1996. The total cost included in the TIP is S6,957,000.
2. Summary of Environmental Impacts
The proposed project should enhance the potential urban growth in the Raleigh-Durham/
RTP area. Additionally, this project will serve as the main link between RDUI Airport and the
Northern Wake Expressway, providing improved access to the airport and northern Wake
County. The proposed project will not require any relocations. Using the North Carolina Division
of Highways Erosion and Sedimentation Control Program, the Soil Conservation Service and
Wake County, in close coordination with NCDOT, has developed a plan which consists cf
rigorous requirements to minimize erosion and sedimentation. It will also be necessary for the
Brier Creek Reservoirs water level to be lowered to an appropriate level to allow for construction
of the proposed Eastern Boulevard. Appropriate measures will be taken to prevent the loss of
any aquatic communities through coordination with appropriate agencies and the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) prior to the Section 404 permit application. The
project will impact approximately 6.7 acres of mixed pine-hardwood and hardwood forests.
Aifbcipatted=-wetland-irnpacts:are categorized: as bankAo-bank-waters of the United States
and fatl.uader the jurisdiction of the U' S. Army Corps of Engineers (CO E). Since this project
crosses the Brier Creek Reservoir, a Section 404 permit will be required. Actions covered by
Individual Section 404 permits require mitigation for habitats lost due to project construction.
Appcaxirnately 3 acres of the reservoir will be::filled:;by the proposed project .:and the location is
b_elow.,headwateFS (ftow grater than 5 cubic :feet per second)., Loss of storage volume due to the
proposed roadway embankment will be mitigated by providing equal volume through excavation
within the existing easement of the reservoir, if feasible, or within the newly acquired right of way
adjacent to the reservoir. Either mitigation alternative will allow normal water pool and flood
capacity in the reservoir to be maintained. Location and quantity of the excavation along with
final sizing of the drainage structures will be determined during the final hydraulic design stage
of the project. Opportunities within the same watershed ousted of the immediate project area
are recommended if on-site options are not available.

3. Alternatives Considered

The project design was based on projected traffic demand between the Northern Wake
Expressway and the RDUI Airport. The alternatives considered were the no-build, providing
improved public transportation, and the proposed project.
4. Actions Required by Other Agencies

Based on information currently available, it will be necessary to apply to the U.S. Army
COE for an individual Section 404 permit. The project will also require approval by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA).
5. Required Structures

Based on preliminary hydraulic studies, a three-barrel 12 ft. X 12 ft (350 ft) reinforced
concrete box culvert (RCBC) with a 48-inch (350 ft.) reinforced concrete pipe will be required for
Brier Creek Reservoir. A 6 ft X 6 ft. (260 ft) RCBC will be adequate at the crossing of the
unnamed tributary. (See attached Hydrographics memorandum in the Appendix)
6. Cost Estimates.

Culvert Estimate I Bridge Estimate
$683.050- I 57,200.000 "

* Does not include cost of earthwork to cross creek
" 2 spans, 36 ft. wide, 2000± ft Long, S50/S.F.
Attachments (2)

tilt
I IA
ak& res
II aR+ ake 2 S
' +dir Re 1 '
r , a r. Y. A- A )
/ i0 dcd:l se t FolesWIC 1 %
sot
e q ~a 96
-
Ewakefield
F 1 2 MrItOr4ok + Liiard lick 4
orni I11ry(. 5( r )1~ S i `.~all ei h'u 1 Ion
r ~ t.w Qle~ il8 •
r} ,
.14fitdale R«k Weno-
Aoea 'La Aubu,
~ ~iltill 5~ Il/ y .
1 S ccullery r
rugs 3 )
/ S r !OI `
L• Willo. SOnnas '
0 \ quay-Yarina
r.% O
%
tt' kp / 7
%PTj~,~ PR E CT LIMITS
t \ N i -P r i jt

+ -

2 I a / a

r,~+• ~y `iii ~'^`'.'~3~s41Ww~ rt L'.^-•L=-0~A

14,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENV ERONMENTA
BRANCH
EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
R-2534
PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIG.

r
S.Vp

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JA AES B. HUNT. JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SAm HUNT
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.G 27611-5201 SECRETARY

February 24, 1993

11,1 EMORANDUivi TO: Mr. L. J. Ward, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental

FROM: A. L. Hankins, Tr., P.E.
State Hydraulics Engineer

SUBJECT: Hydraulic aspects of the environmental impact of the
proposed connector, Eastern Boulevard, from Aviation
Boulevard to the proposed Northern Wake Expressway in
Wake County, Project No. 8.240203 TIP No. R-2634

The proposed Eastern Boulevard is to be a four-lane divided freeway to serve as a
connector between Aviation Boulevard and the proposed Northern Wake
Expressway (one mile in length), in the vicinity of Raleigh-Durham International
Airport. The preliminary typical section consists of two 12 ft. lanes in each direction
with a 56 ft. grassed median within a proposed 250 ft. right-of-way. The proposed
alignment crosses the Brier Creek Flood Control Reservoir approximately 1500 ft.
south of the northern terminus of the project as well a small unnamed tributary
located approximately 300 ft. north of the southern project terminus.

Based on a preliminary hydraulic analysis, a three-barrel 12 ft. x 12 ft. reinforced
concrete box culvert along with a 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe will be adequate
for conveyance of the anticipated discharges at the crossing of the Brier Creek
Reservoir. The roadway grade must be constructed above the flood capacity level
of the reservoir (above the emergency spillway crest elevation of the dam). Loss of
storage volume due to the proposed roadway embankment will be mitigated by
providing equal volume through excavation within the existing easement of the
reservoir, if feasible, or within the new acquired right-of-way adjacent to the
reservoir, thereby maintaining normal water pool and flood capacity in the reservoir.
Location and quantity of the excavation, along with final sizing of the drainage
structures will be determined during the final hydraulic design stage of the project.

y

Erosion and sedimentation control will be a major priority for this project; therefore,
in addition to standard erosion and sedimentation control practices, some special
measures shall be taken, which shall include, but are not limited to the following: The
lake will be completely -drained prior to construction. The natural channel will
convey normal runoff through the reservoir during construction. Where the
proposed roadway crosses the natural channel, the 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe
will allow passage of the normal flow under the roadway embankment during
construction., A standard stilling basin and silt screens for sediment removal shall be
provided downstream of the pipe outlet. The proposed box culvert bottom invert
must be set above the estimated sediment level to prevent sediment accumulation in
the culvert. Also, both sides of the proposed roadway embankment must be
protected from erosion with rock plating up to the 100-year pool elevation.

At the crossing of the unnamed tributary, preliminary hydraulic analysis indicates that
a 6 ft. by 6 ft. reinforced concrete box will be adequate. Erosion and sedimentation
will be controlled at this crossing through the appropriate specification, installation,
and maintenance of standard erosion and sedimentation control devices.

Wake County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program.
Attached is a copy of the Flood Rate Insurance Map showing the limits of the 100-
year flood plain and floodway in the vicinity of the crossings at Brier Creek Flood
Control Reservoir and its unnamed tributary. The flood plain in the vicinity of the
crossings at Brier Creek Reservoir and its unnamed tributary consists mostly of
wooded areas and low density development (in vicinity of airport runway). The
proposed roadway with the recommended hydraulic structures will not have a
significantly adverse effect on the existing flood plain.

The Brier Creek Reservoir crossing is below headwaters and, this project will involve a
significant discharge of fill below ordinary high water; therefore, an individual
environmental permit will be required. Groundwater resources and existing drainage
patterns will not be affected by the proposed project.

Consideration has been given to the feasibility of providing an interchange on the
Aviation Parkway Connector at Nelson Road (SR 1642). If an interchange is
proposed, it will be necessary to relocate Nelson Road south of its present location in
order to provide adequate distance between the Nelson Road and Northern Wake
Expressway interchanges. Two interchange configurations are currently under
consideration. The first proposes relocation of Nelson Road approximately 800 feet
south of its present location, which would involve considerable fill across the upstream
portion of the Brier Creek Reservoir. The second configuration proposes relocation
approximately 350 feet south of present location and would also involve considerable
fill in the reservoir, but significantly less than that of the first configuration. The
second configuration would also require significantly shorter lengths for the drainage
structures. The key hydraulic and environmental concern with the proposed relocation
of Nelson Road is that the reservoir storage lost due to roadway fill must be mitigated,
preferably within the existing drainage easement or within the NCDOT right-of-way.

_ f

Therefore, the second interchange configuration is preferred. If Nelson Road is
relocated, it is recommended that a double-barrel 10 ft. by 9 ft. reinforced concrete
box culvert along with a 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe be provided where Nelson
Road crosses the Brier Creek Reservoir (valid for either interchange location). The
same design criteria mentioned above for Eastern Boulevard are applicable at this
crossing as well, including mitigation to maintain flood storage capacity and
application of special erosion and sedimentation control measures. The feasibility of
these improvements are currently under study for inclusion in the planning document
only and are not being considered for construction as part of this project. If
relocation of Nelson Road becomes an NCDOT project, mitigation alternatives will
be studied in detail during the final hydraulic design stage of that project. It should
also be noted that an individual environmental permit will likely be required for these
improvements.

ALHjr/AMR/js

CC: Mr. D. R. Morton, P.E.

Stat of North Carolina
Department of Environment, 41'V
t N7 alth and Natural Resources •
Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
i
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary EDE H N R
Henry M. Lancaster II, Director

MEMORANDUM

TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse

FROM: Melba McGee
Environmental Review Coordinator
RE: 95-0930 EA/FONSI Aviation Parkway, Northern Wake
Expressway, Wake County

DATE: July 26, 1995

Staff from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources have reviewed the Department of Transportation's
EA/FONSI.

Questions continue to remain with the Division of
Environmental Management and the N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission. It is felt that specific agreements that were made
with the Department of Transportation were not recognized in the
EA/FONSI. The department hesitates to concur with the
environmental document, however, I understand that these issues
will need to be addressed before the Division of Environmental
Management will issue the 401 Certification. Therefore, the
department will not ask that the EA/FONSI be modified provided the
Department of Transportation agrees with the attached request
during the permit process. It is requested that the Department of
Transportation continue to work with our commenting agencies to
avoid delays in the permit review.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
attachments /
cc: Eric Galamb
David Cox

P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

NCWRC,HCP,FRLLS LRKE TEL.[phone] Jul 25'95 10:15 No.00r P.03

t M'

_ n North Carohm Wildlife Resources Commission Pal

.512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733,3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM

TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental) Affairs
FROM: Franklin T. McBride, Manager ~•~.a
I Iabitat Conservation Program

DATE: July 25, 1995

SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for SR 1002 (Aviation Parkway), from RDUI
Airport Connector to the proposed Northern Wake Expressway, Wake
County, North Carolina, TIP No. R-2634, SCH Project No. 95-0930.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have
reviewed the subject FONSI and are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The
purpose of this review was to assess project impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our
comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
'fhe proposed project involves constructing a multi-lane facility on new location
from the Raleigh-Durham International Airport to the Research Triangle Park. The now
roadway will be a four-lane facility with a 56 foot grassed median. Full control of access
is proposed. Project length is approximately 1.0 mile. Approximately 6.7 acres of open
water will be impacted.
We do not feel that our concerns regarding the Environmental Assessment (EA)
have been adequately addressed in the FONSI. We remain concerned about the impact
this project will have on wildlife movements along Brier Creek and on waterfowl habitat
in Brier Creek reservoir.
We do not agree that the Brier Creek corridor will continue to function in the
same capacity as wildlife corridor after this facility is constructed. The new four-lane,
median divided, access controlled facility will likely pose a significant barrier to wildlife
movements along the reservoir. Many species will continue to use the corridor, and will
therefore cross the freeway. This is not only hazardous for the wildlife but fbr the
motoring public as well.

=RLLS LRKE TEL:[phone] Jul 1b'95 11J:1b NO.uur r.u4

Memo 2 July 25, 1995

'The facility will also affect the migratory waterfowl that currently use the area for
resting or loafing. Audio and visual impacts may limit the use of the area by certain
waterfowl species.

We request the FONSI be modified to include:
I . A. discussion on the measures that will be employed to maintain a wildlife
corridor along the Brier Creek reservoir.

2. A discussion of the measures that will be used to mitigate for the reduction in
waterfowl habitat values. One option that was discussed at a previous permit
review agency meeting was the creation of shallow water habitat for
waterfowl in Brier Creek reservoir.
If the FONST were modified to include the requested items we would not object to
the project document or to the issuance of the applicable permits.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this FONSI. If we can be of further
assistance please call David Cox, Highway Project Coordinator, at [phone].
cc: Wayne Jones, District 3 Fisheries Biologist
Mike Scruggs, District 3 Wildlife Biologist
Randy Wilson, Nongame/Endangered Species Program Mgr.
Howard Hall U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh

NC DEM WQ ENVSCI Fax:[phone] Jul 7 '95 13:59 P.02/03

State of North Corollno
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Environmental Monageme it James B. Hunt, Jr.. Governor

Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.. Director

J ly 7, 1995

MEMQRANDU A

To: Melba McGee

Through: John Dorne
Monica Swihartj

From: Eric Galambo
Subject: FONSI for Aviation Park ay
Wake County
TIP No. R-2634
EHNR # 95-0930, DEM 10988
The subject document has been revie red by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) is esponsible for the issuance of the Section 401
Water Quality Certification for activate which impact waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that w ters of the U.S. will be impacted. The following
comments are based on a review oft document:
A) On March 23, 1995, several ag rides including WRC, COE and DEM
recommended to DOT that they replace the flood storage capacity of Brier
Creek Reservoir with shallow w ter habitats. This may allow for the creation of
freshwater marsh habitat. DOT staff (Mr. Frank Vick and Mr. Bill 1(inlaw)
agreed with this request. Durin the parmit stage. DEM will request that DOT
incorporate the creation of the hallow water habitat.
The project sponsor is reminded that lie 401 Certification could be denied unless
Certification should
be water c quality Er cBGal mare satisfied. Questions b (733-1786 in DEM's ~ Water n~~ Quathe 401 lity Environmental
be
Sciences Branch_
cc: Raleigh COE
avparkw.fon

P.Q. Box 29535. Rdelgh. North caroilna 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] x ? Pape3-2A96
An squd opportunNAffirmdWAction pioyer W%recyc" 10%p

State of North Carolina II 9661 Nil-
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Reso Q~
DMsion of Land Resources

James G. Martin, Governor PROTECT REVIEW COMMENTS Charles H. Gardner
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Project Number: County:
Project Name:

Geodetic Survey

This project will impact L geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic
Survey should be•contacted prior"to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
.Raleigh, N.C. 27611 (919) 733-3836. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.

Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at (919) 733-3836.

Reviewer Date

Erosion and Sedimentation.Control

No comment
This projeclt will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land =disturbing activity if more
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.

If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,

/ increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Other (comments attached)

For more information contact the Land Quality Section at (919) 733-4574.

Reviewer Date
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources r'4**A
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ID FE B. Howes, , Secretary C

A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director

July 7, 1995
MEMORANDUM

To: Melba McGee ~n

Through: John Dorn.

Monica Swihart
From: Eric Galaml)o

Subject: FONSI for Aviation Parkway
Wake County
TIP No. R-2634
EHNR # 95-0930, DEM # 10988
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401
Water Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that waters of the U.S. will be impacted. The following
comments are based on a review of the document:
A) On March 23, 1995, several agencies including WRC, COE and DEM
recommended to DOT that they replace the flood storage capacity of Brier
Creek Reservoir with shallow water habitats. This may allow for the creation of
freshwater marsh habitat. DOT staff (Mr. Frank Vick and Mr. Bill Kinlaw)
agreed with this request. During the permit stage, DEM will request that DOT
incorporate the creation of the shallow water habitat.
The project sponsor is reminded that the 401 Certification could be denied unless
water quality concerns are satisfied. Questions regarding the 401 Certification should
be directed to Eric Galamb (733-1786) in DEM's Water Quality Environmental
Sciences Branch.

cc: Raleigh COE
avparkw.fon

P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

DepartrrOdnt of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs ? Project located in 7th floor library
Project Review Form hG
Project Number. County: Date: Date Response Due (firm deadline):

C X30 W Arc L, I Z ~ ~5
- ~ 7 //q/P?

This project is being reviewed as indicated below:

Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area UV of `(J In-House Review
? Asheville ? All RIO Areas ? Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries
? Fayetteville ? Air ? Coastal Management ? Water Planning
? Water ? Water Resources ? Environmental Health
? Mooresville ? Groundwater
Wildlife ?Solid Waste Management
? Raleigh ? Land Quality Engineer ? Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Washington ? Recreational Consultant r%A
Land Resources ? David Foster
? Coastal Management Consultant ? Parks and Recreation ? Other (specify)
? Wilmington ? Others
environmental Management RECEIVED
? Winston-Salem PWS Monica Swihart
JUN 3 0 1995
EWIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:

Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager. In-House Reviewer complete individual response.

? No objection to project as proposed ? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
? No Comment ? Applicant has been contacted

? Insufficient information to complete review ? Applicant has not been contacted

? Project Controversial (comments attached)
? Approve ? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)

? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked) ? Consistency Statement not needed
? Recommended for further development with recommendations for ? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
strengthening (comments attached) NEPA and SEPA
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive ? Other (specify and attach comments)
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attached/authority(ies) cited)

RETURN TO:

Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
PS-106

AVIATION PARKWAY
RDUI AIRPORT CONNECTOR TO NORTIERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
State Project 8.2402302
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(2)
T.I.P. No. R-2634

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Highway Administration

and
N. C. Department of Transportation

Division of Highways

Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2XC)

Da a H. rarMii ick, P. E., AOmager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT

Date Nicho L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator, FHWA

AVIATION PARKWAY
RDUI AIRPORT CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
State Project 8.2402302
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(2)
T.I.P. No. R-2634

ADUMSTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Document Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:

William B. Kinlaw
Project Planning Engineer

Linwood Stone
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head

•••oE CC C /C ..e
M2~ SEAL
Richard . Davis, P. E., Assistant M nag r 6944
Planning and Environmental Branch '
' ENE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paee

I. TYPE OF ACTION 1

H. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION I
III. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS 2

IV. NEED FOR ACTION 2

V. CIRCULATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3
VI. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT

VII. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING 10

VIII. REVISIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT 10
IX. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 10

Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Recommended Alternative

Appendix

Agency Comments

Aviation Parkway
RDUI Airport Connector To Northern Wake Expressway
Wake County
State Project 8.2402302
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(2)
T.I.P. No. R-2634
1. TYPE OF ACTION

This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

This report's project description has been updated from the one used in the
Environmental Assessment (EA) to the current project description used in the 1995-2001
Transportation Improvement Program.
The FHWA has determined that this project will not have any significant impacts
on the human environment or natural environment. This FONSI is based on the
Environmental Assessment (EA) which was approved on February 25, 1994. It has been
independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately
discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project. It provides sufficient
evidence and analysis for determining that an environmental impact statement is not
required. The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the
attached EA.
H. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct a multi-lane highway on new location between the Raleigh-Durham International
(RDUI) Airport and the Research Triangle Park (RTP) west of the City of Raleigh (see
Figures 1 and 2). The proposed new road will connect the proposed Aviation Parkway
(SR 1002) interchange (TIP No. R-2030) and the proposed Northern Wake Expressway
(TIP No. R-2000), a distance of approximately 1.0 mile. The project consists of
constructing a four-lane divided facility on 250 feet of right of way. The proposed cross-
section will provide for two 12-foot wide lanes in each direction with a 56-foot wide
median. Full control of access will be maintained along the proposed project. The
intersection of Nelson Road and the proposed project will be grade separated. A new
bridge for Nelson Road will be constructed over the proposed project.
This project is included in the NCDOT's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
1995-2001. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1995 and
construction is scheduled to start in fiscal year 1996. The total cost included in the TIP is
$6,957,000. The total projected cost for the recommended improvements is $6,375,000
including $6,150,000 for construction and $225,000 for right of way.

III. ENVIRONMENTAL CONMITMENTS
Using the North Carolina Division of Highways Erosion and Sedimentation
Control program, The Soil Conservation Service and Wake County, in close coordination
with NCDOT, has developed a plan which consists of rigorous requirements to minimize
erosion and sedimentation (See page 14 of the Environmental Assessment for particulars).

2

It will be necessary for Brier Creek Reservoir's water level to be lowered to an appropriate
level to allow for construction of the proposed Aviation Boulevard Connector.
Appropriate measures will be taken to prevent the loss of any aquatic communities
through coordination with appropriate agencies and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) prior to the 404 permit application.
The project will impact approximately 6.7 acres of mixed pine-hardwood and
hardwood forests. o
the United States and fall under a jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Since this project crosses the Brier C eservoir a Section 404 permit will be required.
Samo
vexed annual- an
Actions co lost_d,
A _gm " ~ T , voltun
volume due to the -W 06d ` =Loss of storage
proposed roadway embankment will be mitigated by providing equal
volume through excavation within the existing easement of the reservoir, if feasible, or
within the newly acquired right of way adjacent to the reservoir. Either mitigation
alternative will allow normal water pool and flood capacity in the reservoir to be
maintained. h~,~~ex~ is the
1 - 1~ of€ttre
tomeswithin a same watershed outside of the immediate project area are
~Z recommended if on-site options are not available.
This project is located in a
fllain must be elevated or Special Hazard Area. All structures within the
P comply with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance of
~J the community. A Uniform Floodplain Management Policy, Executive Order 123, signed
on July 24, 1990, will be followed ,
All applicable Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be implemented and
maintained throughout construction of the proposed project.
IV. NEED FOR ACTION
The proposed project will enhance the potential for urban growth in the RDUI
airportJRTP area. This project will serve as an mtermodal link between the RDUI airport
and the Northern Wake Expressway. (The Northern Wake Expressway is a key element
in the thoroughfare network and will eventually provide circulation around the Raleigh-
Garner-Cary area.) The project will provide improved access to the airport and to
northern Wake County, including, but not limited to, Raleigh, Wendell, Knightdale,
Garner, Cary, Apex, and Morrisville. In addition, construction of this facility will provide
some traffic relief on US 70 and I-40 for commuters of the RTP area, thus, providing a
safer commuting =-vironment.
V. CIRCULATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

The environmental assessment (EA) was circulated among the following federal,
state, and local agencies and officials:

3
y

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
U. S. Federal Aviation Administration-Atlanta
* U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Raleigh
U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Asheville
* U. S. Soil Conservation Service-Raleigh
* State Clearinghouse
* N. C. Department of Environmental' Health and Natural Resources
N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
N. C. Department of Human Resources
N. C. Department of Public Instruction
Triangle J Council of Governments
Wake County Commissioner
Town of Cary
City of Raleigh
* Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Wake County
Written comments were received from the agencies denoted with an asterisk
Copies of the letters received are included in the Appendix.
VI. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. U. S. Department of the Interior

Comment 1:
"...Comments on the other four species (bald eagle, red-cockaded
woodpecker, Bachman's warbler, and dwarf-wedged mussel) are limited to a brief
description of their habitat requirements, a short statement that habitat for the
species does not exist in the project area, and the conclusion that the project will
not impact the species. We believe that the EA should give more details regarding
the justification for these conclusions. Most Federally-listed species have a limited
number of very specific habitat requirements. We believe that the EA should very
briefly state the critical habitat requirement(s) of each species which are not
present and the basis for this statement."
Response 1:

The bald eagle is found throughout the United States and northward to the
arctic. Nesting in the southeast is limited primarily to Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi and South Carolina. The Bald eagle is principally riparian, associated
with coasts, rivers and lakes, usually nesting near bodies of water where they feed.
The proposed project will not impact suitable nesting or feeding resources for this
species. It can be concluded that the subject project will not impact the bald eagle.
The red-cockaded woodpecker is found in scattered locations throughout
the southeast. Nesting habitat is made up of open pine stands (minimum age 60
years or mixed pine/hardwood stands, (50 percent or more pine). Longleaf pine
(Pings alustris) is most commonly used, but other species of southern pine are
also acceptable. The home range for a clan (a family unit) averages about 200
acres and includes nesting habitat as well as foraging habitat. This bird requires
pine or mixed pine/hardwood stands (50 percent or more pine) 30 years or older

4

for foraging. Foraging habitats must be contiguous with nesting habitat. The
proposed project will not impact suitable nesting and feeding habitat for this
species. It can be concluded that the subject project will not impact the red-
cockaded woodpecker.

The Bachman's warbler's range includes the southeastern U.S. during the
breeding season and western Cuba and Isle of Pines in the winter. Historic records
indicate the Bachman's warbler nested m low, wet hardwood forests. Openings in
the forest canopy, covered with dense thickets of cane, palmetto, blackberry,
gallberry and or other shrubs and vines. There is no suitable nesting habitat in the
subject project area. No sighting of this species in the last 20 years suggests that it
may be extirpated from the county. It can be concluded that the subject project
will not impact the bachman's warbler.
The dwarf-wedged mussel is known from the Neuse and Tar River
drainages in North Carolina. Currently, the only known populations are in the
L.itde River and 1Vliddle Creek in Johnston County, the upper Tar River in
Granville County, and Crooked Creek and Cedar Creek in Franklin County. This
mussel seems to prefer streams with deep water and coarse sands, however it has
also been seen on bottoms of gravel or mud, among submersed aquatic plants and
near stream banks underneath overhanging tree limbs. No suitable habitat for the
dwarf-wedge mussel occurs in the study area. It can be concluded that the subject
project will not impact the dwarf-wedged mussel.
Comment 2:
"Based on the information in the EA, we concur that the project is not
likely to affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species under the
jurisdiction of the Service. Therefore, the requirements of Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (op. cit.) have been satisfied. However, obligations under
Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts
of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner
not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner
which was not considered in this biological assessment; or, (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action."
Response 2:
If changes occur to the project's scope, or if new species are listed,
obligations under Section 7 of the Act will be reconsidered.

Comment 3:
"The Service is concerned about wetland losses and hydrological
disruptions associated with this project, most of which are in Brier Creek
Reservoir area. Utilizing the Service's Mitigation Policy, compensatory mitigation
is a last resort in the normal sequence for wetland mitigation which includes
avoidance, minimization, rectification, and reduction. Therefore, the Service
strongly recommends that NCDOT develop a detailed wetlands impact analysis
which states efforts to implement the above mitigation sequence."

5
f
Response 3:

The primary purpose of the Crabtree Creek Flood Control Project was to
provide flood control to portions of Wake County and highly developed areas
within the City of Raleigh. A secondary function of the Crabtree Project was
sediment containment. (see March 27, 1992 letter from Wake County in the EA
Appendix.) Based on the termini points of this project and the relative short
distance between the two (approx 1 mile), any other alternative designed to avoid
Brier Creek would be too costly as compared to the recommended alternative
location. Constructing dual bridges to span Brier Creek rather than the
recommended culverts would increase the Brier Creek structure cost by several
million dollars.
Comment 4:
"Some potential, adverse, environmental impacts could be avoided if the
crossing of Brier Creek Reservoir was bridged....The Service recommends a
more thorough analysis of the bridge alternative."

Response 4:
Both the culvert and bridge alternatives are expected to increase
sedimentation from construction-related erosion. These impacts are viewed as
temporary. Sedimentation and erosion control measures shall be strictly enforced
during the construction stage of this project. In addition, the cost of the
recommended culverts, inchuling earthwork, will be approximately $1,105,000 as
compared to an estimated $7,200,000 for bridge structures (2 spans, 36 feet wide,
2,000± feet long).
Comment 5:

"...The location of the mitigation area, current land use, proposed actions,
and monitoring efforts to determine mitigation success should be included. The
EA states that loss of storage volume in the reservoir due to wetland fill will be
mitigated by excavating an equal volume elsewhere in the easement of the existing
reservoir. The Service recommends that any excavation be designed to maintain
the natural contours of all wetland areas."
Response 5:

Actions covered by individual Section 404 permits require mitigation for
habitats lost due to project construction On-site mitigation opportunities will be
considered first. Loss of storage volume due to the proposed roadway
embankment will be mitigated by providing equal volume through excavation
within the existing easement of the reservoir, if feasible, or within the newly
acquired right of way adjacent to the reservoir. Either mitigation alternative will
allow normal water pool and flood capacity in the reservoir to be maintained.
Location and quantity of the excavation, along with final sizing of the drainage
structures will be determined during the final hydraulic design stage of the project.
Opportunities within the same watershed outside of the immediate project area are
recommended if on-site options are not available.

6

B. U. S. Sod Conservation Service-Raleigh

Comment 6:

"Our review was limited to concerns we had previously expressed
regarding the potential impacts of the proposed work on the Brier Creek Flood
Control Reservoir (Structure 20 A Crabtree Creek Watershed). It appears that our
concerns regarding the Brier Creek Reservoir have been recognized and will be
addressed during design."
Response 6:

None.

C. State Clearinghouse

DEHNR - Office of Policy Development

Comment 7:
"We ask that the Department of Transportation continue to work with our
agencies to thoroughly answer their concerns prior to finalizing project plans. It is
also recommended that every effort be made to avoid and minimize environmental
impacts during the final design and construction stages."

Response 7:
The NCDOT will continue to coordinate and address environmental
impacts with the environmental review agencies prior to finalizing project plans.

DEHNR - North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Comment 8:

"NCWRC is concerned about the impacts of this project upon the Brier
Creek Reservoir and the associated greenway. The reservoir supports a variety of
game and non-game fish species. Wintering migratory birds are frequently seen in
large numbers providing good bird watching opportunities. The greenway
provides an important buffer to the reservoir from development as well as
providing a forested corridor for wildlife movements along Brier Creek."
Response 8:

The NCDOT recognizes the Greenway System for Wake County as an
interconnected series of linear open spaces which typically follows natural drainage
basins such as Brier Creek (see Figure 7 of the EA). After the construction of this
project, the Brier Creek Reservoir and the associated greenway are expected to
function in the same capacities as they currently do.

• 7

Comment 9:

"NCDOT did not study a "build" alternative which does not cross Brier
Creek Reservoir. The only construction alternative discussed in the environmental
document other than the preferred alternative was a spanning structure which
would cross the reservoir on the same aligmnent."
Response 9:

Based on the termini points of this project and the relative short distance
between the two (approx. 1 mile), any other alternative designed to avoid Brier
Creek would be too costly as compared to the recommended alternative location
The roadway is crossing Brier Creek at its narrowest location as compared to other
reasonable crossing locations for this project.

DEHNR - Division of Environmental Management

Comment 10:

"An Individual Water Quality Certification will be required for this project.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of an EA by DEM would not preclude the
denial of a 401 Certification upon application if wetland impacts have not been
avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable."
Response 10:
Wetland impacts will be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable.

DEHNR - Division of Environmental Health

Comment 11:
"Existing water mains and public water supply wells may be affected
depending upon the location of the road construction and possible changes m
drainage features. Appropriate water system officials should be contacted."

Response 11:
The appropriate officials will be contacted prior to any involvement with
existing water mains and public water supply wells.

DEHNR - Division of Land Resources

Comment 12:
"Any dam involved in this project which is 15 feet in height or greater (as
measured from the highest point on the crest of the dam to the lowest point on the
downstream toe) and has an impoundment capacity of 10 acre-feet or more (as
measured at the highest point on the crest of the dam) will require a permit from
this office for construction, modification, removal or alteration of such a dam.

8

Also, any dam which is classified as "high hazard" will require a permit form this
office regardless of its height or impoundment capacity. The Brier Creek
Reservoir Dam, if modified, and any other structures which meet the above criteria
will require permits form this office for dam safety approval."
Res onse 12:

NCDOT will coordinate with the Division of Land Resources (DEHNR)
prior to the construction of any recommended structure(s) and any required
permits will be applied for at the appropriate time.
Comment 13:

"..:the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973
should be implemented."
Res onp se 13:

Siltation of adjacent areas and streams due to project construction will be
minimized by the stringent use and maintenance of the standard erosion control
devices and measures. The general requirements concerning erosion and siltation
are covered in Article 107-13 of the Standard Specifications which is entitled
"Control of Erosion, Siltation and Pollution". The N. C. Division of Highways has
also developed an Erosion and Sedimentation Control program which has been
approved by the N. C. Sedimentation Control Commission. This program consists
of rigorous requirements to minimize erosion and sedimentation which are
contained in the N. C. Highway Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures
and are implemented together with the policies of the Division of Highways
regarding control of accelerated erosion and sedimentation on work performed by
State Forces. The measures implemented will meet the requirements of the
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973.
DEHNR - Intergovernmental Review
Comment 14:
"Any open burning associated with subject proposal must be in compliance
with 15A NCAC 2D.0520."

Response 14:

The contractor will obtain the necessary permits to comply with these laws.
Comment 15:

"It is clear that DOT plans to address S&E very seriously in accordance
with the approved procedures; however, I am concerned about the
feasibility/design of the proposed sediment trapping system below the area affected
within Brier Creek Reservoir. A similar project required negotiation with the
operator of the flood control dam, and this may also be applicable here. The flood
control feature of such impoundments forces them to fill quickly (even when
drained), and this may render traps inside the reservoir ineffective as sediment
control devices. Management of the structure to maintain some minimum
sediment pool is more effective."

9

Response 15:

See Response 13.

D. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority

Comment 16:

"We note that the approach light system to be installed in the near term for
existing Runway 5L traverses a portion of existing Aviation Parkway and the
approach light system for a planned runway traverses a portion of roadway to be
constructed The horizontal and vertical alignment of the project roadway must be
designed such that the roadway alignment and placement of sign structures and
other elevated structures does not interfere with these approach light systems.
Additionally, because the project roadway is located in close proximity to the
approach end of existing Runway 5L and a planned runway, the horizontal and
vertical alignment of the roadway and placement of sign structures and other
elevated structures must be compatible with FAA requirements regarding
maintaining approach surfaces clear of obstacles as well as other FAA criteria
relative to aircraft safety. Lighting for sign panels and area lights must be designed
such that light emissions do not interfere with aircraft operations."
Response 16:
Coordination with the FAA and the RDU Airport Authority has addressed
these concerns and the appropriate measures to avoid or minimm impacts to
aircraft operations. (see Section VIII)
Comment 17:

"We agree with the recommendation for full control of access; however,
we note that access to the approach light system to Runway 5L must be
maintained and access to the approach light system for the planned runway must
be provided Access is required so that these systems can be maintained. Limited
access will also be required by the Authority for maintenance of ground covers,
control of rodents, and other similar maintenance items in the areas between the
runways and the lake."
Response 17:
Access to the approach light system to Runway 5L will be maintained.

Comment 18:

`Bikeways (US-1 and NC-2) now use portions of Aviation Parkway. With
completion of the project we believe it would be prudent to relocate these
bikeways off of Aviation Parkway from I-40 to the North Wake Expressway
because of the traffic levels expected on this roadway and the nature of the traffic.
Response 18:

Refer to Section I.B.10. of the EA.

10

Comment 19:

"With respect to utilities, we note that before commencement of the
project there will be underground power cables in the vicinity of the approach to
Runway 5L. These cables, which will be owned by the FAA, will serve the
approach light system to Runway 5L. D rmg design of the project provision must
be made to maintain this service. Additionally, provision should be made for
future underground power cables serving the approach lighting system to the
planned runway."
Response 19:

Utility conflicts will be coordinated with the airport prior to the
commencement of any utility work so there will be no interruption of utility
services to airport operations.
Comment 20:

"Because of the proximity of portions of the project to Runway 5L-23R,
extreme care must be exercised dining construction to prevent endangering aircraft
operations. Particular areas of concern include dust control, control of light
emissions from construction operations, maintenance of cables providing power to
approach light systems or other navigational aids, control of debris which may be
an attractant to rodents, and control of flying fragments from blasting operations.
Additionally, there may be height restrictions on construction equipment operating
in close proximity to Runway 5L-23R."
Response 20:
The contractor will coordinate construction activities with the airport so
aircraft operations will not be interrupted.

VII. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING
A NOTICE OF AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A PUBLIC HEARING was
distributed on May 31, 1994. No requests for a Public Hearing were received, written or
oral, thus, no public hearing was held.

VIII. REVISIONS AND AMMONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
As a result of coordination with the RDU Airport Authority on February 10, 1995,
the alignment described in the EA was determined that it would encroach on the airport's
future runway safety zones. After review of possible alignments, it was determined that a
45 in shift toward the lake would alleviate this problem. However, an additional $250,000
of earthwork will be necessary to maintain the existing flood capacity of the lake.

IX. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon environmental studies and comments received from federal, state, and
local agencies, the Division of Highways and FHWA have concluded the proposed action

3
11

will have no significant adverse impact upon the quality of the environment. The
following is the basis for this conclusion:

A. The project is not controversial on environmental grounds.

B. There are no significant impacts on natural, ecological, cultural, or scenic
resources of national, state, or local significance.
C. The project will not involve relocating homes, businesses, churches, or non-profit
organizations.

D. No significant detrimental impacts on air, water quality, or ambient noise levels of
adjoining areas are expected
E. The project is consistent with local plans and will not divide or disrupt local
communities.

In view of the above, it has been determined that a Finding Of No Significant
Impact is applicable to the project.

FIGURFb

now.

-ek fare:
1 kr 7 s 7
F.& Ret 1
T S1.1 « A 7 .
10 e 1 RoleSao 0 1
1 2 Mill ? LizaEwakefiei
rd Lids A
nsvill 6. 1 D 70 S' / T e ) b en '
u r w
i tdole ale 618
Rods eq
` Ape.
'LaAx~ '3 N
9 ~
1
Ml 3
I 11 9
/ Isr 1 _
mas e ~
S 401
. ~ wY•Yerin willow springs
5 B
l \

W v O
log.
, z

is 3j e J

®

Mme.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
R-2634
PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIG. 1

w ~
44,
b ~x '1 A+a Urs
or i"A
t
,
y
y r
r
oxV
qt}7 1 3
ow~ n•`a fi?i~.r~ F'v
ON N
41
MIT
I V%11_1
15
l b~ 3
klsk "C
r
ml A71,
Etta",.
fr , q
4
T
s
r
r
a= ,
n
2~ ° Y
E
47,
G
"'N T F 4 a
rr
AND OJECT
,
w
~T
i.
s
a
x
y ~gY ° , ?r , •drt, x.. a r q~, - 1! ~ ' 7~- 3 a" `s`%a .
,
,
Z,
?dart
"'I
x
A, 4p
,.#{t,
1I
e
Y11~~1 x 3.
a €
"
'1Y s`s, 154 ,a
y
R
11 k
a ~
~'''aa 8......"a a" , ~ : ;~?5;,, ..'4'.j ,s• - 9f's,~"#_ d'a' 'V~I
fx ;
„
t
E CT 40,
41
# +3.
, _ .,„rv 4 ' ` gar
13 r_- R\?
GIN;
w.
a
E
-4 'No
Q .tr
01 0
r= 2.< 4
_ a
~iSR ~ o~moa XO RIH i'Akid v ^ I)l;l':1RIMEN1 UI
r,
700
1 t CI{_\\
I(I\ Itill)~ OF ill( H\V.\Ys
r s
' \ \\I I ti\ II{ONM N I 1
4, PORT NA NCI (I:\ ?
RALEIGH DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIR EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR ;
- TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
T •a WAKE COUNTY z
s x - R 2634;
'a, c
a~
' ~N r I,:.r .a" F ft. 500
, f IG
r ' k .4r

AMW

APPENDIX

Tw~
s United States Department of the Interior AWr~~E

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
MgRC4 3 Ecological Services -
Post Office Box 33726 O E I Ir
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 ~O
May 27, 1994

`SUN 0 1
z
2 DWI$" ~U
Mr. H. Franklin Vick HIG~t~~~~_
and Environmental Branch
sion of Planning Highways
Division of Highways
N. C. Department of Transportation
Post Off-ice Box. 21520.1
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Dear Mr. Vick:
This responds to your letter of April 4, 1994 providing the U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) with a copy of the
Environmental Assessment (EA) for Eastern Boulevard (Aviation
Boulevard Connector to Northern Wake Expressway), Wake County,
North Carolina (T.I.P. No. R-2634). This document was prepared by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in
consultation with the Federal Highway Administration. This report
of the Service on this EA is provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C.
661-667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The NCDOT proposes to construct a four-lane divided facility on a
250-foot right-of-way from the proposed Aviation Parkway
interchange to the proposed Northern Wake Expressway. The proposed
r,-ad will be approximately 1 n1le.. long. The prcjcct Will alir,:1.-.ate
approximately 6.7 acres of uplands, specifically mixed pine-
hardwood and hardwood forests. The project will impact
approximately 3 acres of wetlands, primarily due to fill in Brier
Creek Reservoir.
The EA adequately describes_ the general fish and wildlife resources
of the project area and evaluates construction impacts which might
occur with the selected alternative. The EA also considers
potential impacts on the five, Federally-listed species in Wake
County. The assessment indicates that a "detailed survey" was
performed for Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) and no individual
plants were found. Comments on the other four species are limited
to a brief description of their habitat requirements, a short
statement that habitat for the species does not exist in the
project area, and the conclusion that the project will not impact

the species. We believe that the EA should give more details
regarding the justification for these conclusions. Most Federally-
listed species have a limited number of very specific habitat
requirements. We believe that the EA should very briefly state the
critical habitat requirement(s) of each species which are not
present and the basis for this statement. For instance, in one
sentence the EA could report that based upon a visual survey of the
area there were no 30+ year old pine trees which are needed. by red-
cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis).
Based on the information in the EA, we concur that the project is
not likely to affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened
species under the jurisdiction of the Service. Therefore, the
requirements of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (op. cit.)
have been satisfied. However, obligations under Section 7 of the
Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of
this identified action that may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner which was not considered in this
biological assessment; or, (3) a new species is listed or critical
habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
The Service is concerned about wetland losses and hydrological
disruptions associated with this project, most of which are in
Brier Creek Reservoir area. Utilizing the Service's Mitigation
Policy, compensatory mitigation is a last resort in the normal
sequence for wetland mitigation which includes avoidance,
minimization, rectification, and reduction. Therefore, the Service
strongly recommends that NCDOT develop a detailed wetlands impact
analysis which states efforts to implement the above mitigation
sequence.
Some potential, adverse, environmental impacts could be avoided if
the crossing of Brier Creek Reservoir was bridged. The EA
mentioned this alternative briefly and notes that bridge
construction would cause a temporary increase in sedimentation.
Bridging the crossing of Brier Creek Reservoir would be an
excellent example of minimizing wetland impacts. The service
recommends a more thorough analysis of the bridge alternative.
If unavoidable wetland losses remain after this sequence of actions
has been implemented, a compensatory mitigation plan should be
developed. The location of the mitigation area, current land use,
proposed actions, and monitoring efforts to determine mitigation
success should be included. The EA states that loss of storage
volume in the reservoir due to wetland fill will be mitigated by
excavating an equal volume elsewhere in the easement of the
existing reservoir. Further details of this procedure are not
given. The Service recommends that any excavation be designed to
maintain the natural contours of all wetland areas.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project.
Please continue to advise us of the progress of this project and
mitigation plans including your official determination of the

impacts of this project. If our office can supply any additional
information or clarification, please contact Howard Hall, the
biologist reviewing this project, at (919)-856-4520.

Sincerely your

L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor

UNITED STATES Soil 4405 Bland Road S0e2416'.&S' '
DEPARTMENT OF Conservation Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 f
AGRICULTURE Service Telephone: [phone]

October 20, 1993

Mr. Bill Kinlaw
Project Engineer
Planning and Research Branch
NC Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard
Connector to Northern Wake Expressway
Environmental Assessment Review

Dear Mr. Kinlaw:

As requested, we have reviewed the subject document. Our review was
limited to concerns we had previously expressed regarding the potential
impacts of the proposed work on the Brier Creek Flood Control Reservoir
(Structure 20 A Crabtree Creek Watershed). It appears that our concerns
regarding the Brier Creek Reservoir have been recognized and will be
addressed during design.
We appreciate the opportunity to review this assessment.

Sincerely,

Thoma T. Cutts, P. .
Civil Engineer

cc: Harry Gibson
David Proper

y 4 -
NORTH'CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
M208 DEPARTMENT Of ADMINISTRATION
116 WEST JONES STREET
06-07-94 RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
MAILED TO: FROM:

NC DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION MRS. CHRYS BAGGETT
WHITMEL WEBB DIRECTOR
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT BRANCH N C STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
HIGHWAY BLDG/INTER-OFFICE

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

ENV. ASSESS. PROPOSED EASTERN BOULEVARD, AVIATION BOULEVARD
CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY (TIP #R-2634)

SAI NO 94E42200821 PROGRAM TITLE - ENV. ASSESS.

THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING

_IS SUBMITTED: ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED

( X) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS1 PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE (919) 733-7232.

C.C. REGION J

Stote of North Carolina {
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Office of Policy Development
%MOM
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor M~A~W~
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C) E H N 1
John G. Humphrey, Director

MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett

FROM: Melba McGee''
RE: EA Eastern Blvd., from the Aviation Blvd. Connector to
the Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County 94-0821

DATE: June 3, 1994

The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
has reviewed the environmental assessment for the proposed project.

We ask that the Department of Transportation continue to work
with our agencies to thoroughly answer their concerns in the prior
to finalizing project plans. It is also recommended that every
effort be made to avoid and minimize environmental impacts during
the final design and construction stages.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. Final project approval
will depend on departmental comments being satisfactorily
addressed.

attachments

r

P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

tV.

Rqr 7.
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission

512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611,919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director

MEMORANDUM

TO: Melba McGee
Office of Policy Development, DEHNR

FROM: Richard B. Hamilton P(CkgAd a'/(Ja 'd*V%
Assistant Director
DATE: June 1, 1994

SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) Environmental Assessment (EA) for Eastern
Boulevard, from the Aviation Boulevard Connector
to the Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County,
North Carolina, TIP No. R-2634, SCH Project No.
94-0821.

Biologists on the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) staff have reviewed the subject EA and are familiar
with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of
this review was to assess project impacts to fish and
wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance
with certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy
Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-
667d).
The proposed project involves constructing a multi-lane
highway on new location between the Raleigh-Durham
International Airport and the Research Triangle Park west of
the city of Raleigh. The proposed roadway will connect the
proposed Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) interchange (TIP No. R-
2030) and the proposed Northern Wake Expressway (TIP No. R-
2000), a distance of approximately 1 mile. The project will
consist of constructing a 4-lane divided facility with a 56-
foot wide median on 250 feet of right of way. The roadway
will be constructed with full control of access with a grade
separated intersection at Nelson Road.

T

Memo Page 2 June 1, 1994 + 4

Wildlife and fisheries habitat losses include
approximately 6.7 acres of mixed pine-hardwood and hardwood
forests and 3 acres of bank-to-bank waters of the United
States. The water resources impacted by the proposed
construction are the Brier Creek Reservoir and an unnamed
tributary. The proposed roadway will cross Brier Creek
Reservoir on fill with a 12 ft. x 12 ft. box culvert and a
48 in. pipe. NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the surface
water impacts by excavating an equal volume within the
existing easement of the reservoir.
NCWRC is concerned about the impacts of this project
upon the Brier Creek Reservoir and the associated greenway.
The reservoir supports a variety of game and non-game fish
species. Wintering migratory birds are frequently seen in
large numbers providing good bird watching opportunities.
The greenway provides an important buffer to the reservoir
from development as well as providing a forested corridor
for wildlife movements along Brier Creek.
NCDOT did not study a "build" alternative which does
not cross Brier Creek Reservoir. The only construction
alternative discussed in the environmental document other
than the preferred alternative was a spanning structure
which would cross the reservoir on the same alignment.
For the reason stated above, NCWRC cannot concur with
the Environmental Assessment for this project. However, we
could concur if NCDOT studies and selects an alternative
that will avoid Brier Creek Reservoir. NCDOT should also
design this project to span the Brier Creek greenway
allowing unimpeded wildlife movements along the corridor.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA.
If we can be of any further assistance please call David
Cox, Highway Project Coordinator, at (919) 528-9886.
cc: Wayne Jones, District 3 Fisheries Biologist
Mike Scruggs, District 3 Wildlife Biologist
Randy Wilson, Nongame/Endangered Species Section Mgr.

i ~ .
t Staia of North Carolina

Department of Environment,
Health and Natural. Resources • •
.Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ID E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director

May 25, 1994
MEMORANDUM

To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dome

Monica Swih rt)o

From: Eric Galamb
Subject: EA for Eastern Blvd, Aviation Blvd Connector To Northern Wake
Expressway
Wake County
State Project DOT No. 8.2402301, TIP #R-2634
EHNR # 94-0821, DEM # 10614
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact of waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that no wetlands but bank-to-bank waters will be
impacted.
An Individual Water Quality Certification will be required for this project. DOT is
reminded that endorsement of an EA by DEM would not preclude the denial of a 401
Certification upon application if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized
to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Planning Branch.

eastemb.ea

P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

~ T
}

May 17, 1994

COMMENTS (PAGE 2)
PROJECT REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NUMBER 8.2402301
WARE COUNTY
Existing water mains and public water supply wells may be affected depending upon
the location of the road construction and possible changes in drainage features.
Appropriate water system officials should be contacted.

W. Allen Hardy
Environmental Engineer
Public Water Section
Division of Environmental Health
Address: Raleigh Regional Office
Public Water Supply Section
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone: (919) 571-4700

May 16, 1994

MEMORANDUM

TO: Ke1ba~McGee
rt .
I :w Office of Policy Development
i
FROM: Jim Leumas ~W?
Dam Safety Engineer
Division of-Land Resources
RE: Administrative Action
Environmental Assessment for
Eastern Boulevard.
Aviation Boulevard Connector to Northern Wake
Expressway
Wake County
State Project # 8.2402301
Federal Aid Project No. RS-9219(1)
T.I.P. ,#R-2634
OPD Project Number 94-0821
Any dam involved in this project which is 15 feet in height
or greater (as measured from the highest point on the crest of
the dam to the lowest point on the downstream toe) and has an
impoundment capacity of 10 acre-feet or more (as measured at the
highest point on the crest of the dam) will require a permit from
this office for construction, modification, removal or alteration
of such a dam. Also, any dam which is classified as "high
hazard" will require a permit from this office regardless of its
height or impoundment capacity. The Brier Creek Reservoir Dam,
if modified, and any other structures which meet the above
criteria will require permits from this office for dam safety
approval.
My only other comment is that the requirements of the
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 should be
implemented.
Please contact either Mr. John L. Holley, Jr., P. E. at
telephone number (919) 571-4700 or me at telephone number (919)
733-4574 should you have any questions concerning this matter.
JKL/

cc: Mr. John L. Holley, Jr., P. E.

State of North Carolina Reviewing ff~tGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Deparintent of-Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
- Project Number: Oue Date:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) andlor approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same
Regional Office. Normal Process
Time
(statutory time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS limit)
Permit to construct b operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
? facilities. Hewer system extensions, 3 sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
technical conference usual 490 days)
systems not discharging into state surface waters.
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
D permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES Reply fNlA)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichever is later.
30 days
? Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary (NIA)
7 days
? Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued (15 days)
prior to the installation of a well.
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
? Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling days)
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
60 days
? Permit to construct d operate Air Pollution Abatement N/A (90 days)
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing 60 days
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A NIA
? NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group (90 days)
919.733-0820.
? Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion b sedimentatro
? control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect.).at least 30 20 days
((30 day I
days before be innin activity. A fee of 130 for the first acre and 520.00 for each additional acre or art must accompany the plan
30 days/
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance:
u I On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount
? Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be pernited. The appropriate bond 160 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued.
North Caroline Burning permit On-site Inspsetion by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day exceeds 4 days 14rA)
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required -if more 1 day
? iounties in coastal N.C. with organic soils than :Ere acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
should be requested ei least ten days before actual bum is planned."
90.120 days
f~I WA (NIA)
U Oil Refining Facilities
1
If permit required. appli4aJor W days before "gin construction. I
Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days
? Dam Safety Permit inspect cu ;s:ruction. Certity Construction is acCorOing to EHNR approv.
ea plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And (60 days)
a 404 permit from Corps -o' Engineers. An inspection of site is neces-
s3ry to verity Hazard Ciassification. A minimum fee of $200.00 must ac-
Company the application. An additional processing tee based on a
Percentage or the total project cost will be requited upon completion
Continued on reverse
•g t1Y.

i Normal Process
Time
(statutory time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS limit)
File surety bond of $5,000 with EI4NR running to State of N.C. 10 days
Permit to dil" -k 4.-:,ry oil or on well conditional-that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon (NIA)
abandonment, be plugged according to ENNR rules and regulations.
' Geophysical txploration Permit Application filed with EMNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application form. (NIA)
State Woes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include 15.20 days
? descriptions Q drawings of structure 3 proof of ownership (NIA)
of riparian property.
60 days
? 401 Water Quality Certification NIA (130 days)
55 days
? CAMA Permit for MAJOR development 5250.00 fee must accompany application (150 days)
22 days
? CAMA Permit for MINOR development $50.00 fee must accompany application (25 days)
Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed. please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687. Raleigh, N.C. 27611
? Abandonment of any wells, if required, must be in accordance with Title 15A, Subchapter 2C.0100.
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
45 days
? Compliance with 15A NCAC 2M.1000 (Coastal Storrnwater Rules) is required. (NIA)
• Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary. being certain to cite comment authority):
PL~vs
pc.IMov^St.y lei a~'Y~~~+4vJ*.lE'' i-~-rT7f T`7ht-
fii !M^ CoAJCrI~~°,:~ "ilitEr' l~i~if3t6r[.ts~i/j3~4 7~h=~S~s~
7Ntc 4ea AY r+,4 fl~r~L2~x o eaa
(~!l?t+~-,,,~.~~! ~ C-vCI~G.¢-~~/1-Vi~t~-, s4- $a.~...t~..A?~ ~~"c.T $CL~E.?~.v',se~~
~IZ.Lr~~1~~N 6'.'~ j i'f ! ~~'~bJL ©F- ~~~o.~ ~lV /7GxL 1"~1'f?.--~-~ ~ Tl~/ss
A-A K 71Fi tc /cz ~ c~n/~~a~ ~,F_.ffv~+st-rte
sJvr( lr..~tlfuOw+~raTs % e/~f+;'S~ 7Z~ Fl~-c. Q?r~.GC.L~j C!L
PrtAt i 11"49 7%'h-5 M A-,6W4"- AP 71W-S
1 ~t~~>' R3 S~O[.HF,~' Ca.a/~- ~?t ~c~. ~?•9~~'y^fr~v~ i
S'~,?c.7vMPi~ I i' p'~41i'`T/ht~ ScA~ii~ MIJ?t.....dr_.. S~rMEi!'~' /'j?c C.. l3 /'."td(~

REGIONAL OFFICES
Duestions:~egarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville, NC 28301
(704) 2516208 [phone]. .
? Mooresville Regional Office ? Raleigh Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950 3800 Barrett Drina Suite 101
Mooresville,' NC 28115 Raleigh, NC 27609,; - -
[phone] [phone] r..
Washington Regional Office ? Wilmington Regional Office
4424 Carolina Avenue 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Washington. NC 27889 Wilmington, NC 28405
:(919) 9466481 [phone] -
? Winston-Salem Regional Office
8025 North Point Blvd.
Suite 100
Winston-Salem. NC 27106
[phone]. ' .

R U RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY
S ii
P. O. Box 80001, RDU Airport, North Carolina 27623 / 919-840-2100
Telefax / 919-840-0175
JOHN C. BRANTLEY DURHAM WAKE COUNTY DURHAM COUNTY RALEIGH
AIRPORT DIRECTOR F. V. ALLISON, JR. JAMES B. HYLER, JR. RONALD A. GREGORY MARGARET RIDDLE
CHAIRMAN VICE CHAIRMAN TREASURER SECRETARY
LENORE BEHAR G. SMEDES YORK GEORGE H. CONKLIN JOSEPH M. SANSOM
October 25, 1993

Mr. Bill Kinlaw
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Re: Environmental Assessment, Aviation Boulevard Connector to Northern
Wake Expressway, Wake County, State Project Number 8.2402301
Dear Mr. Rinlaw:

We have reviewed the subject environmental assessment. Our comments
follow.
We note that the approach light system to be installed in the near
term for existing Runway 5L traverses a portion of existing Aviation
Parkway and the approach light system for a planned runway traverses a
portion of roadway to be constructed. The horizontal and vertical
alignment of the project roadway must be designed such that the roadway
alignment and placement of sign structures and other elevated structures
does not interfere with these approach. light systems. Additionally, because
the project roadway is' located in close proximity to the approach end of
existing Runway 5L and a planned runway, the horizontal and vertical
alignment of the roadway and placement of sign structures and other
elevated structures must be compatible with FAA requirements reqarding
maintaining approach surfaces clear of obstacles as well as other FAA
criteria relative to aircraft safety. Lighting for sign panels and area
lights must be designed such that light emissions do not interfere with
aircraft operations.
We agree with the recommendation for full control of access; however,
we note that access to the approach light system to Runway 5L must be
maintained and access to the approach light system for the planned runway
must be provided. Access is required so that these systems can be
maintained. Limited access will also be required by the Authority for
maintenance of ground covers, control of rodents, and other similar
maintenance items in the areas between the runways and the lake.
In the land use planning section of the document there is reference to
the project being located in the jurisdictions of the Town of Cary and Wake
County.. We note that a significant portion of the project is located
within the jurisdiction of the Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority.

k~ r

Mr. Bill Kinlaw
October 22, 1993
Page 2

Bikeways (US-1 and NC-2) now use portions of Aviation Parkway. With
completion of the project we believe it would be prudent to relocate these
bikeways off of Aviation Parkway from I-40 to the North Wake Expressway
because of the traffic levels expected on this roadway and the nature of
the traffic:
With respect to utilities, we note that before commencement of the
project there will be underground power cables in the vicinity of the
approach to Runway 5L. These cables, which will be owned by the FAA, will
serve the approach light system to Runway 5L. During design of the project
provision must be made to maintain this service. Additionally, provision
should be made for future underground power cables serving the approach
lighting system to the planned runway.
Because of the proximity of portions of the project to Runway 5L-23R,
extreme care must be exercised during construction to prevent endangering
aircraft operations. Particular areas of concern include dust control,
control of light emissions from construction operations, maintenance of
cables providing power to approach light systems or other navigational
aids, control of debris which may be an attractant to rodents, and control
of flying fragments. from blasting operations. Additionally, there may be
height restrictions on construction equipment. operating in close proximity
to Runway 5L-23R.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this assessment. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincer ,

David R. Powell
Assistant Director for
Facility Development
DRP/gm
cc: John C. Brantley
Tom Quesenberry
70109.1 NCDOT

EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
State Project # 8.2402301
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(1)
T.I.P. #R-2634

4

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration

and

N. C. Department of Transportation

Division of Highways

Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)

• A~'etJ
a e H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT

R

2.z
Date Nicho L. Graf-, P. E.
Divis on Administrator, FHWA

air`

EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
State Project # 8.2402301
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(1)
T.I.P. #R-2634

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Document Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:

William B. Kinlaw
Project Planning Engineer

Linwood Stone
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head

••0q*tor.+to?,#p
••.•`o1H CARO1

.
rim 'FESS/py.
zMa %
Ri hard B. avis, P. E., Assist anager s' ; SEAL
Planning and Environmental Branch = 6944 ;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
SUMMARY i

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1

A. General Description 1
B. Summary of Proposed Improvements 1
1. Length of Project 1
2. Project Termini 1
3. Design Speed 1
4. Typical Section 1
5. Right of Way 2
6. Access Control................. 2

7. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control 2
8. Required Structures 2
9. Greenway 3
10. Bikeways 3
11. Cost Estimate 3
12. Special Permits Required 3
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION 3
A. Thoroughfare Plan 3

B. Traffic Volumes and Level of Service 4
C. Characteristics of Existing Roadways 4
1. Existing Roadways Cross Section 4
2. Type of Roadside Development 5
3. Existing Right of Way 5
4. Access Control 5
5. Utilities 5
6. Speed Limit 5
7. Bikeways 5
8. School Bus Data 5
9. Geodetic Markers 6
D. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community 6
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 6
A. Recommended Alternative 6
B. "No-Build" Alternative 6
C. Public Transportation Alternative 6
D. Supplementary Considerations 7
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 8

A. Land Use Planning . 8
B. Social And Economic Characteristics 8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
1. Neighborhood Analysis 8
2. Economic Factors 9
3. Public Facilities 9
4. Relocation Impacts 9

C. Cultural Resources 9
D. Natural Resources 9
1. Plant Communities 9
2. Wildlife Communities 10
3. Soils 12
4. Water Resources 12
5. Jurisdictional Wetlands 14
6. Protected Species 15
.a. Federally Protected Species 15
b. State Protected Species 17
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts 17

E. Floodplain Involvement 18
F. Traffic Noise Analysis 18
G. Air Quality Analysis 18
H. Transportation Management 19
I. Construction Impacts 21
J. Contaminated Properties 22
K. Farmland 22
L. Permits 23
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION 23
FIGURES

Figure 1 - Project Location Map
Figure 2 - Aerial Photo of Recommended Alternative
Figure 3 - Projected 1999 Traffic Volumes
(Recommended Alternative)
Figure 3A - Projected 2018 Traffic Volumes
(Recommended Alternative)
Figure 4 - Typical Section (Eastern Blvd.)
Figure 4A - Typical Section (Nelson Rd.)
Figure 5 - Greater Raleigh Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan
Figure 6 - Aviation Parkway Closure Map
Figure 7 - Greenway Corridors & Park Areas - Umstead
District
` Figure 8 - 100-Year Flood Areas
Figure 9 - Existing Bike Routes

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLES

Table I - Approximate Impacts To Plant Communities
Table 2 - Animals Visually Observed In The Study Area
Table 3 - Federally Protected Species For Wake County
Table 4 - Federal Candidate Species Listed For Wake County
Table 5 - State Protected Species For Wake County
APPENDIX (Agency Correspondence)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION PARKWAY CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
State Project No. 8.2402301
Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(1)
T.I.P. No. R-2634
i
SUMMARY
1. Description of Action

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct a multi-lane highway on new location between the Raleigh-Durham
(RDU) International Airport and the Research Triangle Park west of the
City of Raleigh. The proposed new road will connect the proposed Aviation
Parkway (SR 1002) interchange (TIP No. R-2030) and the proposed Northern
Wake Expressway (TIP No. R-2000), a distance of approximately 1.0 mile.
The project consists of constructing a four-lane divided facility on 250
feet of right of way. The proposed cross-section will provide for two 12-
foot wide lanes in each direction with a 56-foot wide median. Full
control of access will be maintained along the proposed project. The
intersection of Nelson Road and the proposed project will be grade
separated. A new bridge for Nelson Road will be constructed over the
proposed project.
This project is included in the NCDOT's Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) 1994-2000. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal
year 1995 and construction is scheduled to start in fiscal year 1997. The
total cost included in the TIP is $7,557,000.
2. Summary of Environmental Impacts
The proposed project should enhance the potential urban growth in the
Raleigh-Durham/Research Triangle Park area. Additionally, this project
will serve as the main link between RDU International Airport and the
Northern Wake Expressway, providing improved access to the airport and
northern Wake County. The proposed project will not require any
relocations. Using the North Carolina Division of Highways Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Program, the Soil Conservation Service and Wake
County, in close coordination with NCDOT, has developed a plan which
consists of rigorous requirements to minimize erosion and sedimentation.
r It will also be necessary for the Brier Creek Reservoir's water level to
be lowered to an appropriate level to allow for construction of the
proposed Eastern Boulevard. Appropriate measures will be taken to prevent 1C
the loss of any aquatic communities through coordination with appropriate I\
agencies and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
prior to the 404 permit application. The project will impact
approximately 6.7 acres of mixed pine-hardwood and hardwood forests.

Anticipated wetland impacts are categorized as bank-to-bank waters of the
United States and fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Since this project crosses the Brier Creek Reservoir, a
Section 404 permit will be required. Actions covered by Individual
Section 404 permits require mitigation for habitats lost due to project
construction.
3. Alternatives Considered

The project design was based on projected traffic demand between the
Northern Wake Expressway and the RDU International Airport. The
alternatives considered were the no-build alternative, providing improved
public transportation, and the proposed project.
4. Coordination

The following federal, state, and local agencies were asked to comment on
the proposed project during preparation of this report.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
*U. S. Federal Aviation Administration-Atlanta
*U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Raleigh
U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Asheville
U. S. Soil Conservation Service-Raleigh
*State Clearinghouse
*N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
N. C. Department of Human Resources
N. C. Department of Public Instruction
*N. C. Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources
Triangle J Council of Governments
Wake County Commissioner
*Town of Cary
*City of Raleigh
*RDU Airport Authority
*Wake County
Comments were received from those agencies denoted with an asterisk
These comments are included in the Appendix and are addressed in the
appropriate sections of this report.
5. Actions Required by Other Agencies
Based on information currently available, it will be necessary to apply to
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for an individual Section 404 permit.
The project will also require approval by the Federal Aviation
Administration.
6. Basis for Environmental Assessment -

Based on an analysis of potential environmental impacts of the proposed
project, it has been determined that no significant adverse effects on the
quality of the human or natural environment will result from the
construction of the proosed project.
ii

7. Additional Information

Additional information on this environmental assessment may be obtained by
contacting:
Nicholas L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone [phone]
. H. Franklin Vick, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone [phone]

iii

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION

A. General Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of
Highways, proposes to construct Eastern Boulevard, connecting existing
Aviation Parkway from the proposed revised interchange at the RDU
International Airport (TIP No. R-2030) to the proposed Northern Wake
Expressway interchange (TIP No. R-2000) (see Figures 1 and 2). The length
of this project is approximately one mile. The subject project is
scheduled for construction in conjunction with the Northern Wake
Expressway between I-40 and US 70 and the interchange revisions to the
airport entrance from I-40. The project is included in the NCDOT's
Transportation Improvement Program 1994-2000, Right of way acquisition is
scheduled to begin in the 1995 fiscal year and construction is scheduled
to start in fiscal year 1997.
B. Summary of Proposed Improvements
1. Length of Project

The project is approximately one mile long.

2. Project Termini
The project begins at the proposed airport entrance interchange
at the Raleigh-Durham International airport and ends at the corporate
city limits of Cary just southeast of the proposed interchange with
the Northern Wake Expressway.

3. Design Speed
The proposed design speed is 70 mph. The project is expected to
be posted at 55 mph.

4. Typical Section

The typical section for the proposed project is a 4-lane divided
freeway consisting of two 12-foot lanes in each direction and a 56-
foot grassed median (see Figure 4). The proposed typical section
will be an extension of the Northern Wake Expressway's typical
section. It will be maintained across Brier Creek Reservoir and tie
into the variable width median of the Aviation Parkway interchange at
Aviation Parkway and Airport Boulevard.
The 56-foot median width was retained in order that two (2)
additional travel lanes could be added in the future if warranted by
increased traffic demand. The advantages of this configuration is
that it will not require any additional right of way and any
additional environmental impacts will be minimal.
Nelson Road will consists of two 12-foot lanes with 4-foot paved
shoulders (see Figure 4A) to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian
traffic associated with the Greenway System for Wake County (see
section I.B.9.). This typical section will begin at the end of the

2

proposed 5-lane section just southeast of Pleasant Grove Church Road
and extend for approximately 2,000 feet toward existing Aviation
Parkway. The proposed Nelson Road bridge is not included in the
estimated 2,000 feet of roadway improvements.
5. Right of Way

The recommended right of way width is 250 feet.

6. Access Control
Full control of access is recommended along the proposed
project.

7. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control

The intersection of Nelson Road and the proposed project will be
a grade separation. The proposed project will be depressed at this
location due to the project termini elevations at the Northern Wake
Expressway interchange and at the RDU airport interchange. This will
allow a new bridge to be constructed for Nelson Road at approximately
the same elevation and location as existing Nelson Road. A temporary
detour will be constructed on the northwestern side of existing
Nelson Road.
In an agreement between RDU and NCDOT, signed on August 3, 1992,
the DOT shall close to traffic, eliminate from the state road system
and abandon its right of way interest in the approximately 2.4-mile
segment of existing SR 1002 (Aviation Parkway) between its junctures
with realigned Lumley Road and Eastern Boulevard (see Figure 6 & Note
#4) . This action shall be accomplished in coincident with the
completion of construction and opening to traffic of the Northern
Wake Expressway section between Interstate 40 and U.S. 70, of
realigned Lumley Road, and of Eastern Boulevard, the three
collectively providing a continuous trafficway between I-40 and U.S.
70 for airport and non-airport traffic . A short segment (0.1 mile)
of Nelson Road and a short segment (0.2 mile) of Globe Road are also
included in the above stated agreement. In addition, a connector
between SR 1642 (Nelson Road) and SR 1644 (Globe Road) will be
constructed by the Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority in order that a
continuous trafficway will be provided between the two roads.
8. Required Structures
Based on preliminary Hydraulic studies, a three-barrel 12 ft. x
12 ft. reinforced concrete box culvert along with a 48-inch
reinforced concrete pipe will be required for Brier Creek Reservoir.
A 6 ft. by 6 ft. reinforced concrete box will be adequate at the
` crossing of the unnamed tributary. (see Hydraulic memorandum in
Appendix)
The proposed bridge for Nelson Road will be approximately 240
feet long with 32 feet of pavement. This will allow for two 12-foot
travel lanes with four feet of paved shoulder on each side for bikes,
hikers, joggers, etc. Bicycle safe railings will be installed on
both sides of the proposed bridge.

3

9. Greenway

The Greenway System for Wake County is an interconnected series
of linear open spaces which typically follows natural drainage basins
(see Figure 7). These form a city-wide network of natural open
space. The Capital Area Greenway System is comprised of three primary
components: 1) Corridors, 2) Connectors, and 3) Nodes, based on
Raleigh's natural hierarchy of streams. These three sometime
interconnect to make a fourth element of the system, Loops.
.r.
The subject project crosses Brier Creek which is part of the
greenway system. Since there are no defined paths along the
designated greenway except along existing roads, greenway traffic
(bicycles, hikers, etc.) will be able to cross the subject project
along Nelson Road.
14. Bikeways
The NC bicycling highway, NC-2, and the interstate bicycling
highway, US-1, will continue to use Aviation Parkway during
construction of the proposed project. Upon completion of the subject
project and subsequent removal of existing Aviation Parkway from the
state roads system (refer to section I.B.7.), both bike routes will
be relocated.
11. Cost Estimate
The proposed project is estimated to cost:

Construction $ 5,900,000
Right of Way $ 225,000
Total cost $ 691259000
The right of way estimate includes the cost of acquisition,
utilities, and relocations. Construction cost includes 15% for
engineering and contingencies.

12. Special Permits Required
An Individual Section 404 permit will be required by the Corps
of Engineers.

II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION
s
A. Thoroughfare Plan
The proposed project is included in the Umstead District of the
Greater Raleigh Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan and will serve as Secondary
Arterial Major Thoroughfare (see Figure 5). The project will be an
intermodal link between the RDU International Airport and the Northern
Wake Expressway and will enhance the development of the surrounding area.
The thoroughfare plan consists of a network of major roadway improvements

4

and new construction, with I-40 and US 70 being the major existing
transportation corridors. The Northern Wake Expressway is a key element
in the thoroughfare network and will eventually provide circulation around
the Raleigh-Garner-Cary area.
Aviation Parkway currently provides access into the airport from
US 70. Based on an agreement between RDU and NCDOT (see section I.B.7.),
Aviation Parkway will be abandoned and removed from the state roads system
to allow for a future third runway parallel and west of the existing
runways. Traffic from US 70 will use Westgate Road, the Northern Wake
Expressway and the proposed project to access the RDU airport.
The current Greater Raleigh Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan calls for an
interchange at Nelson Road and the proposed project. The recommendation
concerning this interchange is beyond the scope of this project. However,
as part of this project, supplemental consideration was given to the
interchange to determine if it is a feasible engineering alternative for
future consideration. The results are discussed in the Supplemental
Considerations section of this report.
B. Traffic Volumes and Level of Service

Projected ADT volumes using the project for the construction year
1999 and the design year 2018 are 28,600 vpd and 50,200 vpd, respectively
(see Figure 3 & 3A). These estimates include 5% truck-tractor
semi-trailer and o dual tired vehicles.
Levels of service are used to describe the operating conditions on a
street or highway. The level of service of a roadway is a measure of its
traffic carrying ability. There are six levels of service (A through F)
which describe the operating conditions.
Level of service A is the highest level of service and represents a
condition of relative free flow and low delay. This is the most desirable
level of service. Levels of service B and C represent increasingly
greater delay. Level of service D is regarded as the minimum acceptable
level of service for design of a new facility. Level E is at or near the
theoretical capacity of the facility. This is considered to be the limit
of acceptable delay. Level of service F is the worst level. This is a
condition of forced or breakdown flow.
A capacity analysis of the proposed project indicates that a
four-lane freeway will operate at a level of service B in the construction
year 1999. By the design year 2018, the facility will reach a level of
service C.
C. Characteristics of Existing Roadways

1. Existing Roadways Cross Section

Aviation Parkway northwest of the RDU International airport
interchange is a 2-lane, 24-foot paved roadway with 2 feet of paved
shoulder and 10-12 feet of grassed shoulder. As Aviation Parkway
approaches the airport interchange, the roadway widens to two 12-foot
lanes with a variable width median.

5

Nelson Road is a 2-lane, 24-foot roadway with 2 feet of paved
shoulder and approximately 6 feet of grassed shoulder.

2. Type of Roadside Development
The land alongside both roadways is mainly agricultural or
wooded with light density residential development.

3. Existing Right of Way

Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) has an existing right of way width of
approximately 180 feet between Nelson Road (SR 1642) and the airport
interchange ramps. Where the proposed project crosses Nelson Road,
Nelson Road has a right of way width of approximately 60 feet.
4. Access Control

Neither Aviation Parkway nor Nelson Road are access controlled.
5. Utilities

Utility conflicts along this project are considered to be low in
severity. Underground utility impacts on both sides of Nelson Road
include sanitary sewer, telephone and water. Overhead utilities
impacted include power and telephone. The utilities at Raleigh
Durham International airport interchange are outside the limits of
this project.
6. Speed Limit

The posted speed limit for Aviation Parkway through the airport
interchange is 45 mph. Beyond the interchange, the speed limit
increases to 55 mph. The speed limit for Nelson Road is not posted
.and therefore assumed to be 55 mph.
7. Bikeways

The NC bicycling highway, NC-2, and the interstate bicycling
highway, US-1, (see Figure 9) are currently using Aviation Parkway
jointly. At Nelson Road, the US-1 route turns and follows Nelson
Road to Pleasant Grove Church Road (SR 1789). US-1 follows Pleasant
Grove Church Road to Airport Boulevard, then turns right and follows
Airport Boulevard to NC 54. From the intersection of Airport
Boulevard and NC 54, the US-1 route continues southward on NC 54 to
the intersection of NC 54, Aviation Parkway, and Morrisville-
Carpenter Road (SR 3014). At this point it joins back with the NC-2
route which followed Aviation Parkway totally and continues southward
on Morrisville-Carpenter Road.
8. School Bus Data
Four school buses currently use both Aviation Parkway and Nelson
Road daily during the school year. The 4 buses use these roads twice
daily, for a total of 8 trips per day.

6

9. Geodetic Markers

One geodetic survey marker is located along the project. The
North Carolina Geodetic Survey shall be contacted prior to
construction.
E. Benefits to State, Region, and Community

The proposed project will enhance the potential for urban growth in
the RDU International/RTP area. This project will act as the main link
between the RDU International airport and the Northern Wake Expressway,
providing improved access to the airport and to northern Wake County,
r including, but not limited to, Raleigh, Wendell, Knightdale, Garner, Cary,
Apex, and Morrisville. In addition, construction of this facility will
provide some traffic relief on US 70 and I-40 for commuters of the RTP
area, thus, providing a safer commuting environment.
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION

A. Recommended Alternative

The recommended alternative consists of constructing a 4-lane divided
freeway from the southernmost leg of the Northern Wake Expressway
southward to the proposed Aviation Parkway interchange at Airport
Boulevard. (see Section I.B.)
The intersection of Nelson Road and the proposed project will be
grade separated. Due to the elevations of the Northern Wake Expressway
interchange and the RDU airport interchange, the resulting grade for the
project will require it to be depressed under Nelson Road. A new bridge
will be constructed for Nelson Road at approximately the same elevation
and location as existing Nelson Road. A total of approximately 2,000 feet
of approach work will be required on Nelson Road (see section I.B.4.). A
temporary detour, approximately 1,200 feet long, will be constructed on
the northwest side of Nelson Road to maintain local traffic during the
construction of the Nelson Road bridge and its approaches.
In an agreement between RDU and NCDOT, signed on August 3, 1992,
existing Aviation Parkway will be abandoned between the subject project
and realigned Lumley Road (see Figure 6 & Note #4). A short segment (0.1
mile) of Nelson Road and a short segment (0.2 mile) of Globe Road will be
removed and a connector will be constructed between the two roads (See
Note #7).
B. "No-Build" Alternative
The no-build alternative is rejected because it will not fulfill the
need for the proposed project.

C. Public Transportation Alternative
Public transit is not an effective solution due to the wide
geographic area served by the airport. Existing public transportation,
including taxis and limousines, serves the airport within the Triangle

7

area, principally to local motels and hotels. The Triangle Transit
Authority currently provides daily regional bus service, Monday thru
Friday, between Raleigh and Durham with stops in the Research Triangle
Park (RTP) and Raleigh-Durham (RDU) International Airport. However, the
market area for the RDU airport extends far beyond the Research Triangle
area, encompassing much of eastern North Carolina. For this reason,
public transportation improvements are not a suitable alternative for the
subject project.
D. Supplementary Considerations i
Consideration was given to providing an interchange at the
intersection of the proposed project and Nelson Road as shown on the
current thoroughfare plan. It is not included in the current
Transportation Improvement Program and is beyond the scope of this
project. The typical section for Nelson Road will consist of 5 lanes (two
travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane). An interchange at
this location will provide access to the interior areas of the Research
Triangle Park from the airport and visa versa. Based on projected 1999
and 2018 ADT traffic volumes and criteria for safe weaving distances
between ramps, Nelson Road would have to be relocated approximately 350
feet southeast of existing Nelson Road. An analysis using a weaving
distance of 1600 feet indicates weaving vehicles will operate at a level
of service C while non-weaving vehicles will operate at a level of service
D for the year 1999. For the year 2018, weaving vehicles will operate at
a level of service D while non-weaving vehicles will operate at a level of
service E.
Based on a preliminary hydraulic analysis, assuming the interchange
would be built, Hydraulic's recommendation is that a double-barrel 10-foot
by 9-foot reinforced concrete box culvert along with a 36-inch reinforced
concrete pipe be provided where Nelson Road crosses the Brier Creek
Reservoir. The same design criteria used for the Eastern Boulevard
project are applicale at this crossing as well, including mitigation to
maintain flood storage capacity and application of special erosion and
sedimentation control measures. If Nelson Road becomes an NCDOT project,
mitigation alternatives will be studied in detail during the final
hydraulic design stage of that project. An individual environmental
permit will likely be required for these improvements.
If an interchange for Nelson Road is constructed, consideration will
be given to the Brier Creek greenway corridor. This corridor is one part
of a comprehensive greenway plan which circumvents RDU airport and is part
of the Capital Area Greenway, a multi-functional linear park system.
The studied interchange and improvements to Nelson Road will not
require any relocations.
However, the interchange would be expensive to construct due in part
to the encroachment into the Brier Creek reservoir. The new 5-lane bridge
for Nelson Road would have to be relocated approximately 350 feet
southeast of existing Nelson Road. In addition to the Nelson Road bridge,
additional structures and right of way will be required for ramp and loop
construction. Total estimated cost for the interchange is $7,677,500.
This includes $5,900,000 for construction and $1,777,500 for right of way
acquisition.

8

III. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS

A. Land Use Planning
The project is located in the jurisdictions of the Raleigh-Durham
Airport Authority, the Town of Cary and Wake County. In general, the land
on both ides of Nelson Road is in Cary's jurisdiction, while the remaining
land is in the Raleigh Durham Airport Authority's and Wake County's
jurisdiction.
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Growth Plan was last updated in
1989. The town also enforces a zoning ordinance and subdivision
regulations within its planning jurisdiction. Wake County also enforces
zoning and subdivision regulations, and adopted its General Development
Plan in 1989.

The proposed freeway is included in the February 10, 1986 Greater
Raleigh Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan.
The project area is adjacent to the Raleigh-Durham International
Airport. The immediate project site is currently undeveloped, though
industrial development is occurring in the general area. Most of the
project is located on land owned by the Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority.
According to the Cary Land Use. Plan (an element of the Comprehensive
Growth Plan the portion of the proposed route north of the reservoir will
cross land designated for commercial development alongside Nelson Road, as
well as land designated for industrial uses north of Nelson Road. Two
Cary zoning districts are located in the area, Industrial Performance
District - Industry and Warehousing; and Commercial District-Highway
oriented Commercial, fronting Nelson Road.
The remaining portion of the route is located within Wake County's
Airport Planning Area. Residential land uses are not permitted within the
Airport Planning Area, nor are any land uses which may result in high
population concentrations. However, industrial and commercial land uses.
are permitted. Wake County has zoned the project area as Airport
District-2.
B. Social And Economic Characteristics

1. Neighborhood Analysis

The proposed project is located in Wake County. Wake County is
in the east central section of the State and is bounded by Durham,
Johnston, Harnett, Chatham, Granville, and Franklin counties. Based
on the 1990 Census Data, the county has a population of 423,380.
The proposed project begins at the proposed Aviation Parkway
interchange at Airport Boulevard and extends northwest on new
location. It passes through the Brier Creek Reservoir, crosses
Nelson Road, and connects with the proposed Northern Wake Expressway
just north of Nelson Road.

9

2. Economic Factors

North Carolina Employment Commission indicates that as of March
1990, Wake County had a total civilian labor force of 249,890. Of
this total, 239,750 persons were employed and 10,140 (4.1 percent)
persons were unemployed.
The proposed project is bounded by the Research Triangle Park
(RTP) to the west and by the Raleigh-Durham International Airport
(RDU) to the northeast. The City's Comprehensive Plan for Raleigh
designates the area served by the proposed Aviation Parkway as the
Triangle Regional Center. Distinctive features of regional centers
include a large employment base, regional transit hubs, major retail
and cultural centers, and a high visibility and scale. By the year
2010, over 100,000 jobs are expected to be located in the area
between and including RDU airport and the RTP. The proposed project
will improve access and enhance economic growth in the area.
3. Public Facilities
Raleigh-Durham International Airport is the major public
facility in the immediate area of the proposed action, and it will
not be adversely impacted.
The Umstead State Park main entrance is on US 70 and is located
just east of the RDU International Airport. The park extends from US
70 to I-40 and serves the Cary, Raleigh, Durham, and Morrisville
areas. It provides primary upstream watershed protection for
Raleigh, extensive wildlife habitat, and a vast natural experience
for its visitors.

4. Relocation Impacts
The proposed project improvements will not require the
relocation of any buildings or families. The Relocation Report
included in the Appendix includes relocations which are part of the
Northern Wake Expressway project and should not be included as part
of this project.
C. Cultural Resources

the proposed project will have no effect on any historic properties.
The State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) has determined that it is
unlikely there are any historic or architectural structures which may be
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The
SHPO has also indicated that no archaeological sites will be impacted by
the subject project. (see attached memorandum from N.C. Department of
Cultural Resources)
D. Natural Resources

1. Plant Communities

Four plant communities found in the subject project study area
include ROADSIDE, MIXED PINE-HARDWOOD FOREST and HARDWOOD FOREST.

10

Uplands

The ROADSIDE/MOWED FIELD COMMUNITY is located along
Aviation Parkway, the southeastern terminus of the project and
the project intersection with Nelson road. Grasses,
predominantly tall fescue (Festuca sp.), common dandelion
(Taraxacum officinale), clover (Trifolium sp.) and wild onion
(Allium sp.) are the species dominating this community.
The MIXED PINE-HARDWOOD FOREST COMMUNITY is found on the
north and south sides of the Nelson road intersection with the
subject project. Canopy and sub-canopy species include loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda), shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), white oak
uercus alba), oaks (uercus spp..), hickory (Carya sp.), red
maple (Acer rubrum), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweet
gum (Li uidambar st raciflua), black cherry (Prunus serotina),
winge elm U mus a ata an flowering dogwood (Cornus on a).
Blackberry (Rubus sp.) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica) dominate the shrub/vine layer.
The HARDWOOD FOREST COMMUNITY is located along the
northwest side of Brier Creek Reservoir. Species composition in
the canopy and sub-canopy includes white oak, other oaks,
hickory, red maple, tulip tree, sweet gum, black cherry and
flowering dogwood. Buckeye (Aesculus s lvatica), viburnum
(Viburnum acerifolium) and Japanese oneysuck a comprise the
shrub vine layer.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Plant Communities
Construction of the subject project will result in loss of
existing roadside/mowed field habitat along Aviation Parkway and
Nelson road and creation of new roadside habitat along the new
road shoulders. Portions of mixed pine-hardwood forest and
hardwood forest communities will be destroyed by construction of
this project (see Table 1). Project construction will also
cause the fragmentation of portions of the pine-hardwood forest
and hardwood forest.
2. Wildlife Communities
Possible amphibian species found in the area include spotted
salamander (Amb_ystoma maculatum), northern dusky salamander
(Desmognathus fuscus), two-lined salamander (Eur_ycea bislineata),
slimy salamander (Plethodon glutinosus), red salamander (Pseudotriton
ruber), American toad (Bufo americanus), Fowler's toad Bufo
woodhousei), northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans), spring peeper
Hyla crucifer), upland chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata), bullfrog
(Rana catesbeiana) and pickerel frog (Rana palustris).
Characteristic reptiles likely to occur in the area include
snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), painted turtle (Chrysemys
picta), yellowbelly slider (Chrysemys scripta), eastern box turtle
(Terra ene carolina), eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus),
five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus), broadhead skink Eumeces
laticeps), ground skink (Scincella lateralis), worm snake (Carphophis

11

amoenus) ringneck snake (Diadophis punctatus), rat snake (-E-laph-e-
obso~eta), eastern hognose snake (Heterodon platyrhinos), northern
water snake (Nerodia si edon), rough green snake (Opheodrys
aestivus), and copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix).
Birds common in the vicinity of the project include Canada goose
(Branta canadensis), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), belted
kingfisher (Cer_yle alcyon), downy woodpecker (Picoides pubesc~ens),
American crow (Corvus brach rh nchos), Carolina chicka ed a (Parus
carolinensis), Carolina wren (Thryout orus ludovicianus), ruby-crowned
kinglet (Regulus calendula), blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila
caerulea), eastern bluebird (Syalia syalis), American robin (Turdus
migratorius), red-eyed verio (Verio olivaceus), yellow-rumped war ler
(Dendroica coronata), white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis)
and northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis).
Mammals such as Virginia opossum (Didel hhis virginiana),
southeastern shrew (Sorex longirostris), silver-haired bat
(Lasionycteris noctivagans), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus
floridanus), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), beaver (Castor
canadens s), eastern harvest mouse (Reithrodontom_ys humulis), 'white
footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), meadow vole Microtus
enns lvanicus), Norway rat (Rattua norvegicus), red fox (Vul es
vulpes , raccoon (Procyon lotor), and white-tailed deer (Odocous
virgim anus) are likely common inhabitants of the area.
Animals visually observed in the study area are listed in
Table 2.
Brier Creek Reservoir is the only aquatic community found in the
study area. It is a man-made flood control water body and is fed by
Brier Creek and Little Brier Creek. This community supports
populations of invertebrates, amphibians, fish and seasonal
populations of waterfowl.
Fish likely to occur in Brier Creek Reservoir include largemouth
bass (Micro terus salmoides), black crappie (Pomoxis ni romaculatus),
white crappie Pomoxis annularis), bluegill -Le-po-mis macroc irus ,
redear sunfish (Lepomis micro phus), green sunfish Le omis
cyanellus), pumpkinseed (~Le om~is ibbosus), warmouth Le omis
ulosus), channel catfish (IctaTurus unctatus), yellow bun head
(Ameiurus natalis), black bul e ameiurus me as), chain pickerel
Esox niger), bowfin (Amia calva) and gizzard shad (Dorosoma
cepedianum).
The Brier Creek Reservoir water level will be lowered to an
appropriate level for the construction of Eastern Boulevard.
Measures will be taken to ensure, to the extent possible, minimum
impact to fish and wildlife. Through continued coordination with the
NCWRC and local agencies, appropriate best management practices and
mitigation plans will be formulated prior to the 404 permit
application. The resultant action will be incorporated into the
project plans and will be utilized during the construction of Eastern
Boulevard.

12

Destruction of terrestrial communities along the project
corridor will result in the loss of foraging and breeding habitats
for many of the terrestrial species which utilize this area. Loss of
these habitats will result in a reduction and displacement of species
found in the subject project study zone. Habitat fragmentation also
places restrictions on those species which may have daily migratory
patterns or territorial behaviors. Roads also increases mortality
among migratory species and species which are opportunistic foragers
along road shoulders.
The proposed action could have affects on the aquatic
environment found in the project boundaries. Strict enforcement of
Sedimentation Control Measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs)
should be observed. Sedimentation into this reservoir can be harmful
to local populations of invertebrates which are important parts of
the aquatic food chain. Fish populations in Brier Creek Reservoir
can also be harmed by sedimentation.
3. Soils
Based on a review of the proposed project, no significant
.adverse effects are anticipated to the geologic regime.

This project portion of the Piedmont physiographic province is
situated within the Durham Triassic basin just west of the Jonesboro
fault. On a regional scale, the terrain is characterized by broad,
gently rolling interstream areas and adjacent floodplains where
elevations range from 300 to 350 feet above mean sea level.
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the principal
geologic unit underlying this area consists of sandstones and sandy
mudstones. Throughout most of the study area, there is a poorly
developed soil profile that consists of residual fine sandy loam and
gravelly loam (A-2, A-4) underlain by a clayey loam (A-6, A-7)
subsoil and/or weathered rock. The high plasticity soils, which are
characteristic of this region, typically present is slight to modern
erosion hazard. Therefore, appropriate erosion control measures will
be utilized to prevent the potential siltation of any adjacent
surface waters.
Historically, the stability of slopes has been a concern for
areas located within the Triassic basin. It is therefore suggested
that east facing (west side) slopes be constructed to no greater than
3:1.
4. Water Resources
The topic of water resources is presented in two sections. The
first section describes the physical aspects of the resource and its
relationship to major water systems. The second section discusses
water quality and special use resource categories.

13

Brier Creek Reservoir is the only water resource located in. the
subject project area. This reservoir is fed from the north by Brier
Creek and Little Brier Creek. Outflow from Brier Creek Reservoir
continues south as Brier Creek. The lake bottom is covered by
silt/clay sediments deposited from storm run-off.
Brier Creek Reservoir has a best usage classification of C.
Class C waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation and
survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture.

No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW) or waters designated as WS-I or WS-II will be
impacted by the proposed project, nor are these resources located
within 1 mile of the subject area.
The Benthic Microinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) addresses
long term trends in water quality at fixed monitoring sites by the
sampling for selected benthic macroinvertebrates. These organisms
are sensitive to very subtle changes in water quality. Good water
quality is associated with high taxa richness (the number of
different types of organisms) and the presence of many intolerant
species. Water quality degradation gradually eliminates the more
sensitive species and leads to a community structure quite different
from that in an unstressed stream. Specific information is not
available for the immediate project area.
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
lists Raleigh/Durham Airport Authority as the only discharger for
Brier Creek Reservoir.
Potential impacts to Brier Creek Reservoir include loss of lake
area and increased sedimentation from construction-related erosion if
the culvert alternative is used. A bridge alternate would impact the
reservoir by increased sedimentation from construction related
erosion. These impacts are viewed as temporary. However, poorly
managed application of sedimentation control policies can result in
serious damage to the aquatic environment. Sedimentation and erosion
control measures shall be strictly enforced during the construction
stage of this project. (see Section H, Construction Impacts)
Based on a preliminary hydraulic analysis, a three-barrel
12-foot x 12-foot reinforced concrete box culvert along with a
48-inch reinforced concrete pipe will be adequate for conveyance of
the anticipated discharges at the crossing of the Brier Creek
Reservoir. The roadway grade must be constructed above the flood
capacity level of the reservoir (above the emergency spillway crest
elevation of the dam).
At the crossing of the unnamed tributary, preliminary hydraulic
analysis indicates that a 6-foot x 6-foot reinforced concrete box
will be adequate.
Groundwater resources and existing drainage patterns will not be
affected by the proposed project.

14

5. Jurisdictional Wetlands

Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of
"Waters of the United States" as defined in 33 CFR 328.3 and in
accordance with provisions of section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C 1344).
Anticipated impacts are categorized as bank-to-bank waters of
the United States and fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (COE). Due to the size of the area which will be
filled by this project (approximately 3 acres) and location below
headwaters (flow greater than 5 cubic feet per second), no Nationwide
permits apply. The Brier Creek Reservoir crossing is below
headwaters and the construction of this project will involve a
significant discharge of fill below ordinary high water; therefore,
an individual Section 404 permit will likely be required. A section
404 permit authorizes the Secretary of the Army, acting through the
Chief of Engineers, to issue permits, after notice and opportunity
for public hearing, for the discharge of dredged or fill material
into the waters of the United States at specified disposal sites.
Actions covered by Individual Section 404 permits require
mitigation for habitats lost due to project construction. On-site
mitigation opportunities will be considered first. Loss of storage
volume due to the proposed roadway embankment will be mitigated by
providing equal volume through excavation within the existing
easement of the reservoir, if feasible, or within the newly acquired
right of way adjacent to the reservoir. Either mitigation
alternative will allow normal water pool and flood capacity in the
reservoir to be maintained. Location and quantity of the excavation,
along with final sizing of the drainage structures will be determined
during the final hydraulic design stage of the project.
Opportunities within the same watershed outside of the immediate
project area are recommended if on-site options are not available.
Erosion and sedimentation control will be a major priority for
this project; therefore, in addition to standard erosion and
sedimentation control practices, some special measures shall be
taken, which shall include, but not limited to the following:
-The lake water level will be lowered to an appropriate level prior
to construction.
-The natural channel will convey normal runoff through the reservoir
during construction.
-Where the proposed roadway crosses the natural channel, the 48-inch
reinforced concrete pipe will allow passage of the normal flow under
the roadway embankment during construction.
-A standard stilling basin and silt screens for sediment removal
shall be provided downstream of the pipe outlet.

15

-The proposed box culvert bottom invert must be set above the
estimated sediment level to prevent sediment accumulation in the
culvert.
-Both sides of the proposed roadway embankment must be protected from
erosion with rock plating up to the 100-year pool elevation.

-The slopes of the fill areas in the Brier Creek Reservoir were
steepened to minimize the displacement of water storage volume.

At the crossing of the unnamed tributary, erosion and
sedimentation will be controlled at this crossing through the
appropriate specification, installation, and maintenance of best
management practices.
6. Protected Species

a. Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists 5 species
as federally protected for Wake County as of September 21, 1993
(see Table 3).
--bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) (E)

This federally Endangered raptor is found throughout the
United States and northward to the arctic. Nesting in the
southeast is limited primarily to Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi and South Carolina. The birds occur elsewhere in
the southeast as migrants, or rarely as nesting pairs. As an
adult, this large raptor displays a wingspread of about 7 feet;
plumage is dark brown with pure white head and tail. Juveniles
of this species are often chocolate brown to blackish with head
and tail changing from brown-to- mottled white-to-pure white as
the bird matures. The Bald eagle is principally riparian,
associated with coasts, rivers and lakes, usually nesting near
bodies of water where they feed. The proposed project will not
impact suitable nesting or feeding resources for this species.
It can be concluded that the subject project will not impact the
bald eagle.
--red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (E)
This federally Endangered woodpecker is found in scattered
locations throughout the southeast. The bird measures 18 to 20
cm long with a wing span ranging from 35 to 38 cm. The male has
a small red spot on the each side of the head. Both males and

16

females show a black cap and stripe on the side of the neck.
The throat is also black while the cheeks and under parts are
white. Black and white horizontal stripes are visible on the
back.
Nesting habitat is made up of open pine stands (minimum age
60 years) or mixed pine/hardwood stands, (50 percent or more
pine). Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) is most commonly used,
but other species of southern pine are also acceptable. The
home range for a clan (a family unit) averages about 200 acres
and includes nesting habitat as well as foraging habitat. This
bird requires pine or mixed pine/hardwood stands (50 percent or
more pine) 30 years or older for foraging. Foraging habitats
must be contiguous with nesting habitat. The proposed project
will not impact suitable nesting and feeding habitat for this
species. It can be concluded that the subject project will not
impact the red-cockaded woodpecker.
--Bachman's warbler (Vermivora bachmanii) (E)
This federally Endangered warbler's range includes the
southeastern U.S. during the breeding season and western Cuba
and Isle of Pines in the winter. The birds.total length is from
10 to 11.25 cm. The male is olive green above with yellow face
and underparts with black throat and crown patches. The female
lacks the black throat. The upper parts are olive green, the
forehead and underparts are yellow and the crown is grayish.
Historic records indicate the Bachman's warbler nested in low,
wet hardwood forests. Openings in the forest canopy, covered
with dense thickets of cane, palmetto, blackberry, gallberry and
or other shrubs and vines. There is no suitable nesting habitat
in the subject project area. No sighting of this species in the
last 20 years suggests that it may be extirpated from the
county. It can be concluded that the subject project will not
impact the bachman's warbler.
--dwarf-wedged mussel (Alasmidanta heterodon) (E)
This federally Endangered mussel is known from the Neuse
and Tar River drainages in North Carolina. Currently, the only
known populations are in the Little River and Middle Creek in
Johnston County, the upper Tar River in Granville County, and
Crooked Creek and Cedar Creek in Franklin County. This mussel
seems to prefer streams with deep water and coarse sands,
however it has also been seen on bottoms of gravel or mud, among
submersed aquatic plants and near stream banks underneath
overhanging tree limbs. No suitable habitat for the dwarf-wedge
mussel occurs in the study area. It can be concluded that the
subject project will not impact the dwarf-wedged mussel.
--Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) (E)

17

This federally Endangered plant is currently known from
only 17 locations, 16 of which are in North Carolina. The
species usually occurs on sandy or rocky soils in open woodlands
and clearings and appears to be dependent upon some form of
disturbance to maintain the open condition. Since most natural
forms of disturbance (fire, large herbivore grazing, etc.) have
been eliminated, this species is often found in it's natural
habitat in open areas created by railroad and highway
rights-of-way.
Suitable habitat for this species does occur within the
project area. This species has recognizable field
characteristics year-round, thus searches for this plant are not
limited to it's flowering period. A detailed survey for this
plant was conducted on May 4, 1992 along Aviation Parkway, the
southeastern terminus of the project and the project
intersection with Nelson road. Areas of suitable habitat were
searched visually on a plant by plant basis. No individuals of
this species were found within the subject project area during
these searches, thus it can be concluded that the project will
have no impact on Michaux's sumac.
Candidate species (see Table 4) may occur in the area.
Candidate species are species which are not legally protected
under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of
its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally
proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered.
b. State Protected Species
Plants or animals with state designations of Endangered
(E), Threatened (T) or Special Concern (SC) are granted
protection by the State Endangered Species Act and the N.C.
Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979, administered and
enforced by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and
the N.C. Department of Agriculture.
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Programs
records failed to turn up any records of occurrence of
state-protected species in the study area.
The state-protected species listed in Table 5 are also
listed as federal candidate species. Suitable habitat
determinations were ascertained from literature review.

C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
No impacts to federally protected species will occur.
Although suitable habitat exists in the study area for several
federal candidate and/or state protected species, no surveys
were conducted for these species.

18

E. Floodplain Involvement

This project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (see Figure
8). All structures within the floodplain area must be elevated or comply
with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance of the community. A Uniform
Floodplain Management Policy, Executive Order 123, signed on July 24,
1990, must be followed.
Wake County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular
Program. A copy of the Flood Rate Insurance Map showing the limits of the
100-year floodplain and floodway in the vicinity of the crossing at Brier
Creek Flood Control Reservoir and its unnamed tributary can be found in
the Appendix (see Figure 8). The floodplain in the vicinity of the
crossing at Brier Creek Reservoir and its unnamed tributary consists
mostly of wooded areas and low density development (in the vicinity of the
airport runway).
The proposed roadway with the recommended hydraulic structures will
not have a significant adverse effect on the existing floodplain. Loss of
storage volume due to the proposed roadway embankment will be mitigated by
providing equal volume through excavation within the existing easement of
the resevoir, if feasible, or within the newly acquired right of way
adjacent to the reservoir.
F. Traffic Noise Analysis
This analysis was performed to determine the effect of the proposed
project on noise levels in the immediate project area. A "worst case"
scenar.io was used in dealing with traffic noise predictions. The 67 dBA
is approximately 156 feet from the centerline of the proposed facility.
This information should assist local authorities in exercising land use
control over the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway in
local jurisdiction. Also, it can help prevent further development of
incompatible activities and land uses. Furthermore, no receptors were
identified in the vicinity of the project, hence, The project's impact on
noise quality will be insignificant. Noise levels could increase during
construction but will be temporary.
G. Air Quality Analysis
The proposed project is located within the jurisdiction of air
quality of the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Wake County has been
designated as a moderate non-attainment area for carbon monoxide and
ozone. The attainment date is December 31, 1995 for carbon monoxide
and/or November 15, 1996 for ozone. The current State Implementation Plan
does not contain any transportation control measures for Wake County. The
t Raleigh Urbanized Area Thoroughfare Plan and Transportation Improvement
Program have been determined to be in conformity to the 1990 Clear Air Act
Amendments and the June 7, 1991 Interim Conformity Guidance on the dates
of November 15, 1991 and December 15, 1993, respectively. There have

19

been no significant changes .in the project's design concept and scope, as
used in the conformity analyses. The proposed project will not cause or
contribute to a new CO violation and does not increase the number or
intensity of existing CO violations.
H. Transportation Management

In Transportation Management Areas (TMA) designated as non-attainment
for air quality, the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
(ISTEA), places restrictions on federally funded projects that increase .
capacity for single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Section 1024(a) of ISTEA
states that projects which increase SOV capacity in TMA's classified as
non-attainment areas must be part of an approved Congestion Management
System.
North Carolina is currently developing its Congestion Management
System (CMS). A working plan for North Carolina's CMS will be in place by
October 1, 1995. Prior to implementation of the CMS, projects that
improve SOV capacity in non-attainment areas will be analyzed to determine
if travel demand reduction and operational management strategies can be
used to reduce SOV demand.
Raleigh is classified as a moderate non-attainment area for carbon
monoxide and ozone. The construction of Eastern Boulevard (R-2634) will
increase the capacity for SOV use. The following are operational
management strategies and alternative transportation modes that have been
considered as part of the proposed project.
Travel Demand Reduction Strategies:

The following travel demand reduction strategies were considered for
this project:
1. Staggering work hours at local businesses
2. Growth management
3. Road use pricing

Growth management involves public policies to regulate development so
that trip generation follows a desired pattern. Road pricing involves
charging motorists a "price" associated with their use of a particular
facility. Growth management and road use pricing are not considered
feasible options because they involve area-wide policies rather than
policies applicable to discrete corridors.
Staggered work hours, flex-time, or modified work meets can be
implemented on a corridor level if large employers along the corridor
cause congestion at their entrances or exits. These applications would
reduce spot congestion at entrances and exits to large employers (those
employes attracting enough trips to cause congestion); however, there are
no such employers along this project.

20

Because SOV reduction strategies are not considered appropriate for
this corridor, additional SOV capacity is warranted and will be provided
by the construction of Eastern Boulevard.
Consideration of Alternative Transportation Modes:

The City of Raleigh and the North Carolina Department of
Transportation have adopted a thoroughfare plan designed to provide
Raleigh with an efficient transportation network. The thoroughfare plan
includes both highway improvements and transit service. The construction
of Eastern Boulevard with Project R-2634 is a part of Raleigh's
thoroughfare plan.
The City of Raleigh, in cooperation with the Triangle Transit
Authority, has alternative modes of transportation available to commuters
which are designed to reduce vehicular trips in the city. An ultimate
goal of 4% reduction in internal auto trips has been targeted by the City
of Raleigh. These programs are outlined below.
Bus Service

Full bus service does not extend to the limits of project R-2634;
however, connector service is available. Raleigh expects to study the
feasibility provision of bus service along this new connector in the near
future. Provision of bus turnouts as part of project R-2634 has been
coordinated with Raleigh's Transit Administrator. Bus turnouts were not
considered useful for transit operations along this new connector.
Therefore, no bus turnouts are proposed.
Carpool/Vanpool Programs
The Triangle Transit Authority operates a computer-aided carpool and
vanpool service for Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill. Currently, there
are 29 vanpools serving the triangle area.

To enhance carpool ridership, Raleigh has established numerous "park-
n-ride" lots for commuters. Unfortunately, use of the public "park-n-
ride" lots have been minimal. Therefore, for the reasons stated above and
because the project area is currently undeveloped, a "park-n-ride" lot
will not be provided as part of Project R-2634.
Bicycle Use

The proposed bridge for Nelson Road has been designed to incorporate
bicycle safe railings and 4-foot paved shoulders to allow bicycle traffic
to cross proposed Eastern and Boulevard.
Congestion Management Strategies

There are no traffic signals proposed for Eastern Boulevard,
progressive signal timing was not evaluated as a valid congestion
management strategy.

21

Ramp metering and High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes are not
appropriate as congestion management strategies even though this project
is a controlled access facility. The project's purpose is to serve as an
intermodal link to and from the Northern Wake Expressway and
Raleigh-Durham International Airport and implementation of this congestion
management strategies are not applicable for this type of facility.
Consistency with ISTEA

ISTEA requirements, as amended in 23 USC 134, for the Raleigh TMA
have been reviewed as previously described. Project R-2634 is a part of
Raleigh's approved thoroughfare plan. Travel demand reduction strategies,
operational management strategies, and alternative transportation modes -
have been addressed along the new connector corridor to determine if these
strategies could eliminate the need for additional SOV capacity.
I. Construction Impacts
Traffic services in the immediate area (Nelson Road and Aviation
Parkway) may be subject to periods of disruptions during construction of
the project. Efforts will be made to insure that the transportation needs
of the public will be met both during and after construction.

Measures will be taken to insure that the public's health and safety
will not be compromised during the movement of any materials to and from
construction sites along the project and that any inconveniences imposed
on the public will be kept to a minimum.
Dust control will be exercised at all times to prevent endangering
the safety and general welfare of the public and to prevent diminishing
the value, utility, or appearance of any public or private properties.
Borrow pits and all ditches will be drained insofar as possible to
alleviate breeding areas for mosquitoes and care will be taken not to
block the existing ditches.

Wastes and debris will be disposed of in areas that are outside of
the right-of-way and provided by the contractor, unless otherwise required
by the plans or special provisions or unless disposal within the
right-of-way is permitted by the engineer.
Disposal of waste and debris in active public waste or disposal areas
will not be permitted without prior approval by the engineer. Such
disposal will not be permitted when, in the opinion of the engineer, it
will result in excessive siltation or pollution.

The contractor shall maintain the earth surface of all waste areas,
both during the work and until the completion of all seeding, mulching, or
other erosion control measures specified, in a manner which will
effectively control erosion and siltation. According to the hydraulic
memo, erosion and sedimentation control will be a major priority for this
project; therefore, in addition to standard erosion and sedimentation

22

control practices, some special measures shall be taken, which shall
include, but are not limited to the following: The lake will be completely
drained prior to construction. The natural channel will convey normal
runoff through the reservoir during construction. Where the proposed
roadway crosses the natural channel, the 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe
will allow passage of the normal flow under the roadway embankment during
construction. A standard stilling basin and silt screens for sediment
removal shall be provided downstream of the pipe outlet. The proposed box
culvert bottom invert must be set above the estimated sediment level to
prevent sediment accumulation in the culvert. Both sides of the proposed
roadway embankment must be protected from erosion with rock plating up to'
the 100-year pool elevation.
Vegetation from land clearing, construction, and land clearing
materials will be disposed of in accordance with applicable federal,
state, and local air pollution and solid waste regulations.
Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for use on this
project, the contractor shall obtain certification from the State
Department of Cultural Resources certifying that the removal of material
from the borrow source will have no effect on any known district, site,
building, structure, or object that is included or eligible for inclusion
in the National Register of Historic Places. A copy of this certification
shall be furnished to the engineer prior to performing any work on the
proposed borrow source.
The roadway grade must be constructed above the flood capacity level
of the Brier Creek Reservoir (above the emergency spillway crest elevation
of the dam).
J. Contaminated Properties
A field survey and records search was performed to identify areas of
potential environmental concerns such as: underground storage tanks,
hazardous waste sites, dumps, landfills, or similar sites. After
reviewing all of the available information, there is nothing to indicate
any hazardous materials involvement on this project.

K. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or
their representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and
construction projects on prime and important farmland soils. These soils
are designated by the US Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and generally
include those soils which produce the highest crop yield with minimal
input of energy and other resources.
Soils which have been converted to non-agricultural land uses, either
through development or by the actions of the local government are exempt
from consideration under the act. As the Town of Cary and Wake County
have zoned the project area for commercial and industrial land uses,
further consideration of potential impacts to farmland is not required.

23

L. Permits

An Individual Section 404 permit will be required for the Brier Creek
crossing.

V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION

Comments on proposed Eastern Boulevard from the Northern Wake
Expressway to Aviation Parkway were requested from the following federal,
state, and local agencies. An asterisk indicates a written response was
received.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
*U. S. Federal Aviation Administration-Atlanta
*U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Raleigh
U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Asheville
U. S. Soil Conservation Service-Raleigh
*State Clearinghouse
*N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
N. C. Department of Human Resources
N. C. Department of Public Instruction
*N. C. Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources
Triangle J Council of Governments
Wake County Commissioner
.*Town of Cary
*City of Raleigh
*RDU Airport Authority
*Wake County
A meeting was held on May 19, 1992 at NCDOT's Planning and
Environmental Branch to discuss the construction of the roadway across the
Brier Creek reservoir. Coordination between the Soil Conservation Service
(SCS) and NCDOT's Hydraulics Unit was accomplished and a plan of action
was agreed upon.
On June 12, 1992, a meeting was held in NCDOT's Statewide Planning
Branch with representatives from the State's Office of Bicycle And
Pedestrian Transportation Unit. The current and future thoroughfare plans
were reviewed and discussed in association with the existing and future
bicycle routes for NC Bike Route 2 and the interstate bicycling highway,
US-1 (Virginia state line to South Carolina state line).
A second meeting with the SCS was held on August 6, 1992. This -
meeting also included representatives from Wake County, Town of Cary,
FHWA, and various DOT representatives. The possibility of adding an
interchange at the project's intersection with Nelson Road was discussed
and, due to funding, construction of an interchange was considered beyond -
the scope of the subject project. It was agreed that the environmental
document would address the design feasibility and cost of providing an
interchange at Nelson Road as a supplementary consideration.

24

Final designs will be coordinated with the Federal Aviation
Administration (FHWA) to insure that the proposed improvements are in
accordance with FAA standards for the airport.
WBKlplr

FIGURES

i, 5 IA
ak~ res o
k he 1 5 t ,1
- A Res
A T Sf. . A 1
10
70 „,elwse I Rolesville i
e $ol?, +im (jsreshar> c 9 401 yb , 1
• f
~J15i^ A 50 EWakefiel 1 1
t 2 Millbr ? Lizard Lick
/ orrisvill1 6 4 3 1U S i 64 a b Ion '
11 , 3
4 N
r 649
K ' t Rooc cdale 000
Rock en
4010
fi4 64 + 5 _
/ ` N
Apex 7 Gake ~ ~ 3 ease ~
Aubur f r
11 3' '
00 ~whill 55 It
~ + r 1 6 cCuller 1 9'
/ emgs 5 401 L 3 B '
quay-Varin Willow Springs
55
hwl,
u / yy
T LIMITS.
\ CL
Y • .a
u¢i /
rho +

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
R-2634
PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIG. 1

11 ,
@.
T-
V
N
4 T
i v _ z a ,x+ ,t K ,f 'S x°'.. ia..sy d6l
, , - ~ , i, I I W"-
" iw_ , ~ ta"w: 1 , T ~ - I I - - " , '.4, *tll
IWI 0 1 , - ~,!i-l":~a"'I"', 1, , ._~~_lr_llj~lll 11 i~,,` , , ~ -
~ 1 I k 't, 'e" 't : ~ .A ~ , , 11 " , , , , 1 471~ ~ 11, - ~t 11 ?-W- ,
,
a
~ ~
~1

~.w. .x
,a. s
nI*,, „ 4.... fi' r s a,' ' ;yqs j. i,s• t I 'V

11 x , ,
I X,
. , r # p,. ,.,.;,41 ~4y $ . X : V x i 3 S <a c y ° .2 °s<x .
N . .i , ~ 11 I , , , 4
#
µ
x
~r ~,1
I -1 - 'e
{C''
" , ,
11 II 1: s+a,.:m.. a . r •
1-
• a . . t . ' . 7r w z
K 7a v a .
I , s, a.; ~ 4.`: n
I It
e
a #rt
" { , , k T ' ' .
a : ;,1 ; * x \ ...g., . , t o'S « , , '`,.c.. n 5 " sr " e z ut ' r~ t'a +a . .r' ' s"
a ..A 5 " , , , . . , , " I *
:9,..ih k F:1'•' l : w ...J, 1 t - , 3^ . & C M , k{ ,~4 Ai. r R M + T+~'vr 3~
~ r xi.~
r
pp
I I . 6 I , ~ ~ ~ - - * -
R+:' 'v`rr. ~
O ,•2n g v°.,w e $c p'," '~'t :tsa
w i.. I -1 40 a, : (
t_ _i _ _0 , ; , I ~ I&A
g " PA t
- , , ,v 4 1,,~ , .1 ~ - , a a'a + T°t .f ' c3 .l m ! IV x t Y.v
I , 1~ _4-1_ 10"" , - It, P_ ~ A ! ,--v 1, - , k, I*-, 1, - - .
. «
a ~ END PROJEr A " `
"i
y , , r idn 't , 3- fik`' , l' S. r.1 Y• 1 ,.rr
#d
Y `aP t. Ip 4~• , ? W 4 M1ti€W.R - s g e Gtf' S
, , • I. - t,
` ''o
P_ I 101 `
r., r
«
,w 0,"
' , • .q.'~r,~ ; " i..,y 'aj 1 's' a`;: ~t,^f« ' a= . ? 1.qi ~t ea » `
'£i
r,~ .i. ',`•r;n.. ! 'w" c.: : . w::''„ ':'YV r„ i 2. 1.h''. r: `s::. g. r,m. A W ar x?-s£ g Z, h,
I 11 " ,x r . ya.. r a x v S "t.A,y J t s^ ..,t , {
s ~
4 ~ , ~M(
11
" - IV!
T m*.,. ;a 3 + _ ~f,- s ' I j" At17 =ti r ° ; ` ~z~ f
,}x 'i',->,.: °r t` 'a , r. pg e~ . .3`"' `,~s P.'R.,., •y,, ..3e'}¢,u
, - - :
a~;,,.y_ a . , ,e i, xn - • ,z "i.: , J< '.fir°; , a K s _
_ 4 -
y
^ . -
~
zt ,
~ #I0 t "
~ w r~s r A. it
' ~
11 t - ' ? , ,4 s i I ' 3 1, I
a r' `##M 13 i 11 s 1-1
~ r z IREM#. 114 ram- * ` a
#RaA
r
T_
-1 - I ~ r~
1 °
i M u

gm
" , + V+1K
f I , ~ , , , , , " , , ,~W~~, ~
fi b
t S, x
g S
j 1 , $ 1
9

o
4
,
'k' .l4
, ~ .11 11
m
, „ ~ j' {4 `
r

,
v
I ell N
4
> r=
.r
~ .~c . I - 11 ~ 1 1,,~
i :1
B
G ~,3 . _1~11 I ,

,,s '1 sue'
m.
P
- ~ 4~ 1 % I _ ~ , , I I , - , ~ ,
•
~r
_ ~o
,
_ /
v r
1
" ~ a ` I - H r " i„, _ q l.) fv A - + &; n P tom.
- , - - i, RE` I- ,,,,,,',-,r -
"a 'k I-YD "`xr t 3" .4-:.t fl .a, ^ ,S•4k''+ ° \
V
y , ~
, x t ^
fl r ,
11~~•
$ , k r a , - 9k _;,,,,ft fee, a- r' 6~ ~~1
s V 4`
rY
x
"r 'w<, b an•:.. `l
V~ Saar, z, 'a..: 2,. ,_*`e" . " : '6 A
4~( v
ems i adV~r. - ( , !i
<a.:
- , Y -
I - X' ,
y u 41, -
r4 wa= ' X, ) i.,.• '*ii - III\~;~~U\(II'}~I(Ifl ti•A:\`t ;i ( ,T't
ii
4
•iw,'~
rg.' J'; „s, ' ',m; _ 'a. M -1 „ "a'4" II,:~.~'.~IV~':~I) N~•I ONI~I ~I I',VIr~I, ;e a'r
'
~zl
i.~ti'(I{
RALEIGH DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ,
k e
I I ~ . - t 1 4- ~ ~ ~P., "4C"""-,',_ ` a, ~ I;IEASTERNBOULEVARD 101P ,
a. " r«~
` , .
- AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
' _ , A ~a„ f TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY 4 - `
I . " ~ ~ , , ~r ,
s < WAKE COUNTY
v "b" ° , R • 2634
' " °il aa`-'t "
r
° ~y, z
m
1~ h
# e r 7 . 4 0 ft 500
,
- ' FIG 2
, . ;nom , " ` , . ^ C . .,r: a . . 1-1 fix'
III. + H«' I 'r=" , I I 1 ill ml i,, ,..EVE,@~~I14~111119P111 IIIIIIIIIP:I I®1! ~,®II Illlil lllllll!111 1111111 uplllllllll#
h , r w,

FIGURE 3 R-263418.2402301

Eastern Boulevard Connector to Wake Co.
April, 1993
Northern Wake Expressway

Estimated 1999 ADT Volumes in Hundreds

Northern Wake
Eastern Boulevard Expressway

254 127 275 550

TTST- 5%
DUALS- 8% 127 275
DHV- 10%
DIR- 55% 3~O e TTST- 10%
R~ '`~0 DUALS- 6%
~Ck
DHV- 10%
s DIR- 60%

X65 3
1

Nelson Road
213
426
143
213 143'0
J
TTST- 2%
DUALS- 3%
DHV- 10%
DIR- 55%
Nelson Road
36

72 72

36

Northern Wake 143 b Q 143

Expressway 286
Eastern Boulevard

Drawing not to scale

FIGURE 3A
R-263418.2402301
Eastern Boulevard Connector to Wake Co.
April, 1993
Northern Wake Expressway
Estimated 2018 ADT Volumes in Hundreds

Northern Wake

Eastern Boulevard Expressway

478 X239 488, 976
TTST 6%
DUALS- 8% 239 488
DHV- 10%
DIR- 55% 12 TTST- 10%

DUALS- 6%
>t DHV- 10%
DIR- 60%

~6 gam,

Nelson Road
382

764
261
y 382 261
TTST- 2%
DUALS- 3%
DHV- 10%
DIR- 66%

Nelson Road
64

128 128
- 64
R
r~,? ~

Northern Wake 261 261
Expressway sot
Eastern Boulevard

Drawing not to scale

r ~

12' 24' Ss' 24' 12 12

10' 10 10' 10' all 21

EASTERN BOULEVARD

y NORTH CAROLINA DEVAR'IMENT OF
Tl(ANSVORTATION
DIVISION OF HICIIIYAYS
I'I,ANNIN(, AND 1:NVIRONhll, NTAI,
G•c~.n+++`~ I3IIANClI
EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
R - 2634
FIG.
TYPICAL SECTION 4

• Y q ~

6' 12' 12' 6' 6'

4' 4'

NELSON ROAD

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
I'RANSPORTATION
-`3 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ISIZANC;FI
EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
R - 2634
FIG.
TYPICAL SECTION 4A

Y? a ~ 00
C) m i 11
W _ o
aa=z _
Da ~II ~ •
zoo D af aod o
o _
O
wmC~ } ~W r
0 ln~ o W
_ a = j W
o 0 o a o E-~ Wd - w
U O O O O Y UQ21 Q6 W Q ~ W 6 O
w 3 C1 6~ _ E E
LL yyJJJWJJ - u
°J ~
d001
J~
LL.

\4 3 \ u/ .0

U n
u
'A \
LLJ
~bdd NO I 1t1 I ~
N~ a
M
"MOM

_ BLZ i
9bd N a 6

~ ~ SIC

s

)I` e'O

L Northern Wake Expressway
2. Realigned Lumley Road
3. Relocated Aviation Parkway
/ 4. Exiating Aviation Parkway (to be abanduned)
6. Existing Airport Boulevard and Aviation
Parkway (to be abandoned)
6. Widen B.R.1002
7. Globe Road and Nelson Road Connector
/ . _ • o S. Proposed Nelson Road Interchange (to be
v \ ® constructed by otbere at a future date,
not an Airport or DOT project)
. ' ®

• ? w • \ - - - - - - Planned' Yuture Runway
- - - - - _ - i
---------------1 2 O ''-y
' Runway 64298
000°oo~OO
n • / 1 Terminal C CD
ge Air Cargo Ramp

1 6 40
• / • 111
01 aw A to
:D:) 00 CD
1 1 Runway 6R-23L e

60

6 e 4 n11 ~ _0 1 FIGURE 6
RALEIGH-DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
/ I NNE 30, 1992

GRUNWAY CORRIDORS, PARKS, & PARK SEARCH AREAS - UMSTEAD DISTRICT

J o i `

we
: •
• I ? •
dSo 40
did,
i
Trib%Ato
6
N.. A
07. • • • , G

elf,

moo` Raleigh/Durham Q
`International
Airport

e C F ~c

%

Umstead
State Park

Grab+re o
e
0 Lake p~/,la, G`
Crabtree &
01 Park (Wake rya
County) p1p ,r
/ ~ ~f x`01 •c .
Scak:
3500 kJapprox.) '
:Jt,
r
Existing Grsenway Corridor
Neighborhood Paris Community Park Letter Designation for Green-
Search Area way Corridor Connector
Greenway Corridor
collector / - - - -
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Search Area Metro. Park FIGURE 7
Umstead District 5- 91 7/92 Raleigh Comprehensive Pion

ZONE X
r
ZONE A
n
0.
U -
Town of Cary Y.
xtraterritorial Jurisdiction m
370238 I

r_
100 - YEAR FLOOD AREA
N C Y pF
e -
C WAKE

CORPORATE
LIMITS. ZONE X
poAp 319 9
I 6aI NELSON O
M I TS I E
ZONE A' Little Brier Creek
(Basin 18, Stream IS)
319
Brier Creek
(Basin 13. Stream 14) '

Town of Cary \
J Extraterritorial

Jurisdiction
370238
~ ZONE A i 01

-

f

100 - YEAR FLOOD AREA
1 I zoNe x

l\ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
+•;TERI.,;UWAL PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
~I zoN:. BRANCH
R-2634
__1\ Town of Cary EASTERN BOULEVARD
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
370238 Wikt WAKE COUNTY
UnincorF
- - TOWN (11 `1RY 3 100 - YEAR FLOOD AREAS
I
0 feet 200 FIG.8

LtU
j,. mi . Ulf > L2u r K
Ila
w pa
•w
1 .03
ty
.40
1113 -
Iw wll mri 1'•
7 g ' Uil x~' ` to
ro.o
st i
A1 •a/j~'4, 31st ~.1"v~i` • ` -
Uu .30
' 3?ST.
na
m. I U21 8
'ARK
~s
y,,.
1
.um
Lill ~ k ~ +~~°tr. t;••r
..?,c_ ty,} S4$.;<»3"'.ayY•«s,~~y~Yh~2~~nC
00
j9 qs'. 'nL~:vL}''
t 1
5 9^~l { WON* 3532` r
Y :.4 ? `s4 ? t P of Cary M
02
1-7
A/ A
gm,
• ':G.ior !o•k ~ ~ 4 i$ r' ~ d }`3.z>>; ,uJ tl
2%9
P O
~Fg , ft~
:n :e:•,y NELSON RD.
r<•~ { Q,
MICA mokr 11
SR 1642)
00
is
1141 /jai v% of
p,M a>:y yL t-, ~ COQ' RALEIGH-DURHAM
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
cir:??ta .:;t!t?r'. ,,..,~•.,,,.-_J ra tr??,,~<,y Wr
e
1IIt ~ , e:T!Ji:,;il~•or~ f • 1 ~ i4Y7r
N:r?'`ES';!!! , :~lnY'!.; .::ra;. ; :y`3:w •tr ye. ~
w" 11
t~{1 j r:• f' I;l:;:• ljr,~L~t t
(gt
. r: jl 3111?.+ : r• G i}"i?, ~ mu
~,lr, 4+f0
10
5.
'•4 `s
• ,r..•'•'!_:u?.' ~ ,ill
1 1,r':g ~ ' lp
e!rr•. ;ti;'r!4:;?::~~;;;:rr?1;;,' I:;i? ~+d~lr?rrr,•'::,•~::-.1 b^ ~.~j;G!: ~It.:~r i;;;.
1:+?i
;:rs 1?irlrrl i?J j~1uy~.~l;
sit?. t
?~1 'Ye ® I'r(+,
s I t ~Y ' i'€€:. 1ZPt .::..>r ~,a. .`~iy,, •a'~t,E 1'ii~itiPr ~

:IijSabllib of Cory
NOTE:
h,llrlr,•,!raii?r;rr `;:"r` i!1?• X51' ' ~F4?! 11!11..., syr, iB, rt RALEIGH CORE.I
p.(?~I J~~;'' ;I;i? ...a.'L.+ r t, u~ N ~ tlli l • y'•'j~t?r
% tlltpJl l/(ljl % r. 1i i~ g w A. UMS

ir1( r ti:"11NII!lf11.~1"~ ~f'
l1y,Z :!+::•{~iJtL.. r !???°a:. 7111?............
lilt J f•I'tIs`..
{s'i.lfi"tJ'y `
. LRU 4Q
q~l c •~y/1rW ' 1
?E~:1L,N±v ~ r;:•..r,?ri IY?' ~IWG~1~lT1h11~f7
tf9r' lit n,lltdiitl'rr ! 111,,3?,•? ! r?1,1(1 1?rl%j%I;? , ~k`•' ~Z+
Tt .Y .:r;+y~ •~I lip :tl"1~~', 14~ ~ f C' ~t F .
'~'?G:;4Gt1`jr, i i' :?f ~li~l Gj;;;. , yr•(! , uu
4 ~ drl• j:
. , ~ ~ti1~6~~VNG~r~ l~ ~ ~il~ii •1'!1~~: ~~U'~'~r.lU~ f !fie, . Irmr~lrm~~>n~n~nam • J:~~':::.
J ~ r ~ 11!11•
„ >:t,,o . I, O Win.>~.,;'. Gy6.' .x.,, i•;•,}" r2>
!:r:: r:it•.,Z;a?ti'~: 1r.' u,:fL; Wt. i•• .S,•1.~ 3
t %i o• 7:•:r+ { r',fill
fry . !
p:;1, ` ••e:.' ~ .-.ltE•'d , Ff.'. 'b .,/••'<d~'' :.:>:n n5;•:^•,•.,:r °sr
l ?t;; 'sue r.::;!;r:i: rL" //n 4f w::• lir>~
i:;:: 1'•it,~~l~:.. :C>;:sh` ...1. ?(tl'} iAJ'ii?iirG•1 Vd.
,4;11 •:'~i~~>,~`o: 1?r,';° r J. I'!, V ! .
g `5
ail tt>sky. :iS•i
1. ti.:n:'<.;~:' ; 1J.1.•.a•. li:rn!!?yii!i?e'E'iF' .`it'r.'i~r•. , J i lr'
1 "S; ((,t ;..,;_j.,l, ,:..+•l.,l~. kj`;i•':. ,,!..t:!u?!?~?!?y:';;ylt MQArgy1LL[, w I~~. "Ar.
L. " St? .~.t•.,,,~,1,~. ..,..races . 3 / O '~Ly .
;,.>"•a,,, r:;1:'133,. ?Or•.251 '41 •.C ;:•i,I~r'
::::t;`:. ~ .:iiq'.. :';W,n",,, ~ f v `t45; ~'~*f.:;..~i~~is~
•';1`tl,i;~'ilill~i~;ii'!Si•. '~;}.a; ol~l,?f' `
till' :1111ii+ > US-1/NC-2
N,';. ~f,N;.l ~ . ' ~~IJu ~ r US-1 mw1~ 1] NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF t:!r
~li• 4,+• t ' <,; ! TRANSPORTATION
^~•.•:•>>.,'i':iijt is
NC-2 11444+411 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1
r 9 lPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL L
v .;I..:iJjr! rs't to
VO ?trIi4?__l:
l
RD - S~ BRANCH
• uRRt SvrLLE, ARpENT`ER ,nrii T. J~? '••s,
s1 C? C A 2 I y
>r9 jj ~ u
JAC
~1'!H`'~'d~11,!~,,.~..it!+""' ~ I 4 !p r~??'t r'j,i''•
cs: 11,x ! 4 EXISTING BIKE ROUTES
• FIG.9
i'~ 1/Ad1ARIAlRdrddi,Ml •

TABLES

September 8, 1993
Page 1

Table 1

Approximate Impacts To Plant Communities
COMMUNITY TYPE ANTICIPATED IMPACTS (ACRES)
Roadside/mowed field 19.8
Mixed pine-hardwood forest 5.0
Hardwood forest 1.7
TOTAL 26.5

Note: Values shown are based upon 250 feet of right of way.
Actual impacts will be less.

Table 2

Animals Visually Observed In The Study Area

COMMON NAME COMMON NAME
American toad American crow
bullfrog Carolina chickadee
white-tailed deer belted kingfisher
raccoon * ruby-crowned kinglet
gray squirrel * blue-gray gnatchatcher
Virginia opossum eastern bluebird
red-tailed hawk American robin
downy woodpecker red-eyed verio
northern cardinal yellow-rumped warbler
Note: denotes spoor evidence only.

Table 3

Federally Protected Species For Wake County

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS..
Haliaeetus bald eagle E
leucoce halus
Pi_coid_es borealis red-cockaded woodpecker E
Vermivora bachmanii* Bachman's warbler E
Alasmidonta herterodon dwarf-wedged mussel E
Rhus michauxii Michaux's sumac E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is threatened with extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of its range).
denotes that no specimens have been reported from Wake County for more
than 20 years.

September 8, 1993
Page 2

Table 4

Federal Candidate Species Listed For Wake County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT

Motis austroriparius southeastern bat C2 Yes
Aimophila aestivalis* Bachman's sparrow C2 No "
Elliptlo 'udithae neuse slabshell (mussel) C2 No
Elliptio lanceolata yellow lance C2 No
Fusconaia masoni atlantic pigtoe C2 No
Lasmi onA subviridis green floater C2 No
See eria diana Diana fritillary C2 Yes
butterfly
Nestronia umbellula nestronia C2 Yes
Trillium pusillum Carolina trillium C2 Yes
var. pusillum
indicates no specimen from Wake county in at least 20 years.
%2" are candidate species presently under review for federal listing for
which information indicates that listing as Endangered or Threatened
is possibly appropriate, but for which adequate data on biological
vulnerability and threat(s) are not currently known or on file to
support propose rules.

Table 5
State Protected Species For Wake County

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT

Myotis austr oriparius. southeastern bat SC Yes
Aimophila aestivalis* Bachman's sparrow SC No
Elliptio judithae neuse slabshell (mussel) E No
Elliptio lanceolata yellow lance T No
Fusconaia masoni atlantic pigtoe T No
Lasmigona subviridis green floater E No
Speveria diana Diana fritillary SC Yes:
butterfly
Nestronia umbell_ula nestronia T Yes
Trillium pusillum Carolina trillium E Yes
var. musillum
indicates no specimen from Wake county in at least 20 years.

APPENDIX

few
fr
US. Department
of Transportation Atlanta Airports District Office
Federal Aviation 1680 Phoenix Panay Suite 101
Administration Atlanta, Gei30348-~3~
APR 2 2 1992 ,
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation a
379?
P• O. Box 25201 r s
Raleigh NC 27611-5201
~~r
Dear Mr. Ward:
We have reviewed the information provided in your letters of
February 27, 1992, and March 12, 1992, concerning North
Carolina DOT projects. The following comments are referenced
by project number:
v Proiect No. 8. 2402301, TIP No. R-2634 - Eastern Boulevard
Aviation Boulevard Connector
Construction of this project may affect existing Runway 5L at
the Raleigh-Durham International Airport. Additionally, it
will affect planning for a new air carrier runway parallel to
and approximately 1000 to 1200 feet west of Runway 5L/23R.
These vital components of the airport require careful
coordination to lessen or, preferably, eliminate potential
conflicts. Accordingly, we request that you coordinate this
project with the Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority if this has
not yet been done. Additionally, we also request that you file
notification of construction at least sixty days prior to the
commencement of construction activities.
Proiect No. 9.8052026, TIP No U-1655F - Triangle Central
Parkway from SR 1973 to SR 1970
We request notification of construction of this project at
least 60 days prior to the commencement of construction
activities for airspace determination purposes.
The enclosed FAA Forms 7460-1 should be used for notification
purposes. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on these
matters. Please contact us if you have any questions about
these matters.
Sincerely,

sM. Hebert, Jr. E.
Program Manager
Enclosures

cc: RDU Airport Authority
NCDOT - Division of-Aviation
PARTNERS IN CREATING TOMORROW'S AIRPORTS

Q~MgNT OF ryF
TA1~~ ~
F , } aA United States Department of the Interior
N O
7 S
FISH AND WILDLIFE sERVrOlt
~4gcH a +$a9 distribubg to: Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Elmore -----Rale' h, 1i 6 - 726 C` E I V
Vick Brute: +1
Cline C.'r:mes
PrQvatt springeargi ? ' 992 A"
Davis
Elliott _ Stone MAR 181992
-0 F
Mr. L. J. Ward, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch ! • L ,,:r
Division of Highways
N.C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Subject: Scoping Comments for Proposed Eastern Boulevard Connector from
Aviation Boulevard to Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County, State
Project 8.2402301, TIP R-2634
Dear Mr. Ward:
This responds to your letter of February 27, 1992, requesting comments on
the proposed project. These comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is particularly concerned about
potential impacts of the proposed project upon Briar Creek and its
tributaries. Therefore, special care should be exercised in the design and
implementation of all stream crossing structures, particulrly the crossing
of the Briar Creek Flood Control Lake.
The attached page identifies the Federally-listed endangered (E) and/or
threatened (T) and/or species proposed for listing as endangered (PE) or
threatened (PT) which may occur in the proposed project vicinity. If the
proposed project will be removing pines greater than or equal to 30 years of
age in pine or pine/hardwood habitat, surveys should be conducted for active
red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees in appropriate habitat within a 1/2
mile radius of the project impact area. If red-cockaded woodpeckers are
observed within the project area or active cavity trees found, the project
has the potential to adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker and you
should contact this office for further information.
The Service's review of any environmental document would be greatly
facilitated if it contained the following information:
1) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within existing
and required additional right-of-way and any areas, such as borrow
areas, which may be affected directly or indirectly by the proposed
improvements.
2) Acreage of branches, creeks, streams, rivers or wetlands to be
filled. Wetlands affected by the proposed project should be mapped `
in accordance with the 1989 Federal Manual for Identifving and
Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
3) Linear feet of any water courses relocated.

4) Acreage of upland habitats, by cover type, which would be
eliminated.
5) Techniques which will be employed for designing and constructing any
relocated stream channels or for creating replacement wetlands.
6) Mitigation measures which will be employed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce or compensate for habitat value losses associated with any of
the proposed improvements.
„ 7) Assessments of the expected secondary and cumulative impacts of the
proposed project on fish and wildlife resources.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments to you and encourage
your consideration of them. Please continue to advise us of the progress of
this project.
Sincerely yours,

L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor
Enclosures

REVISED JANUARY 1, 1992

Wake County

Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) - E
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) - E
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) - E
Dwarf wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) - E
Bachman's warbler (Vermivora bachmanii) - E
r
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for
listing as endangered or threatened, are under status review by the Service.
These "Candidate"(Cl and C2) species are not legally protected under the
Act, and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. We
are providing the below list of candidate species which may occur within the
project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification. These
species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be protected
under the Act. In the meantime, we would appreciate anything you might do
for them.
Bachman's warbler (Vermivora bachmanii) - C2
Bachman's sparrow (Aimonhila aestivalis) - C2*
Nestronia (Nestronia umbellula) - C2
Carolina trillium (Trillium pusillum var. pusillum) - C2
Southeastern bat (Mvotis austrorivarius) - C2
Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) - C2
Yellow lance (mussel) (Ellivtio lanceolata) - C2
Atlantic pigtoe (mussel) (Pusconaia masoni) - C2
Diana fritillary butterfly (Sneveria diana) - C2
*Indicates no specimen in at least 20 years from this county.

a

i

04-09-92 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
'i~ DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
116 NEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27611
~ ~ V Fa
w

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS AQa v
N Ofr 2
MAILED TO FROM OH`GuWAYS
L.J. Ward MRS. CHRYS BAGGET
N.C. Department of Transportation DIRECTOR
Planning & Environmental Branch N C STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
'Highway Bldg./Inter-Office

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPING = PROPOSED EASTERN BOULEVARD, AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR TO NORTHERN
WAKE EXPRESSWAY (TIP #R-2634)

S AI NO 92-E-4220-0660 PROGRAM TITLE - SCOPING

THE ABOVE =PROJECT _HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING

IS SUBMITTED- C I . NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
A X) COMMENTS ATTACHED

SHOULD-YOU. HAVE ANY QUESTIONS9 PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE 19191 733-41319

C.C. REG IGN T
r

. ST a

State. of North Carolina
Department of Environent, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

James G. Martin, Governor Douglas G. Lewis
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Planning and Assessment

~ h
n ANDTM
1 MO V
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse

FROM: Melba McGee IY tl-
Project Review Coordinator

RE: 92-0660 - Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard
Connector to Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County
DATE: April 8, 1992

The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
has reviewed the proposed scoping notice. The attached comments
list and describe information that is necessary for our divisions
to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the project.
More specific comments will be provided during the environmental
review.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. The applicant is
encouraged to notify our divisions if additional assistance is
needed.

MM:bb

Attachments

cc: David Foster

RO Box 27687. Pulcikh, North Caru6na 27611 7047 Telephone I)I9-733-,376

Forestry

i a A`

N.C. - Where it all began
State of North Carolina

Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Forest Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stanford M. Adams
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Griffiths Forestry Center
2411 Garner Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
March 16, 1992

MEMORANDUM

Me1ba0TcFee .
Environ'biental Asseusmeatt-IInit.-

FROM: Don H. Robbins
Staff Forester

SUBJECT: DOT EA Scoping for the Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard
Connector to Northern Wake Expressway In Wake County, N.C.
PROJECT #92-0660

DUE DATE 3-23-92

To better determine the impact to forestry in the area of the proposed
project, the Environmental Assessment should contain the following information
concerning the proposed route for the possible right-of-way purchases for the
project:

1. The total forest land acreage that would be taken out of forest
production as a result of this project.
? 2. The productivity of the forest soils as indicated by the soil
series, that would be involved within the proposed project.

3. The impact upon existing greenways within the area of the proposed
project.

P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2

-4. The provisions that the contractor will take to sell any
merchantable timber that is to be removed. This practice is
encouraged to minimize the need for piling and burning during
construction. If any burning is needed, the contractor should
comply with all laws and regulations pertaining to debris burning.
5. The provisions that the contractor will take during the construction
phase to prevent erosion, sedimentation and construction damage to
forest land outside construction limits. Trees outside the ,
construction limits should be protected from construction activities
to avoid:

a. Skinning of tree trunks by machinery.
b. Soil compaction and root exposure or injury by heavy equipment.

C. Adding layers of fill dirt over the root systems of trees, a
practice that impairs root aeration.

d. Accidental spilling of petroleum products or other damaging
substances over the root systems of trees.
We would hope that the project would have the least impact to forest and
related resources in that area.

DHR:la

pc: Warren Boyette - CO
File

Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Planning and Assessment ? Project located in 7th floor library
Project Review Form
Project Number: County: Date: Date Response Due (firm deadline):

L d' S' Cj Z 3- L

- This project is being reviewed as Indicated below:
Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review

? Asheville ? All RIO Areas ? Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries

? Fayetteville it ? Coastal Management Water Planning
star ? Water Resources Environmental Health
? Mooresville roundwater `T"'ildlife ?Solid Waste Management
sleigh d Quality Engineer (,Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Washington Recreational Consultant Land Resources ? David Foster
?Coastal Management Consultant arks and Recreation 'other (specify)
? Wilmington ?Others Environmental Mana ment 11~v
? Winston-Salem

Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:

Response (check all applicable)

Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager. In-House Reviewer complete individual response.
? No objection to project as proposed ? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)

? No Comment ?Applicant has been contacted
? Insufficient information to complete review ? Applicant has not been contacted

r-~ ? Project Controversial (comments attached)
u Approve ? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked) ? Consistency Statement not needed

? Recommended for further development with recommendations for ? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
strengthening (comments attached) NEPA and SEPA
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive Xt her (specify and attach comments)
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attachedlauthority(ies) cited)

RETURN TO:
Melba McGee Division of Planning and Assessment by Due Date shown

State of North Carolina Reviewing Office:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources

--INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: Due Date:
9 0~ ~o - y
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Normal Process
Regional Office. Time
. PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
? facilities, sewer system extensions, & sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
E) permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply (NIA)
time, 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichever is later.
30 days
? Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary (NIA)
7 days
? Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued
prior to the installation of a well. (15 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
? Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct 3 operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days
1 Efacilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H. NIA (90 days)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be In compliance with 15A 60 days
? NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal NIA
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Grotlp
919.733.0820. (90 days)
? Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion 6 sedimentatio
? control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect.) at least 30 20 days
days before be innin activity. A fee of $30 for the first acre and $20.00 for each additional acre or art must accompany the plan. 30 days)
? The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: (30 days)
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount
? Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be permiled. The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be Issued.
? North Carolina Burning permit On-site Inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
exceeds 4 days (NIA)
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site Inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more 1 day
? counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (N/A)
should be requested at least ten days before actual burn Is planned."
90.120 days
? Oil Refining Facilities NIA (NIA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days
? Dam Safety Permit inspect construction, certify construction is according to EHNR approv-
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And (60 days)
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is neces-
sary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of $200.00 must ac-
company the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion.
K.,~ Continued on reverse

Normal Process
Time
(statutory time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS limit)
File surety bond of $5,000 with EHNR running to State of N.C. 10 days
conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon (NIA)
Permit to drill exploratory oft or gas well
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations.
? Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with EHNR at least 10 days prior to Issue of permit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application form. (NIA)
State Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include 15.20 days
descriptions 8 drawings of structure 3 proof of ownership (NIA)
of riparian property.
60 days
? 401 Water Quality Certification NIA (130 days)
55 days
1250.00 fee must accompany application (150 days)
? CAMA Permit for MAJOR development
7(2522 days
$50.00 fee must accompany application days)
? CAMA Permit for MINOR development
a Several geodetic monuments are located In or near the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Abandonment of any wells, if required, must be In accordance with Title 15A, Subchapter 2C.0100.
? Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (USTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
45 days
? Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. (NIA)
* Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority):
l~Tbt~ ~~'`y~(a1S S~i~'c•M~.lr -~'~?~-~~~~,J Go~.(~Roc~ ~-~S~ 6.~~ ~v/~r'ss~
tie-f r-s P(~6.1W tle-640'f . D'~7 /U*Is
S1E.P, 1~ -r-(cv s Go nl ~ ,N•~ST G t~1'-~CRe rt-sto &AZ"sJ e'er`-er rv
6T1~ Wit, n16 S> 'mar ~~•a-Zy ~Fr~tlwt lL S ~ou~~ r ?1~4,ra1~13/~sr >•1s /K •••~~:i t_
A3 S11*KO.fE G1~M.w-?*~~ v S~(t-r` DIL~hr.( o.1-IL*rr,

REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
• 59 Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Building
` Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville, NC 28301
(704) 251208 [phone]
? Mooresville Regional Office ? Raleigh Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Mooresville, NC 28115 Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone] [phone]
? Washington Regional Office ? Wilmington Regional Office
1424 Carolina Avenue 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Washington, NC 27889 Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone] [phone]
? Winston-Salem Regional Office
8025 North Point Blvd.
Suite 100 „nc

• Tin /yfi^1.~ "

00
c...
IAND

Sta
te of North Carolina
)"0'
• partme nvironment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G, Martin. Governor PROJECT REVIEW COiMNTS Charles H. Gardner
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Project Number: _ County:
haw ~ a 0x %k Uw-.CL4 o" :cl C~ ~r. ~r~a c ~ ~o NQaV~.~ t~^E~ lcu
Project Name: f a _ p,ro' No R 24WaQ1 i i Q ~?1e3~
U
Geodetic Survev
t~ This project will impact geodetic survev markers. N.C. Geodetic
Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 (919) 733-3836. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at (919) 733-3836.

3 - /7
Review Date

Erosion and Sedimentation Control
t 9 No comment

This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.

? If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.

The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
other (comments attached)

For more information contact the Land Quality Section at (919) 733-4574.

Reviewer Date

P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh. N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

,~x 1

70

YLOW C
yA X\ , ah
~y -4

1 \ v O/ EDWIN 54 G, w
\ c POPLII
CLARK OVERNITE
D 3 /Op4r
MORGAN / POPLIN
%
MYATT.
BED• Qv KEA
TONY Q ~ J S23
UNIUS RES TLAWN ~i R I C E
A 151 (PL) Q SCOLLLO" L 1
JOBER WK60 FAS
SHILOH GAST0 o NGUS 2 (D)
9
R W M p© KB ENO 9 NORLEE FARLESS
KOPP S VIEW REBE~ CONTROL A2. ~
ERMAN OZ FARMRIDGE FARLES
At I . AERO 2 WARD
z 150 KNIGHTS
A189 (P RA DELL CONTROL OPTICAL
V1, ~
RV 537 WK2 ~T ES PL 9 J~~~
~fF F-S
a o LAWRENCE& BELINDA D LAO
B 18I9LE ; V, Raleigh~DUrha117R1 A Cqr~ \ ~y ~Op
MOBILES:~'•"'~' ~ 40 '
: Airport
:MORRISVILLE OLD(0) PINEC EST
DRIVE 2 70 / TRAI ING
` POP. 251. SCRUB: " ;y' LIVEO K
(b' BRACE EBENEZER ~O`/ PIS
'STIRRUP
A N C H D R '{i;: ~:r ;:•r.:•:: •i' ;.;y;:ri;:~.•::?.? '~O,Q ~ ~C` :j.C /
UNK Cr, FURNITURE -eOI -eq
150 /
EATAN Tq C cOC v4, WOOODSLAN C1,
~'cRge :WILLIAM B. v~ <F ~Fw SR NI
ANN AKE G,Q ~O9 Q
9} WESTLAKE

. e r A~tt

`rte w. '

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary March 27, 1992 Director

MEMORANDUM

To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorneg4)

From: Eric Galamb

Subject: Water Quality Checklist for EA/EIS/Scoping Documents
Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard Connector to
Northern Wake Expressway
Wake County
State Project DOT No. 8.2402301, TIP #R-2634
EHNR # 92-0664, DEM WQ # 49"
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
EA/EIS/Scoping documents:
A. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?

B: Please identify the borrow locations.

C. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project.
The stream classsifications should be current.
D. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations
/relocations.

E. Number of stream crossings.

F. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and tempory)
to be employed.
G. Will permanent spill catchbasins be utilized? If so,
identify the responsible party for maintenance.

H. Efforts employed to minimize interrupting water and
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
7041251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919946c,481 919/395-3900 919/8967007
Pollution Prevention Pays
PO. 13o\ 29535 Raleigh, North Carolina 276-260535 1elerhonr 919733-7015
Equal Opporwiti v Athrmauvc A.nnii I -pl: -

sanitary sewerage.
I. Wetland Impacts
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying
and delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat
losses.
v) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
vi) Total impacts of wetland impacts.
vii) List the 401 General Certification numbers
requested from DEM.

checklis.sco
cc: Eric Galamb

r

7 R ^
`L
APp :992

Gr v L
c r -=C J.f0OFFICE
A
Jt -t
April 3, 1992
,r

MEMORANDUM

TO: North Carolina State Clearinghouse
Department of Administration
FROM: Janie S. Archer
National Flood Insurance Program
North Carolina Division of Emergency Managment

SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Review
State # 92-E-4220-0660
Aviation Boulevard/Northern Wake Expressway
Comments: This project is located in Special Flood Hazard Area.
All structures within the floodplain area must be
elevated or comply with the Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance of the community. Detailed information may be
obtained from the county/town.
For information purposes the Commission is advised that
on July 24, 1990, Governor Martin signed Executive Order
123, a Uniform Floodplain Mangement Policy, which must
be followed for development on any site.

''1

q.r

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

James G. Martin, Governor Division of Archives and History
Panic Dorsey, Secretary Wiliam S.:Prcer;i4 ec~

' September 19, 1991

MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward,.P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation

FROM:
David Brook, Deputy Stets
Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Eastern Boulevard from Aviation Boulevard to Northern
Wake Expressway, Wake County, R-2634, 8.24023019
RS-9219(1), ER 92-7261

Thank you for your memorandum of September 4, 1991, concerning the above
project.
Most of the project area was surveyed for the expansion of RDU back in
the 1970s. While sites are in the area, none are eligible for the
National Register. We have no reason to believe that the remaining
portions of the project will affect National Register-eligible sites.

We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures
of historical or architectural importance located within the planning
area.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
r
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. Robin Staucil will
be on vacation and not attend the meeting.
DB:s1v
cc: B. Church be: Highway
Claggett/Shattuck/Hall
Southern/Di Sec4e %fll~
oun .
IF

NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT, P&E

MEMORANDUM

TO : ~i r ~ 1 ~ (a~• tn/

FROM: Tom Padgett, Archaeologist
Environmental Unit
SUBJECT: Archaeological Input Request, Project -

DATE: 41121
/ r
The checked items below concern the status of your project
input request:

This project is currently scheduled for completion to
meet your requested due date. If any complications
arise the project archaeologist will contact you.
Due to current workload, it is unlikely that this
project will be completed by your requested due date-.
Please reevaluate your timetable or have the Branch
Manager or Assistant Manager assign a priority to this
project.
We are holding your project request until we receive
SHPO scoping comments. Please forward when available.

The following information was not included in your
project input request. Please provide:

Project work order number.
Project location map.

Project scoping comments from SHPO.

Cross-section, length, width of right of way.

Topographic mapping.

V This project has been cleared by the SHPO for Section
106 compliance. If you need a copy of the compliance
documentation, please see me.

Town of Cary

North Carolina
27-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
March 25, 1992

Ms. Pat White
Triangle J Council of Governments
P.O. Box 12276
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Subject: Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard Connector to
Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County, Project
Number 8.2402301, TIP Number R-2634

Dear Ms. White:

I am writing on behalf of the Town of Cary to provide
comments with regard to the proposed extension of Aviation
Boulevard to connect to the Northern Wake Expressway.
.The proposed extension of Aviation Boulevard from
Aviation Parkway northward to the Northern Wake Expressway
is within the Town of Cary's extraterritorial zoning
jurisdiction. Much of the property within this area is
owned by the Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. Other
properties under private ownership in this area are
designated as industrial development on the Town of Cary
Comprehensive Growth Plan.
The extension of Aviation Boulevard as described as a
part of this project is for the construction of a four (4)
lane median-divided freeway with an approximate 250 foot
right of way. The design of this facility is such that it
can accommodate a high volume of traffic between the
Northern Wake Expressway and other main thoroughfares. The
roadway will also serve as a primary access from the north
to the Raleigh-Durham International Airport.
The information provided by the N.C. Department of
Transportation designated that the project would have a
grade separation at the project's proposed intersection with
Nelson Road (SR 1642). It was also indicated that an
interchange analysis would be accomplished as a part of this
* project but any interchange construction is beyond the scope
of this project. However, the Greater Raleigh Urban Area
Thoroughfare Plan designates an interchange for Aviation
Boulevard at Nelson Road. Inclusion of the proposed
interchange will be needed to provide access from other
thoroughfares within this area to the Northern Wake
Expressway and Raleigh-Durham International Airport. The
Town strongly urges consideration of funding for an
interchange at this location as a part of the construction
of this project.
CAflY
316 North Academv Street P.O. Bo\ 1147 Cary, North Carolina 27512-1147
[phone] An Equal Opportunith Employer [phone] Fax RECYCLES

Ms. Pat White
March 25, 1992
Page 2

The Town of Cary currently has a wastewater pump
station along the north side of Nelson Road adjacent to the
Briar Creek flood control lake. This wastewater pump station
provides sanitary sewer service to existing development
within this area. Also, extending along Nelson Road is an
eight (8) inch force main from the aforementioned wastewater
pump station. Additionally, a twelve (12) inch water line
exists along Nelson Road providing fire protection and water
service to development within this area. The design of this
roadway project should accommodate continued service of the
utility infrastructure serving the existing development.
I trust that this letter will provide an overview of
the comments from the Town of Cary related to the proposed
extension of Aviation Boulevard. Should you have any
questions or require any additional information which I may
provide, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Si cer ly,

L
S. Douglas Spell, P.E.
Town Engineer
SDS/ba

cc: James L. Westbrook, Jr., Town Manager
William B. Coleman, Jr., Assistant Town Manager
Glenda Toppe, Director of Planning and Development
Ronald D. Singleton, P.E., Director of Utilities

101673

C i t J Of a l e ig h ApR ::9 L1992

5Vorth Carolina Di 7 `a
~!D 0F
HIGH YS
April 6, .1992 4;&E
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Ward:

SUBJECT: Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard Expressway
Wake County, NCTIP Project # R=2634

Pursuant to your February 27, 1992 letter requesting information
on the referenced project, the following comments are provided by
the City of. Raleigh for your consideration. These comments are
not listed in an order to indicate priority or relative signifi-
cance.
Facility Name - Aviation Parkway

In 1990, the Greater Raleigh Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan was
amended in the vicinity of the Raleigh-Durham (RDU) Airport to
reflect changes in nearby roadway system plans brought about by
studies such as the Northern Wake Expressway Environmental Impact
Study. The current thoroughfare plan no. longer refers to the
subject facility as Eastern Boulevard. It is now referred to as
proposed Aviation Parkway. This nomenclature is based upon the
premise that the Airport's eventual third major runway will
likely be constructed in the location of the existing road paral-
leling the runways and, as such, that road segment would cease to
exist. To reduce possible confusion, it is suggested that the
proposed multi-lane thoroughfare currently being evaluated by
your department be referred to as proposed Aviation Parkway and
the existing two-lane road be referred to as Old Aviation Park-
way.
Comprehensive Plan
The City's Comprehensive Plan designates the area served by the
proposed Aviation Parkway as the Triangle Regional Center, which
is considered appropriate for the largest scale of high intensity
mixed use development. Distinctive features of regional centers

OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Recycled Paper

Future Aviation Parkway Comments
April 6, 1992

are a large employment base (over 40,000 jobs), regional transit
hubs, major retail and cultural centers, and a high visibility
and scale. By the year 2010, over 100,000 jobs are expected to
be located, in the area between and including RDU airport and the
Research Triangle Park (RTP).
Proposed Aviation Parkway is designated as a Secondary Arterial
Major Thoroughfare. Recommended design standards include provi-
sions for three travel lanes in each direction and a median of
thirty feet or greater in width. Between the proposed Northern
Wake Expressway and the Airport, this facility is identified as a
proposed freeway, having full control of access.
Design Adequacy
Since the area served by this facility is targeted for substan-
tial urban development, it is strongly recommended that this
project be designed such that ample additional traffic capacity
can be readily provided in the future. This is particularly
important on underpasses which cannot be widened once built
without prohibitive expense and traffic disruption. Provisions
for future High-Occupancy Vehicle lanes should be considered.
This would provide improved access to the Airport and the devel-
oping RDU/RTP employment center.
Capital Area greenway System

The Capital Area Greenway is a multi-functional linear park'
system that encompasses many of the creeks and streams within
Raleigh's jurisdiction. The completed system would comprise
approximately 4500 acres with over 200 miles of trails. The
current system contains over 1100 acres and 31 miles of developed
trail.
The Brier Creek greenway corridor includes the Brier Creek Flood
Control lake west of the Raleigh/Durham International Airport.
This major greenway corridor may also provide future linkage with
Durham County. An overpassing bridge accommodating greenway
trails on both sides of Brier Creek is recommended. A bridge
structure should provide a minimum of 15 feet horizontally and 10
feet vertically to accommodate each greenway trail. If a culvert
treatment is utilized, adequate lighting should be provided and
the boxes should be placed above the 100 year flood line.
Water and Sewer Facilities
The City of Raleigh has no existing or planned water or sewer
facilities in the project corridor; however, the Town of Cary and
the Raleigh Durham Airport may. Close attention should be given
.to areas where the proposed Aviation Parkway would cross water
transmission lines or major sewer mains. Flows in these facili-
ties should not be interrupted. Overburden due to the roadway's
construction might require encasement or relocation of these
systems.
2

Future Aviation Parkway Comments
April 6, 1992

Aesthetic Considerations
Since this roadway may provide the first impression to area
visitors upon leaving the airport, the aesthetics of Aviation
Parkway should be an important element of its design. Architec-
tural elements should be innovative and consistent, desirably
matching the designs to be used for the planned reconstruction of
the airport interchanges by the RDU Airport Authority.
The design of the landscape should be a part of a comprehensive
design approach for this project. Color, when used in the land-
scape, should be applied in concentration at the major inter-
changes. Consideration should be given in design to utilizing
bifurcated roadbeds, allowing each to vary independently to
reduce cut and fill requirements and minimize wetland encroach-
ment.
Schedule

According to NCDOT staff, the current schedule of construction of
this facility is at least four years behind that of the nearby
Northern Wake Expressway (NWE). It is strongly recommended that
the schedule be accelerated so that this project's opening co-
incides with the opening of the NWE from US 70 to I-40.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important trans-
portation improvement. If we can provide further assistance;
please advise.

Sincerely,

empsey E. Benton,
City Manager

deb/mh/ej

r

3

R D U RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY
P. O. Box 80001, RDU Airport, North Carolina 27623 / 919-840-2100
Telefax / 919-840-0175
JOHN C. BRANTLEY WAKE COUNTY DURHAM RALEIGH DURHAM COUNTY
AIRPORT DIRECTOR G. SMEDES YORK F. V. ALLISON, JR. LUCY H. BODE RONALD A. GREGORY
CHAIRMAN VICE CHAIRMAN SECRETARY TREASURER
EUGENE B. HARDIN,, JR. WILLIAM S. MILLS S. TONY JORDAN, JR. ORGE H. CONKLIN
w
March 9, 1992
4149
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E. fp
Manager 799?
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation 4y, ~YgrOF
P.O. Box PICH Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:

This letter is in response to your February 27 letter to Mr. John
Brantley regarding the proposed Aviation Boulevard Connector to the North
Wake Expressway.
With respect to this project there are no environmental permits or
environmental approvals issued by the Airport Authority. We have reviewed
our files and find no recent environmental investigations of the project
area which would be useful. As you are probably aware the project impacts
Crabtree Creek Watershed Reservoir 20A. I suggest you contact Wake County
regarding the Reservoir.
Because of the proximity of the proposed roadway to existing and
planned runways at the Airport, it will be necessary for design of the
roadway to be coordinated with the Authority; furthermore, since a large
portion of the project is on Airport property an Easement Agreement will be
necessary.
I appreciate you providing the opportunity to comment on this
important project. If you need any additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 840-2100.

Sincerely,

David R. Powell
Assistant Director for
Facility Development

DRP/gm
cc: 70109.1 State
10049.1

SV

2a ~A9
COUNTY OF WAKE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA ! X
49
CO~+ MNITY DEVELOP11ENT SERVICES V' 9?
TELEPHONE (919) 856-6170 1q~ O,c
4t716
RPISC
March 27, 1992
r

Mr. L.J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201
Subj: Eastern Blvd., Aviation Blvd. Connector to
Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County
Project No. 8.2402301, TIP No. R-2634

Dear Mr. Ward:

This letter is in response to your solicitation for comments regarding the
above referenced project and its proposed impact on the Brier Creek Reservoir,
Structure No. 20A of the Crabtree Creek Watershed Project.
As you are aware, Wake County is currently involved with the development
of the Crabtree Creek Flood Control Project. The Crabtree Project as planned
calls for the construction of eleven (11) flood water retarding structures
located along Crabtree Creek and its tributaries. The primary purpose of the
project is to provide flood control to portions of western Wake County and
highly developed areas within the City of Raleigh. To date, ten (10) of the
eleven (11) flood control structures have been completed and are presently
providing the function and effectiveness expected.
As shown on the project location map for Eastern Blvd. it is apparent that
a portion of this highway will pass through Structure No. 20A. The items that
we believe must be addressed during the evaluation of the environmental impacts
of this project are as follows:
r
Flood Storage Capacity - As previously noted, the primary purpose of the
Crabtree Project is flood control. To achieve a desired level of flood
protection, each structure has been designed to provide flood storage.
The total project flood protection level is achieved through the
cumulative effect of each structure's flood storage capabilities. Any
reduction in an individual structure's stage/storage relationship, as a
result of road embankment fill or bridge abutment fill, will adversely
impact the overall project flood protection level. In addition, the

Post Office Box 550, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Mr. L.J. Ward, P.E., Manager
March 27, 1992
Page Two

alteration of an upstream structure's stage/storage relationship could
adversely effect the intended function of a downstream structure. Certain
design measures will be necessary to minimize alterations of stage/storage
relationships.
Sediment Storage - A secondary function of the Crabtree Project is
sediment containment. The permanent pool of each structure is designed
a
for sediment deposition. Appropriate sediment erosion control and water
management measures should be implemented during the construction phase of
this project to avoid shortening the design life of Structure No. 20A
through accelerated sediment deposition.
Please be advised that the conveyance of all necessary rights of way will
be contingent upon review and approval of plans and specifications by Wake
County and the USDA-Soil Conservation Service for that portion of the Eastern
Boulevard Project that will be located within the project limits of Structure
No. 20A. It should also be noted that any modification to Structure No. 20A
shall be performed in accordance with the North Carolina Dam Safety Law. In
order to expedite the review process I would encourage you to contact the
County and SCS early in the design phase for this project.
We appreciate the opportunity to offer comments on this project and are .
most willing to meet and discuss these concerns. Please advise us of any
future action concerning this project.
Sincerely,

David P. Proper
Contracting Officer
DPP/d

c: USDA - Soil Conservation Service

Town of Cary
_ North Carolina

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
July 9, 1990

Dr. Larry R. Goode, P.E.
N.C. Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh NC 27511-5201

SUBJECT: Proposed Eastern Avenue (Aviation Parkway
Ext.fTnsion); Project # R-2634

Dear Dr. Goode:

During recent months, Town Staff and representatives of
the N.C. Department of Transportation have discussed
thoroughfare facilities within the northern jurisdiction of
the Town of Cary. These facilities have included the North
Wake Freeway,*Eastern Avenue (Aviation Parkway Extension),
as well as other surrounding thoroughfares. -
The N.C. Department of Transportation is currently in
the process of designing the proposed extension of Eastern
Avenue from the North Wake Freeway southward to Nelson Road.
This thoroughfare extension is in conjunction with the
design of the North Wake Freeway by engineering
consultants. This subject was previously discussed as a
part of my March 29, 1990 correspondence and your April 18,
1990 response.
The current design of Eastern Avenue designates a grade
separated crossing of Nelson Road rather than the
construction of an interchange. However, the N.C.
r Department of Transportation had previously concurred of
"the need for the Durham-Airport Connector with access at
Nelson Road and that the precise location and type of access
cannot be defined without further study." I have included a
copy of correspondence transmitted on this project
addressing the Nelson Road interchange. Based on this
information, the approval by the Cary Town Council of
thoroughfare revisions in the area of the Town's northern
jurisdiction stipulated the provision of an interchange at
this location.

316 North Acadernv Street P. O. Box 1147 Care.- North Carolina 27512-1147
1010% AAOAWVY L...

Dr. Larry R. Goode, P.E.
Page 2
July 9, 1990

The construction of the North Wake Freeway between
Interstate 40 and U.S. 70 is necessary to supplement
vehicular traffic demands in this area. Similarly, proper
thoroughfare facilities will. be required to supplement
access and service for this area. Supplemental access will
be required to the Raleigh/Durham International Airport, a
proposed Sports Complex, as well as other surrounding land
uses. The current proposal for acc::5zi ~o tLe coni.clle%d
access facilities would require vehicles to travel more than
three (3) miles out of the way to access the North Wake
Freeway or Eastern Avenue.
On June 14, 1990, Mr. James Goodmon of Capitol
Broadcasting Company presented to the Cary Town Council a
proposal for the development of Triangle Central Park. This
proposal included the development of a major Sports Complex
that could accommodate professional soccer, ice hockey, and
tennis facilities, as well as an amphitheater and indoor
arenas. I have enclosed a schematic drawing showing these
proposed facilities.
The construction of an interchange at the crossing of
Eastern Avenue and Nelson Road would also seem imperative to
provide access for the proposed Sports Complex development
to the controlled access facilities. Without this
interchange, traffic using the Complex would be forced to
travel approximately three (3) miles to access the major
facilities of Interstate 40, the North Wake Freeway or
Eastern Avenue. Similarly, the other existing and proposed
land uses in this area are deprived of reasonable access
without this interchange.
The provision of an interchange at the crossing of
Eastern Avenue and Nelson Road should be included as a part
of the current design and construction associated with
project number R-2634. This interchange will greatly assist
the controlled access thoroughfares serving this area by
distributing traffic demands and providing a much more
reasonable access point serving these facilities.

Dr. Larry R. Goode, P.E.
Page 3
July 9, 1990

The Town requests the N.C. Department of Transportation
to comply with their earlier determination for the present
need of an interchange at this location. A detailed study
should be initiated on the location and type of interchange
such that the proposed construction should incorporate.the
interchange rather than delaying its construction until a
future date when significant congestion necessitates the
interchange. .
Thank you for your consideration of the items discussed
herein. I look forward to your response on this issue.

S' cer ly,

S. Douglas Spell, P.E.
Town Engineer

SDS/ee

cc: Mayor Roka E. Booth, Town of Cary
James L. Westbrook, Jr. Town Manager
Thomas J. Harrelson, Secretary of Transportation
George Wells, State Highway Administration
J. Thomas Peacock, NCDOT Roadway Design Unit
Blake Norwood, Thoroughfare Planning Branch
Debi Hutchings, NCDOT Thoroughfare Planning Branch
James Goodmon, Capitol Broadcasting Company
John Brantley, RDU International Airport

jack ward.. Manager
Planning and Research
G Room 462, Hwy Building
.z

"I tfg Q~jb
_ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
_~r,_r . r_•; DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
.bt rrt
JAMES G. MARTI...,.F- THOMAS J. HARRELSON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
September 18, 1991

MEMORANDUM TO: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch

FROM: Curtis B. Yates
Bicycle Coordinator
SUBJECT` Scoping Meeting for Eastern Boulevard, from Aviation Boulevard to
Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County, TIP R-2634

In your memorandum of September 4. 1991, you requested comments regarding the scoping
of Eastern Boulevard in Wake County.

The attached map, NC-2 Mountains-to-Sea, indicates that the portion of Eastern Boulevard
proposed to coincide with SR 1002 is an existing signed and mapped NC Bicycling Highway. In
addition, the interstate bicycling highway, US-1, runs from the Virginia state line to the South
Carolina state line and follows the SR 1002 corridor in the same location as the proposed
Eastern Boulevard alignment.
SR 1002 has been designated for bicycle travel due to the scarcity of other suitable roadways
in this part of Wake County. It would be difficult to relocate bicyclists to an acceptable
alternative roadway nearby.

The Bicycle Program recommends that plans for Eastern Boulevard include bicycle safety
accommodations from the junction with SR 1002 southward to the end of the project. The
proposed 4-lane divided freeway should include wide paved shoulders at least 4 feet in width.
the minimum paved shoulder width recommended by AASHTO when the shoulders are
intended for bicycle use.

Please contact Tom Norman, Bicycle Facilities Planner, at 733-2804, if there are any
further questions regarding bicycle safety accommodations for the proposed Eastern
Boulevard.
CBY/jc

Attachment

An Equal opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

MOUN' AINS
I Bicycle Laws and Safety Tips
In North Carolina the bicycle is legally classified as a vehicle. This means
that bicyclists have full rights and responsibilities on the roadway and are TO SEA
>s subject to the regulations governing the operation of a motor vehicle. North
Carolina traffic laws require the rider of a bicycle to:
ride on the right, in the same direction as other moving traffic
a obey all traffic signs and signals, including stop and yield signs and
one-way directional signs;
0 use signals to communicate Intended movements;
I= Stg g yield to pedestrians and emergency vehicles;
SIMI ~ equip the bicycle with a front lamp visible from 300 feet and a rear
¢ reflector or lamp which Is visible from a distance of 200 feet at night;
II Ion ~
In addition, bicycles are prohibited from all Interstate highways.
Traveling by bicycle can be an exhilarating experience, but requires a
great deal of care on the part of the cyclist. Motor vehicle drivers often
do not see bicyclists on the road and many do not realize that the bicyclist
has a legal right to be there. It K Important, therefore, to ride defensively
? 4 ¢ and In a predictable manner. The bicycle always loses in a conflict with a
car. Stay alert and keep safe.
To insure a sate trip along the back roads of North Carolina, please note
g the following suggestions:
#t 0 always wear a bicycle helmet;
c avoid riding at night, especially in rural areas,
1 • when riding in a group, ride single file,
do not ride during periods of low visibility, particularly
at dusk, in dense fog or during heavy rain,
ado not attempt trips which are beyond your capabilities,
>e~ swear bright clothing for visibility; NORTH CAROLINA
0 he courteous to other driven; keep traffic flowing by
helping them pass you in a safe manner. r.
11111/1111~~~IIIIIIIIIII111ttIgI1t111t
,~futtllllllllll!!t!!11 lot
off
N
W "This guide is published by the Department of Transportation as an aid to bicyclists. ' III 1
? Z$ The Department of Transportation in no manner warrants the safety of the highways 1
E indicated on these maps for use by bicyclists. These roads are suggested only as more III'
Z suitable than others for use by bicyclists as connecting routes. All roads suggested
J are regular roads of the highway system used by automobiles and trucks. with no
special lanes provided for bicycles. As no separate lanes are provided for bicycles and
therefore are dangerous for use by bicyclists. the bicyclist assumes the risk for his
own safety when using the routes indicated on these maps."
a
It is urged that no one under 15 years of age attempt to ride all or any portion of these
routes without adult supervision. BICYCLING HIGHWAYS

1
I
Bicycling Highways Using This Guide
North Carolina is an ideal place to bicycle tour. Climate, terrain and the The information presented in this guide has been compiled to help you pre-
many miles of pleasant country roads combine to provide an exciting trip for pare for and take a bicycle trip along one of the North Carolina "Bicycling High-
every type of bicyclist long-distance tourist, week-end rider or day tripper. ways" routes. Included Is information on state laws which pertain to bicycles, N
safety tips, weather Information, sources for additional tourist information, a q
Many people are unaware of the unlimited cycling opportunities in North campground directory and a set of strip maps detailing the route. d
Carolina. For this reason, the Department of Transportation Bicycle Program .r n 9
created a system of "Bicycling Highways", routed along 3,000 miles of lightly These maps provide a wealth of information. To orient you to your general voc v+
traveled back roads throughout the state. Ten different routes have been location, the road network, prominent physical features, cities and towns and Ip r
developed, selected according to strict criteria based on the safety needs of county boundaries are shown. A north arrow and scale of miles/kilometers are , cc Y v
cyclists. These "Bicycling Highways" routes generally parallel major high- also included. The actual route you follow is highlighted with color. An en- $ W v ,o e
ways, thus offering a good alternative to those busy roads. largement of any section of the route which is confusing or difficult to follow ~C $ A N
u c 15
is shown in a special Inset on the appropriate map segment. Match lines are Z
i~z
provided to show how the segments of the route fit together. If another "Bi- M m
r
cycling Highways" route intersects the route you are following, It Is Identified ;.e
with dashed lines in color and the appropriate map series/segment number is F ^.2
Mountains to Sea shown.
From Murphy,to Manteo, the extremes of North Carolina---that's where this All roads which are a part of the route or which Intersect the route are num-
700-mile route takes you. On the way you'll pass the loftiest peaks east of the bered. To. help differentiate the numbers of the secondary roads which are a
Rockies, traverse portions of the Blue Ridge Parkway, then drop 2,000 feet from part of the route from those which are not, the numbers of the secondary roads
the Blue Ridge escarpment to the rolling foothills of the piedmont. Quiet lanes which you follow are enclosed in a rectangle ( 1342 US and NC numbered
take you through lush farm country to most of the major cities of the state. highways which are a part of the route are not differentiated in this way. On b v
Once past Raleigh, the Ragland of the coastal lain makes the ride to the coast r
P the road, secondary road numbers can be found on posts at all intersections. ;
seem easy. Seventy miles from the end of the route you have the choice of These numbers are small and sometimes obscure, so look carefully. Also import.
taking the ferry to Ocracoke and the Outer Banks or continuing to Manteo. ant to note is that although you may be going straight, secondary road numbers `o_ ; a
Either way, you can't lose. Wide Atlantic beaches are your reward at the end can change at county lines, major Intersections and sometimes when going
of the trip. through a town. i 4 8+
a
m
The Mountains to Sea route is de- ^ 3 g' L
Much additional information pertinent to your safety, travel needs and interests Z ut « "
si nated as NC Bike Route 2. Signs sn ~ N
9 it highlighted in color on the maps. This information includes the locations of .6 ry q. I lS
like the one to the right mark the country stores ( A full service towns with motel or inn accommodations, laundro- T c C, z
way. But don't put your maps away, mats, supermarkets, restaurants, post offices, banks, etc. and hazardous M
just in case a sign is missing. Other- w areas Special pictographic symbols mark the location of bicycle shops, a o L Q u
wise you could find yourself a long • /0 campgrounds, recreation areas, historic sites, and other points of interest. gg °D Y
way off the route or on a road not J o g 2
9 m
suited for cycling. Narrative information is provided for each map segment to explain or expand
the information symbolized on the map. Included is a general description of the
terrain, the overall distance of each segment; an assessment of roadway condi-
tions, potentially hazardous areas, noting approximate distance of any problem;
lop availability of services along the route or within reasonable biking distance of the
route, bike shop locations; and, descriptive information on each point of interest.
C o
A 0Vs
E v e: 0
This guide was produced by the North Carolina Bicycle Program through the efforts of: L a
Curtis B. Yates . Bicycle Coordinator 12 EE
Mary Paul Meletiou • Assistant Bicycle Coordinator C O H ^
Bruce Burgess - Cartographer
Mark Smith - Graphic Designer rr i- ^r v' n
Joanne Cavallo - Secretary p X Z q c
r v
We welcome your comments or further questions. Contact: Z q Z .2 S 3S
Bicycle Program C ' ti-
North Carolina Department of Transportation LL t! O UM a
P O Boot 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
6,000 copies of this map set were produced at a cost of $1.08 per set. [phone]

RouteC 19os , r t•, ss
202P I926 ' 4 I Ma C-4 1
\ 1118 54 1 34tS 1831 ` •
906 FALLS' LADE a
• , : i. % + 190
1
URHAM C0.. • • ~ • 50 98 191 I`
/ YOUNGSVILLE J
WJN` C 1831 LL'
Q .teat ( 1116.
• - 197; `-F" ~ • i' • - /
`t;E ~M ; , '1839 y IA >
751 w•
y } 16` laaa 1 1105
( ,113 96
1 M . 2 ® 1831 Af 0
1 ~b BA ^rI

_ • . • 16 , 2005 f K ORES • 110
HA C ~ ~ • • ~ ~ 301. ez 1e30 iAllS 200° ~ ~
IF on
AKi}.\ laze 005 LA E ALLS
C PENTER - 1 1926 SIX' 9e
2000 1102
1621 \ 40 i Is as
• ~?1atc!:.... 1101
00 ~ ~ rat • . .hi::~ri:::. i ~ I ~
• o -/7 J R VILLE r• t? 'a.. 1922 2006 2049 ~
• 1615 1613 / 54 1945
S
G E F CO.
1 RMESVIIL AK CO.
lEV 5s UP 1615
2030 1~ a
1601
R0U C 1003 1103
64 Map to- / 005
loll , 401
1613 / _j \2,224 f 2224
ro11 i
/ .
1 1300 1 0 I 2 3 a
1011 1010 64 MILES l
1009 1313 ? Z l` N 0 ' 2 3 4 5_^ t_ 2309
i E E KILOMETER -1
A¦~ d the executive mansion with its gables and balconies, its spacious
New Tryon D hails and reception rooms, its grand stairway and sixteen-loot
Umstead State Park ceilings is a gem from a by-gone era. Tours are available daily,
This 5,000 plus acre park offers camping, boating, fishing, nature Tuesday through Friday from 10 a.m. -12 noon, Octoberthrough
study and hiking, with approximately 15 miles of trails. May.
2D Raleigh Historic Sites Other sites of historic significance Include Mordecai Historic
Park, a restoration of an eighteenth century country manor
During much of the colonial period, North Carolina was without complete with kitchen garden: Oakwood historic district, a
a designated capital city. Governors generally lived in their own al area near the Governor' s Mansion, which provides a
Gwwr l DescriPt~+ homes: legislators moved from place to place, first meeting in residentiglimpseal a the past with many restored period homes; the
iently rolling hills are interspersed with flat stretches in this private homes, then in courthouses when available. In 1722, loto .its
.egment of the route as you begin the transition from the Edenton was fixed as the capital, but years passed before any Joel impressive Lane e House, Gothic oldest Revival house in structure built Raleigh; in and the Christ rist Church, an
piedmont to the coastal plain of North Carolina. governmental facilities were provided. By then the state's center of population had shifted southward, and the government again O North Carolina State Museums
top-
Approximately 43 miles/69 kilometers. became migratory. Various, other efforts to establish a seat of The North Carolina Museum of Art is one of the nation's top
government failed until New Bern was selected in 1766. Tryon ranked art museums and boasts of the finest collection in the
Palace was built there to house the governor, and as a meeting Southeast. Among its treasures are impressive collection of
Roadway (p fli l' m place for the government representatives. A few years later when Italian paintings, one of the best
Most of the roads in this segment are of a rougher pavement type New Bern became exposed to attack during the American Renaissance collections of and Spanish earlier still life paintings the country, a strong
but are in excellent condition and are well-maintained. Revolution, the government took to the roads once again. Tryon representation of Dutch and Flemish 17th century works, as well
Palace was neglected and, in 1798, was ravaged by lire. as a fine group of English portraits.
Ha~a/dlt7laf aNtl Meanwhile, the center of population had shifted westward in The Museum of Natural History began in 1879. Fossils and other
. w rhnrornra here Weer. a site in Wake County was selected to become the seat at of rarer items are exhibited to show the animal and the plant li'

R EL OC A T ION REPORT North Carolina Department of Transportation
_X_ E.I.S. _ CORRIDOR _ DESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PROJECT: 8.2402301 COUNTY: Wake Alternate
_L of -2-- Alternate
I.D. NO.: R-2634 F.A. PROJECT: N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Eastern Blvd - Aviation Pkwv connector-to Northern Wake xpr sawav

ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of Minor-
Displacee Owners Tenants Total sties 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Individuals
Families 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Businesses 1 0 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLINGS AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20M NA $ 0-150 NA

ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 0 20-40M NA 150-250 NA
YES NO EXPLAIN ALL 'YES' ANSWERS 40-70M 0 250-400 1 40-70M NA 250-400 NA
X 1. Will special relocation 70-100 0 400-600 0 70-100 NA 400-600 NA
services be necessary
X 2. Will schools or churches be 100 UP 0 600 UP 0 100 UP NA 600 UP NA
affected by displacement
X 3. Will business services still TOTAL 0 1
be available after project
x 4. Will any business be dis- REMARKS (Respond by Number)
placed. If so, indicate size
type, estimated number of 3. No effect on general business community is
employees, minorities, etc. predicted.
X 5. Will relocation cause a
housing shortage 4.. one business has a small building and many sd,mi-
X 6. Source for available hous- trailers parked on it's lot. Though no proposed
ing (list) R/W lines were marked on plans, it is evident
X 7. Will additional housing that it would be affected by at least a partial
programs be needed take.
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing
be considered 6. MLS, newspapers. Plenty of housing available in
X 9. Are there large, disabled, all price ranges.
elderly, etc. families
ANSWER THESE ALSO FOR DESIGN B. Last Resort could be necessary if the probable
10. Will public housing be tenant has low income. House is old and probably
needed for protect rents for very little. Replacement rents are high
11. Is public housing avail- in the area.
able
12. Is it felt there will be ad-
equate DDS housing available
during relocation period
13. Will there be a problem of A,
housing within financial
means
14. Are suitable business sites
available (list source)
15. Number months estimated to
complete RELOCATION
Z
t
Relocation-Ag nt Date Approved Date
Form 15.4 Revised 5/90 Original & 1 Copy: State Relocation Agent
2 Copy: Area Relocation File

RELOCATION REPORT North Carolina Department of Transportation
_X_ E.I.S. CORRIDOR _ DESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PROJECT: 8.2402301 COUNTY: Wake Alternate 2_ of _2w Alternate

I.D. NO.: R-2634 F.A. PROJECT: N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Eastern Blvd. - Aviation Pkwy connector-to Northern Wake Expressway

ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of Minor-'
Displacee Owners Tenants Total ities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Individuals
Families 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Businesses 1 0 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLINGS AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20M NA $ 0-150 NA

ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 0 PO-40M NA 150-250 NA
YES NO EXPLAIN ALL 'YES' ANSWERS 40-70M 0 250-400 1 40-70M NA 250-400 NA
X 1. Will special relocation 70-100 0 400-600 0 70-100 NA 400-600 NA
services be necessary
X 2. Will schools or churches be 100 UP 0 600 UP 0 100 UP NA 600 UP NA
affected by displacement
X 3. Will business services still TOTAL 0 1
be available after project
x 4. Will any business be d~s- REMARKS (Respond by Number)
placed. If so, indicate size
type, estimated number of 3. No effect on general business community is
employees, minorities, etc. predicted.
X 5. Will relocation cause a
housing shortage 4.. One business has a small building and many stmi-
X 6. Source for available hous trailers parked on it's lot. Though no proposed
- ing (list) R/W lines were marked on plans, it is evident
X 7. Will additional housing that it would be affected by at least a partial
programs be needed take.
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing
be considered 6. MLS, newspapers. Plenty of housing available in
X 9. Are there large, disabled, all price ranges.
elderly, etc. families
ANSWER THESE ALSO FOR nFSIGN B. Last Resort could be necessary if the probable
10. Will public housing be tenant has low income. House is old and probably
needed for project rents for very little. Replacement rents are high
11. Is public housing avail- in the area.
able
12. Is it felt there will be ad-
equate DDS housing available
during relocation period
13. Will there be a problem of
housing within financial
means
14. Are suitable business sites
available (list source)
15. Number months estimated to
complete RELOCATION
-per,
-1 z / 2-
ReIocation.Ag_nt Date 74 Approved Date
L
Form 15.4 Revised 5/90 Original & 1 Copy: State Relocation Agent
2 Copy: Area Relocation File

ENVIROIVMENTAI, AND PUBL

x IC INVOLVEMENT REVIEW
PP&D ENGR. BRIDGE
P.D.ENGR
ENV, ENGR. ROW A.D.A.
x COPY TO STATE TOS
AREA ENG.
PROJECT NO.
STATE NO.
RS-9219(1) 8.240232301 TIP NO. COUNTY
TYPg TtEVIZW. R-2634 Wake
Telephone Conversation
x Office Review of Documents Meeting Participant
Public Workshop Participant Site Visit

Re-evaluation Consultation P•H• Attendance
Per Environmental Commitments in PS&23 CFR 771,129 (c)]

DATE OF E
REVIEW.
REVIEW MADE BY: GREG PUNSKE
COMMENTS: TITLE: AREA ENGINEER
Project Description: Eastern Boulevard Aviat
to Northern Wake Expressway ion Boulevard Connector
Comments from the review of
the Draft EA are as follows;
1) List of Environmental co
listing the environmental mmitments: NCDOT would like to wait on
until the FONSI.
Since there are no
agreed. significant or unusual commitments I have
2) Supplementary Considerations:
ommended that the issue of In my review of the
v rjcd• In discussions withan interchan a draft EA
g with Nelson Road be
of Car the PE Engineer, he indicated that
the NCDOT To could y was in favor of constructin
Nelson not rule out the constructin g the interchange
and
constru teddat that 1er, an interchan an interchange
ovation. ge g is not likel with
likely to be
I recommend that the
discussion remain in its current form,
3) Page 18; correct the spelling of carbonmonoxide.
4) Page 18: Under the Air
statement to this section: „ Quality Section: Add the
contribute to a new Co viol t
The ion proposed
does project will notfcauselor
increase the number

a

or severity of the existing Co violations."

5) Page 18, last paragraph on the page, 7th
bottom: Delete n/orn.
line up from the
6) Page 18, last pare
"September 30, 1992" to graph on the pa g December 15, 1993 last line: Change
7) Page 18, last paragraph, third line from
"clear" to "clean". the bottom
change
8) Page 194, 3rd paragraph second sentence of this under raps ortation Mana ement.
construction of Paragraph should be revised to read. The
capacity of for SOV Eastern Boulevard (R-2634 '@ The
use. (Delete "notfl_ ) will increase the
from the sentence.)
Comments 3 through 8 have
been
meeting on 2~22/94. discussed with
distrib
distribution. All corrections will~- 8111 Kinlaw in a
distrib I recommend execution of made prior to
receiving the minor revisions. the document
prior to

r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
5"V
Health and Natural. Resources 4 Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E„ Director

May 25, 1994
MEMORANDUM

To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorne

Monica Swihart

From: Eric Galamb y
L I
Subject: EA for Eastern Blvd, Aviation Blvd Connector To Northern Wake
Expressway
Wake County
State Project DOT No. 8.2402301, TIP #R-2634
EHNR # 94-0821, DEM # 10614
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact of waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that no wetlands but bank-to-bank waters will be
impacted.
An Individual Water Quality Certification will be required for this project. DOT is
reminded that endorsement of an EA by DEM would not preclude the denial of a 401
Certification upon application if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized
to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Planning Branch.

easternb.ea

P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT III
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY

April 4, 1994

Mr. Eric Galamb
DEHNR
Div. of Environmental Management
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1148
Dear Mr. Galamb:

SUBJECT: Federal Environmental Assessment for Eastern Boulevard, Aviation
Boulevard Connector to Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County, State
Project #8.2402301, Federal-Aid Project No. RS-9219(1), T.I.P.
#R-2634
Attached is a copy of the Environmental Assessment and the Natural
Resources Technical Report for the subject proposed highway improvement. It
is anticipated this project will be processed with a "Finding of No
Significant Impact"; however, should comments received on the Environmental
Assessment or at the public hearing demonstrate a need for preparing a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement you will be contacted as part of our scoping
process.
Copies of this Assessment are being submitted to the State
Clearinghouse, areawide planning agencies, and the counties, towns, and
cities involved.

Permit review agencies should note it is anticipated Federal Permits
will be required as discussed in the report.
. Any comment you have concerning the Environmental Assessment should be
forwarded to:

Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Division of Highways
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

April 4, 1094 W
Page 2

Your comments should be received by May 20, 1994. If no comments are
received by that date we will assume you have none. If you desire a copy of
the "Finding of No Significant Impact," please so indicate.

Sincerely,

-g. a~ V A Om
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch

HFV/plr

P ,

1 w<~e y.a ~+f r

V

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON June 1, 1992 WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
SECRETARY STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR

MEMORANDUM TO: Linwood Stone, Unit Head
Urban Unit

FROM: Hal Bain, Environmental Biologist Environmental Unit

SUBJECT: Construction of Aviation Boulevard Connector
(Eastern Avenue) to Northern Wake Expressway
Wake County; TIP # R-2634; State Project #
8.2402301; Federal-Aid Project # RS-9219(1)
ATTENTION: `Bill Kinlaw.
~Projeect-'Engineer

The attached Natural Resources Technical Report provides
pertinent details and descriptions of each natural resource
likely to be impacted by the proposed project, including
wetlands and federally-protected species. Please review the
information at your convenience. This report is available on
computer disc and I will be glad to transfer the file to your
disc at your convenience.
It has been determined that the proposed project will
not impact any federally protected species, after reviewing
the literature on federally protected species for Wake County
and conducting an on-site visit to the proposed project area.

cc: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.
M. Randall Turner, Environmental Supervisor

An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

t

Construction of Eastern Avenue - Aviation
Boulevard Connector to
Northern Wake Expressway
Wake County

TIP R-2634

State Project # 8.2402301
Federal Aid Project # RS-9219(1)

NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
R-2634

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT

Hal Bain, Biologist
June 1992

i.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Description ..............................1
1.2 Purpose ..........................................1
1.3 Study Area .......................................1
1.4 Methodology....... ...............................1
2.0 Biotic Resources
2.1 Plant Communities ................................2
2.1.1 Uplands ........................2
2.1.2 Summary of Anticipated Impacts 3
2.2 Wildlife........ .........................3
2.2.1 TerrestrialCommunities ...................3
2.2.2 Aquatic Communities ...4
2.2.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts 5
3.0 Physical Resources
3.1 Water Resources...... ..........................5
3.1.1 Streams, Rivers, Impoundments, Etc....... 5
3.1.2 Water Quality ............................5
3.1.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts 6
3.2 Soils .............................................7
4.0 Special Topics
4.1 Waters of the United States: Jurisdictional
Issues ...................................8
4.2 Protected Species ................................8
4.2.1 Federally-Protected Species ..............9
4.2.2 State-Protected Species .................12
4.2.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts 12
5.0 References

j

1. 0 INTRODUCTION

The following report is submitted for use as a
supplement to assist in preparation of an Environmental
Assessment (EA), followed by a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).
1.1 Project Description

The subject project involves connecting Aviation
Boulevard from the proposed revised interchange at the
Raleigh/Durham (RDU) airport to the Northern Wake Expressway
interchange. The project is 1.0 mile long and the typical
section will be a 4-lane divided freeway, consisting of two
12 foot lanes in each direction and a 56 foot grassed median.
Right-of-way is projected to be approximately 250 feet. A
bridge alternative and a culvert alternative for crossing the
Brier Creek Resevoir are being investigated by Hydrographics.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this technical report is to inventory,
catalog and describe the various natural resources likely to
be impacted by the proposed action. The report also attempts
to identify and estimate the likely consequences of the
anticipated impacts to these resources. These descriptions
and estimates are relevant only in the'context of existing
preliminary design concepts. It may become necessary to
conduct additional field investigations, should design
parameters and criteria change.
1.3 Study Area
The project is located southwest of RDU airport in the
Piedmont physiographic province in the western part of Wake
County. The topography of the area is gently rolling.
1.4 Methodology

Preliminary resource information was assembled and
reviewed, including U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey (USGS)
quadrangle map (Cary) and NCDOT county road map. other
preliminary, off-site work was accomplished by conducting a
review of literature, reference resources and data on soils,
water resources, wildlife populations, protected species,
etc., provided by agencies of the North Carolina Department
of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR), the
U.S. Fish and wildlife service (USFWS) and the Soil
Conservation Service (SCS). An aerial of the subject project
(111= 1001) was also used as a reference of the surrounding
area. A field visit was conducted on May 4, 1992.

i

j 2

2.0 PIOTIC RESOURCES

Living systems described in the following sections
include plant communities and associated animals. Plant
communities and animals have been separated for ease of
description.
2.1 Plant Communities

Four plant communities found in the subject project
study area include ROADSIDE, MIXED PINE-HARDWOOD FOREST and
HARDWOOD FOREST.
2.1.1 Uplands

The ROADSIDE/MOWED FIELD COMMUNITY is located along
Aviation Boulevard, the southeastern terminus of the project
and the project intersection with Nelson road. Grasses,
predominately tall fescue (Festuca sp.), common dandelion
(Taraxacum officinale), clover (Trifolium sp.) and wild onion
(Allium sp.) are the species dominating this community.
The MIXED PINE-HARDWOOD FOREST COMMUNITY is found on the
north and south sides of the Nelson road intersection with
the subject project. Canopy and sub-canopy species include
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata),
white oak (Ouercus alba), oaks (ouercus spp.), hickory (Carva
sp.), red maple (Acer rubrum), tulip tree (Liriodendron
tulivifera), sweet gum (Liguidambar stvraciflua), black
cherry (Prunus serotina), winged elm (Ulmus alata) and
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida). Blackberry (Rubus sp.)
and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera Japonica) dominate the
shrub/vine layer.
The HARDWOOD FOREST COMMUNITY is located along the
northwest side of Brier Creek Reservoir. Species composition
in the canopy and sub-canopy includes white oak, other oaks,
hickory, red maple, tulip tree, sweet gum, black cherry and
flowering dogwood. Buckeye (Aesculus svlvatica), viburnum
(Viburnum acerifolium) and Japanese honeysuckle comprise the
shrub/vine layer.
2.1.2 Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Plant Communities
Construction of the subject project will result in loss
of existing roadside/mowed field habitat along Aviation
Boulevard and Nelson road and creation of new roadside
habitat along the new road shoulders. Portions of mixed
pine-hardwood forest and hardwood forest communities will be
destroyed by construction of this project (Table 1). Project
construction will also cause the fragmentation of portions of
the pine-hardwood forest and hardwood forest.

3 '

Table 1. APPROXIMATE IMPACTS TO
PLANT COMMUNITIES

COMMUNITY TYPE ANTICIPATED IMPACTS (ACRES)
Roadside/mowed field 19.8
Mixed pine-hardwood forest 5.0
_
Hardwood forest 1.7
TOTAL 26.5
Note: values shown are based upon 250 feet of right-of-way.
Actual impacts will be less.
2.2 Wildlife

The following inventory of fauna, likely to occur in the
study area, is merely a sample of vertebrates that are known
to exist in Wake County. Complete listings'of fauna can be
found in one or more technical references in section 5.0.
2.2.1 Terrestrial Communities.

Possible amphibian species found in the area include
spotted salamander (Ambvstoma maculatum), northern dusky
salamander (Desmoanathus fuscus), two-lined salamander
(Eurvicea bislineata), slimy salamander (Plethodon
alutinosus), red salamander (Pseudotriton ruber), American
toad (Bufo americanus), Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhousei),
northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans), spring peeper (Hula
crucifer), upland chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata),
bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and pickerel frog (Rana
palustris).
Characteristic reptiles likely to occur in the area
include snapping turtle (Chelvdra serpentina), painted turtle
(Chrvsemvs picta), yellowbelly slider (Chrvsemvs scripta),
eastern box turtle (Terrapene caroling), eastern fence lizard
(Sceloporus undulatus), five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus),
broadhead skink (Eumeces laticeps), ground skink (Scincella
lateralis), worm snake (Carphophis amoenus) ringneck snake
(Diadophis punctatus), rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta), eastern
hognose snake (Heterodon platvrhinos), northern water snake
(Nerodia sipedon), rough green snake (Opheodrvs aestivus),
and copperhead (Aakistrodon contortrix).
Birds common in the vicinity of the project include
Canada goose (Branta canadensis), red-tailed hawk (Buteo
Jamaicensis), belted kingfisher (Cervle alcvon), downy
woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), American crow (Corvus
brachvrhvnchos), Carolina chickadee (Parus carolinensis),
Carolina wren (Thrvothorus ludovicianus), ruby-crowned
kinglet (Regulus calendula), blue-gray gnatcatcher
(Polioptila caerulea), eastern bluebird (Svalia svalis),

5

2.2.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts

Destruction of terrestrial communities along the project
corridor will result in the loss of foraging and breeding
habitats for many of the terrestrial species which utilize
this area. Loss of these habitats will result in a reduction
and displacement of species found in the subject project
study zone. Habitat fragmentation also places restrictions
on those species which may have daily migratory patterns or
territorial behaviors. Roads also increases mortality among
migratory species and species which are opportunistic
foragers along road shoulders.
The proposed action could have affects on the aquatic
environment found in the project boundaries. Strict
enforcement of Sedimentation Control Measures and Best
Management Practices (BMPs) should be observed.
Sedimentation into this reservoir can be harmful to local
populations of invertebrates which are important parts of the
aquatic food chain. Fish populations in Brier Creek
Reservoir can also be harmed by sedimentation.
3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES
The following two sections describe soils and water
resources that occur within the study area, or that relate in
one way or another to the study area.
3.1 Water Resources
The topic of water resources is presented in two
sections.. The first section describes the physical aspects
of the resource and its relationship to major water systems.
The second section discusses water quality and special use
resource categories.
3.1.1 Streams, Rivers, Impoundments, etc.

Brier Creek Resevoir is the only water resource located
in the subject project area. This resevoir is fed from the
north by Brier Creek and Little Brier Creek. Outflow from
Brier Creek Resevoir continues south as Brier Creek. The
lake bottom is covered by silt/clay sediments deposited from
storm run-off.
3.1.2 Water Quality
Brier Creek Resevoir has a best usage classification of C. Class C waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation

and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and
agriculture.

r 6

No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW),
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) or waters designated as
WS-1 or WS-11 will be impacted by the proposed project, nor
are these resources located within 1 mile of the subject
area.
The Benthic Microinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN)
addresses long term trends in water quality at fixed
monitoring sites by the sampling for selected benthic
macroinvertebrates. These organisms are sensitive to very
subtle changes in water quality. Good water quality is
associated with high taxa richness (the number of different
types of organisms) and the presence of many intolerant
species. water quality degradation gradually eliminates the
more sensitive species and leads to a community structure
quite different from that in an unstressed stream. Specific
information is not available for the immediate project area.
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) lists Raleigh/Durham Airport Authority as the only
discharger for Brier Creek Resevoir.
3.1.3 Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Potential impacts to Brier Creek Resevoir include loss
of lake area and increased sedimentation from construction-
related erosion if the culvert alternative is used. A bridge
alternate would impact the resevoir by increased
sedimentation from construction related erosion. These
impacts are viewed as temporary, however, poorly managed
application of sedimentation control policies can result in
serious damage to the aquatic environment. Sedimentation and
erosion control measures should be strictly enforced during
the construction stage of this project.
3.2 Soils
The soil found in the study area is classified as
Creedmoor-White Store association. This association is
characterized by gently sloping to hilly, deep and moderately
deep, moderately well drained soils that have a very firm
clayey subsiol; derived from sandstone, shale and mudstone.

v 7 r

Table 3. Soil Map Units Encountered Along
Project Alignment

MAP UNIT HYDRIC PERCENT SLOPES
SOILS
Altavista fine sandy loam (AfA) yes 0 to 4
Chewacla soils (Cm) yes 0 to 2
Mayodan sandy loam (MfB2) no 2 to 6
Mayodan sandy loam (MfC2) no 6 to 10
Pinkston sandy loam (PkC) no 0 to 10
" Map units with inclusions of hydric soils and or have
wet spots.
Altavista fine sandy loam (AfA) is found on low stream
terraces. The surface layer is light brownish-gray and light
grayixh-brown to dark grayish-brown fine sandy-loam 3 to 15
inches thick. The subsoil is yellowish-brown to reddish-
yellow, friable sandy clay loam to clay loam mottled with
gray in most places. It is 12 to 29 inches thick. Altavista
fine sandy loam is listed as a map unit with inclusions of
hydric soils and or has wet spots.
Chewacla loam (Cm) is nearly level and is somewhat
poorly drained. This soil is found on flood plains along
streams throughout the county. The surface layer is brown to
dark grayish-brown sandy loam to silt loam 4 to 12 inches
thick. The subsoil ranges in depth from 34 to 72 inches and
ranges in color from brown to dark grayish brown, with
mottles of brown and gray. The texture ranges from sandy loam
or silt loam to clay. Chewacla loam is listed as a map unit
with inclusions of hydric soils and or has wet spots.
Mayodan sandy loam (MfB2) is on broad, smooth
interstream divides in the uplands. Its surface layer is 3
to 7 inches thick. The surface layer is grayish-brown to
light yellowish-brown sandy loam in the less eroded places,
but the color ranges to strong brown and the texture ranges
to sandy clay loam in the more eroded areas.
Mayodan sandy loam (MfC2) is on narrow side slopes in
the uplands. Its surface layer is 4 to 6 inches thick. The
surface layer is grayish-brown to light yellowish-brown sandy
loam, in the less eroded areas, but the color ranges to
strong brown and the texture ranges to sandy clay loam in the
more eroded spots. The subsoil is 26 to 45 inches thick and
consists of yellowidh-red to strong-brown, firm clay loam to
clay loam to clay, with wommon mottlew of red and brown.

8 `

Pinkston sandy loam (PkC) is on small ridges and side
slopes in the uplands. Its surface layer is pale-brown to
dark brown sandy loam 4 to 10 inches thick. The subsoil is 5
to 30 inches thick and consists of yellowish-brown to
yellowish-red, very friable or friable sandy loam to sandy
clay loam.
4.0 SPECIAL TOPICS

4.1 Waters of the United States: Jurisdictional Issues
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad
category of "Waters of the United States" as defined in 33
CFR 328.3 and in accordance with provisions of section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344).

Anticipated impacts are categorized as bank-to-bank
waters of the United States and fall under the jurisdiction
of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Due to the size
of the area which will be filled by this project
(approximately 3 acres) and location below headwaters (flow
greater than 5 cubic feet per second), no Nationwide permits
apply. Construction is likly to require an Individual
Section 404 permit. A section 404 permit authorizesthe
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers,
to issue permits, after notice and opportunity for public
hearing, for the discharge of dredged or fill material into ,
the waters of the United States at specified disposal sites.
Actions covered by Individual section 404 permits
require mitigation for habitats lost project construction.
On-site mitigation opportunities should be considered first.
Opportunities within the same watershed outside of the
immediate project area is recommended if an on-site optoin is
not available.
4.2 Protected Species
Federal law states that any action, which has the
potential to result in a negative impact to federally-
protected plants or animals, is subject to review by the
USFWS (and/or the National Marine Fisheries service), under
one or more provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended. The USFWS and other wildlife resource
agencies also exercise jurisdiction over protected species in
accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of
1979. Certain plants and animals, which are endemic to North
Carolina and/or whose populations are in severe decline, are
also protected by North Carolina law.

9

4.2.1 Federally-Protected species

Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists 5
species as federally protected for Wake County as of March
16, 1992.

Table 4. Federally-Protected Species for Wake County

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Haliaeetus bald eagle E
leucocephalus
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker E
Vermivora bachmanii* Bachman's warbler E
Alasmidonta herterodon dwarf-wedged mussel E
Rhus michauxii Michaux's sumac E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is threatened with
extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range).
denotes that no specimens have been reported from wake
county for more than 20 years.
bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) (E)

This federally Endangered raptor is found throughout the
United States and northward to the arctic. Nesting in the
southeast is limited primarily to Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi and South Carolina. The birds occur elsewhere in
the southeast as migrants, or rarely as nesting pairs. As an
adult, this large raptor displays a wingspread of about 7
feet; plumage is dark brown with pure white head and tail.
Juveniles of this species are often chocolate brown to
blackish with head and tail changing from brown-to-mottled
white-to-pure white as the bird matures. The Bald eagle is
principally riparian, associated with coasts, rivers and
lakes, usually nesting near bodies of water where they feed.
The proposed project will not impact suitable nesting or
feeding resources for this species. It can be concluded that
the subject project will not impact the bald eagle.

10 '

red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (E)

This federally Endangered woodpecker is found in
scattered locations throughout the southeast. The bird
measures 18 to 20 cm long with a wing span ranging from 35 to
38 cm. The male has a small red spot on the each side of the
head. Both males and females show a black cap and stripe on
the side of the neck. The throat is also black while the
cheeks and under parts are white. Black and white horizontal
stripes are visible on the back.
Nesting habitat is made up of open pine stands (minimum
age 60 years) or mixed pine/hardwood stands, (50 percent or
more pine). Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) is most commonly
used, but other species of southern pine are also acceptable.
The home range for a clan (a family unit) averages about 200
acres and includes nesting habitat as well as foraging
habitat. This bird requires pine or mixed pine/hardwood
stands (50 percent or more pine) 30 years or older for
foraging. Foraging habitats must be contiguous with nesting
habitat. The proposed project will not impact suitable
nesting and feeding habitat for this species. It can be
concluded that the subject project will not impact the red-
cockaded woodpecker.
Bachman's warbler (Vermivora bachmanii) (E)
This federally Endangered warbler's range includes the
southeastern U.S. during the breeding season and western Cuba
and Isle of Pines in the winter. The birds total length is
from 10 to 11.25 cm. The male is olive green above with
yellow face and underparts with black throat and crown
patches. The female lacks the black throat. The upper parts
are olive green, the forehead and underparts are yellow and
the crown is grayish. Historic records indicate the
Bachman's warbler nested in low, wet hardwood forests.
Openings in the forest canopy, covered with dense thickets of
cane, palmetto, blackberry, gallberry and or other shrubs and
vines. There is no suitable nesting habitat in the subject
project area. No sighting of this species in the last 20
years suggests that it may be extirpated from the county. It
can be concluded that the subject project will not impact the
bachman's warbler.
dwarf-wedged mussel (Alasmidanta heterodon) (E)
This federally Endangered mussel is known from the Neuse
and Tar River drainages in North Carolina. Currently, the
only known populations are in the Little River and Middle
Creek in Johnston County, the upper Tar River in Granville
County, and Crooked Creek and Cedar Creek in Franklin County.
This mussel seems to prefer streams with deep water and
coarse sands, however it has also been seen on bottoms of
gravel or mud, among submersed aquatic plants and near

t

11 '

streambanks underneath overhanging tree limbs. No suitable
habitat for the dwarf-wedge mussel occurs in the study area.
It can be concluded that the subject project will not impact
the dwarf-wedged mussel.

Michaux's sumac (R us michauxii) (E)
This federally Endangered plant is currently known from
only 17 locations, 16 of which are in North Carolina. The
species usually occurs on sandy or rocky soils in open
woodlands and clearings and appears to be dependent upon some
form of disturbance to maintain the open condition. Since
most natural forms of disturbance (fire, large herbivore
grazing, etc.) have been eliminated, this species is often
found in it's natural habitat in open areas created by
railroad and highway rights-of-way.
Suitable habitat for this species does occur within the
project area. This species has recognizable field
characteristics year-round, thus searches for this plant are
not limited to it's flowering period. A detailed survey for
this plant was conducted on May 4, 1992 along Aviation
Boulevard, the southeastern terminus of the project and the
project intersection with Nelson road. Areas of suitable
habitat were searched visually on a plant by plant basis. No
individuals of this species were found within the subject
project area during these searches, thus it can be concluded
that the project will have no impact on Michaux's sumac.
The following Candidate species (Table 5) may occur in
the area. Candidate species are species which are not
legally protected under the Endangered Species Act and are
not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or
Endangered.
Table 5. Federal Candidate Species Listed for Wake County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT
Mvotis austroriparius southeastern bat C2 Yes
Amophila aestivalis Bachman's sparrow C2 No
Elliptio iudithae neuse slabshell (mussel) C2 No
Elliptio lanceolata yellow lance It C2 No
Fusconaia masoni atlantic pigtoe " C2 No
Lasmigona subviridis green floater C2 No
Speveria diana Diana fritillary C2 Yes
butterfly
Nestronia umbellula nestronia C2 Yes
Trillium pusillum Carolina trillium C2 Yes
var. pusillum
indicates no specimen from Wake county in at least 20
years.

z

12

11C2" are candidate species presently under review for federal
listing for which information indicates that listing as
Endangered or Threatened is possibly appropriate, but
for which adequate data on biological vulnerability and
threat(s) are not currently known or on file to support
propose rules.
4.2.2 State Protected Species

Plants or animals with state designations of Endangered
(E), Threatened (T) or Special Concern (SC) are granted
protection by the State Endangered Species Act and the N.C.
Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979, administered
and enforced by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission and the N.C. Department of Agriculture.
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Programs
records failed to turn up any records of occurance of state-
protected species in the study area.
These state-protected species are also listed as federal
candidate species. Suitable habitat determinations were
ascertained from literature review (Table 6).'

Table 6. STATE-PROTECTED SPECIES for WAKE COUNTY

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT
Mvotis austroriparius southeastern bat SC Yes
Aimophila aestivalis Bachman's sparrow Sc No
Elliptio judithae neuse slabshell (mussel) E No
Elliptio lanceolata yellow lance It T No
Fusconaia masoni atlantic pigtoe " T No
Lasmigona subviridis green floater E No
Speveria diana Diana fritillary Sc Yes
butterfly
Nestronia umbellula nestronia T Yes
Trillium pusillum Carolina trillium E Yes
var. pusillum
" indicates no specimen from wake county in at least 20
years.
4.2.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts

No impacts to federally protected species will occur.
Although suitable habitat exists in the study area for
several federal candidate and/or state protected species, no
surveys were conducted for these species.

i1
s
t 13 '

5. 0 R~FCRENCE S

American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list gf North
American Birds (6th ed.). Lawrence, Kansas, Allen
Press, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical report Y-87-1;
U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Miss.
Lee, D.S., J.B. Funderburg, Jr. and M.K. Clark. 1982. A
Distributional Survey of North Carolina Mammals.
Raleigh, North Carolina Museum of Natural History.

Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey and J.R. Harrison III.
1980. Amphibians an Reptiles of the Carolinas and
Virginia. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina
Press.
Menhenick, E.F. 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North
Carolina. N.C.WRC., Raleigh.
NCDEHNR-DEM. 1988. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient
Network (BMAN) Water Quality Review 1983-1986.

NCDEHNR-DEM. 1991. Biological Assessment of Water Quality
in North Carolina Streams: Benthic Macroinvertebrate
Data Base and Long Tern Changes in Water Quality, 1983-
1990.
NCDEHNR-DEM. 1991. "Classifications and Water Quality
Standards Assigned to the Waters of The Yadkin-Pee Dee
River Basin". Raleigh, Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources.
NCWRC. 1990. "Endangered Wildlife of North Carolina".
Raleigh, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission.

Plant Conservation Program. 1991. "List of North Carolina's
Endangered, Threatened and Candidate Plant Species".
Raleigh, North Carolina Department of Agriculture.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds
of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The University of North
Carolina Press.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and G.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of
the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The
University of North Carolina Press.

14 '

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of
The Natural Communities of North Carolina. Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
1970. Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina.
North Carolina Agriculture Experiment Station.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1979. Classifications of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.,
U.S. Government Printing office, Washington D.C.
Weakley, A.S. 1991. "Natural Heritage Program List of the
Rare Plant Species of North Carolina". North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program;
Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell and W.C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals
of the Carolinas. Virginia and Maryland. Chapel Hill,
The University of North Carolina Press.

1~. .surFo
A

State of North Carolina

Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary March 27, 1992 Director

MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee

Through: John Dorneq~)

From: Eric Galamb
1
Subject: Water Quality Checklist for EA/EIS/Scoping Documents
Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard Connector to
Northern Wake Expressway
Wake County
State Project DOT No. 8.2402301, TIP #R-2634
EHNR # 92-0647, DEM WQ # 4902
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
EA/EIS/Scoping documents:
A. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?

B. Please identify the borrow locations.
C. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project.
The stream classsifications should be current.

D. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations
/relocations.

E. Number of stream crossings.
F. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and tempory)
to be employed.

G. Will permanent spill catchbasins be utilized? If so,
identify the responsible party for maintenance.
H. Efforts employed to minimize interrupting water and
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007

Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 276260535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

l

sanitary sewerage.

I. Wetland Impacts
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying
and delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat
losses.
v) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
vi) Total impacts of wetland impacts.
vii) List the 401 General Certification numbers
requested from DEM.
checklis.sco

cc Eric Galamb

Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
? Project located in 7th floor library
Division of Planning and Assessment
Project Review Form
Project Number: County: Date: Date Response Due (firm deadline):

q 6 ~ 6 ~J &,0- - q-), 3

This project is being reviewed as indicated below:

Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville ? All R/O Areas ? Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries

? Fayetteville it ? Coastal Management Water Planning
ater ? Water Resources Environmental Health
? Mooresville roundwater `f""'ildlife ?Solid Waste Management
*Raleigh and Quality Engineer 'Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Washington Recreational Consultant Land Resources ? David Foster
? f { ant N~Parks and Recreation ~Qther (specify)
? Wilmington = • 1
?Q e' p Environmental Manag ment V( ~-0'
? Winston-Salem
MAR 9 1992
WATER QUALITY
Manager Sign-Off/Region: SECTION Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:

Response (check all applicable)

Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager. In-House Reviewer complete individual response.

? No objection to project as proposed ? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
? No Comment ?Applicant has been contacted

? Insufficient information to complete review ? Applicant has not been contacted
? Project Controversial (comments attached)

? Approve ? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked) ? Consistency Statement not needed

? Recommended for further development with recommendations for ? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
strengthening (comments attached) NEPA and SEPA
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive ? Other (specify and attach comments)
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attached/authority(ies) cited)

RETURN TO:
Melba McGee Division of Planning and Assessment by Due Date shown.
P$•,04

f r

^ J\
S TA

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
r~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
February 27, 1992
THOMAS J. HARRELSON WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
SECRETARY STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
MEMORANDUM TO: Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
Dept. of Administration
FROM: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Eastern Boulevard, Aviation Boulevard Connector to
Northern Wake Expressway, Wake County, Project No.
8.2402301, TIP No. R-2634

The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has
begun studying the proposed connector from Aviation Boulevard to Northern
Wake Expressway (see Location Map). The project is included in the
1992-1998 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is
scheduled for right-of-way in fiscal year 1995 and construction in fiscal
year 1997.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation has begun to study the
-construction of a 4-lane divided freeway between Aviation Boulevard and
Northern Wake Expressway, a distance of approximately 1.0 mile. The
preliminary typical section consists of two 12-foot lanes in each direction
with a 56-foot grassed median. Right-of-way is projected to be approxi-
mately 250 feet. The recommended structure to cross the Briar Creek Flood
Control Lake will be determined after further hydrographic studies. Two
alternative structures are being considered, a bridge and a culvert. There
will be a grade separation at the project's proposed intersection with
Nelson Road (SR 1642). An interchange analysis will be accomplished as
part of this project, but any interchange construction is beyond the scope
of this project.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be
helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If
applicable, please identify any permits or approvals which may be required
by your agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a
document evaluating environmental impacts of the project. It is desirable
that your agency respond by March 31, 1992 so that your comments can be
used in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Bill
Kinlaw, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at (919) 733-7842.
LJW/plr
AttarhmPnt

I A
Pore s l O
,o ^ ,dLe.NCe.~•.(~ 10 Roles,lle II

A 50 4: Ewake lield I 21
\~r It0 Millbrgok + Litard Lick 1
/~orrisvill1~ ,-I 1' 5 I z'Raleigh 64.
:1 0- t 3 r ebulon
V1
r K i9Ttda Ie R«Iky en4B .
10, Ape O , 1:4 ' 11 le`t`
Auburry t
~I Nhill S5 11
1 0 cCuller i!1 8
~ Ings ?
401 v
- c .'1 Wi low Springs
quay'Varina.
I 9
/ 55

5 0 E T LIMIT

.a a „ I
1 <
fcn
r` U) I
w
Cc
G'?
o~Y w
- O ~1 ,y'J u I .
Z I a
1 rr
4>
1 y.= 14 .,r
0

t-o ~sr \~t

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
e DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANTING AND I;NV120NMENTAL
0' BRANCH
EASTERN BOULEVARD
AVIATION BOULEVARD CONNECTOR
TO NORTHERN WAKE EXPRESSWAY
WAKE COUNTY
R-2634
DOn IC/^T I ~r nr,-, uw n