HomeMy WebLinkAbout20011274 Ver 1_More Info Letter_20080324o`'~~ W A r~9p~
>_ ~
p '<
Mr. Lindsey Riddick, Senior Scientist
ARCADIS
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
zo o ~ ~,~ 2'-~
Michael F. Easley, Governor
~~ ~~2 ~s
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
March 24, 2008
SUBJECT: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules [15A NCAC 2H
.0506(h)], NC 49 Widening, TIP No. R-2533, Stanly and Cabarrus Counties
Dear Mr. Riddick:
Polly Lespinasse of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) met with you, Steve Lund of the US Army Corps of
Engineers and representatives of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) on February 26,
2008, in order to provide verification of potential jurisdictional features previously identified by your consulting
firm for the above referenced project. These features were evaluated for applicability to the mitigation rules set
forth in [15A NCAC 2H .0506(h)]. The maps containing the project corridor were provided in the jurisdictional
verification package received by this office on February 26, 2008, and via your company's FTP site. The
jurisdictional features are approximated on these maps.
Due to the size of the project, a selection of sites was identified and visited to represent stream and wetland
determinations conducted by your firm. Nineteen (19) features were evaluated to include ephemeral,
intermittent, and perennial streams and wetlands. Changes were made to ten (10) stream determinations based
on the field verifications, with additional comments on three (3) wetlands. The changes/comments are outlined
below:
• Stream SL10: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for the entire reach. This site was not
field verified. However, based on agreement between all parties in the field, the stream will be classified as
perennial. The stream was originally evaluated September 17, 2007, under extreme drought conditions and
scored 29.5 points.
• Stream SL11: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for the entire reach. This site was not
field verified. However, based on agreement between all parties in the field, the stream will be classified as
perennial. The stream was originally evaluated September 18, 2007, under extreme drought conditions and
scored 29.5 points.
• Streams SL15 and SL16: Both of these streams were originally classified as intermittent. The confluence of
these streams was identified as SL15 and continued to be classified as an intermittent stream for the reach
located within the project boundaries. Based on the site visit, both SL15 and SL16 will continue to be
classified as intermittent. However, the stream will be classified as perennial from the confluence of SL15
and SL16 downstream.
• Stream SL17: This stream was originally classified as ephemeral for the entire reach. This site was not
field verified. However, based on agreement between all parties in the field, the stream will be classified as
intermittent. The stream was originally evaluated September 19, 2007, under extreme drought conditions
and scored 18.5 points.
• Stream SL18: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for the entire reach. Based on a site
visit by DWQ staff on March 13, 2008, this stream will be classified as perennial. Perennial stream
characteristics were observed (the stream was re-evaluated and scored 34 points) in addition to the
presence of various biologicals (crayfish, mayfly larvae).
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Internet: h2o.enrstate.nc.us Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone (704) 663-1699
Fax (704)663-6040
N °ehCarolin~
~~aturally
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Lindsey Riddick
Page Two
• Stream SL20: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for entire reach. Based on the site visit,
this stream will be classified as perennial. Perennial stream characteristics were observed (the stream was
re-evaluated and scored 31.5 points) in addition to the presence of various biologicals (crayfish, isopods,
amphipods).
• Stream SLHS: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for the entire reach. This site was not
field verified. However, based on agreement between all parties in the field, the stream will be classified as
perennial. The stream was originally evaluated January 24, 2008, under low flow conditions and scored
29.5 points.
• Stream SLH6: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for entire reach. Based on the site visit,
this stream will be classified as perennial downstream from the beginning of the wooded area. Perennial
stream characteristics were observed in addition to the presence of various biologicals (many crayfish,
isopods, amphipods).
• Stream SL21: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for entire reach. Based on the site visit,
this stream will be classified as perennial. Perennial stream characteristics were observed (the stream was
re-evaluated and scored 32 points) in addition to the presence of various biologicals (crayfish, isopods,
amphipods).
• Wetland WL1: The wetland boundaries were evaluated and appeared to be accurate. However, DWQ staff
recommends that the Wetland Rating Worksheet be revisited with increased points given to the wetland for
water storage and pollutant removal.
• Wetland WL2: The wetland boundaries were evaluated and appeared to be accurate. However, DWQ staff
recommends that the Wetland Rating Worksheet be revisited with increased points given to the wetland for
water storage, pollutant removal and aquatic life.
• Wetland WLH1: The wetland boundaries were evaluated and appeared to be accurate. However, DWQ
staff recommends that the Wetland Rating Worksheet be revisited with increased points given to the
wetland for water storage and pollutant removal.
Based on the site reviews of the jurisdictional determinations made by your consulting firm, DWQ will consider
all sites identified in the jurisdictional verification package and revisions identified above as accurate. Please
note, however, that DWQ is not prepared to concur with the Wetland Rating Worksheets for the project
at this time. Many of the wetlands scored 20 points or lower on the DWQ Wetland Rating Worksheets. In
addition, only a small number of wetlands were evaluated and these reviews were limited to an evaluation of the
wetland jurisdictional boundaries, not necessarily a wetland "quality" evaluation.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and does not approve any activity within buffers,
Waters of the United States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers must comply
with 404/401 regulations, water supply regulations (15A NCAC 26 .0216), applicable buffer rules, and any other
required federal, state and local regulations. Please be aware that even if no direct impacts are proposed to any
protected buffers, sheet flow of all new stormwater runoff as per 15A NCAC 26 .0250 is required.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the Director. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Brian Wrenn, DWQ 401
Transportation Permitting Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected parties (including downstream and adjacent landowners) are notified of this decision. DWQ recommends
that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely
manner.
Mr. Lindsey Riddick
Page Three
To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please contact Polly Lespinasse at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
~.~ ~ ~ ' 7 r ~ ,;
~~~~ ~
~,~ Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office
William Barrett, NCDOT PDEA
Sonia Gregory, DWO Wetlands Unit
File Copy