HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110645 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119Annual Monitoring Report
FINAL
Project Name: East Fork Pigeon River Wetland
Monitoring Year 3
NCDMS Contract No.: 006035
NCDMS Project No.: 94203
Haywood County, North Carolina
Data Collected: 6/2/2016-10/26/2016
Date Submitted: 11/23/2016
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC
This Page Intentionally Blank
Prepared by:
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
Project Contact: Drew Alderman
Email: drewgequinoxenvironmental.com
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................
1.1. Project History and Background......................................................................................
1.2. Project Goals and Objectives...........................................................................................
1.3. Project Success Criteria...................................................................................................
1.4. Annual Monitoring Results..............................................................................................
2.0 Methodology........................................................................................................................
3.0 References............................................................................................................................
Appendix A General Tables and Figures.........................................................................................
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data..............................................................................................
AppendixC Vegetation Data...........................................................................................................
2
2
3
3
5
9
.......18
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Project History and Background
The East Fork Pigeon River Wetlands Project (EFPR) restoration site is located in the French Broad River
Basin (HUC8- 06010106) near Cruso in Haywood County, NC. It is a North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) site whose purpose is to provide wetland mitigation for unavoidable losses at
other locations within the basin. The site is situated between the right -descending bank of the East Fork
of the Pigeon River and Old Micheal Road, off of Highway US 276.
The established goals for the EFPR site were as follows:
Enhance and protect existing wetlands and wildlife habitat along the East Fork Pigeon River.
Specifically, the target goal was to enhance the vegetative community of the wetlands by
removing identified invasive plant species through manual and/or chemical methods and by
replanting the site with native species.
Protect the wetlands on the site with a permanent Conservation Easement.
Preserve approximately 1,411 feet of the East Fork of the Pigeon River and approximately 664
feet of Perennial Stream with a permanent Conservation Easement.
The project did not require Clean Water Act Section 404 / Section 401 permits as no ground disturbing
activities within jurisdictional wetlands were anticipated or occurred on the site. Additionally, the project
was instituted prior to July 28, 2010 and did not require a mandatory IRT mitigation plan review.
On November 3, 2010, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved a wetland Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) on the project site. The JD was used to prepare a mitigation plan that would result in
enhanced wetland function. The mitigation plan for the project was completed by Mactec Engineering
and Consulting, Inc (Currently AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, Inc.) in March 2011
The control of nuisance plant species within the bottomland hardwood forest and shrub/understory open
areas on the site entailed the treatment of the seven invasive nuisance plant species: Bamboo
(Phyllostachys sp.), common cattail (Typha latifolia), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese
knotweed (Reynoutria japonica), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), kudzu (Pueraria montana),
and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
A majority of the invasive species infestations were mapped in the 2011 mitigation plan; however
Chinese privet and multiflora rose were essentially scattered throughout the entire bottomland hardwood
forest. The control methods entailed the treatment of small -sized plants with foliar spray and larger stems
by hack and squirt. The chemical `aquatic glyphosate' was used for the herbicide applications. The cut
bamboo was placed in a slash pile and burned on the site. New shoots of bamboo, which developed after
the initial treatment, were treated with aquatic glyphosate. All invasive control treatments and planting
efforts were conducted by Habitat Assessment & Restoration Professionals (HARP; Charlotte, NC). The
nuisance plant species were treated for two growing seasons prior to the planting of the site. Upon
review, however, DMS postponed the planting of the site for a third growing season to allow for
additional nuisance species control before replanting. Spot treatments of invasive species will continue
through the scheduled 5 -year monitoring term.
The 2011 mitigation plan estimated the wetland planting area to be approximately 5.64 acres. Based on
2013 site conditions and the extent of the invasive plant treatment areas, approximately 2.26 acres of the
project's 13.95 acres were planted in December 2013. The wetland areas that were excluded from the
planting operation encompassed: (1) a deepwater wetland drainageway that occurred along the southern
shoulder of Old Michael Road and was determined to be an historical channel of the East Fork Pigeon
River; (2) the stream banks of East Fork Pigeon River (bankfull bench and spoil areas); and (3) the
East Fork Pigeon River Site 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
heavily forested portions of the bottomland hardwood forest. Therefore, the planting operation primarily
encompassed the areas of the bottomland hardwood forest that were open and lacking an overstory of
trees or a dense shrub component. The planting of trees (seedlings) within these open areas will
essentially restore the hardwood overstory of the wetlands.
The 2011 Mitigation plan and project implementation did not include any enhancement activities for the
East Fork Pigeon River or the unnamed perennial stream that occurs within the western portion of the site.
These surface waters are essentially unimpaired and provide suitable habitat for fish and benthic macro -
invertebrates. The proposed stream preservation assets have a minimum 30 -foot buffer from edge of bank
on both sides of the channel.
1.2. Project Goals and Objectives
The established mitigation goals for the EFPR site were to enhance and protect existing wetlands and
wildlife habitat along the East Fork Pigeon River. Specifically, the target goal was the vegetative
enhancement of the existing wetland community. The project objectives included:
• Enhance existing wetlands by removing identified invasive plant species through manual and/or
chemical methods and by replanting the site with native species.
• Protecting the wetlands with a permanent Conservation Easement.
• Preservation of 2,075 feet of perennial stream.
1.3. Project Success Criteria
The project success criteria are as follows:
Vegetation success within the wetland areas that were planted and proposed for Wetland
Enhancement (2.26 -acres) will be based on the criteria established in the USACE Stream
Mitigation Guidelines (2003). This document states that vegetation monitoring results indicate the
following planted stem density minimums in the corresponding monitoring years: 320 stems/acre
through year three, 288 stems/acre in year four, and 260 stems/acre in year five.
Vegetation monitoring will not be conducted in the wetland preservation areas; however, the
entire site will be monitored via yearly photo points. Invasive plant species and beaver
colonization will be suppressed on the entire site until project closeout; however, there will be no
success criteria linked to treatment of the invasive plant species or beaver removal.
1.4. Annual Monitoring Results
Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) data collection consisted of monitoring previously established vegetation plots
in three of the four planted areas. Results from vegetation monitoring indicate that all plots are currently
meeting the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre (Table 6). Planted stem density
averaged 513 stems per acre across all plots. Stem density ranged from 324 stems per acre to 850 stems
per acre. When naturally recruited stems are included, densities ranged from 607 to 1,214 stems per acre
with an MY3 mean of 917 stems per acre across all plots. Ten woody species were documented in the
vegetation plots.
Visual assessments performed on June 2, 2016 and October 26, 2016 focused on planted stems outside of
the permanent vegetation monitoring plots and the status of invasive exotic vegetation. Although no
quantifiable data related to planted stems were collected during the visual assessment, observations
suggest that the planted stems are surviving throughout the easement. Dead stems were noted; however,
these were limited to isolated stems and not large areas.
In addition to planted stems, an inventory of invasive exotic vegetation was performed. Japanese
honeysuckle, Oriental bittersweet, Multiflora rose, and Chinese privet were documented throughout drier,
upland areas of the easement and scattered in low densities throughout the easement (Figure 2). Along
East Fork Pigeon River Site 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
the southeastern portion of the easement, a large swath of Japanese knotweed was noted in the floodplain
of the Pigeon River. Along the road in the northwestern portion of the easement, a patch of Kudzu was
documented. Bamboo was also noted in the wetter, more central portions of the easement. Treatments of
invasive exotic vegetation during MY3 occurred in May and September 2016. During the May
treatments, Chinese privet, Japanese Knotweed, Oriental bittersweet, multiflora rose, and bamboo were
treated with foliar spray of Element 3a and glyphosate. During the September site visit, Japanese
honeysuckle, Chinese privet, Multiflora rose, Oriental bittersweet, Japanese knotweed, and kudzu were
treated. Larger vines of kudzu were treated using cut and stump spray of Garlon 3a, while matted
infestations were sprayed with a foliar spay of Garlon 3a. The remaining invasive exotic species were
treated using a foliar spray of glyphosate. Treatments showed good efficacy; however, populations of
invasive -exotic vegetation still persist throughout the easement (Figure 2).
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables
and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Final Wetland Mitigation Report on NCDMS's website (NCEEP 2014).
All raw data, supporting tables, and figures in the appendices are available from NCDMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Vegetation plot monitoring data were collected following the standard CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level II, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). A total of three plots were monitored for this project.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2014. Final Wetland Mitigation Report -
East Fork Pigeon River Wetlands Project. Haywood County, North Carolina. Raleigh.
East Fork Pigeon River Site 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
East Fork Pigeon River Site 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix A
General Tables and Figures
Appendix A
Figure 1. Vicinity Map of the East Fork of the Pigeon River Wetland Site
s
rife{
G
��♦ ���` /
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
East Fork Pigeon
Project No. 94203
Haywood County, North Carolina
i
East Fork Pigeon River
40
Directions: From Asheville, take 140 West for approximately 18 miles,
Take exit 31 for Carolina 215 toward Canton_ Follow 215 to Pisgah
Drive mid true right. Go approximately a 0.5 miles and
turn right onto NC -110. Fallow NC 110 for approximately 5 miles.
Turn lett onto US -276 and follow for 2.3 miles, Slight right auto Old
Micheal Road. in approximately 0.3 miles easement is on right.
The subjectpmica site is mi environmental restoration site orthe
NCDEQ Division of MitipsTinn Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accesshhg the site may
require travemmg areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the g titers] public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees /contractors involved in the development, oversight and
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms mid
timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
"� FQ U [ N OX
Date: October 2016 Sheet: 1 of 1
Notes:
1 11
a 0.5 1 2
Miles
East Fork Pigeon River Site 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix A
Table 1. Project Components and Summation
East Fork of Pigeon Wetland / Project No. 94203
Feature
Mitigation
Quantity (Linear
Ratio
Mitigation Units
Dec 2010
Approach
Footage/Acreage)
N/A
(SMU/WMU)
Stream
March 2011
Permit Date
N/A
N/A
Perennial Stream
P
664
5:1
133
East Fork of the
p
1,411
5:1
282
Pigeon River
March 2011
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
June 2012
Total:
2,075
Total:
415
Wetland
July 2013
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Nov 2013
Bottomland
E
2.26
2:1
1.13
Hardwood Forest
Final Mitigation Plan (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
-
March 2014
Invasive Exotic Treatment
Bottomland
p
11.69
5:1
2.34
Hardwood Forest
Dec 2015
Dec 2015
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Total
13.95
Total
3.47
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
East Fork of Pigeon Wetland / Project No. 94203
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
orDelivery
Land Acquisition
-
Dec 2010
Environmental Resource Technical Report
N/A
N/A
Restoration Plan
N/A
March 2011
Permit Date
N/A
N/A
Initial Wetland Delineation
-
Oct 2010
Initial Invasive Exotic Reconnaissance
-
Oct 2010
Topographic Survey
-
Nov 2010
Initial Mitigation Plan / As -built
-
March 2011
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
June 2012
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Nov 2012
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
July 2013
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Nov 2013
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Dec 2013
Wetland Planting
-
Dec 2013
Final Mitigation Plan (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
-
March 2014
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
July 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct 2014
Nov 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec 2015
Dec 2015
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Sep 2016
Invasive Exotic Treatment
-
Oct 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 2016
Nov 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
N/A - Item does not apply.
- Information Unavailable
East Fork Pigeon River Site 7 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix A
Table 3. Project Contacts
East Fork of the Pigeon Wetland / Project No. 94203
Designer
AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, INC.
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27701
Primary Project Design POC
Richard Harmon (919)381-9909
Construction Contractor
N/A
N/A
N/A
Construction Contractor POC
N/A
Planting Contractor
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Professionals
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Planting Contractor POC
(704) 841-2841
Seeding Contractor
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Professionals
301 M cCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Seeding Contractor POC
(704) 841-2841
Seed Mix Sources
-
Nursery Stock Suppliers
_
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2013
AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, INC.
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27701
Monitoring POC
Richard Harmon (919)381-9909
Monitoring Performers
Equinox
(Yl -Y3) - 2015- 2016
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman (828) 253-6856
Invasive Control Contractor
Carolina Silvics
(Y2 -Y3) - 2015-2016
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Invasive Contractor POC
(252) 482-8491
N/A - Item does not apply.
- Information Unavailable
East Fork Pigeon River Site 8 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix B
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Appendix B
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
East Fork Pigeon River Site 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
w
�E 0
1
2
500
M Feet
Wo
rr
•
71!.
�k.. PP I 1
s ,
3
t �+
�rarr��
Lff,';,J?A%M
Prepared for:
NCDM S
Fi 2. Current CditiPlan Vi
Figure Condition View
g
East Fork Pigeon River Wetlands
Monitoring Year 3
NCDMS Project No. 94203
Haywood County, North Carolina
� Photo PointF7Criteria Met Cattails (Typha latifolia)- Vegetation Plot Success
very Low Density
•••-••-• -
UT -Preservation
Invasive Status
E. Fork Pigeon_
Preservation Present
_
�••7 Easement Dense
ti Treated
. Planted Areas M
U I N OX
�:� ��'
Date: October 2016 Sheet: 1 of 1
Notes:
-This figure is not a survey and should not be construed
as such.
-NCOnemap Aerial Imagery (2010).
-Planting Areas digitized/georeferenced from AMEC Mitigation Report (2014)
4
•
s, _ _
♦ n' S,
PPS
��•
>1������
°
'; PP6
��
►®�� �� PP3
i.
IPP2
PP5
t
w
�E 0
1
2
500
M Feet
Wo
rr
•
71!.
�k.. PP I 1
s ,
3
t �+
�rarr��
Lff,';,J?A%M
Prepared for:
NCDM S
Fi 2. Current CditiPlan Vi
Figure Condition View
g
East Fork Pigeon River Wetlands
Monitoring Year 3
NCDMS Project No. 94203
Haywood County, North Carolina
� Photo PointF7Criteria Met Cattails (Typha latifolia)- Vegetation Plot Success
very Low Density
•••-••-• -
UT -Preservation
Invasive Status
E. Fork Pigeon_
Preservation Present
_
�••7 Easement Dense
ti Treated
. Planted Areas M
U I N OX
�:� ��'
Date: October 2016 Sheet: 1 of 1
Notes:
-This figure is not a survey and should not be construed
as such.
-NCOnemap Aerial Imagery (2010).
-Planting Areas digitized/georeferenced from AMEC Mitigation Report (2014)
Appendix B
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
East Fork Pigeon River Site 12 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix B
N/A - Item does not apply.
East Fork Pigeon River Site 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 4. Vegetation Condition Assessment
East Fork of the Pigeon Wetland / Project
No. 94203
Planted Acreage: 2.29
Number of
Combined
% Of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
Stipple
2. Low Stem Density Areas
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Orange Dots White Background
0
0.00
o
0%
Totals
0
0.00
0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
N/A
0
0.00
o
0%
given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Totals
0
0.00
0%
Easement Acreage:
16.53
Of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
18
1.71
10%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
Stipple
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
0
0.00
0"
Purple Dots White Background
N/A - Item does not apply.
East Fork Pigeon River Site 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
x
lot
v
*�{ -
lit
Appendix B
Permanent Photo Station 7
East
Permanent Photo Station 8
South/Southeast
Permanent Photo Station 9
Southwest
Permanent Photo Station 10
South/Southwest
Permanent Photo Station 11
Southeast
Permanent Photo Station 12
East
East Fork Pigeon River Site 15 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Permanent Photo Station 13
Upstream
Permanent Photo Station 13
Downstream
East Fork Pigeon River -Permanent Photo Station 14
East/Southeast
Permanent Photo Station 15
North
Permanent Photo Station 16
West
East Fork Pigeon River Site 16 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix B
Permanent Photo Station 17
Northwest
Permanent Photo Station 18
North/Northeast
Permanent Photo Station 19
South/Southwest
Permanent Photo Station 20
North
East Fork Pigeon River Site 17 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Appendix C
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
East Fork Pi eon River Wetland / Project No. 94203
Vegetation
Vegetation Plot
Survival
Tract Mean
ID
Threshold Met?
1 Yes
100%
2 Yes
3 Yes
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
East Fork Pigeon River Site 19 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 6. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
East Fork Pigeon River Wetland /Project No. 64203
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
94203-EQX-0001 94203-EQX-0002 94203-EQX-0003 MY3 (2016)
PnoL P -all T PnoL P -all T PnoL P -all T PnoL P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoL P -all T
MYl (2014)
PnoL P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoL P -all T
Acer rubrum
Red maple
Tree
2
2
1
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
Red maple
Tree
1
Aesculus
Buckeye
2
2
Aesculus flava
Yellow Buckeye
Tree
2
2
Alnus serrulata
Hazel Alder
Shrub
I
I
1
I
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Shrub
1
1 1
1
1
1
4
41
4
4
4
4 4
41
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
4
4 4 5
5 5
4 4 8
13
13
17
14
141
14
14
14
14 12
12
12
Lindera benzoin
Northern Spicebush
Shrub
I
Lindera benzoin var. benzoin
Northern Spicebush
Shrub
1
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera
Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood Tree
6
6
6
Morus rubra
Red Mulberry
Tree 1
4
4
11
1
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
5
5 5
1 1 1
61
61
6
10
10
10
10
101
10 121
12
12
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
I I
I I
1
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
12
12 12 3
3 3
3 3 3
18
18
181
22
221
22
22
22
23 24
24
24
Salix caroliniana
Coastal Plain Willow
Tree
3
3
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
1
3
14
18
22
22
Sambucus
Elderberry
Shrub
2
2
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
Stem count
21
21 27 9
9 15
8 8 30
38
38
72
51
51
82
51
51
82 59
59
59
size (ares)
1 1 1
3
3
3
3
size (ACRES)
0.02 0.02 0.02
0.07
1
0.07
0.07
0.07
Species count
31
31
6 3
31
6
31 31
5
41
41
101
51
51
13
51
51
121
6
6
Stems per ACRE
8501
8501
1,093 364
364
607
324
1,214
5131
5131
9711
6881
6881
1,106
6881
6881
1,106
7961
796
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
East Fork Pigeon River Site 19 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 3 — June 2, 2016
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 3 — June 2, 2016
East Fork Pigeon River Site 20 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 3 — June 2, 2016
East Fork Pigeon River Site 21 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 94203 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5