20080833 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2015_20160328

Fletcher -Meritor Site
(UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project No: 138
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5
Henderson County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Construction Complete: May 2012
Data Collected: May 2015
Report Submission: February 2016

Prepared by:
Fm)I
HDR Engineering
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, NC 27601

0
Fletcher -Meritor Site
(UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project No: 138
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5
Henderson County, North Carolina
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................
2.0 Methodology.............................................................................................................................
2.1 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability.................................................................
2.1.1 Profile............................................................................................................................
2.1.2 Dimension.....................................................................................................................
2.1.3 Pattern ...........................................................................................................................
2.1.4 Substrate........................................................................................................................
2.1.5 Sediment Transport .......................................................................................................
2.1.6 Photo Documentation....................................................................................................
2.2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................
2.3 Hydrology.............................................................................................................................
3.0 REFERENCES CITED.............................................................................................................
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A GENERAL TABLES AND FIGURES
Figure 1
— Vicinity Map
Figure 2
— Asset Map
Table I a
— Project Components
Table lb
— Component Summations
Table 2 —
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 —
Project Contacts
Table 4 —
Project Attributes
1
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page i
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT
Figure 3a — Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3b — Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3c — Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3d — Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment — Upper Reach
Table 5b — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment — Lower Reach
Table 5c — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment - Tributary
Table 6 — Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos — Permanent Photo Points
APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 — Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 8 — CVS Vegetation Metadata
Table 9 — Vegetation Plot Data
Photos — Vegetation Plots
APPENDIX D STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table I Oa — Stream Data Summary — Upper Reach
Table 10b — Stream Data Summary — Lower Reach
Table l Oc — Stream Data Summary — Tributary
Table 11 a — Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary
APPENDIX E HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 — Verification of Bankfull Events
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Data
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page ii
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Fletcher -Meritor Site Stream and Wetland Restoration Project, completed in May 2012, restored
3,575 linear feet of meandering C/E-type stream along an Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Cane Creek plus
648 linear feet of a first order tributary (Tributary) to the Main Stem as well as re-establish hydrology and
hydrophytic vegetation to 6.7 acres of historical wetlands. This natural channel restoration consists of a
Priority II restoration that includes a bankfull bench to allow for flood attenuation before reconnecting to
the natural floodplain. The riparian buffer was planted with species representing an Alluvial Forest
grading to a Bottomland Forest Community (Schafale and Weakley, 1990). This stream was preserved
within the 20.3 acre conservation easement.
Efforts to restore or enhance wetlands on the project site included restoring topography, hydrology, and
habitats of a natural wetland system by excavating overburden/berms and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation. Following excavation, removal of drain tiles and
plugging of drainage ditches, the wetland areas were planted with native hardwoods.
The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
■ Improve local water quality by reestablishing stream stability and capacity to transport watershed
flows and sediment load.
■ Provide additional floodplain storage by increasing the capacity of the stream to mitigate flood flows.
■ Restore aquatic and riparian habitat.
■ Reducing non -point source sedimentation and nutrient inputs into the project reaches.
Project Objectives
■ Restore/enhance approximately 4,223 linear feet to stable stream channel morphology, supported by
instream habitat and grade/bank stabilization structures. Restoration and enhancement consists of
restoring the channel pattern and profile and building a floodplain bench along the reaches.
■ Reestablish hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation to 6.7 acres of historic wetlands by removing
overburden/berms, plugging agricultural drainage ditches, and replanting with native grasses, shrubs
and trees.
■ Eliminate accelerated bank erosion by creating a bankfull bench, floodplain, and laying back slopes.
■ Reestablish a native riparian buffer. Revegetation of the buffer was accomplished by planting tree and
shrub species for alluvial and Bottomland Hardwood Communities.
The project has been divided into segments which include three stream reaches and four wetland areas:
■ Upper Reach Main Stem -1796 linear feet
■ Lower Reach Main Stem— 1779 linear feet
■ Tributary — 648 linear feet
■ Wetland A — approximately 2.92 acres
■ Wetland B — approximately 1.43 acres
■ Wetland C — approximately 1.34 acres
■ Wetland D — approximately 0.97 acres
The project site, which is protected by a 20.3 -acre permanent conservation easement held by the State of
North Carolina, is situated in Henderson County in the North Carolina Mountains Physiographic
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 1
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

Province. The project is located in the French Broad River Basin, USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
06010105 and NCDWQ subbasin 04-03-02. Cane Creek is a North Carolina Class C stream that is listed
on the 303(d) list as ecologically/biologically impaired upstream of US 25 (NCDWQ 2012). In addition,
restored reaches drain lands with significant non -point source impacts to water quality from agriculture,
industrial/commercial development, and historical clay strip mining. Land Use / Land Cover data
indicates that more than 60 percent of the 1.1 -square mile UT to Cane Creek watershed is currently
pervious with the dominance of open fields/lawn/low-density residential lands, and about 40 percent is
impervious commercial/institutional buildings/roads.
The vegetative success of the restoration site is based on criteria established in the USACE Stream
Mitigation Guidelines (2003). Vegetation monitoring will be considered successful if a minimum of 260
planted stems/acre are surviving at the end of five years. The interim measure of vegetative success for
the site will be the survival of a minimum of 320 planted stems/acre in year three. The Monitoring Year 3
(MY3) stem counts are located in Tables 7 and 9 in Appendix C. Currently, 14 of 17 vegetation plots are
meeting the interim measures of success. Vegetation throughout the reach appears to be growing at
acceptable rates and the mortality rate appears to be fairly low. The three plots that are not meeting
interim success criteria include 2 along the tributary which may not have been planted at the appropriate
density and the plot closest to the confluence with Cane Creek which has had backwater impacts
numerous times over the monitoring years.
Numerous locations along the reaches have been noted as having sparse vegetation during previous
monitoring events; however, these areas are much smaller than in previous years. These areas are
illustrated on the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) in Appendix B. In addition to these locations, a
large area of cattails (Typha latifolia) is growing within the upper wetland area. The cattails are not
posing problems to the reaches currently; however, this location provides a seed source and should be
watched. Cattails have created issues when stands grow within streams by out -competing other riparian
herbaceous species and creating potential areas for aggradation. One location of multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora) was noted near vegetation plot 9. No other invasive species were noted. This will be
monitored in subsequent years due to the potential for invasives to develop.
During the March 2015 visit someone had removed the state combination lock to enter the site and a
keyed lock was on the crossing. There were no issues with access during the May site review. There
were some areas of encroachment during the visits; however, Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has
installed new signs on the site where farming activities were encroaching on the easement. In addition,
during a visit to gather monitoring well data it was noted that a well had been destroyed due to vehicles
driving over it along the western side of the tributary (within Wetland C area) at a farm access road that is
not gated. The local group of model airplane enthusiasts continues to maintain the nearby grassed area
and have been there often during our visits. A ditch which was cut in 2014 adjacent to the conservation
easement near the proposed wetland on the Lower Reach appears to be draining the proposed wetland and
may be an issue for maintaining hydrology at this location.
The reaches of the restoration project were observed to be in stable condition. The channel accesses its
floodplain and evidence of bankfull events were observed during Year 3 monitoring. This evidence
included the presence of wrack lines, sediment deposits, and the crest gauge. The substrate shows a
gradual change to more coarse material in the upper and lower reaches although the tributary reach still
has a hard clay substrate. This is expected as the tributary reach has little available to migrate into the
system. Sediment transport analysis and shear stress fall within acceptable ranges and similar to those of
the baseline condition.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 2
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

Notable areas of concern occur on all project reaches. The greatest of these was the number of beaver
dams on the Upper Reach and the structure failures along the Tributary Reach. The Upper Reach above
the permanent crossing was ponded with only one riffle noted due to the beaver dams although during
subsequent visits to the site several of the dams were breached. Also as noted in 2014, over half of the
log structures along the Tributary Reach had been eroded or are completely undermined. These structures
are still undermined or have erosion issues; however, water levels were higher during the monitoring
event and it appeared water was going over every structure rather than under as noted in 2014. The
substrate along the Tributary remains clay and there doesn't appear to be any larger size particles moving
into the reach. The most likely cause of the structure issues was the heavy rains received between May
and Dec 2013.
The Lower Reach also has an excavated ditch just outside the conservation easement which is currently
draining the proposed wetland. The ditch appears to have been dug by the farmer to drain his fields. The
wetland area is of concern as there is minimal hydrology reaching the site due to the ditch.
The last major area of concern is located at the permanent stream crossing near Sta. 24+00 on the Upper
Reach. There is some past erosion at the access road culvert (and floodplain pipes); however, the beaver
ponds upstream of the culverts continue to provide a source of debris that may obstruct the pipes and
cause additional damage to this crossing. Evidence of past erosion along the upstream side of the
crossing as well as scour on the downstream ends of the floodplain pipes still exist. In addition to the
permanent crossing on the Upper Reach, the beaver activity on this reach appears to be impacting channel
morphology, specifically in the loss of riffles and increased ponding of the majority of the reach.
Other areas of minor aggradation, erosion, or areas of sparse vegetation are noted in the tables, shown in
the photos, and illustrated on the attached mapping. These areas do not appear to be negatively impacting
the channel morphology at this time. Water clarity was slightly turbid to clear and water levels appeared
to be slightly higher than the previous assessment. Some trash/debris was noted on the site including
balls, cans, papers, etc. No construction equipment or materials were noted along the access roads during
the assessment.
In the previous year (summer 2014) a temporary crossing was located on the Lower Reach for utility line
installation. This has since been removed and stream repairs have been made to the areas that were
eroding, the log structure was replaced, and plantings were installed in January 2015. Planting included
15 live stakes, 90 bare roots, and 30 pint containerized plants consisting of river birch (Betula nigra), red
maple (Acer rubrum), willow oak (Quercus phellos), and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). This area
should be monitored for vegetation and structure stability.
Several factors have been determined to be worthy of future attention on the site. These include
backwater effects from Cane Creek during large precipitation events, beaver monitoring due to presence,
vegetation planted outside the planting window, and future plans by the Town that may impact the project
area such as development of the park with multiple uses.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting documentation formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on DMS's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS upon request.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 3
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

2.0 METHODOLOGY
Channel stability and vegetation survival were monitored on the project site. Post restoration monitoring
will occur for a minimum of five years or until the success criteria are met. The monitoring assessment
was completed using submeter accuracy GPS and Trimble VRS System on May 6, 7, and 8, 2015. This
report details the results of Monitoring Year 3.
2.1 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability
2.1.1 Profile
The entire length of the reach was monitored by HDR using the VRS System. Multiple parameters were
located including top of bank, thalweg, and water surface. In year 3, the upper reach was greatly impacted
by beaver activity. New dams were observed at the very top of the reach and near the riffle cross section
at 12+02. Breached dams and debris also contributed to water backing up in the reach. As a result, there
is a significant absence of riffle features until downstream of the culverts at Sta. 23+50. The riffles
observed however, matched well with values from previous years.
In the lower reach segment, similar measurements for riffles and pools were observed as compared to the
previous year. Some aggradation was observed, as reported in the CCPV, but overall profile facets are
remaining stable. Also of note is the removal of the aerial sewer crossing. Work on the sewer was
complete prior to longitudinal profile monitoring.
The tributary profile shows similar measurements compared with Year 2 with the one exception being
pool depth. Values for Year 3 show a noticeable increase in pool depth when compared to Year 2 and
previous monitoring years.
Bankfull and water surface slopes remain consistent for the lower and tributary channel segments when
compared to year 1, year 2, and baseline monitoring. The upper reach bankfull slope remains consistent
with previous years but water surface slope shows some increase. This is most likely a product of the
beaver activity causing water surface to change dramatically at dam locations and then stay flat through
large sections of the reach.
2.1.2 Dimension
Nine cross sections were measured by HDR staff on May 6-8, 2014. The morphological data is presented
in Tables 10 and 11 in Appendix D, along with the cross-sectional data. Riffles 1 and 3 in the upper reach
remained consistent with the dimensions from the previous year. The same is true for cross section 2
(pool) in the upper reach with a slight decrease in cross sectional area from Year 2.
Permanent riffle and pool sections for the lower reach are performing well and have changed little from
previous years in respect to dimensions. One item of note on riffle section 6 is a hole that has formed at
the outer right side extent of the floodplain bench before sloping up to terrace height. For the tributary
reach, the permanent riffles (XSC's 7&8) continue to show increasing depths from the previous year.
Also, the bankfull widths have noticeably increased. The permanent pool section (XSC9) continues a
trend of increasing depths.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 4
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

2.1.3 Pattern
The pattern of the channel was obtained using VRS measurements. The location is illustrated on the
current condition plan view map in Appendix B. No lateral movement in stream pattern was observed in
Year 3 monitoring.
2.1.4 Substrate
Pebble counts were taken for Year 3 monitoring at permanent riffle cross sections on the upper and lower
reaches. The Wolman Pebble count methodology was used to calculate the D50 and D84 to assess
changes in particle size distributions. Pebble counts were not initially planned for this restoration and
were not performed in baseline monitoring. However, due to significant presence of substrate seen during
year 1 monitoring, counts were performed to compare with future years. Counts were not performed on
the tributary reach due to the hard clay material making up the streambed.
The pebble counts from XSC1 remain similar to the previous year. Counts on XSC2 indicate in increase
in D50 from Year 2, putting the section back into the fine gravel range.
The lower reach cross sections, XSC4 and XSC6, continue the trend of hardening. XSC4 shows a notable
increase in D50 from Year2, moving from a medium to coarse gravel.
The pebble counts were taken at the same time as longitudinal and cross section data collection. On
subsequent visits since data collection in May, increased beaver activity has been seen in areas that affect
all four cross sections. If these areas stay dammed up, the pebble counts may be hard to get or show
skewed values in future year monitoring.
2.1.5 Sediment Transport
Shear stress values were calculated using riffle cross section measurements obtained in year 3 monitoring.
In Year 3 the shear stress values for the upper reach again showed the ability to easily move the D50
particle obtained from year 3 pebble counts (movable particle size predicted using Revised Shields
Diagram, Rosgen, 2002). The predicted movable particle size for Upper Reach riffle sections were 17mm
and 18mm, matched up with D50 values of 2.3mm and 3.2 mm, respectively. These results would
indicate some degradation; however, little degradation was noticed in visual assessment. An increase in
overall water surface slope factored in with the increase in predicted movable particle size. However, as
noted in section 2. 1.1 above, water surface slope on the upper reach is skewed due to beaver activity.
Lower Reach values for predicted movable particle size versus D50 from pebble counts are similar
indicating stable conditions. For XSC4, the predicted movable particle size is 13mm compared to the
observed D50 of 20mm. Riffle XSC6 has a predicted movable particle size of 12mm compared to an
observed D50 of 19mm.
The tributary reach has much higher shear stress values mainly as a product of a high water surface slope.
Predicted movable particle sizes, calculated at the two permanent riffles, indicate movable particle sizes
of 38 to 42mm. The bed material, however, is made up of hard, sticky clay that does not seem to move
during high flows. Also, over the monitoring period so far, there has been little evidence that sediment is
being brought into the system from upstream. This makes sense given the land use in the tributary
catchment. This lack of sediment supply along with flashy storm events has impacted in -stream
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 5
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

structures by lifting and transporting stream structure backfill material (No. 57 stone in particular). This
backfill material has been deposited on interior meander bends and other places along the reach.
2.1.6 Photo Documentation
Photos were taken at the 52 stream photo stations and 17 vegetation plots on March 24`h and May 12-14,
2015. The locations of the photos stations and vegetation plots are noted on Figure 3 in Appendix B. The
photos for monitoring year 3 are also provided in Appendix B.
2.2 Vegetation
The Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Protocol Level 2 methodology was used to sample vegetation on
May 7 and 8, 2015. Monitoring was conducted on seventeen vegetation plots (3 on the tributary, 7 on the
main stem upper reach and 7 on the main stream lower reach). The 100 -square meter CVS plots are
permanently marked with galvanized metal pipe. The plots occur within the floodplain/riparian area with
a few running upslope slightly.
According to the data collected, the average plant density among the 17 plots is 412 stems/acre with the
range from 162 to 809 stems/acre. The highest plant density occurred in plot 4 with over 800 stems/acre.
Currently, 14 of the plots are meeting the interim 3 -year vegetation success criteria of 320 stems/acre.
Year 3 monitoring data is provided in Appendix C. Vegetation throughout the reach appears to be
growing at acceptable rates and the mortality rate appears to be fairly low. Herbaceous vegetation which
has been noted as sparse during previous monitoring events appears to be filling in with the exception of a
few locations noted on the CCPV. The three plots that are not meeting interim success criteria include 2
along the tributary which may not have been planted at the appropriate density and the plot closest to the
confluence with Cane Creek which has had backwater impacts numerous times over the past couple of
years.
2.3 Hydrology
Thirty-five groundwater wells were installed in June 2013 in the proposed wetland areas to document
hydrology for the remaining years of monitoring. Several of the wells have not been fully operational
since their installation. Two crest gauges were installed and indicated several bankfull events as well as
evidence of bankfull events along the site in wrack lines.
Data from the groundwater monitoring stations showed 33 stations were in operation for a portion of the
2015 growing season. Well 29 was destroyed by a vehicle early in the growing season and Well 17 had
been destroyed by a vehicle in a previous year. The data revealed that 28 of the 33 stations met the soil
saturation criterion of groundwater being within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 5 percent of the
growing season (10 consecutive days). Several wells (3, 4, and 5) located in the proposed lower reach
wetland area are not meeting the hydrology criteria; however, the adjacent landowner has excavated a
nearby ditch which is potentially drawing down the water table. This could impact this proposed wetland
as the newly excavated ditch is extremely close to the wetland and is at least a couple of feet deep. The
other wells that were not meeting criteria were 22 and 28.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 6
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

4.0 REFERENCES CITED
HDR Engineering, Inc. 2008. Final Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan for the Fletcher -Meritor Site
(UT to Cane Creek).
HDR Engineering, Inc. 2011. UT to Cane Creek Stream Restoration Final Plans (90%).
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.)
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2011. Baseline Monitoring Document: Format, Data
Requirements, and Content Guidance.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2013. Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek)
Stream and Wetland Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV (EPA),
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(WRC).
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 7
Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5 February 2016
Project No: 138 Year 3 of 5

AppendixAM
General Tables And [Figures M

Vicinity Map
Figure 1
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 3 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program I Project No. 138

Asset Map
Figure 2
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 3 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program I Project No. 138

Table 1a. Project Components
Fletcher-Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Project
Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
Footage
or
Stationing
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP
Comment
or Reach ID
Feet/Acres
Level
Acreage
Ratio
Units
Elements
Fully restores pattern, dimension and profile by
excavating a new channel with an adjoining
Main Steam
1520 If
R
P2
1796 If
10+00-28+38
1:1
1796
floodplain bench that grades to the existing
Upper Reach
ground elevation in order to partial restore flood
prone conditions. A 42 foot road crossing was
installed on this reach.
Fully restores pattern, dimension and profile by
excavating a new channel with an adjoining
Main Steam
floodplain bench that grades to the existing
Lower Reach
1320 If
R
P2
1779 If
10+00-27+79
1:1
1769
ground elevation in order to partial restore flood
prone conditions. A 20 foot utility easement
crosses this restoration reach. SMUs were at 1/2
credit in the area of this crossing.
Fully restores pattern, dimension and profile by
excavating a new channel with an adjoining
Tributary
550 If
R
P2
648 If
10+00-16+48
1:1
648
floodplain bench that grades to the existing
ground elevation in order to partial restore flood
prone conditions.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland A
0 acres (TBD)
R
2.92 acres
1:1
2.92
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland B
0 acres (TBD)
R
1.43 acres
1:1
1.43
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland C
0 acres (TBD)
R
1.34 acres
1:1
1.34
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland D
0 acres (TBD)
R
0.97 acres
1:1
0.97
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.

Table 1 b. Component Summations
Fletcher -Meritor Site(UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Restoration
Level
Stream (If)
Stream
Mitigation
Units (If)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Planted
Area (Ac)
Potential
Buffer
Area (sf)
Upland
(Ac)
Total Conservation
Area (Ac)
BMP
Riverine
on-
Riverine
Main Steam
Upper Reach
1796
1796
0.0
0.0
Main Steam
Lower Reach
1779
1769
0.0
0.0
Tributary
648
648
0.0
0.0
Wetland A
0
0
2.92
Wetland B
0
0
1.43
Wetland C
0
0
1.34
Wetland
oas
(Feet/Acres)
4,223
4,213
6.7
18.59
20.3

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 3 yrs 0 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 3 yrs 0 Months
Number of Reporting Years: 3
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Completion or
Complete
Delivery
Restoration Plan
December 2007
February 15, 2008
Final Design — Construction Plans
December 2007
May 2011
Construction/Grading
NA
May 2012
Temporary Seeding
NA
Dec. 2011 -April 2012
Permanent Seeding
NA
April 2012
Planting (containerized, bare root)
NA
April 2012
Final Inspection
NA
June 2012
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0
Monitoring — baseline)
September 2012
May 2013
Year 1 Monitoring
May 2013
March 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
May 2014
August 2014
Utility Construction / Planting
Summer 2014
January 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
May 2015
January 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Designer
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207, Raleigh, NC 27612
Primary project design POC
Jonathan Henderson, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor
Buchanan and Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 123, Whittier, NC 28789
Construction contractor POC
Chris Buchanan, [phone]
Survey Contractor
Terminus Land Surveying, PLLC
28 Bessie Drive, Fletcher, NC 28724
Survey contractor POC
Christopher J. Gagne, [phone]
Planting Contractor
HARP, Inc.
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28262
Planting contractor POC
Alan Peoples, [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Buchanan and Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 123, Whittier, NC 28789
Contractor point of contact
Chris Buchanan, [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Protech Environmental, Charlotte, NC
Phone: [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Cure Nursery, Pittsboro, NC - [phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery LLC, Creston, NC - [phone]
Supertree Nursery, Blenheim, SC - [phone]
Habitat and Restoration Plants, Lexington, NC - [phone]
NC Division of Forest Resources, Greensboro, NC - [phone]
Little River Nursery, McMinnville, TN - [phone]
Virginia Department of Forestry, Crimora, VA - [phone]
Monitoring Performers - Baseline
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207, Raleigh, NC 27612
Vickie Miller, AICP, PWS [phone]
Stream Monitoring POC
Wyatt Yelverton, PE [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Vickie Miller, AICP, PWS [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
NA

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Fletcher-Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Project County
Henderson
Physiographic Region
Mountains
Ecoregion
Blue Ridge (Broad Basins)
Project River Basin
French Broad River Basin
USGS HUC for Project (8 digit)
6010105
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project
04-03-02
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
No
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
of project easement fenced or demarcated
100% marked with EEP easement signage
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Main Steam Upper Reach
Main Steam Lower Reach
Tributary
Wetland A
Wetland B
Wetland C
Wetland D
Drainage area (ac)
480
704
205
NA
NA
NA
NA
Stream order
2nd
1st
NA
NA
NA
NA
Restored length (feet or acreage)
1796
1779
648
2.92
1.43
1.34
0.97
Perennial or Intermittent
NA
NA
NA
NA
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing etc.)
Devel.
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.)
Watershed impervious cover (%) (Commercial/Institutional
Buildings/Roads)
Forested
Low Density Residential / Open Fields/ Lawns
Medium-Density Residential
38
20
28
14
NCDWQ AU/Index number
-
NCDWQ classification
C
NA
NA
NA
NA
303d listed?
No
NA
NA
NA
NA
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Biological Integrity (Benthos)
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total acreage of easement
20.3
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
18.59
Total planted acreage as pad of the restoration
18.59
Rosgen classification of pre-existing
Impaired Ditch
Impaired Ditch
Impaired Ditch
NA
NA
NA
NA
Rosgen classification of As-built
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley type
VIII
VIII
VIII
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley slope
0.31%
0.15%
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley side slope range (e.g. 2-3.%)
-
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley toe slope range (e.g. 2-3.%)
-
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cowardin classification
NA
Paludrine
Palustrine
Palustrine
Palustrine
Trout waters designation
No
NA
NA
NA
NA
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (YIN)
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Comus
Codorus
Kinkora
Codoms I
Kinkora
Kinkora
Kinkora
Comus I
Kinkora
Depth
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Clay°/
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
K
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
T
U
U
U
U
U
U
U

Appendix[ 0
Visuallkssessment0 0

LEGEND
0
Monitoring Wells
V Structures
6
Rain Gauge
Top of Bank
O
Photo Points
F-1 Vegetation Plot
•
Crest Gauge
Conservation Easement
Cross Section Pins
As Built Centerline
Cross Sections
Potential Restored Wetlands (A -D)
Stations
DATA SOURCE:
Bing Maps
0 Feet 200
"LOWER REACH
1779 FT
LOWERREACH
DIRT ROADjj
REMOVED
BEGIN LOWER REACH
STA. 10+00
END UPPER REACH
STA. 27+g6
END TRIB REACH
STA. 16+48
1: r 1
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
2-36" CMP
2-24" CMP FLOODPLAIN CULVERT
TRIB R
648 FT
UR 12
UR 11 7
&tR,60-
\ Q
UR 14 - - = 0UR 10 ♦ o
Bilge idyUR 16 0 96 p
9 0 9 a# 6 13 + 16
_
UR
.`� 11 14
UR 15 ♦ 12 18
1r7 y
7 +
7
+ 10
s
ACCESS
��•
BEGIN TRIB REACH
STA. 10+00
�, ±•. + ' Image courtes
FLETCHER-MERITOR SITE (UT TO CANE CREEK) MONITORING YEAR 3
01 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 3A
PATH: V:IPROJECTS10S177_NCWRPk20671_FLETCHER%MAP_DOCSIMXDkMONITORINGkYEAR3%FIG3A_MONITORINGLOCATIONS_REV20160226.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: 212 612 01 6 NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I PROJECT NO. 138

GIN UPPER
A.10+00.00
PERMANENT STREAM CROSS 0
2-36" CMP ,O
224 CMP FLOODPLAIN CULVERTS 7 WA
Az
'W
Monitoring Wells
Rain Gauge
A.,
WIF WE yj7 0 Crest Gauge
Photo Points
Cross Section Pins
Cross Sections
Stations
Year 3 Conditions
ACCESS Structure Condition Bed/Bank Conditions Vegetation Plot Condition Problem Areas Top of Bank
ROAD Stable =EE:w::: Aggradation Bare Vegetation
A =Criteria not met, >10% Vegetation Plot
AScour Erosion Exceeds requirement, <10% Beaver Dam Conservation Easement
Silted In Debris Exceeds requirement, >10% Breached Beaver Dam
CE Disturbance As Built Centerline
0 50 100 200 Cattails Feet Potential Restored Wetlands
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3b
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 3 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program I Project No. 138

EXCAVATED
DITCH Year 3 Conditions
Structure Condition Vegetation Plot Condition
/ \ Stable Criteria not met, >10%
A Scour Exceeds requirement, <10
4 Q
© Exceeds requirement, >10
Silted In
Problem Areas
Bed/Bank Conditions
Ofl � Bare Vegetation
Aggradation
O�1 Beaver Dam
® Erosion
Moo Breached Beaver Dam
Debris -
CE Disturbance
fF Cattails
343 m� TEMPORARY STREAM
N CROSSING REPAIRED "r" � Q
DIRT ROAD u}
REMOVED
x -„#► w � 'fir _ _,' CQi�I
t � -
BEGIN LOWER REACH '
STA. 10+00 „• .
END UPPER REACH
STA. 27+96 fl9C4
END TRIB REACH
STA. 16+48 m
m �
m mo
Q ACCESS
fl
Monitoring Wells Q ROAD
,
2 Rain Gauge `: F
• Crest Gauge ��3t11 m4
€!3 A
O Photo Points t i
O Cross Section Pins
Cross Sections X38 �39�
Stations
Top of Bank . TRIB REACH``
648 FT
Vegetation Plot
Conservation Easement
Rockwell Road RI
BEGIN TB REACH
j
As Built Centerline STA. TRI
+00
Potential Restored Wetlands o so too 200
Feet
Current Conditions Plan View
N�ZF)l Figure 3c
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 3 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program I Project No. 138

Current Conditions Plan View
Kro F)�Z Figure 3d
Fletcher-Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 3 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program I Project No. 138

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Upper Reach
Assessed Length 1796
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
7
157
91%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
21
76%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
17
23
74%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
17
23
74%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
22
22
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
21
21
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
7
94
97%
97%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
7
94
97%
0
097%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
23
23
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
23
23
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
23
23
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
6
6
°
100/o

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Lower Reach
Assessed Length 1779
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
8
258
85%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
14
16
88%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
12
16
75%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
12
16
75%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
16
16
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
16
16
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
4
100
97%
97%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
4
100
97%
0
097%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
18
18
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
16
17
94%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
17
17
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
4
4
°
100/°

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Tributary
Assessed Length 648
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
7
11
64%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
-
10
11
91%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
10
11
91%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
11
11
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
11
11
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
16
242
81%
0
0
81%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
16
242
81%
0
0
81 %
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
12
12
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
9
11
82%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
12
33%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
7
12
58%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
11
11
o
100/o

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreage' 18.59
Easement Acreage2 20.3
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Ve etation Cate o
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.001 ac.
Pattern and
14
0.11
0.6%
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Color
1
0.01
0.0%
Pattern and
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.001 ac.
3
0.06
0.3%
Pattern andColor
Color
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Total
17
0.17
0.9%
Pattern and
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.1 ac.
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
Cumulative Total
17
0.17
0.9%
Easement Acreage2 20.3
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slight) longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that general y do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, ifyin the judgbement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is su pressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
inteects
historytion of risk will warrant acoors ntrol, but pote tial) y EEP such as sgg�arge cecies overages of Mic osttheir eg um intheherbon re layerve owillnative
ot Ilkley �gtrigger contrthe ol because offtthe limited capacities ent. For pto impaceven tltree/shrub ayersodest amounts fwithinKudzu
the timeframes discussed aanese Knotweed ndnthe the potential
particulars cts of
given their extreme risk/Threat at lle el for mapping o und cove r. Those es 1es ppoints where isolated speciith the "watch list" mensor in are founds particularly ealry ine are of tas a projects lmonitoring but have tto be history. Horved across the wever, areas of disce et with
densef patches willof course beitalics
mapped st
polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for sym o zing Invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet
patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things Pike high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section
of the executive summary.
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vecietation Cateaory
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Pattern and
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
1
0.01
0.0%
Color
Pattern andColor
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0.00
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slight) longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that general y do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, ifyin the judgbement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is su pressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
inteects
historytion of risk will warrant acoors ntrol, but pote tial) y EEP such as sgg�arge cecies overages of Mic osttheir eg um intheherbon re layerve owillnative
ot Ilkley �gtrigger contrthe ol because offtthe limited capacities ent. For pto impaceven tltree/shrub ayersodest amounts fwithinKudzu
the timeframes discussed aanese Knotweed ndnthe the potential
particulars cts of
given their extreme risk/Threat at lle el for mapping o und cove r. Those es 1es ppoints where isolated speciith the "watch list" mensor in are founds particularly ealry ine are of tas a projects lmonitoring but have tto be history. Horved across the wever, areas of disce et with
densef patches willof course beitalics
mapped st
polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for sym o zing Invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet
patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things Pike high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section
of the executive summary.

Upper Reach Photo Station 1 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
p
Upper Reach Photo Station 1 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 2 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 2 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 3 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 3 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 4 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 4 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 5 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 5 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 6 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 6 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 7 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 7 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 9 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 9 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

� �1r7 •,a,r f � ,
.,.
4p, Ip
TN
��� ,. � d �
,} I,- o F 1
ki%
:, I,wC J�,/l�J�py
j A3A
,rr fl i
r 't
-
� � a

Upper Reach Photo Station 11 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 11 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 12 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 12 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report
February 2016
DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 13 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 13 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report
February 2016
DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 14 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 14 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 15 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 15 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 16 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 16 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

W�
�+
o
F ,I
z
1
w `y
µL15 -1A li �

Upper Reach Photo Station 18 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 18 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

^Fw{ h
_ \ a
7.
;�
Ij
.. ��,: ..i . fix a�� � �r t •� �i+ _
•�£� ' � { �� � �i .s"' ;{�+ a� `:q� �3tTi;/. Yom'

Upper Reach Photo Station 20 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 20 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 21 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 21 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 22 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Upper Reach Photo Station 22 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

41
�.� qtr• `;t ,. I �� .�` Jy �f� ��',�� ! �a���i �' �,,,Y yy
' + i• 1P��� � t���g� � �f gy4� �,y f'Fy i'.i �t�� ;r:1�v
r I
J it
8r 1

Confluence with Cane Creek (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Looking upstream of Confluence with Cane Creek (3/18/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

lop
.b 1• ,
r
o,
- IS
y
�" -3 1-2U

Lower Reach Photo Station 2 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 2 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Ar
Y1
5 1?
__-
ij" y�
03/23/2'015 .,.:
�% � I

Lower Reach Photo Station 4 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 4 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 5 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 5 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

4
1 ,
Lower Reach Photo Station 6 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 6 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report
February 2016
DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 7 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
''44A
iw;�,, ;•uw• h_�1�
x =.40
i,.v
Lower Reach Photo Station 7 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 8 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 8 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report
February 2016
DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 9 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 9 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

SAF
1 I
f Yr! i �- :�fp, 1. � ,�• q �� � {�I NY. drP i �'�I ..fir,
94Y
-0-312

I
IWIR
1
03'J 23'120 !°5-='

Lower Reach Photo Station 12 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
�,, .a VtAx
Lower Reach Photo Station 12 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 13 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 13 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 14 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 14 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 15 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
4.1 s 7f
d`
✓{ SA�,J ~`� , is
Lower Reach Photo Station 15 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 16 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 16 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Y
is
IUJ���c�J�L�IJ�
Lower Reach Photo Station 17 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Lower Reach Photo Station 17 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 2 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 2 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 3 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 3 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

- .,Ain _ZyiM.�, l � �' � ANO WM sli Ak '
60.
NOV
- rt
NZ
Tributary Reach Photo Station 4 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 4 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

r
{ l/
iv
i 1
Tributary Reach Photo Station 5 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
• 1' tr r S'
Tributary Reach Photo Station 5 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138
el !r
,r
1
1
• 1' tr r S'
Tributary Reach Photo Station 5 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 6 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 6 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 7 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 7 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 8 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 8 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 9 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
r
Tributary Reach Photo Station 9 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138
Tributary Reach Photo Station 9 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

4r�#�� ��' -; f
796
q �
,
4N/ }
'03 2312015

Tributary Reach Photo Station 11 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 11 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Tributary Reach Photo Station 12 Downstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 12 Upstream (3/23/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project February 2016
Year 3 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

AppendixEM
Vegetation [Plot®ata M
0 0

Fletcher -Meritor Site (#138)
Year 3 (07 -May -2015)
Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Riparian Stream/
Buffer Wetland
Plot # Stems' Stems2 Live Stakes Invasives Volunteers3
Tota 14
Unknown
Growth
Form
1 n/a 4 0 0 20 30 1
2
n/a
8
0
0
3
18
0
3
n/a
5
0
0
1
6
1
4
n/a
20
0
0
7
27
0
5
n/a
13
0
0
13
27
0
6
n/a
8
0
0
36
44
0
7
n/a
17
0
0
10
27
0
8
n/a
11
0
0
13
24
0
9
n/a
8
0
0
6
14
0
10
n/a
10
0
0
16
26
0
11
n/a
11
0
0
306
317
0
12
n/a
10
0
0
122
132
0
13
n/a
9
0
0
106
115
0
14
n/a
10
0
0
100
110
0
15
n/a
15
0
0
300
315
0
16
n/a
9
0
0
105
114
2
17
n/a
5
0
0
207
212
2
Wetland/Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Stream/
Wetland Success
Plot # Stems2 Volunteers3 Tota 14 Criteria Met?
1
162
809
1214
No
2
324
121
728
Yes, barely
3
202
40
243
No
4
809
283
1093
Yes
5
526
526
1093
Yes
6
324
1457
1781
Yes, barely
7
688
405
1093
Yes
8
445
526
971
Yes
9
324
243
567
Yes, barely
10
405
647
1052
Yes
11
445
12383
12829
Yes
12
405
4937
5342
Yes
13
364
4290
4654
Yes
14
405
4047
4452
Yes
15
607
12141
12748
Yes
16
364
4249
4613
Yes
17
202
8377
8579
No
Project Avg
412
3264
3709
Yes

Stem Class
1Buffer
Stems
2Stream/
Wetland
Stems
3Volunteers
4Total
Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Riparian Success
Buffer Criteria
Plot # Stems' Met?
1
n/a
2
n/a
3
n/a
4
n/a
5
n/a
6
n/a
7
n/a
8
n/a
9
n/a
10
n/a
11
n/a
12
n/a
13
n/a
14
n/a
15
n/a
16
n/a
17
n/a
Project Avg
n/a
characteristics
Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines
Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines.
Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines.

Report Prepared By Vickie Miller
Date Prepared 8/19/2015 22:47
database name
database location
computer name
file size
cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1 Fletcher Year 3.mdb
C:\Users\vimiller\Desktop\Fletcher Veg Plots
RALE -12116343
57147392
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code 138
project Name Fletcher -Meritor Site
Description Wetland and Stream mitigation in Henderson County, NC.
River Basin French Broad
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 17

EEP Project Code 138. Project Name: Fletcher -Meritor Site
Current Plot Data (MY3 2(
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
138-01-0001
138-01-0002
138-01-0003
138-01-0004
138-01-0005
138-01-0006
138-01-0007
138-01-0008
138-01-0009
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
Acer
maple
Tree
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
5
7
7
7
2
1
1
3
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
1
31
1
1
1
1
21
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
10
2
2
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
6
2
2
3
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
S
S
S
2
2
4
4
4
12
21
2
2
1
1
2
4
4
4
Populus
cottonwood
1
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1
1
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
11
1
1
11
1
3
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
5
5
24
7
7
10
1
1
1
9
27
8
5
1
Unknown Prunus/Ilex
1
11
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
101
101 30
151
151 18
51
51 6
201
201 27
141
141 27
81
81 44
171
17 27
111
Ill 24
81
81 14
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
51 51 61 41 41 4 31 31 4 51 51 6 7 77 3 3 5 6 6 8 4 4 7 4 4 7
404.7 404.7 1214 607 607 728.4 202.3 202.3 242.8 809.4 809.4 1093 566.6 566.6 1093 323.7 323.7 1781 688 688 1093 445.2 445.2 971.2 323.71 323.7 566.6

Annual Means

A`l
r.;
_
r
r
r .
t_
y,
IN

Vegetation Plot 3 — IOm x 1 Om (5/07/2015 Year 3)
Vegetation Plot 4 — 1 Om x 1 Om (5/07/2015 Year 3)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project (Year 3 of 5) February 2016
Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

7- --Vr-9P-4PWT
It �'Xplj *,N!,l
x , f
iW
7
1,4

�'
.���
�'�a", Axa fi�� w � I -.I • � i ,,i'� � � �vV'"''$. � �y� �`W� E ' � 1��{1y � �13a t� ;��� � a;'.. � � � ��, ��p,�,g,, i ° r
7 � � M�.M +� 4 1 •, � 'fir . � � ,� i �' �'�; �YV� ",��,• � ����E `E,� i � >��' � ° -� "j Ei,�� �q f h�;+��
i tt
x
z'
,
,
i

vs. f .
fn
f ,
r1.�g { Y 1
f il S i' f rf�N T
Jaer

�•� ¢w �� r vi_. D r � l7.. i A i=r r��
i
v 7:
` 1 y
x i
,
,
v
A]

J
V:I; a
. + +a✓,. at wit b, d��`n aI�L�-l��r�.:j�' kx R ° � ��%
F 7 Y
_ �' y >/ ' _
— _a+.r.4i N t • 1�R�S1' Qtt'!-�q`)r,r }1 fiy
lu
ANI
'`• pix'-.""._ .
7+°
° "r��� CJs
V:I; a
. + +a✓,. at wit b, d��`n aI�L�-l��r�.:j�' kx R ° � ��%
F 7 Y
f f I
�,`���� � 4� '� 1't �'�� {k ..r r7 I<�
�i.�,F \.'r�� f y�d�
� ��. 7 j 1 ;• ir" ���� ��"\ - �
� I
}� �: ���
'� f 'L. —
��' �, � r � ,1'`17
� �.
r r �, ��
1 7� % �a � 1' , iR � �� ! � ..S -:.
{ � �t,r �
✓ .
�

1
, s
i
1
' I
I
�A
a
r

r
r
\�
\
.a
a

Appendix® 0
Stream lkssessment®ata 0

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Upper Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-1, Riffle, Upper Reach, 12+02
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.75
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC
�f— MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 —
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.90
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ftZ
14.20
Bankfull Width, ft
11.60
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.29
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.22
Width/Depth Ratio
9.48
Flood Prone Width, ft
94.40
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.19
Entrenchment Ratio
8.14
Bank Height Ratio
0.99
Stream Type I C/E4 I I Sta. 12+02 Looking Downstream
2063.00
2062.00
Fletcher -Meritor XSC
�f— MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 —
1- Riffle, Upper Reach, Sta. 12+02
MY105/13/13 — Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
--------------------------------------
------ ----------------------------
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
0.00 20.00 40.00
60.00 80.00 100.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Upper Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-2, Pool, Upper Reach, 14+69
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.75
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 2 - Pool, Upper Reach, Sta. 14+69
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/2012 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.61
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft2
21.00
Bankfull Width, ft
19.50
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
3.08
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.08
Width/Depth Ratio
18.11
Flood Prone Width, ft
>86.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.69
Entrenchment Ratio
>4.00
Bank Height Ratio
1.06
Stream Type I I Sta. 14+69 Looking Downstream
2062.00
2061.00
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 2 - Pool, Upper Reach, Sta. 14+69
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/2012 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
0.00
10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Upper Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-3, Riffle, Upper Reach, 15+23
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.75
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ftZ
20.50
Bankfull Width, ft
14.80
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.95
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.39
Width/Depth Ratio
10.68
Flood Prone Width, ft
>86.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.69
Entrenchment Ratio
>6.00
Bank Height Ratio
1.05
Stream Type I C/E4 I Sta. 15+23, Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 3 - Riffle, Upper Reach, Sta. 15+23
-o--MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14—MY105/13/13 —Baseline 09/17/12 —Baseline Bankfull Datum
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
------------------------��
Air
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00
90.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Lower Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-4 Riffle, Lower Reach, 14+55
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
1.1
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 4 - Riffle, Lower Reach, Sta. 14+55
-;� MY3 05/07/15 - MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 - Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2053.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ftZ
26.20
Bankfull Width, ft
17.70
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.71
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.48
Width/Depth Ratio
11.96
Flood Prone Width, ft
138.30
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2056.45
Entrenchment Ratio
7.81
Bank Height Ratio
0.99
Stream Type I C/E4 I Sta. 14+55 Looking Downstream
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 4 - Riffle, Lower Reach, Sta. 14+55
-;� MY3 05/07/15 - MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 - Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2056.00
2055.00
2054.00 -----------------------
2053.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2052.00
2051.00
2050.00
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Lower Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-5, Pool, Lower Reach, 16+15
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
1.1
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 5 - Pool, Lower Reach, Sta. 16+15
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2053.32
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ftZ
33.80
Bankfull Width, ft
27.10
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
3.34
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.25
Width/Depth Ratio
21.73
Flood Prone Width, ft A
84.90
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2056.66
Entrenchment Ratio
3.13
Bank Height Ratio
0.98
Stream Type 1 Sta. 16+15 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 5 - Pool, Lower Reach, Sta. 16+15
�E— MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 — MY105/13/13 — Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
OOK
2055.00
2054.00
---------
--------------- ------------------------ ------------------
2053.00
2052.00
2051.00
2050.00
�1110 woof
2049.00
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Lower Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-6, Riffle, Lower Reach, 17+89
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
1.1
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2053.03
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ftZ
25.00
Bankfull Width, ft
17.80
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.65
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.40
Width/Depth Ratio
12.67
Flood Prone Width, ft
102.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2055.68
Entrenchment Ratio
5.73
Bank Height Ratio
0.97
Stream Type I C/E4 I I Sta. 17+89 Looking Downstream
00
Fletcher -Meritor XSC
6 - Riffle,
Lower Reach, Sta. 17+89
MY3 05/07/15 - MY2 05/14/14 -
MY105/13/13
- Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
Ar
2054.00
2053.00
2052.00
2051.00
2050.00
2049.00
0.00
20.00 40.00
60.00
80.00 100.00 120
00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Tributary
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-7, Riffle, Tributary, 12+10
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.32
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2059.00
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft2
10.30
Bankfull Width, ft
9.20
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.87
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.12
Width/Depth Ratio
8.22
Flood Prone Width, ft
34.02
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2060.87
Entrenchment Ratio
3.70
Bank Height Ratio A
1.03
Stream Type I I Sta. 12+10 Looking Downstream
2063.00
Fletcher -Meritor
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14
XSC 7 - Riffle, Tributary, Sta.
MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/12
12+10
--- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
0.00
5.00 10.00 15.00
20.00 25.00 30.00
35.00 40.00 45.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Tributary
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-8, Riffle, Tributary, 12+72
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.32
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 8 - Riffle, Tributary, Sta. 12+72
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft2
12.60
Bankfull Width, ft
9.90
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.26
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.27
Width/Depth Ratio
7.78
Flood Prone Width, ft
45.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2060.71
Entrenchment Ratio
4.55
Bank Height Ratio J
0.89
Stream Type IC/E4I Sta. 12+72 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 8 - Riffle, Tributary, Sta. 12+72
—it— MY3 05/07/15 t MY2 05/14/14 - MY1 05/13/13 Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
0.00
10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Tributary
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-9, Pool, Tributary, 13+07
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.32
Date
5/7/2015
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2057.55
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft2
13.00
Bankfull Width, ft
8.10
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.94
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.60
Width/Depth Ratio
5.05
Flood Prone Width, ft
34.70
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2060.49
Entrenchment Ratio
4.28
Bank Height Ratio
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
2054.00
0.00
0.98 Stream Type I C/E4 I Sta. 13+07 Looking Upstream
Pool XSC in Foreground
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 9 - Pool, Tributary, Sta. 13+07
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 - MY105/13/13 - Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00

2062
2061
X
xx
2060
2059
2058
,--� 2057
C
2056
cC
a�
W 2055
2054
2053
2052
2051
XX X x X x x
XX x x X X x
x
� x x X
�----- X x
x
VIN
Longitudinal Profile
Fletcher - Upper Reach
Project Number - 138
Station 10+25.00 - 28+37.86
X x xx X X X X
X X XXX X X X
XX x
Break in Conservation Easement
X
xX XXX
x x X X X x
x x
x xx XX
X Xx
X
J
Culvert Location
X X x X
X X x XC x
X
X
x X X x X x x xx
X
X
2050 i
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850
Station (ft)
Baseline 9/17/12—MY 1 5/13/13 —MY2 05/14/14 MY3 5/7/15 — — -Water Surface MY3 x Bankfull/TOB MY3 ♦ Cross Sections A Structures

Longitudinal Profile
Fletcher - Lower Reach
Project Number - 138
Station 10+00.00 - 26+45.00
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________-------------
--------------
m______________
--------- ___-
-------------
-----
x x
2055
X
x
x
X X
X
X
X
X'
2054
X
N
x
X
X
X
XX
x
X
2053
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
2052
- - -
X
X
C
X
X
X
X
a? 2051
- -
-
-
x
X
W
2050
2049
2048
2047
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750
Station (ft)
Baseline, 9/17/12 MY1, 5/13/13 MY2, 05/14/14 MY3 5/7/15 — — -Water Surface MY3 x Bankfull/TOB MY3 ♦ Cross Sections 0 Structures

Longitudinal Profile
Fletcher - Tributary
Project Number - 138
Station 10+00.00 - 1647.65
--------- ------------
2062---- - — --- --- - -----------------------------------------------------
Profile Begins at Outlet of
Double-48" CMP (Station 10+00)
2061
x
X
X X
X
2060
X X
X x
71�
X
x
X
2059
X
X
X
2058
__------
......
X x
` ♦
x X
X
CK
X
r
X
y 2056
W
XX
X
/2055
r
X
X
X
X
2054
......... ............. .............
.................................... ....................................
J
L
2053
2052
2051
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650
Station (ft)
Baseline, 9/17/12—MY 1 5/13/13 MY2, 05/14/14 MY3 5/7/15 — — Water Surface MY3 x Bankfull/TOB MY3 ♦ Cross Sections A Structures

Fletcher - Upper Reach XSC-1 Riffle -Pebble Count
Location: STA 12+02
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY1
Count
%Total
% Cum.
3
D84
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
30
30.0
30.0
9
Very Fine
0.062- .125
S
A
N
6
6.0
36.0
Fine .125-.25
2
2.0
38.0
Medium .25 - .50
2
2.0
40.0
Coarse .50 - 1.0
0
0.0
40.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-27
1 4
4.0
44.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
25
25.0
69.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
9
9.0
78.0
.22-.31
Fine 5.7-8
7
7.0
85.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
6
6.0
91.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3- 16
5
5.0
96.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
4
4.0
100.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
0
0.0
100.0
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
0
0.0
100.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
0
0.0
100.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
0
0.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
2.4
2.1
3
D84
7.7
6.5
7
D95
15
10
9

40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
�a
20.0
0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Pebble count at XSC-1-Riffle
�MY2 05/14/14 MY1 05/09/13 — MY3 05/07/15 —MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
ppti ��h `Lh hp ``O p j• 0,'� �'l 1 '�^� �O �`ti�O p0, �h OR pO ��4� �`bO O��o po`L ��`L Ne
op�ti" �ti ti w' ,�bo,
Particle Size (mm)
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0 >
Z
R
50.0 E
V
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Fletcher -Upper Reach - XSC-3 Riffle Pebble Count
Location: STA 15+23
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY1
Count
%Total
% Cum.
3
D84
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
7
7.0
7.0
10
Very Fine
0.062- .125
S
A
N
5
5.0
12.0
Fine .125-.25
15
15.0
27.0
Medium .25 - .50
5
5.0
32.0
Coarse .50 - 1.0
4
4.0
36.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-27
1 1
1 1.0
37.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
19
19.0
56.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
5
5.0
61.0
.22-.31
Fine 5.7-8
19
19.0
80.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
15
15.0
95.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3- 16
5
5.0
100.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
0
0.0
100.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
0
0.0
100.0
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
0
0.0
100.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
0
0.0
100.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
0
0.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
3.2
0.5
3
D84
8.7
8.3
8
D95
11
11
10

Pebble count at XSC-3-Riffle
�MY2 05/14/14 MY1 05/09/13 — MY3 05/07/15 —MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14 MY1 05/09/13
25
20
15
�a
0
H
0
10
5
0
Opp �`�� `�� hp `�� O L c' � �� 'l '16 h�llb Np rl`1i� "��L ph OR pp NTIb NpO �Jb OO`L `j��' Ne Opp ioG�
op�ti" �ti ti w' ,�� �ti c �ti ,mow �� '� , �
Particle Size (mm)
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0 >
Z
R
50.0 E
V
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Fletcher -Lower Reach - XSC-4 Riffle Pebble Count
Location: STA 14+55
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY1
Count
%Total
% Cum.
10
D84
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
0
0.0
0.0
61
Very Fine
0.062- .125
S
A
N
4
4.0
4.0
Fine .125-.25
0
0.0
4.0
Medium .25 - .50
4
4.0
8.0
Coarse .50 - 1.0
6
6.0
14.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-27
1 0
0.0
14.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
5
5.0
19.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
0
0.0
19.0
.22-.31
Fine 5.7-8
5
5.0
24.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
8
8.0
32.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3- 16
10
10.0
42.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
12
12.0
54.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
10
10.0
64.0
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
25
25.0
89.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
6
6.0
95.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
5
5.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -
14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
20
13
10
D84
42
40
38
D95
64
54
61

30.0
25.0
20.0
Pebble count at XSC-4-Riffle
�MY2 05/14/14 MY1 05/09/13 — MY3 05/07/15 —MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
0-
0
10.0
5.0
M
Opp �`�� `�� hO `�� O L c' �� 'l ' 6 h� llb Np rl`1 i� "�`L ph OR pp ��4� �pO ���0 OO`L Ne �O�'�` Opp ioG*
oC310 �ti ti w' ,�b�ti c �ti ,mow �� '� , � �p��
Particle Size (mm)
60.0 >
Z
R
50.0 E
V
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Fletcher -Lower Reach - XSC-6 Riffle Pebble Count
Location: STA 17+89
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY1
Count
%Total
% Cum.
0.6
D84
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
1
1.0
1.0
20
Very Fine
0.062- .125
S
A
N
1
3
3.0
4.0
Fine .125-.25
7
7.0
11.0
Medium .25 - .50
5
5.0
16.0
Coarse .50 - 1.0
0
0.0
16.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0 - 2
0
0.0
16.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
5
5.0
21.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
2
2.0
23.0
.22-.31
Fine 5.7-8
1
1.0
24.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
8
8.0
32.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3- 16
4
4.0
36.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
28
28.0
64.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
30
30.0
94.0
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
6
6.0
100.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
0
0.0
100.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
0
0.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
19
17
0.6
D84
28
26
16
D95
34
31
20

40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
�a
20.0
0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Pebble count at XSC-6-Riffle
�MY2 05/14/14 MY1 05/09/13 — MY3 05/07/15 —MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
ppti ��h `�� hp `�O p L c1,'� �� 1 r�lb � NO � "��L ph OR pp NT NpO ���0 5(b `jN Ne, Opp io0
oppti" �ti ti w' Nb
p
Particle Size (mm)
60.0 >
Z
R
50.0 E
V
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Exhibit Table 10a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Fletcher -Meritor (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetiand Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Upper Reach (1838 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SID
n
Min Mean
Med Max SID
n Min Mean Med Max SID n Min Mean Med Max SID n
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.50
14.80
15.10
2
14.00
14.20
14.40
2
12.60
13.15
13.70
2
11.60 13.20
14.80
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
53.00
>86.00
2
65.20
>86.00
2
>86.00
98.40
2
>86.00
94.40
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.26
1.37
1.47
2
1.19
1.33
1.47
2
1.13
1.30
1.47
2
1.22 1.31
1.39
2
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.80
2.00
2.20 1
2
2.01
2.15
2.29
2
2.23
2.57
2.91 1
2
2.29 1 2.62
1 2.95
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
19.10
20.20
21.30
2
16.70
18.95
21.20
2
14.20
17.15
20.10
2
14.20 14.50
14.80
2
Width/Depth Ratio
9.87
10.91
11.94
2
9.78
10.76
11.74
2
9.34
10.26
11.18
2
9.48 10.08
10.68
2
Entrenchment Ratio
3.50
>6.00
2
4.70
>6.00
2
>6.00
7.81
2
>6.00
8.14
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
1.00
2
0.99
1.01
1.03
2
0.95
0.99
1.03
2
0.99 1.02
1.05
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11.48
25.61
23.29 45.54
14.93
6
5.05
15.63
15.69 30.45 6.75
16
6.09
12.22
10.87 21.75 5.02
12
7.76 15.12
14.70 26.01 6.29
6
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0025 0.0075 0.0040 0.0203 0.7100
6
0.0014 0.0069 0.0056 0.0143 0.0039
16
0.0027 0.0126 0.0092 0.0266 0.0087
12
0.0065 0.0150
0.0145 0.0264 0.0066
6
Pool Length (ft)
14.20
28.75
21.87 63.10
18.63
6
16.08
26.33
26.06 45.58 7.52
22
18.83
37.53
32.47 72.47 17.89
12
11.42 27.82
28.01 42.64 9.34
14
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.63
2.93
2.83 3.56
0.36
6
2.89
3.48
3.40 5.08 0.50
22
2.50
3.32
3.32 3.94 0.49
12
3.12 3.63
3.52 4.68 0.44
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
61.00 1
70.58 1
68.71 89.47
21.50 1
5
48.97
72.69
72.45 139.12 1 20.52
18
54.28
96.85
92.86 153.10 30.88
10
54.52 72.12
71.04 88.50 10.68
10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 33.00
Radius of Curvature (ft) 30.00
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 2.03
Meander Wavelength (ft) 101.00
48.40
37.70
2.55
129.70
44.80 75.00
40.00 40.00
2.70 2.70
130.00 180.00
11.08
4.30
0.29
16.68
22
22
22
21
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant
shifts from baseline
Meander Width Ratio
2.22
3.27
3.03 5.03
0.75
22
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1838
1838
1838
1838
Sinuosity (ft)
1.18
1.18
1.18
1.18
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0025
0.0025
0.0027
0.0033
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0027
0.0025
0.0028
0.0028
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
4
3
3
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Exhibit Table 10b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Fletcher -Meritor (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Lower Reach (1779 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SDn Min Mean Med Max SID n
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.20
18.49
19.77
2
16.10
19.35
22.60
2
15.50
15.80
16.10
2
17.70
17.75
17.80
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
97.90
117.63
137.36
2
101.50
117.20
132.80
2
98.50
115.50
132.50
2
102.00
120.15
138.30
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.36
1.56
1.75
2
1.21
1.41
1.61
2
1.39
1.46
1.53
2
1.40
1.44
1.48
2
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.20
2.34
2.47 1
2
2.46
2.51
2.56
2
2.39
2.43
2.47 1
2
2.65 1
2.68
2.71 1
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
23.40
28.95
34.50
2
26.00
26.65
27.30
2
22.40
23.05
23.70
2
25.00
25.60
26.20
2
Width/Depth Ratio
11.32
11.99
12.65
2
9.97
14.34
18.71
2
10.14
10.86
11.57
2
11.96
12.32
12.67
2
Entrenchment Ratio
5.69
6.32
6.95
2
4.50
6.35
8.20
2
6.12
7.34
8.55
2
5.73
6.77
7.81
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
1.00
2
1.00
1.02
1.04
2
1.04
1.05
1.05
2
0.97
0.98
0.99
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
7.73
23.60
24.49 43.50
11.37
10
9.66
20.98
19.59 33.68 8.34
8
7.10
13.65
12.21 30.00 6.29
14
7.98
16.62
14.15 34.20 7.57
14
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0035 0.0094 0.0094 0.0172 0.4000
10
0.0013 0.0099 0.0080 0.0309 0.0096
8
0.0036 0.0115 0.0090 0.0267 0.0070
14
0.0010
0.0087
0.0080 0.0142 0.0035
14
Pool Length (ft)
22.25
37.41
38.04 56.23
11.18
10
16.53
36.61
37.07 57.69 11.80
12
19.43
39.46
42.71 64.25 14.61
10
11.13
31.06
25.58 62.56 17.33
14
Pool Max depth (ft)
3.13
3.44
3.42 3.85
0.22
10
3.39
3.74
3.66 4.22 0.26
12
3.11
3.45
3.47 1 3.85 0.23
10
3.06
3.78
3.76 4.52 0.40
14
Pool Spacing (ft)l
44.30
74.46
82.61 90.34
16.55
7
53.27
90.62
89.29 130.65 23.89
12
75.37
102.42
94.74 139.50 26.67
8
34.23
84.98
74.46 139.12 36.67
12
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 36.00
Radius of Curvature (ft) 35.00
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.89
Meander Wavelength (ft) 128.00
65.30
42.20
2.28
167.70
69.00 83.00
45.00 45.00
2.43 2.43
172.00 193.00
13.68
3.64
0.20
18.30
16
16
16
12
rPatternta will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant
shifts from baseline
EF -
Meander Width Ratio
1.95
3.53
3.73 4.49
0.74
16
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1779
1779
1779
1779
Sinuosity (ft)
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0027
0.0022
0.0021
0.0021
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0024
0.0026
0.0023
0.0025
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
14
3
3
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Exhibit Table 10c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Fletcher -Meritor (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Tributary (648 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SID n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.33
8.79
9.24
2
7.90
8.15
8.40
2
7.40
7.50
7.60
2
9.20
9.55
9.90
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
22.32
23.62
24.91
2
25.20
26.70
28.20
2
27.40
28.30
29.20
2
34.02
39.51
45.00
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.82
0.83
0.83
2
0.86
0.96
1.06
2
0.80
0.98
1.15
2
1.12
1.20
1.27
2
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.19
1.22
1.25 1
2
1.34
1.56
1.78
2
1.67
1.82
1.96 1
2
1.87 1
2.07
1 2.26
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6.80
7.22
7.63
2
7.20
7.80
8.40
2
6.10
7.30
8.50
2
10.30
11.45
12.60
2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.21
10.70
11.19
2
7.43
8.67
9.90
2
6.44
7.96
9.47
2
7.78
8.00
8.22
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.68
2.69
2.70
2
3.00
3.30
3.60
2
3.61
3.78
3.95
2
3.70
4.13
4.55
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
1.00
2
1.00
1.15
1.30
2
0.97
1.07
1.16
2
0.89
0.96
1.03
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13.84
18.32
18.80 21.90
2.89
9
7.12
11.92
11.85 18.65 4.00
7
4.10
8.67
6.61 17.57 5.14
7
3.68
7.60
4.76 20.13 6.22
8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0087 0.0142 0.0144 0.0220 0.5800
9
0.0043 0.0168 0.0164 0.0365 0.0110
6
0.0117 0.0223 0.0224 0.0307 0.0064
7
0.0048 0.0226 0.0168 0.0612 0.0199
8
Pool Length (ft)
13.03
22.26
17.58 36.76
9.30
10
11.93
19.42
18.89 30.90 5.52
11
11.47
15.70
13.06 27.45 5.25
9
10.90
15.36
13.72 25.08 4.70
8
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.45
1.89
1.93 2.40
0.32
10
2.38
2.88
2.90 3.39 0.39
8
2.31
2.81
2.72 3.44 0.37
9
2.69
3.28
3.24 4.22 0.54
9
Pool Spacing (ft)l
36.53
52.91
56.00 60.11
9.09
9
27.34
55.55
57.06 78.07 15.28
10
35.86
54.00
53.54 77.56 12.96
8
31.53
51.44
52.94 63.56 12.03
6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
26.00
25.00
2.84
77.00
39.20
25.00
2.84
92.90
38.00 55.00
25.00 25.00
2.84 2.84
96.00 102.00
8.33
0.00
0.00
8.63
10
12
12
10
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant
shifts from baseline
Meander Width Ratio
2.96
4.46
4.32 6.26
0.95
10
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
648
648
648
648
Sinuosity (ft)
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0114
0.0118
0.0119
0.0112
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0118
0.0120
0.0116
0.0116
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
3
19
19
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior
performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
2 = Based on the elevation of any dominant depositional feature that develops and is observed at the time of survey. If the baseline datum remains the only significant depositional feature
then these two sets of dimensional parameters will be equal, however, if another depositional feature of significance develops above or below the baseline bankfull datum then this should be tracked and quantified in these cells.
Table 11 a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Fletcher-Meritor (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Upper Reach (1838 ft), Lower Reach (1779 ft), Tributary (648 ft)
Cross Section 1 (Upper, Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Upper, Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Upper, Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Lower, Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Lower, Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation(datum)used 2058.90
2058.90
2058.90
2058.90
2058.61
2058.61
2058.61
2058.61
2058.74
2058.74
2058.74
2058.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.32
2053.32
2053.32
2053.32
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.10
14.00
12.60
11.60
21.90
21.90
21.40
19.50
14.50
14.40
13.70
14.80
19.77
16.10
15.50
17.70
26.16
25.70
23.60
27.10
Floodprone Width (ft)
53.00
65.20
98.40
94.40
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
137.36
132.80
132.50
138.30
83.70
84.30
83.00
84.90
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.26
1.19
1.13
1.22
1.25
1.18
1.17
1.08
1.47
1.47
1.47
1.39
1.75
1.61
1.53
1.48
9 1.45
1.38
1.23
1.25
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.80
2.01
2.23
2.29
3.10
3.07
3.03
3.08
2.20
2.29
2.91
2.95
2.47
2.46
2.47
2.71
3.31
3.22
3.19
3.34
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
19.10
16.70
14.20
14.20
27.40
25.80
25.10
21.00
21.30
21.20
2010.
20.50
34.50
26.00
23.70
26.20
37.88
35.50
29.00
33.80
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.94
11.74
11.18
9.48
17.50
18.59
18.25
18.11
9.87
9.78
9.34
10.68
11.32
9.97
10.14
11.96
18.07
18.61
19.21
21.73
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.50
4.70
7.81
8.14
>4.00
>4.00
>4.00
>4.00
>6.00
>6.00
>6.00
>6.00
6.95
8.20
8.55
7.81
3.20
3.30
3.52
3.13
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
0.99
0.95
0.99
1.00
1.15
0.94
1.06
1.00
1.03
1.03
1.05
1.00
1.04
1.05
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.08
0.98
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftz
d50 (mm)
Ea=
Cross Section 6 (Lower, Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (Tributary, Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Tributary, Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Tributary, Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation(datum)used
2053.03
2053.03
2053.03
2053.03
2059.00
2059.00
2059.00
2059.00
2058.45
2058.45
2058.45
2058.45
2057.55
2057.55
2057.55
2057.55
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.20
22.60
16.10
17.80
9.24
8.40
7.60
9.20
8.33
7.90
7.40
9.90
12.81
10.50
7.40
8.10
Floodprone Width (ft)
97.90
101.50
98.50
102.00
24.91
25.20
27.40
34.02
22.32
28.20
29.20
45.00
25.89
31.00
32.60
34.70
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.36
1.21
1.39
1.40
0.83
0.86
0.80
1.12
0.82
1.06
1.15
1.27
0.93
1.13
1.32
1.60
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.20
2.56
2.39
2.65
1.25
1.34
1.67
1.87
1.19
1.78
1.96
2.26
2.04
2.51
2.62
2.94
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
23.40
27.30
22.40
25.00
7.63
7.20
6.10
10.30
6.80
1 8.40 1
8.50
12.60
11.96
11.90
9.80
13.00
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.65
18.71
11.57
12.67
11.19
9.90
9.47
8.22
12.21
7.43
6.44
7.78
13.71
9.26
5.59
5.05
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.69
4.50
6.12
5.73
2.70
3.00
3.61
3.70
2.68
3.60
3.95
4.55
2.02
2.90
4.41
4.28
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.00
1.00
1.04
0.97
1.00
1.30
1.16
1.03
1.00
1.00
0.97
0.89
1.00
0.89
0.95
0.98
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ft2
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior
performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
2 = Based on the elevation of any dominant depositional feature that develops and is observed at the time of survey. If the baseline datum remains the only significant depositional feature
then these two sets of dimensional parameters will be equal, however, if another depositional feature of significance develops above or below the baseline bankfull datum then this should be tracked and quantified in these cells.

Appendix[E M
Hydrologic Data M
m

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Fletcher
Meritor Site (UT
to Cane Creek)/ 138 Segment/Reach: feet
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo
Visual observation of bankfull
9/18/2012
9/18/2012
event during monitoring
Visual observation of bankfull
5/7/2013
5/6/2013 - 5/7/2013
event during monitoring
5/7/2013
Unknown
Stream gauges
Stream gauges (3 events on the
5/13/2014
Unknown
tributary reach and 2 on the main
reach
Stream gauges and observation
5/7/2015
Unknown
See below
of bankfull event debris

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
13D4CA2A
1
5.0
0.0
Q.X17
-10.0
3
C
o' -15.0
t7
3
0
cO -20.0
a)
a
s
u
c
25.0
-30.0
-35.0
Begin Growing Season : End Growing Season
(419115): (10129115)
ifpiilt,1�19111 Jim
IM'M Do
YI
11MM11MIlil,
11
11
M1111M
Ln Ln Ln Ln U) U) U) U) Ln Ln Ln U) U) U) Ln U) U) U) U) U)Lr) Lr) Lr) Lr) Lf) Lf) v, v, v, Lr) Di 1n
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N e-1 r-1 N O O N N N N N e-1 N c -i N N O O O O O O Dl Ol Dl 00 00 00 00 00 00 I,
ci ci e -i N N M M t V Ln Vl Vl to lD lD 1, n n 00 00 a) a) ci O O 1-1
ci c-1
2.5
7
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
11311987
2
5.0 7
2.5
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
(419115):
li
(10129115)
Daily Precipitation (in)
0.0 -
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
®12" below ground surface
-5.0
- 2
1L
-10.0
o
- 1.5
'^
-15.0
a
c
3
�
o
a`
Q
T
3
20.0
M
0
0
CD
- 1
0
s
-25.0
s
u
c
�
-30.0
0.5
-35.0 -
-40.0 -
111111MM11
11
011111MI
11
Ill-
0
Ln Ln
Ln
U) Ln Ln U) LO Ln
U) Ln U) U)
U)
U)
Ln Ln
U)
LnLr)
Ln Di 1r,
1r, 1r, 1n 1n 1n 1n 1fn 1n
U)
0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N N N
N N N (N N N N N
0 0 N N N —1-1
M
c -i N N N
N
N
0 0
0
0
0
0 M M
M 00 M 00 M M 00 1,
ci ci c-1
\ \ 1*
N N M M
\ \ Lr) \
It d' Vl
\
Vl
\ \
Vl lD
\
l0
\
lD
\
1,
\
n
00
\ 00 \
n 00
\ C) \ \ O \ \ c-1
00 Ol Ol ci O O ci
ci c-1
li

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
1130DD07
3
5.0
d
2.5
Begin Growing Season
1
:
End Growing Season
Daily Precipitation (in)
(419115):
(10129115)
0.0
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
®12" below ground surface
- 2
-5.0
-10.0
U
U
C
- 1.5
0
3
ills
-15.0
fl
d
o
a`
U
T
3
-20.0
M
0
0
m
°
a
s
-25.0
-30.0
0.5
-35.0
-40.0
0
Ln
Ln
-I
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
-I
Ln Ln Ln Ln
N -I -I
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln
Ln
-I
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
-I
Ln
1-I
c
0 0
-4
0
-4
0
N -4 c r1 rl Ci
0 0 0 0 0 0
-4 C r
0 0 0 0
1-I
0
"1
0
N r-1
0 0
C
0
,H
0
"I
0
"I "I "I
0 0 0
"i .--I "I C "1 1-I 1-I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C,
0
N N
N
N
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N N N
N N N N N N N
N
ci
ci ci ci O O N N N .\i
-ii -i .\-I -1
-1
-1
O O
O
O
O
O 01 Ol
Ol 00 00 00 00 00 00 I,
��M�� m --- a
----Lin ���������
0000 --
rn �� 0 --
N
N
N
N N M M
� Ln
Ln
Ln
LD LO
lD
I,
n
n 00
00 01 M N O O
N 1-I
N
d

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
14E17875
4
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
C7
3 -20.0
0
w
m
N
t -25.0
5
r-
0:11111 0:i1x11
-35.0
-40.0
c, r-4 N c, rl N r-4 r-4 r-4 N r, r -q N c, ,-q r r r-1 c, , q ,I N c, "I "I N c, "I N c -i rl r-4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
� � � � O O N N N c\i c\i c\i c\i c\i c\i i\i O O O O O O 01 dl 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
ci N M rl N ci N cLn
i N ci N M ci N M ci N M ci N ci N ci N
N M M vl vl vl tD lD lD I, n n W 00 Ol Ol ti O O 1-4
ti N
0.5 0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
138BE816
5
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
2.5
i7
Daily Precipitation (in)
—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
3 -20.0
0
a
CO
s -25.0
u
c
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N Nr -1 O O N N N N N N ti c -i N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M of 00 00 00 00 00 00 I,
M \ \ V\ \ \ �? \ \ \ \ \M
\ \ \ W \ \ D\l \ \ O
ci ci ci N N M M V Ln Vl M lD W W I, n n 00 00 01 0l ci O O rl
ci c -I
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
11313657
6
5.0
0.0
-5.0
10.0
3 -20.0
0
v
CO
25.0
c
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419115): (10129115)
MIME11
11 NMI
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
ci ci ci r-qI�
m 0 0 N cV cV .-7 1-4ci rl H r -1l rq m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dl q Ol W 00 00 00 00 00
ci ci ci N N M M a a lfl V1 Ln 1.0 1Z l0 r� n n 00 00 Dl T ci o o ci
ci ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0 0
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 9BEBF83
Gauge ID : 7
5
2.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing
Season
(4/9/15) (10/29/15)
;
Daily Precipitation (in)
0
I
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
I
I
—12" below ground surface
2
-5
I
I
I
-10
I
�
I
I
I
w
U
O
1.5
I
1
Y
V)
-15
0.
i
M
c
u
O
Ei
P
a
(7
'
I
'
I
T
-20
to
,
1
OmO
1 0
O
I
I
I
I
VI
�
L -25
41
s
I
I
u
u
I
I
I
I
-30
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
0.5
-35
�
I
1
I
I
-40
0
In In In 111 In In In In In In In In 111 111 Ln 111 111 111 111 In In Ln In ul 111 In 111 In 111 In
In In In In
In
In
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
c
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
-I O Q1 00 lD 111 In M N O Ol 00 lD V1 M N c-1 O dl 00 � Ln d' M N O Q1 00
N N N N
\ \ \ M
lD 111 M
N
\
N
c'1
C 4 I
\ \ \ N \ \ M \ \ V \ \ \ 111 \ \ w \ \ \ n \ \ 00 \ \ a) \ \ \
O \ C -4
c\'1
\
N 1-I 1-I N N M M �t �t -Zt Ln Ln W la la n n 00 00 m Ol dl
N O O N
N
ci c -I
ci

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
U
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9BEBF83
8
5.0
0.0
-5.0
10.0
3
-15.0
c
3
0
-30.0
133xs
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419115) (10129115)
M IMMIMM
loll
-40.0 -
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u, u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
-4 O O N M N N .\-i N N N\-1 N O O O O O O O1 M M M M M M M 00 r,
e -i ci ci N N M M ct It Ln Ln M lD l0 lD r, n n 00 00 M M -1 O O ci
-i -i
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBD106E
9
Begin Growing Season � End Growing Season �
5.0
2.5
I
,
Daily Precipitation (in)
0.0
—@--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface
2
-5.0
10.0
w
u
�
o
1.5 '
-15.0
�
C
u
�
P
a`
c�
a
3
-20.0
m
0
0
m
1 ~
0
W
25.0
m
�
c
-30.0
0.5
-35.0
-40.0
0
Ln
Ln Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln a, Ln Ln
Ln u) a, a,
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ln Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln Ln Lq Ln Ln a, a, a,
0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N
N
N N N
N
N N
N N N
N N N N N N N N
N c-1 N
�--1
0 0 N N
N\ -I cH N
1--4
N 0 0
0
0 0
0 M M
M M W W 00 00 00 r,
�--�
\ \ \ \ \ M \ \
\ \ M \
\
\ \ \
\
\ \
\ 0000 \
\ CF) \ \ O \
ci ci
ci
N N M fel
V d' Vl
Lr)
Ln lD l0
l0
r, n
n 00
00 M Ol ci O O ci
ci ci
Begin Growing Season � End Growing Season �
(4/9/15) � (10/29/15) ;
,
,
I
,

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
4,
U
M
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
10FACBB4
10
2.5
7
5181111
r -
O
c7
3 -20.0
0
w
m
N
s -25.0
u
C
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 N N N �--i e\—i rq r -i N N i --I 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M 00 00 M 00 I,
� -- -- -- -- -- m -- - v -- -- M -- -- -- -- -- -- - -, 0 -- m -- -- 0 -- -- -i
ci ci ci N N M M V IZT M M M lD lD lD r, n n 00 00 M M ci O O ci
ci ci
0.5 0.5
0
Daily Precipitation (in)
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
AB37304
11
5.0
2.5
Begin Growing Season
End Growing
Season
(4/9/15)
(10/29/15)
'
_
Daily Precipitation (in)
0.0
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
X12" below ground surface
2
-5.0
i
-10.0
O
1.5
'�
.n
-15.0
a
c
v
o
a`
C7
.
3
-20.0
0
Oc
1
0
25.0
u
-30.0
'
0.5
-35.0
LEId-40.0
0
N N
N
N N Nr -4 N N c, N
N N N�r-I
N
N
c,
N�4
N N N
N N N
c4
Nr -4
Nr -4
0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0
N N
N
N N N N N N N N
N N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N N
N N N
N
N N
N N
ci
N
N
M ci N ci N rl
��
N ci
N
M
ci
N
M
ci
N
M ci
XC�
N ci
m ��
N
ci
0 C(
N
N
1-41-4N
N N M M
lf1
lf1
1.f1
ID
l0
lo
I,
n
n CO
W Ol
Ol
N O
O N
c -I
H

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
v
U
M
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
10FAA7C4
12
5.0
0.0
-5.0
10.0
2.5
7
� Daily Precipitation (in)
—@--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
C7
-20.0
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
ti ti rq e-1 O O N N N N r-1 N N N N N O O O O O O M M M W M M M X X r,
r-4 rj1rrj m -i r-4 vr-i r�4 n ��m r -i r-4 m r-4 rq M -q rJ m r-1 r1J o 4 r4
-1
c -I ci ci N N M M M M M -.Dl0 l0 I, n n 00 00 M M .-i 0 0 ci
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
10FADD4C / A278DE1
13
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
`M 15.0
3
N
'o -20.0
c7
3
w -25.0
m
N
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
-45.0
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(41911.5) (10129115)
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .. N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N N N O O N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O Ql Dl Ol 00 00 00 00 00 00 I,
N \ \ \ \ \ M \ \ V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M \ \ 0\l \ \ O \ \ N
N N N N N M M d' V u1 M V1 l0 l0 l0 I, n n 00 00 a) D1 N O O N
N ci
W&7
701
Daily Precipitation (in)
—@--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
u
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
A28ABBO
14
5.0
0.0
-5.0
318x1,
3
-15.0
C
3
0
c7
-20.0
2.5
7
r-
0
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
e -i N N rq O O N N N c\-1 rq r -i c -i N N N O O O O O O M M M 0000 00 00 00 00 00 r,
c -I c -I ci N N M M IZT -ZT M M M lD lD lD r, n n 00 00 M M c-1 O O r -I
r -i a1
0.5
0
Daily Precipitation (in)
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9DE54F2
15
5.0
2.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(4/9/15)
Daily Precipitation (in)
;
(10/29/15)
0.0
I
I
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
I
I
12" below ground surface
I
�
2
-5.0
1
I
I
—
1
I
1
-10.0
I
I
I
I
I
� I
V
C
1.5
°
-
3
-15.0
a
P
a
c7
a
m
o-20.0
o
d
m
I
I
I
�
1
0
°
N
25.0
C
—
I
I
I
I
-30.0
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
1
1
I
0.5
-35.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
-40.0
I
I
I
I
I
1
0
0 0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N N
N
N
N N N N N N N
N N N
N N
N N
N
N
N
N N N
N N N N
N N N N
N —1-1
r-1
N
O O N N N\-1 N
N i\-1 N
N "1
0 0
0
0
0
0 of of
M 00 M M
00 00 00 r�
c-1 \
\
\
\ \ M \ \ \
\ if \
\ \
\ \
\
\
\
\ 0000 \
\ T \ \
O \ \ -i
rl
ci
rl
N N M M V
d' Lr)
Ln Lr)
1.0 to
1Z
n
n
n 00
00 0l 01
ci O O ci
ci ci

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
w
M
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
138BD91 E / 11 30EA33
16
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
3
-15.0
C
3
0
c�
3 -20.0
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
;
(4/9/15) ; (10/29/15)Al
i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
ti N r -i N O O N N N N r -i N N i --i .-7 N O O O O O O Ql Ol rq 00 00 00 00 00 00 I,
i -- -- -- -- -- m ---- 1* ---- �n ��������� 0000 ---- m ---- o ---
ci ci ci N N M M t V Vl Ln u1 lD lD lD r, n n 00 00 D1 Ol ci O O ci
ci ci
2.5
7
- Daily Precipitation (in)
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9BEBCFO
18
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
U
M
3
M -15.0
O
t7
3 -20.0
0
v
m
N
t -25.0
u
C
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(4/9/15) (10/29/15)
1 �
1
i
i
c, 11 e-1 1--1 11 11 1--1 1--1 11 11 1-1 e-1 1-1 11 14 . -1 rl 11 . -1 . -1 11 11 . -1 11 11 e-1 . -1 11 11 . -1 . -1 11 1, .--1 e-1 1-1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
e\1 O a\1 0000 lDD Ln �t V\1 7 M N O aa) 0000 n W Ln M N N O m W n Ln d' M\1 O M W r, W Ln M N
N c -I c -I N N M M V V d' Ln Ln lD lD lD 1, n 00 00 a) al al N O O -4
eti N i i
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
-12" below ground surface
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
136ACA3C
19
5.0
-
2.5
— Daily Precipitation (in)
0.0
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface
2
-5.0
-10.0
w
U
0
L
O
I
Begin Growing Season
+°
N
M
-15.0
End
°
(4 9115)
(01
91?5)
O
i
a
c7
a
o-20.0
m
o
W
CO
1
'0
°
N
25.0
-30.0
'
0.5
-35.0
-40.0
0
1n
Ln
u1
u1 Ln Ln Ln V1Ln In
N
N Ln Ln
Ln Ln
In Ln
In
Ln
Ln Ln Ln Ln
In N Ln
In
Ln Ln
Ln Ln
-i ci
O O
ci
O
ci ci ci -1 c, ci ci
O O O O O O O
ci
O
ci ci ci
O O O
ci ci
O O
-1 ci
O O
-1
O
ci
O
ci ci ci ci
O O O O
ci ci ci
O O O
ci
O
ci ci
O O
ci ci
O O
N N
N
N N N N N N N
\I
N
N N N
N N
N N
N
N N
N N N
N (N N N
N N
N N
c -I O O N N rzi
N
N i\-1 N
N N
O O
O
O O
O O1 Q1
a\1 00 0�0
00
00 00
00 I�
M \ \ �\\\\\\\\\\
U
\
W\
\ M \ \
O
r-1
r-1
rA N N M M
1*
V U)
Ln Ln
l0 la
l0
N
n n 00
00 N
M
c-1 O
1-1
O c-1
r -i

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
B651924
20
5.0
2.5
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
(4/9/15)
(10/
9/15)
Daily Precipitation (in)
0.0
A
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface
2
-5.0ai
—
10.0
v
0
1.5
O
-15.0
a
'
'
u
P
a`
3
-20.0
0
,
o
°'
m
1
0
N
N
M
25.0
,
,
d
u
-30.0
'
0.5
-35.0
-40.0
0
unIn
m
Ln In m In In m �n
�n
�n In In
In
m
un
Ln
�n
In
m
m In m
In m Ln �n
m In In In
_1r1
r_1r_1r-1ri
ri r-1r-1r-1r-1r-1r-1ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri ri ri
ri r-1r-1r-1ri
ri r-1ri
0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N N
N
N N N N N N N
N
N N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N N
N N N N
N N N N
ci ci
ri
ri O O N N N 1-1
-1
r\-1 -ii -ii
-ii
-1
O
O
O
O
O
O m m
m 00 00 00
00 00 00 1,
c-1
N
M ci N ri N--
M -, -- a
c-1
--
N-- ci
In
--���������
NM
ri
N
M
ri
N
M-- ci
oo ----
N-- c-1 N--
m ----
ci N
o ---, ri
ri
ri
ri N N M M
a
a Ln
In
In
�6
Lo
tD
r�
r�
r� 00
00 m m
ri o 0 ri
ri ri

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 138BB5AA
Gauge ID : 21
10
5
-25
-30
-35
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
rl N N i-1 O O N N N c-1 N i --I N N N N O O O O O O Ql Ql Ql 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
\ \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0000 \ \ M \ \ O \ \
ci ci ci N N M M 7 d' u1 M u1 lD lD lD 1, n n 00 00 M M c-1 O O ci
c -I ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
0
0.5
0
I
� i ►L �Ii� lii�
f it
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
rl N N i-1 O O N N N c-1 N i --I N N N N O O O O O O Ql Ql Ql 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
\ \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0000 \ \ M \ \ O \ \
ci ci ci N N M M 7 d' u1 M u1 lD lD lD 1, n n 00 00 M M c-1 O O ci
c -I ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
0
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 11312837
Gauge ID: 22
5
0
-5
-10
CU
-15
3
N
13
c
'o -20
3
v -25
CON
d
L
-30
-35
-40
-45
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419115): (10129115)
11
IIMill
I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
ci ci ci r-im 0 0 N cV cV .-7 ci ci rl H rl m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dl q Ol 00 00 00 00 00 00 I,
q � � � � m -- -- a -- -- l\n � � � � � m � � M W -- - m -- - o -- -- -i
ci ci ci N N M M a a Ln Ln Ln lD lD lD r� n n W OD T T ci o o ci
ci ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o ---Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
M

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial #
182727
/ EDB96D7
Gauge ID :
23
5 ..
Begir
0
-5
-10
v
U
M
Ln -15
c
3
0
3 -20
0
a
m
N
M -25
u
c
-30
-35
-40
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
o Ln Ln o Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln o Ln o Ln Ln m Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
i-7 N N N O O N N N N N -4 rq _q r-1 N O O O O O O M Q1 Q1 00 00 M W M x r,
�--� \ \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W d' V m00 M
ci ci ci N N M M u1 u1 -z ln n 00 D l0 I� 00 a> Q> r-1 O O -1
c -I ci
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
1314D206
24
5 -
2.5
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
(419115):
(10129115)
Daily Precipitation (in)
0 -
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
- 2
-5
V
-10 -
ILI,
Imli
v
u
C
i
- 1.5
'
3
I
15 -01�
111M
y
L
�
C
3
u
N
o
M
Ellm
a`
(�
T
3
-20 -
0
0
CO
as
11
al
IM
Ell
1
0
0
N
N
r
-25 -
a
s
1MM=11KNd111=�11M
u
c
�
-30 -
I
0.5
-35 -
-,11101121
-40
1
- 0
Ln
ui vi
vi
Ln Ln Ln ui Ln vi
vi Ln ui vi
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ln vi
in Ln Ln
Ln vn Ln Ln Ln Ln vi vi
—1 —1 -4
-4
c, N r-1 c, r-1 —1
-4 —1 —1 -4
r-1
c, N c,
c,
"q "I
N N N
ti r c, N N 1-1 N N
0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N
N
N N N N N N
N N N N
N
N N N
N
N N
N N N
N N N N N N N N
O O N N N -I
-I -I -I -I
�
O O
O
O O
O Ol Ol
Ol 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
ci
ci ci
ci
c\
c\ c\ c\ c\
.\-�
00 \
\ Ol \ \ O \ \
N N
.--i
N N M M
M
M
MlD LO
lD
I, n
W
"1
M Q1 r-100 l O O N
N e -I

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 9BEBF22 / 13D413149
Gauge ID : 25
5
V
-5
Its:
CU
U
3
-15
c
3
0
3 -20
0
W
CO
t -25
c
-30
-35
Begin Growing Season : End Growing Season
(419115): (10129115)
wills
1 11
i
[,1111
111
100=111MI!1lil��
m 111!110,
in
'
-40 -
Ln Ln u) u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u) Ln Ln Ln u) u, Ln u, u) u) u, u) Ln Ln Ln u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
rl N N N O O N N N N N i --I N N N N O O O O O O Ql Ql Ql 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
\ \ \ \ \ M \ \ 1* \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0000 \ \ M \ \ O \ \
ci ci ci N N M M 7 d' Ln M Ln l0 lD lD r, n n 00 00 M M ci O O ci
ci ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 1314D1 F1 / 1130FAA2
Gauge ID : 26
5
V
-10
ar
-15
3
H
o -20
l7
3
0
a -25
m
v
t
-30
-35
-40
-45
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(4/9/15) ; (10/29/15)
At
i
I
vi m vi m Ln Ln Ln m Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln vi Ln Ln m Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln vi vi vi Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
ci ci ci ci 1-1 ci ri ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 1-1 ci ,-i ci -1 1-1 -1 ci ci ci ci a -i ci ri a -i ci -1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M M M M M 00 \ \ \ \
N i -i N N O O N N N N N N N N e -i cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol Ql rq W 00 00 00 00 00 I,
����� m ---- � ---- �n ��������� 0000 ----m ---- 0 ---
ci ci e -i N N M M 1:t LY Ln Ln Ln lD lD l0 r, n n 00 00 T al ci O O ci
1.1 e-1
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0 0
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 113118F8 / 14E160313
Gauge ID : 27
5
a
-5
-10
u
-15
3
H
'O -20
l7
3
a -25
m
N
N
-30
-35
-40
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419115): (10129115)
M M,
Iff
III
w�
-45
O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N r-1 N N O O N N N N N N N N e-1 cr-qn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol Ql Ol W 00 00 00 00 00 I,
� � � � � m -- -- � -- -- �n � � � � � � � � � M -- � m � � o � �
ci ci -1 N N M M 1:t LY M Ln D1 lD lD lD 1, n n 00 00 M M c-1 O O ci
-1 -1
2.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
X12" below ground surface
2
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9BEA4DB / 9BEA426
28
5
!■1�11�11lI�L1I1�1�11!_
- 2.5
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
:
(419115)
(10129115)
Daily Precipitation (in)
0
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
®12" below ground surface
- 2
-5
-10
M,
I ik flit,
R
0
1.5
3
}
V'
-15lullIlls
a
�
c
v
3
y
o
a
c7
�
3
-20
ro
0
0
m
- 1
0
N
N
L
-25
d
c
�
-30
0.5
-35
-40JINE11M
- 0
Ln
Ln U)
U) U) U) U) U) U) Ln
L') u, U)
Ln
Ln U) Ln
U) U)
U)
Ln U) U)
U) U) U) U) Ln Ln��
Ln
ci
ci
ci ci
ci ci ci ci ci ci ci
ci ci ci
ci
ci ci ci
ci ci
ci
ci ci ci
ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N
N N
N N N N N N N
N N N
N
N N N
N N
N
N N N
N N N N N N N N
rl N
N .-i
O O N N N N N
.� N N
N
,-i O O
O O
O
O M M
M M 00 0000 M M 00 I"
M \ \ V\ \
\ \
\
\ \ \
\ \
\
\ W \
\ \ \ O \ \ ci
ci
e -i ci
N N M M �Y
ct M
D1
Ln lD lD
l0 I"
n
n 00
00 M M c-1 O O ci
ci ci
!■1�11�11lI�L1I1�1�11!_

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 138BE066
Gauge ID: 30
5
a
-5
-10
ar
u
-15
'O -20
l7
3
a -25
m
N
N
-30
-35
-40
-45
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N c -i N N O O N N N N N N N N rr-Iq cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 al Ql rq W 00 00 00 00 00 I�
� � � � � m -- -- � -- -- �n � � � � � � � � � CO -- -- m -- -- o -- -
ci ci e -i N N M M 1:t LY Ln D1 D1 lD lD lD r, n n 00 00 a) a) ci OO ci
ci ci
Begin Growing Season End Growin eason
(419115): (10129115)
NNIF"I I - iiIMEMET,
1111,
iM1110qiW6,!111
1111 1
lam.
2.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
2
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 182724 / 13D4CFD5
Gauge ID: 31
5
[sl
-5
ID"
ar
L
3
-15
c
3
0
l7
3 -20
0
v
m
M -25
c
-30
-35
-40
Ln Ln u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u) Ln Ln Ln u) u, Ln u, u) u) u, u) Ln Ln Ln u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
rl N r7 N O O N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O 01 Ol Ql 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
\ \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0000 \ \ M \ \ O \ \
ci ci ci N N M M 7 d' Ln M 01 l0 lD lD r, n n 00 00 M M ci O O ci
ci ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0
IM
�►t�, �Vl
1I
lIII
ism
11111011
11
a
Ila
11111111
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBDD960
32
5
�i��■ice
2.5
Begin Growing Season
:
End Growing Season
(4/-9/15):
(10129115)
Daily Precipitation (in)
0
—s --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
�-12"
below ground surface
2
-5
-10
o
1.5
'
3
r
-15
a
c
3
i
o
Will
11111
a
�a
3
-20
'm
0
0
a
as
oil
IM
I
1
0
m
M
-25
d
s
u
C
u
�
-30
O.S
-35
-40
0
0 0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
N N
N
N
N N N N N N
N N N N
N N
N N
N
N N
N N N
N N N N
N N N
N
\ \
N N
\
i -
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \
O O N N N N
\ \ \ \
-4i N N N
\ \
N
\ \
0 0
\
0
\ \
0 0
\ \ \
0 M M
\ \ \ \
M 00 00
\ \ \ \
00 00 00 I�
�
4 �iC�
m ��
�� n �m��m��m
rj
o\o ��
r i
m �
o �r,4 -1
ci
ci
ci
N N M M
Lfl
L/1 Ln
lD l0
lD
I, n
n W
00 Ol Ol
ci O O
ci
ci ci
�i��■ice

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBDCF48
33
5
0
-5
-10
CU
U
Ln3
-15
c
3
0
l�
3 -20
0
N
m
M -25
U
30
35
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419115): (10129115)
'rk7law"��►
11111
110=11as
NIMMMadmomi
M
Lill=
11
I loll
al
11
-40 -
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u) u) u, u) u) u, Ln u, Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N N N N O O N N N N N N N N M 0 0 0 0 I�
--� a n r j m r -i r4 M M W Dl Dl Dl 00 00 00 00 00 00 m o
ci ci ci N N M M M M Ln .D lD lD r, n n 00 00 M M 1-1 O O ci
ci ci
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
r-
0
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBDB81A
34
5
2.5
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
Daily Precipitation (in)
(4/9/15);
(10/29/15)
0
—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
I
I
—12" below ground surface
2
-5
I
rw
I
-10
I
I
I
�
I
1
V
_
1
i
1.5
+�
3
-15
ii
I
3
I
W
O
L
1
a
l7
,
,
A
3
-20
m
I
O
o
CO
O
L
-25
I
I
�
U
I
1
I
I
-30
,
I
I
1
I
,
I
1
1
0.5
-35
1
,
I
I
ILII
I
I
I
-40
I
I
1
1
0
In
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln ui
Ln Ln Ln
Ln Ln In Ln
Ln Ln Ln Ln
N r-4
N
N
N r-4 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-4 r-1
"I "I N
N
"I
"I
"I
"q
"q �-1
r-1 r -q �-1
�-1 r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r -i �-1
0 0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N N
N
N
N N N N N N N
N N N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N N N
N N N N
N N N N
ci
ci
ci
ci
O O N N N -ii -ii
-ii -ii -1
1\-1
c\-1
0
0
0
0 0
0 M M
M 00 M 00
M M 00 1,
\ c -I
N
M
\
c-1 N \ c-1 N \ c-1
\ \ M \ \ � \
N \ -i
\ Ln \
N
\
M
\
c-1
\
N
\
M
\
ri N
\ \
M \ c-1
\ 00 \
N \ c-1 N
\ a) \ \
\ c-1 N \
O \ \ i" 1
c -I
N
N
N N M M zT
zT Ln
Ln
Ln
Lo
Lo
Lo
n n
N 00
00 M a)
r1 O O c-1
r-1 N

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
174146 / 14E1 53D2
35
5
2.5
Begin Growing Season
J�1
i
(419115)
End Growing Season
Daily Precipitation (in)
(10129115)
0
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
—12" below ground surface
2
-5
-10
Ina
CU
U
=
0
i
1.5
'
�'n
N
VU
o
Emil
i=111al
11m
0-
l9
>
3
20
0
0
CO
1
~
0
M
-25
v
10=11alYllI=
u
c
5
-30
11-
0.5
-35
INN=
I
-40
0
�n
vi
vi
vi �n vi vi Ln Ln vi vi
vi vi vi
Ln
�n
vi vi
Ln
Ln vi
vi �n vi
vi Ln �n vi vi Ln Ln vi
r
c
-1i
C
—1
—1i i i i i ci
CCCCCi c
—1i —1
c
Ci
Ci
i i
CC
Ci
Ci Ci
ci ci Ci
Ci i i i
ci Ci Ci Ci CCC
0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N
N
N N. N N N N N
N N N.
N
N N
N
N N
N N N
N. N N N N N N
O O N N N
-I
-I
O O
O
O O
O Ol Ol
Ol 00 00 00 00 00 00 I�
ci
ci
ci
ci -ii -ii
.\i -ii -ii
c\
c\
00 \
\ M\ \ O
r -4N
l
N N N M M
M
V1
V1
lD lD
lD
n r`
r` W
W M Mrl O O N
r -I N
J�1