20081019 Ver 1_401 Application_20080608

08-1019
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Steven Ball
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Courtesy Copy of Saxonbury Subdivision PCN
Wake County, NC
June 26, 2008
S&EC Project # 10259.W6
kg F6
ow p
JUN 2 6 2008
DENR - VdAI ER QUA'd IY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
On behalf of the owner, Singh Development, please accept the attached complete application and supplemental
information as a courtesy copy for your files. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Saxonbu
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Singh Development
Coun Wake
Nearest Town Apex
Waterbod Name White Oak Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-05
Index Number 16-41-6-(0.7)
Class WS-IV; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit 03030002
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres)` 0.037
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.037
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Attachments:
PCN Application
USGS
Soil Survey
Agent Authorization Form
Impact Exhibits and overall site plan
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
D .a.
II. Applicant Information
1UN 2 6 2008
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Singh Development, LLC °?rak,QNR' any AQOP?UTY
T R6RAN0H
Attn: Paul Rizzardi tAND
Mailing Address: 5001 Weston Parkway Suite106
Cary, NC 27513
Telephone Number: 919-677-1700
E-mail Address:
Fax Number: 919-678-8300
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Steven Ball
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridae Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: sball(a-,sandec.com
Page 1 of 10
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0723880011
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Apex
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Saxonbury
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh Take NC
55 West to Green Level Church Road; continue on Green Level Church Road; Turn left on
Green Level West Road; Site is on the right approximately 0.5 miles
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.777577 ON 78.905577 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/-19.26
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: White Oak Creek (16-41-6-(0.7); 03-06-05 WS-IV;
NSW)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin (USGS Cat. Unit 03030002)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently a mix of agriculture and forested
The surrounding developments are single family residential homes.
Page 2 of 10
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
Proposed project will be a residential subdivision with typical roads and utilities. Heavy
equipment necessary for the construction of roads and homes, as well as the installation of
utilities, will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
construct the Saxonbury development to provide additional residential housing for the area.
The proposed impacts to wetlands are necessary to construct the required utility, as well as a
eenway trail.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. On May 17, 2006 S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation of the
Saxonburg parcel. On March 18, 2008, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation on the
offsite sewer that connects to the existing sewer easement along White Oak Creek. A site
meeting with Mike Deaton of the Town of Apex was conducted on March 28, 2008 to determine
subjectivity to Town of Apex Buffers onsite. On July 10, 2006, a site meeting was conducted
with Thomas Brown of the USACE to verify the wetlands for the Saxonburg parcel. No prior
permits have been requested or received for this site.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required at this time
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 10
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impact #1 (NWP 29): 161.7 square feet
(0.004 ac) of permanent wetland impact for utility line installation and stormwater device
Impact #2 (NWP 29): 91.7 square feet (0.002 ac) of permanent wetland impact for egr enway
trail installation
Impact #3 (NWP 29) 129.6 square feet (0.003 ac) of permanent wetland impact for lot fill
required to bring utility and ear enway easements up to grade
Impact #4 (NWP 29) 1229.6 square feet (0.028 ac) of permanent riparian wetland impact for
installation of offsite utility easement.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized
clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
1 (NWP29) Permanent Forested No N/A 0.004
2 (NWP 29) Permanent Forested No N/A 0.002
3 (NWP 29) Permanent Forested No N/A 0.003
4 (NWP 29) Permanent Herbaceous No 75 0.028
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.037
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.083
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls,
gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and
profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Intermittent? Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - NA
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) - NA
Page 4 of 10
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean
and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill,
excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water

Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of

Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact

(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.037
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.037
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no isolated waters on the subject property.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant requested a
Page 5 of 10
detailed delineation of streams and wetlands prior to site plan development in order to determine
the extent and location of streams and wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed impacts The
utility impacts proposed are permanent in nature and are necessary in order to provide services
(i.e. sewer) to the development.
Per the engineer: The sewer line had to cross the wetland because of the natural
topography of the site. There is a high point in the middle of the site and the proposed alignment
is the only way the northern portion could have sewer service without either laving the line
through the hill at depths of greater than 20' (the Cary maximum depth) or clearing and mass
grading the whole site (which Cary would not allow). The town required a eenway trail along_
the western perimeter of the site, and crossing the wetland next to the sewer line was the most
practical solution. The greenway is located within the sewer easement and only impacts the
area that will already be disturbed for the sewer installation. A stormwater inlet and piping is
required in this area to pick up the water from the streets and lots and carry it under the
greenway. The small amount of lot fill is necessary for grading to ensure proper drainage from
the lots, to provide enough cover on the pipes and to ensure the slope of the greenway is
handicap accessible
The applicant is also aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide
Permits 29. With respect to residential development conditions (Regional Conditions section
4.9) there are no proposed single-family recreation facilities there are no 100 year flood lap in
limits identified on this project and therefore there are no permanent wetland or stream fills
proposed within the floodwav and the stream classification for this project is WS-IV; C, NSW
(i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters or High Quality Waters With respect to utility line
activities (Regional Conditions section 4.3) the applicant cannot utilize directional
drilling/boring methods to install the proposed sewer and water lines due to the presence of rock
on the subiect site. Additionally, the cost of directional drilling or boring for each utility
crossing is prohibitive. The permanent utility maintenance easement corridor does not exceed 40
feet in width. The proposed sewer lines are not anticipated to interfere with navigation nor are
they proposed to be aerial in nature. These minor fills are not being used to create an upland
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 6 of 10
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htti):/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant has reduced impacts to less than 1/10 acre of wetlands therefore mitigation
is not proposed. If however, through the review of this application, the USACE determines
that mitigation shall be required, the applicant will utilize the NCEEP to satisfy this
requirement
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 7of10
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Please see the attached post construction
drainage map. The anticipated impervious surface for the post-development drainage areas will
be greater than 24%, however, as this project is within a WS-IV• NSW Watershed the Town of
Cary has delegated authority to review and approve the proposed stormwater management
plan. The proposed stormwater management plan is currently under review with the Town of
Cary. Per the August 10, 2007 memorandum from Coleen Sullins Director of the NC DWQ•
"Lthe necessary local approval of the SMP has not vet been obtained at the time of
application, the application should indicate that a SMP has been or will be submitted for
local government approval, indicate the local government that approval is being requested
from, and indicate under what State stormwater program the activity will be covered by Any
401 Certification approved under this scenario shall be conditioned so that the proposed
activity shall not commence until such time that the appropriate local approval has been
granted."
Page 8of10
Please note that this is a courtesey notification to the NCDWQ. If however, written
concurrence is required, we are requesting a conditional 401 Approval contingent upon
receiving the appropriate Stormwater Management Plan Approval from the Town of Cary,
The applicant understands that none of the proposed activities shall commence until the SMP
Approval has been issued by the Town of Cary and copies of the approved plans and supporting
documentation have been forwarded to the NC DWO.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project proposes to tie into existing Town of Cary sewer lines. The Town of Cary will
insure that the capacity of their treatment facility will not be exceeded.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. This residential project does not meet any of the three
criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. This development is
relatively small in nature, has no commercial component associated with it, is within a primarily
residentially developed landscape and therefore, the utility infrastructure (i.e. water and
electricity) are already in place to service the proposed development. We anticipate that you will
advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 9 of 10
N/A

Applicant/Agent's Signature 'Date '
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
G
..0
-lZ o

f
I
1? ? a
Project No.
1O259.W2
Project Mgr
I " = 1320'
4/25/06
0
o?
Figure 2- NKC5
Doll Survey Map
Green Level Site
Singh Development
Wake County, INC
Wake County 5oil Survey
Sheet 55

site
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
P
0
V?\V
0
0
ti

O
Ni

Project No. Figure I - 1:24K USGS
10259.W3 Topographic Quadrangle

Project Mgr.: Green Level Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
513 Singh Development 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Scale: Wake County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1 2,000'
Green Level Quadrangle
3/20/08

7 CrB:
CrC2
C:
j A- ,, -i
CrB2
crB2
6 M
? `
•
x ;x
`
3 o
'
?
•
. ?
*
t'f ?' ^`D .?
.
r CtC2 p
°• ti
« Cr6 t

, ?
i ?B
r??? •'? i
tY y.
t Cr&

+? r 0C :
:
41
.
k fJ

w,

,

? { g Au
;;
/ , Cr82 ` 92 f CrC2
ti
i
•
? CrC2 , r
??
• Cr92 ye ,?,
?

?? S
? ?
L?
'
r'?'4
^
?
? CfB2
?
' ??•
?

?
y
«
'?„ jr
a «
.
'
? ,? ?
f
rC2
cY?;r? ,
G
? ,fit ?
ri;
r
\? ? 4
? rI ?
?
?
'
?? i .t <
. ???
a .?S''?' a?!
y .4•?
!! CrC? i
?
..?
?•
t. ?
'QUC2 ?
? i
.'?
''
r '` ?,. xi
•
t, f ?.
y . j. ti
. ..,L•?r??
? r?
CrE G0
'3 ,..

'1 r'i 4
a
\'`s
Cr02 F
4 ?.j .
t
jC'
., • A
,
CrB2
Cr132 . J
i

! K 1? ? iN/ rE
a
Project No. Figure 2 - NKCS Soil
10259.W3 Survey Map
Project Mgr.: Green Level Sewer
? Soil & Environmental Constiltants, PA
Steven Ball Singh Development 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
5cale: Wake County
NC [phone] • [phone]
, Web Page: www.SandEC.com
I ° = I ,320'
k
C
W
t
S
l S
a
e
oun
y
oi
urvey
3/20/08 Sheet 55
Jun 16 2006 8:18RM HP LRSERJET FAX
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Namee6e???)
P.2
Address: 34Sd Tree n Lev-C,-1 mod, AJ,-
9 n& Ape)( NL
Phone: A?me) `l ZZY 7?6Z 4)6,k)
o., LrTT-Tft IN N 14Z-1 ?1 n&rt- uct-2m wi rS
Project Name/Description: Varcr-1 # 07 - -?I I-,J
Date: ilLtne. go
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To '%Nhom It May Concerr
I, the current r er owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, FA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
sup lemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 14= day of
LA Vie,?
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Albert- Nltrma iou.nci 1 N e i rs `
70-Re Cccv 4n n -Pri r,ce_. J)"
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Domey
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Mr. Jason Payne
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
bl" agent auth form. doc
Jun 16 2006 e:ienm HP LRSERJET FAX
P.3
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner.
Name: Tonnie- ?• gdee and k l;, K. 4dc, _
Address: y'? S1Q G' Teen LeveJ /,? )e-s4- pe4 NC. 47Z213
Phone: 1 ' - V U 1
3/0l0 rscn i.ev?.I.iZoacl, Wes _
Project Name/Description: 'Rea ! t<?I (? # d 1 X9931
Date: J l C n e- l ?. ?DOIo
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
fNC
I, the current ro er owner; hereby. designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The -? day of
SnF_•?
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
,&nn; e- P- and W1'//;&.w 4.,Iqe?
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. Jason Payne
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
blank agent auth 6orm.doc
Jun 16 2006 8:188M HP LRSERJET FAX
3um-14-06 05:43 PM PHILLIPS FARM
WET
919 467 3004

p.4
P. 01

;-NT AU O'KNO
?a mar _,P4M''-?_ -lbe-_. 1/ Zr,.?,?,'?'-?.?..........._..---•--• .._._....?__.-...r_ _.._....___.`.
i... , ?ti.l i ??M.? ! C?rrurt}+t:.oit• ?f?'5?.??ltSl,?-t„?•r, ! sf?h, ?:?z?.I! ?'eaGii??.i? M.?-%?!?..??'?.: ??!?5.. i2::?'?i.: `.`•'
'hs i;?.•p,.tirr?•,t c+i +Jir .??rri?.
Cr."', A?• y CL,..rs of F.1sgin'vvl. VvWmlrt?,to:t 17i xtrwr,
V..Cj. 6o t 7 AN
iViliiuitram, Nc sF?if7:
ACM: ...._ ._._ . ,__.......,..- _... _ _..._ M..
Rt?: N,'et?latcl:? ii'.'vtrc:a•_l ;?<r.•?:??ytr?r?,, .?nd i?cruuttutl,
T•,t Whom 1- Nilvty l: cn:rr
Pw c1UTwr,t i?CS•?t:: c""nrr, iter3? d4wi( to ar'! ?e rlt-•ar> 5?i1 Cn4zrjml ++ta1 C nriru; taitiy, FA u
-,•t In my tl 4At an awy ap-mt ir the, pt k-mijUtg vi r Shit sC}s.'ica?orx+, ca f+3Lt> 'h ui+nr wKZt????i.
,, r1,?fl?•g1dLltiL ic:.irisuoyo?to.appliCali 070, e'fi.Ir;nt?Nslsraaf ??.rrv?:++rl. 'i"te„?,.?_?_.__,l?y??i
hLattattiir;:e;,n suN:c?tazx v+y prics.douatar:e?jcnri?rx the aar,,t for t6cip- firr..jti?tt.
NOTICE: 'Thio avAhoc?zsttlvr, far URI? liry r< . d psnj*4. nai'. crAuitay remana, i'valid only far
Qovtrrimmt o idalo to ordw the property rrhan anxn.ust+nnlt:d by S!i FC staff. `lots shotrltt cat; ?.1?E1°
to arrans,e a mile mvr-tire, pritx to vtsttinp; tho q+•te.
F?:n: "rc+F?ws??` cer?1`C 1.?,,?n s .--•--.._...
? - _
t?rryi:,acrt i"n.ti•nrr'N?:1??tu.t
CC: Mrr jo'run DO." :t.
22U7( Crabtree
Rale.'.?. , NC 7? 604
_. :.dr. l???r. Pat•rrt?
?C ik En+ic•?rc:awrmttp' C :-.3a4ultentw,, FA
Ula.?l ,.Kw?ruJ? f?+u'. ?'K
0
o7
00 C)
N
Q N
0
Do
Z
0
a
00
oZ
o?
m'0)
m
Q'z
?o
N C
0
m
o
ao
mo
a o
CL
?.
£a
o rn
aSR
-• N
?• O
?W
N
? N
N
C A
Ot
S
0
FD
-n
7
0
8CD
o `0
m1 07
?+ N
N
?y
WET DETENTION ?•
BASIN 11
w - - - 20 TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER f
j j % • • HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
20 13 I 12 LOT I
j ,•' / J \? 17 ' 16 I 15 I 14 I 20' TOWN OF CARY
\ ' 1 DRAINAGE I I I PIPELINE & UTILITY
?) \ 18 EASEMENT EASEMENT II \ 10 19
20
\ VJ? \ \ \ 25 26 27 28 i
1 . 24 \\ \ I I I 8' ASPHALT
/• Of /
1 ?• . \ ` I I I GREENWAY
TRAIL (TYP) 9
25' TOWN OF / - -E- - {- - - - { /
- - _ _
CARY PIPELINE / - _- - - - - - - - - - - -1 .1
--- - i I
\ AND UTILITY / / ... - - - - - - - J 1 EASEMENT
BIORETENTION I I
AREA 13 I I I. I 8
32 31 30 I'
23 I
IMPACT #12 I I 29 1
I 22 \ ` ; \ SEE FIGURE 1 1 I f' - - - - -
? ? ? I I I
? ?? I
21 aglow
33.: -?- 7 f4c l 6 1
REMAINDS TO I \ \ \ b4 IMPACT 13 ,,IIIUNDISTURBED SEE FIGURE i I T I
IMPACT 11 \\/ // I ( I 38
293.7 SF ---_ ??
SEE FIGURE U RE 1 36 37
^ Il:
10.007 AC FlGURE 1 1 `\\ / 35 20' TOWN OF CARY fP I
i PIPELINE AND ? •f 5
i UTILITY EASEMENT
1 ?? S I 20' DRAINAGE f
EASEMENT
? J
\ 40 39 r 4 g
BIORETENTION \ ` \ 41 20" PRIVATE I , /QyU
AREA 14 42 GREENWAY I ? /
\\ EASEMENT
40' TOWN OF 1 \''? =?????? / ?? ? /o
CARY PIPELINE
AND UTILITY
EASEMENT ( ? /
1 ? 1 (! • I a-
i 43 1 2
\ 20' LANDSCAPE
I 20' DRAINAGE
1 EASEMENT EASEMENT I
20' LANDSCAPE
EASEMENT ;-•• BIORETENTION
MATCHLINE IX-1 _ ?•• - •• AREA 15
1
WETLAND IMPACT SU MMARY
TOTAL WETLANDS TO BE 1,612.6 SF
REMOVED 0.037 AC
TOTAL WETLANDS TO 2,004.7 SF
REMAIN UNDISTURBED 0.046 AC
02008 by ETd, PA. No portion of the drawings
may be copied, reproduced, redrawn or modified
without the written consent of ETd, PA.
0 100 200
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1" = 100'
ELAM, TODD, d'AMBROSI
ORRIRTL17688i.LQMSCAMARCMB T JR8
COV.?.L-M=CONSULTINO
?ROBBINS
& ASSOCIATES
INTERNATIONAL
CALF mmLSEDMON • MASI}RPLAM.'ING•
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEN.ENT
]8615 TER ROAD. SURE 2110
MORRWVMIA NORTR CA LIKA 17%0
USA
OFFICE 919.481.2021
FAX [phone]
EMAIL [e-mail]
PRELIAMVARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SAXONBURY SINGH
WETLAND IMPACT
EXHIBIT
CLIENT
SMGH DEY NiM, TLC
5001 T&9TON PUT, STS 106
CARP, NC 27515
019-677-1700
CONTACT! PAUL R1E9JBDI
rlaudl0dojhmaloom
ENGINEER/LA
KA TODD, dA10ME
2880 MAT= RD, STE 200
140R&3MM NC 27660
KO-M-2=
CONTACT! TUVE HO MEW
tnmeheeaMdpLeam
SURVEYOR
KENNETH CLOSE, BIC.
114 NACOM DR STE 200
CARY, NC 27511
919-661-2344
CONTACT I= GOODTOW
mEooditvd eca?meLcom
Drelm Br. AT
amcked Br. SH
Date: 5/20/08
Proji: 2708001
Berldaae
SHEET
EX-1
0
Nr7
o?
mo
?o
Dp
Z
0
0
o 0
o Z
o I?
5 Sn
m Z
a
N
N nv
y n
?O
CD
0
-2.
N N
aV
0
v °o
0 I'
C
?o
F a
7?
o ?
oSe
-. N
O
?OD
F N
? N
V
C O
A
S
N
?D
CD
80
7 N
?o
om
?A
?O
Y?
cu WvuJtdVL
EASEMENT ?- - 1 ?doi
MATCHLINE EX-1
EX-2 i
I I
i
I ?
i
I BIORETENTION
i AREA 16
i
I _
_-? man

mmmmmmmmm
-8' ASPHALT
GREENWAY
TRAIL (TYP)
30' RIGHT
-OF WAY
DEDICATION
"-BIOREfENT10N\1
AREA /5
1 1
MEN =001 low ON
I
1
1 1
1
1
1
i 1
_ -? /-
I I
I
?I
20' TOWN OF
I ?
CARY SANITARY
I J/ SEWER EASEMENT
I
WETLANDS TO
REMAIN
i UNDISTURBED
1114.5 SF
0.026 AC
I
IMPACT 14
WETLANDS TO
I BE DISTURBED
1229.6 SF
I 0.028 AC
I WETLANDS TO
I REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
596.5 SF

S
l`
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.014 AC I
.00
-- ss ?- - a -
- -
Ir EXISTING WHITE OAK
INTERCEPTOR BY
TOWN OF CARY
TOTAL WETLANDS TO BE 1,612.6 SF
REMOVED 0.037 AC
TOTAL WETLANDS TO 2,004.7 SF
REMAIN UNDISTURBED 0.046 AC
©2008 by ETd, PA. No portion of the drawings
may be copied, reproduced, redrawn or modified
without the written consent of ETd, PA.
0 100 200
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1" = 100'
ELAM, TODD, d'AMEROSI
URBANn wNM*LQM9CAMAaamecnme
C1YR.M401? twa*LANOUS8CONBULTRIG
R ROBBINS
& ASSOCIATES
INTERNATIONAL
G UNURSEDESIGN• AW'ItRAANNNG•
CONSI =ON MA AGE. W
2880 SLAIHR ROAD, SU= 200
MORRISVRS$ NORTH CAROLINA 27%0
USA
OFFICE 919.481.20 1
PAR 919481277
EMAIL etd@etdp8.-
PRELLVRNARY
NOTFOR
CONSTRUCTION
SAXONBURY SINGH
WETLAND IMPACT
EXHIBIT
CLIENT
SINGH D679MM, llC
5001 '1&41O1t PKWY, SM 106
CART, NC 27519
919-677-1700
CONTACT PAM @QS19DI
rhserdNMoghmeD.oom
ENGINEER,/LA
MAX TODD, dAYHR08I
2680 SIIT? RD, SH 200
M0RRB7DIE, NC 27580
919-481-2021
CONTACt`. TRUIS NDNffiAD
tmmwhead044-cam
SURVEYOR
MINIM MDR, BIC.
114 MACA7,W DR, 818 200
CARY, NC 27511
919-66t-2344
CONTACT: MIU GWD}ffiI
mgooatredNwlteelvawmetcom
Drawn Br. A!
Checked RT SH
Date: 5/00/00
Proj#: 2706001
RerWoee
SHEET
EX-2
25' TOWN OF CARY / LEGEND
PIPELINE & UTILITY
EASEMENT ® SEWER & STORM IMPACTS
n /
TRAIL IMPACTS
/ D LOT FILL IMPACTS
MH112 33
8" PVC
• IMPACT 12
WETLANDS TO BE
DISTURBED DUE TO
GREENWAY TRAIL
91.7 SF
0.002 AC IMPACT J3
20' PRIVATE
GREENWAY
,EASEMENT do
O
or
OOO o
J
co
O_
0
00
O Z
o ?
i0 WETLANDS TO REMAIN
z UNDISTURBED
293.7 SF
0.007 AC
GOo
w
? p
(D
0
0
Q N
L J
0
COO
o i?
c
p
?R
Qo ?
N
O '
N
0 N ELAM, TODD, d'AMBROSI
O UARANPIANNINO. ARCFIIIECTURE
S CIVE.IAR7INEERDIGo ANDUSECONSULTINO
N
. ROBBINS
& ASSOCIATES
*INTERNATIONAL
8 Dou COURSE DESIGN • MASTER PLANNINO
CONMUCHONMANAGEMENT
S805LATER ROAD. SUI
USA TE 200
(((UUU MORRISVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 27560
?
"' Rp OFFICE 91,9.481.2021
O ? FAX 919.48L2773
O EMAIL [e-mail]
PL r?)
O

181RCP WETLANDS TO BE
DISTURBED DUE TO
LOT FlLL
:20' PRIVATE 129.6 SF
ENWAY 0.003 AC
EMENT
JB#23
0
YI/23A
18"RCP
n

34
2
IMPACT jf 1
WETLANDS TO BE 35' TOWN OF
DISTURBED DUE TO CARY PIPELINE
SEWER & STORM M14111 & UTILITY `
161.7 SF EASEMENT r
0.004 AC .
0

20' DRAINAGE C
t
EASEMENT a
"
, z
18 "RCP
SAXONBURY SINGH
WETLAND IMPACT
EXHIBIT
0 20 40
SCALE: HORIZONTAL I" = 20'

PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
FIGURE I