20170834 Ver 1_B-5715 JD request_packet_20161202

Bridge 17 over the Haw River on SR 2351 (Witty Rd.)
B-5715
Bridge 17 is located on Witty Rd., just over a mile south of its intersection with NC 158 in
Rockingham County (the Guilford/Rockingham County line traverses the project). There are
two perennial streams and six wetlands in the study area. Two of the wetlands are small
depressional features (WB, WE), two wetlands are relatively large forested systems along SA
(Haw River; WC and WD), one is an impoundment dominated by emergent vegetation (WF),
and one wetland is a forested, linear drainage that joins up with larger wetlands where it meets
the Haw River floodplain (WA). No jurisdictional stream feature was determined to be flowing
through this wetland.

A.
B.
C.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: w�tty Rd.
Clty, state: Summe�eld, NC
C011llty: Guilford/Rockingham County line
D1ieCt10T1S: From Raleigh, take I-40/85 to exit 227 (future I-840). Take US 70 West to US 220 North;
veer right on Lawndale Dr./Lake Brandt Rd. and take a right on Witty Rd. (just past NC 150)
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 1:
N/A
Nicole Thomson
PO Box 14996, Greensboro NC, 27415
919-754-7806
[e-mail]
Select one:
� I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑✓ Other, please explain.
This JD request is for a NCDOT bridge replacement project; landowners have been
contacted for access and permission to have USACE regulatory personnel on their
property.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
N/A
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an a�proved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
� I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
❑✓
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 9�0
�
G.
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
36.250615 -79.838764
�/ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓
❑✓
0
0
❑
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)�:
Wetlands:
� Wetland Data Sheets8
✓❑
�
�
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
� USACE Assessment Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
� Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
�
❑�
❑
�
�
Longitude
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
' 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.armv.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ResulatorvPro�ramandPermits/re� supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.or�/c/document librarv/�et file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&aroupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatorv/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
$ Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
� Wetland Data Sheets9
❑
❑
❑
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
� USACE Assessment Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
u
�❑
Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
n
u
�
I-
❑�
❑�
�
�❑
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
� When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
� all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie-to
surveyed project/property boundaries
� Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
� Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non-
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
� Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
� When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundarv is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean WaterAct as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5J years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
� When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundar�
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean WaterAct as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013
Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
� be at sub-meter accuracy at each survey point.
� include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
� include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Nicole Thomson, PO Box 14996, Greensboro, NC 27415
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
B-5715; bridge no. 17 over the Haw River on SR 2351 (Witty Rd.)
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC COUIIt�/Ij�al"ISiIII�OrOUgil: Guilford/Rockingham Clt�/: Summertield
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36.250615 °N; LOng. -79.838764 °W,
Universal Transverse Mercator: ��s
Name of nearest waterbody: HaW R��er
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
695.5 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: R3AB3
Strgarp F�OW: Perennial
Wetlands: 2��$ acres.
Cowardin Class: PFo a�a PEM
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
� Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
� Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appl�nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1�24,OOOLakeBrandt&Bethany
✓❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Cltatl011: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
� 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
QOther (Name & Date): S�te pnotog�aPns
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
�

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
�
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Site Latitude Longitude Class Estimated Class of aquatic
amount of resource
aquatic
resource in
review area
SA (Haw 36.250610 -79.838748 R3SB3 491.5 linear Non-section 10;
River) ft. non-wetland
SB 36.251103 -79.839246 R3SB3 204.0 linear Non-section 10;
ft. non-wetland
WA 36.25006 -79.838251 PFO 0.37 acre Non-section 10;
wetland
WB 36.250443 -79.838475 PFO 0.04 acre Non-section 10;
wetland
WC 36.250369 -79.839446 PFO 0.61 acre Non-section 10;
wetland
WD 36.251289 -79.839322 PFO 1.09 acre Non-section 10;
wetland
WE 36.250853 -79.83842 PFO 0.01 acre Non-section 10;
wetland
WF 36.251865 -79.838378 PEM 0.07 acre Non-section 10;
wetland

i � -
+ , � � ',
� � + �
� � �;
�
� �
� ��r
.
• �
�
.� 't --
�. �
� w
� � � �'�
� '� � '
i a� .F
.
� '�� .� �`�
� - -
�► � " _ -
� .� .._.� �� '
� s _
T � � -
� . 4 �� ,.
�.
���"- - .. �
� ...` � . .
� ' i M � �
.� _ , r „ ��
� . , �
f � a � � Y
'�„ r - f • �.
_ � _ � j + ��
= - �
� ,� ,' ,�` ' �
�,
� �� . : , �
� o�
_ R � �'., i • ,'
_ ' 1t "- '�'ti • � � , �
. � , �, �
� r . r
. .. 4 ,
. R �
� �-�
r � �� �
� � � .�` _y � -
�
Ln .� -�' - � �
ege d � _ _
� Stud Area I . � f
y rvice L r Cr s: Copyng :•O 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
0 300 600 B-5715 �`p' q�
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 17 OVER HAW m!+E�„�F
Feet R�vER orv SR 2351 (WiT�rv RDJ �P
FIGURE 2 PREPARED BY: DATE:
GUILFORD & ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NC �� PL� N& SEPTEMBER
TOPOGRAPHIC Ct�°-�° RFsr<�RAG�>� 2016

�r �L r � }' i
: � '� .` ;�-� a��t�
11'..
8
:, , �
�
�
�4
HbA
,.E. �.a- .__.
� +�;t r`�y'L���!'�+� i1 �'RSi�,� �: d �. +�,��+ � r� � .c
4.✓„' a �� , _,j� ' •
�� i + !' � °e�C �' ,'.C�,�, •� : '
��" _L . � ry � `, � : ' +1 � r ` ..�+y { j � �y,�j t �.
�p KJ" � k " � , ,�f`ti �� �i' �4 �
_ � �1"�'`
��',�,. ' . ���, � .'. __-- - �_ ��r..�b'`f�' •���1+ ����,
. .
' ': � i ' r
� { ti \ . � , . . �: �`t,1 `,`� ,.SS' �' - '
'X�4 � � �� ` (���, „`� • + Y' � �.+,.
, : �•'� � �,: �� . ~�
��r �.`�� �.V � ��r � .�jT'' �d , �
,, ti � � ,� ,� � , ,e�. ��il�'.��,-� � �, ,
� ` �' i, � �+'. �! 4. �+;.�t 'i� ��� , `^ �^�~� �1 �.t , �'r- �<.
� �( DaA ��. � � . '� �ti r � `�! �. ; ` ^ �.
:4 �~ �. .� + ,:� �%"� � • �',�r, �r ,> > M >=
�I' . , . . ," , :�T �' I '•.
' �`� � ' �, . A � � ' . , i; � �.l\W . ~ � � \.
w. .� ���� _\� . ��� �F � '�1���( �''d ' y.� .
� � ": • �. w ' xr . . . � - � ''.� •� �.- ,�.t ' � ti
�.. . -°� ,�'•'� " Sm F � '� °.� , �'►y�,. `.`ta,� �; � � ��.
�� � , w• ,� �
' ` ' , f � ,c � `. � `.. � : �: �,���... \�� +` ' �
" 2� ' �' �� , �,a • �_ -- ,� `�� 'js"�!" a �, .,.a,`�+.,.y� �
� � . _'� i 'Y. • • �. ' h � �".\ �It�. ., , }1�5;�; 1 s�.-.n "C�'.��
i� ' � •� ♦ �� �1' `'� I 1 �� � �, �4 .,',+ S!�\\�' J`�
�" ._, .,' �� `�' DaA ��' >•� �' ,� .��•:i '�"��
` � '� �i "�'?�. ' ' 1���`i
4s+�'� '� �, ;k. :�' x , ,�vi�`.� , '',,, �`'� '�
< < �
,, �4 :. � . {,;'+ � �. i'+�.` fi�. ' � � `,��
y �• , �d.•�• ��' Li ��C`
1 �� `,l .. . . � i'I, / '�'T� �` � SI�.�� �a�4, , J
�'i � � ` � t . . ; .., � ti. '. wi' � � K"� , �� �i
A i �, �� . .C, .� r.� ` � � �
;� � t _ Sm E :�"'4� ';;+�'� � � �,, �._:� �;'
k �r {, � t
� `� ��r . 1 � `� � ` .�' �.��r,�• ��T\�� y' � !,y
� `� ',`. 4 � � �. �, '-��'`k y,, �-
�, ° �. y .�,, �� "�; ,_
, b�, �i ,i� '� `
, ..���� :'a r�. . i r . _ . .
� �� � w�� 4�� f' '`=~� ♦: r't� �.
.�., a .(.r � I� y �,�(,� : , � � � . � �i �0 �,
,
r � ~�
,. . ,. r A
, � w
i " , . � f . - . � •, ��
yy �
' �, . . �( _._" -- �+ 4
',%.��`,� . +
' : A-~ ,�'+, .'. 1 . ,..., s ��•� " `�-, �1 . � , �..� ��. � R`�'N �,� � ��i'� t rL
]�yV.� �`_ �. ��y``�� `, ���'
'*� '�(ft ��6 '�I1����'� .`�� l ����`�� �."� ' ' � .r�
l � j
�✓ v.,�, �. • � ?, • »n n!4• �t ►y` � ` y �.
'� �;!"� � ,_.` ,�.. t \� !4r�j� ' �11�, ,•Fy�.,� �� �� �`,�T,M��-
�. �R .. � �tr� A'. V:� -.. •���'., yS
Legend f ' ;'� ' . �a t''� ��" ,1�
� M . ' ,� �.�. � • � , � '�• .
�1lS �� t� �Y�' R r�, � �.y
;, � s '�l L, ti '�;' s . ' "''ft''7 • r
Dan River Loam, 0-2% slopes .� �':�-�� ' �'��, '"'���. � � .� !'�• r'„ �`' J
t <. � ,� . '. �,.
� :.
, . , .
Hatboro silt loam, 0-2% slopes ~ `'' �,� ,��� ��,, ";^„ ` ��`� .;� • � `
o •'�'� ' �.�' ��'�'r,�•�' '�'�'�j,.t'��1� � `` �2 �,' �
Siloam sandy loam, 15 45 /o slopes � f - .,�9', • ,: � � ��,,,t ,��� ,,�''� � ,� � t ;� ,`j+.,. �
a� � �� ° � �,� ���'`'� ; �' ��
Siloam sandy loam, 10-45% slopes .'� � `�'�' � $ • �
�,� } ..`�''��� "� `�� �. +� y,,.� � �; - � ��
L___�� Study Area � r r w1�. t r„ `�,�' _ �. .�,5 a�� Yp �. � ,;+,
• ' .r � r. M ��
.�� ����. � � �, -
0 150 300 B-5715 �
Feet REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 1% OVER HAW o!��
RIVER ON SR 235`I (WITTY RD.) T�'° �s"°P
FIGURE 3 PREPARED BY: DATE:
GUILFORD & ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NC �RF�NRAT&N NO2E�M�BER
SOILS 1e�

. '� �,,� Y�t� ,�,,
� :A ta',',-r.�
i., � :� ,� (�r:,
►, r 11
�� � _'.+ :
�i ��t .. � �'?r,:, � WF
f f.. . =�q � �
- i,
v � • � ' . . .
t '� r i ` J�`+" �. l
, ;�. ���i"�[ ,. ,, .
� •. �Ir�:
W D t: `� .,''�, , , r �;: ~� .
' - � . ,. •�•.,,�k,:•,�` ' , '
�' :' ,, �.:�` � ;y`'�i
( ��1 P��• *, � . '1� �
. ' \ �'' �~ 1 ,r ' _
't�• � � U�, ,i.�1' ' .�
1 � � ' o' = ` ' � �e�{'� S"w 11 , < � � .
ti � j �� , `t �� `. �� �' : ' S • . ' � � � (: I` � , +
� 1� Y + .+�.�. � l'.'} • t � .j. , � �} S �' �y .;{.
. 4� '� ' :� - a • � .._ ���
k; 7 � - , ., " � � • 7 'l' � -.• � ." , .� ls � f�T:
`r \'� �• ; . � t '� -'f�f�t�`,•�,��' .L � 4'''�k�\•� �.,�,�
''�.� � � � Wp t�.�.: .� �..� � ,, ,"�;, ,;; , �,;.�� * �
��� ,�.�t:: , ,� �c ��� .I SB �I < t�! �' �L.�1; .",y� �� C'�'�,�'
���,� .. I ?� ,�i 1 ..`T j���i� \ �y- �i '
�,, `t� 1,p ..�. _i�1'1 ;� "'�;y,,;: .� t .�: '` � �i�iJ, r�"�1+� •t• �;;�[.
:,� •�r \ • ,�� ,., r r. fl �� s - ' W E �.IF`�� \ . � 1 . � � \, }.. �, ..� \ � .
� j �f�, � ,'`:���`•�t .. A �� �..-��t���rP��
'•t, `L �,•; ` ; � S��A j � d� �. ,�`� _ �• ._,, \ V N � �R����� ;��' "��� ���t�
�, � ,� . ^j� f � % � '� 1,�`�t a'• - � � �� < pa <,� �� S � yy .'I�Y i �� \, � � {'�L:. � a S �
1.,� ��!� � ���� 3y t�, �� . ��..�,SA .� • y�'�-r�" ;'p a� � 7•�` ��� �C .:!1��
�� �� t,. .� , , r }" ' 1i `.�Si` ��.�1� �r'� � ��." � � -'4�- � A��, `';- -�� '' :,�l;��..\` �+��,
y� � . �+ �,� . �' � {��� V. tti t
s•'•�• , -�Y. �7 F + � ,��jti'�ti.j1 �"� .��J'•�` �� .��tiy�'�i��'.a��',���.�;\ ,�����,� C�I
. 4' � ) �; ,! 4,� �i� .• � �� . �` `�' ''r � ��,� �,�;,f, '�y 'y` Ja.�.� x �� ��j`, `�� ��
•. ''�� s� y �\ - '�,.�?� ; �e�� ::�. •. � `�,: ,�;
' .,a '� ,� ,• , ,"���.� 'WB #• _'4,� � , � , :tr: ;
` � , ' � , i' � ► � � ` . Y�c. ` � ti';
ti , � ��r," WC ? + � \.�0, �� \ '`� . � ,��%1(, ,�, ''�*j '���y
.,.� f, . , ' y� :� � , • �`. �I" j�"� , \ •
� � �� _ . ^ G + . '.,�, ,`,j • �,; �,`' ' � „
` {',���,�. '`w� t � �I' R'` ��-: `S ' . t� �i
►I� . � ~��l`h1 .q �� ` _� � . .�� �`. \` '�. '��
1 .7�.�'y�1� {-,y�� ..` •� 2���i'. � ` f� ' '�,.Y�` M,rya��' �k ..�t, j �� �.. �
; °�,. ��� 11�;�� \1 l �;:� A , +� '{` _ i'\ \ , � � � � , t.� � WA �� �� � , i �y�'j � �� �` � �ti
•� . � _} � \ �'" `� �c ,� .::
. � �� �\ . . i . �, �; ,�r�,!•j ���l.+ +' s t ' •` ' ��i , � t�
' H.\��\�, .. •' �.:y' �� �,, • ♦. � �' �`,� �',� {,��`~�� � .�', •7,�
�. 1 �� j ��. � .�', �.
� y �.'\ ' � �` y'. ,` -. � '� . �I�� '��r �'� • � �r ,'��1y��'' , .p.��
� X , `� A �' , . .� � C' . l , �. . �1 � . 1 , ���ny ••�t_ �`�
� � .� : ;�. � ..� .., � ' �, , , �
``i��� ' l ' •" '��4 �. \ ` .` ,. i�I ,
�� 1 �1� ,y�
�n .. �, �• '.�*,� v�v ' �. �;^�`1�7� ;r•`�r�'G :4i'i
`•` '�,i� � � ,� �y��_,�,{ `!- •� -��,�.•�,'Z� • i` ' '+� 1`'�'�`�
����a•� 'j•� �' �!?�� �' f.:` '�y•h��"� •} � .�� f �' ��j`�`.,�.,��, ,`,�
�� , , . --� ��, r: �, . 4� ��;, � ., ,��
' �:� � ';,`� , � t r� # ►, �• , i
� { � �, , _ � \ `*�? � :,��!+"1r���, � ��' ,
'`* i, �f � 1� �. �. ''.,�`/�/ /� �, ��;i �.
�'• .• �� �.�j - �,. ,� � "iMr� }�� ' �. \.V V~ �� j�.�l.`' ' ;�� 's� �r
f, , �, � ' � : �. .�� . � :1 t .,` y
��� '.1T� v�, � ���, " � . � �:: .�",� �.��. 1+ ;� .
''� '• � .d' ;� ' �,/ � � : �� 1� ,� , 4 :��1 '•; ��`
Legend i � . � C:.� ,�. �, � , t ;�f,
• ,/� �j�l,��e ` 1�'� �.� ' ��1..r, •'- ,�- •�..�A� '�, �'►�!'iri. ,. '�.
� r Ai1�i1C � .iL-�—���`,: �., � }.•� c. ��'%, �� , �. ��-r.;,� 3�' ��
�StudyArea ;,, .�,, '�,' " < <: � ,� `� � �'�'Y 1�
�'�i „ . ''r. � ' '' ��+ � ;i�, .. �.�.
. Q'�C ."�� �4 r ; ,��, . �?�'' , .. ::� ���.
Streams �.��'�,�� . `• � .,`;:t- .�''. � �1� ; ."�,,�-��t�• �,� �+ :
� Wetlands :�'���:� w � °sl�`+`..'�• �'��� '����"�".�a��, r ,
\
� � -�� . '�` ` ,� ,�i y • �\ • ♦ F, ��,, v,R � :1�� ` .v� �� I,�Y; ' � �+ � � y�.
0 125 25Q B-'rJ% �'rJ PREPARED BY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. '[7 OVER HAW �E°°SYSTE"'
�
Feet P�^NN,�� � ��F
RtvER oN SR 2357 (WtTTY RDJ R�'�°''^T'°"
horrnneb
FIGURE 4 GUILFORD & ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NC DATE:
JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES SEPTEMBER 2016

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for ldentification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
�W Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: /O ( 2 �� ProjectlSite:'Pj� ,�J' a� S I$� �atitude: 31a, 25p4� O
Evaluator: �, �Q,m,� County: �j ( Qyd Longitude: -��j , g7�a
Total Points: Stream Determination (ci Other
Sheam is at least intermittent 2, $,�j Ephemeral Intertnitten Perennial e.g. Quatl Name:
if t 19 or perennial "At 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �.51
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. Inchannel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Adive/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = a. 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23.Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Alaae
Sketch:
u'
1
1
1
streams may also be itlentified usinp other methods. See D. 35 of manual.
41
2
2
0.5
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
=�S/
3
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #� (indicate on attached map)
;,� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the strearo reach under assessment:
1. Applicanf s name: IUCAO'(� 2. Evaluator's name: /�_ .Titrn th
3. Date of evaluation: �4/���� 4. Time of evaluation: ��k�v+'1
5. Name of stream:���,� 6. River basin: �
7. Approximate drainage area: �7� �J' S'!. . Y111 (.Cfi 8. Stream order: 2 d✓ G.� 6Vfi
�
9. Length of reach evaluated: ��'1 d�'. 10. County: �Ilr (�✓� ��Eit/u rv� � Co �i N�i
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any�
Latitude(ex.34.872312): �7�P.25O�DiO Longi[ude(ex.-77.556611): -'�-1• b7o�lTb
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho Aerial Photo/G Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather
16. Si[e wndi[ions a[ time of visit: CJV ll���y' T✓� �
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trou[ Waters _Outstanding Resource Wa[ers �Nutrient Sensi[ive Wa[ers _Water Supply Watershed_(I-IV)
1S. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES N� If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: r�% Residential 3% Commercial _% Industrial �% Agricultural
�% Forested Z% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: ��. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): rJ' %��
24. Channel slope down center of stream: �Flat (0 to 2%) _GenHe (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to ] 0%) _Steep (>]0%)
25. Channel sinuosiry: _Straight �Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion ot worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by de[ermining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, eta Every charac[eristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign poin[s
to each characteristic within the range shown for t6e ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluatioa If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the swring box and provide an explanation in the
comment sectioa Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided in[o smaller reaches that display more continuiry, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total swre assigned to a stream reach must range beriveen 0 and ] 00, with a score of 100 represen[ing a stream of the
highest quality.
TotalSeore(fromreverse):�� Comments: {'�C6.����q�h�joyJ DI'l�y��
_ �
Evaluator's Signature�, Date �� I�D I���
This channel evaluation Torm �s in nded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners a�l en�+ironmental professionals in
gathering [he data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
par[icular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject [o change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 9 t9-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTIC5 Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
� Presence of tlow / persistent pools in stream Q_ 5 0- 4 0- 5 �
(no flow or saturatio� = 0; strong flow = max points)
Z Evidence of past human al[eration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 4-
(exlensive alleration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparianzone 0-6 U-4 0-5 �
(no buffer= 0; conti uous, wide buffer=mass oints)
4 Evidence of nutrienf or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
�„a 5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 �-
U(no discharge = 0; spnngs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
,.., Presence of adjacen[ floodplain �
� 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maY points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
a � En Venchment / tloodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 3
(deeply entrenched = Q frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacen[ wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 �-
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity p_ 5 0- 4 0- 3 �-
(extensive channelizatio� = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 L
(extensive deposition= 0; fittle or no sediinent = max points)
� � Size & diversity oT channel bed substrate �rA* 0- 4 0- 5 %
(fine, homogenous = 0; larqe, diverse sizes = max points)
tZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 3
deepl incised = 0; sfable bed & banks = max oinis)
� � 3 Presence of major bank failm�es p_ 5 0- 5 0- 5 �.k-
►a (severe erosion= 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
�r
QRoot depth and density on banks 2
F
14 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 0- 3 0- 4 0-? J
� Impact by agriculture, livestoek, or timber production �
15 0-5 6-4 0-5
(substantial impact=0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riflle-pooVripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
E no riffles/ri les or pools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints)
Q Habitat complexity 2
F 17 0-6 0-6 0-6
� Qittle or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q�$ Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 5
�, (�o shading vegetation = 0: continuous canopy - max points)
19 Substrateembeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 �
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 Q- 5 0- 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, munerous [ pes = max points)
�j Z� Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 �
� (no evidence = 0; commoq numerous Types = max points)
'� Presence of fish D
� �� (noevidenee=0;common,numeroustypes=maxpoints) 0-4 0-4 0-4
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 Z
(no evidence = 0; abundan[ evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) ��
" lhese charactenshes are not assessed m coastal streams.

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for ldentification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.17
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: (OI(1f ��� ProjecVSite:'�6j�rj S$ �atitude: �j(fl, yr 1f03
Evaluator: �},`�Rryy�Laj County:���{�y�y.n Longitude: -�.$2�9;
i oim ru�nus: Stream Determination (circle one Other
Sheamisatkastinre�mittent %J'L E hemeral Intermitten erennia e. quadName:
;r� ,o ... �e.e�..;s� ;r� am P 9�
B. H drolo Subtotal =
12. Presence of BaseFlow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0. 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal =
1 S. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note divewiry antl abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. WeUand plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
•perennial sireams may also 6e identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: i � � � �� �
Sketch:
41

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #� (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
�)±
1. Applicant's name: ��O'r 2. Evalua[or's name: �. JCc�rt.E/>
3. Date of evaluation: �! 2��� �n 4. Time of evaluation:� WI
r
5. Name of stream: UT-�'� �'�-cut� �l V�i✓ 6. River basin: �!-uU {�2/..✓
7. Approxima[e drainage area: f/.7 •�O 9�' • 8. Stream order: ��
9. Length of reach evaluated: �LD 5� _ m� � 10. Counry:��q nw �'L
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. t2. Subdivision name (if any):
La[itude (ex. 34.872312): �71Y• 25 �yv3 I.ongitude (ex. -77.556611): — � • �� 1 �' Vf
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho Aerial) Photo/GI O[her GIS O[her
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) bcation):
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special watenvay classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Wa[ers � Nu[rient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upsheam of the evaluation poin[? YES NO If yes, es[ima[e the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: �% Residential _% Commercial _% industrial �% Agricultural
�Q%Forested �%Cleazed/Logged _%Other
22. Bankfull width: J� '.r7 �%• 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �����
24. Channel slope down cen[er of stream: �Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X. Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
InstruMions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appmpriate ewregion based on
location, temain, vege[ation, stream classification, eta Every charac[eristic mus[ be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each chazacteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
chazacteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due ro site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., [he stream flows from a pasture
in[o a forest), [he stream may be divided into smaller reaches [hat display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):_ 5��
Evaluator's Signature ��!�G�1'� Date �� l�O l� ��
This channel evaluation form is in ended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and e� n�mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the Onited States Army Corps oT Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular miNgation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Commen[, please call 919-876-844I x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal piedmont Mountain
� Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 ��--
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
Z Evidence of past human altera[ion U- 6 0- 5 0- 5 J2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max poin[s)
3 Riparianzone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; co��ti uous, wide buffer = max oints)
4 Evidence of outrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2�
(exte�sive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
� 5 Groundwa[er discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 �-
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
� 6 Presence of adjacent ttoodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 4-
� (no floodplain = 0; extensive Iloodpiain = max points)
�
''I,' � Entrenchment / fluodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 �-
p" (deeply entrenched = Q frequent floodin� = maac points)
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 4-
(no wetlands = 0; large adjace��t wetlands = max poin[s)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
�� Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
�� Size & diversity of cham�el bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 �.,
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
� z Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 7j
�. (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints)
,.F".i Presence of major bank failures /�
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 -�
�„� (severe erosion = 0; no erosioq stable banks = max points)
� � 4 Root depth and deusity on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 ?j
F, (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, Iivestock, or timber production �
IS 0-5 0-4 0-5
(subsiantial impac[ =0; no evidence = max points)
� 6 Presence of riftle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 2
F (no riffles/rip les or ools = 0; well-developed = max points)
� Habitat complexity Z
F �� Qittle or no habirat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = ma� poin[s) 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6
�.
� � 8 Canopy coverage over s[reambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 5
x (no shadinQ vegeta[ion = 0; cootinuous canopy = max points)
19 Substra[eembeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 Z
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = ma�c)
Zp Presence of stream invertebretes (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5
� (no evidence = 0; commoq numerous es = max oints) 0
� 21 Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poin[s)
'^ Presence of fish
O 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poin[s)
Z3 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 !�
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 ] 00
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 5`�'j
' lhese charactenstms are not assessetl m coas[ai streams.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA-34 wet
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: flOOdplain Local Relief: COIlCBV@ Slope (%): 0-1%
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.25006 Long: -79.838251 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Siloam sandy loam, 15-45% slopes NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Ephemeral drainage connecting to larger floodplain
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
X Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
X Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ndary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
Evidence of flow downslope
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants Sampling Point: WA-34 wet
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
1. Quercus falcata 25% Yes FACU OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 15% Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
3. Acer rubrum 15% Yes FAC Speicies Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4. Carya tomentosa 15% Yes FACU Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
5. U/mus americana 10% No FACW oe�, FACW, or Fnc: 80% (wB)
6. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10% No FACW
7. QuerCus michauxii 10% No FACW Prevalence Index Worksheet:
100% =Total cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 50% 20% total cover: 20% OBL species x 1=
FACW species X 2 =
so u e o omman n ica or
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status FAC species x 3=
1. Ilex decidua 20% Yes FACW FACU species x 4=
2. Asimina triloba 15% Yes FAC UPL species x 5=
3. Carpinus caroliniana 10% Yes FAC Column totals (A) (B)
4.
5. Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
45% =Total cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 23% 20% total cover: 9% Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Yes Dominance Test is >50%
so u e o ominan n ica or
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
1. Microstegium vimineum 25% Yes FAC Problematic Hydrophytic
2. Cinna arundinacea 10% Yes FACW Vegetation'(Explain)
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5% No FACW � Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
4. Carex spp. 5% No FAC must be present unless disturbed
5. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
6• Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
45% =Total cover approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
50% of total cover: 23% 20% total cover: 9% diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Vine Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status
1. Toxicodendron radicans 25% Yes FAC Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
2. Smilax rotundifolia 5% No FAC than 3 in. DBH.
3.
4• Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
30% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 15% 20% total cover: 6% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
Remarks: (If observed. List morphological adaptations below). woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA-34 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-4 2.5Y 5/2 60% 7.5YR 3/4 40% C M Ciay Loam iron-manganese bodies
4-12+ 2.5Y 5/2 75% 7.5YR 4/4 25% C M Sandy Clay Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 31ndiCators of hydrOphytiC vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 736) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematiC.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB-03 W@t
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
�anaform: depression Local Relief: COIlCBV@ Slope (°io):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.250443 Long: -79.838475 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam, 0-2% slopes NW I classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Appears to be an excavated depression, possibly associated with old road bed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
X High Water Table (A2)
X Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
No standing water at point, but standing water was found throughout
y Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Fraxinus pennsy/vanica
2. Acer rubrum
3. Acer negundo
4. Platanus occidentalis
5. Liquidambar styraciflua
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Asimina triloba
2. Carpinus caroliniana
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Cinna arundinacea
3. Rubus argutus
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Vine Stratum: (Plot Size 30
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Toxicodendron radicans
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Cover
40%
25%
10%
10%
10%
Species?
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Status
FACW
FAC
FAC
FACW
FAC
Sampling Point: WB-03 wet
Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Speicies Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
8 (A)
8 (B)
100% (A/B)
95% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
48% 20% total cover: 19% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
15% Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
10% Y2S FAC FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
25% =Total cover
13% 20% total cover: 50�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
35% Yes FAC Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
10% Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic
5% No FACU Vegetation�(Explain)
� Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
25% 20% total cover: 10% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
25% Yes FAC
10% Yes FAC Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
35% =Total cover
18% 20% total cover:
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
�% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB-03 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 100% Silty Clay
3-12+ 2.5Y 6/2 75% 7.5YR 4/6 25% C M Clay
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytiC vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematiC.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA & WB Up
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: flOOdplain Local Relief: IlO1l@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.250277 Long: -79.838224 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Siloam sandy loam, 15-45% slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X NO (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
y Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover
1. P/atanus occidentalis 60%
2. Acer rubrum 15%
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10%
4. Carpinus caroliniana 5°/a
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Ilex decidua
3. Asimina triloba
4. Liquidambar styracif/ua
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Carex spp.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Vine Stratum: (Plot Size 30
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Species?
Yes
No
No
No
Sampling Point: WA & WB up
Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
FACW OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC Total Number of Dominant
FACW Speicies Across All Strata:
FAC Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6 (A)
6 (B)
100% (A/B)
90% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
45% 20% total cover: 18% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
15% Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
5% NO FACW FACU species x 4=
5% NO FAC UPL species x 5=
5% NO FAC Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
30% =Total cover
15% 20% total cover: 60�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
10% Yes FAC Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
10% Yes FAC Problematic Hydrophytic
Vegetation�(Explain)
� Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
10% 20% total cover: 4% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
10% Yes FAC
5% Yes FAC Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
15% =Total cover
8% 20% total cover:
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
3% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA & WB up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 100% Sandy Loam
3-12+ 10YR 4/3 100% Sandy Clay Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematiC.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WC-27 W@t
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: flOOdplain Local Relief: COIlCBV@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.250369 Long: -79.839446 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam, 0-2% slopes NW I classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X NO (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Haw River floodplain
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
X High Water Table (A2)
X Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
X Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ndary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
Evidence of surface flow from creek; lots of fine sediment deposited on floodplain
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover
1. Acer negundo 55%
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 20%
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15%
4. Ulmus americana 10%
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Acer rubrum
2. Asimina triloba
3. Acer negundo
4.
5.
6.
Species?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Sampling Point: WC-27 wet
Indicator
Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
FAC OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
FAC Total Number of Dominant
FACW Speicies Across All Strata: 6 �B�
FACW Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
100% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
50% 20% total cover: 20% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
10% Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
5% Y2S FAC FACU species x 4=
5% YeS FAC UPL species x 5=
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
20% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 10% 20% total cover: 40�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
1. Carex spp. 15% Yes FAC Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
2• Problematic Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation�(Explain)
4• � Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
5. must be present unless disturbed
6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Vine Stratum:
1. None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
50% of total cover: 8% 20% total cover: 3% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status
0% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 0% 20% total cover:
Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
�% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC-27 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/2 95% 7.5YR 5/6 5% C M Clay
6-12+ 10YR 5/2 60% 7.5YR 5/6 40% C M Clay
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytiC vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematiC.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WC Up
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: hIIISId@ Local Relief: IlO1l@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.250005 Long: -79.839041 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam, 0-2% slopes NW I classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X NO (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
y Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover
1. Ulmus americana 35%
2. Platanus occidentalis 25%
3. Acer negundo 10%
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. P/atanus occidentalis
2. Asimina triloba
3. Liquidambar styracif/ua
4.
5.
6.
Species?
Yes
Yes
No
Sampling Point: WC up
Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
FACW OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FACW Total Number of Dominant
FAC Speicies Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6 (A)
6 (B)
100% (A/B)
70% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
35% 20% total cover: 14% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
5% Yes FACW FAC species x 3=
5% YeS FAC FACU species x 4=
5% YeS FAC UPL species x 5=
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
15% =Total cover
50% of total cover: g% 20% total cover: 30�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Persicaria pensylvanica
3. Cinna arundinacea
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum
5. Boehmeria cylindrica
6.
Vine Stratum:
1. None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Plot Size 30
50% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status Yes DominanCe Test is >50%
60% Yes FAC Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
20% No FACW Problematic Hydrophytic
15% No FACW Vegetation�(Explain)
10% No FAC � Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
5% No FACW must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
110% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
55% 20% total cover: 22% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
0% =Total cover
0% 20% total cover:
Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
�% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-11 7.5YR 4/6 100% Sandy Clay Loam
11-12+ 10YR 4/4 75% 7.5YR 4/6 25% C M Sandy Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 31ndiCators of hydrophytic vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WD-07 W@t
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: flOOdplain Local Relief: COIlCBV@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.251289 Long: -79.839322 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro silt loam, 0-2% slopes NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Persistent forested floodplain wetland along Haw River
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
X High Water Table (A2)
X Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
X Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ndary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
Evidence of overbank flooding, lots of fine sediment deposition
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum
1. Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Plot Size 30
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Cepha/anthus occidentalis
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum:
1. None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Vine Stratum:
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cover Species?
95% Yes
Sampling Point: WD-07 wet
idicator
Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
FAC OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Speicies Across All Strata: 4 �B�
Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
95% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
48% 20% total cover: 19% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
25% Yes OBL FAC species x 3=
10% Y2S FAC FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
35% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 18% 20% total cover: �o�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
50% of total cover:
Plot Size 30
Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
Problematic Hydrophytic
Vegetation�(Explain)
� Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
0% 20% total cover: 0% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
30% Yes FAC
Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
30% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 15% 20% total cover:
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
6% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WD-07 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 5/2 100% Siity Ciay Loam many fine roots
2-12+ 10YR 5/2 60% 10YR 5/6 40% C M Clay
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 31ndiCators of hydrophytiC vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WD-07 Up
Investigator(s): Amy James, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: fl8t Local Relief: IlO1l@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.251285 Long: -79.839097 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro silt loam, 0-2% slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X NO (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
y Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainge Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover
1. Quercus alba 40%
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 35%
3. Liriodendron tulipifera 15%
4. Carya tomentosa 15%
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Quercus a/ba
3. Quercus phellos
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Arundinaria gigantea
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Vine Stratum: (Plot Size 30
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Toxicodendron radicans
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Species?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Status
FACU
FAC
FACU
NR
Sampling Point: WD-07 up
Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Speicies Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
7 (B)
57% (A/B)
105% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
53% 20% total cover: 21 % Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
20% Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
10% Yes FACU FACu species x 4=
5% NO FAC UPL species x 5=
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
35% =Total cover
�$o�0 20% total cover: �o�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
35% Yes FACU Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
20% Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic
Vegetation�(Explain)
� Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
55% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
28% 20% total cover: 11 % approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
20% Yes FAC
5% No FAC Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
5% No FAC than 3 in. DBH.
30% =Total cover
15% 20% total cover:
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
6% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WD-07 up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture
0-3 10YR 5/2 100% Sandy Loam
3-12+ 10YR 5/6 100% Sandy Clay
Remarks
coarse sand
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytiC vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematiC.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: B-5175 City/County: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WE-08 W@t
investigator(s): Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
�anaform: depression Local Relief: COIlCBV@ Slope (°io):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.250853 Long: -79.83842 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam, 0-2% slopes NW I classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X NO (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Depression hydrologically connected to Haw River
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water (A1)
X High Water Table (A2)
X Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (67)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
uired: check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ndary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainage Patterns ( B10)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observation:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 7
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
Evidence of overbank flooding
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover
1. Carpinus caroliniana 50%
2. Acer negundo 20%
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30
1. Asimina triloba
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum:
1. None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Species?
Yes
Yes
Sampling Point: WE-08 wet
idicator
Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
FAC OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
FAC Total Number of Dominant
Speicies Across All Strata: 4 �B�
Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
70% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
35% 20% total cover: 14% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
50% Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
50% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 25% 20% total cover: � �o�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
50% of total cover:
Vine Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index is <_3.0�
Problematic Hydrophytic
Vegetation�(Explain)
� Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
0% 20% total cover: 0% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
30% Yes FAC
5% No FACU Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
35% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 18% 20% total cover:
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
�% Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE-08 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TYpe� Location Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/3 100% Clay Loam
2-12+ 2.5Y 5/2 80% 5YR 4/6 20% C M Clay
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 748) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytiC vegetation
MLRA 747, 748) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) unless disturbed or problematiC.
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: B-5175 city�county: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WF-04 Wet
Investigator(s): Amy JBmes, Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: flOodplain Local Relief: COtICaV@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.251865 Long: -79.838378 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro silt loam, 0-2% slopes NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? YeS X NO
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Point taken on the edge of a large freshwater wetland marsh that appears to join up with the Haw River floodplain
farther east of the project area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
X Surface Water(A1)
X High Water Table (A2)
X Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Iron Deposits (B5)
X Inundation on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water Stained Leaves (69)
check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (614)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ndary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns ( 610)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
X FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observation:
Surtace Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 1-2
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants Sampling Point: WF-04 wet
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20% Yes FAC oe�, FACW, or FAC: 5 �a,�
2. Total Number of Dominant
3 Speicies Across All Strata: 5 �B�
4 Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
5. OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
20% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
50% of total cover: 10% 20% total cover: 4% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
1. Acer rubrum 25% Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Liquidambar styracif/ua 15% Yes FAC FACU species x 4=
3. Alnus serrulata 5°/a No OBL UPL species x 5=
4. Column totals (A) (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
45% =Total cover
so% of total cover: 23% Zo% total cover: 90�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
1. Hibiscus moscheutos 25% Yes OBL Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2. Peltandra virginica 10% Yes OBL Problematic Hydrophytic
3. Lobelia cardinalis 2°/a No FACW Vegetation'(Explain)
4• ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
5. must be present unless disturbed
6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
37% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
50% of total cover: 19% 20% total cover: 7% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Vine Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover Species? Status
1. None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 0% 20% total cover: 0%
Remarks: (If observed. List morphological adaptations below).
Trees were present on the edge of the wetland
Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WF-04 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Location Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 3/3 100%
1-12+ 10YR 4/1 98% 10YR 5/6 2% C M Sandy Clay Loam
� Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains z Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 747, 748)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation
MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 736, 722) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (SS) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: B-5175 city�county: Guilford/Rockingham Sampling Date: 10/12/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WE & WF Up
mvestigator(s): Tom Barrett Section, Township, Range:
Landform: depfeSSlOfI Local Relief: COtICaV@ Slope (%):
Subregion: LRR P Lat: 36.250839 Long: -79.838482 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River loam, 0-2% slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? YeS X NO
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain in remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Adjacent to Haw River; at 'top' of depression forming W E
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
Surface Water(A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water Stained Leaves (69)
check all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
True Aquatic Plants (614)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ndary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Sparsley Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainge Patterns ( 610)
Moss trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visble on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
X FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observation:
Surtace Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use Scientific Names of Plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size 30 feet) Cover
1. Asimina triloba 40%
2. Liquidambar styracif/ua 30%
3. Acer negundo 20%
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Asimina triloba
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum: (Plot Size 30 feet)
1. Boehmeria cylindrica
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Vine Stratum:
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Remarks:
50% of total cover:
Size 30
Species?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Sampling Point: WE 8� WF up
idicator
Status Number of Dominant Speices
That Are
FAC OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
FAC Total Number of Dominant
FAC Speicies Across All Strata: 6 �B�
Percent of Dominant Speices
That Are
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
90% =Total cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
45% 20% total cover: 18°/a Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status FACW species x 2=
50% YeS FAC FAC species x 3=
2% No FACU FACU species x 4=
UPL species X 5 =
Column totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
52% =Total cover
26% 2o%total cover: ��o�o Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Absolute % Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status Yes Dominance Test is >50%
2°/a Yes FACW Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic
Vegetation�(Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must be present unless disturbed
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
2% =Total cover Tree-Woody Plants, excluding vines
1% 20% total cover: 0% approximately 20 ft or more and 3 in. or larger
diameter at breast height (DBH).
so u e o ominan n ica or
Cover Species? Status
5°/a Yes FAC
Sapling - Woody plant, excluding woody vines
approximatley 20 ft or more in height and less
than 3 in. DBH.
5% =Total cover
50% of total cover: 3% 20% total cover:
(If observed. List morphological adaptations below).
1%
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft in height.
Herb - All herbaceous plants including
herbaceous vines and woody plants, except
woody vines, less than 3 ft in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE 8� WF up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of incators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Location Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/4 100% Clay Loam
3-12 10YR 4/6 100% Clay Loam
12-15 10YR 5/4 80% 7.5YR 4/6 20% C M Clay Loam
� Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains z Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prarie Redox (A16) (MLRA 747, 748)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Redox Depressions (F8) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation
MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) and wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 736, 722) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (SS) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hydric Soil Present?
Depth (inches): Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0