20100099 Ver 3_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20161117

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 4 (2016)
Pancho Bank Parcel
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems' Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits - Neuse River Basin
19 tia7_3"Aa07:1•ii
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET, SUITE 211
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
and
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
November 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) this Year 4 (2016) Annual Monitoring Report for the Pancho Bank Parcel (Parcel) pursuant to
the Restoration Systems' Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument (Banking Instrument) signed March 17, 2008 between the Sponsor and the NCDWR.
The Pancho Bank Parcel is located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western Wayne County;
north of U.S. Highway 13 near the intersection of State Road 1008 (Stevens Mill Road) and State Road
1105 (Dobbersville Road) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Encompassing 65.62 acres of land, the Parcel is
within the Neuse River Basin 14 -digit United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit
03020201150050 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of Water Quality
[NCDWQ] Subbasin Number 03-04-04).
The Parcel was designed and constructed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Neuse River Basin. Neuse River riparian buffer mitigation credits provided by
this Parcel are available over the entire Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 6 -
digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030202, per 15A NCAC 02B .0242 (Neuse River Basin: Nutrient
Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection and Maintenance of Existing
Riparian Buffers). Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made available within the Neuse River Basin
USGS 8 -digit HUC 03020201 excluding the Falls Lake Drainage Basin.
Prior to construction activities, Parcel land use was agricultural based and utilized for livestock grazing
and row crop production with degraded forest pockets. Pasture areas were accessible to livestock and
were routinely cleared for hay production, resulting in local disturbances to stream banks and wetland soil
surfaces. Additional land use practices included the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation;
ditching of adjacent riparian wetlands; and relocation, dredging, and channelization of onsite streams
resulting in degraded water quality and excessive sedimentation resulting from unstable banks (stream
entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
Adjacent land use is currently characterized by pasture land for hay production and livestock grazing.
Prior to construction, adjacent landowners installed and will be responsible for the maintenance of
fencing to protect from livestock trespass and damage to Parcel assets.
Parcel construction activities were concluded in early April 2013. An onsite determination for
applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0233) was conducted in June
2013 and NCDWR approved the Pancho Bank Parcel Development Package on October 4, 2013. The
Sponsor currently owns the property in fee simple, a perpetual Conservation Easement was placed over
the Parcel on April 18, 2012. This Parcel was designed and implemented in concurrence with the Pancho
Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Corps Action ID # SAW -2010-00142).
Restoration of riparian corridors was accomplished in conjuncture with the objectives and methods
outlined by the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank. Primary objectives of the riparian restoration
focused on improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat by
planting a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels, Primary objectives were accomplished by
the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production including a)
removing livestock and b) ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other
agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel streams through treatment of runoff within the
forested buffer.
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Executive Summary i
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, plowing, and hoof shear adjacent to Parcel streams, and b)
removing livestock from the Parcel.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing
Parcel floodplain.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for
agricultural production.
6. Restoring and reestablishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's full potential of stream and riparian buffer functions and values in
perpetuity.
The primary objectives were achieved by implementing a two phase restoration plan, which consisted of
the following.
1. Re-establishment of riparian buffer forest up to 200 linear feet from channel margins.
2. Permanent protection of the Parcel in a conservation easement.
Year 4 (2016) vegetation sampling occurred October 25, 2016. Stem density across the Parcel was above
the required average density with 619 planted tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving in year
4 (2016). In addition, all individual plots exceeded success criteria with the exception of Plots 2 and 9.
When including naturally recruited stems of appropriate species such as green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica) and American elm (Ulmus americana), Plot 2 is well -above success criteria. Plot 9 was
one stem shy of success criteria. The area surrounding Plots 8 and 9 is characterized by compacted soils
from previous agricultural land -use; therefore, planted stem survival in this area was low. This area was
planted with 200-1 gallon northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and white oak (Quercus alba) tree stems on
February 5, 2015. Although some of the original bare root stems have continued to die bringing stem
counts down, the newly planted stems appear vigorous.
Overall, Parcel conditions remained stable during Year 4 (2016). No signs of herbivory, easement
encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed. The fences protecting the easement from
livestock intrusion are intact and effective. Additionally, minimal invasive species were observed on the
Parcel, continual monitoring and treatment of invasive species will be conducted by Carolina Silvics, a
NCDA & CS Licensed Pesticide Applicator.
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Executive Summary ii
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................................................... i
1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA.................................................................................1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL............................................................................................................1
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY......................................................................................1
4.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................2
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. SITE LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1.
Site Location
Table 1.
Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Table 4.
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5.
Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6.
Planted Tree Species
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2.
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3.
Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7.
Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report
Pancho Bank Parcel
Table of Contents

1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual plant
survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed as
outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Detailed
qualitative and quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will
be visually inspected periodically and reported qualitatively within the annual monitoring report, which
will include photographic record of the Parcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Restoration Systems shall submit annual monitoring reports to NCDWR no later than December 31St of
each year. Quantitative monitoring will occur at seventeen (17) 10 -meter x10 -meter vegetation plots
(Figure 2, Appendix B). Vegetation sampling will be performed as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol
for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) in September or October for the remainder of the
monitoring period or until vegetation success criteria are achieved.
During the first year, vegetation will receive a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to ascertain the
degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species. Success criteria within the riparian buffer
and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 320
stems per acre after five years of monitoring. Natural recruits will not count towards annual success
criteria, but may be taken into account during review by the NCDWR.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
Riparian areas suitable to generate mitigation credit were calculated by measuring 50 linear feet
horizontally from the top of bank on all subject streams for Neuse riparian buffer credit and 200 linear feet
from the top of bank on all hydrologically connected conveyances for nutrient offset mitigation. Riparian
buffer credits were measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into square feet.
The Parcel will generate 16.35 acres of restored riparian area; of that 11.33 acres will be used specifically
for nutrient offset credit, generating 25,753.31 pounds of nitrogen offset credit (the NCDWR determined
that restored riparian areas at the Parcel would abate 2273.02 pounds per acre of nitrogen), and the
remaining 5.02 acres (218,671.2 sq. ft.) will be used for Neuse riparian buffer credits. The mitigation
provided in the Neuse riparian buffer can be used for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset
credits, but not both. The Sponsor will request and receive approval of the transfer of any mitigation
credits from NCDWR. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on the credit ledgers. Figure 3
(Appendix B) and Table 1 (Appendix A) summarize the Parcel's components and mitigation credits.
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of NCDWR in the event that
the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. In the event
that exotic invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical (physical
removal with the use of a chainsaw) and/or chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance
with North Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Page 1
Pancho Bank Parcel

4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson,
J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. U.S.
Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .024 1, and 15A NCAC 02B .0242
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. October 2004
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Page 2
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX A.
SITE LOCATION MAP
AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

E„07 A
S
REEN
JOHNSTON
H WAYNE
ENOI
_SAMPSO�-� 9i1�
N �DUPLlN�
�
Goldsboro
Je ds
I
e..-
V Af
reek N uk,U p
Cul- - l
5
Cj
rt
Bank
s`
Parcel
_ y Directions to the Site from Raleigh, NC:
Travel east on U.S. Highway 70
Travel - 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection
C , ck with Martin Livestock Road
Turn right Martin Livestock Road mile)
at (0.7
Church
r -> Turn right at Progressive Road (4 miles)
-> Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
-> Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
-> Turn left at T-intersection onto Harper House Road,
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 which becomes Stevens Mill Road (1.3 miles)
Miles — + -> The Bank is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses
Stevens Mill Road
Scale 1:120,000 -' "` -> Latitude: 35.3337550 N, Longitude: 78.192699' W
--p v
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Snow Avenue
` Raleigh, NC 27603
Raleigh,
SITE LOCATION
PANCHO BANK PARCEL
Dwn. By:
CLF/KRJ
Date:
Jan 2014
FIGURE
919-215-1693
Wayne County, North Carolina
Project:
E^ �.
13-010

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Mitigation Credits
Nutrient Offset (Nitrogen only)
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
11.33
--
Projects Components
Existing
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigation /
April 2012
Acreage
/
Acreage
Acre
Comment
March 2013
Mit. Ratio
July 2013
January 2014
Year 1 (2013) Annual Monitoring
October 2013
January 2014
Year 2 (2014) Annual Monitoring
November 2014
Cessation of current land use
11.33
Restoration
11.33
2273.02 lbs. /
practices, removing invasive species,
November 2016
(1:1)
acre
and planting with native forest
vegetation.
Component Summation
Restoration Level Nutrient Offset Credits lbs.
Restoration 11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Totals 11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Neuse Riparian Buffer
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
5.02
1 --
Projects Components
Existing
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigation /
Acreage
/
Acreage
Acre
Comment
Mit. Ratio
Cessation of current land use
5.02
Restoration
5'02
43,560 sq. ft. /
practices, removing invasive species,
(1:1)
acre
and planting with native forest
vegetation.
Component Summation
Restoration Level Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits (sq. ft.
Restoration 5.02 acres = 218,671.2 sq. ft.
Totals 5.02 acres = 218,671.2 sq. ft.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Completion or Delivery
Restoration Systems Neuse UMBI
NA
March 2008
BPDP
NA
September 2013
Conservation Easement
NA
April 2012
Construction
NA
April 2013
Bare Root Planting
NA
March 2013
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
July 2013
January 2014
Year 1 (2013) Annual Monitoring
October 2013
January 2014
Year 2 (2014) Annual Monitoring
November 2014
January 2015
Year 3 (2015) Annual Monitoring
October 2015
October 2015
Year 4 (2016) Annual Monitoring
October 2016
November 2016
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Provider
Restoration Systems
Pancho
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Wayne
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
65.62
George Howard and John Preyer 919-755-9490
Designer
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Physiographic Province
218 Snow Avenue
Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces &
Rolling Coastal Plain
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Construction and Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark Road
03020201150050
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919-639-6132
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
+/-3.3
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
CGIA Land Use Classification
Mary Margaret McKinney 252-482-8491
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen 888-888-7158
As -built Surveyor
K2 Design Group
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro, NC 27534
John Rudolph 919-751-0075
Baseline Data Collection &
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Annual Monitoring
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Project Information
Project Name
Pancho
County
Wayne
Project Area (acres)
65.62
Project Coordinates (latitude and
longitude)
35.333755° N, -78.192699° W (NAD 83/WGS 84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces &
Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit
14 -digit
03020201150050
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-06
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
+/-3.3
Project Drainage Area Impervious Area
< 5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cropland and Pasture
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Onsite Observations + Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Canopy Species
Understory Species
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
River birch (Betula nigra)
River birch (Betula nigra)
Pecan (Carya illinoinensis)
Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
Coastal sweetpepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Dogwood (Cornus florida)
Sweetgum Li uidambar s raci ua
Sourwood (Diospyros vir iniana)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendrum tuli i era)
American holly (Ilex o aca)
Black gum (Nyssa biflora)
Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendrum tuli i era)
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
Common sweetleaf (Symplocos tinctoria)
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
Winged elm (Ulmus alata)
Winged elm (Ulmus alata)
Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum)
American elm (Ulmus americana)
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wavne Countv, NC
Vegetation Association: Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Total
Area (Acres) Total= 48.9 acres
3.6
17.5
27.8
Vegetation Association:
Streamside
Assemblage
Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest
Coastal Plain
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Species
Number
Planted
% of
Total
Number
Planted
% of
Total
Number
Planted
% of
Total
River birch (Betula nigra)
1,100
47.8
1,000
3.02
2,100
American elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
2,300
52.2
2,300
American Beech (Fagus grandifolia)
1,850
5.59
1,850
Northern red oak (Quercus rubra)
5,800
17.53
5,800
White oak (Quercus alba)
5,850
17.69
5,850
Black cherry (Prunus serotina)
5,000
15.12
5,000
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
5,300
16.02
5,300
Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida)
2,000
6.05
2,000
American tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera)
1,000
3.02
1,000
6.91
2,000
Southern red oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodifolia)
2,800
8.47
2,800
Florida maple (Acer saccharumsubsp. floridanum)
2,475
7.49
2,475
Black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Swamp chestnut aak (Quercus michauxii)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1,850
12.78
1,850
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum)
2,000
13.82
2,000
Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis)
975
6.74
975
Shagbark hickory (Carya ovate)
250
1.73
250
Total
3,400
100%
33,075
100%
14,475
100%
50,950
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Marsh Treatment Area
Fixed Station Photographs
Taken October 2016
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2016 (continued)
Plot 8
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2016 (continued)
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Year 4 (2016) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 001. Project Name: Pancho Nutrient Offset
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY4 2016)
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
. ...
. :..:...
size(ACRES)MMMMMMMMM
Speciescount
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 001. Project Name: Pancho Nutrient Offset
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY4 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Acer floridanum
Common Name Species Type
Southern Sugar Maple, FI Tree
001-01-0013
PnoLS Pall T
3 3
3
001-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
6 6
6
001-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
001-01-0016
PnoLS P -all T
6 6
6
001-01-0017
PnoLS P -all T
MY4 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
26 26
26
MY3 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
28 28
28
MY2 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
27 271
27
MYl (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
28 28
28
MYO (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
31 31
31
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
11
60
16
15
27
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
24
20
20
99
20
20
125
21
21
95
19
19
19
19
19
19
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
Cornus Florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
9
9
9
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
9
9
9
1
1
2
4
4
4
23
23
25
19
19
19
22
22
22
21
21
21
22
22
22
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
14
14
25
14
14
20
15
15
23
16
16
16
15
15
15
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
2
2
3
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
1
2
2
63
163
177
72
61
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
3
3
5
5
5
19
19
23
20
20
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
6
6
36
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
28
10
4
Prunus
plum
Shrub or Tree
5
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
19
19
20
20
20
29
23
23
23
21
21
21
23
23
23
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
21
21
21
26
26
26
26
26
26
22
22
22
22
22
22
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
20
20
20
24
24
24
27
27
27
24
24
24
24
24
24
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
6
6
7
6
6
6
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
3
3
3
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
17
17
17
17
17
17
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
27
27
27
25
25
25
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
5
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
12
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
12
15
11
axodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
2
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Vaccinium corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
9
9
9
9
9
9
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
22
8
1890.3 1
22 23
1
0.02
8 9
890.3 1930.8
24
11
1971.2 1971.2
24
1
0.02
11
1
26
12
1052
12
4
1485.6
12
1
0.02
4
1485.6 1
26 12
6 3
1052 1485.6
12 14
1
0.02
3 4
1485.6 1566.6 1647.5
16
6
16
1
0.02
6
1647.5 1
42
8
1700
260
24
618.9
260
17
0.42
24
1 618.9 1
483
31
1150
271
24
1645.11645.11
271
17
0.42
24
674
29
1604
277
241
1659.4
277
17
0.42
241
1 659.4 1
574
32
1366
263
19
1665.2 1665.2
263 350
16
0.40
191 21
1 885.2
267
201
675.3
267 355
16
0.40
201 22
1675.3 1 897.9
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits