Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20161033 Ver 1_More Info Received - Email_20161122 (43) Strickland, Bev From:Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Samantha.J.Dailey@usace.army.mil> Sent:Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:46 AM To:Smith, Cherri L Subject:RE: Waterstone, Hillsborough Cherri, Side bar conversation. With regard to the area where the stormwater BMP is proposed, Dave Bailey and I have in our notes that the area was VERY low quality, so if there is an area where we would want that to be placed, that would be it. The other email covers the rest :) Have a great Thanksgiving and it was a pleasure meeting you yesterday. Sam Samantha Dailey Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 (919) 554-4884, Ext. Ext. 22 -----Original Message----- From: Smith, Cherri L \[mailto:cherri.smith@ncdenr.gov\] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:45 PM To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Samantha.J.Dailey@usace.army.mil> Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] Waterstone, Hillsborough Hi Samantha, I was just wondering if you'd had a chance to look at the Waterstone project that Spangler Environmental has recently submitted. Impact Areas B and D are most problematic from my perspective because we typically don't like to see wetland fill for lots and it looks like Street B can be shifted. Also, Impact Area A consists of putting a stormwater BMP within a stream which is also something that's typically not viewed favorably. Since you've been to the site, I'm interested in your perspective on this project. Thank you for your help. Cherri Cherri Smith 1 NCDEQ Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 ph. 919-791-4251 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties 2