20080960 Ver 1_401 Application_20080608

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
June 10, 2008
S&EC Project # 10596.PI
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Jamie Shern
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Nicole Thomson
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Evans Road Extension
Wake County, NC
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
ol?p'??f?? 111
l= r
SPAID U ?.l
DENR - VVA i "t:n , aiOAU 11
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
On behalf of the owner, Town of Apex Attn: Brace A. Radford, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the
N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 14 and
General Water Quality Certification 3704. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Evans Road Extension
Project Type Linear Trans oration Project
Owner / Applicant Town of Apex Attn: Bruce A. Radford
Count Wake
Nearest Town Apex
Waterbod Name UT to Beaver Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-05
Index Number 16-41-10-(2)
Class WS-IV; NSW; CA
USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.096
Wetland Impact acres : 0.025
Open Water Impact acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.121
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 210
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
USGS Topographic Quad Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Agent Authorization Form
USACE signed JD maps
DWQ Buffer Letter (IPRRO 07-04)
EEP Acceptance Letter
Letter of Explanation from Town of Apex
Overall Impact Map/hnpact Map Details (full size to DWQ; 11x17 to USACE)
$570 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
248 LePhillip Court 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
g 0 9 6 0
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. p
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
PAID
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
u?1 ;a. 11 2008
Name: Town of Apex
Mailing Address:_ Attn: Bruce A. Radford ? "I
'" ;1_A.Nnc Aria STS RNAVAI'ATIR BRANCH
73 Hunter Street
Apex, NC 27502
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: N/A
Fax Number: N/A
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Nicole J. Thomson
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: NThomson(a,sandec.com
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Evan Road Extension
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0721861333
4. Location
County:Wake County Nearest Town: Apex
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, take US 64
West/US 1 South to exit 95 for NC 55: turn right onto NC 55• turn left onto South Salem
Street: turn right onto Humie Olive Road• turn right onto Evans Road; the subject property is
north of the current stub out for Evans Road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7174 ON 78.9033 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 18
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Beaver Creek (03-06-05: 16-41-10-(2)• WS-
IV: NSW, CA)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htW://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently forested with a managed sewer
Page 2 of 9
easement corridor through the property. The surrounding developments are single family
residential subdivisions and a proposed Town of Apex Nature Park.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project is to construct the Evans Road extension which will be a two lane roadway
connecting Humie Olive Road to Apex Barbecue Road in Apex, NC. Equipment typical of
linear road projects including backhoes, graders, etc. will used.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed Evans Road
extension is to build a two lane road that will service the proposed and existing residential
developments in the area The Evans Road extension has been part of the Town of Apex's
Transportation Plan for some time, designed to meet the traffic needs of the rapidly growing
population.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. On January 30, 2007, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation
and Town of Apex buffer evaluation of the subject property. On October 4, 2007 S&EC
requested a Jurisdictional Determination (see attached AID SAW-2007-03763). On March 9,
2007 the NC DWQ reviewed the site for an Intermittent/Perennial stream determination (see
attached DWQ I/P letter IPRRO 07-04).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 9
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impact #1: 210 LF of permanent
important/perennial stream impact for the proposed roadway;
Impact #2: 1.073 square feet (0.0246 ac.) of permanent riparian wetland impact for the
proposed roadway.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Impact #2 Permanent Fill Riparian Yes 0 0.025
(road crossing)
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.025
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 1.35 ac.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Perennial Average
Stream Impact Stream Impact Area of
Number
? Stream Name Type of Impact
ittent
Intermittent Width Length Impact
indicate on ma
(
p)
? Before
(linear feet)
(acres)
Impact
Impact #1 UT to Beaver Creek
T Culvert
(permanent)
Perennial
+/- 20'
210
0.096
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 210 0.096
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.096
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.025
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.121
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 210
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No isolated waters are known to exist on site.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant requested a
detailed delineation of streams and wetlands prior to site elan development in order to determine
the extent and location of streams and wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing.
The site plan has limited permanent impacts to one road crossing of an important/perennial
channel. Streams are not crossed multiple times by roads. The proposed road crossing is
necessary in order to connect the existing Evans Road to Apex Barbecue Road. The proposed
Evans Road Extension has been part of the Town's Transportation Plan for several years.
Currently, the only North/South connector streets through this developed residential area are
Richardson Road or Kell. R? oad (SR 1163) which are approximately three and five miles away,
respectively.
Page 5 of 9
The applicant is also aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 14.
With respect to linear transportation crossings conditions (Regional Conditions section 4.5)
the applicant does not anticipate any stream relocations, the proposed box culverts will be buried
the appropriate depth below the streambed to allow for aquatic life passage, floodplain culverts
are being utilized as this project is within an identified FEMA floodplain and this project only
proposes the single road crossing and is not being used in conjunction with a NWP 18 to create
an upland area.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnnaide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
S&EC believes that additional mitigation, beyond avoidance and minimization, for
available resources, precludes the applicant performing any onsite restoration for the
unavoidable stream channel impacts; however, the Town of Apex has proposed on-site
Page 6 of 9
preservation of 7,189 linear feet of stream channel and 24.63 acres of wetlands in the
neighboring _parkland tract. Therefore, the applicant proposes payment into the NC EEP at a
1:1 ratio for unavoidable, permanent impacts to 210 linear feet of important/perennial stream.
Mr. Jamie Shern (USACE) stated he was in agreement with this mitigation plan in previous
correspondence. Please see the attached EEP acceptance letter. The Wetland and Stream
Conservation survey maps are not complete at this time and will be submitted under separate
cover.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 210 LF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact #2 - Road crossing "Allowable"
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. This project is not within a River Basin with
State Regulated buffers.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Although the impervious surface area for the
road will exceed 24%. tvpically stormwater devices for linear transportation proiects are not required. This project will also comply with the Town of Apex's Unified Development
Ordinance (see attached letter from the Town of Apex).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
It is not anticipated that this project will generate any wastewater.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3 2002, version 1.6. While the proposed Evans Road extension is a "road on
a new location" which has the potential for growth-stimulating effects, the surrounding area has
been built upon or is currently being built upon. It is this "build-out" that has necessitated the
construction of this road. Additionally, the proposed Evans Road extension is within the Town
of Apex's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Area (ETJ) and as such is subject to the Uni aed
Development Ordinance which has provisions within to prevent the degradation of downstream
water quality due to development. We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
June 10, 2008
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: N
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Apex
Mailing Address: Attn: Bruce A. Radford
73 Hunter Street
Apex, NC 27502
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Nicole J. Thomson
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: NThomson(a,sandec.com
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Evan Road Extension
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only)
N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0721861333
4. Location
County: Wake County Nearest Town: Apex
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, take US 64
West/US 1 South to exit 95 for NC 55; turn right onto NC 55; turn left onto South Salem
Street; turn right onto Humie Olive Road; turn right onto Evans Road; the subject property is
north of the current stub out for Evans Road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7174 °N 78.9033 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 18
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Beaver Creek (03-06-05; 16-41-10-(2) WS-
IV; NSW, CA)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03030004)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently forested with a managed sewer
Page 2 of 9
easement corridor through the prosy. The surrounding developments are single family
residential subdivisions and a proposed Town of Apex Nature Park.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project is to construct the Evans Road extension which will be a two lane roadway
connecting Humie Olive Road to Apex Barbecue Road in Apex NC Equipment typical of
linear road projects, including backhoes, graders, etc. will used.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed Evans Road
extension is to build a two lane road that will service the proposed and existing residential
developments in the area. The Evans Road extension has been part of the Town of Apex's
Transportation Plan for some time, designed to meet the traffic needs of the rapidly growing
population.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. On January 30, 2007, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation
and Town of Apex buffer evaluation of the subject property. On October 4 2007 S&EC
requested a Jurisdictional Determination (see attached AID SAW-2007-03763) On March 9
2007 the NC DWQ reviewed the site for an Intermittent/Perennial stream determination (see
attached DWQ I/P letter IPRRO 07-04).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 9
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impact #1: 210 LF of permanent
important/perennial stream impact for the proposed roadway,
Impact #2: 1,073 square feet (0.0246 ac.) of permanent riparian wetland impact for the
proposed roadway.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) linear feet)
Impact #2 Permanent Fill Riparian Yes 0 0.025
(road crossing)
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.025
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 1.35 ac.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Perennial Average
Stream Impact Stream Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact or
Intermittent Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before (linear feet) (acres)
Impact
Impact #1 UT to Beaver Creek Culvert
(permanent) Perennial +/- 20' 210 0.096
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 210 0.096
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma ocean, etc. (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.096
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.025
Open Water hn act (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.121
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 210
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No isolated waters are known to exist on site.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant requested a
detailed delineation of streams and wetlands prior to site elan development in order to determine
the extent and location of streams and wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing.
The site plan has limited permanent impacts to one road crossing of an important/perennial
channel. Streams are not crossed multiple times by roads. The proposed road crossing is
necessary in order to connect the existing Evans Road to Apex Barbecue Road. The proposed
Evans Road Extension has been part of the Town's Transportation Plan for several years.
Currently, the only North/South connector streets through this developed residential area are
Richardson Road or Kelly Road (SR 1163) which are approximately three and five miles away
Page 5 of 9
The applicant is also aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 14.
With respect to linear transportation crossings conditions (Regional Conditions section 4.5)
the applicant does not anticipate any stream relocations, the proposed box culverts will be buried
the appropriate depth below the streambed to allow for aquatic life passage, plain culverts
are being utilized as this project is within an identified FEMA floodplain and this project only
proposes the single road crossing and is not being used in conjunction with a NWP 18 to create
an upland area.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html,.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
S&EC believes that additional mitigation, beyond avoidance and minimization, for
permanent impacts to wetlands, should not be required given that permanent impacts to
available resources, precludes the applicant performing any onsite restoration for the
unavoidable stream channel impacts; however, the Town of Apex has proposed on-site
Page 6 of 9
preservation of 7,189 linear feet of stream channel and 24.63 acres of wetlands in the
neighboring parkland tract. Therefore the applicant proposes payment into the NC EEP at a
1:1 ratio for unavoidable permanent impacts to 210 linear feet of important/perennial stream.
Mr. Jamie Shern (USACE) stated he was in agreement with this mitigation plan in previous
correspondence. Please see the attached EEP acceptance letter. The Wetland and Stream
Conservation survey maps are not complete at this time and will be submitted under separate
cover.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 210 LF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact #2 - Road crossing "Allowable"
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260. This project is not within a River Basin with
State Regulated buffers.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Although the impervious surface area for the
road will exceed 24%. tvnically stormwater devices for linear transDortation Uroiects are not
required. This project will also comply with the Town of Apex's Unified Development
Ordinance (see attached letter from the Town of Apex).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
It is not anticipated that this project will generate any wastewater.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. While the proposed Evans Road extension is a "road on
anew location" which has the potential for growth-stimulating effects, the surrounding area has
been built upon or is currently being built upon. It is this "build-out" that has necessitated the
construction of this road. Additionally, the proposed Evans Road extension is within the Town
of Apex's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Area (ETJ) and as such is subject to the Uni led
Development Ordinance which has provisions within to prevent the degradation of downstream
water quality due to development. We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
V A`pplicant/Agent's ignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
G

..
Ol

i In ») f: '( rI _ crr` -??; :sir j 1,m I; ) 36,,.x- .
Project No. Scale:
11056.P1 1"=2000' FIG. 1 - USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SOURCE: • 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
Project Mgr. Drawn By: EVAN'S ROAD EXTENSION NEW HILL Raleigh, NC 27614
NT MM WAKE COUNTY, NC USGS QUADRANGLE 9195465900
Date: 06/09/08 DATE D:1999
Environmental Consultants, PA.
Road • Rakibh, North Cwulina 27614 + Phonc_ [phone] • Fax.: [phone]
Name: Bruce A. Radford, Tawn Manager, Town of ,Apex, NC
Address: PO Box 250
Apex, NC: 27502-0250
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Frans Rd. Extension S&EC Project #10 `T9(6 - LO Date: April 15, 2008

The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,'W'ilmuzgton District
P.O. Box 1890
Wihrlington, NC 28402
Attn:-,4 P!?1 S H E fL tom(
Field Office:
Re; Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May C oncern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc, from this day forward. The
day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concenndn.g the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC qjsff?. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Bruce A. Radford
Print Fropmty Owner's or Municipal Official's Narne Property O 's r unicipal Official's Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly cc: Mrs. Nicole Thomson
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, FA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard.
Raleigh, NC 27604
S'harlotte Office: Greau.horc, OIL=
2.36 U-Phillip Court, Salle C .181 7•E Uwnd ilc 6W
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: (3:36)540.8234
Fax: [phone]
Fax, [phone]
0Le0
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled in By The Current Landowner or Municipal Official
identifies as wetlands all areas of wetlands regu,
"This certifies that this copy of this plat eIqp;ggq Me bobwde0q, 009
section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned
on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
SR 1160 of Engineers Wet/ands Delineation Manual."
RD
0p ?E
0Nq E .! r' 4 Name
SR 1162 Title
R
E3 APEX Date pr?l o2UOg
CREEK S/TE BARBECUE RD. n 1 '
SR 11g7 kD ` S?cW - X03 763
HOLLgND RD
(NOT TO SCALE)
VICINITY MAP
This survey is of an existing building or other structure, or
natural feature, such as c watercourse. KELLY WEST SUBDIWSION
PHASE JA & 4
B.M. 2001, PG. 1339-1340
pursuan
???fll5.j7 r
JUN
WETLANDS AND ? .•' r r' : v
April 15, 2008 c4-1
Surveyor Date F----------------------,
z JOHN L. BARRS, ET UX. ` / I I
D.B. 8176, PG, 2561 \
CAROC /
41 ?i 1 1 I I I KELL Y WEST ASSOC/A7ES LL C) I
? of _SS D.B. 6901, PG. 748
SEAL r%
= I / /
oy L-3766 00 \ I / I SHEET 3 OF 9 CRAIG A. W1LK/NS, ET UX.
SHEET 2 OF 9
? e (?e ? I
I D.B. 3707, PG. 565
oo°?`\
C.
l l l ll???? I , _ ?? . t BE EEK I STEPHEN M. BEAULIEU, ET UX.
R/?y ?A E) D.B. 5172, PG. 289
II KNSHIP
-?----
?? I hELLA CASH SUBDI HSION
/ I I` I I PHASE 2
J L --- y B.M. 2006, PG. 1655
HOLLANDS CROSS/NG?? I I\` I J I
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA 77ON INC I ' BELLA CASH SUBDVWSION
D. B. 8288, PG. 2552 ` 11
! SHEET y? B. M. 2006, PG 75J v I
/r I 4 OF 9 i o+-s\ \ I------------i i ll J
? I I oA,?? I ?? ?P f
f I I GAGq
C,
I I 00
f----------T-----------T-
I I I i I ?\
I I R I I _ R/w
I I I TOWN OF APEX R
1 I ?? I IW
I \ I I I D.B. 9874, PG. 2380
J
SHEET SHEET
TOWN OF APEX 5 OF 9 i 6 OF 9
I
i D. B. 9002, PG. 2333
I I I B.M. 2001, PG. 1288
I I SHEET I SHEET I i I I I
I I I------------
8OF9 I 7OF9 I -I
I I „? ? '?I' ,? I I I
I I I ?- I -?11 I I
I i I I ? I I
I I I I ? ?_ ?-- ?
I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I
----------
0 I I
TOWN OF APEX
TOWN OF APEX I D.B. 9874, PG. 2380
D.B. 8309, PG 519 B.M. 2003, PG. 37 I SHEET
B.M. 1999, PG. 824 I I 9 OF 9
I I I
I ' I I
I I
I I
L ? ? I I
I I
L---------------------?
v
NOTE.-

REFERENCE.- DEED BOOK 11246, PAGE 547 7HE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DEL/NEATED BY
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENVIRONMENTAL
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND CONSUL TAMS
MEASUREMENTS
SHEET No. WETLAND DELINEA 770N FOR
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD
I OF_9 O
TO?,tVh1j OF .tl Jjj?JL'}jT
?? V 1711[ ?n?
LEGEND CID
E/P -1 - Existing Iron P/po 400 0 200 400
1PS -O - /ran Vipe Set WHITF OAK TOWNSHIP WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
,
MP -O - Mathematical Point Only O
E/S -• - Existing Iron Stoke
C - - GentedIne - D.4TC+
Smith an d Smith MAY J 2007
PKS -O - Porker-Ko%n Nor/ Set IN FEET
ERR -• - Existing Roilrood Sp/ke ( )
RRS -O - R
il
d S
ik
S
t co surveyors SCE I- = 400'
a
roa
p
e
e
1 inch = 400 ft.
EPK -• - Existing Porker-Kalov Nail Set
C> DRAI{N BY
P.O. BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 ?YBH
R/W - - Right Of Way
ECM -M- Existing Concrete Monument APEX, N. C. 27502 P=BORO, N O. 27312 PROJECT NO.
[phone]
[phone] 07-88WZ
This survey is of on existing building or other structure, or
natural feature, such as a watercourse.
SR 1160 `rte
OPELE Rp.
5R 1162
40 RD
SIBARBECUE RD.
r(NNO APEX
SR 1187
'4t
TO SCALE) NOLL
VICINITY MAP
5WMP?5? April 15, 2008
urveyor Date ?- _
6o
0
KELLY WEST SUBDloslON
PHASE 3A & 4 10
2
e
° SEAL ° B. M. 2001, PG. 1339-1340
er-7 L-3766 C-^ /
°°°°SUR`??° 2 k
j
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS.
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD
1
1 k9?
/
JOHN L. BARRS, ET UX.
D. B. 8176, PG, 2561 P-
P- 73
/ P-74
/ P-75
/
R ?/ P-7s
0
O P( P-78 L20
P-77
?,000"01.
P-80 P-79
L23
P-82
N
P-81
P-84
P-B6 ??$ V P-85 /
? P-87
v?
P-88
\P-89/
P-1
/? P-2
DATA TABLE
L 1 S 29 53'13" E 45.56'
L2 S 5923'13" E 37.07'
L3 N 8136 47" E 27.05'
L4 S 56 23'13" E 37.98'
L5 N 7506 47" E 30.06'
L6 S 7853'13" E 22.65'
L7 S 06*J64 7" W 49.00'
L8 S 113647" W 37.27'
L9 S 8053'13" E 33.07'
L10 N 493647" E 40.08'
L 11 N 8236 47" E 51.10'
L12 S 242313" E 20.44'
L 1J S 59 23'13" E 96.99'
L14 N 6006 47" E 41.48'
L15 N 4036'47" E 3.38'
L16 S 28 23'13" E 32.93'
L17 S 28 23'13" E 36.07'
L18 S 0331'57" W 47.21'
L19 S 1928'06" E 40.22'
L20 S 693154" W 47.21'
L21 S 580154" W 45.31'
L22 S 373154" W 54.30'
L23 S 763154" W 37.73'
L24 S 33 O1 '54 " W 56.79'
L25 S 073154" W 46.51'
L26 S 373154" W 49.21'
L27 S 3931'54" W 38.93'
L28 S 3621'54" W 38.53'
L29 S 523154" W 38.63
L30 S 29'06'59" W 70.84'
L31 S 3523'35" E 52.92'
L32 S 8801;36" E 37.24'
L33 S 8174'10" E 52.42'
L34 S 5154 23" E 51.84'
L35 S 672428" E 67.79'
L36 S 4224 28" E 64.78'
L37 S 675428" E 31.99'
L38 N 813532" E 29.28'
L39 S 565428" E 57.36'
L40 S 515428" E 32.69'
L41 N 8935'14" E 37.10'
L42 N 6948'03" E 30.95'
L43 N 887745" E 26.55'
L44 N 737745" E 40.63'
L45 S 86'12'15" E 29.45'
L46 N 887745" E 26.36'
L47 N 49 47 45" E 44.52'
L48 N 877745" E 38.33'
L49 S 8872'15" E 58.40'
KELL Y WEST ASSOCIA TES L L C
D.B. 6901, PG. 748
\.
FF?
AQ
?o
v
V
???y L32 L33 P-3
-? 0 P-5
\ G ??'oF+ C+s\ (MISSING FLAG)
p B ''A "rn P-6 P-20
\ o•'9?p P-18
,p ?F- ° P-8 L48 L49
Ga,GF` ?\ L38 < P-14 k1
.p 'pp s P-12 L45 L46 P-19
P-7 ? P-f0 L43 L`14 P-17
-P P-9 ' Ao L41 L42
P-11 P-13 P-16
"This certifies that this copy of this plot -bu., t q- of-44eidentifies as wetlands Gil areas of wetlands regulated pursuant t -&ecbret&'? Me rree4eEien--ef section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned
on this dote. Unless there is a change in the low or our publdshed regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for o period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1,987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. "
Name
Title [) o
Date r? f`? ??a l?
J.(1) - a D 01- 03 7
\ ,6/ I
/1o I
/ I?
10
l
- P-72
P-69
L3 P-68
1 !R L5 L6 P-67
P-70
P-69 N
(DUPLICATE FLAG) V P-66 P•-62 cal
L11
v? 10? n' P-59
L 9 11 P-63
P-65/ ? P-• 61
CREEK
BEA DER
NOTE.-
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSUL TAN TS.
SHEET No. TOWN WFI LLAND DELINEA TIO?N f'ORR
2 OF? OF ?].L,1 E
LEGEND
£IP - • - Existing Iron Pipe 100 0 50 100
/PS -O - Iron P/pe set
MP 0- Mathematical Point Only
ElS -? - Existing Iron Stoke
- - Centerline
PKS -O - Porker-Kalon Nail Set (lN FEET )
ERR - • - Existing Roiirood Spike
RRS -O - Railroad Spike Set 1 inch = 100 ft.
EPK - • - Existing Porker-Kolon Noil Set
1?1`W - - Right Of Way
ECM -0- Existing Concrete Monument
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1 Smith and Smith DATE MAY 3, 2007
"" SCALE 1" . 100'
surveyors
P.O. BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 DRAWN BY W8/-/
APEX, NC. 27502 PITTSBORO, NC. 27312 PROJECT NO.
[phone] [phone] 07-88K
P-64
k
L?
P-so
31
aI°
°lo
?i
I
This survey is of on existing building or other structure, or
natural feature, such as c watercourse.
1160
S ?
Rp
GNAPEL .
BE4VER
REEK
(NOT TO SCALE)
? w
0
SR 1162
APEX
BARBECUE RD. I
SR 1187/
HOLLAND RD
VirCINITY MAP
s
urveyor
.?`\01 ICARO! ?'
? o?ESS/0 %
SEAL r o
ory L-3766 o e
%
Fy C. S ?.?.
11111111//
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS.
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD I
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L50 S 5872'15" E 45.32'
L51 S 4972'15" E 58.90'
L52 N 8143'33" E 50.26'
L53 N 6473'10" E 50.86'
L54 S 8176'50" E 20.44'
L55 N J45859" E 4.40'
L56 N 334606" W 15.43'
L57 N 5976'13" W 29.73'
L58 S 763747" W 23.75'
L59 N 0876'50" W 36.90'
L60 N 33 43'10" E 40.29'
L61 N 4843'10" E 55.65'
L62 N 39'43'10" E 55.05'
L63 N 14'13'10" E 42.29'
L64 S 857650" E 31.61'
L65 N 6973'10" E 51.36'
L66 N 76'13'10" E 49.87'
L67 N 30'4J'10" E 36.20'
L68 N 3473'10" E 17.75'
L69 N 0973'10" E 21.24'
L70 N 34 43'10" E 56.05'
L71 N 744325" E 61.53'
L72 S 694J55' E 55.26'
L73 S 5920106" E 45.00'
L74 N 884943" E 171.61'
L75 S 7123'49" E 20.60'
L76 S 473705" E 23.73'
L77 S 8253'57" E 28.54'
L78 N 7471102" E 16.44'
L79 S 813835" E 68.79'
L80 N 3152 47" E 89.89'
L81 N 895240" E 36.65'
L82 N 557002" E 19.02'
L83 N 0354 02" W 19.66'
L84 N 407329" W 37.93'
L85 N 221525" W 14.89'
L86 N 467747" E 52.11 '
L87 N 2056 21 " E 50.30'
L88 N 52 40 57" E 24.20'
L89 S 303647" E 39.70'
L71A N 875522" E 37.00'
L718 S 7134 38" E 47.87'
4
?o ?Q
O
N
qv
v
? Q

N
I o
??
/
o KELLY WEST ASSOCIATES L L C
6
c? D.B. 6901, PG. 748 VV CRAIG A.
` ?C I W1LK/NS, ET UX.
\? I D. B. 3707, PG. 565
I
r I
w
Lei

?L
?/
\
- -
---
L74 G1S ?.?
BEA vER CREEK L77 P-42 N
L71A
'? <?,B
L71
L78

\V P-43 I
P-41
P-40
? I STEPHEN M.
6
P-38 BEAULIEU, ET UX.
1 P-39 I D.B. 5172, PG. 289
P-36
P-34 L66
X65
L64 P-37 O
rid
P-35 I cOp
O
P-32 6ti P-33 ? ? ---
V I ?
1
?6 °
I

60 P-31 O
I =

P-20 P-30 O
I O h
s
P-28
58
P-27 I
!S
?S P-21 L
I
C.
j N
P-29
P-24 %
I LLJ Q.
'n
X53 L54
P-26
`sue
L52
?bb I U N
P-22 P-23 P-25 I
I u
W
d
I
?N897223"W
470.97'
I
BELLA CASA SUBDIVISION
PHASE 1
S. M. 2006, PG. 753
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies as wetlands o/I areas of wetlands regulated pursuant tc
}Iis6Ls#,r-ef section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned
on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. "
Name
Title

Date FI n f 'Ll L Q J VIvU(,)b
SHEET No.
03
OF?
LEGEND
EIP - • - Existing Iron Pipe 100 0 50 100
/PS -O - Iron Pipe Set
MP -O- Mathematical Point Only
EIS - • - Deis t/ng Iron Stoke I -
C- - Centerline
PKS -O - Porker-Kolon Nail Set (/N FEET )
ERR - • - Existing Railroad Spike
RRS -O - Railroad Splke Set 1 inch = 100 ft.
EPK -• - Existing Porker-Kolon Nail Set
R/W - - Right Of Way
ECM -¦ - Existing Concrete Monument
N07F.
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENWRONMENTAL
CONSUL TAN TS.
WETLAND DELINEA TTON FOR
. CF V OF APEX
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Smith and Smith ,DATE MAY J 2007
,GALFY 1, = 100'
surveyors WN BY
BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 DRA WBH
N. C. 27502 PITTSBORO, N. C. 27312 ]PROJECT NO.
362-7111 [phone] 07-88WL
April 15, 2008
Date
1160
00 .
C?pEL R
BEEEK
CR
(NOT TO SCALE)
?o
SR 1162
APEX
BARBECUE RD.
SR 118/
HOLLAND RD
1 VICINITY MAP
This survey is of on existing building or other structure,
or natural feature, such as a watercourse.
CSIAiI Ll April 15, 2008
urveyor Date
\\111111111
/////
Wo?
%
= a SEAL r °
00
?\ = or- L-3766 0
°
?? E " c1? elip 6*°
1, o
h1 ??j /,FY C. 5,.?.
9,,t? FLAT?\ //11111111111
1Pv 1y9 IRON
0 , k k)4000'
,W ? ? ?p,N 1 k 9 q ?1 Q,
KI?SN?P 5?? 1,? 11 P P-112
r \
h1 0 L112
\
LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH P
EIf, Pe' ph 110 \ C>
\
L 118 N 60:53'44" E 48.30' L 165 N 11107'59" E 19.96' 1/ h L110
L119 N 550344" E 48.01' L166 N 0036'40" W 46.12' R?? PP-11? P-109 ?C-- n o \
IL544 L109
L 120 N 25 56'16" W 34.99' L167 N 44148102" E 85.05' PP-10 P-108 0 - \
L121 N 4956'16" W 26.93' L 168 N 66'18'02" E 5717' I L543 L 108 \ ?o?i-? \
L122 N 5303'44 " E 30.41 ' L 169 N 62 48'02" E 41.02' O PP-9 P-107 yo
SHOW FLAGS PP-1 THROUGH
PP-13.
NDTF-
L 123 N J4193'44' E 27.53' L 170 N J748102 " E 42.72' p I L542 L 107
L124 N 440344" E 42.74' L171 S 827158" E 31.09' oo?? PP-8 P-106
?h I L541
L 125 N 0826'16" W 17.19' L 172 N 4X48'02" E 62.78' ? PP-7 p ?l p5
L 126 N 2556'16" W 32.30' L 173 N J222104" E 92.52' (L540 L 106 \ 9J` 00)X
L127 N 230320" W 42.08' L174 S 6528'10" W 30.00' PP-6 P1044 \ ?'0 C2 I539 O
L128 N 7403'44" E 6.76' L175 N 874133" W 34.57' f PP-5 P-103 \ 91 P-89//jj
L 129 N 44'03'44" E 73.75' L 176 N 574557" W 16.69' W I L538 L 103 v 7 .?
L130 N 653344" E 39.06' L177 N 003402" W 30.31' PP L537 P-102 P-91 P-90
L IN N 7821'56" E 7.27' L 178 N 36:2545" E 44.27' L 102 J Nth P-1 y
L 132 N 18 4125" E 22.46' L 179 S 7110927" E 50.28' I PP-3 P-101 P-93 L93
L536 L 101 M-2
L 133 N 65'41!25" E 36.91' L 180 N 667751" E 43.92' I PP-2 P-100 /
L 134 S 55 4835" E 2718' L 181 N 047425" E 108.63' O L535 L 100 a P-92
L 135 N 677125" E 26.38' L 182 S 6050!29" E 28.37' Zt P-99 P-94 U-4 ti
`?• L534 -4 P-338 P-337
L 136 S 8X48'35" E 39.82' L 183 S 274230" E 55.98' ? P-200 r L99 p-98 / L 171 ? M-3
L 137 S 6548'35" E 25.17' L 184 N 65:2824" E 19.47' t\ m C i I P-96 1 0 ?? r
L 138 N 80'4125" E 29.28' L 185 N 553333" E 42.47'
P 201 PM l,9> ?9 EK 1? P 0 X, P-333
L139 N 294125" E 53.55' L186 N 8332'15" E 28.11' ?o P-95 ?9s GR 9 V -340 V
L142 P-336
L 140 N 36'1125" E 52.15' L 187 N 2702'13" E 20.32' N P-204 I P:202 L141 N 234125" E 47.94' L188 N 4843'01" E 26.70' L114 115 BEP •? 16" M-5 ??'? P-339 ?,??0
L142 N 7071'25" E 37.31' L189 N 867424" E 23.79' ai P-205 X L M-6 > ,p
L 143 N 407125" E 23.97' L 190 S 54 U858 " E 42.30' O STOP L113 P-203 P-335 4147 -7f-
L144 S 352834" E 17.34' L191 N 78141101" E 9.73' I M- M-7 ,?k0 P-341 P-332
L 145 S 4451'16" E 8.38' L 192 N 2309 57" E 54.60' N 0134'54" E P-334 14
L146 S 3503'39" E 54.93' L193 N 525030" E 43.66' 13231• P-348 P-331
L147 S 873338" E 21.73' % M-9 P-347 0 P-329 L152 111
L148 N 30'17'05" E 14.27' \ ?P-351 P-345 N P-342 V
L149 S 423338" E 26.02' 'NG C N 0134'54" E TT h L133 L1 L136 ht X153 P-330
L150 S 165622" W 39.48' C OSS ON ?N 15.75' M-g X35
L 151 S 4556 22" W 34.50' S R CIA (I t- P-328
L 152 N 8833'38" W 16.55' LLPND ASSD 2552 MTT 1 P-400 L? 30 '! ``N P-346 P-343 P-327 (JI
L153 S 652622" W 32.90' NDERS g8? P? P-400 MT 11 P-349 P-344
DMED B 82 \ M-10 P-350
L154 S 382622" W 30.31' 9
L 155 S 06 4734" E 55.04' N HIV ,-4
4 ry V0?
L156 S 162622" W 36.39' L2p <1
L157 S 1333'38" E 64.31' N s
,
L 158 S 2556 22" W 36.89' `1' I r
L207
i r ^ N'
?
-
L 159 S 82:26:22"
W g
48.35'
s L 18
d
o
`
L216 ?r
L160
L161 S 535622" W
S 055622" W 53.94'
g
44' ?I r 118
54 M-13 N P-401
??'' L128 rn r
. ? 144
L 162 S J7:2622" W 45.26' M-12 P-402
L163 S 335622" W 67.90'
' k
L 164 S 17:2622" W 65.10 P-404 P-403
M-29 ?? ?>q 8? w o ???
M-30 ?'? 199??0 L201 M-26
1
r ?12ti v
M-28 tit S
3 M-27 P-406 P-405
,
v M-32
0? 9
19 1
? M-34

?
S
L 197 X ?
P-407 No
M-31
L1')
v
119
P-410 1-18 P-408
P-409
P-323
.A
P-326
v
P-325
v P-325
P-324 (b
L 159
P-322
X6`1 P-322
V
P-321
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
SUREVEN
MEA U
HE D.M.D. METHOD ?ATCy//?/ P-320
BY TT
identifies as wetlands oll as of wet7or2ds S/,ee v P-319
'This certifies that this copy of this plat . re t S
jL-4ad4tion -e4 on this date. Unless section 404 of the Clean Water Act aor our s determined by the undersigned determination of there is a
404 change in
fo
'SUOr7e
may we/ed upon r?od not t0/s .01 p40/- 6
determination jurisdiction y be Pon for o period
exceed five years from this dote. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. " REVSED MARCH 27 2008 TO
Name ?tl? I
Title
Date C)(_/
? I b , E)t c P-oo7- o37? 3
LEGEND
EIP - • - Existing Iron Pipe 100 0 50 100
IPS -0 - Iron Pipe Set
MP -0- Mothemot/cal Pont Only
as -9- Existing Iron Stoke
C - - Centerline
PKS -0- Porker-Kolon Noll Set IN FEET
ERR -0- Existing Railroad Spike
RRS -0- Railroad Spike Set 1 inch = 100 ft.
EPK - • - Ex/sting Porker-Kolon Nail Set
R/W - - Right Of Way
ECM -N - Existing Concrete Monument
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L534 N 002957" W 32.11'
L535 N 32 43'40" W 19.81
L536 N 0350 02" W 31.99
L537 N 15U459" W 24.15'
L538 N 3335 06" W 29.31'
L539 N 0953'05" E 25.26'
L540 N 0120105" E 27.07'
L541 N 0328'57" E 23.76'
L542 N 0536'25" W 19.71'
L543 N 25'05'56" E 16.05'
L544 N 39'1430" W 24.93'
L545 N 0729'13" E 23.55'
L546 N 26-41107" E 38.63
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L90 S 2545'09" W 28.25'
L91 S 4046'14" W 44.97'
L92 S 4234 00" W 31.15'
L93 S 8446'15" W 32.90'
L94 S 14'46'15" W 58.55'
L95 S 550145" W 68.70'
L96 N 69 48'05" W 28.30'
L97 N 6732'32" W 27.00'
L98 N 155220" W 24.68'
L99 N 137147" W 9.84'
L100 N 232031" W 18.09'
L 101 N 313232" W 19.00'
L 102 N 15102100' W 30.85'
L103 N 0520'15" W 17.34'
L104 N 303232" W 22.30'
L105 N 143232" W 31.10'
L106 N 2249'02" E 10.70'
L107 N 0032'32" W 22.40'
L108 N 162728" E 39.00'
L109 N 2574108" W 14.89'
L110 N 030232" W 5.20'
L111 N 25'02'32" W 32.70'
L 112 N 205728" E 59.87'
L113 N 804821" E 21.81'
L114 N 775728" E 17.00'
L 115 N 62J4'02' E 31.98'
L 116 N 057545" W 21.00'
,L117 1 N 153247' E 29.82'
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L 194 N 435458" W 23.48'
L195 N 645458" W 44.11'
L 196 S 5235'02" W 28.42'
L 197 N 812458" W 28.42'
L 198 N 0954 58" W 29.60'
L 199 N 413502" E 27.93'
L200 S 562458" E 36.71'
L201 S 832458" E 31.87'
L202 N 5135'02" E 36.21'
L203 N 0654 58" W 41.15'
L204 N 0635'02" E 36.12'
L205 N 1135'02" E 28.52'
L206 N =921" E 10.20'
L207 S 1751'10" E 34.50'
L208 S 1254 58" E 39.67'
L209 N 7335'02" E 31.97'
L210 N 40105102' E 32.86'
L211 N 8735'02" E 26.84'
L212 N 5935'02" E 32.86'
L213 N 36 05'02" E 37.79'
L214 S 845458" E 26.54'
L215 S 5324 58" E 29.31'
L216 N 6905'02" E 3296'
L217 N 1702'13" E 18.33'
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY LAND
MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENI9RONMENTAL CONSULTANTS:
SHEET No. WETLAND DELINEA 17ON FOR
?T
4 OF? ?V'V'1' V OF AFI.C1lil
WH17E OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Smith and Smith DATE MAY J 2007
11ja SCALE 1 100'
surveyors Br wBH
P.O. BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 DRAWN
APEX, NC 27502 PITTSBORO, N. C. 27312 PROJECT NO.
[phone] [phone] 07-88K
1160
SR
OPEC Rp. <<? 6?

SR 1162
BEA?ER
REEK
517E APEX
BARBECUE RD.
118
SR
AND RD
(NOT TO SCALE HOLL
VICINITY MAP 48 LINE DATA TABLE L249 S 515953" W 35.60' L282 N 57'41'59" W 29.35' L317 N 282525" E 137.53'

" ' L283 613946" W 63
95'
LINE BEAR/NG LENGTH L250 W
S 57'59 53
" 34.80
'
L284 N
S 6847'04" W .
94'
25 L318 N 3436'12" W 13 .98'
L218 S 1703'38" E 50.65' L251 W
S 622953
" 32.40
30'
43
L285'
N 31'1256" W .
56.08' L319

319 N 114527" W

" 53.39'

'
L219 S 032622" W 39.28'
' L252 W
N 353007
" .
20'
50 L286 N 43'4704" E 43.40' L W
56
75'13
'
N 15.45
'
L220 S 472622" W 77.47 L253 W
N 440007
" .
60'
6 :
L287' ,
56
12
" W
N 10- 37.72' L321 W
15"
6252
'
S 20.80
'
L221 S J250'40" W
"
1 44.57
' L254
L255 W
N 5530 07
S 75295J " W .
3
45.40' L288 ,5
6
-
12
N 66" W 36.65' L322 S 38'1755" E
"
1 20.48
02'
5
L222
L223 E
S 12U9
09
S 04 20 51 " W 51.76
46.96' L256 N 01-1441" W 39.97' L289 N 34'17 04" E
" 34.25'
24'
9 L323
L324 W
S 04:25
02
S 794443" W .
1
2267'
L224 S 06*39109 " E 53.36' L257 N 3059 53" E
" 35.10'
' L290
j
L291 W
N 097256
'12'56" W
N 70 .
2
56'
44
L32
5 5 22" W
58
5
N
622 20.34'
L225 S 4520'18" W 21.29' L258 E
N 435953
"
1
- 45.10
80'
L292
S 77'17 04" W .
46.07 L32
6 " W
9
172
N 19.56'
'
L226 S 74 '0456 " W 29.75'
' L259 E
07
00
S 85
" 46.
80'
29 L2931 N 274704" E 40.86' L32 N 1554 32" E X. 49
'
L227 N 723007" W 41.50 L260 E
S 563007
"
1 .
00'
39 L294i N 814704" E 50.17' L328 N 473056" W 35.47
'
L228 N 52100107" W 39.30' L261 E
07
S 1800
I,
' .
10'
78 L295 N 70 47 04" E 50.47' L329 S 88 47'13" W 27.67
'
L229 S 59 59 53" W
" 29.40'
' L262
L263 E
31
S 6553
N 7222'07' W .
79.70' L296 S 2372 56" E 29.14' L330 N 6224'16" W
"
'
. 105.14
92'
L230
L231 W
S 395953
N 7200'07" W 45.20
28.00' L264 S 0203'11" E 39.64' L297 S 01'1704" W
-
- 38.06'
48'
19 L331
L332 W
1843
S 72
18 19" W
30
N 72 28.
6290'
L232 N 1729 53" E 30.10' L265 N 6103'11 " W
"
' 40.64'
' L298,
L299 E
4256
S 07
N 73'47'04" E .
51.75' L333 N 45 07'43" E 51.09'
L233 N 14595J" E 41.40' L266 W
11
N 1 B 03
"
' 45.72
6255' ,
L300 N 65,47'04" E 41.55' L334 N 114502" W 14.80'
'
L234 N 0930 07" W 29.20' L267 W
11
N 5733
"
' 71'
22 L301! N 164144" E 36.32' L335 N 5323'03" W 58.04
'
L235 N 8730107' W 43.40' L268 W
11
N 3003
" .
66'
58 L302 N 21'11'44" E 68.87' L336 N 225329" E 29.33
'
L237 N 8653'03" E 48.11' L269 E
N 3056 49
" .
69'
81
003,
S 834952" E
34.74'
L337
N 153731" W
39.62
'
L238 S 7356'16" E 19.88' L270 W
N 423328
"
' .
29' L304 N 5471'49" E 58.37' L338 S 7343'59" W 55.17
'
L239 N 0456'16" W 38.66' L271 W
19
N 4801
" 79.
70'
4 L305 N 04'35'02" E 28.71' L339 N 69 43'03" W 33.60
'
L240 N 4526'16" W 41.84' L272 E
N 142953
" 3
.
90'
49 L306 435458" W
N 24.28' L340 N 32'18'01" E 55.72
'
L241 N 2956'16" W 23.65' L273 W
N 210007
"
' .
50'
33 L307 N 6846'16" W 64.81' L341 N 7628'32" E 124.75
'
L242 N 0126'16" W 31.21' L274 W
07
N 1500
" .
40'
5 008 S 0555'14" E 31.27' L342 S 2620104" E 57.53
'
L243 N 492676" W 59.63' L275 W
S 832953
"
' .
4
02'
3 L309 S 5758 29" W 17.77' L343 S 242422" W 43.26
'
L244 N 4456'16" W 43.73' L276 E
51
S 1400
" .
2
50'
7 L310 N 7102;39" W 25.72' L344
4 N 63'1140" E
6J71'4 72.10
'
L245 N 535676" W 14.71' L277 W
S 512953
" .
1
70' L311 N 335422" W 34.71' L34
5 E
5
"
N 58.27
'
L246 N 0833'44" E 41.25'
' L278 W
N 040007
' 31.
30'
27 L312 N 072920" W 31.72' L34 E
225
"
N 464 5704
'
L247 N 5033'44" E 59.44
' L279 W
N 110007
"
'
1 .
14'
41 L313 N 57'52'16" W 70.42' L347 S 89140106" E 41.39
'
L248 N 3333'44" E 41.35 L280
L281 W
51
02
N 49
S 8175'38" W .
31.51 ' L314 N J372'21 " W 44.23' L348 N 3121'12" E 50.57
g 77,
L315 N 5732'28" E 55.32' L349 N 491707 W 6
1
HOLLANDS CROSSING 'P\
HOMEOWNERS ASSOC/A 77ON INC. > o M_35
D.B. 8288, PG. 2552 ya? 14 N ?C
M-38 v k M-36 See
L347 P-410 Sheet` st
1 Vh? L303 M-37 1 P-411 Of 6
M-46 ?ry ?r?k
M-47 34 95 N v ry P-412
L294 M-44 M-39 v P-319
M-49 M-45 v O^ P-413
?til ry?^? L292 /,:> M-50 o^i > ?b? ti344 Rs
L v v? 0 M-40 r'sr? P-318
w\ 99 1,30 P-414 P-415 N
L 338
L2
X33
M-48 U-42 M-41
P-317
M-51 M-43 P-416
v ti?
L415_?B8 M-53 P-445
-FELINE M-52 P-446 L259 N
m P-444 P-417 ?-vr P-316
?I ms`s rVla
/ L334 V VV r- P-418
See Sheet Vhh?/\1?h6 M-54 ?hA P-447 P-418 P -J15
06 7 `r -315
Of 8
N
P-4 NO
M-55 ?N P-448 ? P-450 <?6? L237 21
?'cs 4 M-57 to P-420
L28 P-449 % !ems P-422 4?3g P-314
N ^ CPBS M-58 L255 A P-451
M-56 33? M-60 L235 P-303 N
L ?- o L281 M_61 P-452 12kg P-302 Z.
P-313
M-65 0 r-
59 L329? M-64 M-66 `rN \;I,- P-304 p-308 N
TOWN OF APEX L328 L275 X25 P-301 -N
D. 8. 9002, PG. 2333 L327 `- 1 v P-300 P-305 kv, 22g P-309 p-311 P-312
M-62 ?., ,? , M-67 P-453 TT L??? L226
L326 TT P-453 P-307 V
P-300
L325 ? ? ,- w P-306 LP-310
L324 c? w
NOTE.' M-63 io M-68 P-307
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY 018 This survey is of an existing building or other structure, or
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENl980NMENTAL t\ vM-69 natural feature, such as a watercourse.
CONSUL TAN TS. ` ^
April 75, 2008
* THERE IS NO LINE L236 * ` M-70 Date
urveyor CARo,
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND •`????°°°°°°°°°°°,
MEASUREMENTS. , M-71 oFESS/0
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD SEAL r
identifies as wetlands all ! e? L-3766 S ° -
areas of wetlands regulated pursuant to \ M-72
"This certifies that this copy of this plat ??
'?,'9? °°°„°°?
jur?ssyst4e,9-e# section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned $UR?
on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulation, this t?6 M-74
M-73 psi M-75 C.
determination of Section 404 Jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
r M-77 O
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps rn?63 M-78
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manuo% M
?e3 ?30> ?t 6
?sro ?3?g A1Cj yr6e
Name M-76 d' Sg6
Title Q' I-
(' I o SHEET No. WETLAND DELINEA NON FOR
Dote
aoQ 03 3 J OFD TOWN OF AREX
LEGEND 50 100 WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
£lP - ? - Existing Iron Pipe 1 ?? ?
/PS -O - Iron Pipe Set DATE MAY 3, 2007
MP -0- Mothemotwo/ Point Only
Sm j th and S'm 1 th
DS -0- Existing Iron Stake SCALE 1" - 100'
ERR - - Centerline
od Set ( IN FEET surveyors DRAWN BY Wgy
PKS -O - Parker-Kalon Nall
ERR -• - Existing Rallr RollroaS Spike
RRS -O- Railroad Spike Set 1 inch = 100 ft. P.O. BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 PROJECT NO.
EPK -t - fighting Parker-Ko%n Nail Set APEX, N.C. 27502 PITTg89R 542 4321312 07-88!42
R Right Of Way [phone]
E M -M- - Existing Concrete Monument
1160
s oL1%\/ E
CHAPEL PO.
BEA?ER
REEK
(NOT TO SCALE)
?o
SR 1162
APEX
BARBECUE RD.
56 118
00LLANp P1
1 VICINITY MAP
This survey is of on existing building or other structure, or
natural feature, such as a watercourse.
9w&?S• k _ April 15, 2008
0 Surveyor Date
CAROB Og;
SEALr o
L-3766 0
Y
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS.
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD
M-82 M-83
M-81 L356
M-84

Of 6 ?O1
?°
y6 rn M-145 M-80
L 353 l

t 5 w ?
L ?3
?
sree 385
6 ?
4
see L359
L391
M-79 M-80
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L393 N 30 0334" W 6.69'
L394 N 6310923" W 25.00'
L395 N 22465X' W 39.55'
L396 N 514304" E 24.54'
L397 N 254559" E 23.72'
L398 N 207141" W 21.01'
L399 N 64:59'19" W 44.27'
L400 S 78'08'47" W 41.74'
L401 N 34 55'19" W 12.08'
L402 N 7046'14" E 17.36'
L 40J N 23 45 53" E 11.16'
L404 N 31*J6'43 " W 19.50'
L405 N 465937" W 3218'
L406 S 823935" W 52.36'
L407 N 55 45:31 " W 20.05'
L408 N 6X58'06 " W 25.20'
L409 S 8339'45" W 47.34'
L410 N 652838" W 49.84'
L411 N 1537'11 " E 29.17'
L412 N 3639:32" W 27.71'
L413 N 810152" W 38.30'
L414 N 473036" W 27.20'
M-81
M-82
l ?8
r
TOWN OF APEX
D. B. 9002, PG. 2333
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L350 N 5555:33" W 58.00'
L351 N 1124 53" W 40.84'
L352 N 6332'03" W 41.80'
L353 S 870426" W 63.50'
L354 N 20'40'45" W 29.96'
L355 N 375534" W 33.20'
L356 N 842539" W 46.50'
L357 S 095649" W 3715'
L358 S 09 03'11 " E 60.06'
L359 S 843649' W 45.32'
LJ60 N 38 03'11 " W 3735'
L361 N 4659 57" W 15.53'
L362 N 60'J455" W 26.68'
L363 N 14 '4658" W 47.60'
L364 N 39 40:35" E 4729'
LJ65 N 6029'40" W 26.21'
L366 N 74 4753" W 31.63'
L367 S 8354'12" W 41.78'
L368 N 195745" W 16.74'
L369 N 5224 51 " E 29.73'
L370 N 555832" W 24.96'
L371 N 6905'19" W 27.08'
L372 S 745123" W 34.74'
L373 N 5228'16" W 50.88'
L374 S 773634" W 44.79'
L375 N 614735" W 59.62'
L376 N 167258" E 3217'
L377 N 49108108" W 28.87'
L378 S 665936" W 19.26'
L379 S 2835'50" W 19.56'
L380 S 853548" W 10.23'
L381 N 0824103" W 46.98'
L382 N 654547" W 61.30'
L383 N 052854" W 50.73'
L384 N 79 54 50" W 88.89'
L385 N 87*44'31 " W 22.75'
L386 N 0838'18" W 35.33'
L387 N 717154" W 45.96'
L388 S 3756 27" W 24.89'
L389 S 17'4136" E 31.03'
L390 S 08 02 00" W 44.29'
L391 N 89 4246" W 60.89'
L392 N 313057" W 31.34'
I
I
I
I
I
Q
O
I h
Ih
I
NNI3
I?
I ?
I
'-83 I
'R L 413 ?? TOP OF BANK LOCH TED DECEMBER 13, 2007 I
l? (L393 - L414)
L380
L376 l?ro L4091!oe
374 Rom L406
L3724?jrl9?o ° \,
L4p01? I
? _ 9y
L367- 6? I
_ s
'PO nib %
m
w
L394
`?` • L393
?d
TOWN OF APEX
D. 8. 9874, PG. 2380 See Sheet
9 Of 9
identifies as wetlands all areas of wet/ands regulated pursuant to
"This certifies that this copy of this plat
ree4es?-?# section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned
on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was mode utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. "
Name
Title
1 1.
Date ?P61 IR. A o0
A l J C.nW ?DQ -7yVh 3 76 3 SHEET No.
/"C 67 OF-9
LEGEND
VP -0- Existing Iron Pipe 100 0 50 100
IPS -0- Iron Pipe Set
MP -0- Mathematical Point Only
EIS - 9 - Existing Iron Stake
C - - Centerline
PKS -O - Parker-Ko%n Nall Set (/N FEET )
ERR -9- Existing Railroad Spike
RRS -O - Railroad Spike Set 1 in Ch = 100 ft.
EPK -• - Existing Porker-Kalon Nall Set
R/W - - Right Of Way
ECM -N - Existing Concrete Monument

NO 7F.-
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENWRONMENTAL
CONSUL TAN TS.
WETLAND DELINEA 77ON FOR
11 ltli V'Vl V OF AF EX
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Smith and Smith DATE MAY 3, 2007
? SCALE I" _ >00'
surveyors wN BY
P.O. BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 DRA WBH
APEX, N. C. 27502 PITTSBORO, N. C. 27312 PROJECT NO.
[phone] [phone] 07-88K
1160
S ?L
CHAPEL Rp.
?R
`rp
SR 1162
Identifies as wet/ands all areas of wetlands regulated pursuant to
"This certifies that this copy of this plot
jr?re?iet4e?-c# section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned
on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for o period not to
exceed five years from this dote. This determination was mode utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. "
Name
Title
BEA / APEX
GREEK M BARBECUE RD.
Date J
/?1 [1 ??? 1
2 I "?
008
SR 1157
40 Rp. D ?
o T 0 6-1103 `'1-'-- See Sheet 5 Of 8
L415__----`
L
(NOT TO SCALE) OLLAt
N ?- - - 77ELINE
1
1 NOTE
'
VICINI TY MAP .
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY
1
I `

9
418 1 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENV/RONMENTAL
CONSUL TAIVT5.
L41
L
i'
CREEK
Lg20/
R I ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS
?BEPVE 31
.
AREA BY THE D
M
D
METH
D
N .
.
.
O
I' P-506
422J
kgk L493 L42?
L430
L431 P-507
OI
-5
28
?N 1
2 P-505
N
z ?' Lk
P-5 04

P-502
a'
v 1
P-500 N§0
?
P-508
^
' P-501
?
?k
? P-509
P-549
r
I?
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L415 S 855435" W 187.35'
L416 S 8477'19" W 19.21'
L477 S 195550" W 55.56'
L418 S 76 *465J" W 125.92'
L419 S 70'08'48" W 52.02'
L420 S 6103109" W 48.99'
L421 S 213421" W 49.34'
L 422 S 64'16'51 " W 45.35'
L 423 S 78 48 58" W 39.08'
1
L g Vk Lkk L448 L449
00
Z
ai
h
93
it
:LAJ
L,LJ
J
DZ
TOWN OF APEX
D.B. 8309, PG. 519
B. M. 1999, PG. 824
?I
I
1
I
1
L1 N 83'03 E .
EIP T
T 165.60 ?e(
Q I
Q;1
?I
31
c 1
P-569 P-568 P-566
P-565
kg2 L491 Logo L489 4488
4 h 1
L
487 P-564 01
P-567
P-570 //--11 RQ? P-563
/
'{?
_SS/? °° y
°
P-558
Y? I
$ P-562
SEAL
g
10-559
L481 P-557
y
_
oy L-3766 00 = 0-561 41. N
=sew
?a 4?8
?
3 L480 4478
?
3
°'?\?
SuFo ° 1
N
P-556
?
\`\`\ P-560
S
?
`'\
111
I I11 to
This survey is of an existing building or other structure, or ?
natural feature, such as a watercourse. .?. S 8744'40" E --
rveyor
P-550
P-526
P-527
P-528
P-545
L424 S 17'1736" E 1757'
L425 S 38 0425" E 50.41'
L426 N 287844" E 30.27'
L427 N 5424100" E 15.98'
L428 N 8470'42' E 44.27'
L429 N 494822" E 34.44'
L430 N 76 09 09" E 37.52'
L431 N 8534 22" E 26.86'
L432 S 125106" W 75.37'
L433 S 473322" W 61.50'
L434 S 48 42'04" W 4727'
L435 S 7045'16" W 32.50'
L 4J6 S 21:3825' W 36.23'
L437 S 19'0050" W 39.84'
L438 S 502634" W 31.24'
L439 S 191J6107" E 47.56'
L440 N 662531" E 80.16'
P-529
P-539 r
P-530
4 -L41
I
L46?
P-538
P-540
P-543
k61
P-544 L
P-532 P-533
L457 P-534
L456 61 L460 4?9 P-535
TOPBANK P-536
P-541
a-
l?
P-542

L441 N 602233" E 54.79'
L442 N 75U4108" E 37.22'
L 44J N 5330 41 " E 29.40'
L444 N 6132 53" E 36.36'
L445 N 7842 24 " E 63.39'
L446 N 5205'58" E 44.13'
L447 N 520558" E 11.11'
L448 S 89713109" E 61.16'
L449 N 713705" E 36.98'
L450 S 6040'00" E 91.39'
L451 S 28:2027" E 52.05'
L452 S 522835" E 26.85'
L45J S 70'50 03" E 43.60'
L454 N 5702 48" E 39.70'
L455 S 8442'13" E 90.38'
L456 S 892256" E J6.71'
L457 N 8210J'57' E 18.57'
L458 S 37105'27" E 32.66'
L459 N 733523" W 26.85'
L460 S 80140108" W 45.62'
L461 S 74 06'14" W 67.43'
L462 S 8255 42" W 57.16'
L 46J S 20 47 02" E 51.15'
L464 S 7725'17" E 103.48'
L465 S 0829'16" W 17.90'
L466 S 28 3122" W 60.60'
L467 S 54 0541 " W 69.63'
L468 S 772551" W 77.62'
L469 S 365554" W 12728'
L470 S 365554" W 44.05'
L471 S 09'19'27" E 55.86'
L472 S 1553'42" E 156.78'
L47J S 51'0251" E 33.65'
L474 S 784724" E 61.82'
L475 S 04 0932" E 58.17'
L476 N 843126" W 79.12'
L477 N 67V555" W 66.25'
L478 N 7334'13" W 72.77'
L479 N 712029" W 50.50'
L480 S 72 4710J " W 29.02'
L481 S 72147103" W 25.43'
L482 S 1778'09" W 37.42'
L 483 N 70'02'4 7" W 66.13'
L484 N 2122'14" W 35.91'
L485 N 063753" W 48.87'
L 486 N 4729'01" W 40.83'
L487 N 713655" W 45.89'
L 488 N 76102107" W 44.97'
L 489 S 6639 58" W 32.57'
L490 N 76 00 02" W 62.24'
L491 S 81105105" W 44.10'
L492 S 557021" W 39.84'
L49J N 814235" W 41.81'
L494 S 547906" W 24.21'
L495 S 034720" W 22.73'
L496 S 4604 33" E 39.94'
L497 S 074954" W 29.51'
L 498 S 550431 " W 32.60'
P-552 <,.v
L 474 P-55JA
P-553
r
lot
1-476
P-555
P-554
_ -' - See Sheet 9 Of 9
1462.20'
April 15, 2008
Date SHEET No.
OF9
LEGEND
BP - 0 - Existing Iron Pipe 100 0 50 100
S -O - Iron Pipe Set
UP -0- Mothemotlca/ Point Only
£IS -• - £x/sting Iron Stoke ?%?
C- - CentedIne
PKS -O- Porker-Kolon Noll Set (//?l FEET )
ERR - • - Existing Ral/rood Spike
RRS -O - Railroad Spike Set 1 inch = 100 ft.
EPK -• - ExIsting Porker-Kolon Noll Set
"- - Right Of Way
ECM -0- Existing Concrete Monument
WETLAND DELINEA 77ON FOR

WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Smith and Sml th sc.4 MAY 3, 2007
k"" surveyors I"= 1Do,
DRAWN BY
P.O. BOX 457 P. O. BOX 277 WBH
APEX N. C. 27502 PITTSBORO. N. C. 27312 PROJECT NO.
[phone] [phone] 07-88K
L40 P-510
v? P-511 L445 Lkk6 P-522 P-523 P-524
P-512 1,444 P-5,20 P-5211
v ArA P-519
P kP-513 1 L442 P-518 1
-514 L44P-517 1
L440 P-516
1
P-515 1
31
TOWN OF APEX
h D.B. 9002, PG. 2333
401 B.M. 2001, PG. 1288
This survey is of on existing building or other structure, or
natural feature, such as a watercourse.
1160
SS O?JVE
CHAPEL Rp.
BEAM
C EEK
(NOT TO SCALE)
? W
SR 1162
APEX
BARBECUE RD.
SR 1187,
HOLLAND Rp.
VICINITY MAP
rveyor
CARP//'%,
C e /,
ESS /0,
°
SEAL r o -
ov L-3766 0
SUFo
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS.
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L499 S 807151" W 74.23'
L500 N 800353" W 46.61'
L501 S 77U6'04" W 42.35'
L502 N 857607" W 18.23'
L503 N 0510J20" E 22.77'
L504 N 402855" E 54.37'
L505 N 26:3647" W 43.97'
L506 N 6470'52" W 37.00'
L507 S 67:22'0.9" W 32.79'
L508 S 352126" W 38.33'
L509 S 5924'50" W 38.67'
L510 N 7249J4 " W 3750'
L511 N 50'1050" W 55.86'
L512 N 612154" E 18.14'
L513 N 69'06'10" E 47.79'
L514 N 822956" E 4750'
L515 S 823230" E 55.18'
L516 S 637548" E 43.32'
L517 S 3070'18" W 62.48'
L518 S 754947" W 45.79'
L519 S 854959" W 29.22'
L520 N 59 3530" W 44.97'
L521 S 8153'05" W 49.79'
L522 S 67'4004" W 9.47'
L523 S 2837'41 " E 8784'
L524 S 350250" E 31.01'
L525 S 287649" E 25.74'
L526 S314431"E 52.00'
L527 S 55101105" E 61.41'
L528 S 2654'07" E 48.08'
L529 S 334328" E 58.81'
L530 N 58:5742" E 43.41 '
L531 N 554737" E 28.39'
L532 S 68'12'17" E 52.31'
L533 N 852634" E 48.78'
April 15, 2008
Date
L507 <S O6
1,509
I ? eE /o
I V ?L500 L499
L502 L501
?I
NI
I
I
3 I P-603
P-602 P-604 p-605
o L5j3 L514 L515
P-606
O 1
? ? Ly22 ?s N
L521 ?O
I L519 LV3 P-607
I P-611 P-609 P-608
P-610
?I
?I
TOWN OF APEX
D. B. 8309, PG. 519
B. M. 1999, PG. 824
?Nw
-580 ?csN
P-579 N
w
P-578
N?
P-577
P-576
P-572
P-575 5? is
?c'.o 3p ?5 `?? L533
LS P-573 P-571
P-574 P-570
identifies as wetlands all areas of wetlands regulated pursuant to
"This certifies that this copy of this plot
se en- &f section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned
on this dote. Unless there is a change in the low or our published regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this dote. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Mcnuol. "
Nam
Title
Date
4 (f) X00'7 , D3 ?? 3
OF.9
LEGEND
E/P - 0 - Existing Iron P/pe 100 0 50 100
/PS -O - Iran P/pe Set
MP -O- Mathematical Point Only
EIS - • - Exist/ng Iron Stake
iC - - Centerline ?5?
PKS -O - Porker-Ko%n Nail Set IN FEET
ERR -• - Existing Rollrood Spike
RRS -O - Railroad Spike Set 1 inch = 100 ft.
EPK -• - Existing Porker-Kalon Noll Set
R/W - - Right Of Way
ECM -M- £x/sting Concrete Monument
O
I\
v
2
Q?
LAJ
Z
v
N07E-
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEA TED BY
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - ENPIRONMENTAL
CONSUL TANTS.
WETLAND DELINEA 770N FOR
TOW OF APEY
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Sml th and Smith
surveyors
P.O. BOX 457 P. O. BOX 277
APEX, N. C. 27502 PITTSBORO, N. C. 27312
[phone] [phone]
DATE MAY 3, 2007
N I" = 100' 1
` WBH
NO. 07-88K
SR 1160 3
CHAP ERp.
BEAVER SR 1162
K APEX
ORES CSIBAR8CCUE RD.
SR 11 g7i
(NOT TO SCALE) HOLL00 RD
VICINITY MAP
This survey is of on existing building or other structure, or
natural feature, such as c watercourse.
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS.
?-' April 15, 2008
AREA BY THE D.M.D. METHOD Surveyor Date
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH I \?????\\\NI I ?15TTSECL3 CARO
L534 N 64 06'12" E 10.85' 11)
L535 N 1804 44" E 8.21' 'o 0??° °C?/j/
L536 ., TOWN OF APEX 3 ?o FESS/? °° 9
N 582857" W 10.62' a Q
L537 N 363130" E 21,17' ?. _ 16CL3 D.B. 9002, PG. 2333 SEAL ?r °
L538 N 165720" E 16.72' , N
- g _
L539 See Sheet = r L-3766 ?? -
N 1330'09" E 20.39' 6 Of 9 Q)
L540 N 2942'4j" E 14.87' 17CL3 Al L541 N 492827"
L542 E 9.91' v 35' c? °°° ,°
o... R°°°° ?` .
N 70'09'44" E 4.07'
L543 S 41:51'06" E 7.14'
L544 S 1326'15" E 21.13' " ` ? IIIIIIII I I I I I1???\\\
L545 ?08BTT?14A F L603 - - - -
S 151157" W 28.30' ^ 18CL3 L606
L602
L546 a,
5 16 44 50" W 17.96' ?O N?14A RELINE 05 T/EL/NE
L547
S 5954'j5" W 15.56' v rn w
L548 S 36 55 59" W 12.31 ' 19CL3 ?13A
?07B
L549 S 463456" W 6.21' L603 S 831339" W 15.55' O1 ?'
L550 N 4320'13" W 68.32' L604
L551 N S 66J7'46- W 21.41' o ?12A
4239'40" W 30.26' L605 S 5554'02' W 16.94' R16
L552 N 402634" W 35.37' L606 N 8754 28" W 125.72' .111A ???R15
?06B p
? OL553 N 511703" W 21.52' L607 S 16 4531 " E 54.64'
R17
L554 N 7150 45" W 25.38' L608 L609 L555 S 270734" E 67.84' J05B loA 4s N
N 432355" W 26.89' L609 S 3958'13" E 38.36' sr R14
L556 N 095421" E 15.13' L610 S 094228" E 49.74' r°r' `r ls8 '
L557 S 64 52'15" E 20.01' L611 S 061645" W 42.11 '
L558 S 24102'55" E 21.08' L612 TOWN OF APEX ,1048 L656 R18 w s R R12
S 095349" E 68.88' J08A
S 8J:59'47" E 19.84' L 613 D.B. 9874, PG 2380
L559 ° w
S 00 43 53" E 39.94' o ,-
L560 N 1155'10" E 27.34' L614 B.M. 2003, PG. 37 `„° 07A
S 342653" W 30.85' R19 °p w
L561 S 74 '0652 " E 21.18' L615 S 542646" W 18.76' ?03B J06A L579 R11 v 08 542
L562 N 69'1442" E 18.33' 1616 S 070132" W' 24.64' ,- J053 R20 L588 06
/- 563 S 692731" E 27.15' L617 S 100128" E 14.20' R1oTT09 !sw 1,59 07 I
L564 S 760129" E 38.07' L618 L652 /-577 L578 g0
L565 5' 7101 57" W 20.93' J04A h R21 L594 Og L5
N 5628'02" W 36.48' L619 S 56'16'19" W 20.40' L651 v <Sjs L596 ?y9y 10
TT09 I j0JA h
L566 N 46'1451" W 51.06' L620 S 10 04 40" W 36.46' L65
L567 N 32'1258" E 37.08' L621 L650 28 ! >2 11 Icy
L568 S 16106'5J" E 42.87 J02A / s? °' 13
)r 14
N 44 39 40" W 29.54' L622 S 45-442J" E 29.94'
<sy8 15
L569 N 35'12 51 " W 38.89' L623 S 827948" E 11.69' JOfATT100A 14
L570 0o A 0 27 ?„ L
N 7559 24" W 23.54' L624 S 2703'05" E 23.11' isms 1 ? 100A ' .A b11 5j0 23 <6OO L601
L571 S 4304 27" W 29.58' L625 <s ?B 6? 26 24
L572 N 70 48 53" W 21.35' L626 S 4735'17" E 42.96' 6, 104A <s? 25 16
N 815722" E 29.45' <6+ B O k fOfA ? I
L573 N 282827" W 33.74' L627 22 ?s
S 195517' E 22.47'
L574 N 455100" W 48.75' L628 z<s,B r Lgh3 fOSA
L575 S 6033'57" E 30.74' ! o? rn L642 ??61 21
N 624841" W 40,32' L629 S 775751" E 21.59' .7o Q" kk k1 106A
L576 N 13'19 49" E 13.42' L630 6 I
L577 N 2641 '15" W 16.03' la se 103A C6 20 !
S 8272'11" E 26.13' L631 f07L 4p s?
L578 N 4624 34 " W 20.73' is I
N 321331" E 35.37' L632 L639 >OBA rn
1 !
N 29 L579 N 08 03'03" E 27.77' L633 N 600:50 50 Of " E 10.4 '
28" W 15.41' L638 109A 19 `s6,S
L580 N 2148'19" W 31.10' L634 N 622528" W 18.75'
L581 N 293630" W 79.88' L635 L637 110A \
L582 N 4932 48" W 33.92' I
N 48 07 45" E 21.86' L636 ?L6?3 P
N 304935" W 17,09' ? r 111A k • ?
S 415120" E 42.61' L637 N 0671'05" E 27.00' 0$0 0 N a, 112A 1165 kP 38 I N
L583 `SBlL56Zlss I ^ O
L584 S 452837" E 38.38' L638 N 272448" E 24.98' 1 109 Og !ate !6 116?yP ssj?7 O4/-
h ?o
L585 S 587035" E 31.48' L639 N 247450" E 26.39'
L586 S 502159" E 29.86' L640 11 S L626 rn 1 ?6 yP lye v 36 ?v _33 32 3' /-S"4 O
N 7926'40" W 26.26' L657 N
L587 S 0824'40" E 27, 95' L641 N 4979'11" E 30.39' L658 13'11'46" W 36.42 111 11?? ?6 1 ?6?1 P?01 3 ?y4 is LSSg 35 =
L588 S 1419'40" E 30.70' L642 N 362544" W 14.69 ' 63 S¢!
ss
N 012055" W 23.45' L659 N 375653" W 44.34' 1110 c9 4o 42
L589 S 473135" E 19.65' L643 41
L590 S 692150" W 24,07' L660 N 2513'49" W 45.06' 11? L`S 1?? ?`ris? 43 I
N 66'1823" E 32.65' L644 S 490836" W 27.04' L661 N
L591 N 652420" E 44.92' L645 N 165853" W 30.21' L662 272030" W 36.52' <<r? 44 I
L592 N 65'04'18" E 23.17' L646 N 3414 46" W 23.20' <SR?+
N 4116'19" E 2
L593
L594 N 733648" E
3*,T6
" 10.71' L647
7
N 352009" E 746
31.61' L663 S 0141'16" W 41.75'
L664 S 07'
2
"
' S3B\
r
L595 S
9
W
S 49'1034" W 11.24'

32.02' L64

L649 N 28 47 54" E

N 4728'02" 26.29'

' 37
5
W 34.41
L665 S 073725" W 4.28' S26
S*?0
\

L596
S 78'09'4J " W
21.31 '
L650 W
N 07-0526- E 11.62
' L666 S 070050" W 79.84' .
<S9 l

L597
S 69 03 48" E
24.96'
L651
N 0316 50" W 25.57
21
63' L667 S 09'13'56" W 38, 49' SOB
S

!598
:599
S 6359'12" E
7
"
30.54'
L652
N 4756'17" W .
16.94' ?B
9
e

600 S 47
1801
E
" 33.34' L653 N 64 07'15" W 16.34' B

' 601 S 650041
E
N 82:Y9'50" E 28.05'
42
31' L654
L655 N 073540" W

" 34.50' See Sheet S 8744 40" E r <Bs
.602
N 875526" W .
77.35'
L656 N 095120
E
N 09146 54" E 43.22'
12.02' 7 Of 9 ? '?" '? .... •-.. <'s?s
1462
20' ¢sB
1/0 TE. ,
1763,21' TOTAL <S3" 1594'
THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY _
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. - EN14RONMENTAL
CONSUL TAN TS: SHEET No.
OF
-9
LEGEND
EIP - • - Existing Iron Pipe 700 0 50 100
IPS -O - Iron Pipe Set
MP -0- Mothematicol Point Only
EIS - • - Ex/sting Iron Stoke
C - - Centerline
PKS -0- Porker-Kolon Noll Set
ERR -0- Existing Railroad Spike ( IN FEET J
RRS -O - Railroad Spike Set
EPK - • - Existing Parker-Kolon Nail Set 1 inch = 100 ft.
R/W - - Right Of Way
ECM -E- Ex/st/ng Concrete Monument
"This certifies that this copy of this p/at identifies as wet/ands a/1 areas of wetlands regulated
494 446 bemqewry- 0,
-9 >
7?+
ten-cf section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determin446 be
ed by the undersigned
on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulation, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. "
Name
Title
;,At
Date
I 54W X00-7 - 037 Z
J
L543 °
. 51A
L544
r 50A
L545
494
L546 ?
48A I .?
L547 ^
47A
•? L548
46A
L549 285.07'
WTLAAND DELINEA77ON FOR
TO j
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Sml Smith an d Sm i th DATE MAY 3, 2007
9
surveyors sC4LE '" = 100E
P.O. Box 457 DRAWN BY WBH
APEX N. C. 27502 R O. BOX 277
[phone] PITTSBORO, N. C. 27312 PROJECT NO.
[phone] 07-BBiYL
W AT
p?pF
FgQG Michael F. Easley, Governor

r - William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality

March 12, 2007
S & EC
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Attn: Ryan Smith
F...__
R GENE
MAR : 3 ;21101
By: Sail S EtNhilmental Consultants, PA
IPRRO 07- 04
County: Wake
INTERMITTENT/PERENNIAL (UP) STREAM DETERMINATION
Project Name: Evans Road Extension Project # 10596.wl
Location/Directions located north of Friendship off of SR 1162 and south of Beaver Creek in Wake
Coun
Subject Stream(s): UT to Beaver Creek
Date of UP Determination(s): 3/09/07
Feature UP Call Location of UP Point
(GPS Points and/or Flag)
E Intermittent From property line to confluence of E & A
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local may request a
determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the
Director in writing c% Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Wetlands1401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC
27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby
notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected parry (including
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the
applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely
manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within
60 days.
NoithCarolina
naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Evans Road Extension
3/12/2007
Page 2 of 2
Project 9 10596.wl
The (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local,
State, and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the
subject property (stated above). This project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed
activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-
733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
Michael Horan
Environmental Spec. I
CC: Byron Brady, Wake County Environmental Services, P.O. Box 550, Raleigh, NC 27602
Town of Apex, Attn: Mike Deaton, Public Works & Utilities Dept., 105 Upchurch St., Apex, NC 27502
Jamie Shern-US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Office
Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
RRO/SWP File Copy
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
c

r'7
a ? 1 E31? '

%r ;, a

? J
\" ? nNt a: P.nwonmatil COnsNtants, PA \? \.. \\\
Illlle Rmrn FMy Road,tWagS; Nm-h CrcLCU'3; n11 \ \?
Ykune: n)1'?Rge.SYeC Ymr m191 R1!,-e1al 11
Wetland APPawdmaum
S?, c4e b. vrv!,vnnsY Fls?mmen"n \. \
J yen f riy , \\ @ ?.
? w?.... M ' aasa.,rh r .rr?s \ \ I
i S A? Lie ..,wyw
Mandy Map ^ - y y
RITA VER OE
APEX Bnk8ECL1E , Y
2 vV D
\
'O SNIfSE
Z
I
f \r
01 CL
R21 tt CH x,
77
29 tt CH R10 it PL
' it 09CL
I
100A
it PC t ?,•' tt 09CL
1008
t r? 17
it PL
18
117A - it PL
tt 1158 30
536 -?? I tt PL
ttCH 45ttPIL
/ C
46B 61A PL 465, ttCH
tt PL
Legend
,,,.? =WETLANDSLItJEAR WETL.IVDS,mustbeccnlirmed ty the USAC[] ? - ?.
= WATERS OF THE US POTENTIALLY St1RJECT TO TH, K•
TOWN OF APEX BUFFERS '
?.e., intsrrnfttenl5raams: It be canfrmed by DWO and US.ACE . , _
WATERS OPTHE US POTENTIALLY SUBJECT TO THE --- N
1 TOWN OF APEX BUFFERS
-
Le., Perennial streams; must be confim sd by DWO and USAGE] W, E
Q -BOUNDARY OF EVALUATED AREA ``-
S
TT Tie 7e CH charnel PL =Property Lira _.` _..
Wetland Sketch Map I
Project No. Scale: Evans Road Extension Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
10596.W1 1"=250' j Jones, Cnossen and Dolle I Engineering 11010 Raven Ridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27614
Wake County, NO I [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www,SandEC.com
Project Mgr.: Feb 6, 2007 Prepared by Ryan Smith
Chris Flowers

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: Latitude:
Evaluator: Site: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent t County: ^ Other
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30 '? 7S y e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = )
a Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1
. C_ontinuous bed and bank 0 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2.7 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting :. 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 r 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Braided channel
1 -- ------
2 ----
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1
5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing , .
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No =9" Yes = 3
evidence.
R..
.....,,, u?ai wmVns n i manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
14. yroundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or .

Water in channel - d or growing season
0
1
2 ?
C-3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 C- 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
_18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0
5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? .
Na-` b 1.5
Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal
20". Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
..
1
0
22. Crayfish
8.s
0.5
1
1
5
23. Bivalves ¢; 1 2 .
3
24. Fish
0.5
1
1
5
25. Amphibians
-- --- ----- -
--
------- -----
0
0.5 1 .
1
5
0
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance _
0 _
0.5 „
"1. .
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1

29 . Wetland plants in streambed 1.5
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75;,,bBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0: Other = n
1 lv- tell a iC presence or upiana plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

losirstem
PROGRAM
May 23, 2008
Kent Clackson
Town of Apex
P.O. Box 250
Apex, NC 27502 Expiration of Acceptance: November 23, 2008
Project: Evans Road Extension County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/LAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts Cape Fear 03030004 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0
Credits Cape Fear 03030004 0 0 420 0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, NCDWQ-Raleigh
Nicole Thomson, agent
File
kmhoria?... E ... Pvrot" our Stag
IWDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
A
TN[ PIKAK prCOWIFi00D uVINo
April 11, 2008
Nicole Thomson
Regulatory Specialist / Natural Resources Program
Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Dear Ms. Thomson:
sloum o/ gvq?x
P. O. Box 250
APEX. NORTH CAROLINA 27502
Please accept this letter in response to our conversations regarding the proposed Evans Road extension
project that you are securing 404 and 401 Approvals for on behalf of the Town of Apex.
As we have recently discussed, the Town of Apex has been considering the proposed Evans Road extension for
several years; this proposed road extension has been part of the Town's Transportation Plan for approximately 6
years (Attachment 1). The Evans Road Extension will be located within approximately 160 acres that the
Town owns and has set aside as part of a future park. As you are aware and as we have discussed several times,
while reviewing the initial layout of the road it was brought to our attention that the proposed location would
impact a significant area of wetlands. It was at that time that the Town agreed to the realignment of the
proposed road to avoid and minimize wetland impacts to the greatest extent practicable. This decision
effectively shifted the original design by 421 feet and reduced the size of the park by approximately 9.1 acres
(Attachment 2). In addition, this change necessitated the Town to pay an additional $18,900 in re-design fees.
Both of these actions, in our opinion, were the right thing to do to demonstrate avoidance and minimization of
the wetland impacts and to help protect our environment.
I hope this information is helpful and reinforces our commitment to minimizing the impacts of area
development on our environment as we pride ourselves on being sensitive to this where we can. Please let me
know if I can provide anything further.
Sincerely,
jo?n ar.
John M. Brown
Director
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources
/?= Thoroughfare and
?C Collector Street Plan
f?a
UIL ?'?
•?ansoo?
4C Pinn s
51 ? R'o ? ? Yyr? yEN DR
p.
D)j
g MIN
• T 11111 DR O
l i

. U
3
I?
R09ptraD k w i

A...
F
.rk ? •
?? ?'• ?? v

rc
• ?e:` . ,L:, a

L
b i
n
.^ O

a• AF
°
n
R • ?

1 •
t , P n'SCO DR

LAWNEY( ?
t 2 O Z
v
Wr I HU

? ? S
w
?t
dlt ??I ro
I
?
(
)
` y
m
i
•

?
``
1 P O a9 w
OR
TAR6ER1 f)N A
I
1
orL'
`
X

t2 P ?T
?
? ?w
,w
? ?I
?
X
? cr
?,
1 f v
A4 P
F
? Y
p. Fy
Y
t -
L-- '•
'
? ? -? J
inn
W i:AFS1'
?Cbl
\`
FR(Y

r

Z WIIARU IN
K?0.D ?.?• /
-ENKS R
rt31
rN ,

?,
? ? t . .
_ :' YYN
p?1 FER

'M? vI510? ?
O
eW
( I

S

A hvP?. S
Ea
p 01
DR
CP
011"",
Jrp,NF.'
,P
UNEDIN
P
V
P,
A
m
r
ifi a HW
b
6.
J
CT..
D
ti
,
f
i ,•..
_ r 4 wrw
,.
_
RY
N9
F t of

0 0
p 64
I ??SOt
DRITTI AY
?' Cr
? ^
.?
,
??.,, EO ? •?
U664 HwY 3
ae • i - 1 - rc
2 . •--' ?
o d : ---?' I m

2
t z _ n
d
PE`N
PP
'400•n xPEW?', CAS 13

p
e.

r

c"%A ` 2 , V WUFFNSF
?? S464 ?Y
AFAp DINeUR RD
ON
TE Ci SOUT{fOR

n

•
A pg P-,,
LIVE CHAPEL RD a .+ ?r•' N

J
v <L SRfMDERS
Y 2' OLDAALEIOH
ST 1d)
C RV'
?? ORErgOry re
hrN9?fVU
J J "t \
U
.1 q
N
f (kL
FRT AY
1<AINESVIEW IN l ' T
ar L.r'',
ll d r ,Y
h
? 9r
i
S F

, ,
> ?.,, p h
??? [[[
C INVE
OOKS ST S rMLN -" Cf
V?,
NLF
z O_____

(0i
2 m..
n ,w
?
/21 ?
9
P F.R . JA
. .{20RO? . S? EMS L
•? MESSr
0.V pD P

??\'? R 3
tB t -
e
-'HiEE•RE'lN p-? 15. f4?` Pg ?ENTiN
'
y
u Evans Rd Extenslo
?? ?, •
• •

Q D ? •,

MA'
?• .
%
?S

SNU,,1, /?.
•
3o
O -IASR--RU. ?
n`
PP2 • .. ` , • y?L - C?/ • ? . EX PFWY
OLIVE DAIRY RD y1`O •• 94M9o4 '? \?`? ?, ,•. ? Z (? ?Y "3?1 ??
rc
- - - - - - -- - - --
R C
20? PO n HUMIE DL IVE RDA ,ter°, '??'S?a ?• .S1•-• ???"' .. k -
P J MF ? E
ti OARLIe 9A ¢ O(/4E RD ?fQ" (9'4 `b J L1 .. y•? _DE2OLA STI
/?? R w ,, RO FaJll '?i4.•q'
OeY \iul 020 S O VJ`'` p i -i. • OaeITTS,p , a SATORI
Z 'I' 4 OV ,y ! ? ?pSE pit ?
o¢q ? _.. 1-'' _ ',=m aar ? ?/ y @ .'•' 8 ? coley c a RHYTHM
SII.VERST,RRUPW •f / ??4. .:t--"•
r \LlF • ;? _- Y 10 .••.wu• .'"'. N- --- rce""?T.
Q PGH so, NHSS OR
,,.-,?.nNO ?Sir<F OOJS 977,
p Q; 4
N
?A, ?"9Y n5 2I CHEV.Y ? .y.J a+?T.•.,..
s so ar Y ;
o °J (101 . drr `.' KATW DR V J`?aba
q9 _ _ 10. 3 -1w"-
, le,.' '
mpo2 z 4rT o ' e'
.S FRIENDSHIPRD p0 •,,y? ;
-1 ST A a P `YO
D PO 2 z 4 AR \ N SO
SFXS O({eEP Js,y`° kik ?,LyyPllpP < i "'o IN ??]] O nlon?neb9LLRD "v. _ Legend F?9
TRAD
t g 2V a mFy0"" TRL D?CHIIIL Collector Streets:
Minor Collector:
i
D= 0 1 Existing
us,,. f1 s"?'? . _ -•-- New Location
'-'?^ +A?FO Major Collector:
c
ADpwsw Existing
New Location
v,p
r e aoNRpo Thoroughfares:
Existing Streets 2 Lanes:
Study Area Existing
pe Wake County Line New Location
21c"P ar r Parcel Left-tum Bays/Lanes - New Location
o? 2 pE" FERR Water Body Left-tum Bays/Lanes - Widening
Apex Corporate Limits 3Lanes:
m?
At" Apex Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Existing
Q 7-
±' D EMANapEO ?Cary Corporate Limits --• New Location
Cary Extraterritorial Jurisdiction ---• Widening
Notes O RExRD Holly Springs Corporate Limits s Lanes:
1. Intersection improvements at Old Raleigh Road/Lake Pine Drive.
2. Potential intersection improvements at Salem Street and Hunter Street. Holly Springs Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Median - Existing
3. . Realign Tingen Road to line up with Lynch Street at Salem Street.
3 Fuquay-Varina Corporate Limits • • • • Landscaped Median -New Location
4 Realign Lufkin Road to line up with US 1 ramps at Ten Ten Road.
5. Realign Holland Road to line up with Friendship Road at Old US 1. Fuquay-Varina Extraterritorial Jurisdiction --- ';""
Landscaped Median -Widening
6. Realign Horton Road to with Shearon Harris Road at Old US 1. Interchanges: 5 Lanes:
7. Realign north leg of intersection to line up with Bosco Road.
8. Realign Old Holly Springs Apex Road to tie into future 4-lane thoroughfare. Ci Existing Grade Separation - Existing
9. Realign intersection of Old Holly Springs Apex Road and Woods Creek Road. Widening
10. Old Holly Springs Apex Road, and New Hill Olive Chapel N Future Grade Separation
Road - 2 lanes on 4-lane divided right-of-way to allow for future widening (if necessary). Existing Interchange Superstreet
11. Pmposed square loop interchange at US 64 and Lake Pine Drive utilizing existing roads.
12. Proposed square loop interchange at US 64 and Laura Duncan Road utilizing existing roads. Future Interchange Future
13. Realign Green Level Church Road to tie into Jenks Road east of the Outer Loop. • Potential Roundabout Freeway:
14. Potential future traffic signal at intersection of Salem Street and Center Street.
15. Widening of bridge over US 1 will be necessary in order to widen Ten Ten Road to a four lane • Future Square LOOP Existing
divided section.
16. Expand interchange of US 64 and NC 55 to include a loop from southbound NC 55 to eastbound CI Potential Square LOOP •--•••• New Location
US 64 to improve signal operation.
17. Implement protected left turns (green arrow) at signal at NC 55 and Salem Street.
18. Implement protected left turns (green arrow) at signal at Ten Ten Road and southbound
US 1 ramp. Adopted by Town otApex Town Council October 15, 2002
19. On a superstreet, select left turns are removed from intersections to improve traffic operations.
20. Apex Barbecue Road - 2lanes on a 4-lane divided 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Amended' Updated
right-of-way to allow for future widening (if necessary). March 16, 2004 October 19, 2004 March 21, 2006
21. Wimberly Road - 2 lanes on a 4-lane divided right-of-way to allow for future widening if Feet May 18, 2004 March 15, 2005
necessary. July 20, 2004 May 17, 2005
22. See I-5401S Salem Street Small Area Plan. Collector streets within the 1-540/South Salem Street Miles
Small Area Plan area are for illustrative purposes. The internal network can be modified during Amended:
development approval provided the modifications meet the intent and spirit of a transit oriented 0 0.5 1 Z 3 February 20, 2007 August 21, 2007 October 16, 2007
development. Connections of collector streets to thoroughfares must be provided.
23. Major collectors prohibit direct access by residential driveways. Prepared by
Town of Ap- Planning Department
April 2008
EVANS ROAD RE-ALIGNMENT
04 15-08