20080891 Ver 1_Application_20080602

µ S?A7F u
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
May 27, 2008
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, N.C. 27889-1000
Attention: Bill Biddlecome
t446 z
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
080891
Subject: NW 14 request associated with bridge # 8 replacement on SR 1320 in Martin County.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting a NW 14 permit and
corresponding DWQ 401 for a bridge replacement in Martin County. Bridge # 8 is located on SR 1320
approximately 4 miles northwest of Williamston. It spans Conoho Creek that flows to the Roanoke River
approximately 0.8 miles downstream. Conoho Creek is classified by the DWQ as class "C" waters. This
creek is also listed as anadramous fish spawning waters by the WRC. The proposed bridge will measure
200' long X 30 wide', which is 50 feet longer and 6 feet wider than the existing 150' X 24' bridge. This
project will impact 0.1002 acres of riverine wetlands, which will be mitigated through EEP. The proposed
impacts are occurring because of the approach widening. The PCN, vicinity maps, and permit drawings are
included with this letter. If you need any additional information or have any questions concerning this
project, please call me at 252-482-7977.
Sincerely,
Jerry Jennings
Acting Division One Engineer
Clay Willis
Division One Environmental Officer
Cc: Garcy Ward, DWQ
Sonja Gregory, DWQ
Travis Wilson, WRC
John Abel, NCDOT
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
200
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 8 0 8 9
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division One
Mailing Address: 113 Airport Drive Suite 100
Edenton N.C. 27932
Telephone Number: 252-482-7977 Fax Number: 252-482-8722
E-mail Address: tcwillisndot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge # 8 on SR 1320 (Johnson Bridge Rd.)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4578
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Martin Nearest Town: Hassell
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): n/a
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take NC 142 through
Hassell in Martin County and then turn left (north) on SR 1002. Travel north 0.8 miles, then
merge right on to SR 1320. The bridge is 0.5 miles down SR 1320.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.77783 ON - 77.2637330 °W
6. Property size (acres): 1 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Conoho Creek
8. River Basin: Roanoke River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The area is characterized by Conoho Creek, which is
surrounded by a riverine swamp forest. The adjacent lands have been cleared and are in
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13
agricultural production. Land use in this area of Martin County is rural and mostly in
agriculture and woodland.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will be replacing a five-span bridge (150 ft. in len h) composed of prestressed
concrete channels with a asphalt overlay. The existing substructure is composed of
prestressed concrete caps on timber piles. This bridge was built in 1974 and has a sufficiency
rating of 38.8 out of 100. This bridge will be removed in it's entirety using NCDOT BMP's
for bridge removal. The new bridge will be a four span cored slab structure totaling 200 feet
in length. It will be supported by concrete piles and caps. The bridge will be replaced using
top down construction on existing location. Traffic will be detoured off-site during the
protect.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To replace a bridge that has a low sufficiency
rating that is considered structurally deficient. The replacement of this bridge with a new
bridge built to current guidelines will maintain the transportation facility, so the traveling
public can safely cross Conoho Creek.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. NONE
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NONE
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: This project will impact 4367.5
sq. ft. (0.1002 acres) of riverine wetlands. This impact is the result of widening the bridge
approaches to accommodate the new bridge design. This will increase safety as motorist
approach and exit the bridge.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
Site AA Permanent Fill Riverine wetland Yes 10 0.008
Site BB Permanent Fill Riverine wetland Yes 10 0.028
Site CC Permanent Fill Riverine wetland Yes 10 0.023
Site DD Permanent Fill Riverine wetland Yes 10 0.040

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.1002
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.50 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.1002
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.1002
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicfible, discuss construction
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Reducing the amount of
widening of the approaches has been considered and coordinated to reduce wetland impacts. The
proposed approach fills went through the minimization effort and will provide an adequate safety
level for motorist traveling across the bridge. NCDOT has coordinated the use of an off-site
detour, which will avoid the need for an on-site detour that would result in temporary impacts
wetlands.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NCDOT will utilize the EEP program to provide 0.1002 acres of mitigation for unavoidable
impacts to riverine wetlands.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.ncegp.net/payes/inlieurgplace.hti-n. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.1002
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone Multiplier
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious acreage on the site consist of the
asphalt roadway, which totals about 0.50 acres within the protect area. The wideningz of the
roadway gpproaches will increase this amount slightly, but will not result in any measurable
increase in surface runoff.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None

ApplicantOAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/ 1 /2005
Page 13 of 13
BEGIN BRIDGE
BEG.APPROACH SLAB FELND 16+07.00+/-
_L_ I5+ +/ -
BRIDGE
- +07.00 + -
WOOOED SWAMP
?` ? O,?OB ?y6?11 er
Yy0 A 1849 uW
\ ? 7
\ \ or 88
1,235.86 SO. FT.
WOODED SWAMP
PL 4lV VIEW
DETAILED "AA W-E C;
A"ATZIV #S
END. APPROACH LA
-L- ! +3200+
WOODS
r
o p5? 08 g.y P, 38
rJ CON O CREEK,
WILL UT TO WETLAND ELEV.
AND REMOVED'
A0.
8y35,pq 362svSa.FT. ?r a ?1D
NI6'IO'10'W ?'S6
a -
12,16' LOWEST W0005
5 LEV= 42.4]'
Du Doo i
A S 0020'31' E HIGHWATER ELEV= 47.4•
HURRICANE FLOYD
T, 51.08' ASA M. HARRISON
/ S 0935'59' W CONONO CREEK
40.13' /
S 2989'18' E
DD
1,753.36 SO. FT
39.42'
S 35'17'35-E 23.29'
10'52'25' E /
34.77'
-----1?1'
-or-
e* ?
Wefl"p?
4`1
CULTIVATION
*OWEO SWAMP
SYMBOLS
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION
- - - EXISTING CROSS SECTION
>• WETLAND IMPACT
PROPOSED RIP RAP
NOTES:
EXISTING BRIDGE AND PILES WILL BE REMOVED.
EXISTING WING WALLS AND END WALLS WILL BE CUT-DOWN TO WETLAND ELEV•AND REMOVED.
AREA AA, BB, CC AND DO EQUAL A TOTAL OF 0.100 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACT.
STA. 18+70 -L-
4 Q 50' PRESTRESSED
CONC, CORED SLAB BRIDGE, 90° SKEW
CR. GRADE EL. = 43.80'
PROPOSED LOW STEEL ELEVATION SHOULD BE
CLASS II RIP RAP
O.T. THEORET
NO LOWER THAN EXISTING LOW STEEL. PROPOSED 100 YR. WS EL. = 42.60'
/NCL UOEO LOW S/OE OF SUPER EL.-VA T/ON J
- 0,3%
I--I---r-j-T--z-? ---------------------
I II I ? I I; I
iI I I I:
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
I it /`I? I/ CLASS II RIP RAP PROPOSED 25 YR. WS EL, = 41,0'
1
I
CAL SCOUR
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ?
I I
I I
I I
I I
DETAIL S.LECTIO N -
/I
/I
EL. 35.20'
END VIEW
SYMBOLS
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION
- - - - - EXISTING CROSS SECTION
COUNTY: MARTIN WBS#: NIA
QUAD: OAK CITY DATE: MARCH 24, 2008
BASIN: ROANOKE SHEET #: 2 OF 3 3
Bridge # 8 Replacement on SR 1320 in Martin County
Quadname is Oak City
N
0 1 2 4 Miles