20080531 Ver 1_More Info Received_20080423

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
73W Environmental Consultants
TO: Ms. Kimberly Garvey
US Anny Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
08 Del
April 22, 2008 r I_
?aPk ? ,31008
DENR - VVAI ER QUAU lY
AVLANDS AND STORMWATER 9PANCN
RE: Additional Information for the NWP 39 Permit Application
Collaborative Medical; New Hanover County, NC
Action ID: SAW-2005-182
Dear Kim:
Thank you for your letter dated April 2, 2008 in which you request additional information
regarding the Collaborative Medical Building Site located in Wilmington, NC. Below is a response
to each of your concerns:
1. It appears based on your application that impacts to wetlands could be completely avoided.
Two driveways into the property already exist off of 17 1h Street as depicted on your site plan.
As such, the road crossing though waters of the US appears unnecessaiy. Avoidance and
minimization is a requirement under NWP General Condition 20. Please provide proof that
NCDOT is requiring this driveway to be built in this exact location.
As noted in our application, NC DOT and the City of Wilmington are requiring the applicant
to place one of the site's driveways so that it lines up with Greenfield Street, which causes
the driveway to impact Waters of the U.S. The engineer attempted to avoid this impact by
designing a driveway that was slightly shifted, but DOT firmly rejected this idea. Please see
the attached email correspondence between the engineer and Anthony Law of NC DOT.
2. The feature you describe as a "ditch classified as waters of the US" is a tributary, not a
wetland as you depict in your Pre-Construction Notification (PCN). The Jurisdictional
Determination survey signed bvMs. Jennifer Fiye of this office and issued to you onJanuary
31, 2005 labels this feature as a tributary cis do her site notes. Please revise your PCN to
illustrate requested impacts.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 9 P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
As requested, we have modified the PCN form and the site plan drawings to describe the
channel as a tributary.
3. It appears that this tributary feature nray be a man-altered stream, not a man-made ditch.
Please provide evidence that you used in making you determination.
Staff of LMG prepared a Stream Identification Form for this channel on 4/8/2008
(enclosed). The form assigns the site 21.5 points, identifying it as a lower level intermittent
stream. We have also enclosed several pictures of the feature. This channel appears to be a
ditch that receives stormwater from adjacent developments. It disappears into a culvert under
17`h Street and cannot be seen again until hitting Greenfield Lake. If it is a stream, it is a
low-functioning, mostly subterranean feature. Finally, we have included a 1993 7.5-minute
series topographical map of the site which shows a topographic feature in this area, but no
blue-line until reaching Greenfield Lake. It is likely that this channel was once a wetland
finger of Greenfield Lake that was excavated for stonnwater purposes many years ago.
4. Compensatory mitigation will be required.for impacts to this tributary.
We have received an acceptance letter from the Ecosystem Enhancement Program to buy into
their program for the restoration of a stream within the Lower Cape Fear River watershed.
Please note that we feel strongly that this feature is not a high quality stream and request that
the required mitigation ratios be reduced to accurately reflect the resource that is being
impacted.
I hope this infornation adequately answers your concerns. Please contact me if you have any
additional questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Ashley Futral I
Environmental cientist
Encl.
C: Mr. Chad Coburn: DWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan: DWQ
Mr. Rob Balland
Mr. George V. Huffinon, III: 17`h Street WPG, LLC
2
Pagel of 3
Ashley Futral
From: Kim Williams
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:19 AM
To: Ashley Futral
Subject: FW: 17th Street @ Greenfield
From: rballand [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:03 AM
To: Kim Williams
Subject: FW: 17th Street @ Greenfield
See below
Robert P. Balland, P.E., LEED AP
PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC.
5911 Oleander Drive, Suite 201
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-791-6707 (P)
910-791-6760 (F)
910-619-1186 (M)
rbal land paramounte-eng corn
www. )aramounte-eng .com
From: Anthony Law [mailto:[e-mail]. nc.us]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:22 AM
To: rballand
Cc: Dan Cumbo; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Teresa Huffmon; mike
kozlosky; Anthony Prinz
Subject: Re: 17th Street @ Greenfield
Rob,
The Department will require the proper alignment of the proposed site signalized driveway with
Greenfield Street with the lane configuration as required in the TIA approval letter.
The proper alignment as referred to above will require the elimination of the shift of the egress traffic
from the site traveling onto Greenfield Street.
The lane configuration referred to above is per the email sent to you by Mike Kozlosky dated 3/3/08.
If you have any questions, let me know.
Anthony Law
rballand wrote:
4/8/2008
Page 2 of 3
Anthony:
Since I cannot guarantee the outcome of a permit from DWQ and the ACOE, we would be
requesting to relocate a blue line stream. It has been my experience that this type of request does
not go over well with DWQ and the ACOE. They typically ask the opposite of what you are asking,
"How can you avoid".
Regards,
Robert P. Balland, P.E.
PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC.
5911 Oleander Drive, Suite 201
Wilmington, NC28403
910-791-6707 (P)
910-791-6760 (F)
910-619-1186 (M)
rb.a.. II_a_nd@p_aramounte-en.g..com
www.paramounte-eng.com
From: Anthony Law [mailto:[e-mail]...usl
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:12 AM
To: rballand
Cc: Dan Cumbo; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Teresa
Huffmon
Subject: Re: 17th Street @ Greenfield
Rob,
What prohibits you from obtaining the proper permits from the ACOE to extend the pipe to
provide the proper alignment to Greenfield Street?
Anthony Law
rballand wrote:
Anthony:
I received an e-mail from Richie Brown this morning regarding the new driveway
connection at 17th and Greenfield Street. I was asked to provide you with justification
as to why we are proposing an offset and could not align the intersection. I've
attached a PDF file as a visual aid to help you understand why we cannot shift the
driveway any further north. When we met with you in August, we mentioned that a
blue line stream runs from east to west along the northern property line of the 17th
Street property and then to an existing 48" culvert that conveys the water under 17th
Street. The top of bank of the stream was classified as wetlands according to the
ACOE. We moved our driveway as far north as possible without impacting the blue
line stream. We have a small retaining wall on the northern edge of driveway to
account for the grade difference since we cannot daylight out to existing grade. Our
offsets meet the minimum design criteria set forth in AASHTO's policy on geometric
design and I have attached for your review.
If you feel that further justification is needed or have any questions, do not hesitate to
call.
Regards,
Robert P. Balland, P.E.
PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC.
5911 Oleander Drive, Suite 201
Wilmington, NC28403
4/8/2008
Page 3 of')
910-791-6707 (P)
910-791-6760 (F)
910-619-1186 (M)
_rballa_nd a@paramounte eng_.co_m_
www.paramounte-eng.com
4/8/2008
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval (s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), the Ito$
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 9.
Name: George V. Huffinon, III
Mailing Address: 17th Street WPG, LLC yjiANDS AND STORM'S ATCR 13RMcH
PO Box 15599
Wilmington, NC 28408
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: teresahuffinongprudentialcresnc.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ashley Futral
Company Affiliation: Land Management Group, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: afutralklmgroup.net
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Collaborative Medical Building
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): R05419-003-001-000
4. Location
County: New Hanover County Nearest Town: Wilmington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not Applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From the Wilmington
USACE office take a left onto Darlington Ave and a left onto Covil Ave. Follow to Oleander
Veer right and follow
5.
another left onto Greenfield Street. Property will be on the east side of 17"' Street between
Greenfield and Primrose Streets.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.2181 ON 77.9244
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Greenfield Lake
8. River Basin: Cape Fear 03030005
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at httL://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/adminMiaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently undeveloped. The tract to the south of
the project area is also undeveloped. The tract to the east of the site is currently a golf course
used by Cape Fear Country Club. The properties to the north and west (across 17t1i Street) of
a sheet that
ow
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12
the project area are being used as commercial development. The area is zoned as O&I-Office
and Institution.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of the development of the aforementioned site for construction of a 3-story
medical building totaling 54 000sf at 18 000sf per floor. There will be 10 units used as
medical offices. The surrounding on site development will be used for parking and
equipment loading purposes Parking spaces will be a maximum of 1 space per 170sf and a
minimum of 1 space per 250sf. The existing driveway will be closed and the driveway apron
will be removed A new driveway apron will be constructed along with a pedestrian
walkway. A 20' front yard setback and 30' public utility easement will be implemented.
The development will tie in to the existing city sewer system. Tree protection fencing will be
installed prior to any clearing grading or construction. Protection fencing will be monitored
and maintained daily throughout construction. All other approvals (i.e. Stormwater
Management Plan and Drainage Plan) have been granted.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to create
access to the proposed development by impacting an area of jurisdictional stream for a road
crossing The placement of the road crossing is determined by NCDOT upon completion of
the TIA (Traffic Impact Analysis).
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is a previously signed Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
signed by Jennifer Frye of the USACE and issued 1/31/2005 (please reference Action ID#
200500182). A corresponding wetland survey was also signed and issued.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Updated 1 1/ 1 /2005
Page 7of12
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts include a
231f impact to a jurisdictional tributary for the purpose of a road crossing. The impacts will
be permanent The road crossing location was determined to meet NCDOT requirements.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
O nrOfP1V lief imi note rlm- to hntlh ztnletiire and flooding-
Wetland Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplar
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mnct hi- inclnrlPrl Tn enlcnlnte ncre.nge_ multinly length X width, then divide by 43560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Stream 1 UT to Greenfield
Lake Fill/Culvert for
road crossing N/A 10, 23 .005

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 23 .005
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8of12
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill excavation dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): .005
Wetland Impact (acres): N/A
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .005
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 23
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Permanent impacts are limited
to an unavoidable road crossimz that will impact 231f of tributary. In order to develop the site
NCDOT has determined that the road crossing must occur at the same point as the jurisdictional
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
tributary in order to line up with an existing intersection and minimize obstructions to traffic
flow. Since this is a requirement of NCDOT the impact is unavoidable.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stmi-,ide.htm].
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 23
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(sauare feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
storinwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Of the total 7.7 acres existing impervious cover
comprises 3.22 acres Future development accounts for 1.84 additional acres of impervious
cover. Total impervious cover equals 78% of the total development. The Stormwater
Management Plan has been approved.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The Drainage Plan has been approved The applicant proposes to tie into the existing city
sewer svstem.
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Project
will not provide connections or utilities to surrounding tracts.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Y/9 2/0
pplicant/Agent's ignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid my if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12

'
- 9da :0-310
+tl
NO.LJNlNT TL1
RffRZ DN (d) 09L9-16L 06(0) LOL9-16L (016) TOJ D I-IHON
VNI
03N0630
ad
O
a
a L w o °v =wmi Moo » .=om,•a x 66SS1 KOWO'd £Ob8Z Lu?loze7 yUON `uoaRvruq?:a1 NO.LOI? TW ITAX .'30 A1,1? Lo/oc/ro ova o
co ro l q»ww? w»•H wlm? Mo°?• i•wa r
•
-
` 10Z jams 'je17Q zjpuzal0 1165
I V_H0gV-j IOD
IGaW -4nl
' ??
N ^o
L ° DdA1.L??US TLl
? 1
I ?' ' L ••
u
-? .
IVD
?Q IU a0/lr/ro1sN0] a0
a I
L LO a ••M a 0 °Z » •u•lw•a - T
?'
J ?s30 lvHl
l r
l o
CJ
Hi N1 'O iYY4 \ 1 w Vd
1 Y
'
7
r7 7T o/+o/w LLI .1 IVMd f13ad rr
c J V
S
?NOUVwaozNlzNano l
?
N?1 VV ;1J.1
Cl a
I
---
------------------
----
°^
?? I
I
1
1
1
1 °a

I

I
I F
I
I
I

I
I
I I
I
I
I
31w
II., Nln

oln
NIA -
o

`I
I I
I
D3 z?w °
J w?zf
I
I
I ?fl
_

w 4
o oQ$
w ? .,
f
I
11 v
'
00 w
1
II II J i u
w`^
3??. °
5 o
hmF

F i
? d°o
oow OJW
¢ox ?ww

III
I
W?
I .e trl

ao}'lilou
??o
/ I
- - 5_ __-_ _ _
?
I
? (\ . - - - e1
73
35
f I ? 1 r
111
I f I I - L €cc Oe s tmg
h NI
II ? I _..S a_ ,?l
II

II?
1 j

1? }

I°
I
-
L
i 11
9.
n0

-1 4=
NOL XIN ISNOD MOLl (DSO TT TH ION N91SACI IM M IM- N d
:z
--------- I- I I-
law I
~
c °
' I
I I I ?'
m I
I
,
o. w
?
a

?
Wm
I
ll
E„
z
w
z
'
I I ' _°?a z
go° _? o
Wz t0?0 2
0
pO 3
mm

m T=%? a?
za
a- 0
¢ Q z
5 w
------- l°i U wU m 0 U pw
a
m €)
w
O
<

I ?:a a
I a"I.A c.'
w
I
I
?
? I ?
¢
I
y
Q
N
h
_ N

<

? z
z
0 a
ul
0
w iW m
oa _ o
ao E m a
i
vua' ?.,
Sa ud p O 0
q o o
o
0 o d
O w
m° 0
1JJ 2
? °
NN Nm
0 a-
0
H 0
17 C
O a IL
Um .
' __ Nm
CCg O
?
¢ II I
152.8 d
M..B L.09 £85 gta;1,
- ?
A301S Ol _
b_
- ° }

?

II

i ?
0.11 to
w
9 '
' dS 894 ' e w x ? I I I I
I I l
?
I 1
_ ?^ N a l-.+ 1 1-? ?_ ??
il
I
I
I 1 I s a? zzuxi aw

/ I
oz
`??
fim T ?

o o3o
`aY o C"I
p? ° Z
UO Hm?ry wQ ,a
oi" ,
?' m0? K<w
4 ?3: N I CN
I..'
{ - 0 h1
aaa n.? m °a 9'
-moo- a
h rm
a
I ow a? x ?wm

ror Sr Al 4. ? Nw d?
I QI is yVl Nw Z
r 1
N'? ,L9'trl to ? r G aN
vl It z ( 3S 964 0 m
z m U ? ? 91 K ... jS, ZDt AS 964
who I c m
ouNmw
r
w Z O N 1 N ?T ` _?_ -{C'W- FJ OE
Qup w 1 ?y ? .
n
a
5 cam- re S. clL is rILK q?Si.?IL?.. ?S £lL x Vary N'.
fi y I ?mD
I I U-?M
® a3I4• 0 Noy
1 I n °

t d?
k
d
I
_? I
I I o i
r
l o d
1,_
,sa=- ?
_ =,tt y R I
Ie
I ??-8 jS SSS 1!S SSS j5 SSS
I 3NIl NOISNI0905 321fll0J
31 I
r
C 0. ? z
u?ww
Paz
00
I
I I I
I, I
I
I I ?I ?

°
I w
?rcmz
1-O S"o°w
m
I .?
v
i
?t-?NZOm U ..
I ?mwwaoa?a
?
a?
°
oa

?
N
F
w?
M
. azo
I .
H s
F-Na?UFU
I Zwl-
U7
U O=?W=IY. C
U?
I
?0
10' SIDEYARD^SETBACK
' ,9Z'Zfib 370,Sb12N (3
o
JO n

aJ
a

Y m g 4p
? w ? E [Fyn O
? `
^
VQ a

U
m .
rc
Wp? ? „? 13 Lno

r il. o m ? ? F ?
n d . m
I
Lm
?I n
Ir
I I
I
?I
1
I Q
I?
I°
0
Iw
I°
I N
I.
'Tti i,
III" ? ?' ,
? ? I m
0
oa0
I'Iri 111 zwz
I Fmo
? I R?<
I W
xY?
0C8 I zap; ?o
9 l W CJ F_ w °". o
_II I! I I,, z J a o N o o
w
9 I?P.Q ?o °
° .o a z s
p tI N
?y I ? i F
?I I J
j$ I
I
II
& ? I I
tD VUZ U
? I? f F
ICN
I I 3 y°j?F
p g
,'g I?cw
' i e Id UN
I ? !I
4
li
r - I
14
? Ibl
< I?
°
IO
bb
I
?i
' I I
I r ??x
l ? ?7as
I
I
L- -. - c'
X1VM3as 3
3 ?•
.' -- i LTIHa
?HdlNT Sti 1
Ak/x D
M9 ? NISI
o
N ro H
K
¢?U o-.
0 W a w ?
W ? O ? O
0'?m NOW
Z O ?
O m °
°
° g
z
------T---

0 Q
w
0 -
0-1
O
0
w
0
w
w
w
O
Q
W
Q

F O
K
U
z z O O

a L'i
z
g
al z
°

a z
¢ 0
F
U a.
F

z
>
F__ w

O z
LLI
?i Q

O (y Xk o

z
o d ? W a F -
>
Q W
W w
w Q
z 0 2 LU w
>
_
(If
< ? O d
Z
II II II W a w F,
O
W r?= z z
5 Q g Q g x
Q Q }
F-LL waaaaO
FiE
O °
W Z.
w x W w¢ i
W r
O w Q O 3 j m x o
m D 3 W LL
a o 0
z w?
w m
° N
U
Z z Z p ° ° X w
oz m ow F -'" aQ °m LL =
oar o m? wo aw oz?znrL? a m r
' rz FwO?pr?zw
c?im3 w wm wQ?U
tt 2 ¢ 2 w a W W U p m ° O F z
w °
w ° 2¢> pw 2a Z?w- 0: x ¢W
p F w N U W Z Z LL F 0 2 m p 0: Q O 2 Q ¢ C7 O°
aO? 3 zowzl' ?Z¢° 4oww<?ars-mow a
wmw w tt E m °.?xxo3 wz w r aw
mow wNZ<O wao C°7i?"m Nm=3?? o >p
?pw iLp WN?WZ m0? S`-'U OQOw OU°U °O ?O
w ?
-20
0F> Qazzaz Fox ?z>?wo z Na
RW,j ?rUp?a? zww mmc?aa?o?wowrLzw° Q?
N w Q ON OU 1¢- O Q Z W t2wo m U n m J 20 > ?i Z J 0: W K a K 0:
O w o Q 2 w cZ-7 ? z 2° LL H a° U O U g W z 0 0
FH LLpzW wam a?0¢????m=wLL[O'1aF Zz
U J N U Q <§83g, IL W M) Q U x° w w> m Z -01 E2
f<a °r-33^p?zci z°ua?o>po¢ ? O °wo
U' W?ww wzOoZ ww m a Frn ?wzU? ° o an~ w.3% U w p z, O w Z¢w 0 1~ O
zwo 3? ZOZ ¢
2 Q W 22 f aFO ju 3? W (x9 ZZ.>i w!,ow KZ W O Z jo?rq?0a
rcm¢LL 4pOgaoao x¢m?u?iz woo¢0¢°w
W Z 3 0 U< m¢ O U z a W T 2 Z O 3 F O F> Z O a w. w. z w z
Z J O w w N W w t~i? O m ti o LL Z W¢ 2 W w ,z < o w p Z° n w N w O Z z 0
o Z F j O N U W U U K G U U w Z °U U w 0: O¢ u W r V o G 4
?22WJw U??LLCC'w>>Z4¢Q'?U>za.,,>U>o,, ooO z,,
[/) R W O¢.? 2 ZO¢K W OK¢ XZOO: W W p¢Ztt a m... O
W U r¢ O r 2 +- 0 0 0 r U w¢ U a K w¢ m¢ U J<
a O g? U
0
Z N m Q m?m
a
n n v
w ° w w w w N °
z
O LL LL LL O y O C] N ° O r c

o c
O
m`O
O
ri ri ri
O
m
O
N in
O o
w-
?2
a?
a.-
a N
aN
ar?mr
arv.=.

? w
U
a w
U
a
O
n
? m m Q
Z
w d r
O rv
W
w O
W
s O
W °
W
: °
W 't'
° O
W
iA
rn z

LL

w o m ? ? ?

a o oa

m

0_ x
0_
? -6 N

0
f o n o o o 0 0 0 ? ,n n

2
O N N

y W
w
7

m
y Oxx
W "w tt j LL. z 0
v (?
z m
>

W? O w
LL
a
U
Z
l
<
¢
>
O
O
O U Y
zamwUU 7
m
p LL
O
O n
O p
0 F
n

m
o
x
m x
z
p z -
z
z
€O W LLwrii ¢ i a i<< 1 ¢i O ° ww
t U z
w z Q
U'
w
a
U p <
ww
¢
x 1- 0 0<
? O ¢ ,n
°
m
LL
h n
i j z z N Z Z W LL

Z p

Z u
. K to
Z Z Z W

H
O Q
p
Z
ti F h
a a w Y

<
m
?
. O
¢ q
ln?? ?? ln?
o ??s?
a LL ??c? W zmw3
¢ a a s>:
> ° LL LL
o w m
O > a °' N N a
U w
w ? z
N z
O w
Q N n K
z m O
O w d ° v
H o
F o m < U w O
F-
? fL ? w tail ? m ¢
Z O w p °o t U
oz n >r, w ?ri o za ¢ as °° -
Z K O Z O X 0_ m v z z Z Z
a
U Z U U F N O z
0z <w IF lz
F, z
Omw?°?cai
d?w Z <O JF ¢ O a
? °u?i00 z pU 0 O i z30J < K h
Z w r U Z i g w n¢ ¢ p Q j a Q F Z
W=M0,; z m ? m m a m o z< z a i
Zw?0
N3 .=z QOw o w?
w
No,gm?zz ?oo w'a-`?01? ?¢ z w >a
K N X g w O O LL F W w O tx-'J
U `.° z U d N E a m< Z w 2
\ \ I I I
PROPOSED I I I
AC?ESS DRIVE I
4\\r\
i I II II
EXISTING STREAM I
DELINEATION BY LAND \?\?\\\? \ \ II II
MANAGEMENT GROUP,
ACTION ID #200500182 I?i? ?\ I 1
PROPOSED PRECAST
CONCRETE HE? WALL `- - - - - - -
PROPOSED 16LF, / \ \ - - -
42" RCP STORM PIPE T T
STREAM IMPACT f23
EXISTING ON??/jR??
HEADWALL TO B REfJIOU
G CONCRETE SIDEWAL -
17TH STREET
SIGN 1I ?--
u
M?l
EXISTING
ASPHALT
4N
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20 40 60
SCALE: 1"=20' PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Date : 3/10/08 COLLABORATIVE MEDICAL
DARA M OUNTE Scale:
Drawn
: RPB ACCESS ROAD
Chk: RPB EXHIBIT
Proj. No: 07102.PE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 4/8/08 Project: Collaborative Medical Latitude: 34.2178
Evaluator: Kim Williams Site: Stream impact #1 Longitude: 77.9249
Total Points: 21 Other Wilmington quad
Stream is at least intermittent County: New Hanover e.g. Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood plain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Q LJ..Jrnl env /G hfMf I - R 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1 O 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 es = 1.
r Rinlnnv /G ihfnfnl = -7 G
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 25 focuses on the presence of aquauc or wenana plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
No benthos observed but likely habitat.
W` -
cap(
at
SITE {
to VW
Iowa
x y ?
ft. orv
I_.,arkeFo
1r r Sch C_
f/ t
L
,
? E
rk IV
? i
.u 7
r
M??rru ernorial
r.
rljl?
2008
*
Boundaries are approximate and are
?,,
not meant to be absolute
Map Source: Wilmington Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1993. SCALE 1" = 480'
Collaborative Medical Tract
New Hanover County, NC LMG Attachment #7
40-08-093 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP i USGS Topgraphic Map
Environmental Consultants
April 2008
Collaborative Medical LMG
New Hanover County, NC LA ID MANAGEMENT GROUP uc Site Photographs
40-08-093 Environmental Consultants
April 2008
View of channel looking back towards culvert.
View of channel stream further past 17th Street and culvert.
Looking north towards property at intersection of 17th Street and Greenfield Street.
Collaborative Medical LMG
New Hanover County, NC LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Site Photographs
40-08-093 Environmental Consultants
April 2008
Looking west at intersection of 17th Street and Greenfield Street.
Channel becomes subterranean past 17th Street.
r4 `lip- l
tem
{ X1.1 l?l ClI1E'l??
PROGRAM
April 15, 2008
Teresa Huffmon
17s' Street WPG, LLC
P.O. Box 15599
Wilmington, NC 28408 Expiration of Acceptance: October 15, 2008
Project: Collaborative Medical Building County: New Hanover
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net,
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Cape Fear
03030005 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely,
William . Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Kim Garvey, USACE-Wilmington
Chad Coburn, NCDWQ-Wilmington
Ashley Futral, agent
File
R."toring... 'E .. PYD" Our Stag

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.neeep.net