Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080589 Ver 1_More Info Received_20080423?OF W ATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor ?O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary ??-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality April 1, 2008 DWQ Project # 08-0589 Wake County CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED City of Raleigh Parks & Recreation Department Attn: Kelvin Morgan 4224 Daly Road ?;??f?'?? Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 L ?_/ Subject Property: Lower Walnut Creek Greenway APR 2 2 2008 Unsigned Application DENR. WAFERQLAUTY 1h9=TIANDS.AND STORMIAATER BRANCH ® REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION Dear Mr. Morgan: On March 31, 2008 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application for the above referenced project. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project. Additional Information Requested: ® The PCN Application failed to contain the Applicant/Agent's Signature and Date. See last page of application. (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from applicant is provided). Please sign/date the enclosed application page and return with the appropriate fee. Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as returned. This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan or me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter. 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-733-1786 / FAX 919-733-6893 / Internet: It ttn:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands One NhCarolina Naturally An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Sincerely, c tCL4 Cy di Karoly, Supervisor 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit CBKlljd Enclosures: Application signature/date page cc: Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office File Copy Central Files Filename: 080589LowerWalnutCreekGreenway(Wake)_S ignaturePage XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ? No ? Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ? XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ? If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at http://h2o.enr.statc.alc.us/ncN?ctlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). r O Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 12 of 12