20080712 Ver 1_401 Application_20080408

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 8 0 7 1 2
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP-29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information D R_ [N 0W D
Name: Phoenix Creek Development, LLC
Mailing Address: attn: Gordon Sadler APR 1 8 2008
280 Settlers Trail
Mars Hill, NC 28754 DENK-WAIERUJALS1
VVET[ANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Telephone Number: 828.242.1060 Fax Number: n/a
E-mail Address: n/a
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Charles Johnston
Company Affiliation: Environmental Services Inc.
Mailing Address: 3661 Alamance Rd.
Burlington, NC 27215
Telephone Number: 336.570.3002 Fax Number: 336.570.9566
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Phoenix Creek NWP29
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 975304923026 and 975300932807
4. Location
County: Buncombe Nearest Town: Weaverville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Asheville, take US
19/23 north. Take Exit 23, turn briefly R on Aiken Road then immediately L onto
Merrimon Avenue (Bus.19/23). Go 0.7 miles, turn R onto Reems Creek Road. Go 5.0
miles, turn L at Phoenix Cove Road. Property begins at the end of paved road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7131 ON, 82.5060 °W
6. Property size (acres): 159.4
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Reems Creek (BIMS Class C; Tr)
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently in mixed pine and secondary
hardwoods. Surrounding land use is mixture of undeveloped (forested), agricultural
(livestock grazing), and single-family residential.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Development of a low-density residential subdivision using standard construction
methods and heavy machinery.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The stream crossings are necessary to
access the interior of the tract.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules: Jurisdictional Determination Request (AID# 20073135) was
submitted 12118/2007 and field reviewed by USACE, NC-DWQ, and NC-WRC on 111512007.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permitting is anticipated for this project. No future impacts are anticipated
to arise from this development.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: This application proposes seven (7)
road crossings with a cumulative impact of 295 LF of stream.
Page 3 of 8
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no
( ) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: <0.01 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multinly length X xvidth then rliv;rlA 1- Al [Kn
Stream Impact Impact I V.
Number Stream Name Type of Perennial or Average Stream Length Area of
(indicate on Impact Intermittent? Width Before Impact (linear Impact (acres)
ma) feet)
A Phoenix Cove Permanent Perennial 4 55 0.005
B Phoenix Cove Permanent Perennial 3 40 0.003
C Phoenix Cove Permanent Perennial 3 40 0.003
D UT "SVB" Permanent Intermittent 1 40 0.001
E UT "SVB" Permanent Intermittent 1 40 0.001
F UT "SVB" Permanent Intermittent 1 40 0.001
G UT "SCA" Permanent Perennial 2 40 0.002
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 295 0.016
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bullcheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Area of
Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 4 of 8
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U. S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.016
Wetland Impact (acres): -
Open Water Impact (acres): -
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.016
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 295
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
(attached as Appendix A - Avoidance and Minimization)
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmizide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
A copy of the EEP Acceptance Letter (April 8, 2008) is attached; this presupposes
at 2:1 mitigation ratio throughout the tract. This application requests consideration
by USACE and NC-DWQ of a lowered (1:1) ratio for four crossings (A,D,E,F) due to
lower aquatic function scores and/or existence of localized pre-existing degradation
(Figure 4). Supporting worksheets and photographs are attached as Appendix B and
Figures 5 and 6.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 295
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify ? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
Gone i extends out 3 U feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or. 0260.
Page 7 of 8
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Proposed impervious surface = 6.6%. All
appropriate stormwater controls will be used during construction.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All residential wastewater will be treated by onsite septic systems in compliance with
the Buncombe County Environmental Health Services.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Immediately downstream of this project, Phoenix Creek is significantly degraded by
livestock enclosures which span the stream channel for almost % mile. Any `change-in-
use' in this area, which might secondarily result from development of the Client's
property, would likely only increase the level of regulatory protection of water quality in
this downstream reach.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 8 of 8
1 1 tam
4.111 li CIIIent
PROGRAM
April 8, 2008
Gordon Sadler
Phoenix Creek Development, LLC
17 Hampton Drive
Weaverville, NC 28787 Expiration of Acceptance: October 8, 2008
Project: Phoenix Creek NWP 29 County: Buncombe
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
French Broad Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer II
06010105 (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm
ian arian Coastal Mars
impacts 295 n
0 M
0 0
Credits 590 0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely,
WWi ' M111
D. Gilmore, PE ?J
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Loretta Beckwith, USACE-Asheville
Kevin Barnette, NCDWQ-Asheville
Charles Johnston, agent
File
X&Sbring.. EkkutcIng... Pro" Our i-M&

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 /,919-715-0476/www.nceep.net
;,
Cr
r.

06 la
?R iig
3d eavervilie
23 ?
Is
' 1794
K nob
IP
t?
f57
j
R!Elem6 Crcu.'-s
•} L,?ir ; Ptrb

t'jeasa-'t
r;0

Project Location
(approximate, not-to-scale)
Basemap Source:
http://www.mapquest.com, 2007.
Disclaimer: All locations and distances are approximate.
Information represented on this map was derived from
secondary data sources and is to be used for general
planning purposes only. No warranties or representations of
accuracy are expressed or implied.
?? ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
3661 Alamance Road
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone]
[phone] Fax
m wcs Est
www environmentalservicesinc. com
o.

Vicinity Map
Phoenix Cove Tract
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Project: BUR07153
Date: December 2007
Drwn/Chkd: csj/vbh
Figure: 1
I
?L
?? lau ?,
,K)
I
17- ! Project Boundary
0 500 1000
Feet
Basemap Source: USGS Weaverville (NC),
quadrangle, 1993; via www.topozone.com.
Disclaimer: All locations and distances are approximate.
Information represented on this map was derived from
secondary data sources and is to be used for general
planning purposes only. No warranties or representations of
accuracy are expressed or implied.
ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES, INC. USGS Topographic Map
3661 AIamance Road Phoenix Creek T
t
Burlington, North Carolina 27215 rac
[phone]
[phone] Fax
m roaa es.
Buncombe County, North Carolina
?.environmentalservicesinc. com
0
6
ll\ti,
Project: BUR07153.00
Date: December 2007
Drwn/Chkd: csj/vbh
Figure: 2

PR
SR
CF
SR
CI Project Boundary
PR = Porters - Unaka stony loam,
50-100% slopes
SR = Saluda - rock outcrop complex,
30-60% slopes
CF= Chandler- Fannin loam,
25-45% slopes
801 = Tusquitee, Tate, Brevard stony,
10-30% slopes
0 500 1000
Feet
Basemap Source: Buncombe County GIS site,
http://gis,buncombecounty.org, 2007.
olsclalmar. Informallon represented on lblm map was derh
from aa.."ary dam so0roe: and la m a sad for 9enerai
planning purposes only. No warranliesorrepresenlatlons&
accuracy are expressed or imp,i d.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
3661 Alamance Road
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone]
[phone] Fax
owvv ai
wwvv envlronmentalservicesinc. com
801
CF
Soils Map
Phoenix Creek Tract
Buncombe County, North Carolina
DR
Project: BUR07153.00
Date: December 2007
Drwn/Chkd: csj/vbh
Figure: 3
F
t.
J"I
r?
Fly `i ? ,
?r
SVA
pt SVA 1st order ?`\\
DWQ 1/P = 28
SQA = 59*
SVA 14
LEGEND:
All locations approximate only.
-? Data Points - Dec. 2007
(submitted in original JD request)
Data Points - Feb. 2008
(additional per USACE site review)
Data Points -April 2008
(submitted with PCN)
"DWQ 1/P" _
Stream IdentificationForm, Version 3.1
"SQA" _
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
A - G Crossing Locations
Centerline Flags
Bank-&-Bank Flags
(in colluvial areas, per USACE request)
0 500 1000
Feet
Basemap Source: USGS Weaverville (NC),
quadrangle, 1993; via www.topozone.com.
Disclaimer: All locations and distances are approximate.
Information represented on this mapwas derived from
secondary data sources and is to be used for general
planning purposes only. No warranties or representations of
accuracy are expressed or implied.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
I 3661 Alamance Road
L Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone]
[phone] Fax
www environmenralservicesinc. com
\74 Z i? ? !

Stream Worksheet Locations
Phoenix Creek Tract
Buncombe County, North Carolina

_ err
t ,
t 1 fr;?
r
Project: BUR07153.00
Date: Apri12007
Drwn/Chkd: csj/vbh
Figure: 4
S V B `... r
.G F?
11R,;
s N }
.f
C
tk, pt SCA 2nd order
DWQ 1/P = 40.5
SQA=76*
i
,f,t I
,%
t •? } J
J?
f
r?
?9
LF

I
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I
Crossing A
Photo 1: Failing culvert
approx. 10' above new
proposed crossing
Photo 2: Existing road
abuts stream, top-of-bank
is unprotected
Photo 3: Gravel from road i
washed into stream
I
I
I
I
T
Crossing D
Photo 4: Stream runs
R-to-L, begins to lose
bed-&-bank features
Photo 5: View upstream,
discontinuous surface flow
ENVIRONMENTAL Representative Photographs, Crossings A and D Project: BUR07153
SERVICES, INC.
3661 Alamance Road Phoenix Creek NWP 29 Date: April 8, Zooa
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone] Buncombe County, North Carolina Drwn/Chkd: csj/mob
[phone] Fax
w .environmenfalservicesinc.com Figure:.5-
r
Crossing F
Photo 9: View upstream,
drainage area flattens,
canopy opens
Photo 10: View downstream,
surface flow discontinuous
and beneath underbrush
ENVIRONMENTAL. Representative Photographs, Crossings E and F Project: BUR07153
SERVICES, INC.
3661 Alamance Road Phoenix Creek NWP 29 Date: April 8, 2008
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone] Buncombe County, North Carolina Drwn/Chkd: csj/mob
[phone] Fax
w .environmentalsmicesinc.com Figure: C)
Appendix A to PCN submittal "Phoenix Creek NWP 29", April 11, 2008
Section VII - Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Steep topography and grade limitations are the primary and constraining factors for road layout
on this tract. The initial site design (Figure A-1) as reviewed in the pre-application meeting of
January 15) had total of 10 crossings; subsequently, three crossings have been removed by re-
routing the road above headwaters and accessing the southwestern quadrant via a `top-down'
layout (Figure A-2). The change in road layout in combination with the elimination of a
switchback has reduced the total road length by approximately 1700 LF from the original plan.
Where possible, the crossings are sited at narrow (e.g. crossings C and G) or locally degraded
locations (e.g. crossings A and E). All proposed culverts are oriented to meet the existing
thalweg at inlet and outfall with a minimum 20% buried below stream bed. Culverts and riprap
are professionally designed and engineered to meet all applicable road and stormwater codes.
The Client understands that compliance with all relevant N.C. Division of Land Resources
erosion-control requirements will be necessary during road construction.
The entrance area of this tract is severely constrained by property and access easement boundaries
(Figure 9 - Inset A, Existing Conditions). The existing gravel roadbed is immediately adjacent
(Figure A-3, Photos 1-3) to the stream's top-of-bank at several points with resultant erosion and
washout problems. Recent re-gravelling of the road surface in combination with placement of
sisal baffles on the bank top has temporarily stabilized this area; however these measures do not
provide adequate long-term protection to the stream.
In one section of the entrance corridor, a meander in the stream requires that the road be shifted
outward, away from the stream, to within 1/2 foot of the easement boundary (Figure 10 - Inset A,
Proposed Conditions; Figure A-3, Photo 4). To adequately stabilize the bank in this area, it will
be necessary to install 65 LF of low retaining wall, placed at 23' to 25' from the stream's top-of-
bank. The wall configuration is designed to be the minimum size necessary to provide adequate
bank stabilization.
The land disturbance from placement of this retaining wall will be temporary and minimal.
Given that the total length of the buffer zone within this tract is 4,938 LF, the proposed wall is
significantly less (1.3%) than the 10% maximum stipulated in 5A NCAC 0413.0125. All other
proposed land disturbances within trout buffers on this tract are road crossings `on, over, or
under' watercourses, per G. S. 113A-57 (1). At the request of the Division of Water Quality, a
copy of this PCN application has been forwarded to the Division of Land Resources for their
review as regards the proposed work and trout buffers on the tract.
?I
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
3661 Alamance Road
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
36)570-3002
1923(3)570-9556Fax
vn .environmentalservicesinc.com
Original Road Layout
Phoenix Creek Tract
Buncombe County, North Carolina
B U R07153.00
Date: December 2007
Drwn/Chkd: csj/vbh
Figure: A-1
? i
X
D
ENVIRONMENTAL Project: BUR07153.00
Final Proposed Road Layout
? SERVICES, INC.
L 3661AlamanceRoad Phoenix Creek Tract Date: December 2007
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone] Buncombe County Drwn/Chkd: cs/vbh
[phone] Fax , North Carolina 1
11 1
o?wo a:i
ww .anvironmentalservicesinc.com Figure: A-Z
i
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
L 3661 Alamance Road
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
[phone]
[phone] Fax
ww? .. environmentalseMcesinc.com
Photo 4 - eastern edge
of entrance corridor,
showing limit of easement
Representative Photos, Entrance Corridor
Phoenix Creek Tract
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Project: BUR07153.00
Date: December 2007
Drwn/Chkd: csj/vbh
Figure: A-3
???sx § 4
Ak,
Photo 1 - western edge
of entrance corridor,
showing inward meander
Photo 2, 3 - existing
roadbed adjacent to
unprotected top-of-bank
Appendix B
PCN submittal "Phoenix Creek NWP 29", submitted April 11, 2008
- Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (6), collected April 8, 2008
USAGE AID- MIUQ. t Site rSVB18(ind'cate on attached map)
F9_ 3 STREAM QI?ALITY ASSESSTMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Phoenix Cove Development LLC 2. Evaluator's name: Charles Johnston, Environmental Services Inc
3. Date of evaluation: April 8, 2007 4. Time of evaluation: 1 P.M.
a. Nance of stream: Phoenix Creek 6. Riverbasin: French Broad
7. Approximate drainage area: 10-15 acres S. Stream order: 1 St
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 LF 10. County: Buncombe
l I. Site coordinates (if lcnow n): prefer in decunal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex _14-872-M-)): 35.7149 Longitude (ex. -77.556-611): -82.5061
Iviethod location determined (,circle): GPS o'o Si Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach neap identifying stream(s) location)-
At or near location Crossina D
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Culverted road crossing
15. Recent v either conditions: 1 "-2" rain in prior 48 hrs
16. Site conditions at tinge of visit:. Sunny, lower 60s F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 _Ti.cla1 ZZ'aters Essential Fisheries Iiabitut.
XTrout Waters -Outstanding Resource ?V,ate.rs utrient tiensiti :-e LT?raters Xl?rater Stlpply ?j'atershecl {I-I?"t
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If ves, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USG-13 quad neap? YES CIO 20. Does channel appear on L SDA 50111 SLIT ccy? YES (
21. Estirmated ix atershed land use: _% Residential -_% coni lercial % Industrial Agricultural
80 % Forested 20 % Cleared,/ Lootred _% Other { )
22. Bankfaall width: 2-3 ft, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 ff.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flit (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4° o) Ivloderate (4 to 100A) X Steel) (>100/0)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander XL'ei-y, sinuous -Braided chainiel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by clet -limning the most appropriate ecoregion based oil
location, terrain, vegetation, Stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecore ion. Assign points
to each characteristic % ithin the ran" showvn for the ecoregion_ Page 3 provides a brief description of glow to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect can overall aassessnient of the strung reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated clue to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g_, the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the strewn may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuit-y, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assi_ned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, , ith a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
#15 - logged 8 yrs ago some slash and loaaina deck areas remain; #20 caddlsfly (1) snails (3)
Evaluator's Signature Date 8 April 2008
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist 1a11riownlers and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of :stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this forin is subject to USAC:E approval and sloes not imply 1
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06,.'03. To Comment, please call 919-876-811 x 26.
STRE. -M Q-U UITY ASSESSMENT WORK.SHEET
SVB18

#
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION.POIN T RANGE,
SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mouatais
1 Presence of floor / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
3 Riparian zone

no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
5 Groundwater discharge
V (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0-3 0 - 4 0 - 4 1
?-•
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max pints

7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; cent flooding = max points)
F 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wrtlan&q = 0. LIMP, atliarrnt u¦rttand-m = ma%r nninftl 0 - 6 0 - 4 0 - 2 Q
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = 0; nattual meander = max points)
10 Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate *

fine, homogenous = 0; lam, diverse sizes = max points) NA 0-4 0-5 3
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
13 Presence of major bank failures

(severe erosion = 0; no erosion
stable banks = max
oint
) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4
,
p
s
14 Root depth and density on banks
0
3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) - 0-4 0-5 1
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production

substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

no riffles/riles or pools = 0; well-developed = max points 0-3 0-5 0-6
0
17 Habitat complexity

(little or no habitat = 0; uent, varied habitats = max oints 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 3
19 Substrate embeddedness

(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max NA* 0-4 0-4 0
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

no evidence = 0; common, numerous tym = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 2

21 Presence of amphibians
no evidence = 0; comm
on, numerous gpes = max pints 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O 22 Presence of fish
no evidence = 0; common, numerous tvm = max points 0 - 4 0 - 4 0 - 4 0
23 Evidence of wildlife use

no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
Total Paints Possible 100 160 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
t Tf_ _ 45
i aa??? ?ucu at.acl.aa?at_? LUU 11VI. tts:S:'?SrC1 321 COUSIZ11 5,FrCa1115_

USA,CE.'sIDr D? Q -'? Site f SVB10(indicate on attached nmcaP)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Protride the following information far the stream reach underassessment:
1. Applicant's name.:- Phoenix Cove Development LLC 2. Evaluator's name: Charles Johnston, Environmental Services, Inc.
3. Date, of evaluation: April 8, 2007 4. Time of evaluation: 1:30 P.M.
5. Name of stream: Phoenix Creek 6. River basiim: French Broad
7. Approximate drainage area: 10- 15 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated:_
100 LF
S. Stream order: 1 St
10. County: Buncombe
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees- 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latittude(ex.34.S723?2): 35.7159 Lon?iftute(e.-77. Sb?11): -82,5062
Method location determined (circle): GPS o io Sh Ortho (Aerial) Photo+GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach niap identifying stream(s) location)
At or near location Crossina E
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Culyerted road crossing
15. Recent heather conditions: 1 "-2" rain in prior 48 hrs
16. Site conditions at time. of visit: Sunny lower 60s F
17. Identity any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat.
X Trout Waters _otitstanding Resotirce ?V,aters -Nutrient Sensitive Witers
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 1t0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad neap? YES \
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
80 % Forested
22. Bankfiill width: 1-2 ft.
20. Does channel appear on L SDA Soil Sur.-ey? YES
_% coimniercial _°..ro Industrial _°,a Abriculwral
20 % Cleared,' Logged _% other
2.1_ Bank height (from bed to top of bnnk): 1 ft.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) ----!Gentle (2 to 4%) I?loderate (4 to 10°'a) X Steep (=-10",ro)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X occasional bends -Frequent meander F'eiy sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of wortzsheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. E,reny characteristic must be scored usum7 the same ecorebion. Assign points
to each characteristic :within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page ; provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
conmient section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flolvs from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be, divided into smaller reaches that display more, contintut-y, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, % pith a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 38 Comments:
#15 - logged 8 vrs ago, some slash and logging deck areas remain; #20 caddisfly (1)
Evaluator's Signature Date 8 April 2008
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist 1at1c1oiauers and enazronmeutal professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to U.SAC'E approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06'03. To Comment, please cad 919-876-8-4,41 x 26.
STREAM QI IT'S ASSESSMENT' WORKSHEET
SVB10
ECOREGION POU T RANGE
# ?IAItACTERiSTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow f persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
no flow or saturation = 0; sumg flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
no buffer = 0; contiguous, pride buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 0
no flood lain = 0; extensive fl lain = max po, rots
? Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; firguent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Sue & diversity of channel bed substrate NA 0-4 0-5 1
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
>- (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 3
0-0
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
.m? 14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 1
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max rots
16 Presence of riffle-poaUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
no d lestri les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
H
bit
t
l
it
ot 17 a
a
comp
ex
y 0-6 0-6 0-6 2
Clitfle or no habitat = 0; fieguent. varied habitats = max points)
18 Canopy coverage over streambed

(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
19 Substrate embeddedness NAI* w 0-4 0-4 0
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
0 no evidence = 0; common, numerous qTws = max points)
0 ' 21 Presence ofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
0 no evidence = 0; common, numerous q-pes = max points)
0 22 Presence offish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous g-pes = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100' 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 38
" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streann.
USACE AIDr Dt- 70 Site r SVAU(indicate on attached nkal')
FM_1 STREAITM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Pro-iide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
L Applicant's name:- Phoenix Cove Development LLC 2. Evaluator's name: Charles Johnston, Environmental Services, Inc.
3. Date of evaluation: April 8, 2007
5. Name, of stream: Phoenix Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 10-15 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 LF
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
4. Tune of evaluationn: 2;00 p.m,
6. River basin: French Broad
S. Stream order: 1st
10. County: Buncombe
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latintde (e7 34.872_312): 35,7159 Loiiginicle (em. -7 `._ 56611): -82.5077
Aiethod location detemiined (circle): GPS o'o SE 0rtho 4-erial) Photo+'GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach neap identlAring stream(s) location):
At or near location Crossing G
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Culverted road crossing
la. Recent weather conditions: 1"-2" rain in prior 48 hrs
15. Site conditions at tune of visit:- Sunny, lower 60s F
17. Identify any special vvatei vay classifications kno-mi: -Section 10 _Ticla1Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
X Trout i[ aters _Outstanding Resource eaters -Nutrient Seinsiti' e Waters _?' ater Supply tj1atershecl (I-Iti?
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point" YES X10 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on LiSGS quad snap? YES VO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _4 o Residential 0"'o Commercial _°..'o Industrial _° `o Agrictalnural
80 % Forested 20 % Cleared ( Logged _% Other C
22. Banltfi111'vicltln: 1-2 ft, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0, 5 ft,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Geintle (2 to 4°0) IAoderate (=1 to I0°"G) _X _Steep (?10%)
25. Channel suiuosity: X Straiglit -Occasional bends Frequent meander cry s inious _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on pa6e 2): Begin by deter-Mil" the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc_ Every characteristic must be scored 1 isiin2 the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic 'within the range shown for the ecoregion_ Page 3 pro%rides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall aassessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions. enter 0 in the scoring vox and provide an explanation in the
cominnent :section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream gander review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into :smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a :separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 48 Comments:
#15 - logged 8 rs a o some slash and to in deck areas remain, #20 - ma I 1 a uatic annelids 5
Evaluator's Signature Date- 8 April 2008
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as 1 guide to assist 1:1ndonmers and enSlroninental Professionals in
gathering the data required by the United ;States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of :stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06.103. To Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SVA14

#
C?iR
CTERIST
C ECORECION POINT RANGE
A
i
S SCARE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max rots 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
,. a 5 Groundwater discharge

(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-4 3

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
no floo lain = 0; extensive fl lain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access

(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max rots 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
Presence of adjacent wetlands

no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
9 Channel sinuosity
extensive chaanelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-3 0
10 Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
I I Size ?4 diversity of channel bed substrate N

fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) A 0-4 0-5 2
12 Evidence of channel incision or szdenmg

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
4
13 Presence of major bank failures

(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 5
14 Root depth and density on banks

no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 0-3 0-4 .0-5 1
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial ' act ?; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-devel ed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
Habitat com
lexit
1 p
y 0
6

rE,,
little or no habitat = 0; fi-equent, varied habitats = max points) - 0-6 0-6 2
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness A*

(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max N 0-4 0-4 1
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 1
21 Presence of amphibians
4 no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
0 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
0" no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints)
23 Evidence of wildlife use

no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
Total Points Poss%le 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on fist page) 48
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

1?TSACE AIDr MV Q Site rSCA18 (indicate on att iclied nmal))
MI STREW Q-L UITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the felloiving information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's naive: Phoenix Cove Development, LLC 2. Evaluators name: Charles Johnston, Environmental Services, Inc.
3. Date of evaluation: April 8, 2007
5. Name of stream: Phoenix Creek
7. Approxinnate drainage area: 10-15 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 LF
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
4. Time of evaluation: 2:30 p.m.
6. River basin: French Broad
S. Stream order: W ra...-
10. County: Buncombe
12. Subdivision naive (if
Latihide (e? X4.5 72731?): 35.7130 Longitude (ex. -?;+_555611): -82.5058
Method location determined (circle): GPS o o Shee° Ortho (.Aerial) Phota`GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach neap identifying stream(s) location):
At or near location Crossina C
14. Proposed charnel work (if and-): Culverted road crossing
15. Recent weather conditions: 1"-2" rain in prior 48 hrs
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunnv, lower 60s F
17. Identify any special watenvny classifications knowai: -Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
X Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive W, aters _?1'ater Supply SG'ateished (I-I G)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ° o Residential
80 % Forested
22. Bankfbllwidtli: 3-5 ft.
20. Does channel appear on USDA_ Soil Survey`' YES
-"o Coininercial _°..r° Industrial _°o Atri-icultural
20 % Cleared , Logged _% Other
23. Batik height (from bed to top of bank): 1-2 ft.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) .Gentle (2 to 4°.) Ivfoderate (} to fl 0°10) X Steep (=-10°0)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander `'erv Sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of n•orksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detennining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Evers- characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic %vithin the range shown for the ecoregion_ Page i pro:-ides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in time -,worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be e -valuated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide in explanation in the
continent section. Where there are ob-aious changes in the character of a stream sunder review (e.g_, the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigimed to a stream reach nmust range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality-
Total Score (from reverse): 60 Comments:
# 13 - colluv_ium upstream and slumping banks; #15 - logged 8 vrs ag_o some slash and logaina
dp(-k areas rPmrnm #2fl - cc ddlsfl)4 (4 lodiv 9 slip)
Evaluator's Signature Date 8 April 2008
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only, as a guide to assist landotsvers and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United :States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
qualit3v% The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to US-ACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Continent, please call 919-576-8441 x 26.
STREAM QL UITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCA18
ECOREGION POIN T RANGE

# CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont sWountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
extensive altermtion = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
< (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
no flood lain = 0; extensive floc lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
(deeply entrenched = 0; uent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
no wetlands = 0, large. ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input )
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
I Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 4
fine, homogenous = 0; large. diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max rots

0"J
13 Presence of major bank failures
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
0-5
0-5
0-5
4

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 5
16 Presence of riffle-poaVripple-pool complexes

no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6

1 Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; uent, varied habitats = max points)
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 3
19 Substrate embeddedness NA; 0-4 0-4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

>1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 2
0` 21 Presence of amphibians

0,
no evidence = 0; common, numerous gpes = max points) 0-4 0-4 0-4 2

0'
22 Presence of fish
0_4
0-4
0-4
0
CG no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints

23 Evidence of wildlife use
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points 0-6 0-5 0-5 2
Total hints Possible 100 100 1-
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 60
intse cuaraciensucs are nor assessed in coasmi streams.
USACE AID-4 D?`'d ] Site rSCA30 (indicate on attached inap)
M STREAM Q_L aUITY SSESSTMENTW ORKSHEET dftmL
Pro,ide the following information for the stream reach underassessment:
1. Applicant's naive: Phoenix Cove Development, LLC 2. E- valuator's name: Charles Johnston, Environmental Services, Inc.
3. Date of evaluation: April 8, 2007
5. Dame of stream: Phoenix Creel(
7. Approximate drainage area: 30-45 acres
Length of reach evalutr-ated:,
100 LF
11. Site coordinates (if known): pref.-r in decimal decrees-
Latittade (eh- 34.872_;12): 35.7122
4. Time of evaluation: 3:45 p.m.
6. River basin: French Broad
S. Stream order: 2nd
10. Counq: Buncombe
12. Subdivision name (if an?j):
Lon-ituule(ex.-77_:56611): -82.5048
R2ethod location detemiined (ei-rcle): GPS o.,o Shee Ortho (? erial)Pltotn;'GIS Qtller GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach naap identifying stream(s) location):
At or near location Crossina B
14. Proposed channel % ork (if any): Culverted road crossing
15. Recent weather conditions: 1 "-2" rain in prior 48 hrs
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, lower Ms F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tided Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
X ')`rout lViters -Outstanding Resource Waters - Nutrient S ensiti v e ?VTaters _t?rater Supply 1['atershecl (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point'? Y7ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
80 % Forested
22. Bankfull width 3-5 ft.
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Suives, ? YES
_% Commercial _% Industrial _9,o Agricultural
20 % Cleared / Logged _% Other
?:. Bank hei12
- lit (from bed to top of bunk): 1-2 ft.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) X Moderate (4 to 10°'0) -Steep (:=-•l0° a)
25. Channel sinnaosity: Stramlit -Occasional belids X frequent ineander Eery sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worlcsIleet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification. etc. Every ch1<aracteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion_ Page 3 pro,udes a brief description of flow to review the
characteristics identified in the ,worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluates) due to site or weather conditions- enter '0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream guider review the :stream flow-s- from a pasture
into a forest), the stream inay be divides) into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range bet-t eem 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a streann of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 59 Comments:
#15 - loaaed 8 vrs ago some slash and
laaaina c1Prk areas remain! #90 - aar-ddIsfiV (1? e..nails steno y (1)
Evaluator's Signature Date 8 April 2008
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United `Mates Army Corps of Engineers to hake a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and sloes not imply a
particular mitiaation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Cominent, please call 919-376-8441 x 26.
S'TRE_ NI QLT-XLITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCA30

C ECORE?GION POM RANGE
C
HARACTERISTICS S
ORE
Coastal, Piedmont 1Viounhim

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max ints

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 0
no floo lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; fix-guent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive chanuelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Sue & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 3
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13 Presence of major bank failures

(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
4
F no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
?•r1 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production

substantial ' impact =0; no evidence = m points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

E-'
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6 1
Habitat com
lexit

1 p
y
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
0-6
0-6
0-6
4

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading v tation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0; common, numerous qTws = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3

1 Presence of amphibians

no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points) 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use

(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
Total Points Nwiblta 100 IN 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first paged 59
tnese cuaractensucs are not assessed ni coastal streams-
USACE AID- DIS'Q Y Site -SCA49 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Prmide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
L Applicant's name: Phoenix Cove Development LLC 2. Eti-aluator s name: Charles Johnston, Environmental Services, Inc,
3. Date of evaluation: April 8, 2007
5. Dame of stream: Phoenix Creek
-.:approximate drainage area: 30-45 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 LF
11. Site coordinates (if known):
prefer in decimal der tes_
Latitude (eb _34.S72_my 35.7101
4. Time of evaluation: 4;30 P.M.
6. River basin: French Broad
8. Stream order: 2nd
10. Counts-: Buncombe
12. Subdivision name (if ally):
Lnncinute (? -7?. X617}: -82,5037
N ethod location determined (circle): GPS ? Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and lalidmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
At or near location Crossina A
14. Proposed charuiel -work (if any): Culverted road crossing
15. Recent weather conditions: 1"-2" rain in prior 48 hrs
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, lower Ms F
17. Identify any special watenvay classifications I'alown: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
X Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive IV, aters _[Tirater Slupply `+t atershecl (I-1t'}
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point YES 1T0 If yes, estimate the seater surface area:
19. Does chainnel appear on USGS quad Fneap? YES PTO 20. Does channel appear on USDA, Soil Survey? YES r(]
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _""D Commercial _% Industrial _% A6ricultuual
80 % Forested 20 % Cleared.` Logged _°,.'o Other (
22. Bankfixll width: 5-6 ft, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 ft,
24. Channel slope dozen center of stream: Eflat (0 to 2%) -!Gentle (2 to 4°fo) X Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (?10° o)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent in-, ncler Very sinuous -Braided cLannel
Instructions for completion of avorlcsheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification. etc_ Every characteristic must be Scored using the same ecoregion. Assl?n points
to each characteristic lvitlmin the rarme shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated clue to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
continent section. Where there are obvious changers in the character of a stream !under review (e-g-, the stream flo tivs from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a :separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score as.sngued to a stream reach must range benxeen 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highe:st quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
#2 - adjacent to roadbed surface runoff # 15 - logged 8 vrs ago some slash and
lagai_ clack areas remain! #2n - naddisfly (1) gocilq
Evaluator's Signature Date_ 8 April 2008
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United :States Army Corps of Engineers to snake a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAC:E approval and sloes not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-84,41 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCA49
ECOREGIOI!i POINT RANGE
# E ARACTERISTICS
C SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max oints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
0
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
R 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 0
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood Lain = max ints
Entrenchment / flood
lain a

a 7 p
ccess 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 0
1 entrenched = 0; firguent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands

no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 4-6 0-4 0-2 0
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max pints
10 Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
11 Sue & diversity of channel bed substrate

fine, homogenous = 0; hwge, diverse sizes = max points) NA* 0-4 0-5 2
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

>.
(deeply incised= 0; stable bed & banks= max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
13 Presence of major bank failures

(severe erasion = 0; no erosion
stable banks = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
r*
,
02 14 Root depth and density* on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
no Nrisible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
16 Presence of riffle-pool/tipple-pool complexes

no riffles/ripples or pools= 0; welt-developed = max oints 0-3 0-5 0-6 1

d 17 Habitat complexity

F'J

(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) 0-6 0-6 0-6 3
Canopy coverage over streambed
l8
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 3
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 2
C,?
21 Presence of amphibians
Q no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-4 0-4 1

Q
C
22 Presence of fish

0-4

0-4

0-4

p
. no evidence = 0; common, numerous tym = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use

no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
T stal Pbints Poss ie 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
t4 T¦ ¦ 45
111c5c L. CU L11-c115Las:5 tuc 11v itsscswu 131 coasrai scrPC' nis-
0
0
-J

LEGEND
ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY
TROUT BUFFER
TOP OF BANK
CREEK CENTERLINE
CULVERT
- -•• BOUNDARY
/ IMPERVIOUS AREAS:
Z
a
1
C O V F
GRAPHIC SCALE (? (DE-NIX
m e w a I so ? 1
IMPACTS PLAN
1 1-n - MO R BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IDS: 3.6 f
3.6 t
3.3 f
:RVIOUS: 10.5 f
159.4 t ACRES

/
i
i
•
i

dIPACT 'A'
.F.
J ?

GRAPHIC SCALE
., /
p HO F NIX ? fJ? `? CO?/
e o a o m m I I I
1 M PACTS PLAN
BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
i men - 00 a 11
1, ?

X
I \

r ? >c
r,

1 '
r
boo
vi,

ER LINE
1 /
INSET A i
39ED CONDITION'S`
i
GRAPHIC SCALE F I -I O E-N 1 X COVE
r e s r m w
IMPACTS PLAN
?IL BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA +? s '
S
O ry
O
rt
I
z Z
O
O
? 0
/
Ln M

0
V CD
D
D z
Z O W
< ? m
rn F1 o
O
m C
z
D

C7 O

m =
o
m
;rI 0
z
I
D N M
D Z
D

m x

o n
m
m 0

r C
O
u M
? rn
D ?
r?

5
r
z
O

n
D

O
C
z
D

O
:E cu
rF-i
D
X !
e-N
? m?AC? ? fi'1
n XOF? m
7
a ?? m No
7C
t;.7
N r
CO CD
C)
p' C,
N
N
r
M CO CO > ti
r

-
- n
-
--PP n n
o (ncnam y
r =
m IIVom
x tl
L1
j 0
rt -P OD > *7
N D C=
OD
G) C
ODrn
IJ v
A
m ?
`\\ III11/???//
00

QQ
?

v
S•
a

I
O En
s

N z4k

n (n

rt
Q
U7
z
O
CD
Z
O
C
-O A c
f a
D
O
z W
< m
rn
m A
O
C

D z
C) O
?
X T
o

7K z

z
co N M
D Z
0

M X

o n
m
m O
o<

-u M
m
a ?
M
s

z
O

A
D
O
C
z
D
o

DX
?,
=
mo
r
r
x :
U
3
N
-, m " O y
7o
v
m z V' C
La. CD O'D
X
U:)
OD
7001 2 t^
L,
S ? ? A A
a G1 UI D ;o y
rr =
Om
N M
VJ
n 14 0 r- ,
m ?OOoys
N D
OD O
C
c?

O M
v o
V v V
;u
m

o O

6
B
'Z
C
R? 1
m
?i
_?.
o
1
I
:?
0
fD w
3
N
? N
3
CD

(JI O
rt
o ' I

p
0 rt

o

? O
()1
I
v? c
r a z
z 0 K
CD
< m
m n
m O
C
z
D ?
--I
C) O
X ?T
0 T
z Q
N M
oz
r
m x
0
m
rn O
r <
O
M
m
5
r
z
O
n
a
O
C
Z
a
O
GDX i
RI ! r
m :U j
o 3?rn ?
m x 3 mN
a ?? • 0 7o p
r,
N OD OD O -n
7 OD OD 5 ? r
AtS.
3?-?0n
o CA0>;u r
n I I ;UM
_
rt Om
l VOT G?
rt SOD ar
N r 14 O
OD a
f?
14 OD m x 'D
?o U
r? n
o (A < (D X
O N
N O N N
.CSI _
Z
n
N
Q
co
ftv11/1j1j,'
VIA.-
f+ ?o
Z
O
rn
S
N
O
Z
Z C
cu
0 N
i z
m
co
m
r-
0
0
a
M

4

?n
Z>
r-
0
X
rn
rn
x

p S N
3

O fD
N n N

O

Z ' z

2
-? O
O

V1 O

-0 X c
r
D 0
z K

< OJ
m
m o

D zz
?
C) O ?
T
0
m O O
z
D M
oz
r
m x

o 0
m
m 0
r <
O
0 M
m
D -?
A
M
S
r
r
in
z
O

n
D
O
C
z
D
O
D ~
X
X (A
-u
-,
mx3
n f
.?
-
0 ? o
CD U,
CD z v
?O NN?r
ODOD?
r?

C?
0 (T cn D ; r
N v?om
z hL* L1
7?Or
m a'OOD Dys Z
rt N
Y ?e O
O
14 OD m
?

< N7
m n
\\\ IIIIII///??? ,
rn
00
Z. O
S2
$a
?v
i
i4S
a
go
9
5
m
J
4y'?
'L1

O
f4 3
O
O
O
O z

U1 o r

z
N O

?
01 o

c
D
D z
0
z r-

< CD
m
m
m
0

D z
?
x ;
m
X
z
z 0
m D M
Z
rn
X
X
0 0
m 0
m
r C
O
-u M
m
D X
C
m
5
F
in
z
v

0
D
0
C
z
D
O
D 0 .r
X
o S r 01
4
nx0r?
3

mO
? m
N .a

x

p
N CO OD o *1 n _
3 OD OD > r
??--Pnn
o cncnD;u

r Z
N ;urn
C) m
rn a OD OD -:g

D
G?
NF
D
tr o
OD m ?' T7
IJ v

m n
III11/
\`\` *1 '/ i
-?
00
n11?1``?``\ TO

x
? ?
v ss n
x ?
9
5
z
S•
i
a
C
m
m

3
O
O
O i
.

cn O z Z

O
z
..
-' O

x C
f D
D z
z c) W
< -4 m
m FJ
m A
cC
z
D
i G)
C)
O T
X

m
T
;u
0
m
x
z
°O
N M
oz

m x

o n
0
m
m
r C
O
-u M
m
D X

S
r
Fn
z
O

0
D
O
C
z
D
O

>X

3
oxor? U
7
m m o
7
a U, .
N'NNA? ?' r\

OD OD >
2 G1
3?•PAA 1
o cncnD;v
;um
voo t..

r
r
z L1
OD Z
m P OD >
Ny % O
OD O C
OD m 'O
IJ v v
M
<
'0
m n
III11/?
00
?v
si
4
5
z
c
m
A
S (n
O
gip' ?D
N
n

rt
O O I z
?
01
- OZ
OZ
f
Ul O
7?1

'0 ,° c
r- a
D z
0
z K

< OJ
m
fl1
m A
cc

D z
?
--I
0
r ri
r
O 0
z
M
D
oz

m
X
M
o n
m
m 0
r C
O
u M
m
a

s
r
F
z
O
M

C1
D
O
C
z
D
O

X

3 -0 5 j
01 fF"?
p X j r\ a
rn m No 7C tJ
a Ln
NN0, V\
OD OD2_{ > r
G,
a Cn cn X y f
N VVom M
,
m ?OODDys 41

N
D
% O
co
m C
CD
?v m

m n
11111//
rx' _
Al
00
?. O
?

6p
v
x
I?

m

a?
z rD-/
c?
r
m
?j

O "0
o

A (n
s
A

A
w

OZ z

O
O
U !
0 ,°o c
;u > A
rn Z 0 w
rn m

2
m
n Z

z o
I v
z z Q
0 D M
cn °
Z
Z
0 _
rn
?
D 0
?O
o C

m m
rn

s

z

n

Z
>
o
X

? t. n
r
U
S fI"I
\
X O E
A 7 IT1 N
ZN ?:
°
to NN0?
? 0) 0)
G UU> C
m
voce 7 n
'O°DDZ> M
F z °
N
00

vO

?, k-z
H Z _
40M
?
FF
F?
s s
A
M

N N N N N N N N N N N
Cn U U (r U U1 (A U 0 Ut Cn
m
x

N
z
a

0 O
0 S A
Irt
n S
w
Cin z
o
I N o
O
C"
I
0 Z
;u
> A
rTI Z
O

m
?

m
0 z
4

z O ?
TT
0 Z O
N D M

C/)

v
Z

z
G) _
m x
M
v 0
?O
o C

m m

M
M
s

z

A
?
o
C
z
>

O
rX
- ?\
n o isrn ?

Ix C"
(D z

r v
to 00 CD 0
Q rn rn ? ? ? L1
c
='-'AA
o cyl > A >
I- Z
m
?I
oClOM
V?

1

1
I.OOID Z>s
F !.. O
N
O
O
D
J m -

v A
?
N
rn
O
OD
cyl
O
m
v
i

W
O
+
O
O
I
??V\ ` Iu111?1j ! ?J7n !
g m
C,+ Z 1 1 Fn
N ni >
'/i/ ' • ...... • • `A,Cp/? '', 1 ? Icy ?I ' I N
/??111111111111???? (w ?1 p? o? - 0
jl p Ni i
1 , I
1 e
2666.5
o!
P o
1 p N X
pl i I
9 ® - '"a
1 A j p Z
C)
p F _
?1 itl
a AZ
oil z o
11 ?i
1 & a:, A
41 ° Z
9 m
1 i
II B°', i?
? QI' QL'• I' '
ry n,
/ i P
° 2661.4 ? A e
T
O ? rt ? w
Ul Z
P W Z
0
L -w
Z
>
m g 0
Z

m 0
w
m

U) !2
m z
n ?

z O
? v =
0 z 0
0 D M
N oz
_
z
0 m x
X
0 v 0
r?l 0
r <
O
m
m
m

s

Z

z
>
0
0
x
., n
n o s s a, k- j:7
mo
I
(11 0
z0
r °

-n
N
N'
?O
?
?
ODOD?.
0) 00 AC\
S #
> A r _
I ;urn
V.10 rn
M
?OOojS

OODD 7 O
C
O M
V 0

A O
? A S
A C
? N
f
O
?
G 7
O

gN
0? C C i- C
I
?/n/[/J 1 1 1111 /
``?: ?O vQA•O?? i
-? co
r/
'''''11111 I 1111„O
Z
0

s
N
0
N
M
z
-?
CD
N
m z
0
>
M

¦
'
• n co
N 14
(DD
0) O
O O O
00 OD
N OD
0) N
O N OD
4k. OD N W
00 N W?(?,1
01 0p0.
O
?.. Q
i
m
i
4
D
YI
m
A
0
Z
0
+
UI
O
O
+
O
O
0
01
O
s ?
o
n n rt
O r. I
O Z
O
O
c
0 cu
D Z
m g 0
z O
O
? -q m
O
(n m c
m z
n
q T
z 0 V
I X
C7 z O
0 C/)
7M
U) 0 i?
z m -
X
0
?O
r <
0
M
m
D X
5
Z
O
M
O
D
O
r
z
D
v
O
n
Dx C
X Ln t'
?ossrn
n x O r\ U
7
'. Z ? x D
OD OD C) -n (I
3 OD OD -{>
2 r
???C?n > Z
o cn cn D ;o t?
;u rri
v O C
7..
:3 OD Z
(b OD >
O
OD G7 tr• C
OODD m 'v
V v U
CA ,v
R1 /\
v (n - 0 0
o < o N
N a y N
s
N II
co IG Z Z
4-z11/11j/'/
O ?i
z =
H rn co
z
p
m
5
O
z
z
co

0
D

m (n
O
z
W
m

0

MOM
n
5 ?
?v
tl
C4 W W
Nj (A
Co N 0)i
a
(A W (A (A CA CA U (A
O --P co N ? O 0) 0)
-PL CCoo

(D
U1
O
m
m 2
3033.3
O
0 °
0
y
4
YI
m

A

rn
Z z

0 +
3026.7 n
O l
0
?
N X
In
m z i

o? ,
i

m m rn CC
z
v '
?
z I
*
°
C ,
C m
z

11
M ?
? it
n ? /
0
X r ?r
? ?/
i i
? , r
'i

?

/
41
? r ?
s

? ,
If
r

'
i
? 0 r
? r
0 0
r

,'
r
r r
?
r s
1
I r ,
1

r
,
e
1
,
1 / r
1 A ,
I a
tl
tl
,
D tl
a
, e
I ? B
r
I°
r r
S MIN.'
i COVEIbr
d /
r. '
/
tl
$ s
r
, a
tl ?
, r
e '
a i
U ? a
;r
° a?
7 !I
3019.1
? r
I /
° ® N X
° ?' , LU W
=1
r ® r
° r r iD
r 41
O ;u
n 0
mz
? ? ® zv
I p ,
?
r ,
0
m
4 m
t °
I
I ,
d ,
/ a
+ 3006.7 ;
v
D
0
0
0
O
D
v
m
m
D
O
z
W
0
w
0

0

rt
?• EA
rt
? s
rt
O
-
? O
'
'ww
V,
0 s z
M A
Z
m C) M

0 Z

Z O
I

0 o

Z
0
O M
N v
Z

c?
Z _
rn x
M
rn v 0
r? 0
r <
0
u M
rn

S
E
m
z

D
8
Z
0
>X
H ^
? S
`
X Q
o
A
??
OD OD n

S??AA
o Lvi0>;a Z
r
;. I 1 :0 m

om
O .i v
_
t":
n ? OD > M
1Y- r o
x
IJ o .

?

s?
v yW
Y I?f

A
?
+
Ln
O
e
B°a
13I z

m
0
O
1111,,
H •Z
0
L4 j j W GI W W
..A ? W
J W W W W W W W
0 0 O J J
O -P co N rn
O
00 J J ? P.? 1 ? J
N OWi O P ODD N 01

m
Z
e ?. 1.

m
?!I
a
X

C
m

i m
!
i

i

I

i

o ,-

,,
Z

-0
n
'
Ul 2
--?
01 U)
3'
rt

O
_
0 n
p

0 CD
M >

m
z
n
2
m Z
M

N
M z

z O V
? o =
z 0
0
O D M
(n ° z

Z
0
m ?_
/
/?
0
r? 0
o C

-r, m
m

s

z

a
;ID
C
z
>
b
X
>
A r
;
A p SSC1
X F
0
a D
W N N 0
OD CO

00
D CA (T >;o
A VVOrn tr

A a?CDDZS L1
NF
Oo > z o
C
WG1
M
vo m
rat -*
e
s

s? ra

N
41
.,,,, DER ...'•••• .???
°
a
m
co
m
r-
0
m
N
N
m
0
z
in

v N In
o s
io m C7 m
rt
O .n.
l
C1 Z Z
J p
O I
-` O
Ol
.1 A
v cu r.a CO)
u > z p" A
m
m is
A
U) m O
m
z
C7 z s
z o
I o
C) Z O
O Y M
U) 0 Z
Z m -
G7 W W GI CA C-4 W W Gd W W W
O N N N N N N N N N N N
o 0 -P ? •P w to rn rn rn v v OD
m `' O 4P oo N 0) O 4? Oo N rn O
O
m NX
O
Z
! e ?Z
1 ® ?
m
o C)
fTl 1
m ? r i n'o
s z Z Izv
F rM r
t Il
Z I r r
g Z.
Z M I g ( m
1 r
o I e
A ' ;I
Z
o ' r
r ', i' ee
z d e
D r g
3254.6 B :f
f
I'
D X H 0 ?'. a e
m
3 ;u (A r rl? m Z
a =r r- 0)
N x 3 mN I ,!
a f° 'Ln p i i r
MG)
s? -PAA 0
o tntnD? 0
t' y y W
l ;urn
C?
7 v_0CT` r rn
(b DID Z> 0 *7 ?4 Z z , r 1
rt D N O t e
000 c , e j tl
?m y .p'
v v? m g e 3' fu?N.
'v m + 3248.4 r g CO%ER w
n o - : o --rte
R o < m o y Z ' e i
m P. y m ^ I g s
Y/ g
! o
v
r g ; °m
N o I s <
? ? > z
/ ? ® r N
`\\4,z 1 11// /,/' 1 ? / W
•VO NIN O
0?V ??? I f, 47 z
C) V - 3241.2
o;o
0 r
?,? ?n N ?O: ! e a m
zo
•? ? r
lL, I , g M
r r
flTz ' t
X
m
5
_N
O
z
Z
-I W
0
m z
co
m
r
O
v
D
i
a
O

J
W
m
v1

z w
O

N Q
N o
2
m ?-

N Z

z
O
N
5
w
it
0
z
O; 0 C*4 dW'; _
00 San) U

0
a
0
m
w
0
0
0
a
Z
0
0
V
H
_e
a?

a
d x w °°

a c?

<
o

5o
zoo- c
V w m o ror, c
r, u
Z ` ww <U)?n `o
UU**t
V x t- it i ?

L) 0 00 co
LOz
a
A=IL x o u
N
O
V
A J
x
`u
Ln5at
-
Ln Of
CF O
m
?
o
CL
z

U

zz Q
Y
W
5; W
? U
W Q
LL
> O
J (n
0? O
V 0 U
w

X ,
^
V/
_ W
Z °
N
o
W

O Z
0 0
_?
o
CL
O N
Of

O
z
m ? U
U
x
F
m U W
z O
z a Z
D o

w
o Lc)
.-
a
z
I o
z to
.- O
+
U U

w! it
I e
1
f eI ?? ? I
I
I
II C I i
1
I ?
I it I I
li f I I
I I
vi ?? I I
1 1? ?
n ?I I
1? , I
1? 1! I
P:
1
itl 11 i
1° 1
c 15
•1 ?
0 6
14
y •TV? V. rg1 m.
v
1\ z
?- p
_ V _... Vim....... i...19 V'I•
I - V VILA( .
Ie
I
i
i
i
i
I I i
i
I /e I
/
/
Ill r
e j
1
1' I
I? ' II
I
II i 1
-I I_a
1 i it
/ I a I
j I 1 f

I I
II e i i
I a
;
I I ?
e

e I !'
I
e ! '

I
I I
w I:; i
i

u I
( p' I
a !I
V
I c
I I

I I
d a I
/
a

/ A I
0
0
C14
n
N
N
N
r-
N
O
C-4
r-
N
-
N
N_
N
O 00
N
O
N
00 co
N N
?
N
000 000 000 N
N N N N

N
O
O
00
N
°a
c
0
0
^_
Z
Oil
a
O 0
if) m
N W
N
O
O

n ? i1 U t

CS
0
O
J
W
m
W
z F-
O
V) p
~
7
N Z
\ Of
z
O
N
5
W
O
z
?..
.0 c"I i
I ls1 • Y?"A
'?aealllll

V
C V U U
rn
m
? a
v
? ?
u
c u
S
v ii
o
v

v
N-? {? I
d ?>
n
w
Z' 13
d. ? W ?
n
W < 00
O Y. J N
J
` 5;zoo c
:O
n
V U O t0 ep
x
_ < 0o1ro
V? U 'WO 00 00 an
L4 u
/ 0 :9 O z
u o
I N W c
o x v
mSCL
yp owW
X<
3
m
O
a:
=z=
O?
U
z m
?y y
5 W
ar
U
\W O <
/ J (n
O ?! O
V Q QU
W
X V)
? J V)
Z
W cn v
0 Z Q
O <
3: 0
CL O
z O
U
4i
U X
W Z
m O W
z O
z < 2
D Of
L0
OI
N z° O
U
0-
? •o
0) a
r4k
W
H
Q
0
0
rr
89'028Z :30A3
L-b' l8+ lZ :SOA3
O
C14
(v
z
O
F
w
U
z
U
U1 J
cai 3
wo
aw
? 00 0 ?o 04
lo- M M
co N N N N N
e e
e ?
. 1
0 1
. o
\ e .
\ e \ W
.
\ a
e
-ZZ
x
e w
\ m '1
\ e
\ ' 1
\ ® 1
\ e i1
v a ?i
? u 1
1
a
1 \ ?
w
2 I
I6 d ?Or
a. a ul
I a 9 ~ dQ
I a I W?W
1 j J Op
I ? I U ^Z
I ° t
?' ' I (O J
X11
' y' I I
Z
(n U
O W
Of
I U p
-y` Y CE
V / W m
c w
I / Ir
U
N. IA f
' ly I
• 'I, 1
•11v I
i
I
It I
I' I
Io I
I
II I
II 1
II I
I' 7
1
I,
Ip !
I
II
e
1 I
j o
I 1 i
I , I
I a I
t
j 1 I
I e
I 1 I
I B I
e I
r u I
r a I
r a I
r u I
I ' I
1 e 1
1 E
I
8
B
I 1 I
r e j
00 80 C0 N 00 d
N N N O O
ONO O N O 0 0 0 N N N N 00 00

° U)
z
° W

a
O L o
+
N m
N
Z
U) 11 [If
O
Z
%`e\\`111111111111//////?/i
Vl% d••
00
H -
///////11111 \\\
.O
O
In
+
N
O
O
+
N

U
Cl)
a
07

Z
0
a
0
11
,b Ti
I
GCe
C?
0 00
Q N
II
?
U
tr

W
c fN
" ?
m U
3:

Q

2
C V

4) U
l 0

N
a? N

V, N

p
`/ ;

:r o n
d x w QO
0
Q 0p
J N
O J Q
?= 5 Z co - C
JOt\
LJ 0 r-, 4)
`
_ .a
} 0
malnN
V O ? t

V x
a?roro?
-IWNN
ll.. O 00 CO
rn
47
Al=k C4 W
N
W
?J O x V
ACP -J -c a
`O>
L
a
? E
to
L4J Q?

X Q
m3

? a

Q
Z
ZI
O
Q
U
0
O
Z U

J
J Y
W
W
5 ?
U
Of
CL Q

Q
/

O O
J
LLI
>

Z
O
V W
? I-
U
W

J V)
N
Z
W Q
N O
of
O

_ Z
0
? o

o
CL O
U of

D W
°
O
U
w w
J
F-
~
X
Z
O

z
z

a W

O
D
m (if
0 ?'

0
Z w
O

I

0
Z LO
.-
.-
LO
O
?
N Q-

N _
y
N
in V
N

d
i
TT,
- -
I ?
a
E
1 I? \\I I
\\ ? 11 I
\ 1'
? , 1 I 1
1 °
1 ?
A 1'
1 A
A
_..1....
1 ,
1
1: ?I
11 A I, 1
1 A 1
"
`
1
1 V e
v'v
,

?
V _ 1
I
• J

•
'
? a I I
P
i
V. -

I
i 'I t I
II 'I I
II I
1
I , I
t I
I
, I
t I
t
i t r
I A
0
?t O (0 N 00 d O 0 N 00 ' d O 0
00 00 r? n co 0 co In In ? It M
O O o O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0
M M M M M M t) M M M M M M
O
LO
M
M
O
O
z 4
Z
N
m
v

a ~

0
O
J
W
m
W
z F-
o Q
m F-
M Z
cr-
O a
N
5
w
Ir
0
z
\\\\\11111111111/^?,,
N dam'- '?
00 U3
JJ O'!
'lllllllll
;q A
23
1
V V O V
OA L V U V
N ° a) Q
U ? L U V O
AM. K
d x 00
< 04
O ? J N .+
5z00? U
OD -
YO'n U
Iwif d<' 1
N O
U U * .4- L
v
V? J JINN
w00000 h
U
Z
:9 O U
N W C
o X
fOSa?
?--N X
O<
°
a
z
U
O 0
z
Y
W
ui
U
F-
W Q
CL
> O (n
JW
O > O
V W Q
? U
W
X V)
J U)
Z< 0
W
O Z
O Q
af O
a o
w OU
0 x
w r-
0 Z
m W
O
z < _
m O
w LO
o
0 0 .-
z
z I .. O
.. V
U
o U .0
U
-
N zlk J
- V)i a`
_I-r -?-
I I
1 1
I'
I °
0
O
rn
1 °
I I ° ?
i
Iry I
I
_ R
• I u c?
Y.` '.Z
N
99+99 Nis cn w
3NnN31N30 >133NO m 0
wm
I_ w
161 I
-4 I
_. Yv.• .I°. 1 U
Ikl
lalll
I
i ' rl I?
1
? I ° II I
iJ ®I J
9 ?
1
1 a 1 I
T a"? I ? I I
Jt o° //
U ? M I N N N N
CD LO R N
M
re)
M M M M t+?j M I) M M
W
p
IL
_G
r
W
N
N
O O
? 1i
+ 0
00 LO

U

O
0
O
J
W
m
to W
z
<
1n p
D ~
Z
iZ _
z 0-
5
w
tr
O
Z
??````\111111111111/1/// /
?; .
00
i2i
//111,11111 `\' '?
v 2 U
rn a ? u ii
U t U U O
o.
?? O n
p, x 00
O U co
a <N
O ?
JZ0
Amp 5 `1
Z O U
D or, tc.•
V w01,n u
_ < °n °A v
x UU??•c
V ?j I
ao I-
0 co co
u
LO z D x o u
U \w o x
to SCL E
of
o<
E O
na ia z
< U
O W
0
z
y
?y W
5 w?
0
Q
W CL
> V)
J Z
V Q O
w
X cn
J In
Z O
W N ?
O z
0
CL O Of
?
Z 0
a U
U x
ow0 C7 IZ
N 0
z < _
D Q CL
w U)
O '-
Z l1? Z In
0

1
IL

:qk

u
u
N U

.lt,

d
i
0
O

J
W
m
W W
z I-
o
v-i Q
vi p

m F-

N z

z a-
0

5
w

0
z
0
0
11
_C
F
N
N
N
Yi
U ?
N
A
C7
O -
U3'
N
00 W
U U V ;
L U
CL U U O
h p U > O ++
U L L U U O
d Of>
I a
d w Go
C7
:L OD
? N
0 r' J ++
y SZao.r u
00
W0 r,
g¢¢ w<LON o
UUtd•L
(0 (D
g m m rn
J aZ?
CO
p x o u
O X
`OSa.
to o'
CF = O
m
O
n:
z
o!
a
U
LL-
z
Y
W
W
U
H
W CL Q
> O cn
J
O O
LLI U
V O
W
X (/l
/? J (n
Z 0
W V) Of
U
O z
_0
o
CL O
O
z U
X
F
m O W
z O
z a 2
D o
O .-
o O '-
z c0 z O
U U A
U O
(f) a
`
k
<
0
0
z
IJ 11?.ytIJ' ?
I
f
1 ?
61
I
I 1 s I
Ai I
Ir , I
a
? ? A 1
p i
I ,? r
I
? A I
7
V ? v it :v ? I
, n•
Z
N'
V i O
v j I-
:.y ?Ne. i w
• i® I q ?
A U
v? ' i A s
In !
IA e
A 7
A z
, I A 1
7 i° I
i 1 A 7
B
A
?o
00 d O c0 N 00 d O co
00 OD OD r- r- co to co LO
to M to M M tt j tN M
I
I
I
A ?I
A ,
A (N k 00
LO It
1'7 K)
O
O
M
rl-
O
N
P-
Q
0
m
w
0
0
I`
0 To
X To
_0
U
rn
.? J41 ow) U x
up=
U
??`\\\\\\??t a Illllrr,,?
00
H _
i
,?/rl/11111 \\

N

V1
V V U
C 3
a O U U
ii
?
V L U U O
u
AQ.
? W
4,
U
L t
V
.lL x
t--P ?
u? iI
T
a'
D
W 00
/, n
< 20,
J
5z-coo .° c
w00nn m
M < If) 0 O
UU?* .
a~aa 0100°0
0000 aNO ?
Z
N L LT U
\J O X
'OSa.LZ u
to a E
X <
O
m
O
a
z
x
tr
<
U
z

W IL
aLLI
- R V

Y
OJ W
0 ?.,
_I
w U
U O
Q

X ?

J

W
J
Z Q O LL.
W cn Of
O
i ? O
CL 0

z

w O

U

W X

Z
0
z U
< O
2
m o d

0 w
O

0 In
z n
I z LO
O
CL

a'
U
ctn

a`
0
caw <? m
ZW
(F/fU ZV Z LLI
W Q
U
? m
m N Z
ZE
CL W
wW
6 a
J <
p ? ? I a in
a ZOCL? W
J
Ck:
/ W
OVWa
a N
V?1 .• p .-- ° UIUJ Z
? t~ U 10 V
(9 ? ?? O ```\\\\11111111/j/j'
g %j w 5
w U a o ..
>- cr
CL W N N
0- V° < - 00
?: ~-
ck: a ¦¦'??? Off:
a '0
LL * ,??///11111 ?\ ??
to c
p I\ - U N
W tr
~ Vi w < W Z
IY ?C V) w
Na
U W O C a% a? JOE V .. O
m 0: 1- w a n a rn 3 v
< < 5 U x J,
u
N N?
W
`W` a to
o r u ?
N°<
d o F- -?- °a U d 0-e w °^°
~ .? < •-
a1^ t SZ00 c
UQW 3 V x?°?n `u
w
. MIX
N3 w
a o
c°?r Z e? UQ*tM
as ?o ?v
;: Z l \.7
~ alo alo
;.?? ZONO0NO V
'
_ W D oC oWv
W J j? U
MP 4 '°550- 4°
?cc
L-H a
W > o<
in
VA
<
< - N a
a
CI w O
o a H z
?o it w
a r N O
` o Z v
In p
W < F
00
wo F5
1- 6'< 2 a
O V) Z W J
Z8? w s
•a. _
C4 M
3
Y m W L
IL Mz w
o Y x > O
Of Q
ow 2 U
p?
Z
? U d cn , ? Q
W O JW W v
} w
J
Z
J ° Q
a W N
O z
T O
i ?
CL 0
0
z
w J
m
z
< Q
a m o
U ?
o
0
Z z
..
u
u •?
N WA N a`