20080600 Ver 1_401 Application_20080408

os-osoo
Environmental Consulting Services ,
f~aY~~I~~~~T
March 28, 2007 ~~~~~~1~~'
Mr. Kyle Barnes
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application - GC3704
232 Osprey Drive -Chowan County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Barnes,
On behalf of Mike Brown, Bay Environmental, Inc. would like to apply fora 401 Water
Quality Certification for 0.49 acres of fill in fresh water wetlands. The site is located at the
end of Osprey Drive near Drummond Point in Chowan County, NC. The delineation was field
verified by Josh Pellitier on October 23, 2007. We will forward the delineation verification and
survey to you when we receive it.
The proposed fill is for a roadway crossing to access the portion of the lot along the
Albemarle Sound where a residential home will be constructed. The applicant is proposing to
mitigate impacts through purchase of 1 acre of wetland credits from the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
The PCN form, site plan, maps, cross sections, and the permit application fee are
included in this package. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the project.
Sincerely,
~~
Amy J.L. Conley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
CC: Mike Brown
Q~~~oe~~
APFt 1 _ 2008
+JinPdFt - '~'d,>E"Ett ~U.~U t'r
v~~E l ~~ahas a~~ srcr~~r~~aT~r~ s~ancH
648 Independence Parkway, Suite 100 Chesapeake, Virginia 23320
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]

(F~~`~~r-~ti~~
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section I O Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 14; GC3704
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: X
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
~~`~
..s ~ ~~~
APR ~ „ 2008
Name: Mike Brown
Mailing Address: 10105 Orland Stone Drive U1'ETLANDSAND STORt~iWATER BRANC;ti
Bristow, Virginia 20136
Telephone Number: 703-350-2510 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Amy J.L. Conley
Company Affiliation: Bay Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 648 Independence Parkway, Suite 100
Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
Telephone Number: 757-436-5900 Fax Number: 757-436-5909
E-mail Address: amy~,bay-environmental.com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: 232 OsRrey Drive
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 786500433791
4. Location
County: Chowan County Nearest Town: Edenton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Albemarle Shores
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Edeton take Hwy
32 South. Turn left of Yeopim Road. Turn right on Drummonds Point Road. Turn left on
Osprey Drive. Follow Road till it ends at cul-de-sac. Lot will be on our right.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.0677°N 76.4137°W
6. Property size (acres): 3.312
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Yeopim River
8. River Basin: Pasquotank
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is located in the Albemarle Shores subdivision which
contains undeveloped land and residential homes. The site is forested. The Albemarle
Sound borders the property to the southeast.
Updated 11 / 1 /2005
Page 6 of 13

9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will involve construction of a roadway to access the upland portion of the lot along
the Albemarle Sound. The roadway construction will involve filling approximately 406
linear feet of wetlands up to an elevation of approximately 6.2 feet. The driving surface will
be 12 feet wide with 5 foot shoulders and a 3:1 fill slope. The roadway will be constructed
10 feet off of the southwestern property boundary away from the open water located near the
northern property boundary. Excavation under the crossing will be 6 to 12 inch scrape for a
total o f 2700 cubic yards which will be stored on site and used for landscaping of the side
slopes The fill will be 70% sand and 30 % clay mixture obtained from an upland source off
site. It is estimated that 2600 cubic yards of fill will be needed. The travel surface will be a
6 inch layer of crush and run toped with 2" of 9.SB asphalt to NCDOT spec. The side
slopes will be covered with mulch and seeded. Five 24 inch culverts will be placed under
the roadway to allow current water flows during rainfall events and storms to continue as
they did prior to construction. These culverts will be covered with rip rap. Silt fencing~will
be used to contain building material runoff from impacting adjacent wetlands. C & L
Concrete will use hydraulic excavator and grader during the process.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to construct a
driveway across~alustrine forested wetlands to access uplands along the Albemarle Sound,
where a single family home will be built. Silt fencing and other sediment and erosion control
measures will be used to stop sediment from impacting adjacent wetlands.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Am~Conley of Bay Environmental, Inc. met on-site with Josh Pelletier
on October 23 2007 to review the wetland delineation and discuss permitting. The delineation
was approved in the field. Included in this package are wetland surveys to be si neg d to go with
the delineation verification when it is issued. There are no known permits related to this project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permits or wetland impacts anticipated for this project.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Approximately 0.49 acres of wetlands
will be impacted to construct a driveway to access the portion of the lot near the Albemarle
Sound where a residential home will be constructed. The road consist of a 12 foot wide
paved surface 5 foot shoulders, and a 3:1 fill slope. It will be approximately 5 feet above the
existin Lground surface at an approximate elevation of 6.2 feet. The total width of fill is
estimated to be an average of 53 feet. The length of fill is approximately 4061inear feet.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 filUculvert palustrine forested wetland yes 208 0.49

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.49
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.36 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Updated i 1 / I /2005
Page 8 of 13

Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill_ excavaticn_ dred~in~_ floodin~_ drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): N/A
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.49
O en Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) N/A
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): N/A
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Updated I I/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Impacts to wetlands were
avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The proposed impact will allow the
applicant to access the portion of the lot along the Albemarle Sound where a residential home
will be constructed. Culverts will be under the roadway to allow water flow, so that there will
not be impacts to adjacent wetlands. The Refuge at Drummonds Point has a road crossing
neighboring the site. There are no uplands connecting the Refuge at Drummonds Point with the
uplands on the site along the Albemarle Sound. If the Refuge at Drummonds Point would allow
the applicant to access their property from the Refuge, they would still have to construct an
approximately 140 linear foot road crossing across wetlands. The Refuge at Drummonds Point
is planning on building villas on the property and would not have room for road access to the
nei g_hboring_property.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant will purchase credits from the NCEEP at a 2:1 credit (totalling 1 credit) to
impact ratio There letter is included in the package.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.98
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No X
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
lil,dated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(sauare feetl Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone l extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within I SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The total acreage on the site is 3.312 acres.. The
impervious surface proposed for the site includin;7 the driveway and home is estimated to be 0.29
acres. This is less than 20% of the total acreage on site. This impervious area would include
approximately 6371inear feet of roadway with a 12 foot paved surface and an approximate home
footprint of 70 ft x 70 ft. During construction of the roadway, silt fencing will be used to prevent
sediment from impacting adiacent wetlands.
Updaied 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sewage on site will be treated with a septic system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No X
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No X
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project is for a driveway to access the upland~ortion of the lot along the Albemarle Sound. A
single family home will be built there. No other development is anticipated.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

Mike Brown, the current property owner of 232 Osprey Drive in
Chowan County, NC authorizes representatives of Bay
Environmental, Inc. to act as his agents for wetland permitting
purposes.
Mike Brown

Date

1~^
s~r~tem
~'~lll~ll 'Clll{.'~1~
PROGRAM
March 12, 2008
Mike Brown
10105 Orland Stone Dr.
Bristow, VA 20136 Expiration of Acceptance: September 12, 2008
Project: 232 Osprey Drive
County: Chowan
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Progarn (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Pasquotank
03010205 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm ]Zi avian Non-Ri avian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0 0.49 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 0 0 0.98 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits Beater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible far the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
~•
Willia .Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Josh Pelletier, USACE-Washington
Kyle Barnes, NCDWQ-Washington
Amy Conley, agent
File
~',P~S'rFDY ~ ... ~ ~ ... PYD ~ ©GGi~ ltA~P~

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Se-vice Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 9'19-795-0476 / www.nceep.net

IR
GSPREY
DRNE
N-E
DRUMMONDS PINT PR(JPERTIES, LLC
DB 233, PG. 83
11A S gp 59'26" E
10A~ ~9A
URVE DATA gq
= 60.00'
~_ CID = 87'51" E 6689` ~W
EIR 0,50 ACRES ± 7A1J
~0 6.19 ~ A
\I~T~ 6754 /p~1'"65'
9~ 70'
\9\~ 59'~
\, ~ ~,
6.5 ~ ~~_
14.7!'~~~
3A
we~l~nd ,r~~pac$
STATE OF NORTH LAR0.INA - LHOVAN COWTY
I, MARK D. PRUDEN, CERTIFY 7HAi THIS NAP VAS DRAVN BY NE lDt UNDER NY SUPERVISION
FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISIDN~ DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED D1
OEEO BOOI( _______________ PAGE __________.____ MAP RNI( _______________
PAGE _______________ PLaI CABINET _______________ SLIDE ______________
THAT THE ERROR OF CLDSURE AS CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURE IS
I ~ _____________________________-________________________
THAT THE BWNDARIES NDT SURVEYED PRE SHOVN AS BROKEN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATIW
FOUND IN SEED BOIX ______________ PAGE ______________ NAP BOOK ______________
PAGE ______________ PLAT CABINET __-__-__---__- SLIDE _-___________-
THAT THIS MAP VAS PREPRRED IN ACCORDANCE VITN GS Al-70 AS AMCNOED~
WITNESS MY RAND ANL iEal THIS _______----_ WY Of ___________________. ________
______. ________ _________________ L-3065
.RDFESSIONAL SURVEYOR REG ND.
~~. ~ ~,3.~ ''~
~ iZ FT Flt
~vj',
0 85~ 2, • ~~E
51823'--~
~` ---
~~ ~ OPEN
~ WATER
2.36 ACRES ±
WETLANDS
~~
z
rFO,
.3,,'' s,
OR-,~
..
~ S ~\ ~iC ~~,wqy .1
:~
c'90 \~ ~S~Qp
~
~- ~ E1..
~
~i
~,
q~ ~
9
Or \
8~~,1
~~
~
d f~F ~'j
t
f ~N~~F~
] ~, ~~
_ _ ~IR
-~
J/o w
47 Z ~
i v
~ ~
/ W
LL ~
W~
I ~ ~
~~
/ff ~ ~ U
! ~ ^ CL
~ 3312 ACRES TOTAL
~ BY PC 1, SL. 165-A
ANDRNNMWiTZ
DB 292, PG. 864
DB 344, PG. 330
EIR ~,
~pJ, o
2 32~` o~~_ 16B
~~
17B o_ A~5B 78 °34'49" E
\\~ 32.50'
~` 18B
4B
EIR13B ~ IR S 23° 13'21" E
1, 12B 4702'
~'•-? 6 7 11B ~ S 60 °3'34" E
~,1 IR \~ 2858'
SURVEY f0R
MIKE HRCIWN
232 OSPREY DRIVE
LOT 32, SECTION 11, ALBEMARLE SHORES
FOURTH iDVN$HIP, CHOVAN COUNTY
NORTH cARDLINa
REFERENLE~ PLA7 CABINET I, SLIDE 165-0
DEE- BOOK 265, PAGE 308
SCALES 1 INCH = SD fEEi NOVEMBER 11 - I5, 2-D7
so• o sa loo' iso'
NARK D. PRUDEN
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR L-3065
148 OAK GROVE ROAD, EOENiON, NC 27932
THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY Of AN E%ISTING PARCEL OF LAND.
1.44~~'~ N~~~w`~, B~gIR S 34°06'57" E
,99 0.45 ACRES ~ 53.12'
zz 1.66 FOCTFR+P~rt B~
7o,X7o~ S 6R°05'12" E
21~Et' ~ 6.9 ~B IR 27.25'
23B Z31~~66, c 7510 W 7z° 10'08' E
~~~~ 34,6 ~ IR4~46'
A~
p ~~ 7B~1\ IR S 13°41'43" W
~F~ \ ~ 34,16'
B
75' AEC SETBACK INE 4BIR 3SB - ~5~3~ IR
zB ~~ ~bA A~
~~ B ~ S
1B~ ~ 8 I
7'~
Ei 1~.re 5: ~Je~land Im~~c~ ~i~u~-e,
9
SITE
goo oa,~
~~'
0
'II
/~
~ I
5-~0
/ ~PQ~c
// P~eE i
SITE NAP
LEGEN-~
E ., CENiERIINE
IPS IRON PIPE SE1
IRS IRON ROD SET
EIP . , EXISTING IRDN PIPE
EIR ., , EXISTING IRON ROD
R/V RIGHT DF WAY
(L) ., CONTROL
N-F .. NOV OR FORIERLY
PP ., POVER POLE
EH „ EIRE HYDRANT
NTS ~ ~~ NOT TO SCALE
~Y-... BROKEN LINE, NOT SHOWN TO SCALE
~,,, SP07 ELEVATIONS
VETLAN- CROSS SELTIWI
PLONG VESTERN PROPERTY LINE
6'
a
5' o ~
'o ~
9'
j 3
3'
A PRDXUfAi C011i
2'
o k yd
~i Aal I AA
~ I
I' I
I
0
100' 2D0' 900' 400' 500'
SLPLE~
HDtIZi 1' = 100
VERi~ 1' = 2.9'

CIR
OSPRE" 9__- ^ - - -
DRIVE /
/'~Cl1R_VE ~j 'A
C~yiD?7'~~`R§~ ~~51' F. 6669'
EIR~ C.50 ACRES '-
~'' ,?p ~ 6.1
~9
. <~'Vfi 5. S '
6 5~ (/I
14. d'~11~
2.36 PORE; !'
W ~_ILANllS
.- _ _ IR

/~
!
O `

/N I
L~D
C
/ w
4
a' N
/
~

/4 T
~.
°a

~ ti 3_312 ACRES TOTAL
'
~ H 3
r PC 1, SL. Ifs-A
/~ rl-F

~ ANDeONCWITZ
B ~92: PC,. d64
~B 344, PC. 337
EIRc
p
\ 4.
]~~.
/'l6B
3.3?;~~6
.
`~J
\ \ )`' ~<<
`~W~\ s~
C.flS~`.. ~ oaf p\ ~.
,~ ~,
0.49 acre `~\`,z~ CFO ~4°'~r...
we~,la~„d 'IMPac~ ~ ~ ~' ~~F`~'e \
~~.. E
v
~~ ~
9jA A~ p~
rr~~tiG'f'C;+
il.lF ~' 41M1N CMilxx - CHDVµ l0.MIr
i. xwc o rxwtx, cc+rxv Iwn rout xnr va wwx Dr w 1• urou w swavimox
rxLN AH MlDll t1R.'{Y w x[ DD W4 xr IDKPVI!'lx ltfD DfttlNTI0.4 PICR!!D IH
141u D.'Yt[ ............... wK ................. IMr D9[ .._._..__...._.
vu, .,r. LxDal ar c,asuu .t crcuHno w .•nnsee uxx m.rarca u
tHnr sr swxxurcs tn! iw~rtreo D-e n~wx .! LDVtlx LwLt nanln rrw wnlw.,nw
rcur w ttco ws ......._..... rnet _._...._... M^r iLtx __..._.._.
Mnlr[ellMne tuxVt.M
DRI;MM~NCS PiIiNK PRf1PFRTIF~S, i.l C
DB 233, PG. 83
tln Y S 8~ 59'26' E 518.23`-~
BA / ~, ~ \`~- OPEN
I1. WA1 ER
.~/!e
\ t7II ~ o: \~3B ~ 78 °'33'49" E
~ ~ ~ 32.58'
~ '~~5~~~~E]R "~EIR J "?3'13'2;' E
\~\\ 1. ~/ t3B 12R~~ h7.02,
~.r -
\ 1R '~~,~ 28~~8'
t,aa~`~~ NOUSE n~QIR .~ 3a°pr,'~~° r
ss' nas Arens ~ ~~~ ~31L,
`2' 6 ~ FOOTPRINT B \
L ~D~.7p' \ ^ 62'05'12' E
21.EP- 5.9 ~ oil '.-1R °_7.e5'
23B 7 1~Q66> S °35'10' W -}I 7i'O 1G'Ot)" C
' \•^? 34.67 . ?i l ~ 44.46'
~~,{~,. ~ ~~ 1IAS 13 °41'43' W
~ SIB \ 3 t,/ 34:6'
<.,' AEC SETBACK ~L'SNE 4St~3s i. fly% ~tR
iB
7'
~i9u.re. 5 ~ bJetland Impa~.~- Figure
t HD
o~m tt~_a.
iF:.~D ,D ~L
*.. srm u.~.rm~
tW' t!D .eD DDp
v[RT 1'

t ....., . .. - ..... .,
[p[p{ ... .. -
~ ..
~'...
- ... .. ._

. W:E7L.-ai~1sD CR~S~".ri SFt..7Yifiv
`: ALQf?d~ WES•~tR'V o:R~PERTY LI~k~E'.
._

g>
_ ,: ,. ,.
, .

7,

6'

~,

~,

3
a
?~

3
1,. u

y
s

~
,
.
...
3
M1 ~a~ 3~, .~ea~ _ . ~~a:,
~
s a~~; v
H~R~z: ~ = iao~
,..
:

• :

r r
D
': k
..
i€

. ,- S

_ - . , _
J

_
..
_ _.

, .

... _
yid ~'.`~ ~~~ ~~~g~~~~ .~~~~~ -_ iJ,
S
,v~ ~y
~ u
.; -
,
:::;:
l o rS~"T-;3hc,~
,,
' ~: .. '
^.
`''" "fit
~~i

_ .
~ Z~rr ~iP~
~E J a a 2-'° 6b3; : „~~iau'a, 0 43 ~ u _~~'£ ca ~.
4-~ u6, ~,, ,~C r
-' _
'S ~
':. UU'ty
~P
1
`~
,
.
~.
y .
~ ,

{

,
_
- - ~,J 73 IBS Pr{ft- ~~" '
- .~_..
-
,~
..
° . - .~
.- - ... 1.,. .-
_
~----~- _
.
.~-- ~~.~ ~r..~._.. '

~
Y
~
b y
m t~ V9 ~ ~ - J ~ a. 11
J y~ /.
~O +7Lr ~~.~~ £ ~~ Iu
4
G 50 °o D ~ ~ ~s d ~ ~ o ~ to 6 ° O caw 1 try O ~a ~ d J `yti i ¢. y ~ n n ., d (j G o ® 'i 4y ~ ~Q a ~ .j....T~\,,....
b ~: D ~ r .+., w }e ~
_ 0 v _ e 0 ~ ~ a „ o-e a„° ~ p, ' ~+ U Q J' d g Q ~ 4 0 •o ~ ,~).(~1~V/~~ '?~ t: .r
- -~ ~ry'~i ,.. ~ ~? Yv ~ B 44 9'/"U 9 ~ 49 • ~ . +.'t+ -. f 1 ~j ~~
r
~' r...`
. ~ _

-
Ct~VC ~ /7F
a

_
- - ~~ ;[ ~ i
- l07, -, !

is .
`~
~~ ~k ~-~.
~_ 4
,:
t
`~
g
1
I,rn _. .
m
'.1
- ~~i
N
W E
S
~ Source: NCDOT USGS Topotile 038 & 061.
Scale: 1 "=2000'
Bay #07-113-01
Date: 7/31 /07
Drawn By: AJL
2000 0 2000 4000
Figure 1: Topographical Vicinity Map
232 Osprey Drive
Chowan County, North Carolina

W E
S
Source: 2003 aerial photograph downloaded from NC One Map website.
Site boundary estimated from Berkley Howell & Associates, P.C. survey, 2000.
Scale: 1 "=200'
Bay #07-113-01
Date: 7/31 /07
Drawn By: AJL
Approximate Site Boundary
Weiiend line
• Data Point
200 0 200 400 Feet
Figure 2: Site Conditions
232 Osprey Drive
Chowan County, North Carolina

r~
DNU7row7 7owrr PAOrEAnE7, ue
W 777. Pa. p
08PREY 'R 77A S 88°59'29• E 538.23' -+-
DRIVE r •A tOAI"' "f aA - -
d#ve DATA ~
~`~-^ 4~OMOIb ~ N /a•aTaf ^ 77Ir' W
~ 7A
`~ 0.60 ACRES'- }ate 0
}~
07r
i4.T'"_'1j~
ZU
WE8T 404 LINE
8A- 4A N 14°00'80• E 48.57'
4A- SA . N 20.67'00• E 24.00'
4A- BA N 40°67.94• E 41.09'
OA- 7A N 20.0Y'6b' E 19.11'
7A- 0A N 10.10'00• E 81.70'
8A- 0A N 28°84.10• E 22.04'
OA-t0A N 77.88.20' W 20.40•
10A-71A N 09.06.45• W 14.67'
EAST 404 LINE
16-28 N 46.45'90• E 99.70'
2B- aB 8 01'10'06• E 10.50'
9B- 4B N a6°bb•a6• E 20.04'
48- bB N b8°66.40• E 20.89'
46- a6 N eb•ao'4a• E Ys.os'
4B- 7B N 44'90'20• W 41.44'
78- BB N 06'86'00' E 88.78'
4B- OB N 60'17'06• W 90.00'
4B-tOB N 11.04'46• W YY.84'
108-118 N 48°52'20' W 94.09'
116-126 N 1Y•o7'bo• w Ya.7e'
128-1aB N 72'06'16' W 64.62'
168-14B N 40.64'26' W 10.07'
148-1bB N 62.06'20• W 26.69'
14B-14B N 44.00'44• W 20.47'
146-178 8 67.82'24' W 14.41'
176-148 8 /0.04'66' E 26.24' -
14B-208 S 70'42'66• W 49.74'
20B-216 8 tD•50'PO• W 25.79'
218-YYB 8 11.24'26' E 28.44'
228-266 9 11•a7'ao• w 2e.o7'
RAn of 7enx 777w7w - oxrA7 oawrr
L rw: s.rw•w~ a7w*r nwr rr r7r w wwwl0r r °7 w7r w 7AAww1
~ Ar wmww wwur n r v rer w arwnrea rw s~aenlo7 7770771 r
ar 7766 rA77 rr 7°°c
-wr lulr eAwwr :R
1rT aw 70AA q warty N aw.awwre R Yrnuw• AOD 07-MOr ^
Sl1RVEY FOR
~~~~_
/~
/? ~
f
/b
2.96 ACRES! 1~ 8872 ACRES TOTAL
1AIETI~S y BY PC 1 SL 186-A
l ~ Kd
~`
~~~
~s~Jw°'
2j~0:`
tar
'~i~-
ar
i
AIbNO1gN1TZ
a s77, Pa. 701
a 7M. P7L 770
MIKE BROWN
232 OSPREY DRIVE
LOT 92, SECTION II. ALBEMARLE SHORES
FouRTH TowNSl4~, cHOwAN couarY
NORTH CAROLINA
R[~BEt7CE: PLAT 1:1181fET t, BLIDE tab-D
DE® 71001( zes, PAC# aas
ecAtE ~ na1 - r t~ Nove7731 n - R tArl
~ ~ w• s •r
YANK 0. PRIABi
Wi0FE8&ON71t. 7#lfiYEYOR L-a07a
176 OAK l7NOYE NOAD, l~B7f017, NG I7f7a
TH6 PLAT B%CF~A/w/fiV~EV OF AN 0069613 PANLB LAN0.
BIiE
.B .•.
~ ~ a~ ss S 78°34'49' E
32.50'
tee t
° s o r~ e* S 23°13'21' E
t~ 47.02•
t<..
zoe # 776 ~S 90°23'34' E
2tB; #~,, r.~ ~ ZB.sB'
tsP € t 0.45 ACRES t0B ` as S 34°Oi'S7' E
_ ~ + ae~ 53.12
rCt S 12°05'32• E
e
* _~ T~ ¢~ 5 0~35~ 4• Y ~ ~ ~ 7x°10'00' E
44.41
~~~ ~ ~ 3N
`~ ~ r1 ~5 13°41'49' Y
ws 64 ~y6a ~ 34.61'
%~ prP

E ... SITE MAP
1r~ea
o•n.a1r
1w ... 1~ rlrt sr
1r ... ur Om OR
71t ... W7rnw 11w1 ^Ire
717 ... 07urOw 111011 Om
OwY ... 71wR of rr
<c) ... oanwL
7~7 ...
n . w•1101YLY
ww07 wu
_.
!N ... rlr Il~r
7n ... rr t• 7wa

--. .oat pow. 779 w77w m 7cwLc
ror n7•rrw
• A, • B, • C ~ APPROXMATE LOCATION ~~ tb ~ . r~
OF DATA POWTS I. 'io
lrr M RYw7wrf 1179 71wwY77 Mw wOr Y 7ww71117r worm 1•r MYW717r
ra7o r os 777c rAr 77•
•Ai rureriwr ~ ws
rwrrr wrw w7-rr r 7sw 0a ~A7c~~O
rn7w7w 7we ww A~nrJ~~~~.~~~K..~
wiww•wL ww'/a OK 0o-.
~ ~m S Nom/
d!a °a~( Y
to OB
s Own~ws t rn7 °°irr or rw7 wwr AOOwrar sOnOn rr
7°iweAwr a rr awdDt7a s A7anwi wa aR M arAO rwtr AGr
u mwrr n n www7ws ow rrw nAn 117070 tlww w w
°1w•10 w a w o0 er w7wwr wwwwm07, r7w weww7n77
OF 17r11011.Mt wr7MOCld Mr wl w{AO w011 fa7 A Iw7W Ipf TO
Owr• 11V7 T711071.0Y rr MrL n.7 wllswlpnW W ^117e oAmq
rr rr OowO a s~7 wenwc0 ws7eArv wi7a7t.

N
W
S
I Source: 2003 aerial photograph downloaded from NC One Map website
National Wetlands Inventory shape file for Yeopim River.
Scale: 1 "=400'
Bay #:07-113-01
Date: 7/30/07
Drawn By: AJL
Approximate Site Boundary
E
400 0 400 800 Feet
Figure 3: National Wetlands Inventory
232 Osprey Drive
Chowan Col.~nty, North Carolina
Legend
PF01 A -Palustrine forested wetlands, broad-leaved deciduous, temporarily flooded.
PF06F -Palustrine forested wetlands, deciduous, semipermanentlyftooded.

Soil Map-Chowan County, North Carolina
(Drummonds Point)
m

0
0
m

0

Y k
.*~ -_ R ' ~

--
n
a' i ~
3 ~
II _
a
`i
~ ~
V -
V
n
n
7 ~~~
~

~
o
N
N

)

j ~ _

V
~F _ ~ ~
~ ~""
O
O
-
_ _..
c. . p
372700 372200 372300 372400 372500 372600 372700 372800 3729x0 373aon s7sinn s737nn s7s~nn
N Meters
A 0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 450 900 1.800 2,700
1,~5f~1 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/13/2007
Page 1 of 3

Soil Map-Chowan County, North Carolina
(Drummonds Point)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
""_ ~ Area of Interest (AOp
Soils
Soil Map Units
Special Point Features
~., Blowout
® Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
~ Closed Depression
;~ ; Gravel Pit
.. Gravelly Spot
~ Landfill
h~ Lava Flow
,;~, Marsh
Mine or Quarry
p Miscellaneous Water
~ Perennial Water
v Rock Outcrop
~- Saline Spot
. Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
p Sinkhole
j1 Slide or Slip
~ Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
~J Stony Spot
MAP INFORMATION
~ Very Stony Spot Original soil survey map sheets were prepared at publication scale.
Viewing scale and printing scale, however, may vary from the
~. wet Spot original. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for proper
~ other map measurements.
Special Line Features Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Gully Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 18N
Short Steep Slope
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
.~ . Other the version date(s) listed below.
Political Features Soil Survey Area: Chowan County, North Carolina
Municipalities Survey Area Data: Version 10, Jun 1, 2007
cj Cities
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 3/1/1993; 3/7/1993
Urban Areas
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Water Features compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
oceans imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Streams and Canals
Transportation
1-i--r Rails
Roads
,.•~ Interstate Highways
US Routes
State Highways
~,,,- Local Roads
Other Roads
uSI~A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 6/13!2007
"~ Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map-Chowan County, North Carolina
Drummonds Point
Map Unit Legend
Chowan County, North Carolina (NC041)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOt Percent of AOI
CO Chowan silt loam 41.5 20.0%
Ro Roanoke silt loam 62.5 30.2%
W Water 103.3 49.8%
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI)
207.3
100.0%
~ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 6/13!2007
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Paga 3 of 3

BAY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project # & Site: 232 Osprey Drive Date: 07/30/07
Applicant/Owner: Mike Brown County: Chowan
Investigator: Bay Environmental, Inc. State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site`? ES NO Comm. ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area (If needed, explain on reverse)? YES ~ Plot ID: DPA
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum- Indicator 'Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Tree FAC Rubus spp.
Acer rubruni Tree FAC Paspalum spp.
Liquidambar styrac~ua Tree FAC+ Eupatorium capillifolium Herb FACU
*Juniperus virginiana Tree FACU- *Quercus falcata Herb FACU-
*Quercus falcata Tree FACU-
Baccharis halimifolia Shrub FAC
Aralia spinosa Shrub FAC
Pinus taeda Shrub FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (Excluding FAC-) 86%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation parameter is not satisfied.
*non-dominant ve etation
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data Field Observations
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Depth of Surface Water: n/a
Aerial Photographs Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
Other Depth to Saturated Soil: > 18"
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required)
Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Saturated in Upper 12 inches Water-Stained Leaves
Water Marks Local Soil Survey Data
Drift lines FAC-Neutral Test (WET =0, UP 1 )
Sediment Deposits Other (Explain in Remarks)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Remarks: No indicators of hydrology were observed. The hydrology criteria is not satisfied.

ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
232 Osprey Drive Plot ID: DPA
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Roanoke silt loam Drainage Class: very poorly drained
Taxonomy Subgroup: Confum Mapped Type? NO
Profile Description
Depth..
(inches Horizon Matrix Color
unsell Moist Mottle Color
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-10 in. A lOYR 5/2 n/a n/a silt loam
10-18+ B 10 YR 5/2 10 YR 5/4 few, faint silty clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma soils with mottles were observed in the to 12". The h dric soils arameter is satisfied.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present YES NO
Wetland Hydrology Present YES
Hydric Soils Present ~ NO
Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland YES
Remarks: The hydrology parameter was not met. This area is an upland.

BAY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project # & Site: 232 Osprey Drive Date: 07/30/07
Applicant/Owner: Mike Brown County: Chowan
Investigator: Bay Environmental, Inc. State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ES NO Comm. ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area (If needed, explain on reverse)? YES ~ Plot ID: DPB
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator ' Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Nyssa aquatica Tree OBL Peltandra virginica Herb OBL
Persea borbonia Shrub FACW Scirpus cyperinus Herb OBL
Magnolia virginiana Shrub FACW+ Woodwardia areolata Herb OBL
Morella cerifera Shrub FAC+ Osmunda regalis Herb OBL
Juncus effuses Herb FACW+ Cladium jamaicense Herb OBL
Polygonum arifolium Herb OBL Polygonum spp.
Typha latifolia Herb OBL
Pontederia cordata Herb OBL
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (Excluding FAC-) 100%
Remarks: H dro h is ve etation arameter is satisfied.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data Field Observations
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Depth of Surface Water: 6"
Aerial Photographs Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
Other Depth to Saturated Soil: 0"
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators -Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required)
X Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches Water-Stained Leaves
X Water Marks Local Soil Survey Data
Drift lines X FAC-Neutral Test (WET =12, UP =0 )
Sediment Deposits Other (Explain in Remarks)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Remarks: Inundation, saturation in The upper 12 inches, and water narks were observed. The FAC-Neutral test
was mei. The hydrolo criteria is satisfied.

ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
232 Osprey Drive Plot ID: DPB
cnn .c
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Chowan silt loam Drainage Class: very poorly drained
Taxonomy Subgroup: Confirm Mapped Type? NO
Profile Description
Depth:. ,
(inches Horizon Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist) Mottle Color _
Mansell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-18+ in. A lOYR 3/2 n/a n/a mucky silt loam

Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma soils were observed in the to 12". The h dric soils arameter is satisfied.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present YES NO
Wetland Hydrology Present ~ NO
Hydric Soils Present ~ NO
Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland NO
Remarks: All three parameters were met. This area is a wetland.

BAY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project # & Site: 232 Osprey Drive Date: 07/30/07
Applicant/Owner: Mike Brown County: Chowan
Investigator: Bay Environmental, Inc. State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ES NO Comm. ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area (If needed, explain on reverse)? YES ~ Plot ID: DPC
VEGETATION
Dominant Flant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Quercus falcata Tree FACU- Smilax rotundifolia Herb FAC
Liquidambar styrac~ua Tree FAC+ Fagus grandifolia Herb FACU
Pin2~s taeda Shrub FAC Andropogon virginicus Herb FAC-
Carpinus caroliniana Shrub FAC
Pinus taeda Herb FAC
Eupatorium capillifolium Herb FACU
Chasmanthium laxum Herb FACW-
Carex albolutescens Herb FAC+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (Excluding FAC-) 64%
Remarks: H dro h is ve etation arameter is satisfied.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data Field Observations
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Depth of Surface Water: n/a
Aerial Photographs Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
Other Depth to Satm•ated Soil: >18"
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required} _.,
Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Saturated in Upper 12 inches Water-Stained Leaves
Water Marks Local Soil Survey Data
Drift lines FAC-Neutral Test (WET =1, UP =3 )
Sediment Deposits Other (Explain in Remarks)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Remarks: No indicators of h drolo were observed. The h drolo criteria is net satisfied.

ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
232 Osprey Drive Plot ID: DPC
enn c
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Roanoke silt loam Drainage Class: very poorly drained
Taxonomy Subgroup: Confirm Mapped Type? NO
Profile Description
Depth
.inches Horizon Matrix Color
Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-10 in. A lOYR 5/2 n/a n/a silt loam
10-18+ B 10 YR 5/2 10 YR 5/4 few, faint silty clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma soils with mottles were observed in the to 12". The h dric soils arameter is satisfied.
WFTI.ANII iIF.TF.RMINATInN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present YES NO
Wetland Hydrology Present YES
Hydric Soils Present ~ NO
Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland YES
Remarks: The hydrology parameter was not met. This area is an upland.