The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCS000374 DMR SW (6) , y GP Georgia-Pacific Georgia-Pacific LLC Lumberton Cellulose 1000 Noir St. Lumberton, NC 28358 (910) 737-3200 www.gpcellulose.corn February 26, 2016 N.C. Dept. of Environmental &Natural Resources Division of Water Quality RECEIVED Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center MAR 0 2 2016 Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 CENTRAL FILES DWR SECTION Attention: Central Files RE: Annual Storm-water Summary Data Monitoring Report for 2015 To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to Section(E) of our Storm-water Permit#144S-00404,-we are hereby submitting our Annual Storm-water Monitoring Summary Data Report as required. Should you have any questions regarding this report please feel free to contact Grant Oxendine, our site EHS Manager at 910-737-3283 or myself at 910-737-3231. Sincerely, &16elfaA4-64-L— Chuck Oxendine Plant Manager Lumberton Cellulose, LLC Enclosure: Stormwater Discharge Outfall—Annual Summary Data Report STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR) / SPPP Annual Update DATA REVIEW FORM Calendar Year 2015 Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS 0 0 0 3 ` ? 1t l or Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG This monitoring report summary of the calendar year should be kept on file on-site with the facility SPPP. Facility Name: Lumberton Cellulose, LLC County: Robeson Phone Number. (910) 737-3231 Total no. of SDOs monitored 9 Outfall No. I Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No NI If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency n Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No Parameter, (units) Total TSS pH Rainfall, Mg/L Units inches Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample �:3, Collected, _ t.� -° r, mm/ddlyy �Pa�'a ,z `� . ; 5 g )44 I5 kof. 22.4 SWU-264 - Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment Outfall No. 2- Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No Parameter, (units) Total TSS pH Rainfall, Mg/L Units inches Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample Collected, mm/dd/yy B f L , 1S l •'tom 30. c) 4..`i SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment - Outfall No. t{- Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes 0 No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes 0 No If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No El Parameter,'(units) Total TSS Rainfall, Mg/L - f ' inches Units Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample ?'„kr' �_ .?,e< r., -r -7x 1 p7k f�77 T++,-��h c_ °A!,411 1� ,"S': r ' Au °64 r s_ RCollected! yy 'n y �mm/dd/ . 3prtr�'� : O / b1 6L' C..91 • SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment - Outfall No. 'S Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No IZ If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No IZ Parameter, (Units) Total , pH. Rainfall, MTSS inches Units Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 ty;,;xTt„^.hr,►Ma=11MU ,+ ra„�5 s k ys%„, ,Date Sample kc^#,441 ;f 2a Collected, , _ ” YN146� �At �• dmm/ddlyy SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment - Outfall No. Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes 0 No // If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No Parameter, (units) Total TSS pH Rainfall, Mg/L Units inches Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample = 6 }+-,'" y . tt-"Collectedf 4F � S, i �� ,• afr mm/dl/yy 41 ff1AVit t ""�1a".'S,;r.a 3-a�f'-�•".�i aaM.. dat- "., 8110 IS I4.. ei 18 .9- r1,LlI5" I.r1S -Bt..2 co_3 SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment - Outfall No. Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No _ Parameter, (units) Total TSS PH Rainfall,: Mg/L Units „ = inches Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample � �"SeY,. Y/ x • ��`_; � h ' 71,15 C011ected {Jr" ar# „"!-hi ±%_ A ,°4'dFfi.'Sr..a '^�Ar�`.;.t-��•�,.aa�N..i,Sm. -.. ,11 ajkpk5;o111 W - :^ mm/dd/yy - • le 1 / )S I.e0 3z.`t -o 11 s P. (0.3 SW U-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment Outfall No. g Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No El Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No El If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency El Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No Ej Parameter,'(units) Total TSS pH Rainfall, •Mg/L Units - - inches Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample `sa , kizr ^ -fr,. OS,T vt!`riyA�".? r~*-*Collected, zo;`,2 -4 t 'tog* '! e , 3 ',L •."mm/ddlyy � � .,-A-4,"" Yy 11. 1 Is E.41-c3 51. 2- • SW U-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment - Outfall No. 9 Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No Parameter, (units), Total TSS pH Rainfall, Mg/L : Units inches 9 ; Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample `t k aA .``417:,:;;S*'; jV� = r� -04.0) Collected, ; er.7; 44 � res 6K` 'MOP_ �" _ma7 arV� . tx 8 1i j 5 1.4 c) lit. CD• SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 Additional Outfall Attachment - Outfall No. I 0 Is this outfall currentlyin Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?� y)• Yes ❑ No ® Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑ Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑ Other ❑ Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No Parameter, (units) Total TSS pH Rainfall, Mg/L Units inches Benchmark N/A 100 6-9 Date Sample Collected, mm/dd/yy 4/l s 1.ti- I. 2c (a. 2 • SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013 "I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a , system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations " Signature C,IL/ Date (/4 For questions, contact your local Regional Office: DWQ Regional Office Contact Information: a _,,.r"., tom' .,,,i,x s"_<^'� it,Al;,., % III n- ,F, yotte elle � ,., ;, s ,,c-----, , wil ngton ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE v FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE 2090 US Highway 70 3 225 Green Street , 610 East Center Avenue/Suite 301 Swannanoa,NC 28778 Systel Building Suite 714 Mooresville,NC 28115 (828) 296-4500 Fayetteville,NC 28301-5043 (704) 663-1699 _ _ _ _ ' (910) 433-3300 _ _ RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE ', WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE 3800 Barrett Drive 943 Washington Square Mall 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Raleigh,NC 27609 Washington,NC 27889 Wilmington,NC 28405-2845 (919) 791-4200 _ _ (252) 946-6481 1 (910) 796-7215 WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE CENTRAL OFFICE 585 Waughtown Street 1617 Mail Service Center .-A `To preserve, soled Winston-Salem,NC 27107 Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 and enhance 336 771-5000 - Abrth Carola�as atero,'� i ( ) (919) 807-6300 - 1 SWU-264-Generic Annual DMR Last revised 5/17/2013