20072133 Ver 1_Glade Creek Mitigation Project closeout report 854_20160818

Glade Creek Mitigation Project
NCDMS ID #854
Design -Bid -Build Project
USACE Action ID # SAW -2008-0071
NCDWR# 07-2133
Closeout Report: Stream and Wetland
Project Setting & Classifications
Meeting XY Coordinates: 36.467448, -81.064665
County
Alleghany
General Location
Sparta NC / Glade
Valley
Basin
New River
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion Level III/IV
Blue Ridge / New River
Plateau
USGS Hydro Unit
05050001
NCDWQ Sub -basin
05-07-03
Wetland Classification
Riparian
Thermal Regime
Cold
Trout Water
Yes
Project Performers
Source Agency
NCDMS
Provider
NCDMS
Designer
Biohabitats
Monitoring Firm
Equinox
Vegetation Remediation
Equinox
Approved for transfer to
Stewardship
Yes
Stewards
State of North Carolina
Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
July 2006
Mitigation (Restoration)
Plan
Dec 2007
Permitted
April 2008
Construction Completed
April 2011
As -built survey
May 2011
Monitoring Year -1
Feb 2012
Monitoring Year -2
Jan 2013
Invasive Treatment
Oct 2013
Monitoring Year 3
Dec 2013
Invasive Treatment
May 2014
Invasive Treatment
Oct 2014
Monitoring Year 4
Nov 2014
Invasive Treatment
April 2015
Monitoring Year 5
Dec 2015
Closeout Submission
April 2016

Project Setting and Background Summary
The Glade Creek project is located in Alleghany County, approximately three miles southeast of the Town of
Sparta in the New River Basin (CU 05050001). It is located within HUC 05050001030020 (Little River and
tributaries, including Glade Creek), which is identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 New
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan. This TLW is located within the Little River and Brush Creek
Local Watershed Plan (LWP) area. The project is about one mile upstream of the Glade Creek II DMS
mitigation project which finished construction and planting in March 2016.
Prior to project implementation, Glade Creek and the downstream portion of the UT channel were unstable,
having over -wide channels, mid -channel sediment bars, incised beds, and steep, eroding, unvegetated banks
throughout. The project also included the preservation of 784 linear feet of stream within the UT -Upstream
reach. Several small groundwater -driven wetlands comprising a total of 0.25 acre were identified and included
as preservation opportunities within the project limits.
Work on Glade Creek and UT -Lower involved restoring a total of 2,823 linear feet of stream channel. The
design approach was aimed at correcting the unstable channel geometry, sinuosity, and steep stream banks. In
order to provide stabilization to the newly graded channel, especially along the outside of meander bends, in -
stream structures including log vanes, root wads, and large woody debris bundles were utilized. Rock structures
such as cross vanes and steps were incorporated into the restored reaches to provide grade control.
A major design focus and one of the most tangible benefits from the project has been the establishment of good
quality aquatic habitat as evidenced by multiple areas of shading, riffles, and pools which were implemented as
part of the project. Local anglers frequent the project creek. The floodplain bench and upland planting zones
were targeted for revegetation to establish native plant communities typical of the ecoregion.
All success criteria have been met for the Glade Creek site. Both woody and herbaceous vegetation are well
established throughout the project. The stream components have remained relatively stable with minor areas of
deposition and scour noted throughout all reaches; however, these are not exceeding a level expected in natural
stream systems. No repairs were required during the monitoring period. Remediation activities were limited to
treatment of invasive -exotic plants. A total of four treatments were applied between 2013 and 2015.
The site is well -marked and posted for long-term stewardship with the State of North Carolina. There have been
no easement encroachments or related issues throughout the project lifetime.
Goals and Objectives (as stated in EEP Final Restoration Plan, December 2007)
The goals of the project are to:
• Rapidly stabilize the channel of Glade Creek relative to natural process,
• Rapidly stabilize and preserve the channel of the UT relative to natural process,
• Restore and rehabilitate channel features and aquatic habitat in Glade Creek and the UT,
• Rehabilitate the riparian buffer along both streams,
• Preserve the existing wetlands onsite:
These goals will be accomplished by designing and constructing riparian buffers along the banks. Project
implementation will greatly reduce bank erosion and consequently decrease the amount of sediment load in the
stream at flows above base flow. Restoration level (Rosgen Priority Level II) design is needed on all but 125
feet of the channel on the project, due to unstable channel geometry, sinuosity and streambank steepness.
Structures will be used to enhance holding and feeding areas for trout. Riparian buffer vegetation will be
established to provide food and cover for terrestrial fauna and to provide a carbon source and shade for aquatic
habitat.

Success Criteria
Mitigation Components
Measured
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Criterion
Parameter
Criterion Met Yes/No
Dimension - stream dimensions should not demonstrate
Riverine Non-Riverine
trends of enlargement either through downcutting or
8 Cross -Sections
ExistingRestored
widening, however, modest year-to-year variation or
(6 riffle and 2
Yes- Cross-section data shows relatively
oscillation in channel elevation or width demonstrating
pool)
little change between years.
maintenance around baseline or design distributions is
Position
0.00 0.00
acceptable.
Profile and Pattern - Reach profiles should not exhibit any
Mitigation
Mitigation Credits
consistent trends in thalweg degradation over any
Footage/
significant continuous portion of its length. Some
Footage/
Yes - Profile data shows relatively little
aggradation will be acceptable and will not be actionable
2,820 feet of
change over the monitoring period. Bed
unless it is apparently causal for widening/bank erosion.
longitudinal
form has remained relatively stable
Over the monitoring period, the profile should also
profile
throughout the reach with some small
demonstrate the maintenance or development of bed form
Ratio
areas of degradation documented.
(facets) in keeping with reference level diversity and
Acres
distributions for the subject stream type.
Acreage
Acreage
Substrate - Pebble count data should indicate the
Yes- Substrate has maintained coarser
progression towards or the maintenance of the known
THyedro
substrates in riffles and finer material in
particle size distributions from the design phase. The
8 pebble -counts at
the pools. Riffle D5o has remained within
absence of any significant trends in bed aggradation or
permanent cross-
the Coarse or Very Coarse Gravel size
deposition should represent stable conditions in terms of
sections
class throughout the monitoring period.
sediment input and transport functionality.
No significant trends in bed aggradation or
deposition have been noted on the project.
Glade Creek
Yes- A total of four bankf ill events were
0+00-25+58
One crest gauge
documented, with three of those events
Stream Hydrology- Two bankfull events occurring in
on Glade Creek
being in different monitoring years.
separate years
(main stem).
Analysis of hydrology data in adjacent
watershed demonstrate that site
experienced a variety of flows.
Vegetation- Survival of planted woody species must meet
6 permanent
Yes- All six permanent monitoring plots
a minimum survival success criterion of 320 planted stems
vegetation
exceed the 260 planted stem per acre
per acre through year three and 260 stems per acre after
monitoring plots
minimum density criterion.
year five.
Mitigation Components
45 linear foot deduction for private drive access location; 20 linear foot deduction for upper power line ROW and crossing 20 linear foot deduction (50%) for lower power line ROW.
=Non -Applicable
Component Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration
Level
Wetland
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
Riparian
(ac)
Upland
(ac)
Buffer
(ac) BMP
Riverine Non-Riverine
Project
ExistingRestored
Restoration
2,738
Creditable
Enhancement
Position
0.00 0.00
Restoration
Mitigation
Mitigation Credits
Component or
Footage/
Stationing
Footage/
Footage or
Approach
Comment
Creation
and
0.00 0.00
Level
Ratio
(SMUs, WMUs)
Reach ID
Acres
HQ Preservation
Acreage
Acreage
THyedro
0.00 0.00
Totals
3,522
0.26
Stream
0
0 0
Glade Creek
2,5691f
0+00-25+58
2,5581£
2,473'
R
P2 1:1
2,473
Unnamed
Tributary
3001f
0+00-2+65
2651f
265117
R
P2 1:1
265
Downstream
Unnamed
Tributary
7841f
Not Established
7841f
7841f
P
5:1
157
Upstream
Wetland
Wetlands
Riparian; Non
0.26 ac
N/A
N/A
0.26 ac
P
5:1
0.05
Riverine
45 linear foot deduction for private drive access location; 20 linear foot deduction for upper power line ROW and crossing 20 linear foot deduction (50%) for lower power line ROW.
=Non -Applicable
Component Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration
Level
Stream
(if)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
Riparian
(ac)
Upland
(ac)
Buffer
(ac) BMP
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
2,738
0.00 0.00
Enhancement
0.00 0.00
Enhancement I
0
Enhancement II
0
Creation
0.00 0.00
Preservation
784
0.00 0.26
HQ Preservation
0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Totals
3,522
0.26
0
0
0 0
Non -Applicable
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall
Credits
Stream 2,895
Riparian Wetland 0.05

Asset and Monitoring Features Map
T
Glade Creek
$r f a Ys,�, i�✓;
Iwo
oy
,fes' ���{:.^�• °
-14
UT Upstream °
w•
0 150 300 `'�400IMMil ° l
Feet I_ +a—®+,.v,_----
NC On
♦ i5 �
UT Downstream
'I -. Log Vane
J -Vane
Cross Vane
Root Wad
Rock Sill
Legend
Stream Centerline
— Restoration
Preservation
Top of Bank
• Pond Waterline
Long Pro Start/End
Cross Sections
® Crest Gauge
Conservation Easement
Wetland - Preservation
BREMC ROW (30 foot)
Vegetation Plot
Criteria Met
Centerfor Geographic Inforniatien and Analysis. NC 911 Board
prepared for Project[: Glade Creek Stream Restoration 111L— 1) Base Map Data Pro,ided by NCDMS & Biohabitats prepared by
Closeout- Asset and Monitoring Map 2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo
NCDMS
Alleghany County, North Carolina 3) Ali lavasives ReeeivedA Final'freatmeat in April 2015
1V CDMS Sheet 1 of 1 A-i�
Date Project Number EQUINOX
March 2016 NCDMS ft 854

Hydrologic and Topographic Features Map
Conservation Easement
2M91 _
-
Contributing Watershed -
_ Y�
To -
2552 i.
elm J
710
- �vw l i� ° i t•
='21..9► - tr
K- 9� O
- - �,P'9� •7 I� \ f �. :t - - �' j !'"fir 1� `,J�-•-.
t
i
.�
J
n
Miles
'^ Copyrig.(92013Nat iohal Geographic�Snciety i -cubed
Prepared lbr PCOjeet: Glade Ciect, Stream Restoration Notes. 1) Base Mop Data Provided by NCDMS & Bioliabitats Prepared by
Closeout -Hydrologic and Topographic Features Map 2) NCOneMup2010Aerial Pbmo
(�
Alleghany County, North Carolina
NCDMS Sheet 1 of t
Date Pro; cc Nmnbcr EQUINOX
Nlat.ch 2016 NC'DMS 4 954

Soil Series Map
WNaF
CaF
Walz
�.•• /♦ TIC �, t
f ,
r
Ad
If
Wal
Wal'
0 TIC 159 300
Prepared a)r Project:
NCDMS
f
I
1
Feet
WaE
Glade Creek Stream Restoration
Closeout- Soil Series Map
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of I
Date
March 2016
Soil Legend Layer
Ad -Alluvial land, wet (Nikwasi)
CaF - Chandler silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
EW CdG - Chandler stony silt loam, 45 to 65 percent slopes
CeC - Chester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
CeE - Chester loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes
1 TIC -Tusquitee loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
WaC - Watauga loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
WaE -Watauga loam. YO to 25 percent slopes
Wal' - Watauga loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
--•-- Stream Centerline
Easement Boundary
Wetland Preservation
y! WaF
♦
S•
WaCi CeC
oi
�' %f CeE
Notes: 1) Base Map Data Provided by NCDMS & Biohabitats Prepared by
2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo
Project Number EQUINOX
NCDMS # 854

Remediation Map
f!f
0 150
Prepared Atr Project:
NCDMS
%�., 4sCf�i ✓, ' as 4 ��
44
SA ,
Je
t 3':
�'"✓�` %.
41 -�V
eetr ,
Legend
I nvasives- Treated 2013/14/15
--•-- Stream Centerline
Top of Bank
• Conservation Easement
Wetland Preservation
r .�
:f •, / y NC OneMap,"NC- Center for Geographic hlfonmation and ,Analysis NC 911 Board
Tilade Creels Stream Restoration Kotcs. 1) Basc Map Data Provided by NCDMS & Biobabiiat, Preharcu hp
Closeout- Remediation Map 2) NC oneMup 2010 Aerial Pbolo
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Shcet I of I
Date Project Number
March 2016 NCDMS N 854
EQUINOX

Cross -Section Overlays: MY1-MY5
Glade Creek
Cross -Section 1 -Riffle
Station 3 + 13.39
2617
2616
2615
2614
e
2613 _____ _____ ,:.. -. _ __________ L _____ _
-- - -----------------------------
2612 ----- ----- ----- -----
w
d
W
2612
2611
2610
2609
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20
Station (feet)
—'— MYO 5/10/2011 MYl 12/13/2011 —MY2 7/17/2012 MY3 6/20/2013 MY4 5/06/2014 MY5 7/29/15--- Bk
Glade Creek
Cross -Section 3 -Riffle
Station 8 + 39.86
2616
2615 7_1
2614
2613
aeol
2612
W1-00
2611
2610
2609
2608
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80
Station (feet)
MYO 5/10/2011— MYl 12/13/2011 — MY2 7/17/2012—MY3 6/20/2013 — MY4 5/06/2014^ MY5 7/29/15-- - B
Glade Creek
Cross -Section 2 - Pool
Station 5 + 99.40
2616
2615
2614
2613
.. --- - --- - - - - - -
2612 --- ---------------------------
w
a
W
2611
2610
2609
2608
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80
Station (feet)
—MYO 5/10/2011— MY112/13/2011MY27/17/2012—'—MY3 6/20/2013— MY45/06/2014— MY5 7/29/15- - - B
Glade Creek
Cross -Section 4 - Riffle
Station 15 + 69.44
2612
2611
2610
2609
a
L 2608
A
W
2607 ____ ___ ____ .
2606
2605
2604
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80
Station (feet)
—MYO 5/10/2011— MY1 12/13/2011—MY2 7/17/2012— MY3 6/20/2013—MY4 5/06/2014 MY5 7/29/2015---' B

Cross -Section Overlays: MY1-MY5 (cont.)
Glade Creek
Cros"ection 5 - Pool
Station 19 + 71.18
2609
2608
2607
2606
0 2605
W
2604
2603
2602
2601
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30
Station (feet)
— MYO 5/11/2011— MYl 12/13/2011—MY2 7/18/2012 MY3 6/20/2013 MY4 5/06/2014MY5 7/30/2015--- B
UT Glade Creek
Cross -Section 7 - Riffle
Station 2 + 38.94
2608
2607
2606
2605
G
2604
w
W
2603
2602
2601
2600
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
MYO 5/11/2011— MY1 12/14/2011 MY2 7/18/2012 MY3 6/20/2013 MY4 5/07/2014 MY5 7/30/2015--- B
Glade Creek
Cross -Section 6 - Riffle
Station 20 + 24.21
2610
2609
2608
2607
C
D 2606
v
2605 _____ ____ _____ _____ _
fd
2604
2603
2602
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30
Station (feet)
MYO 5/11/2011—MY112/14/20it— MY27/18/2012 MY36/20/2013 MY4 5/06/2014— MY5 7/30/2015- - - B
UT Glade Creek
Cross -Section 8 - Riffle
Station 0 + 53.21
2607
2606
2605
2604
e
2603
m
a
2602
2601
2600
2599
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
—^MYO 5/11/2011 MY112/14/2011—MY27/17/2012 MY36/20/2013 MY4 5/07/2014— MY5 7/30/2015- - - Bid

2617
2616
2615
2614
2613
2612
2611
2610
2609
2608
2607
w
0 2606
2605
W 2604
2603
2602
2601
2600
2599
2598
2597
2596
2595
Longitudinal Profile Overlays: MY1-MY5
Glade Creek Mainstem
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 0+03 - 25+58
Oxo 2x0 AXO cX0 8� 4k I% 115r 'Ir 4 A 22 2y 16
O O O O O 00 XOO XOO 110, XOO 00 XOO XOO XOO
Station (feet)
T TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MY1 12/13/2011 TW - MY2 7/17/2012 TW - MY3 6/19/2013 TW - MY4 5/6/2014 TW - MY5 7/29/2015 0 Structure- MYO • BKF ------- WS
I
1
1ra
__..._.. ------
wr
XS1-R I �
I '
I I
1
Vol - P XS3 - R
-------------- ---
..________i
- ---- .......
1
I
I
i
I
I '
XS4-R
I I •.
XS5-P XS6-R
Oxo 2x0 AXO cX0 8� 4k I% 115r 'Ir 4 A 22 2y 16
O O O O O 00 XOO XOO 110, XOO 00 XOO XOO XOO
Station (feet)
T TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MY1 12/13/2011 TW - MY2 7/17/2012 TW - MY3 6/19/2013 TW - MY4 5/6/2014 TW - MY5 7/29/2015 0 Structure- MYO • BKF ------- WS

W
Longitudinal Profile Overlays: MY1-MY5 (cont.)
Unnamed Tributary
Longitudinal Profile
Station 0+03 - 2+68
2X>s 0 2x2S 0 lx>s JXrO rx1-s jxoo OX>.S oho 62s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/11/2011 TW - MY1 12/13/2011 TW - MY2 7/19/2012 TW -MY3-06/20/2013 — TW - MY4 5/7/2014 —+— TW - MY5 7/30/2015 ® Structure • Bkf-•----- WS
2605
2604
2603
2602
2601
2600
2599
2598
0.11
Average Bankfull Slope
i
i
XS7-R
�
-----------, i
i
i
i
i
XS8-R
O
2X>s 0 2x2S 0 lx>s JXrO rx1-s jxoo OX>.S oho 62s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/11/2011 TW - MY1 12/13/2011 TW - MY2 7/19/2012 TW -MY3-06/20/2013 — TW - MY4 5/7/2014 —+— TW - MY5 7/30/2015 ® Structure • Bkf-•----- WS
2605
2604
2603
2602
2601
2600
2599
2598
0.11

Dimensional Morphology Summary
N/A - Item does not apply.
Unnamed Tributary (264 feet)
Glade Creek (2,558 feet)
Cross -Section 7
Riffle
Cross -Section 8
Riffle
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,602 2,602 2,602 2,602 2,602 2,602
Cross -Section 1
Riffle
17.5 17.7 16.9 16.0
15.3
18.9
Cross -Section 2
Pool
18.1
18.5
Cross -Section 3
Riffle
12.4
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 Base
MVI
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,613 2,613 2,613
2,613 2,613 2,613 2,612 2,612 2,612
2,612 2,612 2,612 2,611 2,611 2,611
2,611
2,611 2,611
Bankfull Width (ft)
47.7
48.8
51.3
45.3
38.1
32.5
50.4
49.3
49.1
46.7
39.0
36.4
47.6
47.6
47.6
46.5
46.1
40.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 109.0 109.4
109.4
109.4
109.4 109.4 69.1
69.1
69.1
69.1
69.1
68.9
70.4
70.4
70.4
70.4
70.4
70.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9 1
0.9
0.9 1
1.1
1 1.1
1.6
1 1.7 1
1.7
1.7
1 2.0
1 1.9
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1 1.3
1.3
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.8
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.5
3.5
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
41.6
45.6
45.9
42.4
41.0
35.7
78.3
83.0
83.6
78.1
77.8
69.1 1
62.2
64.1 1
63.9
59.5
60.5
1 54.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
54.7
52.2
57.4
48.4
35.3
29.7
32.5
29.3
28.9
27.9
19.6
19.2
36.5
35.3
35.5
36.3
35.1
30.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.4
2.9
3.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.9
1.9
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ftZ
41.8 1
45.6 1
45.9
48.4 1
41.0
1 35.7
78.3
1 83.0 1
83.6 1
78.1
1 77.8
69.1
62.2
64.1
63.9
59.5
60.5
54.4
d50 (mm) N/A 1
47 1
33
1 33 1
35
1 17
N/A
1 7.3 1
1.7 1
1.1
1 0.3
1.8
N/A
1 45
22
40
41
42
Cross -Section 4
Riffle
Cross -Section 5
Pool
Cross -Section 6
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,607 2,607 2,607
2,607 2,607 2,607 2,606 2,606 2,606
2,606 2,606 2,606 2,605 2,605 2,605
2,605 2,605 2,605
Bankfull Width (ft)
35.2
36.3
34.9
34.8
33.5
32.8
53.2
51.5
51.9
44.4
34.6
33.6
42.1
42.9
42.4
37.4
34.9
28.6
Floodprone Width (11)
68.8
68.8
68.8
68.8
68.8
68.8
117.9 117.9
117.9
117.9
117.9 117.9 107.6 107.6
107.6
107.6
107.6 107.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3 1
1.4
1 1.3
1.6
1 1.5
1.3
1 1.5 1
1.4
1.6
2.0
2.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1 1.3
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.9
2.8
3.7
4.1
4.0
3.9
4.1
4.4
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.4
2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')44.9
46.9
47.5
46.1
50.3
49.4
68.7
75.0
74.1
72.1
68.3
67.8
47.7
49.0
48.4
44.1
45.9
43.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
27.6
28.1
25.6
26.3
22.3
21.8
41.1
35.3
36.3
27.3
17.5
16.6
37.2
37.5
37.1
31.7
26.5
18.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.7
3.4
3.5
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.9
3.1
3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ftZ
44.9
46.9
47.5
46.1
50.3
49.4
68.7
75.0
74.1
72.1
68.3
67.8
47.7
49.0
48.4
44.1
45.9
43.8
d50 (mm) N/A
47
14
38
50
16
N/A
8
1.4
0.062 0.062 0.062
N/A
44
18
51
43
23
N/A - Item does not apply.
Unnamed Tributary (264 feet)
Cross -Section 7
Riffle
Cross -Section 8
Riffle
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,604 2,602 2,602 2,602 2,602 2,602 2,602
Bankfull Width (ft) 17.3
17.5 17.7 16.9 16.0
15.3
18.9
19.1
18.1
18.5
17.8
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 33.5
33.5 33.5 33.5 33.5
33.5
41.8
41.8
41.8
41.8
41.8
41.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ 13.2
13.0 13.4 12.4 12.0
10.6
12.7
13.0
12.2
12.1
11.7
10.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 22.7
23.6 23.4 23.1 21.4
21.8
28.3
28.1
27.0
28.4
26.9
15.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1.9
1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.4
3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2) 13.2
13.0 13.4 12.4 12.0
10.6
12.7
13.0
12.2
12.1
11.7
10.2
d50(mm) N/A
33 16 28 25
23
1 N/A
38
6
35
41
28
N/A - Item does not apply.

Onsite Verification of Bankfull Events
Frequency of Events Greater than 18.59 feet at the Little River Gauge near Sparta'
Year
Frequency ofEve nts > 18.59 ft
Feet Above
5
2012
Average Average
Date of Collection Date of Occurrence
Method
2014
0
2015
Bankfull
Grand Total
9
Elevation
3/25/2013 1/18/2013
Crest gauge & wrack lines
1.70
10/31/2013 Unknown
Wrack Lines
NA
7/15/2014 Unknown
Crest gauge
0.26
11/19/2015 11/18/2015
Crest gauge & wrack lines
1.80
Frequency of Events Greater than 18.59 feet at the Little River Gauge near Sparta'
Year
Frequency ofEve nts > 18.59 ft
2011
5
2012
1
2013
3
2014
0
2015
0
Grand Total
9
Plot of Stage (feet) at the North Carolina Flood Warning Program gauge at Little River near Sparta'
45
40
35
30
25
J
20
15
110
5
0
3/31/2011 10/17/2011 5/4/2012 11/20/2012 6/8/2013 12/25/2013 7/13/2014 1/29/2015 8/17/2015 3/4/2016
Date
'Analysis of peak stage heights at the USGS Little River gauge adjacent watershed to Glade Creek indicated that a gauge height of 18.59 feet had a 1.5 year recurrence interval. Using this as a proxy for bankfull height at the Glade
Creek I site the table and figure above illustrate the variety of flows that occurred at the Glade Creek I site.

Annual Mean Stem Counts and Densities
Pnols= Planted Stems, No Livestakes; T = Total Stems
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Recruit Stems
Summary of Planted Vegetation
Plot Number
Planted Stems per Acre (no live stakes)
Counting Towards Success Criteria
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Annual Means
809
728
647
486
486
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY5 (2015)
PnoLS T
MY4 (2014)
PnoLS T
MY3 (2013)
PnoLS T
MY2 (2012)
PnoLS T
MYI (2011)
PnoLS T
MYO (2011)
PnoLS T
Alnus serrulata
Hazel alder
Shrub
1
31
1
24
1
30
1
12
324
7
5
688
Aronia arbuti olia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
8
8
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
Betula nigra
Riverbirch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Callicar a americana
American beautyberry
Shrub
1
1
4
4
Cal canthus oridus
Eastem sweetshmb
Shrub
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
4
4
3
3
Carpinus caroliniana
American hombeam
Tree
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
13
13
Carpinus caroliniana var. cc Coastal American Hombeam
Tree
2
Celtis
Hackberry
Tree
3
Ce halanthus occidentalis
Common buttonbush
Shrub
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
3
3
Cercis canadensis
Eastern redbud
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
Cornus amomum
S dogwood
Shrub
2
4
1
2
Dios ros vir iniana
Common ersintmon
Tree
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Hamamelis virgin iana
American witchhazel
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Hibiscus
Rosemallow
Shrub
7
Hydrangea arborescens
Wild hydrangea
Shmb
1
I
I
1
8
8
Kalmia lati olia
Mountain laurel
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Lindera benzoin
Northern s icebush
Shrub
4
4
Lindera benzoin var. benzob Northern s icebush
Shrub
I
I
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulitree
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
Malus an usti olia
Touthem crabapple
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Ph socar us opuli olius
Common ninebark
Shrub
1
Pinus
Pine
Tree
1
Pinus vir iniana
Virginia pine
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
Americansycamore
Tree
12
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
Quercus alba
White oak
Tree
1
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak
Tree
8
8
9
9
9
9
11
11
12
12
12
12
Rhododendron
Rhododendron
I
I
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Salix
Willow
Shrub or Tree
3
3
Salix nigra
Black willow
Tree
4
7
2
9
Sambucus nigra
European black elderberry
Shrub
4
S iraea lati olia
Shrub
3
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
2
2
Stem count
66
108
70
119
75
110
81
104
86
96
106
109
size ares
6
6
6
6
6
6
size ACRES
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
Species count
15 1
20
15 1
22
15
19
16
19
16
18
17
18
Stems per ACREI
445 1
728
1 472 1
803
1 506
1 742
546 1
01
580
647
715
735
Pnols= Planted Stems, No Livestakes; T = Total Stems
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Recruit Stems
Summary of Planted Vegetation
Plot Number
Planted Stems per Acre (no live stakes)
Counting Towards Success Criteria
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
1
809
728
647
486
486
405
2
809
728
728
688
647
607
3
607
526
526
526
526
526
4
567
445
405
364
324
283
5
688
445
445
445
364
364
6
688
607
526
526
486
486
Average of All Plots
71S
580
S46
506
472
445

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
Overall, the project has met its goals of returning Glade Creek and the lower portion of the Unnamed Tributary to stable and natural channels, restoring channel features and aquatic habitat, and reestablishing a
native riparian buffer, as reflected by morphological, vegetative, and visual assessment data.
Native vegetation is well established throughout the easement. The annual mean planted stem density in Year 5 was 445 planted stems/acre, well above the success criterion of 260 planted stems per acre. In
addition, all areas of high threat invasive plants previously found in the easement were effectively treated twice annually starting in September 2013, with a final treatment occurring in April 2015.
A total of four bankfull occurrences have been documented through crest gauge readings or observed wrack lines at the site over the five-year monitoring period. It is likely that the site has experienced more site-
specific bankfull events than those documented through methods used during monitoring, as shown through peak stage height data at the Little River USGS gage station nearby.
In summary, the Glade Creek Restoration Site is meeting success criteria for channel stability, surface water hydrology, and vegetation survival as outlined in the original restoration plan. Vastly improved aquatic
habitat is present. Invasive plant species are absent or minimal.
NCDMS recommends closure of the Glade Creek site with a total of 2,895 SMUs and 0.05 WMUs.
Contingencies
None.

:�
-
�•
.o*
+:
,,,:e,
�.r��
,.
.� �_.
_-
`:;;' _
�.

May 2005 May 2011(MY01) May 2014 (MY04)
May 2005 April 2011 (MY01) March 2015 (MY05)

Appendix A: Watershed Planning Context of Project
854 — Glade Creek
Watershed Characteristics Overview
The Glade Creek project is located in Alleghany County, approximately three miles southeast of the Town of Sparta in
the New River Basin (CU 05050001). It is located within HUC 05050001030020 (Little River and tributaries, including
Glade Creek), which is identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 New River Basin Restoration Priorities
(RBRP) plan. This TLW is located within the Little River and Brush Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) area. It is 77 square
miles in area, comprising a predominantly rural landscape of forest lands and farms (cattle and Christmas trees); but it
also includes significant urban/suburban development within the Town of Sparta (Bledsoe Creek subwatershed). Based
on information in the 2009 RBRP document, the TLW is characterized by 41% agriculture, 52% forest cover, 8%
developed area, and 41% degraded (non -forested) riparian buffers. The watershed includes 27 permitted animal farms.
The 2014 statewide list of impaired waters [303(d)] within the TLW includes the entirety of Crab Creek (impaired fish
community). There are 59 natural heritage element occurrences (NHEOs), approximately 4% of the TLW area is
conserved, and it includes WRC -designated priority aquatic habitat.
Links to Watershed Goals and Objectives
The table below summarizes major watershed stressors identified by the Little River and Brush Creek LWP effort,
recommended management strategies to address the stressors, and how the Glade Creek project addresses these major
stressors. [Note: the list of major stressors comes from the LWP Summary of Findings & Recommendations, which was
developed for the Bledsoe Creek focus area. Only those stressors directly applicable to the rural project catchment (6.2-
uare mile drainaee areal are included in the table.
Stressors and Issues
Management Strategies
Glade Creek Project
Deforested riparian
Stream and buffer restoration projects.
Restored approximately 2,800 linear feet of
buffers
stream channel and riparian buffer.
Unstable stream banks;
Stream and buffer restoration; protection of
Restored approximately 2,800 linear feet of
degraded aquatic habitat
headwater tributaries
stream channel and riparian buffer; preserved
approximately 800 linear feet of tributary
streams and 0.3 acres of riparian/non-riverine
wetland.
Elevated nutrient and
Stream and buffer restoration; livestock
Restored approximately 2,800 linear feet of
sediment inputs
fencing and other agricultural BMPs;
stream channel and riparian buffer; preserved
riparian wetland restoration and
approximately 800 linear feet of tributary
protection/preservation
streams and 0.3 acres of riparian/non-riverine
wetland.
Livestock access to
Fencing and alternate water; agricultural
Installed fencing to exclude cattle associated
stream buffers and
BMPs.
with active cattle operation on upstream
channel
property.
Watershed Context Summary
In addition to the Glade Creek project, there are four other DMS mitigation projects within this TLW: Sparta Bog (#349),
an 11.9 -acre non -riparian wetland preservation site now in long-term management; Vile Creek (#96582), a 7,700 -ft
stream and wetland restoration project currently in construction; Glade Creek II (#92343), a 2,450 -ft stream and wetland
project currently beginning first-year monitoring; and UT to Crab Creek (#857), a large stream and wetland restoration
and preservation project that closed out in 2015. According to information compiled through early 2015, there are no
agricultural BMPs or NC DWR 319 program -funded projects related to stream or wetlands restoration/protection in the
TLW -- but there are three NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) projects, including storm water BMPs in
the Bledsoe Creek subwatershed.
[See map figure below.]

2016 DMS Project Closeout: Glade Creek
oil
Legend
0 DMS Prolootz (5) OAF
us Hy
stuo—
Cw.ging unit
Target Locau Wat—hads if
County Boundary

Appendix B: Property Ownership & Protection
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at: http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra ry/Prope rty/Property%20PortfoIio/854 GladeCreek
PD 2007.pdf
Project
EEP
IMS
I
County
I
Grantor
Type
Deed
Acres
Name
Name
Glade
tr4hany�Stephen W. Faw and wife,
Glade Conservation
DB 358, P 382 and DB 13.9
Creek
Victoria F. Faw
Creek Easement
309, P 595
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

Appendix C: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2008-0071 County: Alleghany USES Quad: Glade Valley
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agcnt: NC Ecosystem Eabancement Program. Atta: Salam Martada
Address; 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone No.: 919-715-1972
Size and location of property (water body, road nante/number, town, etc.): Glade Creek Stream Restoration Preiect
incorporating approximately 2569 linear feet of the main stem of Glade Creek and 1088 linear feet of an unnamed
tributary on approximately 12 acres located off Dewitt Road approximately 4 miles southeast of Sparta.
Description ofprojects area and activity: Enhancerntut of125 linear feet, _ reservation of 788 linear feet and
restoration of 3657 linear feet of stream channel and preservation of 033 aches of existing wetlands. Work will
include channel relocation and resizia2. construction of rock vanes, log vanes, root wad revetments and rock
riffles esha ip and stabilain streamban establishment and rev elation of stream buffers.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Pemdt Number:
Nationwide permit Numbers: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the auacbed conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
pemuttee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked If, prior to tine expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued andlor
modified, this verification will rennin valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., aro
under construction) or are under contract to continence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the dale of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the pennirtee of dic responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Steven Lund at telephone [phone].
Corps Regulatory Official: Steven Lund t.J 7f- hate: April 39.2048
Expiration Date of Verifrcatio A 1 2010
:�
The Wilmington District is comr mg the lughesi level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Surveyvitit�w ce.army.miUWETLANDS/index.html to
complete the survey online. .,
MAY 5 20fl8
ltl: ,v3TFhi
ErVtt{P.i SU 1::aN f PROGRAM
128

Delerndmdan ofJurlidfcttKIS:
Q 2--J on preli r rmry infornsadM three ap"s to be -Lgkn of dtit U; iTKludLng wffd4nda wkthm the ahrrve do scrJred project arts
?l,es prsoLkd—Y deter atiao is myl an apptelable 433 undet the Acgnil1101y T'0lJ9nM A i-dM'.jve Apptal PaK3�:sa
( ltz&nnce 13 CFR Pon 331 ).
Ll °ha art N41098bh Wanrm of the Cnittd:taJea within she 0ave de3c:;6ed praj xt m3bjcct to the pc ml rcqu rMnenk iof
5=6=10of the Rit-m aro I rrbm Act nti d Scctioo+9(w csf tae Clem WUCr dict. Uule,$'hcrc is a chertge iia the law ryr
pvbhehad er olotioas. this dererntir�tion maybe rs9rmd up izi Fear R p�xttxd n❑t en exceed five }ratrF fro.n the dare o: +hid
n1.7tL1{C:1>I�h
X Th=ane sues afthe US andlcr WVTtmds w d m the lbovc dvwnlvd pioject am s ajectto the pmmtrequlrpoetrta of Sejfttica
404afihe CIM 1sfFterAci{CS AX33 USC § 1 X44}. Ltnleas sly is o chane to fisc Iew at p Jafia6ed r y
debmnimakmmy be ro]ied LV= for s period urn in eKoeed five yeas, fram the t6i= ofthia notelaeslDvn.
Thejtuliadin�lioml mss wilhdn the ab0*e deaceibn:d lxioject ora her* tx.�n;denliFird �sro psewinur#*ctiioe. >''leasttt:fatincrs
j� dcterstirrydrnaiheued Asdar IU
Bases or I'Xrradktional 1791=nME autm Made C'reaek Merl Its fr Wt*rr aft zMa" etas rnssh's1 noiywk tr, a r t ev1 Rjver, y
trsdidinma llg rt#YilMble 1�"ager {iT+'wl. wetlarida abort tAe Itl�ti4'c
ApkEa I afarmirl�d3� [ThA lnfurruation opplles ,;nth' to opJPr' A JvrlFdfetlojWdeftewtwnMftj
At7 hd1 w this vc�{.,� w,TM an appaoverJ jutisd cticmrl.decnTcdvg ion Ify"In nal in egL=mclt *ill +hat apj"vt'l jvrisdictia l
detasni -'br Pr,, ygu can mike an adtriaiatrative xpp"l under ii UR 331. &lck*W You twill find a NotifieauunofAplrsl Practiss
(NAP) 501 ahmi and nxqutst fur #ppm (R.FA) ftAM If para Tegmn to aWAI this dcknnibuinaa yvu nit rah_rit o 003ttpLln d RFA
krfln to tic .following oddrm:
Di%dv Fungi bm. l4 iJrninogtoa Regina" I)Lvisirra
AdmL Smwen W. Luted, Irnojaar-wianpggr
Azheviile Regulalofy 1-3eld 4f cr
151 palr!an Aveiwc, ROOM 209
Ashtvllle, Nor;h f"juoUw 23gol-5006
In CH cF for an IRFA to be L=q ted by [be {*M, the Carpe nmt &1[trurine *11 $ a eoatry 10 --dol it els the eriroetit fur appeal
anodcr33 CFX pan 33 1.5, and that it hent heed* rived by flee 13instriei €3ff m in 60 days ordndate of the MAP. Sb&uid yyru
dccidc to- swbtmt Fn RFA fair_,, ill moal be TeOL: ved at die abiowc adtteu by i rb2m,
'It Is rye neoeseary to submit as RFA f6im to the D*rrist 09ke if ym do imh-abject to the dc--ft-tion is iltit cs�r�ptrndtn> e,"r
Carps k tgLdiWy LlflScml: 51rvm Iaam W --f
imc dkps,lt a Zm
SURVEY PLATS. FIELD SKETT-Ull, 44'ErLAND DELE11FATION FORMS. JPRt�JE I° PLANS, CTS., MTS$ BE
+tT X11 NFJ? To Tf�r. FR_� C'i P'y QF THIS FORM, ]F MQVIRFT) OR. AVAILABUI
Copy Fumishti: N/A

Acdpm ID Number, SAW -2008401 Cagaty; Alk hegy
Yermlttfe. NC ErMYSIEM Y,0119pceFMI Prrrern.m, MIN- SmUm Murtada
NW 27, -Glade Creek Stream RastDrAtion
Dais Permit lssucd. ApHI 30, 21108
ProjcctMaunger: Lund
Upon complction of the ALefiVity authorized by thi$ permit and amy .rniti tion required by Ihi! permJr,
sign this certification and re -turn It to the'firlhrwing zddren—
US ARMY CORPS OF F`NGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
A5HEV11_IXREGULATf]KV FIELD O)•FIC.F:
151 PAT -MN A,YENIJF,RoHDNf 211tH
ASH EVILIX, NORTH CARO LINA .288411-$I}%
Pit$sr nate that your permitted activity is subirct to a compliance anspectiou by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers reprrwatat9ve. If You roti 1U comply wills Ibis pe-rmit you are subject to permit s;speu5(on,
modificRtion, ar revocation,.
I hereby reify tkat the work autboriaed by the abmre rt-jereared pfr,nit has been coaplrted in
a"orciance wilk the Frons and condition of the said iperni t, a.od required mitigation was compleud in
accordance wilt the pereait conditions,
Sign rture of Perniitlre
Date

Acmlic&rkt, A1C Ecosysleni File Number: -DW], Apt M, 2009
Atta bed is: SW See iMbelow
U ITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Leder of A
�i*Gibri
FROFFERED PERMIT (Slaaid,&A Permed orLgtcs of nttissian) E
PERMIT DENIAL. c
APPROVED ]L1F SDIC,'TIONAL DETER!', NATION D
PRELIIvr NARY .11JRLSI710nONAL DETERMI[vlATION E
SEC.T143V i Tlie fvllo`v,rl`clg merit its y6t* nght m4lopfioro mgar [iig rt#ni cistrWvc.f4p l Qftic:abovc..
deci.siari AdditivnMlirf oimau a rna)" be found at
A: INI'TIAL.. FROFEPRED PETIUM T_ You ma acccTl w objw to the lac_-ni.1.
r MYW T If ym rammed a Steftd&rd Ptrvly you may sign the pertrut dom&sat and ramm it to the dk6ct engitttcr fie flral
arrlb uiaatics. If yo+u rcecived a Lctttr of Pan Won (L )f% you my mx*pt the LOP mkd y im watt is asrborizod. Your sigiature
rap 1Le stud"id Ptmdor araepulre of the I"nv�3m that you. ateopttht prion itsCnrircty„and x`arwo ell eigIM ts, apptel dM
p”mit"k4lulitVllseerinsendt`rotsdid avdapprovedjjueisdi datAldeaeuasiesuoaaassociatedwithtbtpeteLk
a OWCT, Ifym el_+Jeet wtM pmnvt(Startdatd or Lilir) bemm of remain etti swA comdirioos tht~rcin, WLLmay mgmLtihal dee
permit btr Ftsm od wwotdm@ig. Yqa tauoot @mWWte Sectioa 1I of thio farm and rel m the fxm to rise intoe.-t etVosrr, YOU
objections arnnil be rwcived Iry the dkriel within 60 days of In doter of this niece, cc you Kilt forfeil }roue right to appeal
the PcnMitiathc fUD"c. uponroccipt Qiyvw km=. ilii di€Ario engi3r=rwill e+ lu&*)owcbje€ti9m seed mai; (a) nxdiiythe
Pemu[ to addxfta elf of'yrre CWKMA fb) "UNdiry the perrrtil to 2ddreu xnme of yaur ob erbo>r, au (c) mesa rrbdify the pm=t
IEaviEtg dewrraned Arae rhe perm aboald be iessuncl ■s Jnvnvuat y %amen. After evaluaturg yncv eb;reeimvu, the dmtnee engineer
tvlll sebi you a ptnt7; m permit for your as ueficarLed ui Sttiiok B below.
B, PROFFERED PERMIT: You may amept of appeal the permit
N ,tkCtrJ F7; ifyou mociftd! a Smndard P nmr You aw sip the permit der irtrEit; and rets --n ii is the dit ti c a vAW lbr fhW
authari MtAMm rdyriu FOCOw t L.MWr of FerMi1$iAA{I0F), YOU may accept the LOP awdynLa wbrie isanehwmivbi Year x vu%uv
cTr fie senderd Perrniror zw c7tnwa: 91! d* LO urgoo Lblii ym a,�rapt the pennii.in ire amdrety, asci wmi"ell. rkom rn Nppei: the
perrrdk including As in= saved ewrddi open, Aad t"raxeh junadix We7al dew mmdats mwiaied w-Lh alit p!axrRtit.
+ APPEAL. If you chwFe to, de€Lime the paQf and permit (SundaA or LOP) breast of re meq term and caudj4oru t v=ir4 ym
may appeal tlae dvbmi d pdmit wed¢ the Capt of Emj; nD rs Adminisnlivc Appeal Proms by m34ANft Scrbm it odtt o harm
and mzding Ibc fbm to Ibe dir•iauon. etrg,inm. Thio famt mum be r=ived by t#Lt &vLsirm =on= wAt m W ds)m of the date of
this notice,
Cr PFR IT I)ENIAI,_ You may appeal elle dettW 9Jitp=th wbdm Ibe c'9� of s +��+,�W-0gfl„e AMV4 Proccrserr
waWicting S=rkm11 of this form aird seeding the fnrmtoft divirica engin, 11sis fom mualbe roceirod by tdre div*ion cmgiattca
Within fltl days of the daft of this ocimc.
D; APPROVED JUR DICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may Ablcpt inr "a] the ttppraved .ID or
pwAdr, new informati-m-
6 ACCEPT? You do not need to notify ;he Corpxto srxcptan apfxundJD. Eaihrtt: to notify the Corps widrin 40 days of flit daft of
nate notice, rescan€ them you ac€epi the appiave4 JR m its crdirtty, and wane aLL eights to appeal the approved TD
4. APPEAI-." Ifyou disagree with the apprr_++ved FD, you may appeal the approved ID urbda the Carpo ofEngiutrr€ Adr airsrssalive
Appta1 Prances by Ca ring Sada If oftEt fmm ar d mbding the farm tD the &v tio" ". gimm- This f8r m ekaf be-bbeivod by
fhc d"aviainaLtngincei within 60 daytof dre dateoftftia notice_

E: FF -EL DAMARY dURFSDICTIWAL DEI'ERA+I.INATION. You da not need to rcvond to 1ho Carps
m9aftlulg the Preimnuwy ,1D. The larcliminery JD is not appealable- If you wish, }ao-u may requer# an -app rveri
]13 (which maybe appealed), bycontacting %I)c Carpi district for furlherinstrucEion, :Uw you rnaylravidenewi
ioaf—ation for fwthcf cOnsiderW011 by clic Corps to rcevefuate the JD,
REASUNS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTI{]p�1S: �Desrri kr� your remons fiat ®ppcali ng the dwis]c�s or objections to An initial proffered pmt in clear canoisc sMteme� You nna} attach additional Onormation Io
this form to clarify ;where your masom or objection® we addres&rd in the &dministntivc record.)
rwuii IUNAL ltu'1•0KJAA7I0N- The appeal is Juni text to a review of the adMinistrstive Towrd. the Cups
memoaMdum for the rocord of the appeal oonfwvnce or meeting, -d any supiplcmental infrrmtation that the
review oftcerhas determined is needed to Warify the adminia&ativc record. Neither tho appclLaiot nor the Curpa
mayr acid new ieformatiM or m,alyses to the r000rd- However, pu m&y+ pluvi& additiomal infwmallion to clarify
the "tion of information rha is alae ii�(iI{' in the adminiseative r=f rd.
Ifyott have gaaestiorrs regarding this +decision If you only have questiorg p;ar€3mg tht:.appesl prcx,Zss }rw:
andlor the 2ppeal process you may contact: may also c suet:
Mr. Steven Lund. Pmje+ct Maaager
CESA W -R(3 -A
US Army C,mW ofEnIOneers, Wilmington District
I51 Psnom Avenue, R*um 206
Asheville, North Carolina 288 1-5006
RIGHT OF ENTRY: deur signature below grants phir18Nof entry to Corps of&tlpnomperm4 and any
6Kv etit comultaats, to conduct iovemigations of the project site during thefirarim ofibeapped process. Y0
will be provided a 19 day notix of any site investigation, erre] will have the opportunity la pa fidpale irr a1i site
Date--
or
ate:
or
DIVISION ENI INKER:
Comm ceder
U.S. Army Englueer Division. South Atlmtle
60 Fvrsyli Street, Rim ILMI S
Altlantr*, Georgia 30303-34

Mitigation Project
Glade Creek
DMS Project ID
854
River Basin
NEW
Cataloging Unit
05050001
Appendix D - Debit Ledger
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 08/08/2016
C
E
M m
v o
h N
d
E
y
m E
:"
y N
L
W
E EN
mU
_
N
W
C
.
E
m
N Ul
a
C
m o
O
m A
CL CL
N
C
EO
O U
2.
W
C
N
o`
C C
.O
C NC
O N
z�
C
=
Z
O U
z
C C
N
U.
c
C R
O .0
z
W
C C
0
M
C N
O d
za
UI C
N O
2 m
mo7
N ill
A d
0
U
N
2 o
N
IO U
o
U
Ui C
� OEy
7e
N R
A L
o c
U W
'.0+m
N5C m
N h
,p d
oa
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
2,738.00
1
784.00
1
0.26
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
2,738.00
156.80
0.052
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
1997-0616 1997-07161
2,738.00
2011-0464 2001-20061
784.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
0.00
0.26
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
0.00
0.052
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 08/08/2016