20160725 Ver 1_401 Application_20160716

N
July 14, 2016
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATT: Karen Higgins
RE: Strathburgh Sewer Emergency Repair Project
Behind 225 Strathburgh Lane
Cary, NC
Dear Ms. Higgins:
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
F3UL 2 6 2016
Enclosed is a completed PCN for an emergency sanitary sewer line repair project
located on Lochmere HOA property behind 225 Strathburgh Lane in Cary. The
purpose for the project is to replace a portion of an eight -inch sanitary sewer line
which has become exposed in the bottom of a stream with eight -inch ductile iron pipe.
The exposed pipe was in danger of being broken by the abundant cobble that
comprises a substantial amount of the stream substrate, and is mobilized during storm
flows.
The work was started on Thursday, July 7 and completed on Friday, July 8. Once the
section of pipe was replaced, the stream banks were laid back to the extent possible
and the stream channel was armored with rip -rap to stabilize the banks.
This PCN was also submitted to the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers for coverage under Nationwide Permit #12.
t
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions regarding
this application or project.
E
f
E
cc: Tasha Alexander — USACE
File Copy
TOWN Of CARY
316 North Academy Street • Cary, NC 27513 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005
tel [phone] • fax [phone] • www.townofcary.org

I
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ ptbct
Form 3 on 3 I 08
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing Z
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number- 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
i
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project:
Strathburgh Sanitary Sewer Repair
2b
County,
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Cary J UL
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T I P. or state
project no.
Strathmoor Subdivision Ph 2
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Lochmere Association (within Town of Cary Sewer Easement)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
04412/0438
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable).
Jim Hallowes - Town of Cary
3d
Street address:
P O. Box 8005
3e
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27512-8005
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no
[phone]
3h.
Email address-
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is,
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c Business name
(if applicable):
4d Street address,
4e City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g Fax no.:
4h Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name
5b Business name
(if applicable):
5c Street address
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no
5f Fax no
5g. Email address.
4
l
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID).
0772228304
Latitude. 35.735909 Longitude.
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
78 755249
(DD DDDDDD) (-DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
7 24 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc) to
UT to Speight Branch
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water,
WS -III, NSW
2c. River basin
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site consists of HOA land with a sanitary sewer easement and stream corridor The surrounding area consists of
residential subdivisions (Strarthmoor and Lochmere) constructed in the late 1980s/early 1990s
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
700
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
The project consists of replacement of approximately 60 feet of eight -inch PVC sanitary sewer line that became exposed
in the bed of the stream due to meandering and downcutting. The pipe was in danger of being broken by the
considerable cobble bedload the stream carries during storm events.
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A pump -around will be used to divert sewer flow around the work area. Approximately 60 feet of PVC pipe will be
excavated and replaced with ductile iron pipe The stream banks will be laid back as much as possible given site
limitations (sewer line and narrow valley) and banks will be armored with rip -rap to protect the banks and sewer line from
future erosion The project will utilize a mini -excavator and hand labor
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments -
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company
Name (if known)
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Unlikely due to construction dates of the subdivisions The line was likely installed in the mid to late 1980s
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain.
0
-1
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments -
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a.
3b.
3c
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P [-IT
Sewer Line
Replacemen/Bank
® PER
El INT
❑ Corps
[:1 DWQ
8
60
Stabilization
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments: Impacts are associated with removal of the PVC line and replacement with the DIP, laying back banks where
possible, and armoring/protecting banks from additional erosion.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com tete the chart below
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
. Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No , If yes, permit ID no
5i Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c.
6d
6e.
6f
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Sewer
❑ Yes
131 ®P ❑ T
Repair/Bank
UT to Speight Branch
® No
600 SF
Stab
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i Comments Table of Uses indicates streambank stabilization is allowable..
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The minimal amount of pipe replacement necessary to protect the exposed sewer line was done. The stream channel banks
were laid back to the extent practicable and armored with rip -rap to protect against future erosion
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Work will be conducted when the stream has minimal flow. A tracked excavator tracks was used to minimize ground surface
disturbance next to the channel.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature*
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h, Comments:
6. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
1
1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h Comments,
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ®No
Comments: Topography was restored to original contours
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Utility project permitted under NW12
GC 3884 does not require a Stormwater Management Plan No impervious space added and pre -construction contours
were restored
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached9
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

r
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statellocal) funds or the
®Yes E] No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments- Local funds only. In addition,15A NCAC 01C 0407 states that
standard maintenance/repair activities do not require filing of environmental
documents (3) specifies existing utilities
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s). Emergency repair
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No additional wastewater was generated as part of this project The pipe diameter and flow capacity are unchanged, and
the area is built out.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

b. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
Y _
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat
See Attachment 5,5d.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
68. Will this project occur In or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ®No
61b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The site is not located In one of the 20 coastal counties
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historic Preservation Office HPOWEf3 Service (accessed 6130/16). No elements on or near the project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur In a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c, What source(s) did you use to make the floodplaln determination? Map No. 3720077200) Firm Panel; 0772. date: 512106
Jim HallowesQ/-
%a ` -i
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only If an authorization letter from the applicant
Is rovided
Page I 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Strathburgh Sewer Line Repair
ATTACHMENT 5.5d.
5d. What data source did you use to determine whether your site would
impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database search was conducted for the USGS
Cary Quadrangle (www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search) on 6/5/16. In addition, a
site-specific NCNHP Occurrences Report dated 7/7/16 was obtained from NHP. The
report did not identify any occurrences of federally -listed species within a one -mile
radius of the project site.
The NHP database search identified historical occurrences of the endangered
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) within the area of the Cary quadrangle). Michaux's
sumac is a woody shrub found in open woods in rocky or sandy soils. Wooded areas
on the site consist of a closed canopy of mid -aged hardwoods with occasional loblolly
pine. Soils along the stream channel consist of poorly drained sandy loam, and
adjacent upland soils are erodible clay loam. Based upon this information, the
project is anticipated to have No Effect on this species.
The USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS) — Species Accounts
by County (http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac) was consulted. In addition to Michaux's Sumac,
four additional federally -listed species were listed as having recorded occurrences in
Wake County.
The endangered red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) has historical
occurrences in southern Wake County. According to the ECOS species profile, this
species inhabits mature pine forests. The site consists of a maintained 20 -foot sanitary
sewer easement surrounded by wooded residential lots. The stream corridor has a
closed canopy, and consists mostly of mid -aged hardwoods with an occasional large
loblolly pine. Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to have No
Effect on this species
The endangered dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterdon) is found in creeks and
rivers in stable habitat with substrates ranging from mixed sand, pebble, and gravel, to
clay and silty sand. The UT to Speight Branch is a degraded, low -flow perennial stream
with a sand, gravel and cobble substrate that is unstable due to the flashiness of the
stream. In addition, impacts are limited to a 50 -foot length of stream. Based upon this
information, the project is anticipated to have No Effect on this species
The endangered Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana) is found in fast -flowing,
well -oxygenated streams with substrates composed of uncompacted gravel and/or
coarse sand. In the Neuse basin the species has only been documented in the Little

River, located downstream of Cary in eastern Wake County. As described above, the
UT to Speight Branch is a degraded, low -flow perennial stream with a sand, gravel and
cobble substrate that is unstable due to the flashiness of the stream. In addition,
impacts are limited to a 50 -foot length of stream. Based upon this information, the
project is anticipated to have No Effect on this species
The Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is proposed as endangered.
According to the USFWS Endangered Species Fact Sheet on the northern long-eared
bat, this species spends winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
They typically use large caves or mines with large passages and entrances; constant
temperatures; and high humidity with no air currents. No caves or mines are located in
the vicinity of the project site.
During the summer northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -reproductive
females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat seems
opportunistic in selecting roosts, using tree species based on suitability to retain bark
or provide cavities or crevices. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like
barns and sheds. The project work will occur within the maintained sanitary sewer
easement. Trees removal shall be limited to those trees that have been undermined
and are leaning, potentially causing an unsafe work environment and potential future
problems within the stream channel.
It is unlikely that this species is present. However, for the purposes of this
documentation, the project may Affect the species, but No Adverse Effects are
anticipated.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Susan Kluttz
Governor Executive Director Secretary
Clean Water Management Trust Fund
NCNHDE-1845
July 7, 2016
Eric W. Kulz
Town of Cary, Water ResourcesDepartment
PO Box 8005, 316 N. Academy Street
Cary, NC 27512-8005
RE: Strathsburgh Sanitary Sewer Repair; PIN 0772228304
Dear Eric W. Kulz:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have
been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records
suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable
habitat exists and is included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a
one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust
Fund (CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project
area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Suzanne Mason at suzanne.masonOncdcr.gov or 919.707.8637.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 4

�
« �
C o
2°k
§04
c C4
cl��
Z w
■m >,2
«U)d�z
�mzU
�E)t z
U0
2
i$a
c
t
k
0
§
E
2
�
�
_
mk
(D
Cc
I�2
3 § E
Z.0
0)o
£ c @
�R$
0 Cc cc
ca ca
��k
-m
(D\
3 Cc U)
£KI
/L
@ §
k cc %
Eft
�
tk
Cc0
20 Co
a c2
■ 5 m
£off
E
%a S�
�&
4) CL
c0/m
k E Q E
£>t°
&§§\
�
=$Mk
777[
0,00
/d 7�
E t /
_c�
��u�2
�.
E/(�
0
= 0
\cM
$£0
M M
0777
§ m E k
§ca0
@i
(D
k\a
0ef2
0 0
c=M■
@ / a %
X020
e 2 0 2
m
= 0 (n CL
R==(n
(D
E
g
0
§ 0 )
e � §
\f
Ekk
E`(
bƒ2
0
75
£4k
E
kCD)
§ )
/ / 2a
cc �k
E»
E
0
a.
° §z
a �k
i2�
2 2CL
M 2)
a M�
E §\\
0■�Ia
22k7\
e e 0 Ef
■ ■ >, e
M
J
CD
CD
o _
mw cocc�e_
■ _ co o =
s ■ �.z f
It
t
k
a

v
E
a
C
M
CI'M
N
m
N
U
m
a)
CL
!C Y
C
to
U')
U)
L6
w
C7
C7
C7
N
_O
O
0
.o
y
w
f0 E
v v
C
ca
C
4;
a
C7
IL
mN
m
m
r
a
cnV
v
t
~
z
o
E
LL ui
N
41
C C C C C C C
d) N N N N N O
,
E
E
E E E E E E E
c
cc
3
�'
d E E E E E E E
0
aa, u, c,c,ma�m
v
0
J
0 0 0 O 0 0 0
d
a
M
U U U U y 0
°'°'
C30000000
O
cC
U U
U3° °
O —1 —1 JJJJlncn
aria
y CL
y
r
C
c
c
t0 d
O
d
D
°
d
M
a1 N
m
W V
y U
=
U
_
o a
d d N N
c c c c c c c N
U
C Zcc ~0 0 �
CLo
C C C C C C C
Z N W
r
v
Q
0 0 0 0 0 `m 0 C U
3
,o ca tiO
H eo
+:
d
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0° c
c y s z
1°szn
J A
G~
4
rn
rn rnorn� rnO
v
u Z
�°
o
m
c�c��c����0 co
arn
plc
d 7
Q O
N
`
O O O O O O O y z
m
0 4--
C
r.0. d
=d�=a =aN =a
=> wO c
8
a
m
Q> > > > > >
,. EEEEEEE—.2
N
`o
a
mN
Z
m
m
y
L
d � ���Z,�°'>
C C C C C C C E 'p
c
a=+ 0
E
E
m
�
w
O
V 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 V_
E
o
V
O
C
E
w
O
d O O 0 0 0 0 O m
�UUciUUUU 4)w
c
d
yZ
3
cn
'
m
y
0
s d N N d 0 0 0 0
3
n1 m
c
Z
o
J
3
cQ
r CYYYYY Y Y
� � � �i � �i � z z
v
.0
O
EV
U_
w
'
'm
c .-
c
d
m
dc�
C
=
C
y
O
d
W
C
V
M
C
m
E }?
O Uc
a
L
y
to
m
:�
C
C C C
O
E
m o
c a
- m
j L
r
:�
d
0
.L'
N
to
m
c n
i+
m
=
•N
�0.
c
w G w
N 75
3
E �
aEi
o
E
m
.o °
N
Z
O N
2
U
J
O
++ 2.1
y
N
0
Lo
o
co
cr
D
E mmmm0c �m c
O aaaaaaac O
to
c�
oj;
0
N
N
o
v dcncnfncocncncn
m
W
ch
N
cm
G m 0 N 0 0 0 0(D�
C E
a
`
y Z a a a a n a a 0
m � OOOOOOO-2
x:i_
°'y
0a
`0
CCD O
c c c c c c c E
a1 j
v
O
m
E
Q Q c
myE
g
O
y
0
a.
00 00 00 00 00 00 00C
00000UUUU CL
y�
� 0
0 X 0
a
O y
E
t>
fA �p
m
Z
m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_
C C Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0
o m
C
O m
WHC9
E
Q
f�0
m
OOLLcn
2>
o
Z
m m m m m m m m m U V
2az
m o
os
v

L
m
Q
N�
L.L
^L
WZ
CO
C
L
m
.E
Um
V /
L
L
m
V)'L^
6
,It
00
r
0
z
U
Z
�m
N In o
o
E0
N M o U
J
O OQ
O w
az
=a
�z
0 o w"c
a
m N
�ooN
N�
a
w
T-
E E
0 w
9 U m
N N
C p
m d 2
a
a)
N
CO 2 '
O 7
d m Z
,11
11
a)
m
d

FIGURE 1
2013 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Strathburgh Sanitary
Sewer Repair
Cary, NC

0 200
j US Survey feet
Scale: 1:1,652
ry
a.
FIGURE 2
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
CARY QUADRANGLE
Strathburgh Sanitary
Sewer Repair
Cary, NC

Strathburgh Sanitary
FIGURE 3 Sewer Repair
USDA NRCS SOIL MAP Cary, NC
�_ WAKE COUNTY (1970)