20061837 Ver 1_Staff Report_20061207

?V VVV
Staff Report
Project Num: 20061837 Version: 1 Status: Received
Name: NCDOT- Sr 1888 Project Type: Road maintenance/repair/improvements
County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Location: Pisgah river Waynesville
Latitude: +35°25'41" Longitude: -82°47'53"
SW Plan Location:
Owner: NC DOT Division 14 - Bryson City
Contact Person: Tippett, Lyndo Title: Phone:
Inspection Date: 12/07/2006 Entry Time: 01:15 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
On-Site Representative(s):
Primary Inspector: Michael R Parker
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Type: Staff Report
Phone: [phone]
Question Areas:
N Site Visit
Inspection Summary:
NC DOT is proposing to grade, widen and pave NCSR 1888, Pisgah Creek Road, in Haywood County. One existng culvert is
proposed to be extended by 15 linear feet. It is recommended that WQ Certification Nos. 3366 and 3404 be issued.
The 401 Certification was issued on December 8, 2006.
Page: 1
Project Num: 20061837 Owner: NC DOT Division 14 - Bryson City
Inspection Date: 12/07/2006 Inspection Type: Staff Report Reason for Visit: Routine
Site Visit
Do impacts described in the application differ those seen in the field?
If yes, please describe differences:
Are the Intermittent/Perennial calls different in the application?
If yes, please describe differences, and how mitigation ratios are affected:
Are there additional impacts not described in the application?
If yes, please describe and quantify:
Were the impacts in place prior to the application for the 401 Certification?
Additional conditions recommended for the Certification:
Recommended project modifications:
Is this a modification request to an existing Certification?
Are there additional stromwater conditions that should be required due to the following classifications:
# 303(d)list, Class WS, NSW, ORW, HQW
Describe:
Is this a subdivision or otherwise part of a larger project?
# If yes, what phase is this?
Are there prior impacts from prior phases?
If yes, what are the cumulative imacts for this project?
Possible secondary impacts noted:
Comment:
0¦?0
0¦??
?¦??
?¦??
0¦??
0000
??¦?
? ? ¦ ?
Page: 2