20000846 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20080215

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: , Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: _ 2E_C e_C 24
4 .Report for Monitoring Year: Z 3
Date of Field Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: _
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site:
1. Office Review Information: ,
- -- - -_t -V- - =.? -

Project Number: 20000846 T
Project History
Project Name: Horsepen Creek (Fedex - PTAA) Event Event Date
County(ies): Guilford

Basin & subbasln: j Report Review - Streams
Re
ort Review - Wetlands 2/6/2007
2/6/2007
Nearest Stream: LAy p
Site Visit - Streams 5/3/2007
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: ! Site Visit - Wetlands 5/3/2007
Mitigator Type: Private Report Review - Streams 1/24/2008
DOT Status: non-DOT Report Receipt: Monitoring 1/24/2008
Total Mitigation on Site
(Ik
Wetland. 17 acres ? .
Stream: 2689 linear feet X" r 5
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: "Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20000846-1 17 acres Wetland D t'1
20000846-2 2689 linear feet Stream - \ --? ?? Z ("L
?-
`?- rA rem- 3 -'Z
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 17 acres Wetland
Component ID: 20000846-1
Description: Horsepen Creek wetlands
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
Monitoring report indicates success Yes , 0
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
undated
_ 'aturated in upper 12 inches
Drift lines
Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
I+
2 rw?
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: t A//-k
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
T1'A Species Stour -- ii ,TPAI'/ cover
?- <?.
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No u?''? ?c
Average TPA for entire site (per report): Art
C-
L?
Observational field data agrees? Yes
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
(?e?s No stay"'), 1?=
Vegetation planted on site?
Date of last planting: ` -yA r1C ?.C, 7 -Gt?C l? N it{ c?U -?? Cdr _ ?C' '- y ,L; ( L4tc
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes n ation:
?c c `_A ?,~?YE c,-` E
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to o veg
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns etc.):
C t
=?--T (-1:1rC'h.?
( i
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
na Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
I
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2