The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160110 Ver 2_Modifications_20160622Carpenter,Kristi From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Ridings, Rob Wednesday, June 22, 2016 1:10 PM Carpenter,Kristi FW: NCDOT Division 5 permit application for widening of Rogers Road (SR 2052) and replacement of Bridge No. 910132 over Smith Creek in Wake Forest, Wake County; TIP/WBS: 17BP.5.R.47 Bridge 910132 and Rogers Road (SR 2052)Drainage Revision Narrative (2016-06-20).docx; SF910132_REVISED FINAL Buffer Permit Drawings_20160621.pdf; SF910132_REVISED FINAL Stream Permit Drawings_20160621.pdf Follow up Completed Kristi Lynn, This will be a version 2, but no fee needed as it's only a stormwater design change. Can you make sure the email chain below is included in the lazerfiche along with the attachments, please? Thanks! rob From: Murray, Christopher A Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 5:05 PM To: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW <Eric.C.Alsmeyer@usace.army.mil>; Ridings, Rob <rob.ridings@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Carpenter,Kristi <kristilynn.carpenter@ncdenr.gov>; 'Jeff.Moore@kimley-horn.com' <Jeff.Moore@kimley- horn.com>; Watson, Malcolm C<mcwatson@ncdot.gov>; matt.adams@blytheconstruction.com; Hinnant, Chadwick D <cdhinnant@ncdot.gov>; Jernigan, Dennis W <dwjernigan@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: NCDOT Division 5 permit application for widening of Rogers Road (SR 2052) and replacement of Bridge No. 910132 over Smith Creek in Wake Forest, Wake County; TIP/WBS: 17BP.5.R.47 Reference: NCDENR-DWR Project Number: 20160110 (Issued on March 4, 2016) USACE Action ID: Not Known (Permit not issued) Eric and Rob, The Department has been coordinating with the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services to reduce impacts to the adjacent mitigation site at this project. Michael Ellison (Director of the DMS) has earlier today provided approval of the required revisions. These revisions have resulted in some significant changes to the hydraulic design at Bridge 910132 near Stations 20+00 to 24+00 Lt/Rt. The attached file: Bridge 910132 and Rogers Road (SR 2052) Drainage Revision Narrative provides a comprehensive review of these hydraulic design revisions. Note also attached REVISED FINAL stream and riparian buffer permit drawing package for the entire project. It appears that there is no increase to jurisdictional impacts previously noted for the project in the February 4, 2016 permit application. Please contact me if you need additional information. Thanks, Chris Murray From: Murray, Christopher A Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 9:59 AM To: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW <Eric.C.Alsmeyer@usace.army.mil>; Ridings, Rob <rob.ridin�s@ncdenr.�ov> Cc: Carpenter,Kristi <kristilynn.carpenter@ncdenr.�ov> Subject: RE: NCDOT Division 5 permit application for widening of Rogers Road (SR 2052) and replacement of Bridge No. 910132 over Smith Creek in Wake Forest, Wake County; TIP/WBS: 17BP.5.R.47 Reference: NCDENR-DWR Project Number: 20160110 (Issued on March 4, 2016) Eric and Rob, The Department applied for a permit for this project on February 4, 2016. The NCDENR-DWR issued certifications for the project on March 4, 2016. Two construction issues have come up at this time. Note the following: Issue at Site 1(Bridge near 21+00 -L-) A portion of the project limits at the bridge is located within the Smith Austin Creek Mitigation Site and this use requires coordination with the North Carolina Interagency Review Team. An existing rock cross vane installed as part of the mitigation site is located directly at the outlet of proposed standard v ditches upstream of the bridge. The Department proposes "field-set and integrate" the ditches to the existing rock cross vane. Specifically, the ditches will be shifted as necessary to be slightly upstream of the top of the rock cross vane to provide at least 2 feet of separation between the low point of the proposed ditches and the top of the rock cross vane. This solution will integrate the proposed ditches and rock vane together, creating the most stable long-term solution. This information is depicted below: �TAh1Q�AyRQ '1�" �IZCM i��yl �y�A�*� 'B' � IP RA� ' E�T �kJ ��r �� 1J �1 l,i� � �E� QET,�IL �� #��E1' �-� ��E��E� �� "�� o�� r � sv c 1'�N R��'�+. ��AS ��G�� #t�RIP A� — �� TAI�.�.�N�� `� �RA4 'V' C}tT�H 1�! C�.�S� 'B' RIP RA T TC�N�, E� I 51� G�� DETA�� F w� T �_� � h �� ''�,, � ;� j � I 4 � r . ` �i '� '� � i ��Ri� ,� _�� c- ��►',�+1, i ; ; ❑T F�ET�V�+ f �I� T F�C� �RdSS �� HT��4ATE P�SE� D�TCxES ', � �u�ANlC�II�NT PR�?��C�1�D� W� ! � Wl #!fX T#�R� �' �`�A55 � Ah+� � } E��` � �`ONS �C $ RF�. � 5 � � T' ` EIVG�N�ER T� f}EL.� IIE�41f7 Jhl; �� - - - �, � ., ,� �'x � ��i•�4 � . � .{ ,�� . ; . i �y 'y + _ �- _ L ��{� R � ` � � � � � �k8 WS �� -� '� w� '••'�, � �'�� - - — —: � ��r�� ___ } .; , c� 1 I I � � � k � � � � r � � 5 � l � � � � � k � �+ • t � Issue at Site 2(Sin�le-barrel culvert near 27+25 -L- �;� � �,� ac�-a� .�, � � } 5 4� � i� / �� { � � �I�! .�'.'s � 1 �{» +�4 �� FiCF �' -�---�.� !� ,�.�� - � � � f ,�; r'" ,1 =1 . ti , � �: "r� �` ' �� r �_ �� . � �� ,.,. �..�_�. .. � . �� . � � *�l�T . �� The fill on the right shoulder of the road (downstream side of the culvert) exceeds the maximum allowable of 5.0 feet for the aluminum box culvert per AASHTO specifications. We were under the understanding this 5.0' max cover applied under the roadway, but according to Pomona Pipes (delegate designer of the culvert) it also applies on the shoulder. As currently designed there is approximately 5.7' of fill at the right shoulder point. To reduce the fill, we are proposing to raise the downstream invert 1 foot to the natural channel bed elevation. The invert at the outlet will be set to match the adjacent downstream elevation. A mix of Class B and Class I rip rap will be installed in the a slight blow hole (i.e. countersunk) in the streambed below the outlet. The upstream invert would remain buried 1 foot and a one foot sill would be placed at the upstream face (slightly inset inside the culvert). A mix of Class B and Class I rip rap will be installed in the streambed (i.e. countersunk) up to the top of sill. The countersunk rip rap in the streambed at the inlet and outlet of the culvert is fully within the previously permitted stream improvements. 3 ■s■■E ■�■■� �w�■� ��iiiE ��0��1�E��l��i ■■■�■iiw■�RF .*.�■■� � �+• � 5��7_1+�� .aEi�� :4� ■■■■■1�■■■� wJr�' w��:�� ■■��■ ■■■■■1�■■�� ■■■ri■■'. �■� i■■�r� �i■■ ■■■■■l�■■�J■■■■■■f�l�l■■■■■■■i #■■■ C��At�■L' �■ ■■■■■■■I E�■ ■■■■■■� 1■!� i�,�.�►:� �'■f 1■■■■■■f��:�■■■■■■■L11►:►� ■iit�l��t:�.?�L' �■■■■■■■�I�r■■■■■■■N'Jl�:w: ■■■��:�:* �i� �■■��■�I�i: ■A■�� r;:�l ■■■■■�l3� '��..r�`ar ��;a�� ■.�.i� ��iir.i�.iR�Rv.��.ir.ira�.�� r.��a�.�r.��ti�.w�.�_�i�� ■■■■■��i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■17■■ y��i��■� I�■■■■L]■■■��■■■ .r I■■�■■�I■�7■■■�!i �1 I■■■■�11■�■■■■■■:'1 I■■■■il�ll�■■■■■■■� � I■■■■'�i�f.^i� ■■■■■■a � I■■■■r�R�■■■■■■■■. I■■■■Gi �■!�■■■■■AG� From: Murray, Christopher A Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:36 AM To: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW; Ridings, Rob Cc: Carpenter,Kristi Subject: NCDOT Division 5 permit application for widening of Rogers Road (SR 2052) and replacement of Bridge No. 910132 over Smith Creek in Wake Forest, Wake County; TIP/WBS: 17BP.5.R.47 Eric and Rob, NCDOT Division 5 proposes to widen Rogers Road (SR 2052) and replace Bridge No. 910132 over Smith Creek in Wake Forest, Wake County . The following information is attached as part of this permit application: -Signed and scanned copy of PCN form -In-lieu fee mitigation acceptance letter -FINAL Stream Permit Drawing Package -FINAL Riparian Buffer Permit Drawing Package Please contact me if you need additional information. Thanks, Chris Murray Christopher A. Murray, PWS Division Environmental Supervisor Division 5 (919) 220-4633 office cmurravCa�ncdot.qov NCDOT-Division 5 2612 N. Duke Street Courier: 17-27-03 Durham, NC 27704 � , � � �M � � Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.