20061144 Ver 1_Complete File_20061115

~OF W A rF9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
`0 G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cq ~ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
~ ~
O „~ Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 15, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1144
Wake County
The City of Raleigh
Attn: Mr. Dale Crisp, Director of Public Works
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: D.E. Benton Water Treatment Plant, Lake Benson and Lake Wheeler Dam
Upgrades and Finished water Transmission Main
UT to Swift Creek [030402, 27-43-(8), C, NSW]
UT to Big Branch [030402, 27-34-(1 I), C, NSW]
UT to Walnut Creek [030402, 27-43-(4), C, NSW, 303d]
Lake Benson [030402, 27-43-(5.5), WSIII, NSVV, CA]
Lake Wheeler [030402, 27-43-(1), WSIII]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) tivith Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Crisp:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill .
within or otherwise impact 0.26 acres of permanent grading/filling offorested non-riverine wetlands, 1.42
acres of temporary excavation of shrub scrub riverine wetlands, 360 linear feet of temporary excavation
of perennial streams, 240 linear feet of temporary excavation of intermittent streams 43 linear feet of
permanent fill of perennial streams, .024 acres of permanent fill of open waters, .014 acres of temporary
draina~e of open waters, 35,937 square feet (ftZ) of Zone 1 protected riparian buffers and 24,176 square
feet (ft) of Zone 2 protected riparian buffers for the purpose of the Lake Benson and Lake Wheeler dam
upgrades and water transmission main installation, as described within your application dated September
17, 2004 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on July 13, 2006 with additional
information received by DWQ on September 29, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) (GC3374 &
3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 12 and 39 when issued by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate
for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or
otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 1501inear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in I SA N °° Carolina
~farall~
401 Ovcrsight/Express Review Pemritting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] /Fax [phone]
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmativeAetion Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The City of Raleigh
Page 2 of 3
November I5, 2004
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
I. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions
of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental impacts:
Amount A roved Units Plan Location or Reference
Perennial Stream 360 (linear feet) PCN page 13
tem ora excavation
Perennial Stream

ermanent fill 43 (linear feet) PCN page 13
Intermittent Stream 240 (linear feet) PCN page 13
tem or excavation
404/CAMA Forested
Non-Riverine Wetlands

(permanent 0.26 (acres) PCN page 12

radin fillin _
404/CAMA Shrub
Scrub Riverine

Wetlands (permanent 1.42 (acres) PCN page 12
radin fillin
Permanent Fill of Open

Waters 0.024 (acres) PCN page 14
Temporary Drainage of

O en Waters 0.014 (acres) PCN page 14
Zone 1 Buffers 35,937 s uare ft. PCN a e 18
Zone 2 Buffers 2,4176 s uare ft. PCN a e 18
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Nortli Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.

The City of Raleigh
Page 4 of 3
November 15, 2004
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714: This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Amy Chapman at 919-733-178
Sinc ely,
AW K/cbk/asc
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures: GC 3374 & 3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: Arcadis, Attn: Ms. Linda Diebolt, 801 Corporate Center Dr, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27607
Jamie Shern, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 061144CORaleighDEBcnton WTP(Wake)401+NBR

The City of Raleigh
Page 3 of 3
November 15, 2004
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum,
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
6. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or
similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer,
wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B
.0233.
7. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive
velocities through the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the
stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233(5).
8. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be
downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at: http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text
of the sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct

Re: I know your'e swamped....
Subject: Re: I know your'e swamped....
From: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:08:23 -0500
To: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
Amy:
I looked aover the additional information submitted by Arcadis dated September 28,
2006. I guess the 200 LF permanent perennial impact listed in the PCN is actually
not proposed.
Rest of the stream impacts are temporary, utility impacts. Wetland impacts over 1
acre; mitigation required?
I guess I have no additional comments.
Eric
Amy Chapman wrote:
but have you had a chance to look over the additional info from Arcadis for the
City of Raleigh W.E. Benton WTP project? (06-1144)
I'm seeing that they still require diffuse flow for the stormwater from the
treatment plant site.
Thanks!
Amy Chapman
NC Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: amy.chapmanc~ncmail.net
Eric Kulz <Eric.Kulz(cr~,ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist III
Surface Water Protection
NC Division of Water Quality
1 of 1
11/2/2006 2:17 PM

r
Z 'd

SONd~18M-DMO ~3WtiN
~~ ~~~~~
Date 10/04/06
Number of pages including cover sheet q-
To: Amy Chapman
~689~~Z6T6~~31 ZS~~T f1Hl 9002-5-190
NC ~itdlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservatfon Program
;.~; ,-~, ~,. P. O. Box 929
.. .~ ~ ~~'/y1 Sadalfa, 1YC 27342.0929
~~ ~ ~ ..a ( _. C f( ,/ /~~.L~~~/~
U l~l
C ~ ~ 2006
~~~r~~no's~ s~~r~RQUAUn.
i'ORAfiY~1~Q~dCN
From: Shari Bryant
Phone Phone
Fax Phone [phone] Fax Phone
CC:
336-449-7625
336-449-7625
REMARKS:
^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment
DWQ ID: 20061144 -Benton Water Treatment Plant
Amy, thanks for keeping us in the loop and for all your he{p on this project. I really appreciate
it!
t•d
Sz9L-6bi~-9EE
~ueRUg •1•g d0T=E0 90 S0 ~~0

Z 'd
LS~~I f1Hl 90aZ-S-190
,.,_
~~g ~ D
~ T ~ zoos
- :v:,r~R Quau
tinr~ sro~„yy,9~ &~tac~
~ North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Amy Chapman, 40l/Wetlands Unit
N. Division of Water Quality
FROM: Shan L. Bryant, P e mont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conscxvation Progam
DATE: 4 October 2006
SUBIECT: Pro-constructionNottfication Application for City of Raleigh, Benton Water Treatment
Plant, Wakc County, North Carolina. DWQ ID: 20061144
Biologists with theNorth Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
subject document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of
1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stet. 401, as amended; 1G U.S.C. 661-667d),
North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.), and the North Carolina Administrative Code 15A
NCAC 101.0102.
The City of Raleigh proposes to construct a new water treatment plant and finished water
transmission line. Impervious surface will be approximately 19%. The proposed project would
permanently impact 2121inear feet of perennial stream channel. Temporary impacts to 360 linear feet of
perennial stream channel and 2401inear feet of intermittent stream channel would result from stream
crossings related to installation of the finished water transmission main. Proposed impacts to wetlands
include 0.26 acre of permanent impact and 1.42 acre of temporary impact.
The project will impact Swift Creek, Big Branch, Walnut Creek and their tributaries in the Neuse
River basin. There arc records for the federal and state endangered dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon); the federal species of concern and state endangered Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masonic and
yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolate); the state threatened triangle floater (Alasmidonta undulate), Eastern
lampmussel (Lampsills radlata), and creeper (Strophitus undulates) in Swift Creek. In Walnut Creek,
there are records for the federal species of concern and state special concern Carolina madtom (Noturus
furiosus) and the federal species of concern and state significantly rate pinewoods shiner (Lythrurus
matutinus).
The area is experiencing rapid urban growth and we are concerned about the cumulative impacts
of development on dwarf wedgemussel downstream of the project. Changes inland use from a primarily
forested area to an urban landscape may exacerbate channel degradation and sediment impacts to stream
ecosystems due to increased stormwater runoff and elevated flooding. Increases in impervious surfaces
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
z•d szsc.-s~~-see ~uea~H •~•s dot =t:o so so ~~o
SONd~18M-OMa~~WtiN ~689~~L6T6~~81
~~^~i
~~

~ 'd
Page 2
4 l7ctobcr 2006
City of Raleigh -Water Treatment Plant
DWQ ID No. 20061144
can result in stream degradation without the implementation of appropriate stotmwater quantity and
quality control measures. In addition, pollutants (e.g., sediment, heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides, and
fertilizers) washed from roads and urban landscapes can adversely affect and extirpate species
downstream of developed areas.
Due to the presence of dwarf wedgemussel downstream of the project site, we recommend the
following conditions be incorporated into the permit to further minimize impacts to aquatic and te~restrial
wildlife resources.
1. In watersheds that support federally endangered species, we recommend a 200-foot undisturbed,
native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a 100-foot buffer along intermittent streams
and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts
to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and
downstream of the project area. In addition, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining
stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with stormwater runoff:
Whereas, a grassed buffer, particularly fescue, is a vegetatod buffer but will not provide the
necessary and highly valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers.
2. We recommend that all remaining wetlands and streams on the site should be protected from
additional impacts by placing them in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling,
draining, flooding, and excavation.
3. We recommend that sewer lints, water lines, and other utility infrastructure be kept out of
riparian buffer areas. All utility crossings should be kept to a minimum, which includes careful
routing design and the combination of utility crossings into the same right-of--way (provided there
is not a safety issue). The directional bore (installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding
impacts to the stream and buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings
wherever practicable, and the open cut stream crossing method should only be used when water
icvel is low and stream flow is minimal. Manholes or similar access structures should not be
allowed within buffer areas. Stream crossings should be near perpendicular (75.10105) to
stream flow and should be monitored at least every three months for maintenance needs during
the first 24 months of the project and then annually thereafter. We recommend a minimum 100-
200 foot setback on all streams, lakes, and wetlar~s for these structures, which falls in line with
the recommended buffer widths. Further, insecticides and herbicides should not be used for
maintenance ofrights-of--way within 200 feet of perennial streams and I00 feet of intermittent
streams, or within floodplains and wetlands associated with these streams.
SaNti~13M-i7Ma ~BWtiN ~689~~L6Z6 ~~31 8S ~~1+ f1Hl 9002-5-190
4. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands to eliminate
the need to fill and culvert, where practicable. If culverts must be used, the culvert shouid be
designed to allow passage of aquatic organisms.
5. In watersheds that support federally endangered species, we recommend new developments
exceeding 6% imperviousness include stormwater controls designed to replicate and maintain the.
hydrographic condition at the site prior to the change in landscape.
6. We recommend that landscaping consist ofnon-invasive native species and Low Impact
Development (LID} technology. Using native species instead of ornamentals should provide
benefits by reducing the need for fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Additionally, native
species should require less water. Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help
E•d
SZ9G-Ebb-9EE
~ueR~g •-7•g dOT=EO 90,S0 a~0

~ ' d SONd~18M-DMO ~ BWtiN
,Page 3
4 October 2006
City ofRaleigh -Water Treatment Plant
DWQ ID No. 20061144
~689~~L6T6~181 8S~~T f1Hl 9002-5-190
maintain the predevelopment hydrologic regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value
of the site.
7. Specialized efforts and techniques are implemented to reduce sediment runoff from construction
activities. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic
resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of
aquatic species.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. if we can provide further assistance,
please contact our office at [phone].
ec; Dale Suitor, USFWS
Sarah McRae, NHP
Rob Nichols, WRC
{,•d SZ9G-Ebb-9EE ~ueRUg •~•g d0T=E0 90 SO X00

ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, facilities
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject:
Response to Comments
D.E. Benton Water Treatment Plant, Lake Benson and Wheeler Dam Upgrades and
Finished Water Transmission Main
DWD Project # 06-1144
Dear Ms. Karoly:
The attached information is provided in response to the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWO) letter dated September 7, 2006 regarding the above referenced
project. Enclosed are five copies of the response to your letter. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call meat [phone].
Sincerely,
ARC t IS G&M of Carolina, Inc.
J
inda D ebolt
Senior Scientist
copies:
Dale Crisp, City of Raleigh
Perry Allen, City of Raleigh
US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Office
Eric Kulz, DWO Raleigh Regional Office
DLR, Raleigh Office
WRC
ARCADIS G8M of North Carolina,
Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER RESOURCES
Date:
28 September 2006
Contact:
Linda Diebolt
Phone:
220
Email:
Idiebolt ~ arcadis-us.com
Our ref:
NC7000012.0000
od~D
o ~~r~
9 2p06
5EP ~
t~F.~~ ~p gZOR~~ ~©R~Gtt

ARCADIS D1NQ
28 September 2006
Correction to information contained within the main body of the DWQ letter:
The DWG letter states that temporary impacts will occur to 431 linear feet of
perennial streams and permanent impacts will occur to 212 linear feet of
perennial streams. According to the permit application, 600 linear feet of
temporary perennial stream impacts and 43 linear feet of permanent
perennial stream impacts will occur. This is also addressed in comment
number 1 below.
Additional Information Requested:
1. 212 linear feet of compensatory stream mitigation is required for this project.
Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The plan must conform to
the requirements in 15ANCAC2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type
of impacts proposed.
As per my conversation with Ms. Amy Chapman of DWO, permanent stream
impacts associated with the proposed project consist of 43 linear feet of
perennial streams. Per 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation is not required for
stream impacts associated with the proposed project since impacts to
perennial streams are less than 150 linear feet.
2. In your Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) it states that the federally
endangered dwarf wedgemussel will not be impacted due to water
withdrawals. However, in Section V1.1. of your PCN, it states "the flow of
Swift Creek from the Lake Wheeler outfall will be temporarily halted during
the construction of the weir". Provide documentation showing the dwarf
wedgemussel will not be impacted during this water flow cessation.
The Final Biological Opinion, issued February 2006, yielded an opinion from
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that impacts to the federally endangered
dwarf wedgemussel (DWM) in Swift Creek would not result from the
proposed project. This Final Opinion was specifically geared to the DWM
found in Swift Creek below Lake Benson dam, but also included parts of the
project upstream of Lake Benson dam. At the time the original PCN form
was submitted to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), both the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the USAGE concurred with the very
minor work to be performed at Lake Wheeler, consisting of the construction
of a 3-foot weir to measure minimum flow release. However, since that time,
our engineers have decided to implement a new technology that will NOT
require the construction of the 3-foot weir. Thus, flow over Lake Wheeler will
not be interrupted.
Pag©:
2/4

ARCADIS °WQ
28 September 2006
3. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required
by GC3402.
Item 4 of GC3402 requires site-specific stormwater management for sites
that are anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30%.
The proposed treatment plant will include approximately 10.3 acres of
impervious surfaces. The total site acreage is 55.3 acres, which results in an
impervious cover of approximately 19% (<30%). Per GC3402, site-specific
stormwater management is not required for the proposed treatment plant
since impervious cover will be less than 30% of the site.
A copy of the Division of Land Resources Letter of Approval, dated March 3,
2005, and a copy of the figures associated with the erosion control plan are
attached for your information. The project will comply with all measures
required for full compliance with the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of
1973, as implemented by 15 NCAC 4A, 46, and 4C, as amended.
stormwater control measures associated with installation of the water line
will include, but will not be limited to, the minimization of exposed soil at one
time. Prior to installation of the water line, streams will be sampled for the
presence of DWM at the proposed water line crossing sites. If DWM is found
to be present, the water line will be installed across the stream using
directional drill to eliminate any disturbance to the stream. For streams in
which DWM is not found to be present at the water line crossing site,
cofferdams will be used during water line installation and measures will be
taken during construction to ensure that excavated material does not enter
the stream channel. All areas associated with construction of the water line
will be returned to original grade, and seeded and strawed in a timely
manner.
4. Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site
plan. Be sure to clearly show Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the buffers.
Figures clearly showing Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the buffers on the site plan are
attached.
5. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. Ensure that the buffer
impacts on Lake Wheeler and Lake Benson are included.
Attached are figures showing all buffer impacts associated with the proposed
project. Please note that no buffer impacts will occur in association with
proposed construction at the water treatment plant site or the Lake Wheeler
Dam site. Please note that on Drawing Number 2, which shows the Neuse
Page:
3/4

ARCADIS
River Buffer Zones associated with Lake Benson, there is a buffer impact
that is not in the PCN application. The impact to Buffer Zone 1 is 0.055 acre
and the impact to Buffer Zone 2 is 0.037 acre. As with the other buffer
impacts associated with the proposed project, buffer mitigation is not
proposed for this project, as stated in the PCN application. The table below
provides the modified buffer impacts associated with the proposed project.

Zone' Impact

(square feet)
Multiplier Required

Mitigation
1 38,333 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 25,788 1.5
Total 64,121
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone
6. Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank
stabilization on the site plan.
For streams in which DWM is not found to be present at the stream crossing
site, cofferdams will be used for installation of the water line across the
stream. Upon completion of the water line installation at each stream
crossing, excluding any stream that was directionally drilled due to the
presence of DWM, the stream banks will be returned to their original
configuration. Erosion control matting will be placed on the stream banks
from normal water elevation to beyond the top of bank within the area of
disturbance. The area of disturbance will be seeded and strawed in a timely
manner. No fill material will be used during this process. A figure showing a
typical stream crossing in which directional drilling is not used is attached.
7. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. Be sure
to include O&M agreements and associated worksheets.
Proposed points of stormwater discharge for the treatment plant site will be
outside of stream buffers and the proposed discharge points for
concentrated flows will be to existing conveyances outside of the stream
buffers. Therefore, no diffuse flow provision measures are proposed for the
treatment plant site.
DWQ
28 September 2006
Pag©:
4/4

~_ -~ -
M 4
~~'~ ~ 4
¢_.
~4~ s ~ ~ ~
t3 _~ q~ ~' -` `,
,.
],, Y ii
' ".~
'~ t ~ ~ w {
Ft~
'~ ~ ~` S 1
~~~~ , ::
6 ~, }
~;~,.4 ,_
~ ' +t Stream Impacts: 0.014 ac ~~.~,,r•
' ~ a• 4 ~ ~ Z "~+•w~Y~l
t ,_-,~ ., `~ A~~ dad .. r ~l ~ ~ J _..'.
F ~ ~..-~- ~-~=- Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres
x ;,,~ M ,~~- ;
~ ' - 6~ ' ~' _~ ~ ';, Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres
~ ~ ,~ ~~~~
w t'
d .. 'Re ..
t- yy.
"1 "'! ,. Y
1' 3 d
e.
k"
Y!
,;~ i r .. i ~ ",.
~ :~ Yi ~~ ~ 1,.
i~i ~ ~ ~
Legend ~~~~ ~ ~- '
S123 Stream Number -- ~- -s
-Proposed Pipeline ~ ~`.~ " ~
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 1 -0 500' looo' 1500'
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 2 Sheet 1
Surface Waters 1"=500'
Stream Impacts: 0.003 ac
~' Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres
~,~ Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres.
t ...,~~;~ __I
~ I {r * } _ to a '' &'~
_~ :'
I ~~ ~~~. i
:, ~;
y ~ h
~d L {
A~ ~ -~. t,
3A? F` ~ e~i r ~ ~.~ ~ 3J} t .4

i

Buffer zone
Buffer Zone
;Proposecl Pips
Veuse River E
Veuse River B
e ....R.,.... lA/.%*j%.
c 64 i
9 ac
P: 0.037 acres,
�.
•� MGL_E`7 Lr�,fi±1
�.. _
Sm3
• u _. :� 'tit
Y,
��j� q R
a, AF�ISOW-
•
MM--

~ ~. ~ ,'~ + 1 ~~ ~w'~ 4. ,.~~' ~' ~ .~,, r ~ w
.~ a
~~
°#, ~ J/J~ `y"`'4 - MIN ®Gk t
r' ~ ' - A ~ e ~~. ','I ~~~ • •~`n of-, QA l~, 'y'~.~ .1 • J,~ , _ ~.1 ~@ ~. ~. ~,b _ !`e z'
l~ ~' ~ ~ `, + ., ~ Pik ' et~ ~'_. -i ~ ;~~'_n 1 ,.! .~ ~~ ~ 4~ r~'~
~\ ` ~y~ ~. ^.oyf~~ ~ '- ~~.t.: nyt •i `' _ `` -`""~-...."~~s~ - - ~ ' r4r 'max{
~; • ~ ~ ~C, ~! ' .:~~~~~ r fir ~~~~~. I . ,-~ -`~Y ,.'A``-`~ M
A ~
,`\ ! ~~k F ~ Af .lY ^ ~ t ~-'84 /fir ~ sp 11 ~J f1 .~ ~ ~1 H.
,.
..
~. .. 1 z -awl. ,_. 1 ~~ R~ ~r `~ .,~ ~.~}1~~~
~, _ ~' ! _ y r ~ ~ F,,1 riF it ~ ~ v r~~ ~ ~~ ~ ok r r+~ 1 1
~~
~ 1 ~ r'~P ,-.~
~-
~r , "` e^'~~ ~.~'.~ y1 ~ Y - 1~~~'~^~ ~ ~ ~ • r rya ~ ~h! r' - - _r~
• ` ... 7~ I
_ _ ~1 /~~ 3 / • tr
r V 1~ ~ !~ 1 .y, k~ ~~af'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 S5 ~~ f; r --~
,.cf 't'
`~ {,;r:~~ ~ "~~~ ~~` ~ ~ '~ Stream Impacts: 0.009 ac - ";
~~
'~~ '~ J Buffer Zone 1 Im acts: 0.055 acres-;~~ ~'
1 ~
~ ~~~ 7 ~ p
~, ' .~.
P ,.,. ~ _,~',-r:,~,R*, F~uffer Zr~np ~ irr~ acts: 0,037 acres- .
4 .ti-~71 ~•'~ sl. " ~~ ~'-` 2 4~}~ .}~nd~i t~ ~f p.v: - ~+. I.~ -_.._-.
'~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, . ! ~ ! "~'_ , 1. 1E _ ~IY 1 ~ -
I
n r, ' rj(r' +~" „rl F~~ ~ ^~A ~ rfi ~r r+4 ; I r~l
~ 5 ~ ii..
. ~''1 -"
~ ~ l i
fi'~ ~'~ ~~`• ~ ~£ Y- %I~ ' ~~ .+-^ ` ~ ~/ ~ ' T ~~!i~ ~z ~ V` ~~ Fit a "!~' , ,~ ~ ~ :C^
.? ~ .~ ~k ~.. a s
Legend ';'~° .._ ~ _ ~ ~ ,g ~ t ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~--~ ~, ~~~~ ' ~ ,~~-
~`~'_ ` ~ _ tip'`` ~ _ '11 '. \'T`~ ,f. '. ~} ~~r.~.'u,.-..- ~i~
s~
S123 Stream Number ~'~ ~~° ~-~ - {.
~~
- Proposed Pipeline ~ t~~t~ '''.~ ~ ~ _. .
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 1
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 2 ° soo~ ~ooo~ ~soo~ Sheet 3
Surface Waters ~~=500
--

~~__ ~ a
3 ~
..: S 14
~:~
__
;~ ~~ d ~~
~~a' Stream Impacts: 0.004 ac
', ~,a ,
} ~;~~ Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres
- ` ~ : ~'~ Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres
_ ,.~,,.
m~f~*-r
~ f.:.; ~i

rr~.e.-.:~ r ~w~
~~
+',. b
`~'
`~:~•p,.

41

s / S16
-I' ' tK_
S15
WETLP'N'D 3
WETLAND 3
Wetland Impacts: 0.88 acres
PROPOSE
PIPELINE
tj
Legend
S123 Stream Number

-. ~ 1 ~'r ~ f t x4..-
~ g PF ~F rE r .,~aa Sr
~I; d K r' ~ r ~ 1
r':,
'~'
a' ` E 5 1
•a , a
r
i k ~,
,~; `~ \ '~ Stream Impacts: 0.014 ac ~ ~ ~
..x~ _ fi .~, ~ ,
'~ ~ ~ Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres •~
;~ ,,~~ ~ ~ ~+~_ ~~ ~., ~ ~ ~~ Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres ,~ ,~
3- ~ .i - ~ r,-:,-
.,,~ ., r _ }h,=~. ~~. i Ei 46_'1' tJr~h. ,n~ '~' .1 i.+`,v
.~ , se s, ' . s ~ r~~ tom., rl ~.-.. ,~
` _ '. ..
t~ ~ s~' .. ~i1~d i 't .~:0 1 'Mt~ ~, ~i
x, ~ "~ a !. y~ l~! 1 '~ ~'~ - -
a ~, '~ i i t ~ ~ 4 ~. !Z ,ti •}~' ~ " ~ f -mod .. s ~ . ~ n
t16 t #' ' J„,~ yap, -- - 5s:-- ~.` F ,fir. _ .
' .~$ ,i+
s. +~'-
,4 _ _
:~ F.
};~ F - ~ ; _ ~r" i
w. ..
~'
x.
. ~ .,
A
_ _
~ ..lM' ~•
• i
~.
i~ .~
w,
~r
• -•
;~
r..~ - - -_. .. __. ~ -
A
;:.
<Y ,
< ~~ ~
,, .
~ :- .~~ ~ -
a
..
r.;
~ ~.. ~ ~"f / ~ y~ i ~ ~` ~ "'lll iii -t
_ . ~ it "f ~a~ hlt!+"'~ ~ ~ i ^~~'~" ~,, 1
y
3t K
n,-.
.~ .
f
.a
.• ~. ~:
~' , 'r. '~ '~ i
1, ,
~... ~ ~:
I~
'~ i I
Legend ~~' ,. k , ~ • `` ~~ f,. ~~.a
S123 Stream Number ' '~~~~*= '~~ `~~ I~ ~ ~z~
Proposed Pipeline ~ ~ _ ~ '~~"
a ~C p't~~' M
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 1 0 500' looo' 1500'
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 2 Sheet 6
Surface Waters 1"=500'

~. a ~ `- ~ `~ ~ -
t r b r Taw y. ,~;~
. ~ ~- Y ,.
_!. u. _ ~- a ~ ~'~w Y. 1. ~~ tli ~.±f~i s i Y,'.,.E,. j~a"i"~ } i~~ #` • ~ :.: i ~ ~~~ r~~y~1
.~ ,
~~ ~ ~ ~
~6d~p ~ S ~ § ._F r~ f Y k 11~ a [~>. A_ ~'~+1 ~-.~ .i ~~~~~~a 1
~/ S 9 ~' F~
~t, jai' ~ - ~ s "~{c f Z ;a it '-:
,'rte ~ ~ y. Y 4 y ~ y A, S ~~ ~ ~ `~~+'r`_
~t:+ Stream Impacts: 0.014 ac ~ A~ ~ ~~~ ~{ ~~~; ~~~, .i
(! ~,.
i ;• 1.4~ t ~1 ~ ~ lP'~ ~ ' i v~~ yes;`' ~ 1„ i 1'~
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres ,~,. . ~~ ~ '~° ,~ ~+ ~,~ ~~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~
~ r .. -1 1 -- r~trl } .<-r Y 7~ w ~.
, Buffer Zane 2 Imlaacts: 0.037 acres ~ ~~• ?~~ ~..~,~~ ~k! ~~ .~• h}, YY 1
?"..~T ~ spa ~ ~': ~ !" K ai a3,~ i ~ '~. ~~~ r t ~.a ~ Qa §
~` ~ i...C'Y ~ a_ ~ ~ y, f .i i ~ ~ t R ~ § #~ k, e ~ a t ~° a.Y ~ ~ Yv.. ~' !~! ~.
44 ~ 1.. + i_l_ ~J ~~ ~s~ ,{~y,~ M 1-~5 ~ •• .'T`~~ ;~.~#Y ~~' r .i ~. 1 ~ 1} { +i. +..~
N~1 ' T 1~ r ~ ~ iM Y r'' § t ~.~•' ~ !'. r a . i it ,. ~A t;~ µ. ~ # ~ t ~,~•
.b't~,_..a .'as ~~ ~~~ ~~~ '1S9i~ . _ - -~~'!?l'' ~~Fl1l~ l~,l~r~~~. i ~+~- ~~~ .~ N_ ,.~~"~s4~' 14 ii ~ ..°?k1-.1 ':~'~' _

Y~
IS
Y
1

Le end d ~'F '` V ~ t ~ ~ ' i'F . ,,sh ~ T g ~ - ~
~;
S123 Stream Number ~~'. ~~° ~ ,
£~ ~r
- Proposed Pipeline ~~"~~ ~' ~' ~ +' ~ _ .
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 1 0 500' looo' 1500
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 2
Surface Waters 1"=500'
~~
S z
nN
4 CIA st4
`
§
.
~
~' ,.
g `
,a
y }

~~'~ '
~y a gyn.
!
i a~ ~
,

~ S10
Stream Impacts: 0.014 ac
~;
~' `~'~ ~" Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.
~, t ~ ~ .
~ ~ - ' '_ Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.
S9
Stream Impacts: 0.004 ac
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres
S8
Stream Impacts: 0.005 ac
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acres
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres
acres
acres
I+ i 'h
7 e'' ~~'.f' L= ` ~~ 1_ ~_.
~- Stream Impacts. 0.014 a ~,r4 ~~~f ~~ T ~. ~ , ~~~ ,~.
~.
Buffer Zone 1 Im acts: 0.055 acres ~~ ~"~~ ~ . ~ ~,", ~ ~ ~.,"; .~,~ ~ v .~€
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres ',~y~ ;~ ' t
~~t.- ark.. n ~.~~_ ,y. ` .pr~ ~ ~=k ~. ~~~~ ~ Y 'p a ~ ~ ) s°'y~,•.--^
Legend ~ a~ ~ ~~,1 _ ~ ,~ `;~" "'' ~: ' ~ _ ,~'Y ~~ ,r ~_;
S123 Stream Number ~'~'~=~;~ ~. ~~;~ - ~' "~
- Proposed Pipeline y.+.~~j ~~ ~'~_ j~, _"~" }1~ ~~
~1' ~ k ~ _ ~ ~ /~' ~ is ~ ! it J ~. c. r~c.
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 1 0 ~~~~ ~~~~} ,~u«~
Neuse River Buffer -Zone 2 Sheet 8
Surface Waters ~°=soo~

.,y, ..

m
.~,
~~U
p„
`T
Us
v
1
a
3
Ee
3%6
oi~
l
bCl
8$
~'%
a>,~
~~
~~
"o
Eo
xox$
da°
3
a ~.
e~
~ o
o~
eo
>Z
~~
~~ ~~
~\ I ~,
\\
` \~ ~ f
~ ~- ~ ~
~ ~
`~ti , _
f/ ;!~~
,_ ~ ~
/ ~~ ~\
-~ ~ 50'NEUSERNER
6
0
roswlFTCREEIc
1, ~~ iir,'c
'~~ ~
\\ ~.
~~~w~%
1
~ ~ 1 ~~
~ ~, ~ 1
~ ~O 1 /,, ,
/1
V ~ 6~~p ~~ '~~r~ /1
~,e, y
`~ ~ i
~~ , r , ,.
,N
~. ~ \
/ ~ ~.
>, f ~ ~
~, ~ ~
~~~
~ ~ , ~`
(RIPARIAN BUFFER ~x ~~
x x
~ ~ xJ ~~
Q ; lj;
,9 '~ ~ ~~
PROPOSED ' 'Y " "~
~~ NIGHWAY50 '~~,,-
1 ', ~ PUMP57AT10N ~ ~~~!,~~~
f
~ `~ _
/~ 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ~ ,~ i~ 1 a k v
'/~ ~~ '1 0'.:
V~~~ ,• I ~~ ! '
NEUSERNERBUFFERZONE 1~~ NEUSERfVERBUFFERZONEI }r~
NEUSERIVERBUFFERZONE2~ 5 '/( ~NEUSERIVERBUFFERZONE2 .~ ``
1 ~ jl ~ 1
I 1

I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~/~~ .-
EX1S11NO4.2 M6D w= ~ ~ / o` D1 SANITARY SEWER
i ~ ~ ,
f~ ~ INFIUENTPUMPSTAiION ~~
I ~ c.~
;11\1
1 ,1~
\~
~~.
NC ~ 1\
~~- - -
_ -~ ~ -
_ _ =~_
11~ETIAND 1
.26ACRESIMPACTED I
rx x x x x x x
r---------r-------- ~
I ;
I I I ~i
~ I ~ ~;
~- ~~
- T- j
I I ~ 1
\ II--~ r----~
r Yr 'yt rn
1 ~ r t ,N F ~I
- ~. ~~ 112=~ , .,
k
~~
, ~~
_ ..... ,,
J ~ • WETLAND
LEGEND
PHASE I BUILDING (WTP)
PHASE II BUILDING (WTP)
WETLANDS
® WETLANDS TO BE FILLED
~ l L1MIT5
r a r • • •
MAHLER CREEK
r . J- ~ti"_ ---
R1VER BUFFER ZONE 1 ~- / ~
RIYERBUFFERZONE2
© ~~.
Q~c~~od~p
s~~ z s zags
4't`.~~` GS al+G STGsVxaNTf;~. Fq(~fi
RLY. ISSIhA 0.lTE DESCAIFIICN
ARCADIS
,~ ~ a1 A~ Carc9m, ~.
881 Caporals Cantor Orne, SuAe J00
Adeigh NC 77607
Td: 919-&5{-1197 Fay: 919-854-5418
rru.orcada-u~.can
PRQIECT TITLE
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
SHEET TNLE
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
ZONE MAP
L~,vwcER
LEAD DESIGN PROF. I CHECKED BY
T15K/PHASE NUMBER DRAWN BY
0 200' 4OOa 600'
~ """ """'"'~ Z PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER
scni~ tN ~~ 1A
``
~\
1\~
~ 1~ ~
`~r/ I ~- 1
W-7r
ti,~/ f
/ ~"/ ~ /
';, \ (` /
~~~~
__ -_
~ POND
BUFFER ZONE 1
I '
~/
x '',
J i
1~

/~NEUSE UFFERZONE2~x_J ' - --__-`--
,~\
~~-'i' \
--~
--- - - -

~n
mW
.._
oa
6F
~~
U
0
a
3
o~
N=
8~
N8
N~
N/
~~
..o
Eo
xox~
da
3
&o
a..
c°
>~
Y~
NORMAL WATER LAKE BENSON
LEVEL ~

~ ~ uwunNrt~trirt-~ ~ ~,:
~~~ - _
~~
NEUSERIV OZ~NE`i-
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 2
`'-.~ -
~: ~
~,;: r/
~-
1EVEL LWATER ~~ `~ I,,
\: , ~~`.
LAKE BENSON
~~/,
180'
0 60 , ,~.,.,,;.
SCALE IN FEET
/ I
TEMPORARY COFFER DAM •`••
~~~ '
NEWMANNOLE ~
\ i
~' ` ~ BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS: 0.055 ACRES I
NEW24"OUTFACE ~~~ ~ ~~ BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS: 0.037 ACRES
~'~~~ 1
o \ \~ ~
_-- _ _ _~'~~~~,B~IFFALO ROAD (SR 271_1)_ o
4q ~ - - 1_
~ -
cc
k~__ _ o ~ - SS -- SS -
.- ~ / c - -- _.. c
°- --
'~ (~~~~
~ ~, U ~~L!
/ ~ 6
ZQO
// ~ ~ ~ STREAM IMPACT ~, 9
/~`~'% •V~' ~5~~~
\ 1 / I \
/' ---
~~ ~~~ \
~~
/ ~~~~
~ ~~
_ \ ,~
~,
/ ~ ~ ~~
~~ ,,
,.
K,
s ~ ~~.
/ ~ ,
/.c ~\` `,
~~ ~
~' ~'
\ ~~F
_~ ~~
~~ ~.
~~~ ~~
\ \\
~~~
\~ ~~ ..
,==~~ ,, _
EDGE OF SPILLWAY ~- =~~ ::
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1
NEUSERIVERBUFFERZONEI~
-°
EDGE OF SPILLWAY
r^
c
t~~~
~,
'~ NEUSE R1VER BUFFER ZONE f
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 2
r
~~h°
fiEY. ISSUED DQE CCSCPIPIION
ARCADIS
I~9Gm1$ CiV of NaN Caro9m, Inc
eo1 Cayaale ~Ig k~, see aw
Adngr, NC 17W7
Td: 919-&Sh1281 FaF: 919951-SH8
rn.mcod~s-uxcan
PROJECT TITIf
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
SHEET TIllE
iAKE BENSON
NEUSE RNER BUFFER ZONES
PROJECT WWAGER DEPARTNENi WUJAGFR
W. W'HEEIER W. WHEELER
LEAD OESIGN PROF. CHECKED BY
!T. SADLER R. HILDEBRAN
TASK/PHASE NUlJDER DRAWN BY
00020 T. BEMON
PRQIECT NU6!0ER DRAWING NUlJDER
NC70012.1000 ~ Z
SITE S•19 SE.P
~t w++a~ rrp sl ~ ~ A~ ~,ct+
r ~ AMJ~pS GdSI, NC.
Q J ~~1

m
••N
U
a~
u9
.;
b
0
3
E T'
~_
g
N8
P
N~
W~
..o
Eo
a~
~a

a ~.
tO C
&a
op
C~
>_
~~
N

SUBMERGED
TOE OF DAM

86, .
~6°
7j
rv'
LAKE !'~
WHEELER ~,
9
N'o
~~
a
C ~`
1
1~
~~B
a~
y~ ,
fI
Y
~;r
r'~
4
rr
0
~vf
o' o°
Q~y ~h•
vi~ ry
~Qi q
Off
~~~~
'~ - - -
t''
EXISTING
60" RCP
PROPOSED BRIDGE,
- SUSPENDED OVER EXISTING
CONCRETE DAM. NO BUFFER
IMPACTS WILL OCCUR
~Q' ~~h
N
O Yj
~~2 ~~•
LANDWARD
TOE OF DAM
~ LAKE WHEELER DAM -I
PROPOSED
WEIR
EXISTING-
HEADWALL
STREAM IMPACT -
SfTE No-S18
`.
NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER ZONE
NEUSE RNER
BUFFER ZONE 2
NEUSE RNER
BUFFER ZONE 1
NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER ZONE 2
SWIFT_ . -CREEK.. ~ •
ALL IMPACTS AT Sib V~LL OCCUR
WIT111N THE STREAM CHANNEL
NO BUFFER IMPACTS WILL OCCUR.
f ~~^1
^^~
~~
s'~
~~~
~~O
1~ 9 ,~pp6
5 ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~
~~~r~~
w
0 30' 60' 90'
~,i ..
SCALE IN FEET
I Qc'm06 IltCID6 Cdl~ NC. I
IRCV. aun cn;C CCx>uPnon
~ ARCADIS
lACA016 GkN d NaN Caro4m, Nc
601 Capaale Cenlar piva, Suite 300
Ralagh, NC 17601
id'. 919-8Sh1181 Fax [phone]
vnarcadu-uf.can
PROJECT TITLE
Dempsey E, Benton
Water Treatment Plant
~ ., ,
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
LAKE IYHEELER DAM UPGRADES -
NEUSE RNER BUFFER ZONES
PR0.IECT MANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER
W. WTiEE1ER W. WHEELER
LEAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED BY
M. SADIER R. HILDEBRAN
TASK/PHASE NUMBER DRAWN 6Y
00020 T. BEN10N
PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER
NC70012.1000 ~ 3

STREAM BED

~~
~~
a
___ .
~~
~~
r~
~~
~~
EXISTING GRADE
- - - - -
WATER LINE
TYPICAL STREAM CROSSING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
~~ 1:~
~~o
no ~ ~ ~0~~
1~ e ~~
S~ ~~4,a1~ 1,y,,a~~
oE~p~:ps~~~~
~;~
~~
O.E. EEt(10N ~!(P FR~Cf
~~ cr. aM COUiIY, Ii0R1N GAOIAN r~wx xxca cewrs xuex
Q Isar. snm a~ ....or+~

NORMAL
- WATER LEVEL
- -
2'-6' MIN.
EROSION CONTROL MATTING

State of North Carolina .. .
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
City of Raleigh
P. O. Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
ATTN: J. Russell Allen
DMSION OF LAND RESOURCES
LETTER OF APPROVAL
March 3, 2005
RE: Project Name: Dempsey Benton WTP
County: Wake
Submitted by: Arcadis
Date Received: 02/08/05; 3/02/05
Date Processing Initiated: 3/02/05
Watershed: Neuse #1/03-04-02
New Submittal (~ Revised ( )
Dear Mr. Allen:
~CFr~~b
~Q
~ ~ fNO/R~e ~ ?~~~
pnhCQ o na ~ ~ it/gr
This office has reviewed the subject Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. We find the plan to
be acceptable and hereby issue this letter of approval. If any modifications, performance reservations, or
recommendations are applicable, a list is enclosed and is incorporated as a part of this letter of approval.
The enclosed Certificate of Approval should be posted at the job site. In addition, it should be noted that
this plan approval shall expire three (3) years following the date of approval, if no land-disturbing activity
has been undertaken, in accordance with Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC)
4B.0029.
If any modifications are not incorporated into the plan and implemented in the field, the site will
be in violation of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Statute
(NCGS), 113A-61.1). .
15A NCAC 4B.0018(a) requires that a copy of the approved plan be on file at the job site. Also,
this letter gives the notice required by NCGS 113A-61.1(a) concerning our right to perform periodic
inspections to ensure compliance with the approved plan.
North Carolina's sedimentation pollution control program is performance oriented, requiring
protection of the natural resources and adjoining properties. If at any time during this project it is
determined that the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NCGS 113A-51 through 66), this office may require
revisions in the plan and its implementation to ensure compliance with the Act.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper ',

J. Russell Allen
March 3, 2005
Page 2
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with applicable federal
and state water quality laws, regulations and rules. This could include the Division of Water Quality
under stormwater or other specific water quality standards, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under
Article 404 jurisdiction. Our approval does not supersede any other required permit or approval.
Since this project disturbs one or more acres, one such approval relates to the stormwater that will
discharge from your project. This runoff is permitted pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) administered in North Carolina by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
Attached is the General Stormwater NPDES Permit, NCGO10000, as revised October 1, 2001, covering
your activity. You are responsible for complying with the General Permit requirements and arc subject to
enforcement by DWQ for any violations of the General Permit.
Due to the location of this project, it should be noted that a rule to protect and maintain existing
buffers along watercourses in the Neuse River Basin became effective on July 22, 1997. The Neuse River
Riparian Area Protection and Maintenance Rule (15A NCAC 2B .0233) applies to all perennial and
intermittent streams, lakes, ponds and estuaries in the Neuse River Basin with existing vegetation on the
adjacent land or "riparian area". In riparian areas with existing vegetation in the first 30 feet directly
adjacent to the stream, the rule prohibits land disturbance or new development within the first 30 feet of
land next to the water (the remaining 20 feet of the total buffer must be revegetated upon completion of
any proposed land-disturbing activity). In riparian areas with existing vegetation that is less than 30 feet
wide, the rule prohibits land disturbance or new development within the area that contains the existing
vegetation (but not the entire 50 foot riparian area). For more information about this riparian area rule,
please contact the Division of Water Quality's Wetland/401 Unit at 919-733-1786, or a Division of Water
Quality representative at this regional office.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided
concerning financial responsibility. You are requested to file an amended Financial Responsibility Form if
any changes become necessary. In addition, it would be helpful ifyou would notify this office when the
proposed land-disturbing activity covered by this plan is initiated.
Your cooperation is appreciated and we look forward to working with you on this project. If there
are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
cerely,
Debbie R. Barbee
Asst. Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
DRB:cIm
cc: David Smith, P.E., Arcadis
Mr. Ken Schuster, P.E., Division of Water Quality

Triage check fist
Date: ~"J ~ ~ Project Name: , V a~ J~
DWQ#: ~~~ ~ I ~ `f
County: t~ ~~
To: ^ ARO Kevin Barnett ^ WaRO Kyle Barnes
^ FRO Ken Averitte ^ WiRO Noelle Lutheran/Joanne Steenhuis
' ^ MRO Alan Johnson/Barry Love ^ WSRO Daryl Lamb
I
' ~ RRO Eric Kulz
j
From: C~ N`o~ Telephone : (919) ~ I S ' (~rY~ 3
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need. assistance.
^ Stream length impacted
^ Stream determination
^ Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps.
^ Minimization/avoidance issues
.(Buffer Rules ease Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
^ Pond fill
^ Mitigation Ratios
^ Ditching
^ Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
^ Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
_S~r~

~~
`~ ~ ~. ~
~~' ~ ~ ~'Vi-el'.~' i ro, l,~ / ~, l ~~~ ~~ s how ~e,~.- c:,o.,~ co ,~~_

,~~;~~~ ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
To:
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 OversighUExpress Review Permitting
Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
From: ~/
Linda Diebold
Copies:
file
Date:
29 September 2006
Subject: ARCADIS Project No.:
Response to ~ invents -DWQ Project # 06- NC7000012.0000
1144
ARCADIS G&M of
North Carolina, Inc.
BO1 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
O ~~~~ri~~iCES
S F p 2 9 1006
DENt~ • W~.fEk puHLITY
YiETt~NDa idtD $Tt)IttAW~TIUt CtW ~ctt
We are sending you:
® Attached ^ Under Separate Cover Via the Following Items:
^ Shop Drawings ^ Plans ^ Specifications ^ Change Order
^ Prints ^ Samples ^ Copy of Letter ^ Reports
® Other: Response to Comments Package
Co ies Date Drawin No. Rov. Descri lion Actlon•
5 29Sep06 Response to Comments Package - D.E. Benton WTP Project -
DWQ Project No. 06-1 144 AS

Action•
^ A Approved ^ CR Correct and Resubmit ^ Resubmit Copies
^ AN Approved As Noted ^ F File ^ Return Copies
® AS As Requested ^ FA For Approval ^ Review and Comment
^ Other:
Mailing Method
^ U.S. Postal Service 1~` Class ®Courier/Hand Delivery ^ FedEx Priority Overnight ^FedEx 2-Day Delivery
^ Certified/Registered Mail ^ United Parcel Service (UPS) ^ FedEx Standard Overnight ^FedEx Economy
^ Other:
Comments: Attached is the Response to Comments Package for the City of Ralei h D.E. Benton WTP project. Please let me
know if you have any questions or require additional information. Linda
Pag©:
c:Wocumeres aM setlirgsJdiebdtmy docwr +es~lransmtlal lel~er.doc 1 ~2

~QF W ATFR p Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
~ r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
~ ~
0 .~ Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 7, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1144
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RF,CEIPT REQUESTED
City of Raleigh
Attn: Mr. Dale Crisp, Director of Public Utilities
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: D.E. Benton Water Treatment Plant, Lake Benson and Wheeler Dam
Upgrades and Finished Water Transmission Main
UT Swift Creek [030402, 27-43-(8), C, NSW]
UT Big Branch [030402, 27-34-(11), C, NSW]
UT Walnut Creek [030402, 27-34-(4), C, NSW, 303d]
UT Swift Creek [030402, 27-43-(8), C, NSW]
Lake Benson [030402, 27-43-(5.5), WSIII, NSW, ca]
Lake Wheeler [030402, 27-43-(1), WSIII]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Crisp:
On July 13, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit received
your application dated September 17, 2004, to impact 1.68 acres of wetlands, 431 linear feet of temporary
perennial streams, 212 linear feet of permanent perennial streams, 0.038 acres of open waters, 35,937
square feet of Zone 1 protected riparian buffers and 24,176 square feet of Zone 2 protected riparian.
buffers for the purpose of the Lake Benson and Lake Wheeler dam upgrades and water transmission main
installation. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate
information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject properly. Therefore, unless we
receive five copies of the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of
your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete
until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may
continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
~; ~',~
1. '~~ r f t of compensatory stre '~gation is required for this pro..'}}e~~. Please provide a
compens• ry mitigation plan. The pl must conform to the requirement~in 15ANCAC2H.0500
and mus be ppropriate to the type i , cts proposed.
2. h1 your Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) it states that the federally endangered dwarf
wedgemussel will not be impacted due to water withdrawals. However, in Section VI.1. of your
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: ~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NOne Carolina
,~trrra!!~
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper

City of Raleigh
Page 2 of 2
September 7, 2006
PCN, it states "the flow of Swift Creek from the Lake Wheeler outfall will be temporarily halted
during the construction of the weir". Provide documentation showing the dwarf wedgemussel will
not be impacted during this water flow cessation.
3. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC3402.
4. Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan. Be sure to clearly
show Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the buffers.
5. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. Ensure that the buffer impacts on Lake
Wheeler aqd Lake Benson are included.
6. Please show'all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the
site plan.
7. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. Be sure to include O&M
agreements and associated worksheets.
Please respond in writing within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this
information to me and to Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you in
writing within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue your variance request and
we will consider the request as withdrawn. Please call Cyndi ICaroly or Amy Chapman of this office at
[phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J~~~
C (~'
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/asc
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Office
DLR, Raleigh Office
3~VRC
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 061144DempseyB enton WTP(Wake)On_Hold

'N
"~

July 11, 2006
Ms. Amy Chapman
N.C. Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC, 27604
Dear Ms. Chapman,
Buffer variance
Good morning. We have spoken in May regarding the City of Raleigh construction of a new
water treatment facility on Lake Benson in Garner, NC. It is named the W. E. Benton Water
Treatment Plant on the site signs. Construction on the main 50 acre site has been underway
for a couple of months now
I was contacted last week by the City attorney, Mr. Rasberry, who advised that they were
soon going to start their construction on my property and wanted to discuss a settlement on
my land and building acquisition. He explained that the delay since last contact was due to
permit problems with the site but he had been re-assured by the project manager that the
necessary permits were in hand or about to be, and construction was moving forward.
I write to request a determination of necessity for a buffer variance and the extent of the
variance, if the City has not actually acquired one as they claim. As Mr. Zarzecki has been
here in 2004, he may have already made notes on this issue. I found that Google Earth has
good atrial photo of the site if you type in 601 Buffaloe Rd, Garner, NC, 27529, and zoom
in close. The pump house expansion site is located on the north end of the lake dam and the
building to be doubled in size is identified by a small blue tarp covering water processing
equipment The parking lot is to be substantially expanded and paved to allow chemical
supply trucks to deliver to the site, where a treatment process will start immediately after the
water is drawn from the lake, then sent to the main plant approximately 1200 feet to the cast.
I have construction plans that may also be helpful in the determination. I will deliver if it
would be helpful
~ ~~~"~~
D
JUL. 1 ~ ~p06
~~'~' S 1 STO,~ ~4aTnLlTy
ER DRAI~CH
601 IiliFI~ALOE RD.
GARNER, NC, 27529

-2-
Jury i i, 200
Obviously, we have a lot hanging in the balance here and need all the information available
to make decisions affecting our future. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
? ~,
~G ~ l ~~~G~~~
David McAleer
GO1 Iiuffaloc Rd.
Garncr,NC 27529
919. 772-8197 home.

l ~ ~.
~~_
`~~~~
~, ~,
w
~ ~~~
~ ~,
~ ~ ,

zwo3 ~- =
RAW WATER PUMP STATION -SITE PLAN

~\
1
\ \ ~ ,`
V ,~~ ,, ~.
~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
,\ ~j\
\ ~\ ~~
~ ~I~a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~. ~
~ ~ ~ ~~
\ ~ ~
\ ~
~ i
1 RAW W
zwo3
ATER PUMP STATION -SITE PLAN
///

1 RAW W
rxai
0
PROPERTY TD ElE ACQUIRED
~-(0.21 ACRES)
d
------ -
. ~ t~; ~
~°
r
-----
i
_ _ ~
___- i
_____
x
i~
~ o
~ ,. _
I
~y
0
~ ,x
L =~`
M
//
~x
ATER PUMP STATION -SITE PLAN
r
L~
w .74 lam) ~ ACQUIRET)
.,~,
K-., ~ f~
. !,\
I ;
fi
/~
i
\\\
e _ - ~

1~~..
~ ~~ ~~
~~ ~~ l~ I vl ~.,~ ~r~
~ CC~L~'ObC d1 c.
o [~ a ~ ~,
D
~ ~~
AUG 1 4 2006 (5''
d~~~ ~.

~..~~-~~So N U~~+ c.. u-r~~i i ~ is }emu M ~ ,c.~ ©~ 5~

Date: 0 ~ f ~ '~ °ZO
Triage ~he'ck ~..,ist
//, 1
Pro'ect Name: ~ C~ • _~' l~-(~ ~f"~ ~~~"
J
DWQ#: ~ ~~ I I Uu
County: ~
To: ^ ARO Kevin Barnett
^ FRO Ken Averitte
. MRO Alan Johnson/Barry Love
RRO Eric Kulz
From: ~ ~~
^ WaRO Kyle Bames .
^ WiRO Noelle Lutheran/Joanne Steenhuis
^ WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919) ~ .5 - ~ o? ~
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need. assistance.
^ Stream length impacted
^ Stream determination .
^ Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps.
inimization/avoidance issues
~uffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
^ Pond fill
Mitigation R~tic~s -~ac' S`~r-c~cr--~
Ditching
^ Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
^ Check drawings for accuracy
^ Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
^ Cumulative impact concern
Comments:

CaM~.~~ ~~R~~
~~

Page 1 of 1
- ~s '-;
`YIIKL:~CO~UNTY`ANU''Ttlt CITY OF KALL'IGN
1fi1DDGDi;D5
f?~~1.1 Kul-~ ~~:
.. WAKE
~~"^ COUNTY
`Fr
-- -
_ __.----
- - -- -- -- BUFFAI nF an
Parcel Number: 1619
REID:
OWNERI:
ADDR1:
ADDR2:
ADDR3:
DEED BOOK:
DEED PAGE:
DEED DATE:
DEED ACRES:
BLDG VAL:
LAND VAL:
BILLING CLASS:
DESCRIPTION:
MAP NAME:
PIN NUM:
PIN EXT:
CITY:
PLAN JURIS:
TOWNSHIP:
YEAR BUILT:
SALEPRICE:
SALEDATE:
TYPE USE:
DESIGN STYLE:
UNITS:
LAND CLASS:
ZONING:
OLD PARCEL NUME
ADDRESS
ST NUM:
ST MISC:
DIR PREFIX:
ST NAME:
ST TYPE:
DIR SUFFIX:
http://imaps.co.wake.ne.us/imaps/printmap.asp?pin=1619569104&pinext=000&minX=211... 8/15/2006
Map created on 8115/2006 2:34:16 PM.
Copyright 2DD6. City of Raleigh, Wake County. 0 ~ 141 ft

fit:

RfW
0 0
RfW ~_
r~~lf~~''LG ,Q Q
~a ~- ~ ~-
Zone A ~' / o /
zox2sz Q
aso slxor /
'z l l °1
-tee se
° a

zone B
~
z
/ 2sFD
i ,~ / h
~ N 02'41' E ~ i/ ~ b

Zl.6ti
"3~'C}j I
~
w
~ \ ~ 229,x0
~AKEC~T r °F R
BFHSDH ~lf/8y
OpFRTr
NOTES 30' easemanl for sewer 8ne has
bean released accor~ag fo Dead Book 3534, pg. 846
100 50 0 100 200
F8 801
I, DANNY 0, WILLIAMS ,certify that under.rir1
direction and supervision this map was drawn fra~~ an
actual field su y•that thg error of closu a of the
survey as calcu~a~e~ by latitudes and departures is
I: 5,000: that this map was prepared in accordance
with G. S, 47-30 as amended.
Y~itness my hand and seal this ~s day of. ocT. lses.
R.L.S._ L-; 281!1 ~yo,.. g ~~,,~ - -
Sw~~rn to and subscribed before me this ~s da;~ of ocT. ,
Ises
My corm i'ss ~ on ~ezp i res I2f I0f 61 ~ ,~
`NOTARY P119L l C
.~ - __
HOUSE LOCATION FOR
DAVID D. McALEER 8 W(FE
PATRICIA G. McAL~ER
ST. MARYS TOWNSHIP
WAK£ COUNTY
~t'~ . ~,., NORTH CAROLINA
_--~__
-` =`~-
~ f- . _
\~
\~ t
S 82°49~ E 1
- - -a---
678.10 1 SR 2111 80~ RIW /
0
5.44 GROSS ACRES
1.17 RfW ACRES
4.2Z GROSS .ACRES.
~ ~
\~• ery~
.pry
~~ 5
0 0' '
c \c
c~ o~
\ou 6° ~EJ MANHOLE
o oa ryro ~
a~° o' ~
4a ooc ~. Q 6rlck Well House ~0~~h
P 0 y/~~~ 5 0, ~~
~o
a
~yo
/ ~,~
~ ?, / 6
S
~. ~ ~/
.~
~~ ~
__. _ LEGEND ~'
0
~ oExisting iron pipe.
300 400 ~~~ o Exlslhg PK Nall
NJILt1AMS, PEARCE 8 ASSOC.
REGl~TERED LAND SURVEYORS
ZEBULON, NORTH CAROLINA
DRA1'!N BYE DOW 8 SML
CHECKED BYE RGW 8 BRT
'DATE
SCALE
10-16-86
I "=100'

~~; ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
To:
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting
Unit
NCDWQ
~_ _._.
From: ~ f.~ ~
Linda Diebol~
Subject:
Permitting Fee
We are sending you:
® Attached
^ Shop Drawings
^ Prints
^ Other:
D
JUL :~ :2006
ti1'ETLAfJDSluVD STCfiht'i1'AT~R BRANC}t
Copies:
file ~'~, ~~
1 -~ ~ ~, .:~ ~~
~',~~ '~~1;1 `',1.~ ~ ~',-1 ~I
~~ ~~
Date:
24 July 2006
ARCADIS Project No.:
NC600012.0000
^ Under Separate Cover Via the Following Items:
^ Plans ^ Specifications
^ Samples ^ Copy of Letter
ARCADIS G&M of
North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
WATER RESOURCES
^ Change Order
^ Reports
Copies Date Drawing No. Rev. Description Action*
1 24Ju106 Pernutting Fee - $475.00, DWQ Project # 06-1144 AS
Action*
^ A Approved ^ CR Correct and Resubmit ^ Resubmit Copies
^ AN Approved As Noted ^ F File ^ Return Copies
® AS As Requested ^ FA For Approval ^ Review and Comment
^ Other:
Mailing Method
^ U.S. Postal Service 15t Class ®Courier/Hand Delivery ^FedEx Priority Overnight ^FedEx 2-Day Delivery
^ Certified/Registered Mail ^ United Parcel Service (UPS) ^ FedEx Standard Overnight ^FedEx Economy
^ Other:
Comments: Attached is a check for $475 that is the permitting fee for DWQ Project # 06-1144 - DE Benton WTP for the City
of Raleigh. We apologize for the oversight of the previous check amount. Please feel free to call if you have any questions.
Thanks for your assistance with this. Linda

Page:
1/2

'O~OF W ATF9pG
~~
O 'C
~.-~~t~TS~'erag~~~M17te~
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 18, 2006
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 06-1144
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ARCADIS
Attn: Linda Dicbolt
801 Corporate Center Drive Ste 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5073
Subject Property: City of Raleigh: D E Benton ~VTP
Permitting Fee
® REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
RETURN OF APPLICATION PACKAGE
Dear IVts. Dicbolt:
On July 13, 2006, tl~e Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated September 17,
2004 for the above referenced project. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete
and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below,
we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 1 SA NCAC 2H .0506 and will
place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
^ Water Quality Certification, See I. Processing, Item 2.. Please state which Permit
(Nationwide, Regional or General) number you intend to use. You may want to contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) to determine wlticli permit they will allow you to
use.
^ DWQ requires the name of an individual shown as "Owner/Applicant" to set up the project.
^ The PCN Application failed to contain the Applicant/Agent's Signature and Date. See last
page of application. (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from applicant is
provided).
^ Water Body information not stated. See III Project Information, Item 7.
^ Lack of permitting fee. Please note that beginning January 1, 1999, the N.C. General
Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee for a11401 applications. The fee for
applications is $200 for projects impacting less than an acre of wetland and less than 150
No°t hCarolina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit ~at!!ra!!1f
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / IntemeC hitm~//h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

`c ~OF W A T ~9P
~O G
o , ~;c ~; .J `~,1
~:~ ~ ~~J `-~ ~~
~,
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 18, 2006
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 06-1144
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ARCADIS
Attn: Linda Diebolt
801 Corporate Center Drive Ste 300
r,^tr., ^--,,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5073 i ~
-,-.- r~l
Subject Property: City of Raleigh: D E Benton WTP _:'~-'.
Permitting Fee
® REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
RETURN OF APPLICATION PACKAGE
Dear Ms. Diebolt:
On July 13, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated September 17,
2004 for the above referenced project. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete
and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below,
we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will
place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
^ Water Quality Certification, See I. Processing, Item 2.. Please state which Permit
(Nationwide, Regional or General) number you intend to use. You may want to contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) to determine which permit they will allow you to
use.
^ DWQ requires the name of an individual shown as "Owner/Applicant" to set up the project.
^ The PCN Application failed to contain the Applicant/Agent's Signature and Date. See last
page of application. (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization, letter from applicant is
provided).
^ Water Body information not stated. See III Project Information, Item 7.
^ Lack of permitting fee. Please note that beginning January 1, 1999, the N.C. General
Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee for a11401 applications. The fee for
applications is $200 for projects impacting less than an acre of wetland and less than 150
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: h~•//h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands
Nt)n° Carolina
~lirra!!~
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/]0% Post Consumer Paper

I~
i
linear feet of streams. For projects impacting one or more acres of wetland or 150 or more
feet of streams, the fee is $475.
® Incorrect permitting fee. Your check # 751046 for $ 200 is herein enclosed. See `Other'
section below.
^ A request for a modification of an issued permit requires re-submission of five (5) application
sets and appropriate fee. We have herein returned your modification request.
^ Application was missing pages or sections of information. See Other section below.
OTHER: A review of the submitted application reflects 1.68 acres of wetland impact and 643 linear feet
of stream impact. The appropriate permitting fee to be remitted is $475.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we
do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan or Ms. Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
~~
C ldi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/Ijd
Enclosures: Check # 751046 for $200
ce: City of Raleigh Public Works, Dale Crisp, PO Box 590, Raleigh, NC 27602
File Copy + Check copy
Central Files + Check copy
Filename: 061144CORaleighDEDenton\VTP(wa ke)_Fee

E/V~~~.Y BUSINESS FORMS 800.392.601 B
:- -_ _ _.
-_ a3o Pl~o DrNa Suf:e 2C0 ~ Hlghbrds _Rmcn, Cegr~do B(1124 = - - _ -_ - - - - _ _ _- - - -_
:':Tel72CU344-3.i00:lFina72W344-3535- _~ _- - - -- - - _ - -- -
-_DAT~ = i3~ -
--- --__ _
_ - _ _-~ - _
,.
__ P,1Y TO TIIE +\ _
' ~ QRDER.Og-~y`~ --\\t-VL-~ ~~~~~f Y U~~_ _ ~ ~~~~~'l~,J~
-- ~ - ~ - v
- - - - _ t ~`~l` '- ~ -
- - - - - - -. - - - - -- -_- oLLARS __ _
__ _ __ -- _ _ _:_~ _ :-..._____ _~ _._---t~IOTYA41D0YER$1000 __ - -
Bank of Amcric~ = = = _ _ _ _
7~-2325/119 IL _ - _ = _ - -- -
_= -- - - -_
- _:_------- ---- _-=- _ _=-its ? 5=~.0 4 S ~i~ ,_i~ ~,:,~_~-q.,~_3_~ 8 ~ ~~ 8.7 6- 5-b ~~i_=b-S~-g ~ii~ _~--==- --~_-~--~=- ____ ~_ _~_ _ -__~ ~-_
n ~~M~..
© a~.w m e.ck
ARCADIS
630 Plan DtNe, SUile 200 • Hkf~lands Rmch, Cdaodo 80129
Tel 72N344-3500 • Fmc 72N344.3535
ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR NO VOUCHER NO AMOUNT PROJECT ACCOUNT
~' ~ ~.J~ ~~ l ~ t
~, 1
~ C 1 ~~ ~~~u
Z°~~
~~0~~~~
~LcC~ 0~~2~
,~flo
~~l•(.~~
~,~~.o

~s ; x_1`1 f~l
(~ } ;~ t,~ 'iZ i ~~E,J 1
Infrastructure, environment facilities
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
2 0 0 6 1 1 4 4
Subject:
PCN Application Form for DE Benton Water Treatment Plant Project
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Sir/Madam:
Attached please find aPre-Construction Notification (PCN) application for the DE
Benton Water Treatment Plant Project. A detailed description of the project is
provided in the PCN application. Nationwide Permit Numbers 12 and 39 were issued
for the project by the U.S. Department of the Army on 5 April 2006 and a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) was issued for the project on 21 April 2006. A copy of
the Nationwide Permit and the FONSI are provided in the PCN application package.
Please feel free to call or me at 919-854-1282 if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
ARC DIS G&M of jVort C ra olin~, Inc.
~~\
Linda Die It
Senior Scientist
Copies:
file
Dale Crisp -City of Raleigh
Mary Sadler -ARCADIS, Raleigh
Randy Hildebran -ARCADIS, Raleigh
.~
-~~' ~
~c~ !.~
~~' ~ ~ ~~0
~ r ~~
..~ ~ `~
s~^~ ~
~.. .
.^::~
~.
~'
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
BO1 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER RESOURCES
Date:
7 July 2006
Contact:
Linda Diebolt
Phone:
ext. 220
Email:
Idiebolt C~ arcadis-us.com
Our ref:
NC700012.1000

i 7 rt !~ r:9 / ~ ~1' I ~ V ~i
'i I
i~ ~ ;j I
~~ c, .~i
l.. l/ i~
~~fICC L1SC Only: Fonn Version h4arch OS
USACI!; Action ID No. D`VQ No.
(If any Particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processinb
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 and 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details U lc •,~"°I1~3rc(~^
II. Applicant Informatton ~~
JUf. ! :i ~C+L16
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~~c r ~i+; tiv~ , ~ ~ ,~ - ;,
Name: City of Raleitih; c/o Dale Crisp - Director o~f~I~CiEilic~Uiillt~~:ti'`~`"'"
Mailing Address: City of Raleigh
P.O.Box S90
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-857-4540 Fax Number: 919-8S7-4S4S
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. AgenUConsuliant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Linda Diebolt
Company Affiliation: ARCADIS
Mailing Address: 801 Cornorate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607-5073
Telephone Number: 919.854.1282 Fax Number: 919.8S4.S448
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
u~dac~a i uuzoos
Page 5 of 20

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: D. E. Benton Water Treatment Plant Lake Benson and Wheeler Dam
Upgrades, and Finished Water Transmission Main
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Water Treatment Plant Site 1619656767,
1619665283, 1619750702, 1619761516; Lake Benson Pump Station - 1619564350; Lake
Benson - 1609778854; the transmission main will be located in existing water line easements
or road rights-of--way, no parcel inforn~ation is available for these casements; Lake Wheeler
Darn Site - 0780519521
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Garner
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):_ Location map is attac}~ed.
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Site: Hwy 70 ~oir~.t; east through Garner. Turn right onto
Hwv 50. Plant site is located east of the Buffalo Rd (SR 2711 and Hwy 50 intersection near
Lake Benson.
Lake Benson Dam Site: Hwy 70 ~oin~ east through Garner. Turn right onto Hwy 50. The
existing dam is located west of the Buffalo Rd (SR 2711 and Hwy 50 intersection on Lake
Benson.
Lake Wheeler Darn Site: Hwv. 401 oink south through Garner. Turn left on to Simpkins
Road (SR 1375). Turn left onto Lake Wheeler Road (SR 1371). The Lakc Wheeler dam is
located on the right approximately 0.1 mile from the intersection at Simpkins Road.
Finished water transmission main: The 48-inch finished water transmission main will be
located in the existing City of Raleigh water line easement corridor from the Lake Benson
Updated l l/l/2005
Page G of 20

raw water pump station to north of the US 70 intersection at Mechanical Boulevard. Just
north of the US 70 intersection the finished water line will fork into a 36-inch water main
and a 30-inch water main. The 36-inch main will tuna east along Garner Road, north along
Creech Road (SR 2564), north along Sanderford Road, north along Rock Quarry Road (SR
2542), and west on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The 30-inch transmission main will
follow the existing City of Raleigh water line easement corridor and connect to an existing
30-inch line at the E.B. Bain Facilit fy or re-pumping.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): WTP Site - Lat/Long 33-35-04/85-34-06; Lake
Wheeler Dam Site - Lat/Long 35-41-34.6/78-41-399; Coordinates for the finished water
transmission main are provided in Table 1.
6. Property size (acres): Water Treatment Plant Site - 55.03 acres; Lake Benson Pump Statio_n_
- Site: 0.12 acres; Lake Benson - G64.21 acres; Finished water transmission main route -
16.8-mile long, 40-foot wide easement; Lake Wheeler Dam Site - 247.01 acres. ___
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Lake Benson/Swift Creek/Lake Wheeler
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The proposed WTP site is undeveloped woodlands, consisting primarily of ZO-30 year-old
pine stands. The Lake Benson site consists of an existing pump station and dam, with
surrounding area consisting of residential development and agricultural lands.
Land use at Lake Wheeler is undeveloped park land surrounding the impoundment. In the
surroundin vicinity, the land use is primarily residential development.
Much of the land crossed by the proposed finished water transmission main route from the
WTP site north to US 70 consists of agricultural fields and pastures, both active and fallow,
with scattered residences. North of US 70 the land use is primarily urban residential and
commercial. However, along the transmission main route, bottomland hardwood forest is the
dominant riparian vegetation at most of the stream crossings.
Lake Wheeler and Lake Benson are impoundments on Swift Creek. Swift Creek is classified
as a "special case" stream per the 1995 Dam Safety rules due to populations of aquatic
species listed as threatened or endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), and due to classifications of
exceptional non-game or fishery resources by the WRC (15A NCAC 2K.0501 [g]Ll and Ll).
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 20

9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The City of
Raleigh proposes to reactivate the Lake Wheeler/Lake Benson reservoirs as a water supply.
Due to Swift Creek's classification as a "special case" stream afour-year, instream flow
study was required. A tiered minimum release schedule for the new WTP was developed as
a con~~onent of the instream flow study. The proposed project includes a series of up rg_ades
and retrofits at Lakes Wheeler and Benson dams construction of a new WTP a water
withdrawal averaging 14 million alg_lon per day (mtd) from Swift Creek at the Lake Benson
dam, and a controlled minimum flow release from Lake Benson dam. The upgrades and
retrofits to the existing pump station and dams will enable water withdrawals from Swift
Creek and enhanced manipulation and monitoring of the stream flows in Swift Creek. T1>e
new treatment plant will treat the source water made available via the upgrades and retrofits
to the pump station and dam structures. Details of each of the components are provided
below.
The City proposes to upgrade and retrofit the existing raw water pump station adjacent to
Lake Benson dam, west of Highway 50, to deliver water to the new WTP. The existing
antiquated intakes in Lake Benson on the upstream side of the dam will be replaced with new
intake screens. The existing raw water pump station will be upgraded and retrofitted to
house new raw water pumps, existing pump dry wells will be converted into wet wells,
motorized controls on the intake control gates will be added, and chemical pretreatment
Facilities will be constnlcted. The pretreated water will be pumped under Highway 50 to the
proposed WTP. At the downstream end of the existing intake sluice at the pump station, a
new minimum flow release structure will be added in the Swift Creek spillway. This
minimum release valve assembly will allow the city to maintain the minimum flow in Swift
Creek as specified in the tiered minimum release schedule. Also at that location, a
work/maintenance Rlatform will be cantilevered over the Swift Creek spillway~Sheets 1B-
D).
The new 20-mt~d water treatment plant will be located east of NC 50 at the intersection of
Buffalo Road. The new facility will consist of the main water treatment plant, a chemical
bulk-storage facility, finished water storage via a 5 million gallon composite tank, an excess
effluent detention pond, and afinished-water pump station wet-wellhouse (Sheet 1 A).
Finally at this location, an underwater filter backwash discharge from the new WTP into
Lake Benson will be added in the narrow, north-reachinl7 arnl of Lake Benson just upstream
of the Buffalo Road crossin~Sheets 1B and lE).
At the Lake Wheeler dam site, the existing water-control tower in the lake will be up rammed.
The manual, water-level-control valves in the tower will be upl;raded to a motorized,
remotely operated system. A motor and computerized controls will be added to the top of the
existing water control tower and covered with a small shed-like structure. Anew, 100-foot-
lon~ concrete foot-bride will be placed over the lake, from the top of the dam to the tower,
to facilitate access. A weir and a flow meter will be added to the Lake Wheeler dam outfall
to allow for accurate ]nonitorin~ of controlled flow releases into Swift Creek (Sheet 11).
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 20

A new, 48-inch finished water transmission main will be located in the existing City of
Raleigh water line easement corridor from the Lake Benson raw water pump station to north
of the US 70 intersection at Mechanical Boulevard. Just north of the US 70 intersection the
finished water line will fork into a 36-inch water main and a 30-inch water main. The 36-
inch main will turn east along Garner Road, north along Creech Road, north along
Sanderford Road, north along Rock Quarry Road, and west on Martin Luther King_ Jr.
Boulevard. The 30-inch transmission main will follow the existing City of Raleigh water
line easement corridor and connect to an existing 30-inch line at the E.B. Bain Facility for re-
pumpin~. There are approximately 19,100 feet (3.6 miles, 35,300 feet (6.7 miles), 18,400
feet (3.5 miles), and 7,000 feet (1.3 miles) of 48-inch, 36-inch, 30-inch, and 16-inch finished
water transmission mains, respectively (Figures 2-10).
Upstream of ttie dam in Lake Benson, removal of the old intake screens anti installation of
the new structures will utilize divers for underwater work, assisted by a land-based crane for
liilin~. Downstream of the dam at Lake Benson, a new minimum-flow release assembly will
be added at the end of the existing sluice. For access to the new valve assembly, awork/
maintenance platform and stairs will be added to the interior of the existing spillway/stream
channel. Construction of the work/maintenance platform and addition of the valve assembly
will require use of temporary in-stream equipment to stabilize the structures until they are
pernianently attached to the existing stream channel wing-walls. Aland-based crane will be
used for heavy liflin~.
Constniction of the WTP facilities will utilize standard construction techniques and
equipment, such as dozers, pans, and motor-graders for site preparation and r~ ading; cranes,
backhoes, and front-end loaders for plant construction; and concrete trucks to deliver
premixed concrete.
Constniction of the filter backwash discharge will utilize a temporary coffer dam to allow for
non-wet dredging of Lake Benson. The area to be dredged will include a channel for the
discharge pipe and a foundation area for the discharge structure. The pipe and discharge
structure when completed will be located entirely under the lake surface. A manhole will be
located above the normal water level at the edge of the lake. Equipment will include a crane
to install the coffer dam and discharge pipe, apump-and-pipe assembly to drain and maintain
the water level in the coffer dam, and backhoe for excavation and discharge of a rip-ran
The construction of the foot-bridge and water-control-tower upgrades at Lake Wheeler will
utilize a barge for the tower upgrade and gland-based crane to do an overhead installation of
the pre-forned concrete foot-bridge. The water level in Lakc Wheeler will be lowered by 8
to 10 feet during installation of the bridge to facilitate constniction of the land-based pier on
the dam. Construction of the weir and flow meter at the outfall of Lake Wheeler will
necessarily he instream. The flow of Swift Creek from the Lake Wheeler outfall will be
temporarily halted, approximately 1 week, during constniction. A 2-foot-high concrete weir
and the flow meter will be installed using standard construction technic ues and making sure
that no water is exposed to live concrete.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 20

Finally, the water main and force main constnlction will primarily utilize dozers for land
clearing and backhoes for trench excavation and back-filling.
Additional project construction at the WTP site will upgrade an existing wastewater pump
station. Anew 9-mid wastewater pump station will replace the existint; 4.2-mid Hi hg~ way
50 wastewater pumR station. The new Highway 50 pump station will send wastewater flow
from the Town of Garner to the Neuse River Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) via a
24-inch force main and then a 30-inch force main. These new force mains will tie into the
existinaL72-inch twin outfalls that route influent wastewater from the City of Raleigh to the
Neuse River WWTP. There will be approximately 28,000 feet (5.3 miles) of 24-inch force
main and 24,500 feet (4.6 miles) of 30-inch force main. These proposed Highway SOSump
station force mains will be located primarily within existing sanitary sewer easements on the
WTP property or within North Carolina DOT tights-of--way along New Bethel Church Road
(SR 2703), Clifford Road (SR 2706), Hebron Church Road (SR 2547, Win Road~SR 2702),
Hicks Road (SR 2701), White Oak Road (SR 1209), Raynor Road (SR 2555), and Auburi-
Knightdale Road (SR 2555). Impacts to jurisdictional resources along the force main for the
Highway 50 pump station have been pernitted under a separate NWP # 12 (Action ID No.
200421195 and 200421196; August 16, 2004). The NCDtiVQ 401 Water Quality
Certification has been issued (Project No. 04-0921; July 30, 2004).
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The City of Raleigh proposes to reactivate
Lakes Benson and Wheeler reservoirs as a water supply source primarily to provide the City
and surrounding Wake County communities with a reliable and independent water supply
source. Second, this project will help initiate solutions to the post-2010 water supply needs
in the project area and for surroundinr~ local communities purchasing water from the City
Water demand projections indicate that additional water supply capacity will be needed after
2010.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the carne subdivision) in the past, please explain. hiclude
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued pernits,
certifications or other useful infornation. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe pernits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. A iur-isdictional determination for the WTP site has been issued by t}~e
USAGE (Action ID. No. 20030193; February 18, 2003). An NCDWQ stream determination for
the applicability of Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules was conducted at the WTP on April 14,
2003, and issued August 28, 2003 (No. NBRRO -03-199). As noted in the NCDWQ letter, the
applicability of the buffer rules to Swig Creek and Mahlers Creek, the southern and eastern
property boundaries, were not in question, and riparian areas along these creeks are assumed to
'be subject to the buffer rules.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 20

There is no project history for the jurisdictional wetlands or surface waters located along the
finished water transmission main route.
A NWP #12 and #39 for this project were received from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on
April 5, 200E.
Impacts to jurisdictional resources along the force main for the Highway 50 wastewater pump
station have been permitted under a separate NWP #12 (Action ID No. 200421195 and
200421190; August 16, 2004). A 401 Water Quality Certification for the force main was issued
by NCDWQ (Project No. 04-0921; July 30, 2004).
V. Future Project Plans
Arc any future perniit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future nerntit requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream chaluiels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perelmial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:_At the WTP site, 0.2G acres of
forested wetland will be pcrmanentl impacted by site grading and facility construction
(Sheet 1 A and Wetland 11.
At the existing pump station, upgrading of the intake structures immediately upstream of the
dam will permanently impact 2,000 cubic feet of open water of Lake Benson (,Sheet 1B-D
and Site Pl). Immediately downstream of the dam anew minimum flow-valve assembly
and a cantilevered walkway and maintenance platforn will impact approximately 400 square
feet of Swifl Creek's stream channel (Sheets 1 B-C and Site S 19). The constnlction of the
new filter-backwash discharge in Lake Benson will utilize a coffer dam which will
temporarily drain G00 square feet of the lake. The discharge pipe and outfall structure will
permanently impact 240 square feet of the lake (Sheet 1 E and Site P2)
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 11 of 20

The upgrades and retrofits at the Lake Benson dam will enable an average withdrawal of 1.4
mid, or approximately 20 cubic feet per second (cfs) of raw source water from Swift Creek
for treatment at the newly constructed WTP. The mean annual flow in Swift Creek at Lake
Benson is approximately 70 cfs. The lowest monthly median flow occurs in Septemhe~
proximately 10 cfs, which is one-half of the proposed average WTP withdrawal. Due to
Swift Creek classification as a "special case" stream, afour-year instream flow study was
conducted to determine and quantify the potential impacts to Swift Creek aquatic resources
resultint; from the proposed water withdrawal. The study concluded that the proposed water
withdrawal quantity would alter the Swift Creek hydrograph and directly affect downstream
aquatic resources, including habitat for a federally endangered species.
At Lake Wheeler, a new pre-formed concrete bride will be installed over the lake from the
top of the dam to the existing intake tower. The Urid e~ will permanently impact 520 square
feet of open water. The water level in Lake Wheeler will be lowered by 8 to 10 feet during
installation of the bride to facilitate construction of the land-based pier on the dam. Anew
weir is proposed downstream of the Lake Wheeler outfall near the base of the dam. The weir
will permanently locate 28 cubic feet of fill in the Swift Creek channel. The flow of Swift
Creek from the Lake Wheeler outfall will be temporarily halted during construction of the
weir (Sheet 1 l: Sites S18 anti P31.
The finished water transmission main will temporarilypact a total of 1.42 acres of shrubby
wetlands at hvo locations and will cross 15 jurisdictional stream channels (640 linear feet),
for a total impact of 0.13 acres (Sheets 2-10; Sites Wetland 1&2 and S1-S17). Due to lack of
detailed finished water transmission line designs, temporary impacts for the transmission line
were calculated for the entire width of the 40-foot-wide easement. As detailed design plans
are completed, it is assumed that the acreage of temporary impact will be reduced as actual
construction needs can be detertnincd.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
cs/no Distance to
Ncarest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
Wetland 1 Pern~anent
Grading /filling Forested, non-riverine No G50 0.2G
Wetland 2 Temporary excavation Shrub scrub, riverine Yes 200 O.s4
Wetland 3 Temporary excavation Staub scrub, riverine Yes 200 0.88

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 1.G8
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: WTP site 7.3
acres: ftnished water transmission main 1.42 acres
tlpaaccd t vv2oos
Page 12 of 20

4. Individually list all intermittent and peremiial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Peretutial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
Internttent?
indicate on tna Before Im act linear feet acres
S 1 UT to Swift Creek Temporary Internttent 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
S2 UT to Swift Creek Temporary Intermittent 3 feet 40 0.003
excavation
S3 UT to Swift Creek Temporary perennial 10 feet 40 0.009
excavation
S4 UT to Swift Creek Temporary Intermittent 5 feet 40 0.005
excavation
SS UT to Swift Creek Temporary perennial 10 feet 40 0
009
excavation .
S6 UT to Big Branch Temporary perennial 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
S7 UT to Walnut Temporary Perennial IS feet 40 014
0
Creek excavation .
S8 UT to Walnut Temporary In[ernuttent 5 feet 40 005
0
Creek excavation .
S9 UT to Walnut Temporary percmtial 4 feet 40 0
004
Creek excavation .
S 10 Walnut Creek Temporary Perennial 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
UT to Walnut Temporary
S13
Creek
excavation pcremtial 15 feet 40 0.014
S14 UT to Big Branch Temporary Intermittent 4 feet 40 0.004
excavation
UT to Walnut Temporary
S15 Intermittent 4 feet 40 0.004
Creek excavation
UT to Walnut Temporary
S 1 G perennial 10 feet 40 0
009
Creek excavation .
S 17 Walnut Creek Temporary perennial 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
S 18 Swift Creek Pern~anent perennial 12 feet 3 0
001
Weir .
permanent bridge 40 ft (x 10
S19 Swift Creek
and nunimum flow Perennial 200 feet
ft wide) 0.184
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 643 0.321
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 20

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Natne of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
P 1 Lake Benson Permanent; Water
intake structures In-stream impoundment 0.005
P2 Lake Benson Permanent fill;
discharge structure In-stream impoundment 0.007
P2 Lake Benson Temporary drainage In-stream impoundment 0.014
P3 Lake Wheeler Pernanent; Bridge In-stream impoundment 0.012
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.038
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting froth the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.321
Wetland Impact (acres): 1.68
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.038
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 2.039
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 643
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 14 of 20

VII. Impact Justiiicatiou (Avoidance and Ivlinimizatiou)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also, discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Impacts to jurisdictional
resources can only be completely avoided by implementation of a no-build scenario The no-
build scenario is not an acceptable option.
The Swift Creek instream flow study determined that a tiered minimum flow release during
periods of low flow into Lakes Wheeler and Benson would minimise direct impacts to affected
aquatic resources in Swift Creek below Lake Benson dam. The upgrades and retrofits to the
outlet structures at Lakes Wheeler and Benson will facilitate enhanced nlonltoring and
manipulation of stream flows in Swift Creek are required to comply with the proposed tiered
minimum-release schedule at the Lakes Wheeler and Benson dams The specifics of that tiered
minimum release schedule are being finalized in consultation with resource agencies
At Lake Benson, the existing intake screens are antiquated and must he replaced The new larger
structures conform to the new raw water re uirements of the proposed WTP Additionally the
old sluice does not have an adequately functioning release valve that complies with the current
enginecrin~ requirements for the minimum release schedule Anew valve assembly is required
and by definition is "instream". The maintenance walkway and platforni are needed to safely
access the valve assembly for routine upkeep and manual adjustments if necessary Worker
safety is a primary consideration, and avoidance is not possible.
At Lake Wheeler, impacts due to the installation of the new foot bride have been minimized to
the extent possible through the use of overhead constnlction techniques apre-formed concrete
bride and locating support piers outside of the nornal lake pool The bride is required for
routine maintenance and is needed for safety. Installation of the weir and flow meter is
necessary to comply with the minimum release schedule No live concrete will come in contact
with stream water.
At the WTP site, the project was designed to avoid impacts to the large (over 7 acres, wetland
complex along Mahlers Creek. The smaller (0.33 acre) forested wetland is centrally located on
the WTP site. Options for avoidance of the small wetland are extremely limited The Town of
Garner ordinances prohibit construction wlthul 50 feet of the 100-year floodplain Due to
en~ineerin~ constraints, a redesign of the WTP layout is not possible on this property to avoid
the small central wetland and simultaneously meet Town of Garler ordinance The Town of
Garner had never granted a variance for permanent constnlction in the buffer Impacts to the
small wetland were minimized to the extent possible through reduction of the rq adil~g footprint
The filter backwash NPDES discharge into the arm of Lake Benson is a by-product of the WTP
process and is therefore a requirement of the proposed WTP operation The filter backwash
discharge is only located as far into the lake as necessary to allow for adequate mixing with the
uPaac~a llnnoos
Page is of 20

existing lake water. Impacts from the above structure were minimized the extent possible while
still meeting minimum engineering and safety requirements.
Along the finished water transmission main route avoidance by shiflin~ the water main is not
possible, since the project is utilizing existing easements and right-of--way and all of the wetlands
and streams are intersecting the corridor in a pemendicular manner. All stream crossings will be
perpendicular to the stream flow to minimize impacts. All impacts along the finished water
transmission main route will be temporary, since the grade will be restored to preconstruction
elevations once the pipe is installed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to peremlial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strtn~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected streatn and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Updated 1 Ul/2005
Page t G of 20

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem El~hancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this forni. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wl-p/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):-
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres)
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. I:uviroumental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you arc not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts oii Riparian and VVaterslied Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detemnine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts arc proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A
NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
(please identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
0.26
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 17 of 20

Zone* Impact
s uare feet IVqultipliec Required
Miti atiou
1 35,937 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 24,176 1.5
Total 60,113
* Zonc 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zonc 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.c.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Buffer mitigation is not proposed for this
project. Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233, nernendicular crossings that disturb treater than 40
linear feet of riparian buffer with a maintenance corridor greater than 10 feet in width is
allowable.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan is
being developed for the project and will be finalized and approved prior to project construction.
Preliminary analysis of the WTP site indicates a low ratio of planned impervious surface to total
property acreage. The use of stornwater stntctures, such as preformed scour boles and level-
sprcader aprons, has not been deterntined at this time. Additional detail re ag rding storntwater
controls will be defined as the WTP facility designs arc finalized.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The following wastewater permits will be obtained for this project:
- Discharge permit from DWQ Water Quality Section for sprayy irrigation of clarified effluent to
aland-application system.
- Discharge permit from DWQ Water Quality Section for transfer of wastewater flow from the
Town of Gamer Sprat/ Irrigation Facility to the City of Raleigh Neuse River WWTP.
- NPDES discharge permit from DWQ Water Quality Section for discharge to surface waters of
the State (Lake Benson).
tlpaatca t vvzoos
Page 18 of 20

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact perlnit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No ^
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://1~2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Dempsey E. Benton WTP Proiect will not significantly affect growth rate final land use patterns
or development densities in the Swig Creek watershed, as these have been deterniined by
separate planning and political processes. Yet, it is also correct to state that the additional
increment of water supply that would be contributed by the project is a necessary factor ut
achieving and sustaining a normal rate of growth. However, the strop local programs in place
by these communities will offset any potential overall cumulative impacts that may result from
the proposed project, such as growth management planning land management planning open
space plans and initiatives, erosion and sedimentation control riparian buffers water
conservation, storlnwater and pollution prevention and planning toward low impact
development. A comprehensive discussion of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project is
provided in the Environmental Assessment. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has
been received for this project attached).
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these pertnits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
A Final Biological Assessment (BA) was submitted to the U.S. Anny Corhs of Engineers in July
2005 that described in detail the findings and approach to evaluating the instream flow studx
results, the impacts of the proposed project and mitigation for impacts to the dwarf
lvedgemussel. The Final BA initiated forn~al Section 7 Consultation under the Endangered
Species Act. A Final Biological Opinion was signed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
February 2006. The conclusions of the Final Biological Opinion are provided in the attached
FONS I.
Updated 11/l/2005
Page 19 of 20

q
~7~~
Applicant/Agen s Si nature Date
(Agent's signature is vali onl if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
r~ ~, ~ c.•~'L1ClY~~ ~. ~ ~~,LCc::~~~vYl UY YY> ~~. aYl. - YVI,(Z ~') Il ~ JU`y
Page 17 of 17

Table 1. Coordinates of Jurisdictional Wetlands and Streams crossed by the proposed DE Benton Water
Transmission I~1ain.
Site No. Type of Resource Latitude Longitude
S 1 stream 35° 40' 17.56" 78° 36' 28.89"
S2 stream 35° 40' 46.32" 78° 36' 36.80"
S3 stream 35° 41' 03.02" 78° 36' 42.08"
W2 wetland 35° 41' 09.64" 78° 36' 42.20"
S4 stream 35° 41' 45.20" 78° 37' 04.71"
SS stream 35° 42' 13.58" 78° 37' 19.85"
S6 stream 35° 43' 40.09" 78° 36' 00.61"
S7 stream 35° 44' 58.79" 78°3G' 44.34"
S8 stream 35° 45' 22.70" 78° 36' 49.21"
S9 stream 35° 45' 32.64" 78° 37' 02.66"
S 10 stream 35° 45' 43.42" 78° 3G' 52.41"
S 13 stream 35° 46' 03.91" 78° 37' 48.34"
S 14 stream 35° 43' 16.58" 78° 37' 39.50"
W3 wetland 35° 44' 21.56" 78°38' 24.38"
S 15 stream 35° 44' 32.12" 78° 38' 24.40"
S 16 stream 35° 44' 40.36" 78° 38' 24.06"
S 17 stream 35° 45' 24.74" 78° 38' 27.25"
Page:
g IwwrtiV00012~mv~ronmm~al auessmentlusace permitllable t.dx 1 ~ 1

DATA FORA1
ROUTINE `VETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE `Vctlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: D.E. Benton Proposed [Vater Treatment Facility
Applicant/Ottner: City oJRalei~h
Investigator(s): Harold ~1 Brady
Do Normal Circttntstartces exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es o
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Jan
County: [Vake
State: North Carolina
Community ID: PFO ([[~etland 1)
Trattsect ID: LBA
Plot ID: LBA S
VEGETATION
llomrnant P ant Species Stratton In tcator llomutant Plant Species Stratum In tcator
1. Betula niRra tree FAC[V 9. hficrosteQium virmineum t'rass FAC+
2. Quercus nigra tree FAC 10.
3. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 1 I.
4. Acer rubrunr tree FAC 12.
5. Platanus occidentalis tree FACII! 13.
6. [Yoodx~ardia aerolata herb OBL 14.
7. LiRrrstrum sincnse shrub FAC 15.
8. Arundinaria ~iRantea herb I:4ClY 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100°'0
Remarks:
IIYDROLOGY
_1Leeorded llata (llescnbe ut Remarks)
Stre:un, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (ut.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in. )
Depth to Saturated Soil: 8 (in. )
Primary hndicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Pattcnts in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rctnarks [['etland located at head ojstream

SOILS
Map Unit Natne
(Series and Phase): Ii'ehadkee soil Drainage Class: Poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Fluventic Haplaquepts Cottfinn Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture
Concretio~ts

inches Horizon (Mansell Moistl
{Mansell Moist) ,
,
Abundance/Contrast Structtue, etc.
0-6 A 7.SYR 4/~l 7.SYR S/G (etv, Tne, faint smtdv clay loam
6-12 B1 7.SYR 5/2 SYR S/8 m_ miy, medium, distinct clay loam
12+ B2 SY 6/1 SYR S/8 few, medium, prom. clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Ilistosol Concretions
_Ilistic Epipedon Iligh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking ut Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Cluouta Colors Otlter (Explain in Rc-tuarks)
Rctttarks The A-horizon co~ttaincd many, fine roots
The B-lrorizat contained oxidized root channels
`VCTLAIVD DCTCI2A'IIIVATIOIV
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Ycs No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ycs No
Hydric Soils Prescnt? Ycs No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland'. Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approximately 20 feet dottnhill of poi,:t LBA S.

DATA rORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: D.E. Benton Proposed TT'ater Treatment Facility
ApplicanVOwtter: City ofXalci~h
Investigator(s): Harald M. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
IS the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es
is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Jan
County: JT'ake
State: Na•th Carolina
Community ID: Upland (TT'etlmrd IJ
Transect ID: LBA
Plot ID: LBA S
VEGETATION
llommant Plant Specres Stratum In tcator Dominant P ant Snectes Stratum In tcator
1. Quereus velutina tree UPL 9. [/actinium arboreum shrub FACU
2. Ouerctrsjalcata tree FACU- 10. Liquidambarstyraci/lua tree FAC+
3. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 11. Laticera japonica vine I~AG
4. Quereus rubs tree FACU 12.
5. Ilex opaca shrub FAC- 13.
G. Fagus,~randifolia tree F"ACU 14.
7. Pinus taeda tree h'AC 15.
8. Smilaxrotundi(olia vine FAC IG.
Percent of Dominant Species Utat are OBL, FAC W, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 36%
Remarks:
IIYDROLOGY
_Recor e llata (Desch e m Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetlan Hy rolo6ry ht icators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturatedut Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drill Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicalors (2 or mare re:quired):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Raot Cttattttels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Dcptlt to Saturated Soil (in.) _Olher (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Drainage Class: lYel!
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Typic Hapudults Cottfinn Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A IOYR S/4 gravelly sandy clay loam
8-12+ B 7.SYll S/G sandy clav
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Ilistosol Concretions
Ilistic Epipedon high Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Glcyed or Low-Cluoma Colors Other (Explain in Rcntarks)
Remarks Soils showed few, medium sized roots
WCTLAND DCTC211IINATION
Hydropltytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ycs No
Hydric Soils Present? Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approximately 25 feel uphill of point LBA S.
Is this Sampling Pautt Witltitt a Wctlartd? Ycs No
Approved by

DATA rORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Alanual)
ProjecUSite: E.B. Bain Proposed 11'aterline
ApplicanUO~rner: City ojRalei~h
Investigator(s): Harald b1 Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es ®o
Is tlus area a potential Proble~rn Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: ld'ake
State: North Carolina
Community ID: PFO (IVetland 1)
Trattsect ID: !i'LA
Plot ID: IVIA2
VEGETATION
llommant Plant 5necies Stratum In ~cator ll_ ommant Plant Species Stratum In icator
1. Fraxinus pennstidvanica tree FACIV 9.
2. Lonieera japatica vine FAC- ]0.
3. Smilax ratundifolia vine FAC 11.
4. l~iburnum dentatum shrub FAC 12.
5. Ulmus americans tree f~AClf~ 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
~• 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dotninartt Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 83%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (ut.)
Depth to Froe Water itt Pit: 10 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 (in.)
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
X Scdunent Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Chatmels in Upper 12 Luhes
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
_OUter (Explaut in Remarks)
Remarks ffununocky u~etlmuf beginning near the toe oJslopc and continueing to the unnamed tributmy along Timber Drive.

SOIL5
Nlap Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chetvacla soils Drainage Class: Sonretvhat Poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (SubgroupAquic Fluvcntic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) {Mansell Moist) Abuttdance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 A SfR 4/3 silty clay loam
4-12+ 8 2.SYR S/1 lOYR S/G med., common, dist. sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Iltdicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Ilistic Epipcdon high Organc Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleycd or Low-Cluorna Colors Outer (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks TheA-horizon containedn:any, fine roots
The B-lutrizon contained jets, fine roots
This soil is likely an inclusion of li~edhadkee soils, due to the exceedingly low chroma i~t the Q horizon.
WETLAND DETER1~iINATION
Ifydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
I Iydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point WiWin a WcUartd' Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approximately 5 feet dau~nhill njpoint IfZ.-12.

DATA rORAI
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: E.B. Bain Proposed {I'aterline Date: 18-Sep
ApplicanUO~~ner: City ojKalei~h County: {{'aka
Investigator(s): lfarold d1 Brady State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Upland (1f'etlmtd 2)
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es e Transact ID: {VLA
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID: WLA2
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
llomtnant Plant Specter Stratum In tcator llomutant Plant Specter Stratum In tcator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FAC{i' 9. Smilax rolundilolia Yine FAC
2. Yarthcnocissus quinquejnlia vine FAC 10. Lonicera japonica Yine FAC-
3. Tnxicodendron radicans vine FAC 11.
4. Quereus alba tree Fi1CU 12.
5. Yitis roturrdi~olia vine FAC 13.
G. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipi~era tree 1%ACU I5.
8. Ulmus rubra tree FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 70%
Rctnarks The majority ojthe vegetatiat is facultative.
HYDROLOGY
_1Zecor e llata (llescri e m Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs f
Outer
X No Recorded Data Available Wellan Hy ology h icators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drip Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary hdicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface ~6rater. (in.) -Oxidized Root Charutels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
De th to Free Water itt PiL•
p (in.) _
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOIL5
Map Unit Natne
(Series and Pltase): AnPlin~ sandy loam Drainage Class: f6'ell drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Typic ffapudults Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abttndance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A IOYR a/4 sandy loam
3-12+ B IOYIt 4/6 2.SY5/G sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Ilistic Epipedon high Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydtic Soils List
_Glcycd or Low-Cluotna Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks Soils showed few, medium sized roots
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Poittt Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks f lot taken approximately 25 feet uphill ojpoint IIZ12.

DATA rORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE `Vetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: E.B. Bain Proposed lYaterline
ApplicanUOwtter: City ojRnleigh
Investigator(s): ffarold M. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on ttte site? es No
Ls the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es o
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: Il'ake
State: North Carolina
Community ID: PFO (wetlmtd 3)
Transect ID: IVLB
Plot ID: 1l~L87
VEGETATION
llomtnant Plant Species Stratum In tcator llommattt Plant Species Stratum In icator
L II'isteria sinensis vine NI 9.
2. Acernes*undo tree FACII' 10.
3. Saururvs cernuus herb OBL 11.
4. Li~ustrum sinense shrub FAC 12.
5. Ru6us ar~dus herb FAC 13.
G. Arundinaria gigantea herb FACIY 14.
7. 15.
g. 16.
Percent of Dotttinant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excludutg FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded llata (llcscribe in Rctnarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 2 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (ut. )
Depth to Saturated Soil: (ut. )
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X Water Marks
X Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in ~TJetlands
Secondary hndicators (2 or mocc required):
X Oxidized Root Channels ut Upper 12 Inches
X Water-5t<Zined Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_Other (Explain in Rctnarks)
Rctnarks II'etland found along an existing setverline easement.
Recent heatiy rains have caused flooding throughout the wetland,
14'itl] CVidGlee Of sigrtiftcant sheet flaw (mast notably large wrztck lines).
The wetland is located behveert a major road (Kanunartd Raad) and steep slopes
wilh a perennial slrcam cutting through the wetland.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chex~acla soils Drainage Class: Somew{rat Poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (SubgroupAquic Fluventic Dystrocl,repts Cottfinn Mapped T}pe? Yes ®°
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist} Abuttdattce/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 A !0 YR ~1/4 silty clay loam
4-12+ P 10 YR S/1 IOYR S/6 »red., common, dist. silty clay loam
2.SYR 6/4 med., common, dist.
Ilydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking ut Sattdy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Rcgune Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducutg Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Cltroma Colors Other (Explain ut Remarks)
Remarks The A-horizon contained mmry, fine roots
The B-horizon contacted few, fine roofs
77ris soil is likely an inclusiort of lVedhadkee sails, due to the exceedingly low chro»ra in the B horizon.
~'VITLAND DCTERn~IINATION
Hydrophy~tic Vegetation I'rescnt? Ycs No
Wetland Hydrology Prescttt? Yes No
Ilydtic Soils Present? Ycs No Is this Sarnplutg Poittt Within a Wetland' Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approximately I S feet dox~n/rill of pai»t 1iZ137.

Dr1Tr~ FOR1~1
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecU5ite: E.B. Bain Proposed lf'aterline
ApplicanUOtmer: City oJRaleigh
Investigator(s): Harold Al Brady
Do Normal Circutnstatues exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es o
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain ott reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: IG'ake
State: Nnrth Carolina
Community 1D: Uplm:d (lI'etlmrd 3J
Trattsect ID: IYLB
Plot ID: IVLB7
VEGETATION
llomtnant Plant Species Stratum In tcator llomtnant Plant Speaes Stratum In tcator
1. Frazinus pennsylvmrica b•ee FACIf 9. Pinus taeda tree FAC
2. Anisostichus capreolatn vine N/A 10. Quercus phellos tree FAC11'-
3. Toxicndendrar radicans vine FAC 11. L{quidambarsh'raci/lua tree f%AC+
4. Elaea£rrus umbellata shrub N/A 12. Carpus/lorida tree FACU
5. Microste~ium virminewn herb FAC+ 13. Lindera benaain shrub FAC{f
6. Aeer rubrunr tree FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipi_lera tree FACU 15.
S. L igustrum sinense shrub FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or PAC (excluding FAC-). 82%
Remarks Tire nrajarzty ojthe vegetation is facultative.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recor e llata (Desch e m RettiZrks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetlan 1 iy rology In icators:
Primary Indicators:
htundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface ~'Jater. (in.) Oxidized Root Clratutels in Upper 12 Itches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (iu.) Local Soil Survey Data
PAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks IS-25% slope

SOILS
Map Uttit Name
(Series and Phase): Madison sandy loam Drainage Class: !Nell drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Typic fanhapudults Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abundancc/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 7.S YR 3/3 frne sandy loam
2-10 BI 2.SYR 4/6 sandy loam
10-12+ 132 2.SYR 6/8 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Ilistic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydtie Soils List
_Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Glcyed or Low-Chroma Colors OUtcI (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks Soils s{tax~ed few, medium sized tools
Eradcd soil.
WETLAND DCTERAIINATION
Hydrophytic Vcgctalion Present? Ycs No
~'Vclland H}'drology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Ycs No
Is Utis Sarnplittg Point tVithin a Wetland? Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approximately 20 feet uphill ojpoint IIZB7.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S 1 (UTI to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 4, 2002 Garner, NC 1,000 feet northwest of New Bethel Church, ui active cow pasture.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, t/icn use of this form is not necessary.
Also, ijin the best professional judgement ojthe evaluator, the feature is a man-rnade ditch and not a modifred natural stream--t/ris
rating system: s/rould not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine~
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Weak 1\><oderate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Strcambed
-Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Arc Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is T}te Channel Sinuous? (0) 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
(0)
1
2
3
6) Is T}te Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7_) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Baril: Present? 0 1
f`NOTE: If Bed & Bank Cmued ByDitchingAnd tVITI/OUT Sinuosity 71rcn Score=0.1 2 (3)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Map itnrUOr In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=(0)
1'RI~IfARYGEOBiORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: R
Ii.IIyclrolot*y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
i) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 I (2) 3
PRI~lARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. Biolo~y Absent Wcak Alodcratc Strom
1) Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambed? 3 2 (1) 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Strcambed? 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRIHARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomornlcolo~Y Absent Weak 1•Ioderate Strom
1~ Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 ~ .5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 I (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainai'c Way?
0
.5 _ __ 1
(1.5)
SLCONDARYGEO11fORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4

II. Tiydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Stron>?
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Lcaflitter
Present 1n Streambed?
1.5
(I)
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel A-:d >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last K-tort'n Rain? (•NOTF,: IjDirch lndicared /n #9 Abore Skip This Step And #S Felow') (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Chamiel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Hcadcut)? Yes=(1.51 No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
IIL I3iolot*y Absent Wcak Aoderate Stron>?
1) Arc Fish Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
2 Arc Amphibians Present? (O) .5 1 1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? (~ .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun~t, is Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(' NOTE: IjTolal Absence OjAll Plants !n Streambed
As Narcd Abore Skin This Srep UNLE.SS.SA~Prescnr•). SAV Dtostly OBL
2 1 Afostly FACW Dfostly FAC
.75 (.5) llfostly FACU Dfostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
TOTAL POINTS (Frio:ary +Sccorrdary) =23 (If Grcatcr TGmr Or Equal To 19 Poirrts Tlie Stream Is At Least
Intcrruittent)
Comments: Stream located in active cow pasture. The bacilc height is 0.5 to 1 foot, 10 to 15 feet wide, and has a silt
substrate. The water depth during the survey was 3 to 6 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Torm
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S2 (UT2 to Swift Creek) Swill Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Gamer, NC 2,000 feet southwest of the State Road 25 62 and NC Highway 50.
*I'LEASC NOTE: Ijevaluator and landowner agree that thejeature is a rnan-made ditch, teen use ojt/ris farm is not necessary.
Also, ijin fire best prajessional judgement ojt/ie evaluator, the jcature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-t/tis
rating system s/rould not be uscd*
I'CIIllary FIeI(~ IIl(~ICatOCS: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine)
I. Gconrornlrolo~y Absent Wcak 1ltodcrate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is T'be USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Arc Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
I
(2)
3
ti,) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alhtvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(•h'OTfi: /t/Jed & !lank Caused tlv Ditching And -i'!TI(OUTSinuosity Then Score=0•) (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
__O__n Topo Map AnrUOr In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=(0)
PRIAfARY GEOt1tORP1IOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 12
II, FIydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
i) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 I (2) 3
PRIttifARYAYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. i3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) I 0
2) Are Rooted ['(ants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 I 0
3~ Is Periphyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) _____ 1 2 3
PRIt11ARY13lOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine)
L Gcomorpholo~y Absent Wcak 1\lodcratc Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 .5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 1 (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage `'Vay?
0
.5 1
(LS)
SECONDARYGEOAIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4

II. il{Vdrolot*_y Absent Wcak Aloderate Strom
1) Is T1tis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streamtted?
1.$
(1)
5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.S) 1 1 $
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 (.5) I 1 $
4) Is Water In Channel Ar:d >48 Ilrs. Since 0 (.5)
Last F-sotvn Rain? ('NOTF,r IlDirch Indicarer! In #9 Above Skip This SfFn An~f #S llelow*1 1 1.$
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Grow7n~ Season)? 0 (.5) 1 1.$
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 No=(O)
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICfiTOR POINTS: 3
III.I3iolo~V Absent Weak Aloderate Strom
1) Arc Fish Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
2) Arc Amphibians Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) .5 1 1 $
4] Arc Crayfish Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
S) Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 $
6) Arc Iron Oxidizing 13acteria/Fun~us Present? (0) .$ I 1 $
Is Filamentous Alnae Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Strcambed?
(' NOTE: IjToral Absence Of All Planlsln Slrcambed
As Norcd Above .Skip This Slop UNLESS SAV Prescn!"1. SAV Afostly OBL
2 I Atostiy FACW Mostly FAC
(.75) ,$ Diostly FACU Diostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1.25
TOTAL POINTS (Priurary +Secondary) =27.25 (If Greater T/ran Or 6~ual To 19 Points Tke Stream Is At Least
Lrternrittcnt)
Comtuents: Stream located in bottoniland hardwood forest. The basil: height is 0.$ to 1 foot, 3 feet wide, and has a sand
and gravel substrata The water depth durutg the survey was 2 to 4 utches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Baut Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S3 (UT3 to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Gamer, NC
2,500 feet soutlnvest of the State Road 2562 and NC Highway 50 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditdi, then use ojtltis jarm is rtot necessary:
Also, if in t/:e best projessiona! judgement of the evaluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch and trot a modified rratura[ sUeam--this
rating system should not be used*
Primary field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine~
1. Geornornholo~y Absent Weak 1\iodcr~tc Strom
1) Is Tltere A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streantbed
Different From Surroundinu Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Arc Nahtral Levees Present? 0 (I) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 (2) 3
5) Is There Art Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
_7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
R) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Banl: Present? 0 1
(•NOTF..• /flied & 13nnk Cnused By Ditching And IVIT/LOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0•) (2) 3
10) Is A 2ne Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AurUOr In Field) Present?
__ Yes=(3)
1vo=0
PRIt1fARYGEOAiORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I8
T1(.IIyclrolo~y Absent Weak illoderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharec Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRI11iARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
jli• I31olo~y Absent Wcak )<Ioderzte Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (Z) I 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In S[rcambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
Q) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PIZI1-1ARY13IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPcrLine)
T. Geornornbolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 15
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topogcaplty Indicate A
Natural Drainaee Way? 0 5 I (1 5)

SECONDARY GEO11fORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
Ii.IlVdrolo~y Absent Wcak 1\ioderate Stronzr
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
(1)
5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last Krr01V/I Rain? (*NOTF.: /t Ditch /ndicated /n #9 Above Skin This Sten And #5 !lelow') (1) 1.5
S) Is 1liere Water In Charuiel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=(1 S) ___ ___ Nn=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: C
ItI.I3iolo>?Y Absent Weak It~ioderate Strom
Arc Fish Present? 0 (5J 1 1 5
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 l 5
4) Arc Crayfish Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
5) Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (l) 1 5
6) Are Iron Oxidizine I3acterialFun~us Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 I 15
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(' (TOTE: IjTota! Absence OJ'Al! Plants !n Streambed
A_ s Noted Above Skin This Sten UA'LF_S.S SAV Present'). SAV 1•iostly OIIL
2 I Mostly FACW Afostiy FAC
(.75) .5 Diostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Prinrar-~ +Secorrdary)= 38.25 (If Grcatcr Tharr Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is ~1 t Least
Intcrnritterrt)
Comments: Stream located in bottonrland hardwood forest. The bank height is 2 to 3 feet, 10 feet wide, and has a sand
substrate. The water depth during the survey was G to 12 niches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S4 (UT4 to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 18, 2002 Garner, NC 1 mile southwest of the US Highway 70 and NC Highway 50 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijei~a/uator and landowner agree that the jeature is a mau--nade ditc/r, then use ojthis jorrn is trot necessary: Also, if
in !/re best projessiaual judgement of the evaluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-dJiis rating system
should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine~
I. Gcomorplrolo~y Absent Weak 1\loder~tc Strom
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sectuence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundine Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Presc-tt? 0 (1) ~ 2 3
4)1s The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Ploodplain Present?
0
(1)
2
3
6) Is Tt~e Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7] Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 (1)
('NOTE.: I(Ifed & Ilnnk Caused l1v Di(chinr And li7T/LOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0 •) 2 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Map And/Or In Field) Present?
__ Yes=3
No=(Ol
PRI~fARYGEO~fORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
Ii.Ilydrolo~y Absent Week >\toder~te Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIt1IARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
Iii.I3ioloey Absent Week 1\ioder~tte Strom
1) Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed~ 3 2 (1) 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed~ 3 2 (1) 0
3_) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
d) Arc Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRI[1TARY1310LOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
Secondary field Indicators: (Circle OneNunrberPerLine)
I. C~eomornholo~y Absent Wezk Alodcrlte Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present in Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainacc Way? 0 S 1 (1.51
SECONDARYGEOt110RPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5

IL Ilydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
1
(.5)
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
3) Are Wrack L Ines Present? 0 .5 {1) 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel Arrd >48 Hrs. Since 0 (.5)
Last Iinorvn Rain? (•NOTE: IfDirch /ndicared In #9 Above Skit/ This Sren And #S Below") 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or 1n Growing Season)? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
6) Arc Hydric Soils Present_In Sides Of_Channel_ (Or In Hcadcut)? Yes=(1.51 No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
IIL I3iolo~V Absent Weak I~ioderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? (O) .5 1 1 5
2) Arc Amphibians Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
3) Are ActuaticTurtles Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 {.5) 1 1 5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(" NOTE: /jToeal Absence OjAll Planes /n Streambed
As Na«d Above Skin 71~is Sfcn UNLESS SAV Present•). SAV Dtostly OBL
l 1 Mostly FACW Mostly FAC
(.75) .S Mostly FACU lltostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOCYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secorrdary)= 23.75 (If Greater T/iarr Or Equal To 19 Points Tkc Stream Is At Least
Lclerrnitler:t)
Comments: Intermittent Stream located in tliui nuxed pine hardwood forest wiQi development surrounding. The bank
height is 2 to 3 feet, 5 feet wide, and has a sand and gravel substrate. The water depth during the survey was 3 to 6 niches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Namc: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
SS (UTS to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Gamer, NC 3,000 feet southwest of the US Highway 70 and NC Highway 50 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and /andoxmer agree 1/rat the jeature is a uran-made ditch, [Iren use ojthis form is not necessary. Also, ijin
t/:e best professional judgement oft/re evaluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch and not a modifred natural stream-[leis rating s}stem should
not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine~
I. Geomorpholo~y Absent Wcak 1lfoderate Strong
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundinc Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Nah~ral Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 (1)
2
3
G] Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 I (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
f`i1'OTEr /fl7ed & /Jnnk Caused !1 v Dilchine And {VIT/LOUT Sinuosity Then Scare=0`1 (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Charmel (As Indicated
On Tono Man AnrUOr In Field) Present? - __
Yes=3
No=(Ol
PRIBiARYGEOt1fORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 13
II. iiydrolo~Y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
IiL Iiiolo~y Absent Weak 1<loderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) I 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 I 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ __ 2 3
PRI~IfARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Fietd Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Wcak I<Ioderlte Stront*,
I~ Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is T}iere A Grade Control Point [n Channel? 0 5 (1) l 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 - ___ (1) 1.5
SECONDARYGEOAIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

IL IIydrolo>?y Absent Weak l~foderate Strom
1) Is T1)is Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
(i)
5 '
0

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
(5)
1 _
15

3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
0
(5)
I _
15
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0
Last Knows: Rain? (•NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Sren And # .5
S 13elow•) (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Seasonl? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
G Arc Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ Yes=[I,S)_ No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5.5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Arc Fish Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AouaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Arc Crayfish Present? 0 5 (f) 1 5
5) Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
_G) Arc Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Funet~s Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Alaae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(• NOTE: IjTotal Absence Of All Plants In Strcambed
As Noted AGo~~e Skip This Step UNLF.S.S SAV Presents). SAV Afostly OBL
2 1 Alostly FACW Dfostly FAC
(.75) .5 Dfostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Prinrary + Secondary)= 32.25 (If Grcaler Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At
Least Ltterstittent)
Comments: Perennial Stream located in thin bottomland hardwood forest, with development surrounding. The banl: height is 3 feet,
10 feet wide, and has a sand and gravel substrate. The water depth during the survey was G to 12 inches.

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Ilarold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S6 (UT1 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
llate: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Garner, NC 3,000 feet southeast of Carolina Biblical Gardens.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijet~aluator and landorener agree that the jeature is a man-made ditc/i, then use ojtl:is form is not necessar}:
Also, ijin the best projessional judgement of the ei~aluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch and no[ a modified natural stream--this
rating s}~stem should not be used*
Primary field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLine~
I. Geomornholo~y Absent Weak Aloderate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Strcambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 (2) 3
4_) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 (2) 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
6) Is T}~e Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Benclt Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Conturuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(•NOTF,: /f Bed & Bank Caused Bt' Ditching And IVITIlOUT Sinuosity Then Score=OJ (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Charuiel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AnrUOr In Field) Present?
Yes=(3)
No=O
PRIBfARYGEOHORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 19
Ii.Ilydrolo~y Absent Weak I<Ioderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRI~fARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.I3iolo~y Absent Weak 1~loder~te Strom
1] Are Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present in Strcambed? (3) 2 1 0
3~ Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRI~1iARY13IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine)
I. Gcornorpholo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 _ 1 (1.5)
SECONDARY GEORIORPIIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3.5

II.IfIydrolo~y Absent ~'Veak 1lioderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Lcaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1.5)
1
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 (1~ 1 5
3~ Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel Arrd >48 Hrs. Since 0 ,5
Last I~rtolvn Rain? ('NOTE: If Ditch /ndicated In #9 Above Skip This Sten And #S Aelow"1 (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=(L S) No=O
SECOND~iRYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: G.5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent ~'Vcak I~foderatc Strom
1) Arc Fish Present? 0 .5 (1) 1 5
2) Arc Amphibians Present? (0) .S 1 1 5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
4) Arc Cravfish Present? 0 .5 (1) 15
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 (i) 1 5
G) Are Iron Oxidizinc Bacteria/Fun£us Present? 0 (.5) 1 15
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(" NOTE: IjTotal AGsence OjAll Plants In StreamGed
As Noted Above Skip This Sten UNf,F,S.S SAV Present*l. SAV iliostly OBL
2 1 Aiostly FACW
.75 Afostly FAC
,$ Afostly FACU 1liostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
TOTAL POINTS (Prirrrary +Secondary)= 39.5 (If Crcater Tharr Or Equal To 19 Paints TJre Stream Is A[ Least
Lrterrnittcrrt)
Comments: Perennial Stream located in bottoniland hardwood forest. The banl: height is 4 to G feet, l0 to 15 feet wide,
and has a silt, sand, and gravel substrate. The water depth during the survey was 1 to 2 feet.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterluie Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S7 (UT2 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 18, 2002 Garner, NC 1 Hole south of the US Interstate 40 and Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijeva(uatar arrd landowner agree that the feature is a uran-made ditc/y then use oft/iis fore: is not necessary. Also,
ijin the best professional judgemcrrt ojthe evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditdt and not a modified natural stream-this rating
system should not be used'
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLinc~
I. Geomornholo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
-Different From Surroundine Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 (2) 3
4) Is T1~e Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Prescnt?
0 1
(2)
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Barrk Present? 0 (1)
('NOTE: lfUcd & Yank Caused I3v Di(chine And !V/TROUT Sinuosity Then Score=0') 2 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Presents
Yes=(3) _
No=O
PRIAfARY GEOAIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1 G
IL Ilydrolo~y Absent Wcak Modcrnte Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
FlowlDischarec Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIIIIARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.13iolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Stron>?
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present to Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIt1fARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumherPerLineJ
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Wenk 11loderlte Stronli
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 1 (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Nah~ral Drainaee Way? 0 5 _(1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEORIORPIIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3.5

II.Ilytlrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Lcaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
{1)
.5
0
?) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 {.5) 1 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 {1) 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel Ar:d >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last K-towrt Rain? ("NOTF..• UDitch lndicntcd In lJ9 Above Skin This .Step And NS Relotiv"1 (i) 1.5
5) Is Thcrc Water In Chatutel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growinc Season)? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
G) Arc Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcat)? Yes=(1.5) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: G
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Wcak Afodcratc Strom
I) Are Fish Present? 0 5 (1) 15
2) Arc Amphibians Present? (0) 5 I 1 5
3) Arc AguaticTurtles Present? {0) .5 I 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 5 {1) 15
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 {1) 1 5
6) Are iron Oxidizinc BacterialFuncus Present? 0 (~ 1 - 15
7) Is Filamentous Alcae Present? {0) 5 I 15
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(• NOTE: IJ'Total Absence OJAII Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skin This S[en UNLESS SAV Present"1. SAV btostiy OBL
2 1 Mostly FAC~V
.75 Dtostiy FAC
.5 Mostly FACU Diastly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary +secor:dart') _36 (If Greater T/tart Or Equal To 19 Points T/re S[ream Is At
Least L-tcrmitterr!)
Conunents: Perennial Stream located iu bottoniland hardwood forest with development surrounding. Ttte bank height is 4 to G
feet, 10 to 15 feet wide, and has a sand and gravel substrate, with trash tluoughout. T1te water depth during the survey was 3 to 9
inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S8 (UT3 to Wahrut Crcck) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 30, 2002 Raleigh East, NC Immediately south of the US Interstate 40 and Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and larsdorvner agree that dre jcature is a man-made dildr, then use ojthis form is nat necessary. Also, if
in the best professional judgement ojthe evaluator, the jcature is a urarr-made ditch acrd not a modified natural stream--this rating system
should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine~
I. Geomorpholo~V Absent Weak 11loderate Strom
1) Is There A Riftle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundinc Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Actrve (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0
(1)
2
3
6~ is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial I7enosits Present? 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfirll Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Baeilc Present? 0 1
('NOTE; /(/Ted & !lank Caused Ay Di(chinn And rVITt/OUT Sinuosity Then Score=0t1 (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Oc Greater Chacmel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AntUOr In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=(Ol
PRI/1lARYGEOAtORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: l l
Il.llydrolo~y Absent Weak Modcrlte Strom
1) Is Tliere A Groundwater
Flow/Discliarce Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRI/1fARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
IIi.I3iolo~V Absent ~Ve~k 1\loderlte Strom
1) Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 (1) 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Pennhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Brvalvcs Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIAiARY13IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLinc)
I. Gcomornholot*y Absent ~VeZk Aloder~tc Strom
1) Is There A Hcad Cut Present In Channeh 0 S (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainace Way? 0 5 _(1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEOAfORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

II.IIydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is Tltts Year's (Or Last's) Leaflttter
Present In Streambcd?
1 5
1 (5)
0

2) Ts Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
(5) 1 _
15
Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 (5) 1 15
4) Is Water In Chamiel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 (.5) 1
Last Known Raln? (*NOTF.r /fbitch Indicated In tl9 Above Skin This Stcn And #S Rclotiv~) 1.5
5) Is T'ttere Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Hcadcut)~ Yes=1.5 No=(O)
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: Z.5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Arc Fish Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
6] Are Iron Oxtdtzmc I3actena/Funcus Present~ 0 (5) 1 1 5
7~ Ts Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
('t\'OTB: !f Total Absence OjAll Plants In Strcambed
As Noted Above Skrn_7his Step fINl,F.S.S SAV PrcscnNl. SAV Aiostly OI3L
2 1 Diostly FACW Mostly FAC
(.75) .5 Dlostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =22.75 (If Crcatcr T/tan Or Equal To 19 Points T/te Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
Comments: httemuttent Stream located in mixed pineJhardwood forest with I-40 inmlediately to the north. The banl:
height is 2 to 3 feet, 5 feet wide, and leas a sand substrate. There was no Mowing water during the survey; however, the
pools contained water.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Natned Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S9 (UT4 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 30, 2002 Raleigh East, NC 1,500 feet northwest of the US Interstate 40 and Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landarvner agree that tine jcature is a man-made ditch, then use of l/iis jor~n is not necessary. Also,
if in the best projessiona! judgement ojthe evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system
s/tould not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLinc~
1. Gcomornholo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1] Is There A Rrffle-Pool Senuence? (0) 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundine Terrain?
0 (1)
2
3
3) Arc Natural Levees Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) is Tlie Channel Sinuous? (0) 1 2 3
5) Is Thcrc An Active (Or Rchc)
Floodplain Present?
(0) I
2
3
6) Is Tlie Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Presents 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Batik Present?
f •11'OTE.' lfl3ed & hank Caused IJv Di[chine And lVITIfOUT Sinu 0 1
osity Then Score=0'I (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Presents
Ye~3
No=(O)
PRI~fARYGEORIORPIIOLOGYINDICfiTOR POINTS: 5
Ir. Hydrology Abscut Wc~k 1\ioderate Strom
1) Is Tliere A Groundwater '
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIhiARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
lii.I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
])Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) l 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streanibed`~ 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4] Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIdIARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLineJ
I._Gcomornholot:y Absent Welk 111oder~te Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channeh 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indtcate A
Nahiral Draina£e Way? 0 (5) 1 1.5
SECONDARYGEO~IORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2

II. Hydrolo~y Absent Weak 1\7oderate Strom
1) Is Tltis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
I.$
(1)
$
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 $
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? (0) .$ 1 I $
4) Is Water In Channel And >d8 Hrs. Since 0 .$
Last KnOren Rain? ('NOTE.• If Ditch Indicated !n #9 Above Skin This Sten And #S Ilelowv) (1) 1.$
5) Is There Water Its Chamtel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .$ (1) 1.$
6 Are Hydtic Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 No=(O)
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
IIi.1<3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1_) Are visit Prescnt? (0) 5 1 1 $
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) $ 1 1 $
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) $ 1 1 5
41 Are Crayfish Present? 0 (5) 1 1 $
5)_Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun~us Present? (0) $ 1 1 $
7) Is Filamentous Alaae Present? (0) $ 1 1 $
8) Are Wetland Plants In Strcambed?
(• NOTE: !f Total Absence OjAll Plants br Slreambcd
As Noted Above Skin This Step UNl.F,SS SAV Present'1. SAV mostly OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW lltostly FAC
.']$ ,$ Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 ~
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
TOTAL POINTS (Pri»rary + secorrdary)= 1 G.5 (If Creaser Tlrarr Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is fit
Least Lrterrnitterrt)
Comments: This is tltc same stream as S8. However, this crossing is on the northern side of I-40, and the stream has been
significantly modified to a ditch. It is peretutial and the water was moving slowly due to its close proximity to Walnut Creek. The
stream is located along the edge of a developed parking lot/flea market with a mixed pine/ltardwood on the opposite side. The
bank height is 1 to 2 feet, 4 feet wide, and has a silt, sand, and woody debris substrate, with trash t(troughout. The water depth
during the survey was G to 12 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain VVatcrline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S10 (Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 1, 2002 Raleigh East, NC 1,500 feet north of the US Interstate 40 a nd Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landax~ner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use ojthis form is not necessary:
Also, if in the best prajessiona/ judgement of the evaluator, the jcature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
ratings}stem should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number/'crLine~
i. Gcomornholo~y Absent Wcak moderate Strom
1] Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is Tire USDA Texture In Streambed
__ Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 l (2) 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0
1
(2)
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 I (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 I (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
('NOTF,: If[1ed & dank Caused ltv Drtchine And if7T/LOUT Sinuosrh~ Then Score=0') (2) 3
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man Arrd/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=(3)
No=O
PRIIIIARY GEOt110RPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: l R
IL Ilydrolo~y Absent Wcak 1~Ioderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/DischarQe Present? 0 ] 2 (3)
PRI~l1ARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Wcak Modcrltc Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present 1tt Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Arc Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRI~IARYIIIOLOGYINDICt1TOR POINTS: S
Secondary Field Indicators: (CircteOneNumbcrPerLine)
I. Geornornholo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present in Channel? 0 (.5) I 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 (5) 1 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
.5 1
(1.5)
SECONDARYGEO~1fORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5

II. Hydrolo~y Absent Weak 1lioderate Strom
1) Is Tltis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.$
(~
.$
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .$ 1 (1 S)
3) Arc Wrack Lines Present? 0 .$ 1 (1 S)
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .$
Last Ilnolvrr Raln? ('NOTF,~ U'I)itch Indicated /n tt9 Above Skin 77~is Step And #5 Below-) 1 (1.5)
S) Is'I'here Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .$ 1 (1.5)
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In I~eadcut~?__ _ .Yes=(1.S) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8.5
IIL Biolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .$ 1 (1 S)
2) Arc Amphibians Present? 0 .$ (I) 1 S
3) Are A~uaticTurtles Present? 0 (.S) 1 1 $
4) Are Cnyfish Present? 0 .$ 1 (1 S)
S) Arc Macrobentltos Present? 0 .$ 1 (I S)
6) Arc Iron Oxidizinc I3actetia/Functrs Present? 0 .$ (1) 1 $
7) Is Filamentous Alcae Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(' NOTE: jTolal Absence Of Alt Planes In Streambed
As Noted Above Skrn This Sten UNI,F,SS SAV Prescnt•). SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 Afostly FACw Diostly FAC
.7$ .$ Mostly FACU Afostly UI'L
0 0
SECONDARYIIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 7
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =44 (If Creator T/ian Or Egna! To 19 Points T/ce Stream Is At Least
Lr[crrnittcnt)
Comments: Perennial Stream located in bottomland hardwood forest. The bank height is 1 to 3 feet, 1$ feet wide, and has
a silt and sand substrate. The water depth during the survey was 1 to 3 feet. Walnut Creek is crossed along Rock Quarry
Road and Soudt Wilmington Street. The above description is for Rock Quarry Road. The crossing along South
Wilmington Street has a bank height of 7 to 10 feet, is 1$ feet wide, and has a silt, sand, gravel, and cobble substrate. The
water depth during the survey was 1 to 3 feet.

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S 13 (UT7 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 1, 2002 Raleigh East, NC Located on tite western side of Chavis Park.
*PLEASE NOT1C: If evaluator and landorener agree that t/ie jature is a man-made disc/1, then use of this jorm is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement ojtlre evaluator, t/re feature is a man-made ditch artd not a modified natural stream-this
rating sy~stctn should not be used*
Primary Field Lldieators: (CirctcOnetrumGerPerLine~
I. Geomornholo~y Absent Weak Moderate fitron~
1) Is There A Riftlc-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streantbed
Different From Surroundinc Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 (2) 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Ploodnlain Present?
0 (1)
2
3
C) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present'? 0 1 2 (3)
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Battk Present? 0 1
(*NOTF_: /(Iced & Rnnk Caused /Tv Ditchinr AnA rrTTIIOUT Sinuosity Then Scare=0'1 (2) 3
10) Is A 2°ir Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man AtrrUOr In Field) Present?___ _ ______
Yes=(3)
Nn=O
PRIdif1RYGE0AiORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 18
II. Hydrolo~y Absent Weak 1\foderatc ~tron~
1) Is Tltere A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 I (2) 3
PRIt11ARYHYDROLOCYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.13iolo~y Absent Wcak Aloderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambcd? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambcd? 3 (2) 1 0
3) is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRIIIiARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4
SCCOIl(IaCy FICId IIi(I1CatoCS: (Circle OneNumGcrl'crLine)
I. Gconrornbolo~y Absent Wcak Iyiodcrate Strops?
1) Is T}~cre A I-lead Cut Present In Channel? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 1 (1 5)
3) Docs Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 (1) I.5
SECONDARYGEO<<iORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

IL IIydrolo~V Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is Thts Year's (Or Last's) Leaflittcr
Present In Streambed?
1.5
1
(5)
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 5 (I) 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel Arrd >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last I+rtolvrt Rain? ('NOTF.r /f Ditch Indicated In #9 Ahore Skin This Sten And #5 Aelow') (I) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
Arc Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ Yes=(1 S) _ No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDIC.~TOR POINTS: 5.5
III.I3iolozTy Absent Weak I<ioderltc Strom
1~ Are Fish Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) Are Atnnhtbratts Present? (0) 5 I 1 5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
a) Arc Cravfish Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
G) Are Iron Oxrdizinc Bacteria/Funcus Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
7) Is Frlantentous Algae Presents (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streatnbed?
(' NOTE: IjTotat Absersce OjAll Plants !n Streambed
As Noted Abore Skip This Sten UNLF_S.S SAV Present'l. SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW Mostly FAC
(.75) .$ 1lfostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Priurary +Secondary)= 30.25 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Lttcrutittent)
Contmcuts: Perennial Stream located in bottontlattd hardwood forest with development surrounding. A recent stream
restoration project occurred immediately upstream of the proposed stream crossing. The bank height is 1 to 2 feet, 15 feet
wide, and has a silt, sand, gravel, and cobble substrate, with trash throughout. The water depth during the survey was 3 to
9 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Btady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: ~ Signature:
S 14 (UT8 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 30, 2002 Lake Wheeler, NC 4,500 feet south of the old State School for the Blind and Deaf.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and lanAawner agree That the feature is a man-made ditd+, then use of this form is nat necessary.
Also, if in the best professional juJgcment of the evaluator, the jcaturc is a man-male ditd+ arrd not a modified natural stream-11tis
rating system shoulJ r:ot be usec!*
Primary Field Indicators: (CirclcOneNumberPerLine~
I. Gcornornbolo~Y Absent Wcak Afodcrate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Seoucnce? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Strcambed
Different From Sunoundin Terrain?
0
1
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 (Z) 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0
(1)
2
•3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 (1) Z 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (21 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Barrk Present? 0 1
['NOTE: I[Red c4c Rank Caused Rv Ditchine And tVIT/LOUT Simiositr 77ien Score=0') (2) 3
10) Is A 2aa Order Or Greater Charmel (As Lidicated
On Tono Map And/Or In Field) Present?_
Yes=3
No=(0)
PRIt1fARYGEO11tORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 12
TT. Hydrolo~Y Absent Weak I1loderZte Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRI~tARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
ITi.I3iolo~y Absent Wcak IVloderate 5trone
1) Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambed? 3 2 (I) 0
2~ Are Rooted Plants Present In Strcambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Arc Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRI~IIARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: ~1
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Gconrornbolo~y Absent Wcak Moderltc Strom
1) Is There A Nead Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (I) 15
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Nah+ral Drainage Way? 0 5 _{1) 1.5
SECONDARYGEO1tIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

IT. Hydrolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.$
1 (5)
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.5) 1 I $
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
4) Is Water In Chamtel Arid >48 Hrs. Sutce 0 (.5) 1
Last Kno-vrt Raln? (*NOTF.r It Ditch fndr~atcd In #9 Ahove Skin Thrs Sten And #S Rc1ow') I.$
5) Is There Water In Channel Durutg Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 (.5) I 1.$
6 Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Ycs=/.S No=(0)
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICf1TOR POINTS: 2
III. Biolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
I) Are Fislt Present? (0) $ I 1 $
2) Are Amnltibians Present? (0) $ 1 1 $
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) $ I 1 $
4) Are Crayfish Present? (0) $ 1 I $
5) Are Macrobent}tos Present? 0 (5) I 1 $
G) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Funcus Present? (0) $ I I $
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) $ 1 1 $
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(* NOTE: /jTolat Absence Of Alt P/ants In Streambed
As N~tc~i Above Skn This Sten UNLF,SS S1 t~Present*). SAV Diostly OBL
2 I Afostiy FACW Mostly FAC
.7$ .$ Diostty FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secortdary) =22.5 (If Greater T/cart Or Egrtal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Lttermittcrtt)
Comments: Intemuttent Stream located in mixed pine/Itardwood forest with a raihoad immediately to the east. The bank
height is 2 to 3 feet, 4 feet wide, and has a sand substrate. There was no flowing water during the survey; however, the
pools contained water.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Narne: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold 1`1. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S 15 (UT9 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 24, 2002 Lake Wheeler, NC 4,500 feet south of the old State School for Qre Blind and Deaf.
*PLEASE NOTE: !f evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditdr, then use ojtltis form is nat necessary:
Also, if in the best professional judgement ojthe evaluator, the jcature is a rr:an-made ditch and not a modrfrcd na[ural stream--this
rating system should not be userfk
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine~
L Geomorpholo~Y Absent Weak I1~loderate Strom
1) Is There A Rrffle-Pool Sequence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Strcambed
Different From Surroundinc Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (l) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0
(I)
2
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? 0 (1) 2 3
Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8)1s There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 (1)
('N0TF_: 1/'lled & Bank Caused /Tv Ditchin¢ And WlTI/OUT Sinuasih~ 7Tten Score=0') 2 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map Arrd/Or In Field) Present?
___ Yes=3
No=(O)
PRIMARY GEOt1tORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
II. Hydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderzte Strnn~
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIr1tARYfIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
IIi.I3iolo~y Absent Weak 1~lodcrate Strom
1) Are Frbrous Roots Present In Strcambed`? 3 2 (1) 0
2_) Are Rooted Plants Present in Strcambed? 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Penphyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIAIARYIIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLinc)
I. Geomorpholo~y Absent Week 1\Iodcr~rtc Strom
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 1 (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 (5) 1 1.5
SECONDARYGEOMORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5

II.IIydrolo~y Absent Week Moderate Strom
i) Is Thts Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
LS
1
(5) 0
2~ Ts Sedttnent On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 5 1 (1 5)
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last KltO1VIt Rain? /'NOTE: IfDitrh Indicated !n #9 0 (.5)
Above Skin This Stcn And #S Rc(ow*) 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Cltanttel Durutg Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Chann el (Or In Hezdcut)~ Yes=(1 S) __ No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5.5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Stron!?
1) Are Fish Present? (0) 5 1 15
2) Are Amnhtb~ans Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AguaUcTuriles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Are Cnvfish Present? 0 5 (I) 1 5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Funcus Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Aleae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(*!1'OTE: IjTolal Absence Of All Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skin This Stcp UNLF.S.S SAV Present'). SAV 111ostly OI3L
2 1 111oslly FACW Diostly FAC
(.75) .5 Mostly FACU Aiostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOCYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.25
TOTAL POINTS (Printary + Secondary) =25.25 (If Creator T/ian Or Equal To 19 Poiuts TJte Stream Is At Least
b:termiltent)
Comments: Intenttittent Stream located in mixed pine/hardwood forest with a railroad ittuncdiatcly to the east. The bank
height is 2 to 3 feet, 4 feet wide, and bas a sand substrate. There was no flowing water during the survey; however, the
pools contained water.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse ~'Vake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S16 (UT10 to Wahtut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 2, 2002 Lake Wheeler, NC 3,000 feet south of the Hanunond Road and US Interstate 40 intersection
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and landon~ner agree t/rat t/re feature is a man-made ditch, then use ojdris form is not necessary:
Also, if irr the best professional judgcrncrrl ojthe evaluator, the jcalure is a man-made ditch and rrol a modified natural stream-[his
raring s}stem should not be used*
Primary field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Ge~rnornholo~V Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Rtffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texttue In Streambed
Different From Surroundine Terrain?
0 1
(2)
~
3) Arc Nahrral Levees Present? 0 (I) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Rchc)
Floodplain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Brawled? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Denosrts Presents 0 1 (2) 3
$) is There A Bankfull Bench Presents 0 1 (Z) 3
9) Is A Contutuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
('NOTE.• /I/Ied & Bank Caused Irv Dirchin~ And fi7TL/OUT Sinuosity Then Score=0 •) (Z) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indreated
On Tono Man AnrUOr In Field) Presents
Yes=(3) _
No=O
PIZIti1ARYGEO1tfORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 17
IL hdrolotiy Absent Wc~k Moderate Strom
1) Is Tltere A Groundwater
Flow/Dischar~e Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRI~fARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Week 1\loder~te Strom
i) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) 1 0
3~ Is Pennhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4~ Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRI~fARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNurnberPerLine)
I. Geomornholo!?y Absent
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channeh 0
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channeh 0
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainaee Way? 0
SECONDARY GEO/IIORPIIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
Weak Moderate Stron
•5 (1) 1 5
•5 (1) 1 5
•5 (1) 1 5
3

~I. Hydrolorl,~~ Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is Thts Year's (Or Last's) Leaflttter
Present )n Streambed?
2) Is Sedm~ent On Plants (Or Debns) Presents
1.5
0
(I)
5
$
(I)
0
1 5

3) Arc Wrack Lines Present?
0
5
(I) _
1 5
4) Is Water In Channel Ar:d >48 Hrs. Since 0
Last Knvrvrl Rain? ('NOTE: IlDitch Incficntrd !n N9 Abor~ S,hb This Stan AnA tF5 .5
Rciotivs) (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel Dunng Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ Yes-(1 S) No 0
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: l.5
III. Biolo~y Absent Weak Afoderzte Strom
1) Are Ftsh Present? 0 (5) 1 15
2) Are Amnhtb~ans Presents 0 (5) 1 1 5
3 Are AguahcTurtles Presents (0) 5 ) I S
4) Are Cravfish Present? 0 5 (I) 1 5
5) Are Macrobenthos Presents 0 S (I) 1 5
6) Are Iron Oxtdtzme Bactena/Fun~tts Present~ 0 (5) 1 1 5
7 Is Filamentous Al ae Present? 0 .5 1 1
5
S) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
' SAV Aiostly 013E 1lfostly FACW Mostly FAC .
Aiostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* 11
OTE: IjTotal Absence OjAlt Planes In Streambed 2 1 (.75) .5 0 0
As Noted Abate Skin This Sup UNI,F_S.S SAV Prasent*l.
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4.25
TOTAL POINTS (Pri`n:ary + Secardary) =33.75 (If Greater Than Or Equa! To 19 Points The Strcani Is At Least
Intermittent)
Comments: Perennial Stream located in a much disturbed bottomland hardwood forest with development surrounding.
This stream is crossed Qtree times by the proposed project. The bane: height is 3 to 4 feet, 10 feet wide, and has a sand and
gravel substrate, with rip-rap in places. The water dcptlt during the survey was 1 to 2 feet. Most if not all of tlus stream
appears to have been straightened.

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
hJnvironmental Assessment for Dempsey I•/. Benton Water Treatment Plant
April 21, 2006
Project Applicant: City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
Responsible Agency: NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Public Water Supply, Division of Environmental Health
Pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. § 113A-1, et
seq.), an environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared for the City's of Raleigh's proposed
Dempsey E. Benton Water Treatment Plant (WTP) on Lake Benson. The proposed WTP will be operated
as a base load plant at a normal treatment rate of 14 mgd. The additional treatment capacity, up to
20 mgd, will be provided to allow occasional short term increases in production during wet weather
periods for the purpose of performing maintenance at the E.M. Johnson WTP. The City proposes to use
the existing raw water intake structure and pump station at Lake Benson dam. Lakes Benson and Wheeler
reservoirs served as raw water sources for the City of Raleigh from 1953 to 1987. The City of Raleigh
plans to reactivate Lakes Benson and Wheeler reservoirs as a water supply source in conjunction with the
new Dempsey E. Benton WTP. Additionally, the City plans to construct finished water transmission
mains to deliver water throughout the project area. There arc approximately 19,100 feet (3.6 miles),
35,300 feet (6.7 miles), 18,400 feet (3.5 miles), and 7,000 feet (1.3 miles) of 48-inch, 36-inch, 30-inch,
and 16-inch finished water transmission mains, respectively. The proposed project will provide the
dependability and reliability of a second water supply source and meet post 2010 water supply needs in
the project area.
The 14-mgd of water supply contributed by the proposed project represents an increase of approximately
15 percent over the existing water supply for the City's utility service area. Additionally, this 15 percent
increase in water supply capacity will be spread across the entire service area, which includes an area over
20 times the size of Garner's jurisdiction in the lower Swift Creek watershed. Authorization of the
proposed Dempsey E. Benton WTP Project will not significantly affect growth rate, final land use
patterns, or development densities in the Swift Creek watershed, as these have been determined by
separate planning and political processes. however, it is also correct to state that the additional increment
of water supply that would be contributed by the project is a necessary factor in achieving and sustaining
a normal rate of growth.
The proposed 309-square mile project area includes city limits, extraterritorial jurisdictions, and long-
range urban services areas for the City of Raleigh, the Town of Garner, and the Town of Rolesville. The
proposed project area is bounded by Falls Lake and the Town of Wake Forest to the north, the Little River
and Buffalo Creek watersheds to the east, the Middle Creek watershed to the south, and the Towns of
Cary, Morrisville, and Apex to the west. The proposed Dempsey E. Benton WTP will be located on two
adjacent parcels east of Highway 50 at the intersection of Buffalo Road. The property is bordered by
Swift Creek to the south and Mahlers Creek to the east.
Swift Creek is classified as a "special case" stream per the 1995 Dam Safety rules due to populations of
aquatic species listed as tlu-eatened or endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), and due to classifications of exceptional non-
game or fishery resources by the WRC (15A NCAC 2K.0501 [g][2] and [3]). Due to Swift Creek's
1 /3

classification as a "special case" stream, asite-specific instream flow study was required to establish a
tiered minimum flow release from Lake Benson, per 15A NCAC 2K.0502 [c] [4] of the 1995 Dam Safety
rules. The proposed tiered minimum flow regime (3 cfs in Tier 1, 2 cfs in Tier 2, and 1 cfs in Tier 3)
represents a 10 percent reduction in the safe yield. The 1995 Dam Safety Rules stipulates that the
minimum release shall be set no higher than an amount which would reduce the water supply yield by
more than 10 percent.
As a result of reservoir reactivation and WTP water withdrawals, instream flows in the portion of Swift
Creek between Lakes Wheeler and Benson and below Lake Benson to the confluence with the Neuse
River will be modified. It was determined through the informal consultation process with the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) that the pro osed water withdrawal an tiered minimum
release schedule ma constitute an impact to the federally en angered dwarf wedgemussel (DWM).
Water wit rawals and the resulting Swift Creek stream owow mo~'ii`icafion may influence the abundance
and availability of mussel Habitat and habitat for fish host species in Swift Creek downstream of the dam.
A Final Biological Assessment (BA) was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) in
June 2005 that described in detail the findings of the approach to evaluating the instream flow study
results, the impacts of the proposed project, and mitigation for impacts to DWM. The Final BA initiated
fornial Section 7 Consultation under the Endangered Species Act. The conclusion to formation Section 7
Consultation was a Final Biological Opinion (BO) signed by the USFWS in February 2006. The USFWS
concluded in the signed Final BO that:
"After reviewing the current status of the DWM, the environmental baseline for the action
area, the effects of the Project and the cumulative effects, it is the Service's biological
opinion that the Project is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the dwarf
wedgy*,emusscl. No critical habitat has been designated for this species, therefore, none will
be affected......In the accompanying biological opinion, the Service has determined that
the Icvel of anticipated take is not likely to result in jeopardy to the DWM. Since critical
habitat has not been designated for this species, the proposed Project will not result in the
destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat."
The signed Final Biological Opinion outlines the detailed Terms and Conditions of the Section 7
Consultation. These Terms and Conditions have been declared satisfactory by the USFWS to minimize
harm to the endangered DWM, as well as protect other sensitive aquatic species present in Swift Creek.
A brief outline of the terms and conditions in the signed Final BO arc as follows:
1. The City will provide in stream flows that are protective of the dwarf wedgemussel,
including a tiered minimum flow release schedule with corresponding reduction in
water withdrawal rates. The City must monitor and report minimum release flows.
Tlie City must place a maximum threshold on the base withdrawal rate of the Project
and limit the frequency of maximum withdrawal rate operation.
2. The City must design and construct intake, outlet, and minimum flow release
structures at the Lake Benson dam to accurately control the release rate of
instantaneous minimum flows and ensure that the water released is of suitable water
quality for the dwarf wedgemussel and meets North Carolina water quality standards.
3. The City must fund and perform periodic surveys of Swift Creek mussels and dwarf
wedgemussel populations downstream of Lake Benson dam to provide information
useful for revaluation and management of the Swift Creek dwarf wedgemussel
population.
4. The City must fund and establish a flow gauging station on Swift Creek downstream
of the Lake Benson dam, preferably in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey
2/3

(USGS). This flow monitoring station must include monitoring for temperature and
dissolved oxygen.
5. The City must provide for monitoring of water quality, biological indices, and
general stream condition in Swift Creek at tlu-ce locations per the City's Sampling
and Monitoring Program.
6. The City must decommission Indian Creek Overlook and Mill Run Mobile Home
Park WWTPs in order to improve the quality of dwarf wedgemussel habitat in Swift
Creek.
7. The City must pursue riparian corridor protection for the Steep Hill Creek and Lake
Wheeler to Benson corridors for water quality protection within the Swift Creek
watershed.
8. The City must implement a Public Service Aimounecment (PSA) plan to encourage
water conservation, especially during periods of low rainfall.
9. The City must adopt additional measures to conserve water usage within the City's
service area.
In addition to mitigation for the endangered DWM and other sensitive aquatic species, the City and
surrounding communities have mitigated for secondary and cumulative impacts from modest growth and
development via strong local programs. These local programs (i.e., land management and planning, open
space plans and initiatives, erosion and sedimentation control, riparian buffers, water conservation,
stormwater and pollution prevention) offset any potential indirect impacts that may result from the
proposed project.
In addition to the strong local programs, the City has agreed to implement a comprehensive Sampling and
Monitoring Program to address any additional concerns in regards to secondary and cumulative impacts
in the service area. The new Sampling Program will cover portions of the service area not currently
addressed in the City's existing programs. The Sampling and Monitoring Program includes extensive
water quality sampling, fish tissue sampling, benthic sampling to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
EPT standard, mussel surveys, USGS gauging stations, and photo-documentation of selected streams for
changes in physical characteristics. DWQ and the City agreed that the Sampling and Monitoring Program
data be evaluated on the five year cycle of the Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan.
The City will work with the DWQ to analyze the data resulting from this sampling program and establish
a timeline so that the data reporting coincides with the DWQ assessment period for the Neuse River basin.
However, the City recognizes that there may be instances where immediate action could be taken if the
City discovers impairnlent from a particular source or activity that could be immediately addressed.
Therefore, the City commits to working tluough the appropriate channels and/or authorities to help rectify
these situations at the time of discovery.
The City of Raleigh Dempsey E. Benton WTP project has been reviewed by the North Carolina
Department of the Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Agencies and has met the criteria of the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Alternatives
for this project have been evaluated and it has been concluded that an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) will not be required.
3/3

} cosYStem
./ , t .
~_
PROGRAM
April 18, 2006
Linda Diebolt
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive #300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Project: D.E. Benton WTP County: Wake
ARCADIS Ceraphty~ Mili'er
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the about referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
topics of the 404/401/CAMA pcrtnits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsli Cold Cool Warm
Ncuse 0 0.26 0 0 0 0 0 0
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or LAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Departrnent of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
R.P.StOYl.GL9... ~ ~ ... PV'OtP.GtGGL~ OGG~' StGLtP.
~~~
~CDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ~~ ~.
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS ~ *~~ $~_~ i
~~+.
Po. eox Faso ~+
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO Aprll S, 2006
Regulatory Division
Action ID Numbers 200320193, 200620626-200620628, and Nationwide Permit Numbers 12
(Utility Line Activities) and 39 (Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Developments)
Mr. Dale Crisp, Director of Public Utilities
City of Raleigh
Post Office Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Crisp:
Reference your permit application of September 22, 2004, for Department of the Army
(DA) authorization to impact 0.26 acre of wetlands and to temporarily disturb 1.42 acres of
herbaceous wetlands and 683 linear feet of stream channels associated with proposed
construction of the D.E. Benton Water Treatment Plant, upgrades to the Lake Benson and Lake
Wheeler Dams, and the construction of a finished water transmission line. The project is located
in tributaries to Swift Creek, Big Branch and Walnut Creek, south of Raleigh, in Wake County,
North Carolina. Also reference the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) biological
opinion, dated February 23, 2006, which. covers the effects of the proposed water treatment plant
on the dwarf wedgemussel (Alasrnidonta heterodon, DWM).
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, lists
nationwide permits. Authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was
provided for activities required for the construction, maintenance and repair of utility lines and
associated facilities in waters of the U.S., provided there is no change in preconstruction
contours. Authorization was also provided for discharges of dredged or fill material into non-
tidal waters of the U.S., excluding non-tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters, for the
construction or expansion of residential, commercial, and institutional building foundations and
building pads and attendant features that are necessary for the use and maintenance of the
structures.
Your work, is hereby authorized by the above referenced nationwide ,permits, provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the attached general, regional and special conditions, and.
your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal
action.
,~.P(~ 0 7 7[l06
-ia ,AJIS Gzrs
't' ~l~ty~Aiillcr

This verification is valid until the nationwide permits are modified, reissued, or
revoked. All of the existing nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or
revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of
changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public notice when the nationwide
permits are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to continence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permits are modified or revoked,
you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the
nationwide permits to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of
these nationwide permits. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide
permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until
March 18, 2007, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terns and conditions.
The District Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify,
suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization under any nationwide permit.
Please note that your activity may also require a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). You should
contact the NCDWQ at telephone [phone] to determine Section 401 requirements.
This DA verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any
other required Federal, State or local approvals or permits.
Following our initial review of your application, we determined that the project as
proposed may affect the federally endangered DWM. Accordingly, we initiated formal
consultation with the USFWS by letter dated June 20, 2005, pursuant to Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS recently concluded their
review of the project with the issuance of a biological opinion, dated February 23, 2006.
The biological opinion lists nine reasonable and prudent measures necessary to minimize
the impacts of any possible incidental take of DWM associated with the project. These
measures are stated below:
1. The City must provide in stream flows that are protective of the DWM, including
tiered minimum flow release schedule with corresponding reductions in water
withdrawal rates, and must monitor and report minimum release flows. The City
must place a maximum threshold on the base withdrawal rate of the Project and
limit the frequency of maximum withdrawal rate operation.
2. The City must design and construct intake, outlet, and minimum flow release
structures at the Lake Benson Dam to accurately control the release rate of
instantaneous minimum flows and ensure that that water released is of suitable
water quality for the DVVM and meets North Carolina water quality standards.
3. The City must fund and perform periodic surveys of Swift Creek mussel and
DMW populations downstream of Lake Benson Dam to provide information
useful for evaluation and management of the Swift Creek DWM population.
4. The City must. fund and establish a flow gauging station on Swift Creek
downstream of the Lake Benson Dam, preferably in cooperation with the U.S.
Geological Survey. This flow monitoring station must include monitoring for
2

temperature and dissolved oxygen and the data will be used to assess impacts to
DWM.
5. The City must provide for monitoring of water quality, biological indices, and
general stream condition in Swift Creek by adding tlrree stations in Swift Creek to
the City's Sampling and Monitoring Program (City of Raleigh, 2005).
6. The City must decommission Indian Creek Overlook and Mill Run Mobile Home
Park WWTPs in order to improve the quality of DWM habitat in Swift Creek.
7. The City must pursue riparian corridor protection for the Steep Hill Creek and
Lake Wheeler to Lake Benson corridors for water quality protection within the
Swift Creek watershed. The target acreage for these two tracts is approximately
862 acres. These additional buffers on Swift Creek will protect the watershed
from additional pollutant runoff and therefore provide some protection of water
quality in DWM habitat downstream.
8. The City must implement a Public Service Announcement (PSA) plan to
encourage water conservation, especially during periods of low rainfall. The
resulting reduced water usage is designed to reduce the duration of low flow
conditions in DWM habitat.
9. The City must adopt additional measures to conserve water usage tivithin the
City's service area.
In order to comply with the reasonable and prudent measures described above, the
biological opinion included terms and conditions that will minimize the level of
incidental take identified for the DWM. These terms and conditions are non-
discretionary and have been included as conditions of this permit authorization (see
attached).
Please note that operation of the project manner different than described in your
permit application may increase the level of harm to DWM through additional adverse
habitat conditions. Accordingly, such changes may require reinitiating consultation with
the USFWS.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the issuance of DA permits
for this project, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Todd Tug~vell of our Raleigh Field
Office Staff at telephone [phone], Extension 26.
Sincerely,
Jean B. Manuele
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Enclosures
3

~ 'S
a~
;~.
~i~.~
~i~'r i~_ ,~~ .
_~
~~~:s~ -
t~
u,~a , ,.,
~ ~,-~,.
~~ ~ ~ ~
,.

~ ~._: _.' ;~
~ tt .i :
~
a
~~ J
V ~ i0
~
r
'
~.
~
1
~~, ~
~ u- --i J
,.. ,G ~-- 0 ..
~'l Jr
~
~Si
f Z ~
`
~ L~
`
:.
n~' -~~ ~ r` ~~ ~~'; W Q ~~
~ `~,, ,c ~ I- Z ~,~
~
~ ~ ~
,
'r~` ~
~ ~} , k ~~. , ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r N ~~~
1~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ `
=a~ _ (
i! ~,~ ,
j y~ ~ l '~
~ a G
.~
~• '
~ V.

W O ~ ~
i 1 i
~ ~

c ~"-
eio
.,~. ~ ~
. ~ ~
~ Z
r

LlJ
~

~ r
G o
~
-,~li
S 1
to
f '" rs 0 ~ ~ 1` Z
O V ~'~
t
h t~
LLW..1 _

~: ~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ ~ i 1. •

~ a ~ ~ - ~~ ~ W

Z Y R~
c,

~~
~
4< <f (L, ~ Q 9, _ W Q
W
~
Z
,~ ~ z w ~ LLI :~.
~ ~ I ~w,
~S ~ LU ~ ~ ~?:~•
M n ~ ~~,: ,~:
I S.r
Q W ~ ~ ~r}
~ ~S~
~ ~
W lI Z/ ~.
~//
~- { ~

aF;J~ ~ ~ ~ t ~a~ ~~~~~~~
p,~, ,
1 ~ , ~ ~ r.~~ ~ _. '~~ ,
-{.._ ~~

d°
~~
1
a
~"
N
__ ~~
~~
~~
S~
rc
~~
~~
~\ V fa •
1
` ~ ~ •.
\ `'
\ ~~~
\ •~
~ ~ -•
`~G
~ ~
1r
o ~ o9a
s uT ro swlFrcREErc \ ~ N
.,, ~ ONE ~\
~~7 ~
/ iOVVNOFGARNER~
50'NEUSERIVER CONSERVA "1
RIPARIANBUFFER J BUFFER ~ \ ~x\
• x
=__"~ ~ - -
/ -"'" ~~ WETLAND 1 I
'a . .26ACRESIMPACTED
4 ,c ~ 'J \ x x x x x
x
• ,:
1 ~ '~~ \\~ _ -'
/ •• '0
~~. 1Q0 YEAR FLOODPIAIN 1 ~~
J 1 ~ ,~
0~~~ . ~ •• I 1, ~ -
/~
'~ ~ ~ x~/ /~ ~ - - -
+ \ , t X J , ` MIE~Iyp
I \ I. EX,SAGfiARYSEV4ER \ 1 III
.. ~ ~ 1 \
/ .. ... x
• •. .+• ~~
• • • • CONSERVADON \ +
• • BUFFER 1
.~
'.• •' •• •~•' sS
1 .' '.\'.' '. '. ..' '.

LEGEND
a PHASE I BUILDING
PHASE II BUILDING
WETLANDS
® WETLANDS TO BE FILLED
.. .. .. ~ \
,• ~ ` • • • WETLAND
• . +.
. ~ . • . . ~ . L1M1fI1S
.+ . . .•
..` '..'.
........
MAHLERCREEK 5O'NEUSERIVER ~ ~ . .7" ,
~^~ ~~
© ~~
{lYJI~
r~xnoN Pa+n. olsc
mix vu ova Flow m
uut~x's cRmc os vu n~
f1LhR 9hq(MVSFI Dts
WTO UKE BENSON.
UL!
~ ~- •~.
C ,~
~,.v:~~
`. <<.:
~, ~, ~~
-.;
~ ~ J ~~~
l,~p~~. >
"~' ~~-
rtv. tsuu rue oac~9a cc
~.i'
~~~~~~
~~_~~~~
T~9 9-ESV-12ffi Fac 919-E51-SN8
m awduvmn
PRQIECT 111TE
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
sHEEr rm>:
\ :~-~J..._~ ~_RfPARIANBUFFER~ ~ : ~ ~~\~ \
.~ ,
I ~ ~ PROJECT -L1N4GER 6EPARi~IEM IV"114GD2
lFM DESIGN PROF. C}iEG(ED BY
0 200' qq0~ 6~, TASK/PHASE NUNBER DRa~rrH Br
_~
Z ,~ PROJECT NUIIDER DRAIMNC NUl1BfR
~.
SCALE IN FEET ~ A

u9
`i
E
3
e
N
S8
i~
~~
N
0
aR
~~
N
~ V
Eo
8a°
u
~°-
o~
mo
zo
..~
o..
>z
e~
a, o
Y5
NORMAL WATER LEVEL f,, ~' / .-~'"~' //~CS~"
~.., ,.., SUBt1ERSED TEtIPORAR1f COFFER DA61 ~ ~,,. ~,~-'~,T;
DISCHARGE PIPE NEW I,WNHOIE ~/"~/ ~ ~~
r '~
/'~~ ~ ~~ ..r"(
LAKE BENSON /'NEW 24' OUiFAIL ~ f,,--~~ ~ ~% ~,,,~-'
r,%~
STONE APRON ~ -'~
_,,s+`'~ .N-
~ ~U~~,O
i
..~-~'
_----.""
.._-~r~--~--''
rt
r
,`/
NORMAL WATER
LEVEL
lA!(E BENSON
T ^ ~ Jy{
~.:
tr~ ~ {i a t ~ ~ i ~
r ~r
r ~lti ^;~ ,~~ ~
r~ ~ ~~ ~,
~'
\~.
~~.
~i ~~~
x~-u`~
f-`~,,',
/ /~
~ ~--
---_
~~~-' STREA~1 IMPACT SffE S-19
~r ~
~II
~~~
~; ti ~~ ~ ~ ~.`~ ` `~'` ~~~ .r°--`
`~ ~ ,~
EXISTNG PULIP i ~ ~ '~- ~.. N r ~ ~.,
STATION ~ ~ Y ~°.._~~ - yl _ :~-
~C~~' 1 T~ ~° F i-TOP OF &WK
NEW INTAKE
SCREENS
EXISTING Dial
IXISfING CONCREfE~ `v'~,,
CHANNEL WALL
~,
S~'lifT CREEK ~"
Y:.
ri
rl ~~,
~~

N
© eaacs cap ~
u, , :~.
(~, '~
C ~, ~~.
~~
r ~.
~ •~
~.~~
(~ ARCADlS
AYh'6 GdY d Math Cadv, Fc
~` ~ TMA7 dM. 51+4 S10
tat ois-a~-~~ r~ n~-asp-sua
PROJECT TNLE
Dempsey E, Benton
Water Treatment Plant
t
"' ~ `
~`
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
QEPARIIIENT W1tIAGER
IfAD DESIGN
0 50' 100' 150'
SCALE IN FEET
TASK/PHASE NUMBER DRABN 6i
PRELIMINARY PROJE~ Nuu~R DRAWNG NIAIBFR
Not for Construction

© u~, rx.

a/
A
~~
IR
~n
~~
~~
~~
~~
~yy
na
&~
~~
~~
I I
I in- -
U --
---------------j-- --- -- ---- ... I
,..
r--~=------- - ------------=fi- I __,.
`~ r-{ ' L ~ - \i - -
I ~~ o +
LJ I I EXISTING PUMP TOP Of BANK
~~ ~ I I I I ~I i _„- i i STATION
I I
~ ~___~ I II III ~ ~ I
~ ~~ I I I I II~ I I I +
I .
~ __= I I I i II I =_= I I
---------------------1-r---------------------f-it-------------m~---~ I
I~ I II III
' ~ I---------------------~-~--------------------III. ---6m1--' I +
~___~ I II IIj---------- i :'
1
i I I Ili --tom D
~~r/ ~~
II 14 L~ ' ~ ~ `~%j~
II 14. '"` nr U
8 ~ A
+>~ r~
- ----------1~-- -------------------------- - ~~ ,.:)
__ _~ ,,1_~ ~y,
------- - '~~ r,~' nc
NEW CONCRETE STNRWAY ~~"~
AND WORK PLATFORM
f I 1
~~ ~~
IXISTING DAM
NEW ItTTAKE SCREEN
TAKE BENSON
PLAN
~• . ~o~
~. ~ ~~
~RG~D1S
titGV7S [dL d NuN~ Coofiiµ he
601 fapaaft Gnter kAa Sub SJO
IC 11697
Tk 919.854.124 Fmc 919-1t5f-SM8
~nam6~-u~om
~~~
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
a
~;.,
.,;,
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
~~ ~ ~~~
tfnn oar Pte. I a+racm e'r
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE IN FEET
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
PRELIf~Ii~ARY
Not for Construction
~uue~t ow~k~+c nuua~t
1~
NEW 12' VENTURI
(MIN. RELEASE COtTiROI)
SWIFT CREEK
- RAW WATER PUMP STATION - AT LAKE BENSON

© cat ~
J
S'o
3
~~
~~
~~
3U
rqq
~5¢~
~8
o
~~
~~
SECTION -RAW WATER PUMP STATION -NEW INTAK
1 /A' c 1'-Il'
0' 8' 16' 24'
SCAIE IN FEET
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
SCREENS
<. -i~o~
TAKE SCREENS ~ ~ll~~ ~ M
` ~ ~:~~r~~+~;.N
r
prt
~ ,.I'
«~' 11
~,,:-
PR~LIMI~ARY
Not for Construction
av. ~ arz
~~ ~~
tisua cw a wpm woino, nc
~ ~ ~c.a.r [Ma sa. ma
r~ o~aax-iz~ ~ ois-as+-sWa
PROJECT TIiIE
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
City of Raleigh, North Carolina ~
SHEET TIRE
PROJECT 64V{+GER DEPAR111ENT TGV1

IfPD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED BY

TASK/PtiASE NUMBER DRAiVN Bt

PROTECT NU1CdER DRAWING h1A18ER
1®

x9rxs c~ ac.
~FacE

SECTION @ MANHOLE -NEW FILTER BACKWASH DISCHARGE
~._~~
EXCAVATION
Y~~J FlLL
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
0 40' 80' 120'
..a,,
SCALE IN FEET
PRELII~IN~RY
Not for Construction
~: cam ah caa>~wM
~RCADIS
9a~~a~~k
~,~~~~
~~~
it 919.854-1282 fmc 919-~N,118
•n.um6rutcao
PROJECr Tf(l£
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
:1
Ci of Ralei h, North Carolina
SHEET TI(lE
PROJECT I1Rt~ DEPARIIIENT Ib+H

IFAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED 6f

TA9(/PWtSE NU118ER DRA'h'N Bt

PROJECT NU1aBER DRAiY~IC NU48ER
~~

.~
x
x
~~
~"
~~
as
~..
~~
~~
ak
rc
~~
~~
r~
y
r
y
~~ ~ EXISTING PROPOSED
' 60 RCP WEIR
~ ~
.~
~ - - --~ - ~ ? . ~tI1F~ • CREEK
~!`~, PROP05E0 BRIDGE
`'~ EXISTING
~ HEADWALL
'l~~ ''~> ~ ~ STREAM IMPACT
8G_ _ ~'''~~~~ StTE No-S18
TOE OF DAM
LAKE
__ WHEELER
PROPOSED ENCLOSURE
OVER GATE CONTROLS
of ~ ~
~-EXISTING
® WATER LEVEL
LAKE
WHEELER
PROFILE
-~
ii
-LAKE WHEEIER
-PROPOSED BRIDGE
86'-6'
q
EXISTING 60' RCP
PLAN
Tyr
Q
0
W
Z
J
Fw-
z
w
U
Q
0
w
Z
J
LANDWARD -
TOE Of OAM
cay, Ntiw
J
~~'~~11
.~~A
,~~~, i ~~v/~i
'c ~:
~~
`1' ~4
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS ~ mun w[ us~on
0 25' :~0' 75' ~R1S
. lItJ7S WI d NcM taeFa k
BOt Capvdi fmhr phy Si4 57D
T~ii~-~~ r~ sis-eH-u~a
mamd~-iamm
PRUIECT RRf
Dempsey E, Benton
Water Treatment Plant
PROFILE
,~ I -~
- S1REA61 IMPACT Cit of Ralei h, North Carolina
SITE No-S18 ~r ~
U4~ ~;}~
FOQT i tc
PROJECT 141N4GER DEPARI4ENT 14WAGER
0. Fail 1.14EI7Dt
EEAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED Bi
0. BF]Ff OC
TASK/Pf1ASE NUMBER DRAWN 8'f
CO/fW1 f61Q1 K TECODt
PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUIJBER
~.oo~ 11

N
~--- -:~~
---~~ ~, B.-BAIN``WATER
.----.
jREATMENT•FACII
~_~,w~
-~eet 7-
_„~___
~~; She-et' 6_ ~~
T;~.~
--.._.
1,
~-~.. ;. ti ...-_..
,. _' ~ {
-...._. ,ti ~,
;~_. ~
`~~ ~'1Sh
PROPOSE
'~
i;\
_~Sheet-1.1 , ~ .

~.
_~.
,_.

~. ~
i t. . f__.._.....t -t-, --~.~
JX ~.~ ~
`__

~.! ~.. S.tB {-

t~ i
i ~ i~

i.
/

~~r
1
,,`

i~.J_.a <..._
,
f
`
•!
~ ~-_-- ~ f `'ti" t

%~She~et'
Index._ _;
~.__._
`~AJi
_ Ll
\She
.~,~
;;
` ~ `a~ ~Sh
,,
\ 'S ~ lam.
~', j
~ ,, ~
heet 8
s•ta _ ,i
r -.
_~- i; '~-
` , - t, `_ __i_ -I
'~, ~ ~'
;; ,_ ~
1 f L--
_ I
~" i ~ j
t
s`
~ ~~-~
`\ F.'(
LOCATION-~OR PROPOSED`
D.E. BENTON ~INATER ('~~
TREATMENT FACILITY ~; j
Sheet 2~
S•19
_. ;
`~, s"~ :,
:S•1 ~.
~l
,~,~- ~ ~
v j~
~ ~
1A-

.•..'~ `~~ ,~ ~ r ~ `y j~' '~,~}' +7, '.t ~ /< .~` ~ ~t ry ~.. ^~" ll`~~ t P~ ~~r ~ ~'~~` riljEr ~ ~ ~~~ J" r'T" ~'M~} R * ; . 'FI~'~1t ? ICI
i ~ ~~^ '"`+`' - ~~ -`k'~ r ~ y~ -~' a ~ ^r. ~ ..i ~ tl. 1 + ~ '. I.i fp i + ~ yeFrlr4+~yi ~'~`" ry j ~,
=°z. ~-'..`e~ ~ '^~ y!. S ~~F»l'r •~+". >F>fti '~ -- ~~ti',Rit-'~*,~~ * ~'. i' ~- li
Fig, ~ :.; j tic.., ~ y ;~ ~~,, ,+~' <'y, i, r `F~ i
~ .a
+t4 ~ r~~g~ F ~• ,~ r: i } ~~ * ~11~b~~~ ~~ ~ ~~C ~ 3+f i r" ,~ i''
~ ~ ~ ` ~~
~ ~ •~. ~~~•`~,~ .„~ - ~, ! `rn~ ~F- '~ k~x~ N ~: i ;3tream €mpacta. O.~DO~ ac
• '''~ '.;-.~•~ ~ '"~~_ ~ ~~ ,~E }~ Buffer Zone 1 Impa+cta: 0
w ~ .0155 ~crea i
I '~ ~ -
'F ..~.~~,~~ .,.± ~:.~.:. . r. ~ ,~"~y. ~ ~^-. ~~ ';~: ~tlffCr Zane 7 Impa~~: 0 0~7 ~cre$=~
.R err. • ~'. y~- : A R~'! ~t "~ ~S` € .. w~ i
i~i 4 n.~~~t ~'ik '~11~~~~+ ~, ~ FdI~. "j 't. -SA1 ~ ,. ~~'~•« _ .. ~ _ 3'~!~ I et '.
.~„s ~ '11 ~ +:: ...yam;.~ '1~ ~.. n' ~
~~j ~ ti ~ x. t' 1 JIB ~!~ ' .~ t ~''! n' ~~~ i'•r.' ~ _ ~ J x. ~ .. ~~ ~ j ~~
~ ~ ~
~ `:~~ -~r ~ j'. + a -- e' ,' ~.~~' ~ ` ,~ k ~ Stream inapae~s: ©.01~ ac `
' -
~-~ r;'e ~-M !`' ' ~` ~~"~ " ~ ~ °4~` E3uffcr Z4ns '1 Impacts: 0.05 a~cras Iii
i '-,~ ;,..,~~ ~,, •",.,~'}' `'"*.~ ' ~ - T'~~'`,~- Buffer Zvne 2 frTrla~~cts: 0.07 acres i
~~~ .I~+ :. ~r R ~` ,;try ~ '~ € ~~~~ ~ -„a~ , y ' `a t ~ >t; F ~ I
M ~ IE` ~'^'~~ J ~~ y,, / ~ ,ya ~~ Zg',?-.. [w!. ~'- ~'`` {, ", tey,4 _ 'i~q
t'.j i r~ ~~ ~~ ~!~ F'1 al ',+~ .. ~t' ~ ~a . -~y~,~ ~.~,ee • ~ e~..; ,~~~,,:y~ ~ ~' &" +t ' ~ x ~k~.~.F~ -':,
}~ ~{, t. ~~~~ ..~ I ~(~~v°+, ...N' ~ ~' '4 ~ } d~~. ~ ~~ `i ~ ~ ' y~ _ ~`~ ... ~ ~~~yfi ~ ~~~~-T;t n ~ -~~ ~eFf.~` F. e
,~, ~~~k ~' ~( ~ ~w ~ * W~ ~ .~ , ~e, ~,r,' .~1 ~~ ' i r: j~ +c.~~'r:~'! - -``~~ is t:
~~ Ii ' M , t c i ~ _ t* 3 Y ~ "`~ 1 F f ~ vi,~~~;~.£~,•r ~+ ~~~t mss: ~ . -'
~'"' ti..5+1'~1~ ~,,C "`!~`" `~ ~, ~ "'t~+• ~ `~ ~ i , ..r +~'~' y z ` $r ~` ?fir- ~~ ~ I
~IF, ~~ t 1~'•"1 4~ y. MT; if~~~ ~ jy~~ ` f~ ~~ ~ fi `+~ • ~,? ~~~R r.. ~ ~ ~~~ a~~'Y~ 9", ;. ~..,,
,i r~ F ~+ ~,~+. y~. `, j~4++: .r.'s3 - ~ 3~' r~ ,~' ~ ~i ~I,y,~ 4 9 ~•~~qp' a_ IC.; F~~ t F.....,~ ,+,"y ell.
+y1~. y ~.~ ~'~~~~. ~ s x4,-'i ~ to .~~~~ex,,~'~ ~'` 1 i l la ! :, ~"~~ P
yly .F ~`.~ dyI lA •~~i.I ~ ~'IV~, i 1 _ ~ ~ },~ a .l, " k 1 ~ ~~
.. ~ , ~- t ~, ~i~ i7y 's -,L ~r ~ I ~Si~~ ~1i1~~~ r ~ y,/~': ~l~ Yfi '~ y3^I, is::
r JR
Legend ' ~i~~ ~,`' ~ -" ~ '~` ~„r+w; '~ ~ ' ~ ° '~'
~% .fir, _ .. F ~; '
S~
S'!x3 Stream Number ,s~~` ~yhsr~ '~ ~ '~~
Proposed Pipeline 4 ', ,~ . ~ .`
~ yF
i .~~~ * ~ ~
Neuse River Bu#fer ~ .~
~~ nG~'t ~
Surface Waters ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ °~ ,.~' ~~~tit y~..~?~ .~:~,, ~

S �� � µJS t � ! . (. �� � � �� •t,\ r d-��
v a
� ° t •�:�f �� w � - �, '[.� `,Y�'1'v� _ - it ;,...., -.
� t �' �;j . ESQ GG•~.` �� �- .- ,� -����. ,k' u2.^'$r' Y atitliilir< - - �-
.. .:.I• 1
A = rt
1 I I } 7 7
1
Wetland Impacts: 0.54 acre
Li-
Y ■Y ■Y LAN 0
).1 P S.3.
i
Stream
r
Impacts: 0.009
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts:0.055
Buffer 1 0.037
a�
� r

i~
i
I
R'
F ~y'',~~r J
r
~ apt w _~
~~r''
~r~~ . ~_
•~ ~~~
%~~~~ ~%-
~` t.~
~r., _
~f ~
4< t~
!
~~
~
r ~+1"'~2
l
~~[[ 5
T ~~r t
••
,
`~.. YS ~ ~ ~
-~'' ~'''
} f ,~y
~.~~^ ~ ,
°"°' , 'a
r i ~ ~;.
~~,~,, ~ .
~, ,~' ,~ - na 1.
'r

4,
rM
I'm
-14
4%
Stream
Impacts: 0.004
acre
Buffer
Zone I Impacts:
0.055 acre
Buffer
Zone 2 Impacts:
0.037 acre
I'm

- ----- '�� I M
S-123 Stream Number -
Proposed Pipeline
Neuse River Buffer
Surface Waters
S-16
Stream Impacts: 0.009 acre
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
Stream Impacts: 0.004 acre
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
WETLAND -3
Wetland Impacts: 0.88 acre
0 1800' 2400'
1"=800'
Sheet 6

N
ik
twu
61 - , t., tt
LN
j,3r
UO
an
Al IM'
yc
Igo
imp
- IM
'Si
Oopnr .-
O"Nal"r
Duvam Numut
Proposed Pipe
Neuse River R
� a
140
P
iS-17
* 117
PROONED
PIPELINE
cam

i ~ • ' k ~. ~t.e, ~~~ ~ t~ r• t u~, ~ ~ i 3 +,;1{Yh '"~I t ..
~y/~ ~{ A
i ~ i'~i i~_ '4 y. {~~~~a1 ~ a .t S 1'f 7i~r1 n11~ ~~: ~'~ fR, ~ -~.a .'~p ~ c5Y ~ 1 r 3''~ Mt..-.
yy~ti~~~,`~ r _- t r:' ~ r ~ei~ ~~ {.~k.5 it Yl~ .. ~ :`:,Y9~ ~ ~. '~q~ o- t' & ~....` t ~,~ -I ~
i a~ t ' i ~Yi
~:~ E = g '~ _- t~7YS~tE-.i t ~ Y~lr~ ' N31~~ ~~'n ~~ ~, 'i ~ ~ 'a ~~~ r,~• y~ -~.
` ~µ!~~,Y~k~{/~ ,' ~lJ. `,,sy+ ~M19~it.';g a '.` ~"°Q6' ~y €~? n; ~(/e+-\rE"`i >~ Y4`
p~ r ~ p, ^4 {'R, 4,s v `~ * { ie't k.fi + , ~ -f~ ~~,w~ k .r... ~/ A a~~:. ^f .^~'~~~ .'~ ,~ ~(i9 iF"1.
~., ''~.' .'E - ~ j. l-j~ ~~~~, #. '~fi~.: r ~.. ~f ~-" z i ~ (~~ r \ Y"~" A .`^^ r~"~`^ n, - i ^A4 'e i 3.,.
~rfi~` ~~,~*„~~ s~ t ~ ~l y~t ~ ~ ' S .ans~g~ }~`~~~ki ,~..~.'+ ?~1 •. ~' ~ , a+ ~'~i~ ~ , b ril ~,~ r ./~ tl \,~
(,•kf~R yt~~~,~ t } r " 7 t"~ ~l i ~ ` 1 ~. A ~.~ rl, ' R1
M-' t at ~'17.,t`~~ J" 'S' 11ti'.' ¢; Vt 1, t:. ~ .51:.{y'~'[(~'~~+ `r.~ 17,~ti k~ °^ (~Jf'~ ~5.y.
~.~ G~~~ It -~~ ' t ~~94 ,i~ ~* ` ~ i.~`~'' i ,~ Y `Rl~d l~~.~
.' ' ' ~~_ ~w DER ` Y7 ^°~rp ~ 'i ~. <~T ~SR.~ , 'j 43 i+~+ir' 6p.a. :fit ,~~.•~~:'.~_t`
c~t'°`~ ~E . ~ ha 'P~' ~~, rt~,• s`" r~.'' ~f 4 +I ~~ ~ F <!°ra ~#~~, ~'C~'t~1r. :;
«~uc ~~~ `~`;'.. ,"# ~±~'~~'~~'}.,y~S,^'' s+ ~ ? ^rx a ~H 1. R`R~~~a ~,~'_we ea~~ '.~ r t~:. ,.M= •~ t.,
~ , k' a r s
f'_' y r ^(/,. ~?1'+. :''1 ~ i ~ 5~ ~ .rk, r ,~.~,'rgT'w ~ t']Md ~ -
~„ra~~,'"~!' ~t+t ~ !.' .. r ^ ~I ~ e ~ M? ~ .,1~?>' J ~ `.• ~r~ ~}~f ~ +'~ ..i• - t ~ 4hy~ tt~*t d~•'t ~.
t1r. ' A~~~ r ^ E,fl. _.`{ ~,, ;,~~+ :~~t r~. 6 .~ { E~+t ~"~s~''A4~~ 7a "y.•f 7?.s' t~4~
^' te~i ~~'E' k. ~ ~'Fij w t -.. 7~ .~~ t d ' k(~ q._ , ~ ~ ~ ~, i ..~.r.`~.
` ~ r r 4s ~~ ~ g %','. ~ .•`~;rs _~ ~~ ' ~ k "' + 6 ~` k y 3 7a~rt Lj ~`~ " ,~ ~~.1 '~S r w~ k4 ` *~ ` a'~i
E f F i n i i /:~ ra a ~r - ,t r~; ~-;.k 1-+.,ds r € ~i s ~e
1' ~ ~ a F, - '~1s ~'~ - a . ~t ~.
.~, ,t ,w .~i~/'- ~ 'i} ~ lM~~ k '~{S~~f ~~r. z yq _ _ ~ s ~t Sri . ~ a,, ~~{~ ~'~ ~~x'~.i - } ~~, r`, ~ `s +h4~
t • S
~: ''`~`~~~~ ~y~^ ~. stream Impacts: 0.014 acre x ~;~~~'~~-~"' ~ ~t ..~ '~~' F' `
~ ~ ~ _ apt ~ ~ , „• ~ ,~ ~~ Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre ,, ~ ;.~ ~,
~, _
r `~` ~, { ,,a~,,~~`.~ _ Buffer Zone 2 Impact: 0 037 acre r ~ ~!~";' ~ ~`~'
~ ~' ,% ~. h'' {tsf4 ~' ~ M`~ ~!!.* ',~c E^'i= N +r §tL ,+./R y
~,~. ~ s ~~Y'+s~ +t.;r`a ` i x a ~3 1, -k t , ri .!`X t ~wi ,d'iL _*r~~ 3 t t a ~.u,; .
i~+'~7', ,, \.,;r. t 1't t ,i? `~ .. '~i~w;~'~~~~,ytP,~- ,,~; :~ } ~' .xlF~: F~. . J~ aY .' '' ~ y,,E~ ~ ~ ~ ` ' ', ~A~ ~R
~'` s t ' z•, A ~ ~ ~~ ih t ', t t ~~ ~~ S~~a~: t .~ ~ ~*r r t ~~~, ~ i
~ C' \ S t }`~,;.~ ti~~3 ~ tjn~ ~r'~.~_y(,~r}R:( a 4~, i t e"+ yr.•~, i ~i lk~_,,, ~lt ~ ,ni _
~ ~~•s ti ~~ f y 1 ' r ~ a "F
.i-, r ~. ~~ Z i~-..:r• x'~r~.a+,~. n ~ ~t, ~7~r.t :~S• F asp ! ~ ~ ! r k~ri'hF ~ ,. r ~ 4's ~ ..
~ ~~ '. / ,+gr4t '~+~ "r'' ' t ti'a tY j3+.~+ ~' tF , <:•~ . ~ fi- i~ c _ ,:, n
~!~ ~';, 2. k t -r'~, ~ L p - ' ~f4~x ti :s. ~ .r r r ~ ~ s - w ` ;.1-. ~." ~ ~'° •~7 { ~y h ~''..
;i .- ~ F!' a~ ~ ~' { .c.{y~ ; r[ ~ ~ ~•' rr ~ S a4 ~« Y 1 ; ~'C!. ~ ~ fi" "'E° sR.
it~.r {#y 1 ~ yt'7 r ., ,R ~ J' , 2 .~~`,}~~:; ~ k , ; is ~d'-'~ _ ~ f~l1pY ` ° +Y 't ,i
~( ~ e ~` ~ s
~ f':t`Snj f!~'i ~: ~~;! ^1 "}~ yq: ~ . ~i' qtr, .. 1a~, s:~~ + ~ ,^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,• ~` `~*' !~ ~ k ~ } .
- ~ ~ -# f :.,~`•:: ' J,..,j'~j-~'~~` ~ ~ r~ ° - •r` } (~ `C '.* s .~ r ., 4 '~ ~ e ~ , ~. ,+ , ~- t rte. ~~~j ,l ... s~~ ;~ ` tom"
. +r'; r ~~w/.n ^~.~,),=~", ~€. S ~ lyk t... t -_ /~~ J~~;1y!*~,~yla~ ~.k~+r` „fit gt~a `•~ s Z
s.sk ~ ~ ` ., ~ h ti' '!ar 1 ~ '4 f.. - ~ ® ~ ~ } ,~5~ i~, 43} _ f ~ ~~~'.• j R ~l~1 ,'(4" ' t r ~ k ~,,'; ~ Y~~~*i 'tr~~v
`' 'w ~ ~" \ ~ 4 ,~ 1 ~:' ~ P ^~1~ - d,. :'# ~I',`?r 11 td ~~ 1. ~_ e~~s~ ~ ~ T 't° i
tI~ •i/\ P 1 r Y~.'i` _ t "M aF ~ ~ . g t ~ ~k ~ - 4 r 4 tv+.
r ,. ~ 'IP s .+1~M„ fr+ R ~. \. ~~_. !y, ~s<. ~f" E ~* .- t ~~ w~`! w,~ I ~ t i 3`~ s, -. ~ ~#C ,+~,
R il~._ P ' !~ 1. n.*~La t asp !.,• ~ i ' ;'~ ~ 5+ ~.. ~ ~ ; ka~' •k ~y.,~' +fa.'~
~ ~ [ '+, ~•` •~' ~ !\ ~ ~ ~+ .t Cw ~, ~ ~°~ ~ sus •' 4 t~ ~ »~ ;r~ S~"+, t rYta `~ ~:~ fc s ti.
i • - r~ \ ~ g ka t~ .-: `V t e `~ ~ `• t w r r ftY r,' ~ r ; k. k a 1
t ~ ~• f
• k`,~(,as rf`h~F1~'~~`~ . / ~ ~ s a' (t,~* ~ ,~i,~a ~~ ~!~s tr~, ~ ~' 4t ftc.
f i% ~;±~,a ~t# ~~i : ti' : ~, ~ ; s +~ # ~ ' . dsp ~ ~~ E ~ ,}. "" ~ ~ ~ {y~'~ K° ~ rFVYni Y` ~~s .a~,, \v
'~~a.~' f~-'trtX'ti.~w1'!et ~e;d4 L:y- ~~`,~Kf~ °a "_r s~,°~, ~. + {M : '~, t •1st~, }A
...,.. ~ ag ~y. ~t'S t 1~c-. s ``' l' v t ~7~ z ~ r ~r ~ ~.. f r ~'~'~ •+ ,X;."' t~ i ~` a = t'4 ` ,{~ ~ ~ C `.
Legend --~-~, t ~~ ~ 3tt}F~; ~" ~ ~ ,~ ~ r ~ ~i ~Fr~.,~ ~ #~ ~~~,~~~ ~ ,~~~~~rp,
r4 ~ w. ~' f- ` r ~ t~ . ,t + ' -. j ` ,r t ~~^~;' ,.r,~'r3r"' ~ ~ +q $rC *~3~~,~
~`
r.Jta r r 4~ fir, ~'ir r is y ~
S-123 Stream Numbe T ~ @~' t ~ ~'; , r:r r~ I ' j~
ji lki ~k. c -~ ~i'~,ap~wl ~yi at •'--~.~ t:, ~:"
Proposed Pipeline . >~ . ,~ µ~..a~:. ..~~~,~•, :..
0 800' 1600' 2400'
Neuse River Buf#er Sheet 8
Surface Waters 1"~00'

~~~_

i7fi ~ 'rr rr~
{ " -ti t ~
~.~ '~~ ~
~~~ x
-~
f ~ ~~
,'' ~`` I * 1_"_ r~ ~aTj"? ~~j'~t~'.Y' ~7' ~ ''y ~_~ ~° ~+~' '~ 2 f'6«~=p~ {r, ~ _
~k. ~ ~TR A7 1 !' +w' f w ~ i J~ - F ~.
/r!'~. ~ ~ ~~ f; ~~ 'y_yp~u'f• ~ 1{ p r,~ tr$~,s Cr ~,'4e~ 'i~t2ti"~~,+ti M.~w ~~~'" a''~,t' f
'r,( e I ~ ~5~~ ~/ 'Z ~.,t'~'.~ ~' i +E.fi t `~8- 'Y. L~~! ~i~ fj ~~_.F. i ~n.: `'~~~. ~/
+.. ~~ I ~ .~,T'Y ~Tt!~F~ .l ~. .. ..ice a., _-b~'''~4~~C~~ C~q f~-'
,~ , S .~#• ~'I l'~ ~~~ f b~~^ ~`~~~ ~ ~'~ *.~~ t ~- ~A ~ ..~ -~ , ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ yeti 1
~. * _ ~J F
'., i ~ • ~ R ~.4 ~~ Y ~ ~ -r'+. ~ ~' ~~.- .~~ t^:, t >~~ eEr~` 7~„_~~" ~ .~" rya ~ s`
t~ ~ ~ ~i« ~j~ "5 ~~~, 3 ~ ~.
Legend ''~~' I (7~~ ,' #~ '~r • ~ ^~` ~~ ~ ~~#~ ~ I +n ~ ~~<~
S-1Z3 Stream Num er ~~ ~ ' ~ ~'
-_ ~ sr
Proposed Pipeline -~;. ~ ~. .~~_~~~~" ~,~,"_~'~:{.,,~,'~`~v at.
0 600' 1600' 2400
Neuse River Buffer Sh
Surface Waters ~~=soo'

~"--E$Y~~Fi~
. ~s
~~ "
€~j ~ .
et 10

t t ..t
` ` ~ a ~; 7
c l u. 6_ ~ '.~ ~ J
Office Use Only: Form Version March o5
~G~~61 14~
U5ACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: -
®Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 and 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coasta ---Marta~me~~~~~('~,..
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), the • ~ he~~-'~]i %
II. Applicant Information JIJI. ~ a X006
1. Owner/Applicant Information w~:ns.~;r:.r,~u~,;;,~,,,~•;;:,,~„~,,~,~
Name:_____ City of Raleigh; c/o Dale Crisp -Director of Public Utilities
Mailing Address: City of Raleigh
P.O.Box 590
Raleigh NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-857-4540 Fax Number: 919-857-4545
E-mail Address: Dale.CrispC~ci.ralei~h.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Natne: Linda Dicbolt
Company Affiliation: ARCADIS
Mailing Address: 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607-5073
Telephone Number: 919.854.1282 Fax Number: 919.854.5448
E-mail Address: ldieboltC~arcadis-us.com
ura~«a t uvzoos
Page 5 of 20

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: D. E. Benton Water Treatment Plant, Lake Benson and Wheeler Dam
Unarades. and Finished Water Transmission Main
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Water Treatment Plant Site 1619656767,
1619665283, 1619750702, 1619761516; Lake Benson Pump Station - 1619564350; Lake
Benson - 1609778854; the transmission main will he located in existing water line easements
or road rir;hts-of--way, no parcel information is available for these easements; Lake Wheeler
Dam Site - 0780519521
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Garner
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Location map is attached.
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Site: Hwy 70 ~g east throug>l Garner. Turn right onto
Hwy 50. Plant site is located east of the Buffalo Rd (SR 2711) and Hwy 50 intersection near
Lake Benson.
Lake Benson Dam Site: Hwv 70 ~oin~ east through Garner. Turn right onto Hwv 50. The
existing dam is located west of the Buffalo Rd (SR 2711) and Hwv 50 intersection, on Lake
Benson.
Lake Wheeler Dam Site: Hwv 401 point; south through Garner. Turn left on to Simpkins
Road (SR 1375). Turn left onto Lake Wheeler Road (SR 13711. The Lake Wheeler dam is
located on the right approximately 0.1 mile from the intersection at Simpkins Road.
Finished water transmission main: The 48-inch finished water transmission main will be
located in the existing City of Raleigh water line easement corridor from the Lake Benson
Updated 11/1/2005
Page G of 20

raw water pump station to north of the US 70 intersection at Mechanical Boulevard. Just
north of the US 70 intersection the finished water line will fork into a 36-inch water main
and a 30-inch water main. The 36-inch main will turn east along Garner Road, north along
Creech Road (SR 2564), north along Sanderford Road, north along Rock Quarry Road (SR
2542), and west on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The 30-inch transmission main will
follow the existing City of Raleigh water line easement corridor and connect to an existing
30-inch line at the E.B. Bain Facilit for re Pumping.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): WTP Site - Lat/Long 33-35-04/85-34-06; Lake
Wheeler Dam Site - Lat/Long 35-41-34.6/78-41-399; Coordinates for the finished water
transmission main are provided in Table 1.
6. Property size (acres): Water Treatment Plant Site - 55.03 acres; Lake Benson Punlp Station
- Site: 0.12 acres• Lake Benson - 664.21 acres• Finished water transmission main route -
16.8-mile long, 40-foot wide easement; Lake Wheeler Dam Site - 247.01 acres.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Lake Benson/Swift Creek/Lake Wheeler
8. River Basin: Neese River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
T}~e proposed WTP site is undeveloped woodlands consisting primarily of 20-30 year-old
pine stands. The Lake Benson site consists of an existing; pump station and dam with
surrounding area consisting; of residential development and a>;riculhlral lands.
Land use at Lake Wheeler is undeveloped park land surrormdin~ the impoundment. In the
surrounding vicinity, the land use is primarily residential development.
Much of the land crossed by the proposed finished water transmission main route from the
WTP site north to US 70 consists of a~riculhlral fields and pastures both active and fallow
with scattered residences. North of US 70 the land use is primarily urban residential and
commercial. However, along the transmission main route, bottomland hardwood forest is the
dominant riparian vegetation at most of the stream crossings.
Lake Wheeler and Lake Benson are impoundments on Swift Creek. Swift Creek is classified
as a "special case" stream per the 1995 Darn Safety rules due to populations of aquatic
species listed as threatened or endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) and due to classifications of
exceptional non-dame or fishery resources by the WRC (15A NCAC 2K.0501 [g](2] and [31)•
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 20

9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The City of
Raleigh proposes to reactivate the Lake Wheeler/Lake Benson reservoirs as a water supply.
Due to Swift Creek's classification as a "special case" stream afoot-year, instreatn flow
study was required. A tiered minimum release schedule for the new WTP was developed as
a component of the instream flow study. The proposed project includes a series of upgrades
and retrofits at Lakes Wheeler and Benson dams construction of a new WTP, a water
withdrawal averaging I4 million gallon per da~(m~dl from Swig Creek at the Lake Benson
dam, and a controlled minimum flow release from bake Benson dam. The upgrades and
retrofits to the existing pump station and dams will enable water withdrawals from Swift
Creek and enhanced manipulation and monitoring of the stream flows in Swift Creek. The
new treatment plant will treat the source water made available via the upgrades and retrofits
to the pump station and dam structures. Details of each of the components are provided
below.
The Citesproposes to upgrade and retrofit the existir~~ raw water pump station adjacent to
Lake Benson dam, west of Hi lg l<vay 50, to deliver •water to the new WTP. The existing
antiquated intakes in Lake Benson on the upstream side of the dam will be replaced with new
intake screens. The existing raw water pump station will be upgraded and retrofitted to
house new raw water pumps, existing putnp drv wells will be converted into wet wells,
motorized controls on the intake control gates will he added, and chemical pretreatment
facilities will be constnteted. The pretreated water will he pumped under Hi l~lway 50 to the
proposed WTP. At the downstream end of the existing intake sluice at the pump station, a
new mininnun flow release structure will be added in the Swig Creek spillway. This
minimum release valve assembly will allow the cit~o maintain the minimum flow in Swift
Creek as specifted in the tiered minimum release schedule. Also at that location, a
work/maintenance platform will be cantilevered over the Swift Creek spillwa~(Sheets 1B-
The new 20-mgd water treatment plant will be located east of NC 50 at the intersection of
Buffalo Road. The new facility will consist of the main water treatment plant, a chemical
bulk-storage facility, finished water stora~c via a 5 million gallon composite tank, an excess
effluent detention pond, and afinished-water pump station wet-wellhouse (Sheet lA).
Finally at this location, an underwater filter backwash discharge from the new WTP into
Lake Benson will be added in the narrow, north-reaching arm of Lake Benson just upstream
of the Buffalo Road crossing~Sheets 1B and lE).
At the Lake Wheeler dam site, the existing water-control tower in the lake will be up rag ded.
The manual, water-level-control valves in the tower will be upgraded to a motorized,
remotely operated system. A motor and computerized controls will be added to the top of the
existing water control tower and covered with a small shed-like structure. Anew, 100-foot-
long concrete foot-bride will be placed over the lake, from the top of the dam to the tower,
to facilitate access. A weir and a flow meter will be added to the Lake Wheeler dam outfall
to allow for accurate monitoring of controlled flow rel~,ases into Swift Creek (Sheet 11~_
Updated it/l/2005
Page 8 of 20

A new, 48-inch finished water transmission main will be located in the existing City of
Raleigh water line easement corridor from the Lake Benson raw water pump station to north
of the US 70 intersection at Mechanical Boulevard. Just north of the US 70 intersection the
finished water line will fork into a 36-inch water main and a 30-inch water main. The 36-
inch main will turn east along Garner Road, north along Creech Road, north along
Sanderford Road, north along Rock Quarry Road, and west on Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard. The 30-inch transmission main will follow the existing City of Raleigh water
line easement corridor and connect to an existing 30-inch line at the E.B. Bain Facilit, fy or re-
pumpine` There are approximately 19,100 feet (3.6 miles), 35,300 feet (6.7 miles), 18,400
feet (3.5 miles), and 7,000 feet (1.3 miles) of 48-inch, 36-inch, 30-inch, and 16-inch finished
water transmission mains, respectively (Figures 2-10).
Upstream of the dam in Lake Benson, removal of the old intake screens and installation of
the new structures will utilize divers for underwater work, assisted by a land-based crane for
lifting. Downstream of the dam at Lake Benson, a new minimum-flow release assembly will
be added at the end of the existing sluice. For access to the new valve assembly, awork/
maintenance platform and stairs will be added to the interior of the existing spillway/stream
channel. Construction of the work/maintenance platforn and addition of the valve assembly
will require use of temporary in-stream equipment to stabilize the structures until they are
permanently attached to the existing stream channel wing-walls. Aland-based crane will be
used for heavy lifting.
Construction of the WTP facilities will utilize standard construction techniques and
equipment, such as dozers, pans, and motor-graders for site preparation and rg ading• cranes
backhoes, and front-end loaders for plant constnlction; and concrete trucks to deliver
premixed concrete.
constnlction of the filter backwash discharge will utilize a temporary coffer dam to allow for
non-wet dredging of Lake Benson. The area to be dredged will include a channel for the
discharge pipe and a foundation area for the discharge structure. The pipe and discharge
structure when completed will be located entirely under the lake surface. A manhole will be
located above the norn~al water level at the edge of the lake. Equipment will include ,t crane
to install the coffer dam and discharge pipe, apump-and-pipe assembly to drain and maintain
the water level in the coffer dam, and backhoe for excavation and discharge of a rip-rap
footer.
The constnlction of the foot-bridge and water-control-tower upgrades at Lake Wheeler will
utilize a barge for the tower upgrade and gland-based crane to do an overhead installation of
the pre-fornied concrete foot-bridge. The water level in Lake Wheeler will be lowered by 8
to 10 feet during installation of the bridge to facilitate constnlction of the land-based pier on
the dam. Construction of the weir and flow meter at the outfall of Lake Wheeler will
necessarily be instream. The flow of Swift Creek from the Lake Wheeler outfall will be
temporarily halted, approximately 1 week, during constnlction. A 2-foot-high concrete weir
and the flow meter will be installed using standard construction techniques and making sure
that no water is exposed to live concrete.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 20

Finally, the water main and force main constntction will primarily utilize dozers for land
clearing and backhoes for trench excavation and back-filling.
Additional project constntction at the WTP site will upgrade an existing wastewater pump
station. Anew 9-mid wastewater pump station will replace the existing 4.2-mgd Highway
50 wastewater pump station. The new Hi~hway 50 pump station will send wastewater flow
from the Town of Garner to the Neuse River Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) via a
24-inch force main and then a 30-inch force main. These new force mains will tie into the
existing 72-inch twin outfalls that route influent wastewater from the City of Raleigh to the
Neuse River WWTP. There will be approximately 28,000 feet (5.3 miles) of 24-inch force
main and 24,500 feet (4.6 miles) of 30-inch force main. These proposed Hi lg iway 50 pump
station force mains will be located primarily within existing sanitary sewer easements on the
WTP property or within North Carolina DOT rights-of-wa along New Bethel Church Road
(SR 2703), Clifford Road (SR 2706), Hebron Church Road (SR 2547), Win Road (SR 2702,
Hicks Road (SR 2701), White Oak Road (SR 1209), Raynor Road (SR 2555), and Aubutn-
Knightdale Road (SR 2555). Impacts to jurisdictional resources along the force main for the
Hi~hway 50 pump station have been Rermitted under a separate NWP # 12 (Action ID No.
200421195 and 200421196; August 16, 2004). The NCDWQ 401 Water Quality
Certification has been issued (Project No. 04-0921; July 30, 2004).
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The City of Raleigh proposes to reactivate
Lakes Benson and Wheeler reservoirs as a water supRly source primarilyprovide the City
and surrounding Wake County communities with a reliable and independent water supply
source. Second, this project will help initiate solutions to the post-2010 water supply needs
in the project area and for surrounding local communities purchasing water from the City_
Water demand projections indicate that additional water supply capacity will be needed after
2010.
IV. Prior Project Ilistory
If jurisdictional deterniinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful infornlation. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. A jurisdictional determination for the WTP site has been issued by the
USACE (Action ID. No. 20030193; February 18, 2003). An NCDWQ stream determination for
the applicability of Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules was conducted at the WTP on April 14
2003, and issued August 28, 2003 (No. NBRRO -03-199). As noted in the NCDWQ letter the
applicability of the buffer rules to Swift Creek and Mahlers Creek, the southern and eastern
property boundaries, were not in question, and riparian areas along these creeks are assumed to
be subject to the buffer rules.
Updated 11/l/2005
Page 10 of 20

There is no project history for the jurisdictional wetlands or surface waters located along the
finished water transmission main route.
A NWP #12 and #39 for this project were received from the U.S. Arnly Corps of Engineers on
April 5, 2006.
Impacts to jurisdictional resources along the force main for the Hi hway 50 wastewater pump
station have been permitted under a separate NWP #12 (Action ID No. 200421195 and
200421196; August 16, 2004). A 401 Water Quality Certification for the force main was issued
by NCDWQ (Project No. 04-0921; July 30, 2004).
V. Future Project Plaus
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No firture permit requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation fornis should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: At the WTP site, 0.26 acres of
forested wetland will be pern~anently impacted by site 'r~~ and facility construction
(Sheet lA and Wetland 11.
At the existingpump station, up radin~ of the intake stnlctures immediatelyupstream of the
dam will permanently impact 2,000 cubic feet of open water of Lake Benson (Sheet 1B-D
and Sitc P1). Immediately downstream of the dam, a new minimum flow-valve assembly
and a cantilevered walkway and maintenance platform will impact approximate) 4y 00 square
feet of Swift Creek's stream channel (Sheets 1 B-C and Site S 19). The construction of the
new filter-backwash discharge in Lake Benson will utilize a coffer dam which will
temporarily drain 600 square feet of the lake. The discharge pipe and outfall structure will
ermanentl im act 240 s ware feet of the lake Sheet 1 E and Site P2 .
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 20

The upgrades and retrofits at the Lake Benson dam will enable an average withdrawal of 1.4
mid or approximately 20 cubic feet per second (cfsZof raw source water from Swift Creek
for treatment at the newly constructed WTP. The mean annual flow in Swift Creek at Lake
Benson is approximately 70 cfs. The lowest monthlymedian flow occurs in September,
approximately 10 cfs, which is one-half of the proposed average WTP withdrawal. Due to
Swift Creek classification as a "special case" stream, afour-year instream flow study was
conducted to determine and quantify the potential impacts to Swift Creek aquatic resources
resulting from the proposed water withdrawal. The study concluded that the proposed water
withdrawal quantity would alter the Swift Creek hydrograph and directly affect downstream
aquatic resources, including habitat for a federally endangered species.
At Lake Wheeler, a new pre-formed concrete bride will be installed over the lake from the
ton of the dam to the existinaLntake tower. The brid e~ will permanently impact 520 square
feet of open water. The water level in Lake Wheeler will be lowered by 8 to 10 feet during
installation of the brid~~e to facilitate construction of the land-based pier on the dam. Anew
weir is proposed downstream of the Lake Wheeler outfall near the base of the dam. The weir
will pem~anently locate 28 cubic feet of fill in the Swift Creek channel The flow of Swift
Creek from the Lake Wheeler outfall will be temporarily halted during construction of the
weir (Sheet 11: Sites S18 and P31.
The finished water transmission main will temporarilyimpact a total of 1.42 acres of shrubby
wetlands at two locations and will cross 15 jurisdictional stream channels (640 linear feet),
for a total impact of 0.13 acres (Sheets 2-10; Sites Wetland 1&2 and S1-S17). Due to lack o_f
detailed finished water transmission line desi~l~s, temporarypacts for the transmission line
were calculated for the entire width of the 40-foot-wide easement. As detailed design ]Mans
are completed, it is assumed that the acreage of temporary impact will be reduced as actual
construction needs can he determined.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are ]lot limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
I'loodplain
( es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Arca of
Impact
(acres)
Wetland 1 Pem~anetit
Grading /filling Forested, non-riverine No 650 0.26
Wetland 2 Temporary excavation Shrub scrub, riverine Yes 200 0.54
Wetland 3 Temporary excavation Shrub scrub, riverine Yes 200 0.88

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 1.68
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: WTP site 7.32
acres• finished water transmission main 1.42 acres
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 20

4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Arca of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Im .act linear feet acres
S 1 UT to Swift Creek Temporary Intermittent 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
S2 UT to Swift Creek Temporary Intermittent 3 feet 40 0.003
excavation
S3 UT to Swift Cmek Temporary perennial 10 feet 40 0.009
excavation
S4 UT to Swift Creek Temporary Internttent 5 feet 40 0.005
excavation
SS UT to Swift Creek Temporary pereiuiial 10 feet 40 0.009
excavation
SG UT to Big Branch Temporary perennial 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
UT to Walnut Temporary
S7
Creek
excavation perennial 15 feet 40 0.014
UT to Walnut Temporary
SS
Creek
excavation Internuttent 5 feet 40 0.005
UT to Walnut Temporary
S9 Perennial 4 feet 40 0.004
Creek excavation
S 10 Wahmt Creek Temporary Peremiial 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
UT to Walnut Temporary
S13 perecuiial 15 feet 40 0.014
Creek excavation
S14 UT to Big Branch Temporary Iutcrnuttent 4 feet 40 0.004
excavatio^
UT to Walnut Temporary
S 15
Creek
excavation Internttent 4 feet 40 0.004
S 16 UT to Walnut Temporary perecmial 10 feet 40 0
009
Creek excavation .
S 17 Walnut Creek Temporary perennial 15 feet 40 0.014
excavation
S 18 Swift Creek Permanent perennial 12 feet 3 0
001
Weir .
Permanent bridge 40 ft x 10
(
S19 Swift Creek and minimum flow perennial 200 feet
ft wide) 0.184
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) G43 0.321
Updated it/U200>
Page 13 of 20

Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but arc not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open ~'Vater Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc.) acres
P1 Lake Benson Pern~anent; Water
intake struchires In-stream impoundment 0.005
P2 Lake Benson Permanent fill;
discharge structure In-stream impoundment 0.007
P2 Lake Benson Temporary drainage In-stream impoundment 0.014
P3 Lake Wheeler Permanent; Bridge In-stream impoundment 0.012
Total Open ~'Vater Impact (acres) 0.038
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.321
Wetland Impact (acres): 1.68
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.038
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 2.039
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 643
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., date/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:_
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 14 of 20

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It Inay be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain wli<y these design options were not feasible. Also, discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
tecluiiques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Impacts to jurisdictional
resources can only be completely avoided by implementation of a no-build scenario. The no-
build scenario is not an acceptable option.
The Swift Creek instream flow study determined that a tiered minimum flow release during
periods of low flow into Lakes Wheeler and Benson would minimize direct impacts to affected
aquatic resources in Swift Creek below Lake Benson dam. The upgrades and retrofits to the
outlet structures at Lakes Wheeler and Benson will facilitate enhanced monitoring_and
manipulation of stream flows in Swif{ Creek, are required to comfy with the proposed, tiered
minimum-release schedule at the Lakes Wheeler and Benson dams. The specifics of that tiered
minimum release schedule are being finalized in consultation with resource agencies.
At Lake Benson, the existing intake screens are antiquated and must be replaced. The new larger
structures conform to the new raw water requirements of the proposed WTP. Additionally, the
old sluice does not have an adequately functioning release valve that complies with the current
en~ineerin~ requirements for the minimum release schedule. Anew valve assembl_ iy s required
and by definition is "instream". The maintenance walkway and platforn~ are needed to safely
access the valve assembly for routine upkeep and manual adjustments, if necessary. Worker
safetyprimary consideration, and avoidance is not possible.
At Lake Wheeler, impacts due to the installation of the new foot bridge have been minimized to
the extent possible through the use of overhead constrnction techniques, apre-formed concrete
bride and locating support piers outside of the normal lake pool. The bridge is required for
routine maintenance and is needed for safety. Installation of the weir and flow meter is
necessary to comply with the minimum release schedule. No live concrete will come in contact
with stream water.
At the WTP site, the project was designed to avoid impacts to the large (over 7 acres wetland
complex along Mahlers Creek. The smaller (0.33 acre) forested wetland is centrally located on
the WTP site. Options for avoidance of the small wetland are extremely limited. The Town of
Garner ordinances prohibit constnlction within 50 feet of the 100-year floodplain. Due to
en ing eeril~~ constraints, a redesi~Ii of the WTP layout is not possible on this property to avoid
the small central wetland and simultaneously meet Town of Garner ordinance. The Town of
Garner had never granted a variance for pern~anent construction in the buffer. Impacts to the
small wetland were minimized to the extent possible through reduction of the ~radin~ footprint.
The filter baclwash NPDES discharge into the arm of Lake Benson is a by-product of the WTP
process and is therefore a requirement of the proposed WTP operation. The filter bac}ctivash
discharge is only located as far into the lake as necessary to allow for adequate mixing with the
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 15 of 20

existing lake water. Impacts from the above structure were minimized the extent possible while
still meeting minimum en ing Bering and safet~equirements.
Along the finished water transmission main route avoidance by shifting the water main is not
possible, since the project is utilizin#? existing easements and right-of--way and all of the wetlands
and streams are intersecting the comdor in a perpendicular manner. All stream crossings will be
perpendicular to the stream flow to minimize impacts. All impacts along the finished water
transmission main route will be temporary, since the grade will be restored to preconstruction
elevations once the pipe is installed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Pcrniits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnn~ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Updated I1/l/2005
Page 16 of 20

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Etiliancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):-
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres)
Amount of Coastal wetland ritigation requested (acres):
IX. Euviroumeutal Documentation (required by DWQ)
0.26
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPAISEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A
NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
(please identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
vPaac~a t tni2oos
Page 17 of 20

Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 35,937 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 24,176 1.5
Total 60,113
* "Lone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zonc 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Buffer mitigation is not proposed for this
project. Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233, pemendicular crossines that disturb ereater than 40
linear feet of riparian buffer with a maintenance corridor greater than 10 feet in width is
allowable.
XI. Stormwater (required >,y DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan is
bein d~ evcloped for the project and will be finalized and approved prior to project construction.
Preliminary analysis of the WTP site indicates a low ratio of planned impervious surface to total
property acreage. The use of stornwater structures, such as preformed scour holes and level-
spreader aprons, has not been determined at this time. Additional detail re wing stornlwater
controls will be defined as the WTP facilit designs are finalized.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by D~VQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The following wastewater permits will be obtained for this project:
- Discharge nernit from DWQ Water Quality Section for spray irrigation of clarified effluent to
aland-application system.
- Discharge pern~it from DWQ Water Quality Section for transfer of wastewater flow from the
Town of Garner Spra~rl-igation Facility to the City of Raleigh Neuse River WWTP.
- NPDES discharge permit from DWQ Water Quality Section for discharge to surface waters of
the State (Lake Benson).
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 18 of 20

1III. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required Uy DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No ^
If yes, please submit a qualitative or qualttitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:/11~2o.enr.statc.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Dempsey E. Benton WTP Project will not significantly affect growth rate final land use patterns
or development densities in the Swift Creek watershed as these have been determined by
separate plannin a~~olitical processes. Yet it is also correct to state that the additional
increment of water supply that would be contributed by the~roject is a necessary factor in
achievinu and sustaining a normal rate of growth. However the strong local programs in place
by these communities will offset andpotential overall cumulative impacts that may result from
the proposed project such as growth management planttin~ land management planning open
space plans and initiatives, erosion and sedimentation control riparian buffers water
conservation, stormwater and pollution prevention and planning toward low impact
development. A comprehensive discussion of the cumulative impacts of the proposed_project is
provided in the Environmental Assessment A Finding of No Si~rlificant Impact (FONSI, has
been received for this project (attached).
~V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
A Final Biological Assessment (BA) was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in July
2005 that described in detail the Gndin~s and approach to evaluating the instream flow study
results, the impacts of the proposed project and mitigation for impacts to the dwarf
wed~emussel. The Final BA initiated formal Section 7 Consultation under the Endangered
Species Act. A Final Biological Opinion was signed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
February 2006. The conclusions of the Final Biological Opinion are provided in the attached
FONSI.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 19 of 20

q/~~/~
ApplicantlAgen s Si nature Date
(Agent's signature is vali onl if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
r~ ~. ~~ c.•~'1'1CM~ L ~ ~~,t-C~~i vYl ~/1' '(Y~ w~2 pYL - V"Vl. (Z, ~') I / ~ / V~ l
Page 17 of 17

Table 1. Coordinates of Jurisdictional Wetlands and Streams crossed by the proposed D>/ Benton Water
Transmission Main.
Site No. Type of Resource Latitude Longitude
S1 stream 35°40' 17.56" 78°36' 28.89"
S2 stream 35° 40' 46.32" 78° 36' 36.80"
S3 stream 35° 41' 03.02" 78° 36' 42.08"
W2 wetland 35° 41' 09.64" 78° 36' 42.20"
S4 stream 35° 41' 45.20" 78° 37' 04.71"
SS stream 35° 42' 13.58" 78° 37' 19.85"
SG stream 35° 43' 40.09" 78° 36' OO.G 1"
S7 stream 35°44' 58.79" 78°3G' 44.34"
S8 stream 35°45' 22.70" 78°36' 49.21"
S9 stream 35° 45' 32.64" 78° 37' 02.66"
S 10 stream 35° 45' 43.42" 78° 3G' 52.41"
S 13 stream 35° 46' 03.91" 78° 37' 48.34"
S 14 stream 35° 43' 16.58" 78° 37' 39.50"
~'V3 wetland 35°44' 21.56" 78°38' 24.38"
S 15 stream 35° 44' 32.12" 78°38' 24.40"
S 16 stream 35° 44' 40.36" 78° 38' 24.06"
S 17 stream 35° 45' 24.74" 78° 38' 27.25"
Page:
g:4vwmV000114nvronmenUl assessment4rsa<e permit\taGle l.da 1~1

DATA rORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: D.E. Benton Proposed it~ater Treatment Facility
ApplieandOwner: City ojRalei,t'h
Investigator(s): Harold AT Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: I S-Jan
County: {Vake
State: North Carolina
Commtutity ID: PFO ({Yetlarid IJ
Transcct ID: L13A
Plot ID: LBA S
VEGETATION
Dominant P ant Species Stratum In icatoc Dominant Plant 5pectes Stratum In tcator
1. Betula ni~ra tree FACIY 9. Microste,~ium vinnineum grass FAC+
2. Ouercus ni~ra tree 1%AC 10.
3. Tozicodendron radiants vine FAC 11.
4. Acer rubrum tree FAC 12.
5. Platanus occidentalis tree Fi1C{Y- 13.
6. {Voodwardia acrolata herb OBL 14.
7. Li,~tsfrum sincnse shrub 1•AC 15.
8. Arundinaria ~i~antca herb Ii1C{V 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding PAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: fut.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in. )
Depth to Saturated Soil: 8 (in.)
Primary Indicators:
Irtundatcd
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Pattcrtts in ~'Jetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
J+; Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Sun,•ey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Oll~er (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks I{'etland located at head ofstream

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): I6'ehadkee sail Drainage Class: Poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Fluventic ffaplaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture
Cottcretio4ts

inches Horizon (Mansell Moist)
(Mansell Moist) ,
,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 7.SYR 4/4 7.SYR S/G fetiv, rne, faint sandy clay loam
6-12 131 7.SYR S/2 SYR S/8 many, medium, distinct clay loam
12+ B2 SY 6/1 SYR S/8 few, medium, prom. clay loam
Hydtic Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Histic Epipedon Nigh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydtic Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Cttrottta Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks TheA-horizon cartlaincd many, fine roots
The B-horizon contained oxidized root channels
VVCTLAND DCTCRMINATIOIY
H}'drophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Poittt Within a Wetland'. Yes No
Remarks Plot taken approximately 20 feet dotirnhill of point GBA S.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: D.E. Benton Proposed If'ater Treatment Facility
ApplieanUO«ner: City ojfZaleigh
Investigator(s): Karold tti1 Brady
Do Norntal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Jan
County: ff'ake
State: North Carolina
Comntuttity ID: Upland (ff'etland 1)
Transect ID: LBA
Plot ID: LBA S
VEGETATION
1)ommant Plant Species Stratum In ~cator llomtnant Plant Spectes Stratum In tcator
1. Quercus velutirra tree UPL 9. I/acciniwn arborcum shntb FACU
2. Quercusfalcata tree FACU- 10. Liquidambarslyraci/lea tree FAC+
3. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 11. Lonicera Japonica vine FAC-
4. Quercus rubs tree FACU 12.
5. Ilex opaca shrub FAC- 13.
6. Tagus grandijolia tree FACU 14.
7. Pines taeda tree 1~:4C I5.
8. Smilax rotundijolia vine I%AC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or PAC (excluding FAG). 31i%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_Recor e llata (Desert e m Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Olher
No Recorded Data Available Wetlan IIy rolo6ry In icators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Ittwtd;tted
_ Saturated itt Upper 12 itches
_ Water Marks
Dtitt Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. (in) Oxidized Root Channels itt Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series attd Phase): Applin~ sandy loam Drainage Class: If~ell
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Typic Hapudults Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon ~Munsell Moist) (Mansell Moistl Abtutdattce/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A IOYR S/4 ~avelly sandy clay loam
8-11+ B 7.SYR S/G smrdy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
IGstic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Orgactic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Cluotna Colors Oliter (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks Soils showed few, medians sized coats
WETLAND DETCRI~IINATION
I Iydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ycs No
Wetland Hydrology Prescrtt? Ycs No
I Iydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wctlartd? Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approximately 2S feet uphill of point LBA S.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: E.B. Bain Proposed Waterline
Applicant/O~;ner City o~Kalei~h
Investigator(s): ffaraklAl. Brady
Do Normal Circurnstaetces exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es e
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: l rake
State: North Carolina
Community ID: PFO ({Vetland 2)
Transcct ID: IV1,A
Plot ID: 11'LA2
VEGCTAT[ON
I~ommant Plant Specter Stratum Inc tcator Dominant Plant Specter Stratum In tcator
1. Fraxinus perrnsylvanica tree FAC{V 9.
2. Lonicera japonica vine FAG 10.
3. Smilaz rotundi~alia vine FAC' 11.
4. [/ibuntum dcntatum shrub FAC 12.
5. Ulmus anrericana tree 1%ACJV 13.
6. Acer rubrunt tree FAC 14.
~• 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species drat are OBL, FACW, oc FAC (excluding FAC-). 83%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Strcatn, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Outer
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit_ 10 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 (itt.)
Prunary Indicators:
httutdatcd
X Saturated in Uppcr 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drifl Lines
X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patients in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Clratutels in Uppcr 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_Other (Explain in IZcntarks)
Remarks Ihrmnrocky x~etland beginning near the toe oJslape and continueing to the unnamed tributmy along Timber Drive.

SOILS
Ivfap Urtit Natnc
(Series and Pttase): Chetivacla soils Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (SubgroupAquic Fluventic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Ycs
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abuttdance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 .4 SYR 4/3 silty clay loam
4-12+ 13 2.SYR S/1 IOYR S/6 med., common, dist. sandy clay loam
Hydtic Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon Nigh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Strc:rtEcing in Sartdy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regittte Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Glcyed or Low-Cttroma Colors Other (Explaut itt Remarks)
Remarks The A-horizon contained mmry, fine roots
77te B-horizon cwttained jew, fine roots
This soil is likely an inclusion oj11 edhadkee soils, due to the exceedingly lotiv chrama in the Q horizat.
~YCTLAND DETERMINATION
Ilydroph}1ic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
I Eydric Soils E'rescnt? Ycs No Is this Sampling Point Wilton a WcUattd' Ycs No
Remarks Plot taken approzin:ately 5 feet downhill ajpoint 1E'L.-12.

DATA FORA1
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Alanual)
ProjecUSite: E.B. Bain Proposed [f'aterline
ApplicanUOwner: Cityofltaleigh
Investigator(s): Ifarold M. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es o
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: IVake
State: North Carolina
Community ID: Upland ({Vetland 1J
Transect ID: 1VLA
Plot ID: {VI.A~
VEGETATION
llommant Ylant Species Stratum In tcator Dominant Plant Specter Stratum In tcator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FAC{V 9. Smilax rotundijalia fine FAC
2. Parthenocissus quinquc/olia vine 1%AC 10. forricera japaJica Vine FAC-
3. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 11.
4. Quercus albs tree f ACU 12.
5. Vitis ratundifolia vine FitC 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Liriadendrat tulipi~era tree I%ACU 15.
8. Ulmusrubrn tree fAC 16.
Percent of Dotttinattt Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 70°'0
Remarks The majority ajthe vegetation is facultative.
FIYDROLOGY
_ Recor e llata (llescn e m Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs ~
Outer
X No Recorded Data Available Wctlan I iy rology Itt icators:
Ptitnary htdicators:
_ Iltundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Dri 1} Lines
_
Scditnent Deposits
Field Observations: _
Draittage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary htdicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Cltatutels in Upper 12 Inches
^
Water-Stauted Leaves
Depth to Free Water itt Pit: (in.) _
_ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) _Otlter (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Pltasc): Appling sandy loam Drainage Class: lf'ell drained
ricld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Typic Hapudults Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) AbundattccJContrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A IOYR 4/4 sandy loam
3-12+ I3 IOYR 4/6 2.SYS/6 sturdy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Lays-r in Sattdy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Org<~tttic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local I-Iydtic Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chrotna Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks Soils showed few, medium sized roots
`VCTLAND DCTGR111INATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Ycs No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks Plnt taken approximately 25 feet uphill of paint ii'ZA2.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: E.B. Bain Proposed li~aterline
Applicant/Owner: City ojlfalciglr
Investigator(s): Harold M. Brady
Do Norntal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es o
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: {rake
State: Na•th Carolina
Community )D: PFO (wetlmrd 3)
Tcansect ID: {pL8
Plot ID: IVL87
VEGETATION
llomtnant P ant Specter Stratum In tcator Domtnant Plant Specter 5traturn In tcator
1. IGisteria sinensis vine NI 9.
2. rtcernegundo tree FACW 10.
3. Saururus cernuus herb OBL l 1.
4. Ligustrun: sinense shrub FAC 12.
5. Kubus argutus herb FAC 13.
G. Arundir:aria gigantea herb FAC[V 14.
7. 15.
S. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100%
Rc~rttarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded llata (llescribe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 2 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (ut. )
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ (in. )
:land Hyc r logy h~icators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X Water Zv'L•trks
X Drift L111CS
X Sedinteut Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in ~'Vetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Chamtels ut Upper 12 Itches
Y Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Ncutrat Test
_ Olher (Explain itt Rcntarks)
Remarks JVetland foundalorrgan existingsewerline easement.
Recent heavy rains have caused flooding throughout the tivetlmul,
with evidence of significant sheet flaw (most notably large xrack lines).
77re wetland is located between a major road (Ilammard Raad) and steep slopes
wish a perennial stream cutting through the tiretlmrd.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Ci,etvacla soils Drainage Class: Son,c~tt~lwt Poor/v
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup Aquic Fluverrtic Dystrochrepts Corm Mapped T}pe? Yes
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundattce/Contrast Sfructttre, etc.
0-4 A l0 YR 4/4 silty clay loam
4-12+ li !0 YX S/1 IOYR S/6 med., common, disf. silty clay loam
2.SYR 6/~t med., eonnnon, dist.
Ilydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Histic Epipedon IIigh Organic Content ut Surface Layer ut Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Citroma Colors Otlu-r (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks TheA-horizon contained mmry, fine roots
Tl,e B-horiza: contained jew, fine rants
This soil is likely m: iachtsion of Ii'edhadkee soils, due to the exceedingly lots chrnnra in the 13 horizon.
~'VI/TLAND DCTETlI17I1VATION
Hydropltytic Vegetation Present? Ycs No
VVetlattd Hydrology Present? Ycs No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland' Ycs No
RetnarksPlottaken approximately ISfeet downhill ojpoint 1{'ZB7.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delieieation Manual)
Project/Site: E.B. Bain Proposed II'aterline
Applicant/Owner: City oJRaleigh
Investigator(s): Karold M. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
{If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 18-Sep
County: f rake
State: North Carolina
Community ID: Upland (iI'etlmrd 3)
Trattscct ID: {I'LB
Plot ID: {l'LB7
VEGETATION
llomtnant Plant Specter Stratum In tc~ator llommant Plant Specter Stratum In tcator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvaniea tree FACIV 9. Pinus taeda tree FAC
2. Anisastichus capreolata vine N/A 10. Quercus phellos tree FACIi/
3. 1'oxicodendron radicans vine FAC 11. Liquidambarstyraci/lua tree FAC+
4. Elaca~rrus umbellata shrub N/A 12. Corms /lorida tree 1%ACC/
5. Microsfe~ium virmineum herb FAC+ 13. Lindera berzzain shrub FACIY
6. Acer rubrunr tree FAC 14.
7. L iriodendron tulipijera tree FACU I5.
8. Lit;ustrum sincnse shntb FAC 16.
Percent of Domutattt Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 82%
Rc-tnarks The majority oJthe vegetation is facultative.
IIYDROLOGY
_Recor e llata (llescrt e m Re-tttarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetlatt liy rology Itt tcators:
Primary Indicators:
httutdated
_ Saturated itt Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_Sedintettt Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) Oxidized Root Cltatmels in Uppcr 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit (itt.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Re-tuarks I5-25% slope

SOILS
Map Unit Nante
(Series and Pltase): Modisar sandy loam Drainage Class: II'ell drai,:ed
Field Observations
Taxonomy (SubgroupTypicltanlwpudults Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon {Munsell Moist) {Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 7.5 YR 3/3
me sandy loam
2-l0 f3l 2.51'R 4/6 sa,rdy loam
10-12+ B2 2.SYX 6/8 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ I-Iistosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon high Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Ctuoma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rc-rnarks Soils showed fern, nredlum sized roots
Eroded soil.
~'VCTLAND DETCRMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ycs No
~Vctlartd Hydrology Present? Yes No
Ilydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point WiUtin a Wetland? Ycs No
Remarks Plot takcrr approximatcl}~ 20 feet uphill of paint IfL$7.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named StrcanL Latitude: Signature:
S1 (UT1 to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 4, 2002 Garner, NC 1,000 feet northwest of New Bethel Church, ui active cow pasture.
*PLEASE NOTE: ljevafuator and landowner agree that the jeature is a man-made ditch, them use ojthis form is not necessary.
ipso, if in the best professional judgement ajthe evaluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch and rrot a modified natural stream--this
raring syslcm should r:ot be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNum6erPcrLinc~
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Wcalc 1lfoderate Strom
1) Is T}rere A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
_Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Arc Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? (0) 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
(0)
1
2
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 ~ 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfirll Bench Present? 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bail: Present? 0 1
(•NOTF•r /flied & Rank Caused Rv Dirchin~ And (f%TI/OUT Sinuosity Then Score=0 •) 2 (3)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
_On_Topo Map A-rd/Or In Field) Present?
les=3
No=(O)
PRIt1fARYGEOIIIORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8
IL_ITydrolot*y Absent Wenk Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRI[IIARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 (1) 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed'? 3 (2) I 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Arc Bivalves Present? ~_0_)_ __ _ _ 1 2 3
PRI/IfARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (CirdeOneNum6crPerLineJ
I. Geomornholo~y Absent Wcak Aloderatc Strom
1~ Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 ~ .5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 I ~1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
.5 1
(1.5)
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4

II. Aydrolo v Absent Weak 1<toderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
(1)
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? (~ .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last IinoWn Rain? ('NOTF,r UDirch lndieatrd /n #9 Ahoi~e Skip This Stcp And #5 Aclow') (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6) Arc Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=(1.5) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
IIi.I3ioto~y Absent Weak 111<oderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? (0) .5 I 1.5
2 Are Amphibians Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
3 Are AquaticTurtles Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crawfish Present? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? (0) .5 I 1.5
ti) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(• NOTE: If Totat Absence OjA(! Plants In Streambed
As Noted .4bove Skip This Step UNLF,SS SAV Prescnt'l. SAV Aiostly OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW
.75 Mostly FAC
(.5) Dtostiy FACU Mostly UI'L
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
TOTAL POINTS (Pri-rra~-y +Secortdary) =23 (If Grcatcr T/ian Or Equa! To 19 Points T/ic Stream Is At Least
Ir:terrnittent)
Comments: Stream located inactive cow pasture. The bank height is 0.5 to 1 foot, 10 to 15 feet wide, and has a silt
substrate. The water depth during the survey was 3 to 6 uichcs.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S2 (UT2 to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Garner, NC 2,000 feet southwest of the State Road 25 62 and NC Highway 50.
*I'LEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree t/rat lbe feature is a man-made ditch, their use of this jorrn is not necessary.
Also, ijin the best projessiona[ judgement ojthe evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream--tlsis
raring system should nat be uscd*
Primary field Indicators: (CirclcOneNumbcrPerLinc~
I. Geomornbolo>'y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
___ Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
Is T}te Channel Sinuous? 0 (I) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0
1
(2J
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) I 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 (I) 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed R; Bank Present? 0 1
('NOTE: /tt3ed & llnnk Caused By Dilchine And !V/T/TOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0') (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=(Ol
PRI11fARY GEORiORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 12
Ii,Ilydrolo~y Absent Wcak 11~iadcrate Strom
1) Is There A Growidwater
FlowlDischarce Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIRiARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
IIi.I3iolo~y Absent Wcak Aloderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3~ Is Periphyton Present? (0) I 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0)____ 1 2 3
PRIt1fARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine)
L._Geomort~bolo~y Absent Wcak Afoderate Strom
1_) Is There A Hcad Cut Present In Channel? 0 .5 (I) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 I (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainace Way?
__ 0_
.5 1
(1.51
SECONDARYGEO1IfORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4

II. iiVdrolo~y Absent ~Vcak Moderate Strom
1) Is Tltis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
(1)
5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 LS) 1 1 5

3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
0
(.5)
1 _
1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Ilrs. Since 0 (.5)
Last Klcotvn Ratn? ('NOTE,: If Ditch lndicnted /n t/9 Above Skin This Sten And #S 1ldowh 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Charutel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
G Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Neadcut)~ Yes=1.5 No=(0)
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
IIi.I3iolo~y Absent `Veak Alodcrate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
2~ Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Arc AauaticTurtles Prescnt? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Arc Crayfish Prescttt? (0) 5 1 1 5
Arc Macrobcnthos Prescnt? 0 (5) 1 1 5
G) Arc Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun~us Present? (0) 5 1 15
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(• NOTE: /j Total Absence Of AI/Plants !n Streambcd
As Noted Above Skin This Strn UNl.F,.SS S.4 V Present•l. SAV Afostly OBL
2 1 Afostly FACW Mostly FAC
(,75) .5 Mostly FACU Dtostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI~IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1.25
TOTAL POINTS (Priuiary +Secondary) =27.25 (IjGreatcr Than Or Equa! To 19 Points T/te Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
Comments: Stream located in bottoniland hardwood forest. The bank height is 0.5 to 1 foot, 3 feet wide, and has a sand
and gravel substrate. The water depth during the survey was 2 to 4 inches.

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S3 (UT3 to Swift Creek) Swi(t Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Gamer, NC
2,500 feet southwest of the State Road 2562 artd NC Highway 50 intersection
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and lm+dorvner agree that t/ie feature is a man-made ditc/r, then use ojtlris form is not nccessar}:
Also, if in the best projessiana/judgement oft/re evaluator, t/~e feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should nat be uscd*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine)
I. Gcomorpholo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is Titere A Riffle-Pool Sectucnce? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Strcantbed
-Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0 1
(~
3
3) Arc Nahual Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 (2) 3
5) Is Tttere Att Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alhrvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
R) Is There A Bankfitll Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bartk Present? 0 1
('NOTE.• /(6cd & Bank Caused flv Ditchine And !Y!T/fOl/T Sinuosih~ Then Score=0 ") (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=(3)
Nn=O
PRIBiARYGEO11fORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: IA
II.IIydrolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIt1fARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.I3iolo~V Absent Wcak IVloderate Strom
1) Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambcd'? 3 (Z) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Strcambcd? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRL1iARY13IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine)
I. Geomornholot*.Y Absent Wcak Aloderlte Strom
1_) Is There A Head Cut Present in Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Nahrral Drainage Way? 0 5 1 (1 5)

SECONDARY GE01IfORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
II. Hydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Lcaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
(I)
5
0
2~ Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 ($) 1 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 (1) 1 5
4) Is Water In Cha~mel And >48 Iirs. Since 0 .5
Last KltOwlt Rain? (`NOTE: It Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Stcn And #5 lielotiv'1 (1) 1.5
$) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growine Season)? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ Yes=(1.5) No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: C
IIL I3iolo~V Absent ~'Vcak IVloderatc Strom
1) Are Fish Present? 0 ($) 1 1 5
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are A~uaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Arc Crayfish Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
$) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
G) Are Iron Oxidizing F3acteria/Fun~n~s Present? 0 ($) 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wctlaud Plants In Streambcd?
(' NOTE: IjTotal AGsence OjAll Plants In Strcambed
As Notcd Alxwe Skin This Stcn UNLESS SAV Prescnt"l. SAV llfostly 06L
2 1 Afostly FACW Mostly FAC
(.7$) .5 Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.7$
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =38.25 (If Creatcr T/tatr Or Equal To 19 Points TJ~e Stream Is At Lcast
Lltcrntittent)
Comments: Stream located in bottonilaeid hardwood forest. The bank height is 2 to 3 feet, 10 feet wide, and has a sand
substrate. The water depth during the survey was 6 to 12 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S4 (UT4 to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
Septentbcr 18, 2002 Garner, NC 1 rule southwest of the US Highway 70 and NC Highway 50 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a rnan-made ditch, then use of this form is Trot necessary. Also, if
in the best projessiorfal judgement of the evaluator, the jcature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-tIris rating sJ~stem
sl:oufd not be uscd*
Primary Field Indicators: (Q'rcleOncNumbcrPcrLine)
I. Gcomorpholo~Y Absent Weak 1\loderate Strom
1) Is T}~ere A Riffle-Pool Seouence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
__Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3, Are Natural Levees Present? 0 Ll) 2 3
4J Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Prescnt?
0
(1)
2
3
Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3

7) Are Recent Alluvial Denosits Present?
0
1
(2) _
3
Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 I (2) 3
9) Is A Contumous Bed & Bank Prescnt? 0 (1)
('NOTE: /flied & Dank Caused liv Ditchinr And {V/TIIOUT Sim~osity Then Score=0*i 2 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Cha-uiel (As Indicated
On Tono Man AncUOr In Field) Prese~it? ______
Yes=3
No=(Ol
PRIhfARYGEORIORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
IL IIydrolo~y Absent Wcak 1lfoderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Plow/Discharue Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIAIARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
IIL Iliolo~y Absent Wcak Moderzte Strom
1~ Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 (1) 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed'? 3 2 (1) 0
3) Is Pcrinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1_ _ 2 3
PRIAfARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POIN"lS: 2
SCCOIlCIai'y Fleld Indlcat0l'S: (Circle OneNumGerPcrGinc)
I. Geontornholo~y Absent Wcak Iltoderate Strom
1) is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point Irt Channel? 0 5 Ll) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 1 (1.5)
SECONDARYGEO1tIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3._5

IL_Nydrolo>?y Absent Weak Mottcrate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Strcambed?
1.5
1
(.5)
0
2~ Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 (I) 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 (1) 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 (.5)
Last Knolvn Rain? ('NOTF.r If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Sren And #S /lelotiv«1 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
_Conditions Or In Growing ScasoT[)? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
6) Arc Hydric Soils Present in Sides Of Channel (Or In HeadcutZ? ___ Yes=(1.5) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
I~ Are Fish Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
51 Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
Arc Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun~~s Present? 0 (.S) 1 1 5
7] Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Strcambed?
(' NOTE: !f Taral Absence OjAll Plants In Strcambed
As Nated Above Skrn This Stcn UNLESS SA['Present'l. SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW
(.7$) 1ltostly FAC
.5 Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (Priurary +Secondary) =23.75 (If Greaser Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
Comments: Intermittent Stream located in thin Waxed pine/Hardwood forest with development sun out[diug. The bans:
height is 2 to 3 feet, 5 feet wide, and has a sand and gravel substrate. T1ie water depth during the siuvey was 3 to 6 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Elarold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
SS (UTS to Swift Creek) Swift Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Garner, NC 3,000 feet southwest of the US Highway 70 and NC Highway 50 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditdr, then use of this form is not rrecessary. Also, ijin
the best professional judgement oj[he evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditc/i and not a modified natural slrcan:-[his rating s}•stem should
not be uscd*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine~
1. Gcomorpholo>?y Ahsent Weak 1\7(oderate Strom
1] Is Tttere A Riffle-Pool Seouence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundine Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is T}te Channel Srnuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Actrve (Or Relrc)
Floodnlain Present?
0 (1)
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvral Denosrts Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Contwuous Bed R Bank Present? 0 1
('R'OTE: /tlJed & Rank Caused Rv I1ilchine And WITlfOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0') (2) 3
10) Is A 2°`~ Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AnrUOr In Field) Present?
Yer=3 __
No=(0)
PRIdiARYGEO1110RPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 13
Ii. Hydrolo~V Absent Week )yToder~te Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharec Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRI~fARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.l3iolo~y Absent Wc~k 1\loderate Strom
l) Are Frbrous Roots Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed~ (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Pcrinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Brvalves Present? (0) 1 2_ 3
PRIt1fARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorpholo~y Absent Weak 1ltoderate Strom
1~ Is There A Ilcad Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Pomt In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainane Way? 0 5 (1)_ 1.5
SECONDARY GEO1tiORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

IL Iiydrolo~y Absent Wc~k Moderate Strong
1) Is Thrs Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1 5
(i)
5
0
21 Is Sedrment On Plants (Or Debns) Presents 0 { 5) 1 1 5

3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
0
{ 5)
1 _
1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Smcc 0 .5
Last Kno-t4r Raln? /'NOTE,: UDltch Indicated /n #9 Above Skin This Strn And #S Rclow*1 (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel Dunrtg Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
G) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel {Or In Headcut)~ Yes=(1 S) ___ _ No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5.5
III.l3iolot*.y Absent Wezk 1lioderlte Strong
1) Are Fcsh Present? 0 (5) 1 15
2) Are Amnhrbrans Present? (0) 5 1 15
Are AouatrcTurtles Present? (0) 5 I 1 5
A) Are Cravfish Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
Are Iron Oxidizing I3acterialF'uneus Presents 0 (5) I 15
_71 Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 I t 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV
(• NOTE: IjTotal Absence OjAll Plants !n Streambed 2
As Nolcd Above Skin 7h_i_s__Srcn UNLESS SAV Prescnt•1. Mostly OBL
1 Mostly FACW tlfostly FAC
(.75) .5 [Mostly FACU Afostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Prirrtary +secorrdary) =32.25 (If Greater Tharr Or Equal To 19 Paints TJic Strcarrt Is At
Least Intern:itterrt)
Comments: Perennial Stream located in thin bottomland hardwood forest, with development surrounding. The banl: height is 3 feet,
10 feet wide, and has a sand and gravel substrate. The water depth during the survey was G to 12 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S6 (UT1 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 17, 2002 Garner, NC 3,000 feet southeast of Carolina Biblical Gardens.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijet~a(uator ar:d landa-vner agree that the jcature is a man-made dirclr, then use oftlris jorrn u not necessary:
Also, ijitr l/re best professional judgeme~rt of the evaluator, the jcature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should no[ be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (CrrcteOneNumberPerLine~
I. Geomornltolo~y Absent Weak 1\foderate Strom
i] Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 I (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundinc Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3] Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 (2) 3
4) Is The C}~annel Sumous7 0 I (2) 3
5) Is There An Acrive (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
$) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Barilc Present? 0 1
(•NOTF,: I(11cd & Ilnnk Caused Ilv Ditching And {VITIIOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0.1 (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=(3)
No=O
PRIt1fARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 19
Ii.Ilydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is Tliere A Groundwater
FlowlDischar~e Present? 0 1 (2j 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.I3ioloay Absent ~Vcak A'Ioderlte Strom
I) Arc Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Pcrinhyton Prescnt? (0) 1 2 3
4) Arc Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRI1ttARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPcrLine)
I. Gcomorpholo~y Absent ~Vcak A7<oderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Docs Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainacc Way? 0 5 _ 1 (1.51
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3.5

II.Iiydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1.S)
1
.$
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .$ (1) 1 $
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 (.S) 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .$
Last Known Rain? ("NOTF,.• I(Drrch Indicated In #9 Above Sdin This Step And #S Ilclow"1 (1) 1.$
S) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .$ (1) 1.$
G) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes={l.5) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: G.S
III. Biolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fist Present? 0 .$ (1) 1 $
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) .$ 1 1 $
Are AguaticTurtles Present? U .$ I 1 $
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .$ (1) 1 $
S] Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 .$ (I) 1 $
G) Arc Iron Oxidizing I3acteria/Fun~us Present? 0 (.S) 1 1 $
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) .$ 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(" NOTE: IjTotal Absence Of Al! Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Stn This Stcn UNLESS SAV Prescnt*1. SAV Afostly OBL
2 1 Afostly FAC1V
.7$ Alostly FAC
.$ llfostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
TOTAL POINTS (Prinrary + Secondary) =39.5 {If Greater T/tan Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is Af Least
Intermittent)
Comments: Perennial Stream located in bottomland hardwood forest. The bank height is 4 to 6 feet, 10 to 1$ feet wide,
and has a silt, sand, and gravel substrate. The water depth during the survey was 1 to 2 feet.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S7 (UT2 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 18, 2002 Garner, NC 1 mile south of the US Interstate 40 and Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and lmrdowner agree t/cat rJ~e jcalure is a man-made ditch, then use ojthis form is not necessary. Also,
ijin tlrc best projessiorra! judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made dilclr and not a modified natural stream-t/ris racing
system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine~
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is 'The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundinc Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 (2) 3
4) Is T}ic Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is Tlrcre An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
G)1s The Channel Braided? (O) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Baiilc Present? 0 (1)
('NOTE,: /(ITeA&lTankCausedlTvl)itchin~And tV/TIfOUTSinuasitvThen Score=0~) 2 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Clsaiinel (As Indicated
On Topo Map iLrd/Or In Field) Present?
Ies=(3)
No=O _
PRI[11ARYGEORiORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I6
II. ilydrolo~y Absent Wc~k 1\toderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIAfARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.I3ioloaV Absent Wc~k 1~Ioderlte Strom
1) Are Fibrosis Roots Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present Tn Strcambed'~ (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Pcrinlsyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Arc Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRIAIARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (CircleOaeNumberPcrLine)
I. Gcomornltolo~Y Absent Wc~ik 1\loderate Strom
1) Is Tlicre A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 1 (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Diaina~e Way? 0 5 _(1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEOAIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5

IL Ilydrolo~y Absent Weak 1\Toderate Strom
1) Is Tltis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.S
(1)
.S
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 [5) 1 1 S
3) Arc Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 (1) 1 S
4) Is Water In Cltaturcl And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .S
Last KitOlvlt Rain? ('NOTE: IlDitch Indicated In tt9 Above Skin This Step And #S Be%w•) (1) 1.S
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growine Season)? 0 .S (1) 1.S
G Arc Hydrie Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcutl? Yes=(/.S) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: G
III. Biolo~V Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .S (11 I S
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) .S 1 1 S
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) .S 1 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .S (1) 1 S
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .S (1) 1 S
6) Arc Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Funaus Present? 0 (5~ 1 - 1 S
7) Is rilamentous Al>?ae Present? (O) .5 1 1 S
8) Are Wetland Plants In Strcatnbed?
(• NOTE: IjTotat Absence OfAtt Plants In Streambed
As Nored Above Skin This Sten UNLESS SAt~PresenNl. SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 lifostly FACW
.7S l~iostty FAC
.S Dfostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secoi:dary)= 36 (If Greater T/ian Or Equal To 19 Points T/le Stream Is At
Least Intcrmittcnt)
Continents: Peretmial Stream located in bottomland hardwood forest tivitlt development surrounding. Tite bank height is 4 to 6
feet, 10 to 1S feet wide, and has a sand and gravel substrate, with trash throughout. The water depth during the survey was 3 to 9
uichcs.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S8 (UT3 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 30, 2002 Raleigh East, NC Irruuediately south of the US Interstate 40 and Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: /jevaluator and landowner agree that the jeature is a gran-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Afso, if
in the best professional judgement of tlse evaluator, the jeature is a rnau-made ditch and not a modified natural dream-this rating system
should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (CircfeOneNumbcrPerLine~
1. Geomorpholo~y Absent ~Vcnk 1lloderzte Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Se4uence~ 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Stceambed
Different From_Surroundin~ Terrains
0
(1)
2
3
3) Are Nahiral Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Rehc)
Floodplain Present?
0
(1)
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Presents 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Presents 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
CNOTE.' I(RcA<~ Bank Causrd R~~ DitclrinQ And lVITIfOUT Sinuosity Then Score-0'1 (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man And/Or In Field) Present~
Yes=3
___
Nn=(0)
PRIMARY GEOAiORPIfOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 11
t1i. Flydrolo~y Absent Wc•~k Moderate Strom
1) Is Thcrc A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIBIARYHYDROLOGYINDIC~iTOR POINTS: I
iII.I3iolo~y Absent Wc~k Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambed~ 3 2 (1) 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) I 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) I 2 3
PRI~fARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (CirclcOneNumberPerLine)
1. Gcomorpholo~y Absent Wezk Moderate Strom
)~ Is Thcrc A Head Cut Present In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Potnt In Ch~nneh 0 5 (1) 1 S
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 (1) 1 5
SECONDARYGEOrIiORPIfOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

II. Hydrolo~y Absent Wcak 1ltoderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Lcaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1 5
1 (5) ~'
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debns) Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lmes Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 (.5) 1
Last K-town Rain? /*NOTF,: /tDireh Indicated In #9 AGoi~e Skin This Sren And #S Below*) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
G) Arc Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ Yes=1.S lYo=(O)
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
III. Riolo~y Absent Wcak ATodcr~te Strom
1) Arc Fish Present? (0) 5 1 15
Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AguahcTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 15
4) Arc Crayfish Present? 0 (5) I 1 5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 (5) 1 1 S
6) Are Iron OxidizmQ Bactena/Funi'us Presents 0 (5) I 1 5
7_) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 I 15
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(* NOTE: IJTolal Absence OjAI! Planes In Streambed
As Noted ALove Skin 7h_is_Stcn UNLF,SS SAV Present*). SAV 1ltostly OBL
2 1 lltastly FACW Mostly FAC
(.75) .S Mostly FACU Dtostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (I'rinrary + Secondary) =22.75 (If Grcatcr Than Or Equa! To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Lrlermitterr[)
Comments: Iiiterniittent Stream located in nuxed piiie/tiardwood forest with I-40 inunediately to the north. The bank
height is 2 to 3 feet, 5 feet wide, and has a sand substrate. There was no flowing water during the survey; however, the
pools contained water.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S9 (UT4 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 30, 2002 Raleigh East, NC 1,500 feet nortlnvest of the US Interstate 40 and Rock Quany Road intersection.
*I'LEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree t/rat the feature is a man-made dit[h, then use ojt/its john is not necessary: Also,
if in !lre best professional judgement ojthe evaluator, the feature is a ratan-made ditch and nat a modified natural stream-!/ris rating system
s/:ould not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLiae~
I. Geornornholo~y Absent Week I~loderlte Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? (0) 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0 (1)
2
3
3) Are Nahtral Levees Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? (0) 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Reltc)
Floodnlain Present?
(0) 1
2
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvral Denosrts Present? 0 (1) 2 3
8) Is T}~ere A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Contmuous Bed & Battk Present? 0 1
('i1'OTF.: !flied & IJankCaused /1vDitchin~And ff'ITIIOUTSinuosity Then Score=0*) (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AruUOr In Field) Present?
Ye__s=3
No=(O)
PRIMARY GEOBfORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
II. f~ydrolo~y Absent Wcak I<loderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Dischar~e Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIt1fARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
IIT. Biolo~y Absent Weak 11Toderate Strom
1~ Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed 3 (2) 1 p
3) Is Pennhyton Present? (0) l 2 3
4~ Are Bivalves Present? (01 1 2 3
PRI~IfARY13IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: -t
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNutnberPerLine)
L Gcotnorttbolo~v Absent Wcak 1\foderatc Strom
1) Is There A Hcad Cut Present In Channeh 0 (5) 1 l 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Pomt In Channeh 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Nahtral Draina~c LVay? 0 (5) 1 __ 1.5
SECONDARY GEOAfORPHOLOCYINDICATOR POINTS: 2

II. Hydrolot?y Absent Weak Aoderate Strove
I) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present 1n Streambed?
1.$
(I)
$
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (S) 1 1 $
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? (0) $ 1 1 $

4) Is Water In Channel Atrd >48 Hrs. Since 0 .$
Last Knor~7[ Rain? (*NOTF,: ItDiteh Indirnted In #9 Alcove Skrn This Step And #S ltelow«)
(I) _
1.$
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .$ (1) 1.$
6) Arc Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ _Yes=1.5 No=(O)
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.S
IIi.I3ioloey Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fislt Present? (0) $ 1 1 5
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) $ 1 I $
Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) $ I 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 (S) 1 15
S) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 (S) I I $
Arc Iron Oxidizinc Bacteria/Punetts Present? (0) $ I i $
7) Is Filamentous Alcae Present? (0) $ 1 1 $
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambcd?
(* NOTE: If Total ALsence Of All Plants In Strcam6cd
As Noted Alcove Skin This Sten UNLF,SS SAV Present*l. SAV mostly OBL
2 I Mostly FACW Mostly FAC
.7$ .$ Mostly FACU llfostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
TOTAL POINTS (Pri[[rary + Seco[[dary) _ 1 G.5 (If Greater T/iat[ Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is ~1 t
Least Lrtcrmittent)
Comments: Tltis is the same stream as S8. However, this crossing is on dte northern side of I-40, and the stream has been
significantly modified to a ditch. It is perennial and the water was moving slowly due to its close proximity to Wahtut Creek. The
stream is located along the edge of a developed parking lot/flea market with a mixed pine/hardwood on the opposite side. The
bank height is 1 to 2 feet, 4 feet wide, and has a silt, sand, and woody debris substrate, with trash throughout. The water depth
durutg the survey was 6 to 12 inches.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basut: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S10 (Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 1, 2002 Raleigh East, NC 1,500 feet north of the US Interstate 40 a nd Rock Quarry Road intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and landowner agree that t/re feature is a marr-made ditch, t/ren use ojthis jornr is not necessar}:
Also, ijin the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the jcature is a man-made ditch m+d not a modified natural stream-this
ratings}~stcm should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumGerPerLine~
I. Geomornholo~y Absent Weak ]lfodcratc Strom
11 Is There A Rifle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 (2) 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is Tltere An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 1
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
R) Is There A Bankfull Benc}t Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Banl: Present? 0 1
(•NOTEr ltBed & Bank Caused By Ditching And JVITIlOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0') (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=(3)
No=O
PRI<<1ARYGEOhiORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I8
Ii.IIydrolo~y Absent Wcak Aloderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
FlowlDischarQe Present? 0 1 2 (~
PRIt1iARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
IIL Biology Absent Wcak Atodcratc Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
2) Arc Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 _ 2 3
PRIIIIARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNurnbcrPerLine)
I. Geomorpholo~y Absent Wcak I1loderate Strom
1) Is Tltere A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
_.5_ 1
(1.51
SECONDARY GEOAiORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5

II._Ilydrolo!?y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
I) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present 1n Streambcd?
1.5
(1)
5
0
2_) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 1 (1 5)
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 (1 5)
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
bast Known Rain? ('NOTE: If Ditch Indicated /n #9 Abore Skin This Sten And #Slle(ow•) 1 (1.5)
5) Is Tltere Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 .5 1 (1.5)
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=(1.5) No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8.5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 (1 5)
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Are AauaticTurtles Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
4) Arc Crayfislt Present? 0 5 1 (1 5)
Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 (1 5)
6) Are Iron Oxidizinu Bacteria/Fun~us Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
7) Is Filamentous A1~ae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(• NOTE: IjTotal Absence OjAll Pfants In Strcambed
As NolcAAbove Skip This Stcn UNLESS SAV PrescnN). SAV Dtostiy OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW
.75 Mostly FAC
.5 D1ostly FACU 1ltostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYIIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 7
TOTAL POINTS (Printary +Secondary)= 44 (If Grcatcr Thais Or Equa! To 19 Poi~its The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
Commcuts: Perennial Stream located in bottomland hardwood forest. The bank height is 1 to 3 feet, I S feet wide, and has
a silt and sand substrate. The water dept}t during the survey was 1 to 3 feet. Walnut Creek is crossed along Rock Quarry
Road and SouQt Wilmington Street. The above description is for Rock Quarry Road. The crossing along South
Wilmington Street has a bank height of 7 to 10 feet, is 15 feet wide, and has a silt, sand, gravel, and cobble substrate. The
water depth during the survey was 1 to 3 feet.

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S 13 (UT7 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 1, 2002 Raleigh East, NC Located on dte western side of Chavis Park.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the jeature is a n:an-made ditcfr, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, ijin the best professional judgemc~rl of the evaluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch acrd not a modified natural stream-this
ratings}•stcm should na[ be uscd*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrPerLine~
T. Gcomorpl-olo~Y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is Thcrc ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is Titc USDA Texture In Strcambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 l (2) 3
4] Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is "Thcrc An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 (1)
2
3
G) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
7) Arc Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 (3)
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (, 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
('NOTE.: If /led & Bank Caused By Ditching And {i7T/lOUT Sinuosity Then Scare=0'1 (2) 3
10) Is A 2°`~ Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=(3) _
No=O
PRIRiARYGEOIIIORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 18
IL Ilydrolo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is Tltcre A Groundwater
Flow/Dischars~e Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRI~IIARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III.I3iolo~y Absent Wcak Alodcrate Strom
l> Are Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambed? 3 (2) I 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Strcambed? 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Perinhytan Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 ____ 2 3
PRI~IARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNunrherPerLine)
I. Gcomornholo~V Absent Wcak l~iodcrate Strom
1_) Is There A Head Cut Prescnt In Channel? 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) [s There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 1 (1 5)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 _(1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEO~1fORPIIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3

IL IIydrolo~y Absent «'eak 111oderlte Strom
1) Is Tlus Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In_Streambed?
1 5
1
(5)
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debnsl Presents 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Arc Wrack Lmes Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Smce 0 .5
Last Krrorvn Rain? ('NOTE.: If Ditch /ndicat~d !x #9 Above Skin This Sten And #S llelow•) (1) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel Durmg Dry
Conditions Or 1n Growin Season ? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
G) Arc Iiydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcuth Yes=(1 S) No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5.5
Iti.I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Arc Fish Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) Are Amnhcbians Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 5 (1) i 5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (i) 1 5
G) Arc Iron Oxcd~zm~ Bactena/Fun~us Presents 0 (5) 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Presents (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(' NOTE: IjTotal Absence OjA/! Plants In S[reambcd
As Noted Above Skin 77iis_SMp UNI,E.SS SAV Prescxt*l. SAV Afostly OBL
2 1 Dfostly FACW Afostly FAC
(.75) .5 Riostly FACU 1lfostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Pri~uary +Secondary) =36.25 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Iirtcrmittent)
Comments: Peretuiial Stream located in botto-nlaud hardwood forest with development surrounding. A recent stream
restoration project occurred imnediately upstream of the proposed stream crossing. The bank height is 1 to 2 feet, 15 feet
wide, and has a silt, sand, gravel, and cobble substrate, with trash tluoughout. The water depth during the survey was 3 to
9 inches.

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Namc: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Watcrlitte Neuse Wake Harold M. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: ~ Signature:
S 14 (UT8 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
September 30, 2002 Lake Wheeler, NC 4,500 feet south of the old State School for the Blind and Deaf.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the jea[ure is a man-made ditch, them use of this jarnr is nat necessary.
Also, ijin the best professional judgcrncr:t ojtlie evaluator, dre feature is a man-made ditdr and not a modified natural stream-this
rating s}~stcm should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumbcrf'erLine~
I. Geotnorpholo~y Absent Wcak Moderate Strom
1) Is T}tere A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 (2) 3
2) Is 'I'ltc USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundinn Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 (2) 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
(1)
2
•3
6) Is T1te Channel Braided? (O) 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Dcnosits Present? 0 ~1) 2 3
8) Is T}tere A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (2) 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Battk Present?
(•A'OTE.• fflfrd cPc Bank Caused ByDitchinpAnd (VITffOUTSinu 0 1
osity 7hrn Score=0'f (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
Ott Tono Man And/Or In Field) Present? _
Yes=3
No=(Ol
PRIt1fARYGEOAfORPIIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 12
IT. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRI11fARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 (1) 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 I 0
3~ Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRI1tiARY13IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4
Seeondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Numberf'erLine)
I. Gcomorpholo~y Absent Weak 111oderatc Strom
1) Is T'Itere A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (I) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (I) 15
3) Docs Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainace Way? 0 5 ___(1) 1.5
SECONDARYGEO1liORP1IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

II.I-Iydroloey Absent Weak Moderate Strop!?
I) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leatlitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
1 (.5)
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 (.5) I 15
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >d8 Hrs. Since 0 (.5) 1
Last Iinoh'It Rain? (•NOTF.: !(Ditch Indicated !n #9 Above Slob This Sren And #5 llelow•) 1.5
5) Is There Water In Chamicl During Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
G Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=/.S No=(O)
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Arc Fish Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0) 5 1 15
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 15
4) Are Crayfish Present? (0) .5 1 1 5
5) Are Macrobentl+os Present? 0 (.5) 1 1 5
G) Arc Iron Oxidizinc Bacteria/Fun~us Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Arc Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(• NOTE: IjTotal Absence OjAll Plants !n Strcambed
As Noted Above Skin This Stcn UNl.B.SS SAV PrescnN). SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 Diostly FACW Afostly FAC
.75 .5 Diostly FACU Mostly UPL
Q 0
SECONDARYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= 22.5 (If Greater Than Or Egrtal To 19 Points T/re Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
Comments: Intemuttent Stream located in mixed pine/hardwood forest with a railroad immediately to the east. The bank
height is 2 to 3 feet, 4 feet wide, and has a sand substrate. There was no flowing water during the survey; however, the
pools contained water.

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold I11. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S 15 (UT9 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 24, 2002 Lake Wheeler, NC 4,500 feet south of the old State School for the Blind and Deaf.
*PLEASE NOTE: Ijevaluator and landowner agree that the jeature is a ratan-made ditc/r, t/ten use ajthis jornr is not necessary:
Also, if in the bes[ professional judgement ojthe eti'aluator, [lie jeature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream--this
rating system s/could not be used'
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrL(ne~
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Week 1\foderate Strom
1) Is There A Rrfile-Pool Sequence? 0 (1) 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
(1)
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4] Is "I'he Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
(1)
2
3
6~ Is The Channel Braided? 0 (1) 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Prescnt~ 0 (1) 2 3
9) Is A Conturuous Bed & Ban!: Present? 0 (1)
("!VOTE: URcd <g Rank Caused Rv Dirchine And rVIT!!O!/T Sinuosity Then Score=0`1 2 3
10) Is A tae Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map Aad/Or In Field) Presents
Yes=3
IYo=(0)
PRI[1fARY GEO11iORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
IL Ilydrolo~y Absent Welk 11lodernte Strom
1) Is There A Grouctdwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRI~1fARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
IiI.I3iolo~y Absent We~ik 1Vloderate Strom
1~ Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streatnlied~ 3 2 (1) 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed~ 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIAfA1ZYI3IOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One NumberPcrLine)
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Weak 1\Ioderlte Strom
1_) Is There A Head Cut Present in Channel's 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Pouit In Channeh 0 5 1 (1 5)
3) Docs Topography Indreate A
Nattual Dninat*,e Way? 0 (5) 1 __ 1.5
SECONDARY GEOAiORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5

Ii. tIydrolo~y Absent Welk 1•fodernte Strom
1) Is Tltts Year's (Or Last's) Leafltttcr
Present In Streambed?
1 5
1
(5) 0

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Presents
0
5 _
(1) 1 5
Are Wrack Ltncs Present? 0 5 1 (i 5)

4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 (.5)
Last hnown_Rain? /•NOTF, • Ifl)ireh !ndlcnred to #9 Above Skin Thr's Sren And ~iS Aeloiv•) _
1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel Dunng Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
G) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)~ Yes=(1 S) No=O
SECONDARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5.5
III, I3iolo~y Absent Wc11: Moderate Strom
1) Arc Ftsh Present? (0) S 1 1 5
2) Are Amnhtbtans Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
3) Are AguattcTurtles Presents (0) 5 I 1 5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
5) Are Itiacrobenthos Presents 0 5
(I)
1 5
6) Are Iron Oxtdtzm~ Bactena/FunPUS Presents 0 (5) 1 15
Is Filamentous Aleae Present? (OZ 5 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(•lYOTE: IjTotat Absence OjAll Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skin This Step UA'!_ES.S SAV Prescnt•l. SAV 1lfostly OI3L
2 1 Diostly FACW Aiostiy FAC
(,7$) .5 Mostly FACU Afostty UPL
0 ~
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICftTOR POINTS: 3.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =25.25 (If Creator Than Or Equa! To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Lrternrittent)
Comments: Intemuttent Stream located in nuxed pinelltardwood forest with a railroad itntnediately to the cast. The bank
height is 2 to 3 feet, 4 feet wide, and bas a sand substrate. There was no flowing water during the survey; however, the
pools contained water.

NCDWU Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
E. B. Bain Waterline Neuse Wake Harold AI. Brady
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S1G (UT10 to Walnut Creek) Walnut Creek
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
October 2, 2002 Lake Wheeler, NC 3,000 feet south of the Hammond Road and US Interstate 40 intersection
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator acrd landoµ~ner agree that tLe feature is a man-made ditc/r, teen use of this jorm is not necessary:
Also, if in tine best professional judgement ojtlre evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modifted natural stream--tlris
rating system should not be uscd*
Primary Field Indicators: (CircleDneNumbcrPerLiae~
I. Geornornholo~y Absent Weak )\'Ioderate Strom
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Seaucnce? 0 1 (2) 3
Z) Is The USDA Texture In Streatnbed
Dillerent From Surrounding Terrain?
0 1
(2)
3
3) Arc Natural Levees Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 (1) 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodnlain Present?
0 (
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? (0) 1 2 3
_7~ Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 (2) 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 i (2) 3
9) Is A Contmuous Bcd R: Bank Prescnt? 0 i
('NOTE.• /f Red & Bank Caused By Dilchin~ And rVITIfOUT Sinuosity lhea Score=OJ (2) 3
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Cha-tnel (As Indicated
On Topo Map Tlrrd/Or (n Field) Prescnt? Yes=(3)_ ___
No=O
PRIMARY GRORiORPIIOLOGY INDICTi TOR POINTS: 17
IL Hydrolo~y Ahscut Wcak ~Iodcr~tt; Strom
1) Is Tltere A Groundwater
Flow/Discharce Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIAIARYIIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. Biolo~y Absent Week Moderlte Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Strcambed? 3 (2) I 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Strcambed? 3 (2) 1 0
3~ Is Perinhyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
4) Arc Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRI[IiAR Y BIOL OGY INDICT! TOR POINTS: 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (CircleOi:eNumGcrYerLine)
I. Gcomornholo~y Absent Wcalc 111oderatc Strone
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Nahrral Drainaec Way? 0 5 _ (1) 1.5
SECONDARYGEO11fORP1tOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3

IL Nydrolot?y Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1 5
(I)
5
0
2) Is Sedunent On Plants (Or Debns) Presents 0 5 (1) 1 5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 S (I) 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Smce 0 .5

Last Klrown_Rain? ('NOTF..• IlDrtrh lndreated In N9 A6ore Skin This Step And #S l3efox")
(1)
1.5
5) Is There Water In Chamiel Duc-uig Dry
Conditions Or In Growin Season ? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
6~ Arc Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In He3dcut)~ Yes=(1 S) No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: G.5
IIL I3iolo~y Absent Weak A'[oderate Strom
I~ Arc Fish Present? 0 (5) 1 1 5
2) Are Amnh~b~ans Present? 0 (5) 1 t 5
3) Are AguahcTurtles Present? (0) 5 1 1 5
4) Arc Crayfish Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
5) Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 (1) 1 5
6] Are Iron Oxid~zme Bactena/Fun~us Presents 0 (5) 1 1 5
_7~ Is Filamentous Aleae Present~ (0) 5 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV
(' NOTE: IjTotat Absence OjAI/Plants In Streambed 2
As Noted Aboi•e Skin 71Js Step UNLESS SAV Present'). 111ostty OBL
1 I1lostly FACW Aiostly FAC
(.75) .$ t\fostly FACU Dlostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4.25
TOTAL POINTS (Prinrary +Scconrlary) =33.75 (If Greater T/ian Or Equal To 19 Poiuts T/re Stream Is At Least
Lrtcrnrittent)
Comments: Peremiial Stream located in a much disturbed bottomland hardwood forest wiQi development sun oundnig.
This stream is crossed tluee times by the proposed project. The bank height is 3 to 4 feet, 10 feet ~c7de, and has a sand and
gravel substrate, with rip-rap in places. The water depth during the survey was 1 to 2 feet. Most if not all of this stream
appears to have been straightened.

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Assessment for Dempsey E. Benton Water Treatment Plant
April 21, 2006
Project Applicant: City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
Responsible Agency: NC Department of Envirocimental and Natural Resources
Public Water Supply, Division of Environmental Health
Pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. § 113A-1, et
seq.), an environtncntal assessment (EA) has been prepared for the City's of Raleigh's proposed
Dempsey E. Benton Water Treatment Plant (WTP) on Lake Benson. The proposed WTP will be operated
as a base load plant at a normal treatment rate of 14 mgd. The additional treatment capacity, up to
20 mgd, will be provided to allow occasional short term increases in production during wet weather
periods for the purpose of performing maintenance at the E.M. Johnson VVTP. The City proposes to use
the existing raw water intake structure and pump station at Lake Benson dam. Lakes Benson and Wheeler
reservoirs served as raw water sources for the City of Raleigh from 1953 to 1987. The City of Raleigh
plans to reactivate Lakes Benson and Wheeler reservoirs as a water supply source in conjunction with the
new Dempsey E. Benton WTP. Additionally, the City plans to construct finished water transmission
mains to deliver water tlu-oughout the project area. There are approximately 19,100 feet (3.6 miles),
35,300 feet (6.7 miles), 18,400 feet (3.5 miles), and 7,000 feet (1.3 miles) of 48-inch, 36-inch, 30-inch,
and 16-inch finished water transmission mains, respectively. The proposed project will provide the
dependability and reliability of a second water supply source and meet post 2010 water supply needs in
the project area.
The 14-mgd of water supply contributed by the proposed project represents an increase of approximately
15 percent over the existing water supply for the City's utility service area. Additionally, this 15 percent
increase in water supply capacity will be spread across the entire service area, which includes an area over
20 times the size of Garner's jurisdiction in the lower Swift Creek watershed. Authorization of the
proposed Dempsey E. Benton WTP Project will not significantly affect growth rate, final land use
patterns, or development densities in the Swift Creek watershed, as these have been determined by
separate planning and political processes. However, it is also correct to state that the additional increment
of water supply that would be contributed by the project is a necessary factor in achieving and sustaining
a normal rate of growth.
The proposed 309-square mile project area includes city limits, extraterritorial jurisdictions, and long-
range urban services areas for the City of Raleigh, the Town of Garner, and the Town of Rolesville. The
proposed project area is bounded by Falls Lake and the Town of Wake Forest to the north, the Little River
and Buffalo Creek watersheds to the east, the Middle Creek watershed to the south, and the Towns of
Cary, Morrisville, and Apex to the west. The proposed Dempsey E. Benton WTP will be located on two
adjacent parcels east of Highway 50 at the intersection of Buffalo Road. The property is bordered by
Swift Creek to the south and Mahlers Creek to the east.
Swift Creek is classified as a "special case" stream per the 1995 Dam Safety rules due to populations of
aquatic species listed as threatened or endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), and due to classifications of exceptional non-
game or fishery resources by the WRC (15A NCAC 2K.0501[g][2] and [3J). Due to Swift Creek's
1 /3

classification as a "special case" stream, asite-specific instream flow study was required to establish a
tiered minimum flow release from Lake Benson, per 15A NCAC 2K.0502 [c][4] of the 1995 Dam Safety
rules. The proposed tiered minimum flow regime (3 cfs in Tier 1, 2 cfs in Tier 2, and 1 cfs in Tier 3)
represents a 10 percent reduction in the safe yield. The 1995 Dam Safety Rules stipulates that the
minimum release shall be set no higher than an amount which would reduce the water supply yield by
more than 10 percent.
As a result of reservoir reactivation and WTP water withdrawals, instream flows in the portion of Swift
Creek between Lakes Wheeler and Benson and below Lake Benson to the confluence with the Neuse
River will be modified. It was determined through the informal consultation process with the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (iJSFWS) that the proposed water withdrawal and tiered minimum
release schedule may constitute an impact to the federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel (DWM).
Water withdrawals and the resulting Swift Creek stream flow modification may influence the abundance
and availability of mussel habitat and habitat for fish host species in Swift Creek downstream of the dam.
A Final Biological Assessment (BA) was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) in
June 2005 that described in detail the findings of the approach to evaluating the instream flow study
results, the impacts of the proposed project, and mitigation for impacts to DWM. The Final BA initiated
formal Section 7 Consultation under the Endangered Species Act. The conclusion to formation Section 7
Consultation vas a Final Biological Opinion (BO) signed by the USFWS in February 2006. The USFWS
concluded in the signed Final BO that:
"After reviewing the current status of the DWM, the environmental baseline for the action
area, the effects of the Project and the cumulative effects, it is the Service's biological
opinion that the Project is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the dwarf
wedgemussel. No critical habitat has been designated for this species, therefore, none will
be affected......In the accompanying biological opinion, the Service has determined that
the level of anticipated take is not likely to result in jeopardy to the DWM. Since critical
habitat leas not been designated for this species, the proposed Project will not result in the
destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat."
The signed Final Biological Opinion outlines the detailed Terms and Conditions of the Section 7
Consultation. These Terms and Conditions have been declared satisfactory by the USFWS to minimize
harm to the endangered DWM, as well as protect other sensitive aquatic species present in Swift Creek.
A brief outline of the terms and conditions in the signed Final BO are as follows:
1. The City will provide in stream flows that are protective of the dwarf wedgemussel,
including a tiered minimum flow release schedule with corresponding reduction in
water withdrawal rates. The City must monitor and report minimum release flows.
T}ic City must place a maximum threshold on the base withdrawal rate of the Project
and limit the frequency of maximum withdrawal rate operation.
2. The City must design and construct intake, outlet, and minimum flow release
structures at the Lake Benson dam to accurately control the release rate of
instantaneous minimum flows and ensure that the water released is of suitable water
quality for the dwarf wedgemussel and meets North Carolina water quality standards.
3. The City must fund and perform periodic surveys of Swift Creek mussels and dwarf
wedgemussel populations downstream of Lake Benson dam to provide information
useful for revaluation and management of the Swift Creek dwarf wedgemussel
population.
4. The City must fund and establish a flow gauging station on Swift Creek downstream
of the Lake Benson dam, preferably in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey
2/3

(USGS). This flow monitoring station must include monitoring for temperature and
dissolved oxygen.
5. The City must provide for monitoring of water quality, biological indices, and
general stream condition in Swift Creek at three locations per the City's Sampling
and Monitoring Program.
6. The City must decommission Indian Creek Overlook and Mill Run Mobile Home
Park WWTPs in order to improve the quality of dwarf wedgemussel habitat in Swift
Creek.
7. The City must pursue riparian corridor protection for the Steep Hill Creek and Lake
Wheeler to Benson corridors for water quality protection within the Swift Creek
watershed.
8. The City must implement a Public Service Announcement (PSA) plan to encourage
water conservation, especially during periods of low rainfall.
9. The City must adopt additional measures to conserve water usage within the City's
service area.
In addition to mitigation for the endangered DWM and other sensitive aquatic species, the City and
surrounding communities have mitigated for secondary and cumulative impacts from modest growth and
development via strong local programs. These local programs (i.e., land management and planning, open
space plans and initiatives, erosion and sedimentation control, riparian buffers, water conservation,
stormwater and pollution prevention) offset any potential indirect impacts that may result from the
proposed project.
In addition to the strong local programs, the City has agreed to implement a comprehensive Sampling and
Monitoring Program to address any additional concerns in regards to secondary and cumulative impacts
in the service area. The new Sampling Program will cover portions of the service area not currently
addressed in the City's existing programs. The Sampling and Monitoring Program includes extensive
water quality sampling, fish tissue sampling, benthic sampling to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
EPT standard, mussel surveys, USGS gauging stations, and photo-documentation of selected streams for
changes in physical characteristics. DWQ and the City agreed that the Sampling and Monitoring Program
data be evaluated on the five year cycle of the Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan.
The City will work with the DWQ to analyze the data resulting from this sampling program and establish
a timeline so that the data reporting coincides with the DWQ assessment period for the Neuse River basin.
However, the City recognizes that there maybe instances where immediate action could be taken if the
City discovers impairn~ent from a particular source or activity that could be immediately addressed.
Therefore, the City commits to working through the appropriate channels and/or authorities to help rectify
these situations at the time of discovery.
The City of Raleigh Dempsey E. Benton WTP project has been reviewed by the North Carolina
Department of the Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Agencies and has met the criteria of the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Alternatives
for this project have been evaluated and it has been concluded that an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) will not be required.
3/3

Y
~;:~ ,:
- ~Ecos stem
t
.~, f ~ iN a` cy~ A ,~ E~,! ~ 5. ! b., ~ d ti.
PROGRAM
April 18, 2006
Linda Diebolt
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive #300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Project: D.E. Benton WTP County: Wake
l~~~il
~~'~ z /, zoo6
ARCADIS Cera~hty~ M~~ler
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Pcrmit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation arc summarized in the
following [able.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Ri avian Non-Ri avian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0 0.26 0 0 0 0 0 0
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3: I ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of tl~c compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality CertiOcation, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gihnorc, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
1Z.LSt-DYGGL~... F ~ ... PVOtP.G~LyL9 OGLY StGLtL
~~L~
~1CDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS ~ ~ ~~ ,
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO April 5, 2006
Regulatory Division
Action ID Numbers 200320193, 200620626-200620628, and Nationwide Permit Numbers 12
(Utility Line Activities) and 39 (Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Developments)
Mr. Dale Crisp, Director of Public Utilities
City of Raleigh
Post Office Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Crisp:
Reference your permit application of September 22, 2004, for Department of the Army
(DA) authorization to impact 0.26 acre of wetlands and to temporarily disturb 1.42 acres of
herbaceous wetlands and 683 linear feet of stream channels associated with proposed
construction of the D.E. Benton Water Treatment Plant, upgrades to the Lake Benson and Lake
Wheeler Dams, and the construction of a finished water transmission line. The project is located
in tributaries to Swift Creek, Big Branch and Walnut Creek, south of Raleigh, in Wake County,
North Carolina. Also reference the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) biological
opinion, dated February 23, 2006, which covers the effects of the proposed water treatment plant
on the dwarf wedgemussel (Alasrnidotita heterodon, DWM).
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, lists
nationwide permits. Authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was
provided for activities required for the construction, maintenance and repair of utility lines and
associated facilities in waters of the U.S., provided there is no change in preconstruction
contours. Authorization was also provided for discharges of dredged or fill material into non-
tidal waters of the U.S., excluding non-tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters, for the
construction or expansion of residential, commercial, and institutional building foundations and
building pads and attendant features that are necessary for the use and maintenance of the
structures.
Your work is hereby authorized by the above referenced nationwide permits, provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the attached general, regional and special conditions,-and
your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted
plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal
action.
~~.t~~~~
~P(~ Q 7 2006
r,C'r?<t)15 Gzragisty ~ Miller

This verification is valid until the nationwide permits are modified, reissued, or
revoked. All of the existing nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or
revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of
changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public notice when the nationwide
permits are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permits are modified or revoked,
you will have twelve (12) months from the date ofthe modification or revocation of the
nationwide permits to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of
these nationwide permits. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide
permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until
March 18, 2007, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions.
The District Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify,
suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization under any nationwide permit.
Please note that your activity may also require a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). You should
contact the NCDWQ at telephone [phone] to determine Section 401 requirements.
This DA verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any
other required Federal, State or local approvals or permits.
Following our initial review of your application, we determined that the project as
proposed may affect the federally endangered DWM. Accordingly, we initiated formal
consultation with the USFWS by letter dated June 20, 2005, pursuant to Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS recently concluded their
review of the project with the issuance of a biological opinion, dated February 23, 2006.
The biological opinion lists nine reasonable and prudent measures necessary to minimize
the impacts of any possible incidental take of DWM associated with the project. These
measures are stated below:
1. The City must provide in stream flows that are protective of the DWM, including
tiered minimum flow release schedule with corresponding reductions in water
withdrawal rates, and must monitor and report minimum release flows. The City
must place a maximum threshold on the base withdrawal rate of the Project and
limit the frequency of maximum withdrawal rate operation.
2. The City must design and construct intake, outlet, and minimum flow release
structures at the Lake Benson Dam to accurately control the release rate of
instantaneous minimum flows and ensure that that water released is of suitable
water quality for the DWM and meets North Carolina water quality standards.
3. The City must fund and perform periodic surveys of Swift Creek mussel and
DMW populations downstream of Lake Benson Dam to provide information
useful for evaluation and management of the Swift Creek DWM population.
4. The City must fund and establish a flow gauging station on Swift Creek
downstream of the Lake Benson Dam, preferably in cooperation with the U.S.
Geological Survey. This flow monitoring station must include monitoring for
2

temperature and dissolved oxygen and the data will be used to assess impacts to
DWM.
5. The City must provide for monitoring of water quality, biological indices, and
general stream condition in Swift Creek by adding three stations in Swift Creek to
the City's Sampling and Monitoring Program (City of Raleigh, 2005).
6. The City must decommission Indian Creek Overlook and Mill Run Mobile Home
Park WWTPs in order to improve the quality of DWM habitat in Swift Creek.
7. The City must pursue riparian corridor protection for the Steep Hill Creek and
Lake Wheeler to Lake Benson corridors for water quality protection within the
Swift Creek watershed. The target acreage for these two tracts is approximately
862 acres. These additional buffers on Swift Creek will protect the watershed
from additional pollutant runoff and therefore provide some protection of water
quality in DWM habitat downstream.
8. The City must implement a Public Service Announcement (PSA) plan to
encourage water conservation, especially during periods of low rainfall. The
resulting reduced water usage is designed to reduce the duration of low flow
conditions in DWM Habitat.
9. The City must adopt additional measures to conserve water usage within the
City's service area.
In order to comply with the reasonable and prudent measures described above, the
biological opinion included terms and conditions that will minimize the level of
incidental take identified for the DWM. These terms and conditions are non-
discretionary and have been included as conditions of this permit authorization (see
attached).
Please note that operation of the project manner different than described in your
perniit application may increase the level of harm to DWM through additional adverse
habitat conditions. Accordingly, such changes may require reinitiating consultation with
the USFWS.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the issuance of DA permits
for this project, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Todd Tugwell of our Raleigh Field
Office Staff at telephone [phone], Extension 26.
Sincerely,
Jean B. Manuele
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Enclosures
3

~~% y
~~
u~~ ~~ q
1 «
b
~~
~t~ ~_:
as s
~ W
H
J
LL
LL V
0 ~
ZD
OZ
as
o~
JV
a
m

F
~/
i .
~~
c
~~
~~
\ ` ~!~,~ j
~ I 1
9
4, /
• ° urroswLFrcREEx 1
~ . o}{ f~
.~I~ \7~
~ '.\ `
,~ , 1 -~
;. - rowN of caRNER'
- 50'NEUSERNER ~ CDNSERVA7~J \
~RIPARLANBUFFER BUFFER
• ~'' ~x\
/ -~'~.~
I . ~ x~ ~J
1 • - ~~
I~
l ~
~ •. -
a~~~ ' 100YEARFLOODPLAIN ~ ~ ` I
~,~~ -
~~ ~ ~

U r~a~L~c
,.
~.
~~~~
wart's cRmc at ~ n~
~~ e~u~t ocE
~ro u~ r~san.

- - '~~ ~
WETLAND 1
16ACRESIMPACTED
-x x x x x

\1
~~
.... ...•
.. ....... ... .
... ........•. ...• L~~,
• • • ~/ CDNSERVAADN \ +
. . . . . . ~ . . BUFFER 1
. `. .. . . `. .'. .' WETLAND
`. .'. .' LJMIIS 1+
. x
:~. . . .V.~. .~ .~. ~~ ----- -___ -
.`. .
...~SERIVE~R-~~~\~ ~7'
..._~ '- .~M~~~ ~RIPARWJBUFFER "\. ~~1~
,~
I
\ \
o
~~AApp
~111~~5
~a~~~
~~~~m
ffi~~
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
- Z o boo, ~, ~, PROJECT NU16FR
SCW.E IN FEET
1A

,wycs aw is

~,,~~.o.
_ r
~--
cH~
l.~ x ~ j'
NoR-u+l WATER I
LEVEL f ~~
t ~ -
""""""°"`"~ EXIStRIG PIA~IP t' ~ "~ o ,~
STATION '~-. '~~ j
t
a
x
I " -'.
.-
~,'
i~
~L~

-STRENrI IMPACT SfiE S-19
H

i
u
r°
N
O `e
bo
rc~
c ••
o,
>~
Z
9 C
<~
6EDISON
NEW MfA
SCREENS
E>QSINIG ow
Q JU, 100 150
SCALE IN FEET
rM. muc at; o
` ~ ARCADIS

C
3 pus cw a x~ ate. aG
a-.
s~ aoo
,~
TOP OF BAIL( .
~ ~ ~
Tt iif-!5{-17R F~ 914851-SIM
n~ami-rmn
Pao~ECr tmf
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
lffW UL-~V1~ fllVf. Nrt~IAW! OI
TASIf/PFUSE NtI1~BER DRAWt1 BY
PRELIMINARY I~ "°'°`y '"'~` I 1 B
Not #or Constnlction

a~
a~
P
IR
~'
N~
~~
~~
~~
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
r
--
---------------r- --- -- ~--- ... I I
I r---~=------- - ------------=f- I
I r l L~ ~~ o l
I L~ I I IXISTING PUMP TOP OF BANK
II III F_r-~ I STATION
~ , ~___~ ~ II III I • I
I ' ' I II III ~ ~ I
I I I II III ~ ' I ~
~ _-_~ I II III 1=__$ I
I , ul ---------------------1-r--------------------~-Ir-------------~ ,
I ' u. I II III ~; ;
I I I---------------------~-E--------------------I IL -- si--: I ~
~___~ I I I I Ij ----------
,~1 ~ II III
I I ~ II III ~~
I
II 14 I
11 I - ~ ,
tl ,~
II „ ~t
I I
' NEW CONCRETE SiA1RWAY
AND WORK PLATFORM
IXISTING DAM
NEW INTAKE SCREEN
LAKE BENSON
PLAN -RAW WATER PUMP STATION - AT LAKE BENSON
,• . ,O~
S~
~~
~~
0 10' 20' 30'
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
SCALE IN FEEr
NEW 12' VENTURI
(MIN. RELEASE CONTROL)
SWIFT CREEK
© ~ cat ac.
r~ ~ ~
~~ ~~
MiG1I1tS 6dY d NarW Cadnq he
E01 Capo'ab Cady GM. Sidi ]00
Rdd~, IC 77607
Tt i19-651-11ffi Fac 919-054~5{{A
n..o'm6.-rmm
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
~..
Ci of Ralei h, North Carolina
sREEr TmE
PRQIECf WUU~GER DEPARi11EHf 44V
LFAD DESK;N PROF. CfiECKED BY

PRELIMINARY ra~c/Pw~E ~uu~x DR,um ~r

Not for Construction ~ ~„~~ DRA~~~ hu~E,
,~

© ,~aas cat ~.
11'
~~
y/
LS
€~
~'
___
~~
~~
+~
z Si
~~
~~
SECTION -RAW WATER PUMP STATION -NEW INTAKE SCREENS

TAKE SCREENS
~.~~
a ~~ ~~
AitGYYS Cdfl d Nath WmFn k
t91 Gryaab Cad.r OiH.. Sub YO
Rii* NC 21b71
ld 919-934-1232 Fa 913-d51-SNd
PROJECT ifilE
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
City of Raleigh, North Carolina I
SHEET T1ILE
PROJECT IWN~tCER DEPWZfNENT Ib+N~~LER
IfAD DESIGN PROF. CIIEp® 6Y
0' B~ 16' 24'
,,.. ,.. .
SCALE IN FEET
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
TASK/PtWSE hUNBER DRAHy BY
PR~tLIMIPIARY ~,~ NUUBER DRAW,NO NWDI
Not for Construction ,~

© xrxz cst~ ac
RFACE
c
i
SECTION
1.=~.
IXCAVATION
IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
- MANHOLE -NEW FILTER BACKWASH DISCHARGE
~+. ~ a~
A~D1S
AWC6 GY d Natli Cma4w, Yc
801 Caparoh Cmtr Q*e. Sds ]00
Rdi¢~ MC D6P7
Tt 919-BSF-17ffi Fa 919-1b4-5118
PROJECE TlilE
Dempsey E, Benton
Water Treatment Plant
'fir. `"
Ci of Ralei h, North Carolina
SHEET TITLE
PROlEI DEPARIUENT fJ,WA~GER
LFAD DESIGN PRDF. CHECKED BY
o ao' ao' ~zo'
SCALE IN FEET
PRELIf~INARY
Not for Construction
PROJECT NUIIDER DRAW;nIG NU4E3'
~~

N r{
y
r
r
~~ ,~~ EXISTING PROPOSED
60 RCP WEIR
~ r
.,
\~ ~ - - - -r-- - ~ ! , ~~ • CREEK..
''~, # -
~!`~.~ PROPOSED BRIDGE EXISTING
~ HEADWAll. \
`STREAM IMPACT
86..` ~~~`*A~r SfTE No-S18
TOE Of DAM
LAKE
PIHEELER
PROPOSED ENCLOSURE
OVER GATE CONTROLS
~i i~ ~
~-EXISTING
® WATER LEVEL
LAKE
WHEELER
PROFILE
,T ~ -~
ii
-LAKE WHEELER
-PROPOSED BRIDGE
86'-6'
EXISTING 60' RCP
0
w
z
J
K
W
z
w
© AtSJIG cast ~
O IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS rax ~ a~~
0 25' S0' 15' ditw~T ~11~'~VI~
AIYh7S WI d IkkM favin, k
SCALE IN FEET ~ ~ ~ ~
Tt DI9-ESi-1292 Fmc 814.85-5{IS
m.vm6~-u~am
PROJECT TIRE
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
~~^'~.
''
-STREAM IMPACT Ci of Ralei h, North Carolina
Sf1E No-S18 sHEEr ~
~~ f~T~
FnOT i k t1t~DES
PROJECT tIANdJ>ER DEPARfIkM 141114GFA
0. N1T,AtMI ~, -t[F1Dl
LEAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED BY
0.~ ~
IASK/PN0.SE NUMBER DRAWN BY
f0/f1YL 1F9p1 K 1FTlLli
PROEECT NUIfBER DW4YJrG NUIIDER
~~ PROFILE ~ 11
~i
PLAN
0
w
z
J
W
z
w
U
LANDWARD -
TOE OF DAM

1
~ `~v :, `,. ~ ..iE BAIN`VIfATER r f ~.f r ~--~ ~~ ~: ~ 1" ~ .~t~;-
%,~ ~-- ~REATMENT~FACIll~1f~ ~~ I ~ ~1. rt "fir--I I I ~ ~
~-~_ i ,,. , , 1 ~;~t
.~ ~ ~ i L---_r._ ^~ ~ wit ~' ! .{ jil I i I f. ._..-...
~ ~ [;~ ~T
..
~, y ., ~~ 1
j ~ L
o ~=Sheet 7 - 'T ~?J ~~_ ., s.,~ _,_,-t
.. '"`C`'
~~ ~j~
.,t\ ~ ~ ,,,~_
-~ ~~~ ~ Sh.eet 6 __ ~-~`
f ~.._ -! ~
~.
:__ ,! 1
r ,.-
~ ..-
_: ~- i
__ ~-
t-- __- ~ t`~ f '' - - -- ~~
.,l ~`-,,
- ~~
i ~ % `;
-..
1. i'- ' ~--_ _.~ -':l. i ~•,'
1, /.- •~..~.~.T_,~/J ` 1
C .: -.'' ~~ ~ S
,,~ ~'_-rSheet~5 ~-
:. , ~,i - PROPOSED-PIP~LiNE- 1 - t--_-.-. ~, .~
-~ _ r ., - ~ t _ ..~ _ ~ ~ Li.
r_ r ~
___
-
s I - ~ I ` ~ ~ --- -- -4';'e t
r _r ~~
~~-- , ft,, 1
I Sheet 1-1 ~~ -~-~-~~~-;-~ ' =~~~~- _he ~ C
\ `\-~ /f `._i i i _f~ ~-1.. -- r' '-----~\~i~--~~~'~-f1--~ J-ter
-~
__~._'
i i ; ~ -_ .1
--,-------fi- ! t ~`' -, ~~
I1, ~She`~,t
~... ~ ~ 1~
{ I T_ _ `~
I / ~, ~
;- ;
l1 h
~ ~:;
{~~ ~-~ Sheet 8
;/
~' /~~,
`'~. r ~ __
,.
~ _i S-6
•f -
1
'- ,
J '
!~ ;
•.1,ri
G--i
., r !;
~~ ~ ,
~ 1
:~ +; S > t : ~_a~i She~t~
`Shee't'
Index
~:~~ it ~~ , ~ ,l~!
LOCATION~FOR PRgPOSED ~,'`
D.E. BENTON 11VATER 1,,~~,
TREATMENT FACILITY C_.-~
Sheet 2-
S-19
LL
~•~ .`~-
~~-
1A-`EI

y
r•
�S
1 `,*'4
U `
AM
L'
r 1
a. wr O,,n y -i• Y�,.
fift
t40
rr!
Legend
5123 Stream Number
Proposed Pipeline
---Neuse River Suffer
Surface Waters
S2
Stream Impacts: 0.,003 ac
Buffer Zana I Impaa#: 0,055 acres
Buffer Zona 2 Impacts: 0.037 acres
lot
S1 rw
Stream impacts: 0.014 ac
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts; 0.055 acres
Buffer Zone 3 Impacts; 0.037 acres
TrMw
!`
51,
Sheet 2
a

A.
r
` w
1 -
•- i 1 1 1 1 1
PRO:
/ PIP
„ WETLAND -2
-Wetland Impacts: 0.54 acre
J i
A - J •�.3-r � �-Fpp \ice:. t.
'4441'" � 1 mea
..Stream Impacts:0.009 a,
cBuffer Zone0.055
' $4. Zone 2 Impacts:0.037 acre
..fR
� .. • . • � • . ::?tom y�;° 6 _ _..; �.�`i...,•, i .. r ✓ �, P.�S„k..rt ,� inc.,'`� -,�

K
•'i}`
~:. r
~,~ ,r.,t: * ~, ~,
f,~:,~`r~#; Via, ._
}`, F y ~r
~~~` ..x^^^^^^777777+ S-5
._
Stream !m acts: 0.009 acre t
~, .7~.+ Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre ' ~ ~;,'! ~` ' , -~~ ~ ~ ~` * ~ `<' ` rt t R ~ ; ~ ! F f~ ~; >,-~~,.
T
r° ~` Buffer Zone 2 Impacts. 0.037 acre ~ ';~ ~ , •~ _~~ '=~ "'}- + - ` ~ r r~
~`-E, ~,~,~ ~+ ~.
~'`' ~\f~ ~~} ;~. '1 VFW i~ ,, -. M~ ~t -1*` -~~^I-~.; - 2 vt
g `; T ea.t uF
~r ~~ ~ x t -~ - ~' 'f,'1~., ' "t" ~' ~ ~ ~~, 1,
c- ~ c'
Tr.^ . ~ I~ ~ Z ''t <«. J i .t , xis, i ' +• : 7
~ r~. ~,'A \,i .1: ..~.. '~. ~ , ~ r~ ~ ~'. ll~t~,. ~,u, ~1 ~4 r r•~ ~- I ~ ~f `
l• !(!. ~ / ~- .r ~~ ~~. rt`il` ~~qp;,~ ,r •~ . '.l ~~~ `-.~ I ~•~ It .~,~•.I~y.: ~"~ ~ .A ~T;1'~i •~t.,~ ~+ ' ft r 's _ ~r
t:.~ w L~ ~ 1~,~ ~ -
. '~~''' ~,,,'~t ,. $. ,. ~ r y} E, r' 11 ;~w~ y t, .. y ~7t k A y ,K r` nrA 8 -- ~ .. s -,.~
S * ` ~ .A ~ 1 t' ~~ f `r.>„'Itn:. ~ , 13G. 4 _ .. • , a.. F'4
,,. ~j ~y
A ~ rr ~s ~.~ `~l\ t^ F~'~'t\~ •- x° ~ a~.~,i ~ ~~~ ~ >~ tnt s~' ! F 3. ~~ f~+t'~~.1 '~e~7~"gip ~."'~t
,r '\ '~ .r 'ti7+ ~ ~~ x Say ~ .~.''°~~•7~a, ~;6 ~~hP sf ~~, ~('~,p`,~, 4
r°
Legend - ~~ ~ ~a~~~~ ~ ~;.~' ~' z~~ ~,, ',~,~ ': ~~
S-123 Stream Num~ier ~ ,~,~ ~~.~~ ~~~'~ ~~- ~~~~~~. ~ .~,
;~ ~. ~ ,'
Proposed Pipeline , , ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ,. r ::'.~ ~~~ ~a=-
0 800' 1600' 2400'
Neuse River Buffer Sheet 4
Surface Waters 1"=800'
I~

®4R.4f�
S.14
Awl

r .SAF s •
CR
Stream Impacts: 0.009 acre
.4 A 1
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre
(f.Buffer Zone• 0.037
Stream
x.F • � Impacts:'�1 1 1 •
S.1 acre
Buffer Zone• 0.055
- --Buffer Zone• . 0.037
,.
WEfL' .3

Cpl L� 7
k �
! e!.
#': J '� 1 .': �� ,� t'`rf Rf3:+.,Y..�Yt'a:u .ktu' =,r.. ,Rd%.'ij. •
' - ixa
�r
Nr R-
�i,rpp' gs �, Rt fes.
A ........... ...... . .... �+.... w. v.vv.. a..wv yaw M '
"., Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
a IL
4
t '
• p t '
a
i
Legend ' .r
S-123 Stream
Proposed Pipeline"'''
Neuse River Buffer 1 t �soo 0% - •,

Legend
S-123 Stream um �r
Proposed Pipeline
Neuse River Buffer
Surface Waters
S-6
Stream Impacts: 0.014 acre
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
0
VOW
Sheet 8

S-7
Stream Impacts: 0.014 acre
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
Legend
S-123 Stream um er
Proposed Pipeline
Neuse River Buffer
Surface Waters
S-10
Stream Impacts: 0.014 acre
3' Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
/ _
S-9
Stream Impacts: 0.004 acre ► `'`'
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055 acre k `
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037 acre
S-8
Stream Impacts: 0.005 acre
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts: 0.055
Buffer Zone 2 Impacts: 0.037
1w=�. I Shea 9
r

s ~ 1 s + s S 'tij T; 1 ~ t4 +.'°~ ~. !_ i r. C! r > - i „~ 1 r ~ ~ ,.i. ~,
1;~ .. _I c , y^'~ 1•.? ~ M~ ~ -~~'.'151. S~' S y~`'i•,,,~; '° ~-• ~i i" ~ ~ ~° ~ ~ ^ 'y*' . r 'i• I ~r• t~°"_
~~ ~ .' S '^ S~4'#•. a - '' i ~~~ I . i ~~~~skl+~ .~' ~ ^!T r '~~ r.< ^ n_ r ~rl 7~'~'e ~
.., _
` }~•}". JdYe i~ ~1 '~~.~ ~t ~ .~5 s'~.ti~w. °Y ~~ 'X~~~,~~`~ _.~!.~~''f ~~ s v. f~MF'( rr. r2~~E~r~~.
1 f~ ~- ~ a,,: 1 f
~ r- irw~r~,~ ~ ";~~ ~ ~h d i ~'~1:`.~"~~e~.•.~~~' ~:4-r ` _'.' :~i}~t`.u~'r~ ~Y .•*~ t4~~v~ F " ' ,~~('A'rl. ~
d ~ Y..
~~. ~F
~~. ~~ Y. ,~, r~~ `+ f' ~ Streamlmpacts: 0.014 acre ~~,~';'~f ~~:,,',~.. •'~ ,~.Y.,.,~~,,
f; ' ~' ~ ~ c' : _ ''~"" Buffer Zone 1 Im acts: 0.055 acre J>a ~ ' '~ ~ ~~ t ' ~ ~~
~, ;~„ ~ '~ ~~ ~F -- { l~ Buffer Zone 2 Impacts. _0 037 acre . ~' ~ ~. ~i 1~, « K !,
i~
~ti ` ~ .. ~ ,r.• ~, .,, ~-t~ ~a ^. 3 l',~:•; ` f~~>~ ,.. Sd `,~ Ii'''~~~~ c~'?I`11'p ~ ~a ~~~, i
.:.- , -~,~, ~' { xR ~ rrtn~.1, ~ ~ w~ ~ 'u ~~? ~ '~~' ~ r ''~R~~,'l~1,'`'..~,c;. +i••~ ~*~~~. ~F ~ »~,r ~ A '~~~ ~t~Li ~ `
m. ,
• r 4 ~!.. ~~ i Hss t'r.u.t,4~ "'d5. ~'~ , k ~ r~;Tlr ' ,.~ A' q~'~w~ '~~": ~~. ~~M1 ° ~^Tr'~'•~[ ~ '~ .`;~~ ` ~°y*~ r, ~s •~J" ,•~ -~~
'"~ {{pt1C' st z ~.~MC_ p ~ . ' :1 r (!Y+ L!- t K' i =5 ~~Fr,~;- r ir'' ..,, t p~ sr
?"~ t r ~ ~~- • rr~ i~ _ ~ ~~ A r
~, T t- ki e..r a .S x }~ ~ ~ ~.*.. 'f E` 1I: ~~ ~ y~, ..,it f •~-r, `''..r~~~~ 1. i ' :~>< j ~ ~ ,~y_t_. ,.~
~~. ~ ...''fPj,:•.r ~, y.~~"JI t3 'i:.7r'~I s1' A r r ~ ~~~~~~.. ' '1'~t- ,:1...A"'~~T ~~ ~~:.:~ f ~ I
~; ~ fit" `1~
f r lJI,~: ~y ~'~ f!~~~• Fq iy~~ /~ 4 i 'F ~ 4 '~- ~lt ~c.
~`T~r. ve ~± ~Z ~ ~ ~""'~ jN,~# . 1 I fi"~~ ~ ~ aIP. ' ,~ ~ ~ ; ~,~~ r « ~ 4' ~r
~ '",~11r^J ''''~ f '~1~-~ ~.1~ ~7t r ' ~ r ~I i n(#'~ ~ - 'f'' x' ~~*
~' •~ '; - i 1 4 .er- S
. sn i #~
~ ~gypp( ~~, ~,1~ry
'a ~ '!.•~ ~~1'.:~r"r s~f y i"1 ~f~~f''.~a'. .__: rx !-. {R1 ',#I' ijrq~~"'.~
t r ~ `~~
ai:~'47' {~• ' ,t>,1..- `~~,~"'. ~ `s_ ~5 `=f ~~~sia~ rr-. ~e ;~' ~ 1• E r ~ -V7 s,~ f,
• 'r I .mss] hr+w.+ ~ ,I~. w 11~r ~ . ~ t f
r i tl ~ ~~'~to~ ~f~ i 1 ~ '1 R^-r r~ A`~~+~t + ~. ~ ~' t r t~°}l ~' ~ *:
t' ~ r ~a. '
)t ~ t Y ~ •~
~-;~rt I f~~ ~,F~~{~ J)li t --.~.. ,1~A ,4,~}65s ~ ; ~+r~ X•... ! ~~t~~?w,'~~ 1
Legend «~Ir' ~ ~, ~ ;~~ ~' ~~ ,~~~ ~~i~ , ~ 's , , ~ ~', ~
-'~. ..,,. ~... - w~ '
I •~ `
S-123 Stream Num er ~ ~ - ' ~~~ , ~:^" ~~ I ..~--- ^-~
Pro osed Pi aline `~`.~ ~~' ;~ ` ~~ `~ ~ :~ ?~
P P 0 800' 1600' 240
Meuse River Buffer
Surface Waters r~eoo'
~..I
7"
~t 10

~ DWQ# (~I OOH 1`~-~ Date ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f) Who Reviewed: ~
Plan Detail Incomplete _
^ Please provide a location map for the project.
~fZ~\ Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the siteplan.
^ Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan. 1 1 ' ~ ~ '
Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. t ~ v
s~~~
L ^ •Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. ~~ __ 1 ~ 1 ~~ ~~ r~~
~(~ `gy`p /'--_ ~~ Pl e indicate the location of the iptected buffers as overlays on the site Ian. ~ ~~` ll~ _ I- "
~ ,Sul ~ SUIi'~. 't,0 CQ9A~lt~ S hc-tr1 Zo r~~ t +- Ld.r't, ~P -f'o }~ O..CL~~, ~~ ~ -~,~
•\ ~'~ ^ Please locate all isolated ornon-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
.~ 5 ~-ii~
~~~-~ ES ^ Picase provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage. ~ ~-r~.50~1~
^ Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
a''~~ ~ ~ ~
2 ~ ^ _ Please provide the location of any proposed storriiwater management practices as required by GC
~`d Pc~,~
^ Please provide detail fot the stoimwater management practices as required by GC }~,~, ~1
~,,~• ^ Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions. ~-,ti.~y
--~~.5 ~' ~ ~^, Please indicate all stormwatc'r outfalls on the site plait. _ ,, l
t, ~~ L ~{J Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. ~ s t.~c ~-}o ~ ' `~-~~ C~ ~' t~ ~'-~=..~
^ Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
kc~- _
Avoidsince and/or Mlnlmlzatfon Not Provided
i "' ~~~ " --}}~~ . ^ ~ The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
S ~`9~ information as to why it is necessary for this project.
^ This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
^. This Office believes that the .labeled on the plans as
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
^ The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwntcr can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
^ The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ .This additional fee must be received before your application can bereviewed. /
^ Please complete Section(s) on the application - ~ ,~ C _ /.
^ Please provide a signed copy of the a lication. /V
PP _
^ Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information;
. _ ^ Please submit elec,; onic CAD files showing , via email to [e-mail] y•1 CD;
Mitigation
1 (; nom' `~'~ rY.
« ~ ~ of compensatory ~~ ~ ~tnitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
^ Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.

Large Timc on Labor Day!!!
Subject: Large Time on Labor Day!!!
From: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, OS Sep 2006 09:47:07 -0400
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
CC: Chuck Wakild <[e-mail]>

Ian:
I reviewed a number of PCNs. My comments are below and on BIMS.
_*20061042 Ashton Hall S/D - Granville County*_
I may not have all the maps for this project. I have an overall Lot Layout map, a
culvert detail sheet, and a standard level spreader cross section from the Town of
Cary (no clue why).
There is no indication on the figures I have as to where the wetland impacts are.
Six impacts listed totaling 0.33 acres. I assume these are associated with road
crossings, or I would imagine they would have submitted for another permit (NW 39?).
The three stream impacts are listed as intermittent impacts. However, the widths
are listed as 18', 12' and 12'. Pretty big intermittent streams. I will check with
Mike, as he did the buffer calls. However, there is no file on this buffer
determination in our file cabinets (NBRRO #04-337).
There is a strange discontinuity shown on the Lot Layout plan in the NW portion of
the site, where the stream and buffer abruptly end, and then reappear somewhat
skewed west from the alignment further south. You may beend to take a look ath this
to understand what I mean. Also, a road is shown over what should be the center
line of the stream in this discontinuous area.
Has the SW Plan been submitted yet? Where are the treatment structures going to be
located?
_*20061265 Irving Parkway Extension - Holly Springs (Wake County)*_
This one needs an IP call; I am scheduled to meet with Holly Springs on this one on
September 13.
Also, do they need to do a cumulative impacts evaluation? The road will lead to a
Holly Springs compost facility (to be constructed), but it looks like it may also
result in road frontage for some other privately-owned properties.
*20061144 DE Benton Water Treatment Plant - Wake County
*_200 feet of permanent perennial stream impacts, and another 121 feet of temporary
perennial impacts. Mitigation required???
I am kind of unsure how this is all considered one site, as it involves two lakes,
a facility, and pipelines. I guess USACE makes that call.
This may not be something we can comment on, but the FONSI for the project states
that no impacts to the Dwarf Wedgemussel will occur due to water withdrawals.
However, Section VI.1. of the PCN states that "The flow of Swift Creek from the Lake
Wheeler outfall will be temporarily halted during the construction of the weir".
How long will the flow be halted, and will this have an impact on downstream aquatic
habitat?. May not be our call, but I had to ask.
*20061393 Garrison S/D - Holly Springs (Wake County)
*_Level spreader design drawings not included; are they earthen or concrete?
NOTE: Road crossing to north connects with existing subdivision street, per Wake
Co. GIS.
1 of 2 9/5/2006 9:49 AM

Large Time on Labor Day!!!

I have no problem issuing this one after we verify the level spreaders are concrete. 1
Let me know if you have questions about any of these.
Eric
Eric Kulz <Eric.Kulz(a,ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist III
Surface Water Protection
NC Division of Water Quality
2 of 2 9/5/2006 9:49 AM

ARCADIS
630 Pidzo DrNe, Suite 200 • Highlands Ranch, Cobrab 80129
gel 720/344-3500 • Fax [phone]
ITEP~1 DESCRIPTION VENDOR NO VOUCHER NO AMOUNT PROJECT ACCOUNT

~ ~ ~~~~ I ~~`~
~l~
~ ~ ~- c D ~~
~ ~~ D
D ~"~~
~~ ~~°t ~
S JUL 2 2006

Y
C /10 A %'~(~- [~"/ DENR - WAT
1VE7lANDS Ati9 S7 R QUALIT
, !,{WATER BRANCH
\ ~~

,�1yQNV2! S��d
It9 t t89 L
i T/35
by���bV�� 1v75 Trds
9YM9-iS9-8t6 w! � �
A rttpr0 9".0 F" SgV3I�lam mm spo"m
siaviuv w
SlIV130
IOWN03 NOIS083
BUIP83 WJOoN `401!9192110 1413
Weld luaw4eaJl Aft
u04ua8 r3 Aesdwea
NOadPMM 311'0 03 M
0£00'LZO£OLON
�� xMMrda
u�nrrl ,
Ire -A
:
AS Rem
93"0 1311 Md
00
RM ro
>8 aDma
WOO aril
ow 'a
Wdem>H li
,�1yQNV2! S��d
It9 t t89 L
i T/35
by���bV�� 1v75 Trds
9YM9-iS9-8t6 w! � �
A rttpr0 9".0 F" SgV3I�lam mm spo"m
siaviuv w
SlIV130
IOWN03 NOIS083
BUIP83 WJOoN `401!9192110 1413
Weld luaw4eaJl Aft
u04ua8 r3 Aesdwea
NOadPMM 311'0 03 M
'A31
A" TA NOd 03'69 1002 Nm 9Z
r
Nam AM lxat Mai 03159 "a ma a,
a
"% MOd 0159 SOP, "111
O
MJ 38 ams Mod MnM soot ma zo
a
sola Hal mm Sao, w o1
0
'�►9 '1PI9 9mV99V 900L Q
TWS ON
nW ON 9Z3t ONION3A N0110310dd 3381 ills NOUNIM00
30N33 ills L n
lsod
iTw a� man a� I I � II
Lsod n n 39 OL MWA �s i )MR OD ,,t I 1
Ow mmli .z4 3NM9 1 431d10S� I l
x3 mm USE I I .91 midM15 I`� 1 I � ,t � � I I
L.
39 0l mm 7LiLYd .9 i otl3mm � I I MYMOLd Om6MImN
rl I I \ NOTd "t TEO MB voomm a
Mata —anla ONSWISM raw 33
cmTROM .M . Ima 01 spo TM M 00 "MMU
ILS ONON S'IMdtilN $L - .09 P/ 91915 Pam T
mm 'OIAmMO jD NDIQ1d11D7'I1M1 NMNMII I
ow mm ND A"3oN37 IIS TM9i Z I I mN S>11 m NO N9mB 3[ 999 MM IIS TIYLSM z SM" TMI .tHA
_� .A -,s 30 X~ V MM 39 OL SM'M't
,0-.S i0 W~ V mm m M !m I= It r SlDll[iJ XM1 .0'A I '=
:Y;zal
3WX ON SZ31
ONION33 N01103108d 3381Im
8
1SOd OOOM��
IN
Mt
'53311 O1 SNDB TNN J0I1
W.
4taat m tterOtam roma law
>m m�
Oa SWMN SL - AS N 9= Tmm Z
lMMP3 MMI I
amr
MD XML31 A9 03lMU�LYIIMII 9/ t
I
0919+8 9NIaKI.d FB31 30N111D
SOI�IWo NOANMmiS 3I31M OM KM TNLSIM�
yrw so srrr �nwo
a t am
S?I1110D 'xM .Q-.Ot
4t[t>tl
s�io twr rho Irc r �. 37M ON
TMS ON 9M
N011tfl3b'1SN1 313388 J18b80dW31 6
1tYY OrrYw rY r dlmFr 7YM 7
3NJS ON SZ3t
NMIG 3dOls AWI AR 5
V NOU33S
3NM ON SZ3t
N01103108d 1311(10 8`88818 l
T,ouro931t xlMt
m3IN malnLvm Tr anerl5 4au lr9itstlo� U; ATLLM R ro
7OMM 3LL d0 WMLMS
y i�1Um su irowom RCMIIIIS AwAsm ow M3LLS
MMM 3 L NPM Mw ATl[ddOMd 9 NOMdM 3LL AMU MW B
19x9 `Iw v AVM Alu Ms MD V3NM MLIG 13N1 NO
01
% .Via on 30 Ar TWI ON�iWl9 30 �mL� ra t�d/�3i�1�90
'marls TM mN P1 MHMH TNMN'OMNI 39
TME L '9NDA8 AM" mm NO 3OIS ffm 30 AMI dM A '9
'r0 3OIS IM9CMM
31L SM U 7138 TrM MAM 34130 SSd10CMLL Mmlw 3LL 9
mm 3m ONlmMI
WN aL 391,I M Uf9 1m111 M A9 a3mrld 38 Al MAI
MM MW 3I 30/1831 WOW 9 3NNMG MA JJ 110
W� KW RM OM M 3MId Ni1109N'WXV ON dr11dM
IO ONK" �mL'AIOMd AllDda9ld 3mB*& SM L
t
9Nid X NO wm6 mm ONI m
mll03dS sm at RIDm LSM am= 13A M9 mN MA 3N1 Z
*MMM doM ML S19WA M A9 UM 39 OSN AYR IM
=3*VA 3LL A ALE= M �3mQ1�M 3�iL N aMM TH
SM UMM 3K
sMcrloi dMMam aNvIxllid Ml WA S 3tt MU SIMM 'I
Imum
'xonlldDlldar
aMIM SM 03&r SO TN (W ,AALidoSd d0 aWM SMIMM M VAO M 31 ANI San
A'MtMO M 'a:WWM ATIxwfiML3d Mg SMI MY mL'i310Md 31L MM VW M AMrSMM
Mn ,k,WNM d aW WMM Ala; MW 3110 =AM OMIIOda1S mN IMO 3d=311 IMM
WROM
-am= "OM wm mA im TN 3Z119ds mrm mro
PI IN 31L A dDL 3LL MW 1d t 01 SSBI ON 30011 3910 03LTrd M '09135 3 L MW V
Nown
MU HM 31L7310Md AT3MO3mM OW 3d015 WdD 30L 31L 000 WMq 3N1 MW "
77NM '!d Ot NMLL mm ON MMA MWIS Mo SL31 M IWMI MRO
3LL im NOU.'13S m9otoc3 3u N31S1d AT3MtM 1.7N SM.9M AMM 1 3d 6 TTN .p�ltt W '39
Md015 3W M aW IM dDL 'Ad 1 'NId30
Ad 9 t dm SNm'IOMO Mt SMI 38015 34L !D dot 3LL V NIM 3 L iliM TId PALL 3MICi13 Y
S310I1 9 o3.iJ9f3 01 lml 5131 M Nm1�35 37M9N3 3LL CNiWW mN am IN X &M QM T
13lllO SU aMMOt 3710 3LL N30N1 3dk d0 N0118S V" 311 MM NMg6
9umm ON glgpw 5 Ty a3xm IML w Im m99IUM M1 M 9MO 3dDs 3DYtd 't
Lv
MS ON =1
831113 83SI8 NISVG HOl`d0 9
d@ arra aura tam vu as m Mrr OW., m t
decor ,aw u
mm aasr nwa an ant sort mm a .r
w Sam acmam -7
(SLM3MII 3dld 9NLLSIX3)
•9'INL+
Ca
c
•ll'
Irr'�
we
mm" am m-TS3M
ON - M PMit m 13911D Sad
3wis ON
W.
4taat m tterOtam roma law
>m m�
�'w
aM wrwrts
�"r � rwr
amr
wrw rrrt
7NIM t�i
istart r a ser srrmw WOW
and
yrw so srrr �nwo
a t am
srt w rrr w r nr
s�io twr rho Irc r �. 37M ON
�I 111E - 'C.
oll .1 //.//..P . \
T" ON SZ3t
NISV83 831113 1N3W103S U
9/= *= rararWm
av macaw •Ma w tar !++arra rr m rano x ser sow arrltrm 7w ow mora+ x mala
zmrara arta a as -W" x ttrr emntrm w r taw -aa
0- atOr man m nOraarr x JO ll�f W1 J/w —m Xmll w IN "err w 0 m Imf x rm L f1 p
waw r r u alar a arra+ x a ram x for xaIO�Y arr INN "= tar aru0 amt 7amna x MDr
aw !MM x A stir am�waMoo x sr+r ar soar 7rorm mauoo r
r a0�m1 no� 3m on at Ito >IDIrr ow �Lr� wOrtli ww�� a mea ®r o OW r+r► Lomsmwwro+ iatw
3�A9R31�
rw
7;5;7
rmr
ww Ma rrrr a 7 — rM War Wmr loam
ff
3S
W.
WON
x+11
nrlu
3dG6 306 t t
.K317!I
MUXMtly
9
>e ]mrrr mmY 7@XW
3d0ll1!
306 lZ
t
i/l —+near! ®tMtra
I�'
(A1 Li at
\\
-
MNOMM .t
NMI du
•tz OnLUS
r9mP
70Ti39 HAM HUTWL31r11 -MMGL'fIdI100 NOW 35(1 T
iao� TM
aw axawrr tar r r amu
owl h M>tm "
.9 lim �AMO.d
.S1pLLgWA3ds dGNrilll Ot OMtpO=
a m rant 0900+!+ na tou
saw r are r nor rrsra r e
tlmrc /
�de
eNM¢;os h a�eru 3e Tmis la[3a
97N wnw tar r OIDfr
��
Sir (34 9 ONm3OM0 IN
I
ppw/ ffij�/1Mr taw
t0r M
i �g1•� J
grAW 3amm so 35n
ifr 1• MIO t[a•1:
'ttaal rr xovr p sna0
C
�_
77!rt
5�
�� lil 3971/18 M 009!
aO r m®1 r - rJ
Ih0IM NrW '19aW brr M7
. C
"�saam9IASI
.EL
am
INI
ww Ma rrrr a 7 — rM War Wmr loam
ff
3S

1.9NLE SHONE oR 3• - 4• RAIRDW BWAST 9WL ff LSED PAD TO BE EO' L x 25 W x frD AT A
MNLLLIL
2. TIRIWC MOI IS SAEEMCIENT TD AOOOWOM LAKE IBM s TO R PROVmE1.
3. ENTRANCE(S) SHOUD BE LW=10 MICE PIR W1aIM UNITY M ALL GONSIRLICIgN VDCIFS.
4. EMRWEI[S) MUST BE MAIM ED N A CON TION WHISH MALL PREVENT WWc OR CEW FLDW OF
NEED ONO STEELS. PERIODIC TOPNR<ssNc WITH STONE WILL BE NFCFSW. AOaiDWL STOW TO E
AWMLABIE AT PST WE My MATERIAL NCH SILL WIQS T ONTO THE ROD MUST RE MEANED EDP
IMLmaer.
a MFLLDL7EE AT ALL PONES OF NT;R6S A tr1ESS LINToL, sE Is spaLOM. FIEME T W= OF THE
DEVICE ARD TWBY "TOW" NEISf RE PROVROEO.
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
1C24 NO SCALE
DIT LT1YS CCfi iIYK
1. NSLYL SK1JW NUE LOW POINTS OF
THE SEDIMENT FENCE.
Z RACE A RATER OF FUER FARC ON THE
000 WM THE SPILIM. PUCE B
DIM OF THE U'PE R ME N 1E IREKK
1 AOC THE SUM, PLACE ADCtMINL
SIEEL POSTS FOR STREN67N THE POSTS MAT
BE A WXKN OF 2 FEET APART AAD DRIVEN
N SCD WAI D A UMMM OF 18 WWJ6
C PLACE WMARE ODCN (WDDED
"wan SUM WIN Sam x
Nal NDI81 O1 THE UPHILL SOC OF THE
POSTS W NICD TIE 600 STONE N PLACE
L MINE THE BOTTOM W THE HAS CLOTH
M UPPER EDGE OF THE AM FABRIC WN
WE DURST AID THE WE FENCE N TIE
NIMOI AD 6OMPIU THE FEL
6 PLACE A FLIER OF #57 Woo SFOE ON
THE HIlll WE OF RFI =W. FILE THE
ONE TD THE TOP OF THE IWDIYE CLOTH
Aro an THE DIT LEFKEN TME (DIET No
WE SLI FELE,
1. INSPECT SLI FETWI SPILLMS *JEER U&
WWFNL F BOEIICF OF RIDDIIMIG W
1E FELE OR OIRIF7 MIS. MVD: RDWIS
I CDN OUr ACCYE M SED EW is
HEEDED 70 ASSWE PROPER OPERITION OF THE
WERL TEEN THE STONE FUD. PEOOMss
QOQQA RUM THE WN0MW4m SCONE,
OF
a WISHED UNE 'APD REPCON
1 DPA THE AREA ABOVE THE O1JW NG
TEEM. 9AE = REMOVE THE OTLET ND
DISPOSE OF NIOPERIN. PI imy SDisRE
1E MFA WHERE THE DUILET M LOCIUM
SILT FENCE SPILLWAY
1C24 NO SCALE
dy
On WIDTH OF PIE BEAM AS REppIEO
WASTERINCE PIM
ALL OWN AD SEDIo1o0pN CONTROL WASUREs SHALL. BE WSPELTED ITCHY
—_ on B Ie.
IPS NO AFTERPROOUCNG WMALL. STWORES TENT SMALL 9:
EINIAM ENT M BE
I. TEMPORARr SEDIMENT ENSIN:
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FTDM THE 1ASN AND THE EPSTN SHALL BE
W.. 230A
RESECREO M ITS ORIGINAL, DIMENSIONS WHEN 1A FOOT OF WNW HIS
ACCIAILILAI�7
�
bE�BE��EC
THE stA.L . THE SKICTiRg►YLBE CHECKED
COHESIVE SOLS
FOR DV4ATE AND THE SPUW SHALL BE MAI WM MM SHALL. BE
CUISS B SIM
REPAIRED LLEDLQEIY. WHEN SETTLEIMT OF THE EMBANKMENT OCCURS. FILL
SALL EE PLACED SET INCHESF NSNGN 5 ABOVE OCAAOE, STNS SHALL BE REPLACED
was
WHEN DISPLACED FROM THE FLNR
CHECK'DAM
IC24 NO SCALE
11� TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
1C24 NO SCALE
j 4 SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION
1C24 NO SCALE
UATERIAL RPM
TDF'ORAIH' LININGS; SHALL BE AMERICAN DCDSOR DOMI' M,T (AERO) CLOW L AEC
PREMER SRW,. 088 IE». S LEramwllDHa LNNIM SL OR ELR KW HOW
HATRED FOR s FPS DID 11 LIE/SF SEAR W4 M.
PERMANENT L)lIGS SHALL. BE 9 RIOSDIMEON S 7RM 1010 PERM IM MMT OR
WAKENT SOL FILLED PDRMAI M MQRNG.
MALRA71ONN
PROOUCTS DESIGNED TO CONTROL EFEOSION SFDIAD BE ISI LLW N ACCORDANCE WITH
1WIFACTLIEM ENSIRUCTIOS. ANY MQ OR SANT TYPE PROM LI ED AS A
TRCTECIK s �M "D PROVIDE COVER W AT LEAST 30I OF THE S WA E WHERE
D.
1. APPLY LIE, !FERTILIZER AND SEED HFORE W= THE NET OR MAT.
I Suver LAYING 11E NET FROM THE 70P OF THE CFMHIi1 OR SDPE AND LINOLL T
LOIN THE WRE. ALLDO MEETING TO STAY LOOSELY ON THE SOL OR MACH DOVER
BIT WITHOUT WRINKLES — DO NOT SAERCN
a TO sECUHRE THE NET, BURY THE LLPUPE END N A Sar OR TRDICL ND LESS THAI I
INCHES DEEP. COVER WTH SOL, AND RLP MU. STAKE THE WE EVERY 12 NOES
ACROSSSTRIPS OF rE1r°P00 AM LO WE 1rr �ADJACENT ARDLIND � SHOIAD EAND OVERLAPPED WHERE 2
3 INCHES AND SWLED TOGETHER. EACH SERF W MEETING S10u D AM BE STAPLED
DOWN THE CE TM EVERT 3 FT. DO NOT STRETCH 71E RET WFEII APPLIED SPREEL
4. TO JON TWD STRIPS CUT A TRENCH TO ANCHOR THE Be OF THE Har NET. OVERLAP
TIE END OF S ROLL 12 NaFS A D STAKE OW 12 IN JUST SUM
1 WII W ANNE
OVFRAP JON E;M TI ZINC DRAG ASPECT ALL MLLES PERIODICALLY, ARD AFTER RAINSTORMS TO C ECIR FOR RLL EROSION.
AND OVEfI.MAG DISLONION
WOW COMM R PAIR WHERE SLOPE 0KC RESM. AND Rf KI. MMOL CWMEE
INSPECTIONS INR VFDEUM S FELLY ESGBISED.
>!� EROSION CONTROL MATTING PLACEMENT
1C24 NO SCALE
2. TEMPORARY I= CJEEX DAM:
MUM TIENT NO RE3TORE SEDIMENT STORAGE AREA TO RS DRINK
DIMENSIONS WHEN S=W AGC MN TO THE WXMIM DEPTH ALLOWADD
SWOT TO FIM BEAN As IELTESSw TO "M am DIMENS10IM
1 SU FBM -
ANY FABHIC WHICH COLLAPSES, TEARS pebMOSES OR EECOIES MEIFELTM:
SMLL EE WLACED IMMEDIATELY . SEDIMENT DEPOSIS SIAL IE MOM IIFEH
SEDIMENT BEHIND THE FENCE WATCHES SIX NOES
4. STOODILES:
STOCIPLES $NULL K CHECKED EOR sFDIEMATDN ARD SWJIZATEIN.
A SEEK FETTWK AFD MUNINQ
SEEDED AIM SMALL E WWFED FOR FM.LIE AND NECESSARY ROME AHD
RNSEFDNCS SAL BE ME WITHIN 7HE SNE WASOK F POSSIBLE
L CONSTRUCTION DTRANCE AND EXT:
Wr= Cg6RI1C110N RDW 9IFACE RDIIARIY, MMAIRM N A CONDITION W
PRIEVENT %DIENT FROM IFAWID THE SHE, AND TOP NRH ADDITIONAL STORE MHN
NEEDED. SWEEP COSTING REAM TO REMOVE ANY ArQRUATED SEDIIDNC
T.7EIEOPART DNERSOH MIM
MMD SEDIMENT FROM THE RDW ARE► AND REPAN DNERSIDN RIDGE AFTER EACH
RVMFALL
I. QMYEL INLET PROTECIM
REMOVE SMIEMD NT FROM ANNET AFTER UMSTCRY. CLEAN OR REPLACE
NE
STOAs NEEDED.
END OF STORM WAN
r
IV
PROTECTION OF STORM DRAIN
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1024 NO SCALE
r r
/IE k N",
no
COMM r
R1ODR
GNU FILM
r r r
� TRAVEL
QNB t aim
Ir
i\\OHO iii
DROP INLET
L 1HE FIDWUt1ON 9HOLED BE DLOILDDED AT LEAST 2 INCHES BBA. THE CREST OF THE STORM CAAII PLACE THE MTOM ROW OF III=
AMM THE EDGE OF THE SRAM DRAM FOR LATERAL S PFW NO TO AVOID MOM WHEN 0VE FRDW OCCURS. F NEEDED CNE LATERAL
SUPPORT 70 SIJEISEMW Ras BY FLAaRG 2 x 4 WOOD SHEDS 1HIDIRN WIM OPeffiCs
I CARE11ILLY FT N1iM E an OR DOI+PAHABEE WOE MSH WITH in -MM OPENINGS OVER ALL 8L= OPENINGS; M HOLD CRANEL N PLADE.
a USE CLEAN GRAVEL 3/4-10 1/2 -IDH M W&7M PLACING 2 INCHES BELOW THE TT1P OF 11E a= ON A 2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER AND
SMOOTH T M AN EVEN OWE DOT JW WASHED SME s RECOMMENDED.
4, F ONLY SFQE AND a4WE1 ARE USED. IDEF THE SLOPE MSM THE NET ND STEEPER THAN 3:1. LEAVE A INTIM 14T WIDE LEVEL STONE
ARE LETWEEM THE STRUCULI E Aro AROLID 71E NET TO PREVENT QWU FRN ENIEANC NEL DH THE SLOPE 70M THE NEW, USE STONE
3 MWaRII NOESTiLICO
N EMMESS OM0F 1R OFLVMER. ON THE SMARMY FROM THE KEEL USE 1/2 - 3/4 -ICH MEL COMM 11157 VMIED STaq Al A
BLOCK & GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
1C24 NO SCALE
IN
K91_:4
ANTI—
VORTEX DEVICE
DESIGN
EINIAM ENT M BE
SECTION OF PIPE. SECLIRE PIPE TO
MRBMIHD.
W.. 230A
A
0
0 0
COHESIVE SOLS
ISSUED OTE 1EscRlmall
PERANTI- IT NETT
I I
_)
TOPis
36. CMP RSM
O
O rITooII LAR ToCORNU S.
0 0
TOP IS""GE CWNJOATED
TEMPORARY FLIER CONE
On 37 WSW STONE)
O O
O
METAL OR 1/R' STEEL PLATE.
PRESSRIRE
RELIEF NOLETi WY
K OMMTTED. F DDS OF
CORNUuTIONS ARE LEFT F"Y
PLAN VIEW
OPEN WHEN TME TOP 15
ATTACHED.
1�
CYU SER B CORRUGATED
KL'�0
METAL PIPE OR FAIRMATED ►ROM
STEEL PLATIL
MN
wm'
—
1. UECYUNOER MUST BE
FIRMLY ►ASn?IW TO THE
TDP OF THE IUM
is x Ir
,,pp�,�LLRR
rsPORr eve scm
M
W �MKM
2- MARS RS ARE WELDED
(7vPL�UW
TO T1E TOP OF THE RISER
OR ATTACHED IY STRAPS
IBM 00jam
DOLTED TO TOP OF RISER
s
SECTION A -A
ISOMETRIC
IN
K91_:4
10' (111L) TOP OF
oeNH"
DIAD -DOTH PIPE I7 ELBOW AND
VX04' THIN CONCAF]E
EINIAM ENT M BE
SECTION OF PIPE. SECLIRE PIPE TO
MRBMIHD.
W.. 230A
--`
ST PRTED R° W`THH
S' MN. SECTION
COHESIVE SOLS
ISSUED OTE 1EscRlmall
PERANTI- IT NETT
I I
OLL
CA� COLLAR(Sy 2THIL
36. CMP RSM
TOP FETE SECIM - 23U
IN
K91_:4
PERFORATED 38• FEW X N OLEOS SLOPE
NO r OC ONSIDE PIPE POND BOTTOM
CORRIJQAFM
1-RSER 6BE
DIAD -DOTH PIPE I7 ELBOW AND
VX04' THIN CONCAF]E
I
SECTION OF PIPE. SECLIRE PIPE TO
MRBMIHD.
W.. 230A
I I
I I
WITH WLWMD mwavivia.
S' MN. SECTION
I I
ISSUED OTE 1EscRlmall
OF24•CMP TID
I I
36. CMP RSM
TOP FETE SECIM - 23U
F1
F:::::::i
:: �
TEMPORARY FLIER CONE
On 37 WSW STONE)
PERFORATED 38• FEW X N OLEOS SLOPE
NO r OC ONSIDE PIPE POND BOTTOM
CORRIJQAFM
TEMPORARY RISER STRUCTURE — SEDIMENT BASIN NO 1
1C24 NO SCALE
1w
A
20136 ARCa131S GMM. BIC
0
1-RSER 6BE
• COMM COLLAR
VX04' THIN CONCAF]E
vwxj r THIN CONCRETE FCR
EMBED CMP 24•. FLL PPE
TRANSITION FROM PERREMAtteT 24•
10 MWEE. NVw.
RC] TO 7EMP. 24• QP. MMI£
26 JUN 2004 ISSLI D FOR U REVEEY
COM1At AND (1) SECTION OF RCP
ISSUED OTE 1EscRlmall
.WEN PEAMAIENr RISER S
INSIALUA
1 C24
TEMPORARY RISER STRUCTURE — SEDIMENT BASIN NO 1
1C24 NO SCALE
1w
A
20136 ARCa131S GMM. BIC
0
10 Ju 2DD6 ISM FOR IDs
D
02 DEC 2005 ISSUED FOR STATE KVVIEW —.—
C
24 FEB 2DO5 ISSUED FOR IL4gIY
B
20 DEC 2004 ISSUED FOR IN& CITY REVIEW
A
26 JUN 2004 ISSLI D FOR U REVEEY
REX
ISSUED OTE 1EscRlmall
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
City of Raleigh, North Carolina
SHEET TITLE
EROSION CONTROL
DETAILS
M ARCADIS
ARAOS GAM of W% OWsin, W_
LD1 Cwwob CKAW DCN.. Sww 300
Tit I `1 �tL F= CHI -I04 s44I
areL
CARp�:ti
9
1681E`N,NF=�
R H U BRAN
R KING
LEAD DEIGN PROF.
CECIS BY
D. SM
IRC
PRwJECT NMMM
DRAWN BY
W. WHEEIOR
K 13OER
PROJECT NUMBER
MOM AMBER
NC703027.0030
1 C24

1. OBTAIN DOPY OF ALL PEiMITS AND APPROVW EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
2. HOLD PRECONSTRUC ION MEETING ON SITE WITH NORTH CAROLINA LEGEND:
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAID QUALITY
SECTION. ONNER, AND ARCHITECT. 7P—iP-7P—tP—tP— TEE p00tH.TtON FENCE
3. FLAG LIMAS OF CLEARING. LOCATE EIOSITNG UTILITIES. —SF SF OF— SILT FENCE
4. INSTALL INE TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. SILT FENCE. Sa4P Sam SILT IBM AID TME PRDTWIIDM FENCE
AND SILT PENCE SPILLWAY AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS.
-
5. SEE SrEINAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCES.
-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•- LOT LIF5
L COMMENCE GRADING. STGR1 GRAN Aro RET TWIN INET MIM
7. INSTALL STORM DRAINACE. PROTECT INLETS WITH TEMPORARY INLET —SF — ---SF— SILT FENCE SPlL1R41
PROTECTION OR CHECK DAMS AT EACH OF THE NEW STORN DRAINAGE INLET
STRUCTURES. 9P IMP OUTLET PRGIECIION
lL INSTALL PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM OUTLET PROIECRON.
9. PERMANENTLY SLED WITH FERTILIZER. LIME. SEED, MULCH. AND TACK WITHIN PEAK IMAM
15 WORKING WAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICH EVER S SHORTER) OF IEWPOR • RiRM gTLH
COMPLETION OF GRADING. PLACE TEMPORARY SM N AREAS THAT WALL
REMAIN INCCUKETE FOR LONGER THAN 15 WQRI W DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR � p� � � p� � UNITS 9F DL�T{RTLN�
DAYS (WHICH EVER IS SHORTER) FOLLOWING ANY PHASE OF GRADING.
10. WHEN SITE B STABIL2ED. SCHEDULE FINAL INSPECTION WITH NLCDEiR,
OWNER. AND ARCHITECT. UPON APPROVAL. REMOVE TEMPORARY DEVICES AND
SEDIMENT. SEW REMAINING AREAS. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM PERMANENT
POND AND ISTABLISH GRADES AS SHOWN. PERMANENTLY SEED DISTURBED
AREA.
:C) 2DO8 ARCADIS GMMM. INC.
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CRY OF RALEIGH
STANDARDS. SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS ANN
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NCDNR EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNRD AND OEM
MANUAL
2. GRADES SHOWN INDICATE FINAL GRADES
(FIIISHFD FLOOR, TTP OF PAVEMENT, ETC.)
3. FIELD VERIFY ALL DasnNG UTILITIES PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIELD LOCATION OF
DOSITNG UTILITIES WETHER SHOWN ON THE
PLANS OR NOT. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COST TO REPAIR
DAMAGED OR CUT UTILITIES.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 31.3 ACRES
oe
%
xEnANDS —230
// /� 1 \ 1 Tey 'I \\ \ X�if�/ -ry \\ \ I �.� -- '�_ -•�.— � � !�
25 s 1D01E1F'ORAM
RELOORTE TO
LOOM IIHEN
I \
� I t
/ / / ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ I / \ / /
LOHPES
/
0 10 .AIL 2006 ISSIFD FOR EDS
D 02 DEC 2006 t55ttED FOR STATE REVIEW
240 ` \ I / I I I \\ \\ / C 24 FEB 2005 ISM FOR RMN
/
8 20 DEC 2004 SSIIED FOR FWNAL CITY REVIEW
A 28 AN 2004 ISM FOR VE RINU
V/ / 1 UNFIS 6iiilis / - REV. MID DATE DESMPT0
IOxpuR
ffw
! - \ /2 SEDIMENT RLaR \ !O\ 1 CM ijj__
VAFACE
Dempsey E. Benton I DIs�ATOR.At` \
---?2D
PRIOR 1PR
Water Treatment Plant
STORWW
OUTILT
DOW
DO NOT
I
re ti� \\ / I ' ,' \ 230 074 City of Raleigh, North Carolina
\ r I \
I ! � I / � / / �, p ,I\ SHEET ,ITIS
i EROSION CONTROL PLAN
\ / / , , / M,„ 1 \ r �� I / } _- - - - _ _ AREAS 5 AND 6
WRAP ObSPA�
I \ -- X�XIA AP � ARCADIS
/7 n C /a0 .� "-' ( I I I \ W / , n• ARP Rl� 'i/ /'� i / /
/' •o/ W SURFACE 1 NO CFS SF. MIN
I I 1 IN 1QlllIE \` / ,' ,' Lti' / i / \G ' ARCADIS G" d mom cmvkx Ye.
W v0uJ 4 / I \ -^' // ' / / '�' ' i1 8111 DwWd• Ordr W^ Sib 300
! 1 I 1N � 4'
SAT1,
l S. xr� 4' 9Y MORIN !r _ / //' /'' /'/ % / / / // /SEAL SEAL
/!/ 1 / / / /,• CUBS A ( 1 _ y� �• , ,/ // / / , ,/ ,, ��quunuup4'
• \ ` // �l 1 1 / r / /l 1 I 1 I =mm
6-
Ruw ,xW AttEfi.i' 1,4////ET _226_----
4808X�12TC
,TA'RP RAP _ - f.-... 0.600 CF,
iKUME
AM
- .� _ 4- - - /
AT _-- tai' / // / ''4i� 1•V�
INN wm mm no bw
i/!Plw"Pi\ / i /,�.../'/ '_ - i-'---222-'• /'l� i' / / PROJECT OKUTOR DEPARTMENT MANAGER
& ! / / r �' r /��/ /' /,s► A\ \I i I I \ \� \ ,%/q/ �l��iMlrsaF •� �' ��' / ' ,• / R.NADmww RDRc
.I
I I I \� ��/1�/ /� ,d� �r �i , MDD Deva+ PROF. CHIDU to
D. SMITH QC
PROJECT M1RMU DRAAR BY
x. MEW K FEEDER
rI 11 l / ~ r i /' I 1 I I\ / // i ,' o/ / / / 0 40 eD 120'PROJECT M1MeFR ORAwNO MAIDEN
SCALE LNFEET NC703027.0030 1C23

LEGEND: © 2= G'' INC.
GENERAL
sm 006SIRIC11ON SMOUENCE., ,IEE P110=11ON FONCE
i. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
1. OBTARN COPY OF ALL PERMITS AND APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN. --aF er e:-- Su I= ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
STANDARDS. SPENICATIO11% AND DETAILS AND
2. HOLD PREDDNSIRUCDOM MEETING ON SITE WITH NORTH CAROLINA lFFt•1P OWM SILT IBM AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE M AOCORDANCE WITH THE NCDNR EROSION AND
OWARIMI]R OF ENVOMMEMT AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND QUALITY SEDIMENT CONIRDL PLANNING AND DESIGN
SECTION, OWNER, JVD ARCHITECT. ....................... LOT LIES MANUAL
3 FLAG LIMITS OF CLEARING, LOCATE EXIST NO UTILITIES. STORY WN NO INLET WIN NLET MAW 2. GRADES SHOWN INDICATE FIN. GRADES
(FINISHED FLOOR. TOP OF PAVEWENL ETC.)
4. DETAIL THE TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, SILT FENCE, ANDPRIOR
SILT FENCE SPILLWAY AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. —SF— as —s— SILT FENCE SP6LINY s TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS CGCkQ ��Y
D. SEE SPECIAL CDwrit 1CRON SEQUENCES. RP RAP oURET tIDTEDIION RESPONSIE703TING USN TEES WwETFIER SHO N OWN THE
PLANS OR NOT. THE IS
0. COMMENCE GRADING. ® CHECK DAM RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COST TD° REPAIR
7. ONSTAII STORM DRAINAGE. PROTECT INLETS WITH TEMPORARY INLET DAMAGED OR cur UTILITIES.
pROIECRDN OR CHM DAMS AT EACH OF THE FEW STORM DRAINAGE OVIET TF rmw OFJDLSION OUCH
STRUCHIRES. — — p— — — p— — HITS OF D61UiWM
a INSTALL PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM OUW PROTECTION. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 31.3 ACRES
9. pff"kNDMy SEED WITH FERTLuZEP. S WORKING DAY CALENDAR DAYS ICH EVER IS SHORTER) AND TACK WITHIN /
REMAIN IFNCOMPLETNCOMPLETE FOR LONGER THAN 1!S WORKING DAYS OR 30OF GRADING. PLACE TEMPORARY SEED IN AREAS T WILL
/
1 I I DAY (WHICH EVER IS SHORTER) FOLLOWING ANY PHASE OF GRADING.
1 / ' SITE gRCT�PR�R
OWNEILW ARCHITECT UPON APPROVAL.REM TEMPORARY TCESAND /
SMISROM
YFROM �
POND
NNDMZABLHGRADES AS SHOWN. MAr�YSEED DISTURBED IREA.too
/
S'"M /
N '.
/ 1 J f
,\ - PROlilry VIE/ / � _
15
1 j i 288 m /
L
II ,V/I, \ I / / I I I \\ / : •� .:r '/ /,/ `� / _252 I I i' I I f I e /
:. -,r....:.
BY if 1 !wl 17 i \\ )
A RPINP 1 r.�pflL f SEE. -
DML -#2, jgY4
EE.-DML-#2,jgY4
- ` _ i \ r / TT i I I o OIRIET ' •• F i / / ! �)� ` `� �\ \ } h L
34-
MSE
\.•• \ ` \_ \� �. \ \ \ \ \ ��.j ( 220_ D 10 JA 2008 MG FOR 906
WE Llwwv ` ?� \ \ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ D 02 DEC MM FOR STATE W&V
\ — — — — — — \�\ \ \ • \ ,\',� - C 24 TO 2005 ISSUED FDR W"
\ . :\ — 7 \ \ \ \ \ }, i \ 8 2D OEC 20M BELIED FDR Frit Ct1' REYEW
UL
A 20 AM 20M =8 FOR YE FOB
�b� � KEY. ISM LATE OESCAPNON
It
IJ
-
I -
1 3D .D
I
Dempsey E. Benton
Water Treatment Plant
34 LJLI I II J I I I 1
FINISHED I ISI ' 0. SF
SIDEZ i
TO
\
I Iv ,
City of Ralelgh, North Carolina
f - - — - -- —
I 256 I I i , i I / � _' �� %<7 ' 230-/ � sNEEr 111LE
TO - EROSION CONTROL PLAN
-- �— i i 2 I i / / I AREA 3 AND 4
� I, II III I i�' I � � \, / \11 , y I ❑ ❑ o a,o o / / 2� � s / / /' / / /// � / - `40P
7--dWAP7� \ _2 ARCADI S
P 1 �
ARMS 0IM of Nark Owaft kit
% I $ 1 1 1 1 N 1 ®tIBED WRE •) \ 1 ` I / / / / ' ' IDT Wpmb oder W^ SLb 3W
�� 1 \ I , I \ \ _2+ate I / ❑ /D D 111 ,o � aRtET1�� � .-' / / / / / _ = = e
Y,pRg ( / 1 I \\ \ JJI '1 fI� I / N 1 i { _ 152 •- f/ CLASS �B' RE26
TtNm
Fm/10-854-dB
�"14 NO 0TIM �M
' ' IA- AAM i )
AFEM75W SF
SEAL r Ir
�\
HAS 248
SIbE 9SPEK
CLEAR AND WMONV T� ''�i�((SRAF►o►p�`�
�1AENY BIt61 , VAtE OlJ(LEi( _
,' ,/ I / % % /' /' \ 1 N.L FDI( STM � Y , , , PROJECT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT MvuGER N° a
BERM AS /BERM
TDAPORARY ON BNfa (SEE _ R. FOff" P R TOJG
--z .t ti / / / DETAK 7-'� ULCN BERM As SOON LEAD
DESIGN PROF. DECOR er
/� / �/ DRAM
cc
AS Py�.�yaJV / / 1 1 D. SIfRi RA
/ PROJECT INYUGETt WN B1•
K tIDDFR
1w 120P �► 1 I I \ I I O /% , , , ; . , 4ti / i PRDJECF NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER
NC703027.0030 I C22
SCALE N FEET

r35
PIMP STATION SITE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. OBTAIN COPY OF ALL PERMITS AND APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN.
2. HOLD PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING ON SITE WITH NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND
OUALTTY SECTION. OWNER AND ARCHITECT.
& FLAG UMOS OF CLEARING. LOCATE EXISTING VMMS.
4. INSTALL THE TEMPORARY GRAVEL. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. SILT
FENCE, AND SILT FENCE SPILLWAY AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED
FE
5. INSTALL BLOCK AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING
INLETS TO REMAIN.
S. COMMENCE GRADING.
7. INSTALL STORM DRAINAGE. PROTECT INLETS WTTH TEMPORARY
INLET PROTECTION OR CHECK MMS AT EACH OF THE NEW STORM
DRAINAGE INLET STRUCTURES
ROAD WIDENING CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE,
1. OETAIN COPY OF ALL PERMITS AND APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN.
2. HOLD PREICONSTRUCDCN MEETING ON SITE WITH NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAID
OUALTIY SECTION, OWNER. AND ARCHITECT. COORDINATE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES WITH UTILITY CONTRACTORS F WORK
PERFORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY BY OTHER
& RAG LIMITS OF CLEARING. LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES
4. NSTNTAIN TEMPORARY SILT FENCE. SILT FENCE SPILLWAYS.
RI WI
AND INLET PROTECTION AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED
PLANS.
5. COMMENCE GRADING.
& INSTALL THE TEMPORARY CHECK DAMS AS ROADSIDE SWALES ARE
RELOCATED.
7. ADJUST LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SILT FENCE AS CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY QQNSTRLICTIONjJEQU0=
1. OBTAIN COPY OF ALL PERMITS AND APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN.
2 HOLD PFSDM6nWCnON MEETING ON SITE WITH NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES BAND
OUALTIY SECTION. OWNER, AND ARCHITECT. COORDINATE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES WITH ROADWAY WIDENING CONTRACTOR F WORK
PERFORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY BY OTHER CONTPACTOR&
& FLAG UMTS OF CLEARINC, LOCATE EXISTING vmjnES.
4. INSTAL/MAINTAIN TEMPORARY GRAVEL COPSIRUCTION ENTRANCE.
SILT FEKL SILT FENCE SPILLWAYS, AND HORSESHOE INLET
PROTECTION AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLAINS.
& COMMENCE UTILITY INSTALLATION.
S. NSTAIIAWNIAN TEMPORARY CHECK( QAMS IN ROADSIDE SWALES
AS INDICATED.
7. ADJUST LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SILT FENCE AS CDNSIRLICDON
PROGRESSES.
S. INSTALL PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM OUTLET PROTECTION.
PROGNZESSES.
& pERMANEMLY SEED WITH FERrd= LIME. SEED, MULCH, AND
9. PERMANENTLY SEED WITH FERTILIZER. LIME. SEED, MULCH. AND
WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICH
& PERMANENTLY SEED WITH FERRRJZER, LIME. SEED. MULCH, AND
TACK WITHIN 15 WOWING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (%N
TACK WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICH
EVER IS SNORTER) OF COMPLETION OF GRADING. PLACE TEMPORARY
THAN
TACK
EVER 6 SHORTER) OF COMPLETION OF GRADING PLACE TEMPORARY
EVER IS SHORTEN) OF COMPLE710N OF 0XRA01NG PLACE TEMPORARY
SEED N AREAS THAT WILL RFSINN INCOMPLETE FOR MANGER THAN
SEED IN AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN NCOAFIETE FOR LONGER
15 WORI/NG DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS (rMOL:IN EVER 6
SEED IN A`F!S THAT WILL. REMAIN INCOMPLETE FOR LONGER THAN
15 WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAIS OAUCH EVER IS
15 WOWING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS MICH EVER IS
SI00M) FOLLOWING ANY PHASE OF GRADING.
SNORTER) FOLLOWING ANY PHASE OF GRADING.
SNORTER) FOLLOWING ANY PRISE OF GRADING.
9. WHEN SITE IS STA WED. SCHEDULE FINAL INSPECTION WITH
10. W WEN SITE IS STABILIZED. SCHEDULE FINN. NSIDECTIDN WITH
9. WHEN SITE IS SGBILUM SCHEDULE FINAL NSPWTION WITH
NCOENR, OWNER AND ARCHITECT. UPON APPROVAL. REMOVE
NCDE]NR. OWNER AND ARCHITECT. UPON APPROVAL. REMOVE
TEMPORARY DEVICES AND SEDIMENT. SEED REMAINING AREAS.
NCDENFL OWNER. AND ARCHMECT. UPON APPROVAL REMOVE
TEMPORARY APO SEDIMENT. SEED NING AREAS.
TEMPORARY DEVICES AND SEDIMENT. SEED MID NESTABLSHH GRADES
REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM POND
AS SHOWN. PERMANENTLY SEED DISTURBED AREA ESTABLISH GRADES
REMOVE SEDIMEIENNT FROM PERMANENT PONDIES
ESTABLISH GRADES
AND
AS SHOWN. PERMANENTLY SEED DISTURBED AREA
AS SHOWN. PERMANENTLY SEED DISTURBED AREA
TOFCIURY
SILT FDCE
(TffrAa
n
LIMITS OF
DISTURNACE
N
��6 O
cif RFRAP D64PAOR m
AT BOOMING OUTLET cvM
aASS,A RPRAP �—
o
BIRwGE ;
1
1E D PIPE
1 1
40 LF tr aMP
1
1
SU PRICE
warp
BIRwGE ;
1
1E D PIPE
1 1
40 LF tr aMP
yw,
/
242,-)
I I / \
_ rJ
244------- /" / / � � �
' CIEIX (1111 (11P•)
/`\' \ \ �� /✓v � �2Aa vv' / / v // / _,,,gy� vv� '' \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ ,I I/ 1 /
QLD` -
i
fig
//�/ �' ✓v /'''//�,��1 v/ / / /� i`\y�/ //// /// II\ rJ jv � IJ �l � JI I ��I�J�I li \\\\
1 IV
256------_
�A�i F7M( 11AY�(114y ! \\--- ------------
i / 2 _/ 254------ -----
/ /------------------ 252---
/ _ ---- --
/ --- - — — --—
D 2D06 ARCADE G&M, INC.
GENERAL
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE N
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CRY OF RALEIGH
STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS AND
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NCDNR EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL.
2. GRADES SHOWN INDICATE FINAL GRADES
(FINISHED FLOOR. TOP OF PAVEMENT. ETC.)
& FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIELD LOCATION OF
EOISTNG LITIUTIES WETHER SHOWN ON THE
PLANS OR NOT. THE CONTRACTOR IN
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COST TO REPAIR
DAMAGED OR CUT UTILITIES.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 31.3 ACRES
0 10 AL 2006 ISSl1FD FOR BIDS
D 02 DEC 2005 =0 FOR STATE IEVEO
C 24 FEB 2005 SSUED FOR ANEW
B 20 CEL 2004 IZUED FOR RIMIL CITY RDEW
A 28 AN 2004 ISSUED FOR KE REVIEW
REV ISSUED DATE DESCRPTON
MO:YPIAR
Dempsey E. Benton
_ Water Treatment Plant
Ciiv of Raleigh, North Carolina
/ Tfl----------.-----
ii ` '
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
----------,-24s__ / �/ / R // // AREA 2
r
/ —' ---2a2 -----' �/ ! / N I / ! i
,242 - - .- /
"-250 -_ _ _ - _ / '
/ / A0'' /� i'' �' - — -- ------ �/� �/ ) / /, �,
� ARCADIS
`1v AFODIS 9W of North DaobrA YK
0dpaub
X240— f ,/ 001OwAvD&^Sib 300
I / NC 27607
--238--
244'�-- --- --- _- I / ! /
Fox 919-054-5448 446
--- ---236 i --238--- Waw6rwn
a------ .- 32SEAL SF1Lt
CAR -23s-246
_ —230—
09180E '
240'
%%�$ X I p� ii°rr, uni.' N / l/J / / ////' / i// , /�/_— r*`\r ��\� ► - �\_\`��_,— `\�_—/ ,-�i!��_—/— -_— -----228-
-------'
/
/ vSq1R6A8ND12_----236---- _, f /O
— ----------232— — — — — — '/_-224— -----234--
—230— x srig1tnlP�lm,t
Nwu!=
o
o
oc PR0.E OR DEPA"MANAGER
------------228''
LED DESIGN PROF. OLDS BY
D. SINN OC
oft" I a /' /! \\ \\ /l t// ] / Jr . l�// �/ , / 'j � PROM WAAGER DRAWN Ff
/i' l
PHOJECT NAEER DRAWING NUMBER
—I,' - // `� \ gyp\ / J 0 30' lD' 90
\:
222---�► +-'� ' ' '► ^ I \�1 ;I i SME IN FTEr NC7O3O27.003O 1 C21
—'224
—� — — — — — I -- ' / l 1
LEGEND:
TREE PI WWTDN H=
SU PRICE
warp
wale SILT FENCE ND TREE PROIECIDN FENCE
-------------•-----•-•- LOT L16C
SEWW GRAN No IOLT WITH 91ET Mm"
_g w— SU R= Sp11><AY
RP RAP OUTI1T PAUTW DN
®CHECK
IAM
TEMPOW DIV8O N DITCH
— — D— —
— D— — HITS OF D6MiBANCE
cC
HORSESHOE IIET PROTECT"
yw,
/
242,-)
I I / \
_ rJ
244------- /" / / � � �
' CIEIX (1111 (11P•)
/`\' \ \ �� /✓v � �2Aa vv' / / v // / _,,,gy� vv� '' \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ ,I I/ 1 /
QLD` -
i
fig
//�/ �' ✓v /'''//�,��1 v/ / / /� i`\y�/ //// /// II\ rJ jv � IJ �l � JI I ��I�J�I li \\\\
1 IV
256------_
�A�i F7M( 11AY�(114y ! \\--- ------------
i / 2 _/ 254------ -----
/ /------------------ 252---
/ _ ---- --
/ --- - — — --—
D 2D06 ARCADE G&M, INC.
GENERAL
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE N
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CRY OF RALEIGH
STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS AND
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NCDNR EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL.
2. GRADES SHOWN INDICATE FINAL GRADES
(FINISHED FLOOR. TOP OF PAVEMENT. ETC.)
& FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIELD LOCATION OF
EOISTNG LITIUTIES WETHER SHOWN ON THE
PLANS OR NOT. THE CONTRACTOR IN
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COST TO REPAIR
DAMAGED OR CUT UTILITIES.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 31.3 ACRES
0 10 AL 2006 ISSl1FD FOR BIDS
D 02 DEC 2005 =0 FOR STATE IEVEO
C 24 FEB 2005 SSUED FOR ANEW
B 20 CEL 2004 IZUED FOR RIMIL CITY RDEW
A 28 AN 2004 ISSUED FOR KE REVIEW
REV ISSUED DATE DESCRPTON
MO:YPIAR
Dempsey E. Benton
_ Water Treatment Plant
Ciiv of Raleigh, North Carolina
/ Tfl----------.-----
ii ` '
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
----------,-24s__ / �/ / R // // AREA 2
r
/ —' ---2a2 -----' �/ ! / N I / ! i
,242 - - .- /
"-250 -_ _ _ - _ / '
/ / A0'' /� i'' �' - — -- ------ �/� �/ ) / /, �,
� ARCADIS
`1v AFODIS 9W of North DaobrA YK
0dpaub
X240— f ,/ 001OwAvD&^Sib 300
I / NC 27607
--238--
244'�-- --- --- _- I / ! /
Fox 919-054-5448 446
--- ---236 i --238--- Waw6rwn
a------ .- 32SEAL SF1Lt
CAR -23s-246
_ —230—
09180E '
240'
%%�$ X I p� ii°rr, uni.' N / l/J / / ////' / i// , /�/_— r*`\r ��\� ► - �\_\`��_,— `\�_—/ ,-�i!��_—/— -_— -----228-
-------'
/
/ vSq1R6A8ND12_----236---- _, f /O
— ----------232— — — — — — '/_-224— -----234--
—230— x srig1tnlP�lm,t
Nwu!=
o
o
oc PR0.E OR DEPA"MANAGER
------------228''
LED DESIGN PROF. OLDS BY
D. SINN OC
oft" I a /' /! \\ \\ /l t// ] / Jr . l�// �/ , / 'j � PROM WAAGER DRAWN Ff
/i' l
PHOJECT NAEER DRAWING NUMBER
—I,' - // `� \ gyp\ / J 0 30' lD' 90
\:
222---�► +-'� ' ' '► ^ I \�1 ;I i SME IN FTEr NC7O3O27.003O 1 C21
—'224
—� — — — — — I -- ' / l 1